A Special Edition Of Fast Money… And Stocks Turn Lower On Trump, Musk Feud 6/5/25

5 Jun 2025 · 46 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

```markdown

Podcast Notes

CNBC's "Fast Money"

Episode Title

A Special Edition Of Fast Money… And Stocks Turn Lower On Trump, Musk Feud (6/5/25)

Episode Overview In this special live episode of "Fast Money," hosted by Melissa Lee, the program addresses the escalating feud between President Trump and Elon Musk, alongside market reactions and critical insights from financial experts. The episode features discussions on various investment topics, including gold, crypto, and international markets, while also providing a platform for questions from fans.

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Trump vs. Musk Feud
  2. Background: Tension escalates as President Trump and Elon Musk exchange public insults via social media.
  3. Impact on Tesla:
  4. Tesla shares plummeted nearly 18%, resulting in a loss of approximately $150 billion in market capitalization.
  5. Musk's statement on Trump's tariffs suggesting they could lead to a recession was highlighted.
  6. Discussion around Trump's capability to terminate government subsidies for Tesla adds to investor concerns.
  1. Market Reactions
  2. The broader market showed volatility with:
  3. S&P 500: Closed down by half a percent.
  4. Tesla's Plunge: The degradation of trust in Tesla's future due to governmental relationships.
  5. Analysts warned of a potential market pullback, with Marko Kolanovic predicting a correction imminent due to high valuations and economic slowdowns.
  1. Expert Insights
  2. Marko Kolanovic (Former JPMorgan Chief Market Strategist):
  3. Anticipates a pullback in the stock market, mentioning signs of economic slowdown and potential trade wars.
  4. Stressed the importance of equity and bond market dynamics, suggesting they might not align favorably.
  • Gary Cohn (IBM Vice Chair, Former NEC Director):
  • Urged calm amid market fluctuations, noting that the situation could change rapidly.
  • Highlighted the significance of Trump’s tax cuts and the implications of not extending them for the economy.
  • Distinguished between spending-related deficits and those caused by tax cuts.
  1. Audience Engagement
  2. Traders provided insight into various investment opportunities:
  3. Nike: Mixed sentiments about its future.
  4. Home Depot: Recommended to hold due to strong fundamentals.
  5. CoreWeave: Skeptical outlook due to overcapacity concerns.
  6. Engaged with live audience questions, addressing concerns about crypto and international investments.
  1. Earnings Reports
  2. Lululemon: Shares fell significantly post-earnings despite a beat on revenue and earnings, attributed to weak guidance and market reactions.
  3. Broadcom: Despite an earnings beat, shares dropped due to high expectations and market conditions.

Key Takeaways

  • The feud between Trump and Musk is causing significant market volatility, particularly impacting Tesla and associated stocks.
  • Market experts are cautious, with predictions of a market correction due to high valuations and economic uncertainties.
  • Engagement with fans provided diverse perspectives on current market conditions and investment strategies.

Conclusion This special edition of "Fast Money" delved into the severe implications of political discourse on market performance, emphasizing investor sentiment and the critical role of expert analysis in navigating volatile conditions. The episode underscored the interconnectedness of political events and financial markets, illustrating the importance of monitoring both for informed investing.

Disclaimer All opinions expressed are solely those of the Fast Money participants and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC or its affiliates. Investors should consider the information provided as general opinions and not specific investment advice.

For more information and to view the full disclaimer, visit [Fast Money Disclaimer](https://www.cnbc.com/fast-money-disclaimer/). ```

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is a very special night here on Fast Money. We are joined by a full house of our most faithful and diehard fans. Take a look at them, folks joining us from all across the country and even the other side of the globe. Guy Adami here is all geeked up to join you all for your questions, Shirley. But first, here's what's on tap tonight. Musk versus Trump, the relationship between the most powerful man in the world and the richest man in the world ripping at the seams as they wage a knockdown, drag-out war of words on their respective social media platforms.

0:34The devastating impact on Tesla today, the ripple effect on the markets and how this D.C. divorce could derail Trump's tax bill. We'll get the latest from Washington. Plus, we're joined by former Trump NEC director and current IBM vice chair Gary Cohn to break it all down. Then a market warning. Marko Kalanovic will join us in his first TV interview since leaving J.P. Morgan, why he thinks stocks are about to see a pullback and how you should position yourself right now. And later, earnings from Broadcom and Lululemon, stablecoin issuer Circle with a monster market debut. And you've got questions, We've got answers.

1:04The traders take on our fans' burning questions live. I'm Melissa Lee coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Karen Feinerman, Dan Nathan, and Guy Adami. Great night. Great audience that we have. It's amazing. I mean, the energy in the room is off the charts. Somebody from Australia. You mentioned it across the globe. Australia is here. It's amazing. Over 30 states. Mary Duffy and her team did a tremendous job putting this together. And they brought some news flow. I mean, I tell you, we like to bring some volatility. the markets and it's an exciting night.

1:35Take a look at that group. Good looking group we got there. We'll get to your questions in just a minute. Meantime, we've got to get back to that social media smackdown between President Trump and Elon Musk. The two men trading insults over the course of the afternoon. Just in the last hour, the Tesla CEO saying on X that Trump's tariffs will cause a recession in the second half of the year and agreeing with the post calling for the president to be impeached and replaced by J.D. Vance. His post coming after the president said on True Social that Musk just went crazy and threatened to ax the Tesla CEO's government contracts.

2:05That, of course, in response to Musk taking credit for Trump's election win. Tesla shares plunged as the feud escalated, the stock dropping nearly 18 percent at its lows, shedding$150 billion in market cap on this session. That's its biggest one-day loss ever. Shares down further in the after-hours session. The broader markets whipsawed, too. The S &P 500 finished in the day down half a percent. For more on the war of wars between Trump and Musk, Let's bring in Eamon Javers, who's at the White House. Eamon. You know, Melissa, I do this for a living, and even I am just kind of out of words to describe what's happened here.

2:37I mean, it's just an epic meltdown between the most powerful man in the world and the richest man in the world. And as you say, we saw Elon Musk tweeting out just a short time ago that Trump's tariffs are going to cause a recession in the second half of the year. So that's Elon taking on Trump's most important economic move of the year. Then he moves on to the president's most important legislative move of the year, which is his big, beautiful spending bill up on Capitol Hill. Elon Musk saying that's a disaster and urging people to kill the bill. And then Elon taking on Donald Trump as a man, as just a human being, saying that he's in the Epstein files and retweeting over the past 20 minutes or so video of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein, the longtime convicted pedophile.

3:25You know, the astonishing nature of that is just sort of beyond my ability to put into words right now, Melissa. It is an astonishing thing. The president, seeming befuddled by all of this earlier in the day, he was in the Oval Office. He was meeting with the chancellor of Germany and, you know, he said, look, we had a great relationship. I don't know if we're going to have a great relationship going forward. And he sort of reminisced about last week when Elon Musk was in the Oval Office with the president. They were both heaping praise on each other. And Trump even said at one point, you know, Elon Musk had a black eye and I offered to get him some makeup to help him.

4:00And he said, no, no, no, I don't need it. I don't need any makeup. Trump seemed a little befuddled by that, too. All of this has just enormous implications for Elon Musk's businesses, for the future of the Republican Party, for technology, for cryptocurrency. You can go on and on and on about all the ways this can rupture relationships around the conservative movement, the crypto movement, the tech movement, all of it at stake now. As Steve Bannon, the outside Republican advisor to President Trump, is now encouraging President Trump to investigate Elon Musk as an illegal alien, suggesting that he needs to be deported, suggesting he needs to be investigated for alleged drug use.

4:38So where this can go is anybody's guess from here, Melissa. But it has been a wild ride here at the White House today. We are somewhat out of words, too, for this, Eamon. It's been a remarkable afternoon in terms of the war of words. Thank you so much, Eamon Javers, with the latest from the White House. Let's get more on the impact on Tesla. Phil LeBeau joined us with that now. Phil. And, Melissa, the one post that I want to focus on from the president that really should catch the most attention with Tesla investors. It's this one. It has to do with the government subsidies that Tesla receives.

5:12The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's governmental subsidies and contracts. I always was surprised, I was always surprised, that Biden didn't do it. The reason I'm showing you this, Melissa, is not because of the subsidies that Tesla may be receiving, whether you're talking about the EV credits, etc. It's the fact that Trump could make life a living hell for Tesla investors. How? Look at all of the agencies. And this is just a few of the primary ones that have some form of regulation over businesses that are core to Tesla, to SpaceX, to Elon Musk.

5:54NHTSA oversees regulation of robo taxis, autonomous vehicle regulations. The FAA is in charge of SpaceX rocket launches. NASA has a huge say in terms of SpaceX missions, whether you're talking about the International Space Station, whether you're talking about missions to Mars eventually. And then the FCC has regulation over Starlink. Now, you might be looking at this and saying, well, yes, theoretically they have regulation over this, but how much could that really impact Tesla? It could be incredibly problematic. We're not saying that's going to happen, but remember, next week we have the robo-taxi launch.

6:31If you want to go to war with the president, Melissa, ask the people at Harvard how that goes. He will continue to battle and he will raise the stakes. So that's the thing that investors of Tesla have to be watching at this point. Absolutely. Phil, thank you. Phil LeBeau. And by the way, Musk said, go ahead and make my day when it came to that tweet threatening that contracts would be terminated. So that's, you know, another concern for investors. Where do you want to go here? I think the broader market is where we go first. Dan and everybody can talk about Tesla. But we were having this conversation before the show.

7:05What does this mean for the bond market? Is it bond bullish or bond negative? I will tell you, in terms of the U.S. dollar, I think it's absolutely dollar negative. So therefore, I have to think at some point it's broader market negative. Now, if the bond market rallies on this, that's probably what a lot of people want in the first place. But if you see a sell-off in the bond market and a subsequent weakness in the dollar, this is what we've seen before. It's not market friendly. I mean, in terms of, you know, if tariffs are delayed because of all the negotiations that are going on now, if tax is delayed, if all that's dollar positive, feasible.

7:36Right. That's all dollar positive. Guys, right. I mean, we we've we've had these days where we've seen the dollar. We've seen bombs. We've seen stocks all going on the same day. And we've said, you know, this is what happens in emerging markets. The political circus here is something that doesn't help whether that's something that we'll see fall through. And I think the more important part of this is I do think that this has emboldened and this is not a political show. No one cares about my politics. I'll just say that this stand up actually could bring some folks on the GOP to at least be more bold to come forward and push back on a bill.

8:07Where does that put what does that do for the bond market? What does that do for the dollar? I think it's bond positive. I ultimately think that if you derail a lot of this policy and you get in at least some sense that this president has a little less power, you're going to see a little more of a flight to quality. And it's so early here. But I do think that if you think about where this administration was very clear, they wanted lower interest rates. And, you know, I don't know how they were going to get there necessarily, but they definitely wanted a lower dollar. And they had gotten that. And we were actually, look, at 98, you've kind of broken some key levels that the dollar was holding up.

8:37Let's watch it. You got the popcorn. Oh, sorry. Wait, is it my term? I'm on Twitter right here. No, I mean, this is, it's a clown show. I mean, let's be clear. And, you know, we can go to tax, you can go to dollar this, you can go to rates or, you know, debt ratings and whatever. At the end of the day, the conflicts of interest that Elon Musk has, it's not just here domestically. It's not just the fear of regulation. And it's not just the fact that he's the richest man in the world worth hundreds of billions of dollars. Think about where his manufacturing bases are in China, in Shanghai. Right.

9:08The cars that they make in Shanghai, which they're not selling a whole heck of a lot in China anymore. They go to Europe. We have all this tariff stuff going on. Think about the importance of Starlink in all of these sorts of situations, whether it's, you know, with Ukraine and Russia. Think about the fact that Elon Musk last year had communications with President Putin. Right. So if this is going to hell in a handbasket right here and we've never seen anything like this, I think there are broader geopolitical implications all this. And I do not think they should be discounted. At the end of the day, you look at these two men of this great amount of power and you say to yourself, whose interest do they have in mind?

9:42Do they have our country's interest in mind or their own self-interest in mind? And I think that's what's really disappointing about this, because this is not going to end here and now today. Tweet wars like this, that's one thing. But the other sorts of wars of influence, those things could go on for a while, and they chip away at this whole idea of American exceptionalism. So, I mean, there's a lot. You could make a lot of different arguments. To me, what I think is that if this tax part of the bill is threatened, I mean, that has been a source of, I think, a lot of the rally in the last couple of months.

10:12Obviously, we had the tariff, you know, pause, that too. But that is sort of an important underpinning of their plan, right? Make sure this tax plan is more permanent or permanent. So if that's threatened, that's one. You could also make the argument, though, that they're going to be able to get rid of a lot of pork, right? That maybe this, when they relook at this bill, that they know they've got to get it done and they won't. Maybe it'll be a different bill, which will be less of a deficit. Check out Karen using the pork term. I like that. The pork term. Why not use the pork term? It's perfect.

10:49Tons of pork, yes. But the runway to tax just got longer. Longer. And for that reason, that's market negative. I mean, whatever the bull case was in terms of the back half of the year, we're going to see developments on trade. We're going to have a bunch of deals done. We're going to have tax done. And it's going to pave the way for the rally in the back half. That's a longer runway now. We're going to wait a little longer for that. I believe so. And if the market had been rallying on the back of that solely, it's fair to think that we give most of it, if not the entirety of it, back. And again, we've talked about the volatility index.

11:20I think it becomes in play yet again. You know, this 18, 17 and a half, 18 level, which was resistance forever, has now become support. For more on the markets and the Trump administration's economic policies, let's bring in Gary Cohn, vice chair of IBM. He served as director of the National Economic Council during the first Trump administration and as president of Goldman Sachs prior to that. Gary, it is great to see you. I think we should clap him in. I'm ready to go home. I'm done. What do you make of all of this? Well, first of all, I would not overreact to all this. If we've learned one thing over the Trump administration, this is a few hours.

11:57The world could be completely different a week from now. So I understand everyone reacting to what we've seen today. And I understand that we're all market driven. But this could change. It could change overnight. it could change next week. And in the middle of this, I think we all missed that the president announced a trade deal with China, which is probably pretty bullish for the markets as well. So it's not like the White House is sitting there only worried about the Elon Musk situation. They're driving business forward and they're trying to deliver on their economic promises. A couple of things.

12:27Gary could be anywhere right now. I'm sure his phone is blowing up. He chose to be with us. He committed this a couple of months ago. He's here with us now. Gary's an absolute gentleman, number one. Number two, I ask you, in terms of tax, you sat in that seat for a long time. Mel made the point. I guess both, you said it to me earlier, they both want the same thing. They're just getting at it in a different way. So sort of speak to that. Exactly. So look, let's take a step back and take the temperature down for a minute. It is an absolute imperative that we roll over or continue the Trump tax cuts that were put in place in 2017.

12:59The implications of not rolling them back and going back to where we were in 2017, We haven't talked about that. But the negative impact on the economy and the markets would be close to catastrophic. I don't think anyone's prepared for that. None of you have talked about it. No one is talking about not rolling over the Trump tax cuts. What's in there for businesses on the accelerated depreciation, on the R &D, making interest deductions, making these things permanent, this is really important for the economy. So I don't really think Congress has a choice. And then you can throw in border security and other things in the bill.

13:32I think the vast majority of us want a secure border. So these things are going to happen. How do we get there? I don't know. As you said, I was part of it when they did it, you know, eight years ago. It's never clean. It's messy getting legislation done. And it's a lot of compromises. But at the end of the day, we'll get to the compromises to continue the Trump tax cuts and roll them forward. When you look at the deficit piece of the equation, which is what the argument's about today, the deficit in the bill is coming from rolling over the tax cuts. That's what's driving the deficit. It's not additional spending.

14:06Yes, there's some spending in there for the border, but the driver of the deficit is the tax cuts. And that's because this arcane way that we score things in the United States. We send it to the Congressional Budget Office. They score it. They statically score it. They say no matter what you do in the tax bill, it has no effect on the economy. Whether you increase taxes, you decrease taxes, you end taxes, you take them to 100 percent, It will have no economic effect. We know that's wrong. The status scoring came up with this$2.4 trillion loss over 10 years. If you go back to where we were in 2017, our tax bill statically scored at a huge loss.

14:41Revenue is coming in dramatically higher than they would have budgeted revenue to come in because we created economic growth. I think this bill continues to create economic growth by leaving tax rates where they are and leaving corporates involved in this. So I think you have to understand that, like, Elon's talking about the deficit, which, by the way, is a big problem. But the tax bill being rolled over is equally as important, and that's what's causing the deficit. So I think we've got to separate the deficit issue and spending, because look, we decided as a country to spend a lot of money during COVID, and I don't think anyone has a problem with that.

15:14Unfortunately, when COVID ended, we never went back to pre-COVID spending levels. We continued on that trajectory. Conflating the tax bill and the COVID spending, they're two different items, and I think we have to look at them separately. So, first of all, thank you so much for being on. Do you think it got harder or easier? Because the last few days, it seemed like there was some cracks in the ability to get this deal done. Where do you think we stand now? Look, we're going to get the deal done. The question is what's in the bill. Okay. And look, I don't want to go down the crazy path of reconciliation, but they're using reconciliation, which means they need a simple majority in the Senate.

15:52But here's the but. The Senate and the House have to agree on the exact same piece of legislation. And that's where the issue is going to come. You know, the House put in there an increased cap on SALT deductions, state and local tax deductions. The Senate doesn't necessarily like that. I don't think that's going to end up where the House put in. There's going to be a compromise. There's going to be lots of compromises in this bill. And I think right now, in week one of the Senate legislative process, everyone's asking for their ultimate asks. And there's going to be compromise and you're going to negotiate down from the starting point.

16:27And that's what we're watching the sausage being made in some respects. I know that you want to take the long view on this and you want to have a cool head about it, which we admire. But we've got to figure this out in terms of the impact on the markets. And so to the extent that this does make achieving an agreement on tax, rolling them over a little bit longer from here, that the deal gets messier, that the process is longer, what is the impact on the markets? How do you see that impacting the bond market? Let me just add this one point. I don't think it's going to be that much longer. There's a forcing function in this whole tax legislation because we've got debt ceiling is tacked in there.

17:03So when Secretary Besson comes out with his X date or the date that we run out of capacity to finance ourselves, that's going to be when legislation has to happen. I always assume that Congress would take all the time they could take to get to the legislative agenda they want. So I don't think it's going to slow down. I think we're going to go through this normal process. As far as markets are concerned, look, I think anyone who thinks that this bill is not going to get through and taxes are not going to be extended, I think they're making a miscalculation. On the flip side, you know, I talked about the China trade deal.

17:35The China trade deal, if we actually have a China trade deal and we're going to see more normalized relationships with China, that's pretty bullish to the markets, pretty bullish to companies. And you think about the exports and the imports and the fact that we're not going to have to worry about supply chains. And we've all been talking about corporate uncertainty for the last four months. One of the big uncertainties has been China. If you take the China uncertainty off the table, it's clearly a good moment for markets. Yeah, but Gary, I mean, there's no trade deal with China, right? And if you go back to the first administration, the first time we put tariffs on China in 2018, we didn't have a phase one deal until January of 2020.

18:13And you could say the stakes are much higher now. We lived through COVID. We understand the implications of disrupted supply chains. Now, throw in AI, throw in this race that we're in, which is really going to determine, I think, you know, who wins the race between the U.S. and China over the next 100 years. they seem to be in a position where they can wait it out. I just don't think that we can say today there's a strong framework for a trade deal with China anytime soon. Well, look, we don't know what was agreed upon today. What may have been agreed upon today is the stop fighting for the Chinese to reinstate some of their exports of rare earths, magnets, things that we're hearing about that are in short supply.

18:53We do know, we do have the data that we do know since Liberation Day, the Chinese have been exporting less to the United States. We see the freight coming in. We see the ships coming into the ports. We know there's less coming in. So if the Chinese reinstate some of the shipments of those goods that we need that go into manufacturing, further manufacturing in the United States because they're not finished goods, that's important to the U.S. economy. It's important to manufacturing here. It helps us get what we need to get done. Just those things by themselves are stabilized in the markets. Look, China needs things from us as well.

19:25We know that we export food. We export energy to China. They need food. They need energy. There are compromises to be made here. And if there's just an understanding between the two heads of state and they invited each other to come to each other's countries and they said they've accepted, just the thawing of the relationship is pretty positive. So I hear you and I appreciate the resolve and the calm on this. This deal is going to get done in terms of the budget and whatnot. So as a market participant and while you spent time in Washington, you're a markets guy. What what policy initiative do you want to see for the market beyond taxes?

20:00We've we've made these jumps and that's going to happen. You've said we've got a China deal done. Let's not let's not challenge that. What's next? Because I feel like this administration was already getting ready to drop the next bit of candy on the market. Is there any? Look, I don't know if there's any. I think it will take us the better party this year to get this this big, big, beautiful bill done. Yeah. I mean, this may take till August, September, depending on next date. So then we start getting into, you know, primary season, reelection season, midterm season. This may be the hallmark piece of legislation.

20:35If you look back at administrations, administrations tend to get one piece of major legislation done in the first year. And so this will be the piece of legislation. Look, I do still think that there is a need to take on spending in the federal government. You know, look, this is why when I said Elon Musk was going after spending in his Doge facility, the president is going after spending. They're both right. We spend too much in this country. So ultimately, whether they can get it done in this bill or not, and maybe they can go back to regular way in the Senate, which is 60 votes, and we can eliminate some things that cost us money that maybe we don't need in this country.

21:14Maybe there's a bipartisan way to cut spending, because I think both sides of the aisle are feeling pressure on the spending. Gary, great to see you. Thank you so much for coming by. Thank you for having me. Come by anytime. Gary Cohn. Makes it sound so— It really does. We needed a measured voice here on a day. It really did. I mean, you're talking dollar and bond impact. And better day to have Gary Cohn. There is no better day. And again, I said it and I'll say it again. an absolute gentleman to be here because I guarantee that every network in the United States is looking for this voice right now.

21:42So thank you, Gary. Yeah. But if we had to go back to the markets, we heard your geopolitical impact speech. Get that. But in terms of the markets, what do you think they do tomorrow? Yeah. I mean, it's not good for the markets. I mean, we were talking about uncertainty for the last two months and we know what that happened, you know, in April when we had a whole heck of a lot of it. I don't have a lot of confidence that, this call with Xi is, and I don't know crap about anything, okay, but let's just be honest. We have enough time now. The first administration, we see how this sort of stuff goes.

22:11He's very easily flattered, but now he's very easily distracted. And I can't stress this enough. I mean, all of these conflicts of interest that Elon has, he's got pressure points right here. And, you know, you think about China. Okay, Canada and Mexico, our two largest trading partners, have not even come to the table. They haven't even talked about negotiating. You think China is going to strike a deal before the EU can? By the way, those markets are up even more. Yeah, and they're massively outperforming it. So the lens of the markets, I think that folks are kind of waiting to see what sort of deal we have with our allies before we have one with our adversary.

Read the full transcript

22:44Can we just talk about Tesla itself for one second? Okay, so Tesla is right around where it was the day after the election, which makes sense. A lot's happened, though. I think this is a way worse scenario, right, I think, for Tesla. because when he was elected, we were all, you know, clearly Musk and Trump. There was no daylight between them at all. Right. They were fast friends. And so he had every reason to hope that everything would go his way, Tesla's way. You can imagine now that scenario not playing out in a bigger way at a time when the value of Tesla is so much about robo taxis, so much about full self-driving and robots.

23:22I don't leave that aside for a minute. you can't help but feel like that is damaged, at least in the near term. Remember what Adam Jonas and Morgan Stanley said about Tesla, the$1.1 trillion market cap. Most of it is based on businesses that basically don't exist right now. They're not commercial businesses. And to that extent, yes, Tesla's in a much worse position because who has a target now on his back? Elon Musk does. The contracts are going to be gone. The credits are going to be gone. Which would happen anyway. The contracts in terms of, you know, Starlink, et cetera, those will be gone in theory if this really plays out the way Trump says it's going to play out.

24:00So one of the fine shows, I think it was on Power Lunch, one of the analysts,$120 price target was talking about some of the things you're talking about. And I know on this show we talked about this recent move to 360 was a textbook 50 percent retracement of the all time high in those 220 lows. But now, given this news, I'm sort of with Karen. It's not ridiculous to think we're not going to visit that 220 level. All right, we've got to get to Broadcom right now. Shares at after-hours session lows, despite a revenue and earnings beat. Kate Rooney's got the numbers. Kate. Hey, Mel. So expectations were pretty high for Broadcom heading into this print.

24:33That is part of the stock drop we saw after hours. It did pare back some of those losses. But by most measures, if you look at the chipmaker and the fiscal second quarter, it did outperform, at least for the quarterly numbers. It was driven by strong AI demand CEO, Hawkton, just saying on the earnings call that momentum in the quarter. He called it robust demand for AI networking. Broadcom, of course, is a key player in this whole AI hardware ecosystem. Chan said the momentum is expected to continue into future quarters. He expects growth in AI semiconductor revenue to accelerate to$5.1 billion in Q3.

25:07That comes as their hyperscaler partners continue to invest, as he put it. EPS revenue topped expectations. Same with Q3 revenue guidance. That was roughly in line at$15.8 billion. Semiconductor and infrastructure revenue also topped expectations. Mel, back over to you. Kate, thanks. Kate Rooney. Just to put the decline after hours in context, record high close. So we started off very high on Broadcom going into the print. Yeah, up nearly 9%, right, since the April lows. And, you know, I think it's important to remember 90. 90. I thought you said 90. And that's how we got back to the fateful eight, people, right?

25:42I know you You guys have been dogged with this MAG7. But, you know, it's over a trillion dollars in market cap right now. The one thing I have to say is, like, here's a company that's growing earnings and sales high teens. OK, high teens. And it's trading at, like, I don't know, 39 times or 20 times sales, that sort of thing. So I'm not sure the valuation is commensurate with the story that Haktan is telling. He's already given us massive targets about what custom silicon could be out to 2027. That's why the stock in December rallied 40 percent in two days. So I just think it's important to remember that this stock got cut in half from its December highs to its April lows.

26:15You could say, well, it's important to remember the stock just doubled from there. This is when things get a lot harder for investors when you're trying to process what is in the stock right here. I think a lot is in the stock right here. All right. We've got to take a quick break right now. Guy has somewhere to go. I'm getting up now. I'm getting up and I'm moving. He's going to go check in with our fans to get their trader questions with the folks from D.C., Texas, Arkansas, Georgia, even Australia. Say hello, Australia. what they want to know about the markets, that is next. Also ahead, former J.P.

26:43Morgan chief market strategist Marco Kalanavik is here, and he's got a stark warning for where markets are headed next. That and much more on our very special edition of Fast Money, back in two.

27:13Welcome back to this special special live event. Guys on the ground with our fans. We've got some burning questions. So, Guy, who do you have? I am here. It's hard to hear. I'm here with Natasha. Natasha, stand up, please. In from Australia. Is that correct? Yes. Yeah, I flew here. It took about 18 hours. And it's great to be here. Well, we're thrilled that you're here. And we've all been talking about it since we found out. So, thank you. But you have a question. Yes, I'm just wondering whether you think the worst correction has taken place so far for the year. That's a fair question. I'm going to throw that to Dan Nathan in terms of correction, where we are now and for the rest of the year, Dan.

27:50Well, you know, Guy, we've been talking about this. It seems like billionaire hedge fund investor after billionaire hedge fund investor have suggested we're going to go back and test those prior lows from April. When you think about this, you know, you think about the potential for a recession. Elon Musk, also a billionaire, he's suggesting that there's a good chance that we have a recession in the back half of the year. The thing about the stock market, it kind of sniffs it out one way or another. And we're not there just yet. We're within, I don't know, striking distance of the prior all-time high.

28:16So I think you can probably take cues from the market a little bit, see where the leadership is going right now. It seems like there's a lot of groups that have been acting pretty well away from big cap tech. If you start to see them weaken, that might be pricing in a recession. That said, if we do have a recession, if you do have a retest of that 4850 in the S &P 500, It probably makes a lot of sense to start thinking long term and start dollar cost averaging into what might be another bull run for the market in the years ahead. Karen's in from Washington, D.C., one of my favorite cities in the country.

28:45Thanks for joining us. Thanks for having me here. You got a question, please. I do have a question. I wanted to find out about Nike. Should I invest more or should I fail? I'm going to throw that to Tim Seymour. He's the Nike expert on the panel. Tim Seymour, Nike. Well, let's just do it here, Karen. Thanks for coming. First of all, it's great having everybody here. And it's interesting. We're going to talk about Lululemon later on in this show, down 20 % at last look. The impact for Nike, you could make an argument. It's not just a Lulu story. It could be discretionary. It could be at leisure.

29:15Nike down about 3 % after hours. I love Nike here. So let's just be clear. I think there is some discretionary spend. There's some concern. I think the concern about the competitive landscape overdone. I think if you saw some of that share loss by Hoka, I think, Guy, you have Hoka's on right now. Decker said, yeah, they had poor numbers. Nike's revalued a lot. I think you've priced in a lot of negativity, and I think this company is getting ready for a multi-year expansion. All right. Before I go to Christopher, I'm going to call BS on that. And everybody in here, you can see I'm actually wearing shoes.

29:43So everybody, give Guy Adami a round of applause for not wearing helpers. Exactly. Exactly. Chris is in from the great state of Texas. Chris. Yeah, tiny little dot there on your map. And I just want to first, you know, being that we're each former football players, I think you probably must have been a DB, obviously offensive line for myself. I did read something about the 104 yard intercept. That's a long time ago, Chris. That's a long time ago. Come on, come on. But here. But basically what I want to know is I've been a long term holder of a Home Depot, solid dividend, you know, just like a good family member.

30:22But what I'm wondering is, do I stick with it or do I move on to something, maybe a faster grower like Costco? I think that's a great question. I know who's well suited to answer that. The great Karen Feynman. Home Depot, Karen. So I'm long Home Depot. I have not been long Costco. I always found that to be too expensive. And that was the wrong move. Home Depot, I think, is a great company. We want rates to be lower. You know, it was an interesting story we did yesterday about how much home equity lines people are taking out of their homes. And I think a lot of that will be going to Home Depot.

30:54So stay in long there. Sabrina's here from the great state of Arkansas, some of the best bike riding in the country. Is that true? That is very true. Best in the world. In the world. That's high praise. But you have a question. Yes, I wanted to get your thoughts on CoreWeave since their IPO in March 2025. Well, that's clearly going to the great Dan Nathan. CoreWeave, Dan Nathan, what do you think? Nothing great about the call that I've had on this thing. I still don't think it's a great fundamental story. I think there's a really strong chance that in the next year or so we see overcapacity. I think some of their biggest customers, 70 percent is Microsoft of this one company's revenue base.

31:30I think some of that starts to go away. So I'm not a buyer here, but it's clearly turned into a meme stock. Yeah. You've been watching this, too, Karen, because the short interest is crazy. So what's happening in the narrative, you know, narrative about AI and all of that data centers has nothing to do what's happening with the stock right now. It is a short squeeze. I follow every day. I asked Goldman Sachs, how much does it cost to borrow? Today, it's down to 100%. So that means literally down to 100 % from 200. So if you borrowed it, that's a price for a year. You'd have to pay 100 % on the borrow.

32:01So you are allowed to be shorted. And if the stock went to zero, you would be flat on the trade. So there's a short squeeze here. This is not what's happening in the underlying business. All right. By the way, we'll have many more questions from our fans later on in the show. But first, time to get bearish. Stocks just a whisper away from record highs. But former J.P. Morgan chief market strategist, Marco Kolonovic, says the good times will not last. Why he is predicting a pullback when fast money returns. Stay tuned.

32:41Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks closing lower as investors digested the president's escalating feud with Tesla CEO Elon Musk. The Dow falling more than 100 points. The S &P down to more than half a percent. And the Nasdaq leading the losses down eight-tenths of a percent. Stablecoin issuer Circle Internet Group making a splash, a big one, in the market debut today. Surging as much as 235 percent, closing nearly 170 percent higher. The stock price set its IPO at$31. And shares of Whiskey Maker Brown form and plunging nearly 18 percent after results this morning. The company missing estimates on the top and the bottom line, setting tariffs and weak spending on alcohol.

33:18Well, the man who is known for moving markets is on Correction Watch. Marko Kalonovic joins us now for his first TV interview since leaving J.P. Morgan last summer. He was a firm's chief market strategist, co-head of global market research. He joins us here on set. Marko, it is great to see you. Thank you. Great to be here. You're looking for a garden variety pullback. Does anything change based on what has unfolded this afternoon? I mean, a little bit, you know, because we got close to all-time highs. I believe Nasdaq was 1.5%. And then you had the sort of Tesla, you had Palantir, you had a bunch of these momentum stocks taking quite a bit of beatings.

33:49So it does remind me on what happened in February 19, if you remember. That was when the sort of Palantir went down and then momentum stock unraveled. So I do think that that could be a catalyst for a bit of a correction because close to all-time highs, but we still have all the problems. We have a trade war. We had sort of signs of economic slowdown. You know, valuations are back to high. So, you know, that's sort of what I'm kind of expecting, a little bit of a pullback here. Does that negative political backdrop, has it gotten worse based on what we've seen this afternoon between President Trump and Elon Musk?

34:24Or is that a sideshow? I think it's a little bit of a sideshow. It's important for a certain company, and it can spill over. Because if you look at it, Tesla is one of the biggest holding of retail investors. They were like kind of a little ecosystem of stocks around it. So I think it could be a little bit of a catalyst, although I think much bigger problems are sort of what we saw, for instance, last three days with ADP, with initial claims, with challenging job cuts. I think that's like a real problem. And the fact that we have this trade war, which almost nothing is resolved yet, right? Marco, a lot of folks want to focus on corporate earnings and really growth, right, as they think about the stock market and potential gains.

34:59But one thing that's really important, if you go back to, let's call it early April, we didn't have a lot of clarity. You know, we had a careening stock market and we had the U.S. dollar, you know, well below, you know, below 100. It got down to like, I don't know, 98 or something. That's a U.S. dollar index. And we also had 10-year yields, which were much lower. Now they're much higher, 4.4%. How important is that disconnect, in your opinion, as you think about the macro situation here? Because you have a stock market that's very close back to its prior highs, but you have the 10-year yield and you have the dollar trading near where they were when the stock market was much lower.

35:29So there is disconnect between dollar and 10-year, right? And 10-year, I think, is a problem, right? Because it sort of drives a lot of different things, real estate, commercial real estate, mortgages, all kinds of things, right? Also, you need to compare equity risk premia and bond risk premia. What are you earning on equities? What are you getting from bonds? So bonds are cheaper than equities. Equities are expensive. So I do think that's a sort of a negative thing. There is a bit of also this standoff between Fed and the president, right? You know, so everywhere else in the world rates are being cut.

36:01Here they are not. You know, eventually there has to impact negatively risky asset classes here. You know, so so bonds sold off a lot of different theories from systematic selling to sort of this like divesting of our trade war sort of counterparts to sort of, you know, inflation risk term risk premium, all kind of different things. You know, like but that's a negative. You know, it's a negative. I do think that bonds are probably oversold at this point. Last two or three days, we are seeing a bit of a rally. I think it's more driven by a weak economic data or signs, hints of weak economic data.

36:35And so I think we could have a bit of a convergence there. So equity is a little bit lower, bonds a little bit higher, just to kind of equalize a little bit these two yields. So a couple of things. First of all, Treasury yields were closed one year ago. The 10-year closed at 439. It closed today at 439. So, I mean, on some level, there's been much to do about nothing. I'd be the first. We've all said there's reasons why we've been concerned about bond yields. And it doesn't sound like you're terribly concerned about a big sell off. I'm trying to qualify. You know, first of all, garden variety means also opportunity.

37:08I'm looking at a market now that also over the last few months has seen real allocation internationally. Any thoughts on that? That's kind of work you guys did at JP Morgan. Look where people are positioned. And again, this U.S. exceptionalism trade is something that got a little a little long in the tooth. Yeah, look, I mean, I was on a Dan's podcast back in November. I said, go buy international stocks. They're cheap relative to U.S. But that has reversed a lot. I mean, look at the sort of DAX. Like, DAX is straight line up, like, to the kind of all-time highs, you know, situation there in Europe.

37:36There is a trade war. They do depend on exports a lot, right? So I'm not so, you know, sold that now is the time to go in that trade. I think that that sort of passed, you know. So with some of these, many of these international instances, literally at all-time highs in the face of trade war, global slowdown, you know, valuations that are reset higher, I'm not sure that's the time now. So I would probably stay away from that. I mean, if you were in that trade, great. I probably even didn't expect it was going to go this far, right? You know, but Europe had some sort of, you know, measures to stimulate.

38:11And so there's some optimism there. I'm skeptical about it. So I wouldn't, I think, probably wait it out a little bit in bonds. There are some cheap aspects of U.S. markets as well, and maybe wait for that, call it garden variety sell-off, that can be maybe 5%, 10%. And if we still don't have the recession probability shooting up, then it's a buy opportunity. But I would keep an open mind that maybe at that point, there is increased probability of recession, and maybe even that 5 % is not a buy at that point. Marco, thank you. Good to see you, Marco Polanovic. Thank you. Coming up, Guy, we're going to send you back.

38:49Get up. Get up. Get up. Come on. You got work to do. Get out of here. I got work to do. We got questions on crypto, gold, cyber stocks, opportunities overseas. That's all next. Plus, Lululemon results are out. Shares are falling on the report. Details and numbers from the quarter when this special Fast Money Live returns.

39:14Welcome back to Fast Money, guys. Where else? Back with the fans with more questions. Guy. I'm here. I'm here with Lance from the great state of Kansas. How are you, Lance? And you have a question. I do have a question. Two things keep me up at night in the heart of America every day. and it's Moody's downgrade of U.S. credit and the increasing debt to GDP ratio. So my question is, does that affect your allocation of U.S. equities? And would you consider using international equities as a hedge against that? Well, that goes right to the ambassador. That Moody's downgrade happened on a Friday. We call that a Friday night dirty.

39:52But Tim Seymour, I know you have the answer to this question. Well, Lance, first of all, we do love your part of the country, too. And I'll tell you what, I think you have an argument for international allocation. I know Marco said something otherwise, but I think if you look at the allocation overweight by foreign investors to the U.S., we're starting to see some of that unwind. I think valuation is still attractive, higher divs. So, yes, Lance, we love USA. We also love international. Jerry's here from Hawaii. We had somebody from Hawaii last show. Jerry came all the way from Hawaii for this show, which is amazing.

40:20We're humbled by that. Jerry, what's your question? Well, first of all, aloha from Hawaii. Thank you. And a quick question I have is I'd like the panel's recommendation on initiating a small position in Bitcoin. That's a Karen Feynman. I mean, Karen, Kay Feyn's been on Bitcoin since Brian Kelly wrote the book in 2014. Karen, what do you got? So if you have no exposure to Bitcoin, then I would say, yes, you get started here. The I bid is an easy way to do it. It's you know, there's a little bit of expenses, but it's clean and easy. That's what I would do. It doesn't matter where it's been before or after.

40:54This administration is very, very pro-cryptive. Dan is here from Denton, Texas, one of the great high school football cities in the country. Is that correct? Yes. Go Ryan Raiders. Go Ryan Raiders, if you're watching. So what's your question? Okay. So I want to get the trader's take on Siemens. That would be Tim Seymour again, sort of an international flair, the General Electric sort of overseas. Tim, what do you got? Love to be in the spotlight. Love to mess with Texas. Miga, right. Make international great again. We joke. But there has been that argument. So part of the whole story in Germany, the great historic kind of moment, I would say about three and a half months ago, was Germany decided they who have the best kind of fiscal austerity would start deficit spending, rearm Europe, rearm Germany.

41:41Siemens benefits directly 20 times forward, not expensive. It's had a great run. I am long in my ETF. Mark is here, and if I'm not mistaken, yep, New York. I mean, upstate New York. Is that correct? Yeah, shout out to Melissa Lee, Buffalo. She's New York not far away. Oh, please. Don't pander to Melissa Lee. What's your question? A question about aerospace. There's been some great performance out of the big caps, Boeing, Raytheon, also small caps. Do you guys have an opinion about the best next place to go? I know Karen thinks about Boeing, and I'll let her take that one. I'll say real quick, Raytheon is now RTX.

42:14I think it made an all-time high today. You juxtapose that with Lockheed Martin. It's been an amazing performer. But, Karen, Boeing. Yeah, so I think you, Tim, and I have all been on Boeing. We all like it. Dan, I don't know. He doesn't like things sometimes. So we still like it. I think this turnaround story is very early, and we are going to start to see cash flow, and that's what's been missing at Boeing. I love K-Fine. I love you, too, Dan. Who doesn't? That's nice. Coming up, more after hours action. shares of Lululemon dropping hard after reporting results of details and numbers from the quarter when this special edition of Fast Money returns.

43:03Welcome back to Fast Money, another earnings alert on Lululemon shares losing more than a fifth of their value even after a top and bottom line beat the athleisure company posting disappointing same-store sales, reducing full-year earnings guidance. At these levels, the shares have erased about six weeks of gains. What a decline, Karen. Yes, quite a decline. I mean, they did. I don't know why anyone provides guidance, because particularly if you're importing like they are so much of their stuff from China, who knows? So they put out guidance was a little bit light. I am surprised how much the market's reaction to it was down 20, I don't know where it is right now, 22, 23 percent.

43:40The guidance was only a couple of a percent miss. So I don't know. I think it's an overreaction, but you don't need to jump. Yeah, it's a really hard time for investors. You know, you're trying to parse out what's going on with the consumer, what's going on, how companies are operating, and then how are they dealing within this trade war? You know, and so that's one of the things I think we're going to continue to hear. I disagree with Karen on the guidance thing. I think incrementally, any sort of piece of news that you can get, especially in a period like this, I think it's helpful for investors.

44:06So this is the sort of thing. You love the story. It's a lot cheaper now. You feel like they're going to have some sort of, I don't know, they're going to get things better on their own execution or the trade war is going to take a long-term view. And this is a great name. So you probably think about, what, three days? Is that what you do, Karen? Three-day rule. Okay. You got a Lulu shirt on, Tim. I do have a Lulu shirt on. So the fashion's nice, but the stock's not. Is it? So maybe we have a case where, look, I just remember this was a$500 stock not that long ago. All we did was talk about the competitive landscape.

44:33All we did was talk about peak margin. I think there's something to not jump into tomorrow. All right. Up next, final trades.

44:47I'm Flew on this show. Final trade time, Tim. I'll tell you what. We have the best audience, the best fans in financial TV and any TV guy. How great was tonight? Did everybody have a good time tonight? We still have some drinks going. This is amazing. Real quick, my final trade, Asa Lawson from the Page Program, his last night. Asa, thanks for everything you've done for us. I appreciate it. Best money. We love our fans. Southern Copper. Copper's going higher, all-time high. Stay there. Karen. Lulu, I agree with Dan, though. Wait. Wait. Dan. Yeah, Broadcom. In a market of disconnects, this is really surprising to me that this stock is not trading lower.

45:25Huge expectations. The numbers were good. The guidance was fine. But I don't know why this thing is knocked down a bit more. I would not be buying it here. Thank you all for watching, especially our live fans, the ones who are here at the NASDAQ market site tonight. We'll see you shortly. See you back here tomorrow for more Fast. Mad Money starts right now. All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBCUniversal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium.

45:57You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit CNBC.com forward slash Fast Money disclaimer.

From the publisher

Fast Money Live is back! Die-hard fans from all over the country and globe join Melissa and the traders for a jam-packed show. Questions and answers on gold, crypto, international investing, and much much more. Plus Stocks turn lower as President Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk trade jabs online. And Former JPMorgan Chief Market Strategist Marko Kolanovic warns of a major market pullback.

 

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 871 episodes
A Special Edition Of Fast Money… And Stocks Turn Lower On Trump, Musk Feud 6/5/25CNBC's "Fast Money" · 46 min
Listen in VO