In short
Awards Chatter Podcast Episode Summary: Joachim Trier - 'Sentimental Value' [LIVE]
Podcast Overview
- Podcast Title: Awards Chatter
- Host: Scott Feinberg
- Episode Title: Joachim Trier - 'Sentimental Value' [LIVE]
- Episode Description: A live discussion featuring Danish-Norwegian filmmaker Joachim Trier, reflecting on his family's film history, his acclaimed "Oslo trilogy," and his latest Oscar-nominated film, 'Sentimental Value.'
Key Themes and Concepts
- Filmmaking Influence: Trier discusses his family's legacy in the film industry, particularly his grandfather, Erik Löken, a filmmaker and resistance member during WWII.
- Personal Reflection: The film 'Sentimental Value' draws from Trier's experiences with family dynamics, memory, and grief, especially after becoming a father.
- Exploration of Memory and Identity: The dialogue emphasizes the themes of memory, identity, and the struggles of adulthood, central to Trier's work.
Notable Discussions
Family Legacy in Film
- Joachim's Background:
- Born in Copenhagen to a Danish father and a Norwegian mother, both involved in film.
- Grandfather’s struggle during WWII and impact on his view of storytelling.
The Oslo Trilogy
- Overview of Films:
- *Reprise* (2006): Explores two friends' ambitions and struggles as writers.
- *Oslo, August 31st* (2011): A follow-up on themes of addiction and loneliness in contemporary society.
- *The Worst Person in the World* (2021): Centers on a woman navigating her 30s, examining love and identity.
Sentimental Value
- Film Synopsis: Explores the complex relationships between two sisters and their father, dealing with themes of grief and reconciliation.
- Oscar Nominations: The film received nine Oscar nominations, including Best Picture and Best Director, making a significant mark for non-English-language films.
Creative Process
- Collaboration with Eskil Vogt: Their partnership has evolved, with both contributing to writing and directing in unique ways, while focusing on character depth and emotional narratives.
- Directing Style:
- Emphasizes trust and intimacy with actors, often working closely with them to create a safe environment for exploration.
- Utilizes the notion of "going to zero," encouraging actors to reset and explore their roles without the pressure of previous takes.
Cultural Impact of Cinema
- Art as Rebellion: Trier's perspective that tenderness and empathy can be forms of rebellion in contemporary art, reflecting a need for connection amidst political turmoil.
- Purpose of Film: Emphasizes the importance of cinema in understanding human experiences and emotions, especially in challenging times.
Key Takeaways
- Joachim Trier's films delve deep into personal and societal themes, reflecting on memory, identity, and the complexities of human relationships.
- His unique approach to filmmaking involves collaboration, emotional authenticity, and a focus on the intricate dynamics of family and love.
- The critical acclaim surrounding *Sentimental Value* speaks to the increasing recognition of international cinema and its relevance in today's cultural landscape.
Conclusion The episode provides profound insights into Joachim Trier's creative process, the significance of family and memory in his work, and the broader implications of cinema in understanding human experiences. As *Sentimental Value* garners recognition, Trier's voice emerges as an essential perspective in contemporary filmmaking.
---
For further engagement, listeners are encouraged to subscribe to the Awards Chatter podcast and follow on social media for updates on upcoming guests and live events.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOIntroducing Joachim Trier and His Work
1:10 to 2:15
An overview of Joachim Trier's background and previous films.
“He was until recently best known for his massively acclaimed Oslo trilogy, comprising 2006's Reprise, 2011's Oslo August 31st, and 2021's The Worst Person in the World.”
Overview of Sentimental Value
2:15 to 3:21
Discussion about the film Sentimental Value and its achievements.
“Then, four years later, came the film that we've just screened here 2025 Sentimental Value, which has taken things to an even greater level.”
Joachim Trier's Early Life and Family Influence
3:21 to 4:25
Joachim shares his family background and early influences.
“a tally exceeded by only three other non-English language films ever.”
The Story of Trier's Grandfather
4:25 to 7:17
Insights into Trier's grandfather's remarkable life and legacy.
“Where were you born and raised and what did your folks do for a living?”
Full Circle: From Legacy to Personal Achievement
7:17 to 8:31
Joachim reflects on his career and his grandfather's impact.
“a part of the financing system that I've been so fortunate to grow up in, where there is government support for personal types of movies in Norway.”
Memory and Its Role in Filmmaking
8:31 to 11:10
Discussion about memory's significance in Trier's work.
“Talk about just this idea of memory, which also is kind of omnipresent throughout your films.”
Joachim's Skateboarding Past and Its Influence
11:10 to 12:44
Exploring how skateboarding shaped Trier's creativity and filmmaking.
“Well, I think, I don't remember if it was Jimmy Stewart or Frank Kappa or somebody, but they referred to movies as pieces in time, pieces of time, which is what, you know, which I think what you're saying.”
Skate Culture and Filmmaking Connections
12:44 to 14:03
Joachim discusses the intersection of skate culture and film.
Influences and Early Creativity in Filmmaking
14:03 to 15:11
Learn about Joachim Trier's early inspirations and creative processes in skate filmmaking.
Transitioning from Skating to Filmmaking
15:11 to 16:43
Explore Joachim's transition from skateboarding to pursuing a career in film.
“We were working as cable dashers in a live TV show on Saturday night in Norwegian television.”
Show all 41 chapters
The Importance of Collaboration with Eskil Vogt
16:43 to 17:48
Discover how Joachim's partnership with Eskil Vogt began and its significance in his career.
“It was just because we knew someone that was working in the...”
Finding a Writing Partner and Collaborative Process
17:48 to 19:06
Learn how Joachim and Eskil developed their writing process and the evolution of their collaboration.
“So it was because I thought I was going to London to meet some screenwriters I could work with, and Eskel felt the same about France.”
The Oslo Trilogy and Its Autobiographical Roots
19:06 to 20:40
Understand the autobiographical elements and themes explored in the Oslo trilogy.
“like all of that that we call dramaturgy form and also mise en scene how do you shoot it how do you tell it all of that comes out of the writing and I couldn't find someone to share that with at the National Film School.”
The Role of Anders Danielsen Lie in Reprise
20:40 to 22:38
Learn about Anders Danielsen Lie's casting and his significance in Trier's films.
“We've developed through six feature films and 20 years of doing features.”
The Themes of Friendship and Artistic Aspirations
22:38 to 24:51
Explore the themes of male friendship and artistic ambition in Trier's film, Reprise.
“And then we're both very engaged in that.”
Life After Reprise and Navigating Opportunities
24:51 to 27:50
Gain insight into the changes in Joachim's career following the success of Reprise.
“I want to ask you about Anders Danielson Lee because, first of all, if you've only seen Sentimental Value, I almost envy you because you're going to get to go discover these other films that we're talking about.”
Challenges in Filmmaking After Success
27:50 to 28:05
Understand the challenges and pressures Joachim faced while trying to find his voice post-Reprise.
“So that movie, Reprise, came out when you were 32.”
Life After Oscar Submission
28:05 to 29:23
Discussing the opportunities and personal challenges after the film's success.
“How did your life and opportunities change after that film came out to the world?”
Exploring Oslo August 31st
29:24 to 33:54
Delving into the themes and inspirations behind the film Oslo August 31st.
“This was apparently inspired by an old French novel, which had then been made into a Louis Mao film, The Fire Within in 1963.”
Dramatic Scenes in Oslo August 31st
33:55 to 36:25
Analyzing key scenes and their emotional depth in the film.
“And at the time, I didn't quite know how to...”
Casting Renata Reinsfeld
36:26 to 40:14
Discussing the casting process and journey of actress Renata Reinsfeld.
“now and we were talking about like how to make the personal distant enough so that you could as an actor put your own feelings into a character without having to defend the character.”
Transition to English Language Cinema
40:15 to 42:00
Exploring the transition to English-language filmmaking and its impact.
“Was that something that you had been hoping to do or were being told it's time to do?”
Connecting with Audiences through Personal Stories
42:00 to 43:00
Learn how personal experiences and storytelling help build a rapport with audiences.
“and I felt that that was a way to reach more friends.”
Challenges of Filmmaking in English
43:00 to 44:10
Discover the challenges faced by filmmakers when shifting to English-language films.
“At Cannes, it was my first film in main competition.”
The Art of Long Takes in Filmmaking
44:10 to 46:00
Explore the significance of long takes in creating emotional moments in film.
“We also had the amazing Amy Ryan and David Strathairn.”
Diving into Genre Filmmaking with 'Thelma'
46:00 to 47:20
Understand the motivations behind exploring genre filmmaking in 'Thelma'.
“What made you want to do a genre film for the first time?”
Casting and Collaborating with Actors
47:20 to 49:20
Learn about the importance of casting and collaboration in filmmaking.
“You know, I think you need to try different instruments.”
Creating 'The Worst Person in the World'
49:20 to 53:00
Discover the creative process behind the film 'The Worst Person in the World'.
“There's so many great actors out there, and it's so hard to be an actor.”
Innovative Storytelling Techniques in Film
53:00 to 56:00
Explore innovative storytelling techniques and audience engagement in filmmaking.
“Well, a couple other just quick things about why you decided to do it.”
Exploring Humanist Themes in Film
56:00 to 58:20
Discussing the balance between storytelling and audience interpretation.
“if it kind of had that humanist spirit to it.”
The Challenge of Representation in Writing
58:20 to 1:00:40
Joachim Trier discusses the importance of diverse perspectives in storytelling.
“And this was, again, her first leading role in a film.”
The Art of Directing: Building Trust with Actors
1:00:40 to 1:05:00
Trier shares insights on developing trust and collaboration with actors during filming.
“I can't just run next to a long tracking shot.”
Going to Zero: A Directing Technique
1:05:00 to 1:07:20
Explaining the concept of starting fresh with each take to enhance performance.
“Just quickly, though, going to zero, which is apparently a very effective direction for Renato, what does that tell her to do?”
Thematic Exploration in 'The Worst Person in the World'
1:07:20 to 1:09:40
Discussing key scenes and thematic elements that shaped the film's narrative.
“and they know what they brought from all those previous scenes that they've shot anyway.”
Tenderness as a Narrative Element in 'Sentimental Value'
1:09:40 to 1:10:01
Trier reflects on the emotional depth and themes of his latest film.
“So in the middle of that, her romantic notion that to be, how do you say, alleviated or removed from time for a moment as a kind of a beautiful idea.”
Exploring Tenderness in 'Sentimental Value'
1:10:01 to 1:11:35
Joachim Trier discusses the themes of grief and trauma in his film.
“And then four years later, you're back in Cannes, with sentimental value.”
The Impact of Parenthood on Creativity
1:11:36 to 1:14:28
Trier reflects on how becoming a father influenced his filmmaking approach.
“Your parents divorced when you were quite young.”
The Role of Art in Challenging Times
1:14:29 to 1:17:02
Trier shares his thoughts on the purpose of art and the importance of hope.
“I don't mean to come off as pretentious, but I feel sometimes when I defend what I do, because there's a lot of smart things to do in life.”
Challenges During Filming and Collaboration
1:17:03 to 1:18:38
Trier discusses specific scenes and the collaborative process with actors.
“I didn't want it to be like, oh, Jogun's making a film about how great film people are, you know.”
Reflections on Oscar Nominations and Gratitude
1:18:39 to 1:24:03
Trier expresses his feelings about recent Oscar nominations and their significance.
“So during the shoot, was there a scene that gave you the most pause?”
Oscar Nomination Excitement
1:24:03 to 1:24:34
Learn about the significance of Norway's Oscar nomination for fiction films.
“So I don't know what to expect, but we're super excited already by being nominated.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This podcast is brought to you by Netflix, presenting Frankenstein. Nominated for nine Academy Awards, including Best Picture, Adapted Screenplay, and Supporting Actor Jacob Elordi, the New York Times calls it stunning the movie Guillermo del Toro was born to make. Nominated for three Actor Awards, including Jacob Elordi, who gives the most transformative performance of the year. Winner of four Critics' Choice Awards for the outstanding artistry behind the hair and makeup, costumes, and production design, Frankenstein, for your awards consideration.
0:39Good evening, everyone. I'm Scott Feinberg, the executive editor of awards coverage, The Hollywood Reporter, and a trustee professor here at Chapman University's Dodge College of Film and Media Arts, from which, I will say for our listeners, this episode of Awards Chatter is being recorded. Tonight, several hundred students and I are fortunate enough to be joined by one of the world's great filmmakers. A 51-year-old Danish-Norwegian writer and director who has been described by the New York Times as sensationally talented, a meticulous craftsman, and incapable of making an ugly image, close quote.
1:13Black Book Magazine, which once hailed him as one of the most interesting young filmmakers to emerge in years and the master of gutting cinema, may have put it best when it wrote, quote, His films are poetic and haunting, honest and visceral, telling stories of friendship, illness, love, ambition, foolishness, and intellect that are both playful in their style and striking in their frankness. He was until recently best known for his massively acclaimed Oslo trilogy, comprising 2006's Reprise, 2011's Oslo August 31st, and 2021's The Worst Person in the World. Each of which he directed and co-wrote with Eskel Vot Are set in Norway's capital Explore memory, identity, and time Center on upper-middle-class, intelligent, but self-doubting protagonists And star the actor Anders Danielson Lee While two of them feature, to varying degrees, the actress Renata Reinsfeld The worst person in the world was Oscar-nominated for Best International Feature and Best Original Screenplay Then, four years later, came the film that we've just screened here 2025 Sentimental Value, which has taken things to an even greater level.
2:24Sentimental Value explores the complicated relationship between two sisters who were raised together in the same old home in Oslo and their father, equally complicated, who left them and that home when they were young, but has now returned following the death of their mother. The film had its world premiere at last May's Cannes Film Festival, where it received a 19-minute standing ovation and was awarded the festival's grand prize. It subsequently won European Film Awards for Best European Film, Director, and Screenplay, and the BAFTA Award just a few days ago for Best Film Not in the English Language.
2:59And it was nominated for the Golden Globes for Best Picture Drama, Director, Screenplay, and Non-English Language Film, the BAFTA Awards for Best Film, Director, and Original Screenplay, and the Critics' Choice Awards for Best Picture, Director, and Original Screenplay. Meanwhile, Still Pending is a nomination for the Top Producers Guild Award to say nothing of nine Oscar nominations, a tally exceeded by only three other non-English language films ever. These for this film include Best Picture, International Feature, and Film Editing, one for each of its four principal stars, and two for our guest tonight, Best Director and Best Original Screenplay.
3:39We're going to get into all of this and more, And so, without further ado, would you please join me in welcoming Mr. Joachim Schreier. Thank you.
4:04Wow, I almost fainted back there after your wonderful introduction and now with these wonderful people. Well, thank you so much. Well, and thank you for being here. I know this is a very crazy time at the end of a very crazy season. So we really appreciate you joining us. And on this podcast and these masterclasses that we do here, we always start at the beginning or at least the ones that I do. Can we go back to the very beginning? Where were you born and raised and what did your folks do for a living? Sure. And that all ties into film, you see, because I was born in Copenhagen. My father's Danish, my mom's Norwegian, and my mother from early on wanted to be a filmmaker.
4:45And she became more and more a documentary filmmaker. My father is a sound designer and sound recordist for films. And they met through my grandfather, who was the director, my mother's father. So my father worked for him. And he said, well, he said to his daughter, be careful with that Danish sound guy. He's a bit of a charmer. And a year later, I was born. and they're wonderful, funny people, my parents. I love them very much. They're still around, both of them. But they, after a while, decided to move to Norway when I was three. So I grew up in Oslo. Now, let's talk about your grandfather, this maternal grandfather who you referenced, because not only was he, like your parents, involved with film, but he had a pretty unbelievable story of his own, which kind of comes full circle with your career.
5:31Talk about who he was and how he made his name. Yeah, I'd love to talk about that. Thanks for asking. His name was Erik Löken. He was imprisoned during the war when, and maybe people don't know that in America, but Norway was occupied by the Nazis and created sort of a Vichy government style where they were ruling a country that was obviously against it completely in a very difficult time for almost five years in Norwegian history, a very dark chapter in our story. And my grandfather was imprisoned and was a part of the resistance. during that period, a very brave man, but also a man who was very tormented by that experience.
6:10And after the war, I think he first became a jazz musician. And I think it was a way to, I know that sounds weird after being traumatized, but maybe it's not, maybe that I speculate, was a way to try to get back into life and create meaning through doing something that had an emotional impact on others in a positive way. And then decided to become a filmmaker. He made a film called The Hunt in 1959. It went to Cannes in 1960. and this was unheard of in Norwegian film almost because Norway is a very small country. It was under Sweden and Denmark during the centuries and what had barely gotten its independence.
6:47And then, so we didn't have a big film industry. And he makes this film that he thinks is a jazz movie. It's experimental, it's playful, it jumps around in time. And the French called it New Wave, Nouvelle Vague, you know, because that was going on in France at the time. And he said, no, I call it jazz movie. And I think it was a huge deal for him. But the problem was when he came back to Norway, it wasn't really recognized. There wasn't infrastructure to really handle his career. So he only made one more feature in his life. But, and here's, I guess, where I come into it, is also that I'm very proud that he helped create a part of the financing system that I've been so fortunate to grow up in, where there is government support for personal types of movies in Norway.
7:29It's only 5.5 million people. So there isn't that huge commercial industry. There needs to be some government, some money coming from somewhere to be able to sustain the industry, and my grandfather was a part of creating that. So when I came back to Cannes with Louder Than Bombs, my third film in 2015, I think, yeah? There hadn't been a Norwegian film competition since 1979 or something. So I remember walking up those steps on the red carpet there where everyone's taking pictures, and I was very moved. I was almost tearing up because it was kind of a full circle for that kind of dream of continuing some family tradition.
8:10And you're allowed to call me a Nepo, baby. It's okay. But for me, it was a big deal. Well, and not only that you got there in 2015 with your own film, but that 10 years after that, your film, Sentimental Value, goes there and wins the grand prize. That's pretty incredible Full circle moment Thank you very much Let's talk though about how The seeds of There were a bunch of varying things That seem to have led you To want to become a filmmaker Not just the fact that other people in your family had done this But I mean one thing you've said is Quote as a child I was obsessed with memory And I think it coincided With the discovery of death close quote I imagine that your grandfather who I think passed away when you were eight or nine was probably one of the first people you knew who died.
9:01Talk about just this idea of memory, which also is kind of omnipresent throughout your films. No, it's true. I think as a child I actually lost, because my parents were very young when they had me, I lost both my grandfathers, Danish and Norwegian, and my great-grandparents on my mother's side, all within a period of three or four years when I was a child. And I remember wondering, and I'm not from a religious background, so there wasn't this narrative of life after death for me. And I think that has affected me. You're inviting a personal conversation, so I'll be straight with you. So I think that has affected me.
9:46I also feel that as a child, and I also see this in my own young children, that we all go through a moment when we start caring about our perception and the mind and memory because it plays into our idea of self, of identity. And the moment you really discover language and you can communicate and you start slowly discovering that the grown-ups don't have all the answers and you also start living long enough, maybe you're five, maybe you're eight, something between there you start really feeling that time passes you realize that you're getting older and you can think back and memory becomes a thing and you realize that you're creating a narrative inside yourself about what happened and you realize maybe also that it can have a discrepancy from how other people remembered it or even how people tell you that it happened you know and that's very interesting that's a scary thing because you're an individual and makes you vulnerable because the world is suddenly not completely coherent and also if something is the past and then something can also disappear because time moves towards a point when you won't be there anymore and you maybe remember someone who isn't there and so forth so all of this when i talk about it i know it sounds very childish but i think it's fundamentally human those notions play into films for the simple reason that if you give a kid a still like a chance to take a photo or film something they will see that that's the closest they get to creating a memory that's that's the easiest way of doing it you know either you tell it verbally or you film it and you show it and say that's how it was almost like you're yearning as as a young child for some way of grasping and holding on to something that you're scared of losing, right?
11:41Well, I think, I don't remember if it was Jimmy Stewart or Frank Kappa or somebody, but they referred to movies as pieces in time, pieces of time, which is what, you know, which I think what you're saying. And another thing, though, in terms of you talk about picking up a camera, I don't know if this was what brought, you know, led to that happening the first time, But I want to talk about a part of your resume that probably most people don't know, which is that from the age of 12 to the age of 18, you were a big time skateboarder. And this was actually outlawed in Norway skateboarding from 1978 to 1989.
12:21And the year the ban was lifted, you became Norway's national champion skateboarder. so talk about talk about how your involvement with skateboarding but also filming skateboarding began because i don't think it's uh irrelevant to the fact that you've gone down this road right you were that was you were making films no thank you you've done amazing research i'm very impressed there my secret past is a skater no i um no i'm proud of that that was a big deal in my life that skateboarded that was great I saw back to the future three times in the cinema I'm sure at least and I got a hold of a skateboard I got my parents to help me smuggle into the country because it was illegal I'll explain quickly the reason it was banned was that in 1979 there was a new act where they tried to illegalize dangerous toys you know some toy that would catch fire by itself because it was made out of some cheap material and you know that's reasonable but they threw skateboarding in there as a dangerous toy which is ridiculous but as the culture developed and it became an underground thing and everyone skated and the police were kind of going what we can't confiscate all these skaters it's ridiculous you know so it became legal and i was allowed to travel around i was a sponsor skater and and i came to los angeles a lot of a lot of great skaters from orange county and la and you know that that's really that's that's the that was the mecca of skateboarding well and and i believe and this is kind of odd but quite a few of them have become very respected filmmakers i know you're buddies with mike mills absolutely and i think they're there i think spike jones yeah yeah spike jones yeah yeah no and i even saw his skate films before i saw his fiction really and admired him tremendously and mike as well mike mills amazing i think one of my favorite filmmakers in the world and and yeah and he was also a skater and comes from that and he took it into graphic design and then into movies and music videos and no so there's a lot of creativity but again i filmed a lot my friends and cut them into my own small skate videos they weren't you know videos that were were professional and i was just 16 but still i learned a lot you know from filming my friends and i even if i look back at them now they were also me trying to film a summer who did the best tricks and who almost broke their arm and falling down a staircase and putting cool music on it, punk music very often, and we would kind of count the culture.
14:54There was all that at play, but there was also this feeling that after a few years, and this will also lead me to some of the material in my films, I think, later on, I had both the privilege but also the grief of knowing people from all strands of society. Skaters were, at least in my generation, a lot of undiagnosed adhd boys that were fun and crazy and we all loved each other but some of them ended up in bad places and i lost quite a few friends to drugs people that also died that way and i look at those skate films with kind of a again trying to capture that summer but seeing that along the way afterwards we lost some of them you know so you stopped at 18 i guess because of an injury and then at 19 you're seemed to by that point have begun to transition to doing it was an injury i injured myself all the time i kept skating i broke everything i broke in my arms and my no no actually i i just because of movies okay i wanted to just i just wanted to film more than i wanted to skate and i know so if 18 was when skating ended 19 just shortly after that you're in one of your first you know kind of menial jobs in in the film and television or in this case television side of things back in Norway right and you have what I think you've described as the most important meeting of your life aside from meeting the person who became your wife who is Eskil Vogt and how did you first cross paths yeah Eskil Vogt my dear friend collaborator through all these years, short films and six features.
16:38We were working as cable dashers in a live TV show on Saturday night in Norwegian television. It wasn't actually to get into movies. It was just because we knew someone that was working in the... It was a good Saturday job and it was well paid. So there was a pecking order. All of the camera people were sitting one place eating lunch and the cable dashers that watched it, they didn't run over the cables during live TV shows were sitting at another table. and it turned out he loved Fellini and weird movies and so did I and we we started exchanging VHS tapes and became really good friends and that friendship I I believe continued through the next few years when you go off to film school initially in Den the first I do a year at Denmark European Film College where you can do everything and then I went to a specialized course at the National film tv school in london in london and he meanwhile was also studying but in france yeah he then the year later got into la femise which is the national french film school and at the time there were we were lucky because there was cheap uh euro rail tickets between like your star you could go between paris and london we feel very fancy they were cheap and we could go back and forth and still be friends even though we were studying in different countries and was that even then was it an idea of we're gonna maybe we're not i mean it was it sort of the idea that we're we're working we're not just friends but we're collaborators or you know maybe we can motivate each other to to start writing and making things or when when did that first evolve into the idea that you might actually both team up to to do more than what you'd been doing in college which I think you were already making shorts after you come out of college you're you're making commercials and stuff, but when did you and he officially team up?
18:27So it was because I thought I was going to London to meet some screenwriters I could work with, and Eskel felt the same about France. And it turned out that I didn't match with anyone, and I had all these ideas I wanted to make into short films, and I panicked. I didn't know how to meet someone. I couldn't find someone. It was a very personal thing. I learned going to the National Film School how personal it is to make movies. how much the first the formal elements of I want to shoot it this way I want to cut like that and I want to come around like this and then I want you to know something about the character but here I don't want you to understand anything and then here I want you to understand something and like all of that that we call dramaturgy form and also mise en scene how do you shoot it how do you tell it all of that comes out of the writing and I couldn't find someone to share that with at the National Film School.
19:20Just maybe different tastes, you know. So I went to Eskild. So a lot of people don't even, their thing is, I'm gonna go do this on my own. It seems like you knew that it was wise to pursue having a writing partner? Yeah, I'm not good at writing. It's hard for me. You know, you feel your talents, you know. It's like I come from my father's side, my great-grandfather, and my grandfather were quite famous painters in Denmark, and I see my dad and my brother can draw. They have beautiful way of drawing. My hands can't do it. I'm really bad at drawing. And when it comes to writing, I'm not great at it either.
20:01But I actually, since I was a kid, know how to pick up a camera and look at something and create a space inside a film, and film a human being in the way I want to, and all of that, and cut it together intuitively. that came easy for me. I'm not saying it's easy for me to make films. I don't think it's easy for anyone. It's always a struggle. But that came easy. Writing the film was hard. So Eskil kind of saved my life in a way. I went to him. I said, dude, can you help me? And it became the greatest collaboration of my life. And we're going to go through the features that you've directed and co-written with him.
20:38But just generally speaking, how does it work with you and him writing? Has it been different on different films, or is it always, you know, we're going to go to the same room together for this amount of time and work this many hours a day and do, you know, I'm going to do this and he's going to do that, or is it a mishmash on different projects? We've developed through six feature films and 20 years of doing features. It started, we both wrote, and then we realized that he had to kind of figure out some of the scenes I wrote anyway, like figure them out and make them nicer. And he writes much faster than me.
21:11And actually what we have done for the last, really last four films, is that we sit together and come up with the material together and structure it quite well. So we are at a point where we have a step-out line and we have like a phone book of ideas. And all the characters are thoroughly discussed so that what we're seeing in the scenes are only the tip of the iceberg. We know their whole life and we love them and we care about them. so we never discuss by the time Eskil writes out the film alone in maybe six weeks time and he sends me in the evening and we talk every day on the phone but we're not in the same room at that stage we've been together for months and months but at that stage he writes alone but we did never I mean we agree on the characters we agree on most of the scenes maybe it will throw in some new ideas he's having and I'll enjoy them or not and maybe along the way I'll suggest something else as well and then there's a very important moment when you have a first draft and it's too long and you turn off the phones get up early in the morning with coffee and we go into separate rooms in a writing office and we sit and we read through it and then we redraft quickly every day for like maybe we do five drafts in nine days or something and it's like 24 hours you know like really getting it done and that's what we call a first draft we really redraft quickly when we have the almost draft, we call it.
22:37That's a very important thing. And then we're both very engaged in that. So the first film that you co-wrote and you directed, which was also the first film in what came to be described as the Oslo trilogy, was Reprise. It comes out in 2006. It's about two friends in their early 20s who dream of being successful writers. How autobiographical was this? Now, one of them in this case, who was played by Anders Danielson Lee, who would, again, he's all the way through sentimental value in your films, but his character has a breakdown and has other things which may or may not have been related to. But this idea of two writers that literally the film begins with them turning in their manuscripts and, you know, let's see where.
23:25I think they say we have to get the hell out of Norway, which is another thing that may have at one time occurred to you guys. Seems that you went to film school abroad, both of you. Anyway, how much did that come out of your own experiences? Had you asked us then, we would have blushed and said, no, not really much. They're very different than us. but what the beauty of it is of course we revealed ourselves and I thought I was shy about it for that film when talking about it afterwards revealed in the sense that it was about the core themes of what we were caring about at the time worried about at the time trying to figure out at the time we were working our way through what the characters were as we were writing them at the same time biographically they're quite different than us and everyone wanted to know who's who and all that and And we hadn't had exactly those problems.
24:17Maybe we had friends who had similar situations, but it was the theme. The theme, when I say theme, I think that's the right word in English, the subject matter in a way. The theme for me is what you want the audience to think about and feel about and relate to in the film. What is that material area? So in that film, the area was about how can you believe that you're good enough to live off of being an artist? And what will that do to your friendships? And what is male friendship as opposed to figuring out how to be with the opposite sex? Love versus friendship. In the case of these specific two boys.
24:58I want to ask you about Anders Danielson Lee because, first of all, if you've only seen Sentimental Value, I almost envy you because you're going to get to go discover these other films that we're talking about. but Anders in Sentimental Value is the actor who she asked to either slap her or sleep with her, but he's more the lead of the Oslo trilogy. How did you first find him, and why do you think you guys clicked to the extent that you kept going back to him? I think people also might be amazed to learn about his life beyond the screen as well, which I imagine you discovered as you got to know him.
25:40So just how did he enter the picture? Yeah, I think I've learned kind of to work with actors a lot through working with Anders. So Anders is educated as a doctor, and he played a role in the film as a child. He was a child actor in one film when he was 11 years old. So when we wanted to make the first film reprise, we knew we were going to get people that were 23, 24, and then we couldn't look in Norway for a lot of educated actors. We had to ask stand-up comedians, musicians, people who had done anything. So he came in in sort of cattle call situation where we have hundreds of boys of that age.
26:16And he was just so funny and smart. But he was a doctor. He was almost finishing his doctor degree as a general practitioner. And he's still working as a doctor a lot of the time still. And he's an incredible jazz pianist. He's written a couple of books. He's very, very impressive. but the challenge was so we worked together on reprise and I remember asking our casting person casting director at some point I said we need to have someone who you could believe is intellectual enough and 23 to have written novels that were good and I remember him coming back after quite a few people and saying is it enough if you believe they have read a novel so it was kind of hard to find that very sharp intellectual type that Anders was but when he came in, it was solved.
27:07The challenge, though, at the time after, was after a priest, he became a bit of a celebrity in Norway, and Elle magazine, a fashion magazine in Norway, had their annual The Sexiest Man in Norway thing, where he came out number one the year after, and he was at the time back to being a young doctor working for free as an idealistic doctor in an STD clinic for young people where they can have free consultation. And he was on the cover of Fashion Magazine. So people came there and, yeah, I know, had rashes that weren't quite right. It wasn't good. So anyway, so it became a bit weird for him. But he's been a very good doctor.
27:48Yes, and actor. So that movie, Reprise, came out when you were 32. Very well received. The New York Times film critic Manolo Darius described it as, quote, one of the most passionately and intellectually uninhibited works from a young director I've seen in ages, close quote. It was also Norway's Oscar submission. How did your life and opportunities change after that film came out to the world? Were people trying to get you to, you know, come and work in Hollywood, for instance? Yeah, kind of, which at first is very flattering. It is flattering and it was well intended by those people, but I hadn't quite found my voice yet.
28:27So I started just reading a lot of screenplays and came out to L.A. and met a lot of wonderful people and felt I wasn't kind of quite good enough to figure out how to do other people's material and felt guilty about it. So I went into a bit of a crisis and then a few years passed and I figured out I had to do another film. And honestly, you think when you made a film that, okay, I can do it and it's going to be easy from here on, but it wasn't easy for me. And I then quickly did Oslo August 31st with Eskel. and again Eskil comes to help me and we said let's do another film together and of course we wrote it quick and shot it quick and worked with Anders again and it felt great and that kind of got me through the next one.
29:13So that was this what again we now look at as the second installment of the Oslo trilogy it's five years after the first Oslo August 31st. It centers now on Anders playing a guy named Anders. In this case a 34-year-old drug addict who is let out of his rehab facility to go to a job interview, but then stays out until the wee hours of the next day, which is August 31st, seeing people in places that once meant a lot to him, but now leave him feeling differently and alone. This was apparently inspired by an old French novel, which had then been made into a Louis Mao film, The Fire Within in 1963.
29:57I guess the common thread through all these incarnations, though, is the idea that you can be in a crowd and still feel alone in a sense. What led you and Eskil to that material? You know, that's, again, kind of, not that it was a strict adaptation of the prior book or the film, but why that material? And then I think maybe you alluded to this when you were talking about friends who you'd lost from the skateboarding community, but with Reprise, we'd seen a guy who'd had a breakdown. Now we're seeing a guy who's just been devoured by addiction. So just subject matter wise, what led you there? I've known a lot of different people, as I said earlier also.
30:37And I have a very, very close friend. One of my best friends is a skater who actually survived heroin addiction. But I've also lost some friends. And I've often asked myself the questions, what happened to those people we couldn't bring with us? Why wasn't it me? Why don't I have that addiction thing? Was it family background? Was it genetics? All that mystery weighed on me and also on Eskel in different ways because of his other experiences he's had. And we've both known suicide in our lives. And I think there was something about seeing also to be in the middle class and be resourceful and having all these choices in a very safe environment like Norway, even despite that, a lot of people have crises.
31:26I mean, I think a lot of the drama I've seen in real life deals with people being their own worst enemy, people that don't know how to tackle life, even though they are shamed about it because they feel that they're privileged and they should be amazing and they should be great and they don't know how to live up to the expectation they have to themselves. and I think to get cinema to a place where you can really get into the internal conflict rather than to just make a bad person, like an antagonist in the story, but really get into how people can be their own worst enemy was also August 31st.
32:01Through reading the Piaud-Trieu, La Rochelle book you're referring to, The Fire Within, La Feu Follet in French, it's a little bit different than the story, but I read it. It was written in the 1930s in France, and it was really about this super hip, resourceful dude who, opposite to the Louis Malle film where he's an alcoholic, was actually a morphinist junkie like the people I'd known. And I was like, wow, this is an existential story. A guy who looks at his life through that dark glass and says, what's it all worth? So it's a way not to just look at addiction, but also look at all his friends and asking the question, what's the meaning of it all?
32:40and seeing how vulnerable a lot of people feel in their 30s if they're not a part of the kind of mainstream conventional life of finding a partner, having a safe job, having kids, and doing that whole thing, how alienating and complicated that can be. And the story gave me an opportunity to talk about that. And also, I have this thing in cinema that I think it's a great art form to talk about loneliness because the way I want to make films, ideally they're seen in the room like we're in right now. We're all sitting together and we're sharing something. And you know how it is when you sink in with someone in the cinema?
33:21Maybe it's a comedy and you just feel like you're having the best times with all these strangers that you're laughing along with or you're maybe silent with them because you're feeling a shared pain for a character on screen and maybe you're going through some feeling of empathy together with strangers in the dark in a cinema. So these stories of loneliness, and I think you said it well, this idea that even if we're in a crowd, we can feel alone. And that's a subject matter I think is true to a lot of people. We go through those phases. So Oslo August 31st is a very important film to me because it's a film where I came out of a crisis myself.
Read the full transcript
33:58Like, can I make another film? And who am I? And at the time, I didn't quite know how to... I was grappling with not addiction. I wasn't so bad off as this guy, but I can understand how it is to feel a bit lost. So I thought it was very important to make that film. That's great. And there are so many scenes I could ask you about, but I want to ask you if you can just share a little bit about two. There's, first of all, the scene in which Anders and his friend Thomas are on a park bench overlooking the city. I believe it's a 10-minute scene. and one of the things Anders expresses is basically you know that if he takes his own life it's because he wanted to he wanted it to be that way like it seems like that was the gist and then the other one is a scene where Anders is in a cafe by himself listening in to other conversations between people who seem to be you know functioning better than he is and it's it's almost a amazing it is an amazing thing of sound design where it's like tuning in to different conversations almost like you know people have likened it to shifting the radio and so those two there are so many scenes that are memorable from that film but just anything you can say about those two i think we wanted to formally explore a film where we could have very different types of scenes in one movie and see if we could make it interesting and work dramaturgically because it's has the frame, the dramatic framework of 24 hours, you can kind of allow it to play out like a day.
35:36In a day, you will have moments when you're talking a lot and you have moments of great silence. And we try to make that a part of the way we told the story, basically. So we really went into long dialogue scenes and long silences in the same movie and tried to make those two energies work for the experience. and I think that impossible conversation of a friend who's kind of asking for permission to not be around anymore is an impossible conversation and I think both Eskel and I have felt we've been parts of being that person who has been with people who've had a really hard time and the impossibility of that and I'm not saying the film is made from a perspective of guilt but a sense of grief over the impossible tasks.
36:22Not that it's exactly the same again. I was talking to a young writer here outside who's amongst you now and we were talking about like how to make the personal distant enough so that you could as an actor put your own feelings into a character without having to defend the character. You know I find that liberating that all of these characters that you see in my film are not quite someone I know not quite me or not quite Eskil but I can understand them through some experience and some personal thing or maybe I can stretch myself into understanding them it's not always that I understand them completely but but through that I can create something where I keep pondering keep wondering keep being curious because it's just removed enough to fill in those themes I'm interested in and then just to follow up about the cafe scene oh the cafe scene yeah yeah thank you no again my dad's a sound designer so i grew up you know thinking a lot about sound which is a wonderful thing in movies and also silences but i'm i'm um i was interested in mixing a bit of documentary into oslo august 31st so some of the conversations you hear are documentaries some are planned some are amateurs that i'm getting to kind of ad-lib around certain topics uh and i i want it to be a snapshot again the idea of memory when i see that film now that cafe doesn't exist anymore it's obtained by a big franchise you don't have over here but kind of in the style of starbucks and it used to be a very specific place and it's just interesting how everything changes but that film has that moment and those conversations about those football games and those things people were talking about at that time in the film and they'll always kind of be there so the last thing i'll ask you about oslo august 31st is something that then it's a seed that was planted that only began to, I guess, blossom in a way 10 years later and then continued into sentimental value, which is you cast in a very small part towards the end of the film, late hours of August 30th into the early hours of August 31st, as one of two young girls who kind of go out with the two guys in your film.
38:35One of them was played by in a very small role by somebody named Renata Reinsfeld, who is now a Best Actress Oscar nominee for Sentimental Value. So going back 15 years to the making of this movie, where did she come from? How did you find her? It's a bit like Anders. She walked in on an open edition. I do a lot of open editions, and I have a whole team that film people and meet people. And she was in the Norwegian acting school that was the most renowned one and she came in but she was halfway through the course so she wasn't really allowed to I think she's kind of snuck they don't want you to work while you're there you're supposed to work after you're done with your education but since it was a small role she kind of took a chance and she came in and we thought she was remarkably charismatic and open to trying different versions of scenes and and had this kind of cool confidence about her and we needed someone that could be in the background but create something that was very lifelike and that's what she did so she had one line of dialogue but she was on set nine days because i was shooting a situation of night going into early morning to catch that light of that transitional beautiful early morning light i had to film many many many mornings just one hour every morning then we went the rest of the day and did other stuff but those mornings she was there for nine days and and every morning she came with that spirit and did stuff and kept the party going because kind of this party crowd that he ends up with at towards the end of the film and she was amazing so I thought she would go off and have a tremendous career after that and other people would see what I'd seen and and she ended up playing some like the competition to the main character as the other mean girl or something in a couple of tv shows and some great theater work but no lead roles in movies so 10 years later we wrote worst person in the world for her yeah then i know that's a that was for a lot of people the the gateway drug to your work so we are gonna of course come to that in a moment but between the two uh the first two renata collaborations what there was also in in 2015 four years after oslo august 31st your first English language film, or only English, primarily English language film, that's Louder Than Bombs about a father played by Gabriel Byrne, his two sons, one who's an adult played by Jesse Eisenberg, the other who's still in high school played by Devin Druid in the aftermath of the death of their family matriarch who was played by Isabelle Huppert in flashbacks.
41:19First of all, you know, I'm curious the root of the title and the idea, but also the idea that you, for the first time now, were going to go work in English language, that you were going to go work with internationally known actors. Was that something that you had been hoping to do or were being told it's time to do? You know, you should go do, you know, if it's the next step in a career. Just like set the scene for how that movie came about. Yeah, no, the seed for that whole script and the beginning of writing it happened before Oslo on August 31st. That's a reaction to that journey to America I talked about after my first film.
41:56And I really wanted to. I'd been educated in London. I had a first film that was received quite well in the US and I felt that that was a way to reach more friends. When I say friends, I mean audience members, people that will hopefully understand what I want to talk about. And I always thought about my life and the group I work with which is a lot of the time the same people. as an indie band who builds a rapport with an audience over time. Like people can see that we grow older. Anders, Renat, the people, they grow older. We follow them in different steps of their life. I like that idea. But Lauder than Bombs was trying that international thing, but still it feels equally personal to me.
42:39And it's a film that now is getting a revival because of sentimental value. I saw there was a great write-up about it suddenly in The Guardian and on Instagram, people are kind of quoting. So I'm like, good, maybe it's going to have its time now. Because at the time, you've said, I don't know if people almost were resentful that you were doing something in English. They felt it was a sellout, some people thought, and that hurt me. At Cannes, it was my first film in main competition. There's a lot of expectation. That year, there were several filmmakers from Europe who'd worked in other languages.
43:11Yorgos, Lantamos. Yeah, Yorgos did for the first time, and also... Oh, Sarantino. Yeah, Sarantino, Paolo. Yeah, he's a wonderful filmmaker, had also made a film in English and it became kind of a little bit of a group takedown as if people were scared that we were going to sell out. And I think all of us had made really personal films. And maybe I was the one that suffered the most from that critique. And also a lot of people in France loved Oslo August 31st. It became a cult film over there and I'm very happy. but it's sometimes like that. Your next one then will have an expectation to be a repetition and you want to go somewhere else.
43:49So there we are. But also a lot of people embraced it. I remember LA Times loved it. I mean, there's always going to be some naysayers but there's also going to be some love. So there we are. But regardless of that, I felt that the film developed my process with actors. I worked with some of the greatest actors in the world, really. Like to work with, for example, Isabella Pair is remarkable. We also had the amazing Amy Ryan and David Strathairn. I mean, we're talking about some of the best actors in America, in my opinion, that came and just did, you know, not the leads even in this film. So I had an amazing time, and I learned so much, and I'm very proud of that film.
44:28One quick last follow-up about that film. There is, late in the film, a scene with a very long take or long shot on Isabelle Huppert's face. she's not saying anything she's not actively doing anything what was the i'm curious what the impetus for that scene was and i believe you might have even been uh as you you're you're always near the camera you've said when you're directing which is not the case for for all filmmakers but in this case i think you were literally behind the camera yeah it's true actually wow your research man you know all this stuff no it's true how how the hell do you know that no jacob ira the wonderful dp that shot louder than bombs said, I think this moment you should hold the camera.
45:11And I did. I remember still, we always, five of the six films shoot on 35mm. It was an 85mm lens, an ARRI lens, I remember. And there was an LT camera. I had it on my shoulder. And Isabelle was sitting in front of the camera. And we listened to some Bach music that you can't hear. And she knew exactly what to do because it's kind of an enigmatic close-up. and we kept it for a long time. And I think it's one of the proudest moments I've had as a filmmaker. I love that close-up. And when I said cut, I was expecting, I took her hand because she was right in front of me and I expected this kind of emotional moment and she just smiled and laughed and said, hey, I didn't blink.
45:56And she doesn't. I didn't even notice. I just felt it, you know. That's great. That was 2015. Two years later, your first sort of step into, I guess what we could call genre filmmaking was a movie called Thelma not to be confused with the there's been like two other movies called Thelma one of them with June Squip this is very different this is about a sheltered girl from an evangelical family who goes off to college and begins suddenly having seizures which may or may not be triggered by some of the people she's making new friends with and new experiences that she's having, especially interactions with another young woman who has a very different kind of background.
46:41What made you want to do a genre film for the first time? And why was this? I don't know if this is still the case after sentimental value, but at one point or another, you've said it was technically the most challenging film you had to deal with. Yeah, it was. It had 200 CGI shots in it. And we had fire and ice and skin treatment, animals, breaking glass. It was complicated. And we didn't have the biggest budget in the world. So I was very proud of that film. I wanted to do genre stuff because I wanted to do something with a lot of what I call mental images. I wanted to have abstract ideas. I was getting tired of my own style in a way, and I needed to try something else.
47:18And, you know, like in the 80s, even Neil Young did a synth album. You know, I think you need to try different instruments. And we shot it digitally. we tried different things and I got some new friends there was a whole new bunch of an audience audiences around the world that embraced that film and that still I have people that don't know all my other movies that like that one and and but it was also thematic stuff about I was seeing around me a new conservatism coming about and I yeah I grew up with a lot of gay friends and I saw how there were religious tendencies in many countries also in norway that were making it tough to be gay which is the most ridiculous provocative you know thing i can imagine not letting people love who they want to love it's just awful so i don't know many things at once happened there and and we uh we were big bunch of people that made that film together and it was a great experience and your lead actress was a discovery yeah fantastic and i love seeing i i tried to like learn more about what she's been up to and when i see that all your leading ladies follow each other on social media and like even if they don't know we're all friends yeah absolutely yeah yeah and it's funny because actually i haven't i haven't talked about this but there was a moment when we were looking for the other girl than eilie in Thelma where Renata, I tried to get her into the film and she didn't fit the role.
48:46And she did an incredible audition. She just came in as if we knew each other then. And she said, okay, we'll try these scenes. And I was looking at her thinking, I got to write her something. I mean, she's so wrong for this role. And it's so important to say to all the actors out there, there are so many great actors. And as a director, you see them sometimes and you're just like, you're not right for this role. And you hope they believe you when you tell them. You know? And Renata was cool. She got it. She said, I felt it too. I was wrong for this one, but I'm so glad you came back, you know, and gave me some other role.
49:15But you're not bullshitting people when you're directing. You really say this to actors. There's so many great actors out there, and it's so hard to be an actor. And I just have to emphasize it. But it's got to be the right role. Well, and so you mentioned this kind of reconnection with Renata. So that almost 2017, 2021 is the worst person in the world, which, just for anybody who needs a reminder, centers on Julie, played by Renata, a woman who's on the cusp of her 30s, torn between two very different men, one of them played by Anders, but named Axel, that's the Anders character, and then Ivand, Herbert Nordrum, and just sort of figuring out what she wants to do with her life.
49:54What inspired the film, which we should note is the first one of yours, I believe it's correct to say, that is about romantic love as opposed to friends, or, you know, which would be, I guess, applies to both Reprise and Thelma, the friendships. I mean, but here you have a man or woman who, you know, are navigating the ups and downs of a relationship. I've heard that you were watching everything from, you know, Golden Age Hollywood movies to Annie Hall. Anyway, just what fed into that one? I came back to Eskil and when we were sitting down to do Worst Person, I said, you know, I shouldn't swear I said F it so I don't know how to edit this I just want to have fun I want to make something where I'm not scared of having to feel that I have to reinvent myself or being scared of repeating or whatever I just want to go purely with my taste I want great music I want it to feel like a musical at times and I want it to be funny and lifelike I want Renato and a lot of this came out of Escal as well it's not just me saying this is the film we're making we figure it out together But it was clear that I felt like making one of those films and Esco was like I get it.
51:06Let's do it You know was it a conscious idea for you guys that all right? This is going back to the thread connecting reprise Yeah, I was a August 31st to this we're doing a trilogy or did something other people then project that on no It's a good question So so we just wanted to do another film and not be scared of repeating ourselves and just feel that we are older anyway So it'll come out different and different actors, you know But again, we are revealing something about life stages and stuff. And I met my wife around the time, and we, during the process of that film, had our first child right before I locked the edit.
51:48And I wrote that film maybe about a period in my life earlier where, I don't know, I was looking for a different connection to making a family, but I was also one of these people who loved to fly off and do my arts, a bit like Axel in the film. And Eskil knows me so well. So we could talk about those subjects and create something that wasn't quite me, but something abstract. And then also then, what is the me for Eskil and me and Julie? And this kind of chameleon character, which is so fun to kind of feel, oh, she wants to be like this and that, and she changes her hair. And it's so fun to write a character like that, but also trying to find the existential core of how complicated it is to figure out love and life at any stage in life, but particularly when you're going from 20s to 30s.
52:37I've seen this in many people's lives. And, you know, it's the great Søren Kierkegaard, the Danish philosopher, once said that you can only understand your life backwards, but you're forced to live it forwards. And we kind of played around with that as a formal idea in that film, I think. But it didn't turn out to be a musical, and it turned into a very melancholic piece as well. So we always start out, ha-ha, it's going to be funny, and then it turns damn sad. With all our films. Well, a couple other just quick things about why you decided to do it. First of all, why the title, The Worst Person?
53:08What is that title to you? Yeah, maybe it's a Norwegian word to kind of have that self-deprecating, oh, I'm failing, I can't figure out my life, I'm the worst person in the world. It's kind of a self-deprecating statement. but I also thought it was interesting to do kind of a romantic our take on a romantic comedy a romance called the worst person in the world it's kind of the opposite right why did you structure it with 12 chapters plus a prologue and an epilogue why I could see you know I've seen with with films that are not that do not work well you unlike this one you sit there and you're like how many more chapter five, it makes you just actually be more conscious in a bad way of time.
53:52But in this case, I think you've talked about there are upsides to breaking it up. What were those for you? I think one of the main kicks I get out of a film is trying to think that every film has its own logic and its dramaturgy and its structuring of emotion and time. So in this one, first of all, it fits the character Julie, who has these kind of great expectations that it has a kind of a faux novelistic feeling to it as if that's how she would perceive herself. Of course, it's a novel and it's going to be an epilogue. It kind of mirrors the character. So that allowed us to do that. But it's also fun to let the audience feel a bit like it's like, I want to make a, I know this is a bit pretentious, so forgive me, but a hit album.
54:34I want all the bits to be really good songs. And I want it to be like, you have to put it together yourself a little bit and that you feel the form of it so that you can do some jumps in time. And then actually we follow her from her early 20s into her early 30s without it being obvious. We kind of jump sometimes and it's winter and summer again and oh, the year passed, but you have to kind of fill in the blanks a bit. I have not seen this film, but I read that one of the films that your grandfather made was a film where it was designed so you could watch it out of order. the set it was maybe like a five-parter or something five-parter yeah right and you could watch part four and then part however many combinations that yeah so a feature film in the old days before a digital copy of dcp came in usually five reels five big reels of film and he constructed his film from 1971 called remonstrance the second feature 10 years after the first in such a way that it could be changed around and he he meant it almost like a political statement that he felt which i think is still an interesting idea that the media was getting quite homogenized in the sense that he was feeding us narratives that were quite absolute and he wanted people to engage with how are we telling stories almost like a political act so he'd say he would invite the audience like put it together your own way let's you know let's make this film together if it kind of had that humanist spirit to it.
56:04It's just interesting because in a way that's, you're not necessarily telling people go watch chapter nine and then two of Worst Person in the World, but that. It's an invitation with a dialogue almost, with an audience to say, hey, I won't give you everything because I owe it to you to have some imagination and to come with your own interpretation of this. Was it different or harder or did you approach it seeking input from others where so you and Eskil are these two you know guys in your at this point 30s or four early at 30s at this point in our 40s in your 40s and with Thelma and then this you have for the first times female protagonists how does that work are you guys you know people you don't have to be exactly who you're writing nobody's I think that's silly but I just wonder if your approach was any different because you're going more outside of your own experience perhaps than...
57:04Absolutely. And we have a lot of readers that beat the shit out of us and challenge us. And we have had a lot of discussion about representation of class, addiction, gender, all kinds of things. And I think that's healthy. It's healthy to open that up early, have those discussions, figure out your relationship to it. where do you feel you can stand truthfully with your material? Maybe sometimes you drop something, maybe sometimes you, most of the time you get better ideas. And I think also actors. I often say this, both Anders, Renat, Estelle, and Gabriel Byrne. I mean, all of these ones, they come in, they say smart things, they do their own research and they challenge it and make it better.
57:46So going back to that question of writing women, First of all, I think gender is one important aspect of identity, but it's not everything. So I primarily always think every character has some specific aspects to them. I know there have been a lot of people who have identified with Julia that are women. And I've also had a few that have said, no, you don't get it. And that's life, you know. But primarily, I feel we've managed with our collaboration with Renata to catch something that a lot of people have felt was true to them. that means a lot to us. And this was, again, her first leading role in a film.
58:23She said that, you know, there was this very close collaboration with you and has continued to be. But this idea, you know, even the way you direct her, it's it's and other actors. But, you know, the way you direct her, we can talk about it in regard to worst person or sentimental or however you want. But I mean, you one of the things she says you do is you say you talk about going to zero. I wonder what that means. And also if you can talk about, I think I referenced it earlier, but we didn't get into it, that when you are directing, you're not in Video Village off watching on monitors far away from the action, which plenty of great filmmakers do, but you choose to be somewhere else.
59:02So can you just, I guess, to give a little sense of what it's like to be directed by Joachim Traer, going to zero and where you are physically while your actors are acting? Sure. It's a big subject. I'll try to be precise and short. First of all, I believe in rehearsals, but not because you're going to nail the scenes or train yourself in doing the exact thing you're going to do on set. Rehearsals is a time to get to know each other because everything when working with actors is about trust. If they can't trust you, and trust needs to be earned, you can't just say, trust me. We know that in real relationships.
59:36Like when you work with someone closely, you need them to feel that they can be silly and maybe actors sometimes have vanities that they're not aware of, ways they want to be perceived and they want to go beyond that to create some more lifelike performance. And they need to trust you that you're taking care of them, showing them in an interesting light. They don't need to be beautiful all the time. You see that from my films, that they're humans and they're faulty and sometimes their crying can be a bit, even though it's sweet, it's ugly and messy. I don't want it to be perfection. or sanitized you know and you need actors to want to go there with you and that's a negotiation that's based on trust so we get to know each other they need to build relationships with each other in the sense that they are playing sisters or family or lovers or whatever they're playing in these films you know so they need to i don't want people to come on set and think about all that other stuff i want them to only focus on being in the pocket in front of the camera being in the moment so we get done with all the intellectualization analysis and getting to know each other so by the time we're on set they we just keep working like we're already in the groove then i feel my job at that moment is to have them explore without me getting in the way too much so in psychodynamic therapy you have this idea of transference which is a natural human mechanism which is that if you sit and talk to someone and you find it boring maybe they're boring themselves or maybe they are used to being perceived as boring and they're scared of being anything else and they're they're getting you into the role of finding them boring and actors can sometimes do stuff that you don't ask them to do which is incredibly interesting maybe you have asked them to be funny but they're kind of feeling some sadness in the scene that you that's underneath it all and if you're too concerned with your vision and i'm the ego director i want it to be my way then you lose the best possibility of the moment in the scene so i can't feel those vibes or transferences that's going on unless you sit and really feel them so i sit next to the camera of course i do a lot of technically complicated shots difficult tracks one-ers, we work with steady cameras.
1:01:57Sometimes I have to be by monitor. I can't just run next to a long tracking shot. But most of the time when we're doing more intimate scenes, I sit there, I have a handheld monitor. It's in my hand. I can check the frame so I know what we're getting, but I look at them and I feel with them. And I get intuition and can help them go further. And sometimes it's very quick. Even though we shoot on 35, we have the most wonderful camera team in the world, in my opinion. And they change magazines like Maniacs. It's like Formula One car, tires, on with a new magazine, and we're ready to go. And sometimes it's just like we say, okay.
1:02:30And in Norway, we don't say cut. We say thank you. Talk, which is beautiful. So I even in English, when I direct English actors, I say cut, thank you. Every time they laugh at me, but I'm grateful. So whatever happens, and I say, so I say cut, and then maybe I just whisper some little thing to one of them, you know, and it could be just, I feel where you're going. You should go further. try that I know we didn't talk about this try that and they go yeah I know I know okay ready go again you know you're just in the loop with them and you're sitting like we're sitting here with you know just close to each other and it's can go very quick it's like a tumble dryer just retakes retakes retakes sometimes we also do big magazines which is a nine minute roll and you can just loop it and just we're about to come to the end or I I know them so well so I feel they've gotten on the wrong trajectory in the scene and i say all right let's go back to be and they're like thank you okay we go again and then and the camera just rolls and we have it on tape and the editor laughs at it later because he hears my stupid notes and then we go again you know keeping them in the pocket and then it's like wow i think we got a lot of good stuff there let's do one more little jazz take okay and the jazz take is just now mess it up completely maybe they already did by intuition but it's like even one more layer of revealing the pressure of the expectation it's remember this if you're working with actors however famous and great they are they're always if they're good actors vulnerable don't feel that directors have to be the visionary coolest person in the room sometimes you just need to be a friend supporter you can sometimes when the when everyone's feeling tense maybe just show that you're also stupid and you're not like the mean father who's demanding everyone to be so damn correct all the time i think to create safety trust and the will of risk is always at play and keep it loose you know it's if everyone's stepping oh they're you know they're they're walking eggshells because they're oh it's this great film and i have a lot of amateurs or first time on feature film actors or children on set in in ensemble film like you know sentimental value there are some amateurs there's some real pros some famous people even in this one, and then some kids, and how I'm going to make them all work together.
1:04:50It's about creating a vibe of a safe zone where we're all human, and we're doing our best. And it's an amazing explanation. I think people really can learn a lot from that. Thank you. Thank you. Just quickly, though, going to zero, which is apparently a very effective direction for Renato, what does that tell her to do? It means that because she's a great actor, in my opinion, one of the greatest in the world. And I know other people feel that too. Now, Paul Thomas Anderson's record saying something similar. I mean, we're all admiring her. She's doing an Alexander Payne movie right now, right?
1:05:23Right now, in Denmark even. They're shooting over there. So anyway, I can't say enough wonderful things about Renata. She's incredible. And whatever she does, it's always, to me, very interesting. So I want to give her a chance to explore the scene properly. And the thing is, you can get stuck in your previous take, but every take is a chance to go from zero, to do something completely different. So in Norwegian, we don't actually say zero. We're more like saying wipe it clean and start again is more like the way we're talking about it, I guess. But I think that's what she's referring to with go to zero.
1:05:58And it's just trying again with a clear mind and not burdening yourself with the pressure of the previous take and also feeling that kind of don't care too much about what we talked about. see if something can occur and what what we discovered through worst person in the world is that and this is a technically complicated it's a very delicate matter because all people have things or ticks or charms things they do strain and some actors feel that they have to put on this thing and you see it when you go from they're sitting before they're taking to say an action and they kind of changed your face in that moment or they strain up.
1:06:44And that's what you want to get rid of. You want them to flow like life straight into the take and not push. And then most actors I talk to, at some point during doing a scene, they feel, am I giving enough? Won't this be boring because I'm doing nothing? And that's exactly the interesting thing if they're good actors. So that's the zero. It's the fact that you trust the situation. because already you have gotten so far. Maybe you shot for five weeks. You know the character, and if the scene is working, the dramatic tension is already there, and they know what they brought from all those previous scenes that they've shot anyway.
1:07:24So maybe they have to do very little and just respond to each other, and suddenly more interesting stuff occurs, and that's the zero thing, rather than to say, I'm going to plan how every beat of this scene is going to be damn interesting and dramatically charged because it creates a weird strain. But on the other hand, also, if you do nothing, it'll be nothing. So you need a skilled actor that brings an understanding of what it is that's going on in the scene, and they allow themselves to open up to the possibility of that feeling without pushing it, I guess, is my best way of putting it. One last worst person in the world thing, and then we'll close with great excitement about the sentimental value questions.
1:08:05But there is a scene, a kind of magical scene in Worst Person, that is going to be a part of every career tribute montage you're getting for the next 70 years, which is when Julie decides to go find Ivan and Oslo kind of freezes and she runs through the streets. What made you think of doing that and how was that achieved? it's again a formal idea that doesn't mean anything until it means something and then you know the idea of freezing time is something we've worked on trying to get into several films but this is the last part of us trying to make a musical out of the worst person in the world we really wanted to have the musical feeling you know something with levity and a romantic feeling that lifts off into something more abstract and beautiful so that's it and it's a simple trick but it's also in my opinion justified thematically by the fact that Julie's main problem is the pressure of time and how quick it moves and the conclusion of the film is also about how loss and the idea of mortality manifested in your life will sharpen you to make some choices and maybe will be the fundament of understanding more about what love could be.
1:09:34And that's a sad but true experience in a way for a lot of people that you need to understand loss to live. So in the middle of that, her romantic notion that to be, how do you say, alleviated or removed from time for a moment as a kind of a beautiful idea. I thought was kind of interesting. That's great. You go to the Cannes Film Festival with that movie. Renata wins the Best Actress Prize, which further explodes her career. The film goes on to receive not only an Oscar nomination for Best International Feature, but also for Best Original Screenplay for you and Eskil, which makes people even more further appreciate you guys, I think, around the world and look back at these other films we've been talking about.
1:10:20And then four years later, you're back in Cannes, with sentimental value. And the difference, though, is, or an interesting thing, is that I think the vibe of this film is so different from any of the others that we've talked about. Some, you know, have called it kind of more, use the word tender. You have said, quote, tenderness is the new punk, close quote. So talk us through that and just what you were drawn to here in terms of just looking at grief and trauma and the way things can be passed down. It sort of anthropomorphizes the home itself, which is a character in this film, but also the things that your grandfather, who we've talked about, was a survivor of the Holocaust whose trauma was at least felt by you and others.
1:11:17Here, I think the mother of Gustav Borg's character was a Holocaust survivor and seems to have shaped him. I'll just also note, you also, of course, come from Oslo, apparently right around the corner from where this home used in your film is. You come from a family of filmmakers. Your parents divorced when you were quite young. so just wondering how much those things also may have shaped this kind of this story and this kind of new direction for you as a filmmaker tonally no i think all of that matters but it's nothing until you find a form when i say form it's not a cold structuring mathematical thing it's the actual shape of the film the the shape of each scene the the way that you you try to create something ideally in my opinion you're yearning for what you call sleight of hand in english where you're looking at something but something bigger builds emotionally and and thematically i think there's a lot to answer in that no no but thank you no no but i'm so impressed with your perspective and research thank you for going so deep into this i really appreciate it i think with this one something radical had shifted in my life primarily that's the starting point and i've i had a daughter while I was editing Worst Person in the World.
1:12:39So I was almost done with that film when I had a child and became a father, which I'd been longing for in my life for a long time. Pieces weren't in place until then. And that whole new experience of taking on the responsibility for another human being gave me a big reflection on my own life, on my parents, on my grandparents. The whole idea that when you have a kid, life throws you a kind of a natural psychoanalysis right in your face whether you want it or not you have to confront what it is to have responsibility for someone and you suddenly also realize the vulnerability of what your own parents and their parents must have gone through and so forth back in generations because you're suddenly your sense of mortality changes because you're not living for yourself you're kind of living for someone else in a more fundamental way so what since you've now seen sentimental value i think i hope it makes sense that it comes out of that moment but also a wish to do a more hopeful i wanted to feel a bit like a hug that says it's it's it's tough but it's you're going to survive this it's okay listen you know like like a friend that's those are the conversations eskel and i have have kind of been having when making this and everyone else casper Tux and the DP, Olivier the editor, all the actors, the producers, we've all actually ended up sharing a hell of a lot of stories that deal with how family in its fundamental concept is just complicated and that's human nature.
1:14:13It's not easy. You never get quite what you need from your parents. And I will also on some level that I can't plan for or avoid fail something in my being a father and that's life. And you play it as best as you can you know so I wanted it to be about reconciliation on a deep level and again that Nora who's so angry at her father has to understand his mortality to try to get to a better place and accepting what is and what isn't between them you know but then it also became this big idea about cinema and making movies and creativity and how that works the mystery of how the mechanisms of you You know, this is becoming quite sort of a grand conversation, like thematically, so forgive me.
1:15:01I don't mean to come off as pretentious, but I feel sometimes when I defend what I do, because there's a lot of smart things to do in life. There's a lot of people who work as doctors or nurses and help people, and a lot of people who are working in social, political engaged situations where they're actually helping people one-to-one in a very specific way that I admire tremendously. So many jobs I could mention. And once in a while you ask yourself, what is the purpose of art? But when the world has gotten more complicated, as I feel it has recently, without going into that rabbit hole of mentioning all those things, I think we can all recognize that we are in tough times, politically and internationally.
1:15:45It's not like everyone's collaborating so greatly at the moment between countries. And not all people are being treated well inside countries either. A lot of countries we expected to be different in the way they treat their population. So how do I find a place to make a hopeful film in art? Well, I know that people have always made art. It's the primary thing we know people have always done because the cave painting is in Lascaux in south of France. We know that we've found pieces of tools. We probably had to have agriculture, make food, kill some animals, eat them. We can speculate about everything else we've done, but we know that someone had to emulate something from reality on a wall, whether it was a religious ritual or we call it art or whatever it is.
1:16:28We know we've always done it. And it's a mystery why. But I know in my life that I have needed a song to comfort me when I was heartbroken. And I've needed to sing to my kids to calm them so they sleep. And I know that I need movies to understand who I am, to mirror myself in. And it's not a technical one-to-one thing. It's just if we aren't allowed to talk to each other through that other language of art, whatever it is, then we are missing something fundamentally human. So I care about movies in that way, too. And I care about I didn't want to make a navel gazing film with this one. I didn't want it to be like, oh, Jogun's making a film about how great film people are, you know.
1:17:09And these are not ideal people either, by the way. I mean, they're kind of messy in the way they live. But I wanted the film to deal with that there are other ways of communicating. So my final thought on that is when I say tenderness is the new punk, that I often felt that the critical position I came from, like the skater who had to smuggle skateboards and be against the stupid adults who didn't get me and what I found was real and all that. Maybe being kind to each other and being hopeful and being empathetic and not be polarizing can also be a position of rebellion right now. That's what I meant.
1:17:46It's just that we need people to really be mad and stand up and say this is wrong. Yes, but we also need other energies alongside that. And we also need to believe that there is reconciliation between us. So that energy, because also I have small kids, I need to believe in that, you know? Yeah.
1:18:12This was a 64-day shoot I read. You wrote this, again, for Renata and for Stellan, who you'd never, one, you've worked with forever, one you never worked with before. And then, you know, discovered Inga, who was great as well, and now has another, all of them are, along with Elle Fanning, nominated for Oscars, the whole group's gone, along with your editor, who goes back to film school. Yeah, yeah. The first film school, even, in Denmark. Just amazing. So during the shoot, was there a scene that gave you the most pause? I mean, I heard you say something perhaps about the final scene, but just like the one that you were most daunted by until it got done.
1:18:58I think you get caught up in technical challenges of dramaturgy and narrative functionality sometimes. and then the stuff you're anxious about everyone puts a lot of energy into it and it can become quite wonderful and I think an example of that is when Agnes I heard there was applause when Inga's name was mentioned and that moves me because she's one of the amazing collaborators you know I I was just with her in London this weekend and with all the cast you know like just hanging out with her she's such a good person and she's such a good actor i'm so excited she's being recognized and it was hard for the younger sister to come to the older sister who's depressed and doesn't want to have anything to do with the dad and just get her to read the damn script towards the end of the movie that scene is tricky why the hell would nora bother to read that script and inga found the way we we worked on it a lot and the way that she came in and was so clearly moved emotionally by what she'd read that her sister can't not read it became much more moving than I thought and at the top of that also solved just a dramatic turning point question that I had been struggling with and Eskil and I have discussed a lot do we have it and it's just how wonderful it is when you collaborate and you have good actors and the way that Renata reads it and all of that stuff and the scene afterwards on the bed, you know, all of that was just really interesting to me and one of the greatest days I've had on set, yeah.
1:20:35Last one for me, I will note that, again, 19 minutes standing ovation in Cannes, they go along for a lot of things, but not that long. That means a lot. That's significant there. The grand prize, by the way, this was right on the heels of Coachella where Charlie XCX declared Joachim Trier summer, which it really was, and fall, and here we are. And then Oscar nominations where, again, not just Best International Feature, not just Best Original Screenplay, these are what you've received before, but to have a non-English language film nominated for Best Picture, Best Director, it doesn't happen all the time at all.
1:21:15to have all four of your principal actors, again, your editor for your whole career. I guess I just wonder how you're feeling and if you could describe in this moment, here we are, February 24th, a few weeks before March 15th when this is all gonna come to a head and then you can get on with your life. Just sort of what's your headspace now and looking ahead beyond this. I'm super grateful. I wanted to explain something technical, which maybe you're all aware I wasn't when I was a bit younger but the nominations for Oscars those are the branches voting for you so the directors vote for the directors the actors for the actors the editors for the editors the writers for the writers when you got your nomination everyone votes for everything but it means in this moment just being nominated amongst those incredible other four directors for example who I actually know and admire means a whole lot because it means that someone stepped up beyond the idea of competition.
1:22:19Just someone said, so which films this year did we think was well directed? The directors voted for me as being some of those people. And that means a lot. And it's not about competition. It's more about the collegial appreciation of each other. And when I was a kid, staying up late at night watching the Oscars because I'm from a film family, And I grew up equally watching Fred Astaire dancing and Charlie Chaplin and The Breakfast Club and, you know, like Tom Cruise in Risky Business, as I later also loved Godard. It's not like we just watched European movies. I grew up on Hollywood primarily in my youth, you know.
1:23:00So watching the Oscars, once in a while there would be a nomination for Ingmar Bergman or Fellini or someone, but it wasn't so often. And usually it was what they called best foreign language. so the fact that once in a while these directors from more my neck of the woods geographically even though you know I felt equally excited if Kurosawa got nominated but just that there were some outsiders from outside Hollywood it was seen by Hollywood made the Oscars even cooler to me so the fact that now the Oscar Academy has gotten even more international and taken everyone into consideration it feels like makes the Oscars more relevant around the world also for us who don't necessarily come from L.A., you know?
1:23:48So I feel gratitude because of that generosity that there's actually a lot of people over here who are curious about movies from even a small, weird country like Norway who don't really, as I told you previously, have a great film history. And no one from Norway has ever won an Oscar for a fiction feature film. So I don't know what to expect, but we're super excited already by being nominated. I have to say that. Well-deserved. Well-deserved.
1:24:17thank you thank you again
1:24:33thanks for listening to awards chatter we really appreciate it and would really appreciate you taking just a minute more to subscribe to the podcast and to leave us a rating and review on your podcast app. And to follow us on Twitter and Instagram, where our handle is at awardschatter. On those platforms we announce upcoming guests and provide details about special live recordings of the podcast that you can attend. Until next time, thanks again for tuning in.
1:25:00Joachim Trier:But what I wanted to say, my daughter is a very good study. Semesterbeitrag, laptop, books, software, Handy, Internet. So a master is really expensive. Oh, tell her, she can you mean from the Steuer to get back, right? But she doesn't pay. No, no, no, no, no, no, no. You make it simple with Visa Steuers. And when she works, it's Kaching! That's it? Save. Visa Steuers. Hol dir dein Geld zurück. Now, you can try it. Now, you can try it.
From the publisher
In front of an audience at Chapman University, the celebrated Danish-Norwegian writer and director reflects on his family's history in film; what led to his celebrated "Oslo trilogy" of 'Reprise,' 'Oslo, August 31st' and 'The Worst Person in the World'; and why he decided "tenderness is the new punk" en route to his latest film, which is nominated for nine Oscars — more than all but three other non-English-language films in history — including best picture, international feature and, for him personally, director and original screenplay.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
