In short
Fast Money episode focuses on: (1) the day after NVIDIA’s reported $500B AI infrastructure/financing summit and whether it creates a new securitization “asset class” or just shifts risk; (2) earnings/stock moves in AI infrastructure (CoreWeave), consumer brands (On Holdings sneaker selloff), and restaurants (Cava); (3) tomorrow’s CPI and what it could mean for Fed rate hikes; (4) options positioning into Cisco’s earnings; (5) broader market/sector read-throughs.
Guests
Steve Eisman (Big Short investor; former Neuberger senior portfolio manager; host of The Real Eisman Playbook Podcast). Joe LaVornia (chief economist at SMBC Americas; former counselor to Scott Bessent). Panelists: Brian Sullivan (host), Karen Feynman, Dan Nathan, Julie Beal, Carter Worth.
Key claims
Eisman says the deal is not a new asset class—AI data-center revenue securitization—but flags an “Achilles heel”: ~70% of major hyperscalers’ AI revenue tied to Anthropic/OpenAI, risking a binary outcome if open-weight Chinese models trigger a price war. Julie Beal argues financing isn’t the bottleneck; data-center build constraints and AI workflow adoption are. Joe LaVornia says the Fed should have hiked already; CPI/core may cool slightly but PPI and core PCE stay sticky, implying hikes before year-end.
Notable examples
South Korea market shock tied to Samsung/SK Hynix; GM/GM Finance analogy; CoreWeave backlog $104B, debt $35B, active power 1.5 GW; On Holdings down 20% on weak sneaker demand/discounting; Cava same-store sales +9% and strength in lower-income and 25–34 demographic; Cisco options implying ~$100–$170 trading range and “sell volatility” around 135 strikes.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VONVIDIA's AI Summit Impact
0:32 to 0:52
Discussion on the implications of NVIDIA's recent AI infrastructure announcement.
“Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand.”
NVIDIA's AI Summit Impact
2:05 to 3:18
Discussion on the implications of NVIDIA's recent AI infrastructure announcement.
“24 hours ago, over$23 trillion in assets under management was sitting around this very table.”
Concerns Over Market Health
3:19 to 5:39
Exploration of potential risks and economic impacts tied to AI investments.
“So just take it anywhere you want, because nothing's happened yet.”
Securitization and Asset Classes
5:40 to 7:58
Debate around the creation of new asset classes from AI investments.
“OK, Karen Feinerman, two points on the financial side.”
Historical Comparisons and Concerns
7:59 to 9:14
Comparison of current market conditions to historical financial crises.
“So I think what you I mean, I'm confused.”
Steve Eisman's Perspective
9:15 to 14:01
Steve Eisman shares insights on AI securitization and market dynamics.
“But I think the most interesting thing is how well those stocks performed today.”
Securitization and AI Revenue Risks
14:01 to 17:47
Explore the potential risks and dynamics of AI revenue and securitization models.
“Let's say NVIDIA is the home builder, right?”
Evaluating the Financial Landscape of Banks
17:47 to 19:50
Discussion on the current state and valuation of banks in the financial market.
“So when you hear Andy Jassy talk about AWS and the spend and talk about, you know, not hard numbers, but some sense of return on capital, what they expect from it, does that, what could go right?”
NVIDIA's Dominance and Market Competition
19:50 to 21:47
Analyzing NVIDIA's role and the emerging competition in the AI hardware space.
“The BKX is up 30 and BAC is up almost 40.”
NVIDIA's Dominance and Market Competition
23:01 to 23:25
Analyzing NVIDIA's role and the emerging competition in the AI hardware space.
“CDW experts are delivering powerful productivity with Lenovo AI PCs, helping users block out distractions, access virtual support anytime, anywhere, and share content seamlessly between devices.”
Show all 19 chapters
NVIDIA's Dominance and Market Competition
23:29 to 28:00
Analyzing NVIDIA's role and the emerging competition in the AI hardware space.
“All right, we've got an earnings alert on CoreWeave, and that stock is popping.”
Impact of Market Trends on Sneaker Brands
28:54 to 30:48
Discussion on the challenges faced by sneaker brands and their market performance.
“Rough day for sneaker company on holdings, finishing the day down over 20 percent.”
Understanding Stock Valuation and Growth
30:48 to 32:36
Exploration of the relationship between stock prices and earnings over time.
“And we're not talking about some random company.”
Fed's Rate Hikes and Inflation Insights
32:36 to 38:33
An in-depth conversation with economist Joe LaVorna about the Fed's interest rates and inflation outlook.
“Long term, if you produce at the income level, your shares will reflect it.”
Cava's Growth and Market Position
38:33 to 39:45
Analysis of Cava's performance and growth opportunities amid industry challenges.
“I think that probably there would have been a little bit more room to maneuver if we had made a decision to raise rates.”
Cisco's Upcoming Earnings Report
39:45 to 42:43
Preview of Cisco's earnings report and market expectations leading up to it.
“Surging and extended trading up 11 % earnings and revenue.”
Options Traders' Insights on Cisco
42:43 to 44:36
Delve into the analysis of options traders and their predictions for Cisco.
“Cisco reporting after the bell tomorrow night.”
Discussion on Cisco's Performance and Margins
44:36 to 45:40
Analyze Cisco's market performance and the impact of memory prices on margins.
“And he just said it's gone sideways for the last three months since that gap on earnings.”
Final Trades and Market Opinions
45:40 to 46:36
Hear the final trades and market opinions from the panelists.
“I wouldn't be directional here before the print.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00At Edward Jones, we believe rich is more than caring about the latest and greatest. It's also taking care of what gives your life meaning. That's why your dedicated financial advisor meets you where you are, with personalized financial strategies that help protect what matters, so you can preserve your progress while creating a path forward. The key to being rich is knowing what counts. Let's find your rich together. Edward Jones, member SIPC.
0:32Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand. It starts with our approach. Every Mazda comes standard with proactive safety features. So you're more aware of what's around you, more focused on the road ahead, and ready before problems ever start. Mazda. More of what matters most to you. Go to mazdausa.com to learn more. Consumer Reports does not endorse or promote any product. Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square, this is Fast Money. Here's what's on tap. Call it the genius of Jensen. The day after NVIDIA announcing a massive deal to a number of the street's biggest firms, we were asking, what does it all mean?
1:17Steve Eisberg, a big short fame, and the traders ready to break it all down for you. Plus, losing its tread. Another sneaker maker getting hammered today. Shares of On Holdings down over 20%. its worst day ever? Is it time to just sideline and sell the entire sneakers sector? We'll debate later on. We're going to go inside Kava's results, do a little options action on Cisco and find out why is the Chartmaster ready to ditch value for growth? Huh. Good question, Carter. Hi, everybody. I am Brian Sullivan in for Melissa tonight coming to you live as always from Studio B right here at the NASDAQ and on your desk, the aforementioned Carter worth.
1:57We've got Karen Feynman. We've got Dan Nathan and we have Julie Beal as well. Big hour ahead. Thanks for being with us. Let's begin with the day after the day. 24 hours ago, over$23 trillion in assets under management was sitting around this very table. NVIDIA's Jensen Wong flanked by David Solomon of Goldman Sachs, John Gray of Blackstone, the leaders of KKR, Brookfield Apollo, and Larry Fink of Black Rock was there as well. The big announcement, a half a trillion dollars of investment in AI infrastructure and maybe the creation of an entirely new asset class. Well, the market today, at least NVIDIA, kind of yawned.
2:40NVIDIA closing a touch lower. But where was the action? It was in the stocks of most of the financial backers. They rose today in a fairly big way for most, Not all, but many of them. The announcement kind of thin on specifics regarding rates and how the lending facilities will all be constructed when this does, if this does kick off. So we want to know, based on what we know, what should you out there, all of you listening and watching, think about yesterday's big AI summit, which happened right here on CNBC, right around, by the way, this very desk here at the NASDAQ. And what does it all mean for the health, if anything, of the AI trade?
3:22Dan, Nathan, a lot of questions there. Sure. So just take it anywhere you want, because nothing's happened yet. But no doubt, this was a big announcement. Yeah. I mean, listen, these arguments are probably pretty consensus at the moment. I think a lot of the folks that were sitting around that table right here yesterday at 4 p.m., I think they all have a lot of good reasons. I mean, they have trillions of dollars of good reasons. They see an opportunity over the next 10 years, right, to monetize these investments. And, you know, to do so, you've got to lay the rails right now. That's the view here.
3:52And so you think about all these big hyperscalers, they use their cash flow first. Then they started using their balance sheets. Then they started raising debt. Then their debt levels got probably higher than we've ever seen for companies like that. They started selling equity. We've had IPOs. We're expected a couple other big IPOs. So at this point, you're just going to need consortiums like this to do these off balance sheet sort of vehicles. And, you know, we know this already. A lot of these hyperscalers have not wanted this debt on their balance sheet. So when I look at an announcement like this, I look at all these luminaries, I say to myself, there's a single point of failure, though.
4:25OK, so we've always said this about NVIDIA. This whole thing has to keep surrounding NVIDIA or they keep having to throw the cash out to the ecosystem, backstopping a whole heck of a lot of smaller companies so they can buy their chips, big companies so they can buy their chips, investing in the companies and giving the capital so they can buy their chips. And now it's turned its way into open AI. And we spent a lot of time over the last 18 months talking about how they've thrown around hundreds of billions of dollars in deals, essentially, to build compute for them. And when you think about all of the interconnectivity of this stuff, at some point it goes really bad.
5:01I think that's a consensus view. I think a lot of folks feel that way. The problem that I have right now is so much of the GDP growth here in this country, so much of the S &P 500 earnings and thus the results of the S &P 500 at all time high are really tied to this. And I could take it overseas a little bit. Think about the economy in South Korea. Think about the economy in Taiwan. If there is a pullback. What am I thinking? If there is a pullback, Sully, and we just saw, you know, the KOSPI in South Korea almost get cut in half because it's Samsung and SK Hynix. If you think the stock markets are leveraged to that, just think about how the economies are.
5:35And I think that's probably what we're in for in 2027. Just any little hiccup and you're going to see it go from the markets to these economies. OK, Karen Feinerman, two points on the financial side. Number one, a lot of big names around that table. One name that was not there was your best friend, Amy Diamond. Comment on that. But also, is this a way to pass the buck literally and maybe figuratively to Wall Street and thus ultimately to retail investors so they can avoid the criticism of, well, are these circular financing deals? So I don't know, pass the buck. I mean, I get what you're getting at.
6:09But to me, a lot of different things are going on with that announcement. The creation of a whole new securitization class of assets that could be securitized. And what that revenue stream. Oh, and they will be. And they will be what that revenue stream could mean for the Goldman Sachs of the world in particular. You know, just securitization fees and then trading. And then, I mean, you can see why they'd want to do that. It's not so crazy to me. And the analogy was made for, you know, if you look at GM, there's GM finance. And GM finance is the purchase of cars. And I don't know if you would find that a circular transaction.
6:43But that's the way it's been done for, I don't know, 30, 40 years now, maybe, give or take. And that functions. That works. Then there's NVIDIA creating what you call their very central piece of the puzzle. And others are trying to compete for that. But it is interesting that he was the only one there of the chip side, right? And so that's a very interesting place to be. I think it sort of extends the story a little bit longer. We'll see. We'll see how it actually plays out. But it was fascinating to have all of them come together like that. So follow up. A lot of the asset managers that were around the table, not Goldman.
7:20OK, they're up 44 percent a year, but you got KKR Apollo. They're different than Goldman. But you think about like a John Deere, right? You think about like farmers. OK, John Deere sells tractors to farmers, finances the farmers. The farmers may sort of sell the receivables on their corn to buy the John Deere tractor to harvest the corn. To me, this deal, I know it's a lot more complex and we say NVIDIA and compute and AI. But this deal, to your point, I think on GM, isn't that original? We're creating a new asset class just like they did 100 years ago with lean hog futures or oil trading. I don't think it's that.
7:58And this is the asset class, I think, that the market reflected today will be big. Right. So I think what you I mean, I'm confused. Are you saying this is sort of them pretending? I'm actually confused by my own comment. So it's fine. So then I understood you. Your point about GM, you know, GM started the financing back 100 years ago, right? And they did it so people could buy their cars, right? They were pretty expensive. And you know what happened 10 years after they started laying into consumers? The market crashed. And then we went into a depression. And I got to tell you, there was – Can you – are you connecting those dots?
8:29Yeah, I am. Okay. You read Andrew's book of the ARS, 1929, The Crash. If you read that book in the 10 years into the lead up of The Crash, all this stuff was going on. All of it. Go read it. It's like a thousand pages. Yes, although margin was very much central to the collapse. We're not talking about margin right now? I mean, look what just happened in South Korea. I'm talking about stocks owned on margin. That's what I'm talking about. We're seeing that right now. We have margin levels. We totally agree. No, I know. But, like, I'm telling you guys, you could take his book and you could change the names, and it's the same thing that's going on.
9:00I mean, like, that's it. I mean, so, and it's all there. Come on. You're a student of history. Get in there. It's always the same. We always change the names. Sitting there. That is a quarterback story. Julie Beal, you've got to jump in here. Hold on. Hold on. I just want to let her know that we didn't forget about her. Okay. But your point is that it's a cliche, it's not even worth bringing up, but history repeats. We know this. You can change the names. That's the nature of this. But I think the most interesting thing is how well those stocks performed today. KKR, the leading stocks within the S &P 500.
9:29Of the whole segment, by the way. Correct. And I went off some rant. Because it gets down to when the bell goes up at 930, what are you buying, what are you selling, right? We're called fast money and so forth and so on. But KKR and OWL and ARIES, if you look at all stocks in the S &P 500 financial sector, the top five or six were all of these players, which is very important. And it looked like they're headed higher. They're bearish to bullish reversals. Julie Beal, what's your what's your take on us? I mean, we got Steve Eisenman sitting down here. Is this a 1929 moment all over again where we're creating some asset class that's ultimately going to implode and cause the destruction of humanity?
10:02Or is this something that we need to reduce some of the risk and fear around NVIDIA and all these people with this idea of sort of vendor financed business? Right, because whenever we do financial engineering with complex structured products, it always turns out well, right? I don't I don't like I think that's always been the case. I sense sarcasm. No, I mean, look, I think that the struggle that we have is I don't really think that the bottlenecks in AI are so much about financing, right? I think that there's been plenty of opportunity for companies to raise capital and there's tons of appetite.
10:36It doesn't really feel like the bottleneck. To me, the much bigger bottleneck is, do we know exactly what the economics are for a lot of these businesses such that we want to continue to support them? And also, will we continue to have a lot of friction in terms of building new data centers, getting enough turbines? To me, the real impediments to further adoption of AI are the limits of all of us in terms of being willing to put it into our workflows and the physical constraints of building out the infrastructure. They're more meaningful to me than what's going on with the financing. Well, I think the interesting thing, Julie, and those are great points, a quick follow-up with you would be this.
11:15How did this all come about? I would love to go maybe behind the scenes. Maybe it's Andrew's follow-up or epilogue, Dan, where you could say, did Jensen call the banks? Or did the banks call him? Somebody got those people in a room a while ago. This all didn't just happen yesterday. They got them in a room and they said, we need this. And my question, I guess, I wonder is, what is the need that this new asset class and this new eventual product or products will meet? I think that that's actually really central to the idea that there is so much engineering happening right now by NVIDIA and Jensen in terms of what are the ways that we can juice and increase demand, broaden it, make it as big and substantial as possible.
11:59And I think some of the engineering around how do we make the chips more efficient might be better served so that it's actually we can prove better returns. But I do think that it makes all of us pretty uncomfortable to have such an intense full-court press in terms of how do I come up with new ways to increase financing. It doesn't really feel like it's to the benefit of markets broadly. Well, let's broaden that out. It's a good conversation. I like kind of a meaty discussion on an August 11th night. Let's bring in one of the big short investors, Steve Eisman. He is now the host of The Real Eisman Playbook Podcast, also former senior portfolio manager at Neuberger.
12:37Berman, you heard all this. You're kind of sitting there. I didn't hear that. Yeah, you're not patched in. I'm not patched in. Point is this. Let's go back to kind of maybe we're using the car analogy. Let's go back to houses. People used to buy houses with cash. They would save up. By the way, not that long ago they did that. Then, of course, you create the 30-year mortgage, which is great because now you can borrow money to buy a house. Prices go up. But then people, I don't know if you heard about these CDOs and CLOs squared. Do you know one thing about that? I heard about it. you heard about that a little bit.
13:08Anything about what we know, we don't know a lot, about what we know from last night and that news alarm you? No, nothing. First of all, it's not a new asset class. Everybody should just calm down. I agree with that. It's a securitization of an AI data center that produces revenue. I mean, people have been securitizing stuff that generates revenue for 50 years. So I don't think it's revolutionary. What I think it's important is that all these hyperscalers have been funding the AI data centers out of their own cash flow and raising debt and now in some cases raising equity. And given that this is$500 billion, it's possible that the free cash flow of the hyperscalers will start to improve.
13:58That's all this means to me. Let's say NVIDIA is the home builder, right? NVIDIA is here effectively as the home builder. And the home builder 50 years ago went to the banks and said, we need some instrument that enables people to borrow money so they can buy more homes, right? Because we don't want to take all the financial risk. So I don't know a lot about Wall Street, except I do know this. And everybody's jumping here. All these firms that we just talked about whose stocks, yes, Carter went up today. Most of them went up today. They're going to make a lot of money off this product, yes or no?
14:29Oh, definitely. Like the banks did with mortgages. They'll make fees. They'll make interest income. I mean, their revenue is not going to double, but, you know, it'll improve. So in that way, is it a new asset class? It's not a new asset class. It's a securitization of something that produces revenue, period. Yeah, I mean, the last time we— I mean, you can secure—people securitize songs. So if you can securitize songs, you can securitize an AI data center that, God willing, produces revenue. Right. Or a song. Or a song. So, Steve, isn't there an issue, though, with just the way in which we're seeing these products securitized, what they're going into?
15:10You talk about the ability for these data centers to make money and ultimately be a payoff. But when you think of the mismatch and duration to some degree, because in these SPVs, as you know, a lot of these companies like Meta, for instance, you know, they have four year leases of these things. They own no more than 20 percent of them. They can get out for a whole host of reasons. If there is overcapacity overbuilt and there will be at some point in the not so distant future. Isn't there going to be some issues with these products? And like what what could go wrong in your eyes? Like I get it.
15:41Lots of things get securitized. A lot of things go bad. I don't think this is where the problem is. The hyperscalers are making lots of revenue, but their free cash flow has deteriorated dramatically. But even that is not the issue. The issue is, to me, that something like 70 % of all AI revenue for Microsoft, Amazon, Google, Oracle, is from Anthropic and OpenAI. Period. Just those two. And then if you dig down even further, it's 70 percent of AI revenue. It's 25 to 35 percent of their cloud revenue. So. The futures of these massive companies, in a sense, are a bet. That open AI Anthropica is going to succeed.
16:33Private companies whose financials until they go public are hidden to almost everybody. wealth and hidden. B, we know that they lose billions like it's water. So to me, the Achilles heel of this whole story, if there's going to be an Achilles heel, is if something bad happens to anthropic and open AI. And I think the argument about what that could be is the Chinese open-end model, open-weight models are much cheaper. And if they start really taking a lot of market share, and it sounds like from what I'm hearing that they're starting to, you could have a big price war. And then we have a problem.
17:19That, I think, is the Achilles heel of the story. That's something I'm monitoring. But the issue is, you know, as everybody knows who short stocks, Carter, timing is everything. You know, that story could happen. But it could be a year from now. And until then, you know. And it may not. And it may not happen at all. But even if it does happen, it could happen a year from now. And between now and that year, the hyperscalers are going to still be spending money like crazy on NVIDIA chips. So when you hear Andy Jassy talk about AWS and the spend and talk about, you know, not hard numbers, but some sense of return on capital, what they expect from it, does that, what could go right?
18:01I understand what you're saying. What could go wrong? You know, having a very cheap influx of Chinese models that just does something like it did to our steel or to our solar panels, let's say. What could go right that would? What could go right as Anthropoc and OpenAI somehow do well? Or others knew. Or other people show up and take up the slack. And then it'll be OK. So I'm not willing to make a call yet on this because I think it's so binary. and it may be even with it being binary, it's so early. You know, when I showed it subprime paper, the nice thing about it, the nice thing, so to speak, was I had a thesis that mortgage underwriting had deteriorated.
18:47But that was just my thesis. What gave me the confidence to actually do something was that I subscribed to Moody's securitization database. And Moody's securitization database provided you every credit statistic imaginable on every securitization every month. So you could check. And as long as there was still massive deterioration every single month, you'd pat yourself on the back and you'd say, I'm still right. There's no if, anthropic. But that's where this is good. Hold on. I know we've got to go. It's not where this is good because if it creates that liquid market, won't we get those kind of databases that you're talking about?
19:25Add some transparency to a market that is, for the most part, largely untransparent. Well, it would be nice when Antropic goes public. Thank you. Opaque. It would be nice for Antropic to go public so we can see real numbers and then see every quarter how they're doing. And, you know, until then, it's just anecdotal. Before you go, because it's your wheelhouse, of course, where are you on the banks in the sense that equity has made a low on March 30? Right. The S &P is up 20%. The BKX is up 30 and BAC is up almost 40. Do you think some of these are quite extended here or do you think there's room to run?
19:59I think on a valuation basis, they're all expensive relative to history. But if the cycle continues a lot longer, they'll probably march higher. But I wouldn't be buying them here because of how expensive they are. Hey, Steve, going back to this NVIDIA deal, right? So it's only NVIDIA. To your point, you just made it. It's interesting right now. We have Google with TPUs. We have Amazon with Tranium. We have AMD with Radian. I mean, everything's got it. And, you know, I think it's interesting, though, that finally the competition is here for NVIDIA. And now all of a sudden you get all those folks around the table.
20:28These are the brightest people that we have in finance the world over. And these guys, NVIDIA, are going to be providing the last 25 percent backstop. It almost seems like they're the last ditch, sort of. It's like the Alamo, like for these guys. And they've got to be there. And so to me, it seems like, again, a single point of failure, because if you do see a pullback, you see less demand. And NVIDIA has to start backstopping this stuff. If you do see, let's say it's the Chinese models, it's also Chinese memory. It's also, you know, like a whole host of things coming from China. There could be some real problems real quickly because then NVIDIA starts reaching into their cash flow, which they generate about 50 billion a quarter.
21:09You sound really negative. You know what? Because everybody is so positive about it. And to me, it just seems silly. I'm not so positive. My point is that I know what I'm looking for, and it's not here yet. And if it shows up, I'll be happy to say, here we are. But until then, it's supposition. And it's real money right now. And if it does ever go bad, Dan, we're going to coin it G-P-U. I know. We won't. See, I can't try it here. Steve Eisen, thank you very much. Thank you. You're the only one I like. All right, coming up, sneaker investors need to do a little bit of soul searching. We're going to give you the results that routed on holdings for its worst day ever.
21:57Some of the other names that are getting kind of caught up as well. Fast Money back at 2.
22:06With the Discovered Cashback Card, it's payback time when you earn cash back on everyday purchases. Activate and earn 5 % cash back at different categories each quarter on up to$1 ,500 in purchases. That's 5 % cash back at different places each quarter, like grocery stores, on gas, and at restaurants. It pays to discover. Terms apply. See discover.com slash 5 for details. As a small business owner, sometimes it feels like no matter how much planning you do, there's always surprises. Like an urgent, expensive repair. But here's a surprise you'll like. With Progressive, small business owners save 10 % or more on their commercial auto insurance when they pay in full.
22:48So enjoy a surprise for once. Get a quote in as little as 8 minutes at ProgressiveCommercial.com. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Discounts not available in all states or situations. When you partner with CDW, you get more from your devices with solutions that take modern work to the next level. CDW experts are delivering powerful productivity with Lenovo AI PCs, helping users block out distractions, access virtual support anytime, anywhere, and share content seamlessly between devices. Make amazing happen. Learn more at CDW.com slash Lenovo. All right, we've got an earnings alert on CoreWeave, and that stock is popping.
23:35The stock is up 13.5 % right now. Revenue doubled in the quarter. Christina Parsonneboulos, to quote the great Karen Feidemann earlier, what went right? Revenue. Backlog. Lots of things. Record revenue. And after selling off the day after earnings for five quarters running, the stock may be finally getting rewarded or may be getting rewarded up double digits after ours. Let's see if it holds till tomorrow. But CoreWeave buys AI chips for data centers, rents out that compute to companies like IBM. It also sells the software and developer tool, so it's not just a landlord for AI. The company is saying they see margins expanding into year-end.
24:11The catch, though, is debt. A heavy interest bill still pushed Corrie to a net loss of$626 million, though that came in narrower than Wall Street feared. Backlog grew to$104 billion, with more than$25 billion in new commitments added early in Q3 this current quarter, though the pace of growth is slowing. On the call, the CEO stating pricing and margins for their Blackwell and Vera Rubenskews are setting new highs, while pricing for prior generation chips is or at above where it was years ago. So that's also a bullish term. And they said that their near-term capacity remains effectively sold out.
Read the full transcript
24:49They also pointed to financial services as a major area of growth. And then two other points, active power, which is the capacity actually switched on and billing customers. It reached 1.5 gigawatts more than triple a year ago, but that's still less than half of what CoreWeave has under contract. Closing that gap is the best bet as more power comes online. Revenue and margins are supposed to follow. And then also watch the NVIDIA connection. NVIDIA owns roughly 12 % of CoreWeave and just unveiled this$500 billion financing pool you guys talked about at the start of the show, which helps at least its chips as the middleman between NVIDIA and the big AI labs.
25:25CoreWeave could stand to benefit. We haven't heard that yet on the call. Corwee's CEO will be on Squawk on the street tomorrow morning at 9 a.m. Eastern. Christina Parts and Evels, thank you very much. Julie Beal, your take on Corwee. Big move. Huge move. Huge move. Probably a little bit of a relief rally. I think people are very encouraged to see the backlog and the strength of the underlying business. I mean, it's still a question mark, though, when you have this much debt. It really, everything kind of has to go well. So far it is. But I do think that the question mark around the debt is valid.
25:58because I think we still don't have the greatest sense of the underlying economics. I do take a lot of comfort in the fact that they are able to rent lower value chips at higher and higher levels. That does indicate that this level of demand is sustainable, even with older chips. You know, Dan, we do a pre-call on this show, and there was a pretty smart comment from Karen Feinerman about the options activity in CoreWeave. Always a smart comment. That's right. that could send this stock popping. And it is. Your take. I mean, listen, Kpart really surrounded the trade. I mean, this is a company that's going to continue to have to raise debt.
26:35When they've raised equity, you know, NVIDIA, this goes back to the prior conversation, has been really important backstopping this company. They had to backstop the IPO. And I just think it's important to remember that their debt service is probably, you know, I don't know, a billion dollars a year. They have$35 billion in debt, and they're going to have to raise more. So you better see a continued improvement of those economics. But if it doesn't happen, that customer concentration, again, going back to that prior conversation with Steve, I mean, these are all the headwinds. Right. And so if things do slow down, the neoclouds are probably going to be most adversely affected before the major hyperscalers.
27:12All right. Coming up, we're going to read the CPIT leaves. what tomorrow's inflation number might mean or might not mean for the Fed and the impact on your money. Watching Fast Money Live at the NASDAQ Market Site. We're back right after this.
27:33With the Discovered Cashback Card, it's payback time when you earn cash back on everyday purchases. Activate and earn 5 % cash back at different categories each quarter on up to$1 ,500 in purchases. That's 5 % cash back at different places each quarter, like grocery stores, on gas, and at restaurants. It pays to discover. Terms apply. See discovery.com slash five for details. Support for this podcast comes from Progressive, America's number one boat insurer. We've all made mistakes on the water, but there's one mistake you shouldn't make, being uninsured. With Progressive Boat Insurance, you can choose coverage for most mistakes you or other boaters could make, helping you float carefree all season long.
28:17Quote today, Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates, number one rating based on 2024 filings with state departments of insurance. Something amazing is happening when power outages strike. Teams are powering through them. That's because CDW Solutions Architects are building more resilient IT and electrical infrastructures with Schneider Electric. With EcoCare remote monitoring services and 24-7 support, your organization can do more than keep the lights on. Schneider Electric and CDW make amazing happen. Learn more at cdw.com slash schneider electric.
28:57Rough day for sneaker company on holdings, finishing the day down over 20 percent. It's the worst day ever. Followed mixed results, but weak guidance. A rough day for the rest of sector to Nike, Under Armour, Adidas, Karen, all closing lower. Yeah, well, if they wanted to be the next Nike, unfortunately, at the moment, that seems to be happening. I mean, they it was really, you know, they didn't want to break price. They didn't want to have their brand seen as, you know, a lesser brand because they were willing to put it on sale. So that that hurt. That hurt margins. There were some other things that weren't terrible, but, you know, they've gone this, they're more direct to customer, which is what Nike chose to do, which was part of Nike's downfall, actually.
29:44So I don't know. It was, it's not for me. I do have some Dick's Sporting Goods. That wasn't delightful today, but I'm out of Nike, not an on-on disappointment for sure. Yeah, you wonder, Julie, is this, I mean, I want to be the next Nike. I'm not sure that's a compliment anymore. Yeah, I think that's like a good comment. I think the real struggle is, is we're learning today what the price of trying to maintain a premium brand is. And I think what disappointed a lot of investors is this idea that the hope was you can have a very large, very premium brand like an Apple of sneakers. And I think that if you're dependent on the U.S.
30:24market where discounting is really important to wholesale, you kind of can't do that. So I think that we're really recognizing this just can't be as big a brand as people had hoped. And that's reflected in the market cap today. You know, Carter, you're going to look at the charts. Nike was$165-ish stock about five years ago. $179. $179 at the high. it's 41 and change. Think about that. 77 % down. And we're not talking about some random company. I mean, this is Nike. Well, that's just it. It speaks to there's no such thing as growth stock. There's only a stock in a growth phase. Let's talk about Disney.
31:04Now, if you can keep producing, then your chart goes up and up and up like Costco or Walmart. But if you falter and you don't have growth, this is what happens. So a couple of things. It's waiting in the S &P. Its market cap was up at$280,$90 billion. It's maybe 40 now. Its weighting was probably 65 basis points. It's nine basis points. But it is a testament to a couple things. Nothing lasts forever. And two, just don't buy stocks in downtrends. It's been in a downtrend, and it's getting worse. Same with Disney. Same with this O-an, O-an, or whatever it is. I mean, and there are others. Adidas is poor.
31:37Wolverine is poor. Steve Madden, Crocs. It's a struggling space. Shoes. It's like nobody's wearing shoes anymore, which I know for a fact they are just not sure which ones. But on the charts, because you know there's people watching and listening right now, Carter, they're like, well, Nike's at$40. It's a buy because it was$180. That's how people think sometimes. It's the wrong way to think. Yeah, I'm not sure there's a premise in that other than, you know, today might be. It seems cheap. It was$180. Now it's$40. But obviously it wasn't cheap because we could have said cheap at any, meaning cheap is, you know, valuation is a terrible timing tool, right?
32:09There is a 100 % correlation long term. Peter Lynch tells us this. and we know this, between earnings per share and price per share. Five years, ten years, but this week, this month, there's no relationship at all. Semis can go up and they can drop 50%. There is no relationship between valuation and share price on any intermediate basis. Just don't do it. But there is 100 % correlation between earnings per share and price. What's long term mean? Well, ten years, 15 years, meaning... The great Peter Lynch. Right. Long term, if you produce at the income level, your shares will reflect it. But this week, this month, a bank can go up, a bank can go down.
32:47We know, just don't do it. Value it, because the word cheap is a dirty word. It's affordable. Are you saying just don't do it because it's Nike? No, no. As a matter of technique. I couldn't care less about Nike. It's just technique and methodology. Just don't do it. Just don't do it. Don't do it. By the way, great song by Dan, the band. Coming up. A fresh read. He's like, yeah. When's the show over? A fresh read on inflation. Whether tomorrow's CPI print could change the outlook for rates and why your next guest, Joe LaVornia, says the Fed, it should have hiked already. What's next?
33:31All right, welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks overall down for a second straight session. But not down a lot. 180 points. S &B down by one-third of a percent. The Nasdaq down about a half a percent. Not big moves coming off of record highs last week. All right, one stock I'm sure you're interested in, SpaceX. Pulling back about 4%, but that after three straight days of gains. Elon Musk, Rocket and Connectivity Company, now back below its$135 IPO price. In the meantime, Karen, J.P. Morgan closing at record highs again. JPM up more than 15 % in the past two months. And Supermicro jumping after reporting second quarter numbers the last hour.
34:13A company missing on revenue, but an earnings beat and strong guidance helping to boost shares. All right. Markets also bracing for a fairly big economic report tomorrow morning. The Consumer Price Index crossing the tape at 8.30 a.m. Eastern time. Be sure to tune in. Somebody you know and love will be hosting Squawk Box. And your next guest thinks the Fed is going to need to hike rates because inflation is not going to come down on its own. That person, Joe LaVorna, he joins us now. He is a chief economist at SMBC Americas and a former counselor to Secretary Scott Bessent. Joe, good to see you again.
34:50Do you think the Fed should have already raised interest rates? I do, Brian, because had the Fed hiked and couched it in terms of removing the insurance that it put in place last year when the labor market looked really soft and there was concern about the economy. Had the Fed done that, then they could take September, maybe October, even November off, get the bull rolling, and market rates probably would have rallied. Instead, the Fed didn't hike. Kevin Morsh had to verbally got himself a little bit twisted up in sort of the press conference, I think, and wouldn't have had to have done that. Markets sold off after the Fed meeting, but I think we'd have had lower long-term rates had the Fed actually hiked.
35:29Is there a scenario, Joe, that 10-year yield at 4, 6, 4, 7, whatever, that the Federal Reserve hikes rates, but bond yields, longer yields, 10, whatever, 30, go down, not up, even with a rate hike? Yeah, in this case, yes. In this case, I do think that had the Fed hiked, it would have just reinforced the Fed's intention to use the funds rate as the primary tool for monetary policy. And again, it was being couched in terms of insurance. Last year was used toward against unwanted weakness in the labor market with the economy booming. It looks like growth might be upwards of 6 percent in the third quarter.
36:07Margins are high. The general employment trends are good, notwithstanding the last report. Or markets would have rallied as the Fed would have said, look, maybe we don't have to do as much longer term. What you don't want to have happen, Brian, is wait and become evident that inflation becomes ingrained in the system. And by the way, we've got CPI tomorrow, which if consensus correct, the year over year rate on core will dip a bit more. It'll go from 2.6 to 2.5. But your PPI the next day is probably going to remain over 4 percent. And the core PC deflator, which is the Fed's preferred metric, is still running well over 3 percent.
36:40So having hiked already would have just, I think, made it easier to go at some later point and give themselves maximum optionality. Having said that, I do expect it to hike before the year is out. Joe, it's Karen. Thanks for being on. So go back to your last point. If we do see some hot or hot-ish data, all right, he didn't hike last time. Do you think he has any hesitation about hiking this time as we get closer to the midterms? Or does he factor that in at all? Well, if we get a 0.18 tomorrow on the core and that rate dips down to 2.5 or even surprises to the downside again, the market will completely take out or largely take out a September hike and they won't go.
37:22The Fed, I think, will still follow the markets. As you move to November, it will have to be super compelling for the Fed to have to raise rates that close to the midterms, which, again, would be another reason why if they'd gone in July when the market sort of priced it and the Fed wants to add some risk premium to the back end, you go and people aren't expecting it. It'll be very tough right before the election, Karen. So I think if they don't go in September, they're probably not going to be able to go until December. Again, assuming the data warrants. Well, Joe, I mean, we got some mysterious rate cuts two years ago in September.
37:57It's always easier, though, Brian, to cut rates than it is to raise rates. And when the Fed cut, it's surprised. It cut more than expected, which when it does surprise, It tends to surprise us. Rate cuts, those tend to be thought of as being good, more salubrious, or whatever word I'm trying to say. It didn't come out the right way. But, yeah, rate hikes are much harder. And politically, of course, they don't play that well. Salubrious sounds good to me. Dan would approve. He corrected me on opaque earlier on in the show. Joe, thank you for being not obtuse. Joe LaVolaine, thank you very much.
38:31Thanks, guys. Julie Beal, I see you're smiling. Me? Never, no. I mean, look, I agree. I think that probably there would have been a little bit more room to maneuver if we had made a decision to raise rates. I think it would have been pretty difficult to do and pretty difficult to justify with the rest of the board. We're talking about would he raise rates? Would he do this? And it's like there's still a board that has to be convinced. And, you know, we're getting board members more comfortable with dissenting. And, you know, I think that what's difficult is that they really would like to be talking less and giving less forward guidance.
39:11And the market is really addicted to that. We really like having our hand held and tell exactly what answers are going to be on the test. And I think it's that that's actually creating the most amount of friction in the markets right now on the debt side. All right. Good stuff. Good conversation there, everybody. And that number out tomorrow morning, 830 a.m. coming up. We're going to go for the Fed to food. Cava serving up results. We're dialed into the Restaurant Chains Conference call, bringing the very latest on Cava. But stocks up right now, by the way, 11.5%. We'll find out why next.
39:52All right, welcome back. We've got an earnings alert on Cava. Shares of the fast casual chain. Don't call fast food. Surging and extended trading up 11 % earnings and revenue. Better than expected, but I'm stealing Brandon Gomez's thunder. Brandon, tell us what happened with Cava. I mean, if you've been to Cava, it's pretty fast when you're waiting in mine. Get you in and out of there. Top takeaway, though, really here, Brian. Same store sales up 9 % ahead of estimates. The second straight quarter of over 9 % growth. Now in the current quarter, the company wasn't immune to Cyclospor's industry-wide impact.
40:21Before today, shares were down about 20 % since July 1st. CEO Brett Schulman on the call saying that exiting Q2, the company saw sales impact, but that started to rebound. Now to that point, the company maintained its annual guidance, Kava CFO. And this is where the stock really turned, saying they're remaining thoughtful in guide. But nothing in today's trends indicate the lower end of that guidance range. Now, she told me earlier today they're actually seeing significant strength in the lower median household income markets. And they're performing better than all other areas of the channel, improving trends with the 25 to 34 year old demographic as well.
40:54Brian, the street clearly giving back some of the recent losses around the cyclospora outbreak. Cyclospora. All right, Brandon Gomez, really appreciate that. Thank you very much. Carter Worth was$145 stock. Not quite two years ago. Exactly. And then here it is wallowing around at 60 and it's got a pop on it because it's a little better than... Don't do it. Don't do it. This goes back to your previous lesson. There are great winners and it's right to typically favor them. Of all the things that have been tested, the biggest quant models in the world, momentum and relative strength, they work. This is not what that is.
41:28Even with that pop, Karen, are you going to buy? Are you going to sell everything and buy Kava? No, it's impressive. I mean, it's impressive. Those same store sales look at totally different data than he does, but I've come to the same conclusion. Not quite for me, but they've done a great job. Julie Beal, what about you? Are you on board the Cava train? No, I think it's a pass for me. I think even with the price action that they've had since the cyclospora outbreak, it's still pretty expensive. And I do think for me as an investor, lunch is my least favorite part to invest in. it's the most competitive and you have to be in business districts.
42:04So you spend a lot on rent. If they can get more dinner, maybe I'm a little more interested. I like that. That's a hard pass. The chart on lunch. Just don't do it, Carter. By the way, I had kava for lunch yesterday. As a matter of fact, I've never been in one. My shirt loved it. I tried to eat it in the car and I bit it and that was it. There you go. My shirt had a great lunch. Coming up, Cisco on the clock. What to expect When the networking giant reports their numbers tomorrow, we will look at the options action heading into the print. Stick around.
42:43All right, welcome back. Cisco reporting after the bell tomorrow night. The networking stock has had a big year. It's up 60 percent. Last quarter, Cisco's results launching shares into the stratosphere. And options traders, they're betting on more of the same tomorrow. Let's find out why. Oliver Rennix at CBO in Chicago with the options action on Cisco. Oliver. Hey, Brian. Despite Cisco going nowhere since its last report, the stock is on a good trajectory over the past year. As you mentioned, its earnings reactions have gotten bigger and more bullish each time, including that 13 % rally after last quarter.
43:18Right now, options traders are looking for a smaller 8 % move without a ton of clear directional bias, though there was a lot of call selling today in addition to put buying, which would argue bearish. But the volumes were not huge today. Perhaps the most interesting data actually can be found in the single biggest trade of the day. Someone sold volatility in both directions. About 1 ,200 of the 135 strike puts and 135 strike calls expiring mid-June. They collected$4.5 million on a bet Cisco will spend the next 10 months between about$100 and$170, with an ideal outcome for the trader at about$135, Brian.
44:00Really interesting. Oliver Renick at the Seaboat, thank you very much. So a lot of options action around Cisco. What's your hot take on the stock either way? Yeah, that guy's good. He's also taller than he looks on TV. Really? Is he taller than you? No, not quite. Really good. So this is a company that is feeling the pinch from memory. They actually spoke to it in February when they reported the stock went down 13 percent. They guided gross margins about 66 percent and the stock got killed. Then it rallied this last quarter they reported in early May. They actually came in in line with that 66 percent gross margin, had a huge ramp because they're growing revenue in AI off a small base.
44:35When they report tomorrow, I am hard pressed to say or see that they have anything to say about memory prices other than negatively, you know, affecting their margins. So this is a tough one. And he just said it's gone sideways for the last three months since that gap on earnings. I'd just be hard pressed to buy this thing into the print. OK, Karen, what could go right? What could go right? Demand is gigantic and they get some operating leverage. Better margin. Is that what you expect? No, I just was where it could go. Right. OK, I don't know. Yes, I don't know. I haven't. You know, my bet's sort of an NVIDIA and the hyperscalers.
45:13Carter? A pair of twos. Meaning this range-bound action, I think, is the tell. After a big re-rating, post-earnings last quarter, you can play for another big rating, up or down, or don't do it. I would just not. Don't do it. Because I know people who have gone all in on a pair of twos. Some of them have turned out well, some have not. That's not good technique. Well, it's called bluffing, but yes. Just don't do it. You're not a buyer of Cisco. I wouldn't be directional here before the print. By the way, Dan, you want to hear something random and interesting? Yeah. Oliver Rennick's high school and my high school in Virginia played each other in football.
45:49Nice. You didn't play football. I did for one year. You're like a hacky sack guy. I wasn't good. Next up, but I'm good at this, your final trades.
46:08Julie, kick off final trades.
46:14Julie Carter. By Bristol-Myers Squibb. Karen. Yes, hello to longtime fan Antonio Rivera, and I'm going to sell some Dell calls. Antonio. Hold up, Antonio. I'd be a seller of rallies. All right, Julie.
46:32Frozen, there you go. That's the final trade. Thanks for watching. Mad with Jim starts right now.
46:41All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC or its parent company or affiliates and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.
47:07To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer. When you partner with CDW, you get more from technology with AI-powered tools that turn complexity into clarity. CDW experts are simplifying workflows with Microsoft solutions, uniting teams with on-the-go connectivity, speeding workflows with exceptional performance, and protecting assets with chip-to-cloud security. Make amazing happen. Learn more at cdw.com slash modernwork.
From the publisher
Investor Steve Eisman of “Big Short” fame delivers an AI bubble warning, coming on the heels of Nvidia’s $500 billion financing deal with top firms on Wall Street. The traders make sense of the mega-deals playing out in tech now. Then, economist Joe Lavorgna lays out his expectations for tomorrow’s CPI report—and why the former counselor to Treasury Secretary Bessent thinks the Fed should hike interest rates now. Plus, all the headlines from CoreWeave earnings, On Holding’s worst day on record and the Options Action ahead of Cisco results.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
