Nvidia’s Post Earnings Blues… And JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon’s Bond Market Warning 5/30/25

30 May 2025 · 44 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary: Nvidia’s Post Earnings Blues… And JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon’s Bond Market Warning (5/30/25)

Podcast Title: CNBC's "Fast Money" Episode Title: Nvidia’s Post Earnings Blues… And JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon’s Bond Market Warning Air Date: May 30, 2025 Host: Melissa Lee Guests: Tim Seymour, Karen Feynman, Courtney Garcia, Steve Grasso

Episode Overview This episode focuses primarily on Nvidia's stock performance following its earnings report and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon's warnings regarding the bond market. The hosts discuss the implications of rising U.S.-China trade tensions and analyze various stock movements in the market.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Nvidia's Stock Performance
  2. Nvidia's shares experienced a decline of nearly 3%, nearly erasing all gains made post-earnings.
  3. Discussion on the overall sentiment in the tech market and Nvidia's specific challenges:
  4. Trade Tensions: Increased tensions between the U.S. and China impacting sentiment.
  5. Market Dynamics: Analysts express concerns about Nvidia's ability to sustain high valuations amid competitive pressures.
  6. Reactions from Traders:
  7. Some traders suggest taking profits from Nvidia at current levels, anticipating a retracement.
  1. U.S.-China Trade Tensions
  2. Reports indicate the U.S. government is considering broader sanctions against China's tech sector.
  3. A back-and-forth exchange of accusations between the U.S. and China regarding trade agreement violations.
  4. Implications for investors: Possible further declines in Chinese stocks and increased volatility in U.S. tech stocks.
  1. JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon on Bond Market
  2. Dimon forecasts potential cracks in the bond market, citing various external and internal pressures.
  3. Market Reactions: Guests debate whether Dimon’s concerns reflect a fundamental issue or are more sentiment-driven.
  4. Long-Term View: David Zervos from Jefferies expressed confidence that the market would stabilize and that fears of a crisis are overstated.
  1. Other Market Movements
  2. Retail and Consumer Stocks:
  3. Positive earnings from retailers like Ulta and Netflix, with market analysts weighing their growth potential.
  4. Ulta’s strong performance highlighted as a reflection of resilient consumer spending.
  5. Alcohol Stocks Under Pressure:
  6. A trend toward non-alcoholic beverages affecting traditional alcohol stocks; analysts question if this sector could become the "new tobacco."
  1. Nuclear Stocks Gain Momentum
  2. A significant interest in uranium stocks due to supportive government policies for nuclear energy.
  3. Analysts caution about the sustainability of this rally and the potential for overvaluation in some of these stocks.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Nvidia's Sentiment: Despite strong fundamentals, Nvidia is facing headwinds from trade tensions and competition, leading to mixed sentiments among investors.
  • Bond Market Concerns: Jamie Dimon’s warnings resonate with some analysts, but others view the situation as manageable with the right policies in place.
  • Consumer Resilience: Positive retail earnings indicate a recovering consumer sentiment, crucial for the broader economic outlook.
  • Regulatory Environment: New regulatory pressures in Europe, especially concerning tech giants, could impact valuations moving forward.

---

Conclusion The episode delves into significant trends affecting Nvidia and broader market sentiments amidst rising geopolitical tensions and regulatory challenges. The discussions reflect a cautious yet optimistic outlook on recovery in consumer sectors and potential growth in tech and energy stocks.

For further details and to catch the full episode, visit [Fast Money on CNBC](http://fastmoney.cnbc.com).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:03Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square. This is Fast Here's what's on tap tonight. Out of steam, shares of NVIDIA nearly giving back all their post-earnings gains. Why couldn't the chip giant turn things around with the rest of the market? We'll debate that. And May flowers. The S &P and NASDAQ looking to their best months since November 2023. But will the summer months be just as sunny? And how will next week's jobs report factor in? We'll get some answers. Plus, Ulta shares get a glow up after earnings. Netflix score two big bullish calls from Wall Street and a literal buzzkill.

0:34why booze stocks have been under pressure and how to trade the names. I'm Melissa Lee. Coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Karen Feynman, Courtney Garcia, and Steve Grasso. We start off with the latest developments on the U.S.-China trade tensions. China stocks falling amid reports that the Trump administration is planning wider sanctions on the country's technology sector. Megan Cassell is at the White House with the very latest on this. Megan. Hey, Melissa, some back and forth between the U.S. and China today. Some harsh words on both sides. But that headline you mentioned coming from Bloomberg about midday reporting that the administration is looking at expanding restrictions on China with new regulations that would capture the subsidiaries of companies that already face sanctions.

1:15So the idea here, they say this is a draft rule that's currently being considered. And the idea is if you take a company like Huawei that's already subject to U.S. sanctions, if Huawei becomes the majority owner in a subsidiary company, that subsidiary would also be subject to the same sanctions. It's meant to stop this sort of workaround that companies have been using to try to avoid some of these restrictions. So that put some pressure on shares, especially because it came after sort of this back and forth, starting with the president this morning saying that China had violated aspects of the trade truce that was struck in Geneva just a few weeks ago.

1:48China then firing back and saying that actually it was the U.S. that was the one that was breaking the deal here. So some tensions and some questions when I was at the White House earlier about whether this might lead to further action from the administration ratcheting up some of their moves towards China. But when the president was asked about China in the Oval Office mid-afternoon, he sort of downplayed things. He said, yes, that China did violate a big part of the agreement. But he went on to say that he's sure that he will speak to Chinese President Xi Jinping and that, quote, hopefully we will work that out.

2:20So, Melissa, no call scheduled between the two leaders. That could be the next step. But for now, the president's still seeming optimistic that they can work on some sort of deal. Megan, were there any specifics on how exactly China was violating that agreement made in Switzerland? Did this have to do with critical minerals, which U.S. Trade Representative Greer made reference to this morning? That's exactly right. When Greer was on Squawk Box, he talked about those critical minerals. And the idea was that in this agreement in Geneva, China was meant to soften its export controls to allow the flow of critical minerals to the U.S.

2:53But remember, there was no timeline attached to that aspect of it. The Wall Street Journal had some good reporting just in the last couple of hours that that piece of the agreement was really hard fought in Geneva, that it came along just at the end and that it was crucial to the two sides both agreeing to lower their tariffs. But with no timeline attached, the U.S. now feels that China has been slow walking that and not doing enough. So that is at the center of this here. I don't think it's the only tension. We also have these fights over semiconductor export controls, of course, and student visas, among other things.

3:24So a lot of tensions, but the critical minerals really do seem to be at the heart of it. All right. Megan, thank you. Megan Casella. And this all comes on today when we saw a sharp reversal in shares of NVIDIA, the chip giant dropping almost 3 percent, nearly erasing all its post-earnings gains. The stock unable to bounce off session lows, like most of the so-called MAG7 stocks. It is now up just half a percent this year, still more than 11 percent off the record high hit in January. So what does this tell you about the world's biggest chip stock that didn't participate in the rebound, especially as we do seem to have trade tensions ratcheting higher?

3:56Well, it participated when I thought the market was reacting to the fundamentals of the release. I think the market got tired today. I mean, again, this was the best. I think I had it the best May since 2000, up 6 percent. It wasn't a sell and may go away. It's a place where I think NVIDIA has largely rocketed back to where it belongs. It gave a little bit back here. But what we heard from the company, I think, reiterates the dynamic that Blackwell, second half of the year, the production that we needed, supply chains eased up. And we heard no sign of a delay in demand. And I guess, you know, I think about the week that was also when we heard from a couple retailers gap today.

4:32We heard it from Best Buy. I mean, there are impacts already in the retail world. The consumer has proven resilient. We've also heard that. I this felt like a week if I had to characterize it as anything. I think rates ground lower, vol ground lower. We're getting through earnings season. And there's always a new headline every day on trade that I think the market started to become more in a year or two. So I think Nvidia, a lot of it was I mean, look at how low it got in the low 90s. Right. So for Nvidia to move more than 50 percent is an extraordinary move into earnings. So we've seen how hard it is to go into big earnings.

5:07And no matter what you put up, sometimes it is enough. It was enough for one day. I think that rising China tensions, you know, with so much focus on Jensen's talking about how important China is to their business and to the AI sort of us leading the AI technology around the world. So this, I don't know, I think it was a little bit ahead of itself. I don't look at it as a structural problem there. And the whole market has had a huge run. Yeah, and I agree. I wouldn't say it's a structural problem. And I think realistically, they did so well with earnings in spite of the fact that they have all these headlines with China.

5:43And then today you get some increased rhetoric again. There might still be some issues with China. And I think yesterday there was some optimism that, OK, maybe these tariffs weren't legal or they weren't going to go through. There was a legal pushback. But now you're seeing that again. So I think some of that's putting pressure on NVIDIA after this really good earnings release. But I don't think it's anything I'd be concerned about just with some of those headlines. I think your peak NVIDIA bullishness, you would be hard pressed to find anything more bullish that's coming down the pike for NVIDIA.

6:11To Karen's point, you had that run from 90 all the way back up to 142. That's a lot locked and loaded for what's coming down the pike. Think about all the competition, AMD, Google, things that you don't, the hyperscalers are actually the competition because Meta is coming up with their own chip. Google is coming up with their own chip. Amazon, their own chip. So I don't see anything tremendously bullish going forward. The stock is sort of range bound right now, 90, 145. You don't think that there's going to be another deal signed with, you know, Saudi Arabia or some party in the Middle East, sovereign AI, for instance, or some sort of, you know, being an exemption in the chip export restrictions?

6:52I mean, all those things could be massively bullish. Massively. And I think that's why it ran to 140 and change. I think that was all factored in. I think that was the pop off of the$90 level. And if we're treating this like a trading show, not an investing show, I think you have to sell your NVIDIA at this level and wait till it round trips, wait till it gets back down to 100 or so. I'm not sure what took it back down to the 90s is going to happen again. I mean, really, we're at the worst of trade rhetoric. I think sentiment on NVIDIA is hardly bullish here. I think it's been kind of a prove-it story.

7:27I understand it's come back and I understand what they delivered yesterday was reassurance. And that should give a lot of confidence. I mean, there was no sign of weakness. And yes, gen sanity does seem to be alive and well. And yes, there are alternative export markets. And there is this sovereign AI market. And I think it's very important because nowhere have I heard of a fall off in demand. And then I would just take it back to a valuation at a time when we're questioning the valuation of the S &P. This is not a place where I mean, you know, I don't think so. Not on the next couple of years forward.

7:57We all know the growth isn't going to be there. So, you know, I hear you, Steve. I mean, it's hard to see a stock that moves from 90 to 140 hasn't had a big run. But I think the sentiment and I think the positioning of the company is important. I think they still could have very good growth. I mean, we'd always talk about, you know, the cloud service providers. Then we talk about Sovereign. But when you look at Dell, they talk about cloud service providers are 50 percent of their business on prem and companies. Right. We don't talk about that is 40. and Sovereign's 10. So that 40 is growing a lot.

8:29And we usually just think about how much are the big three or four, whoever it is, CoreWeave, Microsoft, Meta, Google, and Amazon, how much they're spending. But there's a whole other giant section that's growing really fast. But just think about the four top clients for NVIDIA, account for 40 % of their revenues. And those are the clients that I hear what you're saying, there's replacement, whether it's going to be a sovereign angle to be replacing. But you still have four clients that I don't think are going to be buying as much or as much at this level of cost. So let me throw the trading aspect back at you.

9:12You said, OK, if this is a trading show, you got to take profits. I get that. But at the same time, what you're talking about is something that happens not next quarter, not the quarter after, maybe not even the quarter after or the quarter after. I mean, in terms of replacing NVIDIA or a sizable amount of NVIDIA GPUs with in-house GPUs, that's something to happen over time. And I agree with that. I can't argue with that at all. But what does the market do? It's a forward pricing mechanism. The market usually probably pulls forward six to nine months. So plenty of times you look on a chart and then you get to the actual event.

9:46You think, oh, that's why it sold off 30%. It's a forward-looking mechanism. Well, I think your point on AMD is a good one, which is also the A in band, by the way, or bland, depending on how good I feel about Lyft that day. I mean, I just I think there's a case here to be made for AMD picking up the pace and what we've heard in terms of their ability to deliver a chip that also people were questioning about. I think in a world where, if anything, deep seek has made the playing field more level for other players and also shown that it doesn't have to be Blackwell all the time. All right. Meantime, another potential headwind for big tech.

10:21Germany considering a 10 percent digital services tax for large online platforms. Meta and Google among the names that could be most heavily impacted. For more, let's bring in Fast Money Friend and Deepwater Asset Management managing partner, Gene Munster. Gene, always good to see you. Hello. So how big of an impact is this? As I understand it, other countries already have a digital services tax and Germany is sort of joining in on the party at this point. Correct Melissa, it's about 2 to 5 % for a dozen or so countries. So Germany has not have one. So they're a little bit late to the game. But the news here is that the size of it is a step function bigger.

10:59It's a 10 % digital tax. It's also on revenue. And that's important because typically you pay taxes on earnings, but in this case, it is an impact to revenue. So think of this effectively as the impact. If it was like a tax rate, it would be about double that number, talking about like a 20 % number. And so that's one piece that kind of sticks out. A second is this rift, this continued friction between US tech and Europe. And we saw it with GDRP, the Digital Management Act. And now we're seeing it with this digital service tax. And I think what is ultimately at play here is kind of the sense that some of these countries feel like an injustice.

11:45And in the case of many of the countries, the Europeans especially, they don't get the benefit of a lot of the taxes because most of those funnel through Ireland. As you know, it's just an awesome tax shelter for big tech, and they're typically paying like a 12 % tax rate. And so the news here is that just the size of what Germany is talking about, and it kind of has some sounds, rhymes like what's going on with tariffs too, is these big kind of step function numbers. And it makes me wonder, is this just kind of all part of a trade negotiation? Hey, Gene, it's Karen. That was sort of my question, which is, was that sort of a, you know, Liberation Day kind of all right throw it out there 10 % of revenue but really we'd settle for five what we're actually a percent of earnings what would be a number that would be easily absorbable for a meta and Amazon or Google rather so keep in mind they're painted today in many countries kind of that two to five percent and so I think that a number the twos go up to fives and the five stays at fives I think probably is something that investors largely would look past The reason why the stocks didn't do as much today, didn't really react to the news is because I mentioned those other shots that EU has taken at big tech and they have made changes to the business.

13:11I mean, these taxes have gone up for them. They have made changes to the business. GDRP impacts how Google can sell ads, how Facebook can track, but they've just keep finding ways to continue to grow the business. And I think that to answer your question, how much would be absorbed from an investor perspective? I think they could probably take it up to 5%. And my guess is it is going to go up. I think that there's enough meat here and precedents that's already in place that you're probably going to see some adjustment higher. But my sense is investors will largely look the other way. Gene, when you look at the percent of revenue that comes from Germany for an alphabet, it's under 3%.

13:52And for a meta, it's just right at 3%. is a lot of this us just digging through, and I get it, the numbers, the absolute numbers are big. Those numbers are$10 billion. But when we really look at it, this doesn't change your thesis on these companies, right? It doesn't change the thesis. There is a piece to this. You're right on those percentage of revenue. There is a piece that the kind of governing body around these types of taxes isn't just a European, it doesn't just have European influence, it's global. And so there is this risk that effectively they ratchet it up for just across the board.

14:31And if you want to take it to the most extreme level, you look at these three companies, two thirds of their revenue comes from outside of the US. And you could build a case where if it goes from two to a 5%, you get a 3 % revenue hit, if all that makes sense. And so I agree, it doesn't change the fundamental thesis of any of these companies. But that's why there is this is worth attention, because it does have an effect of potentially impacting many companies beyond Germany and Europe. So when we say that Germany is the one that sort of laid to the party in terms of any sort of digital services tax, is the real I mean, it's surprising almost that the EU doesn't band together and say we will all or event maybe this is going to happen at some point, we will all raise it to 10 % because that will give the maximum leverage when it comes to an EU trade negotiation as opposed to Germany saying 10%.

15:24Absolutely. I'm surprised that the fact that Germany kind of went at this alone, I would think that if this was part of more of an orchestrated tariff negotiation, Europe would have maybe done something that was a little bit more organized. And so that does surprise me, but it's still on the table. And I think that, you know, they're probably, you know, they're going to float this out. They're going to see what the administration, the White House says about it. Germany is going to float it. They have floated it. And now they're going to see what the reaction is. And Germans, the European allies are going to, I'm sure, fast follow.

15:57Gene, to what extent are the Googles and the Metas of the world just going to be negotiating on their own? And in some sense, I kind of see this is where it's going. I mean, the revenue streams of these companies, they're like many sovereigns. And if you think about the influence they have in some countries, more important than others. So I'm tending to believe this is kind of no news because I think these companies are important. But I do think that ultimately the leverage lies in the sovereign. Just curious. But again, one on one bilateral. This is kind of the fallout from trade rancor everywhere.

16:28I think sometimes the U.S. government can get cut out of the middle. I think what we see over the last year, last six months, really since the election, it's a different answer today. I think that just given how tech has been positioning around the White House, kind of the influence and the effort that you've seen from their leadership, there is this sense that the companies are negotiating along with the U.S. government. And if you're going to rewind back to six months ago, a year ago, I'd have absolutely agreed with you. Each of these companies for themselves and they have to defend and debate their position on their own merits.

17:04But my sense is that there just seems to be bigger at play. Look no further than Jensen's comments last night. I mean, the White House is having a big impact on its business, and he's spending a lot of time there to try to make sure that they're well aligned. Gene, always great to get your take. Thanks so much. Thank you. Gene Munster, Deepwater Asset Management. Courtney, does this change your thesis on these stocks? You know, it doesn't change my thesis, but when you look at a lot of the MAG-70 or big tech companies, is there are a lot of headwinds and the regulatory concerns have been one of them.

17:36And I think this is something where you've already seen a lot of regulation happening, both in the US, but in Europe. And now you're seeing things like these taxes that are going on top of it. And I don't think those are gonna end in the near future. So you're looking at like some higher valuations, you're looking at some tariff exposure. This is just another one of those headwinds that I think is a big reason why you wanna stay diversified. So I absolutely wanna own these companies. You just don't wanna be overexposed. And we find so many people are much more exposed than they have any idea. And we just really try to point that out.

18:02Yeah. It does seem that for years, years and years, the EU has been going after big tech in so many different ways. And this is just another step. And GDPR was going to be disastrous. Not so much of an impact in the end. In the end. In the end. It was painful for a while. For a while. Yeah. Now now we're through it. Well through it. Yeah. Yeah. They do. They have just they throw out. They know they can get a billion dollars for anything. Right. Right. without even trying there. So I do think, though, for more for Google than meta, there is a very large or two very large issues out there that are well bigger than this would be, right?

18:41It's the antitrust, both antitrusts. That's going to be the most important thing to happen to these stocks in a while. Yeah. Yeah, I guess I just think about these companies in a place where really one of the other big themes of May was broadening of the market. I, you know, we don't even need to go out there and say it was peak. It's peak mag seven because, you know, I think on some level these kinds of skirmishes and dynamics around regulatory and change in some of the world tech order. I think it's obvious the market is broadening. This is actually good news for investors. And I would also just say that the negotiation stance that this administration has had with China and even Russia.

19:17I think there's other parts of the world that are saying, you know, China's kind of gotten what they wanted so far. Russia's definitely gotten what they wanted so far. And we might as well as well. I think this is healthy. They used to trade like a monolith. And now you see Microsoft up 9 percent, Meta up 11 percent. Google, to Karen's point, has a host of issues that they're facing. And that's why the stock is down 9 percent with an NVIDIA flat. So I think there's enough room to pick and choose which mega cap tech that you want. I think it's much more healthy for the markets. All right. Coming up, no need to conceal.

19:46We are highlighting Alta's big jump after earnings in the profit primer. Oh, boy. Giving the stock a solid foundation. We got the defense next. Oh, come on. Never ending. And on Friday, come on. And a radioactive trade for your portfolio. Nuclear stocks exploding this month thanks to the chain reaction from Trump's nuclear renaissance order. The names powering the trade and whether the gains are sustainable. Don't go anywhere. Fast Money is back in two. This is Fast Money with Melissa Lee right here on CNBC.

20:24Welcome back to Fast Money. No blemishes to cover up in Alta's latest quarter. That's a good one. Shares jumping nearly 12 % as opposed to the other ones, which are marginal. Shares jumping nearly 12 % on the back of yesterday's earnings report. The beauty retailer topping top and bottom line estimates, raising its annual profit forecast. Alta saying lower inventory losses and new launches, especially of celebrity-owned brands, help drive demand at its stores. It was a very strong quarter. They're saying consumer spending really picked up in May. Yeah. Post all the tariff uncertainty. Traffic was great.

20:58I mean, this is Keisha still been the CEO. She's been there, I don't know, 15 years. Maybe this is her second CEO. This is a second great earnings. I mean, so many good things happen. Comps were great. The margins were good. When you have that top line growth, the margins are good. And then you leverage, you know, your SG &A, you get great operating margins. That's happening. They they took share in mass. They took share in prestige. I'm surprised they had the confidence to put out. You don't need to. Right. You don't need to forecast in this environment. Everybody sort of gets a pass. And so they must feel awfully good.

21:32All of that was great. My only concern now is valuation. Right. This is now a high teens, multiple. It hasn't been here in a while. Not quite sure what to do. But I mean, kudos to them. They did a fantastic job. I mean, analysts are saying that the raised guidance was actually cautious because of what the CFO said. They said, oh, it's a pretty dynamic environment in terms of consumer spending, what's going on with tariffs. So we thought it'd be safer to take a cautious approach to guidance, which leads one to believe that the raised guidance may be a conservative raise. They have to feel very comfortable with that.

22:04Super confident, yeah. Yeah, and I think it's great to see they're actually taking share from their obvious competitors, like a Sephora. But even as Amazon or Walmart starts to get more into beauty, the fact that they're really able to continue that. When you're ordering everything on Amazon and Walmart, the fact they're still going to Ulta is, I think, a really strong sign. And the fact that consumer has still been picking up, and you actually just saw this with the consumer sentiment numbers, is people are getting a lot less pessimistic about the economy. I don't know if they're optimistic yet, but definitely not as bad.

22:31But you are seeing that savings rates are going up. So people are still cautious on their spending, but they are still spending at Ulta. And I think that's actually a really positive sign. They have zero international exposure, right? So I think that probably goes into a little bit of no headwinds for them of the current environment that we're in for the rest of the market. And if you go back to October 2023, stock was at 375, gapped up to 470-ish in January of 2024. Then it was a solid base. And then it ran another 100 points higher. So I think you're good here. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, Courtney's right.

23:04I mean, I'm getting my beauty at Walmart these days. So, I mean, it shows. Wow. I did set myself up for that one. You totally did. I was waiting for somebody to come in. It was intended to be. But part of what was interesting about this is the new brand launches and where they're incubating new brands. I mean, they are looking to stay on top. They are looking to stay in the lead. They are looking to actually have the margin associated with house brands. And I think that that's part of what works for the multiple. Given the move in the stock today, the multiple is actually north of 20 now. So it's not as bad.

23:35No, a little higher. Oh, higher. Yesterday was 18 and change. Oh, I didn't realize that. But the stock moved up so much. A little uglier. Yes. Yeah, yeah. There's a lot more Fast Money to come. Here's what's coming up next. The chain reaction pushing the nuclear trade to new heights. More on the radioactive run and whether the gains in these names are sustainable. Plus, Jamie Dimon ringing some alarm bells. The cracks he sees in the bond market and the impact it could have on equities, the economy, and your money. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market site in Times Square. We're back right after this.

Read the full transcript

24:20Welcome back to Fast Money. Uranium stocks closing out a massive month buoyed by the Trump administration's moves to boost a nuclear renaissance in the U.S., the URA ETF having its best month since 2020. But are these games sustainable? Our Pippa Stephens has got more on this. Pippa. Hey, Melissa. So the stocks did dip today, but still a big May for nuclear. First, the industry was a relative winner within energy from the House's reconciliation bill. And then the White House's four executive orders aimed at quadrupling nuclear capacity by 2050 really turbocharged the rally. The NLR is having its best month on record and the URA gaining 27 percent, pacing for its best month since 2020.

24:58Now, retail investors also getting in on this trade, snapping up shares of the URA at the fastest rate since January. That's according to data from Vander Research. Small modular reactor companies New Scale and Oklo, the biggest winners, up 93 % and 122 % respectively in May, begging the question of whether the stocks are simply now stretched, especially since neither company has actually built a reactor. Centrist, another big winner this month, they're producing Haloo for the Department of Energy, but not yet for commercial customers. So the market is clearly viewing the federal support as a positive.

25:32But as think tank Third Way put it, caution is warranted since the EOs will be nothing but talk if they aren't backed up by factors including real funding and robust staffing. Melissa? Pippa, for New Scale and Oklo, neither have built reactors, but they do have contracts, right, to build a reactor. So they are sort of, you know, they have those revenues in the pipeline, so to speak. So they're in the works, but New Scale is definitely further ahead than Oklo here, because remember, New Square is the only company that's had a small modular reactor approved by the NRC. That was back in 2020. And then actually this week, that was for 50 megawatts.

26:07This week, they got their reactor approved for an upsized 77 megawatts. They had started construction on a project in Utah, but then that fell through as the costs rose. Oklo submitted an application with the NRC for their Aurora reactor that was denied. They are now in talks once again with the NRC. They said that their application was denied because of issues during COVID. So an important distinction there. Both companies do have revenues in the pipeline, but I would say New Scale is definitely further ahead here. All right. Pepper, thanks. Pepper Stevens. Tim? Well, the valuation argument against uranium stocks is easy.

26:45They're really expensive. And if you look at Cameco CCJ, which is the one I own, and I own some Sprott uranium Trust. I just think that the valuation is not equating with where the earnings are now. The dynamic here is I think there are people that believe that there are going to be major squeezes in the spot uranium market. Spot uranium is actually traded kind of lower. It's had a little bit of a bid. But if you look at it year to date and if you look at it even in the last six months. But I think this really does come down to execution on where they are with their existing production and also how disciplined they will be in contracting existing.

27:22And I think that's part of the story here. So a lot of volatility. But this is this is a five year trade. It's been a great five year trade for the last five years. And I think it's going to be as good for the next five. And I agree with that on the valuation. But I do think longer term, this is a story that's going to play out, because if you saw anything from the Nvidia earnings is AI demand is not going anywhere anytime soon. And so when you're looking at AI demand and data centers, there's a huge need for electricity. And nuclear is really the way to solve that. And especially if you are seeing this administration is more optimistic or friendly to getting these actually through and getting them regulated, that is really the biggest hurdle they have.

27:57It's not demand that's the issue. So that's going to benefit them. This is absolutely going to be a bigger, longer-term story. All of these stocks, when you look at them, they all are in danger of double-topping and failing. So CCJ, SMR, New Scale, that one actually shows the most constructive technicals because it broke out from that former high. But I would wait. And to Tim's point, I think they're all a little bit over their skis right now. I'd wait. Coming up, Jamie Dimon raising a red flag for the bond market. Why he thinks a crack is forming and what he thinks you should or shouldn't do about it.

28:30Don't go anywhere. More Fast Money in two.

28:37Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.

28:52Welcome back to Fast Money. Major indices flat today, but closing out a month of gains. The Nasdaq up nearly 10 percent in May. The S &P 500 rising more than 6 percent. Both seeing their best month since November 2023. The Dow is also up nearly 4 percent. To some movers today, CBS and Signa filing two separate lawsuits looking to overturn an Arkansas law banning PBMs from owning or operating pharmacies. CBS has said the law would force them to close 23 locations in the state. And shares of Regeneron plunging about 19 percent, its worst day in more than 14 years after a late-stage study of the drugmaker's experimental COPD treatment failed to meet targets.

29:29And shares of MP Materials climbing today as Trump blasts China for violating trade agreements. MP has been your final trade a number of times, Steve. Yes, and it's going to be, if you see where it traded to, it traded to approximately$30. And then when negotiations with China started to be a little more softer, the stock came in by a third. You're going to see this conversation just get volatile, then peter out, and the stock is going to trade right with it. So I would take profits up 10 percent. All right. Well, J.P. Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon predicting trouble in the bond market. Dimon speaking today with CNBC's Morgan Brennan at the Reagan National Defense Forum.

30:07You are going to see a crack in the bond market. OK, it is going to happen. And I tell this to my regulators, some of you in this room, I'm telling you it's going to happen and you're going to panic. I'm not going to panic. We'll be fine. We'll probably make more money. And then some of my friends will tell me that we're that we cause we like crises because it's good for JPMorgan Chase. Not really. Classic Jamie. For more, let's bring CNBC contributor David Zervos. He's Jeffrey's chief market strategist. David, great to have you with us. Do you think that we will see that crack in the bond market?

30:41I feel like you're a not panicking kind of guy, but should we be concerned about that? Yeah, you know, you've had me on a number of times recently, Melissa, trying to not get people to panic about tariffs and tariffs seem to be consistently moving in a non panicky way after the initial panic. And I think the same story in the bond market for me and the whole idea that we're going to have a least trust moment or some sort of backup in yields because everybody's scared of holding U.S. Treasuries. I just I don't buy it. I think you can tell stories where the term premium is a little bit higher. And I like that story.

31:14We've steepened the curve a lot this year. And that makes sense to me. But the idea that we have some major crack does not seem like a reasonable story to me. David, I was sitting. Hey, it's Tim. I was sitting next to you on the desk and I remember your calm. And I think I guess the question I have for you is where is your fear moment here for this market? And again, there still can be calm. But what is what is the thing that worries you most here, especially as you think about a strategic market that has come back and roared back to where we were? It's funny, Tim, I remember your comment because I went on a little diatribe and you go, wow, that felt good.

31:52Yeah. I think we were in the April, the second week of April. And that was what I was trying to do with a lot of our clients, talk them off the ledge, even some of the most sophisticated. And it was a complicated time. There's not a lot that really makes me nervous in terms of policy and in terms of geopolitics. I'm always nervous because I just I think those events are not anything we can ascribe easy probabilities to. But they're there. There's wars going on. There's there's potentials for changes like what we had in COVID era. There's always those. But I do feel like we have a lot of insurance.

32:28We have a central bank that's got rates over 4%. If something goes horribly wrong, we have a lot of insurance and monetary policy that I think could be applied quickly and judiciously, even if the politics might initially get in the way of that. And so my worries are probably pretty low, consistent with where they've been for a while. So it's Karen. Thanks for being on. You generally look like a guy who's not super worried about a lot. But let me just ask you, what do you think about the Fed? Do they need to do anything? If you were Jay Powell, what would you be doing? Well, you know, Karen, I'm not a big fan of saying what I think the Fed should do.

33:07I'm like, I don't that doesn't make my clients any money because I'm not in control. So I try to predict what I think they will do. I think they're going to be a little sticky. I think they've been a little sticky. I thought Jay was going to play ball with the president a little more friendly pre-April 2nd. And I think he, like many others, saw April 2nd and went, oh, my God, I can't have a red jersey on. This is crazy stuff. And he backed away. And the markets really saw that in the second week of April when the Fed didn't respond to all the madness in the bond markets. And ultimately, I think the Treasury secretary is the one who stepped in and stopped it.

33:42But I will say, if you push me, Karen, and you say, what do you think you should be doing? And I think there is a CNBC group that I'm part of that we put our what we would do if we were in the FOMC or on the FOMC. I would be cutting. I'd be cutting pretty significantly. I don't think there's a great storyline here to have rates 200 basis points above neutral. And I think neutral is still somewhere in the low to mid twos. We've got inflation all the way back. We had another great PCE report. And there just doesn't seem to be a great story for that. I think you're playing with fire and you don't need to.

34:21David, that's where I was going to go with PCE and CPI. It does seem like mission accomplished, right? So why not just take the victory and take the lap and move on? Is it obviously the dual mandate is what's getting in the way here, but I think they've done enough to check the box. you know i i think the the fact that he got rid of qt early he did that in the end of q1 that seemed like a nod to the new administration like he was going to play ball with them and then i said tariffs just got the fed twisted up with you know typical dc politics where they just don't want to be seen as enabling behavior that that people consider to be reckless whether that's true or not i don't believe it i think it was just negotiating tactics but i understand where others come from.

35:06I guess where I would come out on the debate for what they're going to do is I think Jay's got one year left. He wants to go down in the history books as the guy who combated the great inflation without a lot of job loss. And that's a good story for him to spin. There'll be people that say he started the inflation, but I think that's a harder sell because every G7 country have the same amount of inflation. So I think he's going to be a little more stubborn. And that'll be slowly coming out of the bond market because forward guidance will lose Jay and it'll move to whoever the new candidate is.

35:45And we might learn about that new candidate within the next three to six months. As Secretary Besson has said, they're interviewing for the new Fed spots probably by the summer and certainly the fall. So we're going to hear from, you know, whether it's, you know, there's lots of horse trading on these. Is it Kevin Hassett? Is it Kevin Warsh? Is it others who have been in the mix before? You know, I think we're going to start to hear a different forward guidance that really isn't Jay Powell anymore. David, last time you were here, you said that the markets were massively overplaying tariffs, which was, in hindsight, the right call.

36:19So have the markets have processed in sort of the volatility surrounding tariff headlines? Has the market also processed the economic impact of the tariffs, which have yet to really manifest themselves in the hard data? And I'm assuming that there will be some impact in the hard data, unless you think that there will be no impact in the hard data. Great question. And let's decompose it into the two parts that you asked. The first part is, you know, how are we thinking about this? I came from the camp of this is a tactical art of the deal, classic Trump style negotiation where he's going to go big, be a little crazy, try to dislodge the opponents and get them to accept something that actually would have been hard to get without going crazy at first.

37:09And I think many people did not see it that way. Many people thought this was some sort of actual true ask in terms of the starting point from negotiation. And it just didn't fit the typical pattern of what we've seen with this president before. So I think if you step back and said, OK, this is all tactics, this is to try to drive a fair trade outcome, to get people to come to the table, to get them to reduce their tariffs, their non-tariff barriers, maybe strengthen their currencies like the Taiwanese have done almost 10 percent since negotiations have started. And the dollar itself has weakened significantly on a trade-weighted basis.

37:47All of that was part of the rebalancing story. And I think that's largely played out and the market's more accepting of the view that I had. Whether there's an economic fallout, the second part of your question, Melissa, is a harder question. And it just depends on where we land. There could be a really positive impact because people just say, we're done. No tariffs. We're out. We're going to let you sell cars and sell beef and sell soy. Come on in. We just want to make sure we have the U.S. markets open for business. We're scared we're going to lose that. Done. And we're going to strengthen our currency a little bit so we aren't playing games with competitive devaluations and unlevel playing fields.

38:28And all of a sudden, it's actually a bigger pie that we're all sharing for global economic growth. And that's one story. And the other story is, you know, you get a little inflation. You get a little stagnation. You get a little because the tariffs stick around during that negotiation process. longer than we would hope for. Right. David, great to have you. Thank you. David Zervos. Coming up, Wall Street still binging on Netflix. The Price Target Hike streaming in. And where are traders? See the stock heading next. Don't go anywhere. Fast Money's back in two.

39:11Welcome back to Fast Money. A couple of bullish calls on Netflix today. Evercore raising its price target on the streaming giant by 200 bucks to 1 to 1350. Bank of America upping its expectations to 1490 from 1175. Analysts citing strong subscriber growth, advertising opportunities and newer live content. The bullish note comes ahead of Netflix's to dumb 2025 event this weekend where the company will announce news about upcoming content. Now, specifically for Evercore, they did a proprietary survey and basically found that a lot of folks liked live and would be more apt to continue being a subscriber if more live events were offered.

39:47And pay up. And pay up, yes. Right,$24.99 a month, I think they talked about. I mean, it's amazing how Netflix just keeps growing and growing and growing their audience and revenue and then ad-supported tiers, growing advertising, all of that. I've always had trouble with the valuation. I am long. I've sold some 1 ,200 calls against it. A trade that probably would not work out great again. it's just the valuation, but it's so, they're so far ahead, it's worth it. And I think the valuation is also my concern. It trades like 45 times forward earnings and like 34 is more like it's five-year average.

40:25I mean, it's not only a premium to the market, but itself. And I think realistically, it has a pretty mature business here in the US. Most people do subscribe to Netflix already here. So I think where the growth will come from is either international, you're going to see more ad revenue or increase in prices. But I think you do have a lot of a mature business. They have a higher bar. So with that and the valuation, I wouldn't be jumping in here. All right. Coming up, the tea totaling trade. Alcohol stocks going flat as drinkers go dry. Can the names get their buzz back? That is next. More Fast and Two.

41:01Welcome back to Fast Money. The tap appears to be running dry on alcohol stocks. Constellation brands, Boston Beer, Diageo, and Coors closing lower again today. The stock's also down significantly for the year, but one major beer stock bucking the trend, Anheuser-Busch, surging almost 41 % this year, but is investing heavily in the zero alcohol beer market, which has been gaining popularity as consumers keep dry January going and going and going. So is alcohol becoming the new tobacco stock? That's what Grasa said on the call today. Yeah, I think the younger kids are drinking more non-alcoholic beer and they're also drinking more cbd infused seltzers and even thc but the surgeon general is definitely taking a hawkish approach similar to what tobacco the way they did with tobacco so there's warning labels now on the back of alcohol but that might just get ratcheted up to causes cancer seven kinds of cancer that's not going to be a great um you know tailwind to this whole entire sector?

42:01Look, I think there is absolutely a trend that's gone on with younger people. I also think there's a lot of cyclicality of this. I think some of it's overplayed. Steve's right, though. I mean, in the cannabis space, hemp-derived THC drinks are the hottest segment by far and are in a national footprint, and there's still a lot to be worked out with that. I guess I look at Diageo as an opportunity. I think the Bud move, some of it is, think about where Bud came from. Again, some missteps in terms of where they had a marketing strategy. There has been a lot of consolidation in the beer space. I think the Spirits brands, Constellation and Diageo are world-class companies, and I think it's an opportunity.

42:39Up next, final trades.

42:49Final trade time, Tim. It seems like the Chinese stocks are once again in the outs along with the sentiment. I think Baidu, of all of them right now, what's most oversold and the bottom of a range here, interesting. Karen? Yep. Ulta, I'm going to sell some upside calls. Courtney? We talked about nuclear. I like Constellation Energy. I think long-term is at play. Take profits, Netflix. Thanks for watching Fast. Have a great weekend. Mad Money starts right now. All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC Universal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium.

43:26You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit CNBC.com forward slash Fast Money disclaimer.

From the publisher

Shares of Nvidia reversing in today’s session, and sat out the mid-day Mag7 rebound. How the chip giant is faring since its post-earnings pop, and how our traders are positioning in the stock going into June. Plus Jamie Dimon ringing the alarm bell on the bond market. The cracks he sees starting to form, and why one top market strategist is ignoring the bond market alarmists.

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 871 episodes
Nvidia’s Post Earnings Blues… And JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon’s Bond Market Warning 5/30/25CNBC's "Fast Money" · 44 min
Listen in VO