530: You Are Not Nintendo

13 Apr 2023 · 2 h 4 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Accidental Tech Podcast Episode 530: You Are Not Nintendo

Episode Overview In episode 530 of the Accidental Tech Podcast, the hosts engage in a casual yet insightful discussion revolving around a variety of topics, including nostalgic food items, Apple software updates, issues with camera technology, and the implications of automotive software ecosystems.

---

Key Topics Discussed

Pre-show

Nonsense Food Nostalgia

  • The hosts reflect on nostalgic snacks, such as Hot Pockets, Pizza Rolls, and Fun Dip, sharing personal anecdotes and opinions.
  • Discussion about food preferences and unhealthy eating choices, including frozen meals like Healthy Choice and Lean Cuisine.

Follow-Up

  • Letterboxd App: Clarification on the app being native in Swift, contrary to previous assumptions.
  • Update on IceCubes App: Future enhancements will include verification of URLs.
  • Experiences shared regarding Apple Photos' de-duplication feature, highlighting mixed results from users dealing with photo management.

Camera Technology Insights

  • Sony Cameras: Discussion on the dual-base ISO feature in newer Sony cameras, explaining how it impacts low-light performance and noise levels.
  • Key points include:
  • Low Conversion Gain Mode for better dynamic range.
  • High Conversion Gain Mode for improved low-light performance.
  • Experiences shared on the difficulties faced when exporting photos from Apple Photos, illustrating issues with error handling and user frustration.

General Motors and Software Platforms

  • GM's Decision on CarPlay and Android Auto: GM plans to phase out support for these systems in favor of their custom Android Automotive interface.
  • Discussion centers around the implications of this decision on user experience and market competition.
  • The Future of Car Software: Debate on whether car manufacturers can successfully innovate software solutions and compete with established platforms like Apple and Google.
  • The hosts express skepticism regarding car manufacturers' ability to create compelling software ecosystems that rival existing platforms.

The Future of EVs and User Interaction

  • Rivian's Approach: Rivian's CEO emphasizes control over the software stack to enable continuous improvement and feature enhancements.
  • Consumer Preferences: The hosts speculate that if major manufacturers eliminate support for popular apps like CarPlay, it could lead to a significant backlash from consumers, potentially impacting sales.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Nostalgia in Food: The discussion about childhood snacks highlights personal connections to food and how adult perceptions can differ.
  • Photography Challenges: The challenges faced in photo management with Apple software emphasize the importance of user feedback in software development.
  • Camera Technology Awareness: Understanding the dual-base ISO feature in Sony cameras can aid photographers in optimizing their shooting techniques.
  • Automotive Software: The conversation about GM's decision reflects broader themes in tech, where companies must balance innovation with consumer expectations.
  • Consumer Power: The potential for backlash against companies that limit user options serves as a reminder of consumer influence in shaping market dynamics.

---

Conclusion This episode encapsulates a blend of nostalgia, technical discussions, and predictions about the future of technology in everyday life, emphasizing the importance of user experience in software development. The hosts' chemistry and diverse perspectives make for an engaging and thought-provoking listen.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Do you have a also I was just finishing listening to the Hot Pockets episode do you have Hot Pockets nostalgia? Me? I did. Let me correct it. Casey, I can't say it's nostalgia with Casey. If it's real, I know he had a Hot Pocket earlier today. No, it was an occasional special treat when I actually had a job that I would take either what I would call a frozen meal, which you would call a TV dinner, typically like Healthy Choice or Lean Cuisine, one of them. But I would take one of those or occasionally a Hot Pocket, although in the last few years of employment I mostly had gotten away from that.

0:33I am not above Hot Pockets, for the record. That is totally in my wheelhouse. It's not a childhood thing that you can remember? You're talking about your adult life. I think I actually was... I was familiar with Hot Pockets as a kid, but I think it was more during my adult life. I realized listening to the podcast and looking at the art that I was mistaken in what a... I didn't know what a Hot Pocket was, because what I had in mind... Wait, have you never had one? Well, looking at them, I'm like, oh, I remember those from when I was a kid, but we never really had them. But then I realized, no, what I'm thinking of are the ones that are like the size of they're a little bit bigger than a postage stamp what are those called tostinos like pizza rolls yeah like they're they don't make sense that they're called rolls they look like little raviolis of stuff that burns your mouth when you bite into it yeah they're always it's always hot as lava inside of those things and they never cool off yeah so but they're tiny but they're very small so that's what i was picturing for hot pockets but then i saw the picture on the box i'm like wait no these are not the size of postage stamps right these are hot and these are pockets but they're not hot pockets yeah i'm not i'm not totally done with the episode but nothing in that episode made me think I wanted to ever have them.

1:34Oh, God. I was so disappointed because I liked them a lot when I was a teenager. I was so disappointed to learn how crappy they are now from adult. Well, you were excited about, so far, you were excited about the pepperoni one. The pepperoni one, I think, was the best. No spoiler. But, man, it's bad. They're all so bad. I don't know what happened. And were they always this bad? Probably. I mean, or, you know, were my standards just, you know. Oh, my God. I think it's a little of column A, a little of column B. Yeah. And like, and you, like, as an adult who has not eaten a Hot Pocket in a long time, oh, you feel bad after eating them.

2:13Oh, my God. Wait, do they not make lean pockets anymore? That used to be a thing. I don't know if they still do. That's what I would usually have, if anything. What's with you and all this lean? Well, because it made me feel slightly better about myself. Yeah, like lean cuisine and healthy choice are neither of those. Like, no, it is not, it's neither lean nor healthy. It is a choice, I guess. I mean, it's the same, it's the same junky food, but there's just, there's just less of it and lower calorie. So what it basically boils down to is you're trading, you're taking in fewer calories and replacing it with all of the sodium on the planet, just all of it.

2:47And smaller portions, like that's the other secret to getting the calories down. Yeah, it's like after you eat your lean cuisine, you're going to then be so hungry, you're going to eat an entire bag of oreos after you know it's it's not really helping you in the were you watching me uh don't don't uh challenge me here because i will i will make you guys do a lean cuisine slash healthy choice slash lean pocket challenge no i can't we can't do any more food challenges like that i just i need another year to recover oh my god still have nightmares and there's i still have like the one that i bought there was like my backup one because if i couldn't find the other one that's still in the freezer i'll eat it feed it to alice when he comes home we'll mail it to casey right whatever condition it's in when it gets there you got to eat it no problem wait till august yeah i still haven't gotten up to the point in the episode where you try the one that says that you don't have to cook it like the the room temperature one that you could like put in your lunch it's like yeah like deli meat or whatever i can't wait to see how that is it's got to be vile you'll say that the i will say those slightly surprised me but i won't tell you in which direction all right yeah it's like lunchables oh god oh lunchables are my favorite.

3:51Oh, can we do Lunchables? Let's do Lunchables for a member special. Please, Daddy, please. Can we do Handy Snacks with those little red sticks and the little flat cheese? I don't know. Oh, yes! Oh, yes, yes, yes. Those were good, too. Oh, man. And Dunkaroos, that was amazing. The red sticks were the best part of those. The red sticks were the best. Just eat the stick. A friend of mine, Brad, had a birthday, I think it was this past Friday, and he got from a nephew of his who works at a candy shop, he got some Fun Dips. Oh, yeah. Those are my freaking jam. Gosh, I love those. So good. Just pure sugar, up and down.

4:26That was like the best part of playing t-ball as a kid, is that afterwards we got to go to the concession stand and get a whole bunch of hot dogs and fun dip. You know, see, in the realm of candies that are not even trying to disguise the fact that they're just sugar, you've got pixie sticks, you've got fun dip, and I feel like the best one that figured out the best way to basically disguise pure sugar is nerds. right because it's it's pure sugar but all they did was like they made these these little crumbly it's like what they do with breakfast cereal like it's all the same material but it's like what shape is it they're kind of like pasta anyway you know pixie sticks is just like we're not doing anything it's just here it is it's in a tube good luck fun dip is like well there's some powder but also a stick which is also made of sugar right and nerds is like we found a way to color them brightly and make them into these little granules i think they would spray some flavor crap on them too right i don't nerds are good man no no no no no first of all nerds are good uh secondly i started recording user using uh former sponsor channels i started recording shoot i'm gonna have to look up the name of it but it was it's this uh show about like the history of food particularly in america and it's usually like my kind of garbage hosted by the guy from double dare no oh what is his name mark summers who but yeah i've heard he's like a real i've heard he's a jerk i forget where i read that it's just got ocd is that what it is yeah we'll go with that uh he's literally he's been on talk shows talking about oh okay the food that built america on the history channel and that sounds like a history channel title yep and one of the episodes they talked about you know uh different foods include or different candies including nerds and if memory serves i might have the details wrong here but if memory serves somebody realized that in making oh shoot i can't remember what other candy they were it was the waste product it was the waste product yep exactly right and they were like oh damn we can turn this into its own candy this is perfect i think they think they spray they spray it with like color in some kind of art like the the usual round of artificial colorings that they you know put on stuff like cherry grave whatever right like and that's and that's a brilliant use of just which is essentially just sugar i mean that's most candy though i know but like it's it's those that's the barely disguised sugar in the family of barely is gonna show someone also point out smarties which is compressed sugar i mean it's the same thing as the smarties versus the fun dip stick well you know spree same thing like there's i don't know what spree is spree is like a better smarty that has like a candy coating like at the like the outside of a nerd it's basically like a a a nerd that's big enough to like to be basically not even it's it's like twice the diameter of a smarty oh yeah i see what spree yeah no i yeah i recognize all right sweet tarts are my jam in the in the smarty spree spree has more of like a coating like the the sort of shiny lacquery color thing yeah yeah exactly see for me i like a smarty just fine spree was like my third tier for me it was sweet tarts all day any day smarties second level after that and if i needed to go for a spree fine i'll go for a stupid spree but they were not my favorite sweet tarts i gotta look up what sweet sweet tarts are let me see there's i think they're similar to spree oh no sweet tarts sweet tarts is like tums for kids Yeah, kind of.

7:34It's like an adult Smarties. Spree is a sweet tart with a candy coating. How many of you like sweet tarts over spree? Spree at least has the candy coating. Yeah, spree's better. No, because then you can just scrape the sweet tart against the inside of your teeth for like an hour, which I'm sure is super healthy. That's what dentists recommend, I hear. Yep, exactly right. Just rub sugar right directly against your teeth. So, you know, Easter just happened in the United States. As if we have a different religious calendar. There's Canadian Easter. anyway setting that aside um so yeah that just happened and of course you know we we go to family and they pour candy all over us basically like so it's just tons of candy not even just for the kids candy also given to the adults i know i got an easter basket too which i don't never i don't know what i'm gonna do with and this is like the one time of year i actually eat candy like really more than just like one or two here or there oh man does it make me feel crappy like i'm just i just gets so tired and i just want more candy it's like a drug that's why you do a valentine's day because you can just have like one fancy chocolate instead of like a handful of jelly beans oh my god it was it's rough man it's really rough yeah the jelly belly some one of the weird you know weird flavored uh things and it was like kids flavors or something so i guess it was like excluding the weird flavors but uh they were wrong there were some weird flavors in there yeah well i feel like every jelly belly assortment contains some weird flavors and not and like be be glad you didn't get the ones where like they had they sell a set where they're intentionally disgusting for like it's like like random draw like you this might be good or it might taste like you know whatever yeah it's and yeah those are horrendous although they did make a fun thing to bring to a bar last fall but for some reason we got them at halloween uh but otherwise that's what you're doing with the Hot Pockets in your freezer.

9:26You're doing the same thing as the Jelly Belly Company does. They all look the same on the outside, but you don't know what you're going to get. There are no more Hot Pockets in my freezer, John. Really? Did you use them for fertilizer? Wow. Maybe they won't biodegrade. Yeah, they won't biodegrade. Are you kidding me? We tried. We asked all of our local friends, hey, who wants these for free? Take whatever you want. I heard that theory of like, who's going to come running over to your house to eat Hot Pockets? Zero of our friends. And keep in mind, we live on an island where it's hard to get groceries.

9:54none of our friends wanted any of them even for free i don't think you can get the deer to eat them so no the deer will eat anything else they'll eat like pizza crust they'll eat watermelon rind i doubt they would ever eat a hot pocket and they probably shouldn't eat a hot pocket the seagulls will eat that sorry the gulls no like i ended up having to throw most of them away because like we needed the freezer space back we had all these boxes that were half eaten you know you don't have a compost uh where you are no well it wouldn't buy the grade anyway yeah i was gonna say like that would probably ruin your compost isn't compost a pretty delicate balance like a lot of things like no like if we have a service that comes and gets it so like it adds of course you do it's not just the most first world i know that's that might be like the like yeah it's the same thing as they come they come to get your recycling quote-unquote recycling and your regular garbage and also your third can which is your compost right and and what percentage of that actually gets you know not thrown away the compost all gets composted because it's compost does it You get it back later if you want it.

10:51Like, that's the whole thing is everyone puts in, and then if you want a bunch of compost, they'll bring it back to you after it's been composted. Oh, really? Yeah. Hmm, so you're just kind of renting space in somebody else's pile. Yeah, well, we don't want it back, so someone else is getting our compost. But if we wanted it, they would bring it to us. Is there enough, I don't know anything about compost, is there enough demand for the resulting compost to make up for all the crap people throw into their compost piles? Probably. I mean, like, it costs money. If you go to the home center and you want to buy, like, real good compost, it costs money.

11:17like if it's heavy to you know ship around like i think there is enough demand well i guess that's good i hope that's good i hope that works out because it's not like recycling which is bs mostly yes unlike the recycling the compost actually is compost okay that's good that's that's an improvement so uh we've now given away like 15 minutes of members content i'd say because this is like straight out of our recent member specials so if you want more of this garbage or compost if If you want more of this compost. No, our members special are much more directed than this. We have a goal. We have a mission.

11:50It's a dumb mission sometimes if we have it. Always. I think most times. Yeah, just like top four. Oh, wow. Brutal. All right, let's get this party started. We have some feedback from Matthew Buchanan, who is the co-founder of Letterboxd. And Matthew writes, with regard to John's comment about our iOS app, it's native Swift, not a web view. except for a couple of screens like our member stats, which are embedded web views. On Android, it's native Kotlin. Perhaps he's not used it recently if he uses the website predominantly, but both apps have always been native since we launched them. This was the most polite way to make this comment.

12:27Matthew is not Canadian to the best of my knowledge, but he may as well be, because if it were me, I would have been like, are you freaking kidding me? None of that, well, effectively, none of that is web. That's all native, you big jerk. And no, that's not throughout Matthew Took. He was much kinder. Yeah, well, like I said on the last show, I was saying that it's all a web view, but, uh, you know, it's a testament to how good their website is that the app is as good. Uh, apparently it's not a testament to how good the website is because it's just a native app. I still think the website is, is really good.

12:54Like the point, the point is that both of them are so they look like they're the same thing. And in some cases they are the same thing, like the member stats, like he was mentioning that they're like the look and feel and functionality is so coherent between the parts of the app, you know, the, the native application and the website that it's difficult to tell which is which. And, and to be clear, I think both of them are good. Like, I don't think they're both, they're all bad and janky. I think they're both good, but one of them actually is implemented, uh, in, uh, in Swift apparently. And one of them is implemented with web stuff, but I just think they did a good job of, of branding and blending such that they can put in pure web content into their native application.

13:30And it fits right in because they're, that's how good their website is. Yeah. Uh, for this next piece of feedback, I need a little help here. Um, i feel like i don't want to give this person credit because of the the wrong that they've committed and they were proud of the wrong they've got their name in lights on apple's website do not do not give attention to the to the offender i refuse to read this feedback or a follow-up now i'm calling you feedback for god's sakes i refuse to read this john if you would like to you feel free i am i am respectfully kind of respectfully abstaining carry on i don't i I don't blame this person for this thing that happened.

14:08I just, is you have to blame Apple here. Cause when you're again, when you're as big as Apple, you get feedbacks about everything. It's up to Apple what to do about those feedbacks. Like whatever it is that you care about, they get, they get feedback saying to do it both ways, the way you want and the way you don't want. Well, in this case, Daniel Compton wrote to tell us this on a recent ATP, he talked about how it'd be great if you could see the last time Apple touched a bug. This used to be the case up until 2017 when I reported it as a security bug. I had reported a suggestion to Apple in 2014 in bug reporter.

14:41I never received any response, but around April 2017, I love the story begins with, Hey, I reported a bug. And three years later, something happened, right? Never received a response. But around April 2017, which is three years later, I noticed that my radar had a last modified date of April 2017, even though there was no activity on the radar when I looked at it. My assumption was that this meant someone at Apple had posted on it. I reported this as a security issue as it leaked information about which radars were being worked on. That's an interesting way of phrasing that. It leaked information about which radars were being worked on because, hey, the modification date changed.

15:12And, you know, to be clear, he's saying from the outside in my three-year-old bug report that had never gotten any response, suddenly the modification date changes. And that made me think that someone in Apple is doing something to it, something that I can't see, but I did see the date change. So this is a security issue in a fact that report that you're leaking information. Oh, sure it is. Which is not wrong. Like, that's not wrong. It's just, you know, So it makes an already terrible system even worse for those of us on the outside. Right. And so three months later in July, I received an email from Apple Product Security thanking me for reporting the issue and asking if I'd like to be acknowledged on their security reporting page.

15:48I said yes, and here is the listing showing my name. We'll put a link in the show notes. No, we will not. No fame for this person. The original acknowledgement credited this as a server configuration issue, which I thought was a funny euphemism. So to be clear, the bug he reported never got any response after three years. but then someone looked at it and it bumped to date. But then when he reported this quote unquote security issue, three months later, it was apparently fixed and he got credited for it. And part of why that's the case is some people have said that like, if you report a security issue using like the security, whatever there's like a form for it, there's an email address, like it's separate from feedback slash radar, that they are actually responsive and like, you know, deal with stuff in a more timely manner because security issues in theory are more timely.

16:29You can also report security issues through feedback. Maybe it's funneled into the same place. But anyway, the point is that quote unquote bug got dealt with uh and uh now we're all worse off for it so thanks daniel no no do not give this person any accolades whatsoever uh no i i refuse yeah so the reason i say this is on apple is because uh if someone reports that your your answer to that shouldn't be oh let's lock this down and make sure that doesn't show up anymore your answer There should be. You know what? Why are we worried about people on the outside knowing that we're working on their bugs?

17:04Is that such a bad thing? Maybe we should actually communicate with them. But no, they went the other direction. Of course they did. And then this is actually pretty much all of follow-up issues this week for sure. Henrik Nee writes, future version of IceCube's app will include verify URLs and search results as promised on the show. And there's a poll request that we'll link. And from the poll request, you can see the original issue, which basically says, hey, I was listening to ATP and they said that this might not be a bad idea. I think this was John. Maybe we should do it. And they did it. So soon or now maybe on IceCube's app for Mastodon you'll see a demarcation of some sort when a verified URL is in somebody's profile.

17:44Yeah, boy, they'll take that suggestion from me, but no one will make a unified timeline. That's because nobody wants a unified timeline, John. Stop trying to make fetch happen. There's just so many Mastodon clients. Just one. I just need one. Nobody wants it. All right. We are brought to you this week by PorkBun.com, a refreshingly different domain name registrar. They have over 500 domain name extensions to choose from, everything from the usual.com,.net, to all the new ones,.app,.tech,.dev, all sorts of them. And they have all this with competitive pricing. They have the best pricing on the majority of their domains.

18:21So you can choose the perfect domain name for your website at the lowest prices around. Pork Bun is currently the best rated registrar. They have more authentic five-star reviews from real actual customers than any other domain name registrar. And you can see why. Everything is backed by five-star support, 24-7, 365. It's all a simple user interface with no weird upselling or anything like that. You manage everything about your new domain name from one place. You don't have to hunt around to find the features that you need. And they avoid upsells like the plague. They don't push you on made-up products that you'll never use.

18:58There's no constant recommendations of other stuff and other domains you should be buying. No, none of that. It's super nice, super respectful of you. They include free with every domain, who is privacy, free SSL certificates, web and email hosting trials, and so much more because they believe why pay for things that should be free? And they also have a really cool feature. I love this. They have a new AI-generated search feature using ChatGPT to change the way people search for domain names. Because, you know, search is one of the hardest things because a lot of times the exact name you want might not be available in, like, the TLD you want.

19:32So search for registrar is a really important feature, and PorkBun just nails it. So see for yourself by going to the link in our description. It's porkbun.com slash accidental tech. That's porkbun.com slash accidental tech. Go there and you can get a free.app or.dev domain name by going there, porkbun.com slash accidental tech or use promo code accidental tech. Thank you so much to Pork Bun for sponsoring our show.

20:04All right, so trouble in paradise for Apple Photos dedupes? Yeah, I was talking last week about how I was using their new shared library deduplication feature and that I had trial run it over dozens and dozens of photos manually checking each time that the thing was doing what I wanted to do. wanted it to do and eventually it never made a mistake and i had faith in it and i'm like okay dedupe all my things and it found 30 000 duplicates and i was like all right well off i go a bunch of people wrote in to say that they had different experiences for me so here is aaron gabbert saying my apple photos duplicate experience was a bit distressing it seemed to be doing some kind of hashing slash abstraction on the photos to verify whether the duplicates and as such it won't pick up on very slight differences in pictures for example there were some quote-unquote duplicate pictures taken on a tripod from a distance one of which had my wife and one of which had both of us she was sitting in the exact same position in all of them and apparently me joining her in the picture did not change the abstraction value enough for photos to recognize them as different there weren't many cases like this but i think i may have lost at least a couple of honeymoon photos along the way due to me trusting the process before going in that's pretty bad picture with one person in it picture with two people in it not duplicates very different picture apple's photos uh matthew schaefer provided an actual example which he posted on a mastodon uh we'll link to you if you want to see these pictures uh just fyi duplicate detection has a number of false positives for me he's really annoyed but there's no way to say these are not duplicates which is true in the interface there's not really a way for you to say i mean you basically just ignore it you say don't merge them and it won't merge them but you can't make it go away which is kind of annoying it's like having a little red badge on your application you can never make go away which also happens with apple software so in this example this is this is a more a less egregious one it's like a family portrait and you can see the two different pictures like the little kids have different expressions in each one right because they can't stay still all right and apple photos thinks they're the same photos right so after seeing this i'm like okay well i didn't check all 30 000 of my photos i just spot checked many many of them until i was confident right so what do i do about this well the good thing is and the reason i would say to like aaron that you didn't lose your honeymoon pictures when you do merge duplicates as i mentioned uh last week it doesn't immediately like delete hard delete the ones that it gets rid of it puts them it deletes them the same way photos always does and they end up in the recently deleted folder so since i did this entire big merge in one big operation on one day my recently deleted folder had 30 000 photos in it and things in recently deleted like they they basically get permanently deleted after they've been there for 30 days and if you look in photos on the mac you'll see a little underneath every photo will say 25 days remaining 15 days remaining like that's how much longer they have to live in recently deleted before they get deleted for good right so what i did was i went back into recently deleted and i selected all the photos that said you know they were all said 29 days remaining or whatever i think it was 29 or 28 whatever day it was when i did that big merge uh and here's the process i did so select them all while and recently deleted then i applied a keyword to them while and recently deleted that said uh what was it like recovered duplicates or something like that after i applied that label to all the keyword to all of them then i hit the recover button to recover them from deleted it's important to do it in this order because if you just hit recover all you've done is just sprayed them back into your photo library and you have no way to find them again but if you label them with a new with a new keyword you know recovered duplicates then you recover them then it went back to my main photo library made a smart folder that said keyword is recovered duplicate or whatever and there's my 30 000 photos right and then what i did because i missed your backup is i exported unmodified originals to all for all 30 000 photos and threw it into an archive drive and pushed it up to my cloud backups and sucked you know i just i got it i got it out of photos onto disk into a dedicated directory structure that said hey just fyi these are the 30 000 duplicates i got rid of and i pushed that into my backup vortex and then i re-deleted them and they went back into recently deleted only now their count is 30 days instead of 29 or 28 or whatever it was right so now if at any point in the future i say where is that picture i thought i had a picture of this and all i see is this other one did that accidentally get merged as a duplicate or whatever i can go into my archive of 30 000 backed up duplicate photos and sift through there and say was there another version of this pose around the same time date and time or whatever uh and now at least i feel confident that even if the photos duplicate resolution thing totally screwed stuff up i still didn't actually lose any data and that's kind of sucky that that has to be the case and it is kind of sucky that uh the the duplicate thing does this but remember when you're doing the merge duplicates you do have it does distinguish between the different kinds of duplicates if you just select a bunch and say merge these all it will the dialogue that pops up at least on the mac will say do you want me to merge all the pictures you selected or do you want me to merge the exact duplicates only and it'll give you the count merge you know 20 exact duplicates move 50 duplicate merge 50 duplicates right if you only ever click the exact duplicate one i think that is the exact duplicate like bite for bite identical file duplicate thing and i think the non-exact duplicates are the thing where it tries to figure out apparently poorly whether the photos are the same so i mean i didn't really you know i got them out of my library i got my library merged uh but i didn't really save the storage space which honestly like you know i'm it would be nice to get that storage space back but I was already using it anyway for my photo library when they were in separate photo libraries.

25:31Well, you got it back on iCloud, didn't you? Yeah, like everything was on iCloud. I'm saying you got the storage space back on iCloud, right? Because you've now... I mean, I will in 30 days. Well, sure, right, right, right. Yeah, but I had this Mac downloading originals for both of my libraries, so everything was on the local disk here. But anyway, they're on two Synologies and then the cloud backup. so if i need to get them someday i can it was a little bit of annoying process oh and as part of that process exporting the 30 000 photos for whatever reason photos was having a real hard time with it i don't know what its problem was i've exported more than that before and it's had no problem but it would get like 30 through and it would just hang up and not do any more exporting and i would look at all the processes and see if anybody's doing anything is anyone doing any file on the ios anything doing any cpu uh you know and it's not always going to be the photos app it's going to be like photo library d and all these other things and no they would just get hung up and i don't know what it was hung up on i could never figure it out i restarted several times i tried to do it in small batches like i hate babysitting programs like that you know what i mean like if a program has a feature where you can select a certain number of photos and do something that you think should be straightforward like export unmodified originals especially when you're doing it from a photo library i said download originals so it's not like it's waiting for them to come from the cloud down to my computer i think they're all on my computer all i want you to do is export them and the originals just export i mean i know where i could just get the original myself and do it right but so tedious so i was doing them in batches of a thousand and it was working but i wasn't didn't want to do 30 batches of a thousand so i kept getting greedy and i'd be like okay i did a couple batches let me just do the rest of them and then it would hang up and i wouldn't be able to resume that operation because when you do the export on modified originals it does not ask you oh it looks like there's a file with this name already in this folder should i overwrite it or skip it like you know like the finder does photos does not ask that it just blindly exports and picks a new file name with like a number in parentheses after it so you can't re-export unless you know the exact photo where it got hung up and i didn't because it's just a stupid little progress bar that says i'm 30 done so tedious eventually i did get it to export oh i should show you the screenshot i think i saved this just for the purposes of the show uh yeah this is great error handling from mac photos i guess this is Marco can put this in chapter art if he wants or we can just look at it here.

27:51It's not that exciting. Take a look at the Slack. Take a look at this amazing error dialogue. Oh yeah, I've seen this before. So this is a dialogue, a results dialogue. It says export results. It's not an error dialogue. It just says export results. It says export completed with errors. That's like when they used to get your app rejected from the app store and the subject line would be application submission feedback. yeah uh here export completed with errors 18 862 of 19 480 files have been exported to duplicate photos the export operation failed to create files for 618 photos semicolon the first 100 are listed below colon and then there is then there is a scrolling list of file names and errors the file are just the actual file names and the errors just say unknown error parentheses 1000 1 comma 005 right so it knows that 618 photos failed to export but it's not going to tell me what those are it's just going to list the first hundred what am i supposed to do with that i can't go and retrieve those 618 myself like i'd only know the first hundred you can't scroll to get any more there's nothing to say just tell me the other 518 nope no those are a secret we can't tell you what those are never mind that file name is insufficient as a unique model thing anyway because i do have duplicate file names just because of you know multiple cameras and stuff over the years so that was incredibly frustrating i eventually my my success scenario was this on my on my successful export which happened over the course of like eight hours while i slept was this where it said this is this is me just doing all of them 27 570 of 20 27 575 have been exported the export operation failed to create the files for five photos listed below yay and i just manually exported those five and it worked fine and now you have a different error code negative one for these that's right and why you know and and by the way i would have to like since those file names are not unique i would have to go look at all the dsc underscore zero zero three one dot jpeg files and see how you know there was four of them i have three so this fourth one is the one that didn't export let me export that one and so i just did it manually for five files and now i'm sure I have all the files.

30:03At least as sure as you can be about anything with Apple Photos. All right. Well, in happier news, Amazon is going to keep DP Review Archives shrug? Question mark? Maybe. It's extremely unclear. The general manager of DP Review, Scott Everett, wrote, we've received a lot of questions about what's next for the site. We hear your concerns about losing the content that has been carefully curated over the years, and we want to assure you that the content will remain available as an archive. That's it. We've also heard that you need more time to access the site, so we're going to keep publishing some more stories while we work on archiving.

30:36Like, that's fine, but even just a hint as to what shape that archive would be, or will be, would be neat to know. That would be nice. What does that second paragraph mean? So they say, remain available as an archive. Okay, we don't know what that means, but whatever, it's vague, right? The second paragraph, we've also heard that you need more time to access the site. That makes it sound like you're taking the site offline. that's why we need more time to access it because at a certain point you're going to take it away and then we don't have any more time and so you need more time to access the site so we're so in response to us needing more time to access site which already doesn't make sense we're going to keep publishing some more stories while we work on archiving what does keep publishing more stories have to do with us that needing more time to access the site those are two different things right also we don't need to access the site in any given timeline because they just said they're going to put an archive up but they said they're going to it's going to remain available as an archive and i don't think they understand like we just want you to leave the site online with all the same urls just make everything read only like that's i don't think they get that i think they're just going to give it like here here's a 70 gigabyte zip file good luck like i don't i don't know what they mean but anyway it's and doesn't this kind of sound like we're going to keep running the site like keep mate like they're going to keep publishing some more story doesn't that kind of sound like while they work on archive i think the idea is like look if the site's up we have to be posting stories to it if it's if we're not posting stories to it then what there's no point in it being up i'm like no there is a point in it being up even if you're not posting stories to it do you understand so this is very poor communication general manager scott everett please clarify but mostly this has been taken as good news in that they've heard the cries of dp review readers and are trying to do something about it but they're really bad at it i i mean and maybe i mean i would read this as a sign that maybe amazon's willing to keep like one or two people working on it i don't know but uh because it's really weird that they're going to keep publishing new stuff that kind of sounds like they're still employing people uh that's that's what that sounds like to me even even on the youtube channel the the you know the the folks who are doing youtube channel who are going over to pet a pixel they they said oh you know uh db review is going away but stay tuned because we've got like we're going to do like five or six more videos before we go away and they're doing like fun sort of like on the way out the door videos of like i think i showed you one of them actually the focal length one wasn't one of those but anyway like like just fun videos to to wrap up and the one of the most interesting things about the videos is they always get to the part where you have to say don't forget to like and subscribe or whatever and they're like well i guess uh i guess you don't need to subscribe like this is the first youtube video they're like they're at a loss like don't subscribe because the channel is going away but uh i guess you can like but it doesn't really matter honestly because the channel going away but you know so they're they're still you know like you know lame duck uh youtube channel right they're still putting out content i think the website is the same thing like as people go out the door it's your last chance like that one article that you always wanted to write and they would never let you write write it now who's gonna stop you right i think that's what's happening i i what a mess and i i still think this is this is not a good management decision by amazon because like this couldn't have possibly cost them that much especially when you add to you know whatever net cost when you when you also then like subtract out all the affiliate sales that it generated yeah like it's perfect synergy for a site that sells camera junk yes like i i don't know like oh god like maybe b and h should have bought them who knows but yeah whatever it is like i don't i don't know why it would make sense for a camera retailer not to run this site like that that makes no sense whatsoever to me it's just small potatoes for amazon so i'm gonna like you know i know it's not like how many how big could the staff have been but that's why they don't that's why they don't bother it's too small for amazon to bother and the shit like i keep i keep going there because like i've been doing all this camera stuff recently and it's just it's so sad i think like next time i need a camera like in another five years whatever it's not going to be on it's just not going to be and i and like these other sites that that are trying to replace it i frankly i don't think are as good um and they don't have you know the history of having the database of how these cameras compared to what I had before so I could compare them in shopping.

34:41Like, oh, have things gotten better since my old Canon whatever? Let me see. I love being able to do that. I mean, it's already now it's becoming difficult to use the site because possibly in response to all the people trying to archive it, they seem to be having extremely strict throttling control on the site. So if I load a camera review, just loading the review for one camera, and I get there by google so i didn't even get any other you know pages on their site just the number of requests it makes to load one review makes it so that if i then click on a picture to zoom it in i get the the you know the the rate limiting screen like i get you know the blank white screen dead request if you look at the you know request it's setting a rate limiting code like that like just loading one review makes you hit the rate limit which is very difficult makes it very difficult to use the site so already it's it's like breaking in weird ways but even that shows me like wow what a loss this is like i i just want to go you know look up you know this cool camera somebody just told me about or this cool lens i might want or something you know and and i and then you hit these walls and it just reminds you oh this is going to be gone soon and then so i go look at some other site to get the information i need because they block me and the all the information is worse or missing on other sites so it's just what a waste what what a loss for what for amazon like why what what could this have possibly been costing them when you net out all those affiliate sales like what could this possibly be costing cost to them and and they decided to kill it like what a weirdly run company yeah then people from the sites will go elsewhere i'm sure like the youtubers going to petapix or whatever but it's like what you said before wherever they go they They won't have the exact same tests, for example, whereas the DP review has been doing more or less the same tests, the same sort of test pattern screens and stuff.

36:32So you can actually compare, you know, at least within a few years of each other, you can directly compare. I know these cameras are being tested in more or less the same way as the new ones. Whereas when you go to a new site, you know, you don't have that same history. I think you're being a bit ridiculous, though, because think about all the money Amazon has to pay to host this site. I mean, they must be paying. Wait, let me check my notes. they must be paying Amazon a lot of money to host that site. So I don't blame them for wanting to shut it down, right? The funny thing too is like now that Amazon is sending all these people to other sites that have their own affiliate links, Amazon presumably didn't have to pay DP Review for their affiliate links.

37:10So all those links that are going through the link to Amazon, Amazon is now going to have to pay out like 7 % or 8 % of all those links to some other site. So by canceling DP review, they're actually potentially going to lose more money overall. Yeah. I bet they did pay them for the affiliate links. I know it sounds silly because it's all like we're all same team here or whatever. But they did just because it's easier in terms of, you know, not special casing or anything like that with all the old affiliate links. It's like just run it through the system. It'll all come out in the wash. All right, John, you wanted sensor shake on your camera.

37:44So this is. No, I wanted sensor shake. Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sorry. It's always John, except this time. No, because I had on my old Canon 5D Mark IIs, they had sensor shake every time you turn the camera off. And those cameras never got any dust on their sensors in the entire many years and many lens changes that we use them. We have Sonys for like two seconds and they get lens dust on them or sensor dust on them. That's very hard to clean off. I also just learned that my new Fuji X-T5 also has sensor shake every time I turn it off. So I don't expect to have a lot of dust in that one either. uh but sony apparently they do have this feature sort of you i think you have to tell it to do it each time right yep it's in and i believe i did it but the one time i cleaned my sensor on one of my cameras which is a terrifying experience um before i uh broke down and bought a sensor cleaning kit and did the whole little scary surgery i did try the uh the sensor shake thing and it didn't entirely work but anyway if you want to do this on your sony camera i'll put a link in the show notes to i think this is my sony camera hit the menu button then go to setup then cleaning mode then hit enter and it will shake i don't think there's a way to make it do it every time you turn the camera on and off it honestly i probably wouldn't want that i being able to do it manually helps no trust me you want that well i mean i've i've been lucky enough that to not have any dust issues on any of my cameras i just had that hair that got caught in the shutter mechanism in which the sensor shake, as you can imagine, did not help.

39:15I had to go in there with some tweezers and get that out. But yeah, if you want to do this, you can do it manually. It would be nice if they put it in a way to do it automatically. We are brought to you this week by Memberful. Monetize your passion with membership. Memberful is the easiest way to sell memberships to your audience, letting you build sustainable, recurring revenue, and is used by some of the biggest independent creators on the web. They are passionate about your success and they've aligned all of Memberful to match your goals. They let you build a membership that's best suited to your audience with custom branding, newsletter support, podcast support, gift subscription support, Apple Pay, free and paid trials if you want them, automatic referral discounts, and tons more features.

40:02They have everything you need to run your membership program at Memberful, including a streamlined and powerful checkout, an easy-to-use member management portal, transactional email support member management dashboards and they seamlessly integrate all this with the tools you already use including mailchimp wordpress stripe discord and more if you need any help getting set up they have a world-class support team ready to help you get set up and they can also help you simplify your memberships grow your revenue whatever you need to be guided by because they are there to support you memberful is passionate about your success and you always have access to a real human.

40:36You can get started for free with no credit card required at memberful.com slash ATP. Check it out today. Once again, Memberful is just the greatest way to sell memberships to your audience. Memberful.com slash ATP. Monetize your passion with membership. Thank you so much to Memberful for sponsoring our show.

41:00Now, John, you want to take us to school, please? I will try. This is a very long video. This is one I referred to last episode with the Sony cameras. And there are two different kinds of ISO that I couldn't remember the name of. It's dual base ISO or dual gain ISO. Different manufacturers use different terms for it. And I was trying to summarize it from memory and did a bad job. So I will do a better job this time now that I've pulled the URL, which will be in the show notes. So here's how it works. because this is apparently only on recent-ish Sony cameras. I think, for example, someone wrote in to say that Marco's older Sony A7R III doesn't have this, but the current A7R V does have it.

41:45So somewhere in between those two, they added it to their cameras. And it's something I didn't know about Sony cameras. For all I know, it's on other cameras and sensors as well, although Sony sensors are actually in many brands of cameras, kind of like lg oled panels or in many tvs i think nikon uses sony sensors now maybe even canon canon does not canon has their own stuff going on but nikon uses sony sensors usually yeah so i'm not saying this is exclusive to sony but this particular youtube video was specific to sony that's why i was watching this channel i don't know if the whole channel is specific to to sony cameras but this video definitely was that's why i was interested in it but i found it fascinating because i had never heard this before uh probably because i don't do anything with video where this is more of a well-known thing it's a 43 minute video which you're probably not going to watch so i'm going to try to summarize it and even in the 43 minute video i think there is not enough information for me to fully understand this like the guy says he's purposely simplifying it to fit it in and the simplified version takes 43 minutes but it's fascinating to watch so i suggest it so here is the summary of the interesting thing so first he's describing how the what they call the photo sites work in the sensors which is a little thing that light hits uh that senses light hitting it and the way it works is the light hits the top of the photo site and that makes it send a bunch of electrons downward you know in in the sensor where they get this is not how it actually works this is the analogy where they get collected in a little well it looks more like a bucket to me but they kept calling it a well right uh and so then the sensor basically counts up how many electrons by measuring the charge counts up how many electrons were in the well by measuring the charge at that photo site and that gives a value and every one of the little photo sites is you know whatever it's not one per pixel but just imagine it's like that um so that's how this that's how a sensor works but the dual gain thing works where there's two wells there's a big well and there's a little well and the camera can choose do i want the electrons that get uh you know chucked out from the photo site do i want them to try to fill the big well or do they want them to try to fill the little well and here's the difference so the large capacity well is what's called low conversion gain mode because it's a bigger well it has more dynamic range which means you can put more electrons in there before it fills and by the way if that well fills you just get 100 white that's when your highlights are blown out or whatever you're not going to get any more wider no matter how many more like how much more light hits that sensor you're already at max right i guarantee you i can get wider all right a bit a big bucket the big well has a has a larger dynamic range between you know the the you know one one little electron a whole bunch but there's also apparently more reed noise and if you don't know what reed noise is watch the video um i don't understand why the bigger well has more reed noise i believe it it just wasn't explained in the video but take that as read the smaller capacity well is what's called high conversion gain mode that has less dynamic range, but the well fills faster.

Read the full transcript

44:40And why would you want the well to fill faster? If you have a dark scene where there's less light, that means less light is needed to reach an equivalent sensor output. So basically, it seems like the sensor output, like the voltage, is determined by what percentage full is the little well, right? A big well with the same number of electrons as a small well will be lower percentage full. So if you put that same number of electrons in the small well, maybe it fills it to 90 % capacity, you get the 90 % of the voltage value and if you have a higher voltage that means it's higher above the noise floor of like the circuitry and the sensor and everything like that so if you're in a very dark scene you want to use the little well the high conversion gain mode to get better low light performance at the cost of less dynamic range and this is the cleanest way to lift the signal above the noise floor because it happens within the sensor itself before you get to any other part of the read pathway again see the video to see the read pathway and this is as opposed to uh the iso control which you know it's interesting we use the same terms for like film cameras and regular because in the world of film cameras uh i believe iso was just basically saying how sensitive is this film stuff to light right and whatever chemicals are on that film uh you know the sensitivity was measured with this iso number right obviously there's no film and no chemicals that are being exposed to light inside digital camera but they still use the same term the way iso works at least in this little diagram of the sony cameras is when you get those voltages from the photo sites adjusting the iso tells an amplifier that's behind that saying hey when you get the signals from the sensor amplifier you know crank up the signal you're getting by whatever amount as you crank up the iso it amplifies it more and more but of course that adds noise because there's noise in the amplifier circuit so on and so forth so by using the littler well the the the high conversion gain mode inside the sensors you get a similar effect but you get that within the sensor itself before you get to the stage where iso has any effect um and that's part of the reason why the most recent sony sensors have really good low light performance when they use the little well they do much better than when they use the big well and you may be wondering okay but when does the camera switch from using the little well to the big well is that a thing that i can control apparently not but you can find out where that is there's instructions in the video one way to do it is to just put the lens cap on your camera so it's just black and then like crank up the brightness on your screen on the back if you've ever done this you can see you know it's black right what i'm expecting to say the lens cap is on but as you crank up the iso you'll start to see noise in the blackness because you know noise see the video for all the different places where noise can come in there's a surprising number of them including photon noise which is scary um because the real world is not simple as you think it is and what you'll see is it'll be black with noise and as you crank up the iso it'll get noisier and noisier and noisier and then when you go one more notch up on the ISO it'll get wait the noise decreased and then it'll start to go back up again right when the noise decreases that's when it skipped switched from one of one of the buckets to the other the other way you can tell is you can go to one of these weird uh sensor measuring nerd websites the one he recommended was called photons to photos it's photons to photos.net put a link in the show notes and you can see charts for your specific sensor and your specific camera measuring various things i think the clearest one is the shadow improvement scale thing um and you can just pick like if you pick two cameras you can see it well this is the one i picked for the for the show notes here is showing um the a7 4 and the a7 s3 compared uh and it doesn't really matter so much what shadow detail is at some measure of something or whatever but you can see there's a discontinuity in the graph where all of a sudden it jumps that place where it jumps is where it switches from one of those buckets to the other and also by the way this one you can see that the a7 s3 has an incredibly low noise floor compared to the a7 IV.

48:27That's why the a7 III is beloved by video people, because it's less noisy. But anyway, you can mouse over these little charts and find for your specific camera, if you have dual gain ISO, you will see that jump in the graph, and you will see exactly what ISO level it occurs at, so you don't have to guess. I don't know why they don't just list this in the specs, but they don't. And finally, why doesn't Sony say that their cameras have this dual base iso which is a thing uh and here's what uh the video had to say about that sony reserves the term dual base iso for something specific in order for sony to say a camera has dual base iso both base isos need to perform the same way with regard to noise performance and dynamic range and to sony the alpha cameras don't qualify mostly because they don't have the same amount of dynamic range at the higher base iso as they do a lower base iso we just got done saying they don't have the same dynamic range they don't have the same noise performance their video cameras do so sony's video cameras advertise hey we have dual base iso but the photogamers don't it's a you know they you get trade-offs you get less dynamic range for the little well or whatever and and there's a sony article that tries to explain this does a way worse job than the video but we'll put it in the show notes anyway because it's an official source so there you have it uh something i definitely did not know about sony cameras not all sony cameras but apparently more recent ones that they have this this strange behavior where the performance of the sensor changes at a particular ISO level.

49:49And by the way, it's not the same ISO level for every Sony camera. That's why you have to look at these charts to find out where it is. And hopefully when you watch that video and you see what's actually happening inside your camera and how different it is from how you may be visualizing it, if you came from like the film world, it will help you realize all the different places in that chain where things can get screwed up and what effect the various controls on the back of your camera have on those various stages and what effects they don't have. anyway i thought this was fascinating uh and it sheds a lot of light on the process that we think is magic where you just point a camera at something and the sensor does some of the magical stuff and you get a picture and as always it's way more complicated than that as we were as i was like looking at you know watching this and figuring all this like you know how this stuff works what kind of blew my mind is thinking like wait a minute they're not just reading the sensor when i push the shutter button they're reading the sensor in a mirrorless camera whenever you're seeing through the camera whenever you're whenever you are like watching the screen on the back or using the viewfinder that sensor is sampling itself usually at least 60 times a second like so it's doing all of that at least 60 times a second that kind of blew my mind yeah that's part of the reason why i mean i remember when uh mirrorless was first kind of coming up one of the big complaints was oh it doesn't let you see through your lens right i can't actually see with my eyeballs the light right because the old the slr is that a mirror where the light would come into your camera hit the hit the mirror bounce upward hit another mirror and then bounce into your eyeball so your eyeball would be literally seeing the photons that were entering your camera but with mirrorless that wasn't happening with mirrorless you're looking at a tiny little evf electronic viewfinder a little computer screen your eyeballs even get to see the light because it's shoved against the camera or whatever and how that's bad but i mean there's many reasons why mirrorless eventually won out but one of them is you do get to see the entire imaging pipeline it's not you know because with with an slr yeah you get to see the photons but you don't get to see like what do my current exposure settings look like on a mirrorless camera it will show you oh you're way underexposing everything is dark you can't see anything because you you get to see like the if you were to take a picture now here's more or less what it would look like it's not exactly the same because there's more stuff that happens when you hit a shutter but it's much closer whereas if you're just looking through a camera lens you know your eye can adjust to to an aperture that may be underexposed or whatever it's their advantages and disadvantages but i feel like the trade-offs for mirrorless are well worth it which you know the market seems to agree with but yeah i think the the evfs on all these cameras run to like 120 frames per second too so again there might be trade-offs there where it's not doing like the full imaging pipeline every time but it's doing most of it one huge advantage that i found you know because i i shot slrs with the mirrors for years and And at first, I didn't like mirrorless more because I missed, like, when you look through the viewfinder, I missed that experience of shooting that way when you're looking through the lens directly.

52:44Like, you know, you kind of have infinite refresh rate when you're looking through like that. And it is very different. Can I pause you there? We should probably re-explain the difference between mirror and mirrorless. And I can take a stab at it, but please, either of you jump in when you're ready. in a big, big, big SLR camera, really anything with a mirror, there is literally a mirror behind the lens that takes all that light and pushes it up, kind of periscope style, up to the viewfinder, right? And so you are literally, this is what you guys were alluding to, or saying a second ago, is that you're literally seeing what the lens sees, not what the sensor sees, but what the lens sees.

53:18Whereas by comparison, and this is what you were talking about a second ago, Marco, with a mirrorless camera, that means there is no mirror, of course. And so the only way for you to see what the camera sees is for the sensor to be reading what's coming through the lens and then show that on a little LCD that's behind a viewfinder or perhaps, you know, the bigger LCD that's on the back of the camera. And so that's the difference between the two. And most cameras that I've used in my lifetime, in fact, I can't remember since film anyway, a time that I have used a mirrored camera. and it's kind of incredible that like with the old mirror equipped SLRs, every time you took a picture, that mirror would first flip up out of the way so then the light could hit the sensor and it was an incredibly complicated system.

54:07Mirror flips up, then the shutter behind it does its shutter thing and then you get to see the picture on the back and that had a number of advantages. I mean first of all the sensor, they kind of had to do it that way first because the sensors simply weren't advanced enough yet to give live video feeds you know for much of the slr's development and then also the the huge advantage they had was battery life because you didn't have to be running the entire sensor imaging pipeline constantly to just see like as you're waiting to take a shot you you were sitting there waiting to take a shot looking through the lens through the mirror and the camera was mostly idle as you were sitting there doing that and and then you know when you took the shot that's when it had to activate the sensor do the image processing run but you know that in that way they're only doing one image to be processed you know just the one that you took and then showing on the screen the screen was on for a few minutes but or you know a few seconds but for the most part like unless you were shooting in what later came was like later slrs did add the like continuous video shoot mode where you could use the screen on the back continuously and it would the mirror would flip up and just stay up and it would work the way mirrorless cameras do you know in in a brief way uh but when you weren't doing that when you were just using it normally the battery life of a regular slr was incredible compared to the battery life of mirrorless cameras um you know now you know everyone just accepts worse battery life because it's not that much worse though it's so much better than it was even the short period of time that i was buying interchangeable lens sony cameras the battery life on these new ones is just phenomenal compared to what it used to be and part of that is just you know silicon shrinks and stuff like that but part of it i think is just the efficiency of all of the parts on the inside like my the camera on my desk here i just you know i wish my ipad had this kind of standby time it just sits here for literal months and every time i pick it up it's still got charged eventually it will go down to zero over the course of like four months but you know i take these to the beach and i shoot literally 2 000 pictures and i have more than 50 battery life at the end of it right so it's like what more could you ask for and by the way the batteries are changeable and i have a spare if i actually needed but i've never needed now that i've gone to the the z size battery whatever the big sony size battery is which is not that big but like the previous size battery whatever the small one is that one's not big enough but the z size battery especially since now that my my a6600 also has the z size battery in that tiny little camera it's like infinity battery like it might as well be infinity because it's like i go to sleep before the before the thing's gonna run maybe if i shot something where i was like holding down the shutter for four hours straight at a sporting event i I would need to swap batteries, but 2 ,000 pictures of the beach, no sweat.

56:43And actually, the biggest thing I like about mirrorless and switching over, now that they're better, now that the EVFFs have much faster frame rates than they used to do. the battery life problem has been mostly or entirely solved depending on the system. You know, like, so now, like, the advantages that mirrored SLRs had are mostly alleviated now by mirrorless being better. But my favorite thing is that the mirrorless cameras, because the viewfinder is a screen, what they usually do is when you are looking at the viewfinder, it just shows whatever it would have been showing on the back screen.

57:17You know, it just, you know, it senses your eyes there. It turns off the back screen and it turns on the viewfinder. and my favorite thing is that in bright sun you can when you hit play to review the picture you just took to see if you got it you can look in the viewfinder and you can see the picture no matter what's going on around you light wise or distraction wise or whatever you can look through the viewfinder and see the picture you just took and review it to see like oh did i did i get what i wanted to get that is my favorite thing about mirrorless besides the fact they're just way smaller but other than that like it that's a game changer for me and that's one thing where like as i was looking at at very small cameras like you know looking at the rico and the you know fuji x100v and the sony rx100 series and stuff like that like looking all these small cameras not all of them have evfs and the ones that don't have them i really miss it when it's gone and even that even the cute little tiny pop-up evf on the sony arcs 100 i i still found myself doing that and being very thankful it was there and so so like that that to me has kind of become like a must have like if i'm gonna buy a non-iphone camera it's gotta have a viewfinder and not necessarily because i always want to shoot through it or even frequently will shoot through it but mostly because i want to be able to review pictures in bright sunlight i guess i suppose they could just make the back screens way brighter but that's probably harder yeah i mean they do have a lot of them do have a super duper bright mode but i'm never haven't really tried that because i assume that really would eat in my battery yeah it just i just used to be fun in fact when i'm at the beach i just turn the back screen off which also extends battery life because honestly you can't see it at the beach like there's no point right i'm gonna use yeah i'm aware the view fund of all time i do kind of miss the uh you know the sound of the mirror clacking up that's another sort of kind of like floppy listening to floppiness drives thing that younger generation probably won't be familiar with because that was definitely a uh it was an audio experience but also you could feel it you know there was the shutter the mirror clacking up the whole and i know slr is pre-day digital but just you know that whole experience was uh kind of going to disappear someday i imagine we are brought to you this week by collide and they have some big news if you're an octa user they can get your entire fleet to a hundred percent compliance if a device isn't compliant The user can't log into your cloud apps until they've fixed the problem.

59:36It's that simple. Collide patches one of the major holes in zero-trust architecture, device compliance. Without Collide, IT struggles to solve basic problems like keeping everyone's OS and browser up to date. Insecure devices can log into your company apps because there's nothing there to stop them. Collide is the only device trust solution that enforces compliance as part of authentication, and it's built to work seamlessly with Okta. The moment Collide's agent detects a problem, it alerts the user and gives them instructions on how to fix it. If they don't fix the problem within a set time, they're blocked.

1:00:10Simple as that. Collide's method means fewer support tickets, less frustration, and most importantly, 100 % fleet compliance. Visit collide.com slash ATP to learn more or book a demo. Collide is spelled K-O-L-I-D-E. K-O-L-I-D-E dot com slash ATP. Thank you so much to Collide for sponsoring our show.

1:00:59justifiably about what General Motors has said recently, reading from Jason's post. General Motors has decided that the company's future electric cars will drop support for CarPlay and Android Auto, preferring the company's own infotainment system based on the lower-level Android Automotive operating system. Essentially, all of GM's EVs will run Android and offer access to certain Android apps. But any hope of connecting your phone to the cars via any means beyond Bluetooth will be gone. There's also a blog post from Gruber at Daring Fireball, which we'll put in the show notes. We'll put the original Reuters article in there.

1:01:38And I just, why? I mean, I know why. The answer is money. The answer is always money. But why? Read the Reuters thing, because that's the explanation. Well, there's the stated explanation, and then there's the likely real explanations. Well, I think the stated explanation is pretty close to the real one. Go ahead. Buyers of GM EVs with the new systems will get access to Google Maps and Google Assistant voice command system at no extra cost for eight years, GM said. GM said the future infotainment systems will offer applications such as Spotify's music service, Audible and other services that many drivers now access via smartphones.

1:02:09Quote, we do believe there are subscription revenue opportunities for us. Quote, Kummer said. GM executive Mary Barra is aiming for 20 to 25 billion dollars. It's billion with a B. in annual revenue from subscriptions by 2030. So the answer, as always, is money. And the secondary answer is GM is dumb and bad at what they do. Because I know they want money. And I know it seems like that if we do this, we'll get more money. But I don't think they will. Yeah, I think we can look back at different parts of tech and different eras that we've achieved or gotten to use. And certain times, things are just better for consumers than they are at other times.

1:03:00And it's usually because of some accident or some standard was adopted or some company got a whole bunch of other companies to agree to something that later on, we don't get that kind of luxury again. So think of when open ecosystems then become like closed centralized services or become taken over by them. When services have APIs for a while and they shut down those APIs, things like this. And I think we can look at the era that we are in now where almost every new car sold and many of the cars for the last few years that have been sold support CarPlay and Android Auto and therefore support pretty much any phone you're likely to have.

1:03:44And if you have an older car that's older enough to have a din socket you can get a din a double din radio to you know add carplay yourself fairly inexpensively and easily and so we're in this era right now where almost everything asterisk tesla and rivian but almost everything else supports carplay and android and it's wonderful as a consumer using these products it's great because you can get into any reasonably recent car and there's a pretty good chance you'll be able to have these experiences and that's Ultimately, that's what people want. They want to use their CarPlay and their Android Auto because it's better than all the crap the car makers make.

1:04:24By far, it's way better. Even the car makers that actually used to make pretty good software interfaces by comparison to their peers, CarPlay is even better than what they do. It's just better. And I'm going to tell you, I don't actually like CarPlay that much. But it's so much better than what the automakers have made. And so we have this situation now where the automakers are totally marginalized in their UIs because all we want is get your crap out of the way so I can show my phone projection system on your display. That's what we actually want. We actually want get all your stupid custom stuff that you made that looks like – it looks like Elon Musk drew it usually.

1:05:07Like get all your – and I don't mean Tesla. I mean like the ones that are worse. like all the ones you look at like gm and all the vehicles that are marketed towards like you know men like those have the most comically overwrought disgustingly bad uis um so you know you have all these car makers who just have done horrendous jobs of making uis it's not their skill set as screens have gotten more ubiquitous as technical needs have gotten higher you know as the graphical capabilities of these screens have gotten better over the years the car makers have only gotten worse at making software for them like amazon with their kindle uis the kindle ui has only gotten worse over time as kindles have gotten better screens and more computing resources because it gives amazon even more rope to hang themselves with uh in terms of their horrendous ui design and that's how cars have gotten too like car uis are horrendous and they keep getting worse as the screens keep getting higher resolution and we keep putting more controls on the screens like The way everyone else is designing their screens is just getting worse.

1:06:11And so, but we have this great moment right now where we, for most new cars, we can just connect our phones and get all their crap out of the way and have what we actually want. I think that's temporary. Usually when we have these kind of, you know, very consumer friendly, more open ecosystems, oftentimes it's in the earlier part of the market. And what happens in the later parts of those markets is the people with the power realize they have the power and say, hey, why are we giving this away? Why are we letting other people control our stuff? Why are we not bringing this in-house and reaping more benefits from it?

1:06:49So you can see this in lots of places all over tech, of course. I think one of the more common places you see it recently is streaming services. You know, we used to have everything on Netflix. Over the years, the various rights holders have realized, why don't we just launch our own service and you know take this off of everyone else's and they have and now that world is worse and more expensive than it was before like that's just the reality like it's it's gotten worse for everyone um except for the people who run streaming services and now now we have to subscribe to 15 of them to get all the stuff we used to get in like one or two you look at you know the the music industry has gone in in and out of things like this but you know so these kind of things are all over the tech world.

1:07:32So I think the automakers have realized, wait a minute, why are we letting Apple show whatever they want on our screens when we can have our own Maps app and we can have our own subscription pricing that we charge people and we can charge them the 12 bucks a month for their GPS service or whatever. Car makers want that revenue for themselves. And so from their point of view, they're like, wait a minute, you know, we're just going to take this back. So, you know, we as consumers, we have a few things we can do in response to that. We can refuse to buy those cars. But as Tesla has shown, sometimes the cars are compelling enough that we're willing to forget about that.

1:08:13Or a lot of people just don't, they don't realize or they don't care. And they might not care until after they've driven it off the lot. And then like, well, I guess this car doesn't support that. I guess I'll use the crappy Bluetooth or whatever. you know but a lot of people don't realize or don't care so those of us who do care it's like we're kind of out of luck so we can say we're not going to buy these cars but ultimately you know this is this is gm today and this is going to go one of two ways either there's going to be enough backlash and they're going to see enough loss of sales that they're going to revert this decision and say oh never mind we'll add we'll add carplay and draw to back these cars or it's not going to affect the sales in a big enough way.

1:08:53And I think this is the more likely outcome. And then other automakers are going to be like, wait a minute, we can do that too. Why? Look, GM is making X billion dollars a year in recurring subscription revenue for their vehicles after sale by selling all these services on the touchscreen and no one's buying those on our cars because everyone's using their phones instead for free. So why don't we capture that value for ourselves? I heard Jason's arguments and I think he's more optimistic that consumers will prevail here, I'm not that optimistic. I honestly don't think that's the most likely outcome.

1:09:26I think the most likely outcome here is they're going to make a bunch of money from doing things themselves in a way that's worse for consumers, but we have not enough leverage over them in this way. And then other automakers will follow. And I think we're going to look back on this time as, wow, wasn't it great when every car had CarPlay? And in the future it's going to be a lot more fragmented, I think. Well, so GM is playing it safe here in that they're allowing the You know, Tesla and Rivian, the two big, you know, highest end, most high profile, most, you know, I'm not going to say most popular because Rivian is not selling, you know, that many cars.

1:10:01But like, I don't know, the best reviewed EVs, let's say, they're allowing them to be the anchors because the two best reviewed EV makers, Tesla and Rivian, don't allow CarPlay or Android Auto, right? And so GM is not doing this on all their cars. GM is only doing it on their EVs. And they're using the other popular EVs as an anchor. and say, well, this is just the way EVs are. When you have an EV, you know Tesla, they don't do this. You know Rivian, they don't do this. Well, with our EVs, we don't do this. But with all the other GM cars, still CarPlay and Android Auto. And I don't know how many EVs GM sells compared to the other ones, but it's presumably a minority of the cars that GM sells.

1:10:39So they're still kind of like dipping their toe in with this thing. And in this scenario, they're not at a competitive disadvantage if you're comparing EVs against EVs, which I think if you're shopping for a GM EV, maybe you are looking at other EVs more than you're looking at just other cars across the industry, right? Yes, but I think almost every other EV, or at least off the top of my head, every other EV other than Tesla and Rivian, and we probably shouldn't even be mentioning Rivian because their sales volume is so low, but pretty much everyone but Tesla, including Lucid, which by the way, I happen to see Lucid Air.

1:11:13Yeah, Lucid just changed. Yeah, and I happened to see one today for the first time. It looked pretty good. I was pretty impressed. But anyways, pretty much everyone else is including CarPlay, to the best of my knowledge. I might not have that exactly right, but effectively. Right, but the best EVs are Tesla, Rivian, and Lucid. I don't know, man. I don't know if that's true anymore. I really don't. Let's say the best reviewed is the best way to sell it. That's very different, first of all. That's an extremely different thing. They are the best vehicles, so that's why they're the best reviewed. I don't think there's any debate there.

1:11:43I don't think anyone is looking at, you know, Chesley, Rivian, and Lucid and saying these are not the three best EVs. In the classes that they compete, obviously, Lucid. I don't think anyone's looking at Lucid. I agree. Well, I mean, Lucid only has, Lucid doesn't have any cars that people want to buy. They just have a sedan, and who wants sedans, right? But among the sedans, they make literally the best four-door sedan EV. So, I mean, it's not even close. Well, but also, I think you're underselling GM's existing EVs, because I always get it backwards. It's either Bolt or Volt, and I always say the wrong one.

1:12:13yeah no they probably sell a lot of them but that's you know but they're they're actually really nice like my parents have whatever it is other than the fact they had to recall them because the battery's catching fire but yeah that happens to everybody eventually i'm serious every ev maker is going to have some recall i toyota had the wheels falling off with their stupid ev which is not well reviewed uh bolt had the batteries catching fire which like you know that's on the battery manufacturer like this those are growing pains right yeah everyone had the tesla had those you don't have any recalls i have for my tesla a lot like and i didn't even and mine was like the one by the time i bought my first tesla it was already out for like four or five years before that yeah and rivian had like the bolts like uh something the suspension components had the bolts retightened or something like that yeah something like that everyone has those but hold on we're getting yeah we're all we're getting off track here what i'm trying to say to you is i do not accept your assertion that tesla is still the only good option the bolts in my part i have driven my parents bolt many this is the the prior generation that now they have a different looking one.

1:13:10Like the GM has a different looking one. But my parents bolt. It is not as nice as a Tesla. I'll be the first to tell you that. But given that it was like half or maybe a third the cost, whatever it was, it is actually surprisingly nice. The Mustang Mach-E, surprisingly nice. I've not personally and I've driven one of those very briefly. I've not personally driven the new Kia and Hyundai EVs, but everything I've read is that they're really, really good. So yes, Up until maybe a year or two years ago, it was basically Tesla or nothing. And if you're a fancy lad, like arguably the three of us are, it's Tesla Rivian or nothing.

1:13:46But for regular people, I think there's a lot of really, really good options out there. And I think GM is going to be cross-shopped with the Kias and the Hyndais and all the other ones that are of roughly similar financial pain. They'll also get cross-shopped with the Model 3 for sure. but i think there's a lot more options out there than you're giving them credit for and that are good like i said i was just picking the the reason i'm picking the best of the best is because that's gm's cover right so what that what gm's cover is see we're being like the best of the best even though you're not cross shopping against the lucid air because it's way too expensive being like lucid is kind of like the companies that copy apple even though they're not really competing with apple because their cover is like it's kind of like a value signaling like we're like the good ones that you can't afford we're like tesla we're like rivian we're like lucid we're not like those other lesser things you know ford machi i know you think it's a good car but like don't you see how where it's like it's a value statement kind of like pricing is a is a value statement this is a value statement of like it's giving them cover to say we don't offer car play because those expensive guys don't offer car play too and i get what you're saying that like they'll they'll be cross shop with cars that are in similar market although like it's a tesla model 3 does kind of ruin that because it is kind of down in everybody's business in terms of pricing although a little little bit less so now because the model three keeps creeping up in price as tesla goes down the tubes with financially with some problems no didn't they just drop prices again yeah they had to drop that they were creeping up but then they had to drop them again because of they they want to sell cars like it's it's not a great situation over there but but no but the model three is very affordable tesla's prices have never stayed the same for more than a few months like they've always changed wildly yeah no but like you know i'm i'm in westchester uh for the moment and i'm you know looking around like this is like ground zero for you know new medium to high-end adoption of electric cars and i see there's still a ton of teslas around still by far the number one but i'm seeing a lot of uh the ionics is that kia or hyundai it's a hyundai hyundai uh ionic 5 you're saying the suv one yeah the ionic 5 tons of mockies tons of teslas multi now there's now two rivians within a block of my house there is tons of them and even and i've i mean i know this is not still even made let alone was ever mass market but like i was driving around i've been driving around tiff's little bmw i3 i freaking love that stupid car it's so stupid but so good in so many ways do they still make that no i think they stopped last year the year before because all of a sudden i'm seeing that car everywhere and it's not just because you mentioned it because i've known you've owned it for years and years and years but there's so many i3s and i've seen maybe it's i'm seeing the same three over and over again but like where are you getting these i3s from i guess they bought them used well the great thing was you could get a great deal on them because nobody wanted them so like we got an amazing deal on ours like it's yeah it's so and there there are so many good electric cars and there's more coming out all the time the market is big and growing like and and now you can kind of tell you know now that the more modern ones are required to make weird noises as they run for pedestrians to hear as i'm walking around like i'll hear something weird drive by and i'll look and it'll be something I don't even recognize, but it's clearly an electric vehicle.

1:17:01It's some kind of weird mid-sized SUV crossover thingy. That's some brand. I don't know. But they're everywhere. There's so many, and they're all different. And by most reviews, they're pretty much all really good. Because as you pointed out before, electric cars, just having an electric drivetrain is just a massive upgrade in so many ways from gas cars that you can have an otherwise fairly mediocre car, but people will love the thing because electric cars are just good overall. They're the SSDs of the car world. Right? Everyone loves their first SSD and everyone loves their first electric car, even if it actually sucks.

1:17:34Right. But it might suck in some ways, but it's so much better in other ways that you just love the thing. Tiff's i3 is like an ancient platform. It only has like 150 miles of range, but the thing is great. It's a great little car and people love the things. They didn't love it at the price that BMW have you tried to sell it for that was the main problem with the i3 well and it was it was very early to the market it was very ahead of its time i think its carbon fiber uh tub design was extremely expensive yeah that's why it was so expensive and also it's a form it's a shape of car that americans don't like but you know what it's an amazing shape we have fit so much in that car and it's such a small car it's very practical but americans do not like that it's basically a tall bubble like it's it it is very it has no footprint you can fit in every parking spot you can do a u-turn in a street without doing a three-point turn just turn around like the turning radius is amazing on it it's so small but because it's tall you have a pretty good you have great visibility out the whole thing you can fit anywhere and it actually holds a surprising amount of stuff given its size uh i love the thing and no one's making that anymore and like no one's making anything close to that size right now in the american market which is kind of unfortunate um but anyway there are so many good electric cars and you know your your assertion i forgot even what we're arguing about but your assertion i was saying they were using they're they're using the the better brands as cover for their decision but let me finish because okay like i said before there are ideas like i will make more money from this the reason i don't think they're going to and the reason i think this is absolutely the wrong decision and the reason i think that even if the entire industry goes the way you said marco and they all realize hey we can do this thing like they just basically it's a it's a chain of using the higher end brands as covered, it goes all the way down and they all get rid of CarPlay and Android Auto, it will be a terrible mistake and that will eventually be reversed.

1:19:24And here's why. These car makers do not have software platforms. They don't have app stores. They don't have APIs. They don't have operating systems. They do not have a software platform. None of them do. None of them have a glimmer of a hope of ever having one. And none of them currently have one. We can name all the software platforms off the top of our head windows mac os android ios that's pretty much all the ones that matter this and tailing off with with the tv os and the watch os and the stuff like that that's it what does it take to have a software platform you got to have apis you got to have developers you got to have a developer program you got to have support for them you got to have an sdk you got to have an ide you got to have a platform that you do development on you have to you know revise those things just bug tracker documentation yeah well you know less less so with apple but you know we know what it takes to have a software platform none of these car makers have that nor should they because that is it's such a huge business there have only been a small number of those in the literal history of the world and making new ones has proven to be extremely extremely difficult after the sort of cambrian explosion of the early pc days and the subsequent consolidation right and why does that matter because software platforms allow developers to produce software that has not existed before.

1:20:41Waze at one point didn't exist, and then somebody made Waze. And it turns out Waze is a good thing to use in a car. If those platforms didn't exist, iOS, Android, or whatever, no one is writing Waze for the BMW platform or any other single car platform. I almost wrote Overcast for the BMW platform, just whatever it's worth. Right. It's just, it's not economically feasible for individual car makers to have their own platforms that are going to have innovation. we know where people are writing applications they're writing it for the popular platforms maybe someday they'll be writing for somebody's headset or whatever we'll find out at wwc but right now they're writing them for ios they're writing them for android and to a lesser extent mac windows whatever you know like those are the software platforms so if these car makers kick software platforms out of the car which is what they're doing if they don't let car play you don't android those are ways for those existing software platforms to allow applications developed for those platforms to get into the car if car makers kick them out if they think hey we'll just write all the applications ourselves no you won't you suck at this and even if you didn't nobody can write all their own applications even nintendo can't get by only with first party games and nintendo is nintendo you are not nintendo right if you have none of those applications like you will just have a lesser platform you say okay well everybody does that then just everyone will have crap applications ah but if everyone has crap applications some the singular of the car company, singular with a C, the singular of the car world will say, you know what?

1:22:05Everybody else kicked all the other software platforms out, but you know what? Apple, Android, we're going to invite you back in. And suddenly it's their unique selling proposition for whatever brand of car this is that decides to do this, like the last place competitor, singular, right? It says, iPhone, you can come on our platform. And suddenly people are looking at singular again. No one was looking at singular before, but hey, you know what? If you want the iPhone, the literal only place to get it is on singular, which will eventually be called AT &T. And I was never a fan of singular slash AT &T before, but they have the iPhone, so I'm going over there.

1:22:35That's what'll happen. And it'll just reverse and ripple back through because there is absolutely no way that any of these car makers are going to make a successful software platform. And they're delusional if they think that you can either make one of their own, which will never, never, never work, or we don't need a software platform. We'll just write all the applications in-house. Go ahead, do that. You'll get singulared. That's what'll happen. And it may take two decades of pain and suffering to Marco's point. It'll suck for us the whole time if this reverses and goes through the whole industry and we got to wait for a whole other decade long cycle for these idiots to get their heads out of their butts.

1:23:06But inevitably, it will happen because there is no fighting against software platforms. That's where the innovation happens, that wherever the platforms are popular, where developers are making software, that's where it happens. And look at Waze. It's like, well, that's software innovation for like cell phones. We want software innovation for cars. That also happened on the phone. phones aren't cars but that's where all the good applications for cars came from on the because people can bring their phones into their cars so there's just there's literally it's like the worst decision ever to decide i don't want any of the world's most popular software application platforms to be able to use their software integrated into my car we're not saying like you gotta let them take over everything like apple wanted to do where they take over the instrument cluster and the climate controls or whatever like by all means car makers keep the car stuff to yourself all we're saying is carve out a little place on your dashboard for android and ios and whatever the hell future platforms but you know the headset thing who knows whatever for for that app ecosystem to be in your in your cars you should be thanking them so that they allow their apps to be in your cars because they add value to your cars value you can never make yourselves because you're never going to make a software platform as good as any of those and even if you did it wouldn't matter because you're just one car company if you're like well I'll make a platform for all car companies and everybody will use Ford OS.

1:24:23Yeah. Good luck with that. Well, I'll make a platform that's independent of any car company. Yeah. That's called iOS or Android for now, for now iOS is independent of any car company. And so is Android. Once Google starts making their cars and Apple starts making their cars, it makes things more complicated if that ever happens. But GM, this is a terrible decision. I know you think it's defensible and I'm sure like, you know, if it works the way Marco says for the next decade, you'll make those billions of dollars of revenue. And then the executives who were in charge of that will retire and tell their grandkids how successful they were as executives but then when they die some point later uh you'll have to reverse course because this is a bad decision all right two counterpoints number one tesla tesla is very successful despite what we think of their you know stupid leader they are a very successful car company that makes overall first mover advantage and they have good cars yeah overall very good cars um and people are very happy with them for the most part and so they and they have never supported carplay or android auto and it doesn't seem like that's in the cards for them i think they they seem to feel pretty strongly about not doing that and they have all their own built-in stuff and it is not great but it is first of all it's the best i've ever used that wasn't apple uh designed like it's it's there's lots of issues i have with tesla's ui and and especially that the weird redesigns that they did over time when i owned when i owned those cars but their their in-car ui was the best i've seen until rivian rivian i think is a little bit nicer but it's overall very similar in terms of quality and design work whereas everyone else is well below the two of them as far as i've seen but the point is tesla shows that you actually don't need carplay that you can be a wildly successful car maker making cars that people generally love and are willing to keep buying even though you don't have carplay so that's but that is a that is a pressure on them though everyone always wants tesla to integrate carplay and the more competitors tesla gets in terms of hey here's a pretty decent uh ev you can say well it's not as good as tesla but the counterbalance says yeah but this one has carplay or android auto that is that is a competitive disadvantage and i understand tesla's you know run by a stubborn child who's gonna do whatever like there's no reasoning with that or whatever but it's still you know i'm not saying it's a fatal decision for tesla but it is a disadvantage it's increasingly a disadvantage because if everybody else has it and you don't that's a disadvantage for you now again if the whole rest of the industry goes the way of tesla then that ceases to become a disadvantage and then tesla it looks even better because they have decent software but you know there there are there is pressure on them right now anyway to integrate android auto and carplay the fact that they're just not giving into it because again they're run by a stubborn child who doesn't really listen to reason that doesn't mean anything one way or the other like they're very successful because they made really good cars and they had a first mover advantage and like exactly yeah but and and they can and that's a perfectly that's not like oh well that doesn't count it counts totally that's that's a way to have an advantage but in the disadvantage column is no android auto or carplay it's just that their advantage column outweighs that right so i don't think they're proof like again if you if you had some company that could make cars as good as tesla and as cheaply as tesla and also had a carplay and android auto that would be better for them again i think that why did lucid backslide because lucid was also out of the gate without supporting either one of them and very recently lucid added support i think lucid is doing it because they have many disadvantages against tesla and that nobody knows who they are and this is their very first car and so on and so forth and they're like we need a little bit more in the advantage com what can we do easy carplay integration tesla doesn't have it we do uh you know it's it's a little thing but i'm saying industry-wide you know deciding that the whole industry doesn't need popular software platforms is just a big mistake.

1:28:06Second counterpoint, what GM is doing is not just making their own OS from scratch. What they're doing is switching to Android Automotive. Now, Android Automotive is not Android Auto. It's a quick recap. We covered this a few months back, but basically, Android Auto is like CarPlay. Show a projection of your phone on a screen in the car. Android Automotive is an entire real-time OS that takes over the gauge clusters and everything else in the car and it is the car's ui and the car makers can work with google to customize android automotive to be the underlying os of the entire in-car uh you know system the entertainment system the screens everything else oh and android automotive like you can't there are apps for it like there are third-party apps for it i think but it's like a very very small selection and it's very different uh requirements and everything so it's never going to be like you know a healthy ecosystem um by any means it's always going to be like a smaller subset but there at least is a path but what i think is going to happen is android automotive because it's like you know the new baseline it's going to be like android in kind of you know in a bad way where all the manufacturers are going to eventually switch over over over the long haul i think they're all going to switch over to android automotive as their like base os for their tech stack but they're going to customize it and limit it and restrict it like crazy because they can the same way that carriers used to heavily restrict android then customize and they would build their own you know special experience on top of it that had only their apps and required only their you know subscription stores and all that other crap like that's what it's going to be like old carrier branding on phones where like you know the verizon motorola phone or whatever was running Motorola's OS, but it was full of Verizon garbage and you couldn't change it and you couldn't install whatever you wanted.

1:29:59That's going to be what happens here, I think, where it is Android Automotive underneath and I think it's going to, again, I think it's going to be a very popular choice over time for car makers, but it's not going to give you the kind of freedom and flexibility that CarPlay and Android Auto do, where you're just running apps off your phone and it can be pretty much whatever you want. If it comes out like the cell phone market, though, say that becomes the Android of the automotive world, which would be fitting, given its name. The money in the mobile phone market is not so much on Android. Even though iPhone has minority market share, it has majority revenue and profit share.

1:30:32And if these car companies want to make a lot of money, following the Android route is probably not going to be as lubricative as following the iPhone route. And also, Android being massively successful in the most popular mobile phone platform in the world did not eliminate the iPhone from existence. Also, it didn't take money, didn't make the iPhone have a minority of the profits or revenue either. So that's a problem for these companies, especially the high-end ones because as long as apple still exists and still has the customers with all the money and still makes the most money on its platforms and still continues to have car play as a thing that exists someone's some singular is going to take them up on that offer and say hey everybody else has got android automotive with that limited selective android automotive things and the carrier junk all over everything and so on and so forth and it's the most popular automotive platform in the world it probably already is by the way android automotive is probably the most popular that tons of car companies use it i think even casey's volva uses at this point it's the most popular in the world but if you want to make money you got to support the apple thing because that's where the money is right yeah so i i think car makers if they think this will play out just like the phone market did that is not a positive scenario for them because they pick the one that doesn't make all the money uh and nobody is apparently picking the one that does make the money so we'll see how it goes but like and also by the way building on top of android automotive is the same thing that these car companies give lip service to of like oh you know why are we letting some other company own the platform that runs our cars well you're already doing that and you know why because you suck so bad at it that you just said let's just go to a lot of car companies tried to make their own and did such a bad job that they said you know what we changed our mind we're just going to use android automotive and brand it well but you know i i think there was a lot of like you know random middleware being sold you know qnx based whatever is like going on like they weren't right on their own os's yeah because in the car industry the car the car companies don't make the things themselves like suppliers do i forgot who the big supplier was of infotainment before Android Automotive swept through the industry, but they didn't make good software either.

1:32:22And by the way, Android Automotive is CarPlay compatible. One of the things it can do is show a CarPlay window, and it's fine. So it's really just down to they're going to, as the carrier in this model, they're going to just disable that. They're going to just not allow that to run. When you say a car supports CarPlay, it's probably running Android Automotive, and it's just showing CarPlay in the little carve-out for it that Android automotive products did either you recall if bmw switched android automotive recently too oh i don't know that would surprise me i don't know either because i think that they were so proud of their software platform and i think they wanted one of the last holdouts but i think i recall a story where they finally gave in i don't know someone from bmw will write it and tell us we'll have to see i i know that like the newer stuff like the ix i think it might run a very a very new software stack so maybe some of the newer stuff might be yeah anyway the point when you're running android automotive you don't know it that's the point of like it doesn't look there's no i thought the so we don't have android automotive and our volvo but the pullstar ones do run the newer ones yeah and i i haven't seen a screenshot i'm not gonna look it up while i'm talking but i thought it was at least slightly obvious that it was android but i may be wrong about that well it looks different right if maybe if you know what to look for but it's they're heavily branded like i think i think the hondas are android automotive at this point too like the hondas look like honda right the you know the kia ones look like kia the honda ones look like hyundai and it could be android automotive under the covers it is it is a lower level thing and to marco's point the carriers quote unquote can customize it up the wazoo that's the point of that platform that's i think that's what apple was trying to do with their thing who knows where that's going but they have the same idea look we're just like android automotive oh no apple would never in a million years allow any kind of customization like this that was their pitch was you can use our thing and you can customize it with your look and feel but you're right that they would allow less customization yeah it'll be like give us a tint color well i think it'll be more than tint color but less than android automotive not much more than tint color i don't know where that effort is going i remember there was in it was in like a presentation an event presentation i haven't heard much about it but things take a move slowly in the automotive industry so we'll see where it goes like again android automotive has taken years and years to like for every car company to eventually give in and say we give up trying to give money to i wish i knew what the manufacturer was there's a bunch of infotainment manufacturers that took on this hey we'll make the interfaces to your things and they made them in the 90s and they made them with bitmap displays and then they just they couldn't keep up and so android automotive has kind of taken over that type of thing but that is entirely i feel like even though it's it seems like it's technically related it is business model independent of this decision because you can use android automotive and choose not to support you know carplay or android auto at all and that's what i mean i'm assuming gm is using android automotive and it's also choosing not to support a carplay or android auto with it but they are choosing to support things like spotify and stuff like that so they do deals with spotify just like they do deals with sirius you know all the the car makers did that like they see the dollar signs in that and it is a way to make money like oh we don't have an app platform and we're never going to make one but you can get spotify and you can get audible and you can get sirius xm if they still exist and you know whoever we partnered with and we'll we'll take your money for that and it's like you know it's on star and all that it's the modern version of on star and sirius radio this is just these type of deals but that's not a software platform the next time the next really good car app comes out again for all we know it could be a glasses slash headset car app or something that's they're not going to have it but the carplay ones will because carplay is like look we don't know what's going to be on this little rectangle you just i just decide where the rectangle is and how you navigate to and from it and it is shows what's on your phone platform and that is an entire platform that we don't own that we don't control but that we don't have to support and that somebody else you know fosters innovation in and somehow developers make these amazing applications and then voila they get to appear in our car, which makes us have an easier sales pitch versus Tesla, which doesn't allow that to happen.

1:36:10I don't know. I think it's more likely that they'll do a couple of deals. They'll have like Sirius and Spotify and that'll be it. And people will say, OK, I guess that's enough. Like for many, like if you look at what people actually use on CarPlay, it's not a large number of apps it's a it's apple's built-in stuff and maybe a maybe a third-party mapping app which is almost certainly google maps or ways like that's that's just two they're even both owned by the same company even apple maps because i mean i feel like apple maps is at this point better than the in-car navigation of any car oh it is but again like but this is like when you look at what people actually are using it's like one map app that might be might already be google maps and therefore already might be included in Android Automotive.

1:37:00And then also, you know, whatever their streaming music app is of choice, which is most likely Spotify for most people. And so all they have to do is make a deal with like one or two, you know, music playing services and that's it. But that changes. That's the point of the platform. You don't know what's going to be the next popular app. Right now it's Spotify. Years ago, it would have been a different set of things, right? Like you don't know where the next Waze is going to come from. You don't know where the next Spotify is going to come from. You don't even know that Spotify is going to be on the top of streaming audio forever because at one point it wasn't.

1:37:29And right now it is like that's what a platform is. It's a place where no matter who ends up being on top, if we're running our platform right, you can get that on our platform because we have the customers with the money. And so here we are. Again, we may have been for a decade of very dark times where you can't use these things on any platforms. But I think inevitably it's going to have to come back around because there's no defeating software platforms. That's where the innovation happens. And that view you have is exactly the right view of a short-sighted executive who's going to retire soon, which is like, look, for the next 10 years that I'm working, we're going to do this deal.

1:37:58We're going to make tons of money that I'm going to retire. Success. But on the long view, if you're not supporting a software platform of entry, all those deals that you made with those companies for those individual car things, they will not be on top anymore. and the ones that are going to be on top will rise to the top not on the market of things that do special deals with bmw and gm but on whatever the popular platform of the day is whether it's still mobile phone platforms or headset platforms or whatever the heck it is that's where the new things come from that's where they rise up you know instagram doesn't rise to fame as a windows application okay it rises to fame as an application on a platform that windows didn't even worry about until it was too late right that's what will happen in the future i hope you're right but i i don't think probably be dead but you know yeah i don't i don't think that's a four-hour conclusion i hope you're right though yeah i think there's a couple of interesting things here i see both of your points and i i i think there's more truth to what marco's saying than i want to admit because i really don't want to lose uh car play in in the cars whatever cars i buy in the future um but you know i think a lot of the justification that a lot of people particularly the ev uh manufacturers are making is that, hey, we want to be able to do a really good job of helping you navigate and charge your car as you're on a road trip.

1:39:13I genuinely don't have the faintest idea if there's one or several apps that do a good job of this. And honestly, it doesn't really matter for the point I'm trying to make. But what happens if there is like a Waze for, or hell, even Waze itself, for mapping and charging where it is able to figure out Electrify America, Tesla, whatever else. Those already exist. Doesn't Google Maps do that already? I think, no, but like there's already apps that do this. You know, there's like PlugShare and a bunch of other ones. But do it incredibly well to the point that like Waze is the de facto standard for most people that commute.

1:39:49Is there something, and honestly, yes or no, it doesn't really matter. But what if there is a Waze for EVs, not in terms of traffic, but in terms of like route planning and whatnot. And I think that GM particularly was citing like route planning is one of the reasons that they want to control the whole widget is because, oh, we'll do route planning better than anyone else. And I think if there becomes a de facto standard or maybe there is, again, if there is one, it doesn't matter. But if and when that time comes, then it's going to be a real competitive disadvantage not to have Waze or the route planning thing with charging on your electric car.

1:40:27and that's going to make all these non-CarPlay, non-Android Auto electric cars seem real bad. That's just one path to where it can become a real competitive disadvantage. Furthermore, at least for now, all these other makers, Kia, Hyundai, a lot of these other ones, Chevy at the moment, they're all offering Android Auto. They're all offering CarPlay and I think people are turning to them more and more. I'm seeing more and more of these regular people EVs over time. I also wanted to point out, this was linked from Gruber's post, there was an interview between the Rivian CEO, RJ Skarange, I think is how you pronounce it, and MKBHD.

1:41:04And MKBHD specifically asked him, like, what's the deal with the lack of car play? And the quote from the CEO was, the thing about controlling the software stack is we get to continually make it better. So you've had your R1T, you've hopefully seen this every few weeks. We have a new software release that either adds features, addresses gaps, we listen to feedback, and our head of software development is on Reddit all the time hearing what people are saying. and he continues later, it drives our software roadmap and makes sure that we're delivering what customers want. Well, first of all, if you were delivering what they'd want, you'll give them frickin' CarPlay.

1:41:32But leaving that aside, I think the one advantage that the software-friendly EV makers, which is basically Tesla and Rivian, the one advantage that they have, especially compared to Apple, is that they can innovate and deliver fast. Now, I would also argue that it's not as big a deal for Apple because CarPlay itself doesn't need to innovate as much when you're offloading the mapping to another app, when you're offloading the charging to another app, when you're offloading the listening to podcasts to another app. But it is an interesting counterpoint, even though I am 1 ,000 % team CarPlay slash Android Auto, it's an interesting counterpoint that at least these software-heavy car companies actually deliver in a speed that certainly, I can't speak for Android, but certainly Apple is not delivering at that speed right now.

1:42:19I mean, yeah, they are fine, but like that's not that seems like an independent concern they should do that for all the things that their software controls which is the whole rest of the car like the climate controls all the features of the car the instrument cluster the the the automatic self-driving driver aid things like oh like yeah that's their job and the fact that they innovate uh they're iterating better than apple i mean we know that's not apple strength right but still uh on terms of the platform every year apple has a new ios and in general they get better and have more features is that CarPlay itself may be a much slower rate of innovation there, but I feel like the main job of CarPlay is connectivity, which they have done at least something.

1:42:57They went from wired to wireless. I feel like there's still room for improvement there, but they did something there. It's mostly just about make a place on the dashboard where our software ecosystem can have a foothold. And then exposed to that software ecosystem will be all the applications on iPhone or on iOS or on Android that want to be useful in a car. So even something like a podcast player, for example, might have awareness of the CarPlay exists and provide support for it. That's different than when you're holding your phone. So you can use Overcast while you're in your car. And certainly mapping applications like Waze are motivated to do that, even though you can also use it by just having the car, the phone mounted on your dashboard.

1:43:36Right. I think the whole idea of like sticking your phone to your dashboard is a weird thing that we have to do during this transition. and if things go the Marco way and we have these dark days where everyone kicks off Android Auto and CarPlay, people will go back to sticking their phones in the dashboard. We've already proven that we're willing to do it. That's what I do. You know, you do it in your Tesla, right? Or you'll probably end up doing it in the Arabian, right? I do it in my car that has CarPlay. Why? We've gone over this because it's better. Because CarPlay is nice to have, but it's actually not that good in certain ways.

1:44:12you know it admittedly it's better than not having it but uh but you know sometimes you have to actually see the phone for something like like ways in carplay is kind of buggy and sometimes you have to do stuff on the phone you know sometimes you have to like enter stuff on the phone it's not great you know you ideally you don't do that while you're moving and and what's great about a like you know dashboard clip for your phone is that you don't have to worry about all this crap that they're doing you know with disabling car player whether your car has or not like you can just put your phone there done and then it's the same and you can use ways the regular way that is the most reliable way to use ways and people are familiar with their phones like that's the main advantage that it has it's like you know it's not it's not learning a new thing you already have your phone you already use it all the time it is a familiar interface in place for you which in many ways i think makes it safer honestly like you know with carplay you know obviously the you know the way it's less safe is if you get tempted to like start texting people that's obviously worse but with carplay you have a learning curve and you have to kind of you know futz with stuff a little bit more but it has bigger targets in carplay you know and there's less you can do so like you know it the advantage of carplay is like if you go if you try to do something that you shouldn't be doing in your car it just won't let you like you just can't um the downside is you actually might spend a decent amount of time scrolling around the screen and there and possibly having your eyes partially off the road when you if it was just using your phone in a dock right next to the steering wheel you could actually be faster and have your eyes off the road less time but so it's it's kind of a complicated you know balance there it's not it isn't you know entirely on one side or the other but you know we we will always have that option as long as they keep having bluetooth that exists you know ideally we have better options but you know we might not and some scenarios you don't even need any car connectivity like i'm kind of amazed this hasn't happen i know car makers have done this stupid incredibly stupid thing which i think we'll look back on and laugh i laugh at it right now we're very high-end luxury cars in the back seat like in the center armrest they'll have an android tablet that comes with the car it really happens all like a literal android app it'll be branded and it'll be like hidden that it's android but it'll be an android tablet and you'll be able to put it on your lap and adjust the climate control all sorts of silliness right but like and we're talking about uh holders on the dashboard where we stick our phones to which is made way easier and cooler by magsafe i'm a convert now that i don't have to use a stupid clip i use the magsafe's gray but it's kind of amazing that no one has as far as i'm aware said you know what uh you know we're going to do the instrument cluster climate controls you know driving controls cruise control all that stuff right um but in the place in our dashboard where normally there would be a you know a big like a big touch screen we're not going to put that there instead just stick your ipad there it's basically an ipad mount and you don't even need any connectivity to the car because if you want to run a cool mapping application on a huge screen just use your ipad like or the luxury brands are like our car comes with an ipad but no one's willing to do that they all come with junky android tablets no one has been willing to say guess what the center touch screen on our dashboard it's an ipad i mean obviously apple would do that right if anyone's going to do that apple would but no car maker has done it yet so you see just how many times like we're talking you know how many people use cases on their phone look at go through a parking lot and next time you're in a big like place with a big parking lot and look in all the cars and see how many of them have a place for it to mount a phone and and then account how many of those cars already have carplay but like marco choose to mount the phone anyway it is this really common thing and i think if android auto and carplay ever go away entirely people will just continue to mount their phones and i i would hope that car executives would be like the same the reason i think the reason a lot of people integrated carplay is they understood as drivers of cars themselves and as observers of the car industry hey you know i look around and i see a lot of people with their cell phones mounted to their car dashboard can we make them not do that because it seems like that like we're trying to design interiors of our cars but now all of a sudden we have to account for where they're going to try to mount a phone why don't we just let them see their phone display on and then apple's like hello carplay we've been out here yelling at you month like okay well we'll do that that for me i think that's one of the main reasons that carplay even exists is because people voted with their dashboard mounts yeah and said we want this in our cars and if you don't put it in our cars i'm gonna block your carefully designed instrument panel or you know center stack or whatever i'm gonna block your climate control vents you know i'm gonna put i need to use this while i'm in the car if you don't let me and so i feel like that's part of the reason that cell phone sort of projection interfaces even exist and we'll just go back there again if they take them all away i think people will just go back to it again i don't think you know the rivian message here about like you know we want to control the whole stack we're going to do the whole thing like that's what they all say when they're trying to be like they're they have delusions of grandeur into thinking that they are going to make a software platform like we're as good as apple we can make a full software platform we can do everything ourselves kind of like steve jobs saying here's the iphone apple's gonna write all the applications itself that's tenable right no not tenable like if and if they had stuck with that it would have been a terrible decision right um so i feel like the car makers are kind of in the same situation whether they're lying to themselves or lying to us it's hard to say but i say by all means iterate listen to feedback do a great job on your interior interfaces consider physical buttons they're really important but people want the current popular platform which right now with cell phones in their cars in some form or another and if you don't give it to them they're gonna stick it to your dashboard with a piece of tape or something i've already ordered the rivian uh mount for pro clip usa you're preemptively just like blocking i mean the rivian's so big inside you have plenty of room well and like and like sometimes like sometimes they go out of stock for certain vehicle models so i'm like just in case i should probably you know i'll take the 20 risk and i'll order this now yeah i bet some people have had ipads like thinking of you know the whole uh oh yeah i've seen like ipad minis in like ubers and stuff yeah i was gonna say uber lyft like you know their whole business is based on that type of thing kind of like square you remember the square ipad like paying the square that type of thing you know like there have been places where ipads have appeared but just the phone is so much more ubiquitous or any kind of phone not just the iphone but phones are so much more ubiquitous that it's much more common but i i bet there are people out there who have ipads especially ipad minis mounted to their cars is just basically bigger phones yeah they totally do i've seen it like more than once yeah it's and for the record too like that i i watched that rivian um interview from with mkbhd i didn't necessarily take the ceo's answer as we will never do carplay i i kind of took it as like we're not doing it now and we we'll see like that's kind of how it read to me like it didn't it didn't seem like an out an outright like no we're not we're not going to do that kind of thing like it just kind of seemed like we don't want to be pressured into doing that right now right this second that's kind of what it sounded like and i feel like lucid making that move because mostly because they're the most desperate i imagine but lucid making that move is also kind of like you know rivian's kind of looking around right at tesla again just ignore tesla because it's run by a maniac right they're they don't apply logic to what they're going to do but rivian is definitely looking at lucid and going hmm i don't know i mean they're so underwater in terms of like they're trying to make a you know a new cheaper platform they're trying to build the cards that they're trying to sell that like it's rivian is a million things going on at once right so i don't blame them for deep right you know we'll worry about carplay if we're still in business next year like i give give rivian some runway here um but i i feel like in the current climate despite what gm is doing rivian is in the position now where if they if they rolled out android auto and carplay uh the people who already own them would be uh very happy and the people who haven't yet decided to buy them this would be in the plus column for them right now yeah i feel like i feel like with rivian it's it's it's felt more like you know we just haven't gotten to it yet and we don't have a good answer for that yet so we're just gonna you know kind of punt in this weird vague way but it it kind of kind of felt like because because look i mean it's not look we we know the actual implementation of of you know supporting carplane and dorado is for the most part pretty straightforward because the phone's just sending you a video stream you are literally just showing a video stream but you have to find a place within the ui that you made where that goes and that's the tricky part right you basically you make a window and you say here you're gonna have this you're gonna have control over this window that's how everyone else has done it and it works fine but you have to you have to sort of bend your ui around that though you have to say okay well when that goes there what what controls from our stuff does it hide do we have a little sidebar that we show it's always visible with our car stuff how do you navigate between them i'm not saying it's difficult that's what everyone does it's fine i know i know i'm not saying it's hard i'm just saying it does it does take some thought to do so if rivian was planning to do this it's going to take a little bit of effort especially since they're probably in the middle of whatever the next major revision of their you know their own software is you have to really incorporate that into the design to have it work there so what even if they're currently planning to do it i wouldn't expect it for a year oh yeah at least a year because you know obviously like you know they're they're still in pretty early days with like just getting stuff out the door you know getting stuff shipped getting stuff built getting stuff sold and working like obviously like they have a lot more on their plate and so that's why i kind of felt like that's like that's like you know a 2.0 or 3.0 feature and they're just not there yet but it would not surprise me if they add that sometime and it's like okay now we support it that's it like you know no no big fanfare just boom now it's there and at some random time in the future like no no warning just oh there it is you know because i it doesn't seem like it's a principled stand to not do it whereas you know with tesla it's instead of giving you like the one feature you actually want of showing this window with CarPlay in it that we have plenty of space for on our screen.

1:54:00Instead of giving you that one feature, we're going to build 17 games that you will never play and this fart simulator and whatever else that you really don't need in your car. And the one thing you need in your car, we're not going to do because we're run by a child. Thanks to our sponsors this week, Memberful, Collide, and Pork Bun. And thanks to our members who support us directly. You can join us at atp.fm slash join and we will talk to you next week. Now the show is over. They didn't even mean to begin. Because it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental. John didn't do any research. Marco and Casey wouldn't let him.

1:54:42Because it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental. And you can find the show notes at ATP.FM. And if you're into Twitter, You can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S So that's Casey Liss, M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-N-T - Marco Arment, S-I-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S-A It's accidental, accidental They didn't mean to Accidental, accidental Tech Podcast So long Oh my god, this ultra fine is driving me nuts. I'm so close If there was a Pro Display XDR in stock in the Westchester Apple Store today, I might have bought it. This thing. Ugh. Why don't you get a studio display? Right, exactly. Why wouldn't you just get another studio display?

1:55:42Not another. I'm sorry. A studio display. No. I really don't want one. It's not that much more expensive than the lg was if i spend two thousand dollars on a studio display that is two thousand dollars for something i'm not that into if i spend five thousand dollars on a pro display xdr i i hate doing that but the result is something that i really enjoy like i love the pro display xd well you gotta you gotta hold strong on that one though because there are you know any day could be mac pro day and if they're going to revise that display now would be the time to do it so You just got to hold out for, I think, another.

1:56:20I know. That's kind of what I'm waiting for. I figure there is probably a revision coming sometime soon. I'm not entirely confident that there's a revision. I'm just saying you got to wait to see. We're close enough now to something happening. And that's something they promised a Mac Pro. I think there's going to be a Mac Pro. Will there be a new XDR? I don't know. I give it like 50-50. But you got to at least wait to see. Because if they roll out the new Mac Pro and there's not an XDR, then you're safe. Just buy one, probably. Yeah, probably. I mean, to each their own. I'm not trying to say you're wrong.

1:56:49but you're wrong. You really think that the XDR is, what is it? It's$6 ,000 with a stand. Is that right? You really think it's$4 ,500 better than the studio display? Oh, no, definitely not. But here's the difference. My option is I can just keep using the UltraFine, which is, I'm currently doing that. Keep using the UltraFine when I'm in this location and just suck it up. That's free. I spent this money in 2016. So it's just, it's free, no additional money here. So I can do this for free, or I can spend$2 ,000 to get the exact same size monitor, which I now feel is too small because I'm used to the XDR.

1:57:31So I can get$2 ,000 for a nicer version of this too small monitor, or I can just use this for free. or i can spend more down the road at some point and get something i actually really like i really like the xdr Everything I've heard from the studio display kind of sounds like, eh, it's good, you know, comma. I don't know. I wouldn't say that. It's better than the LG. It is better than the LG, but is it$2 ,000 better than the LG? Because the LG is sitting here for free right now. See, you don't need it for speakers, and certainly the camera is garbage. But actually, early on, it was a little rough.

1:58:11Like, I had some audio playback issues. I was rebooting it from time to time. I've had zero problems with the XDR. Never, not even a single problem. No, no, I understand that. I understand that. But now I can't recall leaving aside the garbage camera, which the XDR doesn't even have one anyway. I haven't really had any problems with the studio display. And I got to tell you, you know, another thing worth considering, although I think ultimately you're right, but I really, really like having my 2-up 5K setup because I have my UltraMeh on my right-hand side and I have the studio display directly in front of me.

1:58:46My speakers are too big for that. That's fair. You've got a wider desk. Or why not just visamount the damn Ultramath? That would fix the stand problems. Yeah, that would fix some of its shortcomings. That's the thing. Every time I have I wouldn't say chickened out, but every time I've overcompromised on something for logic instead of following my feeling on something, I have almost always regretted it afterwards and i don't want to spend two thousand dollars on something that i that i will regret afterwards i would rather either spend nothing and keep the crap i have now for free or spend more on the thing i actually want again like throughout life like i i have done the compromise thing many times and every single time i regret damn it why why didn't i either you know wait until i could afford the bigger one or the better one or whatever or just stick with what i had like that's so many times i've had that dilemma and made the wrong decision i can identify it and i i see now it's like okay this the studio display it's nice but it's not nicer enough than the lg to be worth replacing the lg for my purposes right at the second if i was using it every day maybe to be different but you know right now it's fine and then the xdr is really nice and i love that it's not an ios computer in there that occasionally has weird bugs and has to be rebooted which again isn't really a thing anymore like literally it literally is a thing but like i have bad news for marco if there's an xdr revision you know it's come on the stupid a13 inside it i mean that's just i'm also glad that i got in before they started adding a series chips to the thing or whatever but it's i mean my guess is a revised xdr will be created on in in the image of the studio display just because assuming they're they're happy with that experience and i have crossed my fingers have not had any problems with my studio display but I know a lot of people have.

2:00:40So I don't know if, if I would be interesting to hear from inside Apple, like how is the studio display viewed? Is like, they decided they're going to make a studio display with smarts and they, they had a bunch, you know, we already have an OS and a chip and everything. Like we have that it's, it's called the A series chips. It's called iOS. We already embedded in lots of little things. We have, you know, there's inside our home pods, inside our Apple TV. Why do we have to make a custom chip and put it in our model? Let's use the A series. We talked about this before. so now they did that uh and from our perspective as consumers it's had its ups and its downs how does apple think it has gone do they think this is a great model we're going to use this for all our future displays or do they think hmm let's let's regroup was this the right decision you know did we do the right thing here or do we regret this do we think that you know the xdr type approach is better where it's just a bunch of you know whatever custom chips in there just for monitor stuff but compared to the studio display the xdr is a quote-unquote dumb monitor not really because obviously it's got like a you know usb hub and some thunderbolt thing and all sort you know there's stuff in there it's not nothing no chips in there but it's not hey this thing runs ios it needs to be rebooted and have firmware updates although the xdr did have firmware updates i believe it's just not like with a progress bar and ios a new version of ios being installed i just looked at um the the article uh from the very simple link in the show notes with the new the upcoming uh samsung and dell big monitors remember when those were announced i yeah we talked about those the hideous looking dell thing oh my god i just yeah i just scrolled down and saw the dell again for the first time since i guess january oh my god that thing is hideous oh wow that i don't care how much that costs i'd rather have the xdr it reminds me of like uh the tv review things i watch that one of the channels i watch has this thing where they do like they invite all the reviewers in to do a blind judging of all the televisions at the end of the year and the way they make it blind is they have like this elaborate you know like stuff like taped you know because you can only see the light up portion of the screen so they try to hide the rest of it so you can't see any other portion of it you couldn't do that with the dell because it was like that lumping stupid oh yeah camera thing could be bulging through you like you'd be able to tell that's the dell i can tell without even the screen being turned on there's no way you can hide it like the only reason the blind test works for tvs is they're all so uniform now it's so easy to hide the bezels and hide everything else in it but the dell is like no you cannot hide this ugly oh god like at least the samsung uh 5k one that they're doing at least they ripped off the studio display like pretty closely like that's samsung for you if you don't yeah exactly it's like if you don't have good design chops at least rip off someone else's good design dell is like nope we're great at this we're gonna do our own thing and then that comes out but hey the feature set on the dell is something else we talked about it before it is i mean look if if i don't think we have a price for that yet do we but man if if we ever if that thing ever comes out like if that's if that's at all price competitive it is gonna it is gonna be you know a pretty big deal but oh god what i mean it's not it's not a looker

From the publisher

Sponsored by:

  • Kolide: Cross-platform endpoint security for teams that value privacy and transparency.
  • Memberful: Monetize your passion with membership. Start your free trial today.
  • Porkbun, LLC: An oddly satisfying experience. Over one million domains under management.

Become a member for ad-free episodes and our early-release, unedited “bootleg” feed!

More from Accidental Tech Podcast

All 184 episodes
530: You Are Not NintendoAccidental Tech Podcast · 2 h 4 min
Listen in VO