China now faces 125% US tariffs in trade war

10 Apr 2025 · 49 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: Big Boss Interview - Episode: "China now faces 125% US tariffs in trade war"

Episode Overview In this episode of Big Boss Interview, the hosts discuss the significant policy shift by US President Donald Trump, who has increased tariffs on Chinese goods to 125% amidst an escalating trade war. The implications for global markets and responses from key stakeholders in the US and China are examined. Guests include Emily Peck, Axios US Markets correspondent, and Han Lin, China Country Director for The Asia Group.

Key Highlights

Introduction

  • Host Rahul Tandon introduces the episode detailing the day's monumental decisions impacting global trade.

Major Policy Announcement

  • Tariffs Raised: Trump announces a hike of tariffs on Chinese goods to 125%.
  • Universal 10% Tariff: Other countries will experience a pause on higher import taxes, with a universal 10% tariff implemented.
  • Market Reactions: US markets surged, with the NASDAQ seeing a 12% rise, its highest in over 20 years.

Guest Insights Emily Peck (Axios)

  • Describes the US markets as responding positively to the tariff announcements, despite ongoing uncertainty.
  • Highlights that while some tariffs have been lifted, significant tariffs on steel, aluminum, and autos remain.
  • Investors' Concerns: Investors remain apprehensive about the long-term impacts of the tariffs and the potential for further negotiations.

Han Lin (The Asia Group)

  • Shares reactions from China, emphasizing feelings of US unilateralism and the challenges China faces in negotiating with the Trump administration.
  • Highlights China's preparedness for a trade war and its belief in its ability to endure economic pressure longer than the US.

President Trump's Statements

  • Trump asserts that previous trade deals were unfair to the US, indicating that new agreements are necessary for fairness.
  • He emphasizes a belief that a deal with China will be reached within the next 90 days.

Expert Opinions Betsy Stevenson (Former Economic Advisor)

  • Critiques Trump's understanding of trade and doubts the effectiveness of his strategies.
  • Warns against the risks of creating adversarial relationships with global trading partners.

Everett Eisenstadt (Former Deputy Director, National Economic Council)

  • Believes the strategy of bringing countries to the negotiating table may yield results, albeit slowly.
  • Acknowledges that the global trade model needs revisions to meet current economic realities.

China's Perspective

  • Graham Allison (Expert on China Relations):
  • Reports that China views its economic trajectory positively, with confidence in its resilience against US actions.
  • Suggests that China may be preparing to bolster its domestic economy in response to the trade war.

Broader Economic Implications

  • US Consumer Behavior: Discussion on the potential for reduced consumer spending as tariffs affect prices, particularly for low-income individuals reliant on affordable goods.
  • Trade Forecasts: The World Trade Organization predicts an 80% drop in trade between the US and China due to deteriorating relations.

Conclusion

  • The episode wraps up with the hosts discussing future trade implications and the ongoing negotiations expected to unfold within the 90-day timeframe set by Trump.

Key Takeaways

  • The increase in tariffs signals a significant escalation in the US-China trade war.
  • While markets initially reacted positively, the long-term implications for consumers and businesses remain uncertain.
  • Both US and Chinese leaders are preparing for an extended period of economic tension, with strategic adjustments being made on both sides.
  • Experts express skepticism about the effectiveness of Trump's trade policies and predict challenges ahead for achieving substantial trade agreements.

Additional Notes

  • Future Episodes: The conversation is expected to continue as developments unfold in the realm of international trade and economic policy.
  • Engagement: Listeners are encouraged to reach out to the podcast team via email for thoughts and questions regarding the episode and ongoing discussions in global trade.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:05Hello and welcome to Business Matters here on the BBC World Service with me Rahul Tandon. It's been another momentous day for the global economy. A series of decisions announced by Donald Trump having huge implications for the global trading system. We're going to talk you through them to guide us through them. As always, we have two guests from opposite sides of the world. We have Emily Peck, who, of course, is co-author at Axios Markets. Emily, a busy day for you or a quiet one? Yeah, you could say it was a tad busy. Some things happened over here in the United States that we can get into. They certainly did.

0:50And Hanlon, as he's waking up there in Shanghai, China Country Director for the Asia Group, a lot for people in China to digest. Absolutely. Thanks for having me on the show and good morning from Shanghai. It just happens to be a beautiful day today. Well, it is a beautiful day in Shanghai and it has been a fascinating day in the United States. Let's just get into some of what has been taking place because Donald Trump has, of course, announced that he has suspended tariffs on a number of different countries now. Emily, what did you make of that announcement, that those reciprocal tariffs that he was putting in place, that he's now reversed those?

1:34Yes. Well, I'm not sure still what I make of it. It's very much to be decided as things go on. There's so much uncertainty right now and so much dislocation. But in the U.S., the markets, the global markets too, they liked this. They were very happy. The NASDAQ, the tech-heavy stock index here in the U.S., rose 12 percent, its biggest leap in over 20 years, I believe. The S &P rose 9.5 percent. This gets the market kind of back within where it was when this all started eight days ago. So the markets really like it, but there's a lot of still worry among investors, among companies about he still left 10 % tariffs on every country with exceptions.

2:23There are still steel and aluminum tariffs that we're placing on and auto tariffs are still in play. So it's not over by any stretch. It isn't over as yet. And whilst those tariffs have been withdrawn, Han, we know that the tariffs on China have now been increased even further. What is the sort of initial reaction you're hearing in China? Official reaction beginning to come in, but also I'm sure people on social media in China must be making comments as well. Oh, absolutely. So what you're hearing a lot more on the social media is the U.S.'s unilateralism, its bullying-ism. And one of the key challenges and frustrations for China is that, you know, despite being better prepared for this trade war than during the first Trump administration, In fact, what is unexpected is how fast U.S.-China trade relations have unraveled without a clear off-ramp or really how to communicate with the Trump administration without having to capitulate.

3:26Yeah, that is something that is not going to be easy for them to do. Let's hear a little bit of what the U.S. president has been saying. Well, I thought that people were jumping a little bit out of line. They were getting yippy, you know, they were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid, unlike these champions, because we have a big job to do. No other president would have done what I did. No other president. I know the president. They wouldn't have done it. And it had to be done. What was happening to us on trade, not only with, you know, if you look at it, not only with China, but China was by far the biggest abuser in history.

4:01He also had this to say. A deal is going to be made with China. A deal is going to be made with every one of them. And there'll be fair deals. I just want fair. They will be fair deals for everybody. But they weren't fair to the United States. They were sucking us dry. And you can't do that. You know, we have 36 trillion dollars of debt for a reason. We don't have it there for fun. They have it for a reason. So some strong words from Donald Trump. Emily, do you think that he's going to be able to get those deals done in 90 days? Because in the world of trade, that's not a very long period of time.

4:40No, it's not, is it? Well, we know from the last time Trump backed off tariffs with Mexico and Canada, he also announced a pause and then negotiations just kind of continued. So if I had to make a prediction, which Rahul, I'm not saying I'm making a prediction because making a prediction right now is not a fool's game. But typically what we've seen in the past is he does a pause, negotiations happen, and the tariffs that he initially talks about don't happen. And I sort of suspect that could be possible now. Okay, I want to bring in somebody who is used to the world of trade and a familiar voice on this program, Betsy Stevenson, who, of course, was also an advisor to Donald Trump.

5:31Not Donald Trump, President Obama. Sorry, Betsy, gave you a new job for a minute there. I'm not sure you'd want to take it at the moment. Is Donald Trump, though, hasn't he been successful here in that he has got a lot of the world's biggest trading partners to begin renegotiating deals with the U.S. that could give them better terms? Okay, so, yeah, that was like the worst slip-up ever. I mean, not only am I not giving President Trump economic advice, but as far as I can tell, nobody is. And he is just getting terrible, terrible advice. You know, it's been very clear since the campaign trail that he just deeply does not understand trade.

6:14I'll tell you one small thing that always perplexes me as he keeps saying we are going to get rid of the American trade deficits and investment dollars are going to flow into the United States like never before. So somebody needs to sit him down and explain the current account and what happens if we're running a trade surplus. So that's just like one small thing, and we're starting to see that, which is why we saw the crazy thing of bond yields going up at the same time that equity markets were going down. So I don't think he's getting great advice. I do not think that there's some genius plan here that he is going to bring a bunch of people to the table and he's going to have negotiated the most beautiful deals the world has ever seen.

7:05a lot of what he did was hit countries with tariffs that they didn't deserve. And so it's going to be pretty easy for them to come to some sort of agreement for him not to put on a ridiculous tariff that they don't deserve. And that isn't going to help the United States in any way. What he's essentially doing is like a king receiving all the lobbyists of people who are telling him what he wants. It's not just the countries coming in to negotiate for the deals. It's industry all over the United States telling them what they want and what inputs they need to get cheap. And we saw this in the Trump first term.

7:41He cuts deals, deals, meaning like he gives special favored status to some companies over others. That's no way to run international policy. Well, you know, maybe you should take a job with him and you could give him what you think is some good economic advice. Hamlin, when you're sat there in China, do you think, what have the Chinese made of Trump moving all those other reciprocal tariffs away from countries? Do they look at this and think he got spooked by the markets? The way they look at it is, it is not just the U.S. against the world. It is really the U.S. just against China. And so that puts them in an awkward position.

8:23But their key reaction is, they've actually been thinking about this for some time. They've made it clear even as early as last year that in the event of a trade war, China would, number one, respond firmly but proportionately. Second, they have a more diverse and deeper toolkit to retaliate. And third, they believe they could endure pain longer than the U.S. could. Of course, we'll see that thesis tested in the next several months. We will indeed. Now, let us hear from somebody who has given economic advice to Donald Trump. That is Everett Eisenstadt. He was deputy director of the National Economic Council in Donald Trump's first term.

9:05This is what he's made of Trump's announcements. I think it's a validation that his strategy of bringing others to the table to try to reorient the global economy is working. Now, it may be an unorthodox way of approaching it, but the reality is that a lot of economies around the world are looking at both internal restructuring and also their relationships with other market that simply wouldn't have been contemplated a year ago. So we're seeing some dramatic movements. It's going to take some time to work out, but I think we're going to see some progress over the near term. Yeah, when you say it's going to take time to work out, he's set this 90-day deadline.

9:40Do you expect to see lots of deals within that period? Because it's a short period for international trade deals, isn't it? Well, deals can be done in various stages. You know, the idea that you have a completely concluded global negotiation within 90 days, that's not realistic. But I do think there is the ability to have pathways to agreement. So as I said, it'll take time, but you got to start somewhere. And this starts today. A lot of people are asking a question here. If we look at the current global trade model, which you know very well, what's wrong with it? Because the US has done very well out of it.

10:16It's the world's largest economy. It's done much better than many others over the past few years. It's a good question. I think part of the issue has been one that is not really, it's attributed to this administration, but I think it's much broader than that because the global trading system was built around a series of rules. And those rules were created and articulated, of course, through the World Trade Organization in a very different period of time. Global economy was different. The accession of China to the WTO, the fact that they came in as a special and differential treatment, they had different rates than others.

10:46They had different flexibilities that were not afforded other economies because they simply were not at the same capacity. Over time, China has clearly become a major global player, but the rules haven't kept up. Betsy, isn't that a fair comment? Rules are in place. Rules have to be changed over a period of time. People don't like the way Donald Trump goes about it. But when it comes to China, some would say they haven't played by the rules. So let's change them. so the thing i'm puzzled by is i think president trump could have gotten a lot of the globe to gang up on china if he had gone to europe and canada and mexico and india and said china is not playing by the rules of of the game let's we're going to take hard action against china but instead what he did is he attacked the entire globe so instead of turning all these countries against China, he turned them all against the United States and encouraged them to work directly with China.

11:45I think if anything, he ended up strengthening China because of the tactics that he took by rallying the rest of the globe around each other and against the United States. So, you know, none of the arguments they use make any sense. You know, another one of the arguments you hear is that he's trying to revive manufacturing, but then he has his commerce secretary in interviews saying, oh, well, yeah, I know that we're not going to have a bunch of low-wage workers assembling garments in the United States. We're going to build high-tech workerless factories. OK, so how are you rebuilding the middle class if your whole plan is to bring more capital back into the United States and not use workers?

12:34So none of their goals seem to make sense with their plan when you push on them. Emily, the fact is, though, when Donald Trump won the election, he did resonate, didn't he, with huge parts of the American working class who feel that they've been left behind. And, you know, some of them may think that a tariff, even though it's a tax on consumers in the U.S., is something that people should be prepared to pay to help them get their jobs back. Yeah, look, I mean, there are people in the United States who think that the Biden administration left tariffs in place that the Trump administration had put in place and they levied more tariffs on China.

13:21But of course, they messaged that very clearly. We understood the policy. They didn't walk it back, etc., etc. It was handled differently. But yes, there are people who feel like tariffs need to be raised because the U.S., especially this working class, has had not a fair deal over the past, you know, 30, 40 years. And I was speaking to a spokesperson from the Teamsters this week, and she said, you know, we like these tariffs. This is what we want. This is good for workers. Companies have really high profits and they can afford this and it's going to be OK. And we and we support it. And the United Auto Workers also feels that way.

14:01And I think there is a segment of Trump voters who also feel that way. And we saw it in the last Trump administration when he levied tariffs that even hurt some, you know, farmers in the Midwest. But they still supported the tariffs. They still wanted to, you know, use them to make a statement to China. And they were OK with that. So, yeah, there is a contingent of people who support the tariffs here. We have seen those tariffs on China and they go up to 125%. The World Trade Organization is forecasting that the trade of goods between the US and China could fall by 80 % because of their deteriorating relationship.

14:41We wanted to hear from someone who knows the Chinese leadership well. Professor Graham Allison is the author of Destined for War, Can America and China Escape the Thosidudis Trap? He recently returned from China after meeting key figures in the Chinese leadership. China believes in their grand narrative that China is inexorably rising and the U.S. is irreversibly declining. From a Chinese strategic perspective, this is positive. If China has to move from 4 % to 5 % growth to 2 % growth, is this a threat to their regime? I don't think so. To Xi's rule, I don't think so. So I could imagine there's some folks there saying we can deal with this pain.

15:25It's lose-lose for sure, but we can deal with the loss more easily than they can. You travel to China frequently. You meet with some of the decision makers there. How would you describe their mood on your last visit? Confident? Worried? I was quite surprised how confident the team feels. I had the chance to see the Premier, and he was very upbeat about both where the Chinese economy stood now and where he thought it would be in 2025. But China faces its own severe economic problems, doesn't it? I think you're absolutely right. So they've been struggling with their own economic issues. They wouldn't choose a trade war at this point.

16:15But if the choice is between a trade war and capitulation to American tariffs that they regard as unjust and unreasonable, my bet is Xi is prepared for a pretty tough trade war. And I think they think that Chinese are probably better at suffering than Americans are. And the Chinese Commerce Minister has been speaking in the last 15, 20 minutes, interestingly, talking about improved relations with the EU, striking better trade deals with ASEAN countries as well. It seems like China is preparing for the long haul. We heard from Graham Allison there that China thinks it can win this trade war. Is that a view that you concur with?

16:59Yeah, I think definitely what we're seeing is that China is realizing if they can't export their way to GDP growth, they really have no choice but to, number one, focus and bolster their own domestic economy And number two, try to make more friends with other aggrieved nations. Now, the fact that Trump just recently postponed the tariffs on other nations kind of cut short China's strategy of trying to pull in together alliances with other nations. But what is true is that China is utilizing many, many levers to try to support the economy going forward, whether it's fiscal stimulus of subsidies for businesses or looking to cut the interest rates for reducing borrowing.

17:42So they are playing for a long game. But the challenge for businesses, international businesses, is now they're being forced to choose between the US or China. And picking sides is never good for business or trade in any event. It certainly isn't. These shoppers in the US gave the BBC their opinion about how the steep Chinese tariffs might impact them. I'm sure I consume much more Chinese products than I realize. I have an iPhone in my pocket, which could now be$3 ,000. I don't know what's going to happen. increasingly negative relations with China, I don't see is good for the global economy or the US economy.

18:18Emily, on this program, we've been speaking to a lot of US companies who bring in a lot of Chinese products, often as part of that complicated supply chain. So when we're looking at tariffs at this level, that's going to be a big problem for a lot of US businesses and eventually for consumers? Oh, yeah. I really think it is. I mean, just to take clothing as an example, the U.S. imports about 99 percent of clothes and shoes. These tariffs are going to be painful, especially for the people who can least afford to increase spending. The people who most rely on cheap goods in the United States are really going to be hurting.

18:58And I think, I mean, And your guest had a point before. I think if Christmas starts to come, the holiday shopping season rolls around and people can't get their ornaments. I already see reporting today on worries over Christmas ornaments, things like that. I think that there's going to be outcry here. And I just I think, you know, Donald Trump is going to he's not going to like that. No, he isn't. And, you know, I'm sure there's going to be many twists and turns over the next 90 days. Many. Many, yeah. So Betsy, when you look at this, and it was interesting when Donald Trump was asked a question about the bond markets, which is obviously where governments can raise cash.

19:41He seemed to be indicating that that uncertainty in the bond markets was something that concerned him. Is it the markets that have forced him to change his policies here? I would guess so. I mean, you certainly saw, look, you saw Elon Musk ranting about the tariffs on Twitter yesterday. So he's losing some key people that advise him and that talk to him. They were losing a ton of money. You know, he probably had his secretary, Besant, probably told him that he was risking a financial crisis at this point. Do you think we would have got there? Because, you know, Thursday was a big day in the US with those, you know, 30 year bonds being up for sale.

20:31And if people if there hadn't been much demand for it, could that have precipitated a crisis? The fact that, you know, the world's biggest economy was was struggling to raise money in that way? um absolutely i think this is a risk he didn't i don't think he fully understood one of the that that was one of the things he was taking on was that the united states has uh really benefited from status as a safe harbor and so we borrow money cheaper than than the than the Brits do? Why is Britain so much less stable than the United States or Australia? It's not. And certainly Trump is making that point right now.

21:13If you had to think which government you would count on to pay you back in 20 years, would it be the British government, the Australian government or the American government? I don't see any strong reason to favor the U.S. And yet Yet the U.S. was really got a lot of benefits from that. So I think those are starting to disappear. And I think that he was being told there's a real risk here. Betsy, thank you so much for joining us, Betsy. Stevenson, former economic advisor, definitely to Barack Obama. Clearly not going to be for Donald Trump as always. Betsy, thanks for coming on the program. Han, do you think because of what we've seen that the Chinese leaders look at this and think America's weak at the moment?

21:57There is a perpetual belief in China that the U.S. is in decline and that China's time has come. And so, but we don't know how that looks from an on-the-ground perspective. So China's really stuck with its China GDP growth target of about 5%. And how it achieves that is going to be a challenge. But I think certainly front and center is how far the escalation between U.S.-China will go. I think China has utilized a number of tools to retaliate, such as export bans, such as counter tariffs or sanctions list. But there's a lot of tools they have not yet used. They have not yet depreciated the currency.

22:40They have not yet threatened to not buy U.S. Treasury bonds that finance the U.S. government budget deficit. So we've got to see. We still don't know. We don't indeed. And we'll continue this conversation after the news.

23:04Welcome back to Business Matters here on the BBC World Service. We've got Emily, who's there in the US. We've got Han there in China. Of course, those two countries now at the centre of an escalating global trade war. Asian markets have opened up in early trading. Shares in Japan, South Korea and Australia have jumped the nickel. I was just having a quick look, up around 7 % at the moment. South Korea, the cost pay index 5%. And in Sydney, well, the stock market there is up by around 3%. So that trend is continuing. A lot of people describe this as Asia's century when it comes to trade. But if there is a trade war between China and the US, how will it impact countries in Asia?

23:48And will they be forced to choose? a question for Professor Chan Hengchi, who is Singapore's ambassador at large. Countries will try to toggle still as long as they can, as far as they can. But it's going to get harder and harder to toggle. Yes, it gets harder and harder. Particularly as the US is now playing a very different role in the global economy to the one that it's traditionally played. In fact, there was some Trump proofing before even the inauguration of President Trump. Countries in my region, Southeast Asia, for instance, has been signing up free trade agreements with trying to get a free trade agreement with Europe, trying to upgrade the Asia and China free trade agreement.

24:36And Indonesia, Malaysia, you know, Thailand, they've been signing free trade agreements with what I call Global South, countries you would not think of before. Countries have been seeking free trade agreement with Bangladesh. You know, you never think of this. The diversification of trade was going on. But in truth, America is the biggest market. and you can try to diversify to soften blows, but if you're missing the largest market, it hurts. A lot of people call this Asia's century. Do you think this change in global trade could alter that? Too soon to say. We don't know how this will play out.

25:19And with the fierce trade fights between the United States and China, I think there are no winners in a trade war. Countries in the region who need both markets and both players will feel the pain. Professor Chan Hongqi, the Han, China's commerce minister, once again talking about safeguarding the multilateral trading system. He's still continuing to speak. Do you think countries will inevitably, if there's no resolution between China and the US, have to choose between the world's two great economic powers? I definitely agree with you. I think when the U.S. was tariffing all the nations and it looked like the U.S.

26:06was against the world, it gave an opportunity for China to take the high ground, to try to promote multilateralism. But the reality is, as long as U.S.-China trade issues continue to escalate, companies are basically going to start seeing a bifurcation. If you were using a China Plus strategy where you were looking to take advantage of Thailand or Vietnam to manufacture and sell to the U.S., that could very well change where it could reverse. You could start seeing supply chains start coming back to China if you're looking to sell anywhere except the U.S. because China has such an advantage in manufacturing.

26:47But if you're looking to sell to the US, you may have no choice but to start moving your China assets offshore to do so. So it's going to be a very challenging situation going forward and a very expensive one for all parties. Emily, even though we've seen the stock markets in the US rally and those in Asia now beginning to pick up as well, if we look at the US, huge damage could have been done to the economy there over the last couple of weeks. So the stock market doesn't always reflect what's happening in the economy. Do you think there's still a possibility now, even though some of these tariffs have been withdrawn, the base rate of 10 % is still there of recession in the US?

27:28Yes. Goldman today pulled back on its recession call. I think they moved from, say, 45 % to less at 30 % or something like that. But yeah, GDP growth is still supposed to be or people are predicting it will be lower than expected. And they're still pricing in a mild recession that still looks possible. I mean, these 10 % tariffs, again, are still in place. It's unclear what's going to happen with those auto tariffs. Auto manufacturers, the auto companies in the U.S. are a huge part of the economy. And in the meantime, companies are sort of frozen with uncertainty. And that's not good for growth or capital investment.

28:12the question I think that is on economists and investors and everyone's mind is where is the U.S. consumer? Because, you know, consumer spending is about 70 % of our economy. So as long as people keep buying stuff, we're going to be okay. So the question is the fear and the anxiety that these tariffs kind of shot through the country over the past eight days, is that going to lead people to pull back. And I'll tell you so far, I had a piece this week about how people were Americans doing their thing. They went shopping. They heard tariffs were coming. They were worried about prices going up. So they went to the store and grocery carts at our biggest retailers were overstuffed, bigger than last week.

Read the full transcript

28:59And people stocked up on beer, electronics. So so far Americans are shopping. So, you know, hard to say. Hard to say. What about are you shopping still? Hard to say. You shopping still? Me? Yeah. I did debate buying a new iPhone because there was, there were so many stories here about an iPhone could cost X$4 ,000, et cetera. Yeah. So I did have a little moment of, should I? But you know what? My iPhone works great. And I'm just, I'm just taking the gamble. Yeah, good to be careful. Good to be careful. Right. Han, Emily, we've had a great conversation about that. Shall we talk about something else for a bit?

29:41I'm sure you've both been talking about tariffs a lot. So let us move on from tariffs. I'm sure we'll return to it on our business matters programs over the next few weeks because, but we're going to stay on Donald Trump because he's been talking about something which I personally think is extremely important and that is water pressure. And he signed an executive order on it. It was designed trying to lift restrictions on water pressure on showers and aimed at reversing steps taken by President Biden and President Obama. They used to have a restrictor where you could take it out, but now they weld it in and you take a shower or wash your hands, whatever you do, including dishwashers when no water comes out, but you wash your hands.

30:20And in my case, I like to take a nice shower to take care of my beautiful hair. I have to stand in the shower for 15 minutes till it gets wet. It comes out drip, drip, drip. It's ridiculous. And what you do is you end up washing your hands five times longer. So it's the same water. And we're going to open it up so that people can live. And we're going to hopefully have Congress approve it so it's memorialized. Now, I know we are a business program, but we do like to delve into other issues sometimes. So, Han, here for you. First question. Your water pressure, how is it? It's actually fairly weak, but I've gotten used to it.

30:57I think, you know, we all want to be clean. We all want to take a shower. But it's not only the shower pressure. It's just being in the period of a shower of a longer time that you can often have your most creative thoughts. That is such a good point, actually. And Emily, your shower pressure, are you happy with it? I'm not sure we can do anything about it if you're not. But are you happy with it? I'm quite happy with my shower pressure. It is excellent. I have no complaints. I don't relate to what President Trump is saying. I've always had good shower pressure in the United States, with exceptions, of course, here and there.

31:33It's been good. Okay, so from your experience, it's not a huge problem. When you talk to your friends, it's not something that dominates the conversation. It really doesn't come up, I have to say. It's something that President Trump seems to bring to the news every time he comes back to power. You know, Obama had these new restrictions. Apparently, there's been restrictions on showerhead pressure since 1992 in the United States, and it was never really a big issue until his first term. But, you know, I have taken some bad showers in the U.S., so maybe he's on to something. Maybe he is. Maybe he is.

32:10And Han, you know, those ideas in the shower, do you have more ideas in a bath, do you think? You know, I haven't taken a bath in decades, so it's hard to compare. Yeah, it's been a shower for a while. I'm with you. I may have to revisit that. Yeah, I'm with you on that. I have one in my house, but I don't use it. My daughter seems to spend most of her life in it. But anyway, well, let us move on from that and bring in Lily Jamali, the BBC's North America technology correspondent. We're going to talk about meta in a minute, but do you think there's some technology that could help Donald Trump with a shower pressure issue that he has?

32:46Lily, I know it's probably not what you're expecting to talk about, but hey, why not? I'm just glad we're not moving on from this topic. because it is really important. And I just want the world to know we don't have sort of a rampant issue with water pressure, at least not in my neck of the woods here in the US. But perhaps it's different on the East Coast. I am sure there are a whole host of technological solutions to this issue. But we'll see with Donald Trump's latest pronouncement. Does he finally solve this this ongoing persistent East Coast issue. Yes, indeed. Right. Let us move on to probably a more important issue because you've been following what the meta whistleblower, Sarah, when Williams has been telling senators.

33:32Just remind us of why this is so important, Lily. Yeah, this is a really big deal because the Senate has deemed it so. And we saw members of a subcommittee on both sides of the Democrats and Republicans holding a hearing today called a Time for Truth, Oversight of Metta's Foreign Relations and Representations to the United States Congress. So basically trying to delve into what kind of relationship Meta has had, Meta, of course, being the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, and whether also if Mark Zuckerberg, the CEO, has at all misrepresented the nature of that relationship. And what Sarah Wynne Williams alleged today sort of mirrors what we saw in her recent memoir, which is that she's saying Meta worked with the Chinese government to censor its platforms, that they provide custom-built censorship tools for the Communist Party there, and that they allow user data, including that of Americans, to be accessed by the party.

34:32There we go. I think we've lost that. Oh, no, you're back. Carry on. I was going to say the final thing was that she's alleging Meta also shared user data or allowed access to it by the Chinese Communist Party, including the data of American users. Yeah, Meta spokesperson Ryan Daniels said Sarah Wynne-Williams' testimony is divorced from reality and riddled with false claims. But this is an important issue, isn't it? Because it's not just in China. We have a number of authoritarian regimes across the world and pressure on social media companies. is something that a lot of people are focusing on.

35:07Yeah, and what she's doing here is offering a look under the hood, so to speak. And effectively, this is a bigger allegation that Meta is undermining U.S. national security to make a buck in order to make, in this case, in Meta's case in China, an$18 billion source of revenue from that country, Even though, and we should note this, that they don't actually have their platforms up and operating in China. Han, do you, you know, China obviously has an authoritarian government there. If you have foreign companies coming in, it is likely that they may come under pressure if they want to continue to operate in the country, and particularly when we're talking about data.

35:55Oh, absolutely. I think there's a basic understanding if you're going to be in the China market, you should comply with China regulations. And so we really see that pick up in the data security side, where data security is really an aspect of national security. And as the Beijing government has made clear, national security exceeds everything else in importance, and that economic and data security help to enable national security. So all in all, companies are much more sensitive. But I think where the difficulty in the last few years was that there was a lot of uncertainty what the regulations actually were.

36:33And now there seems to be a lot more clarity on what's going on, even if you don't agree with the direction it's going. Emily, not just in terms of this particular case, but generally now we have companies operating in many different markets. And it can be a difficult juggling act, can't it? Yeah, it really can be. And I think for Meta, they've had trouble going back years with running a social media site in other countries where they run into censorship issues or other political issues that maybe they get a lot of blowback for. And I was just thinking when Han was speaking about national security in China, taking sort of the priority, I was thinking back to what happened in the U.S.

37:21with TikTok here, where in Congress they banned TikTok and they said it was a matter of national security. But because Americans really like TikTok, we didn't ban it. Yeah, that is that is very true. Very true. Indeed. Lily, final thoughts from you. We've got you to talk about showers. Meta, let us get a quick thought from you on tariffs now. Because we saw the NASDAQ, you know, that tech heavily weighted index. Some of those companies really going up today, particularly the court-mire was big rises for Apple and NASDAQ. But if those tariffs on China remain, that's going to be a huge problem for them.

38:01Unless, and Donald Trump was asked this, some companies get exceptions from those tariffs. Yeah, and I think, you know, to some extent, it looks like investors are looking past the concern that you just raised. It is interesting to see Apple rising up to, I think it was about 15 percent today on this news. But in terms of the final note that you just that you left us on there, I think one of the concerns that a lot of observers have had is that, you know, Donald Trump and his administration are using tariffs to broker deals with various parties, whether that's nations or with specific companies.

38:40One issue that I've been hearing academics talk about these last couple of days is how that can potentially open up the door to corruption. So if you want to pass that you have to make some kind of concession or promise something potentially to this administration. And, you know, sometimes I think the concern is that some of those negotiations aren't fully above board. Lily, thank you very much for joining us and speaking about a variety of topics. Let us move to South Korea now, because how do you keep things running when there are not enough people to work? South Korea's retail industry is finding innovative ways to reduce its reliance on labor in the form of unmanned stores.

39:21Devi Kan has been speaking with an unmanned bar owner in Seoul, South Korea's capital. Meet Sung Nae Kim. He's the founder and creator of an unmanned bar, Sul24, which just means 24-hour alcohol. I met up with him at his bar, where he started by showing me how everything works here. These are wine dispensers. You just pick up a glass from here and pour yourself as much as you want. Over here are beer fridges. You grab the bottles you want and pay over there at the kiosk. The income is so much more than using a person. Most people who run businesses will know this. In order to operate a bar of this scale and profit, I'll need 12 to 15 staff.

40:04But I only use two people. The unmanned bar was packed full without a single empty table. I spoke with some of the patrons. I think the convenience is very good. We can just arrive comfortably and enjoy the vibe here. It's very convenient. It's open 24 hours because it's unmanned. I'm not sure if it would work in another country. I'm not saying Koreans are special or anything, but there aren't many thieves here. In fact, theft rate in South Korea is one of the lowest in the world, at 400 per 100 ,000, according to latest data. The unmanned bar wasn't without risks, But it wasn't a matter of choice for the bar's founder, Sungnae Kim.

40:47I never really do the math on what gets stolen. I don't lose money overall, so it isn't a big deal. The benefits of saving money is greater than the loss anyway. It wasn't just high wages, but also the changing perception of low-skill, low-wage work. People don't want to work anymore. I can't find anyone. Even if I find someone who's willing to work, they don't want to do anything dirty. They only pretend to work when I'm here, but when I'm not looking, they're just on their phones. Despite his rather critical views towards the younger generation, he trusts that they will be the ones that keep the young man businesses going.

41:24I still think this will be a long-term trend. This new generation will go on. It's like how you listen to the same music from your youth. The culture will continue and the new generation will grow up and continue with their culture. People trust those who trust them. And as a businessman, I distrust people who distrust me. So I get it. They want to be left alone. That feeling of being undisturbed appears to be one of the biggest benefits of unmanned stores. But some concerns remain. Loss of jobs is one. And almost half of jobs in South Korea are expected to be at risk of being replaced with automation in the next 20 years.

41:57But with number of unmanned convenience stores growing by 15-fold in the last five years alone, and with no signs of the growth stopping, it appears that unmanned stores are here to stay. And you can hear more of David's report if you go to Business Daily and find his piece of work there. You should also listen to some of the ones he did earlier this week. He's been doing a whole series in South Korea. Fascinating listening. Han, China, declining birth rate there as well is an issue. I presume you could see things like this in China very soon if you're not seeing them already. Absolutely. So there's a declining birth rate, but there's actually still a surplus of workers.

42:37But what we're starting to see is the future of unmanned facilities. In China, you're seeing that really reverberate with robots, robotics, so that it looks like the future of factories is that you can run 24 hours a day with no lights and maybe just manned by one single worker and a dog. And maybe the future of factories is just the dog is enough. But in many cases, the Chinese government is aware that it'll probably lead to a lot of job losses as automation really picks up. So I suspect that's why there's been a lot more focus on strengthening consumption, strengthening services, because maybe there can be more job growth in restaurants, hotels, tourism to offset the job losses of AI and automation.

43:22While I was listening to that, Emily, it takes us back to the conversation we were having earlier with Betsy about, you know, Donald Trump trying to bring these jobs back to the US. The problem I mean, a lot of those jobs in factories will be automated, won't they? Yes, absolutely. I mean, people aren't talking about this enough, but over the past decade, the manufacturing sector in the US has grown. But employment in the sector has been basically flat. And that's because manufacturing here, the newer factories, et cetera, they're highly automated and not as many people work in them, which is fine because birth rate in the United States is declining.

43:58the population is aging. There are fewer people who can do these kinds of jobs, probably not to the extent that South Korea is seeing yet. But now layer on top of that, the Trump administration's crackdown on immigration. And it's really an open question, even if, you know, everything the Trump administration says can happen, does happen. And all these jobs come back, it's not really clear who would take them. And also just, you know, just away from that argument, just on a personal level. I quite like going into a shop, you know, and having a chat and you're going to miss that, aren't you, Emily?

44:33Wouldn't you miss that? Yeah. Oh my gosh. Don't even get me started because we do have these self-checkout lanes. They just put them in my local supermarket. And yeah, I really miss just having random chats with the checkout person, you know, and going through the machine where you have to scan the code and they always break. And then someone has to come over with a key. Just let me just have an interaction with a human. Let's do that. I'm with you on that. I can't operate this. I can't operate this self-scanning machine. It's not my job. I don't want to work when I go to the supermarket. I just want to shop like an American, Raul.

45:10Yeah. And what about you? Do you like a little bit of a conversation when you're doing a bit of your shopping? I love to have a little bit of conversation. I'm curious about the world, but my children have a different view. They seem quite happy to be in their mobile phone bubble. And I don't know if that's a younger generation trend we'll see going forward. I think it probably is. I think it probably is. My children too, yeah. Yeah, yeah. All right. Yeah, well, you know, let's all have a go at our children on the program. I think that's what we're, what's what it is for a bit of a therapy session.

45:39Tell a global audience. Yeah, yeah. About our kids. Yeah, talk to your dad, Hans children, you know, spend a bit of time with them. I know you do. I know you spend a lot of time with them. Right, Hollywood star George Clooney is currently enjoying considerable success on Broadway where a new play, Good Night and Good Luck, in which he stars broke box office records for its first week of business prior to its opening last week. It was also a pretty good movie. Clooney is making his Broadway debut in the stage adaption of that film of the same name, which was released almost 20 years ago, which he co-wrote, directed and starred in.

46:09Tom Brook's been to see the play in New York. Hello. Hi, everybody. George Clooney's enthusiasm for the play was evident at a pre-opening press conference attended by camera crews and journalists. The fun part about this is we get to do a play about a subject matter that's very close to our hearts, which is about everything that you guys all do, which is telling the truth and holding truth to power. And so it's a play we're very excited to do. It's not a civics lesson, it's an entertainment. Inevitably, comparisons are being made between this Broadway production of Good Night and Good Luck and the original 2005 film.

46:44That picture is seen by many people as a great black and white classic. It had excellent cinematography, really strong acting and compelling content. And some people say this Broadway production can't quite match the magic of that. While George Clooney has been praised for his portrayal on stage, there has been criticism that some of the other characters are underdeveloped. But many of the stars who came to the opening night support him in the belief of having independent journalism for the people, among them actor Pierce Brosnan. We have to have a voice. The people have to have a voice, now more than ever.

47:23For George Clooney, this new play can be viewed as a career triumph. He was last on stage 40 years ago. Now, at the age of 63, he's made his Broadway debut and succeeded, emerging as a credible, leading man on stage. It's a significant milestone. There we go. I didn't realise George Clooney was 60. Emily, have you managed to see this play? I haven't managed to see it, but we had a story actually on Axios about a week ago. While it was still in previews, it was the highest grossing show on Broadway, bringing in$3.3 million in just a week. Really interesting situation here where the top three Broadway shows are all, they're not musicals, and they're all starring Oscar winning actors.

48:09Yeah, which is I suppose to get people, if you could see anyone on stage, who would be your top choice? Emily, who would you like to see? I mean, I wouldn't mind seeing George Clooney, if I'm being honest. That does sound really appealing. He's a great actor. I've been following him for a long time. Yeah. What about you, Hannity? Is there anybody, you know, theater, you know, pretty strong in China as well? Anybody you would like to see on the stage? I would like to see George Clooney as well. So I agree with Emily there. But I don't know the... Yeah, I don't see the movie here in China. And I'm not sure if the play could actually come into China.

48:45So I may have to make a trip to the US just to see it. Well, I'm sure that, you know, you could go with Emily. I don't imagine either of you get tickets with you, Emily. It's pretty hard to get older than them. Not only are they hard to get, but these tickets now are going for crazy prices. There's Othello also happening on Broadway starring Denzel Washington. And I'm seeing ticket prices as high as$900. Wow. Well, listen, thank you both. We say thank you to both of you for joining us on the program, I'm talking us through tariffs and a whole series of issues as well. I have to say if I had a choice, George Clooney, Denzel Washington, I think I'd go for Denzel, to be perfectly honest with you.

From the publisher

In a dramatic change of policy, US President Donald Trump hikes China tariffs to 125% on goods entering the United States. Most other countries will now see a 90-day pause on higher import taxes.

The pause means a "universal 10%" tariff will be in place for all countries, other than China, the White House said.

Markets soared following the announcement with all three main US indices closing up more than 6%.

Throughout the program, Rahul Tandon will be joined by two guests: Emily Peck, Axios US Markets correspondent in New York, and Han Lin, The Asia Group China Country Director in Shanghai.

More from Big Boss Interview

All 93 episodes
China now faces 125% US tariffs in trade warBig Boss Interview · 49 min
Listen in VO