In short
Podcast Episode Notes: Trump Marks First 100 Days in Office
Overview The episode discusses the significant economic events and policies during Donald Trump's first 100 days in office, particularly focusing on tariffs and their implications for both the U.S. and global economies. The hosts, Sean Farrington, Felicity Hannah, and Will Bain, are joined by industry experts to analyze the unfolding economic scenario.
Key Guests
- Rebecca Choong Wilkins: Senior Asia Correspondent for Bloomberg, based in Hong Kong.
- Tony Nash: CEO of Complete Intelligence, joining from Houston, Texas.
- Erin Delmore: North America business correspondent who provides insights from Donald Trump's ABC interview.
- Professor Zhu Ning: Professor of Finance at Shanghai Jietong University, discussing the impact of tariffs on China.
Main Discussions
Economic Policies and Tariffs
- Initial Impressions:
- Both guests emphasize the uncertainty created by Trump's tariffs, which have been particularly disruptive for businesses reliant on global trade.
- Trump’s administration is seen as radical, as it turns traditional trade principles upside down.
- Global Trade System:
- Rebecca notes the unprecedented nature of the current trade environment and how businesses are struggling to adapt due to inconsistent tariff announcements.
- Tony points out that the U.S. has historically tolerated high tariffs and non-tariff barriers from other countries, highlighting the need for businesses to adjust to new realities.
Reactions to Trump's Policies
- Support and Criticism:
- Trump's rhetoric at his rallies indicated a level of support for his policies, citing positive economic indicators such as lower gasoline and mortgage prices.
- Guests discussed the backlash and doubt within the business community regarding potential price increases due to tariffs.
- Impacts on Small and Medium-Sized Businesses:
- Charles Dardus, a supplier in the auto industry, expressed concerns that tariffs could threaten the existence of small suppliers due to rising costs and uncertainty in policy.
China and Tariff Implications
- Trade Dynamics:
- The episode explores the tension in U.S.-China relations, emphasizing the implications of high tariffs on Chinese exports and the potential transformation of China's economy towards more domestic consumption.
- Professor Zhu mentions that while exports still play a significant role, China has been working towards a more consumption-driven growth model.
- Long-term Outlook:
- Experts agree that while there may be short-term pain due to tariffs, it could also prompt necessary economic adjustments in both countries.
Outlook on Future Policies
- Negotiations and Uncertainty:
- There are mixed signals regarding the possibility of negotiations between the U.S. and China, with some experts suggesting that it may take time for substantial discussions to take place.
- Erin Delmore provides updates from Trump's interview, where he reassures that the economy will stabilize and that tariffs will not lead to price hikes for consumers.
Key Takeaways
- Economic Uncertainty: The rapid changes in trade policies have created confusion and concern among businesses, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises.
- Global Trade Relations: The episode highlights the potential shifts in global trade dynamics, especially concerning the U.S. and China.
- Consumer Impact: Despite Trump's assurances, many Americans express anxiety over the long-term effects of tariffs on their purchasing power.
- Business Resilience: The discussion underscores the resilience of U.S. businesses, emphasizing that while challenges exist, there is hope for adaptation and recovery.
Conclusion The episode encapsulates a momentous shift in U.S. economic policy under Trump, marked by a contentious approach to trade and tariffs. The discourse reflects deep-seated concerns across various sectors, painting a complex picture of the current and future economic landscape.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:04Hello and welcome to Business Matters here on the BBC World Service. Now, sometimes we decide to devote the whole programme to a specific issue. That's often because it is an issue that's dominating not just the business headlines, but the news headlines as well. And we're doing that today because Donald Trump, it's now 100 days since he took over the presidency. So we're going to be looking at some of the economic policies that he's put in place and the impact that's had not just on the US economy, but the global economy as well. As always, to guide us through that, we have two guests on opposite sides of the world.
0:39Rebecca Chung-Wilkins, senior Asia correspondent for Bloomberg, who, of course, is there in Hong Kong. Rachel, 100 days of Donald Trump has kept many people busy. I'm sure you as well. Just give us your initial thoughts from the part of the world that you're in of what this 100 days has meant. well I think it's really been a story about tariffs and uncertainty over precisely where we're going to end up of course we had that toe-for-toe matcheting ratcheting up from tariffs up to and all the way above 145 percent so really the discussion I think in this part of the world has been do we come down from here where do we end up and in the meantime how do companies and corporates figure out how they're going to pass that cost on either to consumers or absorb that themselves.
1:28Rebecca, I don't know why I called you, Rachel. My brain is frazzled from 100 days of this. But Rebecca Chung-Wilkins there. Tony Nash, CEO of Complete Intelligence, joining us from Houston there in Texas. Your impressions initially of this 100 days? Hi, Rahul. Thanks for having me. Gosh, there are a lot of people upset over the last 100 days, I think, just over the drama of Trump delivering on what he said he was going to deliver on. And so it's interesting to see the level of kind of shrill criticism of things that he said he would do all last year while he was touring the US for election. Rebecca, that is true.
2:13But I know as somebody who's looked at global trade so closely, have you ever seen a period like this where, Tony's totally right, Donald Trump said what he was going to do and that's what he's going to do. But he really is turning global trade or the system to some extent upside down, isn't he? I think that's right. I mean, we are entering an unprecedented period, not just in terms of sort of that uncertainty, but to your point, Rahul, about fundamentally the global trading system and the principles that it's operated. I would say to some extent, of course, you can say, yep, Donald Trump laid out partly what he was going to do in terms of tariffs.
2:48But part of the difficulty for companies has been a sort of whiplash and the flip-flopping, one day thinking, OK, we're about to see tariffs imposed on, let's say, Mexico, Canada and China, and then seeing some of that reverse the next day, or indeed the sort of really dramatic escalation that we saw with China ratcheting up higher and higher and higher and higher. And so I think that kind of whiplash or indeed the pace of change has really been what businesses have struggled to deal with. President Trump has been holding a rally in Michigan to mark the first 100 days of what is already, according to some, one of the most radical presidencies in modern US history.
3:26He's pretty happy with the way that things are going. We're here tonight in the heartland of our nation to celebrate the most successful first 100 days of any administration in the history of our country. And that's according to many, many people. This is the best, they say, 100-day start of any president in history, and everyone is saying it. We've just gotten started. You haven't even seen anything yet. It's all just kicking in. And he said that prices are coming down for consumers. So gasoline prices are down by a lot. Energy prices are down. Mortgage rates actually just went down. Prescription drug prices just saw their largest monthly decline ever recorded.
4:19How about that? Grocery prices have gone down. Everything's gone down. Throughout the programme, we are going to be joined by Erin Delmore, familiar voice, North America business correspondent. Erin is extremely busy. She is watching Donald Trump's interview on ABC. She's going to keep flipping in and out of the programme. He's going to be talking about tariffs again, isn't he, Erin? Hi, Rahul. Yes, surely. And in fact, we do have a snippet of the interview that has come out a bit early that ABC is using for promotional purposes, where the interviewer does press Donald Trump on tariffs and says, you know, surely we do know that the prices of many things will be going up.
4:58And the president seems to push back, saying that he thinks that China will absorb the higher costs that come into effect because of tariffs. So that's a bit of a news line there. Tony made a good point at the beginning of the program. I mean, often does, that when it comes to Donald Trump, he was pretty clear about what he was going to do with tariffs. Does it surprise you, Heron, that sometimes we seem so surprised by what we're seeing? You know, I think the math is really what surprised a lot of people here. President Trump, as you say, was not shy, saying that he wanted to level the playing field as he puts it and impose more tariffs.
5:32He said for a long time now, the better part of a decade, that he thinks that the U.S. is being ripped off by other countries. But I think what really shocked a lot of folks in the business community is when he held up those big charts on what he called Liberation Day on April 2nd, showing what he thought the tariff rate was that other countries had imposed on the United States, which in fact measured goods but stripped out services. And many economists have found to be a bit imbalanced. And so that is what he is responding to. And I do think that that is what has garnered a lot of attention here.
6:02Aaron, go back, watch it. I know you spend a lot of time watching, listening, analyzing what Donald Trump says for us. So we will be hearing from you, I'm sure, in a few minutes time with more details on that. Tony, there is a point in that, isn't there? It's not the tariffs. It's the numbers that took people by surprise. Yeah, you know, I think what most people – so I started my career as a customs broker. So I know I've worked around global tariffs for 30 years. And so I think what people haven't been attuned to, because what we've had for the last 30 years is an era of free trade. And I put free trade in air quotes because we've had tariffs fall to an average of 2.4 percent under the WTO.
6:49But we've had subsidies and non-tariff barriers rise to unprecedented levels. And so when we see these tariffs levied by the U.S., it's the full tariff impact for trade. And we can argue about how that was calculated, but you can't argue the fact that import restrictions, regulations, other barriers have barred U.S. goods from a lot of markets. And the U.S. has tolerated it for 40, 50 years in many cases. And so when the yardstick is simply tariffs, people are shocked when they see what their own exports face when they go into a country like Japan or China or something like that. That is a valid point, isn't it, Rebecca?
7:44Because China is often accused of subsidizing huge – a lot of its sectors, particularly we're talking about EVs. And when we use the word tariffs, that's one part of a way of dealing with a problem. But, you know, there are other restrictions that people put in place. The Indian market, a lot of that is closed to foreign companies as well. Yeah, that's absolutely right. And to Tony's point, I mean, those sort of protectionist measures have been imposed, not just by countries, other countries, but also by the US. You can look, for example, at the US autos market, where China really makes very little dent, for instance.
8:17but absolutely there is a concern not just in the US but also that we've seen expressed by the European Union for example about subsidies that they see are unfairly directed and rooted into industries that we now see over capacity including automakers but historically has also involved solar panels and so on battery makers and that kind of thing I think the challenge you know to Erin's point is that because tariff levels have been set according to deficits rather than say actual reciprocal rates, there is a bit of a question mark for governments, particularly in Asia, who have been hit by some of these really high tariffs about specifically what they should be taking into the negotiating room to try and figure out a deal.
9:01And so to some extent, I think there is this feeling among some governments and some diplomats that they're slightly operating in the dark. They're not entirely sure what it is the counterpart across to the desk really wants to see from them. Okay, let's bring in somebody who knows a lot about trade negotiations, because as we've been saying that trade and tariffs really have been the central point when it comes to economic policies of Donald Trump's first 100 days in office. Stephen Vaughan was the acting trade representative when Donald Trump was in office last time. And he told me what he makes of the introduction of tariffs this time around.
9:35He's always had the belief that we should have stronger tariffs. And I think he saw an opportunity to put these measures into place here at the beginning of the term. And I'm not surprised that he took advantage of that opportunity. He's talked, hasn't he, about short term pain that the American economy is going to face. Has he underestimated that pain? No, I don't think so. I mean, I think if you look at sort of the overall economic numbers are still looking strong. The markets have been going up here in the last few days. And I think he's, you know, he has a very, very good sense of sort of how the voters feel about these things and how the economy works.
10:11And I think you're seeing them, you know, making, you know, adjustments as necessary. And I think they're going to get in a very good place. You talk there about that good sense. All the opinion polls seem to say Americans have never been so worried about their economy. That fear of recession seems to be growing every day. Polls go up and down. And I think, you know, History shows that successful leaders are the ones who can persuade the country to go in the direction that they want it to go. And I think he's had a lot of success in this. He's been in our political system now at the very top of the system for nine years.
10:46He's won a lot more battles than he's lost. And I think he's going to win this one, too. Whenever we speak to businesses, they talk about confusion in policy. We just had another change in the automobile tariffs that's been announced. That is the problem, isn't it? Nobody knows with any certainty what's happening. Well, I think you have to understand that this is basically a situation where you're trying to get companies to change some of their approaches. You're trying to get them to hire more Americans than they would hire otherwise. You're trying to get them to pay those Americans more than they would pay otherwise.
11:18And it's an ongoing negotiation between the White House and the business community. And, of course, anytime you're in a negotiation, it's never in your interest to let the other person see all of your cards or all of your intentions. How would you sum up the first hundred days of the Donald Trump presidency when it comes to the economy? I think it's a very exciting beginning. I think that he was elected to create a stronger position for middle class Americans, the people who have been forgotten, the people who have been left behind. And I think he's putting policies in place that are going to work for those people.
11:50And I think it was a success in the first term. And I think it's going to be a success this time. So let's see if it is a success. On some of those trade deals that are being negotiated, we're going to talk about China in a moment, Rebecca. But when you look at other countries around you, like let's take Vietnam, do you think they're in a very difficult position because they need both markets here, the US and China? And it looks like Donald Trump and China want them to choose, don't they? Yeah, I mean, Vietnam is a really excellent example here. They're facing potential tariffs of around 50 percent.
12:24And what's more, they have actually promised to entirely eliminate their tariffs. And that has been that sort of request has been so far apparently dismissed out of hand by Navarro. And so that sort of underscores the difficulty that, you know, I was speaking about earlier about what it is that diplomats, what it is that policymakers from Asian countries need to be presenting. And Asia in particular is so vulnerable to these tariffs, of course, because we've seen very high levels, but also because trade, there's such deep interregional trade in this part of the world. And so it is really imperative.
13:00There's a real urgency that countries here want to sort of get their act together. Now, alongside that, we have also seen, of course, China pushing now, to your point, to try and strengthen some of those trades in Asia, to try and make the case that they are a more reliable partner, and not just when it comes to trade, but also to some extent over this issue of national security that has been very, very pressing. And of course, there are many US allies in this part of the world have long sort of depended on the US as the sort of security partner for itself in the region. And so there's sort of these dual priorities that I think are going on.
13:39It historically has been pretty difficult, though, for Asian nations to figure out these sort of trade deals. We saw the resumption of discussions between China, South Korea and Japan, for example. These are sort of trade talks that have been going on for years and years and years. So it'll be really interesting, I think, to watch and see, does the sort of pressure and economic stress as it starts to really bite here, does that actually successfully escalate and accelerate some of those trade discussions and trade agreements? Right. Let us talk about what has probably been the defining feature when it comes to economic policy of the first hundred days of the Trump administration.
14:13And that is relations with China and the tariffs that have been put in place on China. I'm delighted to say we're joined by Ningxiu, Professor of Finance at the Shanghai Jietong University. Thank you so much for joining us on the programme, Professor. There is a trade war between the US and China at the moment. Both have high tariffs on each other. How is that affecting China? And how is that affecting Chinese factories in particular at the moment? Well, I think it is definitely having its impact on China's economy. I mean, it is not a secret that China depends on about 20 % of its GDP growth on export.
14:52And the US has been historically a very important trade partners with China. And that being said, I think China also has morphed a lot over the past decades in a way that, well, now consumption makes up around 40 % of China's growth and investment makes up the remaining 30%, 40%. So, I mean, export is no longer the most important driver of China's economy. Of course, it was very important over the past two or three years with the softening in the real estate market. But then it is not that China's economy depends solely on export anymore. So I think that is one thing. It doesn't, but it's a huge part of it.
15:30When we were chatting this morning when I was speaking to you in China, you told me about what you were seeing at the ports in China. Just remind our listeners or tell our listeners of what you are seeing there. Yes, I think there are shocks to various parts of China, especially the coastal region, which used to be very heavily depending on export. And we are seeing that while some of the really busy ports in the past are now, I mean, having far less traffic, both in terms of the importing and exporting ships and also the trucks of delivering goods to that. That is partly because of the uncertainty.
16:09It's not like it is going to be like this forever. It's just people don't know what to do with whether the tariff will be dialed back or whether Chinese exporter will be shouldering the cost or it will be the importer from the U.S. side or eventually U.S. consumers doing that heavy lifting. So I think it is impacting Chinese economy, not a question. But then I think it remains to be seen about how this game eventually is going to play out. Stay with us, Professor. Tony, it will have a big impact on China's export-driven economy, won't it? But won't the Chinese be able to bear this more than the U.S.?
16:44Oh, no, I don't think that's the case. What I do think, though, and I think there is a potentially very good outcome here, and it's this. China really has to have more domestic consumption in its economy to move to the next generation of economy. And it's a very convenient situation where they can blame Donald Trump to undertake some very unpopular economic decisions to force more of a consumption economy in the US. So while we hear things out of China that they're very opposed to this and all this other stuff, I advise those guys in 2015 and 16. I spoke to the National Development and Reform Commission when Trump was coming into office the first time.
17:35They had no idea that he was going to impose tariffs and they didn't want to plan for it. And I doubt they did this time. But if they can blame Trump so that they can make some unpopular economic adjustment decisions at home, then everybody wins. OK, so I don't think this is – although there is short-term pain in China, if we look at, say, 1959 or other parts of China's recent economic history, China has been willing to undergo very difficult economic decisions in order to bring about, say, generational change in the economy. So I think it's possible that although they're not expressing that they're happy about this, I think on some level there may be some satisfaction in China that they can actually become more of a consumer-led economy after this.
18:22Professor, would you like to pick up on that? I do not disagree with the other guest about China's transition into a more consumption-driven growth. I think China has been thinking and doing that over the past decade. And I think it's exactly Donald Trump's 1.0, the trade war with China that is holding China's back from making that transition faster or smoother. So in that regard, I think it is China's interest to going through that transition. But then China is never willing to do something under the pressure or being hijacked by another major country in the world. I think that is one thing. The second thing is, I mean, let's not forget it.
18:59It's not China that is having a trade surplus to the U.S. U.S. is having trade deficit to almost all countries in the world. And then it is not surprising to China that U.S. is imposing terrorists on China. What is surprising to both Chinese and many Americans is the U.S. is imposing tariffs on so many other countries, which don't quite seem to make economic sense. Well, there is a pause on those. Rebecca, give us your perspective, particularly on this point about China and becoming a more consumer-driven economy. That is difficult, isn't it, when a lot of people in China have seen the value of their houses decrease so much in the last few years?
19:38Well, I think Professor Zhu is absolutely right that the move and shift towards a consumer-led economy was already taking place. And indeed, policymakers have already been trying to sort of engineer that and engineer a more sustainable model of economic growth. To your point, Rahul, in order to, for example, eliminating excessive amounts of property debt, this big crackdown that we've seen. And that has dented consumer confidence in China and it has slowed the economy significantly. And in fact, the Chinese economy is still sort of struggling to fully find a bottom when it comes to the property market.
20:11And that has held back in some ways this transformation. But ultimately, it's all about engineering its way to a much more long term, much more sustainable model. I do think that Tony has a good point, though. It's worth looking at what Donald Trump has done in terms of unifying and unleashing this wave of nationalist support for presidency. some of those transformations that we have been talking about, for example, targeting the tech sector, targeting the property sector, have been really uncomfortable and painful for Chinese people. They have seen the property, the value of their properties fall, for example.
20:48And there has been some amount of not just a confidence, a crisis in China, but also some discontent and scepticism, you know, that really, in fact, you can trace back to, for example, very strict COVID lockdowns. But what we've now seen is that the tariffs have sort of sparked this wave of patriotism in China. People from all sorts of backgrounds rallying behind Xi, not just business people, but also Bloomberg has, for example, reported that local government officials have been invigorated by this. They are feeling sort of much more confident to try and engineer economic plans and growth plans.
21:24So we have seen really situation giving Xi this sort of temporary reprieve from some of the criticism that he has been facing. We have Aaron Delmer, who is watching Donald Trump's interview with ABC News senior national correspondent Terry Moran. And Donald Trump was pushed on the impact terrorists are having on small businesses. So your answer to the concern about the tariffs is everything's going to be hunky dory. Everything's going to be just fine. It wouldn't have been if I didn't do this. I had a choice. I could leave it, have a nice, easy time. But I think ultimately you would have had an implosion.
21:55Donald Trump has spent quite Had a lot of time speaking today. Spoke for about an hour and a half at Michigan. Erin Delmore still following him. What are you making of it so far? Doing a lot to calm nerves of Americans who are worried that the tariff policy could cost goods to cost more. That is, you know, how he spent part of his interview with Terry Moran here saying everything is going to be fine. He also talked about how he sees prices coming down, inflation falling. He also talks about the price of eggs and the price of gasoline. And again, he echoed that from his speech in Michigan as well, but really doing a lot to kind of get out ahead of some of those anxieties, which we've seen borne out in the polls.
22:34A lot of Americans are nervous about the impact the tariffs could have. And so he's trying to assuage those fears. Erin, keep watching for us. We're going to hear more from Erin in the second half. We're going to finish up our conversation on China at the beginning of the next half as well. And then we're going to hear from a lot of U.S. businesses about how things are for them.
23:03Welcome back to Business Man News here on the BBC World Service. We're looking at the impact of Donald Trump being in power for 100 days. Of course, tariffs have been a word that we've been using more than ever on this programme. We have Rebecca Chung-Wilkins from Bloomberg, who is there in Hong Kong, and Tony Nash, of course, there in Texas for us as well. Before we went to the break, we were talking about Chen. I want to get some final thoughts from Professor Zhu Ning, Professor of Finance at one of Shanghai's leading universities. Somebody who's also advised the Chinese Central Bank as well.
23:38Now, Professor, when we're talking about the possibility of communications between President Xi and President Trump, President Trump keeps trying to indicate that there is some sort of communication. From the Chinese perspective, is that happening? I don't think there's any official evidence of negotiation. I mean, let's be very specific with the wording. I wouldn't be surprised there were some communications between the two sides. I mean, the depth or the width of the discussion is highly contingent, I think. But then in a way, I think China is being pushed against the war this time in a way that China has made a lot of concessions in Donald Trump 1.0, but it doesn't seem to rebalance the trade or please the president.
24:25So I don't think there's a lot of room for China to back down this time. So I think even if there is some discussions or communications, I think it's more of the boys in the quarter of the U.S. side to make certain changes and concessions. With your knowledge of those in the corridors of power in Beijing, do you expect there to be some sort of swift deal here or is it going to take some time? I think China is sticking to its ground this time. And we're also preparing for a wider range of ammunitions in monetary and physical stimulus in case that the trade war situation were to persist. Professor, thank you so much for joining us here on the program.
25:06Rebecca, would that be your thoughts as well, that we're not going to see a quick resolution between the world's two great economies, something that many across the world would like to see? Yeah, I mean, I'm just thinking about a couple of months ago, we were talking about this potential birthday summit between President Xi and President Trump. By coincidence, they have a birthday just either side of each other on the 14th and 15th. And that just now looks so, so far off. I mean, not least that President Trump and, you know, Chinese foreign ministry and other Chinese officials seem to sort of disagree over whether or not negotiations have even started to take place.
Read the full transcript
25:43Tony was it not always inevitable because a long time since we had two great economic powers which China is and which the US is is it not inevitable that they're going to clash isn't it something we just have to get used to. No, I don't think it is. But I have a weekly geopolitics show. And since the election in November, I've been reminding people that Xi Jinping and Trump will not get along for three to six months. So China will not align with the U.S. for, well, I would say until probably end of Q2 or Q3, because Xi Jinping has to he has domestic political issues that he has to tend to because he's got so many economic problems.
26:24that he has to be very nationalistic. And so if he were to talk to Trump within the first, say, three months or six months, he would look like he's weak. So I think both sides know. I know there are discussions going on between both sides. I mean, to act like there's not is, I think, silly. But I've known that Xi wouldn't talk to Trump for six months because he has to look strong domestically. And Trump knows that Xi Jinping has to stay strong domestically because you have pretty hardline communists just behind him. So while we think of Xi Jinping as a hardline communist, he's a known factor. And so Trump doesn't want Xi Jinping deposed or someone else coming into power.
27:13so he has to allow, not allow, but he has to kind of be patient with the process of domestic Chinese politics. Okay, let us look a bit more at what's going on inside the US itself and we're going to talk about the car industry now because President Trump has been speaking in Warren, Michigan, near to Detroit, which is the home of the US automobile industry and he said his attempts to bring back manufacturing will help create jobs as well. But I'm thrilled to be back in this beautiful state. I love this state. Got a lot of auto jobs coming. Watch what's happening. The companies are coming in by the tens.
27:54They all want to come back to Michigan and build cars again. You know why? Because of our tax and tariff policy. Donald Trump also announced a cut to some tariffs on car parts coming into the U.S. I've already proudly imposed a 25 % tariff on all foreign automobiles. And to help these automakers bring their factories home as rapidly as possible, I've just signed an executive order to give partial tariff rebates to any company that assembles its cars right here in the USA. In other words, I'm giving them a little bit of a break, right? Somebody would say, oh, well, that's a change in that. It's called a little flexibility.
28:33The guys were crying. They love it. Everything's good. We give them a little time before we slaughter them if they don't do this. Right. OK, let's get some reaction to that from Charles Dardus, president and COO of Alpha USA in Michigan, who is a supplier of parts to the car sector, to the big three. Charles, so we've had, we can use whatever words we want, a slight change in policy. Is that going to make any difference to you? No, thank you so much for giving us this audience. What the administration was talking about was to the car assemblers, the car manufacturers, those of us that are in the parts supply business, it didn't apply to us whatsoever.
29:17We're still faced with tariffs on steel, potentially tariffs on imports we make from Canada and Mexico. So what we heard today is actually irrelevant to us in the auto supply base. He has talked about the fact that, you know, if you are bringing in some parts from Canada, that if you also bring in steel, you won't have to pay double tariffs. That seemed to be something that was indicated. That would help you, wouldn't it? It would help us. But the way it stands right now is we're paying the steel tariffs for parts that are coming in from Canada. But on May 3rd, the administration still has to decide what the applicability is of the Canadian tariffs.
30:03So we've got the steel tariffs and the Canadian tariffs. If the administration is going to be deciding how much tariff would apply to our parts, if we have any U.S. content, this way it appears, if we have any U.S. content in the parts coming to us from Canada, we would get a partial exemption under USMCA. However, the parts we get from Canada are all Canadian. Therefore, we could very well be faced with another 25 % tariff on top of the one that we're already paying. Yeah, USMCA is that deal between the United States, Mexico and Canada as well. Just generally around you with some of the uncertainty that's obviously there with the tariffs that have been put in place.
30:47Give us a sense of how that's affecting your company, the wider car industry, Michigan as well? Well, in the auto supply base, the company I'm with, we're not that big. We're a couple hundred employees, as you and I have talked about before. And we can't withstand this load of cost. We've got wonderful customers that we deal with, but they don't have a bottomless pit of being able to help us either. We don't even know what the formulas are going to be to get any assistance if we can whatsoever. But if we're to bear the burden of these tariffs with companies our size, we could go out of existence.
31:29And I've said that publicly a number of times. This could be an existential threat to our existence. And our wonderful company has been in business for 67 years. It's a shame to see a good, solid American company like ours be threatened as we are. We've done nothing wrong. Stay with us. Going to bring in Joe Seamus in a minute, who I'm sure would have heard lots of stories like that from the Small Business Council in the US. But just want to get Tony and Rebecca's thoughts firstly on this. Tony, we've heard from lots of small businesses who seem to be in this predicament. So, you know, Donald Trump wants to bring manufacturing back to the US.
32:10He says there's going to be short term pain. And that is for companies like Charles's, isn't it? Yeah, it is. I mean, look, I when I was talking with the producer before the show, I was talking about this, the pain that small businesses felt during the pandemic. Right. And so, you know, it's comparable, I think, in some ways. But I look at companies like mine and we haven't received the funding we were supposed to receive from the federal government four years ago. OK, so when I'm hearing companies saying that they're having a hard time kind of three months in on this, To be honest, it's kind of hard for me to hear when my company is waiting four years for reimbursement from the federal government.
33:00So if a company is having trouble already, then there are bigger problems than the tariffs, to be very honest. Charles, would you like to respond to that? Sure, I would. I'm not saying that the problem is immediate for us right now. What I'm talking about is if these continue on for a year or more. I don't know. It's like in your business. You know, like if you have your material cost increased by 50 percent, maybe you can withstand it, but ours cannot. Well, if it lasts for five or 10 years, then it's going to be a problem, too. I mean, it's – but when I hear people talking about them, companies having issues already, then I have to question how strong is that business anyway?
33:42And there were other issues before the tariffs because three weeks, four weeks in, if they're going out of business, then they were not strong businesses anyway. I want to bring Rebecca in at this point. We're talking a lot about US businesses. We've been speaking to a lot of companies in China and there are big problems, aren't there? Because a lot of US companies have put orders on hold or may not even proceed with them if the tariffs remain at this level. Yeah, I think that's absolutely right. And to Professor Drew's earlier point, that's why we're seeing these sort of some chaotic scenes at some ports in China.
34:15We have assembly lines coming to a halt. We have some companies actually deciding that they're not going to even carry on. They're going to sort of call it early and either close down and try and revamp their business and become something else or find entirely new consumer markets. So there are quite radical decisions that are happening. And it definitely is denting people's confidence around jobs, for example. So we've had the likes of Morgan Stanley showing one survey that about 44 percent of people believe that they or their families are going to see someone out of work. And so overall sentiment has really taken a hit.
34:49And there is this deep, profound concern about the sort of existential doubt and the ability just to survive that really is being discussed here by individual businesses. But underlying this, there's this interesting commonality by both presidency and President Trump, which is this conviction that both countries have a tolerance for pain, a tolerance for a certain level of pain that can be sustained in order to engineer sort of a bigger, more dramatic shift and reshaping of the economy. It's interesting that both of those countries are really committed to this sort of longer era of sort of just kind of withstanding pain.
35:29But when it comes to Chinese manufacturers, and you eloquently described some of the problems that they may be facing, Donald Trump would say that's not his concern. That's not his country. If other countries are having problems, his job is to look after the US. Yeah, absolutely. And to that point, the whole issue has been to what extent are and who is actually going to foot the bill when it comes to tariffs. Now, there is a very decent argument and is likely that to some extent, Chinese manufacturers are going to decide to take on some of those costs. But we do have evidence that companies eat big e-commerce platforms.
36:06You look at the likes of Xi 'an and Timu. They are facing huge tariffs, about 120 percent tariffs on money in their products. And they are putting almost entirely all of that onto the consumer, onto the U.S. consumer. So for Xi 'an, for example, we analyze a whole bunch of data looking at how they're repricing. The highest level, some of their goods are being repriced at 377 % increase. On average, among beauty and health, we're seeing a 51 % increase. So there are Chinese companies that are certainly not taking that approach. They are not willing to take that price hike on the books themselves.
36:42And they are willing entirely to impose that on the US consumer, even though their business is entirely dependent on the US consumer or largely dependent on the US consumer. It's interesting. We spoke to somebody who was involved in bringing in wedding dresses from the US the other day who talked about how they were splitting those tariff costs. You know, the Chinese manufacturer was taking some, they were taking some on themselves. Joe Shamus has been very patient, venture capitalist, owner and general partner of Flintlock Capital. He's also chairman of the US Chamber of Commerce, his Small Business Council.
37:12Thanks so much for joining us. We heard from Charles. We also heard from Tony with his perspective there. What are you hearing from small businesses? Are they worried that some of the bigger companies may be able to get exemptions from tariffs, but they're not going to be able to get them? Well, I'm hearing a lot of different things. We have businesses that are being affected more, are having larger impacts from this, and we have businesses that are seeing positive impacts from it. So it's difficult to say. I think we'll know a lot more in another month or two. But what's being overshadowed by a lot of the discussion of tariffs is the incredible work that's happening to secure tax policy, pro-growth tax policy for small business.
37:55With the expiration of the R &D expensing three years ago, with the small business pass-through deduction that's set to expire at the end of this year, and with potentially bringing bonus depreciation back, these are huge issues for small business that are absolutely going to spur economic growth. And that's what's happening right now between the president and the House and the Senate. They're working in earnest to do this. They are working to do this. In terms of, though, moving forward, a lot of those small businesses can only hold inventory, can't they, for a small period of time. So once that inventory from China runs out, what are they saying to you they're going to do, Joe?
38:34Well, some of the businesses that I'm talking to are looking at alternatives. Some of them have already had alternatives that they've used in the past and are looking at shifting back to those locations. Depending on the type of business, some of them will have huge impacts and some will have lesser impacts. I mean, I've got a friend who runs an American manufacturing company that does 98 % of their stuff in the United States and their business is growing. And so I think the tendency is to paint all of this in a very specific light. and the real answer is there's a whole lot of diversity when it comes to American business and so you know I think we have to wait and see how this shakes out and hopefully it shakes out positively for these companies that are being impacted and they are able to find good alternatives or a good you know trade policy that supports them in the long run.
39:25Charles that is a valid point isn't it it's very different from sector to sector it's very different from business to business but as you look ahead to the next couple of months what's your perspective are you are you still worried oh yes i'm i'm worried i i think we all hope that uh cooler heads prevail what we're doing is we're pivoting uh to the best we can to to our fellow u.s manufacturers um but many of them still buy steel offshore but um we were working very earnestly you know with our customers to mitigate this, you know, also to reduce our internal costs. We've got a lot of, you know, we have ongoing programs anyway to reduce our costs, but this certainly has put an accelerator on it.
40:15You know, but we still, you know, we certainly still have hope. You know, this is, you know, we're very proud of our country and proud of what we can accomplish. So we're hoping for the best. We'll keep in touch with you on that particular story. Charles, thanks so much for joining us once again. We wanted to bring you an interview with somebody who had voted for Donald Trump at the last election, but who also runs a business as well. So I've been speaking to Isaac Larian. He is the founder and chief executive of MGA Entertainment, the world's largest privately owned toy company. I don't want to be very dramatic, but I can say it's disastrous.
40:54Our sales will drop 30, 40 percent. And you're going to see a lot of empty shelves. Come this fall, you're going to see many, many children not having toys under the Christmas tree. Or if they have toys, they're going to be very expensive. And these children are going to remember. You run the largest toy factory in the U.S., don't you, in Ohio? So as a business, you were planning to expand that factory, weren't you? Are you still going to expand it? Yes, you're right. We have the largest toy manufacturers in America, in Hudson, Ohio, which employs 700 people. We were planning to increase that facility by 220 ,000 square feet and hire more workers.
41:48That plan is on hold. We also purchased 575 acres of land in California, where we were planning to make that the toy manufacturing up of America, bringing in MGA and many and many other toy companies to make toys here. And that is on hold. Can I ask you, why is it on hold? Surely, if you're not going to bring in so much from China, the president's rationale is you'll build more in the US. So if you're not going to bring so much in from China, why don't you build more in the US? You know, money doesn't grow on trees. And we need to have profit, which we were planning to, from our import of toys, to invest in these expansions.
42:37And that money is not going to be available right now. And frankly, it's going to have a reverse effect if it's not changed immediately. And we will end up not only putting these factories on hold, we have to lay off people. You voted for Donald Trump, didn't you? Do you regret that decision now? I voted for him. No, I don't regret it. I truly believe that Donald Trump cares for America and its success. But right now, I think he's being advised by some wrong people, especially a guy named Peter Navarro. Peter Navarro is one of his most senior advisors when it comes to the economy and manufacturing.
43:18Let's be very clear, in terms of your business, do you now worry about the future of your business? Of course I'm very worried. I am an immigrant who came here in 1971 with$753 an American dream. I built this company from washing dishes to where it is now. And I never thought I have to worry about the future of my company, my family and my employees and their families. And I am now. So interested to hear the points of those business views of the business owner there, Joe. But I'm sure you would agree with certain of the points he makes, which is that Donald Trump has the best interest of the U.S.
43:57economy at heart. And, you know, that we could see deals that are going to be made, which will mean that in a few months time we'll be in a very different situation. Yeah, and this is my personal perspective, not necessarily my chamber hat. But both of the last two people talked about how much they love their business and how they built it over multiple decades or multiple generations. And they've lived through multiple administrations, down cycles in the economy, COVID, inflation, all of these things. There is the incredible resiliency within the American entrepreneur. And they always figure it out.
44:37The ones that win will always figure it out. And we live in an incredible country that leads in innovation, that has the best universities, the best infrastructure, the best capital markets. And so I will never bet against this country. And I personally think that this is going to work out positively for the country and for economic expansion and for the American people as a whole. Well, listen, we're going to keep talking to you. Thank you for coming on the program. Tony, one thing, you know, President Biden agreed with this as well was that the U.S. has to move away from China. You can't just rely on one country when it comes to your supply chains.
45:11Yeah, well, if you look at your recent guest, 80 percent of the toys that are imported to the U.S. come from China. So, of course, we're going to see impacts on, you know, on the shelves. But when we look at and I've seen in recent weeks, I've seen people try to scare up kind of panic about things not being on shelves. Things that Americans need to know is the vast majority of their food is made in the U.S., right? So we don't have to worry about food shortages, paper products. You know, you saw all the footage of people hoarding toilet paper and stuff during the pandemic. All that stuff is made locally.
45:48So there's no need to hoard any of that stuff. And we won't see shortages on shelves of that stuff. But things like toys, certain electronics, that sort of thing. Yeah, there's going to be some delays, of course. And that decoupling process is not a one-way street, is it, Rebecca? China has been trying to move away from the US as well in certain areas. Yeah, that's right. I mean, this idea of sort of dual circulation, essentially China trying to, on the one hand, boost its own domestic market and domestic consumption, essentially to try and shore up its economy against shocks like this and try and protect it in these sort of circumstances.
46:26So this has been quite a long sort of prevailing effort on the part of Beijing. But clearly, this has added a whole different element of urgency to doing that. But China will also be very actively trying to seek alternative markets. I mean, I think it's no surprise that we are seeing China redoubling its efforts, even sort of soft cultural power events. We're seeing China collaborating on the first, for example, K-pop, Korean pop concert. I think that's the first time in nearly a decade or something that we're seeing that. So it's certainly no surprise that, on the other hand, China is also going to be seeking much more actively to expand its markets overseas.
47:02And there is the potential that it will start to ruffle some feathers. We already had, for example, certain Latin American countries complaining about Chinese steel exports into their economies, particularly some of these overcapacity sectors that we've already discussed about. So it's not going to be a smooth process. No, it's not. Well done for getting K-pop in there. Now, yesterday on the programme, we were talking, Davina was talking a lot about the Canadian elections, Mark Carney has won, didn't quite get a majority. He will be the next prime minister of Canada, and he's promised to take a tough stance with Donald Trump.
47:32The system of open global trade anchored by the United States, a system that Canada has relied on since the Second World War, a system that, while not perfect, has helped deliver prosperity for a country for decades, is over. We are over. We are over the shock of the American betrayal, but we should never forget the lessons. Aaron Delmore has been watching Donald Trump's interview with ABC. Any talk of possible trade deals? Any talk of Mark Carney? Oh, Rahul, I am afraid to admit that they have moved on from business talk as much as it is the center of our universes and admittedly the beginning of the hour long interview.
48:16But as you can imagine, there is much to cover from every corner of the Trump presidency over these first 100 days. What stood out for you, Erin? You know, I think it's interesting to see that the president is implicitly reactive to some of the polling that we've seen lately. You know, the story leading up to the election is that a lot of voters, the majority, in fact, said they were going to vote on the economy and chiefly on bringing prices down. But economists have said that the tariffs as they stand now threaten to be inflationary and actually cause the prices of goods to go up. So you saw the president really drawing some clear lines here, saying everything is going to be fine.
48:53I expect to deal with China. It's even possible that China might absorb these costs, the way he said it was China might eat the tariffs. So it's interesting to see him trying to navigate this line here and trying to really speak to some of those anxieties that Americans are saying in surveys they've been feeling. Well, Erin, thank you very much for watching that. for us. Rebecca, Tony, thank you for guiding us through the first 100 days of the Donald Trump presidency. It's caused many different, it led to many different opinions, lots of different discussions. Those will continue.
From the publisher
On the programme we are looking at Donald Trump's first 100 days in power, during which he has talked a lot about tariffs, and there have been many changes to trade policies. Rahul Tandon looks at the key important economic events of the initial 100 days and the way they have upended global trade. Also, Mark Carney is celebrating his election victory in Canada, although Canadian broadcaster CBC projects his party will fall just short of the 172 parliamentary seats needed for a majority.
Throughout the programme, we’ll be joined by two guests on opposite sides of the world – Rebecca Choong Wilkins, Senior Asia correspondent for Bloomberg, and Tony Nash, CEO of Complete Intelligence.




