Nike Reports Results… And Economic Track Records Ahead Of Presidential Debate 6/27/24

27 Jun 2024 · 44 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Notes: CNBC's "Fast Money" Episode Summary

Episode Title

Nike Reports Results… And Economic Track Records Ahead Of Presidential Debate 6/27/24

Host

  • Melissa Lee with a panel including:
  • Karen Feinerman
  • Dan Nathan
  • Guy Adami
  • Rebecca Patterson (former Bridgewater chief strategist)

Key Themes

  • Nike's Earnings Report: Notable decline in stock after a revenue miss.
  • Presidential Debate Insights: Comparison of economic records under President Biden and former President Trump.

Segment 1

Nike's Earnings Report

Overview

  • Stock Reaction: Nike shares fell to 18-month lows after reporting a revenue miss and disappointing guidance.
  • Key Financial Metrics:
  • Revenue down 2% overall.
  • Profit was above expectations due to margin expansion.
  • CFO hinted at guidance cut for fiscal 2025.

Discussion Points

  • Growth Concerns:
  • Decline in lifestyle products (e.g., Air Force Ones, Air Jordans).
  • Performance business had double-digit growth but insufficient to offset lifestyle losses.
  • Significant drop in digital sales by 10%.
  • Traffic in China also declined, leading to lowered expectations.
  • Management's Strategy:
  • CEO John Donahoe's turnaround plan in progress, involving shifts to core areas and reducing direct-to-consumer sales.
  • Executives expressed confidence but faced skepticism from investors.

Analysts' Opinions

  • Guy Adami: Noted a poor quality of earnings beat and concerns about Nike's competitive position.
  • Karen Feinerman: Suggested caution around Nike's stock amidst competition and market conditions.
  • Rebecca Patterson: Highlighted the impact of external factors like sluggish overseas growth and dollar strength on Nike's performance.

Segment 2

Presidential Economic Comparisons

Overview

  • Presenter: CNBC's Steve Leisman provided insights into economic performance under Presidents Biden and Trump.
  • Key Comparisons:
  • GDP Growth: Biden (2.9%) vs. Trump (2.4%).
  • Unemployment Rates: Biden (4.1%) vs. Trump (5%).
  • Job Creation: Biden (15.6 million) vs. Trump (2.7 million).
  • Inflation: Biden (19% increase) vs. Trump (8%).
  • Stock Market Performance: S&P rose 44% under Biden compared to 68% under Trump.

Implications

  • The upcoming presidential debate will likely address these economic contrasts.
  • Concerns about inflation and unemployment could influence voter sentiment and the candidates' strategies.

Segment 3

Broader Market Trends

Economic Indicators

  • Rotations in Tech: Notable shifts within tech stocks, with a sell-off in AI-related shares while software companies saw gains.
  • Consumer Trends: General moderation in consumer spending, reflected in various earnings reports.

Specific Stock Movements

  • Hims and Hers: Experienced decline due to a negative short seller report concerning its GLP-1 drug offerings.
  • Walgreens: Reported its worst day ever after missing EPS estimates and announcing store closures.

Final Thoughts

  • Nike faces significant challenges as it navigates competition and operational adjustments. Analysts recommend cautious observation of its stock.
  • Economic conditions remain a high-stakes topic as the presidential debate approaches, with implications for market sentiment and investment strategies.

Conclusion

This episode of "Fast Money" offered critical insights into Nike's performance amid broader discussions on economic indicators and political implications as the U.S. gears up for a presidential debate. The discussions were characterized by expert analysis and a focus on actionable investment strategies.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is fast Here's what's on tap tonight. The Nike Swoon, shares hitting 18-month lows after its latest earnings report. We've got all the details on the footwear giant's quarter, and we'll bring you all the headlines from that conference call. Bloss out of AI and into what? As the red-hot semi-trade loses steam, where is the money flowing? The great rotation may already be underway, and the beneficiaries may surprise you. And later, Roaring Kitty barks. The market provocateur sending out a cryptic message this afternoon that sends shares of Chewy and other pet stocks on a volatile ride.

0:37What the options market is saying about the moves. I'm Melissa Leak, I'm D-Live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Karen Feinerman, Dan Nathan, Guy Adami, and former Bridgewater chief strategist Rebecca Patterson. But we start off with an earnings alert on Nike. Shares are lower after reporting revenue miss and disappointing guidance for the current fiscal year. The conference call is just getting underway. Sarah Eisen has got the details from that quarter. Hey, Sarah. Hi, Melissa. Good to see you. So the concern here with Nike is growth or lack thereof. Profits were a big beat, driven by margin expansion, but sales missed and were down 2 % overall.

1:10Also importantly, CFO Matt Friend alluded to a guidance cut for 2025 in the release. Here's a quote from his statement, in part saying, Our fourth quarter results highlighted challenges that have led us to update our fiscal 25 outlook. Expect those new details to come on the call, but it is unusual to hint at a guidance cut from Nike in the press release. So why? What are those challenges? Well, I did speak to some senior executives at the company, and here's what I can tell you. The lifestyle business declined. Think Air Force Ones or Air Jordans. And then the performance business, which is running and basketball, it did grow double digits, but it wasn't enough to offset the lifestyle declines.

1:48Another weak spot, the digital business. That was down 10 percent in the quarter. They really started to see weakness in April and May. And in part, it's because the lifestyle products are more represented on the website. So an outsized decline there. The business has tripled also in the last few years when it comes to digital. So it is seeing the decline. And that's where you see the DTC, direct-to-consumer, drop off. And then finally, traffic in China actually started to decline in April. And so the company lowered expectations there. Now, here's the big picture. CEO John Donahoe is about one year into a three-year turnaround.

2:23He's made executive changes. He's made cuts to the organization, shifted the focus to core areas like running, and also making some changes around the channels, for instance, shifting business back to the wholesale partners away from the direct-to-consumer and clearing out some old products to make room for some of the newer innovations. Now, some of this can be attributed to some of those changes, some of the weakness that is in the quarter, but some are surprising too, for instance, like the drop-off in digital sales. Nike executives tell me, Melissa, they do feel confident in the turnaround still and the innovation cycle.

2:56They're pointing, for instance, to optimistic wholesale orders that they're seeing. But clearly, they're going to have to convince investors. Sarah, it looks like the margin was disappointing compared to estimates. And I'm wondering if you think it's because of a mixed shift, because of the lifestyle weakness, or if there was discounting involved here. Well, clearly, it's a promotional environment. The executives see that in China. They see that in North America as well. So that's part of it. Also, discounting as it relates to some of the changes that they're making in order to make room on the shelves for new product.

3:29But I think overall, you know, they have more levers to pull on the profitability side of things when it comes to costs, for instance, it's a massive organization than they do on the revenue growth. And that's really what the concern is for investors here. It's getting the brand heat back to Nike and franchises that are so important like Air Force One and Air Jordans and Dunks. That is the core of the issue of the business. It's why you look at Adidas, for instance, its stock has outperformed thanks to Samba's becoming cool again. And that's really what investors want to see. Now, Nike says it started the innovation turnaround with performance and it saw double digit growth in places like basketball.

4:09And it will take time to work through and get to lifestyle. But that's something that the executives are going to have to try to convince investors on the call of what other sort of progress are they seeing and what kind of confidence level do they have in turning that around. All right, Sarah, thank you. Good to see you, Sarah Eisen, on Nike. What did you make of the quarter, Guy? Well, we're going to talk about a few things after the Nike conversation that I'm sure America's wondering about. But I'll say this. You know, they looked at the EPS and said, that's a pretty significant beat. And then you sort of look at the quality of the beat.

4:38SG &A was part of it. Huge tax rate differential in terms of what the street was expecting and what they came in at. Then they said, OK, let's look at the revenue. Revenue wasn't good. Now, last night I sat here and said, listen, last quarter inventories really came in down 11.5 % against sort of flat sales growth. I thought that would mean margins this quarter would be very good. They weren't good either. So you sort of put this all together and say, wait a second, you know, things are not going particularly well. And then you hear some of the commentary and now they're going to be in the penalty box.

5:05You know, I thought the stock would be trading 99 post earnings. It's trading 89. And I think people are going to start to take a hard look and say, even the multiple that's less than it's been historically, is that too rich? To your point on the low-quality beat, gross profit dollars fell short of consensus estimates. So that's the number to focus on. Yeah, and Sarah really surrounded that trade. But she was really focused on that lifestyle stuff. And it's interesting, in the Wall Street Journal this morning, there was an article how Nike missed the boom in running culture, which I thought was really interesting timing here.

5:35And they're talking about Hoka. They're talking about New Balance and some of these other brands. And so that was always at the core of this company, right, in the last 50 years or so. And the lifestyle stuff has been huge. Jordan brand is massive. And then you think about, OK, they have the Olympics. We have the Euros going on. There's a lot of promotional opportunities for Nike here. So again, like the guidance is not out now. The fact that she said that they hinted to a guidance change for 2025 that reads kind of negatively. But let's see what happens. For sure, it reads negatively. Yeah, we're going to update our forecast.

6:06But yeah, I'd be shocked if it's positive. Right. I would be shocked. I mean, disappointing. I own some. I would like to be bigger. I'd rather buy it higher with better news than lower with bad news. I think that, I mean, this is a few quarters now. They had some, you know, a couple of ups where things seemed better. We talked about last night the inventory getting into better shape and so less promotional, which ultimately would be better for gross margins. But, I mean, this is a little deported. They've lost their mojo, right? So the multiple, I don't know exactly what the new guidance will be, but it will go down at least one turn, which puts them at about 23.

6:43and for a company that I do still think deserves a premium multiple, it's not crazy expensive, but as I was saying before, I'd rather buy it higher when they seem to have gotten it together than here. But you're presuming that their passive innovation is still going to hold, that they're going to be able to revive that sort of gene in their DNA. I believe that. I mean, for no other reason, they have tremendous resources, right? They have tremendous resources to do that. And I think, I mean, this is the company that wants to win. It reminds me of Lululemon. We talked about this before. Similar dynamics.

7:20Wow, new competition, right? Fiore and Aloe. And here we have different competition on and Hoka and New Balance and others. And yet I do still think there is a way for Nike to win. Yeah. And I would just say, you know, going from the product and the strategy to the environment they're dealing with, two uphill battles they're going to have continuing for the rest of this year, probably in the next year, which is going to be sluggish overseas growth. You know, China, greater China is over 15 percent of their revenues. They only half of their total revenue comes from outside North America. So it's going to be a sluggish China consumer.

7:52I think we're going to get a sluggish European consumer despite rate cuts, just given the environment. Even with the Olympics, you think? Well, Olympics is a point in time that's not going to last the rest of this year. But yes, you might get a little spike for a week or two. And then the other big one is the dollar. You know, the dollar is up. DXY is up about four and a half percent this year. Dollar's up about 12 percent against the yen. And I don't think we're going to see the dollar weaken materially any time in the foreseeable future. The Fed may ease in September or December, but they're not easing fast or a lot unless something really hits the fan here, which tends to be dollar supportive as people come back and bring in cash.

8:26What do you want to know from the conference call? What's going on? I mean, this is now three years. Think about it. I mean, put up a long term Nike chart. This stock is cut in half since the all time high in November of 2021. It's a series of really poor quarters. It's just, you know, they're trying to get their inventories in line, but the margins aren't going up. Like, what's happening? Is competition eating their lunch? I mean, that's pretty clear to me. And innovation, I guess, is part of it. But I think competition is a huge part of it. And I think they probably, quite frankly, got lazy.

8:53I'll say this real quick. I mean, the October 2022 low, I think, was 87-ish. And we're obviously precariously close to that now. I mean, stock has to hold. This is pretty key support levels, Mel. It's funny. You know, as long as I've been in the business, people have been, and this is over 25 years, is they've been challenging the multiple that this company has, not too different than what we've heard with Starbucks and a few other, you know what I mean, discretionary sort of things. And it's been, you know, bottom left, upper right until very recently. Now, there have been periods where there's been big drawdowns and the like.

9:23And so, you know, to me, this is a company that has, you know, over 25 % market share in U.S. footwear. And, you know, any time these guys hit a multi-year or multi-quarter, however you want to think about it, challenge, they usually figure it out. Karen just used the term they like to win. And, you know, and then when you think about Lulu was always challenging them and the women's, you know, athleisure and all that sort of stuff. Lulu's down 40 percent in the last six months from its recent highs or so. So maybe there's something going on in the athleisure sort of space, especially when you talk about dunks in Jordan and all that sort of stuff.

9:53But again, I think that they probably work on some momentum from something like the Olympics. And, you know, we're going to have the Olympics here in the U.S. in 2028. And I think the World Cup is here, too. So this is stuff that works for them over the next few years. All right. We've got a news alert out of the CDC on a Merck vaccine. Angelica Peebles got the details. Hey, Angelica. Hey, Melissa. That's right. We just now are getting news out of the CDC's Vaccine Advisory Committee about Merck's new vaccine to prevent bacterial pneumonia. Now, this committee is recommending that Merck's vaccine should be an option for people 65 and up and some adults 19 and up who are at higher risk of severe disease to get this vaccine if they have not already gotten one already.

10:33Now, the 65 and up is really important here because this vaccine is approved for people 50 and up, but there was a lot of debate whether we should make it 65 or 50. And the committee eventually landed on sticking, keeping it at 65 because they felt like there were too many questions about whether it would be cost effective for 50 to 64 year olds to get this vaccine and whether it would be confusing because there's already a vaccine approved from Pfizer and that's for 65 and up. They will revisit this in October at their next meeting. But for now, this is the recommendation. Melissa. Angelica, thanks.

11:09Angelica Peebles. Guy, you've been on Merck for a while. Yeah, I know if it's necessarily going to be stock moving, but it's, you know, again, it's going to be one more sort of, I guess, arrow in their quiver. I mean, Merck, to me, makes sense. It's made sense. It's not Lilly. It's not Nova. We said that. But this is slow and steady wins the race. And, you know, they're seemingly sort of figuring things out. And they're probably going to sort of have some tuck-in acquisitions along the way. So, yeah, I still like it. All right, let's get now to the broader markets. A rotation out of the AI trade today.

11:36Micron leading the semis lower after its earnings report last night, taking the other chip stocks with it. NVIDIA down over 2 percent. Qualcomm and Broadcom following suit as investors left the red hot sector. Where do they go? Well, maybe surprisingly, they didn't flee tech entirely. Looks like software names like Palo Alto, Palantir, Salesforce and more all posting strong gains. What does this rotation within this tech sector tell you? I mean, presumably it was always all the spend is going there to AI, and so therefore it's going to be pulled from software and SaaS. And so we just have a reversion here.

12:08Well, I'll just say this. In the last couple of weeks since WWDC, you know, Apple has been a huge beneficiary. The stock went from 192 to about 215. And when you think about that, I thought that was pretty bearish. Whatever the excitement was about Apple is that they weren't spending billions and billions of dollars on high-end GPUs to build their own models. And then they were going to get into it. They've been actually licensing or they're going to be licensing a lot of other folks. And when you think about that, OK, what are the use cases right now? And they're not very clear, you know, I mean, to me, the monetization efforts.

12:37And there was an article in the information today I thought was really interesting, said in a surprise, OpenAI is selling more of its AI models than Microsoft is. So when Microsoft reports in a month from now, if they're not given the goods, if they're not saying that all of this investment,$13 billion in OpenAI and, you know, like the budget shift that they've had, right, towards selling these sorts of products and what it means for their enterprise customers. I think the whole trade, I think a lot of error comes out of it, to be very frank. And it won't be too different than what we saw from late July to October of last year.

13:08You know, the S &P sold off about 11 percent, the Nasdaq a bit more. Stocks like Microsoft were down high teens, you know what I mean, from those highs. So, again, I think it's obviously a bit more severe now because there's been so much appreciation. Microsoft's up 47 percent from its October lows. You just do the math on a$3 trillion market cap company. It's pulled forward a lot of excitement about what they may do, how they may monetize these investments. I mean, it's quarter end. It's half year end. I also think there's a lot of medium term investors right now just looking at their portfolios and rebalancing.

13:41And so it might be as mundane as that. Obviously, there's some specific stock news going on as well. And when something rises as much as Dan just described to have some profit taking, I actually see that as really healthy for the market. So I'm not concerned by this at all. Yeah, it does seem like the time frame that you were mentioning, like that Microsoft has to prove that it's working for them in terms of the investment. They're getting that return back. The timeline is not very long. It almost seems unreasonable. But at the same time, the stock is because of the stock's run. Right. The stock's run was unreasonable.

14:11And so therefore, the expectation has to be two. The expectation has to be high. Remember, we're going to see a new Windows operating system later this year, which will be a very likely catalyst for a lot of upgrades. So they're going to need to give some color on that maybe. But exactly what you're saying. I mean, they've pulled forward a lot of the stock return for the hope of this really, you know, selling. I don't know how many millions of co-pilot subscriptions a month. But to the rest of the trade, that wasn't really. I mean, we always look at NVIDIA as the sort of everything. A lot. I mean, Oracle was up a little.

14:43Dell was up a little. AMD was up a little. ARM was up a little. But I don't think it really matters. We sort of don't have a good catalyst right now until somebody starts their earnings announcement. Do you think this was the start of a rotation? Feels like, I mean, without question it was today, and I think it would probably continue. I thought the rotation would be in energy and maybe health care. It obviously was in software. But throw Amazon in the mix as well in those miserable Super Bowl commercials. One of them was this, what do they call it when you get a brain worm thing? Wasn't that Timo?

15:16Remember that whole, wasn't that a Super Bowl commercial? Do you have one now? I have one constantly. I hope not. Anyway, but yesterday was on Rivian. Today there was more news. I mean, Amazon very quietly is actually bucking some of the trend here. Yeah, and, you know, to NVIDIA, we know the story here. It's Microsoft, it's Meta, it's Amazon, it's Google, and it's Dell make up 50 % of their revenues. And so in a month from now, we're going to hear from all of those companies. We're going to hear about their guidance. You know, and Micron, you know, make no mistake about it. I mean, this stock joined the party a few months ago.

15:45It had tremendous appreciation. They were telling a story how memory is going to be hugely important in these data centers and the like. Dell was also telling that story about servers. Both of those stocks got nailed after they gave guidance that wasn't better than expectations. And so to your point, Karen, it's like you have that sort of appreciation over a period of time. You have a multiple that's severely stretched at 13.5 times sales and 35 times earnings. it doesn't leave a lot of room for disappointment or not beating far better than what the consensus is. Do you think that the ROI expectation also applies to NVIDIA, though?

16:21Sure. Listen, I'm going to tell you guys this. We're five pretty intelligent people who have, you know, like we know what, well, four and a half. You know what I mean? There's no use case in my life right now other than a little perplexity here and there of summarizing something for work or whatever. And that's not doing a whole heck of a lot because I have to check all the facts. You're a consumer. You're not an insurance company that's using AI to go through a lot of paperwork. Years away. Oh, I think I'll take the other side. Dallas Fed just did a survey of 400 companies in their region, and they found that 40 % of them already are using AI on a daily basis and something like another 10 % plan to in the next 12 months.

17:02I think there are a lot of users out there across lots of different industries. I'm with you. Consumer-wise, what do I use? I use chat GPT or perplexity or one of those to make my life faster and easier. Okay. But there's going to be a huge data issue on one of these big enterprise companies. Everybody's going to pull back from it. The hallucinations that this, that that. And I'm not saying that enterprise is using for that, but there's mission critical stuff that has to go. If you're going to adopt this sort of technology, you better make sure that it's working correctly. And I just, that's what takes years before there's mass adoption of it.

17:33before companies, the C-level suite, can say, yes, we're replacing thousands and thousands of employees. But do you think we're priced for that right now? No, we're not. I mean, to me, I think we're priced for it in three years. You know what I'm saying? That's what we pulled forward. And it's no different than the excitement that we heard about how the Internet was going to transform every industry. Like, this is 25 years ago. It's the same thing, people. I'm just telling you. So the enterprise thing, it's going to take a while to see that drop to the bottom line. And the consumer use cases, I think Apple has the potential to be the biggest fail when they release this 16 in the fall, because I don't think you're going to see an upgrade cycle based on what they showed us, especially given the cadence of the rollout of a lot of these products.

18:15I think it's going to be a 2025 thing. So, you know, have at it, people. That's my favorite. On that note, coming up, Walgreens' worst day ever. The pharmacy retailer tanking after a really rough earnings report. Is the company running out of time to turn its restructuring plans into reality? We'll dive into today's disaster next. Plus, him and hers plunging on a scathing short, a short seller report. We'll dig into the findings and debate the winners and the losers of the GLP One trade next.

18:45This is Fast Money with Melissa Lee, right here on CNBC.

18:58Welcome back to Fast Money. Walgreens getting booted to its lowest levels in 27 years today after a rough earnings report sent it to its worst ever single day percentage drop. The pharmacy operator beating revenue expectations but missing EPS estimates and slashing full year guidance as sales growth slows. CEO Tim Wentworth telling CNBC that he hoped the consumer would have gotten stronger in the second quarter, but that didn't pan out. Obviously, it also said it's going to close a significant share of its stores in the United States, which total just about 8 ,600. So these are major moves here, Karen.

19:31They are. Yeah. And he's a relatively new CEO. Right. We saw Rose Brewer was fired. And but this is this is a great example of the melting ice cube. Right. So we have the front of store, which has been just hammered by Amazon over the last few years. And now the back of store, the pharmacy as well, hammered, but also actually by Amazon and Walmart, who are really just, you know, beginning to enter in a big way, what I think will end up being a big way. So so they're talking about, you know, slashing number of stores. And, you know, it's generally hard to grow your way out of a problem like this when the fixed cost base cannot shrink as much as the is the revenue base.

20:13And so, I mean, I looked more closely. They don't have as much debt as I thought, but they certainly have a fair amount of debt. It's cheap at five times earnings. It should be cheap. It wouldn't shock me at all if it gets cheaper. I was just struck by the CEO's comment that they had expected the consumer to accelerate over the last couple of months. I mean, what was going to drive that? For a small segment of the population, you have equities and home values, but for most of the population, they're feeling pinched. And we're seeing that left, right, and center in earnings and in guidance. I mean, the Amazon thing that you mentioned a minute ago, Guy, talking about having this super, super cheap arm of Amazon where it takes longer to get your goods, but you save money.

20:51Or McDonald's doing the$5 value meal. I mean, we're just getting more and more data points that consumers are saying, no more. Right. I'm not paying more. I want cheaper prices. And I'm being more cautious. And we saw that in the data this week as well. It's both on the micro side from the companies and on the macro. The jobless claims going up, pending home sales going down. I'm not saying we're about to see a recession at all, but we are seeing a moderation. So I'm not surprised at all it slowed down. Why is the CEO surprised? I wonder how he missed it. You know, why forecast an uptick when that wasn't for sure a thing?

21:27It's one more. I mean, again, it's just one more anecdotal thing about the consumer slowing down. And you're right. I mean, he absolutely should have seen that. And we've talked about it every night for the last six months. However, I mean, cut your way to profitability with 8 ,600 stores. We plant a significant share of stores. What does that mean? I mean, is it? 1 ,100, I think, 28? Yeah, so I mean, that is pretty significant. So, again, this is a 27-year low in the stock, and it deserves to be. A lot of it is WBA-specific, but a lot of it's sort of the environment as well. It definitely can go lower from here.

Read the full transcript

21:58All right. There is a lot more Fast Money to come. Here's what's coming up next. A scathing short report haunting hims and hers shares today, raising big questions about the company's weight loss drug business. Could this be the first domino to fall in the compounded GLP-1 trade? The winners and losers in weight loss next. And ahead of tonight's primetime presidential debate, we're priming your portfolio. The inside track on taxes, tariffs, inflation, and beyond. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market side in Times Square. We're back right after this.

22:42Welcome back to Fast Money. Hims and hers down 7 % today after a short seller report slammed the company for its compounded GLP-1 drugs, a category not approved by the FDA. Hunterbrook Media raising questions around the reliability and safety of the single compounding supplier used by HIMSS. Meantime, our next guest says a proposed FDA rule could deal the ultimate blow to these cheaper, unregulated formulas, aiming to compete with Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly. Max Reale is Compass Point's head of policy research. Max, great to have you with us. And this goes back to the FDA putting out sort of a proposal saying, what if we deem certain drugs not suitable for compounding?

23:19So how do you make that link that that GLP ones could be one of those drugs? Yes. So the FDA has had this authority for years. It goes back to the 2012 New England pharmacy infection that you had, 64 deaths from meningitis. They just never have used it. And so under the authority, they're allowed to create a list of drugs that present demonstrable difficulties for compounding and create a criteria for doing so. In March, they proposed the list. It has three categories of drugs on there. One actually does have some impact on compounding today. The way the list is written is the criteria taken into effect or taken into account includes adverse events, how complex the process is, how you administer the drug.

24:01And these are all issues that are already kind of presenting themselves with compounding drugs. The other issue that they bring up, and that Pharma actually makes a really good point around in their comment letter, is if you look at other semiglutides, so ones that are used for tulicity, for example, That's also in shortage, but you can't compound it because biologics are too complex to be compounded, according to the FDA. Now, you have too few amino acids for things like Wagovi, Monjaro, so they still count as small molecule drugs. But they're still very similar from a process standpoint. So if you're the FDA, you want to get your hands around this.

24:34It seems like a very easy way and also very odd timing or convenient timing to be releasing this if you want to get your hands around the compounding drug issue. But these drugs are already compounded and they're compounded not just by the compounding pharmacies that are only overseen at the state level, but also the compounding pharmacies that are licensed by the FDA. There are about 70 plus of them in the United States. So how can they say that at this point in time, after the drug has been compounded for so long, that it's dangerous or it's not suitable for compounding? So you can, for any reason, come up with a public health or safety rationale.

25:11out, and that is the underlying principle guiding the FDA's decision. And if they believe that it's not in the public health's interest and that these drugs are only getting compounded because of a technicality with how they set the level of the amount of amino acids you need to qualify as a biologic, I think they can make a very plausible case. If you just step back, FDA's number one concern is integrity and safety of the drug supply chain and control. And one thing that you don't have with compounded drugs is the same visibility into the market with reporting adverse events, with tracking sales and monitoring for sterilization, infections, impurity, things like that.

25:46There's a very clear argument to be made if you're the FDA that to maintain public trust and to maintain public safety, you need to add these to the list. They can, I mean, they could technically just do this now, right? I mean, what is preventing them from just doing it now? Do they need approval? Do they need, like, what's the process? So there is no authority to ban these today. They had to establish the authority, so they went through the rulemaking process. It's proposed. They'll probably finalize it sometime in September. Once the list is finalized, the process for adding drugs to the list is finalized, then you can go out and suggest any drug or drug category you want.

26:22I imagine they'll do just like Australia did. You'll put semaglutides or GLP-1s as an entire category on there. Most GLP-1s cannot be compounded because of complexity already. So you'd just be adding two more drugs to the list. Did you say most GLP-1s cannot be compounded? Yeah, so durglutide, ones that are used for insulin production. Insulin's been in shortage for years, but you don't see compounding pharmacies producing it because they're not allowed to. Biologics, per the FDA, are too complicated to be compounded. Okay. Max, we're going to leave it there. Thanks so much. Really interesting, Max Riali of Compass Point.

26:55Obviously, we saw hims and herds really skyrocket on the back of them selling compounded through a licensed FDA pharmacy, by the way, but really gaining on the back of it. Yeah. One would have thought with that report that you decided and put up a HIMSS chart, it should have sold off today. I get it. It should have been a lot more given the recent run the stock had. I'm surprised it only sold off as much as it did. And maybe it's the beginning of something. But you actually sort of have to be impressed at how resilient it was, at least today, in my opinion. One of the allegations within the Hunterbrook report was that the compounding pharmacy that it uses has ties to past fraudulent activity, et cetera.

27:33So there's sort of a shady past. But that's, you know, we haven't gotten a response from HIMSS. Yeah. And again, I mean, big shot, right? I saw the report. You did a lot of work on compounding. You did. You did, right? No, it was really interesting. I mean, there's going to be supply shortages for a very long time. So it really does matter who you partner with, I suspect, because there's going to be a lot of liability on both of these things. Yeah. We do want to get a check on Nike shares. They're at after-hour session lows. The company gave guidance on the conference call. Seema Modi's got that.

28:03Hey, Seema. Melissa, we're on the call, and Nike just says we now expect fiscal 2025 reported revenue to be down mid-single digits, with the first half down high single digits. The company citing uncertainty around the macroeconomic environment, Forex headwinds, and challenges in China. Melissa, stock down 9.7%. So challenges in China, even though China was a bright spot in the quarter that they just reported. Seema, interesting. Seema Modi with that on Nike. All right, so Karen, your presumption was correct. Well, that was kind of a layup, but that, I mean, that's a lot. And I hope it is, you know, sort of clear the decks kind of number.

28:45Right. Because if their credibility is on the line, which it is now. Yes. Then they are better off, you know, saying we're really going to miss and coming in higher than putting out, you know, a little rosier and not making it. And I'll just add one quick thing. since they did highlight China with this guidance correction. China has a big policy event, too, actually, in July, the third plenum and then a Politburo meeting. Both of those talk about economic policy. If they're going to do anything to revive the consumer, which I think is highly unlikely given President Xi's kind of focus on it, but that would be a moment in time to do so.

29:21So if you're going to see an upside surprise around the Chinese consumer, more stimulus targeted at the consumer. Mid-July is what we want to be watching. I'm hard-pressed to see too many U.S. consumer brands that have done well over the last year in China. If you think about Starbucks, you think about Apple, you think about Nike, again, the list goes on and on. I know that there was some data out of China that was suggesting that iPhones were up like 50 % in maybe April or May, one of those two. But again, one month does not make a quarter and certainly doesn't make a year. So we're seeing a lot of pressure on U.S.

29:53brands in China. It's still a North American story. I mean, China's obviously interesting. I mean, it's$12 billion revenue overall. North America's five and a half, six. So, you know, China's important. North America's where they really got to figure things out, in my opinion. All right. 10 % decline in shares of Nike after hours coming up. The countdown is on to the first presidential debate this year. We are digging in on everything from taxes to tariffs and inflation and beyond right after this. Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.

30:37Welcome back to Fast Money. In less than four hours, President Biden and former President Trump will go head to head at the first presidential debate of this election season. The respective economic agenda is sure to be one of the topics in focus. CNBC's Steve Leisman has a look at how the U.S. has performed under each candidate's watch. Steve. Hey, Melissa, yeah, comparing these presidential terms is tough and not none tougher than comparing the Trump and Biden economies. Presidents get the economy left by their predecessors. And this race has this problem of the dramatic effects of the pandemic on growth, jobs and inflation as well.

31:12Biden beats Trump on quarterly average GDP, 2.9 to 2.4. Trump's numbers, of course improve you take out the pandemic and biden's come down a little bit biden had lower average unemployment at 4-1 to trump's five percent biden created far more jobs 15.6 minus 2.7 for trump but question is how much is trump responsible for those job losses take out the pandemic affects the losses narrow and the initial gains for biden you take those out too it gets closer but biden's numbers are still better biden had stronger capital spending beating trump with a 31 gain to 14 but There it is. There's the inflation, a major knock on Biden, a major concern for voters.

31:49Prices up 19 percent during his presidency compared to prices being up just about 8 percent for Trump. That's led to a decline in real or inflation adjusted hourly earnings of minus 0.6 during Biden's presidency. That compares to 7.1 percent under Trump. Looking at Wall Street, Biden had a 44 percent. S &P rose 44 percent while Biden was in office. Trump 68 percent. NASDAQ doing a lot better under Trump. But take a look at the Fed funds that they had to deal with. Biden, much higher Fed funds rate compared to during the Trump presidency. There are early signs that rate hikes could be starting to bite the economy just as the electioneers.

32:25The electorate could see lower inflation rates. But the danger for Biden, the possible gain for Trump as we head to the polls, would be rising unemployment just as it comes time to pull the lever in November, Melissa. And I guess that's why everybody thinks that maybe the Fed might step in and save the day in terms of a rate cut, which, of course, is vehemently denied, Steve. But even so, like, let's say there is a rate cut that's not going to that wouldn't do a single thing, I don't think, for the elections. Right. They step in in September before the elections does nothing in terms of the impact, maybe psychological, maybe brings mortgage rates down immediately.

33:00So ask your traders, because I have nothing better to do with my time. I was rereading a March 24 Bostick speech this morning, and he said one of his concerns was if the Fed cut rates, that this would unleash a wave of business spending and perhaps a wave of investment. So I am really interested in what would happen if the Fed gave the green light on rate cuts and took that risk away. We're seeing right now some really interesting activity in the bond market. These auctions have gone extraordinarily well, and they're super large. And you know me, I give them an A when they just actually happen.

33:35Whereas Rick, of course, has tougher grades, and Pete's probably right about that. I'm just happy we haven't not had a failed auction. But we're selling, and they're coming in under the win issue. They're very strong auctions. So I wonder a little bit if the bond market is starting to smell rate cuts trying to trade like they're around. And the question is what happens to the stock market? What happens in the C-suite when we get to go ahead on rate cuts in terms of things that might be held back when it comes to investment? The Fed's a little worried about that. Do you think one cut, though, is really the go ahead?

34:05Like, oh, we're entering a period of lower rates because we're going to cut once in September. It feels like the jury would still be out as to when the next cut is with a cadence of cuts after even the first one. You know, Melissa, you should go to work for Powell because he would love for you to be able to pull that off. The trouble, it's really interesting. First of all, Powell and other Fed officials have talked about rate cuts as a process. I think Powell even said, what's the point of cutting just once? The other thing is, is look what Lagarde was able to do. I don't think the Fed has the confidence to be able to pull off one cut and then make the market think that's it unless we decide to do another one.

34:43The thing the Fed is scared about is that the market is going to price in a whole series of cuts. Look at what it did when the Fed kind of made its pivot last year. The market priced in six cuts. The Fed said three. So I think the Fed has a different problem here than Europe does. the Fed, you know, is essentially riding on a thoroughbred that wants to run to the front of the pack. And Powell's sitting there on the reins pulling back. So that's a problem that he would love to have, that the market would only price in one cut. Yeah. All right, Steve. Thank you, Steve Leisman. Rebecca, what do you think?

35:17I think it's possible that the Fed cuts in September if the data are telling them that inflation is close enough to two, maybe the unemployment rate is ticking up a tiny bit. But they're going to it's going to be what they call a hawkish cut. They'll cut and then they'll say that cadence is going to depend on what the data do from here and what other. They don't set monetary policy on the back of fiscal. They take fiscal as a given. But if we have a change in the government and we have a whole new wave of fiscal stimulus, unfunded tax cuts, trade war, then that's going to factor into what they do.

35:49They're not going to just go with what the market's discounting necessarily. So I if they cut in September, It's one and then just hold off. And I don't think September is a given. Yeah, I agree with you. I can't see the people who are holding back. If only we had a 25 basis point cut. Let's go. But also remember, you know, where we were eight or nine months ago with the expectation of six cuts or so. And the market kept being disappointed, disappointed. And yet the stock market did better than fine, even in the face of multiple disappointments. And I think if I can, that's such an important point because we tend to think that, OK, we get a president and then we have policy.

36:24and that determines the economy. It's only a piece of it, right? This year, what helped us? AI, IT, tech, right? It was the private sector that was really driving things. I mean, those four or five mega cap companies have put something like$200 billion of CapEx into the market over this calendar year. I mean, the chip sack was only 50. We're getting 200. CMA FedWatch tool is saying a 58 % probability that there's a 25 basis point cut in September. which is 58 percent. So when you think about that, we don't have a Fed meeting in August. We do have that Jackson Hole, that Casey Symposium, August 22nd to 24th.

37:04And if we get cooler data, we're going to hear a lot more about the potential for cuts in September and then again in November. And then it's like, what are you starting to price in? You know, Steve said something about what the bond market started to price in. I think I read something the other day. They're pricing maybe 250 basis points of cuts next year after maybe one or two this year. That's the sort of thing that will get equity traders all geeked up. Neither one of these guys is running on austerity. So in my opinion, regardless of who wins, it's inflationary almost by definition. Coming up, a big roar and reversal.

37:37Roaring Kitty sending shares of Chewy on a roller coaster ride today. The details and options on that one next. More Fast Money in tune.

37:59Welcome back to Fast Money. Chewy shares on a roller coaster today briefly halted for volatility after rising as much as 34 percent at its highs. Shares of PetMed Express and Petco also spiked midday, but all stocks closed well off their best levels of the session, with Chewy ending the day in the red. The move's coming after Roaring Kitty retail trader Keith Gill posted this photo on X, a dog on a blue background. This tongue sticking out. A flood of bullish options activity in Chewy adding to speculation that Roaring Kitty has his paws all over this one. Baycrest Managing Director David Bull joins us now with some more color on what went on in the options market.

38:36David, what did you see? So that's right. There was buzz about a dog tweet and call option volume in Chewy. Now, there's been speculation whether or not Roaring Kitty would potentially look at a different name after he seemingly exercised the GameStop options and turned those into stock about two weeks ago. Now, speculation has always been there with Chewy because of the link between Ryan Cohen, who's the CEO of GameStop Largest Shareholder, and previous co-founder of Chewy. Speculation heated up after the tweet. And looking back, just like we did in GameStop, were there any breadcrumbs in the call options in Chewy?

39:14And there were about 20 ,000 of the July 30 calls traded about 1040 a.m. this morning. And the tweet hit about 1 p.m. Looking back over the last week, almost 75 ,000 calls traded on this line. That's about$12 million of premium. Pretty sizable. Less sizable than the 170 million premium outlay that Roaring Kitty previously took in GameStop. But the way in which these executed seemed pretty similar in terms of pretty aggressive, pretty execution style, and the way they went in clips, 5 ,000 contracts and less. David, thanks. David Buhl, Baycrest. Karen, does seem curious, the ties between the two.

39:55It does, especially, you know, just a conspiracy theory of thought. There was an article that came out last night in the Wall Street Journal. It was taking some of the, Sue Gov, who was one of the board of directors, one of the directors on the board of Bed Bath & Beyond, and they were talking about, she was saying that there was a concern that there was a leak between members of the board going to Ryan Cohen. Now, this was in a deposition, I believe, and so that seemed sort of odd that today would be the day to sort of go after or tweet a cartoon dog. Exactly. And interestingly, Interestingly, also in the article, there was someone, they were talking about a basket and then a moon tweeted.

40:41I think that Brian Cohen, people are like, that's not bullish. To the moon. Yes. I think that is a signal, a bat signal. Yeah. To the troops. Obviously. I think so. Yeah. All right. Coming up. Propping up payment stocks. The key levels MasterCard and Visa are nearing. Will they find support or are they in for some payment pain? More Fast Money right after this.

41:09Welcome back to Fast Money. Two payment names dropping today. Visa and MasterCard each down over 2%. Both stocks now below their 50-day moving averages. But, Guy, you've mentioned that both are at support levels. I think they are. I mean, throw a chart up real quick. I mean, both these stocks, and they're both pretty much the same chart, so pick your poison. They both topped out in the middle of March. And since then, they've been basically slightly lower to significantly lower over that period of time on what's been a very good tape. Now, again, American Express is hanging in there. That's the one you should be concerned about if you're concerned about credit.

41:39However, if transactions are slowing down, it goes back to some of the things we talked about the consumer. Is the consumer slowing down? I'd watch both of these very carefully over the next couple of weeks. All right. Up next, final trades.

41:57One more check on shares of Nike, which are sitting pretty much at after our session lows down by almost 11 percent right now. Now, the quarter that they had just reported, the EPS was a beat, but it was a low-quality beat. The revenues came in light. For the first half, they were guiding for a revenue decline of the high single digits. Prior estimates were for a decline of the low single digits. And they're also saying that the quarters ahead are going to be tough ones, challenging ones for Nike, given the tougher macro as well as the difficult outlook for China that they are seeing right now.

42:29So tough times for Nike here. We'll watch that tomorrow. Time for the final trade. Rebecca Patterson. XLE. I like energy as a geopolitical hedge. Karen. Yeah. Too late for me. I already own some Nike, but if you like it, wait. You'll get a chance lower. Dan. Not much lower. I think you can buy it here and stop it at 80, though, in case it does go much lower. Guy. America wants to know, Mel, those glasses look great. I think you should rock those from now on. Barrett Gold, G-O-L-D. All right. Thanks for watching Fast Money. Mad Money with Jim Cramer starts right now.

43:02All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC Universal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.

43:36To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.

From the publisher

Nike swooshing lower after reporting a revenues miss. The details out of the company’s conference call, and how you should play the retailer. Plus Presidential impact. A look at the economic records under President Biden and Former Presiden Trump, as the two go head-to-head in tonight’s presidential debate.

 

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 871 episodes
Nike Reports Results… And Economic Track Records Ahead Of Presidential Debate 6/27/24CNBC's "Fast Money" · 44 min
Listen in VO