In short
Podcast Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money" Episode from 9/24/25
Overview "Fast Money" is hosted by Melissa Lee and features a roundtable of expert traders who provide insights into the financial markets, focusing on actionable news relevant to investors. The episode aired live from the Nasdaq market.
Key Topics Discussed
- Investment in Intel
- Chicago Bears' Valuation
- KB Home Earnings
- Market Movements for GM and Other Stocks
- Copper Prices and Freeport-McMoRan's Operations
- AI Developments and Their Impact
---
Detailed Discussion Points
- Intel's Potential Investment from Apple
- Current Situation: Intel is reportedly seeking funding from Apple as part of its turnaround strategy.
- Market Reaction: Intel shares rose approximately 6% following the news.
- Expert Insights:
- Analysts expressed cautious optimism about the partnership, suggesting it might not significantly address Intel's ongoing manufacturing and technological challenges.
- There’s skepticism about Apple’s true interest given its historical move away from relying on Intel for chips.
- Valuation of the Chicago Bears
- Recent Sale: A minority stake in the Chicago Bears was sold, valuing the team at $8.9 billion.
- Market Implications:
- This valuation sets a new record for NFL teams, suggesting a bullish outlook for the league and increasing interest from private equity.
- The Bears' potential for revenue growth is tied to plans for a new stadium.
- KB Home Earnings Report
- Performance: The homebuilder exceeded earnings estimates but lowered its revenue guidance for the full year.
- Market Reaction: Shares showed minimal immediate reaction, indicating mixed sentiment in the housing market.
- Context: New home sales have risen, but mortgage rates remain a concern.
- GM and Tesla Market Performance
- GM Upgraded: UBS upgraded GM to a "buy," citing potential to handle tariff costs effectively.
- Tesla's Strength: Analysts predict strong Q3 performance for Tesla, driven by the approaching expiration of tax credits for electric vehicles.
- Freeport-McMoRan and Copper Prices
- Operational Issues: A deadly mudslide halted operations at a key Indonesian mine, prompting a significant drop in Freeport's stock price.
- Market Response: Despite operational setbacks, copper prices surged, reflecting broader trends in metal markets.
- AI and Future Economic Impact
- Market Dynamics: Increased investment in AI raises questions about job displacement and economic growth.
- Expert Opinions: Analysts are cautious about the Federal Reserve's perception of the AI impact on employment and inflation.
---
Key Takeaways
- Cautious Optimism for Intel: The potential partnership with Apple may provide Intel with temporary support but does not resolve fundamental issues.
- NFL Valuation Trends: The Bears' valuation highlights a strong market for NFL franchises, influenced by private equity interest and projected future revenues.
- Housing Market Complexity: KB Home’s performance reflects challenges in the housing sector, compounded by rising interest rates.
- Investor Sentiment: There is optimism about GM and Tesla's futures, but market conditions for auto manufacturers remain volatile.
- Copper Market Movement: Operational disruptions at Freeport-McMoRan highlight the sensitivity of commodity markets to geopolitical factors.
- AI's Dual Role: While AI offers potential for productivity gains, it also poses challenges for workforce stability, complicating the economic outlook.
---
Conclusion This episode of "Fast Money" encapsulates significant market movements and trends affecting major companies and sectors. The discussions provide valuable insights for investors navigating the current economic landscape.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Live from the Nasdaq market state in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is fast money. Here's what's on tap tonight. Another investment in Intel, the semi-giant reportedly turning to Apple for its next team up, what it could mean for the stock and how Wall Street is looking at the name now. And nearly$9 billion bears, minority stakes setting an eye-popping valuation for Chicago's NFL team, the precedent it sets for future team sales. Plus, all the details on KB Home's latest earnings, the guidance that sends shares of Copperminer, Preport Mac Moran sinking and driving higher. Shares of GM getting a boost thanks to a bullish call from Wall Street by one analyst sees the stock revving up.
0:38I'm Melissa Lee. Come to you last in the studio of the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, C. Grasso, Karen Feinerman, Dan Nathan, and Bono in Eisen. We start off with what could be another big investment in Intel. Bloomberg reporting the company is seeking funding from Apple to help its turnaround efforts. It would be just the latest in a string of cash infusions. Our Christina Parts and Eblis is here on set with details here. Christina, what do we know so far? This is a potential investment that could be seen as a comeback of sorts for Intel. And the reason I say that is because, like you said, Bloomberg did put out this report just within the last 45 minutes or so, saying that they are in the early stages.
1:12Nothing is confirmed yet. I did reach out to Intel myself. They are not commenting. They're quite conservative when it comes to these types of reports and headlines. But they did also say that there could be a partnership. It would be limited at the moment. Nothing significant. And I'd like to point out, too, that Apple and Intel don't actually have a relationship right now. Apple creates its own silicon. And nonetheless, you do see a positive reaction in shares. Shares closed about 6 percent higher. But if they're signing on a new customer like Apple, you would expect the stock to jump even higher, right, even if it's just a headline.
1:43So we have to take this with a grain of salt that right now this is just a beginning of a conversation with a potential partner. And maybe we can just fast forward to just the part where we have all of these investors that are investing in. You have not just too long ago, NVIDIA making a$5 billion investment. You had Intel announced Intel's largest external shareholder. You had SoftBank at$2 billion injecting it. The White House, or I should say the administration at$8.9 billion, so a 10 % stake. So you have all of these, I guess, rescue squads, that's what I called it, really representing validation maybe for Intel's turnaround at this moment.
2:20but it doesn't necessarily change the problem for Intel, which is dealing with the losses at the foundry, the slowdown in the 18A advanced manufacturing processes. But nonetheless, it's, I guess, seen as a positive if Apple signs on or even just starts talking or invests, right? It doesn't necessarily mean they need to start working together on an actual product. It's just... But not working together on an actual product and asking for just money, like cash. Well, maybe they'll do something like NVIDIA, right? So NVIDIA said that they're going to be working specifically on a PC product and a data server product.
2:50But then they had a press conference and everybody was asking, why didn't you commit to the Foundry business? Why aren't you building any NVIDIA chips? Why aren't you even using Intel Foundry for packaging? Which is, I know, Karen, something you and I spoke to just offline. Intel could do packaging quite well as TSMC has backlogged. There's just not enough capacity for putting these chips all together. Intel could maybe step in on that. But no, NVIDIA didn't. So what is Apple going to bring to this equation? Perhaps they'll announce some type of small partnership. But it's just it's a rescue squad and it's not changing the underlying problems, but it's good.
3:23And the stock, people are liking it because the stock keeps climbing because it could signal good things to come. Right. Christina, thank you. Christina Parts Nevelis. As Christina pointed out, the stock was already higher during the regular session. And that was sort of eye raising. There wasn't any news. And so maybe this is the answer to that question there, Dan. It could be that Apple sees who the rescue squad is and says to itself, let's get in line with the administration. Yeah, but Apple spent the last 20 years trying to get away from Intel. I mean, let's be really clear. And KPAR just said this.
3:53I mean, less than 1 % of the revenue comes from Apple. So Apple has been designing all their own silicon. I think the only legacy sort of Qualcomm has like a modem in the iPhone, and they've been trying to do that. So at the end of the day, it is curious, especially if it's not for Foundry. I mean, Apple does have most of their chips are made at Taiwan Semi, which is the case for most chips that are out there on the planet. it. So it's curious. The one thing I'll say about Intel is that there are very few stocks in the S &P 500 with over a hundred billion dollar market cap that are as hated as much as this stock by Wall Street.
4:26I think there's only five buys. There's about four holds and like eight or so sells. So when you think about that, this is really I love the term rescue squad because no one's investing in this company because of their technology or their IP or their manufacturing prowess. There's something else there and I'm not really sure what it is. Yeah. And I'm with you. And I'm really curious what that something else is. I think what this does is essentially makes the pool a little bit murky. Are you investing in Intel, partnering with Intel, because you actually have a strong conviction around what that ROI or ROIC will be?
4:58Or is this a way for you to align yourself with the administration? And I just think I'd be a bit ignorant. Maybe both. Okay. Yeah? Maybe both. But my point is that, like, I certainly don't have a clear answer. And given what we're seeing in the recent positioning, the recent announcement of the White House ownership, to me, a murky picture is not what I want as an investor. Now, with that said, I think this is all tailwinds as far as the narrative is concerned. If you look at the performance of the stock over the last two years, clearly, like, you want an American turnaround, Phoenix from the Astra story.
5:31And I'm not willing to get in front of that because I do think that momentum can be quite powerful. I just do want to spend some time saying that I believe the narrative at this point has somewhat disassociated itself from the actual fundamentals of the company. Yeah, I mean, I agree with everything you said. I think, you know, the cash infusions, that helps. They need it. They're losing money, right? That's really important. So taking away some of that downside makes the calculus a little bit better. But there is this frenzy going on right now and just announcement of any kind of tie up, even with or without details, it seems like buy the stock and ask questions later, which I'm really not comfortable with that, you know, and thinking about the response.
6:07What could go wrong? What could go wrong, you know, to the NVIDIA OpenEye announcement of likelihood of a deal, I guess you would call it, expectation of a deal. I don't know. It just seems like the math is just starting to get out of whack. You know, I don't know if we'll touch on Alibaba later. Can I talk about it now? You just did. OK, so I mean, the response of the stock to this fifty three billion dollars of initial. First of all, I don't know if it's incremental or if that was always the spend. Let's just say it's somewhat incremental reaction. The stock of, you know, twenty nine billion dollars of market cap improvement for that is seems like a lot.
6:48And I like Alibaba. You know, it's fun when it goes up. But I feel like things are getting a little bit out of control. All that having been said, I am taking some money off the table either through put spreads or looking for other things to hedge what feels like a very frothy AI environment. I bought Intel on the new CEO and then three life preservers or rescue squads later, I sold 25 percent of the position. I think we can make it to mid 30s, but it's had an incredible move. This was a$50 stock back in December 2023. If it retraces half of it, it's 35. I'm going to sell the other 25 there. If it doesn't and it breaks down, I'll just liquidate the position.
7:31I get your points completely in terms of all the narratives and the question marks. But at the same time, you also have the juice potentially of a new CEO, a new CEO that is committed, has been brought on to make the story work. So that plus the life preservers, doesn't that change? If it were Pat Gelsinger still, the old CEO with these life preservers, I would agree that the narrative has not changed at all. Maybe we haven't got it. That's true. He was a technologist. I mean, these were people that were meant to do this every step of the way. I think they've had five CEOs in the last 20 years or something like that.
8:03These were not like chumps. You know what I mean? These were people meant to do this to actually figure out what's coming next, execute on that roadmap. And, you know, all the way along, I mean, AMD was eating their lunch. You know, obviously NVIDIA and GPUs. So, listen, these guys all see something. I'm just some dumb guy sits on this desk. You know what I mean? I'm looking at this thing. I'm like, they're all seeing something. I'm not buying it. But, you know, all of these equity infusions, they're all dilutive to equity shareholders. You know what I mean? So it doesn't mean that this is a great investment if you're buying the stock right here.
8:32If you are a strategic buyer like an NVIDIA or an Apple, there might be dividends that are paid that have nothing to do with the price appreciating one way or another. And the other thing I'll just say about the Alibaba, it is curious. You just mentioned that it got this market cap appreciation based on a CapEx number that they threw out there. We had seen that in the hyperscalers going back the last couple of years. Now we start to see it with those sorts of revenue guides that we're seeing like out of Oracle the last few weeks or so. So it's a little curious. I'd rather a stock go up because of revenue guide than a CapEx guide, which is way, you know, the returns on that, who knows when that's going to materialize.
9:07At the same time, the appreciation of Alibaba, you may be able to justify it a little bit more because the valuation of Alibaba is much lower than, say, Oracle or any of these other companies that have announced something and then, you know, got rewarded for it. Even with the extraordinary run of Alibaba, I think probably maybe the multiples moved to like 17 times earnings. Right. Yeah. After you take out the cap. Yeah. And then you still have some of the friction around the Hopper 20 and whether that's going to be accepted in China. So I think that there are tangible things that you can point to in terms of Alibaba.
9:38I hear you in terms of 50 some odd billion dollars translating to an increase in market cap of 30 billion overnight. Yes, that's pretty incredible. But I can at least wrap my mind around the narrative about how you get there. When it comes to Intel, the fact that the CEO has essentially just re-explored the 18A process, like undoing what was a poor investment to me is differentiated from a new winning strategy. And I've yet to understand what that is. Clearly, they've been able to kind of rally the troops and get this investment into a U.S. domicile company. But aside from that, I don't know what the deliverables are.
10:13All right. We mentioned Alibaba earlier. Shares jumping to four-year highs after the Chinese tech giant unveiled its latest AI model. Said it would invest even more into artificial intelligence than it already planned to. Our Yunus Yun is in Beijing with all the details. Yunus. Thanks, Mel. Well, Alibaba's CEO told a developer conference that spending on AI infrastructure would exceed$53 billion planned over three years. The cloud unit would open data centers in Brazil, France, the Netherlands in 2026. And the company unveiled an updated large language model. Now, this bullish outlook emboldened tech analysts to see Alibaba potentially as a serious competitor to the likes of Google and Microsoft.
10:56There could, though, be other reasons for the stock has been moving so much. One is that the state stock paper, the Securities Daily, recently headlined an article that said that the Alibaba stock rally epitomizes the strength of China tech. That was essentially encouraging a lot of Chinese investors to take the government's cues and buy into the stock. And then ARK CEO Kathy Wood had bought into Baba as well for the first time in four years. Another potential factor that Capital Economics, the research firm, pointed out was the ramping up of the national AI plus initiative. So this is essentially getting AI into everything.
11:37So it's AI plus manufacturing, AI plus health care. And so Capital Economics said we suspect there is more upside for MSCI's tech heavy China index as a country's own AI plus plan gets going. Guys. And of course, you know, there's the question of the chips that they're not probably going to come as much from NVIDIA anymore. And so it is coming from Alibaba created chips, internal chips. Yeah, well, that's what Alibaba says. But although Alibaba has also expressed an interest to maintain its relationship with NVIDIA, but that is seen as one key weakness for China's AI industry, that they don't necessarily have the chips, so then they wouldn't have the computing power.
12:24And another weakness is that a lot of people here believe that the Chinese AI industry doesn't have a lot of resources when it comes to financing. So even though the government has this big initiative that it wants to run, the local governments are kind of broke. And also private money and capital has been beaten down for so many years because of all the regulatory crackdown. So there's been kind of a reluctance on the part of VCs as well as private capital to infuse their money in a lot of different things such as AI. So that's another big factor that people have discussed as a key weakness for China's AI industry.
13:02All right, Eunice, great to see you as always. Thank you. Eunice Yun live from Beijing for us. Let's get more on the potential investment in Intel and AI. Alibaba with Susquehanna's Chris Roland. Chris, great to have you with us on a day when there's just so much chip related news in the air. I first want to get your take on this Bloomberg report that Intel has approached Apple for some sort of an investment. The stock was up curiously during the session, outsized gains relative to peers. What do you make of this report? Yeah, I think it does make sense on the surface. You know, our take right now is Intel's on a roll.
13:41Trump is behind him, of course, with that$20 Intel investment for the U.S. taxpayer. You know, they've added a bunch of guys here. SoftBank, obviously, NVIDIA as well. And really, Apple still probably owes Trump something for removing iPhones from tariffs. And so this could be, in some ways, a bit of a payback. Intel right now is also desperate to get themselves a 14A Foundry customer. And so that would presumably be linked with that investment. Hey, so Chris, the whole notion of like state capitalism, where the administration is taking stakes in strategically important companies, might you see something in like an AMD, for instance?
14:32You know, AMD is obviously trying to take market share from NVIDIA. the whole idea of having second sources or multiple producers of this technology make some sense. Are you expecting, you know, possibly any other investments by the Treasury? I am not expecting an investment in AMD. I think this is more about kind of boots on the ground, CapEx, actual manufacturing brought back to the United States, and AMD is fabulous. But there could be some manufacturing sites and related companies that the U.S. could invest in, particularly if there was a strong need. TI could be one of those companies, although I think TI is reluctant.
15:20Wolfspeed needs some money in order to continue their silicon carbide ambitions. You might see something there. But but but other than that, I think it has to be manufacturing based. Is this enough of a narrative, Chris, to be constructive on Intel, that there is a new CEO on board, that they are able to string together all these cash infusions from various parties, that the Trump administration seems to have a hand, at least on the surface, in arranging these extra lifelines to be there? I mean, is that enough? I don't know if it's enough. I think cash is good, particularly when you have these manufacturing ambitions.
16:02You need cash. But I don't know if it's enough. What they really need is a bona fide, large foundry customer and not just a one-off chip, you know, a few hundred thousand. We're talking about millions of units and a roadmap that extends through probably 2030. That's what Intel needs. And if they can share the costs of this manufacturing with their foundry customers, they might have a chance here. Chris, it's Karen. Thanks for being on. Can we talk about NVIDIA for a minute? A lot of news lately, all kinds of things. Where do you think the stock is? How do you think the stock is priced, given all the news?
16:47Yeah, I think it's priced. I think there is a little bit more upside. we could see in NVIDIA. Obviously, there's a ton of pushback right now about some of the circularity in the deal between OpenAI, NVIDIA, Oracle. Vendor-supplied financing is not a game that usually ends well. But the flip side of that coin is that the numbers that we are seeing, the projections that we are seeing are upsized. They are larger than we were anticipating. And there are more to come as well. It's not just about OpenAI. There are some other really big guys out there. Sorry to interrupt, Chris. The numbers that you are seeing in terms of the potential deals that have yet to be announced but are announced prematurely, I mean, I'm just trying to understand, you know, because a lot of this is sort of is tentative.
17:50I mean, specifically for NVIDIA and OpenAI, this is like the precursor of a deal because the details have not yet been finalized. We hear all these announcements. We don't really know the deployment of this capital or the cadence of the deployment of this capital. And so therefore, you know, as an analyst, how do you put that into your model? Sure. Some of the details are missing. You can back into using some basic assumptions, roughly what we're talking about here. So we think this is a$300 billion deal for NVIDIA. But there are more to come as well. There's Sovereign AI. There are other startups.
18:34Whether they will be on NVIDIA platforms or not, it's unclear. There is clearly a growing ASIC movement. TPU right now from Google is gaining a lot of momentum. We also have a bunch of other kind of startup infrastructure movements like MTIA from Meta and alluded to earlier the Chinese contingent, which now looks to be in country. Chris, always great to get your perspective. Appreciate it. Thanks, Melissa. Chris Rowland of Susquehanna. Just quickly, Steve, where do you stand on any of this? NVIDIA? Yeah, I do think that CapEx is unsustainable. You can't continue to spend. And they have it going out into eternity, the way that they're spending money right now.
19:26And I just think that that's something that we all have to come to grips with, that these seven companies or even 10 companies or 15 aren't going to be the only ones who benefit. We have to start broadening out that surge. Coming up, details behind copper's rise and Freeport Macquarie's drop in the week, guidance weighing on that name. But first, some after-hours action results from KB Home's latest quarter when Fast Money returns.
19:56Welcome back to Fast Money Earnings Alert on KB Home. The home builder is just down fractionally after reporting earnings and revenues that beat Wall Street estimates. Delivery is also slightly higher than expected for the quarter. The company, though, did lower its estimates for the full year housing revenues down to$6.1 to$6.2 billion from a prior guide of$6.3 to$6.5 billion. So not too much reaction here. We also got some other data in the home sector in terms of new home sales, which were up 20 percent. It was a massive increase there. Yeah, so apparently it's somewhat of a noisy figure. I mean, so KB Home's a couple of little dings.
20:33You know, average selling price, a little bit light. The backlog a little bit down. Nothing terrible. I mean, the sort of narrative around the home builders has been difficult, right? Some of the tariff things have really hit them. Some of them may be hard to get some of the labor they need. So I have exposure to the space primarily through Home Depot and Lowe's and Zillow. And Zillow this week hasn't been the right place to be. But I'm sticking with those other two. Not a bad report, though. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, Diana today, Diana Oleg was saying mortgage rate, 30-year fixed mortgage rates were back up to 6.37 percent.
21:09So that still is a hefty lift in terms of the buy-down of the rate by the homebuilders. You need these rates to drop to the middle fives. If they drop to the middle fives, then the lift that the homebuilders have to do is a lot less. But if rates are going down, I think you buy all of them. D.R. Horton has been the one that's outperformed. But if you go with a Pulte or a KB or the industry leader, Lenar. I agree with you. DHA is always interesting just because it has a scale. I think if you want a bit more nuanced approach, KB Homes does offer some value here. For one, it typically trades at somewhat of a discounted P.E.
21:42and price to book than the group. They also haven't had the same spec house building that you've seen some of the other players. So perhaps to Steve's point, if you start to see rates come down and they're able to lower that promotional value, I would expect it to have more of an incremental effect on their margins vis-a-vis some of the other partners. Yeah, there's another reason why rates might come down, though. And that might be the labor market. Right. Which would be a terrible thing for this sector. It wouldn't be good for housing. You know, one thing I'll just say, the stocks have run in front of the rate cuts, right?
22:09So we had a high in the 30-year, I think about two years ago, fixed mortgage at like 7.1%. So here we are, let's call it 6.4%. I mean, if we don't see yields come down meaningfully or rates for the right reasons, that's going to keep the housing market kind of stuck. But you look at the three-month average and you look at this big new home sales being, you say, that's pretty good. You know what I mean? So, I mean, maybe they're getting a bit more aggressive. That's why we're seeing these earnings misses and the like here. So it doesn't seem like, you know, this is an easy one from here. I just think they kind of run far fast in front of this.
22:39And we start having hawkish cuts the next two. I just don't see this group acting particularly well. Are you worried at all in terms of consumer discretionary spending and the pressure it might feel from a weakening labor market on a Home Depot and a Lowe's? Or is it more defensive? I think of it as more defensive. I also think, I mean, the projects will get done as long as, well, the employment thing is key, critical, of course. But I don't know. I also think the valuation, particularly for Lowe's, is not demanding, as Guy would say. And if rates come down, you get home equity loans, which helps people to make the purchases.
23:13So it's not a one-to-one with home builders. Or if rates come down, you could see those hard items like dishwashers and dryers be purchased more. And getting that inventory that's been stuck, those are Home Depot customers. It doesn't need to be a new build for someone to buy a new home and start to spend money. There's a lot more Fast Money to come. Here's what's coming up next. A mining meltdown. Freeport-McMarin forced to halt operations in Asia after a deadly mudslide. The details from the accident and the impact on copper prices. next. Plus, the next move for markets as major indexes pull back from record highs.
23:55What one top strategist sees in store for stocks after Fed Chair Jerome Powell raised a red flag on valuation. You're watching Fast Money live from the Nasdaq market side in Times Square. We're back right after this.
24:19Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of Freeport, Mac Moran, dropping 17 percent today, the worst one-day move since the start of the pandemic. The company cutting its outlook for gold and copper sales after a mudslide halted all operations at a critical Indonesian mine earlier this month, killing at least two workers there. That news sending copper futures higher by more than 3 percent, hitting its highest level since June 30th. This is part, though, of, you know, aside from today, an overall bid for metals across the board. Gold, most specifically silver also, but also some copper showing signs of life.
Read the full transcript
24:52Well, copper on revenue basis, it's 63 percent of Freeport's revenue and 15 percent is gold. And then the rest, you get a lot of assorted little stuff there. Terrible news, terrible headline. But I would still be a buyer. I still own the stock. I've trimmed a little bit, but I would still be a buyer on this discount. Yeah, first and foremost, again, we want to kind of acknowledge a loss of life. That's clearly like the most important issue here. But in terms of kind of like part and parceling out the trading opportunities, I'm with Steve. It's something that I'd monitor. I'd probably add it to my shopping list.
25:24But I want more clarity on how long these delays or pause are going to be and whether or not this might kind of be an incentive for there to be some type of investigation or re-overhauling of safety protocols or things of that nature. I think that could add a little bit more murkiness and perhaps make this a much more protracted process. And to me, that's the real risk here. Yeah, gold miners, gold, all catching. But I know that that's not where you normally traffic, Karen. But in terms of the data center build out and the grid build out that has to accompany a data center build out, you have copper, you have aluminum, all of these other industrial metals that are needed to back that.
26:02And you saw, you know, taking that much offline. So copper spiked a lot today. Yeah, I know for home builders, that's not going to be great either. I think, I mean, the data center, I don't know the percent. I'd be curious to know. If someone knows, please add me. The percentage spend of copper in a data center over the denominator of the entire spent. Well, it should be how much of a, I mean, how much copper in terms of the total supply of copper would a data center build out? Excellent point by you as well. Yes. Isn't this on a short list too for a government stake as well? Right? Howard Lutnick made that comment about it, just sort of a one-off as a strategic reserve.
26:46So maybe when you see a sell-off like this, and I echo what Bono and said, you never want to see any loss of life be responsible for a sell-off that you want to profit from. But when the administration sees a sell-off like this, maybe that ups the odds. Coming up, stocks falling farther from records after yesterday's valuation warning from the Fed chair. What our next guest sees in store for equities next. Fast Money is back in two.
27:13Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.
27:28Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks closing lower for a second straight day. The Dow falling 171 points. The S &P and Nasdaq both down about three-tenths of a percent. The small cap Russell 2000 dropping nearly 1 percent. Marvell Technology jumping more than 7 percent, leading the Nasdaq 100. The chipmaker unveiling a new five billion dollar buyback plan. The stock still down, though, more than 25 percent this year. And energy stocks pumping higher. The best performing sector in the S &P with EQT Corp, Phillips 66, Devon Energy leading the charge there. Marathon Petroleum also hitting its highest level since April of 2024.
28:01Well, markets turning their attention to two big events in the next week. Core PCI, the Fed's preferred inflation gauge, comes out Friday, and the federal funding deadline is next Tuesday. To discuss all of this and much more, let's bring in CNBC contributor David Zervos. David is the chief market strategist at Jeffries. He is on the list of 11 potential candidates to be Fed chair. To see Jerome Powell, he is the most dressed-up guest we've ever had here at NASDAQ. It is great to see you, David. It's great to be Usually you're in a hoodie. It's like a full transformation. But I want to talk to you about, first of all, Chair Powell and what he said yesterday in terms of the stock market, because you are very bullish.
28:41And what he said yesterday was that stocks are fairly highly valued. Why is he wrong in your view? Or is he not? Look, valuation is one of those things. It's like tasting wine, right? Everybody's got different views. I think there's a lot of ways you can look at the equity market and say we've had we have an incredible earnings outlook ahead of us. We've got an investment horizon that looks incredible based on a lot of the changes that have taken place in the policies, whether it's DREG, whether it's the one big, beautiful bill, whether it's tariffs forcing some people to the table to invest more back in the United States, which is a huge positive that I don't think a lot of the models at the Fed are taking into account.
29:24So I think there's a lot of reasons to be confident. And one of the reasons, you know, that that we've got a headwind a little bit to it, particularly in interest rate sensitive sectors and in the labor market, is that I think monetary policy is just way too restrictive. So I've been saying that for a while. I've been saying it since before the election. I'm still sticking with it. Happy to see that they they kind of have turned a little bit, but we've got a lot more to go. The turn sounds very cautious, though. I mean, when they call it a risk management technique to cut rates now, it doesn't sound like there's another cut firmly in the books or another, you know, even after the next meeting.
30:01I mean, it just doesn't sound like the path is clear there. Well, look, Jay's got five meetings left. He's really not our forward guidance. Our forward guidance is going to be the folks, one of those persons from the 11 that you mentioned, along with whoever takes the Adriana Kugler seat in January, which may be Stephen. He's there for four months now. And then the drivers of Mickey Bowman and Chris Waller. So you're going to have four folks on the committee and possibly five, depending on what happens with Lisa Cook, that I think are going to come at this very differently. They're going to come at it with a supply side style view, with a view that is very different than the groupthink that has engulfed this Fed for a very long time, but has, I think, become, unfortunately, more political as of late.
30:54So, David, you're an economist at an investment bank. If you're sitting in that seat, let's say in May, all right, and you are kind of getting a sense of what you were seeing all over the investment banking community. You talk to a lot of investors. You see what's going on in the investment in AI. How would you be thinking about AI and the payoff and what it might mean for the U.S. economy, for productivity alike? I mean, is this something that would work into your thought process? It would. And I think it's a very complicated model that you'd have to put out there. And I wouldn't even call it a model.
31:22I'd call it a kind of discussion. I also don't like the term economist so much, even though I did my Ph.D. in economics. I call myself a strategist for a reason. I think economists kind of ruin a lot of things. And every time I put on my Ph.D. economics hat, I seem to get things wrong. I was a trader for almost a decade. And any time I relied on my economics degree is usually when I lost money. So I learned to disavow a lot of that. That said, I can still talk the talk and listen to their models. And I will say this with AI. The smartest AI guys I know, the guys who have made the money in the largest amounts, and you know them, you have them on these shows.
32:01They've been saying it for a while. They're early in all the stocks. These are the people that are telling me in meetings, we're going to lose three to five million jobs in the next three or four years, maybe even faster. And the revisions that we just got, the 911, as well as the three or 400 ,000 in the last few months, These are big changes. I'm surprised the Fed is taking this so casually, like, oh, yeah, just a 25 and, you know, maybe we'll keep. This was a massive change. And it's very consistent with that story that those folks are spending. I say to some of them, if you were Fed chair, and I don't think they want to be, they're making billions in their AI investments, they would probably have rates closer to zero because we could tell a story where the unemployment rate is actually going up quite significantly.
32:47Those AI guys are talking their book, though. I mean, they're talking about how effective AI is and therefore we're going to take over the world. Of course. And I always step back and I'm like, OK, you're listening to the guys who are talking. I get it. But they're they're also kind of spinning a story which which was a very non-inflationary, strong growth story that has some of the characteristics of the 90s that I think are really making their way through this particular time. They're spending hundreds of billions of dollars now with Fed funds where they are. Can you imagine if they were close to zero what sort of investment bubble we might have them?
33:21I'm not as worried about that because I don't think interest rates matter as much to these guys. These guys are looking at fat tails in the distribution. You're looking at Oracle. Oracle is looking to raise$15 billion to basically deal with, what, hundreds of billions of dollars in order. It's going to become a debt issue for a lot of these companies. Yeah, I just think these guys are going to make those jumps if rates are even a couple hundred base points lower. It's not going to change the calculus that much on how they see the potential payouts. It will change discount rates in the future, for sure.
33:54So the long dated stuff looks better. The real venture venture stuff will catch a bit, particularly if we start to go to thinking that rates are going to stay toward one or zero for a long time like we did pre-COVID. I don't really expect that. But again, I come back to the storyline, which is one of we could actually have a pretty strong growth economy. your AI story, their AI story, something really pretty spectacular. But the job growth side of it is not nearly as comfortable as you would like it to be. And that's a dilemma for the Fed because they have maximum employment and price stability.
34:31There's nothing about growth in there. So imagine a world maybe where we're growing at three and a half or four. Things are really good, but the unemployment rate keeps ticking up. What's Fed supposed to do? Well, what would you do? Mandate-wise, I think you're supposed to be stimulating some aggregate demand. You've got millions of people that need to retool and reset. And that's the job of the Fed. And there's not an inflationary story behind that growth. That is true supply-side growth. And I like listening to a lot of the folks that populate this administration. They come at it from that supply side, like I said in the beginning, Melissa.
35:06You have Joe Livornia, who I think is great at talking that. I think Stephen has talked that book. Chris and Mickey still very much in that kind of ilk. So I think you get more of that view, more of this idea that we can have stronger growth with disinflation, which is not a traditional Keynesian story that you're going to get from the Austin Goolsbys and the Neal Kashkari's and the sort of old guard that are spinning this, oh, my, when I get too much inflation, it's a little bit nervous. I think you just dropped down to number three.
35:40I just I think it's a nice change to kind of answer your question full circle. I'm not really looking to Jay Powell for forward guidance right now. Right. That's that's really the answer to that question about his version of irrational exuberance. David, great to see you. We'll let you go to your gala because you definitely did not dress up like that for us. Thanks for having us. Always fun. Good to see everybody. Coming up, the Bears, booming valuation. The NFL team marking a major milestone, what it means for the most valuable sports league when Fast Money returns.
36:14December 11th, join Melissa Lee and the team of traders in New York City for an all-access celebration, live and on air. Fast Money Live, trading the holidays. Get your tickets now at CNBCEvents.com slash Fast Money.
36:38Welcome back to Fast Money. The Chicago Bears marking a milestone selling a minority stake, less than 3%, that values the team at$8.9 billion. What does this mean for the sports league in upcoming sales? Let's bring in CNBC Sports' Mike Ozanian for all the details. Hey, Mike. Hey, Melissa. Yeah, this shows the continued upward trajectory of NFL team valuations. The$8.9 billion valuation for this tiny stake sets a record valuation for an NFL team. And in fact, if you look at the trajectory, it surpasses the recent high of$8.6 billion for the 49ers for minority stake. And then prior to that was$8.3 billion for a small piece of the Eagles.
37:21So we see where this is going. The upward trajectory is due in part to the expectation that the league's next national TV deals will see a huge increase. Part of it also, and this really pertains to these small LP stakes who have no say in how the team is run, is the liquidity that the influence private equity has had since it's been allowed to invest in the NFL. Even though private equity has only taken a stake in three teams to this point, they kind of set a floor and provide liquidity to other LP investors who used to say, gee, if I buy this stake, you know, how am I going to get out? What's the exit strategy?
38:00Now they're saying, you know, there is an exit strategy. I can go to a private equity firm and they buy me out. Mike, help me out with this. Okay, so the Dallas Cowboys for 19 years straight, I read your work, I love your work, have been the highest valued NFL team. They have not been to the Super Bowl in 30 years. In the last 30 years, they've been in the playoffs only 13 times. How does that work? Well, a lot of it has to do with the stadium, number one. And Jerry Jones is a master at generating revenue from his stadium, principally sponsorships. He wrote the blueprint on it. And number two, you've got to remember, guys, the NFL shares like two-thirds of its revenue evenly.
38:39So, you know, winning doesn't necessarily play a big part in terms of playoff game revenue and things like that, as it does in the NHL and the NBA. And then particularly with the Bears, this is a team that unlike, say, the Rams and the Chargers who share L.A. or the Jets and the Giants who share New York, they own by themselves the third biggest market in the NFL. And I think the upside as it pertains to the Bears from the rest of the league is their stadium is one of the worst in the NFL. It's old and their lease is not that good in terms of how much revenue they get from it. They're pushing and working on getting a new stadium.
39:21If they do, there will be big upside. They'll be able to generate revenue more from sponsorships and from non-NFL events that are held at the stadium. Mike, good to see you. Thanks. Thank you. Mike Ozanian. Coming up, GM and Tesla both driving higher today. The Wall Street call is getting both those shares revving up after this.
39:55Welcome back to Fast Money 2. Bullish calls on the auto sector today catching our eye. UBS upgrading General Motors to buy from a neutral, upping the price target to$81 from 56. Analysts saying the company is well poised to manage tariff costs. Meanwhile, Tesla shares up nearly 4 % for their highest close since December. Analysts at Wolf Research saying Q3 could be a strong quarter for the EV maker with deliveries beating expectations. Of course, there's a race to use the last of the tax credits. And so that's going to potentially boost demand for the third quarter specifically. Yeah, I agree with that.
40:28And I think that Tesla does have tailwinds going into year end. There's a little squishy month coming up, but it seems to have have compensated for that with that September 30th deadline. If you look at GM and Ford, that to me is lower rates. People buy cars more. Have you shopped for you don't drive, right? I'm sure. Why would I shop for a car? OK, so so when you look to add a car, these interest rates are insane, insane. So I have four kids. And when you look to actually replace cars, it's double what you paid from back three years ago. Now, granted, there's a lot of tariffs action that influence that price.
41:03But I'm talking about things that don't have any tariff effect whatsoever. The interest rates have dramatically made cars less affordable. Rates go lower. Ford and GM sell a ton. That's a major reason behind this upgrade here. Also, they're expecting North American margins to be between eight to 10 percent, which is also pretty aggressive. Really aggressive. I mean, it's a bold call. If they're right, because I think it was setting the rest of the street at six to six and a half, that is a huge difference. It still wouldn't be expensive, even if it met that target. I mean, bold call on the margins.
41:35I don't own it, but it's not expensive. But I am concerned about the overall price of cars. I'm with you. Inexpensive, super bold call. And the rollback of essentially like the regulatory and some of the regulatory and environmental protections. Yes, I think perhaps it's a short-term win, but I think it's a long-term loss. All right. This just in, we've got a first read on ratings for Jimmy Kimmel's return to late night last night. According to Disney, the show got 6.26 million total viewers, even with 23 percent of U.S. TV households preempted among adults 18 to 49. The show saw its best regularly scheduled episode in over 10 years.
42:15The monologue has garnered more than 26 million views across YouTube and social platforms. Wow. Up next, Final Trades.
42:31Final Trade time, Steve. I bought FUBU TV on its impending merger with Hulu and Live TV. I'm still one. Karen? Yes, I went ahead to some of my AI exposure, bought some NVIDIA put spreads. Dan? You can make no sense at all. Okay, what do you got? The E in your carb is energy. So OIA is in it. breaking out. Bono in. I'm fading the move in IWM. All right. Thanks for watching Fast Mad Money starts right now.
43:01All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC Universal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.
43:35To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.
From the publisher
Listen to our traders take you behind the money...how to play the volatility...pops and drops and the movers you missed.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
