In short
Podcast Notes: CNBC's "Fast Money" - Episode: Elon Musk Weighs In… And Fed Survey Results (5/20/25)
Episode Summary In this episode of "Fast Money," hosted by Melissa Lee, the show focuses on a wide range of financial topics, prominently featuring an exclusive interview with Elon Musk conducted by David Faber. Musk discusses Tesla's upcoming robotaxi rollout, his commitment as CEO, and the current landscape of cryptocurrency, particularly Dogecoin (DOGE). The episode also covers recent developments in Alphabet's AI endeavors amid its Google I/O conference, discusses earnings from companies like Toll Brothers and Palo Alto Networks, and wraps up with insights from CNBC’s Flash Fed Survey regarding recession odds and economic outlook.
---
Key Highlights
- Elon Musk and Tesla
- Robotaxi Rollout:
- Musk confirmed the launch of Tesla's robotaxi service in Austin, Texas, set for the next month.
- Initial deployment will involve a limited number of vehicles (10-30) without drivers, but monitored remotely.
- Plans to expand to cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles in the future.
- Emphasized a cautious approach to the rollout, stating, “We’re going to be extremely paranoid about the deployment.”
- Sales and Stock Performance:
- Tesla's stock has seen a significant rebound (over 40% since earnings report on April 22).
- Musk mentioned that Tesla vehicle sales are rebounding, but investor interest is driven more by optimism in autonomous and humanoid technologies rather than traditional auto sales.
- Competitive Landscape:
- When asked about competition, particularly from BYD in China, Musk claimed he does not monitor competitors.
- Discussion on Tesla's Stock Valuation
- Optimism vs. Fundamentals:
- Panelists noted that Tesla trades more on future potential rather than current sales numbers, leading to dislocation in valuation.
- Concerns regarding the disconnect between the stock price and Tesla’s automotive revenue performance.
- Alphabet's AI Developments
- Google I/O Conference:
- Alphabet’s stock fell during the conference, which raised questions about its position in the competitive AI landscape.
- They showcased advancements but failed to clearly define the future of its search engine versus AI-driven models.
- Waymo, Alphabet’s driverless car unit, surpassed 10 million paid rides, marking significant growth.
- Economic Outlook from the Flash Fed Survey
- Recession Odds:
- Respondents indicated a 41% probability of recession, down from 53% in April.
- Growth outlook slightly improved to 1%, while inflation forecasts remain high at 3.1%.
- Over 80% of respondents expressed uncertainty regarding the economic impact of tariffs.
- Earnings Highlights
- Toll Brothers:
- Reported strong earnings, reaffirming full-year guidance despite a softer demand environment linked to rising mortgage rates.
- Palo Alto Networks:
- Shares fell despite beating earnings estimates due to margin concerns and guidance that did not excite investors.
- Market Reaction and Broader Economic Concerns
- General market trends showed declines across major indices, emphasizing ongoing uncertainties in the economy and the market’s response to earnings and economic data.
- The FAA's recent announcement about Newark Airport operations was mentioned, indicating external factors influencing market performance.
---
Key Takeaways
- Elon Musk's commitment to Tesla and its innovations shows confidence but also raises questions about the sustainability of the stock's current valuation.
- Alphabet's challenges in the AI sector may pose risks to its future earnings potential, especially in a rapidly evolving market.
- Economic indicators from the Flash Fed survey suggest cautious optimism, but high uncertainty remains about inflation and recession forecasts.
- Earnings reports from various companies reflect mixed results, with market reactions indicating sensitivity to broader economic trends.
---
Conclusion This episode of "Fast Money" encapsulates critical insights into key players in the tech and automotive industries, alongside important economic indicators that could steer investor sentiment. The discussions highlight the complexities investors face when navigating current market dynamics, particularly in technology and automotive sectors driven by innovation and changing consumer expectations.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square, this is Fast Money. Here's what's on tap tonight. A Tesla turnaround. Shares hitting a three-month high as CEO Elon Musk sits down with their own David Faber. All the headlines from that exclusive interview coming up. Plus, losing ground. Alphabet shares falling into the red as its Google I.O. conference kicks off. Why investors weren't so excited about the company's place in the AI race. And Toll Brothers and Palo Alto on the move after their latest earnings reports. Pfizer inks an up to$6 billion deal in the cancer space.
0:32We're counting down to target earnings? Will the company hit the bullseye or will it be a miss for the retail giant? I'm Melissa Lee. Come to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Bono and Eisen, Dan Nathan, Guy Adami and Julie Beal. We'll get to Alphabet's AI ambitions in just a moment, but we start off with all the biggest headlines from Elon Musk's big day. The polarizing Tesla CEO saying in just the last hour he believes the company's optimist robots will be the biggest product ever. Speaking with our David Faber not once but twice today about everything from Tesla's robo-taxi rollout and competition in China to the progress Doge is making in Washington.
1:07Musk also saying earlier today he's committed to remain CEO of the EV maker for the next five years. Our Phil Lebeau has even more on Musk and Tesla's stock reaction. Phil. Melissa, let's start first off with the comments he made regarding the robo-taxi development and the service that the company plans to launch starting next month. And he gave us a timeline for the robo-taxi. Now, this is not new, but it is a little more detailed in terms of what's going to happen here. He did confirm that the Austin, Texas launch next month is on schedule. Small number of cars. They're going to start maybe in 10, 15, 20 range and then ramp from there in a geo-fenced service area within Austin.
1:46And these vehicles, while they will not have a driver in the vehicle, they will be monitored by remote drivers. Here's Musk talking with our David Faber. We'll start with probably 10 for a week, then increase it to 20, 30, 40. And I think by, say, you know, we'll probably be at a thousand within a few months. And then we'll expand to other cities, expand to San Francisco, California, Los Angeles, Is that a real possibility in the not too distant future? I mean, Texas is very different, I don't need to tell you, than California when it comes to regulation. We'll see what happens as the rollout develops over the next year, year and a half here.
2:33Elon Musk once again reiterated that he sees the potential for Tesla vehicle owners who have the full self-driving, unsupervised full self-driving technology within their vehicles to add those vehicles. And perhaps your own personal vehicle could be part of the Tesla robo taxi network. But he stressed time and again, they are going to go slow in launching this robo taxi network. We're going to be extremely paranoid about the deployment as we should be. It would be foolish not to be. So we'll be watching what the cars are doing very carefully. And as we find, as confidence grows, you know, less of that will be needed.
3:17One last thing. We're going to show you Tesla versus BYD over the last year. And why are we showing you this. David Faber asked him point blank, what about the competition in China? What about BYD? You know what he said, Melissa? I don't watch the competitors. I don't know. You can make your own mind up about whether or not you believe he doesn't watch the competitors because they're certainly watching him and they will be watching him as they launch the robo taxi service starting next month in Austin. Melissa? If he doesn't, maybe he should. Phil, he also made comments suggesting that Tesla sales are rebounding, which I would have thought would have been better for the stock.
3:55Yes, but increasingly, Melissa, it seems like the sales of Tesla vehicles, while they may have an impact when they're starting to slow down, as they did earlier this year, especially around when sales are reported, if they're way below expectations, we do see it hit the stock. But increasingly, this is a stock that is moving on the optimism that Elon Musk has when it comes to autonomous vehicle technology and the humanoid robots. Those two things, which he has pounded time and again for the last nine months, that's what's driving the stock, Melissa. So, yes, sales may be improving, but the traditional business, auto business within Tesla of selling vehicles to people like you and me, that is not driving the stock as much as it once did.
4:40All right. Phil, thanks. Phil LeBeau. You bet. And when Phil's talking about driving the stock, the stock is up more than 40 percent since it reported earnings April 22nd here. So what do you make of these comments of the interview? I mean, it was an unprecedented two-part interview here. David does a great job. I mean, a lot to glean from that without question. There's a lot of hopium, as Dan will tell you. Self-driving is the way. I mean, their head of self-driving basically said, I think it was earlier this month, that Waymo is a couple years ahead of them. So there clearly is competition. But break down the stock from here.
5:10Made an all-time high close to$500 earlier this year for a lot of different reasons. Traded down to that sort of 220 level, which we collectively said was support before, should be support again. This bounce that you've seen, and you just mentioned it's a big one, is about a 50 % retracement of that entire move. It makes sense that we're here. The question is, do you continue to own the stock on the optimism, or do you trade around the edges, which has been an opportunity for the last few years? Yeah, so what's interesting, you asked, is it driving the stock? When you look at Waymo, they probably have 700 cars out there in four different cities right now.
5:44They work pretty well. I've been in them. It's a pretty interesting experience. It takes up to four people in those cars. In the Google or Alphabet's other bets last year, they lost about$2 billion, right? So this takes me back to Tesla back in the day. The Model S and the Model X were meant to fund what's going on in the lower end, which is the Model 3 and the Model Y. Now, those cars have done really well. I think it's a really low percentage of the cars that they make right now are those higher end ones. So if you think about all the losses that Alphabet has just to put Waymo on the streets until you get some level of scale, these things are not scaling.
6:21Even the Waymo is not scaling. So when you think about what's going on, they're going to launch 10, maybe 20 of these robo taxis or cyber cabs. They're two seat cars, which is kind of, you know, it doesn't make a lot of sense. They're two seat cars. And so at the end of the day, if Tesla is going to make these things, then that means that they have to own the fleet. And that's something that we learned this from Uber over the last 10 years or so. Nobody wants to own the fleet. If you want to talk about losses until something scales, that's the thing. And one last point, when you look at earnings for Tesla, they're expected to do$4 in 2027.
6:55They did$4.07 back in 2022. So you've got to figure out how to pay for this thing. So if the stock is up 40 percent right now, it's got over a trillion dollar market cap. I just don't see how it grows into that because Optimus is years away. Yeah, I don't really think there's much debate over whether or not, you know, the stock is trading a bit dislocated from the actual automotive business. I mean, if you look at the last quarter's numbers, you had a 20 percent decline in revenue and 71 percent decline in net income. So clearly that coupled with the 40 percent rally, you see some dislocation there.
7:27That doesn't really seem to make a lot of sense. With that said, and Dan makes a good point, if you talk about the fleet, you typically don't see these type of multiples on very highly capital-intensive businesses. It just kind of erodes gross margin. You have deferred maintenance. You have capex. You have all these things that you have to – an inflated cost basis that makes it very tough to support that type of multiple. With that said, I clearly think the bulls are all about humanoid robots, full self-driving, and you really have to get behind that story if you're going to own the stock, particularly at this level.
7:58It has never traded with an auto multiple. It has never traded on sales. It has never traded on all these things that you guys are talking about. It's always traded on hope. Adam Jonas and Morgan Stanley makes an interesting point. He says most of the valuation of Tesla is based on products that have no disclosure, little disclosure, or far from commercialization. And it has always been the case for Tesla's valuation that that has made up the bulk of the valuation. Julie Beal, I know you can't get on board with Tesla, but can you see why others might? No, not at all. I think the real thing is that it's all kind of hopes and dreams.
8:40Remember, the very first time we talked about robo-taxis was in 2019, and Elon was promising one million robo-taxis by 2020. So I think the credibility gap with the proclamations that we're expecting has always been very wide. There's never really been an ability to deliver. And I think if you look at what the Cybertruck really means, it's an inability to recognize product market fit. And I think it's the same with having a two-seater for your robot. You're really building off of what you think is kind of cool and great, but I really don't have conviction that it's what the market is looking for.
9:17And I think that's really what's going to hinder the stock and earnings, although it doesn't seem to really matter in terms of the stock multiple. But I do think at a fundamental level, there's really not enough here to justify anywhere near this level of valuation. Yeah, I think everything Julie just said makes a lot of sense here. And I just I'll guess this right here. I think they'll buy X and XAI. They won't. Well, I mean, he says a lot of things. And you know what I mean? But but think about it. If the autos don't really rebound, they're expected to do one point eight million units this year.
9:48I think some have estimates down at one point six million. You're going to have to say, don't look here, look there, especially if RoboTaxi doesn't scale because Optimus is years away. But you make the point how disconnected it is. That's fine. A lot of people have made a lot of money doing it. But you better believe that all this stuff that Cathie Wood believes that Ron Barron Lee, you know what I mean? because we've never seen a stock like this in the history of stocks. Like, think about it. How many trillion-dollar market cap companies are there? There's probably seven. This is one of them.
10:18The others trade on fundamentals. This one does it. I don't know why it's special. You know, you mentioned Ron Barron. I mean, he is convicted in a major way. We had the futurist from the ARK Innovation, ARK Invest, I think, the day of earnings. You know, he said, I mean, I'm paraphrasing to a point, but, you know, the auto business is sort of a lost leader, and you're not focused on the right things. I mean, there are people out there, and they might wind up being right, that think Tesla, forget about a trillion-dollar company, could be the first$10 trillion company. And a lot of people, a lot smarter than I, believe that.
10:48Not a high bar, I know, but there is the other side of that coin. Well, if you missed any part of David Faber's interview with Elon Musk, you can catch the full conversation 7 p.m. Eastern time right here on CNBC. Well, another MAG7 name-making headlines today, that would be Alphabet. The stock turning sharply lower as it kicked off its Google I.O. developer conference today. The company also just releasing new Waymo trip numbers. CNBC's Deidre Bosa has got all the details of moving the stock. Deebo. Hey, Mel. So Google, it showed off advanced AI capabilities and features, but what it didn't do was answer the biggest question and really the biggest dilemma around its business right now.
11:22Is this an evolution of search or is it a replacement? And so the implications of a new landscape on Google's cash cow advertising still not clear. Despite today's move, Alphabet shares they have climbed back from the EDIQ comments a few weeks ago about declining Safari search volumes and viable alternatives to search. And underneath the surface, Google is catching up as it focuses on adoption, but it really needed to tell a narrative today. Now, one area where Google is the clear leader is its subsidiary Waymo, driverless cars. Waymo has just surpassed 10 million fully driverless paid rides, doubling its lifetime total in just the last five months.
12:01The Alphabet unit, it hit 5 million rides at the end of last year. And trajectory is set to accelerate as it expands to new cities like Atlanta and Miami. This is a major milestone for the robo-taxi race. I know you guys were just talking about it. It's also a direct challenge to Tesla out of its own autonomy push. I spoke exclusively to Waymo's co-co, Takedra Mawakana, who said that Waymo's approach is about replacing the driver entirely, not just assisting them. So guys, as you talk about Tesla and the robo-taxi trade, it is so notable that Waymo is that 10 million paid driverless rides, which is just a massive milestone considering that Tesla is going to be putting 10 to 15 out on the road.
12:41Yeah, a very timely update on the Waymo business. Deirdre, I'm curious in terms of the AI mode, do they speak exclusively about how they're going to experiment putting in ads? It sounded like they were considering putting ads in, but they haven't reached the point where they will. Yeah, so the key word, as you said, Mel, is experimentation, right? There's AI mode, which is now going to be a tab. There's AI overviews, and then you've got Gemini. The way that they're incorporating AI into search is exactly how they can figure out how to experiment with ads. And they say that they're actually seeing more engagement in AI mode and AI overview.
13:19So that should lead to monetization that should keep up with sort of the old search 10 blue links business model. But we'll have to see if that's the case, right? Because we know that OpenAI perplexity and others are working on their own ad models and, you know, experimenting as well in very different ways. I guess the question is whether or not this AI mode will actually replace traditional search and whether it can monetize fast enough in order to make up for the lost business on traditional search. I mean, that's the$10 ,000 question, Exactly. And Google's kind of been straddling both, right?
13:51They're not going all in on Gemini. They're having AI mode, so they're having their cake and eat it, too. And some might question whether if you don't take a risk on one, do you risk losing it all? Yep. Deidre, thank you. Deidre Bosa from the Google conference. So is it competitive with some of the smaller upstarts out there? I mean, you've used all of them. Flexi, ChatGPT, blah, blah, blah, et cetera. Deirdre had a great interview last week of Dmitry Shevlenko. He is the chief business officer at Perplexity. And they are going to be releasing a browser soon. So is OpenAI. And I think that's going to be a huge headwind for Google because a lot of people use Chrome.
14:27Most of the people use Chrome as a browser. That's the only time I am doing Google searches when I have my browser up right now. I use Perplexity all the time. And I'm going to continue to do that. So once the browser comes out, I think it's going to be a huge headwind for Google. But I get it. It's probably years off. And I am actually really excited about Waymo. I think you're going to keep seeing investments into that product, which will. And this goes for Tesla, too, by the way. They don't have a hard time raising money. So if you have private equity or some of these other folks come in and actually fund the expansion of these things, that will be, I think, a big positive for both of those guys.
15:03All right. For more on Alphabet's newest AI announcements, let's bring Fast Money Friend and Deepwater Asset Management Managing Partner Gene Munster. Gene, always good to get your take on things. What do you make of Google's AI advancements? I don't know if you want to call it advancements at this point. Melissa, we actually, I think we learned a fair amount today. And we learned first that the landscape's changing more fast than what they had expected. They're opening comments around search. They said it's been a profound change over the past year. Second, we learned that their answer is AI mode.
15:40And basically what AI mode is, think of it as AI overviews or just a generative search result that has ads wrapped around it. So it's not the peer kind of GPT simple answer. And then the third piece that we learned was that Google's not willing to rip the band-aid off. And not that they should, given that they've got 2.2 billion people that use search 20 plus times a day. I mean, just huge muscle memory there. But that's something that really stuck out. And I think that's what investors were hoping was that they would be a little bit more aggressive. Effectively, what Google is telling those users that really haven't got the bug related to generative AI yet is just trust us.
16:25We're going to have a great experience. No need to look over here. My sense is that over time people would just still find their way to these more simplified results. But I think we learned a lot, and we learned that Google understands there's a lot at stake here. Gene, obviously your take is extraordinarily important, but, you know, Ben writes, I think it was the end of March or early April, and I don't think he made this comparison likely, but he sort of compared, he didn't sort of, he compared Google with Eastman Kodak, which, again, he obviously thought about that. Thoughts on the potential for them to become as irrelevant as Kodak did seemingly overnight?
17:01So my version of that isn't quite as harsh. It's that they're the next eBay. And I don't know how long it took Eastman Kodak to wind down, but I was recently looking at how long it took Netflix for their DVD business. And by the way, we recently had a conversation about Outerbox. same thing, Redbox, is that it took 16 years from the time that Netflix announced that they were going to effectively focus on the, in 2007, on the streaming business, they shut it down in 2022 or 2023. So what does that tell us as we think about that Eastman Kodak or that eBay, is that this is going to take a long time.
17:42And despite the fact that things are moving at a profound speed. And I'm a person who I just quick jump forward one, two, five years and kind of think down there. And the reality is, is that Google is going to have a good search quarter between here and there and the stock's going to skyrocket. And then it's going to kind of drift back down until they really answer that question, a true offering that competes with these other generative, very simple answers. I think that's ultimately what they need. Well, are they moving fast enough to answer that question, Gene? Because I think, I mean, if the stock is going to be caught in a range because of that the lack of an answer to that question then it's it's i don't know it's not a holding that you hold and and you said and forget it kind of thing definitely don't hold and forget it and they've got time here i mean again muscle memory 20 times a day 2.2 billion people use their product i mean that is just unprecedented and that gives them room to figure this stuff out.
18:37And those people, like we obsess about this, but the average person just likes Google and they find ways to use it. They don't want the Band-Aid to get ripped off. And so I think that they do have time. And right now, my sense as an investor, I don't have time for this. We don't own the stock anymore. But I think that for as we kind of move forward, they're going to still have good pockets here that investors are going to say it's not happening as fast as we thought it will be. And so you just kind of have this bumpy road down. Definitely don't want to rule them out. I mean, make no mistake, they got an incredible brand, but they probably need to, they do need to innovate beyond what they're showing with AI mode.
19:14But I'm curious though, because as they continue to push AI mode and AI tabs to the average, you know, Google search person, and let's say more and more people use those tabs, but they're not monetizing they can have a good search quarter but advertising wise it might not be a good quarter well they will the the basically why they did ai mode is because they still have search shots on net i mean it it will show you a generative result but at least i watched the demo twice there's there's paid there's basically paid links on the bottom and the side and so you can what's unique is you can keep going down a thread which you really can't do with ai overviews today It doesn't allow you to keep going down there.
19:57So that's something that definitely is better. But to answer your question, I mean, they promoted this 10 percent increase in search and there's more usage. And that's just shots on that. So that's how they can kind of keep moving along here is that as more people do it, they can they can capture those blue links. Jean, thanks. Always good to get your take. Thank you. Jean Munster, Deepwater Asset Management. Julie Veal, how are you feeling about Alphabet? that? I just think they're in such a difficult position. You know, if you think about how much they're going to have to do, how much they have to overcome, people have already decided it feels like the chat GPT is the winner.
20:33There are inroads for them. I think if they can really make inroads in terms of getting into the iOS system so that it's not just chat GPT, but they have a shot there, I think there's opportunity for them. The thing is, is that, you know, if you think about the internet writ large, right, we made a decision at the very beginning that the way we were going to of fund all of it was through advertising. And advertising is its own form of cocaine for, you know, capital markets. It's what's kind of supported Netflix through its last transition. And I think like what's really difficult is what we're trying to do, it feels like with a lot of these AI models is do freemium or subscription models, because you get a better multiple on those for sure.
21:11And I just think that they are really trying to sit in the chasm of being able to have it all, they really are going to have to commit one way or the other. I agree there's a lot of inertia for most people. But for investors who are really seeing what's out on the horizon, it's just not good enough. You know, I'm of the opinion, I think DeepSea kind of informed us all that I'm of the opinion that they have to get it right, but they don't necessarily have to get it right right now. And I don't believe that search is going away. For me, they really need to be able to produce a premium offering. And as we start to see inference and innovation over time, the lapse between being able to come up with something and bring it to market, that time is going to shrink.
21:49So I'm still of the opinion that they can continue to use ads to fund that business and that growth model. So, yes, I think investors are a bit uneasy that they don't have a solution right now. But I'm a bit hesitant to kind of pull the ripcord because they don't have an answer yet, being that we've seen how quickly a new innovation can come to market. Coming up to last week's trade talks with China moved the needle on recession odds. The latest results from CNBC's Flash Fed survey is coming up. But first, shares of Toll Brothers and Palo Alto networks both on the move after reporting results, details and numbers from the quarters.
22:21Next, don't go anywhere. Fast Money is back in two.
22:32Welcome back. We've got a news alert on the FAA and the issues at Newark Airport. Phil LeBeau is back with the details. Phil. Melissa, after meeting with the airlines last week and after saying on Friday that it planned to make a proposal for 28 arrivals and departures per day at Newark, and then 34 after June 14th per day. That's what the FAA has just instituted, announcing just a few minutes ago that until June 15th, when one of the runways under construction, most of that work will be finished, it'll be 28 departures and arrivals per day out of Newark. And then after June 15th until October 25th, it'll be 34 departures and arrivals per day.
23:12So the schedule has been reduced officially by the FAA at Newark International Airport. Melissa, back to you. All right, Phil, thanks. Bill LeBeau. Meantime, we've got an earnings alert on Toll Brothers. Shares of the luxury home builder jumping on an earnings and revenue beat. Toll also reaffirming its full year guidance. Same week's Diana Oleg has got all the details. Diana. Beat on the top and bottom lines. Toll's adjusted gross margin came in at 27.5%, in line with expectations slightly higher. Home deliveries were up 10 percent year over year, well above expectations, and the average price of those homes was$933 ,700.
23:48That was below estimates of$954 ,200. Toll's CEO, Doug Yearley, noted a softer demand environment in the release, part of that likely due to rising mortgage rates during the quarter and the big swings in the stock market after the tariff announcement in early April. But he added that given the shortage of housing and favorable demographics, we continue to believe the long-term outlook for the new home market remains positive, particularly for our luxury niche. And this goes along with what we've been seeing in the overall market, which is much more activity on the higher end where buyers are not so sensitive to mortgage rates.
Read the full transcript
24:23Melissa. Diana, thank you. Diana Olek on toll. The expectations going into the quarter were kind of low. I mean, analysts are expecting softness in the luxury market. They're expecting some volume and margin softness as well. Correctly so, and they beat it. It's a good quarter. The average price is concerning, not so much. I mean, the high end is going to be the last one to feel it. But look, Mel, this is a stock that went from 170 to 90, not in a straight line, but pretty much in a straight line. So you see how when things start to soften, things slow down, these are going to be affected. If you think rates are going higher, which I do, and if you think the unemployment rate is going higher, it's really hard to get your arms around these homebuilders despite the fact that it's rallying here.
25:01I tend to agree, but I would just say that I don't think the home builders are a monolith. I think toll is probably your most defensive just because you don't have the same rate sensitivity. You don't have the same employment sensitivity. You have a much larger cash buyer cohort. And then if you kind of look around some of the earnings, you look at Beezer, you look at Home Nanny, and you look at these sub -$3 billion revenue companies, which kind of just don't fit the bill in terms of really applying to the upper consumer. So I think DHI, if you're looking for kind of scale and scope, I think they do about$35 billion in revenue toll.
25:37And then I think KB Homes. And I think you will see a separation between those three and the other constituents of the XHB. Yeah, I'll just say this. The average 30-year mortgage right now is 7%. The low over the last 10 years was 2.65 back in 2021. If you think about all those folks that are locked into those, you can tell me that a million-dollar buyer is not sensitive to mortgage rates. I don't really buy it. I think if you're doing or considering a trade-up and you have a 2.75 mortgage, you're just not doing it. And if you are, you probably have to put 20 % or 25 % down right now. And the tariff thing is a problem for these guys.
26:09Their input costs are going higher. We have a shortage of people to build these homes. So there's a whole host of things that I just don't think this lines up particularly well for right now. Coming up, more After Hours action to bring you shares of Palo Alto Networks on the move after reporting the details and the numbers from the quarter next. You're watching Fast Money live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square. Back right after this.
26:38Welcome back to Fast Money. An earnings alert on Palo Alto Network. Shares lower despite beating top and bottom line estimates. Pippa Stevens has got the details. Hey, Pippa. Hey, Melissa. Well, a margin miss and guidance that didn't blow investors away seems to be behind the weakness. The company sees Q4 EPS between 87 and 89 cents, a bit better than forecast with its revenue guide toward the higher end of estimates. The call is underway now, with the company saying the urgency around AI is omnipresent for Palo Alto's customers, which is creating a higher sense of urgency to undertake technology transformation, and that traditional IT architectures weren't built for the scale, speed, or complexity of AI, all of which is good news for cybersecurity.
27:1330 CEO Nikesh Arora adding the company's XIM product is now its fastest growing product ever, saying it has the potential to be a game changer for Palo Alto networks. Now, for more on the quarter, be sure to catch CEO Nikesh Arora tonight on Mad Money at 6 p.m. Eastern. Melissa. All right, Pippa, thanks. Pippa Stevens, Julie Beal, what do you make of this sort of a stealth AI play? Yeah, I think the real challenge with them right now is that whether or not they can really get this kind of platform strategy to work and sink in. And I think investors are probably concerned, are they going to have to discount to make that happen?
27:47What they're trying to do is really be your one-stop shop for security. Part of the way that they're approaching that is just by having a great AI solution. And I have confidence that they can do that. The real trick, though, is being able to maintain that strong pricing and drive growth. Security is always a tricky place to be investing. And you really have to have a lot of expertise and know what the movements are going to be like. And the other thing is that, in general, most companies, they won't switch out their security vendors. They'll just layer them on top of each other. And I think by trying to be the platform, it's a bigger lift for them, but there's more reward as well.
28:22The quarter was fine. I think we all agree. Revenue is up 16 % year over year. The guide was in line, and you can't inline guide with that kind of valuation. But we've seen this before with Palo Alto a number of different times, where the report earnings, stock sells off, and a week and a half, two weeks later, it's back to new highs. I think that's the sort of setup we're in right now. By the way, I think there might be a conference call in a few minutes, so you've got to wait and listen to that. Technically speaking, they are bumping up against short-term resistance. Long-term, I mean, I'm just a buyer of the space in general.
28:50I think as we see, you know, we were talking about it with Google and Alphabet, as we see the shift towards more AI generative type things, you are going to need more security. So long-term, I'm a player. I do think, you know, technically they're a bit challenged in the short term. Near term, you're a player. Long term, I'm a player. No, but near term, you are a player. You are a player. Is that a compliment? We're your panelists and you're a player. Yeah, I just want to say really quickly, this company is growing earnings and sales 15 % over the next few years. And, you know, 60 times not particularly interesting to me.
29:23Coming up, markets may have rebounded from their April lows, but have recession odds really come down? The latest read from CNBC's Flash Fed survey and the outlook for growth, inflation and more. Fast when he's back in two.
29:41Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks closing the day in the red. The S &P snapping its six-day winning streak. The Dow falling more than 100 points and the Nasdaq down nearly four-tenths of a percent. Meantime, CNBC went back into the field after the U.S. and China reached a deal to temporarily cut tariffs. To find out if recession expectations had changed, our Steve Leisman joins us now with the findings. Interesting, Steve. What did you find? Yeah, hey, Melissa, after that agreement to the U.S. and China, a trade agreement of sorts, we went out with our CNBC Flash Fed survey. What's happened is respondents have dialed back their inflation and their recession concerns, but both remain elevated and policy uncertainty is very high.
30:21Here's the data. We came up with 34 respondents, including Fed fund managers, strategists and economists, put recession probability at 41 percent. That's down from 53 in April following the massive tariffs imposed by President Trump. But concern about a recession, it remains nearly double where it was in January. So 41 or 42 is pretty elevated. Compared to March, the growth outlook, a touch better at 1 percent. Still weak, though. Inflation forecast, a little bit better, but still high at 3.1 percent year over year. And unemployment, 4.5 percent, better than the prior forecast, but higher than the 4.2 right now.
30:55Forecasters have almost no confidence in their numbers. More than 80 percent said they were uncertain about the outlook for tariffs and uncertain about the economic impact of tariffs. The average respondent sees a 3.9 percent funds rate by year end, so about two quarter point cuts and another two next year, which is to say the Fed remains restrictive or you can see they're above that 3.3 percent terminal rate for a couple of years yet. Seventy percent of forecasters say proposed deficits were larger than previously expected, while a 36 percent plurality said this tax bill not working through Congress actually makes them more optimistic about the outlook.
31:30But about two thirds say it makes no difference or actually makes them more pessimistic. So, Melissa, you know, it's not all better, but it's a little bit better than it was. It's a little bit better, but with the asterisk that nobody's really confident in the little bit better either. Yeah. No, it's a huge asterisk because people just aren't confident that, for example, some of the commentary talked about the 90 days. Like, what happens at the end of that? Can I make my forecast based on that? So they're not as confident. They're not a confidence with the mechanisms and they're not confident with the outcomes here.
32:04Steve, great backdrop. I hope you're fishing later. Here's a bit of a curveball, but I know you're well suited to hit this one. Japan just had their worst bond auction since like 1987, and it's been concerning how quickly their yields are going higher. I know the Fed watches everything, but is this something you think that concerns them or is this just a bit of an anomaly here? Only, as you might expect, to the extent that there is, it's a symbol or symbolic or emblematic of any broader systemic risk in global markets. I think the Fed was probably much more concerned about the recent decline in the dollar, along with the decline in bonds and decline in stocks.
32:43Those three assets moving together was a cause of concern, as well as some stuff that was going on inside financial markets that were reasons for concern before the president, you know, backtracked on those tariffs on April 9th and then again helping out on May 12th. So I think it's something worth watching. I'm not sure that there's a reason to think about. There's an analog to that, what's happening here. But there is the issue, you know, if we're going to try to reduce our trade, we're reducing the amount of money available from overseas to finance our deficits. Steve, thanks. Steve Leesman joining us from Arizona.
33:19Where the CNBC CEO Council is being held. Today's market action was kind of interesting in that. And I know Guy was watching this. And Julie, I'm sure you're watching this too. The 10-year yield going above 4.5 % once again, testing that level. Yesterday it made sense. It was moving on the Moody's downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. Today, just for the heck of it, it was pushing up against 4.5 percent. Just for funsies, right? We're just having like a great old time trying to figure out where this thing should go. And, you know, I think what everyone is really wrestling with is what level of growth are we going to have?
33:52Are we going to be able to attack these deficits? And it feels like the question is we're not going to be able to really attack these deficits. and that really has major ripple on effects for the rest of the economy, particularly small cap, my little land. I think broadly speaking though, the level of uncertainty is still there. And I think that that still makes it very, very difficult to do any kind of capital allocation and any kind of inventory management. There's like a great port optimizer tool that you can look at that shows you what's coming into the ports of Los Angeles. And you see the volatility in the ports that's happening, it creates volatility for the rest of the country in terms of the shipping and logistics that we're having.
34:31And so all there's going to be is just like a lot of noise, like the toddler variety. Which is a lot. And you know that well, Bonoan. Yes, coming from someone who's bothering a toddler right now, that is not making, that's not the most constructive setup. With that said, listen, I think we're through the bulk of earnings. I just think there's like less to focus on. So You have the comments out of the White House regarding Huawei and China's pushback. You know, we spoke about the correspondence about their level of certainty in terms of forecasting the path forward. And I think the volatility in yields is just echoing that, that we no longer have economic data to focus on.
35:13We no longer have corporate-specific data to focus on. And now we're sitting here trying to understand what's going to happen over the course of the next three months. And I think that volatility lends itself to translate into the bond market. Coming up, the latest pharma deal for Pfizer, how the company is trying to tap the China market and how much of the leg up it could provide. The details when Fast Money returns back in two.
35:59Welcome back to Fast Money. Pfizer gaining over 2 % after inking a deal to develop and commercialize a novel cancer drug from China's 3S Bio. The deal worth up to$6 billion is the latest sign of big pharma's push into China to replenish drug pipelines. Angelica Peebles joins us now with all the details. Hi, Angelica. Hey, Mel. So Pfizer is striking a deal with China's 3S Bio to get its hands on arguably the hottest cancer technology of the moment. The drug targets PD-1, that's similar to Merck's blockbuster Keytruda, as well as VEGF. And the thinking is that going after two targets will better attack cancer than going after just one.
36:34And the excitement behind that idea started taking off last year when a similar drug from Summit Therapeutics beat Keytruda in a head-to-head study, the first time that any drug has bested Keytruda. Mel, you've talked to Summit and you know how confident they are. BioNTech is another name to watch in this space and even Merck's in the race thanks to its own licensing deal. And Pfizer paying the biggest price tag so far,$1.25 billion up front and up to another$4.8 billion for the rights to develop and sell this drug outside of China. That's roughly double what Merck paid. And like Merck, Pfizer is going to China for this asset.
37:10And we've talked about this trend before. So far this year, 42 % of big pharma deals with at least$50 million up front came from China. And that's already topping last year's record. And that's according to data from Dealforma. So another big trend to watch. Mel? There was also some news from the FDA regarding vaccines that helped lift some of these vaccine makers, including Pfizer. Yeah, that's right. The FDA is saying that it now will want to see randomized placebo-controlled studies for boosters in people younger than 65. And for people 65 and older, as well as people with health conditions that put them at higher risk for COVID complications, They will continue to accept studies that show that those vaccines can elicit an immune response.
37:58And it sounds like it's restrictive because it really is saying that no longer will the FDA accept boosters for all. At least that's what it sounds like. We still need to figure out some of the details about what it means for fall boosters. But at the same time, people maybe were expecting a little bit more of a restrictive policy. You have this whole idea that this administration doesn't like vaccines. You have this push, whether it's on the Hill or some of these other groups, saying that they don't want mRNA at all. And so perhaps this is a little bit less restrictive than what people were thinking.
38:28And that's why you're seeing some of that reaction today, I think, Mel. Angelica, thanks. Angelica Peoples. We've talked about Tim and Karen's Pfizer for a long time being in a funk. Let's just call it what it is. Is this deal going to make a difference? A funk is, yes, that's a good way to put it. I mean, they just recently made a 13-year low in the stock. Think about that for a second. Will it make a difference? I think it'll keep it from trading back to those levels, but is it going to get up to a$30 stock? I don't think so. Flip side of that coin is Gilead, which has, by the way, made its way into sort of big cap pharma in a major way.
39:01Spoken at an RBC conference today. That stock sold off, bouncing again. I mean, if you want to be someplace, Gilead works here. Julie, do you want to be someplace in pharma? In pharma, no. I think that right now there's just too much uncertainty that's happening. I'd much rather be around the companies that help pharma companies develop their drugs. Something like a Sertara is more appealing to me because the binary risk of it is too difficult. And also, while I can see that so much development is really happening in China, when you have an administration that is this kind of bulled up against it, it makes me really nervous.
39:35Coming up, in major need of a bullseye, Target's quarterly results do up tomorrow as the big box retailer lags far behind the competition. What investors need to hear for that stock to play catch-up. Next, more Fast Money in two.
39:53Welcome back to Fast Money. Target scheduled to report earnings tomorrow and investors will be keyed into any comments about price hikes due to tariffs. Target shares are down 27 percent this year, far underperforming rival Walmart, which has gained 8 percent in the same period. Last week, former Walmart U.S. CEO Bill Simon told Fast that while his former firm may be better positioned to handle tariffs, Target stock is more attractive long term. Best to whether the tariffs would be Walmart. Best, I think, from an investment standpoint. Target's so beat down. They're so beat down. And they're such a good company.
40:26They're not going anywhere. You know, I think if you could find a way to, you know, sort of stomach a long play on Target, you'll do really well. So stomach a long place. Would you rather Bill Simon said Target? I remember when you played the game with him. So respectfully, I mean, we could have made that. Target made its all-time high in the summer of 2021. It is now May of 2025. The stock was$220-something. That argument could have been made dozens of times since then, respectfully, and it has not worked. Now, is it due for bounce? Absolutely. Do you sell it if it does bounce? Absolutely. They are in a tough spot, though, because they know that they cannot really talk about price hikes because of tariffs.
41:07And they are in a very tough spot because they sell a lot of general merchandise, stuff that is imported mostly, and we'll see higher prices. You know, I'm wondering, we've seen companies in tough spots kind of kitchen sink it. I wonder if the setup is so poor now and the cinnamon is so poor that you just go on ahead and rip the Band-Aid off. They're not in the same situation as Walmart where they can say, we're just not going to move forward with price hikes. They can't really comment around it. Clearly, it's so central to their business that they're able to retain some margin on the type of inventory that they hold.
41:43I don't think they're in the same position. I think maybe you just kind of kitchen sink in and move forward. Yeah, I think that we learned over the last week that CEOs are not going to come out and make big proclamations about what they're doing with price. And I think there's a way for them to raise prices and, you know, not absorb too much of the, you know, against their margins. And, you know, the price increases and input costs, the whole sort of thing. And we're going to see it. It's going to happen over the next 90 days. But you're just going to keep your mouth shut about it. There's no reason to put a sign up there.
42:11Right. Up next, final trades.
42:20Final trade time. Julie Beal. FICO was under pressure today when Bill Pulte was criticizing them for how much their reports cost. It's a couple dollars right on the weekend. Bonowitz. I think you've got a tremendous run-up addition to the index. I think you cash in coin. Dan. Yeah, Carter Braxton Worth of Worth Charting. He likes the Pepsi. Massive double bottom. I think from a technical perspective, you take a shot. This is like an ode to CBW. Oh my gosh. The back half of Final Trace. Well, yesterday we talked about a bearish to bullish reversal in dollar gen. Well, look at it today. That's going to happen again, Melissa.
42:58That's exactly what CBW said. I know! I know! Thanks for watching Fast. Mad Money starts right now.
43:21You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit CNBC.com forward slash Fast Money disclaimer.
From the publisher
Tesla CEO Elon Musk covering a broad range of topics with CNBC’s David Faber. What he had to say about the EV maker’s planned robotaxi rollout, his stint as CEO, and how DOGE is faring. Plus, stocks may have turned a corner since their lows, but have the odds of a recession done the same? The latest results from CNBC’s Flash Fed Survey, and the outlook for growth, inflation, and more.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
