In short
Accidental Tech Podcast - Episode 571: Adding Some Carrot
Episode Summary In this episode of the Accidental Tech Podcast, the hosts dive into a variety of tech-related topics, particularly focusing on Apple products, software updates, and industry dynamics. They also discuss the recently launched Apple Vision Pro, its pricing, accessories, and the implications of Apple's decisions on developers and consumers.
---
Pre-Show Updates
- YouTube Updates:
- The podcast now has a YouTube presence, where episodes are converted into videos showing only the podcast's logo.
- Challenges with YouTube's handling of show notes, including formatting issues and character limits.
Follow-Up
- SCSI DB-25 Correction:
- Clarification that SCSI DB-25 connectors were used on Macs, not DB-50.
- iOS Screen Sharing:
- Confirmed that iOS has a screen sharing feature, but lacks control capabilities for remote users unless under specific conditions.
- Apple's 30% Cut & Payment Processing:
- Discussion on Apple’s 30% fee for in-app purchases, and the implications on developers and customers.
- Apple Vision Pro:
- Updates on preorder status and features, revealing initial inventory estimates and customer reactions.
Apple Vision Pro Discussion
- Preorders & Accessories:
- The Vision Pro is available in different storage capacities, with significant pricing.
- Accessories include batteries, light seals, and optical inserts, all priced at a premium.
- Repair Costs:
- High repair costs for the Vision Pro have sparked discussions about the viability of AppleCare, with crack glass repairs estimated at $800 without coverage.
Key Concepts
- Apple's Pricing Strategy:
- High prices for accessories and repair services raise questions about Apple's value proposition and customer satisfaction.
- Developer Relations:
- The hosts emphasize that Apple's rigid policies and lack of transparent communication contribute to developer dissatisfaction, specifically regarding the 30% cut on in-app purchases.
- Market Dynamics:
- Discussion on how Apple navigates regulatory pressures, especially concerning the EU laws on sideloading and competition.
Ask ATP Segment
- iMessage Contact Key Verification:
- Hosts discuss the utility of the feature and their personal choices regarding privacy and security.
- Email Backup Regime:
- Strategies shared for backing up emails, with suggestions like using Gmail's POP function and Google Takeout for archiving.
---
Conclusion
- The episode encapsulates a mix of technical insights, product discussions, and reflections on Apple's market practices, underscoring the ongoing challenges and opportunities in the tech landscape.
---
Key Takeaways
- Apple Vision Pro's Success: Early sales numbers may not indicate sustained demand, as inventory issues and customer engagement are closely tied.
- Repair Costs Impact: The high cost of repairs may push customers towards AppleCare, creating a shift in how users approach product insurance.
- Developer Frustration: Ongoing issues with Apple's communication and policies could hinder developer relationships and innovation on the platform.
---
For further information, check out the [Accidental Tech Podcast](https://atp.fm).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Wow, we're going to get to bed tonight before 10 o 'clock. I am very happy about this because daddy didn't get a nap today. Oh, poor you. I usually try on ATP days. I usually try to get a little snooze in and I did not have the chance. This would be a lesson to me because I cut off some follow-ups. I'm like, we don't have time. We got so much stuff, but I could have left it in. Oh, no, John. This is not the lesson you should take from this. The last thing this episode needs is more follow-up. Yep. John, I hear we have some YouTube updates you would like to share with the class. yeah as we said last episode uh youtube has a thing well the read your podcast rss feed and make little quote-unquote videos out of each podcast episode there's nothing in the video except for the logo of the show there is no actual video component but at least the audio is there and we did that because it's you know it doesn't require anything of us it's just rss feed like any other podcast and youtube uh you know consumes it and does this it's like great because we know some people like to use for whatever reason they like to use youtube to listen to audio and so now they can with our podcast a few updates on that uh first is that youtube will import the the quote-unquote descriptions of the video uh from the rss feed so basically our show notes that have all our links youtube will import that our show notes are in html the the youtube podcast rss ingestion thing i don't know what it's doing but it ends up taking our html and turning it into plain text filled with tons and tons of blank lines it looks awful i don't know what it's doing i mean obviously it it extracts all the urls and puts them out longhand in the thing so there's no like link that you don't know where it's going to go everything is http called like you can see the url so it does that with the links which also lengthens it a little bit but then it put tons of blank space in there so i wrote an automation to get rid of all the blank space then the second problem was uh if my automation didn't run fast enough to sort of slim down the show notes uh to get rid of all the blank spaces sometimes they were too long and youtube would truncate them for us helpfully uh by just cutting them off apparently youtube can host youtube can host petabytes of video uh i forget what the absurd number is like how many gigs of of youtube videos are uploaded per second it's some ridiculous number but the descriptions are limited to 5 000 characters because they don't want to waste space you really have to be you really have to think about the space efficiency you know if you let everybody put i don't know like four kilobytes of text in there what's going to happen um anyway uh and so i was fighting with that with my automation and then someone suggested that wouldn't it be great if youtube when they ingested the rss feed uh would uh also understand our chapters because we put chapters in the podcast because youtube now supports chapters and wouldn't it be great if they could just take our chapters stick them in there um and so all this conspired uh to make me eventually decide you know what i'm just going to put a link to the show notes so it just says show notes colon https colon slash less atp.fm slash 1234 um and then you can just get to the show notes that way and they'll be correctly formatted and you'll see all of them and they'll never be truncated well then the chapter stuff turned out to be super easy because i was already had a script that was modifying the uh the description uh apparently the way chapters work on youtube is you just put some text in the description that looks like a chapter list oh yeah youtube parses that oh the time you like put timestamps as text yeah yep that's it that's literally yeah overcast also parses that that's their system um and so i'm like oh great so now i know what all the show notes will be so i'll just replace all the show notes with show notes colon link to show notes and then chapter chapter chapter chapter so for people who are listening on youtube uh now you get access to chapters too here's one caveat though to do all this i had to use the youtube api which is like you know part of the google some google developer platform so i have to like get a google developer account and say i want to use the youtube data api v3 and deal with auth and do all sorts of crap like that and then i'm writing my script and i'm debugging it i'm trying to get it to work right um and every time I did this, I've been doing this for like four days now.
4:03I blow through my API quota. Like there's a number of requests per day that you're allowed to use. And the first time I blew through it, I was like, I didn't know there was a quota. Well, I guess there's a quota. I'll just be more careful tomorrow. Right. But every single day I've worked on this, I've blown through my quota within like less than an hour. You can I was like, I'll just pay the money here. Here, Google, here's 10 bucks. Give me more API requests. I just need this for a few days to finished development of this thing after that it's i'm not going to need a lot of requests right but apparently they won't take your money so you have to request more more uh api access and there's this form that you fill out it's like uh tell me about your application what are you using it for how many people are using this can you send us your source code why do you need to use this api if you didn't use the api what would happen like they just want to know so much about you like where are your parents from uh how are you feeling right now uh have you ever spoken to anybody about this script has anyone seen this script what are you going to use it for it's like just can you just give me more requests and anyway they came back to me today and said uh tell can you send us a source code to the script that you use to upload your videos what for the umpteenth time i don't upload my videos as i said at length last time i wrote to you and filled out your giant form it's your feature that's reading my i don't upload the videos they're already there i'm just want to change the descriptions oh my god it's such i'm never they're never going to give me more requests anyway uh final thing is you may be wondering why are you blowing through your api request are you you just doing something dumb on the first day i was like oh i must have just you know had some looped it looped too many times and burnt you know when you're just writing code i didn't know there was a limit i probably did something dumb but now i've realized that i have no idea how the things i'm calling relate to their api queries or whatever because as far as i'm aware and i've stepped through it in the debugger here are the calls list videos in playlist right and it's 50 per page so i got to call that 10 times because they have a paging system right so that's 10 requests 10 or 11 requests to loop through all the 500 and something videos right but that's five calls to the google api function i'm doing this in node right what i think is maybe yeah i'm calling a function five times maybe each one of those calls fires off 100 api requests or something and then while i'm looping over them the only thing i ever do is i loop over the things that i've just got from this query each you know 50 at a time right and i look at them and say do i need to update this description and if i do i call it update api once and i say update this description right but somehow i blow through the my daily quota of 10 000 requests within an hour i'm like there's no way i i made 10 000 function calls and now i'm thinking like is there some some internal retry logic that i don't understand or anyway uh i'm almost done with the script but of course i can only work on it for a few hours a day before i blow through my quota so tomorrow i get 10 000 new requests.
6:46Hooray! See if I can manage not to blow through all those. But I did manage today to update all the descriptions, so they're all up there and they all have chapters. Please do enjoy. Wow. We appreciate your service. Salute emoji. By the way, here's what the limits are. Queries per minute, 1.8 million. Queries per minute per user, 180 ,000. Queries per day, 10 ,000. What? So you can do 1.8 million queries per minute for a fraction of a second. And then you're done for the day. Oh, my word. Google. Well, genuinely, I know I sounded sarcastic a moment ago, but truly, I do appreciate your service because this is a pain in the tuchus that I am pretty freaking confident I can speak for Marco in saying, I would have given up on this long ago and said, hey, you should be using tube anyway.
7:35Tough noobie. I would never even attempt at this. Right. Exactly. So, again, we appreciate you, John. All right. we appreciate you even though apparently you don't know what the back of a mac looks like tell me about this please yeah during our connector tier list thing i had said that the the db50 connector was the scuzzy that was on the back of the mac and that's not the case it was db25 which of course looks exactly like db50 but a little bit narrower and when things aren't really to scale on a bunch of little thumbnails it's hard to tell i apologize for this mistake i think the last time i plugged in a scuzzy db25 connector was many decades ago so what can i tell you we regret the error the offending party has been sacked uh john if you haven't heard this episode and don't know what the crap it is we're talking about what can you do uh you can go to atp.fm slash join and become a member we have these member specials that we do and they're silly and fun and the last one we did was ranking various computer connectors uh it was a blast you should check it out indeed it was a lot of fun uh if you go to atp.fm slash join then you can not only get access to this member special, but all the member specials that proceeded.
8:38And at this point, we're building up a fair repertoire, not repertoire, a catalog is the word I was looking for. And so you might want to check those out, adp.fm slash join. iOS screen sharing. We were talking about how to help perhaps a relative that is a bit older and less tech savvy, or maybe just someone in general who is less tech savvy. And John, you said something that I would have called you on had I realized that you were wrong, but I thought you were exactly right. It turns out we were both wrong because as it turns out, iOS does have screen sharing. Can you tell me about this, please?
9:09Yeah. Some people are saying this was rolled out in iOS 15, although I think it might be older than that. I'm not sure when it rolled out, but yes, you can do screen sharing in iOS, but screen sharing in the way of they can share their screen with you so you can see it, which don't get me wrong, is very helpful, but you can't control it. I didn't think there was any way to control it, but then someone named Jenger said, there's no remote control unless you're on the same wi-fi network with the same apple id and switch control is enabled well those things are probably not going to be the case if you're trying to help a relative because if you're on the same wi-fi network then just walk over and help them with their thing right and the same apple id they're probably not using your apple id uh so it's interesting to know that that is possible to remote control it under this narrow circumstance but with regular screen sharing all you can do is see their screen and then just try to talk them through it uh which is again way better than not being able to see their screen but the beauty of the mac one is you just get to take over because a lot of the times they're not interested in learning how to fix it or what went wrong they just want you to fix their computer and that that is made so much easier by just okay uh you know hit the accept button and now i've got control of your computer and i'll fix it for you and you're done indeed all right we had a fair bit of feedback about uh r slash my rant about apple and their 30 percent uh and i think john you had maybe not corrections but some notes you would like to add yeah obviously we've talked about this topic tons and tons of times in the past And very often when we talk about it for the 15th or 16th time, we don't say all reiterate all the same things.
10:36I know it sounds like we do, but we don't actually say all the same things that we said last time. And then people write in to tell us about them. And in this case, we get a lot of people coming back to say, you know, the fee that Apple charges for its in-app purchase, whether it's 30 percent or 27 percent or whatever, that's not for payment processing. So I don't know why you were talking about Stripe and how much they charge and that they would make a replacement in-app purchase thing or whatever, because Apple's not charging you for payment processing. They're charging you for access to their intellectual property, you know, hosting and distribution, marketing, whatever, whatever thing people thought like they were, we would explain to us.
11:09And then presumably we would hear them and say, oh, we hadn't thought of that. You're right. They should get 30%. And obviously the Stripe comparison, because Stripe is a payment processor. Like what we were saying is Stripe would do all the same things Apple does in terms of APIs and so on and so forth. right but here's the thing and here's this is the reason i keep mentioning and linking my stupid blog post about this that apparently is not clear enough for people to understand what i'm saying or maybe they just don't read it which you know fair enough but the thing is it doesn't really matter what apple thinks the 30 is for or what you think the 30 is for or what the 30 is actual actually for or whether it's for payment processing whether it's for access to intellectual property or it's this, that, the other thing.
11:48None of that matters. The only thing that matters is how do people feel about paying the 30 %? The people who have to pay the 30%, how do they feel about paying for it? Do they feel like, that's a fair price or do they feel terrible about it and they resent it? And it's fair for you to try to convince somebody who resents the 30 % that they shouldn't be resentful. They just need, maybe they just didn't know that they're actually paying for access to Apple's intellectual property. And maybe you think you can convince them and then they will feel okay with it. But I can tell you that all the arguments put forward by people saying, no, here's what Apple's 30 % really is for, have thus far not proven convincing to the developers who resent their percentage.
12:28And then the second thing I'll say is that Apple itself really does not spend any time at all trying to convince developers that 30 % is the right amount. Like, you see much more from people who are trying to explain on Apple's behalf Apple what they think the 30 % is quote unquote four. But how much do you see Apple making an effort to explain when they're not on the witness stand in a court case? Why it is that they think they should get 30%. And that I think might contribute to the dissatisfaction. Like that's what it boils down to. Do you think any answer they would actually give would actually, you know, make people all of a sudden be, oh, okay, I guess I guess I will pay it.
13:06Like, I don't think the people who don't want to pay it would be satisfied by any explanation Apple could possibly give. with apple attempting to explain it at least there would there would be some kind of conversation i don't obviously you know that's part of the here's the thing that's why i was talking about game consoles apple developers some of them resent the 30 but game console developers resent it less right the 30 that they pay not to say they don't resent it but they resent it less and that must seem unfair to apple but i would say to apple have you made any effort whatsoever to try to figure out the origins of the satisfaction dissatisfaction and talk about it not that you're going to be able to talk them into it or whatever but the first step along that road is communicating about it whereas apple's like how about we just say nothing and continue to insist on 30 percent and that of course leads to more resentment and this doesn't i know this doesn't seem fair it doesn't seem like well that's not you're not being fair at why do they not like it but that's what i tried to write about in that blog post like at this point with this going on for so many years for so long, it's clear that for whatever reason, there is resentment about the amount of money that Apple asks for.
14:14Is it fair? Is it unfair? Should people not feel that way? Should people feel that way? The fact is they do. And so far, nothing, it hasn't, it's been getting worse and not better. And that may seem like not right to certain people, but it is what it is. That's what the art of the possible post is about. It's like, you may not think it's fair, Apple. You may think you're justified, but there is resentment there. It is an unhealthy relationship that is not getting better. So something has to change if you want this resentment to go away. And that's what I would say to all the people who say, you don't understand.
14:49The 30 % is not for payment processing. It's for X, Y, or Z. It doesn't matter what it's for. It only matters if people are okay with it and people are less okay with it than, than Apple wants them to be. And it fosters a relationship where there is this sort of distrust and resentment between the two parties. And that has ramifications, like, for example, Division Pro launching without a Netflix, YouTube, or Spotify app on it. So I talked about this a little bit on the talk show coming up soon, but I think Apple does not know how to either court developers or to negotiate when they are not in a position of power, which is basically any negotiation.
15:28Because, you know, Apple, what they know how to do is dictate. and they know how to be fond all over. But when people aren't busting down the doors to get into their app stores and to participate in their new platforms, they don't know what to do. They don't negotiate. They don't really do a lot of outreach or trying to build those relationships. All they do is manage when people come to them. And even that, it's really more of a dictation scenario. They're very controlled in their messaging and they don't get roped into arguments they don't want to have, which is just good PR, right? But you're right that the thing I was talking about, they don't spend any time trying to convince people that they should feel better about the deal they're getting.
16:10That's what they don't do. I'm convinced they really do not know how to negotiate or build those relationships because to a large degree, they never really had to. So much of Apple in the last 15 years or whatever, during so much of that time, they have been in the position of power in the areas that they would need this skill potentially in. So they really haven't had to use any kind of negotiation or relationship building, developer outreach. Even developer relations is fairly minimal in its interaction with most developers. So Apple doesn't know how. They just think everyone just comes to them all the time.
16:50And they seem genuinely surprised when they put something out there and it goes kind of poorly with some people in the community or with certain developers or whatever, I don't think they know what to do because they literally do not know how to negotiate. They've never really had to in most ways. And if you look at the ways that they are not in power, app stores for lesser platforms that don't have the massive reach that the iPhone has or whatever else, if you look at certain content deals, in many of those other areas, they actually don't do very well. They don't succeed very much because they don't have this skill.
17:31So when it comes to this, you know, the 30 % thing, like they are just so accustomed to being able to dictate whatever they want for the iPhone and have people, you know, grumble and bend over backwards to accommodate them because the iPhone is such a big market that when it comes to something like the Vision Pro launching, no wonder so many developers, especially the big companies, no wonder they're like, why should I work with you? There's not the big audience here to make it worth it. so why should i give you more power when i'm kind of tired of what you've done with your power and that's the apple's usual move their main negotiating tactic is well we'll just sell as many of these as we can if we make a good enough product we'll make the market big enough that you'll have to pay attention to us and that's that is an important strategy and a good idea it's just made more difficult by the fact that you don't have as much help from third-party developers as you could have if you had a better relationship that's also not negotiation that's literally just dictating to the market but it is it is a form of saying a form of saying can we make this more attractive to you and one way to make it more attractive is that well we apple it's our job to make a product that people want to buy so they'll just we'll sell a billion of them that's on us we'll do that and that will make the platform more attractive to you and it's not taking away the bad it's not taking away the stick it's adding some carrot anyway one final thing on this um we also the last episode we were talking about the whole hey you want to use a link out to a third party uh payment thing you can do that but you still have to pay us pretty much the same amount you always paid us um we talked about that last episode uh and some i saw some discussion online of people saying well given all of this given that it's just like the dutch dating app thing or whatever like why would anybody choose to do use a third part of payment processor because it just seems like more work and you pay exactly the same amount so it's like even if they're complying with the letter of the law which epic says they're not but we'll see how that goes in court um how you know who would choose to do this it's like they've given an option and they'll have zero people who want to do it.
19:25And as we've discussed many, many times in the past, but didn't mention on last episode, we will reiterate the one remaining important motivating factor is when you send somebody through a third party behavior processor, whatever, have them pay on your website. Unlike with the App Store, you now, quote unquote, own that customer, you know who they are, you know what they paid with, you probably have their email address, like, when when someone does something through in-app purchase, Apple owns the customer, Apple knows who they are, you don't know, you just get the money, you know, the 70 % or whatever of the money they give you, but you know nothing about them, right?
19:59That if you have the type of business where, quote unquote, owning the customer in that way is valuable, you may be willing to pay exactly the same amount as you paid before, do a lot more work, subject yourself to audits from Apple, also now you can own the customer. And what kind of business might it might be really important that they own the customer? Probably businesses that are going to make some money on the side selling information about you or spamming you or doing other things. So yeah, there is a reason somebody, a company might want to go through these hoops to do this, even though they're paying Apple exactly the same amount is just to get ownership of the customer, ownership of the customer's information, all that stuff.
20:37And with that in mind, I'm happy to report that the rumblings about how Apple will handle this forthcoming EU law about sideloading is that they're going to be extremely generous. Oh, I'm sorry, breaking news. No, they are not going to be extremely generous. My mistake. They are going to continue to be petulant turds. According to the Wall Street Journal, which writes, Apple is planning to add new fees and restrictions when it begins allowing people to download apps outside of the iPhone's closed ecosystem. Apple's approach to the EU law will help ensure the The company maintains close oversight of apps downloaded outside the app store, a process known as sideloading.
21:10The company will give itself the ability to review each app downloaded outside of its app store. Apple also plans to collect fees from developers. Of course they are. That offer downloads outside of the app store, said people familiar with the company's plans. Who'd have thunk it? Yeah, I mean, we don't know a lot about this yet, but I think anybody who is surprised by this, I think, is not paying attention. because we have seen over and over again if a regulator or a lawmaker passes some law that says like they have to somehow give up some of their control or money in the app store they will do it only kicking and screaming and only the bare minimum they need to do and they will make it as absolutely painful as possible so with the eu dma and and you know forcing you know side loading by law i can't imagine apple's going to just say okay well i guess we have to allow it and just throw their hands up and say, all right, done.
22:04No, we've seen they're going to make it as incredibly hostile and painful and expensive as possible because they don't want to be doing this. And honestly, for this particular case, I feel very differently as we talked about last week about whether apps should be able to link out to external payments. But for sideloading and third-party app stores. I really don't think this is a great idea for iOS. I'm worried about what it could do, especially with, you know, imagine, we don't have to imagine, it's been in the news, a Facebook app store, or excuse me, a meta app store. There are so many ways that can go badly for users and developers.
22:45I really don't want that to be the case on iOS. So I'm not surprised Apple is going to be, you know, probably very painful on this. And in this particular case, I'm not going to be upset about it. But certainly if you were just if you were hoping that they would just allow you to like, you know, download something off someone's website and that'd be it. And it'd be super easy and you can totally bypass the app, you know, the app store review process or, you know, code signing with Apple or rules or whatever. And especially bypass, you know, any kind of financial arrangement with Apple. I think that's only going to happen through a lot of painful lawsuits and legislation again down the road.
23:24But for now, Apple is going to do the bare minimum they can and make it so make it so hostile and expensive that nobody will do it. It does make me wonder, like the people who are writing these laws, like is this just like an example of regulatory, regulatory capture where the regulated company is really running the show here? Because it's just a bunch of rich companies and people who are in suede of rich companies sort of arranging for them. We're going to pass this law, which looks good to our people. But really behind the scenes, Apple, you can just do whatever you want. You're still going to get all your money.
23:52You're still going to have all your control. It'll be fine. Just go with it. or did they actually try to, you know, pass this Digital Markets Act that would like increase competition for apps on the iPhone and just did such a bad job of it that Apple's approach, as described in this rumor, complies with the letter of the law? Because if Apple's still controlling everything about it and still getting the same amount of money, how is that competition? Like how you haven't made the market and like, what was your, what were you trying to do, EU? Presumably you're trying to increase competition, right?
24:23people can't put their apps on the iphone unless apple says they can so let's fix that by allowing apple to decide what apps can go on and collect money like i i find it hard to believe they would have done such a terrible job that all this would be allowed but maybe they did and maybe it's just a bad law anyway or maybe this rumor is not true or maybe this is what apple wants to do but eu will say no that doesn't fly we'll see how it shakes out but um it is baffling to me but i will say one thing just like i said before like why would anybody do this with that with the third party payments the answer was to own a customer there is still one thing that this eu law uh and this approach to satisfying it would provide that didn't exist before and that is and again this is another assumption based on information we don't know the assumption being that even though apple gets all its money and gets to like you know check the apps for malware and do whatever still i would assume that the whole point of this is that if you want to put an app on uh if you want to put an app on your own app store on the thing and apple doesn't want that app to be distributed they can't stop it so like if you want to put up a nintendo emulator or some other app that apple refuses to put in there you want to have a different web browser engine or something like that right what this would allow is yes apple gets the same amount of money yes apple still does code signing yes they scan for malware but apple can't actually stop you from putting up an ios version of chrome that uses the blink engine for example if they can stop that then this is totally pointless and i don't know why they did it at all but that is the one additional thing that even this terrible solution would provide uh if there's an app that apple wouldn't let you put in an iphone now in theory you can get it on there through one of these third-party app stores because apple won't i wouldn't say can't stop it but apple won't stop it uh speaking of apple and legislative and related issues uh apparently their workaround for the massimo related import ban on the apple watch is software.
26:16So over at Daring Fireball, John Gruber writes, Apple refuses to say so, but it seems clear that this is a software change. These new watch units still have the blood oxygen sensor, but the sensor is disabled by software. This workaround definitely does not apply to the already sold watches, even after those watches upgrade to future versions of watchOS. The reason why is that the ITC injunction is an import ban. Apple is banned from importing watches that violate Massimo's patents. Units that have already been sold aren't affected by import ban yeah that's what we were wondering about last time this seems like pretty solid info even though if it's not officially confirmed by apple uh and by the way if you go to apple's website and you go to the apple watch page you'll see a big blue banner on the top that fades to black after a few seconds it says apple watch series 9 and ultra 2 no longer include the blood oxygen feature i presume you won't see that banner if you're not in the u.s but if you are uh there it is boom right at the top of the page before it fades out uh never mind it might come back we'll see we are brought to you this episode by squarespace the all-in-one website platform for entrepreneurs to stand out and succeed online whether you're just starting out or managing a growing brand squarespace makes it easy to create a beautiful website engage with your audience and sell anything your products your content even your time all in one place and all on your terms squarespace has never been easier to use to make your website and business take off they now have this new Fluid Engine.
27:39This is a next-gen website design system from Squarespace. It has never been easier to unlock your unbreakable creativity. You start with one of their amazing templates. These are best-in-class. And then you customize every detail you want to customize so it really looks like yours. You have reimagined drag-and-drop tech that now works on desktop and mobile. You can really stretch your imagination online with the new Fluid Engine, built in and ready to go on all new Squarespace sites. And of course, Squarespace supports whatever kind of online store or business functionality you might need. Whether you sell physical goods, digital goods, or even service products, Squarespace has the tools you need to start selling online.
28:17Everything you might need is there. Things like flexible payment options, credit card, PayPal, Apple Pay, buy now, pay later service support, everything you might need for a modern high conversion rate checkout. You have analytics to back it up, email templates to send out campaigns and stuff. So much on Squarespace. You can see for yourself by building your site, with a free trial at squarespace.com. You can build the whole site in trial mode and see for yourself how Squarespace works. See how great it is for you. When you're ready to launch, go to squarespace.com slash ATP for 10 % off your first purchase of a website or domain.
28:52So once again, squarespace.com, start that free trial. See for yourself how great Squarespace is. When you're ready to buy it, go to squarespace.com slash ATP for 10 % off your first website or domain purchase. Thank you so much to Squarespace for sponsoring our show.
29:10And then we have some information from some, I'm going to call them optometrists, maybe they're ophthalmologists. I always get them backwards. I'm so sorry. But people, eye professionals, eye care professionals, let's go with that. Todd Zarwell writes, as further proof that you have a listener in every profession, I'm an optometrist, there we go, who has been listening to you since the days of hypercritical and build and analyze. Here's some information about the math of focal distances. If you're using metric measurements, the additional close power is just the reciprocal of the focal length and meters.
29:38If you're correct about the Vision Pro, excuse me, the Apple Vision Pro, having focal distances of 1.3 meters, then you'll need 1 over 1.3 or about 0.7 diopters of additional power or add power over your normal distance correction. So if you usually wear a negative 6D prescription for distance, you'll need about a negative 5.25D to see effort-free at 1.3 meters. If you wear a plus 2D to see far, you'll want a plus 2.75D. And if your glasses prescription includes astigmatism, this adjustment will only affect the sphere power. Of course, this is assuming you want the lenses to do all the focusing work for you.
30:14Most people under 40, womp womp for the three of us, can do all the focusing they need to see things up close. And I'd even say many people under 50, whoo, could focus up to 1.3 meters without additional add power. but trying to sustain that focus for long periods of time could become uncomfortable. I'd be curious to learn how the folks at Apple will approach this. Will they just use the distance prescription? Will they automatically adjust it by adding 0.75? Will it be age dependent? For example, under 40 years old, no adjustment, 40 to 45 year old plus 0.25, etc. I have a hard time believing that they'd want people to get specific glasses prescriptions that are adjusted to focus at 1.3 meters though.
30:48The easiest thing to do would be to just extrapolate from the distance prescription. Dealing with people's reading prescriptions, computer prescriptions, etc. would just introduce a lot of confusion into the process yeah this this uh brings up one point that i saw a lot of people asking questions about they're like why would it be a focal distance of 1.3 meter no one's going to have glasses that are calibrated to 1.3 meters they're going to have their distance glasses and their reading glasses for like reading distances with the ad power that we talked about and i was talking about like where you can go to your eye doctor and just tell them what normal distance you look at uh the the important point that's uh put out brought out by todd here is when you adjust prescriptions like if you have uh you know regular eyes with lenses, even if you're an old person, you still have the ability to use the muscles in your eye to squish your eyelids into a different shape to change your focal distance like that.
31:36That gets worse as you get older, but it doesn't go away. So you don't need a prescription exactly suited to your eyes in a total relaxed state at one point three meters. That's what I say. Accommodation, right? Like you could get that. You could say, give me a prescription. It lets me see 20 20 at 1.3 meters without me having to do anything with my eye muscles right but most people you know have some ability to change their focal distance by using their eye muscles it just decreases how much and how far you can go so you don't need glasses calibrated or prescription calibrated to 1.3 meters you can have it calibrated any distance away from that that you can accommodate by squishing your eye muscles to focus on that and again as you get older that the amount that you can squish gets worse because i guess your lens gets harder or whatever um because you're getting old and you're just getting crusty right uh that's why old people need two sets of glasses because they can no longer change their focal distance as much as they could when they were young and healthy and vibrant yes um but anyway hey i'm still mostly healthy and vibrant as todd points out uh if it's near the edge of what you can accommodate like you really got to use your eye muscles to really squish your hard little lens uh to to see it it might be uncomfortable a long period of time so you want some prescription that's close to 1.3 meters but don't think that you have to get a prescription that's exactly 1.3 meters when i was a younger person i just had one pair of glasses and i could see every distance with them and i didn't have any ad power to my prescription i was a young person i had supple lenses i would say here's my prescription and i can see right in front of my face and all the way down the road and that just changes when you get older right so that's the important thing to remember your eyes do focus themselves they have the ability to do that uh most people's eyes anyway i think if you get like cataract surgery and they put like solid lenses in there you might lose a lot of that ability but anyway um so don't think you need some special prescription and i'm also curious about what apple's doing because i would imagine they're just using your distance prescription because for most people with your distance prescription you can do 1.3 meters for me it's borderline if i put on my distance prescription i can focus at 1.3 meters but it hurts my eyeballs because I'm old.
33:42So that's kind of at the limit of my, but anyway, don't think you have, you don't have to buy glasses for every focal distance, right? Your eyes will do some work themselves. It's just a question of how old are your eyes and how much work can they do? Then Jaycon K writes, optometrist here, you mentioned the focal distance of the Apple vision pro, excuse me, of Apple vision pro. Hi, I'm Casey, uh, being 1.3 meters at powers are written as the inverse of a meter or one over 1.3, which is about plus 0.75. So people looking for a typical single vision correction at 1.3 meters would be their distance prescription plus 0.75.
34:13We typically test add powers at 40 centimeters, making one over 0.4 or plus 2.5 a common reader prescription. However, this all assumes the patient has no accommodation or eyes-focusing power that they are adding. Younger, thankfully, Jay Conkay provided a pronunciation guide, which I will now butcher. younger presbyopes still can accommodate or focus some so the bifocal strength is less i think that john this is what you were talking about interestingly the apple website instructs people to pick the reading insert that matches their prescription so i'm sure that if the lenses are compensating for the difference in the apple vision pro sorry in apple vision pro focal length versus how it's typically measured either way i'm really curious to hear more about the vision pro sorry the about apple vision pro insert process is so awkward why do they make us do this as well as feedback on the visual experience.
35:04Also, it's worth noting, I didn't realize this until just earlier today when I was doing research for the episode, there are two different kinds of inserts, and I think we're going to talk more about this later, but there's reader inserts, and that's Apple's words, where you just, I guess you kind of just tell them what kind of a script you want. Yeah, it's like the kind of glasses you can buy at the drugstore. Yeah, because you don't need a prescription to buy reading glasses in the U.S. You just know, oh, I'm a plus 1.5 or whatever. Right, right, right. And then there's what we have already been talking about, the full-on scripted or prescription inserts, which is what I think Todd Zarwell was talking about.
35:40And it sounds like JConK is more talking about the reader inserts. I wish I had given that context before. I apologize. But anyway, there you have it. Let's talk Vision Pro, baby. So the pre-orders have happened. I did notice, by the way, that the URL for the Vision Pro is not apple.com slash vision pro, but rather apple.com slash apple hyphen vision hyphen pro, because of course it is. But nevertheless, pre-orders happened. We'll talk about what we did or did not order in a minute and whether or not we caved or kept up to our theories from last week. But let's go through what was available to order.
36:18There were three storage tiers. The default was 256 gigs, which came in at$3 ,499. Then 512 gigs, so doubling that is an additional$200 to basically$3 ,700. And a terabyte is plus$400, so doubling it again. So a total of$3 ,900, which is a lot of money. Then AppleCare Plus is$500 or maybe$499 or alternatively$25 a month. And then there's a litany of accessories that you can order. So, gentlemen, please jump in and interrupt me when you're ready. We start with an extra battery. That is$200. There is a travel case, a bespoke travel case, which is also$200. It's like optioning a Porsche. Everything is at least$200.
Read the full transcript
37:05Right? Yeah, it's so true. It's so true. Yeah, the travel case in particular, like, ooh, that's a lot of money for that. It's made out of$1 bills. and annoyingly i knew that i think it was spigen speaking whatever they're called uh came out with a travel case that was something like 30 to 50 bucks and i saw that it was a thing and if i had ordered a vision pro i should have ordered it um and so i regret not having done so but that's neither here nor there don't worry like i mean so keep in mind also like you know stuff that's not proprietary to the vision pro like a case you know anybody can make a case very easily for this or a battery probably possibly well i don't know i think it has a custom connector we'll see how we'll see how it goes yeah but anyway like any of these things like you're basically paying for day one you know apple nice version of this it's always going to be a huge premium whereas if you just wait a few months at most you'll be able to buy like you know a million thirty dollar versions on amazon of things like the travel case and stuff like that yeah i looked on amazon to see if there was anything there yet i mean look like i i know what you got to in a second of like the belkin battery holder which is basically a plastic bracket for the battery that's 50 for your 200 battery yes i didn't we didn't actually put that in the show notes yeah i didn't put third-party stuff well but that's barely third party yeah they work with apple on this for sure but you can get a belkin uh piece of plastic with a liquid with like you know a belt clip for the battery for 50 because of course the battery in typical apple design the battery is just a smooth featureless blob of metal and you can tell even like even in the vision pro travel case for 200 to hold the battery they have to like strap it in because they designed this blob of the battery that has zero way to attach anything to it so you like so the only ways to attach it to things or to attach things to it are incredibly inelegant wraparound or you know straps or plastic kind of things like they couldn't have just put like a mounting hole or a slot or it's just like the air tag it's like you make a robotic core you add what you want to it but we're not going to tell you you need a clip what if you just want a slippery little stone you can't make it smaller but you can always make it bigger buy this 50 case all right all right so then light seals are 200 a piece so now let's let's look at this here we have a piece of electronics the battery we have a piece of cloth the case and we have a cushiony thing all of these things are two hundred dollars really these are equally valuable equally just the light seal that seems especially egregious because it's like it's a wear part it is well not i mean the thing on the front it's actually it's not the cushion yeah the cushion is what touches your face oh if you're thinking by the way oh light seal that's the thing that goes in your face no it's an extra 30 dollars to get a complete thing that goes in your face no no it says it says it includes the cushions in two sizes all right anyway replacement cushions are 30 bucks yeah but it but like if first if for instance you need to change the size of the light seal like if you're if you're adding another person to it or giving it to someone else or selling it to someone else they probably have to spend 200 for a different light seal yeah it's bananas and it's just like i mean what is this made of it's like you know some probably some kind of like you know rigid you know plastic frame with cloth wrapped around it it's 80 recycled material i mean it looks real nice for what it's worth i i don't i don't really begrudge apple for this being not cheap but this is quite expensive so yeah i mean i don't know what to make of it but anyway so light seal which by the way uh friend of the show quinn nelson pointed out to me uh somebody m1 astra on on twitter pointed out there appear to be according to this individual 28 light seal sizes my word whoa that's why they don't list them i put i put the sizes here but when you look at the light seal when you're trying to buy it uh it says what size is available they're going to make you measure your face with their scanner thing like you don't get to pick from a pop-up menu of 28 sizes you you use and what it gives you is like a number and a letter like i you know we'll talk about it with the ordering processes later but like it just tells you the size and presumably when you go to the store they'll do the same thing scan your face with the face id scanner and then it comes up with the size and obviously if you're at the store you could probably try it on if you're doing a tryout thing and decide it doesn't feel right or whatever but yeah a lot of sizes indeed then the light seal cushion as discussed is$29.30 sizes n and plus w and w plus i guess normal and wide narrow and narrow and wide not normal let's not be normative it's narrow and wide then we have the solo knit band so this is the one that goes behind your head if i'm not mistaken the one that the one that looks like it's the one apple wanted to make yeah it's the one that looks cool it looks less cumbersome.
41:42Less slapped together in the last minute. Right. So that's$100, which honestly, that seems more in line with what I would expect, because that appears to be a relatively complex thing to make. It's an inert piece of fabric with adjustable straps for$100. It has a knob on the side. Alright, sure. Okay,$100. And it does seem complicated to construct. But yeah,$100 in sizes, small, medium, or large. Then there's the dual loop band. Now this one, to your point, John, does look like they threw it together at the last minute. It's got twice as many loops and it's the same price. What a bargain. It's also small, medium, and large.
42:17Then the optical inserts reader style are$100. Optical inserts full-on prescription style are$150. Both of those are for pairs. $100 for a pair,$150 for a pair. And just to be clear, when you buy the Vision Pro, you get a battery, you get a light seal with a cushion, you get the solo band and the dual loop band. You don't get the optical inserts. of any kind so it's not like you have to add all these numbers you put up together you pick your storage size which who knows how anybody knows what storage size to pick because we don't really know what we're going to be storing on it um and then if you want a travel case you can add that on and if you if you need optical inserts you can add them on but everything else comes in the box with it so it does have a lot of stuff like i said it does come with both the straps which is nice you don't have to pick one of them yes at these prices it comes with 600 of accessories in the box yeah well can't afford not to buy one oh my gosh you're not kidding are you holy smokes no i'm not oh yeah all right so marco what'd you order i got the base model what you i didn't get any glasses i didn't get any extra storage do you not need glasses with it i don't think so so you know if we're correct that we're roughly doing like a you know 1.3 meter focus distance here i don't need the only glasses i need are reading glasses for up close stuff and my my minimum focus distance is still less than my arm length so i think i am fine i don't think i'm going to need any kind of reader insert but just if for some reason i do i can always just get those afterwards yeah well uh you heard it here first marco bought the base model of something i know i am shocked on purpose for himself no and i'll tell so i'll tell you why so okay first of all i didn't get apple care because it's 500 and i i don't see myself taking the vision pro many places and i think by the time i am using the platform that much if that time ever comes there will probably be another model out that i will probably want to upgrade to because i i think this again i think it's gonna be a fairly slow build up in like the app ecosystem and stuff like that so i didn't necessarily think apple care was net was worth it for 500 um also i'm pretty careful with my stuff most of the time so i don't see myself breaking it Anyway, and then on the storage tiers, I got the 256 base model because I'm considering this basically like an iPad.
44:33And I think, like, how do I use iPads? I don't foresee myself loading it up with a whole bunch of stuff to take on a plane that would actually exceed that level. And if it's anything other than, like, loading it up with media, I don't know what I would use that much space for. You know? I didn't want to like super option up this one and then have all these resources I never used. And then when I want to buy the next one, that's even better in two years to have invested so much in this one for stuff I never used. Oh, I totally I don't think you should be like ashamed or kicking yourself or whatever about getting this.
45:09It's just out of character. Yeah, it's just extremely out of character. And I'm very proud of you. Well, I mean, you know, when I buy iPads and stuff, I don't I don't ramp up the storage that much. yeah yeah but that's i mean it's kind of like you know you like you said you you know how you're gonna use an ipad it's a known quantity i think that's the problem with the storage in this one nobody knows like is storage going to be important or is it going to be like the apple tv where it's mostly a non-issue we don't know we don't know what the app ecosystem is going to look like and so everyone especially when you see these prices you're like let me just get the base one like because like you said marco if it turns out that you're wrong you're like oh i shouldn't have got that one it's constantly being filled up by the time you're annoyed by it you're just going to get the next model anyway so yeah and and i mean and to be fair like i do expect media for this is going to be large you know if they had a 128 i wouldn't have gotten that one you know but yeah like a 3d movie because it's got to have basically a separate movie for each eye or even you know what i what i expect to enjoy on this a lot is like immersive experiences put me on a mountaintop or whatever that i expect to enjoy a lot but i mean how many of those am i going to have on there at once like how big can they possibly be you know i i think 200 gigs of free space should be plenty for what will for my purposes mostly be a dev kit and a messing around occasionally kind of device well we still have like questions like but what if you turn on iMessage in the cloud oh all your storage is gone now but that's still no problem because iMessage gives you lots of ways to control how much space it takes up in your devices so don't worry it'll be fine No, it doesn't.
46:37It just takes all your space and there's nothing you can do. Focus. All right. So for me, I also ordered the base model. I did not get any accessories. I did not get AppleCare, although I'm thinking I might actually add AppleCare because I saw... We'll get to the repair prices. Yeah, I saw the repair prices, which we'll get to, but suffice to say, I think I might add AppleCare. And the part of the reason I think I might add AppleCare is if you'll permit me a slight tangent, I'd like to tell a funny story. So I was at a friend's house. It was a total of four couples, inclusive of Aaron and myself and the associated children.
47:12We were hanging out at somebody's house. This was, I think, the day of pre-order, the day after, something like that. I forget exactly when it was. But we're all hanging out, and they're all just beating me up in a friendly way about spending this pile of money on this thing that I may or may not even want. And that was totally justified for the record. But nevertheless, it was clear pretty quickly in the conversation that as much as they're giving me a hard time about it, everyone in the group was at least intrigued by this thing. And I started to explain, well, here's the thing though. I don't know if you could try mine.
47:44Like I'm happy from like, I'm happy to have you try it, but it may not be a particularly great experience because your faces may be differently shaped than mine. Well, they are differently shaped than mine. And you know, the light seal may not match. So then that got into a conversation about what the hell does that mean? What are you talking about? Blah, blah, blah. Well, how do we figure out if what we, if what you got works for us? Well, come to think of it, why don't you all bust out your iPhones and go and pretend like you're buying a vision pro. And so the next thing you know, and I wish I had taken a picture.
48:13I didn't have the presence of mind to take a picture, but the next thing you know, our video would have been even better. All of them are looking at their phones doing the, and I know this is not a video podcast, but doing the thing for scanning your face, like face ID style in order to get their size. And so everyone was checking out pretty much at the same time, checking out what size light shield they would need so they could see whether or not they could have a good experience testing out My Vision Pro. And the answer was of a total of eight people, inclusive, again, of Aaron and myself, and they were all boy-girl couples, as it turns out, all but two of the women could use my, or were sized to be the same as me, even though these body types are wildly different among the people that are allegedly the same size as me.
49:02the body types are wildly different which I thought was quite funny but yeah just imagine a total of eight adults you know all of us pretty much all of us in our early 40s just doing the thing all at once trying to size ourselves maybe it was one of those experiences you had to be there but it was hilarious to be watching all this go down but yeah I bring all this up to say and this is relevant for the AppleCare plus thing because even though all of them are probably better with their stuff than I am I just have a vision of like I have a vision ding of handing the Vision Pro from one person to the other and it dropping on some tile or something like that.
49:36And holy monkey, let's just skip forward to the repair cost. Don't you want to know if I ordered one? John, did you order a Vision Pro? No. Did anyone in your family order one? No, but I did go through the order process to get my size. You should have just told the people, oh, don't worry, if you want to try mine out, just buy a new light seal for$200. Right. Just$200 to try Casey's headset. that. Right, right. And then I would have a collection of them at the end. Oh, for the record, not that it matters, solo knit band, small, do loop band, small, light seal 21W. Yeah, someone was saying that they were getting different size measurements when they, whether or not they said they had prescription lenses, but it could have just been variability in the face scanning bit.
50:16I actually heard that a lot as well. In my understanding, which I am not sure is correct, is that it actually accounts for a little bit of depth for the inserts if you're getting inserts again i don't know if that's true i could be accidentally lying to you but it does stand to reason that maybe that's true i don't know just a theory yeah that's why i mean obviously i didn't order one but if i had i ordered one like it would just make me feel a lot more comfortable to be able to sort of try on to know oh yeah definitely you know especially since we don't know what like the the return exchange situation will be like uh because of the variability because it's just your phone scanning your face because some people have reported i guess if you're on a borderline between two different sizes depending on what mood it's in and when you scan your face if it's going to put you on one side or the other it's like trying on jeans i mean you can know your jean size but it really helps to try them on first right yeah i'm very curious and i think marco you had told me privately you're doing some in-store pickup somewhere is that correct yeah because i basically figured if for some reason the light seal doesn't fit right or whatever i figured that's a lot easier and they might even you know like depending on what the process is for in-store pickup.
51:22They might even have me take it out and try it on there before I go. So that I figure in-person is probably best for something like this. Yeah, I feel the exact same way in that. And partially because my delivery schedule for UPS and FedEx seems to be at the end of the day. And partially because it just seemed like a smarter approach. I am also doing in-store pickup. And so by the time I got through the ordering process, which we should briefly talk about, actually, but I went through the ordering process as quick as I could. I was trying to toggle between or I was alternating between my iPad, my iPhone and my Mac.
51:54And it so happened that the iPhone landed first. And that was excellent because that seemed to be the thing that was most equipped to scan my face and so on and so forth. It took a little while to scan my face, I think in part because I was in a relatively dark room in the house. I was in the office and it was still dark outside or maybe it was an overcast day. I don't recall. And you may be hearing this and say, but Casey, Face ID doesn't need light. It just uses infrared. head what difference does it make what the lighting was well i can tell you that the scanning that you do in the apple star app on your phone demands that your room is well lit i don't know why it does but i just tell you for a fact it will tell you that your room is too dark and face id will never tell you that because face id i believe does not use the plain old light camera it uses the ir spreader entirely so whatever they're doing for this thing apparently it also wants to actually see your face you need to be well lit it also it it threw me off too because it this one made me do just up, down, left, right, not a big circle.
52:49So I kept doing it wrong and it kept yelling at me. Same, exactly the same story. You trained us for years to do the roll your head around, to loosen up your neck muscles, and now you've got to go up, down, left, right. Yep, I screwed up, particularly, I think, they have you scan it twice, and I think it was the second time. I don't know why I did it right the first time and not the second, but I screwed up the second time because I was doing the roll, just as you were saying, Marco. And that is an important point, John. I appreciate you jumping in there. Yeah, I definitely got yelled at once or twice that the room wasn't bright enough.
53:15But nonetheless, it was really easy for me, other than my own issues following directions and doing up, down, left, or not doing up, down, left, right, and rather doing a circle. It was pretty easy. I mean, I didn't get the 8 o 'clock time slot, which is a little bit of a bummer, but I'm a big boy. I can wait 30 freaking minutes. And so, yeah, I put five stars on the ordering process. I thought it was really, really straightforward. I heard a lot of people had problems, particularly in busier stores, where they would go to pick a pickup slot appointment, whatever. And then during the time they're doing the financial portion of the checkout, then the pickup slot would run out of available spots.
53:54And I guess it was presented as a payment error, but really the issue was that the pickup slot had been snatched out from under them. And this is huge Apple energy to show either no error or an incorrect error. There's something wrong. But I didn't have that problem. Like it was lickety split for me. But I did hear a lot of reports of that. But I don't know of anyone that I had seen that was deeply interested in getting one that in plan to get one that wasn't getting one either day one or, you know, within the first week or something like that. And, you know, friend of the show, Alex Cox, they ended up ordering one late on launch day, if I'm not mistaken.
54:32and still was able to find a day one delivery. I don't think it was first thing in the morning, but still a day one delivery, which is pretty cool. Yeah, we'll get to the rumored sales numbers a little bit, but I hoisted up the repair costs so we can talk about that next. Ah, yes, thank you. I got myself sidetracked. So yeah, so as I was saying, as all of my friends are scanning their faces and we look like a bunch of dorks, nevertheless, it occurred to me, I will be potentially passing this backward and forward. And I think I will probably go on at least a couple of trips with this thing. And at first I thought, there's no way I want to pay$500 for AppleCare.
55:01And then I saw the repair prices. Cracked cover glass,$800. With AppleCare Plus, the extraordinarily affordable$300. It doesn't even save you the entire price? Of course it doesn't. You're paying$500 for this AppleCare Plus to save you a few hundred dollars? Well, wait for the next repair, though. And then additionally, what we assume to be a full replacement due to, quote, other damage. two thousand four hundred dollars if you do not have apple care two thousand four hundred dollars if you do not have apple care but it is comparatively genuinely affordable at three hundred dollars if you do oh my god so for me i think as long as they let me retroactively you know how they typically in the first month or so let you add apple care yeah i think i'm probably gonna be adding apple care because holy jamolies yeah well so here's the thing if you crack the cover glass wouldn't you just leave it cracked who cares if people can see your eyes as long as everything else works fine i think people are gonna be like yeah i'll pass on the 300 dollar with apple care glass replacement so people can see my computerized eyeballs but like what if it affects the cameras and stuff that's that's the question well well here's the thing like the two categories we'll put a link on the show notes to the web page the only two things you can pick are crack cover glass and other damage and other damages covers everything i what i'm wondering is like okay but what if there's no damage what if just like something goes wonky like your r1 chip fries itself or something is that also a 300 repair is like is any kind of thing 300 with apple care well that would be warranty for you know the first year for the first year yeah but after that anyway man so i i don't know i don't know how to gauge the apple care on this i remember when i noticed that the apple care had run out on my 2019 mac pro which happened several years ago at this point.
56:50And I was like, because if anything breaks on this thing, it's also like a bazillion dollars. So yeah, I mean, I guess this argues for the doing the$25 a month thing instead, so you can just continue it indefinitely. But for this particular product, if you make it for the first two years, you're probably buying a new or better one. Potentially. Yeah, because I can't imagine like, you know, if you get really into this two years from now, there's going to be a better one that you're going to want. And you're going to want it, yeah. David Schaub in the chat makes a good point. They only have one part other than a full hardware replacement.
57:19So that's probably why, at least for now, it's cover glass or anything else. It's just like the Apple Watch. They don't even replace the cover glass in that. It's just total replacement. Yeah. All right. The weight. So let's talk about weight. This is in grams. All right. So I'm going to start with other things and end with the Vision Pro. PlayStation VR 2, 560. Valve Index, 810. MetaQuest 2, 503 grams. MetaQuest 3, 515 grams. metaquest pro which is the closest i think most analogous device to the vision pro 722 grams the apple vision pro i'm sorry not the apple vision pro apple vision pro 600 to 650 grams depending on the light seal and the headband but john you helpfully reminded us of something can you tell me about why these numbers aren't really fair so some of these in fact other than the valve index all these headsets have their batteries built in whereas that apple vision pro weight is just the weight of the apple vision pro not including the weight of the battery and i think that's fair because the point is that apple didn't put the battery on the headset you put it in your pocket or wherever else you're going to put it with that 50 clip and so the weight actually isn't in the headset but you can see it's it's pretty heavy you know the the meta quest 2 and 3 are lighter and they have the batteries with them so the meta quest 2 and 3 are 503 515 and the apple vision pro is 600 to 650 and those those quest ones have the battery in the headset uh the valve index is the big chunker but it is also probably the the beefiest sort of gaming thing that includes the battery inside it anyway um i don't think it's outrageous i think the weight is reasonable i think apple did a pretty good job keeping it light i think apple made a wise choice not to have the battery uh as part of the headset uh i just wish they had made the dangling battery a little bit bigger yeah it doesn't this doesn't seem that bad i mean like my my big favorite headphones are 500 grams so goodness it i mean this seems like pretty normal for like high-end thing you'll have on your head i mean how much are the airpods max i'm trying to look yeah 384.8 grams you are pretty darn close i mean they feel really heavy on your ears for a long time but again that's part of their design um based on this the vision pro doesn't excuse me apple vision pro doesn't really seem like it is uh you know particularly heavy compared to its peers yeah and then uh apparently attaching the zeiss optical inserts to the apple vision pro there i go again to apple vision pro you don't they're not the boss of you casey you can say it however you want they're not going to come no i i'm trying to make a point i this is this is my uh you're not you're making a point by obeying their marketing uh edict no i'm making a point that it's so ridiculous that that this is the way they want it pronounced but nobody actually pronounced it this way except up marketing at Apple.
1:00:03It doesn't matter. Attaching Zeiss optical inserts to Apple Vision Pro requires pairing. On 9to5Mac, they write, the pair of Zeiss optical inserts comes with a personal code to pair the lenses to Apple Vision Pro. After attaching the optical inserts magnetically to the headset, users will have to scan the pairing code on the card inside Zeiss optical inserts box to finalize the pairing process. The code in question appears to be an app clip code that triggers a system action to pair the Zeiss lenses to the Apple Vision Pro. That's interesting and kind of cool so this this brings up a a point that was mentioned before right uh you may be wondering and i don't know if this is different in other countries why can you get readers uh like we were saying in the drugstore like you don't need a prescription you just go buy them uh whereas uh apple is insisting that you have a prescription uh signed by a u.s uh qualified optometrist or whatever to be able to even buy these inserts like why why all of the uh stricture around certain kinds of vision correction and not others i don't actually know the answer an optometrist will write in maybe in next episode and tell us here's my best guess my best guess is based on what we were just talking about like accommodation and everything that if you have if you put on a pair of readers and you pick the wrong one you pick plus 2.5 instead of plus point one or whatever uh that it doesn't cause as much eye strain like you're not going to mess up your eyes by doing it it'll just kind of like things will be blurry and things close up will be bigger than they were or whatever um whereas the prescription lenses that you need a prescription for like these inserts for for uh people who can't just use readers if you were to get the wrong prescription and wear them for a long time that it could if not mess with your eyes then at least cause problems with your eyes in terms of like causing eye strain uh and potentially i suppose mess with your eyes and i've seen a couple of stories recently about um what causes uh nearsightedness what causes people not to be able to see things far away was it was part of a scare story of like oh kids they're staring at the phone screens up close and if you do a lot of that it will make you nearsighted kind of like the thing that your parents used to tell you if your nose is buried in books you'll end up wearing glasses because you're focused on things up close and turns out there is some medically explainable mechanism within how the eye forms and grows over time that lends some support to the idea that if you spend a lot of time focusing, I think it's really close that your eyes can become misshapen in a way that makes you not able to see things far away.
1:02:27That's my guess. If you're an optometrist and you're out there and you know, why is it? Is, is it just some, you know, historical regulatory thing doesn't make any sense? Or is there actually a medical reason not to let people say, I know by a prescription, it's this, that, and that, give me these lenses uh is that why we're not allowed to do that in this country or is it just some weird thing and anyway this pairing process you only need to pair i think the ones that well we'll see when people get these i would imagine you don't need to pair the readers for the same reason that you don't need a prescription to buy the readers but we'll see how that works out if you do need to pair the readers then i don't understand this feature at all you can even get these engraved by the way because it's hard to tell like one insert from one person insert from another they like magnetically snap in but i think you get free engraving on them or you can put your name on the inserts so if you have a whole family using the vision pro and they have different inserts and presumably different 200 face shields uh that's how you can do it just look for the tiny incredibly low contrast engraving that you won't be able to see without your actual reading glasses and then you'll know which inserts to put in wonderful All right.
1:03:26We made a brief mention of this earlier in the episode. Mark Gurman writes, I've been told that Apple's initial inventory for launch weekend is about 80 ,000 units, which the company sold out in the first hour of pre-orders. Is that true, though? I don't think that's actually true. Well, read the next rumor. These are all people guessing about how many units they have. German is usually pretty well sourced, but, you know. So then Ming-Chi Kuo writes, Apple sold between 160 ,000 and 180 ,000 Vision Pro headsets during its first pre-order weekend, according to Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. I'm sorry, this is being recounted by Mac rumors.
1:04:00Quo said that the headset sold out soon after the pre-order process opened, with shipping times for all models slipping by five to seven weeks. While the instant sellout and extended shipping times appeared to be positive at first glance, Quo cautioned that shipping dates remain unchanged 48 hours after pre-orders opened, indicating that demand may quickly be tapering off after core enthusiasts place their orders. Again, it's hard for me to square this, which I'm not trying to say that they're wrong, but square this with what Alex had, where they were able to order, I think it was like my evening time and still get a day one delivery.
1:04:30Now, maybe they're saying for the first weekend. First weekend is two days, right? Fair, yeah. It's not like on the very first day. Like, I didn't check, but if you were to go to order now, I'm assuming you can't get day one delivery. Yeah, I didn't check either, but I presume you're right. But I mean, the thing we all don't know, and we're trusting rumors like German or whoever to tell us, is like, we don't know how many have been made and are ready to ship to people. And, you know, I presumably only Apple knows that. Well, so I haven't confirmed this, but Chris3 in the chat writes, I just went on and could get one for the 3rd of February in-store, but late February if shipped.
1:04:59Yeah, that's the other factor very often with everything that Apple sells. If you try to get it shipped to your house, you get one shipping date, but if you're willing to go to a store and pick it up, you get a different one because I guess there are different pools of inventory for retail stores. They always want to have stuff available in retail stores at the expense of people who are ordering it for delivery. So we'll see what happens. And then, of course, we have to bring up the reseller market, and there's a post on 9to5Mac which talks about this, And apparently, based on both what 9to5Mac has found and what we looked at briefly, it looks like generally it's between$5 ,000 and$10 ,000.
1:05:33Yes, I said$10 ,000 for one of these. I did try to look for completed auctions on eBay, and I think I did find one for something like$5 ,000. So that's the thing. yeah it's some story i wish i had the link for notes of saying like you know that's people who wanted to resell this basically had found a way to automate the process that we all just described of like going through the apple store app and scanning your face and buying one apparently they found a way to automate that i don't know i'm just picturing like mannequin heads or something or whatever so they could order tons of them for resale that that was the story i don't know if there's any if the story is true i don't remember where i saw it but i just just imagine you know the motivation to get a bunch of these on day one so you can resell them kind of like ticket scalpers is motivating somebody to come up with a way to quickly and in an automated fashion go through the face scanning process and then a couple of videos that are i genuinely think are worth your time first of all there's the apple vision pro guided tour which you can find on apple's website there's different segments but they stitch them together into one cohesive movie that's something like 10 minutes.
1:06:37And I think it's a pretty good representation of what the Vision Pro is all about. And they do briefly talk about using your Mac within the context of Vision OS. I wish I had a better, shorter description for that. But anyways, they show that among many other things. The one funny thing about this, though, and I'm not the first to point this out, is that they have someone who they claim had never used a Vision Pro, which I do take on face value that that's probably true. But the person, the gentleman that's using the Vision Pro, they have a persona or they have the eyesight turned on and I'm pretty sure...
1:07:12They set it up off camera. Exactly. So they must have at least done enough setup to get through the orientation process and eyesight scanning process off camera. Yeah, that was a really weird... I have a hard time believing that those were his first reactions. They're actors. Don't tell anybody. And they were so, the reactions were so well in line with how marketing wants to describe things. And everything was so effusive. They're reading from a script. Don't tell anybody. There is no way. It's a commercial. Yeah. Still. I thought it was tastefully done. I thought it was nice. Yes. We all want to believe that we will be happy in our beautiful clutter-free home, led through a magical experience of this Apple product by attractive, charismatic people.
1:08:00That's the thing. Like, the content of it was good. Just like that, the conceit that, oh, this is allegedly this person's first time ever. I don't really buy that. I thought it was fine. I mean, the important job, the reason I think that it's worth looking at is if you're wondering, if you just want to see for the umpteenth time or you've never seen it before, what are all the things you can do with this? They go through all of them. Here you go. This is what it looks like. You can do this. You can use an app. You can look at a movie. but you can do, they just go through it all very quickly. And it's a nice overview.
1:08:28It's a guided tour. I thought it was a well done video. If someone, if, for example, like Casey, if you're having dinner over somewhere and they're like, what is this thing you're talking about? I would send them the link to the video and say, if you actually want to see what this thing is that we're talking about, this video will more or less explain it. You know, as long as you get the idea that what you're seeing very often is what that person is seeing inside the headset, you'll be fine. Yeah. They also have a like minute and a half long making Apple vision pro video, which is very much you know marketing it's almost like you know it's the sort of thing that usually accompanied johnny in his white room uh but it was a seriously sweet 90 second video so it's worth your time uh it's it's bananas the stuff that they're going through in order to make these things so it's trying to make you feel better about the price you say well it is really complicated to build and we have a lot of fancy machines although i always wonder with these things like how do square the beauty of these videos and the machines making it with what must surely be the much more cluttered and sad looking factories where things are put together with workers being oppressed by you know like it's just there's there's the marketing video of the factory and there's what a real factory looks like and how the people who work in that factory feel about working there and it's i think there's still some distance between those by the way some quick real-time follow-up i also just now checked the vision pro ordering to see like how back ordered is it now and so now we are almost a week from ordering being opened up i'm able to get all three capacities at it like not at like any store i want but at a store that's that's you know within a decent drive for day two or three delivery like february 4th february 5th february 4th like it's all like you know really right there so maybe there's some and and they're all back but you know for mail order out to like february 28th but that's a little that's very surprising to me like i think maybe obviously you know they're going to probably reserve a lot for for retail but maybe these are not actually selling out as quickly as we think well again we don't know how many they made if they already made as many as they can make like they made all of them now and they're just sitting there waiting then yeah you're not going to sell through a year's supply in the first week uh but if they made uh you know 20 000 of them they still have some left that's much more concerning but yeah only apple knows i also wonder if they favored and i think Marco, you were just alluding to this, if they favored the retail experience.
1:10:49And I wonder if they have regional caches of Vision Pros or something like that, which they can easily get to a retail store, but maybe is a little bit harder to get into the shipping ecosystem for whatever reason. I know nothing about logistics. Maybe that's an extremely – well, it is an extremely ignorant to say. Some people were speculating that Apple might be making decisions about what other countries to open up based on how much stuff they have lying around, like for Canada or whatever. So we'll see. Speaking of other countries, that was a perfect segue. Thank you, John. Apple Vision Pro, App Store, Apple Music, and TV app require U.S.
1:11:20Apple IDs. So this was stated on Apple's website in the pre-order section, but MacRumors has a pretty good summary. for international customers who are thinking of purchasing Apple Vision Pro in the United States and using it in their own country, Apple has cautioned that they will be faced with several limitations when attempting to use the device. According to an FAQ on Apple's Vision Pro pre-order page, first of all the Apple Vision Pro only supports English US for language and typing and English for Syrian dictation. Number two, Apple Store excuse me, the App Store requires an Apple ID with region set to the US.
1:11:54Number three purchases on Apple Music and the TV app require an Apple ID with regions set to the US. Number four, for customers with vision correction needs, Zeiss will only accept vision prescriptions written by US eye care professionals and will only ship to US locations. Number five, customers may not be able to access certain apps, features, or content due to licensing or other restrictions in those countries or regions. And finally, number six, Apple support is only available in the US. This is fascinating. This is particularly fascinating for a lot of our mutual friends. I don't recall where I heard the story, probably on connected or maybe app stories, but the length to which, uh, uh, Federico and, uh, and Mike have gone to procure these devices is astonishing and it is worth listening to their stories.
1:12:38Again, I would look at connected. Uh, I probably won't put a link in the show notes because I'm not sure where I heard this for sure. Um, but anyways, it is worth investigating this because it is both funny and amazing what they've done in order to make this work. But yeah, it is kind of crummy for those not in America. And I get, especially if they're inventory constrained, why they would start here. But I do feel for our, you know, European and UK friends. Also, I'd be terrified to change the region on anything happening to do with my Apple ID because of all the horror stories I've heard about it.
1:13:05Oh, yeah. You don't want to do that. You're basically just going to end up using a test ID, which is great because, again, if you used your own Apple ID and you sync your messages, it would just fill the SSD. I don't know that that's true, but I'm just bashing on Apple's poor control of storage on the iPhone when it comes to messages. Hello, listeners. We are brought to you this episode by ATP Membership, and you can join today and become a member yourself. Here's what this gets you. First of all, the big one, an ad-free version of each episode. You have your own private RSS feed to add to whatever podcast app you want, so you can listen ad-free with your own feed there.
1:13:42You also have a bootleg feed. This gives you unedited copies of the live streams. Many listeners choose to listen this way because it's kind of like a raw, uncut version of the show. Usually has some extra bonus stuff kind of mixed in here and there. You get to hear Casey swear. It's totally unedited and it comes out right after we finish recording. So it comes out usually about a half a day to a day earlier than the regular show. And then also you get bonus episodes exclusively for members. We've done a lot of really fun bonus episodes recently. Everyone's raving about the connectors tier list.
1:14:15we've also done some movie episodes some different tech stuff non-tech stuff food stuff it's a lot of fun so all of that with atp membership at atp.fm slash join it's about eight dollars a month or whatever your local currency might be we have annual discounts we have gift memberships now so much stuff in our membership program so consider becoming a member today it is the best and most direct way to support the show and we give you all this cool stuff and we think it's pretty fun and our members seem like they enjoy it. They keep telling us how much they're enjoying all the extra stuff, the bonus episodes, the bootleg, stuff like that.
1:14:50So check it out, atp.fm slash join. Thank you so much for considering it. And now back to the show.
1:15:00Let's do some Ask ATP. I think we've actually slacked on this accidentally for the last couple of weeks. So one way or another, we're getting back to it, baby. Nigel Warren writes, listening to the, quote, Vision Pro Tidbits segment, of episode 570. I was struck by how the lens inserts complicate things in a variety of ways. Do you know why the Vision Pro doesn't have some kind of focal adjustment diopter like a camera viewfinder would use? Sure seems like it would make the buying using sharing of the device easier. Are there specific requirements or constraints that make it not practical for a headset?
1:15:30Do other headsets use lens inserts or have some kind of built-in adjustment system? I thought a lot of other headsets, or at least the MetaQuest, I thought they do take inserts, but I am talking way outside my comfort zone. Do one of you actually have facts to share about this? Well, I mean, I think this ties into everything we just discussed. All right. So what I was speculating about, is there something about prescription lenses that justifies us having to have a prescription in this country to get them, unlike readers, right? In other words, some kind of health damage or thing that could be done that will be bad for your eyes if you're just allowed to do it willy-nilly you really need someone to give you a prescription if that's true then maybe they don't want to provide the type of adjustment but setting all of that aside the much easier explanation is any kind of adjustability for lens stuff uh it adds space and complexity maybe not a lot but it is additional space and additional complexity versus snap and inserts and i can imagine the snap and inserts can be higher quality because it is just one lens element that doesn't move that's exactly the right position that is exactly your prescription and then finally there's more to your prescription than can be adjusted easily now obviously you can adjust it when you go to the eye doctor you know that big thing you sit in front of and they go one or two three or four and it's got a million different lenses that go in front of your eyes that can adjust for everything that's the it's the doctors you know it's their device for figuring out what your prescription is but there's more than just that you know the sphere number or whatever you can have the stigmatism they make you look at the lines tell you which one is thicker Like it is possible to do all those things.
1:17:02But when I look at the size of the thing at the eye doctor, I think to do that well probably requires space. They don't want to spend on the inside of this device. Space, weight, complexity, cost, all that. Those, I think, are the main reasons that this doesn't exist in the Apple Vision Pro. Because it makes for a smaller, lighter, simpler headset not to do that. And especially if you wanted to do it well. I don't know the details of what's going on inside that big thing in the doctor's office, aside from things tumbling in front of my eyes and things looking different. But I know it's not as simple, especially, again, if you have astigmatism, of just having a lens that you move farther and closer and farther away from your eye.
1:17:41If you have bad enough eyes, there's all sorts of things that can be wrong with them that are not solved by taking a single lens element and moving it farther or closer to your eye. Lawrence Koteff writes, Do you have an email backup regime outside of Time Machine or local computer backups? Recently, a family member accidentally deleted all of their iCloud and email in the Mac Mail app, not realizing that they had all the folders selected when they hit the delete button. And being a very fastidious email user, they immediately emptied the trash folder without noticing. Apple does not provide any way to restore trashed email, so we were left with restoring the mail database from a backblaze backup.
1:18:13This got most of them back, but apparently Apple Mail does not always download and store the contents of emails and attachments. So many of them were blank and lost. I haven't found an obvious solution for automatically backing up an email account and I wanted to know if this is something you have considered before. For me, it is not. I don't have a good answer. I'm not terribly worried that I will put myself in that position, I say, as I knock on wood. But I don't have any good answer for this. Marco, do you do anything about this? Not besides just local file backups. First of all, I am not an aggressive trash emptier.
1:18:47like that's i mean like the the purpose of the trash is to be like a buffer so that you're not like if every single time you delete anything you immediately empty its trash you know whether it's in your mail app or the you know the trash on your mac you're kind of you know ruining the point of the trash i think of that every time i delete something from my media volume on my synology because the finder says just so you know i'm going to delete this immediately and not move to the trash is that okay and the only choice you have is yes it's okay or no don't bother deleting it yeah like so i i think getting getting out of the habit of trashing everything or emptying the trash constantly like that is that would be extremely beneficial for you know to whatever degree you have control over it for you know whatever people you're talking about here um you know so i don't have this problem because i i let the trash be the trash i let it be a temporary buffer for deleted stuff in case i need to go get something out of it that i accidentally threw away or decided I didn't want to throw away.
1:19:45And I only empty the trash if I'm running low on space. I find it funny that both of my children, both in real life and on their computers, never empty the trash. Because unless you are out of space, you need the space right now, there's not much reason to empty it right after you've been deleting things. Oh, there's a reason. There's a reason, the same reason that this person's relative emptied the trash. That reason is very simple. A full trash icon bothers people. Oh. That's what it is. it's like it's like notification badges right i wish there was a way in the finder to say don't show the crumpled up paper because it makes people want to empty it makes me want to empty the trash yep that's a fair point john do you have any backup strategies for this what do you think i'm sure you do of course i do how many is the question right so this is uh you know so here's the things i do with my email all right first strategy so i use gmail for everything i use the gmail web client i use it and like it but i also use apple mail for this one purpose which is to pop to use the pop protocol to pull my gmail using pop down to my mac because that way i know i've got a copy it's not like imap where it might be somewhere else and you know the problem they were having it's like oh but mail didn't have all the mail locally some of it was still on the server i use pop which is an older dumber protocol which says just give me a copy of the mail from the server and i use apple mail periodically run it so it will pop all my gmail down and fill its apple mail database but of course i don't trust apple mail as far as i can throw it so that's just one thing i do the main thing i do once per year on a calendar you know reminder that i think it's sometime in december i use the very good google takeout feature that allows you to download data your google data onto your computer and google will make you a tarball tar.gz file of all your gmail on demand whenever you want it and i do that once a year and that gives me all my i think it's in like inbox format or whatever so worst and then of course once those are files they're in my backup vortex and they get backed up or whatever so worst case scenario i'm gonna lose on average six months of mail assuming my apple mail thing totally doesn't work at all which again i'm not sure i entirely trust it so those are my strategies pop from gmail using a mail client that i don't actually use for mail and i just launch apple mail every once in a while and just let it run in the background and then quit it right because it catches up pretty quickly and then google takeout i suggest everybody who uses gmail as their main email thing put a reminder in your calendar once a year once every six months whatever you're comfortable with to download all your gmail you can set the options it will give you a single file a single multi-gigabyte file depending how much mail you have it compresses really well so gzip compression will get it down pretty small because it's mostly text and that's what i suggest and then yeah that put that file into your own personal backup vortex and have it go on time machine and your super duper clone and your cloud backup the whole nine yards Severin writes, do you use iMessage contact key verification?
1:22:35I just stumbled upon it in settings in iOS 17.2.1. I've never seen it before. So in short, this is a mechanism by which you can verify that the people you are talking to are the people they claim to be. You can do a manual contact key verification by way of getting a key and then over like FaceTime or a phone call, whatever you read your two keys and verify that they're what you expect. I don't use this because I don't think anyone's going to man in the middle of me for state secrets. I just don't think I'm important enough. But I don't know. Do you guys use this? Let's start with Marco again.
1:23:11No, for the same reasons. I didn't know about it until fairly recently, but I think it's a pretty recent thing. I think it's iOS 17.2 that added it. But I don't really have the need for this level of security in my iMessage. Now, if this becomes easy and on by default and everything, then sure, yeah. but you know for the same reason i don't use that like ultra lockdown protection mode of ios i forget what that's called lockdown mode is that it yep yeah so i don't use that either for the same reason that like you know i don't i don't really deal with data that's sensitive or and that big of a target uh but if i were dealing with very sensitive stuff if i was like a whistleblower or a journalist or you know like that would be different then i then i would be very happy these features are here but the way it is now i don't need them john i do actually want to try it with somebody because i want to see how onerous it is it seems kind of onerous like it seems like a burden that you would not want to deal with unless it was like super important like marco said like you're you're in an actual secure situation where you want to make sure you're talking to who you think you're talking to i just wanted to see what that burden was do i have do you have to like use some side channel to do something is it done all through the phone i was willing to try it but i haven't found anyone to try it with so i currently do not have this enabled or used at all and related to that uh 17.3 is out now iowa 17.3 and it has the stolen device protection and i turned it on i turned it on on my phone and i had my wife update hers and turns it on on her phone and i'm trying to get my kids to turn it on have you guys turned it on i haven't yet but i probably should i have it and i'm doing test phone probably this weekend with it because that's one of those things where like because like she can access our shared bank account and stuff like i feel like this is like a family it security policy thing that is worth uh you know closing all the doors on well they can still get to your banking out they just can't take over your apple id well but again yeah that's that's it's it's a high risk enough situation and also her passcode hygiene is not great anyway the reason i did it on my wife's one is remember the the family photo library is on her apple id now with the great shared library feature i get access to all of them but technically it's her Apple ID.
1:25:20So having her Apple ID get taken over is really the worst case scenario, not mine. Although I have all the purchases so we'd lose all the movies. But honestly, I'd much rather lose the movies than the photos. So yeah, I want her to have stolen device production on. Thanks to our sponsor this week, Squarespace. And thank you to our members who support us directly. You can join us at atp.fm slash join. And we will talk to you next week.
1:25:46Now the show is over. They didn't even mean to begin, cause it was accidental. Oh, it was accidental. John didn't do any research. Marco and Casey wouldn't let him, cause it was accidental. It was accidental. And you can find the show notes at atp.fm. And if you're into Twitter, you can follow them at C-A-S-E-Y-L-I-S-S So that's Casey Liss M-A-R-C-O-A-R-M-E-N-G Marco Arment S-I-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-R-A-C-U-S-A-C-U-S It's accidental Accidental They didn't mean to Accidental Accidental Tech Podcast So long has adam or tiff shown any enthusiasm for the vision pro adam because he is so into the quest uh three yeah he's so into that he has requested that i please let him try it tiff doesn't care at all what does adam know that there's no controllers yes and because he's a big fan of um because there are so the quest two some games could use like just hand recognition the Quest 3, based on what he's told me it seems like that has gotten better but not every game will use it so he still uses the controllers and it makes sense, I can understand why for gaming purposes controllers are generally a better option because you want the higher precision, you want maybe more buttons because most of the gesture recognition of these systems, it can do a handful of gestures, no pun intended but it's not doing every single finger individually, stuff like that and latency is better with controllers presumably yeah i would assume so uh you know when you look at the vision pro it's very clear that this is a device that's made for computing first and games maybe second or not at all right exactly whereas like you know the quest is a game console and to be fair to apple like you can just use like a playstation controller with the vision like that's their solution essentially oh you want to play a game in the vision pro just literally use your xbox or playstation controller right which is not the same thing as a vr controller which like in the like in the valve games like oh you have a virtual hand and you're reaching out to grab the ladder or the gun or the bottle like that's not a thing that apple is showing or promising at all it's more like oh you can put something in front of you and here hold the playstation controller now you get low latency fast access to buttons yeah yeah so but it seems it seems like you know the way apple has designed the vision pro they they want it to be a computer and that is a very different set of priorities and a very different set of choices than game consoles the quest series those are game consoles first that facebook keeps trying to make computers and they're not very good but they're they're game consoles and you know and all the stuff that the vision pro does that's not games adam doesn't care he might someday but he doesn't now it's not his job he's 11 he hears about games he might like the movie thing or the panorama like imagine if they have like a you're riding on a roller coaster immersive experience thing that'd be fun to do like but i'm thinking about games and the vision pro all that resolution that's good for looking at like your documents is not good for games games don't want to push that many pixels they want high frame rates and you can't get high frame rates in a you know a headset type thing with a low power soc and gpu on there and so not having so many pixels to push is an advantage to those less expensive ones but yeah the only thing i can think of where it'd be an advantage is oh you're on a roller coaster that you might want to see in HDR 4K for each eyeball.
1:29:33Yeah, but I feel like I would think that's amazing. I don't think Adam would... He would just be like, okay, that's cool. And then he would just go back to his game. Show him the gerbils demo from Quickdraw 3D. Neither one of you knows what that is. Nope. Do you know what Quickdraw 3D is? I know what Quick... Quickdraw, that was like the toolbox functions in the original Mac that made fast window drawing stuff, right? Yeah, it was the drawing API. You know what CoreGraphics is now? quick draw was so what was quick draw 3d yeah so quick draw 3d was at a certain point and this this is the time when apple did its quote-unquote most serious push into gaming they made libraries for gaming stuff called game sprockets they had input sprockets and a bunch of other sprockets were like handling joysticks and you know doing game type stuff and they had a 3d api you know like instead of open gl or direct x or whatever and they called it quick draw 3d and it was it was you know it was 3d api just like all those other ones i described except for much much worse and uh and made by apple and one of the demos they had for it like in a typical apple fashion once they came up with quick draw 3d like it works everywhere there used to be a desk accessory called the scrapbook i don't know if you guys remember that nope you go to the apple menu to pick scrapbook and it was just basically an application with a bunch of like a horizontal scroll bar and a bunch of different things and what could you put in the scrapbook anything you wanted you could paste in text you could paste in images you could paste in a movie and once quick draw 3d came out you could paste in 3d objects so you'd get a mac with quick draw 3d and you'd open the scrapbook and there would be a 3d model of a palm tree that you could rotate anyway one of the things they had i believe it was a demo application called gerbils i think and it was a quick draw 3d application that uh modeled I believe a bunch of supposedly furry gerbils riding on a roller coaster in in 3d if you can find a movie of what gerbils look like uh it is the most hilariously not impressive to young people thing you've ever seen in your life and the frame rates were awful I don't think there was any 3d hardware acceleration either so it was all in software not an impressive experience but if someone can port gerbils to the apple vision pro I guarantee a bunch of old people like me that actually had a Vision Pro will buy it for 99 cents and try it.
1:31:49I'm like, yeah, so they'll sell like 12 copies. Right. Yeah, yeah, no, it's a big market for gerbils. Ha ha ha ha ha ha.
From the publisher
- Pre-show: YouTube updates
- Follow-up:
- SCSI DB-25 was on the back of Macs, not DB-50
- iOS Screen Sharing is a thing
- On Apple’s 30% cut and payment processing fees
- The Art of the Possible (John’s blog post)
- Whose customer is this, anyway?
- Apple’s compliance with EU law is likely to go exactly as expected
- Apple Vision Pro optics (via Todd Zarwell & jkahnk)
- Apple’s software workaround for Masimo-related import ban
- Apple Vision Pro preorders
- Accessories
- Battery
- Belkin Battery Holder
- Travel Case
- Light Seal
- Light seal sizes? (via Quinn Nelson)
- Light Seal Cushion
- Solo Knit Band
- Dual Loop Band
- Optical inserts (readers or prescription)
- Please don’t break one 💸
- Weight
- You have to pair the optical inserts
- Launch inventory was 80,000 units?
- Reseller market is optimistic
- Apple Vision Pro Guided Tour
- Sorry, non-🇺🇸
- Accessories
- Ask ATP:
- Does the Apple Vision Pro work like a camera viewfinder? (via Nigel Warren)
- Do we do anything to back up our emails? (via Lawrence Koteff)
- Do we use iMessage Contact Key Verification? (via Severin)
- Post-show: Family Apple Vision Pro vibe check
Sponsored by:
- Squarespace: Save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code ATP.
Become a member for ad-free episodes, member specials, and our early-release, unedited “bootleg” feed!