Yields Spike As Consumer Confidence Drops… And Altman Weighs In On AI Pacing 9/29/26

29 Sep 2026 · 44 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Fast Money episode covering (1) Trump’s White House “super intelligence” AI summit and a signed “Truth Social” White House accord emphasizing industry self-regulation with independent audits/board oversight, (2) rising Treasury yields and weakening consumer confidence pressuring stocks and consumers, and (3) AI/tech stock catalysts: OpenAI Developer Day (DOTS autonomous agents), Meta’s Muse threat to Apple services, and a bullish Netflix call; plus quick market segments (Micron ahead of earnings, gaming/travel/prediction markets, IPO delays).

Guests

Elizabeth Burton, chief strategist at Fortress Investment Group (trader for the hour). Background: investment strategist focused on AI/market implications, hardware/inference and memory themes.

Key claims

Self-regulation is a near-term “green light” for AI stocks/capex, but safety and liability remain unresolved. Agentic/personal bots (Muse, DOTS, OpenAI/Muse, Siri comparisons) will drive token demand and likely a hardware upgrade cycle (local inference; memory beneficiaries). Meta’s Muse could shift transactions away from Apple’s App Store services fees. Netflix is undervalued internationally despite weaker U.S. viewing trends.

Notable examples

OpenAI DOTS announcement; “White House accord” signed by Trump and NVIDIA/XAI/Meta/Google/Anthropic/OpenAI; Muse vs Apple services; Deutsche Bank upgrade of Netflix; yields: 30-year near 2002 levels; Micron earnings tomorrow.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

AI Headlines from D.C.

0:32 to 0:52

Discussion on the latest AI developments from President Trump's summit.

“Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand.”

AI Headlines from D.C.

1:40 to 1:54

Discussion on the latest AI developments from President Trump's summit.

“Come to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ.”

Post-Summit Analysis

1:54 to 6:06

Report on the outcomes of the summit and implications for AI self-regulation.

“The president just wrapping up his summit with tech leaders in the past hour, addressing safety concerns and innovation in the sector.”

Market Impact of AI Developments

6:06 to 7:24

Analysis of how the AI news affects the stock market and investor sentiment.

“everybody's not sort of going on this endless race?”

Consumer Perspective on AI

7:24 to 14:00

Discussion on consumer sentiment regarding AI and its implications for the economy.

“But when I look at it, when I want to really drill down, it's a win for Micron.”

The Evolution of AI Bots

14:00 to 17:09

Discussion on the increasing impact and variety of AI bots in daily life.

“actually provide substance around keeping agents in check.”

Apple's AI Strategy and Market Position

17:10 to 18:52

Analysis of Apple's performance in the AI landscape compared to competitors.

“But they really got to get the fit and finisher on Siri right to compete with these other personalized bots.”

Productivity and Economic Impact of AI

18:53 to 21:12

Exploration of how AI might influence productivity and economic spending.

“in terms of the tremendous amount of productivity that could potentially be unleashed by all of us using agents, Elizabeth?”

OpenAI's Developer Day Insights

21:13 to 23:19

Highlights from OpenAI's Developer Day, including new AI technologies and discussions on liability.

“Professor Kate Rooney spoke to CEO Sam Altman and CFO Sarah Fryer earlier today.”

Meta's Muse AI and its Risks to Apple

23:20 to 28:00

Debate on how Meta's Muse AI could disrupt Apple's services business.

“in terms of revenue grew about 70 % in the quarter, said they are seeing a lot of momentum, and pointed back to this DOTS agent, said it is a way for them to grow revenue, and it's paid versus Muse, which is free.”
Show all 19 chapters

Discussion on Muse and Apple's Market Share

28:00 to 30:07

Exploration of Muse's market impact and Apple's commission structure.

“I think that's that's the big question still.”

Discussion on Muse and Apple's Market Share

30:08 to 30:43

Exploration of Muse's market impact and Apple's commission structure.

“Something amazing is happening when teams brainstorm ideas.”

Netflix's Upgrade and Market Analysis

31:18 to 33:50

Analysis of Netflix's recent analyst upgrade and market positioning.

“Netflix getting a rare upgrade today as analysts at Deutsche Bank upgraded the streamer from a hold to a buy saying concerns over U.S.”

Rising Rates and Consumer Confidence

33:51 to 39:44

Discussion on rising rates and their impact on consumer confidence.

“S &P 500 and Nasdaq posting small losses, but the Nasdaq 100 managing to see a small gain.”

AI Agreement and Market Implications

39:45 to 41:02

Overview of the AI agreement signed at the White House and its implications.

“And Eddie Ardenny was on earlier this week, and I agree with him.”

Gaming Industry Trends

41:03 to 42:01

Discussion on the gaming industry's challenges and predictions.

“Coming up, the stocks to watch as the gaming industry goes through some big changes and how the rise in prediction markets is shaking up the space.”

Wynn Resort Insights and Macau Trends

42:01 to 44:22

The discussion covers Wynn's bullish outlook on Las Vegas and Macau visitation trends, highlighting the disconnect between visitor numbers and gambling revenue.

“Look, we're going to do, as we've always wanted to do, what's in the best interest of shareholders.”

Aura's IPO Postponement and Market Implications

44:22 to 46:18

The hosts analyze Aura's decision to postpone their IPO amid market uncertainty and its broader implications for consumer product offerings.

“Smart ring maker Aura announcing it will postpone plans for its Nasdaq IPO due to uncertainty in the market.”

Final Trades and Market Reflections

46:18 to 47:08

The segment features final trade recommendations from the hosts, reflecting on current market conditions and investment strategies.

“I think this is more of an aura question than an overall IPO question.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00At Edward Jones, we believe rich isn't about having life all figured out. It's opening yourself to all the possibilities. That's why your dedicated financial advisor provides long-term planning built around you, meeting you where you are, and helping you get closer to where you want to be. So no matter where you're starting from, you can move forward with confidence. The key to being rich is knowing what counts. Let's find your rich. Edward Jones, member SIPC. Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand. It starts with our approach. Every Mazda comes standard with proactive safety features.

0:41So you're more aware of what's around you, more focused on the road ahead, and ready before problems ever start. Mazda. More of what matters most to you. Go to mazdausa.com to learn more. Consumer Reports does not endorse or promote any product.

1:02Tim Seymour:Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square, this is Fast Money. Here's what's on tap tonight. AI taking center stage at the White House. All the headlines from President Trump's summit with big tech leaders and what it means for the future of the industry, which the president is now calling super intelligence. Plus, a new milestone for interest rates yields on long-term treasuries, hitting their highest in nearly a quarter of a century. The toll it is taking on the markets and on the consumer trade. And counting down to micron earnings tomorrow, why Meta's Muse could threaten Apple's services business, and a recently rare bullish take on Netflix, where one analyst thinks the streamer's shares could be a buy at these levels.

1:39Tim Seymour:I'm Melissa Lee. Come to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Karen Feinerman, Courtney Garcia, Steve Grasso, and our guest trader for the hour, Elizabeth Burton, chief strategist at Fortress Investment Group. And we're glad to have Elizabeth here. And we start off with the latest AI headlines coming out of D.C. The president just wrapping up his summit with tech leaders in the past hour, addressing safety concerns and innovation in the sector. Let's get more with Eamon Javers at the White House. Eamon. Yeah, Melissa, the president just wrapped up an impromptu gaggle right here on the White House driveway, right where I am.

2:09Mark Zuckerberg called this a historic moment. And he's certainly right. We haven't really seen anything like this before at the White House, this kind of all-star gathering of tech talent. And what we're trying to do right now is confirm what exactly the document was that Zuckerberg and the president said that they signed related to AI. We believe it is some kind of self-regulatory agreement among all of these AI companies. We don't know for sure. We've asked the White House for a copy of whatever was put on paper. But the president, both before this event today and after the event today, continued to hammer home his perspective, which is that self-regulation is enough.

2:47We don't want to slow down the AI boom. We don't want to get in the way of the tremendous economic growth that AI can generate. Here's what he said earlier today. I believe they're going to be used for the good. And when they're not, we're going to be able to nab them. But there's going to be a tremendous self-policing aspect.

3:06Tim Seymour:We're also thinking about forming a committee of sorts where we put maybe 10 people on that committee. It could be from that group so that we can so the committee can watch over the whole enterprise. So you heard the president there talking about the possibility of a committee. Not clear that that's actually what they signed today. We're trying to, as I say, figure out what's on that piece of paper. But clearly the president is thinking about ways for the industry to self-regulate here. Jensen Wong speaking at this same gaggle with the president, also emphasizing the positive side. Here's what he had to say.

3:40there's no conflict between innovation technology and safety we are going to have to create new technologies to advance the capabilities of ai but we're also creating new technologies to advance the safety of ai all of this technology is being developed by the industry today but melissa i was standing on the street as dario amodi walked out of the white house just a couple of minutes ago uh we tried to talk to him he was wordless as he left this meeting surrounded by his team just hustled right into the SUV and left. No comments at all for reporters here. And Modi, of course, is one of the people who's been ringing the alarm bell the most about AI security and safety.

4:19And so the question is, you know, whether he feels that his concerns were taken seriously here at this White House. But the message clearly coming out from the president and the other CEOs was full steam ahead. We don't need to be so focused on this question of AI doom and existential risk to humanity and all the things that Dario Modi has been talking about in the past weeks and up until the S-1 filing we saw today.

4:42Tim Seymour:It was a remarkable assembly there in the driveway, Amen, of these tech CEOs, which represent approximately$25 trillion in market capitalization and valuation there, including the privately held companies. What fascinated me was Mark Zuckerberg also said he made some references to what was agreed upon in this, what he called White House accord, and that is that there would be an independent review. There'd be audits, and the boards of these companies would independently review those audits. But there's no mention of those audits going anywhere near the government either. Right. We don't know who sees the audits.

5:19Are they ever made public? Who gets access to that? Is all of this voluntary? Is there some sort of binding mechanism here? Is there contractual language? We just have no idea. And like I said, I just was inside the West Wing asking folks there for a copy of the document. And they said that as soon as they're ready to send it around, they'll do so. So we just don't have that information right now. Clearly, Zuckerberg, though, said he views this as a historic first step anyway, into that kind of world of AI safety and world of AI regulation. But the president's perspective is very much this ought to be self-regulation, not the government doing the job.

5:53Tim Seymour:Yeah, self-policing of superintelligence. Eamon, thank you. Eamon Jarvis joining us from the White House. So was this actually a win for the AI industry in terms of no federal regulations? Or would the industry benefit from regulations to sort of set a groundwork, set rules so that everybody's not sort of going on this endless race? I think in the short term, it's a win. Right. So I think for the moment, just continue as you were, run as fast as you can. And maybe that is, I don't know if that's intended to be, I don't know, a threat or something to China. Like, we're just going all in. Later, however, when there's, you know, stuff happens, things break, who's responsible, then it's a lot, then it's really not clear.

6:42I don't know how that gets fixed then. But I, if you're, I mean, look at who is collected there. They all seemed, some of them didn't seem that happy, actually. Some of them actually looked pretty happy. So I think in the short term, it's a win. Yeah, I think it's a I think I agree with Karen. I think it's in the short term, it's a win. I think by the time we get to that phase of making rules, these stocks will be off even higher than where they are now. It's a win for the market. Right. So the market ran on tech. It's running on tech now. There's no end in sight. And it's not the Wild West, but it's some version of that in the tech world.

7:18And in the tech world, they're responsible for 25 percent of the earnings growth right now and 40 percent of the market. So to me, it's a win. But when I look at it, when I want to really drill down, it's a win for Micron. Inference is what agents run on. Agents run on tokens. They create that token demand, not semiconductor, not chip demand right off the bat. It's memory that's going to be driven right off the bat with agentic forces.

7:45Tim Seymour:OK, so that's the granular interpretation of this in terms of, as you mentioned, the stock market aspect of it and the economy aspect of this. This is sort of off we go. CapEx spend is on. There are no throttles here and there are no throttles to the key driver of S &P earnings growth so far this year, the key driver of GDP either. Yeah, and I think when you look at the markets today, I mean, markets continue to hold up pretty remarkably well, even with the Treasury going higher. And I think that's been the sole concern here. is the Treasury going higher because of inflation concerns or because of growth concerns.

8:18And when you see the MAG-7 continue to hold up here, even with that, I think that is showing that this is because we expect the growth to continue to remain strong here. And so I think that story does continue. And I think everything at the White House today does show that. I think what's kind of interesting, too, is when you look at OpenAI, they're showing that they're not bringing out their most updated model of chat GBT, which is almost a form of self-regulation, right? They're saying it's not ready yet. We are going to wait. I think that's the question there is where does that come from? But now he's excited about the agentic AI portion there, and they're kind of shifting the focus there.

8:49And, you know, I think we have to see where that goes in the future. Do you see more of that pulling back as we go forward from these big companies?

8:54Tim Seymour:So careful what you wish for. The growth is on, Elizabeth. And does that mean a foregone conclusion as Treasury yields go higher? I don't think anything's ever a foregone conclusion. About today, I would say it seemed more like a pep rally or even you could call it a quarterback draw. Like, look over here. We're going to keep running right down the middle. So I would say that just taking the market aside, for the consumer, what does this mean? We had a pretty negative sentiment reading. Did they take any comfort out of this? And I think the answer to that is no. I don't think AI has done a great job of selling itself.

9:25And while today seems, you know, rah, rah, let's go team, I don't think it really changes anything for the end consumer. And in terms of the economy, you know, we had like kind of a soft print on GDP in Q2, one and a half. If you take out consumer spending, PCE, component of that and the fixed investment, the hyperscalers, the R &D, you actually had a negative print. So I think that that's a very big component of this. And that's part of what we'll have to see if that stays up.

9:51Tim Seymour:Yeah, I think that's an excellent point in terms of, you know, when you listen to the questions that were asked, so many had to do with data centers and how that would go over in the midterm elections. And President Trump just kept saying, no, data centers would be great for the communities that they are built in. They will make people rich. They'll help with the schools. There'll be more teachers, et cetera. All the great benefits that data centers should have. But yet in the public, they are not popular whatsoever. And if maybe there were actually federal regulations, public perception of all this might actually be better.

10:23Tim Seymour:If there were federal regulations on the, not on data centers per se, but on AI. Because the public perception of data centers aren't necessarily just my power bill is going up. It's what does this mean for my existence and for my living? To the open AI, you know, pulling that model, that seemed like theater to me, actually. I don't I mean, I don't know. It was like self-belicing. We're doing it right now. As a matter of fact, today, just today, we're self-belicing. So it was interesting, though, to hear reporters were really focused on, OK, Mr. President, you say you're very much in favor of data center build and all the good things that could go.

11:05go along with that. And yet you have several Republicans running on a anti-data center platform. I don't know how he could really square those two, but he's obviously very bullish on data center growth. Yeah, it's a problem. And we've talked about the polls and I heard you talking about it on the prior show that people would rather have a nuclear reactor in their backyard than a data center. They might get both.

11:28Tim Seymour:That was a Bradley Tusk of Tuscan. Yeah, he actually said a prison. They want a prison in their backyard versus a data center. I think we've jumped the shark on the data center, you know, a push back against. I think that'll be softened up within the next couple of months. After the midterms, I don't think it's going to be as big of a topic as it is right now. All right. Let's bring in Gene Munster of Deepwater Asset Management for more on all of this and what this could mean for the AI trade or SI trade. Gene, I don't know if you're ever going to get used to it or ever will call it super intelligence.

11:58Tim Seymour:I'll do my best. But was this good news for the industry, sort of a green light by the federal government to say, go fast, see if you do break something, and self-police. Yeah, I think I would agree with kind of the collective decision here. This was great news for the AI trade. If we rewind a few weeks ago with Dario's letter, that kind of sent the market into a little bit of a tailspin. A lot of these stocks were down 5%, 7 % on that Monday after that weekend. And what this essentially is saying is there was there is a fluff piece. There's a theater piece today. I'll start there. The theater piece was they've got it.

12:35They've got safety under control. They're going to self-regulate. That helps people at the dinner table. I don't know if anybody's going to buy it, but that was kind of the fluff side of this. The substance, of course, is that Trump is all on board with this being critical to the US's future. AI is the US's future. And so kind of the drip that they are having around what is the self-regulation really doesn't hide the substance that we're going to go fast. I would say there's another kind of piece below the surface here on the safety topic, because that's kind of what's central to this whole conversation today was what are we doing about safety?

13:11Jensen was talking about that. The people that were out there, it is in their best interest to downplay safety. Even though the Dario piece came out and Musk and Altman kind of joined forces on that to try to have probably a better say in what is happening today. I think it worked, but it really doesn't help them when they talk about some of the risks, whether it be employment or whether it be to our mental health, it really doesn't bode well for them, bode well for their businesses. And so the reason why I mentioned that is that I just want to underscore is that the safety topic has still not been solved and it won't be solved because the government is essentially saying, go for it.

13:54What Jensen announced yesterday with NVIDIA and kind of the safety protocol with Sentry and then this open wave, that probably has the biggest opportunity to actually provide substance around keeping agents in check. But the big picture here, Melissa, is that this is game on when it comes to AI. I'm a big believer that there's a lot of positive that's going to come out of AI and think investors should still look at us in the third inning of AI. We are nowhere close to the end of this train.

14:25Tim Seymour:So extrapolate, I mean, add up what we saw today in terms of, you know, the green light, the go, go, go signal that we're getting from the government, along with what we've seen in the past couple of weeks with the MUSE, successful MUSE launch, two and a half million downloads since it was announced, and all this sort of fervor around AI agents. And does that equate to probably an increase in capital spending from what we've already seen forecasted by a lot of the hyperscalers? I think it does. If we look at the numbers right now, the street's looking for 40 % for next year. It's probably going to be 60 % or better.

15:02What you said about the bots, what these personalized bots, Muse, today, of course, we got DOT from OpenAI from their dev day that's been launched. Now we have seven of these personal agents. Less than 1 % of people in the U.S. use these on a daily basis. I highly recommend trying these I actually plead people to try these bots you will be totally blown away when you start to use these and understand that they can automate much of our digital lives today and they're only gonna get better I think it will start to dawn on people how early we are and how impactful and so Melissa these bots are the next wave this is something that is going to capture the attention it's going to be totally steamroll I think public opinion on what's going on on AI.

15:47And I think that it really speaks to the success of these bots will continue to power a hardware piece that will probably last three to five years. So, Gene, I'm a one percenter like you. I use these bots and it's an agentic world right now. But when you look at it, the company that's not really reaping the benefits of an agentic world is Apple. Does Apple sit on the side and wait for a clear winner to emerge like they did with AI and then partner with them instead of making their own? So the seven major personalized bots that are out there, Siri is one of those. We're testing them right now. I don't want to preview our test because it's a very thorough test.

16:28I can say that Siri is struggling when it compares to some of these others. So to your point, they have a product. It still is not at the same caliber as what we've seen from and GrokBot and what we've seen from Dot today and Muse. I think the big picture is this. Maybe if it's possible for people to get out of the kind of day-to-day headlines, look at the big picture. A year ago, we basically had none of these agents. We've got seven of them now. Anthropix is going to come out with one. We're going to have eight. Some of them are going to be incredibly good, and Apple is going to have to stand up and continue to make changes there.

17:00I think some of the news today about Ternus and streamlining their development for better AI improvement, I think that that is going to help. But it's a huge opportunity for Apple. Like, don't get me wrong. This is a massive opportunity. We own the stock for that. But they really got to get the fit and finisher on Siri right to compete with these other personalized bots. Gene, it's Karen. Thanks for being on. So when you think about this agentic growth versus the prior path, let's say, do you want to be in an AMD over an NVIDIA? Do you want to be in a meta over either of those? Because maybe they'll be taking a small piece of every transaction.

17:34How do you think about where the opportunities are in this next phase? So I can tell the ones that we own, like on the public side, we own Apple, Micron. I think on the memory side, I think it's going to be a big beneficiary. One piece, like this is dominating the conversation. It's really important to understand how these personalized bots can be used, and you'll use many of them in the future. That's really important. I want to kind of fast forward and make a prediction. What are we going to talk about a year from now? Because that's what you want to be investing in today, is to think about the trends, what are a year from now.

18:04And a year from now, we believe the local inference, that's AI running on your phone or your computer is going to be a big deal. That means that these agents are going to work more quickly when they do inference on your device. That means that the hardware that you have is likely going to have to be upgraded. We're going to see an AI multi-year super cycle on hardware. And so, Karen, when I think about the investments that we're making, we want to own some of those hardware companies. As boring as they are, we think that they're going to have a great run, 27, 28, 29, as people start to recognize the power of these personal agents and understand to capture that they've got to upgrade their hardware.

18:43Tim Seymour:All right. Gene, always great to get your thoughts. Thank you. Thank you. Gene Munster, Deepwater Asset Management. It is staggering to think about how much more spend there will be by the hyperscalers, but also in terms of this massive upgrade and what Gene was talking about in terms of the tremendous amount of productivity that could potentially be unleashed by all of us using agents, Elizabeth? Yeah, I'm a little bit of a skeptic on the productivity angle. I mean, we brought up bots. You know, there's a study from the OECD that talked about how robots are, you know, two out of every 1 ,000 workers, and yet they contribute about 10 % to GDP in the places that they're used.

19:23But on the other hand, if you think about penetration levels, it took 84 years for the steam engine to reach 50 percent penetration. So is AI a steam engine or is AI a bot? It has components of both. The steam engine took so long because you had to get that integrated. My least favorite class in business school was organizational behavior. I think we should all probably revisit it because we're going to need it for that productivity angle. But, you know, as Robert Solo said in 1987, you can see the computer age everywhere. but in the productivity statistics. I think it's really hard to determine when it's going to show up.

19:54There's some evidence right now that in the UK, it's showing up at in tenths of a percent. So we'll have to wait and see.

20:00Tim Seymour:And what does that mean for the company spending on AI then, Karen? If we were to believe that AI is, you know, companies are increasingly going to spend on AI and gain efficiencies, and we're not going to necessarily see it in productivity. I sort of think, I don't know. I want to take that other side a little bit. I think we'll see some areas of tremendous productivity, tremendous, and then other areas not. And so it's going to be very uneven, I think. Yeah. I think that's a fair comment. If you looked at past productivity cycles, like if you look at like the 70s, you could see productivity in certain parts of the economy, but it wasn't showing up in farmers and farmland, right?

20:37So I think you have to look at how it's impacting the whole economy, not just the small financial world in which all of us here at this table live. Yeah, but I think, too, the productivity may come longer term. In shorter term, when we're talking about how good this is for companies, it's because they're going to have subscriptions. They're charging customers more for this, right? And I think short term, even seeing the AI actually is adding to the inflation story. When you see all these stories about these bots coming out and being like, oh, great, we can charge consumers more for this, that does add to the inflation story.

21:03So short term is actually inflationary. Longer term, the productivity kicks in. I think that's the question is how short and long term that is, and that's what we're all trying to figure out.

Read the full transcript

21:10Tim Seymour:Where the handoff is. The other big AI event today, OpenAI holding its annual developers conference. Professor Kate Rooney spoke to CEO Sam Altman and CFO Sarah Fryer earlier today. Kate, what's the latest? Hey, Melissa, that's right. We are here at OpenAI's Developer Day in San Francisco. It segues from what you guys were talking about. The theme of the day is bots. In particular, OpenAI announced DOTS. So this is their autonomous agents that can work on your behalf, work behind the scenes. I would say that's the biggest headline that we got today. Also, ChatGPT got an update on weekly actives.

21:44Tim Seymour:1.2 billion worldwide. And then also, I mean, I should say this group here is really the next generation of big companies. There are a lot of startups here. These are kind of the power users of AI that OpenAI is trying to court and trying to convince that their technology is the best. It's the one they should be using. But you have the split screen where you have the safety debate at the same time where OpenAI has had issues. We talk about hugging face. We talk about some of these rogue agents going off the rails. We spoke to Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI earlier, who said that they are, in some cases, walking back some of this technology and in other cases, depending on the situation, evaluating safety when it comes to what models should be released.

22:25Tim Seymour:I also asked him about liability. You know, we think about these startups and companies using AI. I asked him who's at fault, really, if something goes wrong. Here's what Altman said. If you think about the auto industry, for example, if there's faulty parts, you know, know, you can be liable in some ways there. If the car manufacturer puts them together in a way that's outside of the spec of what they're supposed to do, then the car manufacturer could be. And if someone's driving drunk, it's their fault. So, you know, depending on whether the fault is in the model and how it's used or someone misusing it intentionally, I assume we'll have like a, you know, a new liability framework.

23:02Tim Seymour:Mel, we also spoke to Sarah Fryer, the CFO of OpenAI as well. We got news and had confirmed a Bloomberg headline earlier that OpenAI is in talks to raise about$30 billion in private markets. That would launch its valuation to$1.4 trillion ahead of an IPO. She wouldn't comment on that specifically, but did confirm that their annualized run rate in terms of revenue grew about 70 % in the quarter, said they are seeing a lot of momentum, and pointed back to this DOTS agent, said it is a way for them to grow revenue, and it's paid versus Muse, which is free. So, thinks that that's going to be a tailwind for them.

23:37Tim Seymour:All right, Kate, thank you. Kate Rooney, interesting to hear the liability question, because if you think about, I mean, if there is liability assigned, then you have moral hazard in terms of going fast until you break something because you're on the hook for whatever is broken. But in this case, you know, what he was pointing out were very discrete instances where damage is sort of defined in this box. Here, we're talking about an AI agent that could go rogue, that could be deployed by a company by accident that will then have an impact on another company or an infrastructure that belongs to the public.

24:08Tim Seymour:I mean, the sort of variations of how you can bring this is endless. Yeah, where does the buck stop? Right. Not here, everyone wants to say. Right, right. Yeah, I don't know. That's an outstanding question. I mean, we had, was it Gary from the other day on talking about, yes, Gary Marcus talking about this idea of if a person were to be an actor that did these things, right, and broke into what— They would be in jail. Yes. And yet here, it's sort of like, well, it's the price of innovation. Right. I don't know. If you were at that—it sounds like from that White House meeting today, keep going.

24:47Yeah. We got you. But don't worry. This is morally binding.

24:52Tim Seymour:Coming up, could Meta take a bite out of Apple by one analyst's warning of a muse threat for the tech giant and the part of its business most at risk? plus a binging bounce in Netflix. Shares rebounding from two-month lows, the reason one Wall Street firm is getting bullish and where shares could be streaming to next. Don't go anywhere. Fast Money is back in the day.

25:18Who says Americans don't build big things anymore? Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.

25:47You know what's not a great use of time? Getting data ready for AI. That's why IT leaders turn to CDW. We help unify data and govern it, building the foundation for your AI and agents to deliver results. Because when your data is ready, AI stops being an experiment and becomes an advantage. We configure, optimize, and deliver the tech that runs business. CDW. Make amazing happen. Hey, Chicagoland. The Wayfair store is in your neighborhood at Eden's Plaza in Wilmette. Finally, you can feel the fabric, sit on the sectionals, and even open the refrigerators. Plus, our in-store designers will help you bring it all together with free one-on-one design support for any project on any budget.

26:33Yep, we said free. Oh, and did we mention the cafe? So what are you waiting for? Come see all that's in store. Visit the Wayfair store today at Edens Plaza and Wilmette. Wayfair, every style, every home.

26:47Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Bank of America issuing a warning today that Meta's Muse AI agent could pose a risk to Apple's services business. Analysts saying the agent could shift spending away from the tech giant by transacting on users' behalf rather than routing fees through the App Store. B of A did keep their buy rating on the stock, though, pointing to Apple's grip on hardware and devices. Courtney, what do you make of this call? Interesting that it would be the services. They're saying whoever owns sort of whatever routes that transaction is the winner of that cost. It won't go to the App Store anymore.

27:20Yeah, I mean, it could be. I think that these are all going to bring up new concerns. I don't think we have thought about before Muse even existed here, right? But I think ultimately when you look at this, Apple's AI strategy is really their on-device AI. So, yes, maybe it takes away from their services, but do they win in this other new area that they're trying to win in AI? But also, I think when it comes to Muse, it's pretty interesting that today it was actually up on the news even when OpenAI is coming out with dots. So you're seeing, like, more competition. But then you get this note out today.

27:45Everyone's kind of assuming that Muse is the winner here. And I think that's kind of an interesting thought process here. They might be. But Gene pointed out earlier, there's now seven of these agentic AIs, eight maybe once Anthropic comes out. At what point maybe it is Muse that takes away from Apple. Maybe Siri gets it together. I don't know. Or one of these other companies. So, yes, is it at risk? Yeah. Is it Muse who does it? I think that's that's the big question still. Isn't Apple, the app store, 86 percent of what they do is commission free. They get it on 14 percent where they have the 30 percent commission after the first year.

28:17Then it goes to 15 percent. But none of these things that Muse is going to be touching are actually what Apple gets paid on. Apple gets paid on gaming and things that are bought inside of gaming. Muse is not going to touch gaming. Muse is going to touch your food delivery. Muse is going to touch your airline tickets. Apple doesn't get paid on those. So I get the thesis. But in practice, I don't think it actually happens right now. So we're not talking about a huge portion of the pie and we're not talking about a huge amount of commissions. I don't know what Muse is going to get paid. I thought this MongoDB thing was kind of mind blowing, actually.

28:56And in terms of enterprise, focus on enterprise. Yes. And so I don't know what they're going to. I mean, they plan on getting a cut of a lot more things than I originally thought, I think. Yeah. Right. So I don't know. I don't know what's safe. But it does sort of feel very reminiscent of where we were with this apocalypse, I don't know, six, eight months ago. And some of them are thriving and some are really not.

29:21Tim Seymour:Coming up, someone on Wall Street is starting to tune in. Why one firm is getting bullish on Netflix, even if the upside isn't as great as it once was. You're watching Fast Money Live from the NASDAQ Market Side in Times Square. Back right after this.

30:07Venture Global That's unstoppable energy.

30:15Hmm. Interesting. Something amazing is happening when teams brainstorm ideas.

30:21Tim Seymour:Devices are keeping the energy flowing. That's because CDW is building modern workplaces with Acer devices. Built-in security, uncompromising processing power, and fast connectivity help fuel collaboration so your team can innovate quickly. Wait, guys, that's a great idea. Acer and CDW make amazing happen. Learn more at cdw.com slash Acer. Hey, Chicagoland, the Wayfair store is in your neighborhood at Edens Plaza and Wilmette. Finally, you can feel the fabric, sit on the sectionals, and even open the refrigerators. Plus, our in-store designers will help you bring it all together with free one-on-one design support for any project on any budget.

31:02Yep, we said free. Oh, and did we mention the cafe? So what are you waiting for? Come see all that's in store. Visit the Wayfair store today at Edens Plaza and Wilmette. Wayfair, every style, every home.

31:17Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Netflix getting a rare upgrade today as analysts at Deutsche Bank upgraded the streamer from a hold to a buy saying concerns over U.S. viewing trends are overshadowing international strength and an ability to leverage AI across the platform. Analysts, though, did lower the price target from$100 to$95 after adjusting operating income and free cash flow estimates there. They're saying, you know what, the stock already sort of factors in this mature U.S. business, but undervalues a very high growth international business that Netflix has. Well, one thing that's, first of all, the valuation has come down a lot, right?

31:52We are very much at a sub-market multiple for Netflix that I don't think should be a sub-market multiple company with a great balance sheet. One of the things that I thought would happen in AI was that the cost of content would come down, Actually making the shows comes down. Maybe that's true. But what else has happened is the cost of content has gone up. Right. If they're trying to be YouTube light or YouTube competitor and they're paying a lot for content there, they're paying a lot for content, live sports. They're paying a lot for content everywhere. So that that I didn't get right. I'm long.

32:27I've been long for a long time. I like it here. I think there is still growth to be had. And I think at this valuation, the risk reward to me seems very compelling. But, you know, to be fair, I am long already. Yeah, I would agree. I think I think the fact that this has come down so much, I mean, you're looking at 18 to 20 times forward earnings here, which is is much cheaper than where Netflix should have been, historically speaking. And I think it's ultimately worth something to look at here. But I think one thing we need to see is when we look at their advertising revenue, That's going to really have to do a lot of the bulk here if you're seeing this mature U.S.

32:59business at this point in time. If you're not seeing as much subscriber increases or additional users, that's really going to have to pick up the steam here. So I think seeing does that happen is something you absolutely want to watch when it comes to Netflix. I mean, the stock has, to Karen's point, it has re-rated. You're paying 22, 25 times where a couple of years ago you were flatlining around 43 times. When you look at the chart, we're back to the same level two years ago where the stock actually took off. So if you're not an owner of Netflix, I would say you could probably take a stab at it here, keep it on a short stop.

33:29And then if you are an owner, I would not be selling it. Now, you've waited. You went through the pain. Whenever around this table, we're streaming. I'm still streaming from Netflix first. And then I go somewhere outside of that. So I get the concerns, but I would be a buyer of the stock here.

33:45Tim Seymour:Coming up, navigating the staggering rise in rates plus a drop in consumer confidence as inflation fears ramp up. The details when Fast Money returns.

34:01Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks largely in the red today. The Dow down a quarter of a percent. S &P 500 and Nasdaq posting small losses, but the Nasdaq 100 managing to see a small gain. Semi-stocks seeing gains with names like Marvell, Armholding and ASML among the group's leaders. Micron also higher ahead of its earnings report tomorrow. The stock has nearly quadrupled this year, but has plateaued over the past few months. And Boeing jumping after hours after the company won a Pentagon contract to supply the Navy's next-gen fighter jet. The contract valued at more than$20 billion. Meantime, Treasury yields continuing their trek higher.

34:35Tim Seymour:The 30-year now levels last seen in 2002. Ten-year yields closing in on 5.3 percent and the two-year climbing just shy of 5 percent before pulling back. The gains coming as inflation concerns continue to rankle the market and consumers. The conference board, we say reading on consumer confidence, plunged to its lowest level since 2014 in September. That took a bite out of retail stocks, AutoNation, Dollar Tree, Walmart, just some of the names seeing outsized losses. So if rates keep rising, is there even more pain to come for the consumer? And by the way, we just saw this cross, the 30-year fixed mortgage hitting 7.58 percent, which is the highest level since November 13th of 2023.

35:14Tim Seymour:So another way in which a consumer sees some more pressure, Elizabeth. Yeah, I do think that the consumer is going to start to feel some real purchasing power degradation going forward here. And, you know, on the bond market, I was here in June or July saying we were going to five and I got so much flack for that. We're there. Maybe we're in a better spot. But I still think you could see fair value on bonds at closer to 6 percent. So on the 10 on the 10 years specifically. So I don't know that all that all that pain is gone. What I don't tend to care that much about consumer sentiment surveys.

35:49I don't put a lot of stick in it. But I do think there's some tail risk here for the administration that if you're getting these super negative consumer sentiments, you've got higher yields. Does that not put more pressure on Warsh, at least from the White House? Like we've got to do something here. This isn't moving in the right direction. But the interesting thing about this move in yields is that if you think about the move index, the bond market volatility index, it was a nothing burger basically from March until last week when it went up like 30 percent and hit highs that we hadn't seen since Liberation Day.

36:20So I think things are finally starting to wake up. But most of the real the yield move lately has really been a real yield move.

36:28Tim Seymour:Some people would say that this is all because we have a great economy. Yeah, one person would say that or two people would say that. I think a lot of economists would say that with, you know, that what we're seeing, you know, we're seeing people still have their jobs. They're still spending. The numbers are holding up. We've got a great stock market. We've got earnings growth. Look, we do have a strong economy. I think, you know, there's a couple of things behind that. And Worsh said it himself. We've got like pretty loose financial conditions other than than yields. We've got, you know, an equity market close to all time highs.

37:00We've got a weak dollar. So we've got loose financial conditions. Things do look OK, but it's precarious and it's resting on a handful of things. So on the labor question, I've been a contrarian there a little bit, but I don't actually think the labor market is as strong as everybody is saying. It reminds me of a time a decade ago when they were saying everything's fine, everything's fine, everything's fine, everything was not fine. And I also don't think that we've done a really good job of estimating labor post-COVID, post-immigration policies. So I think you might see that change going forward.

37:31And you have to remember that on a wage basis that people are starting to finally see that pinch in their paycheck versus inflation. And you get to the point where, you know, I had a conversation with my husband who's staying home now if this doesn't you know, if it doesn't make sense to send the kids to daycare. So I think you might see those conversations pop back up. You know, if the labor market isn't as strong as we think it is, then there's really no reason to push for for rates to be higher than where they're at now. Now, you know, I think for better or worse and probably better, the Fed has taken a backseat on this last maybe the last week or so.

38:06We've seen real real rates rise. But break evens, 10 year break evens, five year break evens really haven't moved at all. So this is not a longer dated inflation worry. This is a now inflation worry. So I saw that pocket between 505 and 530 in the 10 year. There's probably another pocket to 555. And then we get to that 6 % range. I think you could see to pop higher if they don't hike. I know that there's a lot of people who are strategists who are saying that there's not going to be a hike in October. I don't put any stake in that. You look back, 27 past elections, 33 % of the time there was an action.

38:44So that's nine. Yes, six were cuts. That tends to be more popular than a hike. But it still happens. And we had it happen in 2022. We had action happen there, so it could happen. But I think it's a mistake. I do think we have an underlying inflation problem. And I don't think that it's just, you know, two wars going on. And I don't I don't think it's just a pure energy crisis. What I will say about the energy part of that Fed decision is they always say we're going to look through these temporary blips. Well, now it's not temporary. Like I found out at work the other day that a diaper cost raw material, something a lot of people in America buy, 65 percent of that has oil related components that are rising that cost.

39:18So it's going to start to hit parts that aren't immediately obvious, and they're going to have to do something about that. And Warsh himself, let's take the metric he uses, he wants to see that the percentage of components in PCE are declining, not rising, and they're still elevated. They're 60-something percent, according to his numbers.

39:35Tim Seymour:So what you're painting in terms of the picture of the economy and thinking about that 6 % on the 10-year year, what happens to stocks? Where should stocks be? So I think credit investors tend to be doom and gloom. I think stocks are OK. I think it depends on this. You said this earlier today. I even think it depends on the speed. It depends on the velocity. And Eddie Ardenny was on earlier this week, and I agree with him. If you get to a place where yields are higher than nominal GDP, then you run into a problem because then if it's too low, you're funding zombie companies. If you get too high, good projects aren't getting funded.

40:10I think stocks can continue to go from here. They've shown resilient earnings. We're not at problem levels yet. But if you go to 6 percent, you know, liquidity split, that could be a problem. All right.

40:20Tim Seymour:We do have the text of the A.I. agreement that was signed at the White House earlier today. President Trump hosting the Truth Social, the White House accord on what he's calling super intelligence. The document lays out four layers of controls, including partnerships with an independent auditor to assess frontier models and designating an independent committee on the company's boards to oversee the effort. Despite all the companies represented at the White House today, the letter is only signed by the Trump leaders, Trump and leaders of NVIDIA, XAI, Meta, Google, Anthropic and OpenAI and says that over time it may make sense to codify these steps into laws or regulations.

40:57Tim Seymour:Right now, he says this is a self-policing agreement that is morally binding. Coming up, the stocks to watch as the gaming industry goes through some big changes and how the rise in prediction markets is shaking up the space. That's when he's back at two.

41:18Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money Casino. Stocks under pressure this year as the gaming industry faces threats from prediction markets and a decline in international travel. Contessa Brewer is live in Las Vegas with more. Contessa. Hi there, Melissa. Yeah, Caesars has the rare stock in the green year to date. CEO Tom Reed told me today he's absolutely gleeful at the freedom from caring about his share price since Tazers is being sold to Fertitta Entertainment. MGM CEO Bill Hornbuckle told me today, well, actually he wouldn't tell me what the right offer price is for MGM, but Barry Diller is no longer in the market to buy it.

41:52I asked Hornbuckle, OK, well, is it true you're considering buying People, Inc.? Here's what he said. I love you. Look, we're going to do, as we've always wanted to do, what's in the best interest of shareholders. And trying to unlock the value of a company that we think is grossly undervalued, particularly when you look at the sum of the parts, in a very complicated business, whether it's BetMGM, Asia, Japan, now the Las Vegas story, the idea is to unlock that value. And so we'll continue to pursue that mission and see where it goes. And that's... Is that a yes? We're going to... No. I didn't say, yes, you did.

42:35Wynn Resort CEO Craig Billings told me he's bullish on Vegas, on Macau,

42:40Tim Seymour:and his new integrated resort in the UAE. In spite of the Iran conflict, he says life on the ground is normal, supply chain is normal, just elevated costs related to the conflict. So he thinks they're on to open in September of next year, Melissa. Have you heard anything about the trends in Macau lately, Contessa? Well, what happened is the visitation just rebounded for August. They set their best August ever for visitation in Macau. The problem is visitation doesn't translate to gambling revenue. And there's a real disconnect between how much those visitors are spending on stuff like, you know, coming to the NBA China games, which happens next week in Macau.

43:20And I'll be there. I think the issue for them is, are the gamblers coming? Are the big spenders coming? And both Bill Hornbuckle and Craig Billings, CEOs of Wynn and MGM, said they're still seeing those big gamblers coming and that it looks good, even in luxury retail, which has been hit in other parts of China by customers who seem like they've been pulling back a bit.

43:43Tim Seymour:Contessa, thank you. Contessa Brewer in Las Vegas for us. Steve, where's your trade here? Yeah, they all look terrible. I mean, if you think about discretionary dollars, this is the discretionary of discretionary dollars. and you have to travel to get there physically. It's all about online gaming. So I would say if you want to be in the gaming world, play the online gamers because those are the ones that you're attached to, that you don't have to travel anywhere, that you can place your bets. This is the real growth area, not the actual physical. Coming up, smart ring maker Aura postponing its IPO on the day shares were supposed to price.

44:17Tim Seymour:What is behind this decision? Is there a broader implication for the IPO market? More Fast Money in 2.

44:30Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Smart ring maker Aura announcing it will postpone plans for its Nasdaq IPO due to uncertainty in the market. The company, which was supposed to price shares today, saying the delay comes despite strong demand and strengthening of the business since it launched the IPO process just last week. It's just the latest company to delay offerings after nuclear services company Holtec and Bamboo Insurance did the same in the past 10 days or so. Karen, do you think this is any indication of the pipeline? Maybe. I think that, well, these consumer products have not a great history, some of them.

45:05I do have an O-ring. I like it. It tells me a little I sleep. I knew that, but it's good to get the affirmation, I guess. But I think if you think about some other things like a Fitbit or a GoPro or things like that came out, you know, hugely successful and then not. It is interesting to me. My read through is, well, the IPO pipeline, what does that mean for the big money center banks that are in the business of feeding that pipeline? That's not a great data point.

45:32Tim Seymour:Yeah. At a time when financials are down about 7%, 6 plus percent in the past month, Elizabeth, do you like financials here? Yeah, I think some financials are baby with the bathwater moment here. There's a couple I won't name specifically, but they operate more like tech companies. So I'm not really sure why they're getting beaten up so much. But I think there certainly are problems given the yield curve with some of these regional banks. Yeah. Yeah, and I think what's interesting, too, is I think this IPO is probably more a function of it being overpriced. Because I think when you look at it, there was what?

46:02It was like three quarters of it were existing venture exiters, right? So you're saying, OK, I'm getting into this. Most people who are trying to get out at the same time. And a lot of money they were raising was going in to pay taxes on the existing employees' stock options. So I think that's the question is, like, are we just paying too much for this? I think this is more of an aura question than an overall IPO question. That's my takeaway from this.

46:23Tim Seymour:Up next, final trades.

46:31Tim Seymour:Time for the final trade. Elizabeth. C-I-B-R, NASDAQ, cybersecurity trade. We don't know what the rules of the road are going to be yet, but we all want an airbag. All right. Great to have you, Elizabeth. Thank you. Karen. Yes. Zoom communications down like 20 % in the cesspocalypse. Lots of cash, lots of anthropic ownership here. Courtney. Financials have been down on rates being up. I think I take a look at J.P. Moore again as we approach earnings season here. See. Apple. All right. Thank you for watching Fast. Matt and Money with Jim Cramer starts right now.

47:08All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC or its parent company or affiliates and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.

47:34To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.

47:55On any budget. Yep, we said free. Oh, and did we mention the cafe? So what are you waiting for? Come see all that's in store. Visit the Wayfair store today at Edens Plaza and Wilmette. Wayfair, every style, every home.

From the publisher

Stocks slightly lower as interest rates continue to rise, with consumer confidence dropping to its lowest level in more than a decade. The impact on equities, and where a top market strategist sees rates heading next. Plus, Muse to take a bite of Apple, Wall St. gets bullish on Netflix, and slowing down AI; what OpenAI CEO Sam Altman had to say about the pace of growth as calls for regulation around safety concerns continue to grow.

 Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 870 episodes
Yields Spike As Consumer Confidence Drops… And Altman Weighs In On AI Pacing 9/29/26CNBC's "Fast Money" · 44 min
Listen in VO