Craig Tiley: Transforming the Australian Open, The Player Pay Debate & How Tennis Can Make More Money (Ep127)

7 Jul 2026 · 1 h 11 min · 28 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Tennis Australia CEO Craig Tiley discusses transforming the Australian Open into a three-week entertainment festival, the “player pay” debate, and how tennis can improve commercial alignment with its global viewership through better governance and a clearer season-long story.

Guest backgrounds

Craig Tiley is Tennis Australia’s CEO and has been Australian Open tournament director since 2007 (and at the event since 2005). He’s set to become CEO of the U.S. Tennis Association (USTA), overseeing tennis for a participation base of 30+ million players across the U.S.

Key claims

Tennis is the third most watched sport globally but not in the top 10 commercially, so the problem is “the sport,” not the slams. Player pay arguments should focus on “fair share” and profit available to grow the game, not just revenue splits. Tennis needs centralized governance and a unified calendar so fans know who to follow and when the season runs. For mid-ranked pros (roughly 100–300/350), tennis must become affordable via minimum guarantees and regional earnings support.

Notable examples

Australian Open’s annual “at least 50% different” experience; adding music/food/gaming pillars; the Australian Open’s leased venue logistics; proposed performance+profile-based compensation; Davis Cup/Billie Jean King Cup only matter with top players in full stadiums.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

The State of Tennis: A Commercial Challenge

0:00 to 0:28

Discussion on the commercial struggles of tennis despite its popularity.

“Tennis is the third most watched sport globally and doesn't rank inside the top 10 commercially.”

Craig Tiley's Journey in Tennis

2:26 to 3:23

Craig Tiley shares his experiences and the intensity of the tennis calendar.

“more money than ever hiring analysts, buying information, building dashboards and subscribing to scouting report apps.”

Craig Tiley's Journey in Tennis

3:26 to 3:40

Craig Tiley shares his experiences and the intensity of the tennis calendar.

“It's amazing to have you in the studio in London.”

Transforming the Australian Open: A Festival of Tennis

3:40 to 6:15

Discussion on how the Australian Open has evolved into a premier entertainment festival.

“It's where everyone's, you know, all the agents are there, all the players are there, the partners that they have, and it's where the most activity actually happens.”

Logistical Challenges of Hosting a Grand Slam

6:15 to 7:27

Insights into the complexities of organizing the Australian Open.

“What a better platform then is to promote growing the game and what we need to do.”

Financial Strategies in Tennis: Profit vs. Revenue

7:27 to 12:00

Exploring the financial dynamics of player salaries and profit sharing in tennis.

“So I think I learned early about thinking more broadly than just what your offering is.”

Advocating for Players: Balancing Profits and Growth

12:00 to 14:01

Craig discusses the importance of advocating for players while maintaining financial stability.

“Because the other remit we have, we're actually a not-for-profit organization that's ultimate responsibility is grow and promote the game in Australia.”

Understanding Player Compensation in Tennis

14:01 to 16:45

Learn about the complexities of player compensation and revenue sharing in professional tennis.

“Because if we're being really harsh, if they're taking money out of the slams, it's got to come from somewhere.”

The Commercial Landscape of Tennis

16:45 to 19:19

Explore the commercial challenges facing tennis and the disparity between viewership and revenue.

“and doesn't rank inside the top 10 commercially.”

Challenges of Governance in Tennis

19:19 to 22:48

Discuss the complicated governance structure in tennis and its impact on decision-making.

“One is performance in the slams and two, how the year-end ranking finishes.”
Show all 28 chapters

Future Vision for Tennis Governance

22:48 to 28:00

Consider potential reforms for a more effective governance structure in tennis.

“the the issue is the sport the issue is like from january to october there's no proper off season as a start, but from January to October, where's our story?”

Raising Tennis' Global Profile

28:00 to 30:50

Discussing the importance of increasing commercial opportunities for players and the sport.

“And if you've got a global tour, an ATP, let's say type tour, rather than Australia, the US, France, and the UK getting the majority of the money to feed into their infrastructures and systems.”

Economic Challenges for Players

30:50 to 33:59

Exploring the financial struggles of professional players and the high costs of pursuing a tennis career.

“And I think that's maybe the International Tennis Federation now called World Tennis.”

Minimizing Professional Player Costs

33:59 to 36:50

Addressing the need for a minimum guarantee for lower-ranked professional players to improve their financial situation.

“So I think minimum guarantee is one avenue.”

Transitioning to USTA Leadership

36:50 to 38:34

Craig Tiley reflects on his journey in tennis and discusses his new role with USTA.

“I fell in love with the sport and then double lucky is being able to coach at a university in the United States and have some success and then get offered a job in Australia.”

Navigating Relationships in Tennis

38:34 to 41:20

Craig Tiley talks about the complexities of relationships with players and organizations in tennis.

“And to become the central hub of tennis globally and to be able to contribute and have an impact on tennis globally, it's probably the one place in the world where that could really happen.”

Antitrust Lawsuit Insights

41:20 to 42:04

Discussing the implications of the antitrust lawsuit against Tennis Australia and the importance of settlements.

Settling Legal Claims and Fiduciary Responsibilities

42:04 to 44:29

Learn about the challenges Tennis Australia faces regarding potential legal claims and how they approach settlement decisions.

“which there was, in any circumstance, it could be brought in by players, a group of players, one player, it could be brought in by a fan, it could be brought in by anyone.”

Defining Success in Tennis Events

44:30 to 45:58

Discover what it truly means to define success in tennis events, focusing on player participation and fan engagement.

“And if you can drive that outcome for the fans, the players are going to win and everyone is going to win.”

Balancing Player Interests and Organizational Growth

45:59 to 48:20

Explore the complexities of balancing player interests with the growth and financial sustainability of tennis organizations.

“To execute and be able to deliver both can be a huge challenge.”

Building Trust and Relationships in Tennis

48:21 to 50:56

Learn about the importance of trust and communication between players and executives in the tennis industry.

“In fact, my father used to say, unless you've been criticized, you're not doing anything.”

Challenges and Opportunities in U.S. Tennis

50:57 to 54:02

Understand the unique challenges and opportunities facing U.S. tennis, including leadership dynamics and stakeholder engagement.

“of advocating for the players, but that's not just the professional players.”

Leveraging Technology in Tennis Events

54:03 to 56:00

Examine how tennis events can leverage technology for innovation and improvement in player and fan experiences.

“the life again i've got a little bit of inside information so i'm kind of leading you here but the day in the life of a CEO of a major federation during those big tournaments.”

The Evolution of Investment in Tennis Technology

56:00 to 57:50

Discover how Australian Open Ventures is changing the investment landscape in tennis.

“an amazing job of that at Australian Open Ventures, which actually includes investing in companies that you've got working with you.”

Navigating Financial Structures in Tennis

57:50 to 1:00:00

Learn about the complexities of financing infrastructure and managing revenue in tennis.

“So a player ranked 50 in the world may make a$50 ,000 investment in today, 2026, on something that has got a whole bunch of other investors and is backed by the US Open or the Australian Open or Wimbledon.”

The Future of Tennis Stars and Rivalries

1:00:00 to 1:05:40

Explore the potential for new tennis stars and the dynamics of current rivalries.

“Whereas when you invest in infrastructure, you can go and say, I'm going to make a$500 million investment in infrastructure.”

The Impact of Player Relationships on Tennis Growth

1:05:40 to 1:07:10

Understand how player relationships and governance influence the growth of tennis.

“And still will be, which is so great about her.”

Challenges in Information Access for Sporting Directors

1:10:06 to 1:10:57

Learn about the common issues sporting directors face in accessing player information.

“But none of that matters if it's not talking to each other, not accessible by the full team.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Craig Tiley:Tennis is the third most watched sport globally and doesn't rank inside the top 10 commercially. So when I look at that, I say the problem is not the slams. The problem is the sport. Fans don't know where the heck we're going. They don't know who's winning from one week to the next week. They know what's happening in the slams. That's about it. And even that sometimes gets sub-optimized. They don't know when the season finishes. They don't know when it starts. They don't know who to follow. They don't know where to follow. They don't know what platform to watch it. And so that's an opportunity for tennis, but also one of our biggest problems.

0:28Hello and welcome to The Business of Sport, the show that takes you behind the scenes with the industry's leading owners, operators and athletes. In the summer weeks when tennis is front and centre, Tennis Australia CEO Craig Tiley joins us as tennis faces both a bucket load of major opportunities to take advantage of and challenges to overcome. Player pay, demanding audiences, lack of centralised governance, some of the biggest stars in global sport. You're balancing multiple plates to try and deliver for the players, the fans and the businesses. Craig has turned the Australian Open into one of sports great events, a now three week festival of entertainment.

1:01Those of you that tune in regularly will know how important that is to the modern sporting business model and appeal. He's now about to take over as CEO of the US Tennis Association, a move that will seem responsible for the US's largest sporting event and the participation base of over 30 million players. A huge job. There is no one better place to take us through the highs and lows of the tennis world. One of the first names on the list of guests we wanted to join us when we started the show, I'm delighted to welcome Craig finally to the Business of Sport. The Business of Sport is supported by Airwallex, the intelligent financial platform used by more than 200 ,000 modern businesses, from SaaS and marketplaces to some of the most ambitious organisations in sport, including McLaren Racing, Arsenal and the San Francisco Giants.

1:45The off-pitch problem is simple. Your supporters, sponsors and partners are everywhere, but the money that connects them is still stuck in slow expensive systems, wire transfers that take days, fees that quietly eat into revenue and clunky processes that make simple things feel hard. Airwallex gives you one clean way through it. A single platform to open local accounts in key markets, collect payments from supporters in their own currency, CFX in real time and pay out fast from backroom staff to agencies and suppliers. If you're growing the business side of a sports organization or any global business with the same problem, Airwallex helps you stop losing time and margin to the legacy banking system and move money at the speed your sport moves.

2:26Clubs are spending more money than ever hiring analysts, buying information, building dashboards and subscribing to scouting report apps. But none of that matters if it's not talking to each other, not accessible by the full team. How many times this week have you been in a meeting, needed information about a player and had to text three people to get it? Your scouts filed reports and email, your analysts have information on their dashboards, your contracts are in PDFs scattered across shared drives. Everything you need to make decisions exist somewhere, just not in one place. Most sporting directors are spending hours every week hunting for information that should be at their fingertips.

2:58Gemini changes that. It's the mobile-first command center that brings everything together. Scout reports, intel, performance information, and now contract intelligence with full budget impact analysis. Drag and drop any contract PDF. The AI automatically extracts salaries, bonuses, sell-on clauses, and projects live financial impact as you evaluate players. See the complete picture. Make better decisions faster from anywhere. Learn more at geminisports.ai and why major clubs across three continents are getting everything they need to win the transfer market all in one place.

3:35Craig, hello. Welcome to the Business of Sport.

3:38Craig Tiley:It's amazing to have you in the studio in London. It's great. It's good to be. I wouldn't expect to be in London having a chat to you but uh timing of the year works out well with uh the women championships happening at the same time yeah we're recording this on day one so i'd imagine a lot of the uh well the work may not have started for you or have you been here no we've been we've been pretty you know the qualifying week is always an intense week for us not like supporting our athletes that are playing but also uh uh starting to get into all the things that we need to do and um and then this week as well is pretty intense it's the business side of the of the event really when the end of qualifying in the first week.

4:12Craig Tiley:It's where everyone's, you know, all the agents are there, all the players are there, the partners that they have, and it's where the most activity actually happens. And then, of course, when you get to the final week of a Grand Slam, that's when it's more about the tennis and, you know, the tennis purists tend to be more focused on that final week. Do you get to enjoy it? Yeah, love it. I mean, I don't get to watch as much as you'd like to, but if you get a moment to watch a little bit, you do, but for the most part you're out there working and being around it. It's kind of like the four grand stamps, like having four major business conferences and workshops a year.

4:51Craig Tiley:So then that's how we approach it. So when I was taking a look before this interview, I always like to see what people have done beforehand. And you're a seasoned pro in front of the microphone, so much so that I actually watched something you did with Andy Roddick. and to quote you, you said one thing you learned from him. You said, that's how you deal with the media. You just don't answer the questions you're asked. So that, I thought, well, this is going to be brilliant. We're going to have a lot of fun in here. No, no, I've been coached to always say what you want to say regardless of what you're asked.

5:25Craig Tiley:Darren's sitting outside with a nod. I've been on a journey whether it be through COVID which is a very intense period for us and I think I picked up my most, I learned managing media and the skills of that probably more than any other time in my career. But I've been fortunate. I've been on a journey where you deal with the media a lot and conversation a lot. And I tend to always say what I think. And sometimes that doesn't go down well. But I think people at least appreciate the fact that I'll be transparent. Brilliant. Well, let's have a look because what you have been doing and also what you are doing are two very different, very exciting things.

6:02Craig Tiley:They are. yeah we'll start by having a look at what you have been doing because you've been at the australian open am i right in saying you've been there for about 20 years yep moved in 2005 and and took over running the event in 2007 so really 20 years this is the 20th australian open this year and tournament director to start and then chief executive the last 13 years yeah anyone that likes their tennis anyone that knows their tennis if you've been watching throughout that period of time the slams of course are amazing events in the telus calendar yeah but a lot of a lot of them for history and heritage reasons etc stay pretty similar the australian open has not done that in the same way that to me has been something that has stood out and i'd love to know what it was when you've come in from going in 2005 to what you see and what you've achieved now that has driven that well i i to give a little bit of story of perspective on it In my first year when I approached those people at the time that were running it, my first question was, you know, how can – because I was in charge of development and getting kids to play and getting kids to perform.

7:07Craig Tiley:What a better platform then is to promote growing the game and what we need to do. So can we use before tennis match, getting kids on the court, showing the audience how much fun they're having and how great this game is, put many nets out there and many rackets. and then can we showcase some of the up-and-coming players? Then I was stopped in my tracks. I said, no, this is just about tennis, just about the competition, just about the event. So I think I learned early about thinking more broadly than just what your offering is. And then when I had the opportunity to lead the event, the first thing to look at was how do we present this differently?

7:43Craig Tiley:We appealed to the rusted-on tennis fan. They loved coming to the event and sitting down and watching tennis, but we can make it a lot more than that. And so from that point on and having a really good team of people is the journey we took is that how do we change this event at a minimum 50 % each year? So you come as a fan and your experience at a minimum is going to be at least 50 % different, completely different to what it was last year. And so now that was an arbitrary number that I just chose and it's become now a policy. But it's worked. and my view was that we need to start and again having a great team and creative team of people looking at it differently and leading it differently but bring in different pillars let's bring the pillar of music and let's become Australia's largest music festival let's bring in the pillar of food and let's be Australia's largest celebration of great food not just from Australia but from around the world and the young kids and family let's provide them with Disney-like entertainment why not?

8:43Craig Tiley:because we can become a festival of the sport then going to the tech side of the business is that whether it be gaming, we could become a gaming platform and 13, 14, 15, 16-year-old young adults can come to the tennis to compete in the gaming event and then happen to walk past a tennis court. They may not even look at it, but they're coming to enjoy this festival of our sport. So we positioned it that way and it's now grown into a must-have for every Australian. They need to go and have this experience. And then globally, the audience want to figure out what are they doing down there that we can go and have some good time.

9:22Three-week event now, correct?

9:24Craig Tiley:That's right. And that three weeks is categorized by one week that looks like what you just described, the entertainment element. Two weeks, obviously, of the tennis then with a huge amount of things going on and around it. What's it like implementing that in a sport where it can be hard to impact change? It's a massive logistical exercise. And one thing that's unique, which people don't know about the Australian Open, it's the only Grand Slam that doesn't own its place that it operates out of. We lease it. We lease it from the Victorian government. And, you know, we're fortunate in the Victorian government.

9:53Craig Tiley:They make investments in it. Although we are on a journey now of needing to accelerate that further because those investments have now slowed. And we need to keep evolving the physical infrastructure of the precinct. But we pay a fee to lease it year round because we live there. And then the fee gets a bit higher during the three weeks in January because there's a contractor arrangement that we have to do that. But what we get out of it is just like paying a rent. So you're going to your landlord and paying a rent. And what we get out of it is the right to operate it during that period of time.

10:25Craig Tiley:So it becomes extremely difficult because we've got to pull everything down, everything that we put up, and start again the following year. So then we've got to get lessons in storage, lessons in sustainability and how we reuse the infrastructure and how we recut the opportunity. And so we've got to become extremely creative in taking the same piece of wood and making it look different next year. And then make sure that we can try and protect that piece of wood so we're not making a poor contribution to the environment. So it's a big challenge. And you've got to look at it very differently. And so our way of operating is very different to everyone else.

11:02So key business line for a lot of these events is going to be your ticketing, the revenue generated around hospitality, the experiential side, should we say.

11:10Craig Tiley:That's right. If you don't own some of that infrastructure, how does that work from what you're able to generate and what goes back into you as Tennis Australia? Yeah. So first of all, the first thing you're going to do, you've got to build it. So now the cost of building infrastructure. So if I'm going to go and charge, you know,$200 for a ticket, out of that cost of that ticket, I'm going to take the cost of the infrastructure build. Then you're going to take your margin you've got to provide to your ticketing provider. And then your margin you've got to provide to your landlord, in this case, the Victorian government.

11:38Craig Tiley:Then the margin you've got to provide for the hospitality piece. And then what's left at the end is what you have in your profit. And so if we didn't have that permanent infrastructure cost, it would enable us in those other channels of cost to be able to have less because you could have some consistent things year on year. So it just means you've got to be really creative on how you deliver it from a financial point of view to make the profit that you need to make. Because the other remit we have, we're actually a not-for-profit organization that's ultimate responsibility is grow and promote the game in Australia.

12:09Craig Tiley:And this is where the big argument becomes. And the four grand slams are all not-for-profits and they have a constitutional responsibility. This is not our choice. This came 100 years before us. And good luck trying to change that because changing a constitution in these environments comes from the ground up, comes from the members. And the members are generally going to say, no, no, no, we're happy with how the structure works. And the structure works, that means off the profits of those events, you go and do the best job you possibly can to grow the profits. But off the profits of those events, part of that needs to be distributed to grow the sport.

12:39Craig Tiley:And there is actually a very interesting symbiotic relationship between the two because research tells us now that most people, 99%, that come to these events have an aspiration to play tennis or do play tennis in some form. So we want to invest in them playing because we know the likelihood of them buying a ticket, investing in a ticket is much higher than just the general population. It's been the big talking point because of the player salaries discussion. Absolutely, yeah. But you kept saying the word then, and this is where for me it's always sat in, could be one side, could be the other.

13:10Craig Tiley:You said profit, not revenue. And quite often we hear discussions at the moment being about the players getting a portion of the total revenue of a slam and how the revenues of the slams have been going up. and therefore they want to see the salaries going up proportionally at least to ensure that the players are getting their fair cut. But as you've said, really profit is the key thing that we need to look at because the more profit you make, the more impact you can have in the key areas that you need to. My challenge in this, and I'd love you to educate me on it, is what's the argument for the players almost being like a kind of a profit sharer and therefore they get remunerated out of the profits versus no, they're a cost line for the Grand Slam.

13:54And therefore, if that does go up and they should get greater access, that's part of the total revenues rather than just the profits. Because if we're being really harsh, if they're taking money out of the slams, it's got to come from somewhere. And the most likely place that's going to come from is from the money that you can give out to, in this position at least, Australia, tennis. If it was here, it would be the LTA receiving the money from Wimbledon for exactly the same reasons.

14:16Craig Tiley:Yeah. It's a great question. And if we've got two hours, I can give you the answer. But no, look, I think, let me start by saying this is, in the first instance, I have always advocated for the players. I come from that side of the ledger, and I always believe the players should get their fair share. I think the organization that I've had the privilege of leading have in many ways positioned themselves always to do that. So when we set aside funds or set aside a position for the players, that's the first thing that we do in budgeting. We make sure that there's a fair share that needs to go to the players.

14:51Craig Tiley:And then we educate all of our stakeholders. This is going to be what's left to grow the game and do that kind of stuff. Now, we've been fortunate that we have that relationship with all of our stakeholders that we're able to do that. Now the question becomes, and sorry, and then the other thing we need to also take a step back on is that one thing I get confused about, similar to you in the argument with the sport of tennis, is in some instances they talk about profit share. and some instance they talk about revenue share. And it does seem to me that we talk about either just depending on how we want to choose to narrate the debate.

15:21Craig Tiley:And so no one's really been able to explain to me clearly. On the one hand, I think the ATP talks about profit share and then you've got a few people talking on the slams about the revenue share. No one's really been able to explain to me clearly why the difference and what's the mechanics for making that difference? Is it just a choice? So maybe hopefully after this podcast, I'll get to understand that more. But I think so. But taking a step back, we ultimately have some accountability in the three areas. That's the fan. Well, I'll put the player first. The player, the fan, and the sport. So these four entities, these four Grand Slams, they have, one, a constitutional responsibility, and some more than others, because in one of them you've got a club, and the other three you've got federations.

16:06Craig Tiley:and in others just in an event responsibility is to ensure that players are getting their fair share and that's a priority. Second priority, fans are getting what they're coming to see because at the end of the day, if the fans get annoyed with what the players are asking and what the event's not delivering, they won't come. So then your whole commercial value changes. And then the sport because the sport has to be relevant and we can be constantly maybe challenged today by the growth of pickleball or the growth of paddle. or, you know, and if you look at the history of sports, you know, where's squash today and where's racquetball today.

16:39Craig Tiley:And so sports come and go. Tennis is the third most watched sport globally and doesn't rank inside the top 10 commercially. So when I look at that, I say the problem is not the slams. The problem is the sport. So we were to start looking at the whole picture, not just part of the picture. Now, it just happens to be that the four slams the ones that are generating all this revenue and generating all the success because it comes with investment you know and so it's not just a simple thing oh you're doing a great job you're making whatever it is 500 million dollars in revenue and you and i see these numbers you're only paying the players you know 15 or 18 whatever it is that's not the debate the debate is are the players getting a fair share is there enough to invest in making sure the fans are having a great experience and are we ensuring that the sport continues to grow so where we're doing ourselves a disservice is that as a sport as a whole fans don't know where the heck we're going they don't know who's winning from one week to the next week they know what's happening in the slams that's about it and even that sometimes gets sub-optimized they don't know when the season finishes they don't know when it starts uh they don't know who to follow they don't know where to follow they don't know what on what platform to watch it um you know you go and if i if i say to you two weeks before women where did jack draper play you know now if i'm a rusted on tennis fan i may know that but if i'm just a punter that goes and watches women then i won't and so that's the opportunity for tennis but also one of our biggest problems so just just to rehash that you have a top three tennis top three sport for viewership but not in the top 10 commercially correct yet interestingly if you have the list which people love to publish now about the highest earning athletes yeah particularly on the women's side yeah also known as all tennis players so yeah the talent yeah is managing to commercialize itself correct but the sport is not yeah and the talent's primary opportunity to commercialize themselves yeah is in the grand slams correct so while the split of that purse may be yeah not quite where they want it to be yeah you can never underestimate the influence of the eyeballs right and i guess the platform that that puts these players on to make themselves attractive hard to quantify it is but a really important point well it's i think you know and you'll be investing in technologies that will provide you with an opportunity to quantify those easier i used to i used to say this and i got into trouble for saying because i said why don't we design a compensation package that part of it's based on performance how you win a round so it's fair for everyone and the other part is based on profile and that can be a combination of your likability uh your relevance your social media your social media following and then if you reach certain points on it so roger federer may win the australian open and he may make 10 million dollars but another player who doesn't have the same profile because they haven't been built at that point may only win five million for winning the same now that now that's it's too complicated to keep it simple but but but i think into the future that's exactly what happens if you if we've seen some numbers but the profiles are built pretty much about i think it's 97 percent off the performance in the grand slams and then you can see um players uh and their contracts if you see how their contracts have been written if you got a copy of every player's sponsorship contract the whole top 20 players and you pulled it out you know the equipment contract or the racket whatever other sponsorship they have and you have a look at where all the bonuses are structured, you could be almost certain they all structured in two areas.

20:12Craig Tiley:One is performance in the slams and two, how the year-end ranking finishes. And so that year-end ranking won't be about profile, it'll be about performance where the slams will be about profile. So it's an argument that I always come from. It's a minefield. It's a minefield. It's a total minefield. That's what's complicated about it. So I've always said, make it simple. Make sure the players have their fair share. The debate on revenue share, I think, is too arbitrary. It's not based on, in my view, it's not based on clarity of data, and it's not based on appreciation of the role that those organizations have to play for the fan and the sport.

20:50Craig Tiley:So we don't ascribe to the revenue share debate. We do subscribe to the fair share debate. And I think the increases that we've seen, the pressure that the players are putting on the slams has resulted in bigger increases than would normally happen. And that's a good thing. If we're being hyper analytical here, you did record revenues this year. A huge amount of that increase, I'd imagine, would have been your strategic extension of that tournament, which is incorporated a lot around tennis, but wouldn't necessarily be directly attributed to tennis. And therefore, there's a reason the revenues are going up.

21:28There's a diversity to your business model that you've had to implement, as you've highlighted, to stay relevant, to keep yourselves at the pinnacle. And building this around the sport isn't what it has been previously over the last 70, 80 years, which is core product on the court. Everything sells off that.

21:45Craig Tiley:Yeah. And so if I was to have a debate with someone, like someone from outside, if it was a player, I wouldn't have a debate because I'd be saying to the player, yes, I think we need to find a way to pay you more. But if it's those representing the players, I'd have more of a sophisticated debate on it by saying that, okay, how do we count revenues? Because we could, for example, not have tennis and run a three-week music event, which is what we really do. Does the music count? And then someone may say, well, it does because you wouldn't have the music unless you had the tennis. I'd argue, no, no, no, we could do it without the tennis.

22:17Craig Tiley:Or we could do a food event. Or we could do a... So I think in Australia, we could look at it differently because the biggest initiatives that we have about the growth of the experience is in everything that's not tennis. but again it brings me back to the argument of it's the it's on the sport it's on the leaders of the sport and the challenge we have is we can't effectively get together as a group there's too many either be you know personal interests or there's too many voices in the room or but the the issue is the sport the issue is like from january to october there's no proper off season as a start, but from January to October, where's our story?

22:58Craig Tiley:Where's our integrated story? Where are the top 100 players playing? What does it mean? Where's the players that aren't in the top 100? How do they play up? Where are those play-up events? What do they mean? And everyone that has an event, they say, well, we can't do that because then my event becomes irrelevant. So that's our challenge. Okay. I mean, that feeds into one of my key questions. It blows my mind. Governance in this sport seems absolutely chaotic. It's a mind field. yeah no the words mindful again yeah to put it into context for people yeah seven if we want independent correct governing bodies you have the four slams you have the itf yeah you have the atp and the wta correct great how on earth do you make decisions or not yeah in a sport where there are so many voices in the room for the good of the collective rather than just the good of the individual well that's the challenge right that's the biggest challenge and that's why what i think the debate we're having right now is a distraction of the opportunity and where the players should be putting pressure and where ourselves should be putting pressure is that we've failed as a sport in closing the gap between our commercial reality and our interest, our viewership.

24:09Craig Tiley:And if you look at that number, if any business person will look at that number and say, okay, where basketball is, where football is, there's a very strong alignment between their viewership and their commercial ranking. Tennis is the only sport in the top 10 where that alignment doesn't exist. And we should look at ourselves and say that's a poor job. And so now it's easy to say that. Then the thing is, it's like going from strategy to execution. How do we get to execution? My first positioning has always been if you get all the leaders in the room and everyone agrees that nobody in that room is going to have any role in the sport moving forward, how are we going to move forward?

24:48Craig Tiley:So you're only going to move forward if you give something up. and no one's willing to give anything up and that's the challenge so maybe the pressure from the players could be uh you know could be a lever that that that helps resolve that but unfortunately i think they're looking just at one part of it and that's just slam pay us more money um maybe the fan ultimately we don't we have you know every year we have more people coming to the gate everyone's loving us everything's working um and uh you know so there's no there's no burning platform from the fan the only burning platform that really does exist is from the commercial opportunity.

25:20Craig Tiley:And if we don't really want the opportunity, it's okay. We're still doing all right with where we are today. So part of the challenge is there's not really a burning platform and there's not really any motivation or desire to give anything up. So maybe that changes when, you know, into the future, can we keep having this unbelievable desire by fans for experiences, post-COVID particularly, buying a ticket, paying a price for a ticket? Are we going to have these events just price themselves out of the average fan's opportunity to observe and to get close to the game and then eventually those fans go and pick another sport i i don't know the answer to that it's harder to kind of have a crystal ball looking into it but how i think about it and how our team thinks about it is that to protect the future uh we've got to make a lot of sense today and if we want to get a young kid into our sport and to get really excited about this global superstars you want that superstar to be superstar in every nation across the across the country and across the world and we don't have that we don't have that in tennis to the extent we can to achieve that if i give you that clean slate what does the ideal governance structure look like i think it's one governing body um i think it's a um it's a it's a it's a premium tour whatever you want to call it but it's a it's a series of events over the course of you know 10 months uh that has a beginning and an end that has a story it has all the top players playing in those events then it's another tier of events that are just as successful, just as commercial, that have their same story, their same journey, but the performance of athletes in those have opportunities then to get the opportunity to get inside that top, into that premium side of it.

Read the full transcript

26:59Craig Tiley:It's a year that has maybe one or every two years has a global team event on the men's side and the women's side. Either it's combined or it's not, but it's something that really means something. And I've always said, Davis Cup and Billie Jean King Cup are irrelevant unless you have the top players playing it in full stadiums. And so we should do everything we can just to have these two objectives, top players, full stadiums. So how do you build a calendar to enable that from a team perspective? How do you build a calendar to enable that from a playing perspective? And then, you know, I mean, it's to the tennis playing world.

27:31Craig Tiley:If a player that's number four in the world goes and plays a little event in, you know, I won't name many names because I probably, but there'll be some obscure place in the world. that only that local environment cares about it is it doesn't contribute to the you know to the overall ecosystem's growth and strength so i mean so that may be more of a pipe dream um because many people will say no what we've got really works well because i run a 250 or i run a 125 challenge and it's great for my and my goal is to get yannick sinner or serena williams to come play it um and the reality is they shouldn't ever play those events because it doesn't make sense to the you know to the picture for the whole sport and and raising the whole sport because remember this is not just about raising the commercial opportunities for the players but it's about raising fan interest and we have fans we have a lot of tennis fans and we have a lot of fans outside of tennis that only kind of lean in a few times a year for wimbledon or for the australia open it's also about if we're then taking it one step further and looking where you distribute your money it's about the development of the global game absolutely into countries that maybe don't receive some of that funding.

28:38And if you've got a global tour, an ATP, let's say type tour, rather than Australia, the US, France, and the UK getting the majority of the money to feed into their infrastructures and systems.

28:50Craig Tiley:That's right. A hundred percent. Well, this has been the role of the International Tennis Federation, which is now World Tennis. And I'm hoping into the future there's going to be, they play a much better role than they have historically. I don't think they can be, you know, we can really look back and say that we've made this unbelievable contribution to more people playing in the nations around the world feel really empowered and and supported i don't think we can say that and if we can then i'm wrong but uh but i i i feel that this is where the grandstands can play a role it's where the sport can play a role and this is where the team plays a role when we get together and do things and and and take our self-interest aside and just put it to put it to the side and actually focus on like how can we make the sport better and uh and one of the ways we can is the international federation world tennis does play a bigger role globally and does rely on the partnership with the slams, which are big revenue drivers.

29:41Craig Tiley:Just as a side note, for example, I've asked this question. There's this push for the players to hit, I think it's 21 or 22, I can't remember the exact number, percent of revenue by 2030 to play compensation. If you total that up, you're going to be over three quarters of a billion dollars funded in prize money to players from four events. That's great but where's the rest of the ecosystem comparative to that? And now you start to get this divide where fans look at that okay this event over here you're making 20, 30, 15 million dollars on the men's side and maybe 15 on the women's side for a master's event but the slams is like in the stratosphere comparatively is all the players are going to do all the fans are going to just prepare themselves for those four events in the year and they have any interest in that.

30:32Craig Tiley:So there's a whole bunch of offsets. We've got to think about more into the future, think about the structure of the sport, but it's always got to come back to what are we doing for the fan? What are we doing for the sport? Our responsibility is sorting out what we do for the player, which totally agree needs to get their fair share, needs to get more. But it has to be done in the context of those two things. And I think that's maybe the International Tennis Federation now called World Tennis. you know maybe maybe the brand very political of you again for the brand trade what's what the brand change maybe maybe re-energize the opportunity i don't know or maybe hide the fact that they've been pretty ordinary for you sitting responsible then for all of this yeah in australia before we go into the years but but with that role that you've held yeah the money at the top of tennis that can get talked about a lot yeah but really it's the feasibility of a tennis career below maybe the top 100 that is really where the percentages start to make a difference and when we've spoken to dominic team patrick mortoglu carl edmund on the show before there's a theme that keeps coming up with them and it's the it's the cost of becoming a professional dominic team literally sat here and said you know through his academies that he has now to get people playing tennis in Europe can be a million dollars to get a top player from all the coaching and academy systems, et cetera, through.

31:55Once you then get there, unless you are at the top end of the game, it can be very hard to make a living. When you're traveling around the world, when you're hiring the physios and the nutritionists, et cetera, the money that you're making on tour can disappear quite quickly if you're paying for all of that. so there is i guess there's a broader economic challenge in an ecosystem play as well where you need to make it an affordable sport to enter if you don't have a huge financial backing and you need to make sure that there is a pyramid system that at least supports those players as they do go through their career if they're not sitting right at the top of the game yeah i think

32:29Craig Tiley:oh you've nailed it basically your question's given the answer because the the the challenge that's where I've lived my life. I've lived my life down at that part of whether it be coaching and trying to make it as a player. And that's where I've lived in that world. I haven't lived in the top 100 world at all. I've been a mile from that. And so I do appreciate and understand. And it is we have a huge problem because up to what point do we define professional tennis? Well, today you can say you can only define it to a point where someone's making enough of a living to afford a coach to travel with and to afford their expenses.

33:03Craig Tiley:and then hopefully to afford something that when they do retire that they've got some cushion built up that they can decide what they do next. But most tennis players have to go and get a second career. So that's a problem for the sport because it's not going to be who's going to get into it when you're going to lay out$250 ,000,$350 ,000 a year at a minimum to make it as a player. There's only a small niche number of people globally that are going to be able to do that. So it's on the sport. It's our responsibility to make sure that that's not the issue. So I'm very clear. I think that players rank between 100 and 300, 350 maybe the number is.

33:37Craig Tiley:Those are your professional players. They're providing on the women's side and the men's side, both equally. Whatever this is done needs to be done on both sides, and there should never be an argument about that. That's where we should be paying our attention. So if there's increases in compensation, if there's money coming into the sport, could there be an environment where every player that's your second tier professional athletes gets a minimum guarantee? So there are no coming in. They reach that point. there's a minimum guarantee that they have that they know that comfortably can go out then they're not chasing points then they're getting on a plane and going to some place in Hungary then getting on the plane the next week and going someplace down into New Zealand and having these ridiculous costs that they'll never be able to afford and they they have to chase these points because that's where they get the best opportunity to get into a high level so we haven't organized the sport effectively we've just put more events on more more more more but haven't looked at it and said, so now that person playing it, how do we best create an environment that they can make it affordable?

34:34Craig Tiley:So I think minimum guarantee is one avenue. So in fact, a version of being an employee, not necessarily saying an employee, but then also creating significant regional swings where the earnings potential is higher than it currently sits today. And that's federations leaning in, world tennis, ITF leaning in, and the Grand Slams leaning in and making sure we're funding enough circuit events that your beginning circuit events that are close enough to each other where a player doesn't have to get on a plane every second of the day to try and make it work as a pro. And then once you get closer into that top hundred or you start meeting the first round or the qualifying of a Grand Slam or the first round of Grand Slam, and now you can start to make two, three, four, maybe half a million dollars to offset your costs.

35:19Craig Tiley:But I talk to kids the whole time and to their parents and the first thing they say, it's not affordable and I can't agree. I have to agree with them. Yeah. You've achieved all of this in the time you've been at the Australian Open. And the three-week entertainment, music, sporting event, and the one point, which was brilliant. We didn't even talk about that properly, but, you know, a fantastic kind of... That was connecting the community and the pros, and the pros were great. Because the story, I mean, you almost got the perfect outcome from it. We did. Not planned, just completely worked out that way.

35:51But a brilliant way to engage, and I'd imagine socially, if you're looking at all, that was a brilliant piece. um so you know was it because of achieving all of this that you decided now was the right time to move on and take on a different challenge because you're about to start as the chief

36:06Craig Tiley:executive of USTA I've been incredibly fortunate personally and professionally um one I I was as an early kid I fell in love with something and it was tennis so I've been very lucky not many people can fall in love with something and then that can become their career and uh so I've been lucky that way so I have a deep appreciation for the sport and the history of the sport and a deep respect for those people that have come before us that have given us this opportunity today and and that's all i want the players to do today as well you know we forget we need to we need to look at the rogers and the roughers and before them on the men's side on the woman's side the chris evitz and the martinez you know they've forged a pathway for where we are today so i always feel that we should be absolutely celebrating and revering those people every single day and and we do in australia with our legends we in fact we employ our legends when they when they finish playing because uh we want them to be a legends forever and uh and i was you know and i'm getting off topic here but like rod laver is a good example is that i saw what rod laver made and it's an icon of our sport you know forged away for players and so so i said you know whatever you need rod you can have whatever it is you have it for the rest of your life and including the fact that we're gonna pay you some money just for the fact that you're rod laver um that uh that's a place to get to isn't it when you get really good there but um but i think and that comes out of the Australian Open revenues too.

37:21Craig Tiley:So that's part of our contribution. But it was a question again. Why now? No, I got it. Why now? So I've been lucky. I fell in love with the sport and then double lucky is being able to coach at a university in the United States and have some success and then get offered a job in Australia. And I went to Australia because I thought it was going to be a three-year gig. They've got the best players in the world and the best history. This is like a dream job and I wouldn't have to do anything and I found out very quickly I was brought in there to make a bunch of changes which we did and they all worked uh changes with the event we did that and that all worked and so I've been fortunate I've got had an unbelievable team you know people I love and uh and yeah so everything is worked out perfectly in that sense and then like everything I think the changes every year in the Australian Open was also but it may be of a personal thing I don't like sitting still uh I like things to be different I like I like challenges I like jumping in the deep end and figuring it out.

38:17Craig Tiley:I don't like failing, but I accept failure as part of the journey of having success and actually sometimes force failure so you can really learn. So all those things just worked out. And then the U.S. opportunity came by and I thought, well, there's so much to unlock in the United States. And to become the central hub of tennis globally and to be able to contribute and have an impact on tennis globally, it's probably the one place in the world where that could really happen. and to be able to do that, to be able to get more people playing across all the 52 states, the 17 sections across the years, get more people to play the game, more people engaged, have bigger events coming back to the U.S.

38:57Craig Tiley:to have more opportunities to play, you know, pro circuit events. Everything that exists today, I want to kind of unlock the potential, unleash the potential and take it to a completely different level. So I got excited about being able to do it in that market and that environment And even the US Open itself, which is America's biggest sporting event, and it's a magnificent event. And people forget about the scope and the extent of those three weeks, what they bring in viewership and what it brings in impact and visitation. But then also be able to continue to transform that to another level. So, yeah, I think it was the attraction of that and also part of my DNA of change.

39:38Craig Tiley:And I also think it can be a platform to help really drive what players want today as well. Interesting. What do you mean by that? Well, I think this comes down to the fair share, the players fair share. I think it's more than just being paid money at an event. I know what's important to players, what absolute amount they have. If you give someone a check of$10 or$20, they'll take the 20. And so we've got to make sure that we're putting the highest possible amount we can. But in the environment that you're in, it's also getting everyone to understand there's other realities which are not a choice.

40:14Craig Tiley:The USTA, for example, it's set up constitutionally that it's a member-based organization. And whatever money is generated, there's a percentage of that that has to go back to the members to help them grow the game. You can't get away from that. And you shouldn't get away from that because that's how the organization is set up. But there's other opportunities you can start to look at when it comes to compensation. compensation. I think the US is a good place to do that from a player perspective. So what kind of partnership could I have with a player ultimately where they can maximize their commercial return on top of the prize money they make?

40:46People who do follow tennis may know that right now the PTPA, Professional Tennis Players Association, have an antitrust lawsuit against, well, collectively in the sport. You at the Australian Open settled that and I can, having spoken to you, start to probably see how that came about with the relationships that you clearly hold with some of the players you're now going into the u.s where they haven't settled it how do you move between these two organizations now because for you to achieve that with the players i'd imagine this is a really important thing for you to be able to navigate yeah i look

41:17Craig Tiley:it's now when you answer this question every time i answer this question someone comes and puts a break on you and says we're the lawyers you can't say anything about the lawyers in the room so i always say that with a bit of qualification because um i will talk as a as a person in a logical way and I'll probably say the wrong thing anyway but here we go but no look so little bit little going back a little bit because Tennis Australia's had a lot of criticism for the decision that they made but at the very beginning of this conversation I did say that the organization doesn't own any assets it leases the the land it's on it pays a significant multi multi millions of dollars to the government for the right of that and that's a fair amount for the right to to lease that.

41:59Craig Tiley:So if there was an antitrust lawsuit against the organization, Tennis Australia, which there was, in any circumstance, it could be brought in by players, a group of players, one player, it could be brought in by a fan, it could be brought in by anyone. The very first position we'll have is how do we settle that? How do we get out of that? Because if we were to fight it, the risk of losing is far greater for us than the risk we take of settling, simply because, Now, this is not an invitation for everyone to have lawsuits against Tennis Australia, but simply because we don't have the assets to offset the cost that we would be, we could potentially put the company out of business.

42:35Craig Tiley:So as the CEO and as our board, we have a fiduciary responsibility to ensure the future viability of the organization. So we actually have no choice. It's not because it's something we liked to do. It's something because that we had to do it. And there wasn't one person on our board. There wasn't one person on our executive team that looked, stared us in the face. whether the claim, the antitrust claims, have any veracity or not didn't really matter. What mattered is that when we look at our set of lawyers and we say to them, we want to de-risk the organization into the future, what's the best way to go forward?

43:08Craig Tiley:They say, let's look at the case. Let's see if there's any validity in it. And if there's 0.005 % validity in it, we recommend you settle because of what the question you've asked us. So that's the world the Australian Open was in and Tennis Australia was in. Now, everyone has a different positioning as to what decision that they make. I'm not under the hood yet to understand the USTA's position, and respectfully they have, for their reasons, would make their decision, as would Wimbledon, as would the French. The thing that's been a little bit, maybe concerning is the right word, but a little bit unsettling and challenging is the fact that the Australian Open has been ostracized a little bit because it decided to make the decision to settle.

43:54Craig Tiley:Now, down the road, I don't know what's going to happen. I don't know what a judge is going to do. There's a legal system in play. And the conditions of Tennis Australia's settlement have been made public, and it's pretty straightforward. There's nothing secret about it. It's actually what we've been talking about for the last half an hour. It's the opportunity to bring everyone together and create a tour that everyone wins, even the 500s and the 250s and the 1000s and the Grand Slams. And most importantly, the biggest winner out of the whole thing needs to be people who say, is it the players?

44:28Craig Tiley:Is it the fans? But it's the fans. And if you can drive that outcome for the fans, the players are going to win and everyone is going to win. That's what we saw in COVID, right? Across all sport, you can always think about the product, but when you watch sport in empty stadiums. Yeah. When I was a kid, I used to ask the question is like what makes it makes a successful event i was very curious about and i don't know i didn't realize i'm going to end up one day being involved in the australian open and now coming up the us open which i'm pretty excited incredibly excited about but and and and people used to always say it has to make a profit and i always was curious about that because i thought like okay so we just run events to make money and then i came to learn over the journey is actually one it's much more than that but what i what i tell people is that what how you define success You define success as you've got your top players playing in a full stadium and the fans coming away.

45:20Craig Tiley:And as they're walking out the gate, is they buying the ticket for the same event next year because they don't want to miss out. And if you've got that formula going, you're a winner. So we need to look at our sport. It'd be interesting if we went today. I've never done this, but maybe it's a good question, is if we go and say, OK, let's go and take every event, every session, and let's look at their attendance and look at the players that are playing. And let's see how we're doing as a health of a sport. And I bet you we're probably giving ourselves a D. Do you feel conflicted? You've said at the beginning, you always want to act with the player's best interests at heart.

45:50But being a tennis executive doesn't necessarily always give you the luxury to do that. You mentioned that fiduciary responsibility as shareholders, you're going into an organization now that does have assets and is, as you said, the biggest viewing event in the US sport. I mean, that's incredible. To execute and be able to deliver both can be a huge challenge. One of the great challenges of sports governance for the executives that really want to put themselves at the heart of it. Has that been difficult on occasions for you?

46:12Craig Tiley:I think it is, but I actually never looked at it as conflict because I will always come from the baseline of the player. So maybe it's my DNA. I don't know. I mean, I can't get away from that. I try. I try to try, but I can't get away from it. But then I do it in a responsible way. So how do I bring that baseline to the argument? And our team at Australian Open will tell you when the finance team comes to me, they don't even come anymore with a discussion on what compensation is going to be. because they know that I'm just going to put a number out there that's going to be much bigger than they're thinking.

46:47Craig Tiley:And that's been the Australian Open's positioning. Now, when we get to the US Open, there'll be a board that makes a decision and I'll be advocating to the board that the players need to get their fair share. But at the same time, I'm not going to do that to compromise the growth of the game in every single section because ultimately in the US, if there's more people playing the game, right now there's a little under 30 million people that are playing tennis regularly. The goal is to get to 35 million in the U.S. by 35. And that's a big stretch because you're going to have churn every year on it.

47:19Craig Tiley:But if there's 35 million people by 2035 playing tennis in the United States, that is a top sport in the U.S. And so that's one of the objectives. And you know what? If we did that, the U.S. Open will be humming, generating revenue. Players will be getting their fair share. So it's a symbiotic circle where we've got to keep supporting each other. But coming to your question on always feeling conflicted, I do every day feel conflicted. But it's a healthy conflict. And it's a healthy debate you have internally in your own mind of what's in the best interest. But it's also a reminder you don't do anything without compromise because you're always going to have to have some compromise.

47:54Craig Tiley:Unfortunately, I think in our sport, from a global perspective, there's too much compromise. We're not clear enough in our own minds and willing to give something up. So instead, we're just going to compromise. so if we were to give up compromise and say this is the direction we need to go and we can have losers and winners as a coach i always just always used to say the pain of change is greater than the pain of losing people choose to lose over change and that's why it's so difficult to change okay so a mutual friend may have let slip that and i was like this is amazing that you call pretty much every player on their birthday you have a great i connect with them you can say in some form cool yeah yeah i was going to expose him if it wasn't um and then you know also told me a story which he said you told him about a young man walking across or a young boy walking across the street a 15 year old in melbourne you spoke to him he always remembered that and that person was rafa nadal yeah so the element of trust i'd imagine that you've built up and the relationships that you've built up however difficult all of this may be however challenging it may be however big that gap is between the players and the executives if you have people like yourself building these relationships at that side there's the opportunity to solve this right there is to fix it yeah and i think i'm proud of the fact today there's more people in our sport that have that view uh when i first started i was there's i was definitely a lone wolf in the in the picture i was a rebel i was and i and i have you know and i know what people say about some things that i I think, is that I think they get a bit nervous because maybe I'm a change agent or I'm going to say what I think or I'm going to support the players with complete disregard.

49:38Craig Tiley:People will say those kind of things. In fact, my father used to say, unless you've been criticized, you're not doing anything. So I'm quite happy I'm doing stuff. So people keep criticizing. But I think when I look at it, is I've always felt that the players do need to trust you. but so does your team and so does everyone you work around because if you don't have that transparency and trust you can't sit in a room and feel like you're really working in the best interest and generally in tennis there's been a bit of mistrust and I think it's because maybe people are looking out for their own interests so I don't know generally what the reason is but there's a massive opportunity what I love about our sport while we can argue about something and even like yesterday I was with some agents which we're having an argument about on, you know, is percentage of revenue the right metric?

50:28Craig Tiley:But we had a big debate about it, and then two hours later we were out going to have a drink. So that's what's the, you know, the family nature of the sport, I think, is healthy. There's no one that hates on each other. But I think, and that's where we have a bit of a gap right now. The gap is that we're not working together collectively, and people have been left out. Tennis Australia has been left out of the conversation, and that's not right. and players have been left out the conversation as well and that's not right. And so I'm going to always come from a position of advocating for the players, but that's not just the professional players.

51:00Craig Tiley:That's the person picking up a tennis racket as like a five-year-old. The satisfaction I get in life is when I walk past a tennis club and every quarter's full, you walk past a stadium and the stadium's full and people are absolutely loving the game. I have kids that play the game. That's the only thing I really know. So I've got no choice. It's always a big challenge when you move in sport or actually in business and organizations and anything, especially when you've seen success and you've done something well to go at australian open we did it like this yeah or you're moving into an organization that has huge opportunity that has a lot of spaces as you've highlighted to grow and develop but also has its own unique opportunities and unique challenges to overcome so have you thought about how you're going to approach that balance between the successful things that do cross over and can be implemented and how you may communicate that in this environment this this is the big question right i think this comes down to um having good people around you saying do you realize what you just said that made no sense this doesn't work here um but but i i want to have people around me that's that uh that debate that and look as a leader you've got to go and you're going to be very conscious of where you're going into because there's a lot of people that done a great job and uh and uh and i just want to be i want to go into a leading environment i will kind of say it how it is um i want to build a lot of trust with the people around and let people perform and uh and build keep building capability that you have unbelievable high performers build high performing teams but most importantly every day we wake up we love this game so much we wake up and find a way to get more people to play it uh and continue to build our relationship with the top end of with with all the top players that they can look to uh in the future can look to the u.s uh as a place they feel really comfortable and the place they feel really supported and the place that's really after their interests and there's a lot of great people that are doing some great things with U.S.

52:45Craig Tiley:tennis and I want to be able to elevate that and amplify that even further. So a lot of it's going to be sitting back and learning and listening and seeing what people do, what they do well, and where I see there can gap that we can improve and less criticism because I don't think you get any benefit criticizing someone because you think it should be different. But I do think you get a lot of benefit about enhancing people's opportunity and then my view on leadership is going to be unlocking all the potential that exists and I know there's going to be, you know, all these federations are big bureaucracies and I don't like, I struggle in bureaucracy personally so I've got to become a better learner in that.

53:21Craig Tiley:And you chose tennis. Yeah, I know and I chose tennis, what an idiot, but I love the game too much. But I want to unlock all those layers of bureaucracy and let people trust each other and it's not going to be perfect and I'm going to make lots of mistakes and I'll be the first person to say, okay, I screwed up and that's one thing that people are always going to get from me and I'll never blame anyone for anything. and so other than myself and so so from that perspective i think it's just i look at it as an opportunity you're going to have detractors i'm sure there were people that were nervous about me getting the job in the u.s or didn't want me to get the job and advocated against me getting that's fine too i don't i don't have any problem with that because at the end of the day i know what i'm really passionate about and i know what i'm really going to be delivering on and that's growing the game today what's the you know the u.s open being the flagship right what's the day in the life again i've got a little bit of inside information so i'm kind of leading you here but the day in the life of a CEO of a major federation during those big tournaments.

54:15From my understanding, you don't really sleep much.

54:18Craig Tiley:No, you don't. You don't get much. Well, if you think about it, it's your three-week opportunity to showcase your sport. And I think sometimes we think these Grand Slams are just for the players. They're not. They're for the fans. And they're for the – you know, kids watch this on TV, and it's their aspiration. And that's why we've got to have more of it. In the U.S., I want to see more of those opportunities, like whether it be the tour finals or whatever it is, or the team events. And the USG want more of those things because you want kids to be closer to that experience about having this aspiration.

54:46Craig Tiley:Then they choose tennis. And then we kill off all the other sports ultimately because everyone's playing tennis. That's the goal. But in those three weeks, it's more than just like the event operations, but it's also all the stakeholders you want to meet and spend some time with and listen to and all the players and having the conversations. And so, yeah, I love it. So I don't have any problem not sleeping during those three weeks. and you do sleep a little bit, but you have adrenaline flowing through your body. You can always generally stay awake for that. Just make sure you stay healthy so you don't fall over at the end of it.

55:18Craig Tiley:But I think you do it because you love it. And so I've never looked at the Australian Open, the roles I've had there every year. I've never looked at it as work. I've looked at it as like the eyes of the world are now over here on the sport. So how can we do a really good job of showcasing? We've talked all the way through this about changing and innovating and developing better products for the fans for the players and i think this brings it all together nicely because the way we actually connected was through work that australian open are doing with investments and venture arms and anyone that knows what we do knows that the root of a huge amount of that and i bang on about it across sport is the ability of sport to leverage its opportunity as a kind of an incubator as a technology hub yeah it's a completely unique industry to to test out businesses and technologies and you've done an amazing job of that at Australian Open Ventures, which actually includes investing in companies that you've got working with you.

56:10How important has that work been in that kind of integration? And then also the opportunity to build that now moving forward, because it does sit at the heart of improving that 50 % experience and improving the players and improving the fans. It's central.

56:23Craig Tiley:Yeah. Well, you hit the nail on the head and I hope one day we're sitting here and you're telling the rest of the world how well you guys did on this thing, because I think the we've been out for over 10 years now and the platform that you have not just with the event but with the sport to test and learn on any tech it would be health, sport, entertainment there's a number of different fields you cover you cover the ones everyone's interested in investing in today but that platform that you have for testing and learning is unbelievable it was never used and I remember a story at the very beginning when Hawkeye arrived on the scene and there was an opportunity through Paul Hawkins to invest in Hawkeye.

57:04Craig Tiley:And this was maybe even just when I started 20 years ago. And I approached our board at the time about making an investment in the possibility of making an investment in a startup or something that was going to deliver something for the future. And I got told we're a tennis company. We don't do that. And it's great to now come full circle today where we have multimillion dollar investments in things that we don't know if they're going to work or not, but we try and make the right, you know, investment committee tries to make the right decision on which tech we invest in. But it's a lot of fun now today to be saying that now we actually have a diversified revenue stream that sits in our business that is going to ultimately, in my view, become the biggest part of the business.

57:46Craig Tiley:Really? I think it's going to be 100 % become the biggest part of the business. And I think the, you know, we're sitting, you know, we have an amount of money set aside with a whole bunch of different partners, but think about all the investors that, and you know this well, all the investors that want to get involved in sport well this is a vehicle easy vehicle to do it so the scale of it can jump up at the platforms exist where you can test and learn immediately uh you don't have to you know wait for a platform to do it you can continue to evolve whatever the tech is that you're putting out to the to whichever market it's going but at the same time that you as the content owner can make an investment in and then you bring partners on to do it and and this is what i meant when i when when we spoke a little about the role of the players in the u.s this is what i'd like to look about the use how do the players themselves start to get a piece of that and start to invest in that and then enjoy it?

58:34Craig Tiley:So a player ranked 50 in the world may make a$50 ,000 investment in today, 2026, on something that has got a whole bunch of other investors and is backed by the US Open or the Australian Open or Wimbledon. And then in 10 years' time, they realize that is now times 50. That opportunity, but it's not happening. So that's what I do. And there's USDA Ventures, by the way, too, which the U.S. have done a magnificent job in this space as well. AO Ventures and our whole incubator program has been around for over 10 years. But that's our next phase of development. So USA Ventures is great. You can go in and look to build on that even more.

59:16You've got a massive infrastructure play, right? The redevelopment of flushing metals. When you have something like this, so central infrastructure and what you can build off, it plays a huge part in how you can implement these developments and technologies. that must be a really exciting moment for you to then leverage as you're now looking to yeah and

59:33Craig Tiley:my 100 i'm very excited about that because my first the premise of every question is like okay that's great so what more what next um how do you how do you take that whatever you're doing there and make it better and then if you reach that point unfortunately it's going to be really stressful for people it's not going to you haven't arrived yet we're going to go again are we going to go again and uh and i always say um you know the everyone israel is the journey to success is that you actually never arrive you're always on a pathway of improvement you mentioned previously that the australian open you hadn't had the venue as in ownership of the venue yeah when you now come into this which u.s tennis owns flushing mountains right yeah with that comes i would imagine significant financing and refinancing of property and land and a bit like again football stadiums which people may be more familiar with you're taking out debt to do it and fund it that has a legacy impact on what you can do as an organization yeah is that kind of financial element of you coming into this new organization while it's great because they'll recognize much more of the revenue through ownership also created the flip side where it's like okay we actually need to make sure we can cover the costs of developments and look at a new financial structure just to keep doing the things you really want to do and i think that's when we went back to the very first part of this question about the revenue pieces australia has been pretty straightforward because we know each year, we know where we can predict where our revenue is going to be and we know what our costs are going to be as far as the rental.

1:00:58Craig Tiley:Whereas when you invest in infrastructure, you can go and say, I'm going to make a$500 million investment in infrastructure. By the time I've delivered, it's$800 million because of the cost increase of which you may or may not have built into your modeling. I try to simplify it and I am excited about the machinations we can to try and be really creative on how these things happen. There's a great team at the USTA, for example, that are very good at how to finance things and there's the history that has proved that. But if I take the dollar and you say, okay, in that dollar, how much is left for growth?

1:01:27Craig Tiley:Because the more you service debt, the more you give up too much on profit, the more you distribute without return, enough return, it diminishes the amount that you have left to invest in growth. And if you get at the end of the day down to zero that you've got now nothing to invest in growth, that's the beginning of your diminishing returns and that's the beginning of your plateauing and that's the beginning of you losing money. And so I'm going to look at it in a very simple way, not a very sophisticated way, and each year go and take that dollar and see what percentage of that dollar is being adjusted by the decisions that we are making.

1:02:03Craig Tiley:And that's why the debate around player compensation is kind of critical because you could take a big chunk out of that dollar and there's a relationship between the impact it has on others that if the slams stop investing in growth, then the ultimate if you want to take percent of profit or percent of rate whatever it is is going down and there's no question every business around the world or sorry that's exactly how it is the less you have the less you have to invest in growth the less you grow i want to finish off just having a look at um my fan perspective entertain me this is now we're in a world of athlete as star brand power that's what attracts people tennis we had again speaking we meet growing up, it was the best generation of tennis players you could possibly wish for.

1:02:49I mean, Rafa Nadal, Roger Federer, Novak Djokovic. Roger Federer is my favourite all-time sportsman across every sport.

1:02:56Craig Tiley:Then moving on from those three. I mean, as an executive, I was looking at growing the game. Did you have that moment? Are you going, oh my goodness. They all kind of retire and it becomes challenging. We've got to make sure that we create and still have those players at the top and the profiles. Now we've obviously got the Ciner Alcaraz duel, which looks like it's going to be amazing you're hoping more players can't challenge it i i've i don't know i've looked at i've never lost confidence in the fact that tennis will tennis star pops up and i'm always excited to see who it's going to be yeah uh like for example here you know in in the i mean i've been a massive fan of jack draper from day one really and i and i think that he you know i've always felt i don't want to put any pressure on him but i always felt that there's no question the next big thing he's got everything and uh i just think there's i just you know he's got to go through the pathway of of getting over the injuries and that.

1:03:43Craig Tiley:But when he does, look out, look out. But on the men's side, on the women's side, the game is healthy. We're very lucky. And, you know, when those players retire again, the only thing I would miss about that area that you spoke about is my friendships. And, you know, with Rafa and with Roger, Serena, and Novak at the end of it. I mean, these are all great people. And, you know, you get to know these people 15, 20 years, you spend a lot of time with them and you become friends. and so then you miss them and I don't see them. Now fortunately we have the Lever Cup, so I see Roger a couple of times and Rafa we make a point of doing things or you invite them to come out and like this year when we invited Roger to the Australian Open and we've done the same for Rafa moving forward and I said, Roger, bring the whole family, come for the week, hang out, do whatever you want to do and they're like the best possible time.

1:04:32Craig Tiley:So those things you kind of miss but I'm excited. We are on the men's side, on the women's side. It's in good shape. there's been a change of leadership for the WTA on the women's side I think I think that the the the new leader woman of God she thinks very broadly very big about the opportunity in women's tenure things fantastic and so I just you know as leadership capability also builds and as these players come through the sports in great shape it is in great shape the question is what kind of bigger shape could it be in and I think that's where we've got to get to I mean women's side but it's felt like the last well a couple of years in particular with a kind of the sabalenka sviante rebachina got off like it feels like i think women women's tennis struggled for a while to have really great rivalries and the extent that went on and i just feel now maybe it's getting to the stage where yeah we're going to see a little bit more of that rivalry i think i think we will on the woman's side you you can never tell it's kind of formed itself a little bit on the men's side but uh but it does every year on both sides of the sport i mean it was always about who could beat Serena.

1:05:37Craig Tiley:Maybe it's like the Arena Sabalek. And still will be. I know. And still will be, which is so great about her. It's mad, isn't it? I love her. I love her. I think it's like, it's so good for the game. I mean, and what a great story. She must still think she can win. Oh, absolutely. She's not. She wouldn't turn up. I know Serena well enough that there's no ways she's walking onto the court unless she feels she can win the whole event. And I guarantee you that's what she thinks. So good for her. Amazing. And so I don't worry about it. And you mentioned it too on the woman's side. If you look at Coco Goff's story, these are like unbelievable athlete stories and her game.

1:06:16Craig Tiley:So a lot of confidence in what we've got. Brilliant. Well, look, I'm so, so grateful for you in probably one of the busiest weeks of your year, giving us the time that you have. I'm so grateful from a tennis governance executive position as well. We've done 130 of these interviews. You got pretty good at it then. Thank you. Asking me. You gave yourself your own answer. That's good. That works too. But no, seriously, it's one of the most requested things because of, I think, the fandom around tennis. But as you've just described, I think it's also why people understand. It's a very hard thing to be able to come and talk properly and openly about.

1:06:53So I really appreciate you doing that. And I'm sure everyone will listening to this. What you have done and Tennis Australia and the Australian Open have done is absolutely awesome and kind of like pioneer status for a lot of other sports to look at and go, actually, do you know what, it can work. So congratulations on all of that. Thank you so much for the time. And I cannot wait to see what you go and do in the US.

1:07:13Craig Tiley:Yeah, well, we're going to get, yeah, I'm excited about, thank you for that, but I'm also excited about on this next journey. And I say the thing I'm most excited about is to unlock the real potential that does exist there across the board. And that's more about getting people to play the game because I think that, you know, we shouldn't lose sight of the fact is that our fans come from those that like the game. And the majority of our fans, I should say, come from that. And why at the Australian Line, we did all the other things to make sure we're covering off the non-tennis fans as much as possible as well.

1:07:42Craig Tiley:But I think the core of what we do is getting more people to play the game and then our ecosystem is going to be really healthy. Completely agree. And I'm sure you will do it with aplomb. We'll give it a good hot go, I can tell you that. Go and enjoy, well, if you can, a very nice week of British tennis. or British summertime tennis. Tennis has started, so let's get out there and watch it. Thank you, Craig. Thank you. Thanks so much to Craig for joining us as part of an incredibly busy schedule during his Wimbledon trip. As mentioned, I've wanted to do this from day one, mostly because the respect that he garners and success he has achieved in the sport.

1:08:18He has perfectly outlined the issues the sport faces to capitalise on the opportunity, but there is so much more in tennis to be excited about if the right governance structures and player relationships can be implemented and protected. I can't wait to see how Craig applies himself to the big US gig. I hope you enjoy the show and would love to hear your thoughts on it. Now, if you want to see more from today's show, you can do so by going to YouTube or any of our other social channels across Instagram, TikTok, and now Substack. There are more snippets to share and bite-sized chunks to consume.

1:08:48And whilst you're there, please do like, subscribe, and follow the show. As you'll hear from your other favourite pods, it makes a huge difference when bringing you the best guests and conversations from around the world of sport, which is of course our endless aim. Thank you again for tuning in and we'll see you next week. The business of sport is supported by Airwallex, the intelligent financial platform used by more than 200 ,000 modern businesses from SaaS and marketplaces to some of the most ambitious organizations in sport, including McLaren Racing, Arsenal and the San Francisco Giants. The off-pitch problem is simple.

1:09:21Your supporters, sponsors and partners are everywhere, But the money that connects them is still stuck in slow, expensive systems, wire transfers that take days, fees that quietly eat into revenue, and clunky processes that make simple things feel hard. Airwallex gives you one clean way through it. A single platform to open local accounts in key markets, collect payments from supporters in their own currency, CFX in real time, and pay out fast. From backroom staff to agencies and suppliers. If you're growing the business side of a sports organisation or any global business with the same problem, Airwallex helps you stop losing time and margin to the legacy banking system and move money at the speed your sport moves.

1:09:59Clubs are spending more money than ever hiring analysts, buying information, building dashboards and subscribing to scouting report apps. But none of that matters if it's not talking to each other, not accessible by the full team. How many times this week have you been in a meeting, needed information about a player and had to text three people to get it? Your scouts filed reports and email, your analysts have information on their dashboards, your contracts are in PDFs scattered across shared drives. Everything you need to make decisions exists somewhere, just not in one place. Most sporting directors are spending hours every week hunting for information that should be at their fingertips.

1:10:32Gemini changes that. It's the mobile-first command center that brings everything together. Scout reports, intel, performance information, and now contract intelligence with full-budget impact analysis. Drag and drop any contract PDF. The AI automatically extracts salaries, bonuses, sell-on clauses, and projects live financial impact as you evaluate players. See the complete picture. Make better decisions faster from anywhere. Learn more at geminisports.ai and why major clubs across three continents are getting everything they need to win the transfer market all in one place.

From the publisher

In the summer weeks when tennis is front and centre, USTA CEO Craig Tiley joins us as tennis faces both a bucket load of major opportunities to take advantage of and challenges to overcome. Player pay, demanding audiences, (lack of) centralised governance, some of the biggest stars in global sport - you are balancing multiple plates to try and deliver for the players, the fans, and the businesses.

Craig has turned the Australian Open into one of sports great events; a now 3 week festival of entertainment. Those of you that tune in regularly will know how important that is to the modern sporting business model and appeal. He is now about to take over as CEO of the US Tennis Association, a move that will see him responsible for the US’s largest sporting event and a participation base of over 30 million players; a huge job. There is no one better placed to take us through the highs and lows of the tennis world. One of the first names on the list of guests we wanted to join us when we started the show, I am delighted to welcome Craig to the Business of Sport.


A huge thank you to our amazing partners on the show: 


Airwallex

The intelligent financial platform for global businesses

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://www.airwallex.com/uk/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠


Gemini

We empower the most confident sports organisations on Earth

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://geminisports.ai/⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠


If you’re interested in partnering with the show, please reach out to us at

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠bos@20vc.com

More from Business of Sport

All 125 episodes
Craig Tiley: Transforming the Australian Open, The Player Pay Debate & How Tennis Can Make More Money (Ep127)Business of Sport · 1 h 11 min
Listen in VO