America’s Housing Affordability Crisis… Plus Lululemon Downward Dog 5/21/24

21 May 2024 · 44 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money" Episode Title: America’s Housing Affordability Crisis… Plus Lululemon Downward Dog Air Date: 5/21/24 Hosts: Melissa Lee, Tim Seymour, Karen Feinerman, Steve Grasso, Guy Adami

Overview In this episode of *Fast Money*, the panel discusses the dire state of housing affordability in America, the challenges facing Lululemon, and key upcoming market events, including earnings reports from NVIDIA and developments in the cryptocurrency space.

---

Key Topics

  1. America’s Housing Affordability Crisis
  2. Statistics on Affordability:
  3. Over 100 million American households are unable to afford newly built homes.
  4. The number of households unable to afford homes has increased by 30 million in three years due to rising home prices and mortgage rates.
  5. Current median-priced newly constructed homes average around $496,000.
  6. Market Implications:
  7. High-end builders like Toll Brothers report strong earnings and cash purchases, while average buyers struggle.
  8. Home prices have risen 46% since the pandemic.
  9. Mortgage Rates: Current rates exceed 7%, significantly impacting buyer eligibility.
  1. Lululemon’s Decline
  2. Current Status:
  3. Lululemon's stock has dropped over 35% from its recent highs, reaching a 52-week low.
  4. The company faces challenges from changing fashion trends and increased competition from brands like Aloe and Viore.
  5. Analyst Insights:
  6. Concerns were raised over the resignation of the chief product officer, indicating internal challenges.
  7. Analysts predict Lululemon's U.S. sales could turn negative for the first time, forecasting only 4% growth next year compared to street expectations of over 11%.
  1. Market Movements & Earnings Reports
  2. Eli Lilly:
  3. Eli Lilly's stock rises as it receives approval for its diabetes drug in China.
  4. The drug is considered a critical component of future growth despite existing competition.
  5. NVIDIA Earnings Anticipation:
  6. NVIDIA is set to report earnings, with expectations of substantial market reactions. Options markets predict roughly 8% movement post-earnings, impacting market cap significantly.
  7. Ethereum ETF Hopes:
  8. Ethereum's price is buoyed by prospects of a spot ETF approval. Discussions include the implications for the broader cryptocurrency market.

---

Insights & Discussion

  • Traders' Sentiment on Homebuilders:
  • Mixed views on the homebuilder trade, especially considering potential interest rate cuts and job market dynamics.
  • Lululemon's Future:
  • Discussion on whether Lululemon can pivot in response to changing consumer preferences and competition.
  • Investor Perspectives:
  • The panel highlighted the importance of understanding both macroeconomic trends and individual company dynamics when making investment decisions.

Final Thoughts

  • The discussion emphasizes the delicate balance between economic indicators, consumer behavior, and market sentiment. With housing affordability at a crisis point, companies like Lululemon facing significant challenges, and major earnings reports on the horizon, investors must stay informed and adaptable in a fluctuating market landscape.

---

Conclusion This episode of *Fast Money* provided a comprehensive analysis of pressing market issues, revealing the interplay between economic trends and investment strategies. As key earnings reports approach, traders are advised to consider both macroeconomic indicators and specific company performances in their decision-making processes.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is fast money. Here's what's on tap tonight. Housing headaches, the staggering new stat on home affordability and what it might mean for home builders even as mortgage rates are expected to pull back. Plus a real Lulu, Lemon, shares of the one-time athleisure darling at their lowest in over a year and down more than 35 percent from an all-time high hit less than six months ago. Can the stock find its zen or has it stretched past this limit? And later, Eli Lilly hits another a record high. Ethereum's ethereal rise on hopes of a new ETF.

0:36And we are counting down to what might be the biggest earnings report this quarter. What is at stake when NVIDIA delivers its results tomorrow? I'm Melissa Lee coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Karen Feinerman, Steve Grasso, and Guy Adami. And we begin tonight with a staggering new stat. More than 100 million American households cannot afford to buy the newly built home, according to the National Association of Home Builders. That number has increased by more than$30 million over the last three years as home prices and mortgage rates have remained stubbornly high.

1:07This is we just got earnings results from high-end home builder Toll Brothers, which beat earnings and sales estimates and raised full-year delivery guidance. That stock right now is higher by a little bit over a percent. For more on both these stories, let's bring in CNBC's Diana Olek. Diana, first that popped in Toll. Yeah, I mean Toll did really well beat expectations, but I have to say Toll Brothers buyers are the high-end. They're not mortgage dependent. In fact, they've already said that 25 % of toll buyers buy in all cash. So even though mortgage rates went up during this quarter, you didn't see the effect that you may see on some of the other home builders.

1:40But you were talking about affordability. Let's get to that. When you combine higher home prices with higher mortgage rates, the sum total is a whole lot of pain for potential home buyers, especially those who want to buy new construction. So home prices overall nationally are 46 % higher than they were at the start of the pandemic in 2020. The average rate on the 30-year fixed is still stubbornly over 7 % after hitting a record low of 2.76 % at the start of 2021. Now, as a result, nearly 67 million American households can't afford a$250 ,000 home today. They just wouldn't qualify for the mortgage.

2:14A whopping 103 million can't afford the nation's median-priced newly built home, which is about $496 ,000, according to the NAHB. That is 82 % of American households. If you were to raise that price by just$1 ,000, an additional 106 ,000 buyers would be priced out. If you compare that back to the same metric in 2021 when rates were at record lows and home prices were lower, that 103 million drops to 75 million households unable to afford a new home. So nearly 30 million potential buyers have been priced out in just three years. The home builders have been buying down mortgage rates in order to get more buyers in the door, but that's eating into their margins.

2:56And Melissa, we did here from CEO Doug Yearley last quarter that they're not really answering to any buyers who want mortgage rate buy downs. They just want some of the added bonuses going into the fixings in the Toll Brothers house. Diana, in terms of the rate at which more homes would come onto the market from the existing home segment, what rate is that in general? Is that five? Is that six? I mean, how do we view that? Okay, so the total amount of homes on the market right now, it's about 40 % higher compared to last year, but still very low. And the rate of new listings is actually coming down.

3:32So we saw this kind of surge going into spring of more homes coming onto the market, and they just sat. Why did they sit? Because they're too expensive and nobody can afford them. But we're not getting more new listings now. And again, part of that is that rate lock-in, that when you're over 7 % and you have 2.75%, why would you sell? But in terms of, I mean, do people think 6 % is going to move a lot of homes? And we did see, Rates come down, I think, in the first quarter or the second quarter, sort of that area. Did we see more velocity in the market at that time? We did. We did. At the beginning of this year, when rates were around 6.5%, we did see an early surge.

4:07In fact, we thought the spring market was starting in January because people were really coming in. The trouble was there wasn't a lot on the market to buy. Then all the supply came into the market March and April, but that's when rates started shooting up again. And so a lot of that is now sitting. All right. Diana, thank you. Diana Olick in Washington for us. And I guess the question for us here tonight is, what do you do with the home builder trade? We're just off of highs in the sector. And so are we, you know, if we're looking at a Fed that's going to cut rates, that's probably the next move here at some point in time.

4:38Is the best behind the home builders? Are we sort of in a Goldilocks period here for this trade? Collectively, we like the home builders for a while. The last six months or so, it has me sort of scratching my head. I get it. I mean, people talk about valuation. They've been compelling. I don't even know if valuation matters in this space. I understand that interest rates matter. I think the thing that's going to matter most for the homebuilders is just my instinct is going to be the unemployment rate, which I do think is going to surprise people to the upside. I've thought that for a while as well incorrectly.

5:05But a lot of these revisions start to make their way in. It's a supply side thing. But people are going to move when they start losing jobs. Counterintuitively, I mean, this is going to sound crazy. The best thing for the supply side is probably a sort of a spike in the unemployment rate. I agree with that. I think the most important thing is a job. But but I also think the question you asked Diana, if we start to cut rates, I think people will start to nibble and maybe take out a mortgage and then they can always refinance. But they have to see they have to be sure that those rates have topped out and that they are coming in.

5:38Tall Brothers has outperformed. So if you look at D.H.I., they're spec builders. That was great during the pandemic. Not so much now. I would stay back from the trade. Yeah, I think it's a combination of the homebuilders are more profitable, even where they're picking up some of the margins. They just announced the gross margin of 28.2. This number's been getting better. I wonder if the wealth effect in stock markets at all-time highs and essentially household balance sheets never being better is also creating a little bit more of a frenzy. A lot of these folks who are cash buyers doesn't really matter, right?

6:07You don't have to apply for a mortgage. You're just lifting it off the top. But I also do think for those people that are out there in terms of actually going through a mortgage process, whether that's easier or harder, the dynamic here, I think it's certainly helping people. They have better balance sheets. I think if you see any deterioration in the stock market and ultimately in where we've seen housing prices, I think it's going to be self-feeding. I also think that a lot of these loans that no one's going to walk away from anytime soon have a shelf life. I mean, I realize a lot of people may be locked into 30 years.

6:35Good for you. That's probably for too long of an outlook for this show. But if you think about 10 ones and even five ones, five ones are pretty much toast. And I think if you think about the environment where the consumer hasn't really begun to weaken because the job market hasn't begun to weaken, that's going to happen, too. How much? We're all trying to handicap that. That's a really important point, I think. You know, it's so when do those what's the what's the life left on those loans? Do people wait to the very end? Maybe not quite the very end. But it's interesting, you know, in in the energy markets, the cure for higher oil prices is higher oil prices.

7:09That is not the cure here. That hasn't been helping. It's, you know, It's such an odd scenario where you have so much locked up inventory that just will not hit the market because people can't afford to leave their houses. But I've been thinking for a while the home builders had had enough of a run. It wasn't. But I mean, these numbers came out tonight. Those are very good. Guys friendly. I can just tell you that I haven't liked them. I've been wrong on this. I've been wrong on it for probably six to nine months because my view is when you don't have any velocity of trading, prices have to come down at some point.

7:40I still think that that's been the wrong. What's interesting, the dynamic, though, is that the home prices have not, the home values have not come in. Right, in relationship to the mortgage. Exactly. Usually it's inverse. Usually the mortgage rates go higher and home prices have to come down, and that has not been happening in this market. But that's why we asked, Diana, if we know that the next move for the Fed is going to be a rate cut at some point in time, maybe the end of the year, the beginning of next year, when do we start looking ahead to believe that there's going to be more velocity, especially on the existing home side, particularly when you factor in a 5-1 or a 10-1 arm, and those people are going to be coming off that, and they have to do something.

8:13They're even going to be paying up. And there's household formation that is happening. Right, and people do have to move at some point. So do you think ahead to that point, maybe six months out, seven months out, when that velocity starts happening once again? I mean, Diana mentioned six and a half, beginning of the year, there were homes being sold involved. Yeah, I feel like the stocks are discounted. They're trading as if that's going to happen. At least that's the moves that they've seen. But I totally get it. Now, what's interesting, I think, is the fact that look at Home Depot and Lowe's, effectively the same chart.

8:45Lowe's has traded a little bit better than Home Depot. With that said, they both made their all-time highs in December of 2021, which actually made sense at the time. If you think about what was going on, those stocks have not traded well now for the better part of three years on what's been a very good broader market. So I think there's a tell there in terms of everybody that needed to spend money. They basically did it. Now there's sort of this sideways action. And again, I'll come back to the unemployment rate. I mean, if things stay here, this is just going to continue to sort of go sideways.

9:14If the unemployment rate moves higher, which is probably going to mean that's what that will force the Fed to move. That will get some inventory, I think, into the system. All right. Let's talk markets now with less than 24 hours until NVIDIA reports earnings. An investor known for the big shorts, these opportunities in the entire A.I. space. Steve Eisenman is senior portfolio manager at Neuberger Berman. Steve, it's always great to see you. You're listening to our conversation. Looking sharp today, too. Looking sharp. I mean, really. Just take a second. All right. Let's just compliment my wife.

9:44We got to dismiss me and move on.

9:49I was going to say, comment on Steve's mood, which is generally good, and you feel good about the economy as well. So you're listening to our conversation. How do you feel? I'm curious. How do you feel about the housing trade? If you are a believer that the economy is in good shape, the consumer is in pretty good shape. I mean, the problem with the housing market is, you know, people are stuck in their homes because they have 3 % mortgages and they have jobs. So somebody is going to get a 7.5 % mortgage to have the same monthly payment as the person with the 3 % mortgage. The housing price has to get cut in half.

10:20Now, is somebody with a job going to sell their house and cut in half? No. So existing home sales are very weak. New home sales take share. And that's been the housing market for the last two years or so. I don't see it changing at all. You are optimistic about AI. And we often talk about how Apple is perceived as sort of the laggard in AI. You think that there's a huge... I think Apple is actually the hidden AI play. Not exactly today, but will be. Because everybody's focused on the chips. Everybody's focused on the cloud. But at the end of the day, when there will be apps, and I have no idea what that's going to be, but when there will be apps that the consumer can use, they're going to want to use it on their phone.

11:04And I have a new iPhone, and I know for sure that when all those apps come on, my phone is going to, I'll need a new phone, and I'll need a new iPad, and I'll need a new laptop. And so when the apps show up, the biggest probably beneficiary is going to be Apple because they're going to have a refresh of literally everything that they sell. Does that same sort of trade happen with Microsoft, which has unveiled its new sort of hardware lineup that is AI equipped? Partially. I mean, that's going to happen a bit. Yeah, I don't know how much Apple. I mean, you're going to need to see people start to buy their laptops.

11:39And it's going to be more than probably need more than just Microsoft doing what it's doing. The apps have not come yet when they will. And I have no idea when that's when this whole refresh cycle is really going to take off. So expanding the AI discussion, last time you were here, you talked about NVIDIA. I think you had said you had never seen an executive as confident as Jen. And happy. He's happier than me. Happier than you now is quite a thing. But do you see that's obviously not the hidden one. It is the most obvious one. But is that one that you still feel comfortable holding? I mean, look, right now, the easiest way to play AI is NVIDIA, AMD, few other chip players.

12:19and then anybody who is in the cloud or with a massive database. Beyond that, there's Apple, which I just mentioned. And after that, it's not clear because so much of what's going to happen is unknown. There's no way to know at this point. Steve, to change gears just a little bit, we'd be remiss not to ask you your view on the consumer, whether you see weakening as someone that's also obviously played that and that manifestation in the past was through the banks and someone that's so successful for having made a call, so many people were trying to make that same call over the last year and a half.

12:52And on some level, it's actually even more impressive that you've kind of been in the other way. Because I think the inclination for many investors was this is just a time bomb waiting to blow up. So what's the latest update from the front? There's no time bomb. I mean, on the credit side, credit quality is fine. Credit card delinquencies are starting to come down. Charge-offs are kind of sticky, but they're at low levels. In terms of the health of the consumer, the upper-end consumer is in great shape. The lower-end consumer is having trouble with inflation, and it's showing up in their spending.

13:26And the middle consumer is kind of treading water. It's kind of the way it's been for a very, very long time. So I just don't see the consumer's impact. I mean, it impacts, obviously, certain subsectors, but it is not an issue for the overall economy. There's that scene in When Harry Met Sally, you know, I'll have what she's having. I mean, I'd like to have what's I mean, look at him. He looks great. Happy Steve. I mean, it's fantastic. Congratulations on the transformation. Thank you. This is not a political show and we're not getting into politics. However, you have a very strong view about this election.

13:58I definitely do. What does it mean for the markets, if you're right? So my call is that with as much certainty as I could possibly have, I think Trump wins every single swing state and becomes president. and I don't think that has much implications for the market at all. Really? I mean, it'll have implications for certain subsectors. You know, there'll be some more tariffs that'll impact certain subsectors. I don't think it has much inflationary impact. Do you think it's already affecting the market right now? No, not at all. I don't think anybody's really focused. I mean, the way I think this is going to play out is in August, when the Democratic Convention convenes in Chicago, ironically, all the protesters from all the campuses are going to convene in Chicago and they'll burn the Israeli flag and they'll burn the American flag and they'll scream their heads off and the whole country's going to watch and the whole country's going to be aghast.

14:45And at that point, everybody will understand the election is over. So, you know, when you're thinking about policies of President Biden versus President Trump again, you don't think that China trade wars will be any worse under Trump versus Biden? I mean, they'll be a little bit worse, but they gave it this way. Trump created the solar tariffs and Biden reaffirmed them. So are they going to make the solar tariffs even bigger? I mean, maybe it may be that impacts a couple of solar companies on the margin. But does that have a big impact on the overall economy? I don't think so. So no, in terms of inflation, doesn't move the needle.

15:24My instincts would suggest that a Trump presidency would be inflationary, not good or bad, just inflationary. I mean, on the margin, maybe slightly, but you'd be reading tea leaves to see it. Why would it be inflationary? Well, I mean, the protectionist stuff that we've talked about for a while. My sense is there'll be tax cuts, which are my definition. So all those different things would theoretically be inflationary. But again, Steve says maybe on the margin. So we'll see. So one other thing you talked about last time you were here is the infrastructure trade that you were very bullish on. Yes.

15:58Has anything changed with that? Nothing's changed. It's the same. I mean, on a Trump presidency, you know, on the margins, some sectors might do better than others. Maybe some of the gas plays come back. But overall, the infrastructure. Should copper be over five bucks a pound? I don't do precious metals. I don't do commodities. There's a whole list of things I don't do. And that's one of them. He's got a land. All right. So if there's really no, I mean, basically, you're saying for the markets, It does not make a difference if President Biden or President Trump is in office, which seems really counterintuitive.

16:34Why? Because they're completely different candidates. Yeah, but think about just the big policies that they both have. I mean, is Trump going to get rid of the IRA or the IIJA? I mean, you may hear things, but you need 60 votes in the Senate to do it. So nobody's going to have 60 votes in the Senate. So it's going to stay the same. So this is actually a great scenario for the markets. Certainty. In either case. Certainly because it's a great case of the markets. I'm just making an election call. That's all. Yeah. No, but it's a fascinating call. How do you think things play out on campus? As you've been vocal when it comes to your alma mater, University of Pennsylvania.

17:11So on that, I'm extremely pessimistic. Okay. And the reason why I'm pessimistic is it goes far beyond just the protests. You know, I remember when I was at Penn, I had a professor who taught intellectual history. I took him twice. and he would teach a book a week, and he would teach it from the perspective of the author. I didn't know that this guy was a conservative until I knew him for two years. If you go through the Penn course catalog or the Harvard course catalog or the Cornell course catalog or the Columbia course catalog, and you read the descriptions of the courses in the humanities that they're teaching, I think there's only one conclusion you can reach, which is these kids aren't being taught.

17:52They're being indoctrinated. So ask yourself, what would it take to move these universities back to what they once were? Well, you've got to expel all the students that are protesting. Every single adjunct professor who's protesting needs to be fired. Every tenured professor who's protesting, you can't fire them, but you don't have to let them teach. And then you have to go through the course catalog and just change the courses to teaching as opposed to indoctrination. Now, do I think, what's the probability of that happening? It's not going to happen because the people who administer these schools believe in this stuff.

18:28They believe in this ideology. So why are they going to do any of this? They're not. And in a sense, they're really on the side of the protesters. They just don't like the publicity. You've taken your name off a scholarship. I did that already. Yeah. It's certainly not going back on. Right. We've got to leave it there. Steve, it's always great to see you and get your perspective on everything. Steve Eisman, Newburger Berman. I don't know if you want to talk trades or UPenn. You're certainly active there. Yeah, I guess I'd rather talk trades than Wharton. But I know I like the infrastructure trade.

19:03I just I get such a kick out of Happy Steve, you know, a novel, right? Well, now it's sort of been a year or two of happiness. Right. I'm Jewish, but now I'm just long. Contagious. Long only. The line was I was born Jewish, but I've converted to long only. Right. And it's made all the difference. It's a good line. All right. Coming up, mainland Monjaro, Eli Lilly's diabetes drug clearing a key hurdle in China. As the weight loss drug wars rage on, what the approval means for competition in that market next. Plus, we have Bitcoin ETFs, but could there be another cryptocurrency ready to follow suit?

19:38The coin everyone is watching, including the SEC. More on that one. Fast Money Returns.

19:46This is Fast Money with Melissa Lee, right here on CNBC.

19:58Welcome back to Fast Money. Eli Lilly soaring more than 2.5 % to close above$800 for the first time. The company's GLP-1 drug, Trisepetide, getting approval in China to treat type 2 diabetes, though its use for long-term weight management is still under review. The company also saw positive data in trials of its late-stage Crohn's disease treatment, finding that over half of patients with Crohn's achieve clinical remission at the one-year mark after taking Lilly's drug. So a lot of developments here. Obviously, for weight loss, we're still waiting for the approval for weight loss specifically, but it is regarded that that's just going to be the next step.

20:33And then, of course, the supply issues still hold. The market continues to reward them, probably justifiably so, but you really got to believe in the, basically in the revenue story, right? And we had a whole conversation. Who's a good looking cat from Cleveland, we always say. Remember? Sits there with his little jacket on and talks about? About Lily? Yeah. Oh, Jared, yes. Jared Holtz. Yes. Love him. And I asked him the question, and he said, you know, they probably have runway. You don't need to see that type of revenue growth until 2026. And that's what the market is getting ahead of. If they show signs of not being able to get there, you know, again, This is a company that$158 billion of revenue.

21:09It's approaching, what,$800 billion of market cap? I mean, it's expensive, folks. Just understand. So the two things today, the China news, though, I wonder what can that market support in terms of what can they pay for this drug? Right. I don't know. It has to be a fraction of what we expect to pay here. So I'm wondering, I mean, is all of this move then on Crohn's? Maybe it could be. And I mean, what Jared was making the point today in his note that nobody has China factored in at all at all estimates for future sales of the drug. So that's just potential upside, whatever it may be, even if it's a small fraction of the population that can pay for it.

Read the full transcript

21:55What is the right multiple to put on the holy grail? I don't know. I'm long some. But Novo has been in China for multiple years now, I believe. So it's theirs to lose. So if it's a zero sum game, I'm not sure. I think that if you if you're a bullish Lily, there's enough for two winners to be there. But if Novo has been there for the last couple of years now, Lily is just there. I think that could be the case where Lily could eat a little bit of Novo's lunch. But Lily's chart looks much better. I mean, the trailing at 120 means nothing because we know what's going on in terms of the EPS growth.

22:29But, you know, back to that competitive landscape, competitors are not closing in as fast here. We know that just structurally in terms of the timeline. As we're comparing this to NVIDIA, I think there's more competition there. All right. There's a lot more fast money to come. Here's what's coming up next. Ethereal Ether. The crypto soaring as traders bet a new ETF is on the horizon. What approval could mean for the whole digital coin space. We'll dig into the Ethereum delirium next. Plus, Lulu getting stretched and not in a good way. shares hitting the mat and trading at its lowest level in more than a year.

23:05Does the drop present a good buying opportunity or should you namaste out of this name? You're watching Fast Money live from the Nasdaq market side in Times Square. We're back right after this.

23:23The SEC is set to make a decision on a spot Ether ETF this week. Hope that approval is coming has helped send the crypto soaring up more than 20 % in the last two days. Those hopes triggered by reports the SEC has requested. Key document updates from potential issuers. Ether jumping another 10 % today, though other cryptos have stalled out a bit. The E is the E in Steve's wage. It's not a blicep. It's what's yours? Clam. Clam. Not a clam. Not a clam. I bet you'd love to stuff that in there. Excuse me? Why would you say something? Well, it's because it's working. It's working. Do we see a sell-off once there's approval, which is what we were worried about with Bitcoin, which we did not see with Bitcoin?

24:03Well, you know, when you look at Bitcoin, there's a supply demand. There's a finite amount of supply for Bitcoin. There's no finite amount of supply for Ethereum. But you're not going to get – I don't think you're going to get the same demand for the ETF that you did with Bitcoin. But I think you're going to get a considerable amount, and I think there's more room to climb from here. Obviously, the odds of the CTF being passed or approved were 25 percent. They went to 75 percent. I still think there's a little bit more left. To me, the issue now is does one plus one equal three? So and as someone that's long Coinbase, I just feel like this is the on ramp.

24:41Now, what's the next one? The fact that you have the SEC in mode where we're starting to approve cryptocurrencies. I realize these two were so far or so far ahead of everyone else. By the way, Ethereum and Bitcoin both up exactly the same amount after this move in Ethereum. And it kind of tells you what the market impact of this kind of an announcement is. I think the on-ramp, whether it's Coinbase or other places, it's still extremely important because all we've done is pretty much validate the size of this addressable market that's going a lot higher. I wonder, though, for the institutional investors who were sort of out of it until there was a product that was better than Grayscale.

25:16And so we saw the big rush in and then billions and then very nice run. And we're seeing it a little bit in Ethereum. I wonder if the next one is going to be somewhat more muted because the institutional investors are sort of they got what they want. Right. There's not as much. Yeah. Well, they're not as exposed to Ethereum as Bitcoin. There's no question. I mean, Bitcoin really is the digital. Right. Bitcoin is the. Yeah. The big one. But it's it's I think it's critical. I also think imagine now like second derivative of this is how about the blended ETF? I mean, you actually now have the ability to actually put a product out there.

25:47Crypto portfolio. But there's also use cases with Ethereum where there's no real use cases. The whole blockchain is basically built on a lot of Ethereum structure. So there's a lot more. While there's not a limited supply, there's a lot more use cases. Coming up, Lulu Loser. Death Leisure stock plunging nearly 40 % this year, but is now the time to take a shot at this downward dog? The great Lulu 11 debate is next. That's actually so bad. It's good. Unprecedented market cap value is on the line when NVIDIA reports earnings after the belt tomorrow. We'll take a look at how the options market is gearing up for a move that could be bigger than 92 % of the companies in the S &P 500 right after this.

26:29Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.

26:43Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks rising today with the S &P and Nasdaq both setting fresh record closes. The Dow also jumping 66 points. Some stocks hitting new 52-week highs in today's session. Altria, Moderna, Charles Schwab trading at those levels. Bank of America and Citigroup at their best level since 2022. And more after-hours action in Urban Outfitters. The retailer jumping after beating at the top and the bottom lines. Meantime, Lululemon losing its grip today. It's sliding to a more than 52-week low. The Athleisure brand has dropped more than 37 % year-to-date and shares down another 2.5 % after hours.

27:17This after the company said its chief product officer has resigned and will leave the company later this month. Our next guest says the company could crash as soon as next year. Let's bring in Jeffrey's Randy Connick. Randy, great to have you with us. That doesn't sound good when the chief product officer quits. What do you make of that news? Look, it's clear that the company is running into product problems, and it's clear that the company is running into competition issues. So this company, it's super simple. It has four issues. It has a category that's slowing. It has a competition that is rising.

27:56It has fashion shifts that are not going towards the company from a fashion perspective. We're moving from skinny bottoms to wide leg bottoms. And then finally, you have the law of large numbers. This is a$10 million revenue company. And with competition from Aloe and Biore, it's going to be hard for this company to keep growing. I mean, in terms of the fashion part of it, since the product officer resigned, I mean, okay, so wide leg bottoms. Can't you just make wide leg pants? I mean, why is this that difficult? They're not locked into leggings forever. They do have wider leg pants at this point.

28:30Has Lulu just sort of lost its appeal? Look, if you go back a decade ago, about 80 % of the company's sales came from its legging product. So when you think of the word leggings, you think of Lululemon. And when the bottom category is shifting to wide leg for the first time in a decade, this is a decade, it creates a massive headwind for the company if it's not known for that particular product category. So, you know, when everybody wants the Lululemon legging, when leggings are in style, they're able to gain market share against competition. But when the actual fashion trend moves away from that to a wide-legged product, the consumer doesn't necessarily have to go to Lulu, doesn't think of Lulu for that particular product.

29:11And they have the idea of potentially substituting for another brand, a potentially cheaper brand, to get that same look, if you will. Karen, thanks for being on. So you talk about a number of micro problems and macro problems, and you're way below the street in terms of earnings. What is the biggest problem there? Is it athleisure has sort of run its course and now it's going to be more difficult for them? Or do you think it's one of those others that alo is a worry? Is it what is that puts you so far below the street? Look, it's both. It's very simple. The street thinks that Lululemon is going to grow double digits into perpetuity.

29:49We think that Lululemon's U.S. business is going to turn negative next year for the first time ever. And why is that? Well, number one, the leisure category used to grow at a mid to high single digit rate before COVID, grew to a double digit rate post-COVID. Now, after COVID, you have that COVID hangover, if you will, and that's creating a slowing in the growth rate for the backdrop of the industry. In addition, you have companies like, as I said earlier, Aloe and Viore. You're seeing it all over the place in terms of big cities. They're gaining market share, particularly Aloe, in a big, fast manner.

30:23So that's creating an additional headwind. And I think what the street is missing is they're not projecting U.S. sales to go negative next year. We are. That's why we're massively below the street. And when you look at our numbers, we're projecting overall growth for the company of 4 percent next year. That incorporates U.S. turning negative, international still staying positive. But the street expects the U.S. business to stay positive and international growth to grow more than 40 percent. So the total growth rate for the company by the consensus is over 11 percent growth for 2025. We just think that doesn't happen.

30:58Your price target is 240. The downside target is 150, which is quite different. So I'm wondering, in that sort of scenario, what is that? Is it a macro, you know, the economy tanks or is it going to be Lulu specific still? It's an earnings. Earnings go down and multiples compressed. We've seen this in all types of companies. You know how it works. When the momentum leaves, so does the multiple. And earnings tend to go down with sales slowing, expenses deleverage, and margins compressed. So what we're saying is next year, the company earns$12 in earnings. The street's saying$16. Slap a 20 on 12.

31:33That's$240. The market cap on that is still$30 billion. So it's not like we're expecting this company to shrink to an Under Armour type of market cap of$3 billion. We're still thinking it's$30 billion. That's the base case. But if the consumer in the United States continues to slow or slows further, if they start to go to the competitors, then you're looking at massive multiple compression,$150 stock price on the downside. Again, that's still a$20 billion market cap and still something that we can expect to see is a real, I think, relatively conservative assumption for Lululemon going forward.

32:09All right. Randy, thanks for your time. Appreciate it. Randy Connick. Thanks, guys. Really appreciate it. All right. Let's go to you, Tim. You flagged Lulu in terms of being an underperformer. Look, I love the call by Randy. He's really dishing out the horns on this one. And as someone that was short Lulu for a long time into that terrible print and covered it ahead of that, I mean, I hate myself. The issues that he is drawing attention to are not the headwinds for the sector and the COVID pull forward because everybody's got that, the competitive nature. But I do think about an Under Armour. I think of the ubiquity that came with a brand that was so hot and became oversaturated.

32:46And it's true. I mean, he's basically saying there is zero moat here. And what's most impressive in terms of the argument is that right now they're at peak margins and the stock's doing what it's doing. Peak margins on gross is 60. He's saying the streets, excuse me, peers are at 45. In terms of where this could go, we haven't even really begun to see that pullback. So when I think about bell bottoms, I think about Levi. Levi is up over 30%, 33%. We're not talking bell bottoms. We're talking wide leg. Yeah, wide leg. Now, you're a fan of bell bottoms. Well, I know where you're trying to go. I'm just trying to go.

33:18But the music, right, Beyonce's got a top country hit. Music is more going towards country, sort of middle American. It's branching out. They wear a lot of jeans, and it's boot cut jeans. Okay. Right? So you have a wider leg. Levi is up over 30%. Lulu's down over 30 % year to date. And I'll throw in one more, Under Armour, which is down. That chart is so bad. It's good. So good. Sold to you. And the boot cuts. And your boot cuts. The blue light versus the bell bottom. The more you know, you're in fast money. Okay, you know something? Why do you look at why? Are you projecting again? I think there was a time.

33:58Are you projecting again? I think there was a time you told me you thought maybe you'd look good in bell bottoms. I think you have suede bell bottoms in your closet. But that's a different story. Coming up, literally all eyes may be on NVIDIA right now. The chipmaker is set to report earnings tomorrow. How the options markets are setting up for this potentially make or break event. We will discuss that next and throughout May. CNBC is celebrating Asian-American, Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander heritage. Here's a chief information security officer at Colgate Palmolive. My mother encouraged us to have a strong work ethic.

34:30And it was one of the key values of Asian culture. My mother was actually encouraged not to speak Cantonese to us in nursery school because it would hurt our English language development. It's amazing to see how far the world has come embracing Asian culture, especially Asian languages.

34:55Welcome back to Fast Money. The biggest earnings report of the quarter might be what is happening after the bell tomorrow. NVIDIA, the chipmaker, has nearly doubled already this year as AI demand skyrockets. And there's a lot on the line with this report. The options market is implying a move for roughly 8 % in either direction after results hit the wire. That translates to nearly$200 billion in market cap. That is bigger than 92 % of all S &P 500 companies. So why are S &P 500 options priced like nothing is happening this week? Let's ask Baycrest Managing Director David Boole. David, great to have you here on set.

35:28Thank you for having me. Why this disconnect here? It's interesting. NVIDIA really is the main event of the earnings season. It's the last big company to report. And like you said, options are anticipating an 8 % move, which is about in line with how options typically price this type of catalyst for NVIDIA. The difference this time around, though, is that it's a$2.3 trillion company. It's at all-time highs. So that's a$185,$200 billion creation or destruction in market cap that the market's expecting to happen tomorrow night. And it's fascinating that the S &P 500 is telling a completely different story.

36:05It's seeing almost minimal movement this week, whereas historically the S &P moves more after NVIDIA's earnings report than it does after several big catalysts such as nonfarm payrolls, FOMC, CPI. So there's definitely a disconnect going on here. How about let's drop that into the context of the Nasdaq? Because, again, you know, we talk all the time appropriately about the leadership of semis to the Nasdaq and to the overall market. I got it. But shouldn't the Nasdaq? What's the Nasdaq doing or is the Nasdaq just as, you know, kind of ambivalent or agnostic on this? It's pricing in a little bit more than the S &P.

36:42But right now, the overall market is very I wrote in a note it's asleep right now. It's pricing in some of the tightest trading ranges that we're going to see over the last couple of years tomorrow and then even through the rest of the week, even though this big catalyst is out there. So the Nasdaq as well. So there are about 80 ,000 or so call options at strike prices 900 and below, probably to 820. Does that create selling if those options are exercised? Will that put a cap on the stock potentially? That is the most notable existing option position right now are those in the money calls. And it's a similar setup that we've seen with other big tech stocks such as Meta, where if the stock has a subdued muted reaction, it likely won't come into play.

37:28If anything, those options will add a little bit of buying pressure. But if the stock starts to sell off negatively after the earnings print, as those option positions move lower, there could be some additional selling. Is that because those are effectively hedges for some people that sold upside calls and it gives them that buffer to the downside? Just looking at the tape, I believe those are long positions for clients and dealers are short those positions. So as they try to keep themselves hedged, as those options go from far in the money to out of the money, their hedge is to sell stock. So the main strike price is$8.80.

38:04So if the selling starts and we go below$8.80, the selling could speed up as we go through that strike. A similar thing happened in Meta, where$4.65 was that strike price in April, and we sliced right through it. So the selling could essentially speed up. I just want to keep an eye on. David, thanks for coming by. Good to see you. David Bull, Bay Crest. What are you expecting? How are you bracing yourself? Long and nervous, as I often am. I just think the story is still very much intact. The P.E. ratio has come down. The overall market cap, of course, is wildly higher. But I do believe in the underlying thesis.

38:41So, Stan Long. When you look at the stock, the stock was$200 lower in April. So, it does give a chance for people to say, I want to buy it on a discount. So when you look at the name, though, this is all pixie dust, right? And now they're the ones that are earning the most revenue, and it's theirs to, quote-unquote, lose. But at a certain point, you have to say to yourself, where do I want to lock in my profit? There's price targets at$1 ,300 or over$1 ,300. People will still tell you that it's probably still cheap at$1 ,300. Margins to me. I mean, I know it's going to be EPS and guide. It's going to be about margins.

39:18You know, I think it was last quarter, 77 percent. Karen probably has it in front of her. So if you start to see margins waning, contracting, that's what people I think that's what people will key off of. So we'll see how it plays out. I don't know. I think people will key off of demand. Right. And where because that regardless of how the margins come in, whether it's, you know, supply chain. Right. Right. They're sold out for the year. But speaking of demand, all we've heard from the biggest companies, hyperscalers in the world is that CapEx is going to be up. 35 percent. And then also that there's the organs of the world are spending on A.I.

39:53too. So it's not even just the hyperscalers. Right. Much bigger picture. All right. Coming up, a surprising new supporter of the ape retail revolution, how RFK Jr. is incorporating the movement into his presidential campaign, along with some birds of prey, oddly. That's next. More Fast Money in two.

40:21Welcome back to Fast Money. The ape movement revival just got a surprising new supporter, U.S. presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. The politician posting on, excuse me, X, formerly Twitter, that his administration would support the retail trading rebellion, going on to say that he personally invested$24 ,000 in GameStop, hoping to, quote, punish predatory short selling to the moon. The tweet accompanied by this bizarre new campaign poster showing Kennedy and an actual ape, each holding what appears to be a falcon. Apes together strong written across the bottom. I don't know what the falcons refer to, but it's interesting that he has recognized this group as maybe potentially.

41:04Very opportunistic. Right. This is a strong and very motivated and passionate group of people. and the whole idea that, you know, short sellers are naked short sellers, first of all, are someone anybody wants. I mean, there are rules to be followed. And, you know, so I commend you if you can pull that up. But I think it's even more impressive that he's latching on to this movement because it's going to be fun. Short sellers are a vital part. When done properly, they're an essential part of the market. And I think there's this attempt to demonize them for whatever reason, which I sort of understand, but they really shouldn't do it because you take them out, you take the speed bumps away.

41:43But, you know, it's sort of the man against the rebellion against Wall Street. That's couldn't be, that's patently false. I mean, Wall Street doesn't have it out for the rebellion of Reddit. I mean, they're trying to help. So I don't know. I understand what he's doing. Currying favor. It doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Do you understand the Falcons? No. I mean, the Atlanta Falcons. who really blew it in that Super Bowl. Are we still talking about that? Just thinking that. Mel brought it up. Well, she's been exercised for a long time. Up next, Final Trades.

42:21Final trade time, Tim. Yeah, I like that Lulu call, and it's a similar call that says, I think you're going to get Nike cheaper, too. Karen. When you said that, I thought, wait, I was doing Lulu. Okay, mine is weight. on Lulu. To buy it? Yes. Or to do... Well, yes, to buy it. Let's see the earnings. Just wait. Steve, we've got a theme here. Steve. So bad. It's good. Under Armour for a trade. I'm going to post a picture of Tim and the bell bottoms that he wore. Are they suede? Of course. I mean, I was rocking them. What can I tell you? It looked good. For sure. You know, letter C continues to climb.

42:54All right. Thanks for watching. See you back here tomorrow at 5. Mad Money with Jim Kramer starts right now. All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBCUniversal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.

43:35To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit CNBC.com forward slash Fast Money disclaimer.

From the publisher

Potential homebuyers are feeling the pain as housing affordability hits a staggering new milestone. The data keeping Americans out of the real estate market. Plus Could Lululemon’s business be getting strained? The stock’s biggest bear lays out why he sees this company going downward dog next year.

 

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 871 episodes
America’s Housing Affordability Crisis… Plus Lululemon Downward Dog 5/21/24CNBC's "Fast Money" · 44 min
Listen in VO