Meta on the Move After a Day That Hit Tech Stocks Hard, and Cracks in the Luxury Consumer 10/25/23

25 Oct 2023 · 45 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money" - Meta on the Move After a Day That Hit Tech Stocks Hard, and Cracks in the Luxury Consumer (10/25/23)

Episode Overview In this episode of CNBC's "Fast Money," hosted by Melissa Lee, the roundtable of expert traders discusses the recent performance of Meta following its earnings report, the decline of major tech stocks, and the challenges faced by luxury retailers.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Meta's Earnings Report
  2. Performance and Stock Reaction
  3. Meta's stock rose by approximately 2.5% after reporting a 23% growth in revenue, beating analyst expectations of 21%.
  4. The fourth-quarter revenue guidance was slightly below consensus, raising concerns among investors.
  • Operational Metrics
  • Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) was reported at $11.23, exceeding expectations.
  • Operating margins improved to 40.3%, compared to 20% the previous year.
  • Concerns
  • The company highlighted ongoing concerns about increasing regulatory scrutiny, especially in the EU and U.S.
  • Rising expenses in the Reality Labs division were a point of contention amongst analysts.
  1. Market Context
  2. The broader market faced a tough day, with the Nasdaq down over 2%, primarily influenced by Alphabet's poor performance, marking its worst day in three years.
  3. Discussion around the overall market sentiment suggested a cautious approach, as many sectors, including semiconductors and luxury goods, were under pressure.
  1. Luxury Retail Sector Insights
  2. Luxury brands are showing signs of weakness:
  3. Notable declines in sales from key players like LVMH and Kering, with the latter seeing North American sales drop by 21%.
  4. The luxury sector is feeling pressure from changing consumer behavior, potentially indicating a broader economic slowdown.
  1. Consumer Behavior and Payment Stocks
  2. Payment stocks like PayPal and Square were impacted by a significant drop in the shares of Worldline, a French payment giant, which fell over 50%.
  3. Analysts expressed concerns regarding consumer spending, particularly in luxury and discretionary segments, reflecting broader economic challenges.
  1. Expert Analysis
  2. Gene Munster, a Fast Money guest, provided insights on Meta's position, emphasizing the need for growth and efficient operations, while acknowledging the challenges posed by geopolitical tensions affecting advertising revenues.
  3. The roundtable discussed the competition between Meta and Microsoft, weighing their valuations and growth potential.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Market Sentiment: The market is currently exhibiting caution, with significant volatility impacting major tech and luxury stocks.
  • Meta's Performance: Despite a strong earnings report, Meta's stock reaction highlights market skepticism about future growth and regulatory challenges.
  • Luxury Sector Concerns: The decline in luxury sales may be indicative of broader economic issues, with potential implications for consumer spending across various sectors.
  • Payment Sector Pressure: The fintech landscape is facing headwinds, and investors are wary of valuation declines in the wake of consumer spending hesitance.

---

Final Notes As the episode concludes, the panelists reiterate the need for investors to remain vigilant and adaptable in the current market climate, especially as earnings season continues and more tech companies report their financial results.

For more insights, visit [Fast Money's official page](http://fastmoney.cnbc.com).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is fast Here's what's on tap tonight. Meta's moment, the stock popping as Facebook's earnings beat and revenue jumps more than 20%. We'll go inside all the numbers and get the details from the conference call straight ahead. Plus, fintech fade, a French payment giant, falling over 50 % on a serious slowdown in Europe. The crushing loss sending shockwaves across major U.S. players like PayPal and Square. We'll get the very latest coming up. And later, Texas Instruments, really bad day after. The options action on Amazon ahead of results tomorrow and talking the tape on Target.

0:35The stock closing higher for a change. I'm Melissa Lee coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Carter Worth, Dan Nathan, and Guy Adami. We start off with a mega pop for Meta. Shares of the social media giant now up 2.5 % just about after posting a top and bottom line beat. The company is seeing a return to ad revenue growth after a dismal 2022. CNBC's Julia Borson has all the details now. Julia. Well, Melissa, Meta beat expectations on the top and bottom lines, reporting its fastest revenue growth in two years, 23 percent revenue growth in the third quarter.

1:07That's ahead of the 21 percent that analysts expected. Now, for the fourth quarter, Meta provided a revenue guidance range with a midpoint just a hair below analysts' consensus. And in Meta's year of efficiency, the company brought down its expense outlook for the year, down to between$87 and$89 billion from a prior forecast of$88 to$91 billion. And it forecasts its 2024 expenses for the first time, giving a range between$94 and$99 billion. Now, for context, analysts had been looking for expenses to come in at$100 billion or below, so they met that. Now, the company did flag growing expenses in its Reality Labs division and also warned, quote, we continue to monitor the active regulatory landscape, including the increasing legal and regulatory headwinds in the EU and the U.S.

1:54that could significantly impact our business and our financial results. Melissa, the call is starting right now. I'm going to jump on. We'll be back if there are any more big breaking news headlines. All right, Julia, thank you. Julia Vorston. So it is still the year of efficiency. I think that was a big outstanding question for a lot of investors. Plus, the ad growth is there. It is continuing, just like what we saw from yesterday's report from Alphabet. Guy. I understand the fourth quarter guidance was, okay, in line, maybe slightly. Okay, let's back that out for a second. But ARPU for Facebook,$11.

2:25What is our boost down for? I was about to ask you. That would be average revenue per user. Thank you, Tim. We could preschool that or we could just keep moving. $11.23. Street was looking for$11.05. Better. $9.31 this time a year ago. Margins, much better. 40.3%, 20 % a year ago. These are great numbers. I'm surprised the stock hasn't gotten back at least today's losses. This stock should be higher than yesterday's close, given this quarter, I think. So it'll be interesting to see what happens over the next couple hours. We did go in down 4 % on the day. Well, that's just it. So haven't even recouped.

2:57And so are they good numbers? It always gets found. There's no such actually thing as good or bad earnings. All there is are earnings, and it's how the market reacts. So if the market is up a little bit, it's not really good numbers. It's great to have Carter here on a big earnings date. I don't think anyone else here would have said that, by the way. It's awesome. I mean, that's just the issue. Why isn't it if it was good? Right. We should be up. Netflix really went up, right, when it was. That's true. This is feeble. It's not even recouping today's losses. Feeble? Well, no, I'm not going to he's not saying feeble.

3:27I'm not going to say feeble. I'm going to say, boy, we've we've combined the year of efficiency with the year of the best growth since 21, 23 percent. But also the dominance in the ad spend. And look, maybe real material signs of A.I. growth. I mean, they talked about ad targeting and they talked about dynamics that are very much A.I. related. And when we started evaluating who was best positioned for AI a few months ago when we started to go down this road, I think a lot of people felt like it was Microsoft and Facebook. So Reels and Instagram continuing to grow. And obviously their audience and the size of the platform amazingly continues to grow.

4:06Question is, where do you go with the stock from here? Because relative to, you know, it's up 160 percent this year. It's been struggling over the last three months. unlike Google, which I think really rallied straight into their numbers. And I think that's really the difference in performance. But hard to argue here. Headcount down 24 percent. The low hanging fruit on expenses is done, though. And that's the real challenge. Yeah, I agree with that. And that relatively labs business is going to be really important. That was one of the things I think caused a lot of concern in late 2021. All this metaverse sort of spending here.

4:35So Julia just mentioned they have, you know, total expenses below 100 billion dollars, which is what investors wanted. Right. But, you know, R &D is going to continue to be high. And again, if like what we saw last night or what we saw today, if that Google Alphabet can lose$150 billion in market cap because they miss a couple expectations as it relates to their cloud business because uptake of the AI product is not as great as it was at Microsoft that gained, you know,$100 billion in market cap or whatever. This is probably not good enough, in my opinion. So to Carter's point is that you need a beaten raise.

5:08This stock has been consolidating over the last three months. It trades at a valuation that has a lot of support. We know that they've been cutting costs, like all of this stuff. So the market reaction, again, we're an hour after the reported earnings. The only thing I'll just say this, if you want to broaden it out a little bit, you know, I'm looking at a sea of red in the NASDAQ, which closed down nearly 2.5 % in the day. The S &P closed 1.5 % in the day. You know, Microsoft makes up 7 % of the S &P. It makes up 10 % of the NASDAQ 100. And we still have that devastation across the board. And I know we're going to talk about, like, semis and Texas Instruments a little bit.

5:39I didn't think there was anything that horrible. I mean, other than I didn't think even Alphabet was that horrible. So why is the NASDAQ down 2.5 %? Because, you know, I know we're going to talk markets. But, I mean, rates closed at their high. We had a closing high this cycle on the 10-year, 495. The auction was terrible. JGB, bad auction, all the things that are hurting equities, and even the mega cap stocks, which are less long-duration stocks than other high-tech stocks. So is that why the reaction is feeble? or are the earnings feeble and deserve that commensurate reaction? Probably a little bit of both.

6:10But, I mean, at the end of the day, there are a lot of people whose economic livelihoods, their lives depend on getting this one stock right. They're an analyst paid to know this or it's a person with its biggest position or an insider. And the reaction is feeble. I think it's more about the truth is it's not that good a number. I think the reaction, I think the quarter is very good. I think given the fact that the stock has sold off 10 percent-ish over the last couple weeks, the reaction is feeble. The stock, and I'm curious what Gene thinks, but the stock should be higher based on what I'm looking at right now, unless I'm missing something, which has happened before.

6:42Occasionally, not too often. You're pretty sharp, buddy. Thank you. But I think the comps here are also important. Think about up 23 % year over year. What was last year at this time? One of the worst. One of the worst years in their history. All right. And so we had a dynamic where also ad revenue was under a lot of pressure. It's nice to see ad revenue come back. We heard that from Google. The growthier parts of the business are the ones that I think we have to be careful about. So it really is about the year of efficiency that might also be largely done. I'm on Facebook. I'm not looking for reasons to to push it down.

7:11But I agree. It's not an extraordinary number. Another reason why the conference call feels particularly important in terms of the commentary and how they talk about expenses. Mark Zuckerberg did an interview with The Verge last month and said we are squarely back to developing innovative products. And when I hear that from Mark Zuckerberg, I think spending money. is that your efficiency still intact well they gave their 94th spend right and and they i think they're they're basically up nine percent or something like that is that good is that bad news uh let's listen here's a company though that is competing on every front with some of the biggest companies in tech when you think about you know oculus and all the energy that they put into this platform which is basically this metaverse platform which is again the stock sold up 75 since they changed the name and changed the focus of the company and a lot of people and i I know Gene is one of them, are really excited about Vision Pro and the applications that can be used for both enterprise and consumer.

8:06And that's a ways out. And so you think about that. You think about where they are in some of their social platforms. I mean, I don't know about you guys. I was kind of excited about Threads at one point. And, you know, three or four months out, it just doesn't. They're not delivering on the product front. You would think that every week they would have another tweak, another, you know what I mean, like sort of addition to that thing to keep people engaged. And they're not doing that. So to me, and then the last thing I'll just say about the ad spend, I mean, you know, what did Snap say to us last night?

8:33And I get it. Their revenue is like a rounding error for Facebook. But they said that they're seeing a little bit of hesitation as it relates to the situation in the Middle East. And that probably only gets worse. And then just throw on what we're seeing. I'll just say the Russell 2000 acts like you know what, okay? And when you think about where a lot of those advertisers are coming from, they're small and medium-sized businesses. So to me, I think that probably doesn't portend well for ad revenue in the near term. So what's interesting is that Microsoft and Meta are pretty much similar in valuation at this point.

9:04So given that we've seen the quarters, which one do you like better? Which one would you rather have from this point on? Facebook, I think, to be honest with you. I think Facebook. No, I mean, I get Microsoft. I understand the excitement around it. I think Facebook is a little more reasonable valuation. And I actually think this quarter was OK. I'm interested to hear what Gene says again. By the way, the Meta CEO is saying on the conference call they will continue deprioritizing a number of non-AI projects, shift personnel toward working on AI. So they're further jumping on that bandwagon. So I think that was a would you rather.

9:38You just dressed up differently, but I'm listening to you, and I'm going to respond to the game. It's Microsoft, I think. And I have trouble saying that. I'm really not long Microsoft. I believe they have more leverage to pull. I believe the strengths that they showed were the ones that the market wanted to see, and at least is rewarding here. And I think there are multiple divisions in Microsoft where they're showing that they've got the pricing power and they're going to be able to push people around. But I don't think you have to love any of them here. And I think, you know, I've got company here.

10:07Yeah, you don't have to. I mean, really think about Meta. Meta is the exact same price it was two years ago. Literally two years ago in the last weeks in October. So here's a stock that goes from 315, drops to 88, loses 70 % of its value. Now it's back to where it was two years ago. Why do it? How about the truth? Would you rather have cash? I'd rather have cash than Google. Then I, then I, then. Sure. Then Google. Or Microsoft. Or Microsoft. How about between now and tomorrow? Or Meta. Or how about now and next Friday? Or now to the end of the year? I mean, you've got to pick your time frame, but I would say.

10:35He's playing. I was going to say. He just did a would you rather, rather. I make an exception for Carter Brax. Yeah, of course you do. Let's get some instant analysis from our friend, fast money friend, Gene Munster. He's the managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management. Gene, great to have you with us. As was pointed out by the desk, you know, the reaction is not that great considering we went in with a decline of 4 percent. So what do you make of the of the earnings and the guidance? Because if it were really that good, shouldn't we at least make up the losses from today's session? We should, Melissa.

11:07And I think that eventually investors will give them credit. This was a solid quarter. I want to put a couple points into perspective is that DAUs, the daily active users, grew 5.4 percent. That's the fourth consecutive quarter of acceleration, albeit it goes from 3.5 % to 4%, 4.5%, 5%. But accelerating, that's a 2 billion number, daily active users. That means that one out of every four people in the world visit a Meta property daily. And Zuckerberg kicked off the call. The first data point that he gave was that the number of people that visit an app monthly was 3.9 billion. My last check, there's about 7.5 billion people in the world.

11:45That means that more than half the people in the world, that's the I think one of the most important overlook points to this quarter is that means that the machine, this addictive machine that they have is intact. And as the second piece related to just the health of the ad business, that they slightly exceeded the numbers. They raised revenue by my math by about three percent for the December quarter and kept expenses unchanged, which gets to the third point, which is margins. Margins are 40 % operating margins. That's the best since June of 2021. And if you're curious, the operating margin for full year 2019 pre-pandemic, before they got that big boost in 21, was 33%.

12:28So they're measurably higher. The question comes up, why own Meta? Deepwater, we do own Meta. The reason to own it is they have a lock in terms of reach that no other advertiser can get. We talked about how many people use it. And separately, they're doing it in a more profitable way than they did three years ago. And I think that is those are positives that I think you put the final filter on top of this, which is valuation. I think it lines up attractive. Everything wasn't perfect. We can talk about Reality Labs. That's still a sore point for me. But that's how I see the quarter in aggregate.

13:01So to oversimplify oversimplify what you just said, Gene, is it about growth or is it about efficiency? Why does someone own the stock? You want it for growth. And ultimately, the efficiency piece is going to top out. I think that margins are going to go from 40 % in September to probably 42%. But eventually, they're just going to kind of keep the margins at that level. It has to come to growth. Where are you going to get the growth from? I do believe that AI is going to make some of these content tools more easy to build content. I believe in the creator economy. Instagram is one manifestation of that, a big beneficiary of that.

13:35And separately, I think that this placeholder that they have related to the metaverse or spatial computing, I wish they wouldn't spend$15 billion. That is absolutely absurd that they're spending that kind of money on it. But Tim, to answer your question, it's about growth. But Melissa, if I can get 10 more seconds, I'd love just to give you my thoughts on Real Adolab because that is, I think, the one negative here. Sure. All right. I'm going to go fast here. As I mentioned, they've increased spending. It's going to be$15 billion kind of a spend annually on that. Annually, Apple spends$30 billion in total on their R &D.

14:11I mean, this just doesn't make sense. I think there's a place for the metaverse. I think spatial computing with Apple is going to be a hit. But that number should be more like$5 billion a year, not$15 billion. Hey, Gene. So, you know, we hear a lot about BARD. We hear a lot about chat GPT-4. Talk to us a little bit about Llama. And so when you look at a company like Meta, which valued not really anywhere near what Microsoft is, Mel just played the would you rather on some of us here. But this is stock expected to grow earnings next year, 20 percent plus sales growth of double digits, maybe 12 percent or something like that.

14:43You just talked about the operating margins of what's built in for their open source, large language model, Lama, which I think you believe that they're going to be able to integrate across a lot of these platforms that reaches nearly four billion people. What at least once a month? Yeah, it's kind of the substance. It's the fabric that they're going to build products on. Just a few minutes I was on with the call. Zuckerberg, his first comments were about reality labs, and his second comment was about AI and getting those into all the products. They need Llama to do that. they're not going to, based on what they've told us so far, they're not going to charge, they're not going to have an outright business around Llama.

15:19And so it's not going to be a direct revenue contributor. But your point is that that kind of generative AI that can be powered by Llama is going to make creating content more effective. And I think they can use less on the generative side, but I think they can use AI to build better advertising tools. Remember, Apple ripped the ball out of Meta's hands when they had those changes to privacy. It was the right thing for Apple to do. It left Meta in a very tough spot. That created a headwind a couple years ago, and they can dig their way out of that by using AI to do better ad attribution, and that's part of the whole Lama story.

15:53All right, Gene, we'll check back with you on Meta a little bit later on after the conference call proceeds. Guy, what do you want to know about the, you know, what would you ask on the call? Reality Labs is a disaster. I mean, at a point now where it has to be addressed. I mean, they had$210, I think, million dollars of revenue, right? And they lost close to$4 billion operating income. It's just an unmitigated disaster. At some point, either you have to have a direction for this, have to have a vision, or you have to cut bait. And I think maybe that's what's holding the stock back a little bit.

16:22All right, let's get to the overall markets here. Sinking during the regular trading session, dragged down by big tech. The Nasdaq dropping more than 300 points for its worst percent drop since February. The S &P finishing below its 200-day moving average for the third time in four sessions. Both indices posting their lowest closes since May. The drop in Alphabet responsible for a lot of the loss is Google's parent company falling 9.5%, its biggest drop since March of 2020. Apple, NVIDIA, Apple all coming along for the ride. So does this action mean the market's been broken here? Carter, do we do damage?

16:56For sure. And I think if you think about it, we're down still only about 9%, 10 % from the July peak. That's nothing. I mean, that's a sell-off. It's a decline. It's a drop. It's a drawdown. It's a correction. You choose the word. But it's nothing really cathartic. And so what if we get a Google-type thing out of Apple? And what if the really compromised stocks in the Russell 2000 break to yet new lows? And I think one has to assume that. And so the question is, and this is important, at some points there's nothing to be lost by postponing all new buying. You just don't have to do it. If you are mandated and you're being paid to run it.

17:30Well, you're paid to have cash. Right, exactly. But individuals are not. An individual can make the decision, I just don't want to do this right now. meaning I can hold back and wait and maybe get a more fortuitous price or level. Because we have the chart master here, let me ask you about the breakdown, though, in the high multiple tech stocks. So these stocks that had outperformed everything because they were the most oversold had big, big years coming into this. Some of them look like they're about to test new lows, so fresh lows for this cycle. And the fact that the velocity of these moves lower in these names is more excessive than even mega cap tech.

18:04These led the market lower, believe it or not. They actually led the mega cap tech stocks lower back. And I'm talking 22. What does that mean to you? It just means that it's gaining. It's gaining. Talk about breath. The breath is now going the other way, right? It's getting ferocity. People are trying to back away from the asset class of equities. And if you think about it, the things that were the most stretched weren't necessarily expensive. Homebuilders were cheap at the top, but they're cheaper now. The point is the things that were really stretched are the things that got hurt first. Think about the big staple stocks, right, that were maybe expensive, maybe not.

18:35But now you've always had bifurcation, strong housing staples while you've got the small cap making 52-week lows. The bifurcation is always resolved by the strong ones succumbing, Estee Lauder's and Hermès's, while the weak ones get weaker. It's usually finished when everything has had its haircut. Tim mentioned yields. I'll go to Japan for a second, if I may. Dollar-yen closing above 150, 150 and a quarter, big deal. Ten-year yields in Japan, 86 basis points. I haven't seen that in a while. That's why our yields will continue to go higher. Yields don't want to stay down. I mean, they had an opportunity over the last couple of days closing high here, 495.

19:13I mean, it feels like yields continue to move higher from here. And I'll just say this, you know, talking about like what led this latest, you know, I guess, sell off over the last couple of months or so. Yes, it was Microsoft and Apple at one point. We're down 15 percent. And it feels like, you know, at least Apple is right back in that. But this felt a lot like 2021. Like we had a bifurcation like you're talking about. I mean, we've seen, you know, tons of different sectors that are in correction mode. We've seen some of the worst valuation stuff, the stuff that doesn't make money, the stuff that was the craziest at the heights in early 2020.

19:45They've been correcting. They've been in bear markets. And so to me, like the equity market didn't feel great. And it doesn't feel great now with a 10-year at$4.95. You know, at 4%, for whatever reason, like two months ago, people were like, well, you know, yields can go up and stocks can go up. And I think at 5%, they're showing us that they can't. And I also think that all the headwinds that we have about the economy, we haven't even talked about the economy yet. If we're looking through the lens of earnings season, it doesn't feel great. It doesn't feel like the consumer is great. When I hear Visa say, oh, travel is great.

20:15What are you talking about? We are like about to be. This is what they see. They see it right here and right now. And they, you know, I don't know. But, you know, what did I say to you last night about what Brian Moynihan said about the consumer for the first time in two years? He's kind of saying that maybe the consumer is not so strong. So I don't know, man. Like, I don't know. Man? I don't know. I'm not buying it. Yeah, it was almost a have at it. I'm not buying it. All right, coming up. We've got more after-hours action. Shares of IBM and Whirlpool on the move after reporting results. The numbers out of the quarters next.

20:44Plus, the auto trade hitting the skids. GM and Ford hitting multi-year lows. And even shares of Chipmaker Texas Instruments have had their hazard lights on. The details on that when Fast Money returns.

21:03Welcome back to Fast Money. Let's get to some more earnings movers, starting with IBM. The stock is higher after reporting a beat on top and bottom lines. That conference call got underway at the top of the hour. Christina Parsonevelis, the details. Christina. A beat even with a strong U.S. dollar. It took less than two minutes for IBM's CEO to bring up the opportunities in what? Generative AI. And there are over 20 ,000 AI consultants. He believes generative AI will consist of multi-models, so it'll be IBM's AI platform like WatsonX, along with other companies, models, and OpenAI. So it's a hybrid AI approach similar to the hybrid approach to the cloud right now.

21:35But 75 % of IBM's revenue comes from consulting and software. IBM's CFO said they saw one of the strongest bookings quarters, but consulting fell light of estimates. I asked him specifically about this. He blamed the strong dollar. Software grew 6 % on a constant currency basis. Jim Cavanaugh, again, the CEO, said they are seeing, quote, nice green shoots of AI leading to a couple of hundred million dollars in the quarter. The company reiterated it would grow about 3 % to 5 % this year, and they reiterated their free cash flow of$10.5 billion. I also grilled him on that. I asked him how they're going to hit$5.4 billion in Q4 one quarter when the combined three quarters of this year was$5.1.

Read the full transcript

22:15He said they historically grow free cash flow more in Q4 and feels confident they can get there. That's why you can see shares up almost 2 percent. Melissa? Christina, thanks. Christina Parts Nevelis. How does this chart look, Carter? Well, IBM is a bond, right? It pays like a Ford. It pays 4.8, 5 percent. Consider this. The stock is the exact same price it was in September of 1999. So it's the exact same price it was 23 years ago, but it pays out 5%. Or consider this. 23 years ago, the number of shares outstanding has been cut in half. They bought back half the shares. That's all it is. So the fact that it's up a little bit I think is irrelevant.

22:55If you want to own it for the yield, it's probably a pretty good yield. Guy? I actually sort of like it. I know the haters are going to come, but I'll tell you, At least you can wrap your head around this in terms of valuation. It's reasonable. They seemingly have got their act together. The Red Hat thing is now fully integrated, doing pretty well. Infrastructure, I get it. Not a big part of their business, only$3.25 billion. But you know what? Margins are improving there as well. So they're getting their arms around the business. And this is a stock that I think can sneak up on you. As a matter of fact, Melissa Lee, Sandy Canald, who is sitting back in our executive producer, This was the I in whatever anagram or whatever they call it, algorithm.

23:33I don't even know what it was. Acronym. What was it? Oh, Swift. I can hear that. Yeah, there you go. Whatever it was. I don't know what the rest is either. Nor do I, but I know the I was it. That was a play on T-Swizzle, though. Huh? He was doing the Taylor Swift. That was very, very leading edge, by the way. This is the T-Swizzle year. She's tough for the stock to pick. All right, let's get to Whirlpool here. A company posting better than expected top and bottom line numbers, but weaker EPS guidance, sending shares lower in the extended hour session, down by 5.5%. Steve Kovacs got the details.

24:03Steve. Hey there, no Taylor Swift angle here. Whirlpool shares falling despite beats on the top and bottom lines after revising guidance for full-year earnings lower than analysts were expecting. Here are the results. EPS,$5.45 versus$4.25 expected. Revenue,$4.93 billion versus$4.81 billion expected. And as for that guidance, Whirlpool reaffirmed its revenue expectations for the fiscal year. But as for full year EPS, dropping down to$16. Analysts estimated that would be$16.06 and all of that down from the prior range of$16 to$18. CFO in a statement highlighting cost cuts for the quarter, saying it's on track to deliver$800 million in savings with$300 million of that saved this quarter alone.

24:49Mel, send it back over to you. All right, Steve. Thanks, Steve Kovach. Tim, you owned it at one point. It's been a great trading stock. No, I don't own it. I haven't owned it for a while. It's not expensive. It's probably just south of seven times or just south of eight times. It's paying a 5.5 % dividend yield. This is not a reason to own any stock, I think. It is a case where I think a lot of these housing components or ancillary housing trades have a lot of problems ahead of them. Again, you're talking about a consumer. Most people don't go and pay outright for an appliance. A lot of people actually put this stuff on some kind of a financing dynamic.

25:25A lot of this was buy now, pay later. We're going to talk all about those disasters. But, you know, if you look at some of the names in here, and again, I would go inside the XHB, and I would just say, you know, for the restoration of hardware that's down 45 % in 55 days, Williams-Sonoma is actually held in there. Should it? I don't think so. I actually think that these are the kinds of pair trades you should be looking at. Actually, I'd be long RH against WSM. All right. This is a stock that is exhibit A, why you should just own ETFs if you don't have conviction in more than a handful of names.

25:54And I mean that like quite because it is like what you just said about IBM trading at the exact place it was in 1999, pays a 4 percent dividends. This stock, the equity market cap is less than the debt that they have. It's been cut in half over the last few years from its recent highs or whatever. Like like trying to parse through how this company is going to go from seven times earnings to 10 times earnings. and you think you're going to make 25 % on that or something like that is an absolute waste of time, in my opinion. 100%. Okay, thank you. I mean, it's a fun conversation. Maybe they can do the more you know here or whatever.

26:26But I don't even know what you know. But also, it's such a classic setup. Technically, we know what a breakout is, where you have well-defined tops at a common level. There's tension, and it breaks out. Guess what? Well-defined lows at a common level. And what just happened? It is literally plunging down$6,$7 in the number right from its 52-week low. Terrible. Terrible. What does the XHB look like overall? Well, that's the high flyer that's rolled over, and I would say there's more rollover to come. Yeah. Yields continue to go. We finally hit, I think, four and three quarters was the level in the 10-year where the XHB woke up.

26:57We go through 5 % close above, it's going to continue to wake up, and it's not going to be a pleasant, you know what I mean, eye-opening experience. There's a lot more fast money to come. Here's what's coming up next. Investors hitting the brakes on the auto trade. And now, it's not just carmakers feeling the pressure. The stocks that might need a seatbelt. Next. Plus, Lux influx. Consumers showing signs of breaking down. The pain felt everywhere from payments to champagne. The hurdles facing the high end after this. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square.

27:35We're back right after this.

27:43Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks dropping across the board. The Dow falling more than 100 points. The S &P down 1.5%, falling below 4 ,200 for the first time since May. And the Nasdaq notching its worst day since February, down nearly 2.5%. Auto stocks like Ford and GM hitting multi-year lows before ending the day in the green. Signs of a potential deal with the UAW spurring this rally in the late session. But the effects of the auto worker strikes may be felt beyond the auto industry. Analysts pointing to a softer car market as one reason for Texas Instruments' weak forecast. That stock dropping 3.5 % after its results last night.

28:20Meanwhile, WM, previously known as Waste Management, bucking today's trend up more than 6 % after an earnings beat last night. The company also upping free cash flow guidance. That stock is up 6%. Wow, that's a big one. You can make a case. Listen, I mean, you can make a case. This is one of those defensive names, I would imagine. And valuation, you can make a compelling case for an environment where I think people are starting to look for valuation. I think the move actually makes sense, and it probably has more room to go. I don't know if Dubs here has any charts on this sucker, but it looks okay to me.

28:51Yeah, well, it's Dubs. I have them in my head. I don't have any to cite, but here's the thing. It is defensive, and today's action is impressive, and I would say all things held equal. I might have a little of this even instead of cash. Oh. How about that? All right. Right. Coming up, a luxury letdown, cracks, and even the high-end consumer starting to form. The name's under pressure in the secondary sectors, feeling the handbag hurt. That's next. And there's still more tech on deck. Amazon and Intel gearing up to report results tomorrow, and options traders are plugging in ahead of those numbers.

29:23How they are playing this group when Fast Money returns. Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.

29:38Welcome back to Fast Money Cracks, starting to show in the high-end consumer. Now even major luxury brands are delivering warnings to Wall Street. CNBC's Robert Frank has got the latest. Hey, Robert. Melissa, good to see you. Well, Porsche's CFO this morning adding to those fears that the luxury consumer is in fact breaking down. He said, quote, we are suffering in the entire economy. It is also hitting the luxury industry. Those shares of Porsche down 12 percent this year. LVMH earlier this month reporting sales growth of 9 percent. Doesn't sound bad, but that was half the level of the earlier quarters.

30:11LVMH stock now down 24 percent from its highs. Company CFO saying, quote, after three roaring years, growth is converging more in line with the historical average. You've got luxury giant Keering. They've taken the biggest hit. The owner of Gucci and Saint Laurent saw North American sales down 21 percent. Asia x Japan was flat as China's recovery seems to be slowing a bit. Kering stock now at the lowest level since March of 2020. And even Hermes, which beat on sales and is always the strongest of these luxury players, that stock is down 12%. Analysts say going forward, the most discretionary items from the most aspirational brands are the most at risk.

30:53And Mel, perhaps the surest sign that the roaring 20s may be ending. LVMH said champagne sales are down for the first time in three years. I mean, people have to drink something, Robert. I just don't get that. Just kidding. Thank you, Robert. Robert Frank. Meanwhile, that was believable, wasn't it? I didn't mean it. Another ominous sign for consumers. Payment stocks affirm block and PayPal plunging today. The move comes after French payment company Worldline slashed its full year targets, pointing to a slowdown, particularly in Germany. Those shares cut by nearly 60 % today. So what does this all say about the strength of the consumer?

31:32Definitely not good, Dan, to your point earlier. It kind of goes back to what we were talking about Visa. I mean, you could take one company that operates very well, and they may have something to say that might not be great to extrapolate to a whole bunch of other businesses. And again, I think, you know, when you think about a company like Worldline and Adyen, which is out of Europe also this summer, had a disappointment. We see how Square and PayPal are traded. We see what fintech valuations. We had Nigel Morris from QED, a fintech investor last week on the show, talk to us about that and thinks there's probably further room to go to the downside.

32:01It's just a place where investors don't want to be public or private, which is not a great thing. Like there's going to have to be a bloodletting. Maybe it's one of these on a big scale here in America to do that, to have a sort of capitulation, because it doesn't feel like we've reached capitulation. No, well, I mean, PayPal, which I was nibbling in the low 60s, so I have a position. And I thought, you know, they'd gone through a lot in terms of both management changes, in terms of really where they are kind of you're getting real numbers now out of true users and globally. But but the payments world also punctuated by, you know, the headlines about the Fed putting, you know, lower caps on credit card companies.

32:37It's awful for Visa and MasterCard, the big daddies. But, you know, if you look at FICO, upper FICO scores, you clearly are not seeing an erosion. in that consumer. And so, yes, there is some insulation in, I think, that luxury branding. As you get into the lower stuff, and I would just say that fintech offerings have allowed lower income consumers to really counter a lot of the inflationary forces out there for only so long. And this is where the sensitivity to unemployment is massively high. So to me, whether you're a mortgage processing company, whether you are a buy now, pay later, or whether you are just exposed to fintech and student loans and whatnot, All of them, to me, all of them are going lower.

33:18And that's on their core business. And it's on their funded costs. It has nothing to do with the credit quality, which is getting worse. I wouldn't go near any of this stuff. I think it goes lower. To your point about higher FICO scores versus lower FICO scores, I mean, that's exactly what we heard from DFS when they reported it. It's the lower-band, mid-band FICO score customer that is really starting to feel the stress in this market. And now we're seeing it on the other side of the equation as well. So Tim makes a great point. Real quick about PayPal. November 1st, I think. I mean, this stock is now at a six - or seven-year low.

33:48Single digits PE trades at one-and-a-half times revenue. I mean, it's a profitable company that's trading like a distressed company right now. If they're just in line on November 1st, you've got to get a bounce at some point in this name. Right. But 18 % of its revenues last year are from Europe. I know. It's a disaster. We've got some breaking news we've got to get to. New CEO at Morgan Stanley has been named. Leslie Pickert's got the details. Leslie. Hi, Melissa. Yes, that highly anticipated CEO search is over. Morgan Stanley announcing that Ted Pick has become CEO of the firm. This is in a press release announced moments ago.

34:24Two of the other contenders, Andy Saperstein and Dan Simkowitz, will become co-presidents. Saperstein will be co-president and head of wealth and investment management. Simkowitz will be co-president and head of institutional securities. A bit about Ted Pick, some background here. He had recently served as co-president of Morgan Stanley for the past two years, and he previously ran the Institutional Securities Group, where he oversaw investment banking and institutional securities as head of institutional equities. He was seen as really transforming that business and putting it in more of a global leading position when he was in charge of that.

35:03And before that, he led Equity Capital Markets, which is the division that underwrites equities, IPOs, and so forth. In this statement, we've got some statements from James Gorman, who will become executive chairman as part of this change here. He says, for several years, I have worked with the board to ensure an orderly succession. I feel strongly that now is the time to step aside. The board's selection of Ted Pick is an outstanding one. I have worked side by side with Ted since the financial crisis and have experienced firsthand values, firsthand his values, intellect, passion and commitment to our people and our clients.

35:40So Morgan Stanley naming CEO Ted Pick as the next CEO here. Melissa? By unanimous vote at that. Leslie, thank you. Leslie Picker. He's got a lot to tackle here. The last quarter for Morgan Stanley was a bit lumpy. Stocks certainly didn't respond well. Investment banking was a big problem there. Tim? So it's easy to point out Morgan Stanley has de-risked their business away from a lot of the investment banking because of the wealth management. But you can't tell me that there's not a huge risk over wealth management, too, as we start to see, again, NAVs just come down, period, across the board.

36:13There's some exposure to E-Trade. I'm not saying it's toxic exposure. I'm just saying, if you look at valuations and all the reasons why they deserve a premium, they do deserve a premium, some of those things are still under pressure as well. That chart, I don't know, Carter, You tell me, boy, that was awful. Pretty awful. In fact, the industry group itself, the S &P 500 Investment Bank and Brokerage Group, making new 52-week lows today. And Morgan Stanley, the same price it was in 1998. So here's another instance of the cult of equity. If your stock's unchanged for 23 years, what did you really do for anybody?

36:43Looking for support, it probably comes in the form of the prior all-time high, way back in 2018, around$60. You're like, how can that be? Well, you know what? In this environment, it can be for sure. Coming up, earnings season just getting started. and there's even more tech on deck to report. The action in the options pits ahead of tomorrow's big results next. And one relative bright spot amid today's market sell-off, what is driving shares of Target higher? And can the gains in this beaten down name last? Fast Money's back in two.

37:15Welcome back to Fast Money. The tech earnings train keeps rolling tomorrow. Amazon and Intel both on deck to report after the bell following some big losses in today's session. Options Traders are betting the reports could lead to even more carnage. Mike Coe joins us now with the action. Mike, what's it looking like? Both of these were quite busy, and both of them are implying some pretty big moves. First, we'll talk about Amazon, which was actually the fourth busiest single stock option today. That one's implying a move of about 6.5 % on earnings, about 8 % by the end of the week. We saw a buyer of 10 ,000 of the October 27th weekly.

37:48Those are this Friday's 115 puts. Buyer paid a dollar contract for those, or about an outlay of a million dollars. Those were actually priced at 220 by the end of the day. So that one's already quite profitable. And the other name we're looking at is Intel. This one also implying a move of greater than 6%. And we saw a similar bet here early in the day. Buyer of 8 ,300 of the December 1st weekly 28 strike puts. Buyer paid about 30 cents. And those two had appreciated by day's end about 42 cents-ish. So up about 100 ,000 bucks on that trade. All right, Mike, thanks. Mike Coe, it feels like Intel needs to pull a rabbit out of the hat, sort of.

38:24in terms of what it needs to deliver to convince Wall Street that it is still in the game. Data center. I mean, just come in line and I think it'll be OK. But any miss in this move from basically 25 to 33, half of it will be erased on the back of this quarter. Coming up, more meta madness. We are keeping a close eye on the social media giant. Deepwater's Gene Munster is listening in on the call. We'll give us all the key takeaways. Fast Money's back in two.

38:53Welcome back to Fast Money. That gain in the after hours from Meta, it's slipping away. It is up only about a third of a percent. The earnings call is still underway. Let's check back with Fast Money friend Gene Munster. Gene, what's the problem here? Melissa, the problem came in the form of a question about geopolitical impact from what's recently happened in the Middle East. And CFO Susan Lee's answer was that they can't attribute anything specific there. Israel's a small part of their business. But they did notice when that's happened, there's just been broader softness related to advertising to start the quarter.

39:26She said she thinks it's related to just global disruption. She mentioned they saw a similar dynamic when the Ukraine conflict war started, and that has spooked investors. And so that's the reason why it's lost some of its gains is never use the word softness as a CFO. Or when you do, just be prepared for the stock to sell off. All right. Gene, thanks. Gene Munster. We heard that from the much, much, much smaller rival, Snap, in terms of the conflict causing ad campaigns to take a pause here. So maybe this is not entirely surprising, Guy. Yeah, and Dan mentioned it, but again, small and medium-sized business.

40:03Carter's pointed this out. The micro-cap stocks have absolutely rolled over. A lot of their revenue, Facebook, comes from these businesses. If they start to feel the pinch, Facebook is going to feel it as well. Obviously, what we just talked about does not help. Dan? Yeah, I mean, listen, this goes back to these companies. They want to be constructive, right? But they don't have a whole heck of a lot of visibility, just like the consumer doesn't have a lot of visibility, just like a lot of their customers don't have a lot of visibility. So you throw all this geopolitical stuff into the mix and you think about what's going on here in the U.S.

40:32We have this debt ceiling thing that's coming up. There's just not if you're a corporate, you just don't have a lot of reason to be too optimistic. So to me, I think it makes sense for a company like this. I'd rather be cautiously optimistic than over my skis a little bit. Right now. Now in negative territory. Well, I guess, look, for all the horrors and we're not a political show. So I'm just talking about the cyclicality or the dynamics seem to me seems like a weather sell off. when you're talking about airlines. In other words, is that really a reason to sell airlines? I'm not saying that the dynamics around geopolitics aren't things we're talking about more broadly for risk and markets.

41:05Identifying the uncertainty in the Middle East and what that means to their audience is, to me, not the reason you're selling Facebook. All right, let's get to Target here. Topping the tape today, closing up more than a percent and a half higher after Guggenheim reiterated its buy rating and$160 price target on the stock. That's about 45 % higher than today's close. The analysts writing that if Target can regain its pre-pandemic margins, full year earnings per share could top$10. They're making the point that you can pay less for something bigger next year because next year's win targets should really improve in terms of the business.

41:37Do you see that in the charts, Carter? Does that make sense to you? I mean, this stock was almost$300. It's$110. So it went up a little bit. This is just not something I would touch with anything. Nobody's money, your money, anybody's money, not my money. Your enemy's money? Your enemy's money. Don't even go after your enemy with this one. A lot of ifs. If, if, if. That's true. That's fine. I can do that math. If they get those margins north of$10, the valuation of 16 times makes sense,$160 stock. Problem is, margins have not been particularly good. They have an inventory problem, and nobody's going there anymore.

42:12I mean, those are three things that they have said over the last couple earnings calls. But this is where, to me, I think relative valuations mean something. So relative to Walmart. And again, the underperformance. You want to pick a time spot. Let's just do year to date. It's underperformed Walmart by 40%. You look at the relationship between these two companies over the years. This is a three standard deviation move of Target underperforming Walmart. So in a world where I love Walmart, but the underperformance here of Target to Walmart, when in fact they still have a very similar consumer, even though Walmart we know is lower end than that.

42:43I think that's an interesting trade being long Target over Walmart. I agree with that. And this company is not going to be Kohl's. It's just not going to be Kohl's. OK, so like when you have a company that is revered by their customers, but also for as long as they had been by investors, they're going to figure this out. They're going to have to figure it out, in my opinion. And so, you know, like to me, I just actually think at$100, like going back to those 2020 lows, I think from a – I'm not you. I'm not the chartist. I'm the chart master. I'm just saying, like, I start to think there's technical support, and I think there's valuation support too.

43:13Sure. I mean, look, you can always just say today is the day, and if you're going to do that, go small. But I would rather forego the next 10%, 20%, meaning we're said differently, you go first, I'll be right behind you. Fair enough. Up next, final trades.

43:32Time for the final trade. Let's go around the horn. Tim. Utilities. Again, whether that was the climax low, I don't know. But NEP, NX, they've given you some reassessment of their business and their cash flow. DBW. O 'Reilly, which reported is up 5 % after hours. I would fade the move. Dan? Yeah, semis. I think Intel probably disappoints. AMD probably disappoints. It'd be a seller on rallies of the SMEs. You folks with the eagle ears would hurt Frank Sinatra's luck be a lady. That's true. Because Stephanie had a plane, which is fantastic. IBM. Melissa Lee, I like it. All right. By the way, Meadows down 1 % after hours.

44:05Stay tuned. Mad Money with Jim Cramer starts right now.

44:11All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBCUniversal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.

44:45To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.

From the publisher

Investors eyeing shares of Meta after its latest earnings report. The stock in action on a day the Nasdaq dropped more than 2%, and Alphabet saw its worst day in over three years. What the results mean for the state of mega cap tech. Plus luxury retailers feeling some pain, and it’s even taking a hit on payment stocks. What these moves say about the consumer and their ability to support the economy.

 

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 871 episodes
Meta on the Move After a Day That Hit Tech Stocks Hard, and Cracks in the Luxury Consumer 10/25/23CNBC's "Fast Money" · 45 min
Listen in VO