In short
Podcast Episode Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money" – Cracks In Homebuilder Foundation Grow… And De-Dollarization Drama (10/9/25)
Episode Overview Host: Melissa Lee Guests: Tim Seymour, Dan Nathan, Guy Adami, Mike Wilson (CIO and Chief U.S. Equity Strategist at Morgan Stanley) Main Topics:
- Decline in the homebuilder sector
- Concerns around de-dollarization and its implications for global markets
- Earnings reports from Delta, healthcare deals, and the athletic brand Lululemon
---
Key Discussions
- Homebuilder Sector Decline
- Current State:
- The XHB Home Builder ETF dropped 2%, marking its lowest level in over two months.
- Major homebuilder stocks have declined 10% or more in the past week.
- Despite lower mortgage rates, they remain above 6%, affecting affordability.
- Expert Opinions:
- Guy Adami suggested a “washout” in the housing sector, highlighting increased inventory and pressure on pricing.
- Concerns about employment and supply side dynamics were emphasized as contributing factors to the decline.
- Mike Wilson noted that builders are facing margin destruction due to rising costs rather than benefiting from lower rates.
- Market Dynamics:
- Builders are resorting to buying down mortgage rates to attract buyers, which could be unsustainable long-term.
- Stephen Kim from Evercore ISI downgraded several homebuilder stocks and emphasized a structural profitability problem in the industry.
- De-Dollarization Concerns
- Market Impact:
- A decade-low in Fed custody holdings has raised alarms about de-dollarization among global central banks.
- Central banks are diversifying away from U.S. Treasuries, leading to concerns about the dollar's dominance.
- Expert Analysis:
- Kathy Lean from BK Asset Management explained that geopolitical risks and U.S. policy shifts are prompting central banks to rethink their asset portfolios.
- The value of gold reserves has recently surpassed that of Treasuries, indicating a shift in asset preference among central banks.
- Earnings Highlights
- Delta Airlines:
- Delta shares surged post-earnings report, attributing this to rising airfares and strong demand from luxury travelers.
- Analysts are bullish on Delta's operational efficiency and its ability to sustain growth.
- Healthcare Sector:
- Novo Nordisk's acquisition of Akara Therapeutics showcases continued M&A activity in the healthcare space.
- Mike Wilson expressed renewed optimism about the healthcare sector, indicating that stocks are undervalued.
- Lululemon:
- Facing challenges in maintaining its market position among teens, Lululemon's ranking dropped according to Piper Sandler's survey.
- Founder Chip Wilson criticized the brand, suggesting it is "losing its soul."
- Final Insights
- The episode underscored a bearish sentiment towards the homebuilding sector with potential structural issues that may not be resolved by lower interest rates.
- De-dollarization is a growing concern for investors, signaling a potential shift in global financial dynamics.
- Stocks in the healthcare and airline sectors may present opportunities, as analysts are seeing signs of resilience and growth.
---
Conclusion This episode of "Fast Money" provided critical insights into the current challenges facing the homebuilding sector and the implications of de-dollarization for global markets. It highlighted the need for investors to stay vigilant regarding macroeconomic trends and sector-specific performance as they navigate an evolving financial landscape.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is fast money Here's what's on tap tonight. A builder bummer. The housing sector has been coming under steep pressure for the past month and is facing its worst week of the year. Is there anything that can turn this group around now? We'll debate that. And the de-dollarization drama. Global central banks reducing their holdings of greenback-denominated debt. What signal does that send and what could it mean for the markets? Plus, Delta shares take off after earnings, another round of deal-making in the health care space, and Lululemon loses ground among a cohort in the latest Piper Sandler survey.
0:37Can anything save the struggling athleisure brand? I'm Melissa Lee. Come to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Dan Nathan, Guy Adami, and Mike Wilson, CIO and Chief U.S. Equity Strategist at Morgan Stanley. Welcome to you, Mike. Thank you. And we start off with the latest headache for the housing sector, The XHB Home Builder ETF dropping another 2 % today, hitting its lowest level in over two months. The ITB Construction ETF on pace for its worst week of the year. And some of the biggest names in the space down 10 % or more since Monday. And while mortgage rates are down from their highs of the year, they remain stubbornly stuck above 6%.
1:12So is there anything other than a major move lower in rates that could get builders climbing again? Guy, what do you say? I think it's a washout into space. And you're starting to see it now. We've talked about this. All these names, D.H.I., Pulte, Holmes, Toll Brothers, they all topped out either October or November of last year. They all sold off into April like everything else did. But the bounces they all enjoyed were nowhere close to the prior all-time highs. Now they're starting to roll. And there are a couple reasons, I think. Trump administration seemingly has a bullseye on their back.
1:41That's not helpful. But I think it's an employment thing as well. It's also an inventory thing. I mean, listen, real estate is regional. I get it. But if you look across the country, you're starting to see inventory builds in some really interesting places. And I think that's going to put pressure on pricing, which subsequently puts pressure on these stocks. Remember, Diana Olick was at a housing conference maybe three weeks ago or so. One thing that really stuck out in her reporting was that builders are buying down an average 100 basis points in mortgage rate. So by that math at that time, you know, that's you're getting down sub five and a half percent.
2:13So if we have to wait for rates to clear that mark, that's a long ways from here. Well, and it's margin destructive. And it's nice having Mike here because I know he's got some theories about corporate margins in general. In the big picture, what may be happening in the housing market, especially because of the stuff the guy is referring to from the White House, if they're talking about supply side and they're throwing margins out the window, then you have a dynamic here of buying out mortgages. I would also just add that haven't we already seen the housing market get this rally on lower rates?
2:39I mean, that to me is what it was on the second spike of this double top that I think you're selling and continue to sell here. So I don't think you need to chase it. The one thing that's kind of interesting, we had our conversation about data center last week. And it's kind of cool that in the XHB, you have some of these data center plays that are the HVAC plays that have traditional been in residential housing. So a train, a carrier, some of those names that are actually some of that data center infrastructure build out. And they're kind of interesting. So take a look at those. But I'm not sure you want the housing part.
3:08Yeah, the cooling names that have exposure to the data center are very interesting. Is it the consumer here that we're looking at? I mean, what's happening? This is a structural problem in the housing industry. And this, by the way, may be the first sign that we're going to see some tariff implications on earnings. So the tariff, I mean, the higher cost is what's killing the home builders. Don't forget the home builders took a lot of share from the existing home market because there was no supply. What was that? You said it took a lot of share, and it sounded like hell. But you would never do that on cable TV.
3:38But at the end of the day, I mean, they've been discounting, and now new home prices are actually cheaper than existing homes. That's the first time we've seen that. So there's a structural profitability problem in this industry because of costs. And so lower rates is not going to help their profitability. I like the housing space, but the home improvement sector on activity picking up if rates come down. Yeah, labor is probably somewhat of an issue there, too, when you think about that. So you have the double whammy of just increased input costs and then labor. You know, it's worth noting 30 year fix, as you said, Mel, is that, you know, one year low.
4:11It's at 6.3 percent. Well, that's where it was last October. Right. Like the same level here. And the fact that the ITB is down 20 percent from those all time highs, it tells you that there's something else going on here. Yeah. I just really quickly. It's interesting because Mike's talking about the home improvement and that. Home Depot has been pasted, too, with the group. I'm not and I actually like Home Depot. I think these are levels both on the stock somewhere. Certainly 350 is a good level of support. But I think the valuations and the numbers we've gotten from Home Depot tell you they are a margin story that's helpful.
4:43You could have said spackled. Oh, that's a good one. You could have done spackled. Because the people may not know what pasted means. Pasted. Have you ever spackled? $4.25 down to$3.77. That's pasted. Have you spackled before? You know what? You say that thinking that I have not spackled before. Who hasn't spackled before? If you can't spackle, you're in trouble. My people don't spackle. Your people meaning what? What are your people? Be careful. The tribe. Real quick, I mean, name like Mohawk Industries, for example. I mean, take a look at MHK, which made its all-time high in 2017 and set some bounces along the way.
5:16And these are the names I think Mike is talking about, some of these names that get bombed out. And then if rates were to go lower, you look at some of these names. But I don't think we're there yet. So basically everybody here is bearish. Well, it depends what happens to existing supply. So if you can get existing home supply out. Now, they have talked about any housing. But rates would have to come down. Well, or maybe mortgage portability, or they could do something structurally. You know, don't rule anything out with this administration. If they say something about housing affordability, there's probably something coming.
5:45Make your mortgage with you. Yeah, something like that. And then you actually get supply, prices down. Activity then leads to more activity in the home improvement space. Have you guys seen Whirlpool? Maybe they can pull that up. It's now 70 % from 2021 highs. It's about to make new multi, like five, seven-year lows or something like that. I mean, where does that come in? Washed out. I like it. I like it. Washed out. See what you did there? I do a lot. Guy, you do a lot of laundry. Can I tell you something? I get in trouble. No, I mean, we have time because I try to do a load of laundry. Sure, it's 5.06.
6:16We've got the whole hour. Go ahead. Say what you want to say. Because then you don't let it pile up until the weekend. I give you 30 seconds. And by the way, you want to wash with cold water. And don't use as much detergent as you think. Less is more in the detergent. I'm sorry. Mike comes in here. once a quarter. Morgan Stanley is appalled by the company's key. I'm an excellent folder just to be careful. Anyway, okay, let's move on. Our next guest downgraded six homebuilder stocks earlier this week. Evercore ISI's Stephen Kim joins us now. He is a firm's head of housing research. Stephen, great to have you with us.
6:49So is it more than just a rates problem for the homebuilders at this point? Oh, yes. So a big part of our downgrade on Tuesday morning was our understanding that the administration was going to aggressively pursue supply side solutions to affordability, which is really the worst possible thing that the builders could hear. And I think that FHFA Director Pulte has been very clear and increasingly clear in his tweets and interviews about what it is that he's looking for. And the administration seems to believe that we have a national housing deficit because we didn't build enough homes. The deficit is why home prices are so high and that housing has become unaffordable.
7:34Higher home prices are also contributing to inflation because the shelter component of CPI is high. And then they look at the builders and they say these builders are deliberately building fewer homes than they could. They're posting strong profitability and cash flow and buying shares back. And they say, well, look, if the builders could produce more homes at lower prices, homebuyer affordability gets better, inflation gets better, employment will improve. And they believe that new home prices can decline even without dragging down existing home prices, which, by the way, has kind of been happening as well.
8:03So there's a lot of truth in what they say. At the same time, it misses something critically important, which I think the builders are really hoping that they recognize, which is that we have a demand problem right now. I think you all have been talking about that. We don't actually have a supply problem right now. If they could have gotten builders to build a lot more maybe three or four years ago, that would have been different. But today, you're now slamming the gate shut when the horse has already left the barn. We don't have enough demand. And so I think that having the administration focus on supply side as opposed to mortgage spreads, I think that's a problem.
8:36And I think it's unfortunate for the builders. Stephen, yeah, it's certainly a problem for margins. It sounds to me, and to think one or two steps down the road at a time when we have heard the White House aggressively, you know, target certain parts of certain industries. If we can look past this. What I was reading between the lines on your notes is that you actually think that the multiple for the sector should go higher based upon the prudence and the approach they've had towards capital allocation, especially after a difficult period of demand. Is that fair? 100%. So we've actually had a multi-year call here where we say that, you know, I should say over the next few years, we believe the builders deserve and will get a revaluation to higher multiples than they have historically received.
9:19And the basis for that is that if you look at how much the builders have improved their operations, if you look at how they have become more asset light, they have more competitive advantages relative to their smaller peers. And so we look at all of what they've done and they've delivered significantly that these are companies that, frankly, if you compare them on cost, almost any metric that matters relative to their S &P peers, I mean, they outperformed them, but they traded a fraction of what the other peers trade. So we think that that's going to change. And we'd say, by the way, there's a builder out there in the wild called NVR that's already done this.
9:55And the other builders are sort of following the footsteps. So we actually think that the builders are looking really good from a multi-year perspective. But unfortunately, you cannot disregard what the government and the administration is seeking to do here. And in the near term, it's going to be, we think, a depressant on the builder stocks. So along those lines, you downgraded, I think, D.H.I., Pulte, Holmes, Toll Brothers, if I'm not mistaken, to inline from outperform. But the price targets you have, although cut, are still higher than these stocks are trading. My question is, what's the next leg lower in terms of price on your horizon if, in fact, you have to go from inline to underperform or whatever the next one down is?
10:36I think it's fair to say that the basis for our downgrade, and we moved everything we cover from that was a buy to a neutral. We have no buys in the space, and we basically, earlier this year, had all the builders buy. We were probably the biggest bull on the space. The basis for our downgrade was the risks that were becoming very clear, these exogenous risks coming from the administration. We don't fully know how those are going to play out. We're just getting a taste of it now. And so therefore, depending on how severe these changes that they're seeking to make with the builders actually are, that could change the outlook for the earnings and the price targets as well.
11:18But we took a first swag at it based on limited information. What we knew is that it was going to be big, it was going to be important, and then investors were not ready for it. That we knew. And so we acted on that. And long term, I still like the group, like I said. But certainly we'll be watching this situation as we go forward and we'll adjust our price targets as we need to. So Mike Wilson here just a few minutes ago suggested, you know, maybe if mortgage portability were an option, that could be a different story and he could be more bullish on the sector. How would that impact the sector in your view?
11:49Well, there's a number of things that the administration could theoretically go after that would be helpful from a demand perspective, because I do think that's the core of the problem. And so something like, like I said, tightening the mortgage spread would be something that would be helpful. The FHFA director also has the power to lower fees that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac charge. And so that could actually lower borrowing costs as well. Mortgage rate portability would be great. I will remind you that actually FHA loans are already portable. The problem is that the people who have those low-rate mortgages have seen the home prices rise.
12:28And so the mortgage doesn't cover enough of the home price. And the people who use FHA mortgages don't tend to have a ton of money lying around. And so the reason why you haven't heard about this portability is the fact that you can't actually get too many people to cough up that much of a down payment so that they can actually take on that mortgage. So it gets a little complicated, obviously, but profitability is an interesting idea. It's complicated. I'm not hanging my hat. I'm not waiting around for that, unfortunately. All right. Stephen, great to speak with you. Thanks so much. Yeah, likewise.
12:59Thanks. So you've got a bunch of bears on housing, basically. That's the bottom line. What's bullish? Go ahead. No, I'm just going to throw it out to you, Guy. What's the bullish argument right now? I think the bullish argument is the unemployment rate stays where it is and the economy is okay. where the economy is okay, that rates actually moderate and maybe start to sink lower for the right reasons, not the wrong reasons. And, you know, again, people start to feel empowered where they can buy a new home for the first time in a while and pricing comes. But that's, I don't think we're close to that.
13:29Wasn't the economy okay last year? We had 100 basis points of Fed funds cuts. We do see, though, whenever there's a tick lower in mortgage rate, you do see activity go up. You see mortgage apps go up. You see, you know, refinancings go up. Everything goes up a little bit. People jump on that. I mean, look, you said something earlier, which is true, which is that the stocks kind of traded the rate cuts in advance twice, first last fall and this year. So that was a little bit of a trade. It got payback. But, you know, to the core question, like why would you get bullish here? I don't think the economy was strong last year.
14:00That's been my view for two years. We've been in a private economy recession. And if I'm right that we had the end of that rolling recession was in April, we're now into an early cycle economy. and all we're waiting for is the Fed to figure it out and start slashing rates. If that happens, these stocks are going to work whether or not the fundamentals justified. They're going to get way in advance of it. That's the bullish view. I think that's going to happen maybe later this year, probably early next year. And that would be my argument for, I guess, you know, we talked about, let me be a Whirlpool bull for a second because I'm not going to necessarily die on this hill.
14:31But we've priced in three and a half years of Whirlpool and we've priced in COVID pull forward. We've pulled forward the lack of brand loyalty. This is a company with a 5 % dividend yield. They have a great small appliance business in the U.S. I think it's been largely grounded. There has been innovation there. So they've actually delevered a bit, and they're selling off pieces around the world like an India stake that I think are going to help that balance sheet and support that dividend. So I think there are places you can play in here. And, again, train, carrier, parts of the housing space that are not necessarily the home builders, I think they look great.
15:06In terms of delevering, though, I thought it was interesting what Stephen was saying, how these homebuilders have really gotten lean and mean during this downturn. They were forced to take a look at their businesses, right, and delever and improve their balance sheet. And that's a theme that we're seeing everywhere. You think about it, there's been a three-year recession in a lot of parts of the economy, housing just being one example. And these companies, these American companies, are really good at cutting costs, and they've been doing that. So if you get any kind of volume increase, don't forget, total home sales are where they were post-GFC, post-GFC.
15:33So don't tell me there's not pent-up demand. There is. They just can't afford it. So once that starts to get unleashed, whether it's in this area or in consumer goods where companies have gotten leaner and meaner, and by the way, AI is now going to allow them to do more with fewer employees, you can see some pretty good operating leverage in these areas that are beat up. That's the bold case for these laggard areas. Listen, real quick, that is the bold case. And as Mike and Tim said, they'll sniff this out long before. I just don't think we're there yet. I think there's another leg lower in these names.
15:59Meantime, Delta flying higher today after beating profit estimates and giving a better than expected forecast for the rest of the year. The company is citing rising airfares and resilient luxury traveler. CEO Ed Bastian also joined our Philabeau earlier today with his thoughts on the government shutdown impact. Today, there's no cause for concern. I would say that if this doesn't get resolved, say, beyond another 10 days or so, you probably will start to see some impact. Is this the kind of thing that investors look through? Tim, I'll go to you because you always trade the airlines. I think for airlines, you do.
16:33I think airlines get quick headline dynamics around storms and disruptions and holiday things. But ultimately, the most important thing for airlines, for the investor community, the analyst community, for sure, is what's going on with the margin profile. Are they being efficient? Are they putting out too much capacity at the wrong time at the top of the cycle? And what you hear from Delta, Ed Bastian has done an amazing job. This is the one that I think is actually going to re-rate and I think should re-rate. And I think it takes every quarter, it seems like the last five quarters they've reported, they've reaffirmed, they've given it.
17:04They gave a guy in September that told you they were going to do this and they're doing it. And they're doing this out of four main hubs, which means they're doing it a lot more efficiently than they've ever done before. So I am a Delta bull. I stay long. I think it hasn't taken back what it lost for the stock from that April period in Liberation Day. Airline stocks got killed and Delta hasn't really it's nibbled back at the 60 level. I think it goes through. Yeah, I'm with Tim. I mean, 60, where do you get this? Like 65 or so? I mean, that's not unreasonable to think just on valuation and just on momentum.
17:36And, you know, they said it today. They're focused on the premium seat. And in that space, they're beating everybody else. So this stock should trade higher. This is probably the poster child of the company that has remade itself in difficult times over and over and over again. I mean, airlines are known for that, right? And this is an early cycle area. So I think it is a tradable stock. I mean, these are rentals. I mean, just me, they're always trading stocks. in the market. 100%. And you have to understand that. So I'm not sure I'm ready to dive in here because I do think that the consumer services area, travel, is one of the three areas that is going through the recession now.
18:07And you see it in some of the data, like Vegas is pretty slow. Yeah, hospitality's been tough. Government's in a recession. Okay, AI CapEx just came out of there, mini recessions. So it's like this is one of the later ones to kind of recover, I think. It's worth noting, and we talk about this a lot, I mean, this stock gapped up nearly 10%. The high tick on the day was basically the opening tick, and the low of the day was the closing tick. So So it's interesting that investors sold into this move, especially when you consider the fact into the print over the last month, the stock was down about 12 percent.
18:34Coming up, dealmaking in the pharma space. Novo's new CEO is making a splash with the company's latest acquisition. Is there more merger mania coming for the space? Plus, Jeffries feeling the pressure after an auto parts company collapsed into bankruptcy last month. What the bank's debt exposure could mean for the stock. Don't go anywhere. Fast Money is back in two.
18:56This is Fast Money with Melissa Lee right here on CNBC.
19:08Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of liver disease drug maker Acara Therapeutics surging today. Novo Nordisk agreed to buy the company for up to$5.2 billion as the Danish company's new CEO looks to spur growth. It's just the latest in a flurry of dealmaking in the pharma space. Pfizer, Roche, Merck all announcing deals in the last few months. And Mike has recently turned bullish on the health care space the first time in many months. Quite a while, yes. And not for just defensive reasons, for a change. Usually when you go health care, it's just like pure defense. I mean, look, the stock got absolutely walloped.
19:39Everybody was so concerned about RFK coming in, what was going to happen. So I think that, you know, we looked ahead. We said, OK, two things. Rates are coming down. It's usually good for M &A activity as well as the biotechs in general. And we're seeing some of that now. And also, the announcements that were made, the most favored nation pricing in the deal with Pfizer, it's just not as onerous as people were fearing. So these stocks literally are as cheap as they've ever been on a relative basis. We had a 7 % move last week in the group. I think it continues. XBI has outperformed SPX year-to-date.
20:08I mean, that's a major milestone for this group. I think that potentially could continue because there's some M &A chatter around that. I mean, look at a name like Innsmed, by the way. We've had the CEO on twice. Look where that stock closed today. So I think we've done a good job sort of bringing some of these to light. I'll say this, though. Just on a valuation basis, if you want to play a little stock market, Bristol-Myers has earned$6 a share. You put a 10, 11 multiple on it. You're talking about a$65 to$72 stock. Merck,$10 a share, 12 multiple,$120 stock. And that's still a discount to an Eli Lilly, and it's still a significant discount to the broader market.
20:42And that's with the patent cliff factored in. So I like the space as well. And, of course, that's a great segue for Tim's. From my Pfizer. So one from one value trap to another. I mean, you know, maybe. But but as we're all saying about the health care space, there's been the macro, the White House dynamics, but also the M &A dynamics that is also just this perpetual. We've got to continue to think about tomorrow's pipeline. XLV was basing around the 200 day is now breaking higher. J &J, which I'm along and I really like. And there was some news around litigation that didn't knock the stock down at all because it focuses on the fact.
Read the full transcript
21:16J &J is a company that generates$20 billion of free cash flow a year. And it's seemingly the worst of the talc litigation is$9 billion. It's an overhang. But you can see this stock has been breaking out to all-time highs every day, seemingly, for the last couple weeks. I think you stay there. Well, here's a would you rather. I love this game. Mike, we play a game called would you rather. You have to make a choice. He's familiar with this show. He knows this show. He's been on this show many times in the past. XLV or XBI? Wow. I like what you did there. I think XBI. If you're forcing me to choose, I think XBI, I haven't looked at both of them that closely, but off the top of my head, I'll take XBI for 500, Melissa.
21:53Yeah. You believe in the dealmaking. There's been three deals. I absolutely believe. Three deals in three weeks, by the way. I absolutely believe in the dealmaking. I think it's just the tip of the iceberg. And a lot of these companies that have patent cliffs are going to have to do something. Now, maybe with the Trump administration off their back, it sort of allows them to do these deals. But, yes, I think deals are coming end of this year, early next year. Absolutely. I mean, I think that the whole M &A thing we've been waiting for is now starting. I was very skeptical on that last year, and now we're finally seeing it.
22:20So these stocks trade off of that. I mean, that's like the juice for biotech. And that's not defense. That's offense, right? Yeah, that's the difference between those two also. There's a lot more Fast Money to come. Here's what's coming up next. First Brands fall out. How an auto parts bankruptcy is stalling out one investment bank. And the hazard lights being flashed for shareholders. Plus, is dollar dominance at risk? What it means that global banks are shifting their assets out of the U.S. currency and the impact it could have on global markets. You're watching Fast Money live from the Nasdaq market side in Times Square.
22:57We're back right after this.
23:06Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of Jeffries falling again today as the Justice Department launches an inquiry into First Brand's recent bankruptcy. Jeffries has$715 million in exposure to the embattled auto parts supplier's debt. In its bankruptcy filing last month, First Brand's declared more than$10 billion in liabilities from acquisitions made over the past 15 years, as well as disputes over the company's accounting practices and a$219 million hit from President Trump's tariffs. Shares of Jeffries down more than 20 percent since First Brand's filing. Is this the exposure problem more than the reputational damage problem and therefore customer loss?
23:46I mean, how do you start to think about exposure first? I think exposure, I mean, bankruptcy, they'll kept a lot of this on their balance sheet, which is obviously now in retrospect problematic. So exposure to me, yes. Reputation stuff we can talk about later. But the real question is, is this the first of many? And what other investment banks have similar things on their balance sheets? And it's like the old saying, there's never one cockroach. So exposure to me is everything right now. Well, this plus the tricolor bankruptcy really raises flags. It raises flags. You're like, eh, not really. I mean, but this, you know, it shines a spotlight on these loans to non-depository financial institutions, which are 33 % of all commercial and industrial loans right now by big banks.
24:26And so, therefore, how worried are you about that just sort of on a broader basis? Yeah. I mean, I spent a lot of time with our credit team last week on this, and we don't think this is a systemic issue. It is a credit issue for the banks that have these loans. So, look, we're in a credit cycle. We've been in an expansion for quite a while. I don't think we're into the final stages of a credit cycle where it becomes a systemic downturn broadly. But this is going to be some other victims from this. It's not systemic in our view. The only thing that's systemic is that lending standards have probably gotten a lot easier and that there's a ton of money chasing certain types of either leverage finance, private credit.
25:03And there's a retail appetite for exposure to this as well. So I don't think it's systemic in terms of a credit problem. I think it's systemic that there are probably bad deals that were done. Yeah. You know, the other thing is on the investment grade side, I mean, there's$1.2 trillion in data center debt right now. And when you think about that, there's a disproportionate amount of investment. Is that high grade? Well, you tell me. I mean, like, what I'm saying is QWERI rates debt all the time. Is that high grade? I mean, like, you know, I'm not asking Mike here. But, you know, some of these neoclouds, I mean, they are losing tons of money and raising tons of debt.
25:38So they can provide, you know, this compute. To me, Oracle is a great example. I mean, negative cash flow. and it's going to be that way for five years. I don't think that's going to be high grade. So you have a stock market at an all-time high. Banks have been trading well until the last couple weeks. Pull up an Apollo chart just for S &Gs, as they say, and look at where that's. What? S &Gs. What does that mean? Look it up. We're not allowed to say that on this show. It's a family show. Oh, okay. This is a stock that made its all-time high in December. We're trading at April lows, and not a lot of things trading at April lows.
26:09This whole space, alternative managers. Yes, so it's something to watch. KKR, Carlisle, all of them. And why? S &G's, obviously. Not for them. No, it's not SNL's. SNL's, sorry. S &G's completely different, and it's not PG. Coming up, a decade late and a dollar short, the alarm bells ringing as global central banks move away from U.S. Treasuries. What de-dollarization could mean for markets here and around the world? More on that when Fast Money returns.
26:39Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.
26:53Welcome back to Fast Money Stocks. Pulling back from records, the Dow falling nearly 250 points, the S &P down a quarter of a percent, and the Nasdaq with a small loss. Shares of NVIDIA up another 2 % today, the chip giant hitting a fresh record high, now at more than 43 % this year. And Pepsi popping more than 4%. The soda maker topping EPS in revenue estimates this morning with strength in international sales. Pepsi still down about 5 % in 2025. And shares of Ferrari stalling out down 15%. It's the worst day ever after the luxury car maker gave disappointing guidance and scaled back its EV ambitions.
27:27And some after hours action to tell you. Shares of Levi Strauss falling despite top and bottom line beats and raised guidance. The gene company saying the macro environment remains complex. That's never a good word to you. I'll just say this. If Ferrari's selling off on their EV ambitions not going so well, I mean, that to me is what has the world come to? I mean, we're talking about Ferraris here. And I realize an EV Ferrari is probably really cool to people that think about the modern world. Why do you buy a Ferrari? Because it's a race car. You want that Ponzi exhaust, right, Mel? I mean, I don't.
27:59But as I understand it, that's what people buy. Do you know how to drive? I have a driver's license. It's in my wallet. You know, Mel and I did a shoot years ago. Remember Tesla before? Or anybody who knew what Tesla was. I got to drive the Ferrari, the Cal T. Yeah, but there's B-roll of that, too. You were a Lyft driver, too. I drove a Lyft. No, but I said, Mel, I'm not letting you drive this car. It's under no circumstances. Anyway, we have more important things to talk about. Meanwhile, the New York Federal Reserve revealing this morning the amount of U.S. Treasuries held by global central banks hit its lowest in more than a decade, the drop of about$130 billion just since August, raising fears that global de-dollarization is accelerating.
28:38For more, let's bring in BK Asset Management Managing Director of FX Strategy, Kathy Lean. Kathy, great to have you with us. It's not just this drop held in treasuries held at the New York Federal Reserve Bank, but it's also the rise in gold, it's the weakness in the dollar. It's all these things combined, Kathy. What do you think is going on? Well, I think that the de-dollarization is impacting the rise in gold. It's playing a very big story. We're seeing a structural shift. And, you know, normally, custody holdings will fluctuate based upon global conditions, interest rates, who's managing the assets.
29:12But this is a deeper issue. I think we started to see a significant decline after we had the initial tariffs. So tariffs and geopolitics have been a big part of the story. And this has pushed a lot of central banks to think twice about what kind of assets they want to be holding. And when trade becomes unpredictable and we're still seeing new tariff announcements, you know, every single month, central banks are starting to look for ways to diversify and protect themselves from U.S. policy risk. At the same time, we have a treasury market that's pretty stable. So how do you reconcile the two? So we do have a treasury market that is fairly stable.
29:47But I think we are in an environment where investors, especially given the U.S. government shutdown and the extreme level of the deficit, the treasuries are no longer seen as true of a risk-free asset as they may have been a decade ago. So this is also affecting the dollars and the attractiveness of treasuries. So central banks, what they're doing is they're not necessarily rejecting the dollar, but they don't want to be overexposed to it in this type of market environment. So there's a lot of factors that are playing into the reduction in treasury holdings. Kathy, the dollar has stabilized and bounced recently, but still it's probably having its worst year since the 1970s.
30:27And I think it's policy, actually, to weaken the U.S. dollar because we have$39 trillion in debt that we're not going to grow our way out of. The question is, at what point does a weaker dollar become problematic? Well, the weaker dollar, as well as the lack of enthusiasm or reduction of enthusiasm for U.S. Treasuries, is a huge problem. Because I think, you know, first off, it's going to increase borrowing costs, making the Federal Reserve's job more difficult. It's also going to hurt the liquidity in the Treasury market and then also hurt the dollar's dominance. But as you said, this could be part of the plan.
31:01I do think at some point it's hard to say, you know, I don't have a magic ball telling me when. But I do think if borrowing costs don't come down as much as the Trump administration or the central bank wants, that will become a more serious problem. Kathy, would you agree that we're in a new kind of inflationary environment? I mean, that's what gold is telling us. And obviously, I mean, bonds have been terrible for the last three or four years. It looks to me as a technician that they were in a new secular bear market for bonds. I mean, to me, that's the bigger issue for Treasuries, that it's just we're in an inflationary regime.
31:34And so that's why people are moving maybe some of their safe assets from bonds to gold. It's not so much that they're afraid of the dollar, but just that they don't want to own bonds. Right. I mean, I don't think they're necessarily afraid of the dollar. They're really just looking for diversification. I mean, pretty much since the sanctions have been run Russia in 2022, central banks have been adding to their gold reserves. And actually, in August of this year, the total value of gold reserves actually exceeded the value of treasuries for the first time since 1996. So this is a really big trend.
32:04And looking forward, three quarters central banks say that they plan to continue to buy more gold over the next five years. So, you know, this is gold is also a safe haven without the policy strings or sanction risk. And I think, you know, gold is telling us a very big story of a lot of things that are happening beyond inflation concerns that is driving de-dollarization. Kathy, it's Tim. I'm a huge gold bull. And for all the reasons you've mentioned, but the number one culprit of de-dollarization is China. You can't tell me China, who is the biggest producer of gold, who has every interest in making Hong Kong and also Beijing a money center, the renminbi backed by gold.
32:42The more gold reserves they have, the more legitimate that currency is. Isn't this really about China? Everything else has been going on for 25 years. But this move in gold in the last 12 months with announcements by China in terms of their gold position and their treasury holdings inversely correlated to that, this move in gold is China to me. I think it's often about China. You see today's markets. Today's markets, the sell-off is driven by the rare earth announcement by China. I think China plays a very big role in asset holdings as well as the direction of a lot of different industries. But trade settlement, which is what I think you're talking about, in non-dollar currencies is very much a trend that China has been advocating and been pushing for.
33:23So as you said, by making gold more of an alternative to a dollar, more attractive one, this diversification is going to affect the demand for U.S. Treasuries in general. So, I mean, it's really about central banks looking for plan B. They're looking for, you know, what's happening over the next three years. And they're looking at the the more attractive option, the gold versus the dollar right now. Kathy, great to speak to you as always. Kathy Lean. My pleasure. I'm glad you mentioned China because all of this can result in China becoming a bigger player on the world stage in finance. You know, the currency of trade.
34:00Exactly. Ironically. And then add in the crypto markets and just the decentralized currency dynamic, which is already at play, already at work. You throw in the fact that between sanctions and also I'm not saying it wasn't deserved. But if you decide if the U.S. makes the call that 300 billion dollars of treasuries or central bank reserves by Russia that are held in some other place are now our position to make a decision on. That's a lot of other countries around the world are saying, I'm not sure how I feel about this. So, again, I don't have a problem with freezing Russian assets. I'm just telling you that that has an impact on people's willingness to hold the dollar and hold treasuries.
34:34We've got some news on one of the potential Treasury candidates. Eamon Javris has got the latest developments. Eamon. Hey there, Melissa. I've just been texting with former Federal Reserve Governor Larry Lindsey. And Larry Lindsey confirms to me over text that he has withdrawn his name to be Federal Reserve chairman. He was one of the candidates being interviewed by Treasury Secretary Scott Besson. He says he is now no longer a candidate for that position. He says, I have a full I have a very full, varied and enjoyable life right now that I don't want to give up to go through the mill of public life.
35:07So scratch Larry Lindsey off the list of potential Federal Reserve chairs as Scott Besson makes his way through that list of potential nominees, interviewing them all and ultimately with the goal of presenting a small group to the president for his selection. Melissa, I'm glad they've got that down from 12 or 11 or whatever. I'm sure it's starting to get their arms around it. Yeah. Yeah. Anyway, we've also got a statement from New York Attorney General Letitia James on her indictment. Yeah, this is a pretty lengthy statement here, but I'll give you the top of it. She says this is nothing more than a continuation of the president's desperate weaponization of our justice system.
35:46He is forcing federal law enforcement agencies to do his bidding, all because I did my job as the New York State Attorney General. These charges are baseless, and the president's own public statements make clear that his only goal is political retribution at any cost. The president's actions are a grave violation of our constitutional order and have drawn sharp criticism from members of both parties. So Letitia James clearly signaling here she's going to fight this, but she is now officially under indictment, as we learned just within the past hour or so, Melissa. Eamon, thanks. Eamon Javers at the White House.
36:20Coming up, moves out of the mainland sending rare earth stocks surging. How China's export curbs are pushing that trade higher when Fast Money returns.
36:32December 11th, join Melissa Lee and the team of traders in New York City for an all-access celebration live and on air. Fast Money Live, trading the holidays. Get your tickets now at CNBCevents.com slash fast money.
36:50Welcome back to Fast Money. Rare Earth stocks exploding today after China tightened export controls and prohibited its citizens from unauthorized mining overseas. Investors betting the Trump administration will continue to take stakes in miners to short domestic production shares of critical metals. USA Rare Earth, NIO corporate developments and Ramico all seeing double digit gains today. President Trump and China's President Xi are expected to meet later this month. I don't know if this is some sort of posturing before those talks. It feels sort of strange to turn up the heat here at this point.
37:20Well, let's be clear. China's got a ton of leverage in terms of rare earth. And they've dangled it and they've pulled it back and they've actually played nice. But again, like so many parts of this China negotiation, we don't have a deal. Rare earth China is probably 92 percent of refined rare earth. Rare earth, which most people probably know. Stuff that's not that rare, except for China is one of the few places where they don't care about mining it. and where the implications from mining it, which are devastating potentially, are part of the reasons why it's so rare. Here's a stock we don't talk quickly.
37:51Look at Albemarle, which is not easy to say or spell. But take a look at where it bottomed out at and look at the bounce we're seeing. And this is a name that could be absolutely in the crosshairs for this administration. I mean, ALB, given the recent low we had, the same low we had in 2019-ish, is worth a look. Yeah, I mean, this is an area where they do have leverage. And as Tim said, they're using it. And it's not so much in the mining, it's in the processing. It's so dirty. But they are selling us magnets for industrial uses. What they're not selling is for military uses, which is kind of an interesting ploy.
38:24It means we really can't go to war if we wanted to without the military-grade rare earth. So this is a leverage point. They're using it smart on their part. But this is going to come to a head, and it's going to remain, I think, an issue. Coming up, Lulu losing its Riz. Oh, what's up here? While the retailers are getting much love from teens these days, especially the ones with money to burn, plus the stock slang. Riz means like cool. Yeah, we'll get to it, okay? After the break.
39:02Welcome back to Fast Money. Piper Sandler out with its fall teen survey designed to predict spending patterns among the key demo. The results bearing some interesting findings in athleisure. Courtney Reagan's got the details. She's here on set. Courtney. I love this one. It's big. It's historical. They do it twice a year. 11 ,000 teens. They got a lot of data to compare it to. So teen spending is down 6 % year over year. $2 ,213. That's well below the 2006 peak of more than$3 ,000. So for athletic wear insights, leggings slash Lululemon. That was the first most popular trend for females. That was on par actually with last year on a percentage basis.
39:38So not much has changed. Athletic wear, the second most popular trend for males, slightly behind baggy pants. 37 % of the preferred apparel brands are athletic. But that's down about 900 basis points from last year and the lowest since spring of 2020. So they're wearing things other than athleisure. Nike, though, still the top clothing and footwear name. It has actually held that spot for many, many years in this teen survey. Despite the company's recent stumbles, say, writ large, but preference for Nike, to be fair, has fallen. It's down about 400 basis points from last fall's survey. Lululemon falls to fourth favorite apparel brand from third, so also falling, but slightly.
40:19And then when asked specifically about favorite athletic apparel, so those names that I just went through was just apparel in general. Nike and Lulu do hold on to the top number one and number two spots, respectively, with about the same share as last fall. Under Armour holds on to the top spot for brands no longer worn. Lululemon also getting called out by founder Chip Wilson in a full-page ad in the Wall Street Journal saying the company is, quote, losing its soul. He's comparing it to a plane crash, saying it's usually a series of mistakes that lead to its downfall. But he gives some suggestions.
40:52He still owns about 8.5 % of the company. So in this athleisure-legging sort of category, what if the favorite brand is Aloe or Viore? Is that somewhere in the survey as well? They only give us sort of the top brands. So if it's peaked in to that very top level, at least like a 2%, 3 % mind share, it'll get in there. And then if not, we don't see it, but it very well could have come in. I mean, they asked 11 ,000 teens. I went through the 78 pages, and so they just give you sort of the top insights there. But, I mean, it has to be, right? And it's not surprising that some of these names are going to still hold on to favor with teens that maybe didn't have the purchasing power to buy them before or maybe couldn't fit into the clothes before.
41:33And now that they are teens, they are interested. So it is predictive of some brands, but I think in some cases there are some nuances when you're thinking about teen spending. Right. Courtney, thank you. Thanks. Always fascinating look. Courtney Reagan, we've got a news alert here on next week's CPI report. The BLS reportedly looking to release the September data by the end of the month, recalling staff at the direction of the White House to get that report out. That is according to Bloomberg. CPI was slated to come out next Wednesday. No word yet on when we'll get September's jobs report, though, but the market will have one data report to chew on, and that will be CPI, according to Bloomberg.
42:11How are you going to look at that CPI number? Well, I think both of them are lagging. So inflation data and the jobs data is very lagging. We've written a lot about this, and I think, quite frankly, I mean, I'm not one of these people. I don't think the BLS is doing anything nefarious. I just think the collection of the data has gotten poor, and it's lagging. And what we look at is revisions. So what I'm going to be looking at is a revision to the data. And that probably confirms what we've been saying, which is that the recession already troughed in March and April. And that's what I'm looking for is revision data.
42:39And I'll throw this out there. I think the November report is going to be really, really important. Up next, final trades.
42:50Take a look there. Those are our traders' final trades for tonight. We had so much fun tonight. We ran out of time. It's been great having Mike Wilson and Morgan Stanley here on the show. Thanks for watching Fast Money. Money starts now.
43:26The Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash fast money disclaimer.
From the publisher
More cracks starting to form in the homebuilder trade, as those stocks continue to fall. The next move in the group, and what it will take to turn the housing trade around. Plus Alarm bells in the dollar trade, as a decade-low Fed custody holding raises de-dollarization concerns. The impact it could have on equities around the world.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
