In short
Podcast Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money" - Intel Reports Results… And Quantum Leaps As U.S. Eyes Next Equity Stake (10/23/25)
Episode Overview In this episode of "Fast Money," hosted by Melissa Lee and a panel of market experts, the discussion revolves around the latest earnings reports, particularly focusing on Intel, the surge in memory chip stocks, and the implications of new U.S. investments in quantum technology. The episode also covers stock movements related to Tesla, Ford, and Super Micro, and discusses geopolitical influences on crude oil prices.
Key Topics and Discussions
Intel's Earnings Report
- Performance Metrics:
- Intel reported adjusted Q3 earnings of 23 cents per share with revenues exceeding Wall Street estimates.
- Driven by strong demand for AI-powered PCs (AIPCs), although foundry revenue fell short.
- Management Insights:
- CFO Dave Zisner noted a rapid refresh cycle in the data center, potentially leading to constrained supply in the coming quarters.
- Intel's stock has risen 85% this year, significantly boosted by a U.S. government investment converting a grant into a 10% stake.
- Future Outlook:
- Discussion about Intel’s foundry business and the need for competitiveness in semiconductor manufacturing.
- Analysts expressed skepticism regarding the sustainability of Intel's high valuation amidst modest revenue growth.
Quantum Technology Investments
- Market Reactions:
- Stocks related to quantum computing surged on speculation about U.S. government investment, despite the Commerce Department denying specific reports.
- Strategic Importance:
- Phil Luck from CSIS discussed the imperative for the U.S. to invest in quantum technology due to its potential for significant advancements in computing and implications for national security.
- Emphasis on the need for a skilled workforce to support advancements in quantum technology.
Memory Chip Market Dynamics
- Price Increases:
- Reports indicated that major players like Samsung and SK Hynix plan to increase memory chip prices by 30%.
- Market Sentiment:
- The panel noted a revival in demand for semiconductors, with companies needing to refresh their technology to stay competitive.
Other Earnings Highlights
- Tesla:
- Experienced fluctuations but closed in positive territory despite mixed earnings results.
- Ford:
- Reported earnings exceeding expectations, contributing to optimism about its operational efficiency and production capacity.
- Super Micro:
- Faced a significant drop in stock price after warning of revenue shortfalls due to delayed orders.
Crude Oil Market Reaction
- Geopolitical Influence:
- Crude oil prices spiked following new sanctions on Russian oil companies, marking the best performance since June.
- Energy Sector Outlook:
- Discussion on the resilience of the energy market and the potential for continued investment in related stocks.
Volatility and Market Sentiment
- VIX Trends:
- The panel discussed low levels of market volatility amid rising individual stock volatility, particularly in tech sectors.
- Investor Positioning:
- Increased demand for downside protection in the options market was noted, suggesting caution among investors.
Key Takeaways
- Intel's Positioning: While Intel’s recent results are promising, analysts are cautious about its high valuation and the sustainability of growth.
- Investment in Quantum: The U.S. government’s interest in investing in quantum technology reflects a strategic priority that could redefine future computing capabilities.
- Memory Chip Demand: Increased pricing and demand in the semiconductor market indicate potential growth opportunities for investors.
- Broader Market Resilience: Despite mixed earnings reports, sectors like energy and technology continue to show resilience, supported by geopolitical developments and strategic investments.
Conclusion This episode of "Fast Money" provides a thorough analysis of the latest market movements influenced by earnings reports, strategic investments by the U.S. government, and significant shifts in technology and energy sectors, highlighting the complexities investors face in navigating current market conditions.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is fast money. Here's what's on tap tonight. Another big round of earnings. Shares of Intel, Ford and more all on the move after their latest results. We'll dive into the details behind the action in these stocks and the next U.S. investment. Quantum stocks surging even as the White House denies reports it's looking to take a stake in the industry. But what other groups could the administration look at and what will it mean for markets and the economy? Plus, Tesla claws back from deep in the red. Crude oil surges in its best day since June and a super slump for Super Micro, why the chipmaker didn't come along for the ride today.
0:36I'm Melissa Lee. Come to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ on the desk tonight. Tim Seymour, Karen Feinerman, Dan Nathan, and Guy Adami. We start off with the Intel popping in its first earnings report since getting an investment from the U.S. government. The chipmaker reporting adjusted third quarter earnings 23 cents a share revenues topping Wall Street estimates. The conference call just getting underway, but Christina Parts Nevelis is here on set with details, and you just spoke to the CFO as well. Yeah, so that revenue beat really driven by products like AIPCs, though the foundry revenue who did fall a little bit short.
1:03I caught up, like you said, with the CFO, Dave Zisner, in just the last hour. And he said Intel is burning through inventory because the data center refresh is actually happening, quote, faster than anticipated. So he's saying that supply could be constrained in Q1, quote, probably Q2, maybe even Q3, as companies really race to update their Windows operating system. So that was a very bullish comment. Shares talked about have jumped 85 percent this year, nearly all since August, when the U.S. government converted billions of a grant into a 10 % stake into Intel. Zizner said they are shoring up cash with this United States government injection and partial Altera sale that happened in mid-September.
1:44And then once NVIDIA pays their promised amount of$5 billion, they could have roughly$35 billion in cash. And with the United States government as Intel's biggest shareholder, I asked if they, you know, brief the government. How does it work? Zizner said no briefings on numbers before earnings, but, quote, we talk to them like any big shareholder. And he even gave Fidelity as an example. He added they're also making progress on advanced processes like the 14A, but won't add supply until they have, quote, real firm demand on the earnings call. They're not going to be making any customer announcements either.
2:18And so all of that you can see is just a bullish commentary this time around coming from management. Any update on their most recent architecture, the 18A and whether or not that's going to Panther Lake? So Panther Lake, I asked specifically, is Microsoft going to sign on? Because that was a rumor. And he said that that was still just a rumor. And it's still going to remain internal to your question. Okay. Well, why do you think everything, it seemed like demand turned on a dime. Like all of a sudden, everybody wants to refresh. Everybody wants to, you know, upgrade to new operating system. But Qualcomm has been saying that as well.
2:50If we talk about the PC and on the edge perspective, and we've seen for counterpoint research, I think, just within the last 24 hours, the laptop sales have gone much stronger. So I think maybe it's finally starting to catch on that everybody wants to have the latest and greatest with the AI systems as well as Windows 10, which was launched. So they're finally seeing the, it's just, like you said, it's amazing it's happening all of a sudden right now, right? Right when he gets a big cash, he, the Intel company, gets a cash injection. Well, so, and how does this affect how we should be thinking about their rethinking of Foundry?
3:21So, you know, suddenly this is now, you know, the understanding is that Foundry really is the answer to margin accretion and ultimately a place where this company needs to compete and really be U.S. semiconductor LTD. What do we think about that? Are we getting any signs from the company? Because the strategic plan has been everything's been put on the table. It seems like they flattened out the organization, but that rethinking Foundry seems to be the number one thing. Well, one of the questions I asked is next week, NVIDIA is hosting a GTC event in D.C., and NVIDIA did make an announcement of spending$5 billion and working with Intel and data centers as well as PC chips.
3:54But I said, are you going to make another announcement about the foundry business now that NVIDIA is on board? And he said no. So to answer that question, they're still working through all their troubles. The foundry business actually declined 2 percent. It fell short of estimates. So it's still an issue. It's still not profitable. I don't know what that means going forward other than the United States government is supporting them. So it's not like they're going to close the foundry business down under Trump's watch. Christina, thank you. Keep us posted on the conference call. Again, we're just about four minutes into the conference call at this point.
4:24The question going in here is the stocks run and the valuation of the stock. I mean, the AI business was like up a couple percent or something like that. And when you think about the demand that they're talking about when it comes to PCs and refresh, I mean, half their sales almost is HP, Dell and Lenovo. So if you're talking about laptops and PCs that need on-the-device AI, Apple doesn't have on-the-device AI. They're just going through this upgrade. So what I'm saying is I'm not sure PCs need that. These are not high-margin products as it is. Do you know what I mean? They have long lead times, that sort of thing.
4:57Why wouldn't you wait if you're a company to upgrade your hardware when you have some of the software that is really compatible? Because we haven't seen uptake of co-pilots just yet. That's what Microsoft's been telling us over the last few quarters. So we talked about, I think collectively we thought this was an interesting stock around$19,$20. That proved to be the case. I think we thought it could get to$36 and then fail. That's where we broke down from in July of last year. Well, obviously it's through it. Now fundamentals, I think, start to matter. Quarter was fine on the EPS front, revenue.
5:28But revenue is only up 3 % year over year, which is not a staggering number. And the full-year guide, given what Christina just talked about, was not particularly robust. So, listen, great for them, but valuation is going to start to matter in a meaningful way. For a company of$40, it's probably trading, I don't know, in terms of price to earnings. I mean, it's got to be approaching 45, 50 times. Well, if you just annualize this quarter's number, and maybe that's fair, maybe it's not. They're going to lose money next quarter. So you're right. Sorry. So the part where it was sort of an option, where there's a lot of debt and not a ton of equity, that's sort of long gone.
6:03I missed that. I think you guys maybe were on that, but I was not. But now it's just, I mean, good for them. They start to, it seems like they're really making some progress in what is a difficult endeavor. So still, I just can't get on board. I'd rather, you know, self-would you rather there. I do have some Dell exposure. You're talking about Dell. You would think that this should be good for Dell. It's only up a little bit. So I kind of feel like this one, I've just missed the boat here. And to get, I could guarantee you that if I bought it tomorrow, it would go down. Well, Wedbush had a note out yesterday saying that the valuation is unsustainably high and said the EB to sales ratio right now.
6:40You haven't seen this since late 2023 and back then in 2023. Their revenues, their gross margins, what they were. That's already the estimate for 2027 and 2028. So you're really trading on, you know, what people are forecasting for years out at this point. And that's what it's trading at right now. Where was the foundry on that? Yeah, I don't know. I don't think that foundry was the drag that it is today. And what's interesting about an EB to sales is what's truly debt that they're taking on? What's truly strategic investment? What's truly equity? What's truly subsidy? Because at one point, that government money was not debt, and it wasn't equity.
7:21And now it's equity and good for the government for making some money here. But that's what's fascinating because, again, we know Intel has a lot of debt. We know they've been burned through a lot of cash. But when I hear about SoftBank and I hear about NVIDIA, I'm not necessarily hearing about debt. I'm hearing about investment. And Nathan was just pointing to his computer. He had a chart up. And what he's looking at is the downtrend that's been in place now since December. There's a reason why Dan's not telling us about this chart. I know. I'm like, Dan is sitting right here. Because he pointed it.
7:50Because he did this thing, which means he didn't want to say anything. You've got to bring him out of his shell, Missy. Get him out of his shell. Speak, Dan. He's in my head. No, no, no. Go ahead, please. Downtrend that's been in place now for four years. We have just made the third price point of that downtrend line that I think is intact. To the penny. To the penny. As our friend Carter Braxton-Workers said. At the same time, we have been seeing a little pickup in semiconductors. Yesterday we had a downdraft kind of a day, but today there's a little bit of catch-up here. Intel could help support that story, but we also got this report from the Korea Economic Daily reporting that its two main chipmakers, Samsung and SK Hynix, We're going to raise the prices of DRAM as well as NAND Flash by about 30 percent in the fourth quarter so that there is strong demand there.
8:32And that while Citi and Morgan Stanley and, you know, big banks were expecting a pickup in pricing, that these major players are already putting that into place right now. I think a lot of U.S. investors are underinvested in Samsung because they don't know where they can buy it. Now, it is in some ETFs. It's in some global ETFs. This is the largest memory chip maker in the world and I think one of the most important tech companies in the world. So it's great to hear the demand there because that's not something we've heard. And that gets us back to the total cyclicality of the sector. The cycle looks pretty solid.
9:01Yeah. Look at Sandus. SNDK pulled that one up. I mean, it's up 14 % today. It's trading a new all-time high. You're seeing Western Digital, Seagate. These are obviously all in the storage space. Micron has been trading really well. So they've gotten to these other components. I think, you know, it was pretty easy to focus on the hyperscalers and NVIDIA a few years ago. And now you have to kind of think a bit broader about who is exposed to this trade. Yeah. Guy. We're going to hear from Western Digital, I think, on the 30th, so it's next Thursday. I mean, the valuation is not ridiculous, but highly cyclical.
9:30Do you buy these companies when they're cheap? Historically, that's the wrong time to buy them. Meantime, let's get to two of last night's big earnings movers, because they staged some pretty major reversals during the trading day today. IBM, for instance, down more than 8 % at the open after saying hybrid cloud revenue grew less than expected in its latest quarter, but it closed well off the lows, down less than a percent. Tesla, same, down nearly 6 % early trade. the EV maker missing profit estimates last night, but shares rallied into the green, into the close, up more than 2 percent. So, Guy, you're flagging this.
10:00I mean, does this say anything about the broader markets, just about these two stories in particular? Well, there's a resilience to the broader market 100 percent, but it's the stories themselves. I mean, IBM, as we talked, we talked, I think we surrounded the trade pretty well last night in IBM. And I think collectively we thought, you know, the quarter was, to me, it was not commensurate with the move lower. I thought it didn't make a lot of sense. And this actually, 285, makes sense. I actually think they're operating really well. I think you can continue to own IBM here. Can we talk Tesla for a second?
10:27I mean, so, you know, a lot about Elon getting on the conference call and making his pitch. And I don't know if there was any bit of people thinking, all right, he's going to be successful in getting what he wants. I'm not really sure if that is part of it because I still, I mean, I've always thought this all along. I can't get remotely close to where it is right now. Now, when you look at some of the other auto companies, and I know this is not an auto company, that valuation differential is so huge. I know we'll get to Ford later. Yeah. I mean, I think the bull argument today that people were sort of rethinking was the notion that Musk yesterday said, effectively, RoboTaxi, Optimus, all of that stuff that makes up most of the market cap of Tesla at this point, that's on track, at least.
11:12So on track is not bad when you're thinking about the sort of sky-high projections that Elon Musk usually has. But he's never on track, even when he says he's always on track. Right? I mean, he's been on, off, I mean, he is so confident about full self-driving today. Today, 2025, when we've been hearing about this for, I don't know, how many years? It's version 19. And by the way, 12 % of their owners here in the U.S. actually have full self-driving. All their competitors around the world are basically giving it away for free. BYD has cars half the price of their low end, and they're giving it away for free.
11:44So if that's but your point, Mel, is at one and a half trillion dollars is not what people are buying this business for, if you think about it. So what did they sell? They're going to sell one point seven million cars this year is down a few hundred grand from a few years ago. I mean, the business is not doing particularly well. So to justify this thing, you got to believe in robots and robo taxi and sci fi stuff. Last night was the Tug McGraw special. And for you Mets fans out there, I know you are. You got to believe you got to believe in that. I mean, you got to believe in a lot. And I feel as if if we had to believe in EV and the Tesla delivery story, that when it was an auto company.
12:19Remember, it wasn't always an auto company. It really was an EV company where there was no competition. That was right. But there's now competition. Why isn't there competition in all these other places? That to me, if you believe that because they have so many cars on the road, because the data is not going to be something people can catch up to, I get it. But what we've seen, at least with the hardware, is that people have caught up. There's a lot of competitors out there, so it's not cheap. I don't know why you'd be buying the dream now when, if anything, it looks as if the dream keeps getting pushed out.
12:47That's my tug. Meantime, the SIBO volatility index down today ending at its lowest in nearly two weeks, but problems may still lurk under the surface. Manny Hsu is the head of derivatives market intelligence for SIBO global markets. Manny, it's always great to see you. Great to be here. We've been remarking about sort of the, you know, on the surface, everything looks calm on the, you know, index level. But then individual stocks seem to have crazy moves. And you actually note that the volatility in individual stocks is much higher than the index level. Exactly. So I think everyone looks at the VIX index as a measure of kind of broad market volatility.
13:18We also have an index for single stock volatility, VIX EQ. And if you look at the difference between VIX EQ and VIX, which tells you how much additional volatility is being priced into the single names, that recently hit an all-time high. Now, that spread typically widens going into earnings because earnings is a driver of single stock moves. But the extent of that, you know, widening of that spread widening we thought was very notable. And I think it kind of speaks to this anxiety around earnings and valuation around some of the high flyer AI stocks and the tech names that we've seen so far this year.
13:53You point out that the dispersion is market stocks like Apple and Amazon. I mean, is there anything so the so the anxiety surrounding the earnings for those particular stocks are much higher? So the measure is market cap weighted. So it is much more driven by the large cap stocks, as, of course, is the S &P. But to a point of the dispersion, that is definitely a theme that we've seen this year, where you get a lot of volatility at the single stock level. But because they're all uncorrelated on any given day, certain sectors ups, certain sectors are down. As a result, the index level volatility gets very muted.
14:28Is there anything in that that is some of the meme stocks, which just have extraordinary volatility, even though they might not be that big? Yeah, so that is not reflected into the VIX EQ. So the VIX EQ, I would say the index, you can think about it as the top 80 to 90 stocks in the S &P by market cap. So stocks like, you know, Open Door or maybe some of the other meme stocks, you know, that are out there, those volatilities would not be reflected into this index. Mandy, on October 16th, the VIX, I think, put a 28 at one point, closed around 25. That was on a down day, but not a historically bad down day.
15:01And again, I think yesterday or the last couple of days, We've seen the VIX spike. Something's going on below the surface. Exactly. So we've seen pretty meaningful shifts in terms of the positioning in the options market. I would say over the past, especially over the past week, we've definitely noticed a pickup in hedging demand. So investors actually buying downside protection, particularly going out to year end, kind of locking their year-to-date gains, kind of looking out ahead and seeing kind of the risks out there and the positive performance in stocks, and looking at the levels of volatility, like maybe this is a good time to start hedging.
15:31So we've definitely noticed that shift in investor sentiment and positioning. Mandy, how about correlation between the bond market and the equity market? So it really feels as if the Treasury market's calmed down quite a lot. And it's calmed down in a bullish tint. In other words, yields are going lower, but it's relatively orderly. It does seem to be, for good reasons, not bad. What is that? Does that – has that had anything to do with either equity side vol here, or does it bode well for something we should be looking for? Yeah, I think what's going on in the fixed income market is very notable.
15:59Not only have yields come down, as you mentioned, but yields have come down at the same time inflation expectations are actually rising. So what the bond market is telling you is that the Fed is going to completely ignore any inflation risk and really focus on the softening in the labor market. And the market's getting very excited about this easing in policy. So real rates have collapsed this year. And that's what assets, cross assets, you know, trade on. And this loosening of financial conditions, which has been happening all year, even before the Fed started resuming cuts, that's been kind of underpinning a lot of the positive performance we've seen across asset classes.
16:32Manny, when you think about like a lot of volatility we see in markets has to do with a lot of data. We don't have a lot of the data. There's still, you know, trade stuff to be worked out here. We're going through earnings season. We have a Fed that's about to cut interest rates next week. I look out one month in the SPY, okay, so the ETF that tracks the S &P 500. I see options pricing a 3 % move in either direction. So if you want to buy an at-the-money call or an at-the-money put, But it costs you 1.5 % of the index or the ETF to make that bet. Just talk to us about where that stands, the way you think about it.
17:01I know you've been looking at markets like this for a long time. It just seems kind of cheap, doesn't it? Yeah, so I think the low levels of volatility, index vol, which we talked about, it means that the absolute premium for options, whether to the upside or downside, is going to be low. So I think that's why we've seen an uptick in option activity, is people using those low levels to really express their views, whether bearish or bullish. You talk about one month out or three months out. If you look at VIX one day index, which looks at the next 24 hours. So we have CPI coming tomorrow. It's around like I think 80 basis points being priced in for tomorrow, which is really nothing.
17:37So not a lot being priced in for macro data, not really a lot being priced in in the horizon. And I think a lot of investors are taking a look at this situation and saying, actually, maybe this is a good time to hedge. Mandy, always great to see you. Thank you so much. Manishu, SIBO. Are you in that camp? Take a look at the situation. Maybe now is a good time to hedge. Well, that's, I mean, yes, yes. I love hedging. I mean, the VIX is a little elevated, but I do, for 80 basis points tomorrow, that actually seems, I'm not in the one day option game. But yes, I generally like to buy when premiums low.
18:13Meantime, we got an earnings alert on Ford. The automaker turning higher after top and bottom line beats. Phil LeBeau has been all over the conference call. He joins us now with the very latest. Hey, Phil. Hey, Melissa, when you look at Ford, this was a quarter that people expected after seeing the GM results. They said, well, if it was that good for GM, is it going to be as good for Ford? Look at what they did. Buck 45 a share, nine cents better than the street was expecting. Revenue way above expectations, four billion dollars above expectations. Q3 margin, 5.1 percent compared to 5.5 percent last year.
18:45That's the impact of tariff costs. And then there's the question of the Novellis aluminum shortage. What's the impact of that? Remember, that's the supplier in upstate New York where there was a fire at the aluminum plant. This plant supplies aluminum for the F-series trucks. It's going to be about$1.5 to$2 billion. And it also raises the question, well, is it going to hit F-series sales? And if so, to what extent? Ford today is saying, look, we have the inventory, so near term there's not going to be an impact. But what we're going to have to do is we're going to be increasing our production over time.
19:19So Ford will be adding 50 ,000 vehicles to its already existing production plan for F-Series trucks, adding 1 ,000 jobs, increasing production time at the F-Series plants in Kentucky and in Michigan. And again, Ford says it already has the inventory in place for existing sales. So as you take a look at Ford, a couple other things to keep in mind. shares of Ford initially went down, but now moving higher after hours. The EBIT guide of six to six and a half billion, only a half billion below where the company's previous guidance was for full year profitability. So that's the impact of the Novellas fire.
19:58And then their tariff costs, it's only going to be about a billion dollars. Remember earlier this year, they were saying it would be closer to two, two and a half billion dollars, but they've been able to mitigate those impacts. They already have the most production here in the United States of any of the automakers. And we also got the news from the White House last week that it's going to be extending offsets for auto parts that are being imported. So that is a cost win for not only Ford, but all of the automakers as they manufacture here in the U.S. Melissa. All right, Phil, thank you. Phil LeBeau.
20:31We got GM earnings, which were good when the stock reaction is very positive. We did a would you rather. But now having the four results, I pose the same question because maybe that maybe it is different now. GM or Ford. I'll still go the GM route. I think it's just I think it's a better company. I mean, the Ford guidance, there's some things to be concerned about, I think. And listen, Ford has been to say we've talked about it. You go back 40 years. It's trading wherever it's trading right now is where it was trading 40 or so years ago. So we've seen this before. GM on your hand seems to have things figured out.
21:01I love GM. I have a position in Ford, but I love GM. And we saw on the margin where GM continues. I continue to think the market is slowly giving them credit for their operational improvements in the margin efficiencies. The company's never been run better. They're handling the things they can handle. It's also interesting to hear both Farley and Mary Barra talk about how they think EV is, in terms of the size of the market right now, they're like, relax. It's not you know, they're almost talking back up the original internal combustion engine story, even though I know we'd like to see otherwise.
21:33Coming up, Supermicro sliding why the stock is sitting out today's semi rebound and whether it's a one off or sign of deeper troubles. Plus, a big bounce in crude as the White House announces Russia sanctions, how the geopolitical pressure could impact oil as we head into the end of the year. Don't go anywhere. Fast money's back in two.
Read the full transcript
21:56Welcome back to Fast Money. Super Micro dropping almost 9 % after the chipmaker warned revenue in its current quarter would come in short of expectations. $5 billion versus previous guidance of$6 to$7 billion. The company is saying some orders would be delayed due to, quote, design win upgrades. Shares are up 57 % this year, but down more than 28 % from their 52-week highs. They also came out, they reiterated their full year revenue outlook, So it's not like they're saying it's not going to come through. They're saying it's going to be delayed. The question is, do you buy that? Well, I mean, listen, you know, they're saying it's back half loaded.
22:27I mean, like, so they're going to push these sales out. And if you look at just the revenue expectations on a quarterly basis, so this quarter is going to be$5 billion. It's supposed to be Q4, about$10 billion. I mean, that's a considerable ramp. And we're also spending a lot of time talking about what does it look like? What does the demand picture look like going forward? And if you start seeing some pushouts like this because design stuff, you know, who knows? like how that's happening. So to me, I think you've got to take it with a grain of salt. Less than a grain of salt, I think. I mean, you know, there's some management teams, if they were to come out with something like this, you might say, all right, they deserve a pass.
23:00Right. I don't feel that this is one of them. So I don't know what the right amount that it should be down, but it should definitely be down. I mean, remember just in August when they reported their quarter in August, they said they didn't have enough money to ramp production as fast as they wanted to, and the stock had a major haircut. I mean, like it's been sort of a rough ride for super micro shareholders. Real rough ride. 16 percent short interest. I'm sure this emboldened folks to go back into the short side of this trade. Karen's right. I mean, they should have far more clarity or visibility than they seemingly have.
23:32I mean, this is not you just said it. I mean, it's not the first time we've heard tape bombs like this before. So you can't give them the benefit of the doubt at this point, I don't think. All right. There's a lot more Fast Monday to come. Here's what's coming up next. Crude making a comeback. The major moves in the oil patch and the stocks best positioned to benefit. Plus, a quantum leap at the White House. The names seeing a power surge on speculation of a U.S. investment. And the sectors that could be next. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square. We're back right after this.
24:17Welcome back to Fast Money Stocks, bouncing back from yesterday's drop. The Dow up almost 150 points. The S &P climbing more than half a percent. And the Nasdaq up nearly nine-tenths of a percent. Some morning earnings reports moving stocks. Honeywell and American Airlines higher after EPS and revenue expectations. T-Mobile also beat but fell 3 % today. Shares of Molina Health, meantime, plunging 17%. at the managed care firm slashing its annual earnings guidance for the third time this year due to higher costs across government-backed plans. And Freeport-McMoran higher after beating earnings expectations driven by higher copper and gold prices.
24:52And we do have some more after-hours action to report. Norfolk Southern topping EPS estimates but missing revenues. Deckers lower despite topping expectations, lowering its full-year revenue and EPS forecasts. And Newmont Mining posting better-than-expected results as well. So the metals trade seems to continue to be on fire, Tim. Yeah, I think so. I think industrial metals are a place to be. I love PGMs more broadly, and so we'll leave gold alone for today. But we talk about copper. We talk about the thematic exposure it has to grid build out, to AI data center, all that. But then you just get into supply dynamics, which are really interesting.
25:26The copper chart, a lot of volatility, but that's still, it's not the gold chart, but it's still a three-year uptrend that's held on the way up. And I think the earnings power for Freeport, Southern Copper, you name it, solid. Agreed. Newmont Mines is probably lower on the back of this only because that's what it typically does. But it doesn't mean you should run away here. The mining stocks obviously doubled the losses of gold the other day, which makes sense. But Tim said it last night. I'll say it again. This mining trade is not over. Molina, Karen. Yeah, yuck. Thankfully, I don't own it. But so there's a lot to not like here.
25:59Missing again and again, that's always something bad because then you don't know what to think. And then how do you put a multiple and I don't know what to think, right? It's difficult to own the stock. But also the broader, you know, the ACA issue is a really big one. Yes. Right. And their medical loss ratio was a giant miss. So, you know, looking at something like a Centene or an Oscar also not doing well. But this is, you know, if it's a black hole like this, I could just stay away. Yeah. For Elevance, the read through is kind of small. I mean, Elevance has less exposure. Less exposure. ACA programs.
26:29Yeah. But, you know, I do get concerned when medical loss ratios in general go up. But I think the Elevance United Health a little different. Coming up, quantum climbing. The White House could be eyeing the group for an equity stake. What it means for the space? What industries could be next? More Fast Money in two.
26:50Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.
27:04Welcome back to Fast Money. Quantum stocks, D-Wave, Regetti, Quantum Computing, and INQ all jumping today after a report that companies are in talks with the Trump administration for equity stakes in exchange for federal funding. The Commerce Department denied the report, but the administration has already made investments in many other companies, including Intel and MP Materials. The news, though, got us thinking, which other industries could the White House invest in? Joining us now is Phil Luck, the economics program director at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. He was deputy chief economist for the State Department in the Biden administration.
27:36Phil, great to have you with us. Great to be here. First, I want to talk about a little bit about the strategic thinking about quantum. And it's great to make that sort of investment in quantum, but there's a whole lot behind it to make sure that that investment can actually come to fruition in terms of advances in computing. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, there's really good both economic and strategic reasons for the government to be investing in quantum technology. Quantum computing and quantum encryption is going to be really important in the decades ahead. But, you know, this is a technology that's not ready for market.
28:11So this is a type of situation where, you know, this is a situation where R &D, investments in workforce, really basic things are really where I think the government should be thinking about spending its money. Yeah, so not just plunking money into an equity stake. In other words, there's a lot that goes behind it as well. When you're thinking about how the government has been viewing what is strategic and how they're going after equity stakes, what comes to mind in terms of what could next be on the list? So, I mean, they've been in some ways looking at a pretty similar list to the last administration, which is looking out at the sort of landscape of technologies, seeing ones where we need these technologies for sort of our own health, biotech and things like that are a good example, or things where they proliferate through our technology.
28:59Semiconductors is a great example, rare earths and critical minerals just everywhere and everything we use. Quantum is a different case where this is going to be in some sense a sea change in how we do computing and what we can and can't see. I mean, just in real layman's terms, because I'm just an economist, not a scientist here. You know, our methods of encryption are really at risk if we get quantum or our adversaries get quantum. So then we'll need a new type of encryption. So things like that. And again, for the economic arguments, you know, there's a lot of different reasons why you would want to make sure you can sort of keep a lead here.
29:36You know, Phil, the most important commodity in the world, people will say is crude oil. But I actually think, and Tim might agree with me, it's copper. And, you know, there's going to be some security risk around copper and the availability of copper. Is that something that you're thinking about? Absolutely. Oh, I'd say two things. You are exactly right. And copper is incredibly important. If you want to, you know, modernize our grid, if you want a grid that can support a data center build out and sort of the type of compute that we're going to need, you're going to need a heck of a lot of copper.
30:04But at the end of the day, copper is a commodity. It's pretty freely traded and it's not overly concentrated. What I would say is probably the most important commodity, especially for things like quantum and other technologies, is talent. This is people. You know, we have basically for every three jobs in quantum, we have basically one homegrown person to fill those jobs. So if we want to take the lead in these areas, if we want to build fabs, if we want to advance in quantum, if we want to build ships, we need people with specific skills. Phil, not a political question at all. What do you think about the government taking stakes in companies at this point?
30:40This seems different than other administrations. Let's talk about it purely from the strategic sense, if that's possible. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, you know, entirely apolitically, I don't think it's the best way to do this, honestly. You know, I think the market, we have an incredibly deep capital market. I think the market's very good at figuring out, you know, where to put where to put capital and where to invest in equity. I think what government does well, what government should focus on doing is solve the problems that markets don't solve, which is investing in R &D that has these really big spillovers, making sure that we're investing in things that have really big strategic implications.
31:17Markets aren't great at pricing in national security. So I think, to me, it could work. If you throw enough money at things, it can work. It just doesn't seem like the best way to achieve the goal we're trying to achieve. Getting back to the notion that people, you know, that's you need the people to sort of back all of these investments. Phil, you actually put forth in a paper published on the CSIS website that there should be a strategic sort of visa, which I think is sort of an interesting approach to this, that we should look at bringing in strategically the right people into this country and having that sort of reserve of talent.
31:56Yeah, absolutely. I mean, we have skill based visas. We generally, though, have them be pretty agnostic. It's not really a function of sort of what sectors or what geographies or things like that. Look, we're in a new world where we've decided that certain technologies, certain industries are incredibly important for us to invest in and have capacity in. We've put a lot of money behind that. We've restricted the trade in those goods for those reasons. It just makes sense to me personally that, you know, let's prioritize those sectors for talent as well. Again, whether it's quantums or semiconductors or biotech or any number of things, you know, why don't we have an immigration policy that sort of allows us to, you know, to me, you know, magnify one of our great superpowers, which is people want to come here and work in this really dynamic economy.
32:43Let's use that to our advantage. Phil, great speaking with you. Thank you so much. Thanks so much. Phil Luck of CSIS. I mean, we've seen the examples time and time again. The administration invests, the stocks go up like that. It's an interesting thought to think what is beyond that investment once you put the money in. You need the talent to back it up, too. Yeah. I mean, if we were calling the government a some type of a private equity investor, it's growth capital right now. They're not VC. They're not. I mean, you know, you can make an argument in rare earths that there's you're you're further you're earlier.
33:16But what we are seeing in the case of Intel is a company that needs an enormous amount of capital to do what needs to be done strategically. this has been rewarded by the market. The view is also investing in strategic sectors is something that is the right place to be, even though that has not worked in the past. Look, that's fine. Quantum's a thing. I get it. But look at the value. And I'm just picking this out of the blue, but it's not. Rigetti is going to do, I'll round up, do$25 million with an M of revenue next year. It has a market cap of approaching$13 billion. dollars. I mean, that's a staggering, staggering valuation at the market.
33:56So if the government wants to invest, that's fine. Understand, though, the valuations are ridiculous. That's a really good question. I don't know if that's the valuation that the government will get. Yeah. Right. It might be a very different number for them. They might just say, this is what we're paying, which, you know, we're sort of free market capitalists here. So that's somewhat problematic. But I definitely would rather have them have a stake in Intel than give the money to Intel for free. Yeah, I guess at the end of the day, it's like it is funding their R &D, right? And so there's two ways to think about it.
34:29If the company wants to go raise capital, they could sell equity, it would be dilutive, and they could sell it to the government. I mean, I agree on the capitalism. The markets are good at rooting out unproductive capital, right? So this is probably the opposite of that, and we just don't know. There's going to be a lot of companies that are basically, they have support that maybe should go away, right? And that's why the stock market or the markets generally work well. you start picking winners and losers, and I think things come on a hinge a little bit. Coming up, action in the oil patch. The headlines behind today's big move in crude and what is next for the energy sector.
34:59Fast Money is back in two.
35:07Welcome back to Fast Money. Oil prices jumping today after the Trump administration announced sanctions on Russian oil companies Ross Neft and Luke Oil. WTA had more than 5.6 percent. On its best day since June, the OIH oil services ETF gained over 5 % for its highest close since February. And, of course, OIH is the E in Karen's acronym, which makes a lot of sense. But, you know, you're a proud holder today. Yes, yes. Well, proud. And I think it is actually now up for the year. So that's really nice. You know, I think that things were maybe going to turn anyway. I really do. But I've thought that for a while.
35:42So I wouldn't be surprised if this fades in the near-ish term. But I think a floor might be in. My first reaction was I thought the energy, the stocks were underperforming the commodity. And I thought, wow, this is not sustainable. But as you said, I mean, you get to a place where I guess now we call it SLB. But Schlumberger or some of the other oil services companies have been so battered, although they've had a very steady rise off those April lows. So I do think energy is a sector one should stay committed to. It doesn't need to be significantly more of a weighting in your portfolio than it is in the S &P, which means it's 4 % or something like that.
36:19But energy has a way of suddenly giving you a 70 % year when you weren't expecting it because the fundamentals ultimately do win out. And I think some of these stocks are starting to look interesting. SLB was your final trade. You pay attention to SLB yesterday. Yes. How can that be in my tube? Because it would be Karen plays the game. I mean, it could be for energy. OK, Mr. Bland, that's where you want to go. That's fine. Go ahead. You can't put that much stuff in my tube. I mean, the tube is what it is. Well, I mean, it could grow. It's already full. It's already full. It's a bullish reversal in both Halliburton and SLB Corp.
36:54So, yes, stay with it. Coming up, the betting bombshell out of the NBA. The latest in the FBI gambling pro to the impact it could have with the sports betting stocks. And here's a sneak peek at the Kramer fam. Jim is chatting exclusively with the CEO of industrial manufacturer Dover. Catch a full interview top of the hour on Mad Money. More Fast Money in two.
37:18Welcome back to Fast Money. A big blow to the NBA just days after the season started. The FBI arresting more than 30 people in connection with a mafia-linked gambling and sports rigging operation, including Portland's head coach, Chauncey Billups, and the Miami Heat's Terry Rozier. And the implications could stretch even wider. Contessa Brewers got all the details here. Contessa. OK, so, Melissa, you've got Trailblazers coach Chauncey Billups expected in federal court in Oregon any moment accused of legitimizing underground poker games organized by the mafia to cheat unsuspecting gamblers. Miami Heat player Terry Rozier and former Cavs player Damon Jones also arrested.
37:57But Rozier and Jones were also among six defendants charged in a sports betting scandal, separate investigation profiting off wagers made on inside information and worse, i.e. they were throwing games. All this coming from the original investigation into Jonte Porter's scandal last year with the Trailblazers. Remember, he has a lifetime ban from the NBA. Well, DraftKings and FanDuel reiterated to me their commitment to reporting suspicious activity to law enforcement. They definitely do not want outraged gambling regulators to crack down on player props, which make up a significant part of the parlays that drive profits for the sportsbooks.
38:37And they want to keep expanding. They still are out of California and Texas, the two most populous states. And a black eye on sports gambling, no matter where it's coming from or who was involved, it just doesn't help. However, if it prompts enforcement against unlicensed operators, well, that might be a competitive win for the gaming companies. After all, unlicensed gambling is estimated to bring in wagers of 674 billion dollars annually in the U.S. FanDuel, DraftKings, Caesars, MGM, they would all like to have a piece of that illegal action. Why then did DraftKings stock basically not move on the back of all this?
39:21They had moved so much yesterday on the announcement about acquiring RailBird, which is going to be their prediction platform. And there's been a lot of punishment from investors as Calci has moved forward and offered now, combine your bets. You know, it's their sort of don't call it a parlay product on Calci that they put there were investors that punished DraftKings for it. DraftKings made up some ground with the RailBird acquisition. Great job by you, as always. I think you alluded to this. This could actually be a great thing for the publicly traded gambling companies, if you think about it.
39:54The regulated ones, the ones that have the ability to monitor what goes on, especially if there's a crackdown on all the sort of the underground gambling. But what kind of a Yahoo who wants to throw a game is going to a regulated licensed sportsbook to do it? I mean, and this is what happened with John T. Porter. They were using real licensed sportsbooks to make player prop bets to say, oh, well, let's give him the under. because they had inside information that he was going to walk out of the game with an injury. And the same thing happened with Terry Rozier, that he walked out of the game nine minutes into it.
40:30And people knew ahead of time, according to prosecutors, this is what they allege, that they had wagered$200 ,000 on that and then profited tens of thousands of dollars that it got split up among the people who were doing the gambling and Rozier himself. So they deserved it to be caught. I mean, there's a there's a great line in the indictment against the poker players. And it says the gamblers basically were going in and they expected a straight illegal poker game. So you expect you expect an illegal poker game to go perfectly normal and not have, you know, a card shuffling machine that's been doctored or cameras in the lighting fixtures.
41:14and all these ways that they were beating the system and taking these chumps for millions of dollars. Is there thinking that this is at the early stage, like that there's going to be so much other stuff to be found? Yeah, because they're learning when they go in and they start doing the investigation, they're learning more about who's saying what in public, who's using that information to their benefit or to the detriment. So are there going to be others? Yeah. In fact, the prosecutor said that today. Our investigation is continuing. This is massive. It's crossed 11 states. It involved at least wagers on at least four teams.
41:53So sorry. How do you view this and then translate that into your DraftKings holding? Well, I think this ultimately does speak to the fact that like so many things we talk about on the show, bringing it into a regulatory environment is is is good for the industry. And it just seems to me that is outweighing what is at uncertain here. Yeah. Contessa, thank you. Contessa Brewer. Up next, Final Trades.
42:24Final trade time. Timothy. It's been kind of a surprising run for the U.S. automakers. I am long GM, but I tell you what, I have a position in Ford and it's going higher. Karen. Yes, you are. I love the company. Did not love that expense margin pressure today. If you're looking for a place to get in, wait at least three days on this. Dan. Sure, Nike looks like it's poised to go back towards those post-earnings. 75 bucks. Contessa, you're talking about Yahoo's and Chucks? First time Yahoo and Chucks. I like Yahoo. Yahoo's a good one, isn't it? Yahoo's been said on this show before. In the context of the stock.
43:00Yeah, PSX. Thank you for watching Fast. Bad Money starts now.
43:12participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC Universal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the fast money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.
43:45To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit CNBC.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.
From the publisher
Intel on the move as results cross the wires, as memory chip stocks rally on reports of higher prices. Plus, how one derivatives strategist is navigating AI volatility ahead of Mag7 earnings, the jump in crude oil as new sanctions on Russia comes into focus, and the leap in quantum stocks as the White House reportedly eyes the space for its next equity stake.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
