Nike’s Historic Drop… And Payment Stocks Getting Burned 6/28/24

28 Jun 2024 · 44 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money" - Episode Title: Nike’s Historic Drop… And Payment Stocks Getting Burned - 6/28/24

Episode Overview In this episode of Fast Money, hosted by Tyler Matheson and featuring a panel of top traders, the discussion revolves around the significant drop in Nike's stock following disappointing earnings reports, the implications for payment stocks amid the fast food price wars, and a mid-year market assessment. The traders share their insights on potential investment opportunities and the overall economic landscape as the first half of 2024 comes to a close.

Key Topics Discussed

Nike's Historic Drop

  • Earnings Report Fallout: Nike shares fell nearly 20%, marking their largest drop since going public in 1980. The company reported a significant miss on earnings and revenue forecasts.
  • Sales Projections: Nike expects sales to decline in the upcoming fiscal year by mid-single digits, contrary to analyst expectations of nearly 1% growth.
  • Market Sentiment:
  • Steve Grasso: Sees Nike's drop as a buying opportunity, citing upcoming Olympics as a pivotal marketing event and the potential for market overshooting.
  • Karen Finerman: Expresses skepticism about the company's leadership and future prospects, highlighting their struggle against competition.

Fast Food Price Wars and Impact on Payment Stocks

  • Market Dynamics: As fast food chains like Taco Bell introduce value menus, foot traffic is declining, impacting payment processing companies like Toast and Block.
  • Darren Peller (Guest Analyst): Stresses that companies 100% exposed to restaurants, like Toast, face risks due to the decline in new business formation and foot traffic.
  • Investment Insights:
  • Block (Square) is seen as a more diversified investment opportunity compared to others reliant on restaurant traffic.

Mid-Year Market Review

  • Performance Metrics:
  • The S&P 500 and Nasdaq experienced significant gains in the first half of the year, primarily driven by tech stocks such as NVIDIA.
  • Discussion on the potential for continued market performance in the second half, with analysts suggesting a consensus around possible rate cuts by the Federal Reserve.
  • Consumer Behavior: The panel discusses a cautious consumer sentiment with selective spending patterns, particularly in discretionary sectors.

Trader Acronyms Update

  • A mid-year check-in reveals the performance of trader acronyms:
  • Steve Grasso's WAGE acronym leads with over 30% gains.
  • Karen Finerman's HELM has performed moderately, while Courtney Garcia's V-SCHEEME is at 7% gains.
  • Tim Seymour's BLISEP is trailing behind, with discussions on individual stock performance within the acronyms.

Key Takeaways

  • Nike's Stock: A massive drop presents a potential buying opportunity, but concerns about leadership and competition remain.
  • Payment Processors: The fast food industry’s dynamics can negatively impact payment stocks, with some companies better positioned than others.
  • Market Outlook: Analysts express optimism for the second half of 2024, with anticipated Federal Reserve rate cuts contributing to a favorable environment for stocks.
  • Sector Performance: Energy and certain tech stocks continue to be favored, while discretionary spending may come under pressure.

Conclusion This episode of Fast Money provides a comprehensive outlook on Nike's stock challenges, the impact of consumer behavior on payment stocks, and a forward-looking analysis of the market as 2024 progresses. The traders offer valuable insights into actionable investment opportunities amid fluctuating economic conditions.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03John, thank you very much. Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square. This is Fast Money, and here's what's on tap tonight. Running afoul shares of Nike erasing more than four years of gains after its earnings report last night. Trading at levels not seen since the depths of the pandemic. The move has one of our traders actually hitting the buy button. We'll find out who and why. Plus, the first half of 2024 is in the books. Hard to believe. We're at halftime, folks. Will the year-to-date winners keep leading the market through the next two quarters? We'll debate that and lay out your playbook for the rest of the year.

0:39And later, banks lay out their post-stress test capital plans. A lot of dividend hikes to tell you about. We count down to Tesla's delivery numbers and a check on our 2024 trader acronyms. Is Karen at the helm? Is Tim flexing his blicep? We will reveal the leaderboard later in the show. Good evening, everyone. I'm Tyler Matheson in for Melissa Lee, coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour. He's really not on the desk. He's not here, but we'll count him on the desk. Karen Finerman, Courtney Garcia, Steve Grasso, welcome one and all. Good to be with you. Thanks for being here, Travis.

1:15Thanks for having me. We start, however, with the historic plunge in shares of Nike. That stock seeing by far the biggest drop in the S &P 500, underperforming the second worst stock by a factor of two. Nike's near 20 % plunge marks its worst day since going public in 1980. All after a massively disappointing earnings report last night. The sneaker giant missing earnings and revenue forecast for the quarter. Slashing guidance, it now expects fiscal year 2025 sales to be down mid-single digits. Analysts were looking for nearly 1 % growth. For the current quarter, Nike expects sales to drop 10%.

1:55Warning of slower online sales, macro uncertainty in China. Never a good thing. and, quote, uneven consumer trends around the world. The stock closing the day at its lowest level since March of 2020. But, Steve, you are a buyer here amidst a really soggy report. Yeah, and it's not to say that I'm so happy about the report or I think I'm bullish on the report. There's a couple things going on. A, they have the Olympics. We talked about this. This is going to be an overwhelmingly important marketing event for Nike, and I think they're going to shadow out all the competition as far as the branding and the marketing ability and the advertising and the PR.

2:38I think that's going to be in their corner. Secondarily, when you have this opening line, worst drop ever. That makes me want to buy something. So it makes me want to buy something because things overcorrect. Markets shoot way too high and they shoot way too low. Algorithms push the market. And the average lot size in an algorithm is sub 100 little shares. So it creates this chase. If you want to get out of a stock and you have 100 other institutions trying to get out of the stock, it feeds on itself. So it overshoots the level that it should be at. You also said that it was around the pandemic low.

3:14This is not a pandemic. Greater China is about 15 percent of overall volume. North America, they have issues. They also have issues with competition. but I think they're going to be able to have this flush. People will let it settle in. And I don't think I bought the bottom, but I think that it's a good start of where the bottom could be. Karen, you own it. You listened to the call you said. Yeah, last night. Was the call worse than the debate or better than the debate? I couldn't watch the debate. I just couldn't watch it, so I don't know. So you went there. Yeah, as a shareholder, I'd rather do this, listen to that, than the debate.

3:52So a lot of things I thought about the call. I mean, one, obviously, it wasn't about the court. The guidance was just awful. And one thing that really stood out to me on the call was, I think, you know, Donahue trying to rally the troops, talking about how proud he was of this team. And I don't know. They may be working super hard, but I don't think the results right now are anything to really be proud of. To be cheering your team over. Right. I think a little mea culpa or a something, you know, some sort of fire in the belly would have been, I think, a better reaction than I'm so proud of what we've accomplished.

4:28Because a lot of things were going wrong, right? Some within their control, some without. China being slower is not really in their control. But their aggressive overshift to direct-to-consumer now having to shift away. They did okay in performance, but leaving lifestyle, I mean, you know, losing share to Awn and Hoka and Adidas and New Balance. They don't own this area the way they used to. The way they used to. You've got Hoka, you've got Awn, you've got Adidas coming back. Right. And so the bloom is off the rose now. And, you know, my hope, I would, this, the three-day rule, I think, I think, Steve and I talked about this in the green room, I kind of changed my three-day rule.

5:07The first day is actually the after hours trading of the event. So that was day one. This is day two. I may look again at day three. I think that I was surprised the analysts weren't more disappointed with this, actually, because some of the new numbers, they have higher P.E. multiples. And I don't think this should be in the penalty box for a while. One other thing, the question about is Donahoe still the guy? Yeah. So he's been there. Terrible timing on his part. January of 2020. Very difficult time to take over a, you know, consumer products company. However, he was on the board for a number of years before that, so he does know the company very, very well.

5:44It was interesting that we were talking in the agreement about this, this letter from Knight or interview from Knight talking about he's still our guy and he's great and all that. Sounds like George Steinbrenner giving an endorsement to the Yankee manager. Not exactly. Right. It was definitely not what Howard Schultz did, which I thought was awful. It was definitely not that. But, I mean, the pressure is really on him now. My hope is that they put out numbers so low that they feel very, very confident that they can beat them and get back into the little bit of momentum in the stock, but also having their credibility somewhat restored.

6:17Yeah, all of their global sales areas, North America, Europe, Asia, Pacific, Latin America, all missing and substantially. And whenever sales go down like that, it is definitely not a good sign. We've got a little breaking news out of the financial sector. Banks outlining what they plan to do with their capital excess after this week's stress test results. Leslie Picker has been going over the details. A lot of dividend hikes here, Leslie, I think. A lot of dividend hikes, and we just got one more from Goldman Sachs. That firm hiking its dividend to$3 per share from$2.75 per share beginning July 1, 2024.

6:57What's interesting about this release, though, is the firm highlights its so-called stress capital buffer. That's essentially kind of a byproduct of the stress test results from earlier this week that tells a bank how much excess capital above the regulatory minimum it needs to hold, kind of based on how they performed on that test. So that stress capital buffer is 6.4%. And in a statement, the chairman and CEO David Solomon says, quote, this increase does not seem to reflect the strategic evolution of our business and the continuous progress we've made to reduce our stress loss intensity, which the Federal Reserve had recognized in the last three tests.

7:38We will engage with our regulator to better understand their determination. So that increase he's referring to is the increase in the stress capital buffer, the amount of capital that the firm needs to hold above the minimum. So that is kind of the interesting story with Goldman, which just came out. You can see shares little changed on this news, however. We did, as you mentioned, Tyler, see some news on dividend hikes as well from the other firms. Wells Fargo said it has an intention to raise the dividend by 14 % to$40 per share from$0.35 per share, also assessing its capacity to buy back stock.

8:19JP Morgan increasing the quarterly common stock dividend to$1.25 per share. That's about 8.6%. And it's the second dividend increase that that firm has done this year. And J.P. Morgan also saying it has plans to have a new common share repurchase program of$30 billion beginning July 1st. Morgan Stanley increased its dividend by 7.5 cents per share for the third year in a row, making its quarterly common stock dividend of 92.5 cents per share there and also renewing$20 billion worth of a share repurchase program. Citi increased its dividend, as did Bank of America as well. So pretty interesting results given what was largely seen as a tougher than expected stress test this year.

9:07Tyler. All right, Leslie, thanks very much. Leslie Picker reporting. Courtney, let's trade the banks or maybe most pointedly pick a bank, any bank, maybe Goldman, maybe any other one that strikes you. Yeah, and I think really the banks have actually started to look attractive here. And I think when you come into these stress tests, there was a lot of concern as they were going to be stronger than usual. But these banks have already set aside the capital, anticipating that it was going to be stronger requirements this year. That's what you're seeing is they're actually able to increase their dividends and return more capital to shareholders even after this, which I think is actually a positive sign.

9:38I would look at some of your big banks like JP Morgan. I don't think you can go wrong with them. I think that's something we constantly want to look at. But I don't think it's a bad thing to be a part of here. Tim, thoughts? Hey, Tyler. First of all, I think the difference between who's buying back shares and who's paying higher dividends is always interesting. And J.P. Morgan, not surprisingly, talking about buybacks. I look at Citibank, who's paying three and a half percent dividend yield right now after a 75 percent move in the bank and a discussion and a backdrop for efficiencies and an ability probably to generate even more cash flow.

10:12So it's my largest of the money center bank positions. And I think it's just about re-rating. I think think of the macro for the banks. The consumer has a job. The inflation outlook has gotten a little bit better. Rates remain high. We got a little bit lost in higher rates that sometimes that was bad for banks. The capital flight dynamics certainly were. But but higher rates typically have meant higher spreads on loans and certainly higher NIMS. So that's really the story here. And banks that are beleaguered for years and years and through if you look all the way back to the May SVB incident of last year, It's only in the last couple of months that banks have exceeded some of those levels.

10:48I think they've got a room to go. Karen, are you into the banks or not? Yes, yes. I have a lot of bank exposure. I like J.P. Morgan. My biggest bank exposure now is Citibank. I have some Bank of America. I'm not as delighted with them. But, I mean, J.P. Morgan is, you know, the fortress balance sheet we see because now they're able to do 30 billion of buybacks. Although, because they trade at such a premium to book, as they buy over, significantly over book, over two times book, they get more expensive price to book. However, on a price to earnings, I can see why they want to buy back their stock.

11:20But it's kind of expensive. But I like it. I think that we're going to see good numbers. I think the economy is still hanging in there. Credit quality, I think, is still hanging in there. And we're going to start to see more M &A, more fees, and the asset wealth management. Investment banking coming back a little bit. Yes, that would be great. And asset management is doing well. Steve, thoughts? So I usually always go to a default, and I follow Karen on the J.P. Morgan. And J.P. Morgan seems to be the leader of the pack. You know, I think at the end of the day, just pull the lens back, Jamie Dimon's not going to be there forever.

11:52And I think there is a Jamie Dimon premium to J.P. Morgan. And I'm sure he's going to or they will backload it so that there'll be some great news that comes out when Jamie's no longer there. He's savvy enough, smart enough to be able to do that. But Tim, Karen have been talking about Citigroup. Citigroup has outperformed on a yearly basis the rest of the banks. JPMorgan Bank America year to date are pretty much exactly the same. And Wells Fargo was that most improved player. So I think people are playing Citigroup as the biggest turnaround story, if you will, and they're probably comfortable staying with that.

12:28All right. Let's turn now to the broader market, shall we? Stocks wrapping up a big first half of the year. The Dow with a modest 3.8 % gain, but the S &P was up nearly 15%, and we know why. We'll tell you in a minute. The Nasdaq, the real standout here, up more than 18 % since January as NVIDIA. That's the why. Its massive run boosted the tech-heavy index and helped the S &P. Major markets did close near their lows of the session today, though, even after both the S &P and Nasdaq hit new intraday records in early trade. Now, as that crossed the 18 ,000 mark for the first time ever, investors digesting this morning's economic data, core PCE, the prime among them, increasing a seasonally adjusted 0.1 percent for the month and up just 2.6 percent from a year ago.

13:17That is the lowest annual rate in more than three years. I think the PCE is the one that the Fed likes to follow. Consumer sentiment also coming in a little better than expected. So what's in store for stocks in the second half, folks? Any thoughts here? Court? Yeah, I think the PCE numbers are really important here because that's what the markets have been doing, is holding their breath with what's going to happen with inflation. You're not seeing about a 95 percent chance that the Fed is going to lower interest rates at least one time this year. And the question is when that will happen. Is that going to be September?

13:50Is that going to be later? But with numbers like we had out today, being that they're data dependent, it's more and more likely that that will happen at some point in time. And I think that's what we want to focus on. And you also saw some consumer spending information, consumer income. You saw incomes actually were up half a percent last month, which is good. You're seeing inflation coming down, income holding up. That means the consumer is still on good footing, which is a good backdrop for the overall economy. Steve, first half down, second half forecast. Historically, they say that the second half is going to outperform as well.

14:19When you have the first half perform so well as well as we've seen it perform so far. And you do have to look forward to the rate cuts. I think that the consensus is around September for the first rate cut. If you look on a historic basis, seasonality, the first 15 days of July are positive, dating back to 1928 in the market. The first 15 days of July. 28. What happened right after that? I don't know. So when you think about it, that goes back. That's a pretty good data set when you're looking at that. So you're fighting with seasonality if you're a bear. It doesn't mean that the second half of July you can't get a pullback.

15:02I still think that we should see a pullback between now and the end of the year. We should touch that 200-day as a blip, not for a long process, but I think it will be healthy to see a nice little drawdown and then see a nice big drawdown. Usually, don't you get a post-election bump up no matter who wins? Is that generally the case? Not in Mexico. No, no. You went terribly wrong. Thoughts on the market going from here? I mean, I'm just staying with what I've got. I do think maybe we'll see a cut, I guess, but I don't know that it makes that much difference because I don't think we will see a big series of cuts.

15:38Why? Why do we need to do that? Yeah. I don't, you know, until inflation is really back in the bottom, which is hard to do. Yeah. I don't know why it needs to. It's coming down, but it's not there yet. It's sticky. It's a long one. Yeah. The last mile is a long one. How about you, Tim? Well, I look at the market and everyone's trying to drum up comparisons to 1999. And the move the markets have had is so extraordinary. I think it's time to at least put in the books that this is one of the greatest bull markets of all time, one of the least loved. And that's often a formula in great bull markets on some level, because I think a lot of people have been calling for recession.

16:13A lot of people have been concerned about the lack of breadth. 34 % move on the S &P from last October and 58 % from October of 22. So those numbers are what they are. But if you think about the S &P relative to other times in that 99 period on a free cash flow basis, it's trading two standard deviations cheap to where we were in 99. And I guess, again, I am less concerned about the lack of breadth in the market. I think we've had periods where you've seen real outperformance. It doesn't bother me that energy is traded off. I'm a long-term investor in energy. I like how the sector is being run.

16:48I'm a long-term investor in banks. So the backdrop that we have, which is one that everyone just talked about with a relatively benign rate and inflation environment, is pretty good for the stock market. And so I think there's still a lot of people that are looking for weakness to buy, not weakness to sell. There's a lot of fear out there. And I think right now the fundamentals, obviously, look, I don't like consumer discretionary. We talked about Nike. We've talked about Lulu. They have competitive issues. I won't get back on that conversation other than to say it's not just about competition.

17:19It's not just about companies that are looking at different dynamics and gross margin. I think the consumer is in a tough place here, and I think discretionary is going to come into some pressure. All right, Tim, thanks. Top strategist at Wells Fargo Security is concerned about investor overconfidence over the next six months. Chris Harvey is the firm's head of equity strategy. Chris, welcome. How do you react to what Tim just said about the consumer maybe getting a little more timid? Are you seeing any signs of that? So, Tyler, what I think is happening with the consumer is you don't have to worry about the consumer buckling under.

17:55The finances are okay. What you have to worry about is where he or she is going to spend their money. What we're seeing is the consumer saying, I'm not paying that for that. And where are they spending their money? They're spending it in Costco. They're spending it in Walmart. They're spending it in TJX and Ollie's in Burlington off price. What is that telling you? It's telling you that they're stretched. They're not finding a lot of utility in the market. And they're being very, very selective. And that's what we should expect going forward. Don't expect a ton from the consumer. But the consumer is not going to knuckle under at this point in time.

18:26They're just going to be very, very selective. Let's talk about the great hero of the first half of the year, and that would be NVIDIA, which has been on Wells Fargo's sort of hot list for quite a while. What do you see in NVIDIA? Is it if you own a bunch of it, is it time to trim? Some people are doing that because it's become such a large part of their portfolio. So there's some inertia. Yeah. So, Tyler, that's exactly what we did. So we have it in our, excuse me, in our SIGPIX portfolio, right, which is our best ideas portfolio. It's been a top idea. SIGPIX. Just rolls off the tip of your song.

19:01That's why you named it that. Signature PIX portfolio. I'm going to take a little bit of heat on that one. That's SIGPIX. It's been a top idea for a while. Now, it's performed, as you know, exceptionally well. And we just keep bumping up into our risk controls. So we trim it back, we trim it back. But it still remains one of our top ideas. And the bigger picture, right, NVIDIA is part of that momentum trade. And so is that momentum trade going to break, bend? What is it going to do? We think that the momentum trade is only going to bend here. It's not going to break because a lot of the macro factors that you need to break it just aren't where they need to be, whether it's credit spreads, whether it's the valuation of the contrarian basket, or whether it's the economy, which is not accelerating.

19:43So you're a little worried about investor overconfidence, but not all that worried, it would seem. No, because what I think is this is a period in the market where people put on more and more risk. You're not getting penalized for putting on more and more risk. At the beginning of the year, many people thought the Fed would be cutting several times at this point. What was their penalty? S &P up 15 percent. When that occurs, I feel pretty good. It's like at Vegas. Just put in the middle and let's keep it going. Anybody have a quick question for Chris before we let him go? Yes. So how much of the seasonality are you putting into it?

20:17How much of the election year cycle are you putting into it? And then when you're rolling and not to get too far ahead of us, but when you look at Q1 of 2025, whoever is in office right there, is it a let the air out of the balloon event? Right. So a lot there. So the first thing I would say is that the presidential cycle is really important. And we saw what happened with the debate and former President Trump's probability went higher. That's really important to the market, because if he wins, the probability that the Senate goes to GOP also is very high. What does that do? That's a more it's a less regulatory, strict environment.

20:54Right. So what you should see is more M &A activity. Get more M &A activity, more IPOs, more risk seeking. and the market can go higher. And traditionally, with a GOP Senate, that's a very good formula for the equity market. There you go. Chris Harvey, thanks very much. I appreciate your time tonight. Yeah, have a good weekend. Any thoughts here, Court? Comment? You know, I see what you're seeing with the overconfidence because you're really starting to get the investors who are just continuing for this FOMO trade. Like, they want to go into the risky areas of the market. But on the flip side of that, you're seeing record levels of cash.

21:25So there's this two sections that are happening right now where people are invested, they want to be really risky and get these high returns. But on the flip side, they're not willing to put all their cash in. And that's happening both at the retail and the institutional investors. And that's where there's going to be this other leg of this, where the second that interest rates come down and money markets aren't paying better, you're going to start to see some of that money go back in, probably not to those high-flying areas, but the broader market. So I think at some point in time, you're going to see that happen as well.

21:48So you're pretty positive on the markets over the next six months then? We are, correct, yes. All right, good. Let's take a break, shall we? Coming up, Dell dropping despite a big positive call from Citi. The major catalyst that the firm says could turn this name into a key AI player. And a number of fast movers catching our attention. The trades on all these moves when Fast Money returns in two minutes.

22:15You're watching Fast Money here on CNBC. We'll be right back.

22:31All right, folks, welcome back to Fast Money. Citi staying bullish on Dell despite its recent pullback. Analysts maintaining their top pick call on the stock as it expects the name to lead in computer hardware. Citi sees Dell as a beneficiary of strong AI data center spend and as a potential new member of the S &P. Citi also bullish on Apple after what it calls the phone maker's best worldwide developers conference ever. Karen, thoughts on these two? Yeah, so Dell I like, I own. I like the story where I feel like we're in the earliest innings. The stock was much higher when they reported earnings.

23:08There was some disappointment about their margin for the second half. And I think they're just right where they want to be on AI storage server. They also have the, hopefully the enterprise pen will come back, but they also have the PC business. and I think that we will see a second half PC refresh, the combination of during the pandemic, people were buying tons of PCs. We're getting four years into that and now we're going to have some AI enabled, Microsoft and others. And I think that'll be a good catalyst for a PC refresh as well. So a lot of good things going, not super expensive, although it is a hardware company, so multiples should be cheaper, but it's not super expensive have given the explosive AI growth.

Read the full transcript

23:53And I like it. I like it right here. What a fascinating evolution that company has had from being one of the... Many times. Many times. I mean, great stock in the 1990s. And then Dell sold it. And then he bought it back. Bought it back. Now they're talking about putting it back. Tim, any thoughts here on Apple or Dell? I've added to Apple in the last month, and I think it's certainly got an argument, especially in favor of the software part of the business. We spent a lot of time talking about the refresh, but more importantly, just I think the core part of the capital markets business. On Dell, at that last quarter, we got a couple of really important things.

24:33First, we did get margin choppiness. We got a gross margin that was down almost 220 basis points. So I think you're going to continue to see that. But as Karen used the term early innings, I think, and by the way, nice that we used that on a day when we talked about the Yankees. And we really should talk about the Yankees' weakness and choppiness of lately. They embarrass themselves. But Guy's not on the show. So we'll wait till he gets back there. But I had to sneak that in. I think it's a case where$3.8 billion in AI server backlog is very, very Dell friendly. The PC refresh cycle that Karen referred to is very Dell friendly.

25:05The pullback of 20 % off of a 250 % move since April of last year is something that you should have had happen. I think you're going to get an opportunity to buy this stock a bit cheaper. But the reinvention, but even the core part of that hardware business is something I think people are going to want to own. Yeah. Yankee's having a bit of a Nike moment. Steve? Can I take it anywhere I want to go? You want me to go Dell? You want me to go Apple? Which way do you want me to go? So everyone counted out Apple and everyone was talking about China sales. And you see how quickly that could that could change.

25:34And that's always transitory when it comes to Apple. They always pull a rabbit out of a hat. Now they're looking at Apple intelligence. That's going to be a refresh cycle the same way that PCs are a refresh cycle for Dell. you're going to get people like me who have an iPhone 13 to re-up. And I think this is going to be a refresh of all refreshes for Apple. All right. Thanks a lot. And coming up, risky business, why payment stocks could be paying the price as restaurant wreckage ravages the dangers facing the space and the names with the most to lose. We'll tell you about that. But first, Trump media, first solar and Bitcoin all lower today, how our traders are handling the moves ahead.

26:12You're watching Fast Money live from the Nasdaq market site in Times Square. We're right back after this.

26:30Welcome back to Fast Money, everybody. Stocks dipping into the red to close out a red-hot first half of 2024. The Dow falling 45 points, the S &P dropping nearly a half percent, Nasdaq losing about 25 points. Both of those latter indexes hitting intraday records early in the session today. True social parent company Trump Media plunging nearly 11 percent today after getting a boost during last night's presidential debate. The former president's company losing nearly 35 percent in the month of June alone. And first, solar dropping nearly 9 % today, its worst day since April of 2021. Finally, Bitcoin falling nearly 2%, closing back in on the key$60 ,000 level.

27:16Cryptocurrency locking in its worst week since Mark's second worst month of the year. Steve, thoughts on the crypto? Yeah, so I get a little deep on this because it should have been negative. The halving should have been negative for the miners. It was negative for the miners because you reduce their payout, you cut it in half. So if you reduce their payout, you're going to have less mining, which means that the supply of Bitcoin is slower to get to their ultimate supply cap of Bitcoin. So I think that's what people, yeah, I told you it was going to be deep. Yeah, it's deep. Really? Doesn't the halving just happen?

27:52That's what they do every day, 6.25 or whatever the number is right now? There's enough miners to do that, no? Yeah, there's enough miners to do that, but there'll be less of it. The theory is that there'll be less of it. They have to become very efficient to keep up on the mining side. So they're not getting the same payback. So in theory, the thesis should be that there's actually less mining and it's a slower go to get to that ultimate end. I hear what you're saying, but that's the thesis. And there's also there was a lot of leverage put into Bitcoin ahead of that ETF. Yeah, right. So if you have the ETF now, you have institutions that couldn't buy it, that can buy it.

28:31So that got a little bit extended. People got over levered. When you see the collapse or you start to see the collapse in the Bitcoin, the ultimate commodity, then you wind up seeing the halving. The halving sounds like either a Stephen King novel or something out of the Book of Revelation. I'm not sure. Like the rapture. I don't know. We're going to take a quick break. Coming up is Tesla's stealthy comeback in danger. The EV maker revving up to report quarterly deliveries on Tuesday, but analysts are betting on the numbers to disappoint. What to expect next? Plus, payment players facing restaurant risk.

29:06What falling foot traffic means for some of the fintech marquee names right after this. Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money Podcast. We're back right after this.

29:30All right, welcome back to Fast. Taco Bell, the latest fast food brand to announce its own value meal offering, joining the likes of McDonald's, Burger King, and Starbucks, as restaurants increasingly turn to promotions to bring customers back into stores. But amid slower restaurant sales growth and a drop in foot traffic across the business, are payment stocks like Block and Toast also getting burned. Let's ask Darren Peller, Senior Equity Analyst at Wolf Research. What do you say here, Darren? Is the drop-off, however slight it may or may not be, in foot traffic going to affect these stocks, which I think three of the four that we're looking at, you have outperformed ratings on?

30:12Yeah, and thanks for having me. But yeah, listen, I mean, I think there's really three or four main fintech payment stocks that are highly exposed to restaurants in our coverage. Obviously, Toast, which many of you have probably seen in the market, is one of the most prolific restaurant technology, software and payments companies out there. And here's a stock that's done well because it's gaining share. But at the end of the day, you are starting to see foot traffic down 3 percent now. You're seeing new business formation at restaurants really go into negative year-over-year territory, even though it's still at a decent rate overall.

30:47It's declining year-over-year now. So companies that are 100 % exposed to restaurants like Toast probably do have more risk than not at this point after what's been a good year-to-date performance. Do you have a favorite among the four we just showed? Toast, Square, let's see, Fiserv, and I forget what the other one is. Shift4 is another one, yeah. Shift4. Yeah, look, I think Block or Square, their business is more diverse. You have a stock that's really trading at a relatively depressed valuation of an RV around 14 times free cash. But more than that, they're investing heavily in technology and sales.

31:21So we're of the view that it's starting at a low enough point that even a bit of a slowdown in restaurants, they have an opportunity to accelerate in the next six to 12 months in a bigger way than what's priced in. Tim, jump in here. I know you have a question. Yeah, thank you. I'm curious what you think about PayPal. This is a name I actually have wanted to believe in. And it's actually we're going to talk acronyms in a little while. They certainly seem to have more competition with the names that you talked about. But obviously, they've had some of their own issues. They've changed management.

31:52Alex Chris seems to be doing a pretty solid job there. Any thoughts there? Because this is not an expensive stock. This is a stock with market share. It's a stock that seems to just not have any catalyst to get going. It's a great question. Look, at the end of the day, it's a brand. It's well-known. It's good free cash, clean balance sheet. Frankly, they have, as you probably know, I mean, 35 million merchants accept PayPal, and you have 200 million monthly active consumers using it. So very strong company brand-wise. The question, however, is and why we're a pure perform rating on it is because there's a lot of competition from even Apple, right?

32:27Apple Pay is now showing up not just on the phone but in browsers. So the bottom line is, unless they can prove using that PayPal or Venmo button is going to grow at a good rate again, it's going to be tougher to break out. But they are making some progress under Alex, and we do think there's some progress on a little bit of acceleration there, at least. Let me come back to restaurants, if I might, for just a minute. An awful lot of the quick serve restaurants have come out with discount programs, and we just referenced one, Taco Bell, the latest of them to do so. So six months from now, what is the effect of those of those discount plans going to be?

33:03Is it going to be a favorable outcome or less so? It's a great question. I think the overarching theme we've seen is that and I'll bring this point up. The difference between inflation right now on restaurants versus stay at home food costs is dramatic. It used to be almost the same inflation on both. And now we have inflation rates that are literally 400 to 500 basis points higher for in-restaurant spending. So I do think you're going to see more and more consumers shift to these QSR-type locations, or frankly, just eat at home, which does have an impact on companies that are either in the restaurant, the higher end, or the service, the company services those restaurants in the pay-a-sit-at-table-type restaurants with a little bit more high-end and more affluent users.

33:49And so keep that in mind. It's a fair point. But transaction and foot traffic is down for all those reasons. I think you're going to see it shift. I'm going to pull out my toast device when I feed my son dinner and make him pay that way. I think that's a new that's a new thing of the Matheson household. Darren, thanks very much. Courtney, do you have a thought question? Yeah. And I think when it comes to these, you are seeing the consumer is pulling back. And restaurants is an easy thing that people are able to pull back on because then we keep talking about the consumers overall still in good shape.

34:17But they're being very choosy about where they're spending, and they are starting to feel that. So these payment stocks are going to be a beneficiary of that. And you're seeing this not just with restaurants, but your consumer discretionary overall. That is going to be a headwind, at least in the short term here. Yeah, it is. The restaurant inflation is really breathtaking. I mean, you go out to a place in New York City, you can't get a steak for under$75. Yeah, I don't eat meat anymore because of this. We're going to take a break. Coming up, delivery danger. Analysts warning, upcoming numbers out of Tesla could put a dent in the EV maker's recent rally.

34:53We'll look under the hood. There's not much under the hood, actually, at Tesla. You know, they have a battery. There's really nothing there. They got a frunk is what they call it. More Fast Money in two minutes.

35:11Welcome back to Fast Money. Tesla shares down today but closing out its third straight week of gains, making June its best month of the year so far. But Tuesday's delivery numbers could throw a wrench in the rally. Analysts estimate the EV maker will report deliveries of 450 ,000 vehicles in the second quarter. An improvement on the first quarter but down from a year ago. Tim, you got some thoughts on Tesla. My thoughts are that it doesn't change for me that the company is still very expensive. I think the expectations have totally changed, both in terms of how the stock and the catalyst and valuation, but also obviously on deliveries.

35:46I think we know what's going on there. There are some elements of what's both going on right now in terms of a revamp Model 3 and the FSD dynamic. It seems to actually be coming to a reality in terms of where you can start to price that into that recurring revenue stream in terms of an overall valuation on the company. In fact, that seems to be what the street's starting to do. They're putting a multiple on the core business. They're putting some kind of a percentage basis on that high margin FSD business. Stocks run 45 % off those lows. It's back up to the 200. I'm not sure this is a time to chase it into these numbers if that's what it feels like.

36:24But I still think the company's very expensive. We know what the risks are. And they don't seem to get any better here for not a cheap company. Courtney? Yeah, and I mean, though it has come off as lows, it's still down 20 % since the beginning of the year. This was part of the MAG-7 that just kind of fell off this year. And really, we're seeing slowing sales growth. Earnings estimates are coming down. And if we don't see them come up with their delivery numbers, I mean, that is going to be a problem for Tesla. And ultimately, they're facing a lot of competition, not just here in the U.S., but even when you're seeing these Chinese EVs that are priced so much lower, it really does start to put them at a disadvantage.

36:57And so I completely agree with Tim. I think it's overly expensive right now. and just given some of those headwinds, I don't think it's something I would chase at this point in time. Court, thank you. Coming up, we've got a mid-year check-in on our trader acronyms. We'll let you wager on who's in first place. That's a hint. And give the traders a chance to reflect on their picks. More Fast Money after this.

37:26Welcome back, everybody, to Fast Money. We are officially halfway through 2024. So we thought it would be a good time to check in on how our trader acronyms are doing so far. Atop the current leaderboard, Steve Grasso. His WAGE acronym is up more than 30 % year-to-date. Mike Coe is in second place, nearly 20%. Karen Feinerman comes in next, and then Guy Adami. Steve, let's start with your WAGE acronym. Jim, every component up double digits, but the big winner here is the Grace Scale Ethereum Trust surging more than 60%. What about your others? Yeah, and it's not even on its highs, actually, and it's pushed back.

38:06Last year it was up 250%, so I think it's going to be a winner going into the back half of the year. WRK, Westrock, they had a merger with Smurfett Kappa. They're a paper company. I thought that an IP had a buyout that was terminated. So I think you're probably going to see a little more of a bullish slant to West Rock going forward. So I think that these are probably a good entry point there. Google, I thought this was going to be their year for AI. It turns out that it is. And Amgen, I thought they were going to be competitive in the weight loss space. They're not as competitive as I thought they would be.

38:44So I wouldn't be a buyer there. But the other three, I still would be a buyer. That's what you're happy with. All right. Karen, you're in third place with your HELM acronym. That is your golden goose here. It is. It is. And my trade really should have been METCH instead of HELM. I should have taken out Louis Vuitton, which has had, you know, some broader luxury troubles, China troubles. The Chinese traveler not traveling as much. You could turn METCH into Kvetch, you know. I could later if I needed a K. But I'd replace it with Citigroup if I could, and then it would be METCH. But meta, yeah, has been good.

39:19I've liked it for a while. It's my biggest position, and I'm just sticking with it. We'll see. Happy with the others? I like the XLV, which is health care and energy. Yep. They're both XL something. I get a lot of pushback that I made it helm energy and what was the? Oh, health, energy and health. They were like, really, it should have been XX. You just had a Biden moment. All right, Court, you're in the middle of the pack with your acronym, V-SCHEEME. Is that right? Up 7 % for the year. What do you make of the move so far? Yeah, and actually, I'm with you, Karen. My E of energy was XLE, but, you know, we've got to do what we've got to do with these acronyms.

40:02You get a lot of pushback on your acronym. That's right. I know. And Melissa, we're here saying this is more like Scrabble and an acronym. You know, I had to make it work. But I do still like what we have here. I mean, energy has been a really good performer. that's been a good beneficiary of artificial intelligence and just the electrification of the economy. And I think you're going to continue to see that as we go forward here. The one that's really been underperforming in my acronym is small cap. So the SC was one that is small cap. So I know this is a stretch. But really, we thought we were going to see this rotation, especially as interest rates came down this year.

40:34That keeps getting pushed out further and further. So that's the one that's really been kind of dragging this down. Still overall doing well, but I think you're likely going to continue to see that moving forward. So long run, I still want to be in it. But that's been kind of the one that's been down. And Tim, sorry to tell you, you need to go back to the gym. Your acronym BLISEP putting you in second to last place even without lift. You'd still be down about 4 % with Estee Lauder being the big drag. Are you still bullish on the name here? Yeah. It's killing me. It's a bit of irony playing the game right and actually playing the game wrong all at the same time.

41:09Everyone else knows what I'm talking about. So I think you've got a case here where Estee Lauder has got the same problems they've had for the last two years. And I still think valuation isn't cheap enough. But I think you can own it here for sure. I'm not changing my tune on that. It's actually had a tougher run. Alibaba, you know, you had a 40 % move. China's been very choppy. We've pulled back. I think you're in this for the long run. I is iDevo. I'm a co-PM on this international enhanced dividend fund. I still believe in international. I believe in owning blue chip global companies. And that's what we do in that ETF.

41:41And Chevron, you know, look, I love energy here. I still think that the pullback that we've had recently across the energy space is not commensurate with the cash flow generation. And obviously, the price of oil has been largely very stable. And if anything, it's rallied in the face of a higher dollar. So there's a lot to do in the acronym game. And I think it's still relatively early in the season. So not ready to, you know, anoint any victories yet. But I do think it's been a challenging year for anything that's been exposed to discretionary. and cheap value stocks have gotten cheaper. Tim, thank you very much.

42:15And when we come back, we'll give you our final trade.

42:26Time of the final trade. The fastest 45 seconds in finance. Let's go around the horn. Tim. Tyler, thank you for joining us. The B and Bicep Alibaba has got more than 40 % of their market cap in cash. I think it will work. All right. Karen, your call. Yes. I do like the energy trade, the XLE. Even though it's had a nice run late, I think there's a lot of room to go. All right. Court, what do you say? Double down on the energy trade. I chose XOM, which is Exxon. I think you want to make sure that you have that energy space right now. It's going to continue to do well. And Steve, bring us home. Nike.

42:56I just did it, and I'll probably do it again next week if it gives me another opportunity. Thanks for being here. Thank you, Tyler. Thank you all for having me. For babysitting. Appreciate it. We'll see you on Monday when it'll be July. The first half is over. Jim Cramer starts now.

43:38but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.

From the publisher

Shares of Nike plummeting after reporting results, as the sneaker giant warns of a major sales slowdown. But one of our traders is using the plunge as an opportunity. Plus the fast food price wars are heating up, but could the payment stocks be getting burned in the process. How that space is being impacted.

 

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 871 episodes
Nike’s Historic Drop… And Payment Stocks Getting Burned 6/28/24CNBC's "Fast Money" · 44 min
Listen in VO