"Neither Side Is Used to Losing." Lucas Shaw on What’s Next for Netflix and Paramount in the Battle for Warner Bros.

17 Dec 2025 · 42 min · 14 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

The ongoing bidding battle for Warner Bros. Discovery—Netflix vs. Paramount/Skydance (Ellison family)—and what it signals for media consolidation in 2025–26, plus a segment on AI’s impact on Hollywood.

Guest

Lucas Shaw, Bloomberg reporter who has covered the Warner/Netflix/Paramount story extensively.

Key claims

Warner Bros. Discovery has not formally rejected Paramount; even after choosing Netflix, the board can’t ignore a higher offer. Both sides are “not used to losing,” but Netflix’s public-company status makes shareholder backlash a risk if it overpays. Trump is mostly a headline factor, with regulatory scrutiny likely but actual blocking less predictable than in the AT&T/Time Warner era. Antitrust concerns differ: Netflix faces “too dominant” streaming claims; Paramount faces financing/CFIUS-style scrutiny tied to sovereign wealth funds.

Notable examples

AT&T–Time Warner precedent; Disney’s $1B OpenAI licensing deal; AI uses like pre-visualization and digital reshoots; concerns about consent for background actors.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Setting the Stage for Warner Bros and Streaming Wars

1:14 to 2:21

Discussion about the current state of Warner Bros Discovery, Netflix, and Paramount.

“And as promised, we are doing it with Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw, who has been the dominant reporter on this story.”

Introduction of Guest Lucas Shaw

2:21 to 2:36

Peter introduces Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw to discuss industry dynamics.

“So I talked to Lucas a bit about AI because as we're legally required to talk about AI.”

Warner Bros Discovery's Acquisition Dynamics

2:36 to 4:52

Lucas discusses the ongoing acquisition attempts and implications for Warner Bros.

“You're laughing because I'm bad at podcasting, but I'm glad to have you back on the show.”

Potential Bidding War Between Paramount and Netflix

4:52 to 7:18

Exploration of the potential bidding war dynamics between Paramount and Netflix.

“try to get another three to five dollars a share for their shareholders.”

Donald Trump's Influence in the Process

7:18 to 10:00

Discussion on the potential impact of Donald Trump's involvement in the transaction.

“They could go again directly to shareholders?”

Regulatory Scrutiny and Global Financial Considerations

10:00 to 14:00

Analysis of regulatory implications and the involvement of foreign wealth in the deal.

“And then Donald Trump will, he's currently having fun sort of making it seem like both sides are going to owe him something, right?”

Hollywood's Reaction to Deal Dynamics

14:00 to 19:40

Explore Hollywood's contrasting reactions to potential ownership of major studios.

“You would think there'd be more outcry about that.”

Hollywood's Reaction to Deal Dynamics

19:41 to 20:39

Explore Hollywood's contrasting reactions to potential ownership of major studios.

“Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor.”

Hollywood's Reaction to Deal Dynamics

20:46 to 21:50

Explore Hollywood's contrasting reactions to potential ownership of major studios.

“Rayman Mehta lets you explore the world without a screen getting in the way, so you can stay present in the moment.”

Implications of the Warner Brothers Deal

21:51 to 28:00

Discuss the potential outcomes and implications of the Warner Brothers deal.

“Both Paramount and Netflix have really dug their heels in there.”
Show all 14 chapters

Impact of Mergers in Streaming

28:00 to 31:38

Explores the implications of potential mergers in the streaming industry and their effects on competitors.

“knee-jerk reaction from other players because you have two smaller somewhat struggling entities combining.”

The Role of AI in Hollywood

31:44 to 39:02

Discusses the arrival of AI in Hollywood and its potential effects on production and creative processes.

“Hasan Piger has blown up in recent years.”

Cultural Reflections in Media

39:02 to 42:00

Covers reflections on media consumption, recommendations, and the cultural significance of recent works.

“Because like there's this idea of like, hey, I was a we saw him extras now.”

Recommendations for Music and Shows

42:00 to 43:16

Lucas Shaw recommends various music and shows, including a docuseries and live performances.

“that I would recommend is the Martin Scorsese docuseries on Apple.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Peter Kafka:We all do it. You have a night for yourself but don't like the sound of the silence, so you turn on the TV just for the ambience. It's a little trick that helps you feel like you've got company and aren't alone. And other insurers, well, they may make you feel alone. But when you switch to GEICO, you've got claims reps available around the clock. So whenever you need, you'll have people around to help. And let's turn on the washing machine, just for good measure. Isn't that soothing? It feels good to have support. It feels good to GEICO. Whatever your thing, it could be anything. Canva helps you make that thing a thing.

0:36Peter Kafka:Canva is a simple online tool thing. It's a way to design with our magic AI tool things. You can social media your thing, generate images or videos of your thing, make decks for presentations to show your thing. Whatever needs to be done for your thing, Canva can make it an even better and bigger thing. Canva, the thing that makes anything a thing.

1:04Peter Kafka:From the Vox Media Podcast Network, this is Channels with Peter Kafka. That's me. I'm also chief correspondent at Business Insider. And today, as promised, we are going deep on Warner Brothers Discovery slash Netflix slash Paramount. And as promised, we are doing it with Bloomberg's Lucas Shaw, who has been the dominant reporter on this story. This sounds like deja vu. There is a reason for that. Less than two weeks ago, when Netflix shocked us by landing the Warner Brothers deal, at least landing it temporarily, I had Lucas on for a quick emergency pod. As you know, the story is far from finished.

1:44Peter Kafka:Paramount and the Ellison family are still trying to buy Warner Brothers Discovery, so this one could go on for weeks or months. With that in mind, I had some practical questions for Lucas, like, what happens if Warner Brothers Discovery formally turns down Paramount again. But also some big picture ones like why exactly do Paramount and Netflix want to spend so much for essentially HBO and a movie slash TV studio? And what does this deal or potential deal tell us about the state of media in 2025 and beyond? It's good stuff, right? This is also a year end pod. So I talked to Lucas a bit about AI because as we're legally required to talk about AI.

2:25Peter Kafka:And we got some recommendations for your listening and viewing pleasure. This is a good one. Okay, here's me talking to Lucas Shaw. Lucas Shaw from Bloomberg. You're laughing because I'm bad at podcasting, but I'm glad to have you back on the show. We did an emergency pod when Netflix won. I'm putting scare quotes around the Warner Brothers deal. Yeah, that was two weeks ago. Two weeks ago, maybe that. Let's call it two weeks ago. The intent was for this previously scheduled conversation to be a look back at 2025 and a look ahead at 2026. We can do some of that. But honestly, the whole thing is Warner Brothers, Paramount, Netflix.

3:07Peter Kafka:It's the story of the year. I think it's the story of our careers. Really? It's the rise of streaming, right? Manifested. Got it. It's taking a huge step back. Yeah. Yeah. And displacing, you know, could potentially whatever. It's it's it's we oversell these stories all the time. People try to tell you why this thing is momentous, but it really is momentous, especially I think if Netflix does end up buying Warner Brothers. We are recording this on Monday. You guys will hear this on Wednesday. Things can change between now and then. But let's just start where the state of play is. Technically, right.

3:45Peter Kafka:Paramount just said, hey, we would like to buy Warner Brothers Discovery. consider our bid Warner Brothers Discovery and they have not yet responded. We expect them to respond any day now. Right. What do you think will happen? Warner Brothers Discovery will say thank you for this generous offer. We decline. We already declined this offer. The big question is whether they will say we don't want this offer and please stop trying go away. We are happy with our deal with Netflix or we declined, but if you want to offer us even more money, we're open to having a conversation. Because at the moment, they're not really supposed to be talking to other parties.

4:28There's kind of no shop provisions in their deals with Netflix, but they have the ability to open things back up where they can basically until the shareholders of Warner Brothers blasts a deal, someone else can come around and try to wow them. And I think it'd be pretty strange if they said go away. I think they'd be more than happy to use Paramount and Netflix to try to get another three to five dollars a share for their shareholders.

4:55Peter Kafka:So basically what we were describing more, we were describing as a done deal when we talked a couple of weeks ago, but saying, you know, Warner Brothers has picked Netflix as their buyer. You're suggesting that they haven't fully picked them yet. Like someone could still come in, would be. I think they picked them, but the board is never going to turn away an even better offer. And if Paramount, which has now made six offers to buy Warner Brothers Discovery, every single one of them rejected, if they make a seventh that is even higher, the board would have a fiduciary responsibility to engage with it.

5:29Peter Kafka:And I'm going to ask you to just do some prognostication, and it won't hold you responsible if you're wrong, because that's how the world works. do we expect paramount and then netflix to then get in a ongoing bidding war where each goes back to warner brothers says here's another dollar a share i think they both paramount has said that that this isn't the last and final which implies that or outright just says like we can we can go higher um my understanding is that netflix in studying the deal and doing its models has also created room to go higher. Whether they will is harder to guess. I would, I think they would, because they seem very committed to this.

6:10And what, one of the things that's interesting about this dynamic is you have two companies that are not, or two entities that are not used to losing, right? The Allisons are used to getting their way. Netflix is used to getting their way. And one of the, one of them has to lose here. Um, the wrinkle for Netflix is that unlike the, unlike Paramount Skydance, which is a fully controlled company, Netflix isn't. It's a proper public company. And so if shareholders really don't like this deal, which it seems like some of them are lukewarm on it, the share price of Netflix has been inching down. If Netflix adds $3,$5 to its bid, you'd imagine shareholders would be even less satisfied with it.

6:48Peter Kafka:This is messaging that I hear, I assume you hear from people particularly in the Paramount sphere saying, look how much Netflix shares have gone down since last fall. Netflix really doesn't, Netflix shareholders really don't want this deal. They've lost$100,$140 billion in value. Not all of which is correct, related to this. So let's play this out. So if for whatever reason, if Warner Brothers says, you know what, all things being equal, we want to stick with Netflix. Sorry, Paramount. Yep. Do we, what, Paramount could sue? They could go again directly to shareholders? They could sue and say that this was an unfair process.

7:30That feels like a risky endeavor. You don't see a lot of those in M &A land. They could continue with going direct to shareholders at their current offer,$30 a share. They have been adamant that it is superior to the Netflix offer and they have had enough dialogue. dialogue they're meeting with and talking to a lot of shareholders to try to get a sense for how supportive they are um from the conversations that that um people on my team at bloomberg have had with shareholders it feels like you know they'd all obviously like to see the number go up i don't know that there is a clear preference for one versus the other so that is also risky this the safest move for for the ellisons if they really want warner brothers would be to come back with more money.

8:17Peter Kafka:And then we have the Trump wildcard, right? And we've gone back and forth for months and recently, the last few days, intensely about what role will Donald Trump have in this, right? He can't compel someone to buy Warner Brothers Discovery. He's, in theory, not supposed to have an active role in this at all. He said, I'm going to have an active role. Many of us assumed, ultimately, that Paramount would win the deal because the Ellisons, Larry Ellison, has a deep connection with Donald Trump. Semaphore had a story where they were quoting an unnamed treasury executive saying we're offended by this idea and this is backfired.

8:55Peter Kafka:How active do you think Donald Trump will be in this process, which could go on in theory for many months, right? He can order a review. There will be a review most likely anyway. So how much do you think Donald Trump is going to play? How big a role do you think he will play? In the negotiations over who who wins the current auction bidding war, whatever? Almost none, I think. I mean, I think his name will be invoked a lot and he will get asked about it all the time, which means that he will comment on various things and people will try to - Which he loves. Which he loves. And people will try to read into his comments and he likes being at the center of attention.

9:33I mean, he just made the death of Rob Reiner about himself and he likes making it appear as though he is the person who, you know, decides things. but I don't think that he exerts any real influence until someone has been selected. I think that the winner of this, you may factor odds of regulatory approval into the side that you pick, but the company that wins Warner Brothers is going to be the company that offers the best deal. And then Donald Trump will, he's currently having fun sort of making it seem like both sides are going to owe him something, right? He was very, he lauded Ted Sarandos, co-see of Netflix.

10:16He talked about how Netflix was a great company and then said, but this will need to be reviewed. And he's been very effusive in his praise for the Ellisons while also saying, but we have to look at market share. So he's setting himself up to either way, demanding something of the winner.

10:32Peter Kafka:He's thrown out this idea that CNN has to have new owners no matter how this deal goes down. If you took that at literal face value, it means that only the Paramount deal works. Those are the ones who want to buy Warner Brothers against Donald Trump. Who knows what he will say tomorrow? But, you know, we all reference the Time Warner AT &T deal, which the first Trump administration tried to stop with a pretty conventional antitrust challenge. There was a lot of speculation that this was done at Donald Trump's behest. Lots of folks in the DOJ say it was a legitimate thing for us to talk about. We're in a different era of Trumpdom where he just literally says to Pam Bondi, go ahead and pursue this.

11:13Peter Kafka:If she then did pursue a real antitrust challenge, does she have grounds to take one up? Both of these deals relative to the AT &T Time Warner would be kind of almost more traditional deals to have reviewed because you have competitors merging, creating greater consolidation and greater concentration of power within an industry. So I think while the you're right that it's almost impossible to predict what the administration will do and they don't seem to follow any of the traditional norms or rules for what they what they review, what they don't, what they care about. I think in a traditional administration, either deal would get reviewed and get a view is different than suits to block, which is what happened with AT &T and Time Warner.

12:03And I don't so I think there will be close scrutiny of either deal. You already have politicians on both sides of the aisle, at least in the case of the Netflix deal, saying that we'd want to scrutinize it. You have prominent industry organizations, you know, unions and filmmakers speaking out and saying we're worried about it. And so it's inevitable that there would be some examination. Whether they would sue to block it is much harder to predict. and the the cases against each deal are a little bit different right that the netflix the case against netflix is they're already the number one player in streaming if they add warner brothers discovery they become unbeatable as well as sort of these ambiguous concerns about the movie theater business which i don't think would generally matter in terms of antitrust with paramount there is like a little bit of where's the money coming from does syphius need to review it which they say it doesn't because there's Middle Eastern money and there's Middle Eastern money involved.

12:57Twenty four billion dollars comes from three different sovereign wealth funds in three different countries, Saudis, Qataris, Emiratis. And an organization called CFIUS tends to review kind of foreign ownership of U.S. businesses. The Ellison's have tried to structure this deal in a way they say will not require CFIUS review because none of those entities will have any governance rights. Whether that's actually true, we'll see. And on top of that, Paramount and Warner Brothers Discovery, if you combine their TV network assets, they control a lot of what's on linear television. Obviously a declining business, but still incredibly influential.

13:34And both, you know, obviously both sides are saying the other one requires more scrutiny than themselves.

13:39Peter Kafka:You're one of many people who says CFIUS review, which I think it's correct to say it. But I think it's a euphemism of saying, hey, it's kind of wild that$24 billion of Middle Eastern oil money. And again, it's not from companies in those countries. It's the country's sovereign wealth funds. It's from the countries. Direct extension of those countries. By the way, that$24 billion number is double what the Ellisons themselves plan on putting into this deal. Um, and you would think from the right, from the left, from people who are, who are just flat out against people from the Middle East and people who have real concerns about, you know, crown prince of Saudi Arabia had a, had a Washington Post journalist murdered in 2018.

14:24Peter Kafka:You would think there'd be more outcry about that. I have been surprised there hasn't been or really much coverage of it at all. Do you think there would be if they were the if they had been the winning bidder, though? Well, that's kind of one of the questions, because I've been asking a bunch of folks this realist to another question, which was I was a little shocked to see how strong the initial reaction against Netflix winning this was from Hollywood. And I kept thinking, they're both of concern if you're in the business of making movies and television shows and you make a living in Hollywood.

15:00Peter Kafka:But I would think you'd be equally concerned about the Ellisons and the Saudis in particular owning this entity. And so why do you think that group of people has not complained? Well, I think the entertainment business would have pushed back on either deal. If Paramount had won, which was the expectation for going into it, all of the noise that there's been about Netflix and movie theaters wouldn't really exist, right? Because Netflix wouldn't have won. or all the concerns about, oh my God, is Netflix going to own all of Hollywood? People would be focused on aspects of Paramount's deal. They would be lamenting the loss of a movie studio.

15:44They would be probably talking about foreign ownership. There'd be a lot more discussion of what are the Ellisons planning for CNN and what's going to happen with the news business. So I think the fact that Paramount didn't win, at least yet, is a big part of it. The other is just, even though Netflix has spent so much money on programming over the years, and Ted Sarandos has worked very hard to become kind of a leading figure in the industry, and they are still treated by many as something of an outsider in the very insular Hollywood community.

16:23Peter Kafka:An outsider who's wrecked the business is the other part of it. Right. Well, that and that's what I was going to say next is a lot of the changes over the last decade. People blame on Netflix. Now, Netflix has obviously been a primary instigator of that. But rather than just say, you know, all of our studios fucked up, this Internet threat came about and none of them responded very well. And so we ended up in a situation where now the most powerful player is Netflix. They they they would rather just say, damn, you, Netflix, you do things differently. We don't like you. And there are there are some things about the way Netflix has done business that you have have written about, podcasted about all of that that are kind of legitimate gripes.

17:04And then some of it is just kind of people upset.

17:06Peter Kafka:I thought you were going to say a big reason Hollywood can't complain about Middle Eastern money is they're all flying out to the desert looking for Middle Eastern money, including some very mainstream names, some liberal, well-known liberals are out there either doing deals or hoping to get deals made with Middle Eastern oil money. I think that's true at the top level. I don't think that's true at the worker level. Right. But also the Middle East feels like a somewhat nebulous threat to some of them, I think. It's not as tangible as like, I know what Netflix, if you're a writer or a producer, you are living day to day feeling how Netflix has affected your life.

17:50Right. If you're a grip, you know, there's less work being done in town. Right. And you even if whether that's Netflix's fault or not, there is a part of you that is blaming them. If you have to worry about like Saudi Arabian influence on CNN or the death murder of Jamal Khashoggi, it doesn't feel like an immediate proximate threat. Most people are self-interested. So they're they're thinking about, you know, it's the same reason in any presidential election. It's like, can I afford my life week to week? If I feel good about my life, I'm, you know, I vote one way. And if I don't, I vote another.

18:21Peter Kafka:One more thing on the oil money. Warner Brothers Discovery has not said anything on the record about this. They have not produced, and they will any day now, a filing that says, here's how we came about deciding to pick Netflix as the buyer, sort of Paramount or Comcast. But Paramount in their filing has suggested, basically, you read between the lines, it It looks like Warner Brothers was at least concerned to some degree about the sources of financing is that it was. But it's unclear to me. Is it do you think that is because they're saying, well, we're uncomfortable with Middle East money or just that every time you come to us, the deal was a little different or we have some other concern?

19:02Peter Kafka:All of the above. from the conversations I've had with people involved in the deal. There was concern that the paperwork and the way the money worked seemed to change with each offer. There was concern about Middle Eastern money, if not ethically, that it would invite greater regulatory scrutiny that they didn't want. And then, I guess the more conspiratorial argument would be that it was also a really good pretext for accepting the Netflix deal that they wanted more in the first place. We'll be right back, but first a word from a sponsor.

19:59Peter Kafka:or fewer headache days a month. Prescription Botox is injected by your doctor. Effects of Botox may spread hours to weeks after injection, causing serious symptoms. Alert your doctor right away, as difficulty swallowing, speaking, breathing, eye problems, or muscle weakness can be signs of a life-threatening condition. Patients with these conditions before injection are at highest risk. Side effects may include allergic reactions, neck and injection site pain, fatigue, and headache. Allergic reactions can include rash, welts, asthma symptoms, and dizziness. Don't receive Botox if there's a skin infection.

20:26Peter Kafka:Tell your doctor your medical history, muscle or nerve conditions, including ALS Lou Gehrig's disease, myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome, and medications, including botulinum toxins, as these may increase the risk of serious side effects. Why wait? Ask your doctor. Visit BotoxChronicMigraine.com or call 1-800-44-BOTOX to learn more. Rayman Mehta lets you explore the world without a screen getting in the way, so you can stay present in the moment. Hey Mehta, tell me what kind of dessert this is. that's a stroopwafel a dutch waffle with spiced syrup in the middle is it sweet yes perfect for a snack or dessert delicious get answers on the go without interrupting your flow ray-ban meta iconic style meets meta ai available at walmart and other authorized retailers are you one of those media strategy people clicking through slides scrolling spreadsheets Yes?

21:21Peter Kafka:Good. This is for you. Because on Spotify, there's an audience that's different. Locked in. Loyal. Invested. They're called fans. Fans don't just listen to music. They feel seen by it, like it belongs to them. So when your brand shows up on Spotify, that's who you're talking to. And you're right next to artists like me, Lizzo. So, are you ready to talk to fans? Spotify Advertising. You're among fans.

21:49Peter Kafka:and we're back what prompts one of these two titans to to tap out it's how when when do they say all right we we cannot it's the done i mean it's too much money too much hassle i assume i mean they're they're they're they've been in it for months now so it can't just be we change our mind right it's got to be we have officially reached a a price that we don't want to pay and how like if you think back to what happened where you know disney agreed to buy most of the entertainment assets from fox and then comcast comes in and says hey wait a minute we're gonna come up over your offer so that the board has to really think about it which then forced disney to pay even more yep we're in a very similar situation here i mean a little bit different in that there there hadn't been sort of this uh and you can correct me if i'm wrong i remember there being sort of like a you know a public auction between multiple parties with that one nothing close to it disney and fox just said we have a deal and everyone holy crap and then comcast came in but in this it is similar in that warner brothers has agreed to a deal with netflix paramount is has come back is is not going away and it may get to a price where either side finally says too rich for my blood i don't want to do it um we haven't actually added to the offers yet So we're not there yet.

23:11And it doesn't feel from the behaviors. Both Paramount and Netflix have really dug their heels in there. You know, Netflix issued it issued something this week that was essentially like a Q &A answering questions, which was presented as for our employees, but was clearly as much as anything for the public. um they're real you know each side is very focused on combating the narratives that they think hurt their cases um but a lot of that is about kind of public perception um and this i still say that this deal comes down to dollars and cents who needs this deal more oh paramount because uh because it's a smaller it is a fundamentally weaker company right david ellison bought Paramount or merged it with his company Skydance because that was his way of sort of getting in the big leagues.

24:02But he bought the smallest and weakest of the big Hollywood companies, right? It's the kind of last place or second to last place movie studio. It's kind of a third tier streaming service. It still makes pretty much all of its money from these cable networks that are slowly dying or rapidly dying. And so if you were trying to position that company for the future. Look, he can take all the money that they're going to spend on this deal and just invest it in Paramount. That is the argument against these deals is like rather than dealing with two years of pain in the ass process, like just buy a bunch of stuff, right?

24:39Go out and buy some IP, spend a bunch of shows. This is what Netflix would do when they didn't bid on deals. So Netflix is obviously in a much stronger position in terms of its stock price, in terms of how much money, in terms of where streaming service is. However, I would say that the fact that Netflix is seriously going after this deal signals to longtime Netflix watchers that maybe the company is not on as secure footing as the public would be led to believe.

25:06Peter Kafka:Yeah, that's what you and I were talking about a couple of weeks ago is a strength or weakness. It can be some of both. Right. I mean, I guess you can make the argument if you're on the Netflix side, like, look, we haven't done any of these deals before, but we never had the chance to buy HBO. This is a one of a kind asset. We don't have to deal with the cable networks anymore. And you know, the odds of anything like this coming up again are very slim because if David Ellison buys it, he's not getting rid of it. Universal is not going anywhere. Disney's not going anywhere. What else is there for us to buy?

Read the full transcript

25:38Peter Kafka:All of Warner Brothers Discovery, Netflix and Comcast only wanted to buy the studio and basically HBO. What is the most valuable asset there is it the movie studio or is it hbo which is a very good streamer but not the most popular i don't know what the the which asset would be given like the you know the greatest valuation if it were to be traded on a standalone basis but i think for both of the companies trying to buy it that the studio film yes but even more importantly the television studio is the most valuable asset because warner brothers if you combine a film and tv studio is either the number one studio or maybe the number two studio in Hollywood.

26:20It's television business. You know, they make Ted Lasso for Apple and they make a bunch of hit shows already for Netflix and for they produce for everyone. Yes. And they own a deep catalog of friends and I believe Big Bang Theory and just like a bunch of things that would be great in any streaming catalog. So that to me is the most valuable asset. The streaming service and HBO's obviously also has a strong brand, strong catalog, I think is, um, is maybe as if valuable for Paramount because of how it can supercharge them in streaming for Netflix. It's, it's largely about catalog. Um, it's almost as valuable as to Warner brothers catalog, but I don't think quite as.

27:06Peter Kafka:And when this deal gets done one way or another, we've been talking, you and I've been doing versions of this podcast for years saying, when's all the consolidation happening? When's all it's happening. It's happening. We will be left with some version. I mean, Comcast will still be here. Disney's around. Like, is there more merging left to happen? Comcast had been getting out of the media business. Then it was signaling it wants to spend more money on media. Do they go buy something else? Their line, by the way, is sort of the Netflix line now. Well, the money that we weren't going to spend on buying this asset, we can now put into programming.

27:41Peter Kafka:They don't quite say that but that's sort of the suggestion right and that they you know there was no way that they were going to come to the price that these two parties have come to um i mean what happens next might depend a little bit on who wins this i think if paramount wins then there's less of a knee-jerk reaction from other players because you have two smaller somewhat struggling entities combining. And people will wait and see what David Ellison does. I think if Netflix gets it, it's a bigger problem for, it's one where Disney sits there and goes, uh-oh, like our big advantage on Netflix has always been that we are sitting on, you know, the greatest library of intellectual property and characters in the world.

28:29And now Netflix has something that's almost as good as ours, maybe better, you know, depending on how you're valuing what you're looking at. it so it could provoke a response from them but um but i don't really know i mean that's that's a

28:43Peter Kafka:year or two down the line also but i mean can you even move the pieces around much more after this well it i think it'd be different type it'd be different types of pieces right like comcast had that flirtation with electronic arts the video game company bought by saudi arabia instead bought by saudi arabia what is there something like that out there does someone try to buy Take-Two Interactive, the Grand Theft Auto game studio, among others, does, again, there are not that many huge companies out there. Do one of those get sold to a giant tech company? Sure. Does Comcast say, you know what, we'll sell NBCUniversal to Google?

29:17I mean, I don't think that deal's going to happen, but we'll sell it to Google. Or does Disney finally do the thing that everyone has been wondering about? Like, is Apple going to buy Disney?

29:27Peter Kafka:But. Why do you think that none of the traditional tech players, obviously Netflix is considered tech player, but none of the traditional tech companies that we know of made a real bid for these assets. We've been told forever that they wanted no part of a cable network. So that made sense. But if you could buy Warner Brothers Studio and HBO, that seems like the kind of thing a big tech company with interest in streaming would take a run at. That's certainly what David Zaslav was hoping and saying he wanted Amazon or Apple, someone like that to come in. Apple and Amazon are the only ones that would make any plausible sense, right?

30:02This is just not in the wheelhouse for a Google or a Meta or a Microsoft. There's nothing for them to do with it unless they were wanting to fundamentally change their approach to streaming and entertainment. So Apple and Amazon are the ones who sort of play in the same pool as these others. I mean, Apple never does big deals and their entertainment business still feels like a flirtation, not a flirtation, but like a nice little side project, right? It's not like central to the Apple business. Entertainment has become a little more central for Amazon. They have invested real money, committed to long-term sports rights.

30:38I don't know. They did the deal for MGM, which was like a half measure compared to this. I don't, I think it's been a mixed deal for them at best. They've gotten a little bit out of it, but it's not like been transformational for streaming. I believe for either company, it would be the biggest deal that they've ever done. And how are you going to your shareholders and saying the biggest deal we need to do is in this business that is not our most important business. It's not our second most important business. It might not even be our third most important business. We'll be right back. But first, a word from a sponsor.

31:14Peter Kafka:Hey there, it's Wayfair here, where delivery and setup are as easy as a few taps on your phone. You're relaxing in an old hammock, scrolling Wayfair's app, when you spot it, a brand new patio set. Next thing you know, Wayfair delivers it right to your patio and sets it up. Oh, you need a new grill too? All right, Wayfair's got you covered. With Wayfair's room of choice delivery and fast experts set up on qualifying orders, life gets a little easier. Visit Wayfair.com or the Wayfair app. Wayfair, every style, every home. Hasan Piger has blown up in recent years. After the 2024 election, the popular leftist Twitch streamer became a go-to voice for the Democratic Party.

31:52But Piker's glow up has angered a section of Democrats who are growing louder in voice. Hassan Piker is anti-American. He is bigoted. He's anti-Semitic. And he is deeply misogynistic. So in March, a Democratic group called Third Way published an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal's opinion section saying, quote, Democrats are too cozy with Hassan Piker.

32:16Peter Kafka:He is such an extremist that it will only do damage to Democrats and hurt their chances of beating right wing populism. Now, Piker is controversial, no doubt. But is he toxic? I don't think this helps Republicans at all. I think, as a matter of fact, Third Way's brand of politics has helped Republicans. Their attitude has been to constantly concede on culture or issues of the Republican Party and never focus on economic populism. I'm Ested Herndon, and this is America Actually. Catch us every Saturday on YouTube or wherever you get your podcasts. The U.S. and Iran say they've agreed on terms to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

32:56You already see oil prices from a high of$126 a barrel down to about$80 a barrel today. That's a lot of progress.

33:04Peter Kafka:The war, of course, drove up the price of gas and other essentials and has led to some ugly polling for President Trump. 61 % of adults polled by NPR, PBS and Marist disapprove of his handling of the economy. His handling, in a certain light, makes sense. His priority was preventing Iran from getting nukes. But Trump's messaging was unusual, unusual for a president. Last month, a reporter asked Trump, to what extent was he thinking about Americans' finances when he negotiated with Iran? I don't think about American financial situation. I don't think about anybody. I think about what's he doing.

33:38Peter Kafka:Coming up on Today Explained from Vox.

33:54Peter Kafka:And we're back. If we didn't start off this conversation talking about the fate of Warner Brothers, I'd say, wow, it seems like a big year for AI in Hollywood. We've been hearing about this. Maybe this is the year things are finally clicking in. last week Disney and OpenAI did a deal. Disney is apparently writing a check for a billion dollars, which is surprising to me. I thought they were just getting in-kind equity because they don't have that much cash. But they're writing a billion-dollar check to OpenAI. They're going to license some of the characters. Do you think that deal is meaningful or symbolic or both?

34:28I think it's more symbolic than commercially meaningful right now. It is a huge deal that the kind of biggest, one of the most storied companies in Hollywood, that is also one of the more risk-averse companies. Famously protective about their IP. Did a deal with kind of the big new player on the block in artificial intelligence. So I think for that, it's a huge deal. It will usher in other companies trying to do similar deals, whether it's with OpenAI or with Google or with someone else. How much what they've agreed to really matters. You know, getting a billion dollars worth of stock in OpenAI at the current valuation, you know, not that great.

35:16I mean, if it becomes a multi-trillion dollar company, it's a nice return for Disney, but it's not that significant. allowing people to use the disney characters within the sora app um is probably the biggest the single you know it's it's the biggest deal it's it's it'd be like disney it'd be like the companies that did licensing deals with with youtube in 2007 8 what have you um we don't really know what popular like really popular ai video looks like yet we don't know how important it will be to be able to include a character, although not their voice.

35:53Peter Kafka:And whether, frankly, whether users generating this stuff is meaningful. We all sort of have been trained to know that that is meaningful, but we don't really know if people are going to want to watch it. And whether Sora is going to be the app or whether it's going to be the Google app or it's going to be another app we don't even know about yet, or that is lesser known. So I think it's a little wait and see on how much it matters. When's the last time you used Sora? I don't use it very often. Yeah, I think that's the answer. And then you wrote about sort of the AIs year in Hollywood and for Bloomberg Business Week, you should check it out.

36:29Peter Kafka:There's people who are afraid of it. There's people who say this is inevitable. The other cleavage that I think is more practical for us is it seems like it to me that it's quite clear that AI, like any kind of technology, is going to be used to in production, right, to decrease costs, increase speed, whatever it is, all variations of that. And that seems inevitable. It might make you feel uneasy, but that's just how technology works. The other is, is AI going to fundamentally change what gets made and what we consume? Is it just better visual effects or is the medium itself going to be different?

37:08Peter Kafka:Is the medium itself going to be different? Do we create entirely new kinds of work that supplant movies? That can always be the case. When you talk to people in Hollywood who are excited or fearful of it, which is the version that stir? I'm assuming the thing people get most emotional about is sort of AI just coming in and replacing a huge swath of the creative business. Correct. Nobody is going to be if it just becomes a tool to make visual effects more efficient or better or you can use it. I mean, some of the ways it's already being used for like pre-visualization so that you can rather you can more quickly create a model for what you think something could look like.

37:52Like that's not a huge deal. But if suddenly, you know, what is a 90 day production is 30 days or you have certain jobs that get replaced or you have, you know, an example that people come up with as a good thing is like, OK, rather than having to reshoot something and have people go back on set and all of that, you can just you've already captured them and you can, you know, do a reshoot with AI. That sounds efficient and great, but it also does mean less work. You were going to pay those actors to come back on the set. And you were not just the actors, but you talked about grip or sound people or costume people, right?

38:30Like there's the concern about what if like, do we are we going to have makeup artists still or is it just all going to be done digitally? So that's the part where people get anxious and we're still in a phase where people don't know, right? Like these, you had both the actors and writers in Hollywood went on strike in 2023 and AI wasn't the issue, but over the course of that strike, it became a bigger part of it. And at the time they, people really knew nothing. Right. Now, you know, a little more, but it's still not really clear.

39:01Peter Kafka:Right. Because like there's this idea of like, hey, I was a we saw him extras now. We call him background actor in this production. And it turns out that I may have signed my rights away and I'm never going to get hired as an extra slash background actor again because they're just going to digitally reproduce me. That seems pretty plausible now. Less plausible. You'd like to believe less plausible is Harrison Ford's image in like this is going to be used without his consent. Right. but he may sell those rights for a lot of money and wouldn't complain about that. I think that consent is the key word, right?

39:38Even when you're talking about background actors, and I don't know the ins and outs of whatever deals they strike, but in theory, if they capture you for a movie, they should be able to continue to use whatever they capture for that movie. They should not be able to use you in all movies going forward without paying you. And I don't think if you are someone who is already famous, you are in the catbird seat, as they say, because, yeah, if you were to try to use Harrison Ford again without his permission, you'd get sued. It would look really bad publicly. It just wouldn't be worth the hassle. Right.

40:19Peter Kafka:But background. Yeah. And we and we we we talked about this a while back. I mean, when whenever you go on stage and very often do a media hit, someone gives you some boilerplate language to sign. If you look at the release, it says your likeness can be used in perpetuity around the world. Blah, blah, blah. We'll never compensate you for it again. And at least in my case, I just don't think people are going to be repopulating their movies with my talking head. Right. But I think I will probably look at those contracts a little more closely going forward. Depends how long they are. How's your deal with Spotify on the Matt Bellany show?

40:52Peter Kafka:My deal? It's non-existent. That was my little inside joke. You were featured in the Matt Bellany profile in the New York Times. There was a cameo from you, a photo. I was featured in photos. That's true. Did your life change after appearing in the New York Times print? It did not. I heard from a lot of... Just so we're clear, I get the New York Times print on Sunday, but primarily I heard from publicists and family, friends and relatives, 65 and up fan. Fuck. That's who listens to this podcast too. In some cases, look at shots, the end of the year. Um, give me some awesome media you consumed this year that you think other people might want to read, listen to watch.

41:34Peter Kafka:Um, it doesn't have to be one of each, whatever you like. Yeah. I don't, I, the movies I've been struggling with because I've seen a lot of stuff that I've liked, but nothing that like was clearly, like I went, I just went to see this Brazilian movie, The Secret Agent, which I really enjoyed and I would recommend people seeing. But I keep waiting for a movie to like knock me away and say that was my favorite movie of the year. That has not happened yet. The last TV show that I watched, other than the guilty pleasure that is Landman that I would recommend is the Martin Scorsese docuseries on Apple.

42:05If you care about him or his movies, it's really great. And it is not hagiography. It does not pull punches about the complicated person that he is or drug use or any of that. We've had a really good run of new music over the last few months. The new Lily Allen, the new Rosalia. People are in love with this band, Geese. I would recommend all those.

42:28Peter Kafka:Said like a really middle-aged guy, like this band, Geese. Yes. Did you see the clips of Cameron Winter, who's the Geese front man performing at Carnegie Hall with Paul Thomas Anderson? was filming him there? He performed in LA, I believe, Sunday night, and I'm sad that I missed it. But yeah, those are all good things. If you want something slightly less popular, one of the most fun shows I've been to this year was a British punk group called the Lambrini Girls. I've never really cared about punk music, but I've gotten a little into it this year. So they're fun. Okay. Lucas Shaw, semi-old man.

43:07Peter Kafka:Semi-old man. Getting into punk music a little bit. Lucas Shaw Great to see you again Likewise Thanks for coming on Once again Enjoy the rest of 2025 See you next year See you then Thanks again to Lucas Shaw It was awesome We'll have him on More often next year How about that For a New Year's resolution Thanks again to Charlotte Silver Who produces And edits this show I'm delighted To work with her She's great Thanks to our sponsors You know why we love Our sponsors They bring this show To you for free And thanks to you guys Literally there is no point In making this thing unless you guys are listening and engaged and writing and talking and sharing this stuff.

43:44Peter Kafka:I'm very appreciative. Thanks a lot. We've got a couple cool bonus shows coming for you the next couple weeks. You'll see what those are when we drop them. And I'll see you in January. Thanks.

44:00Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. I don't know if you knew this, but anyone can get the same premium wireless for$15 a month plan that I've been enjoying. It's not just for celebrities. So do like I did and have one of your assistant's assistants switch you to Mint Mobile today. I'm told it's super easy to do at mintmobile.com slash switch.

44:19Peter Kafka:Upfront payment of$45 for three-month plan equivalent to$15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only. Then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. Default terms at mintmobile.com.

From the publisher

The backstory here is that weeks ago, Bloomberg’s Lucas Shaw agreed to join me for my 2025/2026 look back/look ahead episode. And then things got way more compelling, because Paramount and Netflix got into a truly unprecedented fight over the future of Warner Bros Discovery.

So that’s what we’re talking about here, including:

*Why this truly is a turning point for Hollywood, and streaming, and the great media/tech collision we’ve been covering for years.

*How Trump, Middle Eastern money and antitrust regulators complicate the deal

*Who actually needs this merger more.

*What happens now that WBD has formally dismissed Paramount’s bid? Again: we recorded this a few days before the news — but as you’ll hear, we had a pretty good sense of how it was going to go.

And because this still is a wrap-up episode, we got some AI vs. Hollywood chat into this one, as well as some listening/watching recs.

PS: I’ve got some bonus programming coming to you over the next couple of weeks. Have a great holiday, and I’ll see you in January.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from Channels with Peter Kafka

All 70 episodes
"Neither Side Is Used to Losing." Lucas Shaw on What’s Next for Netflix and Paramount in the Battle for Warner Bros.Channels with Peter Kafka · 42 min
Listen in VO