In short
Fast Money Podcast Episode Notes
Episode Information
- Podcast Title: Fast Money
- Episode Title: Nvidia’s Shareholder Meeting…. And Bank Stress Test Results 6/26/24
- Air Date: June 26, 2024
- Host: Tyler Matheson (in for Melissa Lee)
- Guests: Karen Feinerman, Steve Grasso, Guy Adami, Julie Beal
Episode Summary This episode focuses on Nvidia's shareholder meeting, the implications for the semiconductor industry amid increased competition, and the results of recent Federal Reserve stress tests on banks. The discussion provides insights and analyses regarding Nvidia's stock performance, market trends in the semiconductor sector, and the overall health of the banking industry.
---
Key Discussions
- Nvidia's Shareholder Meeting
- Performance Overview:
- Nvidia's stock closed up 0.25%, recovering from earlier losses of nearly 3% during the day.
- CEO Jensen Wong provided an optimistic outlook on Nvidia's future in AI and semiconductor markets.
- Key Insights from Jensen Wong:
- Emphasis on Nvidia's superior performance and efficiency despite competition from lower-cost chips.
- Anticipation of the Blackwell GPU being the most successful product in Nvidia's history.
- Growing adoption of AI across various sectors (e.g., pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, automotive).
- Market Reaction:
- Despite Nvidia's gain, other semiconductor stocks (Qualcomm, AMD, Taiwan Semi) experienced declines, indicating a competitive and challenging market landscape.
- Expert Opinions:
- Guy Adami: Historical patterns suggest Nvidia may face a correction despite its strong fundamentals; interest in Qualcomm as a potential trade.
- Steve Grasso: Nvidia's dominance in the AI sector remains significant with an 80%-85% market share, but the stock may face pullbacks.
- Julie Beal: Investors are concerned about the future profitability of Nvidia's chips and the overall demand for high-performance computing.
- Bank Stress Test Results
- Test Overview:
- All 31 tested banks passed the Federal Reserve’s stress test, indicating soundness in the banking sector amid a challenging economic backdrop.
- Aggregate hypothetical losses projected at $685 billion, with noted upcoming pressures on capital ratios.
- Market Implications:
- Increased potential for dividend announcements and stock buybacks as banks approach earnings announcements.
- Concerns regarding commercial real estate exposure and the necessity for deposit insurance reform were highlighted by Tom Michaud, CEO of KBW.
- Expert Opinions:
- Tom Michaud: The soundness of the banking sector was reaffirmed; potential for modest changes in earnings estimates due to cautious Fed views.
- Julie Beal: The importance of deposit insurance reform to maintain consumer confidence in regional banks.
- Other Market Highlights
- Micron Technology Earnings Call:
- Shares declined despite a positive earnings report due to disappointing future guidance.
- Market perception as a supplier for AI technology continues, but concerns about demand and competition remain.
- Gambling Stocks Analysis:
- Only a few gambling stocks (DraftKings, Flutter) are performing positively, while traditional operators struggle.
- Analysts suggest that companies like Caesars and MGM are undervalued and pose potential buying opportunities.
- Nike Earnings Preview:
- Anticipation for notable earnings report with bullish sentiment in the options market.
- Discussion on the potential for improved margins due to reduced inventory levels.
---
Key Takeaways
- Nvidia's Competitive Position: While Nvidia shows strong growth and market share, caution is warranted regarding stock valuation and competitive pressures.
- Banking Sector Resilience: The successful stress tests highlight a stable banking environment but signal the need for ongoing reforms, particularly regarding deposit insurance.
- Investment Opportunities: Analysts identify potential value in undervalued gambling stocks and express cautious optimism for companies like Nike amid a challenging retail environment.
---
Final Thoughts The episode presents a dynamic analysis of current market conditions, emphasizing the interplay between technological innovation, competitive pressures, and regulatory environments. Investors are encouraged to remain vigilant and consider both the risks and opportunities in these evolving sectors.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02John, thank you very much. Live from the Nasdaq market side in the heart of New York City's Times Square. This is Fast Money, and here's what's on tap tonight. All eyes on NVIDIA as CEO Jensen Wong lays out a rosy picture for the semi-giant's AI future. The stock staging a late-day rally to end the day in the green. Is this a good sign for the stock and the sector? We will discuss. Plus, stressed out? Bank stocks on the move after the results of the latest government stress tests. What they revealed about the health of the financial system and how shares should react. And later, shares of Whirlpool Whirl higher on reports Arrival is weighing a takeover bid.
0:42General Mills loses a star as revenue and guidance disappoint. And is it time to bet on casino stocks? Why one top analyst thinks the year's drop is overdone. I'm Tyler Matheson, in for Melissa Lee tonight. Glad to be with you, coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ Mark desk tonight. Karen Feinerman is with us, along with Steve Grasso, Guy Adami, and Julie Beal. Glad to have each of you here. Thanks for being here, Tyler. Oh, it's great to be with you. You know I love being here. Short straw again for you. I love it. I love being with you. We start with a late-day rebound in NVIDIA, managing to close a quarter of a percent higher for a second straight day in the green.
1:22Shares were down nearly 3 % at their lows, even after CEO Jensen Wong delivered an upbeat outlook to investors at today's shareholder meeting. On the competitive environment, Wang suggested that while competing chips might have a lower price tag, NVIDIA still offers the best performance and cost to run. He touched on the growing number of industries relying on AI processors from pharma to telecommunications and autos, ultimately expecting the recently launched Blackwell GPU to be the most successful one in the company's history. But while NVIDIA did eke out again, other semi names were feeling the pain.
2:02Qualcomm, AMD, Applied Materials, and Taiwan Semi, just some of the chip makers in the red. So what should we make of the choppy trading in chips? Let me turn to you, Guy. It is great having you, Tyler. Great to be here. So it's a great question. NVIDIA late day rally without question. Obviously had a nice day yesterday. I'll still go back to June 20th of last week when we saw that reversal. looked a lot like it did back on March 8th. So the setup to me suggests that the stock has a leg lower. It's not an indictment of the story by any stretch of your imagination. It's just what we've seen historically.
2:37And we try to sort of get in front of some of these trading moves. To answer your question about some of the other ones, you know, it's interesting. It's become almost zero sum, not only in the market, but in the sector as well. And NVIDIA's gains are to the detriment of a lot of names you just mentioned. I'll say this, though. Qualcomm, which traded down to the 50-day moving average today and seemingly held, looks more interesting for a trade right now than I think NVIDIA does at these current levels. Steve? So a couple of things. I think they did a great job at pointing out the sectors in space that will be helped with AI chips, which are all, right?
3:11So 11 sectors are going to be helped by it. And they also have an 80%, 85 % market share. So as long as those two things are still reality, I think it can go higher. But to Guy's point, it's had a massive run. The law of gravity probably applies. Would I be shocked if it came in? No. Am I long it? Yes. Will I stay long it? Yes. And Karen, history shows that this stock can go down, not only up. Yes. You know, I still think we're in the early innings, but that doesn't mean the stock needs to track the opportunity exactly, right? So just as Guy and Steve said, a little breather is not – we should expect it.
3:50Don't freak out. Absolutely. Don't freak out. Nothing has changed since that three days ago when it hit 140 and change. And today, nothing's changed. Valuation is now 10 percent lower. But I still like the story. I'm long. I think that – it's interesting. I don't usually think of the shareholder meeting as eventful in any way. But it was an opportunity for him to, you know, talk up the story still and, you know, the market share in Blackwell. Karen just made the point, Julie, that it's not really all that often that shareholder meetings get this kind of attention. But it's not all that often that we have a stock that gets the kind of attention NVIDIA has lately.
4:29That's right. I mean, Jensen's an absolute celebrity at this point. And so it makes sense that people would be listening with a lot of interest. And I think the onus is really on the company to start being able to demonstrate what the economics are of using their chips. It's not enough to me that they are the most efficient or that they are saving on power. And what they've tried to do is talk about, for hyperscalers, if you spend$1 on NVIDIA, you're going to get$5 of hyperscaler revenue over the next four years. That's great. But the problem with that is that we don't really know for sure that that's what companies are going to be willing to pay.
5:01And so I think that question mark is going to hamper really the development and the growth in this business. But I think for long term investors, it's still the place to be. I was speaking earlier today with a person and I kind of asked the question this way. Are the chips that they're making so advanced that the companies that are buying them need to find a way to use them? In other words, we haven't figured them out yet. that there's a scenario that you get$5 in return for every dollar you spent. But who knows, really, because these are so new, Julie. It's extremely ambiguous. And I think that's the big problem with any kind of tech transformation.
5:40You know, there's the acronym IPA. You start with infrastructure, which is the level that we're at right now. Then you have platforms and then you have applications. In order for the whole thing to work, we have to have these killer apps. And if they don't come to fruition, then all of this spending will be for naught. I'm confident that we will get there, but it's an ongoing question that I think plagues a lot of investors who are worried that the return case isn't quite there yet. Guy, IPA is usually something to drink. You don't do that, Tyler. Did you take math at the University of Virginia, or was it just a liberal arts thing?
6:11I took a probability class, and then I was done with it. You probably did extraordinarily. So let's play a little math game here, shall we, for a second. So Qualcomm, very mature company, and again, I'm only comparing it through the lens of they're both semiconductors. So I understand NVIDIA should trade at a premium. But Qualcomm is a$220 billion company that will do$42 billion of revenues-ish next year. Let's just round up and say they traded six times revenue, which, by the way, is sort of the historical norm for semiconductors. And the flip side of the coin, NVIDIA, with a$3.1 trillion market cap,$155 billion expected to earn next year, I mean, back of the envelope suggests they're somewhere between 19 and 20.
6:49Now, they deserve that premium multiple on revenue. To revenue. Just to sales. Historically, again, these are mid-to-upper single-digit companies. Now, I'm not saying it should trade at six times revenue, but should it be trading at 20? So there has to be, at some point, there's a maturity to these companies. It will manifest itself in margins. Competition is coming. And the 20 times revenue, unless they grow into it in a remarkable way, is expensive, in my opinion. Where is the competition coming from? Well, I mean, AMD is hoping that it is coming from AMD. I wonder if it could come from NVIDIA itself with needing to sell chips at a lower price, right?
7:28If there's just some pushback on the demand and that maybe would make them need to sell at a lower price. But, I mean, for right now, that kind of market share is so extraordinary. They've got like 90-some percent, right? And I think it's between 80 % and 85%. But we're splitting hairs here, right? So they're so far ahead of everybody else, and they've got the only ability to actually produce the chips. so the other companies can't actually get them as fast as NVIDIA can get them. Go ahead, Karen. One other point I want to make, right, so you're locked in now to NVIDIA, and they want to lock you in with software and hardware, right?
8:05So you get this very sticky customer. Ecosystem, somewhat like Apple. Ecosystem. Ecosystem. That's what they're building. That's what he's trying to do. Yeah. And they're still best in breed, right? Yeah. So as long as they can be the arbiter of who can produce the most amount of chips, They produce the best in breed chip. All these corporations are going to want the best in breed chip, especially if you want something that's really advanced. So NVIDIA started out with Internet of Things, gaming, car, everything. And now they're all everything to everyone. And that can't last for an extreme amount of time.
8:41But it certainly could last until the others start to produce. I would think I don't I'm not a money manager. You guys are. You have this virtuous cycle where I'm sure clients would say, if you're not overweight in NVIDIA, what are you doing? Why aren't you hitting this stock in a major way, right? Well, you're talking about career risk for people that do it for a living. Like, how do you explain to people that, no, we didn't believe the NVIDIA story. We're not in it. I mean, as you get towards July, which we're on the precipice of, as it gets later in the year, if you missed it, you're chasing.
9:14And I think to a certain extent, that's what we're seeing. But quite frankly, I don't know if that's good or bad. It is what it is, but I'm not certain it's a good thing or a bad thing at this point. All righty. We're going to stick with the chip sector. We've got an earnings alert now on Micron. Shares in the red after earnings despite a top and bottom line beat. Let's get the explanation from Seema Modi, who's been listening in on the call. Hi, Seema. In guidance, that seems to be why the stock is down, Tyler. CEO of Micron, Sanjay Mahathra, spending time on the earnings call discussing its next generation higher bandwidth memory product, HBM3E, which he says has 30 percent lower power consumption compared to its competitor solutions.
9:51He adds that HBM shipment ramp began in the third quarter. He also says data center solid state drives are in the midst of a strong demand recovery as customers have worked through their 2023 inventory and that the PC replacement cycle, which there's been a lot of questions around, should gather momentum through calendar 2025 as new artificial intelligence applications are rolled out. Now, Micron has been widely seen by the market as one of the AI beneficiaries in the semiconductor industry, providing the memory and storage for those systems. Its forecast, though, as I said, failed to meet the high expectations going into this report with a stock up 67 percent.
10:30CFRA analysts in the last hour saying that what you're seeing right now is a re-rating of the stock, but he still sees upside from current levels, tighter inventory levels. Another big talking point, they expect that to help pricing long term. Tyler, we're looking at Micron down 4.7 percent. All right, Seema, thanks very much. And Micron's and Micro CEO. Steve, why don't we talk a little bit about this? How do you trade this particular stock? So I was in and out of this one and I haven't been in it in quite some time. So I missed the hyperbolic run that it's had. It's about DRAM for them. It's a little over 70 percent of their revenues is DRAM.
11:07DRAM is needed for these data centers. So they were sort of a secondary trade for the AI push. They're not a sexy story like NVIDIA. They're the ones that are supplying the memory storage for them. They need to keep that story sexy, as sexy as you can make DRAM. And then DRAM is a boom bust commodity story. So right now, it's forever. It's been like an annuity. They had their time in the sun. Now they have to really put up or shut up that the future is going to be just as exciting as people had thought it was going to be. Julie, can you make DRAM sexy? If anyone can, it's me, right? Well, no, I think the real trick for this business is that the stock doesn't go up if they just sell as much as they possibly can.
11:59They need to not be able to even meet the demand. And that's not the case right now, because as we noted, it's a commodity type of business. And so for these guys, they can attach themselves to the AI train as much as they want. But at the end of the day, it's still a much more competitive and commodity business. So they can benefit, but there's going to be lots of competition. And who knows what margin and profitability there's going to be in that business. Very interesting. All right, let's get more on NVIDIA. Go back there in the AI trade with the Milius head of technology research, Ben Reitzes.
12:29Ben, welcome. Good to have you with us. Hey, Tyler. Great to be here. Is what's been going on in, we sort of touched on it with Karen a moment ago. Is what's been going on with NVIDIA a kind of expectable phenomenon, something we've seen before? So an investor who is in there for the ride and goes, oh boy, we were down 15 % last week. Is this the end of the game here? Should I be out of it? What's going on here? Well, I think that NVIDIA has these moves intracorder where people find themselves underweight and they have to catch up and then it runs and then there's all sorts of things. This last week there was a rebalance and I think a lot of people were playing that and then it kind of unwound and it created a big move.
13:09But in general, NVIDIA has nailed the full-stack approach. The only thing that I've experienced like this is, well, maybe two things, maybe the Wintel monopoly of the 90s or duopoly, whatever they were, and then Apple getting the iPhone. And the full-stack approach, when people nail it, when a company nails it, is able to generate a disproportionate share of the profits for that sector. And in their case, some people argue it's like all the profits. Well, that sounds like you're describing the word we used earlier, and that is ecosystem, that they have built it, they own it, it is their game to lose.
13:46That's right. Or win. Well, the foresight that they had is unparalleled. unparalleled. That's why we were kind of laughing when some people asked me, are they being investigated? For what? For foreseeing the biggest tech change ever and they should be punished? But okay. But what they did is they built a language, a computing language and an ecosystem that allows you to monetize AI and obviously they're killing it. And I think that people, this is probably got the most upside of the Mag 7 that we cover, even though we really like Apple and a few others. Questions, thoughts? Oh, good, Karen. Sorry.
14:25No, go ahead. Go ahead. Real quick. Ben initiated Dell on November 20th, and you've been spot on ever since. The quarter was May 31st. The stock sold off. Made actually sense to me. Are you concerned how it's been trading since? You had that little bounce after the sell off, but it's right back to sort of those levels. I think the story's still intact, but the stock seemingly run out of steam a little bit. Well, you can't go straight up unless you're NVIDIA, right? That's the rule. So in Dell's case, they missed margins. And there's concern that only NVIDIA is allowed to beat margins, but some of their partners don't.
14:59I think if Dell demonstrated margin expansion sequentially as we go throughout the year, stock rebounds. But bigger picture guy, I think that we're in a generational shift of market cap from like software SaaS back towards hardware. And if Dell shows that they can be part of these AI factories, that means a secularly right company. Secularly right companies get market multiples, even premiums, right? So we're staying the course based on that thesis. What is – you had a question. Yeah, so he talked about Blackwell, first of all, coming out earlier than people thought. And then also that we will come out every year with a new chip.
15:39So in part of that, creating the ecosystem, how long do you think customers will buy that? Yeah, I think that what's really amazing about these guys is obviously they're doing all this and then they're innovating on this annual cadence. So developers and their customers, the clouds, can say, hey, I know where they're going. I'm going to budget accordingly and look into the future and know that there's an upgradable cadence. That is so valuable. Well, you know, even though it's not an enterprise business, Apple does it every year. And that cadence is so reliable and gives you such a pole position.
16:15And also, they're running, you know, everybody's trying to catch them. And if they're running 150 miles an hour while everybody else is running 100, I mean, it's going to be hard to catch these guys. So, Ben, sort of piggybacking on that, when you look at the stock, it's got 80%, 85 % market share. We've discussed that. When they did the stock split, I had thought they were pulling a rabbit out of a hat that they didn't need to try to take the attention off of megabeats going forward. They wanted to sort of suck up as much oxygen in the room. The retail investor could buy fractional shares. You didn't need to split the stock to be able to do that.
16:52In your mind, I know you're bullish, but in your mind, how long before we get to that next hump in the road do they have? Is it a two-year cycle? How long do they outperform? Well, we think they continue to outperform, and it's really hard to know quarter to quarter, but we are showing sequential growth. And I think that what we need to see is they continue to beat and raise, at least at some cadence. And that is very doable in a lot of our research that we see. The margins actually, one of the big surprises, margins have been able to stay intact and expand. And that's just staggering. 70 % operating margins is rarefied.
17:29air guy. That's why they deserve that high EV to sales. Because anyway, I think that as long as we see that sequential growth, you know, we're going to keep going. One thing we wrote about recently, Steve, is that there's 270 billion in cash these guys are going to generate over the next three years. If they add a buyback to this, they don't want to say that because that's something mature companies do. I just got the goosebumps. Well, that was going to be my question. What are they going to do with all the cash they're going to have? This could be the thing that answers Steve's question. It's no one's talking about it.
18:01And when you do the model we do, it's a cash gusher. And there's just nothing they can do. This government's not going to let them buy anything big. They can't invest that much in R &D. It's just not possible. So we got to get it as shareholders. And that could be the thing, one of the things that helps. And it doesn't mean they're not growing. It's not an insult to buy back stock if you got nothing else. Of course, final button here. It's in the 120s now. What's your price target on that? My price target's 160. And we feel really good about that. Ben, thank you very much. Thanks, Tyler. Thanks, guys.
18:31Thank you for being with us. All right. Coming up, we're going to jump into Japan as the yen sinks to its lowest level against the dollar in nearly 40 years. What it means for the Japanese and U.S. economies and a pair of fast movers heading in different directions. Why Whirlpool is flowing higher and the results that had shares of General Mills getting toasted. Don't go anywhere. Fast money's back in two. You're watching Fast Money here on CNBC. We'll be right back.
19:12Welcome back to Fast Money. The Japanese yen slipping to its lowest level against the dollar since 1986. The currency topping the key level of 160, a level at which the Bank of Japan has previously intervened. The country's central bank has recently suggested its quantitative easing plan could be bigger than expected next month and may even include a rate hike. You've been watching this level. What is the JCB likely to do here? Well, I think whether they acknowledge it or not or whether they know it or not, I think they find themselves in a bit of a difficult situation. Proper decorum prohibits me from saying exactly what it is, but they're screwed in a word.
19:48And, you know, they intervened in April. They intervened on behalf of the yen. Dollar went from 160 down to 152. And here we are right back above it. That's, by the way, in the face of interest rates going higher as well. So those two things shouldn't be happening. Their economy is a bit of a mess. They have a demographics problem. And quite frankly, I mean, whatever they do at this point is going to be really problematic for their economy. You say, OK, why should we care here? Because they own a little over$1 trillion worth of U.S. Treasuries. And I don't think it's coincidence, Tyler, that 10-year yields went up in a pretty market fashion today on the back of dollar yen going through 160.
20:22So all along, one of the things that I've thought about interest rates, they'll go higher here in the U.S., predicated not in large part, but in some part of what's going on in Japan. Julie, what's the economic implication of this? When you look at what a weaker currency means to a country that exports a lot, it means that their exports become, what, cheaper, more available. Can that help Japan's economy? It can in some ways, but I think there is a limit to where that becomes helpful. And the challenge for them is they cannot fight our Fed, which is holding rates higher. Jerome Powell is like Derek Jeter at a little league game, right?
21:03It's just really hard to offset that. And I think that's a little bit the situation of a lot of different economies. They don't feel like they can even lower rates because until the Fed does it, it really doesn't help their economies all that much. Karen? Well, also, Julie, another point of Julie's point is, but everything they import is so expensive. So expensive, yes. There's the other side of that. Yeah. So it raises their cost of living. Can I ask Guy a question? Certainly. Okay, so this trillion dollars, are you saying that they're not going to roll over? They're going to use that because they're rolling over at, you know, much higher percentage than they're going to earn on their own bonds.
21:37But are they going to use that all for trying to support the yen? I think that's one of the fears that that's exactly what we'll do, right? And they've been sort of, I don't want to say the buyer of last resort. They've been a pretty obviously significant buyer. I don't think that's happening now. And I think at some point there's a concern that they'll actually start selling U.S. treasuries. By the way, and Tim said this a couple nights ago, all what we've just talked about for the last four or five minutes leads to the gold trade, I believe. So nobody wants to say it. I get it. They're the fourth largest economy in the world.
22:06I understand that. You know, Karen said it in the break. But, you know, you're going to start hearing as this thing, if it approaches 165, you're going to start seeing headlines about currency crisis and those things and the ramifications it might have for global markets. What's the third largest economy, by the way? I think it's U.S., China, Germany, Japan. But Germany and Japan are basically 4.2-ish. Quick final button here. Well, this is the problem. And Julie spoke about it. If the U.S. is holding rates where it's at right now, it's not just dollar yen. It's dollar everything else in the world.
22:38and there usually is a coordinated effort to stay on the same page. So even though people are saying that they're going to remain hawkish in the U.S., there's a limited time that they can do so. All right, a lot more fast money to come. Here's what's coming up next. Whirlpool making a splash as General Mills gets baked. How one company's potential appliance buyout and another's weak revenues are moving these stocks. Plus, stress test results are out, so the bank trade is coming up. Why our next guest says the group is in great shape and could just keep climbing. You're watching Fast Money live from the NASDAQ market side in Times Square.
23:17We're back right after this.
23:27Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of Whirlpool topping the tape today, jumping 17%. That's the agitator right there, the agitating cycle. 70 % on reports that Germany's Bosch is considering making an offer for the home appliance company. It was Whirlpool's biggest gain since March of 2020, but the stock is still down more than 16 % so far this year. Spin cycle here. Yes. So, I mean, even with this big jump, it's gone from like seven times earnings to eight times earnings. They do have debt there. I mean, that's kind of crazy, right? But, you know, obviously, without a lot of home sales, we don't need to replace all of those appliances again.
Read the full transcript
24:05And there was this big pull forward during the pandemic. But I think this is attractive. I just am not sure that the FTC, the regulators going to let it go. Bosch, although Bosch and Mealy, those are kind of high end. Whirlpool, which owns KitchenAid and Maytag and a number of things, that's a lower end. You'd think this this FTC, though, would be against aspirational appliances, maybe just as they are against aspirational handbags and Capri. So I think this is going to be difficult from a legal standpoint, but it makes a lot of sense. Julie, any quick thoughts on Bosch and Whirlpool? Sorry, Bosch is like 8 % of the market here and Whirlpool is more like 28, 30.
24:49So I think there's for sure reasons to support this business because it has been struggling. And so I could see the FTC looking on it more favorably. And for sure, there needs to be an improvement in margins. And I think this transaction could help. Yeah, interesting. All right. Meantime, shares of General Mills. Bit of a buzzkill in today's session. The packaged foods giant dropping more than 4 percent after missing on revenue estimates in the latest quarter. The company also giving lackluster guidance for the current fiscal year, citing cost pressures. Today's move bringing General Mills into negative territory on the year.
25:24No crunch here, Steve. Yeah, if you go back just on technicals, you go back to March, February, March levels. There seems to be a little bit of support here. But as long as inflation stays high, people will reach for the secondary box, the generic box, not the one that they ordinarily, the brand that they pay for. And then as soon as inflation starts to break, then people go back to their old habits unless they like the stale box that they got. So that's what we're watching here, sort of a cyclical event with inflation and seeing how it performs. A cereal is expensive, man. Damn straight. Yeah, really is.
25:59I mean, the boxes get smaller, you pay the same price. That's screwflation or shrinkflation. Neither one you want to have, by the way, as a human being. Any thoughts on general? Organic growth was in North America down 6%, which was much worse. It was almost twice as bad as the street was looking for, meaning effectively, you know, they're unable to. Inflation's hurting them now. It was working for them. Now they can't pass on their cost, and growth is slowing down. So Steve is right. And where do you buy the stock? It feels like it has another leg lower. By the way, this leg lowers on the back of a couple legs lower since April of last year when I think it made its all-time high.
26:36All righty. Coming up, the Fed announcing in just the last hour that all banks passed this year's stress test, but there are still concerning data points in the results inside the action. And what it means for the financials is next. And you're looking at the only major gambling stocks in the green this year. We'll dig in on what's weighing down on the gambling sector and whether you should roll the dice right after this. Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.
27:15All right, welcome back to Fast Money, everybody. Stocks closing in the green just barely. Dow up 15 points, but still negative for the week. The S &P and Nasdaq extending their gains since Monday. Shares of FedEx and Rivian holding on to yesterday's after-hours gains. FedEx delivered strong profit guidance for the year and suggested a possible sale of its freight unit. And Rivian jumping after VW announced it's going to invest up to$5 billion in the EV maker. That stock sold its best day since going public back in 2021. Rivian's move helping give Amazon a boost. The biggest shareholder in the company saw its stock rise nearly 4 percent to a record market cap above two trillion dollars for the first time ever.
28:00That's rarefied air. Shares of Moderna, meantime, heading in the opposite direction, down 11 percent after the drugmaker announced that its RSV shot showed just 50 percent efficacy after 18 months. Shares of Levi's dropping after reporting the company beating on an earnings beat but posting a small revenue miss. Jim speaking exclusively to CEO Michelle Gass tonight at 6 p.m. on Mad Money. The Federal Reserve releasing its annual bank stress test results in all banks involved this year. Well, at least they passed. CNBC's Leslie Picker has the details. Hi, Leslie. Hey, Tyler. That's right. The Fed tested 31 banks this year, found that all of them would be able to withstand that severe recession that it devised.
28:48The results announced about an hour ago indicated that projected hypothetical losses would amount to$685 billion in aggregate. And the CET1 ratio, the cushion against losses, would decline to a minimum of 9.9 percent. Now, that's a higher absolute level and a deeper decline than last year, even though the test was fairly similar to the one conducted in 2023. Senior Fed officials believe the aggregate stress capital buffers, which determine how much more capital banks need to hold as a result of these tests, should go up modestly. The Fed says the larger decline is due to increases in credit card balances and higher delinquency rates, corporate credit portfolios that have become riskier, as well as higher expenses and lower fee income.
29:31Now, that CET1 ratio saw some dispersion among the six largest banks under that severe adverse scenario. J.P. Morgan maintaining the highest levels at 12.5 percent, while Wells Fargo had the lowest at 8.1 percent. Banks can start, and that's among the largest six banks. Now, banks can start announcing their capital return plans after the market closes on Friday, Tyler. So that's something that we could be looking for as it pertains to some market-moving potential among the banks. All right, fantastic. Leslie, thank you very much. For more reaction to the bank's stress test, let's bring in Tom Michaud.
30:07He's the CEO of KBW, a Stiefel company. Tom, welcome. Good to have you with us. Was there anything in these stress tests that surprised you? Did it pretty much go the way you expected? Pretty good results here. Yeah, I would say, first of all, it speaks to the soundness of the industry. In the first page of the report, they give a multi-year track record of the capital ratios for the banks. And you can see that the banks have done an incredible job of building capital over the last decade. So I think the first piece of news is that there is no worry from the credit quality adverse selection basis.
30:43What we did see is that the Fed had a little bit more cautious view of what the earnings of these banks would be in an adverse scenario. And like Leslie just said, their capital ratios might be required to be a little bit higher than originally expected. So maybe you might see a modest change in some earnings estimates. But we think the story remains intact, which is you're going to see lots of dividend increases. You're going to see lots of buybacks. And we think these stocks are very well positioned to go into the quarterly earnings in a couple of weeks. Do you think the big banks will continue their sort of dominant position, not in terms of market share, but in terms of stock market performance over the midsize, the regionals?
31:26And how do you explain that? Well, they have less commercial real estate, and they also have exposure to investment banking. Investment banking has been bouncing off the bottom in terms of revenue opportunity. Like, for example, this quarter, we think Goldman's going to be up 15 % to 20 % year over year, but their run rate is only 75 % of what we think a typical run rate would be. So the big banks tend to have less commercial real estate. They have more exposure to the business that's going to come first, which we think is investment banking. And they also tend to be a little bit more profitable.
32:01So we have been focused on the bigger banks and we will continue. Karen. Hi, thanks for being on. So I think this, as you suggested, wasn't really a surprise. What are you expecting, though, from Basel Endgame? Would that be a bigger deal here for these banks? So Basel Endgame, we think, is going to be adjusted. The Fed chairman has said that. And we think the banks have already been building capital to get ready for it. So so we think there's a very good chance that when you see it, it will be treated as good news rather than bad news, because what was originally proposed was just a little bit too strong, we think, and would have really, I think, dinged the profitability of the banks and maybe even changed what financial services was going to look like in the next five to 10 years.
32:49Tom, we always seem to be fighting the last war. So when we look at the stress tests, what do you think that they should be doing? Because we thought we had everything in order and then we had the regionals really hit a wall. What do you think that they're not doing that they should be doing? Because this script was written a decade and change ago. Thank you for that question, because the biggest missed opportunity is deposit insurance reform, which is the banks that failed last year had plenty of capital. It's just that deposit depositors got nervous about the bond losses. What we really need is we need the myth that we need to raise and take the FDIC suggestion and raise deposit insurance for small businesses.
33:35So small businesses can keep their deposits in regional banks and not feel like when they're stressed, they need to go find a too big to fail bank. It's going to change what the industry looks like in 10 years if it isn't addressed it soon. I think the capital situation's been dealt with, which you can see even in the stress test. Now it's time to focus on deposit insurance reform. All right. Fantastic. Tom Michaud of KBW, thank you very much. Let's trade these stocks, Guy. Steve asked the right question. I mean, Karen, but Steve is spot on. And we talked about this at the time. If Silicon Valley Bank were under the auspices of the stress, they would have passed, just to be clear.
34:15And they were the 16th. So the stress test to me is somewhat meaningless. I get it. Now, you'll say that Silicon Valley Bank, the deposit base, was effectively all the same person, and they all pulled it one time. I get it. That was probably idiosyncratic. It's not going to happen again. However, how important are the tests or how valuable are the tests? I'll say this quickly. KRE does not trade well at all. If you look at the small banks, they do not trade. They're trying to tell, I think, you something. And I think they're trying to tell you what the state of the consumer is and maybe what the state of small business is as well.
34:44Karen, thought here? Well, I like the big banks. I like J.P. Morgan. The city is now the biggest position and I think is the most upside. But I think we're going to see a good quarter from them. And I can't believe it starts in two weeks already. Yeah, right. Earnings all week. Yes. I think the 12th is J.P. Morgan for sure. Yeah. And I think we'll see buybacks, more buybacks. All right, coming up, is it time to ante up on the gambling stocks? That group could be a betting bargain ahead. Fast Money is back in tune.
35:20Welcome back to Fast Money. Of all the major gambling stocks, only DraftKings and Flutter are in positive territory in 2024. Traditional casino operators like MGM, Caesars, Las Vegas Sands, and Melco all in the red. But it's now the time to place a bet on this sector. CNBC's Contessa Brewer joins us for a closer look at what's weighing on the gambling stocks. Contessa. Tyler, good to see you. Yeah, gaming stocks are lagging the S &P year to date. Pens off almost 30 percent. Caesars off 20 percent almost. MGM, wind, sands in the red. As you point out, only FanDuel's parent flutter and DraftKings in the green for the year.
36:00OK, so Morningstar says the whole group is an attractive bargain, especially Caesars, which it says is undervalued by 48 percent, MGM by 28 percent, followed by Wynn at 27 percent. The analyst says investors are shying away because of competition, because of regulatory risk like, you know, Illinois raising the state taxes, worries over inflation hitting discretionary spend. But really what we've seen is that consumer reticence is just not showing up in gambling. Online and sports betting is fueling growth, and likely that's going to expand to more states. Las Vegas is on fire. It hit a new milestone in May, we just learned today, air travel of 5 % over last year.
36:44That's a record for May. Macau still plotting upward in its recovery, but investors are spooked by macro China issues. Though just a note this week, analysts say, look, Macau is insulated here. So Seaport Research came out with a note today picking Melco, Galaxy and Wynn as the best short-term picks for Macau casinos. Las Vegas, Sands, the pick through 2026. It's clear that if you think that this is a group that can weather the storm and the headwinds that are in front of them, they are undervalued and might be a good bargain right now. Tyler? Thanks very much. Karen, do you have any thoughts on these?
37:21Do you take a chance on them? Well, I do for the draft, you know, pick DraftKings with Breonna Stewart, my partner, who had a phenomenal day on Sunday. She was just on fire. So that was great. Stock, this Illinois thing, as Contessa mentioned, where they just, you know, slapped this progressive tax on Illinois, that was not good for DraftKings. Julie, any thoughts on the gambling stocks? Yeah, it's really tricky, right? Because you would expect there to be more stability in the earnings income streams on these businesses. And you just look over history and it is all over the place. So I think they trade cheap for a reason.
37:57Because while you would expect demand to be relatively stable through cycles, it's not. And they end up having all of these exogenous factors like wage increases, et cetera, that make it kind of a less attractive sector to be invested in. Too much instability there for Julie, Steve. I tried Las Vegas and it was cheap and it got cheaper. I had to dump the Las Vegas. And usually, so you get Macau, you get Vegas, or you did get Vegas, and then you had Singapore. And when you get Macau and Vegas. And MGM, you get more of a Vegas tilt to it. If Vegas is on fire, it's not down that much this year. It's down 5%.
38:34So maybe you want to stay close to home on the MGM. But I think Karen's probably got the best way to play it right now because people are thinking new casino stocks, not the old ones that we're used to trading. The old legacy stocks in that sector. All righty, coming up, shares of Nike down more than 13 % this year. But could earnings tomorrow help save the swoosh? How options traders are lacing up for that report when Fast returns.
39:14Hi, welcome back to Fast Money, everybody. Nike shares just not doing it this year, down more than 13 percent in 2024. The Sportswear stock reports earnings after the bell tomorrow. But despite this year's weakness, option traders are feeling a little bit bullish about the coming results. Mike Coe joins us now to break down the action. Mike, I mean, you'd kind of think that going into an Olympics is a good time to own Nike. Yeah, I mean, I think the company is obviously looking to that as a potential propellant for it. Right now, the options market is implying a move of about 7 % higher or lower after they report earnings.
39:51And we saw a lot of volume. It traded well over two times its average daily options volume today, calls significantly outpacing puts. Interestingly, the busiest contract is one that's actually seen a lot of activity this month. The September 100 calls, 8 ,000 of those traded for over$3.20 a contract. That adds to 36 ,000 of existing open interest. Buyers of those calls are obviously betting that the stock move post earnings could be higher. That would be a representative move of about 10 percent over the next 12 weeks. All right, Mike, thanks very much. Guy, any thoughts here? Yeah, I do. So when they reported on the 21st, I think it was the third quarter, inventories were down 13 and a quarter percent or so against, well, flat sales growth, which suggests to me maybe margins will be actually better than people expect this quarter.
40:35You've seen the commensurate sell-off. I actually think it's sort of interesting here. That$90 level is sort of a bottom. I think you can trade Nike from the long side. All right. Yeah, cooling consumer demand. China demand has slowed. But you started off that conversation with Mike. You're going to have a marketing event for the entire Olympics. So there's a tremendous amount of competition. But I think it's the opportune time for Nike to gain that spotlight back, and they're going to do that with the Olympics. Julie, lace them up or not? ANNE RULETTANI - I think I agree. One of my favorite things in a stock is when expectations are pretty soft.
41:09And I think that's the case here. They're really moderate. And I do think that there's an opportunity for a refresh cycle for them that they desperately need. They need product innovation. So I think there's potential here. JOHN WHYTE Yeah. Karen, any thoughts on Nike? KAREN KUMARANI I kind of agree with Guy, both on the inventory issue, which was a good one, so that they're under-reliative to where they have been. So they should be able to have decent pricing. And I think we're all sort of in agreement. Everybody agree. Well, by the way, I like Nike. I got to go to this. Your daughter swims. I was in Indianapolis for the Olympic trials.
41:42Really? That's badass. Oh, that's serious. Belly flop. They don't wear Nikes in the pool. They don't wear Nikes in the pool. No. All right, folks. Final trades coming up in just a minute.
42:03All right, time for the final trade. Let's go around the horn. Julie, you get to go first today. I'm still nervous investing in bank stocks, but I like software providers for them, and Sino's one of the better ones. All right, let's go to Karen next. Yeah, so similar to the Nike story, Lululemon, great premier company, sort of lost its way a little, but I think it's found its way back. Lululemon. Yes. Steve. I love this symbol. The stock is called Sam Sara. The symbol is Sam Sara. The symbol is Internet of Things, IOT. It got obliterated on earnings, bounced right where it should have bounced, and I think it rises further.
42:40Guy? You should go to YouTube and watch Tyler Matheson's graduation speech. No, am I kidding around? I'm going to watch it. I had the good luck to give the graduation speech. P.A.S. At Montclair High. Go. P.A.S. All right, that's it. Thanks for watching Fast Money. Jim Cramer, right now. Thanks, Todd. All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC Universal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion.
43:19Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash fastmoneydisclaimer.
From the publisher
Nvidia leading a semi selloff, as the company’s shareholder meeting sheds light on growing competition. What the moves mean for the chip trade. Plus Bank stocks in focus after the Fed’s stress test results. Why one investment firm’s CEO says the group is in great shape.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
