In short
Fast Money 1/14/26 covers: crude oil and energy stocks rising on Iran-related de-escalation fears; gold and silver hitting new records; a debate over whether to underweight or buy software amid renewed “AI threat” concerns; bank stock weakness after earnings tied to credit-card portfolio worries about a potential rate cap; commercial real estate’s 2026 refinancing “inflection”; and Bitcoin’s early-year rally catalysts.
Guests/backgrounds
Pippa Stevens (CIBC Private Wealth) on oil/geopolitics; Carter Braxton-Wirth (Wirth Charting) technicals on software; Gil Loria (DA Davidson) technology research on software valuations; Greg Friedman (Petrie CEO) on commercial real estate debt/refinancing.
Key claims/examples
Oil strength is mostly “geopolitical risk premium” with no confirmed supply disruption; Citi/WTI/Brent forecasts (Citi Brent ~$70). Software charts show underperformance and potential reversal patterns; Microsoft singled out. Loria argues software fundamentals remain recurring, high-margin, and AI hasn’t disrupted companies; cites Adobe as holding up. Bank declines: Wells Fargo miss from severance; BofA/Citi hit by credit-card rate-cap fears. CRE: ~$1.3T debt maturities in 2027; banks “extend and pretend”; Friedman says Class A stabilizes, B/C office challenged; Petrie buying loans at 10–20% discounts.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOCrude Oil Market Overview
0:00 to 0:22
Analyzing the recent trends and factors affecting crude oil prices.
“Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand.”
Crude Oil Market Overview
1:42 to 1:54
Analyzing the recent trends and factors affecting crude oil prices.
“We start off with that crude awakening in the oil markets.”
Expert Insights on Oil Prices
1:58 to 4:06
Guests discuss the implications of geopolitical events on oil prices.
“Today's gains led by Action Conoco, APA and Marathon Petroleum.”
Interpretation of Oil Stocks' Performance
4:09 to 6:26
Discussion on the durability of oil stocks amidst market fluctuations.
“So if it's not really a supply disruption that we're worried about, and it's just the fear here in oil stocks are trading higher, how do you interpret that move higher?”
Gold and Silver Market Trends
6:47 to 9:22
Exploration of the recent performance of gold and silver in the market.
“You have that sort of built-in cap in a way for the administration who are desperately seeking affordability for the American people.”
Tech Sector Performance and Analysis
9:23 to 12:52
Analysis of the tech sector's current performance and challenges.
“But back to the central bank thing, I think it's worth repeating.”
Software Sector Investment Opportunities
12:52 to 14:00
Discussion on potential investment opportunities in the software sector.
“Gil Loria is the head of technology research at Davidson and is out with a note today on software evaluations.”
Evaluating Adobe and Oracle's Performance
14:00 to 20:30
Discussion focuses on Adobe's resilience despite AI concerns and Oracle's financial struggles.
“and their stocks keep going down every day, that we believe that if we continue to buy those, there will be a re-rating once this wave of negativity is over.”
Market Trends in Software Stocks
20:30 to 22:20
Exploration of the current trends in software stocks and expected future performance.
“What is wrong with Microsoft in your view?”
Bank Performance Analysis Post-Earnings
23:56 to 28:00
Analysis of recent bank earnings and their implications for Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citi.
“Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citi all dropping after their earnings reports this morning.”
Show all 21 chapters
Legislative Developments on Stock Trading Ban
28:05 to 29:15
Discussion on a GOP-backed bill banning lawmakers from buying new stocks.
“Uncrustables are the best part of the sandwich.”
Details and Implications of the Stock Trading Ban
29:15 to 30:50
Emily Wilkins provides details on the stock trading ban and opposition to it.
“Welcome back to Fast Money, a GOP-backed bill that would ban lawmakers from adding stocks to their current portfolios, passing a key hurdle in the House.”
Perceptions and Concerns Around Insider Trading
30:50 to 34:18
Discussion on perceptions of insider trading and transparency in Congress.
“And he will say that it wasn't him who made all the trades.”
Market Overview and Upcoming Interviews
34:18 to 35:03
Overview of current stock performance and upcoming guest announcements.
“Stock's down for a second straight day as more bank earnings filtered in.”
Commercial Real Estate Trends and Predictions
35:03 to 40:25
CEO Greg Friedman discusses the future of commercial real estate and challenges ahead.
“Well, maturing commercial real estate debt is set to peak at nearly$1.3 trillion in 2027, according to S &P Global.”
Trader Acronym Reveal and Investment Strategies
40:25 to 42:01
Julie Beal presents her 2026 trading acronyms and investment picks.
“Coming up, it's day three of our Fast Money Trader Acronym Reveal.”
Courtney Garcia's Trade Insights
42:01 to 43:30
Discussion on Courtney Garcia's acronym trade strategy and performance.
“exposure to kind of continuing equity markets and a little bit of an interest rate hedge, kind of.”
Humorous Interjections and Trade Reactions
43:31 to 44:00
Lighthearted banter among hosts regarding Courtney's absence and trading strategies.
“Then you don't have SLB, which could be really good.”
Teaser for Bitcoin Discussion
44:01 to 44:15
Introduction to upcoming discussion about Bitcoin's recent performance.
“Bitcoin staging a stealth rally to start the year.”
Bitcoin's Recent Rally Explained
44:16 to 45:39
Analysis of Bitcoin's price increase and the contributing factors.
“Bitcoin continuing its climb higher now, trading above$97 ,000, up more than 10 % over the last two weeks.”
Final Trades of the Day
45:40 to 46:35
Hosts share their final trading recommendations and insights.
“A lot of people are dumping, Tim, and it comes on the heels of you sharding.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand. It starts with our approach. Every Mazda comes standard with proactive safety features. So you're more aware of what's around you, more focused on the road ahead, and ready before problems ever start. Mazda. More of what matters most to you. Go to mazdausa.com to learn more. Consumer Reports does not endorse or promote any product. At Edward Jones, we believe rich isn't about having life all figured out. It's opening yourself to all the possibilities. That's why your dedicated financial advisor provides long-term planning built around you, meeting you where you are, and helping you get closer to where you want to be.
0:47So no matter where you're starting from, you can move forward with confidence. The key to being rich is knowing what counts. Let's find your rich. Edward Jones, member SIPC.
1:02Tim Seymour:Live in the NASDAQ markets, I've been in the heart of New York City's Times Square. This is Fast Money. Here's what's on tap tonight. A commodity climb. Crude prices touching nearly three-month highs, while gold and silver set new records. What's behind the moves? How do you trade the space? And software has been sliding to start the year. The chartmaster says go short. But one top analyst thinks this is the time to buy in. Who is right? Well, here are both cases. Plus, what is behind the breakdown in bank stocks? The state of commercial real estate with one top investor. And it's day three of our 2026 trader acronym reveal.
1:32Tim Seymour:We've got top picks from Julie and Courtney later on this hour. I'm Melissa Lee, coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Karen Feynman, Steve Brasso, and Guy Adami. We start off with that crude awakening in the oil markets. WTI prices settling over the$62 mark for the first time since November, but pulling back late in the day after President Trump's suggested turmoil in Iran was abating. Still, the strength in black gold has been pushing energy stocks higher. the sector the best performing on the S &P today and so far this month. Today's gains led by Action Conoco, APA and Marathon Petroleum.
2:05Tim Seymour:And ExxonMobil shares closing at an all-time high. For more on all these moves in the latest in Iran, let's bring in Pippa Stevens. Hey, Pippa. Hey, Melissa. Well, oil did pull back from that three-month high after President Trump said the Iranian government has no plans to execute protesters, which the oil market is viewing as de-escalatory. But Rebecca Babin from CIBC Private Wealth noting, this looks more like a pause and escalation rather than a resolution. About a dollar of geopolitical premium has come out after the market built close to six dollars over the last week, meaning the market is not suddenly pricing in a peaceful resolution.
2:39Now, some of that recent move is driven by short covering. While many believe the market is well supplied this year, especially since OPEC plus can raise output with the Iran uncertainty, as well as ongoing disruptions from Russia and Ukraine, there seems to be a floor on the downside. Now, Citi today hiking its near-term Brent forecast to$70, pointing to the growing risk premium. But they do see these risks moderating in the back half of the year. Mel?
3:03Tim Seymour:When you're talking about a Citi estimate of like 70, let's say, Pippa, does that price and disruption in the Strait of Hormuz as well? I mean, what is that worst-case scenario that analysts are pointing to? So this is certainly not the worst-case scenario. Basically, Citi is saying that this is all going to be driven by that geopolitical risk premium, but no actual disruption on the supply side. They note that last year in June, we saw prices on Brent rise from 60 to 77 and nothing actually came from that. There was no actual supply disruption. But it is that fear, particularly when this market had grown very complacent and when it was very well telegraphed that this market is going to be well supplied as of right now.
3:39So there is no talk at this moment of any disruption out of the Strait of Hormuz. But I do think it's important to note that civil unrest in some way is more uncertain than if there were some sort of direct military escalation, given that President Trump is very focused on that$50 oil limit. So it would probably be unlikely to attack any energy infrastructure. But if we see unrest internally, that could also just impact operations if protesters were to target any type of oil infrastructure.
4:06Tim Seymour:Yeah, great points, Pippa. Thank you, Pippa Stevens. Vince. So if it's not really a supply disruption that we're worried about, and it's just the fear here in oil stocks are trading higher, how do you interpret that move higher? Is that durable or is that short lived?
4:19Karen Finerman:Well, I think the market today versus yesterday is less sanguine on there being no fallout. In other words, I think there is some view, I mean, Straits of Hormuz, what could happen here? There's a lot of things that could happen. Given the non-OPEC rising supply of what I think is also out there pushing around oil prices. I mean, largely the world's awash in oil right now, I would argue. And I think there's a risk of even more of that if you at some point believe once you get through, I can't predict what's going to happen in Iran, but oil markets might look ahead to a place where Iranian oil can flow more freely at some point.
4:57Karen Finerman:I think in the short run, oil but energy equities trade fantastic. And I think after underperforming for a long time, And I think you can get to valuations and you can get to free cash flow yields and dividend break evens in terms of an oil price in the mid 40s for the big integrators that I think makes them very attractive here. Yeah, I think trading the commodity and trading the equities are entirely different stories to Tim's point. So I think oil can go sideways to slightly lower from here. And I think these stocks have now told the marketplace that they're in this sort of new paradigm. And I'll say Exxon Mobil, which was sideways for the better part of three years between 112 and 120.
5:35I mean, that move is significant now at an all time high. Valero continues to work. Marathon Petroleum, the oil service names, the Ian Cairns carved last year. Obviously. Yeah. I mean, look at Halberton and look at Schlumberger. Now, I'll say this. Halberton's right against a nine year downtrend that I think it's going to break, by the way. But Schlumberger trades extraordinarily well. So the straight of her moves. Stratum Ramos carries 25 % of the global oil supply. If that were to stop flowing, WTI probably goes to 100 to 125. That's most likely not. Pippa said it. I don't think it could happen.
6:13I don't think it could happen with this administration. I don't think they would let it happen. But I would stay in ExxonMobil. I don't think it's overvalued. And I do think that oil is coming lower. How much lower? I think it could trade to 45 or 50. It didn't do anything on Venezuela. And now with Iran, I think that this will either escalate and we'll have a blow off top or it will, I was going to say, disintegrate. That's not a great word. So it will expire or evaporate on the upward side for this risk analysis to oil. And I think that's probably where we're headed.
6:46Tim Seymour:Well, you know, the Trump administration doesn't want oil prices to go higher. You have that sort of built-in cap in a way for the administration who are desperately seeking affordability for the American people. Right. And one of the bright spots has been that oil has really been tempered. Much lower. Yes, much lower. So clearly there's a motivation there. But I think I agree with everyone here. But I think it's that there's a rotation now. This has been out in the cold for a while. And this is where there's value. And Tim always talks about getting away from the MAG-7 and where else could you go.
7:18And here's one that's really been left for dead for a while. And valuations, they started to move, but still they have so far to go. I still think there's a ton of value there.
7:28Karen Finerman:That's where I think you have to go, though, because I do think it at some point gets back to valuations. And I mentioned NatGas last night as places as part of this trade. What else works also in a world where there's some cap on utility prices and different parts of that trade? And I mentioned Chenier. And, you know, it's trading at a 15 percent free cash flow yield. We know that there's maybe an overbuild on the NatGas side. All that's well in the price. I think there are places to play throughout. I also think the MLPs, midstream, more utility-like returns, have fantastic balance sheets, haven't overextended, and I think are very interesting here.
8:04Karen Finerman:I will say the administration, President Trump has a delicate balance, though, to strike between a very strong part of his base that is in the shale-producing parts of this country. I mean, we're not terribly competitive below$60 a barrel in terms of oil, in terms of shell and Permian and big, important parts of the production base in the United States.
8:26Tim Seymour:Yeah. We cannot forget about gold and silver. I mean, yes, it's sort of a separate story. But they are rallying two records. It's the second record close this year for gold. For different reasons. But, yes, we should bring them up. And I think we've done a good job collectively around this. And silver is on the cusp of having a triple digit, which obviously we've never seen before. But all the things we talk about are working for gold and silver. They have not gone away. The fundamental story is still there. Central banks continue to buy it. Silver is an industrial metal, as Steve has said a number of different times.
8:56And, you know, I just I don't think we're just getting started. But I think if you fade this, I think you do it at your own peril.
9:01Karen Finerman:I also just think that we have more inflation out there than we're showing. And I think we're seeing that in industrial metals prices. So I think gold, I don't see what stops gold. I see rallies that could have, you know, 5 to 10 percent pullbacks in gold. I also see maybe not the strongest hands in silver and possibly new gold investors that could get shaken out. But back to the central bank thing, I think it's worth repeating. China, who's made a point about diversification, has only got 8 percent gold reserves of their total reserve base. Germany's at 80. Italy's at 75. Now, I'm not saying China's getting there, but why wouldn't China continue to be pushing it here?
9:39Karen Finerman:And why wouldn't the rest of the world, frankly? I mean, with all that's going on around here, this is a hedge for geopolitics right now. And boy, the last two weeks have told you everything. I agree with the gold. But when you look at silver, there's a supply-demand deficit. They miss by 100 million to 300 million ounces per year on a deficit. So there's a real supply-demand issue with silver. You don't get that with gold.
10:03Tim Seymour:Let's get to tech now. IGV, we've got to get there. The iShare software ETF down over 2 % on renewed concerns over AI's threat to the industry. The chart master today reiterating his January 5th call to be underweight the tech sector, advising clients to trim long positions and add to shorts. Let's get the technical take now with Carter Braxton Worth of Worth Charting. Carter, what do you see here? Hi, team. Yeah, likewise. So, you know, it's messy. I think the first thing we know before we look at the charts is that the tech sector's relative performance peaked October 30. So we're into a third month of underperformance to the market.
10:39But within the sector, it's software, of course, that's really taking the hit. Maybe we can pull up some charts and try to figure out the way forward together. This is a two panel. It's the iShares Expanded Tech Software ETF on top. That has, of course, big names in it like Adobe and Microsoft and Palantir. And on the bottom panel is relative performance to the S &P. And you can see even as it's going higher from 2020 to 2026, its relative performance peaked five years ago, which is really quite remarkable. It's the definition of no alpha. But let's look at the ETF itself. Three identical charts.
11:16One way to annotate it. That has the elements of a top, whether you want to call it a head and shoulders or not. It's what a reversal looks like. A second iteration, you have a well-defined trend line. In effect, since the tariff low, and we have breached that trend line. Third and final, you have what would be called, of course, converging trend lines. Some people like to call it a triangle, a wedge. It doesn't matter what it is. It all sets up, I think, for more of the same, which is poor relative performance. So the thought was in the first research report of the year to be emphatic and just say underweight technology.
11:52Tim Seymour:There's so many stocks in the sector that are just flat on their back. That's to put it nicely. I mean, there is Snowflake. There is Workday. There is CRA. I mean, which one to you looks the weakest? Well, I think that maybe the way to answer that is the most important, of course, is Microsoft. And it is such, so heavy here, acts so poorly. I think that's the one, obviously, to watch. The others are obviously well-known names, but they just don't have the cap and the import that Microsoft does. The fact that Microsoft and other key names like Meta, like Netflix and so forth, are in such straits, if you will.
12:33I think the message, as we see the exact opposite with Walmart surging and Exxon surging, there's a message for the market.
12:40Tim Seymour:All right. Carter, great to see you. Thank you. Carter Braxton Wirth of Wirth Charting. Not everyone is a seller of software. Our next guest sees bargains in the space and says the AI scare narrative is not tied to reality. Gil Loria is the head of technology research at Davidson and is out with a note today on software evaluations. Gil, great to have you with us. I take it that you heard Carter's analysis of the space. It's not a very rosy picture in terms of performance past or performance future. So why do you think this group, what are the fundamentals that will drive this group higher when they've seen such underperformance for the past five years?
13:16Yeah, the simple reality that software businesses are still the best type of businesses. They are recurring revenue businesses that scale well at very high incremental margins. None of that has changed. The good news is we used to talk about software companies as a multiple of revenue, and who can really tell the difference between six times revenue or eight times revenue? We don't have to do that anymore. We have great software business growing double digits, 20 % and higher, that are now trading in the teens on cash flow, on the twenties on cash flow, those are attractive price points. And we don't have to fight Carter's charts.
13:55We're not calling a bottom on all of software. We're just being selective about the stocks that are so well, the companies that are doing so well, and their stocks keep going down every day, that we believe that if we continue to buy those, there will be a re-rating once this wave of negativity is over. Because again, there has been no AI impact on any of these companies. AI has not disrupted or dislocated any software company. And if it doesn't do it this year, at some point, we're going to scratch our heads and say, isn't AI just a disruptive technology that good companies are going to adapt well to?
14:35And bad companies are not going to adapt well to. So if we buy the good ones, They're going to do well. All right, Gil. So Adobe made its all-time high in, I think, the fall of 2021. Think about that for a second. Think what the market's done in the meantime. And we're trading the levels that we last saw in the fall of 2022. What's the bull case here, other than the fact that technically we're hitting what should be support, and you can make a decent case on valuation? So the bull case on Adobe is for all of the negativity around AI, Adobe's growth has actually held up better than the overall software universe.
15:12Their growth has decelerated from maybe 12 % to 11 % or 10 % over the last three years, which is to say that really strong recurring revenue business that's embedded in every marketing organization and every agency has held up really well. And to your point, the stock has not. It's now trading at low teams multiples on earnings and cash flow. So if they just keep doing what they're doing, which is grow 10 percent this year, then it's not going to be sustainable that their stock will continue to be this inexpensive, which isn't to call for a catalyst here. They're just going to keep doing what they're doing.
15:53It's the narrative that's been very negative about Adobe, again, without evidence. They haven't lost any business to AI, nor does it look like they're going to lose business to AI this year.
16:05Tim Seymour:What's your take on the Oracle, the bondholders' lawsuit with Oracle? They allege that, you know, there might have been malfeasance. Maybe there should have been more disclosure at the very least because they bought these bonds in September. And then several weeks later, Oracle went out to raise another$38 billion and they feel cheated. Is this going to be an overhang as companies go again and again to the debt market to finance? Yeah, Oracle overextended itself for OpenAI. OpenAI promised them the moon, and then Oracle realized that OpenAI actually had promised everybody else the moon as well.
16:43And then they overborrowed to build infrastructure. They're now at the very bottom. They're approaching the bottom rungs of investment grade. They're approaching the ceiling of debt ratio. And yet they need to borrow more in order to deliver on these commitments. So they put themselves in a real bind. The stock's gone down a lot. Their debt is trading at a discount. And it's not too surprising that recent debt holders feel like this isn't what they bargained for when they bought the bonds a few months ago. Gil, it's Karen. Just going back. First of all, thanks for being on. But going back to the earlier conversation, is there for, let's just say for Adobe, is there a churn or renewal number that you would look at and say, oh, all right, that's concerning?
17:30Yeah, if the revenue starts decelerating significantly from here or if they can't hang on to those best in class margins, we could start worrying about that. But Adobe has had competition from the likes of Canva and Figma for a while. those companies are doing very well on their own. But Adobe, again, has still been able to maintain its revenue growth better than Salesforce, better than Oracle, better than a lot of other companies. But there's this persistent narrative that they're a big AI loser in spite of the fact that they add value so much more than just creating an image or a video. They've been left for dead.
18:09That's reflected in the multiples. And if, let's say, they actually have accelerating revenue growth, Let's just say they go from 10 % growth to 11 % growth because IT budgets looks to loosen up this year. The stock could get re-rated very quickly. Let's not forget two years ago, it was trading in the 30s on earnings on very similar growth rates.
18:32Tim Seymour:You know, Gil, when you said that, you know, this year we'll find out if AI was truly disruptive and whether or not it will have disrupted the software industry. If we find out a year from now, we're sitting here next January and find out that there was not additional churn to software customers because of AI, that AI wasn't all that was cracked up to be that we had anticipated in terms of the impact on software. Does that mean the AI trade didn't work? That AI itself was not cracked up to be? And so, therefore, other parts of the market should inherently be weaker. actually there's a world where ai does phenomenally well and these software companies still do well let's not forget we all love these ai tools they are phenomenally potent tools and every day we get a new tool that's even more potent than the one before but the reality is that we're using these tools we've brought them to work we use them in our personal life that's very different than enterprise technology being replaced by vibe coding, which is where the narrative is.
19:33If you've ever bought software or sold software, you know that selling and buying software at an enterprise level is a lot more than vibe coding something. So we could have a world where we're all using AI, we need a lot more data centers, we need a lot more compute capacity, and yet enterprise software, good enterprise software companies actually do better. We could have the best of both worlds. And there's stocks in the middle of this that are going to do well anyway. Microsoft Azure growing 40%, accelerating. Snowflake growing in the high 20s, accelerating. Datadog growing in the high 20s, accelerating.
20:11All these companies are going to do well with AI, without AI. And those are the stocks we're really focused on because we don't even have to make a leap about narrative changing. These are companies that are doing so phenomenally well, and yet their stocks go down every day.
20:27Tim Seymour:Right. Great. Gil, great to chat with you. Thank you. Gil Loria, DA Davidson. What is wrong with Microsoft in your view?
Read the full transcript
20:34Karen Finerman:Well, it's interesting, again, thrown on a list of stocks that go down every day. There's Microsoft. And and there was a time we would a lot of criticism on the multiple. And I think, you know, I think you can actually start to have a valuation argument in favor. Remember, software budgets, what I'm understanding in the enterprise side are growing somewhere around nine and a half percent a year. The allocation to software for enterprise is not getting smaller. It's getting bigger. And there's no question Microsoft is as powerful as they have ever been. I like Microsoft here. Microsoft, I agree.
21:08But when you look a little bit deeper in the names, Microsoft will always have buyers in that name. When you look at Snowflake, that's back to levels that we saw August 2025. I think that gets interesting. Palantir already had that sell-off pretty recently. I think this one could rally back above 200. And then another interesting one is ServiceNow. That's back to May 2024 levels on a technicals. If it's going to bounce, this would be a great spot for it to start.
21:34Tim Seymour:Are you going to talk about your junk? No. I wasn't going to talk about my junk, although I'm more than happy to. You ever been called Snowflake? Never. Would that bother you? I was going to pay you a compliment. Now, not so much. What I was going to say was, you know, people know Tim is this steely, blue-eyed emerging market specialist, as they should. Okay. But they don't realize that in sort of the off hour, he's a vibe coder. You just don't like to tell people that.
22:00Karen Finerman:No, look, I mean, it would be too much for them, I think, so I just try to keep it to myself. Too much for me.
22:04Tim Seymour:Coming up, more big bank moves today. The latest Factor results weighing on Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citigroup. And what a potential credit card rate cap could mean for the group. Plus, a potential congressional trading ban. The latest on the bill looking to stop lawmakers from stock picking. And who's going to be most impacted? Don't go anywhere. Factor News back in June.
22:26The world of business is constantly evolving, and Comcast Business keeps you totally in step with secure, AI-backed networking in more than 100 countries. They're powering over 90 % of the Fortune 500 and millions of small businesses. That's a lot of muscle. And behind it all, thousands of experts answering your call at 2 a.m. like it's 2 p.m. One partner powering how business gets done for companies around the globe. When you add it all up, No one does business like Comcast Business. Are you as confident as you should be when it comes to growing your business? Is your strategy ready to execute today?
23:02If cash flows aren't where they need to be, growth could be at risk, especially in the eyes of your investors, board members, and the business press. But when your business is operating in top shape, you've earned the right to grow. EY Parthenon can help you reimagine your business and execute a game plan for long-term growth. EY Parthenon. Solutions that work in practice, not just on paper.
23:27Karen Finerman:Never bet against American grit or American energy. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost and a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture Global. That's unstoppable energy.
23:57Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Bummer for the banks. Wells Fargo, Bank of America, and Citi all dropping after their earnings reports this morning. Wells Fargo missing estimates as severance costs drove up expenses. Shares were down 4.6%. Bank of America and Citi both beat expectations, but concerns over their credit card portfolios tied to a potential rate cap sent shares sharply lower. Reports of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley on tap for tomorrow. Was it just the setup going in, Karen? I think that's most of it. I mean, we always hate to see that setup going in. And so it was exceptionally bad, I think, this time because they had such a huge run.
24:31I think, you know, each one had a little bit different things. I was surprised Citi got hit as hard as it did. I think the credit card thing is more problematic for them. At the very end, they sort of tried to temper expectations. I think that was a little bit of it. But I think they were sort of all overdone going in. this reaction all overdone going out. We'll see what the credit card, is it going to be? One year, 10 % cap for only new accounts. If that is the case, that's a far different thing. So I think it's somewhat overdone. And I like Citibank here. You know, short some calls. Those are going to go away worthless.
25:11I would look to probably replace them. I think it's overdone. I agree on the Citi front for sure. But, you know, Bank of America, for our crack staff in EC, Michael Figuene can put this up. We're at levels we lost. Thank you, Tim. In 2006 for Bank of America. So you have a major double top. You also have a stock that, you know, at its zenith was trading almost two times tangible book, which I don't think they're deserved of. And if they're deserved of it, Citi is definitely worthy of one and a half or 1.6. So I like Citi better than Bank.
25:41Tim Seymour:Some were disappointed by the NII guide for Bank of America. So that could be part of it.
25:45Karen Finerman:Yeah, and I would, although net interest income came in above some forecasts, but the margin of expansion was less than expected. And I do think that NIMS are an important part of what the story has been for money center banks. But there's no question Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs have a different story to tell than money center banks. And the world of deregulation has not been dereg for money center banks. I think we're going to get great numbers, especially given all that's going on in capital markets. If the reason for the latest weakness is more about what you just said to Tim or more about the cap on 10 percent on interest rates, those are two totally different things.
26:23So, yes, the the the entrance of earnings, while we've had such a stellar performance on DREG and everything that the Trump administration brought in. But I don't believe that the cap on rates is even going to take place. I don't think that'll happen. So if that last leg of downward draft is happening because of that, that's a buying opportunity. I sort of think that Goldman Sachs is up more than any of them on the expectation. I mean, Citi had some great numbers from their more Goldman-esque type of businesses. I'm just talking about the news.
26:48Karen Finerman:You're right. Your setup being more important than the news itself is absolutely more important for Goldman. You're right. But the news flow over the last couple of days doesn't affect Goldman as far as I'm concerned.
27:02Tim Seymour:Yeah, there's no credit card cap. Right, and Goldman was down less. Yeah. Right? So Goldman is very near its peak peak. And if you look at J.P. Morgan, it's off 20%. That makes you think it's vulnerable. Correct. Just that people know, wow, for these guys, that's where you want to be. I mean, you know, in the trading, right, when you saw cities trading. Yeah. Right. There's a lot more Fast Money to come. Here's what's coming up next. Landmark legislation in Washington as Congress looks to ban stock trading by lawmakers, the latest on the vote, and the legislators that could be most affected. Plus, commercial real estate at an inflection point.
27:40what our next guest sees in store for the space and why he's flagging a potential refinance risk. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square. We're back right after this.
27:57It's the Smucker's Uncrustables Radio Hour with round, soft, pillowy bread filled with delicious PB &J. Here's your host, Uncrustables. Call her on line three. What's eating you? No one. Crust, is that you? Uncrustables are the best part of the sandwich. Sorry, Crust.
28:38for a limited time while supplies last. All rights reserved. 2026 McDonald's at FIFA World Cup 2026. At Venture Global, we think about what can be done, not what's usually done. Through innovation, Venture Global is not only building some of the largest energy facilities in the world right here in the United States, but delivering American energy at a fraction of the cost in a fraction of the time. So while others are busy talking, we're busy building. That's Venture global. That's unstoppable energy.
29:15Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money, a GOP-backed bill that would ban lawmakers from adding stocks to their current portfolios, passing a key hurdle in the House. CNBC's Emily Wilkins has got the details on this. Emily. Hey, Melissa. Well, yeah, this ban on lawmakers buying new stocks was approved by a House panel today and is expected to get a vote on the House floor soon. Now, the bill still faces a number of hurdles, namely growing opposition from Democrats who say that the bill has a lot of loopholes. Lawmakers, they don't need to divest their assets. They can still buy commodities, futures and diversified funds.
29:51Plus, they can still sell funds if they give funds if they give seven days public notice. And of course, they can use dividends to buy more shares of stocks, all things that Democrats do not want to see. But look, this would be the first stock trading ban to get a vote on the House floor. Lawmakers have been working on this issue for years. And that is because, in part, the levels of trading that go on. Nancy Pelosi and her husband, who does a lot of stock trades, they're probably the most prominent examples of trading in Congress. But if you look at the tracker on capital trades from the past year, this is not a partisan issue.
30:27You're seeing members there of both parties that have made thousands of trades. And while insider trading is hard to prove, there are many cases like lawmakers who sold off a ton of stock before COVID-19 crashed the markets that look very suspicious and have helped really increase the number of lawmakers who support a ban and want to be able to vote on something. Melissa?
30:49Tim Seymour:Emily, on the wall there, there was 4 ,000 trades in one year, Ro Khanna. 4 ,000 trades in one year. And he will say that it wasn't him who made all the trades. That it's, yeah. And some of these members say, look, it's not me. It's, you know, the person who manages my finances or it's a spouse or a partner. But the fact of the matter is that a lot of lawmakers say, look, the perception is there. And we don't truly know. There's no way to really verify exactly who did this or exactly what information that they had. And the lawmakers have just told me this doesn't look good. We can't do it anymore.
31:23Right.
31:24Tim Seymour:But to be specific, this is just Congress and it doesn't apply to cabinet officials or even the president. It doesn't. And that's another reason DEMS are upset with this bill. They're going to offer their own. But of course, they're in the minority right now. So not a huge chance that it passes. Emily, thank you. Emily Wilkins. I would love to have Ro Khanna on and see what he is trading that often. I mean, 4 ,200 trades in one year. Imagine you're making 10 trades a day at least. And he's here. He's here. 250. I mean, there's 250.
31:58Karen Finerman:Forget Ro Khanna. But, you know, let's just talk about the average person on the hill. They're not involved in any conversations. They're not hearing anything. I mean, I don't understand why this isn't bipartisan. Where's the problem? I think it's appalling. I don't. And I think the rest of the world is held by a different standard. And it's outrageous. But let's take it back. We all everyone agrees with that statement. But take it back. All they're going to do is go into a dark pool. All they're going to do is do it into a fund. No, because then they can be held accountable. I mean, it can be traced into a dark pool.
32:28But right now I can trace it. I have no problem. I think technicals always show.
32:33Tim Seymour:You'd rather have the transparency? I'd rather have transparency. I think insider trading always shows up in technicals. You know how you look around the table when you say—
32:40Karen Finerman:Except for when it's not insider trading. In other words, except for when it's not material and non-public information, when in fact you are someone that is not held by the same standards. But there's a Pelosi tracker. No, no, I'm not disagreeing with anything. I think what I'm saying is it goes into I can't see it anymore. I'd rather transparency of having a Pelosi tracker so that I could actually see what she's buying and what they're buying and what pharma companies they're buying. I think there's an element to it that you're shining a light on, even though they're doing something. Is that so that you can actually you can coattail those trades?
33:11Karen Finerman:I'm trying to understand. I mean, the more if everyone knows that it's not insider information anymore. Right. If the retail audience gets to see exactly what they're doing, it's not insider information. Everyone knows it.
33:21Tim Seymour:But they are making those trades with information that is not available to anybody else. Yes, and then you could trail them and you could make it too. But when you have it. You will never make that same trade. No, no, no, no. You would never. But we'll never see it again. And these guys are smart enough and ladies are smart enough that we're not going to see it. They're going to have it in blind trust. Someone's going to do it. Someone's going to leak it. How do you follow their spouses? How do you follow their kids? It's always going to be there. But when you limit how it's there, I think it goes down a rabbit hole.
33:47I'd rather see it this. It's a bad idea. I don't like insider trading. I don't like anything about it, but at least it's transparent.
33:53Karen Finerman:I mean, Jane Street's always looking for a few good traders. I mean, you know, I mean, Roe, you know, he should show up down and, you know.
33:58Tim Seymour:In his spare time. Apparently, he's got some spare time to make trades. Coming up, the next move in commercial real estate, what our next guest sees in store for this industry this year. And where he's seeing the most opportunity. Fast Money's back in two.
34:18Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Stock's down for a second straight day as more bank earnings filtered in. The Dow down about 42 points. The S &P losing half a percent and the Nasdaq leading the losses down 1%. Shares of Intel meantime jumping another 3 % today. The stock is already up more than 32 % this year, trading near two-year highs. And shares of Novo Nordisk lower today. The company's CEO weighing in on potential acquisitions at the JPMorgan Healthcare Conference saying they are ready to go very big in their hunt for a deal in the obesity drug space. Novo has been staging a bit of a comeback this year, though.
34:49Tim Seymour:up 16 % in January alone. By the way, do not miss our interview tomorrow with the CEO of Structured Therapeutics, Ray Stevens, on the back of positive phase two data of the company's oral weight loss drug. That is tomorrow right here on Fast Money. So you won't want to miss that. Well, maturing commercial real estate debt is set to peak at nearly$1.3 trillion in 2027, according to S &P Global. And the industry is facing a refinancing reality check with interest rates still well above pre-pandemic levels. For more on CRE in the year ahead, Petrie CEO Greg Friedman joins us now. Greg, great to have you here on set.
35:20Yeah, thank you for having me today.
35:21Tim Seymour:You say 2026 is inflection. In what way and how sharp is that inflection going to be? Yeah, definitely. So going back three years ago now, they were talking about, you know, survive to 2025, which now we're past 2025 and we're in 2026. And I think it's now you've got to grind to 2029. And 2029 really just represents the fact that there's not a quick recovery to commercial real estate. It's going to take some time for commercial real estate to recover. But the reality is there's been a lot of extend and pretend over the last three years with the banks, which make up about 50 % of the commercial real estate debt market, as reported by TRIP.
35:59And banks have continued just to extend loans as a way to deal with the issues with commercial real estate assets. And now you face about a trillion dollars of loans just maturing in 2026, which is two times the normal amount of loans maturing. and they're maturing at a much, you know, in an interest rate environment that's almost, you know, caught 50 % to 100 % higher than what they face at origination.
36:19Tim Seymour:That does not sound like the setup for an inflection point in 2026. It sounds like a big comeuppance in 2026 for the space. Yeah, so I think it's an inflection point in the sense that finally, I think you're going to start seeing assets trade because the market's been very muted just on assets being able to trade and really recalibrate to this new normal, you know, higher for longer long-term interest rates. And that's where I really see the market being at that inflection point. that it's really not an issue with the fundamentals at the asset level with the performance. It's more of an issue of broken balance sheets.
36:49And up until this point in time, I feel like we've just sort of extended out the issues versus dealing with them. Greg, the market's focused on Fed, Fed rate cuts, but in reality, it's 10-year yield and everything outside that duration that matters. Speaks to that. That's right. Like the 10-year Treasury is the risk-free rate, and the 10 years double what it was between 2010 to 2022. and has a very negative impact to the values of commercial real estate assets. And you've seen with just the drop in short-term rates, you know, with federal funds rates, you know, the 10 years remain elevated. It hasn't even come down.
37:24And I think that's going to be the case, you know, over the next several years. And when you look at, you know, assets trading that have traded over the last three years, some of the cap rates are, you know, pretty astounding on the low side, just because values haven't fully recalibrated to this new thought process that the 10-year is going to stay above 4%. So you talked about some of the Class A stuff performing and the business doing fine might be a balance sheet, but for B and C, which is a different story, particularly in New York, that model isn't working. Do you see a ton of just turnover?
38:00You're expecting a ton of turnover, buildings that have to get sold? Yeah, so I think buildings, I think when you look at office buildings, you know, specifically, you know, if you're referencing office buildings, I think the Class A is starting across the U.S. You're starting to see them actually lease up. You know, there's more demand for that space really driven by the AI trade. I mean, that's helping, you know, get a lot of these office buildings. You know, you're starting to see stabilization on the, you know, really the Class A office buildings. The Class B and C are still challenged. And there's still, you know, there's a bifurcation within the office space that's, you know, that has been taking place over the last year.
38:34I think it's becoming clearer now that you have a lot of winners within the office space where these are assets that should do well long term. You do have some challenges, you know, across certain buildings that probably are never going to recover just because, you know,
38:47Karen Finerman:the Class B and Class C buildings that just lack the right locations, the right amenity set to ever, you know, get leased back up. Greg, help us understand the timeline. Sounds like 26 is this period where stuff is happening and some of it not good. And so as you're gauging, even for investors watching the show tonight, whether they're professional retail that invest in commercial real estate, and there have been times, again, you know, coming out of COVID where there were huge opportunities where things were mispriced. And I'm, you know, so when's, it's not all assets, but give us an idea in 26 when you actually think you're going to start to see some credit events that are going to create blowouts that are going to create buying opportunities.
39:26Karen Finerman:I mean, it's happening now. We're buying, I mean, because we're buying a lot of loans from banks. You know, we bought in 2025, we bought$600 million worth of loans. So the three, you know, caught$3 billion of loans that we originated or new debt investments that we made. 20 % of that was loan purchases. That was the most that we've done since 2021, going back to COVID in the first half of 2021. And we bought a bunch of loans, primarily on hotel assets that were in trouble. And you're starting to see that trade occur now where banks and other lenders are just selling off paper, you know, at discounts.
39:57Karen Finerman:So you're saying it was$3 billion face that you bought for$600, so you're trading at 20 %? No, no, no. So we originated, yeah, I apologize. So we bought$600 million worth of loans that we bought probably on average a 10 % to 20 % discount off of face. And then we originated another$2.4 billion of loans that we originated. Just, you know, there were new loans that we made that were first mortgage loans that financed the acquisition, development of commercial real estate assets.
40:20Tim Seymour:Greg, great to get your perspective. Thank you so much for stopping by. Yeah, thank you for having me. Coming up, it's day three of our Fast Money Trader Acronym Reveal. Julie Beal is in the wings with something she hopes isn't delusional. Plus, is there a new chart master in town? We'll explain when Fast Money returns.
40:41Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. It is day three of unveiling our 2026 trader acronyms. Today, we have got Julie Beal with her picks. Now, last year's Julie's MOCA acronym consisted of Moellis, Ollie's, Clearwater, Hermes, and Aon. It was down 9 % in 2022. So, Julie, what do you think will turn things around for you now? I don't know, but I'm working with Delulu. So, obviously, it's very important to get good Gen Z slang into the investment community, and I take that responsibility really seriously. Delulu, in addition to being an acronym, is an onomatopoeia. It is what it sounds like, Delulu. The D is Descartes.
41:21you can think of this as the Bloomberg terminal for any kind of shipping, commercial shipping that you do. It's where all of the information and action happens. The E is for Enerpac. This is some nice small cap industrial exposure, but it's a quality name that's pretty durable. The L is for LeMetre, which is a healthcare company that I think is well positioned, has lots of pricing power, and kind of stays out of the regulatory crosswinds, which I think is pretty important in healthcare. The U is for ULS, which is, you can think of it as like the Moody's for electric bulbs. They're the standards that tell you exactly what things are rated at or safety, et cetera.
41:57What's the other? The other L is LPL financial, which I think is really nice exposure to kind of continuing equity markets and a little bit of an interest rate hedge, kind of. And the U is Ulta. Ulta, I think, is really well positioned to have a good uptick in demand from more makeup and the ability to really get that front of their store really marketed, it, really merchandise it. I think they're quite well positioned for the next year.
42:23Tim Seymour:I'm not sure if Julie really abided by the rules. I think she did great. I thought you were saying the Lulu, like the Lulu. I didn't, I totally didn't get the Lulu, like delusional. Delusional. That's a thing. That's a thing. Yeah. Okay. Good work, Julie. Karen likes Sulta. Julie, thank you. By the way, we should mention that Courtney Garcia couldn't join us this week to reveal her acronym, but she gave us permission to lay out the trade on her behalf. Courtney's 2025 global trade finished fourth among the traders, up 20%. Alibaba led the way, up 76%. Goldman Sachs was next, gaining 57%. This year, she is channeling Carter Worth.
43:03Tim Seymour:Her acronym, CHARTS, Caterpillar, to play AI-driven power demand, Home Depot to benefit from the home improvement market, AstraZeneca to get exposure to global health care, Rio Tinto to take advantage of the growing trends in electrification and decarbonization, Taiwan Semi, for chips and SLB to trade global energy. Charts for Courtney Garcia. She couldn't deliver the acronym herself. She's too busy delivering her own baby. Yes. Oh, congrats. So what do you think? Well, I mean, I dig the charts. Why not just chart?
43:38Karen Finerman:Then you don't have SLB, which could be really good. I understand that. But at some point, why don't I just put down 25 letters? I don't want to be critical of Courtney because she deserves so much support right now. And she could have made it short. I'm sure you've sharted before.
43:55Tim Seymour:Why do you have to sniffle like that? We're going to go to break. Bitcoin staging a stealth rally to start the year. What our traders think is behind the recent thump and where the token is heading from here. More Fast Money in two.
44:16Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Bitcoin continuing its climb higher now, trading above$97 ,000, up more than 10 % over the last two weeks. And between pending crypto legislation, the approaching tariff ruling, and even the turmoil in Iran, our traders spotted several catalysts for the move. Steve, what did you make of this? Yeah, I think it's more of just the fiscal state that the U.S. is in right now. So if we have to, I guess tariffs have already produced maybe$300 billion,$250 to$300 billion. So the fiscal state probably takes a dip if tariffs are rejected. And then you have, you know, the issue with gold and silver rallying.
44:50So I think this is just an alt rally. I think both of them have their near term catalyst.
44:55Karen Finerman:I think this is more about the SCOTUS decision versus the congressional regulatory framework. I think this was just it was oversold. I mean, I think we had a leverage dynamic. I think we had a momentum dynamic. I think we had a couple of major players that had to be dumping. And I do think that there are a lot of people out there. Excuse me. People are laughing for some reason. And I'll let people decide why that might be happening. But I do think that this Bitcoin crypto bill that is being discussed right now is a catalyst. You've got a lot of people in Washington that want to see this go through.
45:28Karen Finerman:More regulation means higher prices. Karen? I agree on both. I think that overdone and then the clarity bill and then some of these other things. and maybe there's a little Fed independence in there somewhere. It was so funny, Mel. A lot of people are dumping, Tim, and it comes on the heels of you sharding. It's obviously in your head. Stand up for the camera. I didn't know what that means.
45:50Tim Seymour:It was 30 seconds ago and it's horrendous. Up next to Final Trades. I mean.
46:02Tim Seymour:Time for the Final Trade, Tim.
46:04Karen Finerman:The humor tonight was really a little off color, But if you need to powder up, go to Estee Lauder. Karen. Yes, Citibank down over$10 in the last few days. I think it's overdone. I like it. Steven. Exxon. Seems a little extended here, but I think you've got a little more left. Guy. So we've had four or five reveals. Two of the five, I think, did not play. It's amazing. And we were sort of adamant about rule follows. Every year it happens. It's unbelievable. Yeah, I'm sorry, Guy. Rick, I think, continues to work here, Melissa Lee.
46:34Tim Seymour:All right, thanks for watching Fast. Stay back here tomorrow at 5 for more Fast Money. Mad Money with Jim Cramer starts right now.
47:18Tim Seymour:The most memorable gifts aren't found. They're made. Zazzle is a custom marketplace where you pick any product, a mug, a card, a tote, a phone case, and make it personal. A photo, a name, an inside joke. The kind of gift that actually fits the person. That's what 30 million customers have been coming back to Zazzle for over 20 years to find. Right now, save 25 % on your first order at Zazzle.com. That's Zazzle.com. Make it z-amazing.
From the publisher
Listen to our traders take you behind the money...how to play the volatility...pops and drops and the movers you missed.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
