In short
Podcast Notes: CNBC's "Fast Money" - How the Mighty Have Fallen, and the Skinny on Lilly (8/7/23)
Episode Overview In this episode of CNBC's *Fast Money*, hosted by Melissa Lee and featuring a roundtable of traders, the discussion revolves around recent market movements concerning major tech companies like Apple and Microsoft, the upcoming earnings report for Eli Lilly, and various stock movements in the market.
---
Key Topics Discussed
- Market Movements: Apple and Microsoft
- Both companies have seen significant declines, each down over 10% from their recent highs, leading to a combined market cap loss of approximately $500 billion.
- The discussion questioned whether this decline is a warning sign for the broader market or indicative of a market that is broadening beyond its tech giants.
- Key points:
- Apple is down more than 9% from its all-time high reached in July.
- Microsoft has also dropped by 10% from its peak in the previous month.
- Analysts expressed concern over the potential impact on the broader market if other major companies like Amazon and Google also experience declines.
- Broader Market Performance
- The S&P 500 had seen solid gains, with the Dow adding over 400 points at the beginning of the week.
- Discussions about whether the market's strength can persist without the support of mega-cap tech stocks.
- Notable performance in sectors such as industrials, financials, and consumer discretionary, which contributed to the overall market rally despite declines in major tech stocks.
- Eli Lilly's Upcoming Earnings
- Analysts are closely watching Eli Lilly as it prepares to report earnings, focusing particularly on its new weight loss products.
- The competitive landscape includes trial results from Novo Nordisk, which could have significant implications for Eli Lilly's market position.
- Key expectations:
- Analysts suggest that Lilly needs to deliver strong earnings to justify its high valuation (trading at 50 times this year's earnings).
- The outcome of Novo's trials regarding cardiovascular event reductions could influence market dynamics.
- Stock Performance and Predictions
- The Tesla management shift and the implications for its stock were discussed, particularly about executive turnover and market perception.
- Earnings reports from companies like Lucid Motors and Tyson Foods were analyzed, with Tyson facing disappointing results leading to a significant drop in share price.
- Amidst discussions, there were reflections on the potential for a consumer-led recession, driven by factors like student loan repayments and rising energy prices.
---
Key Takeaways
- Apple and Microsoft Declines: Serve as a potential indicator of market stress, with implications for investor sentiment and future market performance.
- Eli Lilly's Position: Remains strong but must navigate competitive pressures and high expectations in earnings reports.
- Sector Rotation: Suggests a potentially healthier market dynamic, with strength in various sectors even as certain mega-cap tech stocks pull back.
- Consumer Spending: Analysts hint at a slowdown that could be triggered by external economic factors, indicating cautious sentiment moving forward.
---
Final Thoughts This episode highlights the delicate balance in the current market, underscored by significant tech stock declines but buoyed by broader sector performance. The upcoming earnings reports, particularly for Eli Lilly, will be critical in shaping investor expectations and market direction in the coming weeks. Investors are advised to remain vigilant about market signals and potential shifts in consumer behavior.
---
For more information, visit the official [Fast Money website](http://fastmoney.cnbc.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Right now on Fast, how the mighty have fallen. Apple and Microsoft are each down about 10 % from the recent highs, losing nearly half a trillion dollars in combined market cap in just a few weeks. What is behind the moves lower and what does it say about the strength of the market? Plus, all eyes on Eli. Lilly, that is. The pharma giant reporting earnings tomorrow and the focus will be on its latest weight loss products. What can we expect to hear? Can new trial results from Novo Nordisk change the game? And later, Tesla C-suite shuffle, a new high for URI and Tyson shareholders fly the coop. The details behind all those stock moves are coming up.
0:34I'm Melissa Lee. This is Fast Money. We're live at the NASDAQ market site on the desk tonight. Tim Seymour, Karen Feinerman, Dan Nathan, and Guy Dami all here in-house. We start off with a potential warning sign for the markets. Major indices all kicking off the week with solid gains. The Dow adding more than 400 points. The S &P 500 rallying almost a percent. And the NASDAQ not far behind. But not everyone came along for the ride. Check out Apple pulling back more than a percent and a half today. The world's biggest tech company is now more than 9 % off its all-time high hit in mid-July. And that's not all.
1:05Microsoft managed to gain today, but it's down an even 10 percent from its record high last month. So is this cause for concern or a sign that the rally has actually broadened out, that we can move beyond just these two, you know, generals? Dan. Yeah. So when you think about the moves that the two of them have, OK, like technically they've broken the uptrends have been in place for most of this year. I think that's important in a market where people don't really care much about valuation. When you think about how far Microsoft and Apple have come, they make up nearly 14 percent of the S &P 500, the two of the stocks together.
1:35If you look at the reports that they had, they were fine. There was nothing great. There was nothing horrible one way or another. But they sold off really hard. And I think that is important to note in the fact that it happened very quickly. So if you were to have some of these other names kind of join the party, that would certainly be a problem. But you talk about the rotations that we've seen, and it has been pretty good. If you think about it, the S &P had its lows on Friday morning. It was only down 3 % from those highs with two of the biggest components that were down 10%, really in a straight line, coming off of news a few weeks ago.
2:03So to me, I think you could look at it. If you wanted to try to be really bearish in a slow market, we've just gotten through earnings. We know we don't have another Fed meeting until there. You could say if we do see some things start to snowball a little bit, some of these other names join the party. If we were to see Amazon, if we were to see Google, which gapped up 10%, fill in their gaps, we could have a bit of a problem. Right now, I think it's okay. We will see the other sectors which rallied today continue their rally, the broadening out of the market, industrials, financials, consumer discretionary, which are all strong.
2:31We see them continue to rally. The markets can hold up, can't they? Can I ask you to ask a would-you-rather of Guy? Oh, wait. Can I follow the rules? Would you rather him? I'm not. But I think it would be interesting to ask someone, would you rather the market actually follow higher the mega cap tech stocks, or would you let them sell off and see the rest of the market brought? Try that out, Guy. What do you think? So you're asking her to ask me. Sorry. I'm confused already. You know what? I was doing great until that last part. I'm out. I'm out. You are out. Guy. I understand what he meant, though, oddly enough.
3:04Yeah. If you had told me on July 20th that by August 7th, both Microsoft and Apple would be both down 10 % from the all-time high, then said, okay, Guy, where's the S &P 500? I would say, Melissa, we are no doubt trading down to that level 43 and a quarter, where we topped out at last August, and we're probably threatening to go through it. Yet here we are at 4520. So I guess it's a good thing to sort of answer Tim's question. I think it's a matter of time before the broader market catches up to what these mega cap stocks are doing. But today, anecdotally, outstanding. Do you think so, Karen? I agree.
3:40Well, I think I would have thought the market lower, but I think this is much better action. I think that to see other companies, other sectors sort of join the party. I mean, there were some like travel, which pulled back a little bit. We're just going crazy. And then love to see that in banks, love to see that in industrials. Consumer discretion, I think, is still unclear. because we do have the student loans beginning to be repaid next month. And so that's a little less clear to me. But I feel much more comfortable with a market like this. I still am short the IGV, which was up today, because I do think that high flyer index should have some pressure on it with rates having moved the way they have.
4:18Tim, question for you. Can I get back in? Can I get back in? So think about this. We just talked about the two big ones, okay? But think about semis, okay? What we heard from AMD, what we heard from Taiwan Semi, and what we heard from Texan, what we heard from Qualcomm, and the list goes on and on, wasn't particularly great. My question to you, and I know you focus a lot on the relative strength of this index, you know, when we get to NVIDIA in a few weeks on August 23rd, I really feel like it has the potential to have this sort of reaction that Microsoft and Apple, because really, just good is not going to be good enough.
4:46So I need to apologize first, because I have obviously taken this desk off the rails, and the irreverence that's going on here now was... Unacceptable. Yeah, it's unacceptable. So let me answer Dan's question. And then can we give the show back to Melissa, please? I look, as I've said, we haven't made new relative highs on semis since NVIDIA reported and the Q's as well. And if you look at Apple's chart, it hasn't broken through to the downside, the 100 day moving average in September of 2022. We all know where it all went. And on some level, these big stocks and Apple, notably, there's a there's a reflexivity to all of this.
5:22and there's a circular nature. I mean, can they pull down the other stocks if it's aggressive enough of a sell-off? And I would argue that Apple is discretionary spending. It's not a tech company. And it's their third straight quarter. They pulled a lot forward. I think it doesn't bode well for discretionary. But I think right now the broader economy is in a pretty decent place. So I actually don't think it's a lot to be alarmed. The velocity of the move, I mean, it's pretty major stuff that we've seen. But seeing rotation that aggressively means a lot of people have been offsides. the broader economy and need to get there in a hurry.
5:54To pull a page from Karen's playbook, though, I mean, some would argue that those valuations, like, for instance, in Apple, should never have gone to 30. Right. So this pullback is natural, and it's totally within the range of normal behavior for the stock because it should not have been at 30 to begin with on a forward P.E. basis anyway. Right. Same with Microsoft. We all thought Microsoft, great company, deserves a premium. Does it deserve that premium? Probably not. And so the quarter was very good, but not quite good enough. and Apple, the quarter, had some, you know, little nicks and whatever.
6:23But to me, NVIDIA will be really important, as Dan said, August 23rd. I think if it is anywhere close, if it is$11 billion, that's bad. $11 billion is not enough. Oh, so they have to beat, in other words. They have to beat. They're raised forecast. They have to beat. Which they wouldn't have said if they didn't think they could really beat it. They had to be sandbagging. So if they don't beat, unless they have something like, we have such a giant book we just were not able to fulfill, and we'll be doing that. But I think$11 billion will not hold this stock here. Karen said that actually the day in video report, she said exactly those things.
6:57And I think today, in small part, this re-steepening of the yield curve, which, again, went north of 100 basis points, squared a close, I think less than 70 basis points, which is, again, an amazing move in a short amount of time. I think the market's construing that as positive, and maybe in the very short term it is. Historically, though, it's the re-steepening where risk assets start to get whacked. In the week that Apple was going to report, and we talked about it for two weeks leading up to it, the big kahuna, we were saying the VIX opened the week at 13. OK, it was just saying to you that there was no fear in the market.
7:28The implied move in the options market, the one day move for Apple was only 3 percent. That might have been one of the smallest one day implied moves for Apple into a print, especially after this perfect 45 degree angle that Carter talked about. He was on the show talking about it. So the fact that that stock sold off 5 percent straight line told you is where everybody was. They were on the same side of it. I think there's a lot of other stocks like that. But we're going to need this sort of, I don't know what you want to call it, snowball effect or something like that, to put some real fear back in the market, to get the VIX back above 20, if you will.
7:57But there are levels. And Nostradamus told us last week, you said that breakout level of 176 in Apple would be a great place to start adding to that. And it went right there. Microsoft's got a level of 300. Fill in the gap maybe to its last earnings from April back to 275. But those are where you want to buy the stocks, which is that's where you want to buy the QQQ if those two stocks get back to those. I think I was selling just not major stuff here, but I was selling some puts out to down to 160 on Apple based upon the velocity of that move. That vol and those deltas were paying you like in two weeks.
8:31Do I want to own Apple 160? Sure. And I can trade out of that if I actually if the stock gets put to me. So you don't get these opportunities with some of the biggest stock in the world, the stock that moved 54 percent into those numbers. off a Jan 4 low. And I just think that if you now look, again, relative Apple to the S &P, it's back to where it was last year. So all the outperformance is gone. I mean, does this hearten you at all, though, that the markets are differentiating? Well, I look like the heartening type. I know. I was asking you that, and I thought how ironic. No, but that the market is differentiated between the earnings reports.
9:07As Karen had mentioned, Apple and Microsoft had the little nicks or whatever you want to call it in their reports, And so they sold off. They warranted that sell-off. They should not have been at that P.E. given what they delivered. Then we had Alphabet and we had Meta. It's a different story. It is a good sign that, you know, a quarter that's good but not good enough, guidance that clearly wasn't good enough, is not being rewarded anymore. That's an encouraging sign. I mean, the fact that we're seeing this rotation, despite the fact, again, Apple, Microsoft, some other names have gotten whacked over the last week and a half, S &P is still 45-20, a very encouraging sign.
9:38I think it's going to be relatively short-lived, though, because, again, these global bond moves, nothing's changed on that front at all. And, again, the re-steeping of the yield curve, which banks love today, I don't know how much longer the market's going to like it. Now a lot of people are seemingly talking about some credit event in the back half of this year. Crudol's back on its horse. I'm sure we'll talk about that at some point. But things to be concerned about in the fall. Higher bond yields. It's so interesting, though, because we knew that it was going to be higher for longer. It's almost as if we didn't want to believe that it was going to happen.
10:07Nobody wanted to believe the Fed. And all of a sudden, Fitch downgrades. We see a spike and it's like, oh, it's going to happen. We better start selling. I mean, but the underpinnings to the economy for the bulls in the market are still the same. If you want to see a soft landing or no landing scenario, it's still there. Yes. That's why I really buy into this story of it's just it's the Treasury saying we have so much more to sell and we're going to be selling 10 years, for example. And so we see two tens to Guy's point, 67 basis points down from one. Oh, I don't know. Three, 10, wherever it was that that's really just a supply and demand issue.
10:42That's it. More supply. Ten years coming. You better either step back and wait or buy them now if they get cheap enough. Well, it's I guess this is what we're calling a bearish steepening when you see the long and actually selling off. And it's not good for equities. All right. Let's just be clear. And we've often said, I mean, there's different things you can characterize movements in the long end equate to. This is not really a concern on inflation. It is concern on maybe some of the macro, some of the credit. Karen's right. A lot of this is technical. But the reality is owning equities when you can get five and a half percent from T-bills, the bar has gotten that much higher, let alone how you value equities to begin with.
11:19And that's the biggest problem with everything we're talking about is the stock market is expensive by any measure. I don't know what the economy is going to do. Clearly, it's playing out a lot longer to go into a downturn. I don't think the economy is in a bad place at all. I realize there's a lot of things that are ugly. I know leading indicators are not good. I know it's a manufacturing recession. But it's the equity market valuation that's the problem. For more on where the markets go from here, let's bring in David Rosenberg, founder and president of Rosenberg Research. David, great to have you with us.
11:45You say it's silly season these days for the equity markets. Why is that? Well, I think it goes back to the comment that was just made about valuation. So I understand the momentum aspect of this market and the technical aspect of it. And we can debate the soft landing or hard landing. I would say that even if you have a soft landing or no landing view, let's face facts. You have a 20 multiple on the S &P 500 on forward earnings. That's a 5 % earnings yield. And you can pick up 5.5 % in the Treasury bill market with no cyclical risk, no duration risk, no capital risk. So I would say that when you do the math, it's a very expensive market, no matter what your macro view is.
12:32And so when I'm talking about silly season, it's one thing to have a 20 multiple a couple of years ago and rates were at zero. But today, the equity risk premium has only been where it is today less than 10 % of the time in the past. So the valuations are extreme. I'm not going to say that they are dot-com level extremes. but we are in the top 10 percent of valuation excess that we've had historically and I think that's a that's a warning sign. How do you see this playing out then? It does seem like so many people are all of a sudden you know moving to the other side of the boat so to speak in terms of soft landing scenario no landing scenario they're jumping on board we see strategists bumping up their price targets for the S &P 500 by year end I mean it just seems that all of a sudden everybody's getting really bullish just when you say silly season is starting?
13:23Well, I guess it's the benefit of having done this for 40 years. So you see what happens is that the market takes off for whatever reason. And then you get the analysts and the economists and the strategists then scurrying around trying to fit the narrative into the price action. Sometimes a stock market's going to do what it's going to do. You know, we go back to 2007, for example. I mean, nobody really had a recession in their forecast. And everybody was talking about, you know, where's the recession? We had the inverted yield curve. The legs are extremely long. And as we had back then, as we had today, we had a very expensive market on our hands.
14:05And at the same time, we had a ripping rally from the summertime of 2007 to the October 9th high. The market absolutely ripped and everybody's scratching their heads. Of course, we know what happened next. And so sometimes people just fit the narrative to the price action because what else are you going to do? But we all know that the market is this malevolent beast, does not always respond to valuations. It's not a timing tool. It doesn't always respond to the fundamentals. it just sometimes takes a head of its own and it's called animal spirits the reason why the term animal spirits is around is because that's what happens when we have a momentum based rally which we've had for the past several months i mean the one thing i would like to ask the group is this that when the fed is cutting interest rates into a bear market all you ever hear is don't fight the fed don't fight the fed don't fight the fed and valuations matter the market's cheap but But on the other side of the coin, you know, the Fed is tightening policy and they really haven't signaled that they're done yet.
15:12And you don't hear anybody saying don't fight the Fed anymore. And now nobody talks about valuations. So it's just a guy. He says it, Rosie. But quick, quick question for you. In your note, you said discretionary spending in real terms barely expanded in Q2. And you talk about the market recognizing things and not. When we talk about a name like Disney or Starbucks or Nike, they're barely like up there unchanged on the year. The market is recognizing, I think, the fact that you're like kind of putting out here about discretionary spending. Will a recession be started by a consumer slowdown, even with the backdrop of the jobs picture, which seems kind of confounding?
15:48Or might it start from something on the enterprise level? I think it's going to start at the consumer level. And I think that we'll see the first signs of this after the student loan forgiveness program ends in the coming month. And so I think that it's going to be consumer-led. I understand that, you know, the frustration amongst the bears. And, you know, I've been on this show before, and the question is, where is this recession already? Where is this recession already? But the thing is that interest rates do work their way through long lags. And what's happened this year, 100 % true, we've had tremendous fiscal stimulus.
16:25But that's going to term out before the end of the year. What's not going to go away are the lags from these interest rate increases. And even if John Williams says, well, rates will come down next year, the question is by how much. The economy hasn't reset yet. And I did this work looking back historically only a handful of times as the Fed raised the funds rate 500 basis points or more in less than a year and a half. I mean, this is a significant rate shock. And we haven't seen the full impact yet. But what I'm going to tell you is that after the 500th basis point increase in the funds rate, and it hasn't happened that often, okay, it's six months till the recession.
17:02And in that six-month period, we're basically in purgatory. We don't know where we are. We're just asking questions, where's the recession? But unless you believe interest rates don't matter in the most credit-sensitive economy in modern history, or you believe the business cycle somehow been repealed because we've had a year where fiscal policy did have an impact. It is not going to be big enough to offset the lags from these interest rate increases. So I think that by the third or fourth quarter, we're going to start to see more evidence, but it's going to come out of the consumer side, not the corporate side, but there will be spinoff effects.
17:38But this is going to be a consumer-led recession, I think will ultimately be more severe than people think in the 2024. All right, David, always good to speak with you. Thank you, David Rosenberg, Rosenberg Research. I'm going to apologize again, by the way, because he posed a question to the group. I know. I was like, where does this end? Anarchy. I mean, I've turned this into, yeah. Chaos, just chaos on this show tonight. Sorry. Do you think it'll start with, we've heard so many stories from retailers so far that have reported about trade down, et cetera. I do, because if you think the consumer stops spending when something typically happens in the market to the downside, it happened in the fall of 2018 from October to Christmas Eve.
18:19Consumer spending stopped on a dime because the stock market went down 19.9 percent. So I'm still of the belief that there's going to be a stock market shock, which will scare the consumer into stop spending, which will then roll into a consumer led recession. Right. But on top of that, the student loan repayment plus higher energy prices, that's going to be a head. Sure. There's no question. Energy is now a fresh headwind. And even though energy companies have actually probably been the biggest disappointment, although they're probably not out of this earning season, but relative to year over year, the inflation is is certainly an issue.
18:49Again, I get it back to Dan mentioned Nike, Starbucks and Apple. I mean, you know, Nike is not going to get away from me on the upside. I mean, what's the multiple you want to pay for these companies? Not a peak market multiple. And it probably started six months ago. Coming up, shares of Lucid on the move after the company's latest results. Numbers from the quarter, plus all of today's Tesla headlines. That's next. Don't count your chickens. Tyson shares dropping as earnings and sales head south. So is it time to take your eggs out of this basket? Whoa, so much up there. We'll discuss that when Fast Money returns.
19:25Welcome back to Fast Money. We've got an earnings alert on Lucid Motors, the EV maker. higher after hours despite our revenue missed. That conference call is just getting started in a few minutes. Let's bring in Phil LeBeau, who's got the latest. Phil. Melissa, I would call that a relief rally. Rally might be a little bit too strong. It is a case of the shares moving higher after the company released Outlook that at least let people say, OK, we know that they plan to build the 10 ,000 vehicles this year, which was their guidance. And that's really what this is all about. The outlook from Lucid after the Q2 results, The 2023 production stays at at least 10 ,000 vehicles.
20:00Liquidity of$6.25 billion. We'll talk more about that in just a little bit. And they do plan to go into SUV production with the next model, the Gravity, in late 2024. As you take a look at shares of Lucid going all the way back to its IPO, I mentioned$6.25 billion. That's how much money they have, you know, the liquidity that they have. They believe that is enough to get them into 2025, that they won't have to do a capital raise before then. With all that said, there's the question about demand. And the demand comes, it's being stemmed from the fact that the company has cut prices on its current models, including prices being cut between$5 ,000 and$12 ,500, brings the base model, the Lucid Air Pure, down to a starting price of$82 ,400.
20:47Now, CNBC did talk with executives after the earnings release today, and they said, we are seeing an improvement in demand. And so they do believe that these price cuts, which were initiated over the weekend, have had some impact here. We'll probably get more color in the next few minutes as the conference call, as you mentioned, Melissa, it's scheduled to begin at 530 Eastern time. Melissa, back to you. All right. Meantime, Phil, we did see a big move in Tesla on news that the CFO is stepping down. You know, some people were saying it's a good sign that he's staying through the end of the year.
21:16So it wasn't necessarily, you know, a sign of bad blood or anything like that. But this certainly underscores sort of the key man risk because this comes as news that Elon Musk might have to have back surgery. And so if he's out of the mix, then who is your backup? The guy who's walking out the door at the end of the year. Well, there are others on the team as well. But Zach Kirkhorn gets the most attention because people have heard more from him on the conference calls after the quarterly earnings than anybody else. And he's been the CFO, what, for the last four years, has been with the company 13, 14 years.
21:46So there's a known quantity there. But he is stepping down. That's effective immediately. The chief accounting officer is going to be moved up to the CFO position. And there is a transition period where Zach Kirkhorn will still be there. I think the interesting thing here, Melissa, is that this speaks to the fact that we've seen a number of executives leave Tesla over the last several years. And I can't tell you the number of times I hear people say, oh, here we go. This person's leaving. This is a sign that they've got problems there. Their executives aren't staying around. But they have continued to do well.
22:18So you do have to give Elon Musk a little bit of credit here that he may be a tough boss. He may be very tough to work for for some people. But he has had a string of executives who have delivered in the positions that they've been put into. Phil, thank you. Phil LeBeau. You bet. Gene Munster was quoted as saying that working for Tesla for, you know, 13 years is like working for Tesla, working at any other company for 50. That's the wear and tear on somebody reporting to Elon Musk. People in relationships with me feel this. I'm sure you feel the same way. Lucid, it's interesting. You know, back when the SPAC, they were projecting$5.5 billion of revenue this year, for this year.
22:57This is two years ago. They just had$150 million for the quarter. You can do that math. So they're nowhere near it. And the stock is reflecting that. The bounce in the after hours is just what we lost today. And it still probably trades close to, I don't know, 12, 13 times revenue. By any metric, it's still an expensive stock. This wasn't a great quarter. It's just giving back, getting back what it lost today. I mean, if Ford and GM were having difficulty in the EV space, these startups really have it stacked against them. Well, scale is everything, right? And Tesla obviously is such enormous scale.
Read the full transcript
23:26But here you do have this put with the public investment fund, Saudi Arabia. They are there. They seem to be willing to throw, I don't know if you call it good money or bad money, but additional money at it at every point. So this will save them, which is something that a lot of other relatively small new EV companies don't have. All right. And by the way, Elon Musk just X'd on X that he would like to thank Zach Kirkhorn for his many contributions to Tesla over the course of 13 difficult years. I thought you were saying he was on X. No. It was a drug thing. Normally known as Twitter. X. Anyway, a lot more fast money to come.
24:05Here's what we have next. No spring chicken. Shares of Tyson walking on eggshells as results disappoint investors. So is this stock a fox in your portfolio henhouse? The details next. Plus, a lily look ahead. Results out tomorrow, and all eyes are focused on weight loss. But will the stock fatten up your returns? We'll debate. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square. We're back right after this.
24:48Welcome back to Fast Money. We've got an earnings alert on Lucid Motors, the EV maker higher after hours despite our revenue miss. That conference call is just getting started in a few minutes. Let's bring in Phil Lebeau, who's got the latest. Phil. Melissa, I would call that a relief rally. Rally might be a little bit too strong. It is a case of the shares moving higher after the company released Outlook that at least let people say, OK, we know that they plan to build the 10 ,000 vehicles this year, which was their guidance. And that's really what this is all about. The outlook from Lucid after the Q2 results.
25:19The 2023 production stays at at least 10 ,000 vehicles. Liquidity of 6.25 billion. We'll talk more about that in just a little bit. And they do plan to go into SUV production with the next model, the Gravity, in late 2024. As you take a look at shares of Lucid going all the way back to its IPO, I mentioned$6.25 billion. That's how much money they have, you know, the liquidity that they have. They believe that is enough to get them into 2025, that they won't have to do a capital raise before then. With all that said, there's the question about demand. And the demand comes, it's being stemmed from the fact that the company has cut prices on its current models, including prices being cut between$5 ,000 and$12 ,500 brings the base model, the Lucid Air Pure, down to a starting price of$82 ,400.
26:09Now, CNBC did talk with executives after the earnings release today and they said we are seeing an improvement in demand. So they do believe that these price cuts, which were initiated over the weekend, have had some impact here. We'll probably get more color in the next few minutes as the conference call, as you mentioned, Melissa, it's scheduled to begin. at 530 Eastern Time. Melissa, back to you. All right. Meantime, Phil, we did see a big move in Tesla on news that the CFO is stepping down. You know, some people were saying it's a good sign that he's staying through the end of the year. So it wasn't necessarily, you know, a sign of bad blood or anything like that.
26:42But this certainly underscores sort of the key man risk because this comes as news that Elon Musk might have to have back surgery. And so if he's out of the mix, then who is your backup? The guy who's walking out the door at the end of the year. Well, there are others on the team as well, but Zach Kirkhorn gets the most attention because people have heard more from him on the conference calls after the quarterly earnings than anybody else. And he's been the CFO, what, for the last four years, has been with the company 13, 14 years. So there's a known quantity there. But he is stepping down. That's effective immediately.
27:14The chief accounting officer is going to be moved up to the CFO position. And there is a transition period where Zach Kirkhorn will still be there. I think the interesting thing here, Melissa, is that this speaks to the fact that we've seen a number of executives leave Tesla over the last several years. And I can't tell you the number of times I hear people say, oh, here we go. This person's leaving. This is a sign that they've got problems there. Their executives aren't staying around. But they have continued to do well. So you do have to give Elon Musk a little bit of credit here that he may be a tough boss.
27:45He may be very tough to work for for some people. But he has had a string of executives who have delivered in the positions that they've been put into. Phil, thank you. Phil LeBeau. You bet. Gene Munster was quoted as saying that working for Tesla for, you know, 13 years is like working at any other company for 50. That's the wear and tear on somebody reporting to Elon Musk. People in relationships with me feel this. I'm sure you feel the same way. Lucid, it's interesting. You know, back when the SPAC, they were projecting$5.5 billion of revenue this year, for this year. This is two years ago.
28:21They just had$150 million for the quarter. You can do that math. So they're nowhere near it, and the stock is reflecting that. The bounce in the after hours is just what we lost today, and it still probably trades close to, I don't know, 12, 13 times revenue. By any metric, it's still an expensive stock. This wasn't a great quarter. It's just getting back what it lost today. I mean, if Ford and GM are having difficulty in the EV space, these startups really have it stacked against them. Well, scale is everything, right? And Tesla obviously is such enormous scale. But here you do have this put with the public investment fund, Saudi Arabia.
28:53They are there. They seem to be willing to throw, I don't know if you call it good money or bad money, but additional money at it at every point. So this will save them, which is something that a lot of other relatively small new EV companies don't have. All right. And by the way, Elon Musk just X'd on X that he would like to thank Zach Kirkhorn for his many contributions to Tesla over the course of 13 difficult years. I thought you were saying he was on X. That's the no. It was a drug thing. Known as Twitter X. Anyway, a lot more fast money to come. Here's coming up next. No spring chicken. Shares of Tyson walking on eggshells as results disappoint investors.
29:38So is this stock a fox in your portfolio henhouse? The details next. Plus, a lily look ahead. Results out tomorrow, and all eyes are focused on weight loss. But will the stock fatten up your returns? We'll debate. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square. We're back right after this.
30:13Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of Tyson Foods sinking as much as 11 % today after posting disappointing results this morning. The meat company posting a bigger than expected drop in both earnings and revenue and announcing four plant closures across the country, an effort to reduce costs amid slowing demand. The stock ended the day down nearly 4 percent. Their gluts, too, have certain proteins, chicken and pork, beef prices. Feast or famine. And this. So I was on Power Lunch. And actually, it was the exchange earlier in the year. And we were talking about how it was the summer of pork and that actually, you know, the beef dynamics were really particularly awful in terms of a drought in the southwest.
30:53And as we always say, one of the great things about commodities, there's always a supply response. So there's a supply response to lower prices and higher prices. The problem with cattle is it's a long lead time. And so the price of beef is going to continue to stay high. The price of pork is being bid up. But the cost basis for all of this is going through the roof, and it's killed Tyson. And if you look at Tyson, if you look at JBS, which is a Brazilian meatpacking company, It's one of the biggest ones in the world. You have a dynamic where their stocks have been basically at lows for the last 15 months pricing this in.
31:26I think it's getting interesting. You've priced in a lot of bad news. Eight-year low, though. I mean, this is an eight-year low for the stock, and people are trading down. We had that conversation six months ago. People are trading down from these things to what was it? Food kitchens, which is a horrible thing to say, but that's the dynamic going on here. We talk about this great economy all the time, yet when you see a report like this, it makes you wonder what's really happening below the surface. So is it interesting on valuation? Yeah, probably, but it speaks to a much bigger problem, I think.
31:54Coming up, some moves in the pharma space. Lilly gearing up for its next quarterly report as the weight loss wars take center stage. What to expect out of those results and how the options markets are setting up next. Plus, shares of United Rentals surging to all-time highs. But can the industrial strength last? We're digging into that trade when Fast Money returns.
32:17Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks jumping to kick off the week. The Dow rallying more than 400 points as the S &P and Nasdaq both snapping. Four-day losing streaks and some after-hours movers here. Paramount jumping after a beat on the top and the bottom line. The company also announcing it will sell publisher Simon & Schuster to KKR. Beyond Meat meantime, in the red after reporting a revenue miss, cutting its outlook, and Chegg surging more than 25 % after the company's CEO said It is building its own, you know what, AI model. Of course, AI. But Paramount was really interesting in terms of the metrics they were reporting.
32:51Yeah, I mean, it was a beat. So that was good. You know, clearly they have a balance sheet issue. So anything they can do to get cash, that's good. They do have some time before the maturities are upon them. But I was just, you know, if Julie Beal were here, she would say, this was a terrible boyfriend. I'm out. I don't care if he says he's changed. I'm not going back no matter what. I just feel like it was too levered. The world has changed for streaming. They've got to make it profitable. And money is not free. And it's very competitive. A 35 % increase in viewership because of higher inventory, which I thought was pretty exciting.
33:26Even if it's a low bar, that's really maybe good news for Disney. I don't know. Look, the bar was low here. But it's interesting to this divestiture is interesting to see where the sum of the parts on a lot of these. Remember, I mean, the whole Time Warner thing was that is why it made sense for AT &T not. But but I think the media sector is undervalued. And I think this is showing that. Meantime, all eyes on Eli Lilly earnings, a company turning in its Q2 report before the market opens tomorrow. The drugmaker has become a major player in the weight loss drug race, but faces not so slim competition from rivals Novo Nordisk and Pfizer.
34:00Lilly is Alzheimer's drug, also facing some stiff competition. But one expert says Lilly is still one of the better position names in the pharma space. Jared Holes is a health care sector specialist at Mizuho Securities. Jared, it's always great to see you. You too. You say the bar is high. Valuation is high. So it's really got to knock it out of the park at this point? I think so. At least the messaging has to be really positive, right? This is trading at 50 times this year, 37-ish next year. that's three to four times what the peer group is trading at. So it's got to be pretty close to perfect, I think, just in terms of like all the dynamics with the pipeline and timing with launches and things of that nature.
34:39So it's got to be pretty great. At the same time, we are expecting the next, in the days to come, the results from the Novo Select trials, right? And that will be really key for all of these JLP1 producers. Yeah, exactly. That's going to show us basically the cardiovascular outcomes of a patient population taking the GOP-1s and those that have not, and just kind of comparing heart attack risks, stroke risks, things of that nature over a two-year period to see what the real impact is. And if the impact is significant, call it mid-teens or so percent difference, then I think that's going to obviously encourage insurance companies to pay for the drug more widely.
35:17Right now, this is basically, like we've discussed it before, I think it's much more of a vanity drug than it is a pharmaceutical drug, meaning people that are really, you know, clinically obese. But, you know, we'll have to see how those results come out. So let's say there is a 15 % reduction in cardiovascular events. Does that support the current valuation or how much more does it add on to the valuation? I think the stocks go up. I think Novo and Lilly on a mid-teens to high-teens delta, it has to, we're looking for a statistically significant. So it's tough to tell what that bar winds up being.
35:50But if it does hit statistically significant, which is probably somewhere in the range of 15 to 20 percent, then I think the stocks go up 5 to 10 percent. They are obviously pricing in a lot here. But, you know, the numbers at least appear doable. And then I think the street will likely increase their estimates, at least for the medium and long term, for what these drugs can do. So, Jared, there's been a few knocks on the story, right, of suicidal thoughts and then this idea of, okay, it's not going to be something you're going to be on for life. So that obviously changes the revenue stream. Do you factor those in your model?
36:24Do you think that's just noise? How do you think about it? I think it's mainly noise. I mean, anytime you have a drug like this, where some sell side estimates have$100 billion, there's going to be a net, like people are seeking out narratives that are negative, especially for a stock that's been so bulletproof for a number of years, but I feel like the drug has been on the market for a number of years, right? These are reformulated diabetes drugs now used for obesity. I think we probably would have heard a lot of this over the years. I feel like we're probably scratching and clawing our way to try to get some negative narrative here.
36:59And as far as like not taking the drug forever, for sure, you know, I feel like for a lot of the patient population out there, they want to lose 20 to 30 pounds, if they do it, maybe they'll start making better choices, less Coca-Cola, less Doritos, more gym. You know, that's the hope at some point that we start acting better. Like right now, I think it's like basically a Bahamas and bar mitzvah drug. And like, we'll get to a point where we can... I don't know exactly what that means, actually. Well, sure you do. Come on. And, you know, whether you're going to the Bahamas or... You want to look good when you're reading the Torah.
37:32Yeah, right, right, exactly. Yeah, you want to look good for photos, you want to look good on the beach, And then, you know, at some point you'll you don't care. You don't care. Right. And then you get off of it. Yeah, that's to Moderna because it's been an interesting six straight sessions of declines, I think, bringing it to levels not seen since the end of 2020. And you had been in it at one point. You wanted to ask Jared a question. Well, I just, you know, in terms of the market cap and the balance sheet. And this is a company we know their pipeline. We know what was priced in. We know what COVID meant for this company.
38:00And by the way, good for Moderna for everything they did for the world. But but and Dan was doing some research and, you know, my understanding is that 21 percent net of debt of the balance sheet is in cash. And at some point, why does the stock continue to get vilified when you've got that kind of a buffer? Well, I think the balance sheet dynamic is interesting and could be a bull thesis, but they're also spending at a much higher rate. Remember, the government subsidized most of the R &D for this company during COVID. So now they actually have to spend on flu and on the cancer vaccine. So the expense line for the company is very different than it was.
38:36And so I think that's the biggest change. Now it's on them to spend and get this pipeline solidified beyond the pandemic. It's almost an approved story, kind of like the Cleveland Browns there on your tie. Nice to work that out. That's right. That's right. It takes a brave person to wear a Cleveland Browns tie. To admit you're a fan. Unless you're a Modell. Give me a lot of credit. Thank you. You're welcome. I appreciate it. Well, Jerry, you're always welcome here. Thank you. Thank you. Appreciate it. I mean, Jared's been on this for a while. I think we've done a decent job. By the way, go back to last quarter.
39:11They missed last quarter. Stocks was trading 375. It's 450 now. So the company does miss. Yes, valuation is stretched, but you're still talking about a company with 32 percent earnings growth, probably 20 percent revenue growth. So it's not a ridiculous valuation. And this is one that if this stock sells off tomorrow, analysts are going to race to raise their price targets because a lot of them have missed this move. I'm going to bring back the guests. Whoa! This is talking about regaining control. Quick question. If Lilly sells off on earnings, do you then buy it ahead of the select results? I think you do.
39:45I think you do. I mean, if it sells off dramatically, you do. If it's a$5 move,$10 move, nothing to do. But down$25,$30 tomorrow, for sure. Okay. Jared, thank you again. Thank you. Again. First ever. Wow, you're going. Good for you. Was that liberating? Did that feel good? Oh, really good to break the rules. All right. Options traders are betting Lily stock could fall after its results tomorrow. Mike Coe joins us at the action. Mike. Yeah, it is one of the busier names in health care today. Traded well over two times its average daily options volume in the busiest contract with a September 450 puts.
40:16We actually saw a buyer of twenty three hundred of those paying sixteen twenty in contract. That's laying out more than three point seven million dollars in premium to make a bearish bet that it could trade down by 20 bucks or so by September expiration. or it could be a hedge, but it would be a hedge against a pretty big position because that would be insurance on about$100 million worth of the underlying. Mike, thanks. Mike Coe for more options action. Tune into the full show. That is Friday, 5.30 p.m. Eastern time. Coming up, shares of United Rentals having a red hot summer as the stock sizzles to a new all time high.
40:46Will the run continue? We'll hit that trade next. Plus, our next guest sees a big red flag in the housing market. What is brewing and how he's hoping to profit from turbulent times. We'll bring you that and much more when Fast Money returns.
41:06Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of United Rentals topping the tape today as the stock soars nearly 4.5 % to a record close. The construction equipment maker has seen shares rise more than 35 % this year and has nearly doubled from its 52-week low. Karen has been in this stock. Yes. I mean, I don't understand why it was up today. I have no idea. I was sold off last week on earnings for what I thought was, I said, dumb. I regret having said dumb, but it didn't make sense. This is a great story. It's really, over time, they just build value, build value, build value, build market share. They're absolutely number one.
41:41The whole business has changed. People used to own their own construction equipment. Now they don't. They rent. URI is very much ahead of the pack. Their balance sheet is as good as it's been. And I like the story and then throw on infrastructure and throw on, you know, reshoring. And there's a lot to like here. I don't love it, though, when stocks go up for seemingly no reason. Shares of Till Ray meantime, jumping about four and a half percent after hours after the cannabis company announced it is buying eight beer and beverage brands from Anheuser-Busch, among the names being sold by Anheuser, Shock Top and Blue Point Brewing.
42:17Tim, you own this one. I do. It's actually a significant position in my cannabis ETF. And yet it's a company that right now has 30 percent of their revenues in non-cannabis businesses. It's one of the reasons why, you know, they had 43 million in free cash flow at the end of the last quarter. And they just announced numbers where, again, sequential gross is 27 percent. A lot of a lot of issues going on. Complex sector to be investing in. But this is a company that Irwin Simon, who's the CEO of the company, has taken a lot of heat for, you know, buying Sweetwater, buying Montauk Brewery, buying Breckenridge, buying different places because people thought it was like trying to backdoor your way and sneak your way and ultimately turn these into cannabis brands.
42:51That was about buying brands that were accreted to the balance sheet. So I like this move. Coming up, the future of real estate. Our next guest is an early stage investor who will tell us how AI is already changing the space. That's coming up in two.
43:11Welcome back to Fast Money. Wilshire Lane Capital is an early stage venture capital firm focused on real estate and technology. It recently completed its first generative AI deal with Colleen AI, a platform that helps property managers with the rent and debt collection process. For more on that deal and the future of AI in real estate, let's bring in founder and managing partner Adam Demuyacor. I knew I was going to get that messed up, Adam. Apologies. Great to have you with us. No, great to be here, Melissa. This is not an industry that you necessarily think of as being sort of a place where AI will be employed, but it makes a lot of sense.
43:45There are a lot of sort of just repetitive, monotonous processes that could probably be streamlined and maybe even wholly replaced by AI. Can you walk us through this deal? Yeah, absolutely. So when you think about technology as it pertains to real estate, historically, real estate has been a technological laggard, right? So logistics, you know, telecommunications, those are front runners when it comes to technology, but real estate is usually behind. And it's been the case with AI as well. So obviously, with the advent of AI, with OpenAI is coming out with its ChatGPT models. You've seen it impacting media entertainment, logistics, transportation, but we haven't really seen it impact real estate so much.
44:22But over the past few months, you're now seeing more of those use cases. And so, as you mentioned, there are so many monotonous, rudimentary manual processes that I don't think people realize that are happening on the back end of real estate, right? So you're looking at anything from leasing to property management to maintenance and capex, collections, These are done by people, and they're typically lower-level tasks. And now that we have generative AI models, you're able to automate a lot of these processes. And so, as you mentioned, Colleen AI, our most recent deal, is actually a company that does exactly that for the collections process.
44:56It uses large language models to generate optimal responses and outcomes in order to be able to communicate with the tenant and remind them such that they can pay their rent on time. So we're very excited about that one. Are there sub-industries that will be completely replaced by this? I think, you know, we like to look at it as an augmentation of the existing industry. So I think that, you know, you have back offices of property management companies where you have people that are, you know, filing paperwork, doing manual inputs for leasing, handling these processes on collections and maintenance.
45:34And so, you know, the people who are doing this work, there's better things they could be doing. Right. When you think about real estate property management tenants, there's higher value of higher value engagement that can occur. It doesn't have to be so transactional. And so I think that if you have automation from A.I. that flows into this, you actually can allow these people to move into higher engagement with their tenants in terms of a win win scenario for the industry. Adam, it's Tim. Thanks for joining us. You've talked a little bit in your notes about the repurposing of some of these office buildings for other things like data center.
46:06I'm just curious your thought on that. You also talk about at some point the debt component is for an industry that's worth 30 to 50 percent less than it was. I mean, do you have to start? I mean, do you think that's where this industry could be in a couple of years? Obviously, not all properties, but. Yeah, when you look at office, right, it's been it's really been, you know, shocking. right? The level of change that's occurred over the course of the pandemic initially was because of the pandemic, but now you have the stickiness of this hybrid work from home model, right? I think you're seeing a lot of companies that are determining that it's not enough just to have your workforces working completely remotely, but at the same time, there's difficulty in getting people in the office five days a week, particularly when you have unemployment rates this low.
46:46And so as a result, you know, you're seeing a lot of estimates. For example, McKinsey has the steady state occupancy of office getting to 30 % below pre-pandemic levels. And so that represents about$800 billion of value destruction in the office space. And so, you know, we have these big assets, these big buildings here. The question becomes, how can we repurpose them to their higher and best use? And so, for example, we actually have a company called Stuff Storage that goes into the basement spaces of office or underutilized spaces and converts it into self-storage facilities and operates it on the behalf of landlords.
47:21And we think that you're going to see this in a whole slew of other repurposing, right? Obviously, multifamily, you can convert some offices to apartments. You can repurpose into self-storage data centers, as you mentioned, logistics. And so I think over the next, we'll call it five years or so, you're going to see more of that repurposing and how technology can be a part of that. Adam, we'll have to have you back. Wasn't enough time. Appreciate it. No, always, always a pleasure. It's great to be here. Yes, thank you so much. Some interesting things coming out of Adam here in terms of the view on commercial real estate, repurposing.
47:52Repurposing. So AI is an all, I mean, people are terrified of it, but if it helps make their job more productive in their current jobs, that's actually a good thing, Melissa. Look at me, learning. I'm a poster child of AI. That's right. Up next, final trades.
48:13Final trade time, Tim. I still believe in this broadening, but I like the industrial sector. I like Boeing. I'm long Boeing. You had a nice move in the stock. It's actually back up near those breakout levels. Stay there. Chairwoman. I also agree in the broadening, which is why I like the value stuff, and I'm short the IGB, the high flyer. Dan. I think the relative underperformance in semis is going to remain an issue for the balance of summer, so I'm going to sell out of the SME. Guy. Gilead, led by Daniel O'Day. We called him D-Day in college. D-Day. Moving into oncology, Gilead has been moving lower left to upper right now.
48:47Did you really? Yeah, we really did. Is that really his nickname? D-Day? Daniel Day. What would you call him? D-Day. I don't know. Daniel. Yeah. Thanks for watching Fast Money. Mad Money with Jim Kramer starts right now.
49:01All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBCUniversal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.
49:35To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.
From the publisher
Apple and Microsoft have each fallen more than 10% from recent highs, losing a combined $500b in market cap in the process. How should you trade the moves lower, and what do they mean for the broader market? Plus, all eyes on Eli Lilly ahead of its earnings report. What you should expect from the drug maker, and how new trials out of Novo Nordisk could change the game.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
