In short
Podcast Notes: CNBC's "Fast Money"
Episode Title
Disney Dips as Streaming Subscribers Fall, and How One Trader is Playing the 1-Month T-Bill
Air Date
May 10, 2023
---
Episode Overview In this episode of "Fast Money," hosted by Melissa Lee, the focus is on the decline in Disney's stock following disappointing streaming subscriber numbers, the company's strategic response, and the implications of the rising yield on the 1-month Treasury bill. The discussion features insights from various traders and analysts regarding the stock market movements and potential investment strategies.
---
Key Discussions
Disney's Post-Earnings Performance
- Stock Drop: Disney shares fell post-earnings due to a reported decline in streaming subscribers despite improved streaming losses.
- CEO Bob Iger's Comments:
- Disney aims to achieve $5.5 billion in cost savings.
- Introduction of a combined app for Hulu and Disney Plus to enhance user engagement and reduce churn.
- Planned price increases for the ad-free version of Disney Plus.
- Content curation strategy involving the removal of certain titles, incurring an impairment charge of approximately $1.5 to $1.8 billion.
- Subscriber Insights:
- Loss of subscribers was largely attributed to a drop in Disney's Hotstar service in India.
- Core subscriber growth was noted in the U.S. and Canada, with a 20% increase in average revenue per user (ARPU).
Trader Reactions to Disney's Performance
- Tim Seymour: Highlights impressive ARPU growth and emphasizes the importance of Disney's advertising model and diverse revenue streams from parks and studios.
- Courtney Garcia: Supports the view that Disney's diversified business model provides resilience against streaming losses.
- Karen Feinerman: Questions the sustainability of Disney's pricing strategy amidst economic pressures on consumers.
- Steve Grasso: Argues that Disney's current stock price does not reflect its potential value, citing it as an attractive buying opportunity.
---
Treasury Market Insights
- 1-Month Treasury Bill Yield: The yield reached a 20-year high, causing significant market reactions.
- Karen Feinerman's Strategy: Discusses her approach to trading the 1-month T-bill, focusing on expected timely payments amidst debt ceiling concerns.
- Bill Foster (Moody's Analyst): Confirms the expectation that the U.S. government will honor its debt obligations, discussing the potential for a downgrade only in the event of a missed interest payment.
---
Alphabet's AI Developments
- Stock Reaction: Alphabet shares rose following announcements at the developer conference regarding AI in search.
- Key Takeaway: The integration of generative AI into search was presented positively, with implications for user engagement and advertiser profitability.
---
Robinhood's Quarterly Performance
- User Growth: Robinhood reports its first increase in monthly active users in two years, though it has not yet achieved profitability since its IPO.
- CFO Insights: Discusses cost-cutting measures and plans to expand trading hours to boost user engagement.
---
Final Trades
- Tim Seymour: Warner Bros. Discovery (WBD) as a potential growth stock.
- Karen Feinerman: Plans to buy Ulta shares amid pullback.
- Courtney Garcia: Advocates for investing in Disney for long-term growth.
- Steve Grasso: Bullish on Apple, predicting a breakout above $200.
---
Key Takeaways
- Disney's strategy to amalgamate its streaming services reflects a focus on profitability rather than subscriber growth.
- The increasing yield on the 1-month T-bill highlights investor concerns regarding U.S. debt management and economic stability.
- Developers' confidence in Alphabet's AI advancements potentially positions the company favorably against its competitors.
- Robinhood's user growth suggests a recovery trajectory, but challenges remain regarding profitability.
---
Conclusion This episode of "Fast Money" provides a comprehensive analysis of current market trends, focusing on Disney's strategic shifts in the streaming landscape, investor sentiment towards Treasury yields, and the evolving role of AI in technology investments. The discussion emphasizes the complexities and opportunities facing investors in a rapidly changing economic environment.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Right now and fast, Disney doldrum. Shares of the media and entertainment giant dropping after the company posted decline in streaming subscribers. But can Bob Iger recapture the magic? The man who wrote the book on Disney will join us to break down the results. And Treasury turmoil, the yield on the shortest-term T-bill, hitting its highest level in at least two decades. One of our traders lays out how they are playing this move and what happens if the U.S. does, in fact, default on its debt. Plus, Google gains, alt is ultra pullback, and a pot stock loses its buzz. We're digging into a couple of stocks, making some big moves today.
0:34I'm Melissa Lee. This is Fast Money. We're live with the Nasdaq Market Site in the heart of Times Square On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Karen Feinermann, Courtney Garcia and Steve Grasso. And we start off with Disney's post earnings drop. The entertainment giant shares near an after hours lows after a reporting decline in Disney Plus subscribers but improved streaming losses. The conference call is underway. CNBC's Julia Borson is listening in. Julia. Melissa, Disney CEO Bob Iger is saying that the company is on track to meet or exceed its target of five and a half billion dollars in cost savings.
1:03He also announced a new approach to the streaming business. The company plans to roll together an app that combines Hulu content into Disney Plus by the end of this year, what Iger called a significant step towards creating a growth business. He said this will create more opportunities for advertisers while also driving engagement for users, which would, of course, then minimize churn. He did note that they will continue to offer separate Disney Plus, Hulu and ESPN Plus apps and give that as another option. He also announced plans to launch an ad tier on Disney Plus in Europe by year end. He noted that they're just starting to scratch the surface around the ad potential of Disney Plus.
1:42And as for the ad-free version, Iger saying they do expect to raise prices on Disney Plus by the end of this year. The company also announcing that they will be removing certain content from the streaming platforms, part of a curation process, and taking an impairment charge of between$1.5 and$1.8 billion. Meanwhile, worth noting that losses at Disney's streaming division were smaller than analysts expected, a loss of$659 million in the quarter, down from a more than$1 billion loss in the prior quarter. Melissa? Julia, to put the subscriber loss overall into perspective, I mean, this was mostly because of Hot Star losses because they didn't get cricket.
2:20So in actuality, their core subscribers that they have right now, they're more profitable in theory than the prior mix. Yes. Yeah, I think the attention has really shifted to that average revenue per user number. And what's interesting is if you look at the breakdown of average revenue per user, there is actually growth in the average revenue per user of 20 percent in the U.S. and Canada. So those subscribers are paying 20 percent more. But if you look at those hot star subscribers in India, they're actually paying 20 percent less than they did a year ago. So a tale of two very different types of subscribers to Disney Plus.
2:54Obviously, they want to be maximizing profitability. They've talked a lot about cost cutting, the fact that their losses are declining, but they really are focused on these price increases. I mean, the fact that they already rolled out a price increase and now they're going to be planning to increase prices on the ad-free tier, it looks like they really want to make sure that everything they're doing, the streaming business, is not chasing growth at all costs. All right, Julia, thanks. Keep us posted on developments from that conference call. Tim, you own this one. What did you make of this quarter?
3:22The ARPU number, so the average revenue per user, 714 versus 595 last quarter, that's really impressive. Pricing power is impressive here. The concept of a lot more ad supported in the model for a company that really knows how to do this, certainly from their days in linear TV and what we see going on with Netflix. So, you know, that's all great. The streaming losses you just explained. Parks are excellent. And studios got some got got a few things going on and there's not been great demand. There's been a lot of promotional expenses around Indiana Jones and other dynamics that we're hearing about.
3:55They're eating into operating losses. The problem is that this there's not a lot to get excited about in this stock right now. And and and the share price, which is basically a five year level of lost money. If you think about it on some level, you could have bought this stock at 95 bucks that much farther back, despite all that's going on. It's great that the company's more focused on streaming profitability. It is great that you have, I think, the ability here to have different levers to pull. The assets are great at Disney. The streaming business is better than it was, I guess, half full on the glass.
4:30Courtney, your take? Yeah, and I don't think people should necessarily be surprised at what you're seeing with the subscribers right now. Because Iger already said this, that they were going to focus on profitability, not necessarily growth. And that's exactly what you're seeing with these numbers today. And really, I think this is trading on specifically their streaming services, but their parks actually came in really strong and I think was expected to come in strong. And that's what I like about them over, you know, comparing them to a Netflix, for example, is they have such a better diversified business that continues to be really strong and will offset even, you know, some loss in subscribers.
5:01So I actually do still like this here. I think you're just seeing some negativity on the streaming specifically. I think the parks, both Tim and Courtney touched on it, the parks are just killing it at this point. And when I look at a chart and I look back to the pandemic low, should this be in the same ballpark as a pandemic low when we knew the parks were going to be shut down? The answer is no. It's in the same ballpark. You're looking at a stock where to trade$80 or thereabouts on the pandemic low. It's trading now in the mid 90s, mid to upper 90s. So if they're going to be more efficient, if it's going to be streaming now, maybe it shouldn't be as it rebounded above$200 a year later after the pandemic low.
5:44But this is giving the stock away just to make it very simple and not get caught up in all the different numbers. Way too cheap. But giving us. I mean, but the multiple is not giving it away at all. Well, the multiple, if you look back to where the multiple was during a year after the after the pandemic, they were not making money. It was it was great. Exactly. It was crazy the multiple that people were willing to pay. Now it seems like it's a true value stock. I actually disagree. I think that if we look at what was happening during the pandemic, a bunch of things that were so incredibly favorable to Disney launching a streaming business, right?
6:17You had people stuck at home. You had money that was free. You had growth numbers that were just sky's the limit. And therefore, valuations that in hindsight were just way too overdone. So to me, I think Disney's not, this isn't a huge discount here. I just think that, I mean, if you look at what's happened in the space, if you look at Paramount, which I sold after that disastrous quarter, just couldn't take it anymore, they actually had subscriber growth. And so here I'm wondering, okay, they raised some prices, I think$3 on$8 to$11. That's kind of a hefty price increase for a household that's a little bit strapped.
6:57I wonder how much more can they do for raising prices to the extent that that's part of the bull story. I don't really know. So I think it's actually not crazy. I'm just pretending you're Dan, so I'm just taking the other time. It's fine. It's fine. Well, the point I was making is when it traded to the low when parks were closed and they were factoring as it was never going, everything was death, literally and figuratively, everything was death and the parks were never going to come back. Those parks numbers were$16 billion. But how do you view the streaming service in conjunction with this? Yeah, so you should get a higher multiple, but streaming has been a disaster for— It's been a drag, and it's in an environment.
7:37It's losing money. They have to focus on profitability, but they're in an environment where Netflix has proven— Sure. I don't want to say it's proven to be king, but, I mean, it's proven to have this advantage, this legacy incumbent advantage, Tim. You own those, right? And they should be the king of content, right? Well, and Netflix— Disney should be. Yeah, Disney should be. We've got a writer's strike coming up. There's a lot of speculation who's better off here. And I think Disney's going to do OK. And I think the streaming slate seems to have a pretty big backlog for both Disney and Netflix.
8:06But Netflix is a more exciting story. I mean, they're generating cash flow. It's a simpler business. It's easier to assess. I can't wait till we're going to speak to Jimmy Stewart about all of this, because streaming companies are looked at so differently than they were two years ago. I mean, how wrong were we? Very. I guess. Or is this just that growing pain that they all need to go through to figure out profitability? Because right now, those losses are costing everyone. All right. For more on Disney's earnings, let's bring in New York Times columnist James Stewart, who joins us on the Fast Line.
8:35He is also a CNBC contributor. Jim, great to have you with us. What did you make of this quarter? Well, I guess I'd call it modest progress, given the auger strategy of focusing on cost and cost cutting and eventually profitability. It'll be interesting to see if he's going to come up with an estimate of profitability on streaming. So we did see, you know, a decline in the losses at streaming. But at the same time, you see the secular forces that are afflicting Disney, the fairly significant decline in the linear programming, you know, the traditional TV cable business, which is going down. And again, I don't want to get too much in the accounting, but, you know, the overall operating income is not as good as it looks because they had that billion-dollar one-time charge a year ago.
9:24So there was actually, when you stripped that out, it was a little decline again in the quarterly earnings. I think investors were a little bit disappointed in that. You know, great performance at the theme park, no question about it. But you've had the reopening in China. Theme parks can only grow so much. We know that you can only raise prices so much more there. You can only squeeze so many more people into this park. And so that's just kind of a given. I think streaming is still the story, and we still haven't seen a model here that looks like it's ever going to rival the profitability that they enjoyed in the glory days of cable.
9:59So do you think that the best days of Disney are behind it? I mean, I'm just wondering, you know, you know, Iger, you know how he, you know, what his sort of playbook is. And I'm just wondering what you think of how he's thinking of this, of the return here. I mean, it seems like it's going to be harder than ever for Disney to reclaim its so-called magic, given the competition in the streaming landscape. And that's sort of the focus right now of investors. How can they get to profitability there? This is tough. I mean, look, Disney's a great company. I don't think they had any choice. They were confronted with this situation that really shook up that wonderfully profitable world they enjoyed for so long.
10:38And they had to react. But this is a fiercely competitive environment. I was just in L.A. for a while, and I talked to a lot of studio people who were saying that, you know, Netflix and Amazon and, you know, to some extent Apple, the spending rate is still underway. They're still pouring the billions of dollars into that. And Disney, if they want to play in that league, has no choice but to compete. Now, the rider strike is going to help them probably more than anyone else because there's an enforced truce in the arms race there. How long that goes on, we don't know, but that's only pushing it down the road because spending is all going to have to come back.
11:12How much can you cut costs and still maintain that subscriber base, which is now obviously has kind of flattened out? If you cut costs too much and you don't have the new programming, you know, people, it's so easy. You know, you just stop the subscription and wait till they come up with something new that you want. It's a very, very tough business, I think. And you've got these unbelievably deep pocketed competitors in Amazon and Netflix that you're up against. James, when you see the offering where he's combining Hulu and Disney, is that just out of the mere mere sheer fact that most people in a certain age group are never going to buy Disney streaming?
11:52Do you think that's going to move the needle for him? because that would be a little more palatable if you have a Hulu along with a Disney, because then you just buy it and you'll get it as a bonus. Yes. I mean, there's no question that the Disney Plus brand is very, like, family-focused and, you know, child-friendly, teen. And then that's good in some ways. It's got a very clear identity. But it's not going to be big enough to get to the Netflix and Amazon numbers. And if streaming really is the scale business that everyone says it is, and as far as I can tell, it is because there is almost no marginal cost when you add another subscriber.
12:32Yes, they've got to get beyond that core brand identity, and Hulu may be a path to do that. Jim, thanks for your thoughts. We'll have to see. Yep. Appreciate your thoughts, as always. Jim Stewart of The New York Times. What do we want to know on the conference call, Tim? Well, we want to hear a little bit about just the soap opera in Florida and what that means with DeSantis and this feud. I think to the extent that we want to get a little bit more insight into their, you know, how they're talking about this new mega bundle. I mean, it is a new concept and it is the sense that the companies that used to be part of the cable bundle and the linear TV heyday are thinking about things a little bit more, a little bit more of an ad model.
13:19And I think this is just the part that I think we're all struggling with what we're supposed to pay for these companies. I mean, I look at like a Warner Brothers Discovery, which has been so destroyed. But if you actually look at the numbers they just posted and they said they're going to be profitable a year in advance of where other people had. I've seen a lot of analysts run to actually upgrade this stock. And if you look at it on a free cash flow yield on 24, it's pretty exciting. So I say a lot of these companies that are especially the media focused part of their businesses are things that have been priced down.
13:48The streaming we know loses money. I think we've written streaming down to nothing. And I think it's getting kind of interesting here. Karen? Have we written it down to nothing? I don't know. It feels like it. I don't know. I mean, if that's the case, then yes. And maybe it's one of your things that are most attractive when they go from terrible, which seems to be right now in the streaming space, to just bad if there is some improvement. Well, and to Steve's point, because, I mean, Steve was talking about, like, the parks business and seemingly studio in a different world where studio are kind of clicking away here.
14:22And so the streaming business is, to me, almost been priced to nothing in that sense. Remember that they do have a ton of debt. Yep. I mean, it's not it's not I'm not saying they have a balance sheet problem at all. I'm just saying, you know, that's another expense and they're not going to be able to roll it over so cheaply. Right. Coming up, we are watching the After Hours Action in Robinhood. Shares on the move after reporting. We'll bring you the numbers straight ahead, but first, shares of Alphabet jumping on some AI updates. The headlines in the company's developer conference next. Don't go anywhere.
14:49Fast Money's back in two.
15:01Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of Alphabet topping the tape today as the tech giant hosts its annual developers conference announcing a new folding phone and what's next for AI in search. I'm sure Deirdre Bosa joins us now on the FastLine with more on this. I imagine the 4 % gain in the stock today was not because of the foldable phone, but it was because of AI. It was interesting because from the first portion of that conference, it was kind of just flat. There wasn't a lot of excitement around it. And then when Sundar Pichai came out, it showed how Search would work with its Search Labs project.
15:32That is when the stock really took off and kind of tells you what investors have been looking for. They wanted to know that generative AI isn't going to kill search. It's going to make it stronger. But here's Sander Pachai in his own words on AI. We are at an exciting inflection point. We have an opportunity to make AI even more helpful for people, for businesses, for communities, for everyone. We have been applying AI to make our products radically more helpful for a while. With generative AI, we are taking the next step. With a bold and responsible approach, we are reimagining all our core products, including search.
16:16So it wasn't just words, because Sanat Pichai has been saying something similar for a very, very long time. There was a very effective, it was about 90-second video, which I urge anyone to watch, where it showed how this new idea of search would work. It pulls in not just those 10 links that you get from a typical Google search, But videos and images and suggestions and summaries, it didn't displace the advertisers as much as sort of change the model for them. And that was what was so key and critical. And they showed it in a very effective way through some scripted demos and some live demos. But basically, the company had a lot to prove because at the last AI event, it was really botched in terms of these demos.
16:54So the fact that it went out smoothly and that it showed a new way of search is, you know, what got investors excited and perhaps gives Google the edge for now over Microsoft and ChatGPT. We'll see how Satya Nadella and team respond, though, to this next phase of the AI armory. Well, it was smart to do a video demonstration as opposed to a live demonstration. It really limits the room for error there. But, I mean, the implication, Deidre, that you were saying is that they're showing how search works and it wasn't displacing advertisers. So, therefore, the baseline is that this new kind of generative search would be as profitable as search right now.
17:33As profitable is a good question. And maybe that's why the stock didn't go up 8 percent. It only went up 4 percent because that's still a big question. We don't know exactly how it's going to work. You know, the Google team would say, oh, it's going to give them more tools to be more creative and better brand awareness. But we don't know that yet. And we know that search as it exists right now for Google is such a profitable business. How can anyone ever replicate that? But I think what he did do effectively is show that they are bringing AI from the back end front and center. Deidre, thank you.
18:04Deidre Bosa at the Google's Developers Conference. Karen, you had a trade on for this. I did. I got a little leg when Google sold off on all this Microsoft stuff. I put on a 100-110 that expires next Thursday, next Friday rather. It was a good day to take it off. I liked so many things about it that I liked. I liked that they actually had something big and, you know, showy. We always joke about, you know, the AI pixie dust being spread around that Google can't seem to find any. They found it today. And I think, you know, the idea of Google's got nothing in AI, that's absurd, right? We've known that's absurd, but here they were proving that.
18:40Some of the things were really interesting and fun, and some of them were kind of, you know, the force clapping by all the developers there, I guess. You know, when they, the fondue pizza, I don't know, I didn't really, or the writing the children's story. What's fondue pizza? It was a whole thing of, if you really want to. And why don't they serve that to us here? They might. Sounds good. But some of the other things about the phone, I thought there was some really interesting elements. They also tried to really be mindful of the wanting to protect your privacy. So one of the things that I found was interesting was this tracking.
19:11We will tell you if you have a tracking device that is not yours on your phone. And also, I think Apple was involved with that as well. I thought that was really interesting. The market is clear or people are concerned about that. So and they had some goofy fun things with what you can do with the your background page, things like that, or your screensaver. And I thought they did a really good job. They showed they are very much in the race. To your question about how profitable will it be, I don't know. But they have been considered to be asleep for the last two or three months. And, I mean, they got a lot of share to protect.
19:46Yeah. So, I mean, that's a hard job to protect share against Microsoft, who's so gung-ho to take some. So I think the different valuation reflects fear that Google will lose some. But I still think it's too wide. Court. Yeah, and I do think they knew what they needed to do today, right? I mean, we've even seen this with like Facebook, who stopped talking about the metaverse. Now they just talk about AI, because clearly that's exactly what investors want to hear is AI and cost cutting. And that's like the magic formula right now. I do think all of this is really positive right now. It is still one of your more expensive stocks.
20:20We'll probably talk about this later because we're still in this higher for longer likely rate environment that I think is, you know, likely going to continue to put some pressure on these. So we do have a position in these. You want to own your Googles by all means. I'm not actively adding to it right now on this news, but I'm really happy to see the way that they announced today. Coming up, Robinhood on the rise, a company adding users for the first time in two years. We'll bring you the headlines in the quarter in the conference called Next Plus, the debt ceiling, recession fears. It's all causing a lot of commotion in the Treasury market.
20:48How one of our traders is playing the moves. You're watching Fast Money Live from the Nasdaq Market Side in Times Square. Back right after this.
21:04We're getting some headlines at a Disney's conference call. Let's get back to Julia Boorstin. Julia. Well, Bob Iger fielding a question about Hulu, saying that in the last earnings call and recently he's been saying that everything is on the table when it comes to Hulu, but that in the past three months that he has been studying this, he said it's clear that the combination of the content on Disney Plus with general entertainment, Of course, Hulu is general entertainment is a very strong competition combination from a subscriber perspective in terms of retention and also advertising. So he said he indicated that at this point, the deal with Hulu is in the hands of Comcast and they'll have to have that negotiation with them.
21:42But they are they do see real value in having general entertainment such as Hulu combined with Disney Plus. So he said if Hulu is that solution, we are bullish about it. Of course, there already is this pre-negotiated deal with Comcast in which Comcast had already pre-negotiated to sell Disney its minority stake, guaranteeing Disney a price valuing Hulu in its entirety at a minimum of$27.5 billion. So it's going to be interesting to see how that valuation plays out. But certainly this is news that Iger is so committed to having that general entertainment piece. And it sounds like it'll be likely through Hulu.
22:20One other note here, Melissa, he was asked a question about AI. He joked that he hopes that someday he hopes that the questions on an earnings call can be answered with AI. But he did say that AI is being used to create efficiencies, ultimately to better serve consumers. But they already do understand how it could be disruptive and difficult to manage, especially from an IP perspective. And they have their lawyers working on that now. We see Disney shares now down over 4%. Back over to you. Julia, thanks. Julia Borsten. Let's get to an earnings alert on Robinhood. Shares jumping after the fintech posted a top-line beat in its first increase in monthly active users in two years.
Read the full transcript
22:59That call is underway. Christina Parts Nevelis joins us with the details. Christina. Well, Melissa, the online brokerage still hasn't posted a profit since going public in July 2021. But its Q1 results show that it's paring back operating expenses, increasing monthly active users, which you mentioned, and posted an average revenue per user of$77, up from$64 a user last quarter, driven primarily, which was just mentioned on the call, by securities trading and net interest income. On the media call that just happened before the analyst call, I was able to ask the CFO about reducing operating expenses since that's been a major overhang for the company.
23:32He said they're going to continue to look at third-party spending. They're going to scrutinize, quote, all incremental dollars and then even question whether open job postings are necessary or if certain roles need to be backfilled. He called it a pruning stage. The company also announcing that next week they will offer 24 hours of trading five days a week, trading names like Apple and Amazon and Tesla. But that's really not expected to move the needle too, too much. But other platforms and trading at 8 p.m. So maybe now you can satisfy that itch to trade at one o 'clock in the morning. The company also plans to enter into retirement advisory services.
24:07They also just mentioned that on the media call. The CEO will be on CNBC tomorrow at 845 Eastern Squawk box. Shares are still higher with this beat. Melissa? Christina, thanks. Christina, parts neveless on hood. What's the catalyst for hood? What's going to move the needle here? Well, profitability is certainly a good place to start. And they haven't proven that. It was a really good quarter sequentially, right? I mean, if you look at their assets grew 26 percent, maybe if you look at what markets did and you think about what a lot of their investors hold, the demographic of the people in that.
24:40But again, in terms of the growth sequentially in the customer base, but a 16 % growth in revenues. But I get back to where we were with this company. What sets them apart? What is really their special sauce? What do they do? 24-7 on brokerage. Who cares? Doesn't do anything. So I don't think they have really the scale to compete. Improvements in net interest, income, and whatnot. Really? I don't think that's something to get excited about in the new world we're in. But this is a stock, surprisingly, only at 3 % short interest. I just looked at that. I thought it was going to be a lot higher and would have expected that that would be a reason to maybe get behind the stock for the next couple of days.
25:18It's having a decent pop in the after hours on a technical basis. The stock came into today trading below all of its moving averages. Now it's above the 50 and 100 day. The 200 day is at 969. And if you go back and look at all the rally that that happens now, unless it crosses over to the upside 1020. This is just another lower high, so I wouldn't get sucked in until you get trading above the 200 and then above$10. I mean, that 50 and 200-day moving average were basically flat. I mean, if Carter Braxton Worth were here, I feel like he'd say a pair of twos. Yeah, to the penny. But buying it here, no one has an edge.
25:57Coming up, beauty buys. Karen Iyung Ulta shares after the stock's big pullback, why she thinks the stock is about to get a big makeover. But first, tracking Treasury is the move in the one-month T-bill that caught one of our traders' eyes. More on that when Fast Money returns.
26:19Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks closing mix after this morning. Cooler than expected inflation report. The Dow ending just in the red, down 30 points, well off the lows of the day. The S &P up half a percent. And the Nasdaq leading the gains up more than one percent. A move in the Treasury markets catching our traders' eyes. The one-month T-bill rising to levels not seen since at least August 2001. The yield now at 5.4%. Karen, you mentioned this as a trade that you were in the other night. Yes, and I find it so fascinating, right? Clearly, there is this hitch in the curve because of the default occurring prior to the maturity of the one-month bill.
26:56So that's the reason why it's there. I just think the most likely outcomes are good, which is the most likely it pays on time. The second most likely it pays shortly after on time. The third most likely it doesn't pay on time, but does continue to accrete interest and ultimately gets paid. And the last one being really bad. But I don't I think the likelihood of what is a really bad one. The really bad one is just, you know, Russia type default of U.S. debt. All right. That's not going to happen. That's not going to happen. And so I think that it's a really interesting scenario. Tomorrow, if you go on Treasury Direct, you can bid on bonds.
27:37You don't have to bid. You can say, I'm going along with the group, whatever that price may be. And they're doing$35 billion of one year tomorrow, May 11th. And then they are one month, rather. So June 11th, I don't know if it's 10th or 11th. You'll know, but you could know before that. It wouldn't be shocking that we just see the can kicked. That's okay, too. Right. So your base case scenario is that you will eventually get paid. My base case is I will get paid on time. I will get paid. But even if it's on. I hope you get paid on time. I hope we're not. I mean, you better get paid on time. I did look at the California defaulted on their debt.
28:17They issued IOUs at the same rate at whatever debt was maturing, which happened to be three and three quarters then. And it wasn't that long that you had IOUs and then got the payment in arrears with interest. Right. That could happen. All right. Well, for more on all this, let's bring in Bill Foster, sovereign analyst at Moody's Investor Service. Great to have you with us. Thanks for joining us to answer these burning questions. Is Karen's trade, does that sound right in terms of the scenarios that she's laid out? Well, we certainly expect the U.S. government to continue to honor its debt. We don't expect an interest payment to be missed.
28:53That's our base case. There's a lot of noise, obviously, around the debt limit partnership issue. We've seen the same thing in prior episodes. But ultimately, we think a deal will get done and the X date won't be crossed and the Treasury will continue to pay its debt on time and in full. I want to make clear to our audience that you are an analyst at Moody's. You wouldn't be part of the downgrading of U.S. debt. But is it possible that the U.S. doesn't even have to default to have a downgrade happen to it? And so then what happens to the curve? Well, I am the sovereign analyst that covers the U.S.
29:25government. So you would downgrade the debt. Yes. Well, I'm responsible for the sovereign credit rating. But ultimately, the short answer is our definition of a default is a missed interest payment. Any other payments that might be missed with regards to Social Security, prioritization of other payments, that's not a default by our standards. So it would have to be a missed interest payment would need to occur for a downgrade to happen. Oh, OK. Okay, because I was under this, for some other ratings agencies, as I understand it, it could just be, you know, sort of like a terrible functioning of the U.S.
29:58government could trigger a downgrade. Well, yeah, I mean, I guess the question, Bill, is on August 5th of 2011, S &P downgraded the U.S. from a AAA to a AA+. Which it still is. And that was seemingly a day the music died, even though it really wasn't. And Karen brought this up on one of our shows recently. you actually had a massive rally in the Treasury market after that for different reasons. Some of them were because what was going on in European sovereign markets. But can you just talk about, again, the perception of the U.S. and the credit worthiness as it goes into an overall rating and, you know, maybe what S &P was thinking, but what you might be thinking, despite the fact that they're going to pay and until they default?
30:40Well, you know, from our perspective, the U.S. has a very strong credit profile and the things that stand out for the U.S. versus other triple A rated economy. The triple A obviously is the highest rating that we have. We're 12 sovereigns with that rating. The fact that the U.S. has the global reserve currency of choice dominance just below 60 % of global reserves are in the U.S. dollar. And then you have the deepest, most liquid bond market in the world, the treasury bond market. That removes the risk of any foreign exchange risk for the U.S. government or any funding risk generally. It's also the largest economy in the world, obviously, and extremely resilient to shocks.
31:14And we've seen that time and time again. That really helps buffer the credit profile for the U.S. Even in a situation where we might have a missed interest payment, those types of things really help keep it close to AAA. If we had a missed interest payment, the scenario would be first, if it was resolved within 15 days, we would keep that rating very close to AAA, probably at AA1, provided there was a resolution before the next interest payment in 15 days and the debt limit issue was resolved. So there's a little bit of a grace period for the United States. Note to the Treasury, note to lawmakers, you've got this window of time here.
31:51For a downgrade. Yeah, to prevent a downgrade, to prevent a downgrade. Bill, great to have you with us. Thanks for clarifying these issues for us. We do appreciate it. Thank you for having me. Bill Foster. So now we know. He's the guy. He is the guy. He is the guy. He's a big shot. Yeah. And he holds the markets. I think we have to call him Billy Big Shot from now on. You have to call him Mr. Foster. Yeah. But it sounds like your trade is a good one. I don't know. Maybe he can't apply it and say, well, it could be. I hope so. I think so. I think so. I mean, I would want to say cooler heads will prevail in the government, but that would just be silly to say that.
32:32Yet, I do think that will happen. We'll get a deal. All right. There are a lot of clouds hanging over the markets these days, but nobody seems to have told the VIX. Yes. The CBOE volatility index is sitting below 17, not far from its lowest levels of the year. But why? Let's bring in Amber's group co-CIO, Chris Cidial. Chris, great to have you with us. So many people say, you know, but the VIX is 17. The VIX is 16. What's going on here? We've got so many regional bank crisis. We've got the debt ceiling. Are there technical reasons why the VIX is suppressed? Yeah, well, I think it's important to understand a couple of things, right the vix right now is still trading at a decent premium to what realized volatility is doing right now right so s p 30 days realized volatility is roughly about 13.
33:16the vix is around 17. vix june futures are at 20 50. right so although volatility may feel low in relation to all the fear that's going on the actual price moves in the s p really doesn't warrant a bigger implied volatility move right the market moving at 10 to 50 basis points a day with that it's really difficult to get big spikes in implied volatility with that price action. However, what we noticed throughout the year is that the hedges that were put on in 2022, a lot of people kind of telegraphed the whole inflation theme. It really led traders to kind of get exhausted in their appetite for volatility.
33:55And it can be very brutal just buying puts and losing money. So a lot of people are puking up that type of exposure, especially this year. And I think one of the other bigger points is that the implementation of these short dated options have been used as a form of yield enhancement. So what you're seeing is a lot of advisors are engaging in these type of systematic option selling programs that just naturally lead to suppress volatility across the board, which obviously has implications on VIX and implied vol. Chris, it's Tim. And thanks for joining us. The concept of volatility in a world where the Fed is always there and the Fed put has been there is different than a world where the Fed is seemingly going to let the market do what it wants to do.
34:37I'm not sure I believe that the Fed is going to do that. But do you think about this from a structural perspective and maybe from a secular perspective if we're in this era where the Fed really does have to be focused on inflation? Yeah, absolutely. And I think a lot of traders, including myself, are kind of calling bluff on the fact that the Fed put is no longer there. I think what you're seeing is this hesitancy from the market to believe that the Fed won't be supportive of equity markets. And I think the banking crisis kind of reaffirmed that, right? You saw the Fed immediately step in and talk about really hammering that down.
35:14And that's why you saw implied bull get destroyed. You know, implied bull gave it all up within a week. So I think, you know, market participants aren't really believing that. Chris, great to see you. Thanks for answering our questions. Chris Cidio of Ambrose. For more Options Action, be sure to tune into the full show. That's Friday, 5.30 p.m. Eastern time. Coming up, here's an ugly chart. But our Karen sees a beautiful buying opportunity in Ulta coming soon. Find out what level she's watching to make up some ground. That next trade is next. That's when he's back in two.
35:56Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of Alta staging a major pullback this month, down 8.5 % since touching all-time highs on May 1st. The stock, though, still up more than 7 % on the year. But is now the right time to buy this one? Karen, what do you think? Okay, what do I think? I got to give it not kudos to me because I owned it at$562. I've owned it for a long time, but it traded up to$562, which was an all-time high, and didn't sell it. But then kudos to Guy. I said, look at this. It opened on its high and closed a lot lower. And he's like, ah, this is terrible. This is, you know, look out below.
36:33Maybe at like$485 you could buy it. And so excellent call by Guy. It was actually it's been down fifty eight dollars since then and actually was down five bucks lower than that earlier today. So it's getting very close and I can tell I'm just not going to be able to wait and I'm going to end up buying it here. I really like it. They'll report earnings later this month. They've just been crushing it. And the valuation now is as attractive as it's been in a long time. They're doing a great job with their business. And but kudos to Guy. He really is. So, you know, I'm somewhat skeptical of the whole charting thing.
37:08But I do see that there is value in it. And so learning. Courtney? Yeah, Ulta, I mean, has been a position that I liked for a long time. I do think that it's something that you want to own. I do think that it's going to have a trend that's going to continue. They really hit kind of all spectrums of the income level. So regardless of what's happening with inflation, you can buy your grocery store makeup the same place you can buy your high-end makeup there. And I think that's going to continue to benefit them, especially as they get into more Target stores. I think this is going to be a longer-term story.
37:38So I do like the fact that it's pulled back here. I do think it's something you want to own for the longer term. All right. Coming up, cannabis cross shares of Trulieve losing its buzz after earnings were breaking down the quarter with CEO Kim Rivers. That's next. Much more Fast Money in two.
37:56Welcome back to Fast Money. Pot stock Trulieve lowered today after Q &A results, a company falling short of revenue estimates but benefiting from record 420 sales and cost-cutting initiatives. The report comes as the Senate Banking Committee is set to take up a key piece of legislation that the cannabis industry views as a financial lifeline. Joining us to discuss all this is True Leaf CEO Kim Rivers. Kim, always great to see you. Great to be here. Thanks for having me. Pricing has always been an issue or has been a real issue in recent quarters. And I'm wondering what you're seeing going on. I mean, I know that you're more insulated from the pressure in wholesale pricing, but there is sort of a knock-on effect.
38:33I mean, if those prices go lower, branded prices also feel the pressure. So what are you experiencing right now? Yeah, so I mean, we're certainly seeing continued pressure on wallet, which has continued from last year. And we're seeing some trade down as consumers shift to the value segment. Certainly, that's our fastest growing segment across our portfolio. But I think the good news for cannabis is that we did have record-breaking traffic and transactions for 420. We sold over 386 ,000 units that day. And so demand is still strong. But we are certainly, as a cash business, we are certainly continuing to see some wallet pressure happening across the country, along with some price compression, for sure.
39:15Hey, Kim, it's Tim. And clearly no question about demand in the cannabis space. It's really more about profitability. Some of it that's very structural within the cannabis industry. Some of it related to the illicit markets. Some of it just related to companies' balance sheets. Congrats on being someone that has more flexibility than most in the cannabis space in terms of your balance sheet, in terms of your ability to actually generate operating free cash flow from operations. How do you see that in the next 12 to 18 months playing out for Trulieve? Can you can you play offense here? I know your CapEx budget's been cut significantly.
39:47That's mostly is just a function of projects kind of running their course and actually now being in a position to see new supply come online. But I, you know, as someone that's in the middle of this industry and invest in it as well, I kind of think it's a great time for companies with strong balance sheets to play offense. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think, look, having optionality at Trulieve has been a key differentiator for us as long as we've been in business. And being in a situation where we are able to eat what we kill also is really key for us. And that's certainly something that we're continuing to focus on.
40:18And to your point, Tim, we have we have spent significant resources in building out our supply chain in advance of catalysts. I mean, we've also are investing in Florida, for example, the ballot initiative there, which we've crossed enough signatures, over a million signatures for placement on the ballot, assuming Supreme Court approval, which will be a major catalyst for us with over 40 percent of that market right now. And continuing to invest, obviously, in stores and retail retail footprint there ahead of that coming online. And that being said, to your point, I think that the opportunity set as it relates to potential tech and strategic acquisitions remains interesting.
40:53I think it's going to get more interesting over the next 12 to 18 months as we see debt come due and access to capital continue to be more sparse for other companies in both private and public settings. Do you have a lot of lobbyists in Washington right now, Kim? Not enough. Working from the banking industry to the cannabis industry? Yes, yes, we do. Yes, we do. We're very excited about the hearing tomorrow. As you noted, Melissa, tomorrow is a historic day and that we will have a Senate hearing on safe banking and expect to hopefully have a markup come out of that hearing, which would put safe banking on the floor for a vote or scheduled actually teed up for a floor vote, which, of course, has not happened to date.
41:37We have passed and safe banking has passed the house numerous times but and to have it originate with bipartisan support from the Senate would be really important again as a reminder and safe banking would provide safe harbor for banking and financial institutions to be able to bank cannabis and it potentially could lead to having cash out of our dispensary so more safe environment and really a critical tool for access to capital particularly for small and diverse businesses so it's it's really going to be important if we can get that across the finish line Kim thanks for joining us. Nice to see you, Kim Rivers.
42:11Grasso, do you think this is going to work safe? I don't think it'll pass right now. I think you need a clean bill. And I think there's a lot of voices on this topic. And I don't think you will see it pass. And when you talk about it passing the House, it didn't pass this house. And I think the Senate has some other stuff going on, too. Yeah, I agree. And by full disclosure, I'm long truly personally and in my cannabis ETF. But I think this is exciting. This is bicameral proposed. proposed. So both houses, House and Senate that, you know, anyone that's been following this industry is not banking.
42:42Sorry for the pun on safe banking going through. But a narrow bill. Steve's talking about a lot of people, including Chuck Schumer, have thrown everything in the kitchen sink in. Please don't do that. I think that's what we'll get it through. Up next, final trades.
43:07Time for the final trade. Tim. A streaming outcast seemingly WBD, I think, is actually de-levering and growing free cash flow better than the bigger players. WBD. Karen. Yes. Guy, really thanks for the guidance. You saved me a lot of money so far, but I can't wait anymore. I'm going to buy some. Courtney. Disney, I think it's what you want to own for the long run. I'd buy on some weakness here. Steve Grasso. Apple on a breakout. I think it's going to be trading above$200 shortly. All right. Thank you all for watching Fast Money. We'll see you back here tomorrow at 5 for more Fast. Meantime, do not go anywhere.
43:42Mad Money with Jim Kramer starts right now.
43:52All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC Universal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the fast money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.
44:26To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit CNBC.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.
From the publisher
Shares of Disney were lower after the media giant posted first quarter earnings. The company saying streaming losses improved, but that subscribers fell. We dig in on the numbers to find out where the stock is going from here. Plus, the 1-month Treasury note hit its highest in at least 20 years, and one of our traders is playing the security. We tell you how.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
