In short
Podcast Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money" - Episode: Netflix Reports Earnings… And Crypto’s Next Move As Bills Pass Through Congress 7/17/25
Episode Overview In this episode of "Fast Money," hosted by Melissa Lee, a panel of top traders discusses the latest market developments, focusing on Netflix's earnings report, crypto regulations progressing in Congress, and market movements related to GE Aerospace and Elevance Health.
Key Topics Discussed
- Netflix Earnings Report
- Crypto Regulation Bills
- GE Aerospace Performance
- Elevance Health Guidance Cuts
Netflix Earnings Report
- Performance Highlights: Netflix beat both top and bottom line estimates and raised its guidance for the year.
- Ad Sales: The CFO noted strong momentum in ad sales, predicting a year-over-year revenue doubling from ads.
- Content Costs: Despite rising content expenses, margins are expected to improve.
- User Growth: While subscriber numbers are no longer disclosed, management indicated favorable growth trends.
- Market Reaction: Despite a strong earnings report, Netflix shares fell by approximately 1% in after-hours trading.
- High Expectations: Analysts discussed how high pre-earnings expectations could have set the bar too high for the stock.
- Analyst Insights:
- Rich Greenfield (LightShed Partners): Emphasized the importance of upcoming content scheduled for the second half of the year and potential subscriber growth.
- Valuation Concerns: Analysts noted that Netflix's current valuation remains a concern, especially given its high stock price relative to earnings.
Crypto Regulation Bills
- Legislative Progress: Three crucial crypto regulation bills passed house votes.
- Genius Act: Regulates stablecoins and is set to be signed into law.
- Clarity Act: Defines the market structure for cryptocurrencies and is proceeding to the Senate.
- Anti-Central Bank Digital Currency Bill: Addresses regulatory stances on digital currencies.
- Industry Response:
- Kristen Smith (Solana Policy Institute): Stressed the importance of these bills for creating a structured regulatory framework and fostering growth in the crypto market.
GE Aerospace Performance
- Earnings Report: GE Aerospace shares surged initially after a strong earnings report showing significant growth in commercial engine orders and revenue.
- Future Outlook: Investors remain cautious, with shares retreating by over 2% after an initial rise.
Elevance Health Guidance Cuts
- Market Impact: Elevance Health shares dropped by 12% following disappointing earnings and lowered guidance due to higher costs associated with Medicaid.
- Trader Sentiment: Karen Feynman expressed disillusionment, deciding to sell her shares citing poor performance and ongoing concerns.
Fed and Treasury Discussion
- Potential Changes in Leadership: Discussion on the implications of potential new appointments to the Federal Reserve and their impact on market stability and treasury yields.
- Kevin Warsh's Views: Mentioned the necessity for better coordination between the Fed and Treasury to maintain market clarity.
Market Summary
- Current Market Trends: The episode reflects a cautious tone in the markets, noting historical trends and the current state of major stocks like Netflix and Elevance Health.
- Technological and Economic Factors: The conversation also touched on the influence of technological advancements like AI and its potential effects on traditional business models.
Key Takeaways
- Netflix is poised for potential growth due to upcoming content but may face challenges with valuation and market expectations.
- Crypto regulations are moving forward, potentially paving the way for significant industry growth and stability.
- GE Aerospace shows promise but investors remain vigilant about its long-term performance.
- Elevance Health's struggles highlight ongoing challenges within the healthcare sector, particularly regarding Medicaid costs.
Closing Thoughts This episode of "Fast Money" provides valuable insights into current market dynamics, particularly concerning earnings reports from major companies and regulatory developments in the crypto space. Investors are encouraged to stay informed and consider the implications of these factors in their investment strategies.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Live from the Nasdaq market, in the heart of New York City's Times Square. This is Fast Money. Here's what's on tap tonight. Netflix gets chilled. The streamer beating top and bottom line estimates, giving better than expected guidance. But shares down just about a percent after hours. Why investors were not impressed and where the stock goes from here. And not one, not two, but three closely watch crypto bills passing their house votes this afternoon. What it means for regulation in the industry and for Bitcoin's record run. Plus, GE Aerospace pulls back after hitting a 25 year high. Elevance gets unelevated on the guidance cut.
0:35and why one of our traders thinks the Fed shakeup could mean a rally in treasuries. I'm Melissa Lee. Come to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Karen Feynman, Dan Nathan, Guy Adami, and Carter Braxton Wirth. We start off with Netflix's earnings beat. The streaming giant also posting better-than-expected user numbers and raising its full-year guidance. Despite that, the stock is trading off by just about 9 tenths of a percent. The earnings call underway. CNBC's Julia Borson's got the very latest. Julia. Hey, Melissa. Netflix kicking off the call that CFO is saying that they are seeing momentum in ad sales on pace to double ad revenue year over year.
1:09Also saying that content expenses will increase in the third and fourth quarter of this year and that the back half will have one of the biggest slates of movies they've ever had. Co-CEO Ted Sarandos just ran through a very long list of shows. But despite those higher production and marketing costs, they say they will still be growing margins this year. Co-CEO Greg Peters said when asked about the health of the consumer that they believe demand will remain strong. And while the company no longer discloses subscriber numbers, they did say that their member growth was ahead of forecast. And Peters disclosed that total viewing hours did grow in the first half of the year, despite the fact that their new releases are weighted to be released in the second half of the year.
1:52And just worth noting here, the company did raise its revenue for accounts, which a number of analysts were hoping for, saying that the majority of the increase reflects the recent depreciation of the U.S. dollar with a balance attributable to continued business momentum driven by solid member growth and ad sales. And, of course, Melissa, we're listening for any more specific details about the ad revenue beyond just the doubling year over year. Specifically, I'd like to know how many members are choosing the ad supported plan. But I'm going to jump back on the call, which is happening right now.
2:20All right, Julia, thank you, Julia. of Boorstin. It is interesting what they note about the boost in revenue, mostly due to the weakness in the U.S. dollar. So you look through currency swings, maybe that revenue would not have changed in terms of guidance. Right. And so the bigger revenue beat was in the United States, right? But, you know, the expectations were so high, so high. So this is, they delivered, right? If you had just told them last quarter, this is what they're going to put in the next scored and this was the number, that would be very good. So I think it's just the burden of expectations being really, really high.
2:54We know it's a very high multiple. Clearly, they are the best in class there. So I'm pleased with this. I always want to wait to hear the conference call. There's so much nuance there potentially. You know, we want to hear about live sports. We want to hear, will the content sound like Julia was getting to that and ads, of course. But so far, I'm pleased. Given the run-up that it's had, I think this was very good and certainly good enough. They also say that they're noting nothing significant in terms of metrics, like if there was any kind of swing because of consumer sentiment. They're watching that very closely.
3:27They did see an uptick at the end of the second quarter, which is good news. But the stock is off an all time high just at the end of June. So to Karen's point in terms of here it is, they delivered and the stock's just off a percent. That's not bad. Shouldn't be surprising. Yeah, I don't think it's bad at all. I actually think it's pretty good. And, you know, high bar, I think they sort of got over a high bar. Margin improvement is staggering, in my opinion. I think it's up 600 basis points year over year. And the operating revenue, revenue growth is, I think, up 16 % year over year. And this is coming off some probably, you know, difficult comps in the first place.
3:58So valuation is obviously a concern. It's always been a concern. I mean, there's no other company out there. So I don't think you run too far from Netflix here. Again, the conference call, we'll see what happens. But I think this was a fine quarter. Yeah, you know, a lot of folks were saying into this year, okay, so they're not going to give us those subscriber numbers. That's something that obviously has caused a lot of volatility in the stock over the last, I mean, as long as we've been talking about it, you know, in the streaming world and that they've been in over the last decade or so. You know, I think about the advertising and I know that's something that we talked about with Amazon over the last call it five years or so.
4:29We talk about this is just kind of pure margin. If you think about it, it's something that is not particularly intrusive. And that's been good for them. It's only 7 percent, though, of their total revenue. So if you think about where the direction that could go, that could be very additive to those margins. And especially when you're trying to offset maybe some of those increased content costs, we don't know what they're going to do with live sports. But that's also going to add another layer of that advertising. And I'll just say, you know, the last thing, we're going to see lots of digital models that are going to be contending with generative AI or these chatbots.
4:59And it's really going to come at a lot of these kind of search advertising sort of models. And that's one of the real issues, I guess, with Google. It's not one that has been evident so far, and Google has been telling us that it's not evident. That's one of the reasons why I think a lot of folks are anticipating, you know, something on that front when they report in a week and a half or so. But this is something that should benefit Netflix. It should not be that controversial for them. So for AI, I mean, a few things. We're going to talk about how they know what you like this, so you might like that and how amazingly good they are.
5:28And then knowing what you like and then creating content that fits that. And so that is something that they're way ahead. But also, I think that the cost of content creation, right, we're early into that, given how much content they create. I think that's potential for additional margin. And then on the flip side, the live program is expensive. I mean, you know, there's a land grab now for sports. But putting it all together, I mean, what an extraordinary job they've done. Yeah. Carter, what do you see in the charts here for Netflix? You mentioned the all-time high was just June 30, so not too long ago.
6:04Right. So as Karen implied, I mean, obviously a lot was baked in and it's a non-event. If you look at the last 40 quarters, going back 10 years, the average move is about 9.5 percent. And here we are moving 1 percent. So having bounced some 55 percent off its April low versus the Qs up 39.40, a lot was priced in. and it turns out to be a non-event, which is to say Netflix belongs right around here. All right. Right around here. So fully priced, Karen. How does that make you feel in terms of valuation, which has always been a concern for a long time for you on this one? Right. It makes me feel a little bit good.
6:44I did put on some collars today. I got a little lucky covering my calls at an okay price and putting on some collars. But, I mean, it's expensive and it's worth it. Right. I think that's right. No, go ahead. No, I was going to point out international programming, which is interesting in terms of content, which is typically cheaper to acquire, right, as opposed to and to make, right, in other countries, that its content is resonating with all users. One-third of all Netflix viewing in the first half of the year was international programming. So even users here are finding what they like from international.
7:17Which, I mean, think about this story five years ago. I mean, we were not having that conversation. So they're iterating. That's a word that Dan uses, and they're doing it really well. And they're doing it more efficiently as well in terms of the more. It's just a great run company. I mean, if there is a knock, it's what Karen just said. It's a valuation that's really hard to get your arms around. But, you know, that's been true for quite some time. And there have been downtrodden in Netflix. There have been some missteps without question. But outside of two or three things over the last six or seven years, they've done everything exactly right.
7:46I mean, do you guys remember 2022? I mean, the stock sold up 70 % from its 21 highs. And I just think that's something we could broaden out a little bit to the rest of the NASDAQ here. I think people have very short memories. If you don't remember that Tesla, Nvidia, Netflix and Meta, they all sold off 70 percent. I'm not saying there's anything out there right now. Clearly, in the macro, everything's kind of gotten a bit complacent here. And there's nothing that would lead you to believe that anything in this business model is going to cause some sort of. Back then, they had a lot of. I mean, there was a lot of volatility around.
8:14There was concern. Subscriber growth had peaked. Right. They had a lot of debt. I mean, yes. And that story is gone now. That subscriber growth since has been enormous in the balance sheet. Yeah, but I think investors might start looking at names like Spotify. They might look at growth rates and they might say to themselves, OK, this is a different bucket of media and there's different costs associated with it. And here's something where, you know, there's ads on podcast. You have a podcast, you know, like, you know how that works. Everybody here has a podcast except me. Well, you've been on all of our podcasts.
8:44You were one of our first guests. You were my very first. Yeah, well, there you go. Maybe we'll ask you back at some point if you're nice to us. People go on together. Well, that would be amazing. We were thinking about doing that. It would be like a Fast Money podcast, which exists already. Yeah, Tim. Anyway. I do have one. Anywho, why do you mention this 70 % solve in 2022 in the context of our Netflix conversation if you're saying that it may not happen here? Like, what was the part of that? All right, so you want to hear? Yes, please. Well, be nice or you're not going to come back on the podcast.
9:08I just want to be really clear about this. Well, I think that in 2021, I think things felt really good for this company. Things felt really good for a lot of companies, right? And so none of it was kind of anticipating the potential for a recession or a bear market or anything like that. And so, you know, I just think that this is a time where you want to start thinking about what could go wrong, not what could go right. Right. And so Spotify is one that's interesting to me. They've diversified, I think, away from that core business model that they had. They're going to benefit from advertising.
9:37They're going to benefit from generative AI. You're going to start seeing companies like this reduce their headcount. And that's something that it used to be back in 2022. too. Like, oh, that business is so crap, they've got to cut people. Hasn't Netflix done the same? Diversified? Advertising channel? Yeah. But what I'm saying is Spotify's growing 2x that of Netflix. Are you self would you rather? Yeah, a little bit. Nice job. I just want to cut to the chase here. Sorry about that. Spot over Netflix. I was going to say, quickly, I mean, if there's an existential risk, it comes in the form of some downturn, a significant downturn here in the United States because the only, and they've talked about this.
10:12The competition that Netflix has is sleep, which is, you know, that's it. Yeah. I mean, think about that for a second. I do get less sleep because of Netflix. Yes, although YouTube would say the competition is, in fact, YouTube, which is more, right, is in front of Netflix. I do think you're right that a very significant economic downturn is bad for Netflix, but it is better for Netflix relative to a lot of the other players. Yes, It is much more of a utility. That's the last thing you want to cut. It took us 10 minutes to actually mention YouTube in this conversation, and that's really important.
10:48So all of these kind of bear cases about search revenue as it relates to Google, everybody comes back to YouTube. It's absolutely destroying it. It's become a real competitor over the last five years to Netflix. And so I think that's something really important because that's something they're going to continue to hear them lean on because some of the pressure on their ad models as it relates to search will not be the same thing as it relates to YouTube. Right. Much more Netflix later on in the show. In the meantime, Nasdaq and S &P both hitting records today, even as tensions over the Fed continuing to rise.
11:15Former Governor Kevin Warsh, seen as one of the president's top picks to replace Jerome Powell, calling for sweeping changes to the central bank's relationship with the U.S. Treasury. Here's what he told Squawk Box this morning. So if we have a new accord, then the Fed chair and the Treasury secretary can describe to markets plainly and with deliberation, this is our objective for the size of the Fed's balance sheet. The Treasury can say this is our issuing calendar. And by the end of, let's say, this administration, we'll be at an equilibrium rate on the balance sheet so that markets will know what is coming.
11:50None of this should be rushed. OK, so what would a Fed chair mean for the markets? Conventional wisdom right now is that there would be a lot of hand-wringing over the independence of the Fed, the fact that that is threatened because President Trump has effectively forced out Jay Powell, putting in his own pick to lower rates and that that would cause a sell-off in treasuries, Karen. And so I'm just wondering, like, how you start to think about this. We played this clip specifically because he mentions this accord that happened in 1951, a Fed-treasury accord where they coordinated their actions in order to manage the treasury market or their treasury holdings.
12:29Well, yesterday you weren't on. Yes. We missed you a lot. You know, we like the babysitters, but yeah. But so Andy Kahnstein was on and had what I thought was a very unusual, interesting take, which is that a lot of things everyone else, you know, you would have inflation and you would have the dollar going down and markets could go up or Bitcoin up. But that the long end of the yield curve would actually be OK because they would decrease substantially the amount of long end curve supply. And so, therefore, it'd be more treasuries, right, more bills, and that that would keep rates lower and actually keep the able to pay off the deficit quicker.
13:08I don't know how long that can stay in homeostasis. Maybe a long time. I'm not sure. But that was interesting to me that, I mean, that is exactly what you're talking about, right? Yeah. That working hand in hand. Right. If they were able to do that. For a different purpose, though, right? The Fed's mandate now is a dual mandate of price stability and employment. Right. This would be somewhat of a different mandate, which is a part of what he's saying, right? The Fed has to evolve as an entity. So cut rates, lower on the short end, and then manage the long end. Oh, it's perfect. Well, I mean, Japan tried to do similar stuff.
13:44And, you know, this is one of those things that works until it doesn't. And I'm not trying to be cute. I mean, that's just factually true. I mean, Janet Yellen, if you think about it, during her tenure at Treasury was funding with bills. I mean, you know, you can play that game as long as the market lets you. But if the back end starts to get away from you at some point, you've got to pay the piper. So I do think, by the way, I think Kevin is right. The Treasury and the Fed probably should be more aligned with one another. I just don't know if that's sustainable to try to do at the short end in perpetuity.
14:13Yeah, and I think more aligned works in different administrations, which is tough, right? We see what's going on with Powell right now. You know, the president said, well, you know, Biden, who appointed him, you know, I wouldn't have kept him around. Well, actually, we know he appointed him. Right. And so, you know, views about different economies, different situations, different debt loads, different deficit spending, different competitive or comparative rates and growth rates and all that sort of stuff. That's going to change year to year. And you want somebody. I mean, Powell's done a really nice job.
14:36If you think about what he came into in 2018 and where he is right now and what happened in the middle with COVID. And we're doing OK here, man, like the economy is still doing OK. The stock market's at all time highs. Yeah, you can say deficits and debts and all that sort of stuff. But everybody we have come on here, other than Ray Dalio, you know what I mean, is telling us that's OK. Just keep kicking the can down the road. So I listen to Warsh and I say to myself, here's a steady hand. I think this is a guy between his experience on the Fed, his experience in the White House and the aughts and that sort of thing.
15:05I think he'd be a good choice. Kevin Hassett, on the other hand, he seems very political and he seems like the exact wrong person you would want, especially if you want an independent Fed. Now, that doesn't mean you can't have some coordination, but it can't be outright political pressure. That would be the thing that I think would keep, I think, a lot of market participants, at least macro ones, on the edge of their chairs worried about what happens in the next crisis that we have. Right. Well, you know, it is worth noting that the 10-year Treasury yield has been very tame and within a very steady range, even with all of this sort of concern about Fed independence and President Trump ousting Jay Powell, etc.
15:41And the dollar has been strengthening, which is worth noting as well. In fact, the dollar index moved higher today, hitting its best level since mid-June. This is on track to be the best month for the U.S. dollar in 2025. Carter, just on Monday, you had a note out saying the greenback is going to break out. Where are we on that forecast now? It's really panning out. A little bit of good timing. We might have some charts here. and we can try to figure it out together. But yes, a bit of a bounce this week. And my hunch is there's more to go in terms of what you said, one of the biggest moves of the year, but it's had such a massive sell-off.
16:23So several charts. Here's the first with no lines or drawings, no judgments. Let's look at the next same timeframe. And what we know is this is going back some 10, 15 years. We're down to a well-defined multi-year uptrend line. How precise? Next chart depicts it. We've come down to the penny and we bounced. So that is the first circumstance. But if we look at it, the here and now, next chart will show you how the levels matter. We've gone from 110 to 96, that level where we bounced, 96. If we can remember those two numbers and then look at the more here and now chart, and you'll see that this is what's happened, that 110 to 96, we've moved above that downtrend line.
17:12So that's a very important development. It would be considered developmental price action. Now the question is how high? I have no idea. But I do think that one can, from time to time, play for an oversold bounce. We are getting that bounce. And I think for now, continue with the trade. It's likely to go higher. Yeah. I mean, Carter, again, prescient is the word I will use. He will say luck. There is no luck in his work. And he's right. I mean, you're getting a bounce here and maybe justifiably so. Maybe there's some relief rally going on. I will tell you that we have seen bounces in the dollar over the last six months.
17:45They've all been rather short lived. And if you want to cue as if it's sustainable, I think it'll come in the form of the gold market if gold starts to give it up, which it has not. Gold's hanging in there. So I think the gold market is telling you this is just an oversold bounce in the dollar. All right. Coming up, we've got much more on Netflix ahead, but also an earnings jump for GE Aerospace. The stock hitting its highest level in 25 years before retreating as investors poured over the numbers of details from the quarter next. And a rough prognosis for Elevance Health. Shares hitting more than four-year lows after its earnings report.
18:15Why one of our traders is closing the books on this one. Ahead, do not go anywhere. Fast Money is back in two.
18:28Welcome back to Fast Money. A rollercoaster day for GE Aerospace. Shares hitting a 25-year high in early trade after beating earnings estimates and boosting full-year guidance before the bell. But ending the day down more than 2 percent. Phil Abbeau spoke with CEO Larry Culp this morning and has all the numbers. Hey, Phil. Hey, Melissa. When you look at the second quarter for GE Aerospace, you couldn't ask for anything more if you were an investor. We're not going to go through all the numbers, but we're going to let you know that, yeah, they beat the street on the top of the bottom line by a wide margin.
18:57On the top line, or on the bottom line, I should say, beat by 23 cents. But this says it all right here. Commercial engines. Orders up 28 % year over year. Revenue up 30%. Look at deliveries. Up 45%. Look, 45 % is amazing anytime you have that. But remember, this was not like they had a bad quarter last year. It was a strong second quarter. This speaks to the success that they're having in terms of driving greater efficiency, driving greater production. In terms of free cash flow, they did raise their guidance both for this year and then they put a target out there for 28. For this year, they're going up to$6.5 to$6.9 billion from$6.3 to$6.8.
19:37And the target for 2028 is$8.5 billion in free cash flow. Here's Larry Kulp talking with us on Squawk Box about why they believe they can get to$8.5 billion. With respect to 28, we think we're going to be able to grow at a double-digit rate now. We're targeting$11.5 billion of operating profit. That should allow us to drive earnings at a mid-teens level. And that should drive$8.5 billion of free cash flow. I love this chart, and hopefully we have this here. This is GE Aerospace against the S &P 500 over the last three years. No comparison at all between the last three years for the S &P versus GE Aerospace.
20:24One other note, Melissa, they did raise their guidance for all of 25 in terms of earnings per share, 560 to 580 from 510 to 545. Bottom line, it was essentially a blowout quarter. Doubled free cash flow, doubled it in the quarter compared to last year. Strong performance by GE Aerospace. Amazing numbers here, Phil. I'm wondering, is this all in spite of the tariff situation, partly because of the tariff situation and pull forward of orders? Not pull forward of orders. I think this is more driving greater efficiency, greater production. That's been a big part of what GE Aerospace and Larry Culp have been working on over the last three years, putting some of their leadership out with some of their key suppliers, critical suppliers, to drive greater efficiency, part of what they call their flight deck plan.
21:17So I think that's part of where the numbers, the metrics for the second quarter come. In terms of tariffs, we talked about that this morning. They are optimistic, like many in the aerospace industry, that the 1979 agreement, the international agreement where you do not have tariffs across borders because of the nature of the industry, that that will ultimately hold with the Trump administration. Now, I should point out, Melissa, nobody is going to say, yeah, that's exactly what the Trump administration is going to do, because nobody's quite sure within the aerospace industry. But that is their hope at this point.
21:50All right, Phil, thank you. Phil LeBeau. Carter, it's some chart there that Phil showed. Where does it go from here? Yeah, it is some chart. And those are incredible. Here's an equally incredible. The stock peaked in August of 2000. And we're not back to that peak. So that comparative chart that is very incredible on a three-year basis is actually the following. GE is down on a 25-year basis versus the S &P, which is up multiples. And so the question is, what's the story? Is this going to falter at its all-time high? So again, going back to 2000, the S &P is up about three and a half, 4x, and GE is down.
Read the full transcript
22:33Said differently, adjusted for inflation, since its peak, General Electric has lost half its value. despite this huge run. It just shows how when you get into a bind, it takes a long time to get out of it. Carter, it's Karen. That's kind of extraordinary. Does that include all the spins? You put the whole thing together. How do you think about it when you look at... Current shares, not the spinoff or the other shares. That's the current GE shares adjusted for all the things that have happened. But, of course, there's GE Vranova. There's healthcare. Yeah, all the pieces here. Well, I mean, if Tim was here, he's been talking about it for a while.
23:14Carter's right in historic terms, but just look at what it's done over the last few years. Larry Culp is a genius. I mean, if you want to go back and look at management from Danaher, I mean, it's pretty remarkable what those folks have done. And here's some numbers for you. 75 % of global commercial jets have GE parts. 70 % of their revenue is services business, which enables them to get the multiple they're getting. And I think two-thirds of all defense companies have GE parts and stuff. So it's a remarkable story, I think. I think it's expensive. I think it's up against resistance, but you don't want to run too far away.
23:46I hope there's a good read-through for the B in Tim's Boeing that his mother talked about. Band. Yes, band. And the B in your carved. Yes, exactly. It's not the B in your tube? Isn't it? No, my tube has other things in it. Yeah. You can't put everything in the tube. No, of course not. There's a lot more Fast Money to come. Here's what's coming up next. An out-of-pocket plunge. The news sending shares of Elevent's Health sharply lower and how one trader is playing the move. Plus, crypto moving through Congress. Three policy bills making the rounds in D.C. tonight. What it means for Bitcoin's record run and the next move for stablecoins.
24:25You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market side in Times Square. We're back right after this.
24:39Welcome back to Fast Money. A buzzkill on Elevance, a health insurer, the worst performer in the S &P 500 today, dropping 12 percent to its lowest level since February 2021. The company posting disappointing earnings before the bell and slashing guidance for the year, citing higher costs of Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. Molina and Suntin falling in sympathy, both names heavily weighted to Medicaid. and it's like the story happens again and again and again, and the stocks take dive after dive after dive, Karen. Yes, I saw this this morning. I'm like, you know what? I am done. So I sold this.
25:11I did a very, very poor job here in protecting a gain, a long-term gain, not wanting to realize gains, which is super stupid. And interesting to me, it came down again on the same news over and over. Sometimes you feel like you reach a bottom when things stop going down on basically the same news. But this didn't. And also just for my own sanity, I don't want to look at this anymore. You know, there's nothing that says I can't get back in. I know that I won't just because, you know, it's a scar that I don't really want to address again. But I really did a poor job here. And I don't know. It's really cheap.
25:46Maybe. I mean, you know, also, I do think my selling it today does give a lot of hope that this is the bottom. Exactly. So but that's where I am with it. I really did a bad job. Yeah, I mean, they cut the guidance to$30 from about$34.50 or so. So, I mean, obviously, people are saying, you know what, the valuation is what it is. But if they continue to cut, you can't just look at that. But there's going to be a point to get back in this. And I think it's around$250. If the crack staff and EC can put up a chart, you will see that this is where we sort of took off from back in 2020. So there's going to be a level for this stock where this bad news is completely discounted.
26:21You get another round of bad news that the stock actually rallies on the back of. And I think it's going to come in a form of that level down there. Carter, what do you think? $250? Oh, it's just a mess across the board from UNH to CNC. Now, at some point, the word cheap comes to mind, but that's a very hard word to define, just as the word expensive is. And so if one is going to speculate in a stock that's in a pretty aggressive downtrend, go small. All right. Coming up, the next move for crypto, a trio of regulation bills coming to a vote in Washington. What will they mean for Bitcoin's record run?
26:54And will other tokens follow suit? Fast Money's back in two.
27:07We've got a news alert. Fed Chair Powell responding to the OMB director about the renovation of the Fed. Megan Cassell has got the details here. Megan. Melissa, that's right. Remember, Resteva wrote to Chair Powell just exactly a week ago on July 10th, asking for his responses to a series of questions about the renovation. The questions were things like whether this project was proceeding in accordance to plan, whether they had changed the original plan. Powell, in this letter, it's about a three-page letter, responding with bullet points to each of these questions. He says, he emphasizes, I should say, this was a plan that was first approved by the board in 2017, has been approved every year since as part of the budget.
27:44He says both buildings were in need of significant structural repairs, including the removal of asbestos and lead contamination. That's something the Fed says has led part of what has led to a higher cost than they had originally planned. And he also talks about how they've been working closely with the National Capital Planning Commission. He says he voluntarily collaborated with the NCPC, even though the Fed doesn't necessarily have to do that. And crucially, he says the project is proceeding in accordance with that plan. The small number of design changes that have been made, Powell says, were to scale back or eliminate certain elements.
28:18They've added no new elements. And he said the only changes were intended to simplify construction and reduce the likelihood of further delays and cost increases. That's likely to be key here, as OMB has said, that why aren't they working with the NCPC or have they changed that plan, that they might need to resubmit a new plan if there have been substantial changes. Melissa, the rest of this just goes through. He's sort of downplaying all of the features on the building as Republicans have seized on them. He says green roofs are common on government buildings, including DOJ. The interior says there's no VIP dining rooms, no VIP elevators.
28:52Now we will wait to see how OMB responds to this letter. Melissa? I mean, on the Fed website, they already addressed a lot of the questions laid out by Mr. Vote. I mean, specifically, as you said, no VIP dining. It wasn't just in this letter. It was also on the Fed website for the past week or so. And it still hasn't quieted anybody in terms of criticism. That's exactly right. He actually references in the letter that they have put all this on the website. The Fed is clearly taking every step here to be as transparent as they can, putting things online, asking for an independent review of all of this, now putting this letter out publicly and sending it even before the deadline that OMB set for them to send it.
29:29So they're really trying to get ahead of this. You're right that it hasn't quieted anything just yet, but it shows how they're participating in this. And then we'll see if they're, what OMB does as the next step, really. I'll also flag that the National Capital Planning Commission that is involved in this now, the president has just appointed his own former personal lawyer and now staff secretary to lead that commission. So maybe we see more enrollment involvement, I should say, with the NCPC, but it's also working hand in hand with the Trump administration as well. All right, Megan, thank you.
29:59Megan Casella, it's like a soap opera as the world turns. This is the latest development in this whole effort to investigate Powell and create a reason to get rid of him. That's exactly what you're looking for. Cause I mean, if you listen to some people, it sounds like he's rebuilding Versailles. And if you listen to them, these were much needed renovations. Obviously the truth is always somewhere in the middle, but you know, we talked about it last night. It took less than a billion dollars to basically renovate Notre Dame. I mean, they're not spending, I'm hard pressed to believe two and a half billion dollars is a number.
30:30I don't even know if that's the point. However, this is just my view. If it ain't broke, don't fix it. The market's at all-time highs. The job market is okay. You know, browbeating the Fed in submission here, I don't think it's the best course of action. It's kind of amazing how inured we've gotten to the idea of the Fed chair being removed by the president. Right, that everything is tame. Dollar's okay. The VIX was good. Down, you know, 16 and a half last. Doesn't really matter. Maybe it's the belief it's not really going to happen. Right. All right, meantime, the House passing three separate crypto bills this afternoon.
31:03The Genius Act, which will regulate stable coins, moves to President Trump's desk, the Clarity Act, which defines market structure for the assets, and the anti-central bank digital currency bill now head to the Senate for a final vote. The news comes even after the bills faced a series of hurdles this week. Cryptocurrencies have been rallying this month ahead of the votes. Ether are more than 35 percent in July. For more on the next steps for the industry, Kristen Smith joins us now. She's the president of the Solana Policy Institute. Kristen, great to have you with us. I believe, according to the notes, that you think the Genius Act is going to be the most important for the crypto industry.
31:37Why is that? Yeah, well, I think that the first two bills you mentioned, the Genius Act and the Clarity Act, are both incredibly important for the crypto industry. What's really exciting about the Genius Act is that bill now goes to the president's desk. So this is the first time that we have a new regulatory framework for part of the crypto industry getting signed into law. The president is hosting a signing ceremony at the White House tomorrow. And so by the end of the week, the Genius Act will be the law of the land. The Clarity Act is also incredibly important. That now moves on to the Senate.
32:10But I think what's really remarkable, and I was actually up in the Capitol, up in the gallery, watching the votes earlier today, is both of these votes got a tremendous amount of bipartisan support. The Clarity Act had 294 positive votes, and there were 308 for the Genius Act. So this is about as bipartisan as an issue gets. And I think it shows that Americans love crypto, and they're excited that Washington is responding and putting the framework in place. We were just showing a graphic with your predictions in terms of how much this industry, which is currently 250 billion stable coins, that is, 250 billion will grow to 2 trillion in the next few years, Kristen.
32:51And does that incorporate, does that assume the Genius Act becomes, did that assume, I should say, the Genius Act becomes law? Or is there an additional expansion because of the passage of this? Well, we've seen tremendous growth in stable coins over the past four or five years, despite having a fairly hostile regulatory environment. A lot of that has been overseas. So I think that these predictions, and these aren't my predictions. This I got from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is the one who made this prediction of the$2 trillion market by 2028. You know, this is, the framework is in place, and this allows traditional finance, traditional payments companies to look at stablecoin solutions as they're upgrading their financial infrastructure.
33:36So I think it's a tremendous opportunity. We've seen some of the big banks are interested in this. The payments companies are interested in this. And so I think now that this rule is in place, this law is in place or will be as of tomorrow afternoon. I think that it's really off to the races for the markets, competitive companies to do their jobs. And I think it's a real opportunity and one that ultimately will benefit businesses and consumers alike. How much alike? And I'm just wondering because it seems like the first use case, as one would imagine, for stablecoin is for trade in some way. I mean, it's faster.
34:14It'll be immediately settled. There's no sort of overhang. And so that seems like the obvious use case in terms of consumers. Are we going to be creating all these different ecosystems where every retailer, every business has their own stablecoin and that's how you transact? That seems very inconvenient. Yeah, no, I think that's a big question. I mean, obviously having interoperability is very good. You know, there are a couple of major issuers of stable coins that are issued on multiple different chains, including Solana. And so I think, you know, how the marketplace plays out is sort of beyond my level of prediction.
34:48But what I know is that, you know, blockchains like Solana, for example, are very fast financial rails. And what we can do is when you put these assets on there, you can trade, as you mentioned, and you can send money around the world. You can settle trades instantly. There are a lot of benefits to it. And I think it'll be really interesting to see the way different companies incorporate this. But I think for the end user and consumer, they want something easy and convenient. And so I think those solutions that meet what the consumer wants are going to be those that are the most successful. Kristen, great to see you.
35:24Thank you. Thanks, Melissa. What do you think, Karen? I'm curious of the impact on banks, right? I mean, you could make a lot of cases for and against it being good for banks. But, I mean, I think it's going to be happening. I think it's going to be probably a pretty quick adoption. Yeah. Yeah. Carter, on the charts, everybody's wondering, how high does it go, Bitcoin? Yeah, I mean, you've just now, as all will know, broken out from a well-defined range typically after a big pause like that and then strength that gets you out of a range, you have room to run. Ethereum, of course, is in many ways the more interesting.
36:04There's more beta, if you will, and it is playing catch up to Bitcoin has been the real sort of story of the past six, seven, eight weeks. And I would say one is right to be long both, but with Ethereum being the better bet here for the more aggressive trader. All right. Coming up, we're keeping an eye on Netflix now trading near after-hours lows down about 2 percent. All the headlines from the streamer's earnings call and what a top media analyst thinks about the quarter. Fast Money's back in two.
36:39Welcome back to Fast Money. Another check on Netflix. The stock down 1.8 percent in extended trading even after the streaming giant reported earnings beat and hiked guidance. Rich Greenfield is partner and analyst at LightShed Partners. He's fresh from the earnings call, which wrapped up this hour. Rich, your initial take on this quarter and the guidance. Well, it's funny, Melissa. I've been coming on and talking to you sort of post-Netflix earnings for years now, and we used to talk about like 10 % to 15 % moves. The reality is a couple percent. If you look at sort of the performance of this stock year to date, this is a pretty muted reaction.
37:13I'd say overall, this is generally as expected. There was nothing terribly surprising in the quarter. And I think that maybe the one if you think about like what surprises me in terms of the reaction is just if you think about the amount of content they have coming, you know, they definitely focus people on the content slate this year is very much back half weighted. You could see they had a real spike in subscribers at the end of the quarter that they talked to led by Squid Games, which had their final season. But that's really the beginning of a much, much bigger content slate over the course of the next six months that culminates, actually, if you think about it, sort of at the very end of the year with the final season of Stranger Things.
37:55And so there's a lot of content coming that, you know, historically, engagement and great content has been the driver of what has driven both subscribers and the overall growth story at Netflix. And I think you'll start to see that play out. This was a relatively weaker first half in terms of content and in terms of just overall. So, again, I think muted reaction in the stock today. What really matters, though, is revenue growth and the revenue growth of 15 percent in the U.S. and faster constant currency in every other market that Netflix operates is what I think is really why this stock has performed this year and why it continues to perform.
38:32Yeah, I agree, Rich. So you can with all the numbers they do give you, they no longer give subscriber growth. But with all these numbers, you could probably back of the envelope the thing and figure it out. Have you done that exercise? And if so, is it sort of in line with what you would be thinking? I mean, look, they're continuing. When you're growing revenue in the U.S. alone at 15 percent and you're raising price, you're certainly getting, you know, continued solid subscriber growth. It's not like subscribers aren't growing. They're no longer breaking it out. And look, there's a lot of pieces.
39:01There's advertising that's doubling year over year. They now charge for an incremental member if you have a member that's outside of your household. So, like, there's a lot of moving pieces to sort of understand all the mechanics. But there is no doubt that subscribers are seeing nice growth year over year. And I think, look, they showed that I think overall time spent viewing in the first half of the year was up in, you know, 1%, 2%. You know, if you kind of back out subscriber growth, you know, they talked about the fact that engagement per member is down, you know, upper single digits. And so, you know, there's you're seeing very solid subscriber growth.
39:37They are not having trouble growing subscribers. I think now with more subscribers, the question and what I think is going to be the key driver of the stock over the next year with more subscribers continuing to come onto the platform. Can they give them more to do so they watch more? Because you watch more, you can charge them more. Like, that's how this whole model runs, especially now that you have advertising. You need more engagement. And that's what they're focused on. Right. Rich, great to get your take. Thank you. Thanks for having me. Rich Greenfield, Lightshed Partners. As Richard mentioned, very back half load in terms of the content slate, which could be a great thing for, right, keeping, retaining, growing, engagement, et cetera.
40:16Right. I mean, they're doing everything right. It's odd to have, you know, so much built in the hype. Victor, I guess if you had shorted a straddle, you would have a very good trade tonight because in the end, the street sort of got it right exactly. They did an outstanding job. High bar. They met it. Coming up, why more analysts are getting bitter on Starbucks and whether shares can turn things around from here. More Fast Money in two.
41:08All of that indicate that they're not going to do well when it comes to posting their sales comps for the quarter. Yeah, I actually agree with that. When you had the announcement of the new CEO, I think the stock was 73. It proceeded to trade north of 115 or so over the next couple of months, which made zero sense to me. And I still think this move lower has some legs. Valuation is still rich. I think they have problems that are more than one or two quarters to be able to fix. And listen, they might have the right person in the seat, but this is a long-term problem that's going to take a lot of time to sort of sort out.
41:39And, you know, I don't think there's I think they're still behind the curve, in my opinion. Carter, your take on S-Bucks? Yes, sloppy. I would note that there was no price change in the target. So while it was downgraded from old to sell, the$76 price target existed prior to the judgment today and now it still exists. So I'm quite sure how to interpret that. But as to the chart, it's messy. it's the definition of poor relative performance to the consumer discretionary sector, to the market overall. And so in general, something to stay away from. Dan, do you have a trade on Starbucks? Well, I think it is interesting.
42:14The guy stuff that he mentioned here is like the volatility over the last year has had to do with management, has to do with changing, you know, sort of strategy and the like. And that's going to take a while to figure it out. And I think the Jeffries analyst is probably doing that going to the sidelines. So to me, it's a no touch. Up next, final trades.
42:36Final trade time. Carter. American International Group, AIG for a bounce. Karen. Yes. So from my acronym, also from Tim's acronym, and his mother also recommended as well. Boeing, I particularly like it on GE. I still think we are early in the turnaround. Dan. Yeah, I like the B in your tube. Is it Baidu? Baidu. Baidu. Oh, I like Baidu here. I like Baidu. I'm so happy. I think I can speak for all of us. We're so happy you're back, Melissa. Freeport, Mac Moran. Thank you for watching Fast. See you on Squawk tomorrow. Mad Money starts now. All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC Universal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium.
43:25You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.
From the publisher
Netflix on the move as the streaming giant reports results. The headlines from its second-quarter conference call, and what a top media analyst sees in store for the stock. Plus GE pops after reporting, a rough prognosis for Elevance Health, and the crypto regulation bills creep through Congress. What it means for Bitcoin’s record run, and the path forward for stablecoins.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
