In short
Peter Kafka (Channels) and CNBC’s Alex Sherman break down Netflix walking away from the Warner Bros. Discovery acquisition and Paramount’s expected purchase, plus what it means for Hollywood.
Guests
Alex Sherman is a CNBC reporter who got sources confirming “it’s over” about 25 minutes before the announcement.
Key claims
Netflix didn’t counter because Paramount’s revised bid was only $1 higher ($30 to $31 per share), making a bidding war and prolonged regulatory fight unattractive; Netflix also feared the deal could drag into concessions and political pressure.
Notable examples
Ted Sarandos’ White House visit photos; Paramount’s claim of DOJ/political pre-approval (Pam Bondi); WBD employee anxiety vs Netflix’s “business as usual” promise. They discuss likely Paramount-led leadership overlap, major job cuts, and uncertainty over who runs CNN/HBO/studios, plus debt concerns and Netflix’s $2.8B breakup fee.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VONetflix's Decision Not to Acquire Warner Brothers
1:40 to 2:20
Exploring Netflix's surprising decision against acquiring Warner Brothers Discovery.
“I'm also chief correspondent at Business Insider, and this is a bonus emergency podcast for very obvious reasons.”
Analysis of Paramount's Bid and Shareholder Dynamics
2:20 to 4:50
A deep dive into Paramount's bid and the dynamics affecting Netflix's response.
“Did you have an inkling, I guess, is a more polite way of asking?”
The Regulatory Landscape Affecting Netflix and Paramount
4:50 to 7:20
Understanding the regulatory challenges faced by Netflix and Paramount in their bids.
“The Netflix stock has tanked since all of this started happening.”
Potential Outcomes of Paramount's Acquisition
7:20 to 9:20
Discussing the potential consequences for Warner Brothers Discovery following the acquisition.
“want the asset or this was all just a ruse to drive the price up but because that's pretty extreme, right?”
Employee Sentiment and Leadership Changes at Warner Brothers Discovery
9:20 to 14:01
Exploring employee perspectives and anticipated changes in leadership at Warner Brothers Discovery.
“A lot of this is just the power of images and photos.”
Paramount's Job Cuts and Leadership Restructuring
14:01 to 15:27
Learn about the anticipated job cuts and leadership changes at Paramount due to corporate restructuring.
“that this is why Paramount has put out the$6 billion synergy number or whatever the latest version of that is because there's going to be a lot of job cuts that are involved here.”
Merging CNN with CBS: Historical Context and Implications
15:28 to 17:19
Explore the historical context and potential implications of merging CNN with CBS in terms of media strategy.
“As an aside, the idea of combining in particular CNN with CBS has been around for years and years under many different ownerships.”
David Ellison's Vision for Warner Brothers and Film Strategy
17:20 to 23:13
Discuss David Ellison's aspirations for Warner Brothers and the potential focus on action movies.
“So I would imagine that they'll go hard.”
The Financial Risks of Paramount's Acquisition
23:14 to 25:50
Analyze the financial implications and risks associated with Paramount's acquisition of Warner Brothers Discovery.
“But like all that stuff is so wishy washy to me that it's hard for me to to say I believe any of it.”
Netflix's Strategic Position After the Deal
25:51 to 28:00
Evaluate Netflix's strategic response and future moves following the failed acquisition of Warner Brothers Discovery.
“There's a sort of snap wisdom like, oh, they're the winner here because they didn't have to pay.”
Show all 13 chapters
Exploring the Implications of Media Mergers
28:00 to 29:00
Discuss the motivations behind recent media deals and their impact on the industry.
“I don't think they would want to run the NBC broadcast network.”
Cultural Concerns in Media Consolidation
29:00 to 31:12
Examine the cultural implications and consumer concerns related to media assets control.
“But there's also like a culture component to this story.”
Generational Perspectives on Media Relevance
31:12 to 32:20
Discuss how different generations view the relevance of traditional media assets.
“And yes, there are concerns that so many of these media assets are controlled by the same person.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Peter Kafka:Oh, hey. Sorry, love to chat, but I'm busy shopping all the rollbacks and more at Walmart. Grab a what? Cancel that. I gotta grab these big savings on the Walmart app online and in-store like right now. See who? Nope, unavail. The only thing I want to see are the prices just lowered on Tech Home and all my must-haves. Wait, you want to shop Walmart with me? Alrighty, I think I can fit you in. Fox News is now streaming live on Fox One. When it matters most, turn to the voices you trust. We go beyond the headlines, bringing you the stories you won't hear anywhere else. Live coverage, sharp analysis, real perspective.
0:48Peter Kafka:At home or on the go, stay connected when it counts. Stream Fox News on Fox One.
0:55Alex Sherman:Download today.
1:28Peter Kafka:We'll be right back.
1:35Peter Kafka:From the Vox Media Podcast Network, this is Channels with Peter Kafka. That's me. I'm also chief correspondent at Business Insider, and this is a bonus emergency podcast for very obvious reasons. On Wednesday, everyone thought Netflix was going to buy or had a reasonable expectation that Netflix might buy Warner Brothers Discovery. on Thursday we learned they're not going to buy it which means Paramount's going to buy it here to explain all of this is CNBC's Alex Sherman welcome back Alex thanks Peter you pretty much just explained it there yeah podcast is over that's right thanks for doing it when when did when did your perception go from Paramount's made it made a bid now Netflix is going to counter that's what we all sort of thought was going to happen this week to Netflix is going to walk did Did you expect this?
2:26Peter Kafka:Did you have an inkling, I guess, is a more polite way of asking?
2:29Alex Sherman:I did not expect it to happen yesterday at all. I actually got a call about 25 minutes before the announcement. Well, I didn't get a call. I was reaching out to sources and I got one to call me back. And that was a plugged in person who told me it's over. Netflix is walking. And so you learned before I learned about 25 minutes before the news. Then I started frantically calling for a second source. Didn't quite get there in time for the announcement. I think, you know, just tweet it out. I should have just tweeted it out, but that's not the way we do things at CNBC. So, you know, I think I think Netflix at that point knew that I was onto the story and they were they were I think they were already going to publish their thing anyways.
3:10Alex Sherman:But look, the whole thing caught me off guard. I will say I don't think anybody was expecting this to happen, you know, the same day that Warner Brothers Discoveries board decided that the Paramount offer was was superior. That's the word that they use, a superior offer. To be clear, it's a table set.
3:30Peter Kafka:The idea was we sort of expected Warner Brothers to say, hey, we've got a bid here from Paramount Netflix. Now it's your turn to respond. Four days. They had said they basically had until Wednesday, end of day, next Wednesday to return. And Netflix had said, this is the offer we've made is we can go higher if we need to. So everyone, I think, expected them to go higher. Why do you think they didn't come back?
3:55Alex Sherman:Yeah. So, you know, look, I think there was a little bit of mixed messaging there. You also had Ted Sarandos saying just a day or two ago that they were going to be very disciplined on their bid. but the Paramount offer to your point, Peter, was only a dollar more than their previous offer. They went from$30 a share to$31 a share. So I think because the revised offer was not that much more, there was a decent chance that Netflix would be like, well, all right, well, we'll bump our bid a little bit and then we'll turn it back over to shareholders. You decide. The shareholder vote was only going to be in a few weeks from now, really.
4:32Alex Sherman:So we'll put out our offer. We'll put out your offer if you decide you want to go in Paramount's direction. Go for it. Don't vote our deal. And if you like our deal, then approve it. I did think it was an inkling that that was going to happen. I think in the end, Paramount probably decided we can definitely see where our own shareholder base thinks of this deal. The Netflix stock has tanked since all of this started happening. You go back to early December. It's down quite a bit. And in fact, shares shot up 10 % upon the news that Netflix was walking.
5:07Peter Kafka:Even this week, when it looked like Paramount's chances were improving, Netflix shares went up, which is a real signal saying, hey, hey, Ted Sarandos, we would like it if you didn't buy Warner Brothers Discovery. Right.
5:18Alex Sherman:So I'd have to think that that was part of it. I think it's also likely that when Netflix first announced the deal, perhaps they thought the regulatory process would be easier for them. It certainly appeared as though this was going to be a lengthy regulatory process, not to say Netflix wouldn't have been able to pull the right levers and make the concessions needed to get a deal done down the road. But it was not going to be smooth sailing. I think that part was quite clear, both in the United States and in Europe. And maybe that was another part of this where the Netflix leadership decided, you know what, if this is going to be that challenging for us, we just don't want to also have to get into a bidding war here.
6:02Alex Sherman:I'll say part three to answer your question is that because the bid was only a dollar more, I think Netflix also felt this could, in fact, get into a bidding war where if Netflix upped its bid, perhaps then Paramount would up its bid again. And then this would be a back and forth situation where Netflix was like, we don't even need to get into that. We're not comfortable with that. We'll just call it quits here. And then the last point I would say, and I know that there's like a section of social media out there that likes to poo poo this one. But I can tell you that I had private conversations with people that I trust around the Netflix universe or, in fact, that work at Netflix who told me initially that when Warner Brothers went up on the block, they were concerned only that it didn't go into the hands of somebody for cheap.
6:59Alex Sherman:That's what I was told directly. and so uh Netflix decided to take matters into their own hands with that and in fact they put in a bid and ensured it did not go for cheap and I think that Netflix leadership became enamored with Warner Brothers Discovery the more and more they looked into it and realized and thought about it was like how would this fit with us and certainly I don't want to say that they didn't want the asset or this was all just a ruse to drive the price up but because that's pretty
7:27Peter Kafka:extreme, right? And there's actually legal consequences. I don't think that's true at all, but I do think it's
7:33Alex Sherman:true that always in the back of Netflix's mind, they felt like well, worst case scenario here, if we walk away with a breakup fee and we force Paramount to pay up the nose for this, that is not a bad situation necessarily for us or at least it puts it's sort of the least bad situation if Warner Brothers Discovery is going to go to a competitor, right?
7:55Peter Kafka:We have to lose, but we basically wounded you by getting you to spend all this money. And the Netflix people for years, when Fox and Disney combined, other mergers are being floated. I would say, hey, how come you guys aren't bidding on this? And they would say, well, we don't want to buy companies. We want to spend money on talent. And they would also say, and by the way, we're very happy for Fox and Disney to spend two years integrating and going through regulatory clearances. We're very happy to see what was then called Time Warner get tied up in court for years when AT &T was buying it. We can just move ahead.
8:29Alex Sherman:But by the way, one of those companies that said that over and over again was Netflix to like every other. That's what I'm saying. No, Netflix. Netflix always said that.
8:37Peter Kafka:And then, of course, forgot that when they wanted to buy Warner Media. But back to why they walk. Right. So there's the price stuff. But we always knew that Paramount was going to spend more. Paramount said over and over, we're going to spend more. You would think if Netflix had already said we're going to spend twenty seven dollars and change per share that they could add another dollar. It is surprising to me that they are surprised by the blowback enough not to bid more. And similarly, on the regulatory stuff, I know that Ted Sarandos had made a lot of entreaties towards Trump, but he knew that Trump and Allison had a tighter bond.
9:16Peter Kafka:And it is surprising to me that they were surprised. And you never know. A lot of this is just the power of images and photos. But that those shots of Ted Sarandos leaving the White House yesterday afternoon looking kind of glum. There's actually if you can look on Getty, there's also amazing shots of him taking a selfie with some guy in front of the White House. And Ted Sarandos looks like he would rather be anywhere else than taking a selfie with that guy in the White House. suggests that they underestimated how much political pressure there would be. Do you think this is more of, if we had to make you choose, do you think this is more of a money thing or a we can't get this deal done thing?
9:55Alex Sherman:Yeah, I don't want to, the cop-out answer is both, I think. I do really think the answer is both.
10:01Peter Kafka:By the way, that's what I wrote, so I think that's a fair answer.
10:03Alex Sherman:I mean, clearly shareholders didn't like the money aspect of this, and tied into that was there was inherent risk that the deal wouldn't get done and they'd be tied up in this for a long time. So I think, you know, and look, I think the other part of it is, call it political or whatever, but I do feel like Netflix did not want to have this thing drag out for a long period of time and then be forced into a position again where in order to get the deal done, it had to make all of these concessions it didn't want to. And I think that the tea leaves suggested that's where we were headed.
10:41Peter Kafka:So, Paramount has already basically said this deal has been pre-approved by Pam Bondi and the DOJ. That's not officially true. In theory, the DOJ can review this, and they might, but, you know, Pam Bondi works for Donald Trump. If Donald Trump wants this deal to go through, Pam Bondi is not going to stop it by filing a suit. You've heard rumblings from the California state's attorney general saying, hey, we're going to try to stop this. We don't know what Europe's going to do. Again, we're just speculating. But is there any reason to think this deal gets stopped for regulatory reasons now?
11:16Alex Sherman:Probably less likely than Netflix, I would say. I think the California AG one is real. I mean, there's going to be a lot of job losses, I think, attached to this in Hollywood that probably were not going to happen in a Netflix deal.
11:29Peter Kafka:Have we ever seen an attorney general suit stop a merger? Right.
11:32Alex Sherman:I mean, I'm trying to think now. That's a good question. I don't think it's unprecedented, but I cannot think of a deal off the top of my head. Rare if ever. It's rare. You can't think of it. It's rare. Okay. Yes.
11:46Peter Kafka:And Europe might try to stop it. Europe has stopped other deals in the past, although it seems like Europe's less interested in stopping deals Donald Trump likes right now.
11:57Alex Sherman:Yeah. Also, I think Europe is particularly attuned to big tech not getting all that much larger. Netflix, I think, fell into that bucket much more so than Paramount, which is really not big tech at all. It's legacy media. So I would imagine the regulatory path is probably smoother from that end in Europe than it would have been for Netflix.
12:22Peter Kafka:OK, let's let's walk through what happens to each of these three players now. um warner brothers discovery we assume is going to get bought by paramount so the big assets there there's the tv movie studio there's hbo and there's this collection of tv networks the one everyone in my world your world cares the most about is cnn david elson hasn't said what he's going to do with any of these assets more or less except i guess make more movies that's been his pitch to to to hollywood but we don't know what that means for leadership at any of these companies who's going to run them. Do you have any sense of what happens to any of these?
12:57Alex Sherman:No, I mean, I'll front run my own story here that I'm currently working on real time for CNBC. There is a lot more anxiety, depression among Warner Brothers Discovery employees with this going to Paramount than what I picked up on in terms of had this gone to Netflix.
13:23Peter Kafka:A lot of them had said, if we have to get bought, we'd prefer to get bought by Netflix.
13:27Alex Sherman:Correct. And so why is that? Well, Netflix is not really in the business that Warner Brothers Discovery is in for most of their businesses. I mean, they're not really in the theatrical business. They're not really even in the prestige TV business. So a lot of those leaders would have been left alone de facto because there aren't existing leaders at Netflix that do those jobs. That is not the case at Paramount. and that goes across the board. They have a movie studio. They have a streaming business. They have a news business. They have a sports business. They have a streaming business. There's just so much overlap here that this is why Paramount has put out the$6 billion synergy number or whatever the latest version of that is because there's going to be a lot of job cuts that are involved here.
14:13Alex Sherman:And so part of the whole premise of this deal is that there's so much overlap that we need to suss out who's going to run all of these divisions. And then whoever doesn't run these divisions will lose their job.
14:25Peter Kafka:Yes, along with thousands of other employees.
14:28Alex Sherman:Along with thousands of other employees, yes. So there'll be a lot of cuts at the leadership level and there will be a lot of cuts at the rank and file level for lack of a better term. So that leads to kind of a depressing scenario from the Warner Brothers Discovery standpoint. So I don't think anybody has a good sense yet of who's going to run these divisions. It's just so early on at this stage. But as my story will say, that's kind of assuming this deal does in fact get done. That's the next chapter here. The next chapter is to figure out, OK, we've got all of these people now. How are we going to restructure this thing so that we put the right people in charge?
15:07Alex Sherman:How fair is that process going to be from a meritocracy standpoint versus, you know, well, we're paramount. We're coming in. And so we're making the calls here. And, you know, it'll just be it'll be old school Paramount buying Warner Brothers Discovery. And we're going to take over from a cultural standpoint and a relationship standpoint. Like, we'll see. But that's why there's so much anxiety on the WBD employee side.
15:31Peter Kafka:As an aside, the idea of combining in particular CNN with CBS has been around for years and years under many different ownerships. I don't know why it's always CBS, but this is not the first time people have contemplated that. And I think there's an alternate reality where you go, it makes perfect sense to take a big news gathering operation that's on broadcast TV and one's on cable. And yes, there'd be some cuts, but you could make something really, really strong if you combine those two assets in theory.
16:01Alex Sherman:Yeah. Just a quick note about why it's CBS. Well, it's not going to be NBC because they already have MSNBC and it's not going to be Fox because they already have Fox News. So really, it was just ABC or CBS in terms of network news that didn't have an associated cable news network. And I think the thinking always was it's more likely to be CBS than than Disney. So that's why I think it's been CBS.
Read the full transcript
16:25Peter Kafka:And is there anything in David Ellison's history, older history, and then in the last year of history when he's been talking about this deal or what he wants to do, that gives you any sense of sort of what he might be interested in in terms of the movie division? And by the way, the Warner Brothers movie studio is also a giant TV studio, enormously valuable for that. and when it comes to HBO. I mean, he really has said very little, but is there anything that you can cling to and go, oh, maybe this means this for the Warner Brothers side?
16:58Alex Sherman:I mean, not a lot. You said it. They've said they want to make more movies, so they want to make 30 movies a year, I think is the number that has been thrown out. That's a lot of movies per year. Many people have noted that you have to go back to the 1970s for studios to make that many movies in a year, So we'll see if that actually pans out. I mean, David Ellison's personal taste appears to be these like kind of action movies. So I would imagine that they'll go hard.
17:25Peter Kafka:Action movies, things that were successful before. Let's make more of them, which, by the way, is most movie studios.
17:32Alex Sherman:Yes, for sure. Yep. But no, I think the answer to that is like there's a lot of just guessing involved there. And I don't think we have heard a coherent strategy in terms of exactly what we're going to find out for changes, if there are significant changes at the Warner level. Again, Netflix, Ted Sarandos, over and over again, very clearly stating he did not want to change the Warner Brothers business. He was basically like, we're going to own this, but it's going to be business as usual. And that, I think, made a lot of the Warner Brothers employees feel more calm about the situation until David Ellison says the same thing.
18:10Alex Sherman:And frankly, even if he does says the same thing, I just don't think they can believe him because of the leadership overlap that we just discussed.
18:18Peter Kafka:So let's talk about what what becomes of Paramount once they buy this asset. The thing that everyone is pointing out is that Warner Brothers Discovery has a ton of debt already. Paramount is taking on a huge amount of debt to make this deal done. One of the reasons Warner Brothers Discovery in its most recent incarnation struggled is because they had this huge debt overload. That all seems like a reasonable concern. On the other hand, even though Paramount is a public company, it's really a private company. It's controlled by the Ellisons. Do they get to play by different rules when it comes to how they service the debt, whether they care, whether they care about share prices.
18:59Peter Kafka:I mean, this thing they bought was worth$7 a year ago. Now they're paying$31 for it. It seems pretty likely that at some point that stock price is going to decline again. But again, Larry Ellison is one of the richest men in the world. So maybe he's not playing by the same rules.
19:17Alex Sherman:Yeah, I don't think they have to exactly play by the same rules. They do have to service the debt. So that is a factor, whether you're a private company or a public company. And, you know, there's a lot of this money that's sovereign wealth money. I don't know exactly how much input these sovereign wealth funds are going to have over the direction of the company or not. I think that -
19:38Peter Kafka:Remember, recently, Paramount said, yes, we're taking$24 billion from three petro-states, but Warner Brothers Discovery, because you raised your eyebrows at this, these petro-states have promised to have zero influence over the company. They won't have a board seat. They won't have voting. They're just letting their money rise. So don't worry about it.
19:59Alex Sherman:Why would I be so silly to think that they might actually have a quiet opinion on how their money was being, how many, many billions of dollars of their money was being spent for a United States media company and a large one. So look, again, we'll see exactly how that plays out. Yes, to your earlier point, I do absolutely feel like the rules are different because this is a quasi-controlled company by the Ellison family. It is not nearly the same as a pure play publicly traded media company. That said, it is still a publicly traded company. They still will have analyst reports and investor bases.
20:38Alex Sherman:And so, again, the near term, I think, is going to be rocky in terms of how do we convince the street that this is going to be anything different than the plethora of other horizontal legacy media mergers that we have seen over the past 10 years, one after another after another. They all lead to value destruction. There's not a single example, I think, that you can point to of a large mega media merger between two legacy media companies that has really gone well. So I don't know why I would think this one would go all that well.
21:17Peter Kafka:Netflix had an answer for that, which was essentially we're Netflix and we're not dumb. And so we know what we're getting into.
21:25Alex Sherman:Just to be clear, I think Netflix was a little different in the sense that, A, it's not as much of a legacy media company, and B, it was more of a vertical merger in some senses than a horizontal one. We're going to add things we don't have.
21:41Peter Kafka:And also, we're not taking on your declining cable TV assets, which is what Paramount has bought. I mean, AT &T bought Time Warner.
21:46Alex Sherman:That was a vertical merger. That was a disaster, too. But Comcast bought NBC. That was less of a disaster, certainly. You know, I think that has they bought NBC at the right time. And that has been a a at least a good acquisition for.
22:02Peter Kafka:And what do you think the Ellison's think? Because, again, this is not the first time someone will suggest it to him. Hey, the track record for these deals is pretty bad. What makes you think it's going to be better? And by the way, Larry Ellison, he's not you know, he is one of the richest men in the world. He doesn't like to lose his money. What do you think he and his son are going to get out of this deal?
22:26Alex Sherman:Well, I mean, what are they going to get out of this deal? I think his son is going to get the job of a lifetime out of this deal. I think his son has gone from running a borderline irrelevant film studio to one of the largest media companies in the world. That's a nice gift. Yes. Do I think that the Ellisons are going to make a fortune off of this investment? Again, I don't know how anyone could say the answer to that is yes. All evidence suggests that this is going to be a slog for a long time. Now, maybe there's a lot of, I mean, you'd have to be wish casting to say this was some sort of genius investment on the sense of the Ellison family.
23:12Alex Sherman:It's like maybe they put this stuff together with TikTok and Oracle and you emerge with some thing on the other end. That's amazing. But like all that stuff is so wishy washy to me that it's hard for me to to say I believe any of it.
23:31Peter Kafka:Yeah, I mean, I guess the most basic argument is, look, we we have enough money that we can play for years and decades if we want to. These are giant assets. There's only so many of them. Some of them are in decline, but we believe they will be valuable for years and years to come. And we don't really know how it's going to work out, but we'd rather own them than not own them.
23:51Alex Sherman:Again, like in many ways, this deal is identical to the Discovery Warner Media deal from the Discovery side, right? If you are David Zasloff and you are running Discovery and you have the chance to merge with Warner, of course you are going to want to merge with Warner. You have taken your piddly little media company and merged it with a much larger one to give yourself more runway. It is the exact same scenario here. Even after buying Paramount, that Paramount Skydance company is still subscale to all of the big media companies and certainly subscale to all of the big tech media companies that either dabble or go fairly full throttle in modern media, YouTube, Amazon Prime, etc.
24:36Peter Kafka:Which, by the way, when they do have regulatory hearings, they will point over and over. Hey, we're small compared to the big tech companies. That's who you've got to really worry about.
24:45Alex Sherman:And they are small compared to the big guys, to be fair. And so now, of course, if you are paramount and you are a, you know, whatever the value of that company was,$12 billion or so, and you have a chance to become a$100 billion company if you combine these things with the debt, you're going to take it. because you now have a fighting chance to compete with the biggest players in the industry for sports rights, for top movies, for top TV shows. Like, you just have the balance sheet to be able to do it. So it makes all the sense in the world if you want to be in this business for the Ellison family to do this.
25:20Alex Sherman:Do I think that they are going to enrich themselves by doing this? No. Do they have to enrich themselves? Absolutely not. Larry Ellison is one of the wealthiest men in the world, so they have the ability and the runway to be able to do this. with some long-term thinking. And if it all goes wrong in the end, well, like at least they had fun doing it. There's worse jobs than running a major media company.
25:42Peter Kafka:Oh, it's like you wrote a title for my story. Thank you for that. Let's talk about Netflix briefly. They got a$2.8 billion consolation fee for the deal breaking up. There's a sort of snap wisdom like, oh, they're the winner here because they didn't have to pay. They didn't get suckered into a bid. They've shown financial discipline. Maybe they could go buy something else. All that makes sense to me. On the other hand, they thought that a big chunk of Warner Brothers Discovery was worth them spending$72 billion,$83 billion with that. This is clearly something they thought was important. What about the theory that if they thought this was important enough to spend$73 billion on and didn't get it, that indicates there's some weakness?
26:29Alex Sherman:Yeah, I think there's a little bit of truth to that. I think it caught people off guard that they were so interested in this and so willing to pay that much money. And so it's only logical that you would think, well, why was this so important to them? I think you can rationalize or justify some of it at least by very simply saying, well, they felt this was amazing generational IP. It doesn't come up for market all that much. We should – our equity is valued quite high at this stage. Not to say it wouldn't be down the road, but it is right now. The market thinks very highly of us. it's time to flex a little bit and prepare ourselves for the future in a way that we can do it and the blowback won't be devastating.
27:17Alex Sherman:So even if our shares do go down 25 % or whatever, we'll live with it. And then as soon as we integrate this thing and people see that we keep growing, our stock price will bounce back and that'll be it. The signal to me is not so much that Netflix shareholders should be freaking out over this. but more of that I think Netflix is in the market for legacy IP and so I've heard that although I
27:45Peter Kafka:think what else would they buy what else is a great question right great question and I think
27:51Alex Sherman:that will probably be the subject of stories the next week or so you know I like if if if universal and and some of the NBC library were ever to be put up on the market I could see Netflix potentially being interested there. I don't think they would want to run the NBC broadcast network. So you'd have to figure out how to suss that apart. But beyond that, there's not all that much out there. And I think that was maybe one of the reasons they were so interested in this deal, because there simply isn't all that much out there. And this was out there.
28:24Peter Kafka:Right, because the bankers are all saying, well, now you've taken out your checkbook. It'd be a shame to put it away. Why don't we bring you over to this showroom over here?
28:31Alex Sherman:I'm not sure that's going to happen. I would certainly say in the near term, you're not going to see that. We already know what the Netflix shareholders think of all of this. So it just strikes me as illogical that Netflix would run out and make some other big IP purchase and go down this road again. But again, if there was some sort of media company that said, we're for sale, take a look. I think Netflix will be there looking.
28:56Peter Kafka:Let's step back for the whole thing. You write about business. I write about business. But there's also like a culture component to this story. And I would argue something about America in this story, too. Right. This is a deal that when you step back, looks like it was engineered by one of the president's closest allies, who's also one of the richest men in the world. and this deal was put through, was constructed so it would be approved by the president of the United States and a rival bid that wasn't approved by the president of the United States didn't go through. And so this is a deal blessed by the Donald Trump administration.
29:32Peter Kafka:How should we feel about that? And how should we feel just as consumers of culture to have all of these assets controlled by one person, regardless of who it is?
29:42Alex Sherman:Yeah, I mean, on the first front, I think while any rational thinker should be concerned by levers that are pulled that are borderline illegal or veer toward bribery or anything like that, I also think people need to keep a longer-term mindset over this. So, again, assuming laws are not changed, Donald Trump will only be president for another, what is it, three years now, however long it feels like. this media deal will last far longer than that. So the CNN of the next three years will not be the CNN of the next 10 years, 15 years, 20 years. Certain changes will be made to certain parts of this media company that may very well completely be undone five years from now.
30:52Alex Sherman:And also, frankly, the world of modern media is changing so much that there's no doubt in my mind that the CNN of today is not going to be the CNN of five years from now anyways, Donald Trump aside. So that's what I would say basically in a long-term thinking here, which is that this deal will outlast all of that. And yes, there are concerns that so many of these media assets are controlled by the same person. But again, that's really no different than all the other big media companies as well. Amazon owns so much. Google owns so much. Apple owns so much that these are concerns because they're giant companies.
31:34Alex Sherman:But this one in particular, to me, strikes me as not all that much different than the other major media companies. A lot of these assets, like Elizabeth Warren has done it a couple times, and I think Bernie Sanders too, where they've shown, Look at all the assets that are going to be owned by this. And it's like MTV and VH1 and Comedy Central. You do need to have a little bit of perspective that these assets are dying. They are dying assets that do not hold nearly the cultural relevance that they once did. So while that may be scary to somebody who's 50 years or older, it is not at all scary to the younger generation who are much more involved with other media assets.
32:10Peter Kafka:You don't think your kids are concerned about the future of VH1?
32:15Alex Sherman:Yes, exactly. so I tend to be less of an alarmist on this one I think than a lot of other people are
32:22Peter Kafka:Alex Sherman it's been a busy 24 hours you've got a bunch more to do I'm going to let you go thank you for joining us you can follow Alex on air and on the internet at CNBC thanks Alex always a pleasure Peter thanks for having me
32:46Thank you.
From the publisher
Netflix shocked the world last year by winning a deal to buy Warner Bros. Discovery. This week it shocked us by walking away.In this emergency bonus episode, CNBC’s Alex Sherman walks us through the whiplash: Why Netflix chose not to counter Paramount, what the market blowback signaled, and how much of this was about price versus the very real prospect of a long, ugly regulatory and political slog.Then we spin it forward: what a Paramount/WBD mash-up means in practice (translation: overlap, “synergies,” and a lot of job anxiety)? What happens to crown-jewel assets like HBO and CNN? And why this isn’t just another media merger, but a power shift. We don’t really know what David and Larry Ellison have planned for their newly acquired media empire — but we do know that they are now very big players.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
