In short
Podcast Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money" - Stocks Jump As America Votes… And Cathie Wood Weighs in on Tech (11/5/24)
Episode Overview In this episode of "Fast Money," hosted by Courtney Reagan, the show dives into the market's reactions on Election Day, with stock prices rising as Wall Street anticipates the results of the Presidential election. The episode features insights from prominent traders and an interview with Cathie Wood, CEO of Ark Invest, who discusses the election's implications for the technology sector and growth investments.
Key Highlights
Market Movement on Election Day
- All three major indexes (Dow, S&P, Nasdaq) rose over 1% on Election Day.
- The S&P and Nasdaq are nearing record highs, with NVIDIA recently overtaking Apple as the largest publicly traded company.
- Traders express optimism about market stability post-election, despite ongoing uncertainties.
Traders' Insights
- Tim Seymour:
- Suggests a reduction in market volatility, indicated by a VIX around 20.
- Highlights solid economic indicators, including a strong labor market and financial sector performance.
- Karen Feynerman:
- Emphasizes the potential impact of a political "sweep" on market direction.
- Predicts a mixed outcome could lead to a stable market.
- Dan Nathan:
- Questions the assumption that Republican leadership equates to better market performance.
- Notes that the economy is currently stable, with unemployment low and inflation easing.
Cathie Wood's Perspective
- Discusses the potential for innovation under both political parties, signaling bipartisan support for transformative technologies.
- Highlights the importance of reducing regulations to foster growth in the tech sector.
- Emphasizes the long-term value of companies in her portfolio, especially in healthcare and technology.
Economic Indicators
- Positive job market and growth signals, including GDP growth of 2.8% and decreasing inflation rates.
- Concerns remain about how election outcomes might impact fiscal policy and the Federal Reserve's actions.
Earnings Reports
- Palantir:
- Reports a significant earnings increase, with shares rising 23%, making it one of the best performers in the S&P.
- Analysts caution about its high valuation relative to growth rates.
- Supermicro:
- Issues warnings about potential delisting and accounting concerns, leading to a drop in stock price.
Election Poll Insights
- Early exit polls show mixed feelings amongst voters regarding the economy, with a significant portion feeling worse off than four years ago.
- Economic confidence varies, with many voters not feeling the benefits of stock market highs.
Final Trades from Traders
- Tim: Delta Airlines, citing strong EPS growth.
- Karen: TJX, indicating its resilience regardless of election outcomes.
- Dan: Google, suggesting options plays for leverage.
- Guy: Newmont Mining, indicating it’s a buying opportunity after recent declines.
Conclusion The episode encapsulates a day of significant market movements influenced by the Presidential election. The discussions reveal a blend of optimism and caution among traders regarding economic stability, the tech sector's future, and the broader market's response to political outcomes. Cathie Wood's insights reinforce the focus on innovation as a bipartisan priority, while traders offer actionable insights for navigating the market post-election.
References
- [Fast Money Disclaimer](https://www.cnbc.com/fast-money-disclaimer/)
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square. This is Fast Micro in focus. The semi-company posting its first earnings report since its lead auditor quit, she tried to say, and what to make of the numbers and how to trade that sector. Plus, Palantir pops to record highs when investors lose their bet on the casino stock and Boeing's machinists approve a deal to end a seven-week long strike. The trades on all of those moves are coming up. I am Courtney Reagan in this evening for Melissa Lee. Coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, we have Tim Seymour, Karen Feynerman, Dan Nathan and Guy Adami.
0:53And we start with some solid market gains this election day. All three indexes up a percent or more. The S &P and Nasdaq less than two percent from record highs. Every sector in the S &P up today with consumer discretionary and industrials leading the gains. And Mag7 names also higher today. NVIDIA overtaking Apple to become the biggest publicly traded company for the first time since mid-June. So is today's action the market? Are we breathing a sigh of relief that we will soon be able to put this election uncertainty behind us. Tim, what do you think? What is the market telling us? How are you feeling?
1:28The people you're talking to? Where are we right now? I think the VIX tells you a story of a market where there's a little less volatility, but it's still trading at 20. And I think that the market is also has some sense that there could be a continuity here that maybe is unexpected. So I'm not sure what the outcome is going to be. Remember, folks, we don't predict that stuff here. I just think we're going to get where we actually had pretty solid numbers out of, say, mega cap tech companies, where we also heard, you know, sectors like industrial sectors like banks. We've seen financials outperform.
1:59I think the setup in November is that this is the best year month of the year for stocks. The backdrop when you had an ISM services, we all know the biggest part of the U.S. economy. It's the highest in two years came out today. The labor market looks fine. The Fed's going to go and they're probably going to cut 25 basis points. The market without elections should be going higher, even though we're already up almost 14 percent off of the intraday low on that fateful August 5th day when we all thought that the world was crumbling. What we learned since then and now is, one, the job market's not falling apart.
2:29The U.S. economy is probably above trend growth. And the Fed is your friend. That's where I choose to opine, because I think no matter what happens in terms of the polls between now and when we actually know, and that's part of the unknown for markets, is I think markets will get back to the reality of where we are with this economy right now. And I think it's a pretty good backdrop for stocks. That is an interesting point, Karen. I mean, whoever inherits the White House does take over a pretty good economy. Obviously, we're talking about many stocks near record highs. Market broadly performing pretty well.
2:59I mean, does it matter who wins the White House for markets? I think it matters if there's a sweep. OK. Then I think we would see a mandate from one side or another. And so that could lead to very different markets. But I think who knows how it's going to come out. And I think the likelihood of a sweep, I don't think that's the most likely. But I think that would be even if actually it's not a sweep, it's just extremely close. It may be hard to get anything done. And I think for the markets, that may be a very good case scenario. Yeah, I believe that's what Stephanie Link was saying today, that that sort of the markets almost want to have the split Congress.
3:32Dan. Yeah. I mean, again, I think there's probably two likely outcomes. one that Harris wins and you have a split government and then another that you have a Republican sweep. If Trump wins, then they take the Senate and they keep the House. And I think that that's kind of contrary to some of the things that people are saying, why the market rallied the way it did. You know, we heard Trump trade, Trump trade, you know, all that stuff for a long time. I don't think there's really any evidence that the stock market trades better than it does, you know, under a Republican president as it does a Democratic president.
4:00And I can go back just in the last 25 years, some of the worst market periods were under Republican presidents. And so, you know, at the end of the day, I think today's rally speaks to more what Tim is talking about, that the economy is, you know, we have a 2.8 percent GDP. We have unemployment at 4.1 percent. It's still at 50 year lows. Right. And we have inflation that is down from 9 percent to below 3 percent. Now, I'm not saying that's the rosiest picture. I mean, it could be late cycle sort of action. But I think Q3 earnings told us, to Tim's point also, that things are OK right now. Right.
4:33And there's still high expectations for 2020. 2025, I think, in fact, has year-over-year earnings growth at like 13%, 14%. Now, a lot of us coming into this year didn't think we were going to hit that 11 % bogey year-over-year earnings growth, and it looks like we are going to. So, again, I think that the economy is okay. That's probably one of the reasons why I think the market goes up no matter who wins. UBS is saying equities are attractive regardless of the result. Guy. Well, a lot's changed since the last time you were here in May for you without question. Welcome back, Bonnie. But in terms of the market, not a lot has changed.
5:04I think everybody's saying sort of similar stuff. I mean, if you look what we've done over the last four or five trading sessions, we basically got back today and Friday while we lost Wednesday and Thursday. And that's sort of been the pattern. One or two big day sell-offs, the market recovers over the ensuing week. And we're seeing now the only difference is, to Tim's point, we have a VIX that's still either side of 20, which may just be, you know, election concerns, you know, people obviously hedging against that or into that or in the weeks after that. But with that said, all the same themes are working.
5:35You know, banks continue to trade pretty well. All seemingly this, you know, renewed sense of the economy and the economy is doing better than people think. Those trades continue to well. And quite frankly, precious metals continue to work as well, which is somewhat, I don't know, doesn't make a lot of sense. But that's been the theme now for quite some time. Yeah, that's funny. Tim, in this UBS report, they're actually talking about how gold remains a valuable hedge against sort of uncertainty regardless of where we are. This is Karen's line, right? Yeah. Yes. What's what's the reason why I can't invest in gold?
6:04I can't find it. So precious metals are certainly your friend when there's political chaos. They are your friend when there's some type of a deflationary force out there. Sometimes they're not your friend in an inflationary environment. And if you look for the period where gold actually really underperformed in the last three years, it was during that period. And it was underperforming barely. Actually, on a relative basis, it was outperforming in absolute terms. it wasn't going higher. So, guys, right, I think we've liked gold here for a while. I think we've liked precious metals here. We've noted that silver has outperformed over the last few weeks.
6:36It probably will continue to. But gold is a function of a long-term trend, which is, say what you want, it's not even about the fall of the U.S. empire. It's really a case where central banks have been diversifying really since the last, I don't know, 25 years that I've been looking at gold, is that this has been a trade that certainly that's part of the dynamic. The The other part of the dynamic is there is a deficit. There is a fear out there that there's fiscal, you know, just lack of restraint out there. Whatever party in power, by the way, look around the world and you can probably see a lot of the same thing.
7:08That's why gold works. That's why I would not run too far from that trade. You're writing down something over there, Karen. Yeah, no, I don't own gold. I always joke that, oh, no, everything's good for gold. So you should have gold. I do have Bitcoin. I've had it for a long, long time. It was supposed to be some of the things that it's not a store of value that really hasn't worked. It really does not become useful for transactions. But for the fear of fiat currencies, which we're in a situation where a fiat currency could really be devalued. Right. I think the case is there. Unfortunately, it's sort of shrouded in regulatory hassles that as those have been dismantled, it's done much better.
7:44But that's sort of my fiat currency hedge. All right. Fair enough. Well, we've got an earnings alert here, I think, on Trump Media. Shares down after hours. Julia Boorstin has those details for us if she's ready.
8:01All right, Julia may not be there. Yes, I'm here, Courtney. Trump Media and Technology, ticker DJT. Shares are down now about 1 percent this after the company reported its quarterly results. Of course, reporting on Election Day here, the company reporting$1 million in revenue for the third quarter, in addition to$4.7 million in interest income. The company also reporting an operating loss of$23.7 million and a net loss of$19.2 million. The company stating in the release that it, quote, continues to explore additional possibilities for growth, such as potential mergers and acquisitions with companies that would benefit from Trump media and technology and branding, including in the realm of fintech.
8:42Shares now down 2%. Courtney, back over to you. Got it. Thank you very much, Julia, for that. For more, let's bring in Weekly Advisories' Peter Buchvar. Peter, thank you so much for joining us here. Really appreciate you being here with us on a very, very active day for markets, of course, as well as for the world and our political landscape. What do you think investors should be positioned right now, as we said, where we have no idea what the outcome will be? Will it be a sweep? Will it be clearly one candidate or another in the White House? What are you advising? Well, policy-wise, if there's a split Congress, the Fed meeting on Thursday is going to be more relevant than who's the next president.
9:19Even though we're pretty sure they're cutting rates and you still think that. Yes, but I think the bond market has been the most interesting thing to watch since the Fed last met in September, when the tenure is up 70 basis points since they met. Now, if you're a responsible central banker, you have to ask yourself, OK. Hold on a second. Is there such a word? I hate it's an oxymoron. I agree. OK, interest rates have gone straight up since I cut rates. Gold's at an all-time record high. Credit spreads are extraordinarily tight. Inflation prints have been a little bit above expectations if you look at the last CPI.
9:55Jobs data is very confusing. I think you've got to look in the mirror and say, do we really need to cut? And if I do cut, maybe I pull back the expectations for December. So I think we really need to see this bond market action here. And getting back to whoever's going to win, regardless of who wins, debts and deficits in the U.S. are going to continue to go higher. Spending at 23 percent of GDP is not going to stop. And whether we raise taxes, lower taxes or whatever, it usually hovers around 17 percent of GDP. So I think that the bond market is sort of taking control in a sense of the narrative.
10:33OK. And I think we need to pay attention to that. OK, but regardless of who wins, I mean, they don't control the Fed, right? The Fed is independent. So why does that message change back to your earlier point? Well, I think from an investing standpoint, you know, we're obviously focused on who's going to win. But I think where interest rates go, where earnings go is going to matter much more. In terms of policy, whoever wins, the most important thing is what happens to the Trump tax cuts next year. Outside of that, I can't think of anything that is as important. Yes, the tariffs matter, but, you know, both sides kind of like tariffs.
11:07I'm not a fan of them, but they're there. But, again, legislatively, it's what happens to those expiring tax cuts. Peter, in the notes it says the equity market will care about yields, but not until 6%, which makes me believe you think there's a more than remote possibility that 10-year yields go to 6%. So how do we get there? Well, it'll be Washington, D.C. that will only care if it gets there. Because everyone says, well, either candidate's not talking about deficits. When will it matter? When will it matter? And that 6 % is when I throw out where you can be sure on the floor of the Senate or the House, people are going to say, oh, boy, we need to start paying attention to this.
11:46Because that's sort of the crisis level. Now, whether it gets there, I'm not sure. I do think that we retest 5%, which was the high of last year. And this 430 level is really key in the 10-year because it's the 50 % retracement of that 5 % on the upside. the 360 that we saw a few weeks ago. So this 430 really matters. Peter, thank you very much for being here with us. Peter Bookvar of Bleakley Financial Group's CIO and CNBC contributor, we should add. Karen, what do you make of the rate picture right now and where we are? We've had a lot of action there in the bond market, clearly very important.
12:18I know. See, I kind of think they should pause. I think either pause with the more, maybe some dovish rhetoric or - Because of ISM numbers? Because of like, yeah, things of, yeah, both ways. I mean, inflation is sort of doing OK. Right. So I don't know. I guess I feel like they have covered to do that if they want. But we had Loretta Mester on the other night. She seemed pretty confident. Who knows? But 25 basis points is the right path. I don't know. I don't think it's really necessary. And what is the bond market telling us that it's moved so much since that 50 basis point cut? Right. And the economy is doing great.
12:54Yeah. And you mentioned this again. The Fed's supposed to be apolitical. I think candidate Trump has mentioned on a few occasions over the last couple of months that he thinks that the White House, the president, should have a say in monetary policy. And you just made the joke about whatever it was about central bankers. Can you imagine what would happen if it did become a political entity, an arm of the president? Yeah, we would. And so I just think that that's just. With all due respect to Turkey. Of course. I mean, maybe. You know, I mean, we got chickens, we got turkeys. I mean, at the end of the day, I just think that that's just one of the other fears that we would have.
13:29I mean, you're talking about fears of devaluing fiat currencies. I just can't imagine that turns us into a banana republic at least. Reversal on the bottom, real quick, in terms of the TLT, if we can put up a TLT chart. I mean, there was one point today where the TLT was falling out of bed. It reversed midday-ish and closed higher, which means tenure yields actually went down. I think they closed around 428 off about 435 high. That's interesting. It sort of dovetails something that Katie Stockton said on the show a week and a half or so ago. She thought it was an interesting place for yields to pause and maybe head lower in the short term.
14:00And Peter just talked about the technical setup for that as well. It makes a little sense. I'm still one of these people, though, that think and agree with Peter. I think we're headed to 5 percent, maybe by the end of the year. And I'm not sure how the equity market is going to react. Well, coming up, after hours, action and shares of Supermicro following its latest earnings report. The numbers, the troubles. We're going to dig into this name next. Plus, Palantir's post-earnings pop. What is investors piling into this software? High Flyer coming up right after this. Stick with us.
14:30You're watching Fast Money here on CNBC. We'll be right back.
14:46Welcome back to Fast Money. We have an earnings alert on Supermicro. the embattled tech stock down following its first report since its lead auditor quit. That conference call is underway. Our Seema Modi has the very latest. Seema, what's going on? Hey, Courtney. Second quarter earnings, excuse me, second quarter outlook is a lot lower than Wall Street had anticipated, a sign that this flurry of accounting concerns are potentially starting to weigh on future sales. Now, on the earnings call right now, Supermicro CEO Charles Liang says it's in the process of engaging a new auditor and, quote, working with urgency.
15:21It follows news last week that Ernst & Young resigned as Supermicro's auditor, citing transparency issues fueling concerns of a potential delisting from the Nasdaq. That deadline is approaching November 16th. Supermicro did share that a special committee's investigation found no evidence of fraud or misconduct and recommended a series of measures to strengthen its internal governance. However, it remains unable to predict when its 10K will be filed. Supermicro does face two fierce competitors in the AI server market, Dell and HP Enterprise. But capturing market share doesn't happen overnight. Industry experts we spoke to say what sets Supermicro apart is its design expertise and price.
16:02One customer telling me its AI servers are about 40 % cheaper than its peers. We are looking at shares of the company down about 13 percent in after hours court. Seema, thank you very much for following along with that. I can imagine that conference call might have been a little contentious when they were talking about the auditor. Karen, I mean, how much headline risk is in this stock? Giant. I mean, there's a lot of things. I mean, there's the auditor thing, which is huge. And if you read that letter of resignation, that really wasn't delightful at all. At all. And so I'm sure they're really trying very hard.
16:32I have no doubt they're trying really with urgency, with urgency as they need to be. Right. And then remember, on this sort of horizon is do they get kicked out of the S &P 500? Oh, that. Right. There's that. But then there's also they cite there. The challenges don't impact our ability to service customers. I find that potentially hard to believe. Right. You've got to think that your employee base is kind of spooked by this and distracted. Right. And so, I mean, there's just a lot of things going on that aren't great. I don't know. They should if I always think companies shouldn't give guidance anyway.
17:07But I feel like if you're in this situation, even guidance for a quarter that is closed, but not yet. I know I'm a little skeptical on the the announcement that they don't that there's no impact on the financials. I'm a little skeptical about that. I don't know. It could be the case. But I feel like that auditor resignation is so important. And so this is one I am long puts just to, you know, so you know where I stand on it. But I think I wouldn't touch it here. At some point, they'll all cover them because the risk reward has changed. But I don't think this is a down three bucks is enough to like, wow, I got to jump in.
17:46Yeah, I don't know why they decided they needed to give guidance. And what's the disconnect between EY and between this special committee, special auditing committee, special investigation committee that seemingly found nothing wrong? I mean, there's obviously some sort of chasm there. And then you have to deal with the delisting from the Nasdaq, which they probably can get themselves out to February of next year in terms of calendar. But that's still hanging out there as well. So, you know, if you pull up a long term chart of this thing, we've talked about it for a while. It feels like it's headed back to high single digits, low, like, you know, eight to twelve dollars is where it started this whole run back a year and a half, two years or so ago.
18:23Well, let's get the latest read on the election as we are starting to get the first exit polling. Megan Casella has the latest from Washington, D.C. Megan, what can you tell us right now? Hey, Courtney, that's right. The first round of exit polls out just now at the top of the hour, giving us our very first glimpse at any results in this election and telling us a little bit about how voters were feeling as they left their polling places both today and during early voting. So take a look here. We have the results on three of the economy focused questions. On the question first of how voters would gauge the state of the economy, only 5 percent called it excellent.
18:56Not really a surprise there, given inflation. 28 percent called it good. And a plurality here, 35 percent said not so good, while 32 percent, just about a third there, called it poor. On the question of how your family finances compare now versus four years ago, 24 percent, almost a quarter, calling it better today. but 45 percent, almost half, saying that their families' finances are worse today. Well, about 30 percent said it was about the same. And then finally, a head-to-head here on the question of which candidate you trust more to handle the economy. 51 percent said Trump, but 47 percent said Harris.
19:32That is an issue on which Harris has been focusing most of her campaign. There had been a much larger gap there in polling as to who was the better candidate for the economy there. So for Harris to be within four points, that's probably a hopeful sign for the Democratic campaign, although, of course, the Trump campaign would say we're still leading there. It's always been his top issue. A couple of caveats on this. This data will continue to update throughout the night as more results come in. And we also will get later a look, a chance to look at poll results in the battleground states specifically, showing us how voters there are feeling in the states that matter the most tonight here, Courtney.
20:04But for now, just our first glimpse, at least as how voters are feeling on the economy. Back over to you. Hey, Megan, it's Tim. Thanks for joining us. Is there any sense how the exit polls or how the voters are able to reconcile job, you know, an employment market, a labor market that's arguably never been stronger with wage gains, which wage growth and an economy that seems to be apparently not well like? That's been the hardest issue for the Biden administration and the Harris campaign for years now, that even though all the fundamentals of this economy have been so strong, voters consistently say that they just don't feel it.
20:40And the issue for the campaign has been how do you message on an economy, you can't quite celebrate your wins if nobody feels like they're doing that well. So that's the issue that they've been dealing with. Harris has really gone out and tried to combat it with approaches, saying things that she would do, a ban on price gouging, for example, help with down payments for housing. So that is going to be the disconnect here. If you see that the economy is strong when you're looking at the data, but if voters don't feel it, can you make that trickle down to the campaign? That's one of the things that we're going to figure out tonight, I think, Tim.
21:10Megan, does the stock market ever come into consideration? Because obviously we're sitting here all time highs. Do people just feel disenfranchised or not part of what's been an incredible run over the, forget about the last, you know, four years, the last eight years, effectively? I think so many people don't think about that. They might, you know, vaguely know what their 401k is at, but, you know, vast majority of the country doesn't own at least not very much in the stock market. So it doesn't seem to come up very much, except in this sense of sort of consumer sentiment or how the economy is doing.
21:38I think it contributes to this overall feeling of how the economy might be doing, but not that much, because like we were just saying, you know, they don't think that the economy is doing that well. So even though the stock market is doing that well, when prices are still high, home loans are still high and expensive, that's what matters more day to day. Fascinating stuff, Megan. Thank you so much for bringing it to us. And obviously, we're going to be checking back in with you throughout the hour and throughout the evening as well. Dan, I want to turn to you. I thought it was very interesting in Megan's numbers there that that 45 percent of Americans feel that their financial condition personally is worse today than it was four years ago.
Read the full transcript
22:12What does that tell you about as they're saying that walking out of the polls? Listen, it's been a tough, you know, five years. And, you know, I go back to 2020 and to 2021. I mean, you think about PPP, the paycheck protection. I mean, it kept a lot of these folks, I mean, tens of millions of people afloat. And then we had this huge savings rate and the economy started to pick up because the monetary and the fiscal. And so I just think it's kind of curious at this point that, yes, I know a lot of Americans are dealing with a very difficult time as it relates to the cumulative inflation. But there was also a lot of spending.
22:43We would not have had the numbers that we did in 2020 and 2021. I think people were just YOLOing it. So, again, I think, you know, it's two sides of the same corn. And at the end of the day, you know, I think the Biden administration has really borne the brunt of this, despite supporting the economy in the beginning and really getting lambasted at the end of it. It just seems to me that that 45 percent number is all about inflation. And inflation is frankly pinned on both administrations of the last eight years. It's also pinned on. How about the central bank? How about monetary policy? Haven't we talked about for years that the central bank has had rates pinned at zero and that the Fed has had a disproportionate impact in terms of liquidity, in terms of asset price inflation?
23:24You can't buy a house. I mean, I'm not blaming this all on the Fed, but let's be clear. Really, since the financial crisis, the Fed has been the most important factor for inflation. And if people don't think that the independent central bank doesn't have their hands on this, they're actually missing the story. Yeah, inflation has become a very, very, very big deal for many people and unfortunately don't always sort of read between those lines. and think about how we got here and who got us there. Well, don't miss the CNBC special election coverage. We'll have results as they come in and reaction from the biggest names in business all night long.
23:54It all starts at 7 p.m. Eastern from the New York Stock Exchange right here on CNBC coverage like you won't find anywhere else. There's a lot more Fast Money to come. Here's what's coming up next. What will the elections mean for big tech and the growth trade? We're sitting down with ARK Invest CEO Kathy Wood for a closer look at what's at stake for the high flyers as America casts its vote. But first, Palantir pops post-earnings inside the monster move that has investors salivating today. You're watching Fast Money live from the Nasdaq market site in Times Square. We're back right after this.
24:38Welcome back to Fast Money. Palantir hitting a record high today. Shares surging 23 % on an earnings beat and positive guidance. That stock now the second best performer in the S &P this year, Palantir passing NVIDIA and is now up nearly 200 % year-to-date, second only to Vistra Energy. It just joined the S &P in September. Dan, can this one keep on climbing? Is this our new NVIDIA of the year? No, but I mean, obviously it can keep on climbing. I mean, it gained$20 billion in market cap today. When you think about that, that's seven times their expected sales this year. It trades at$116 billion market cap.
25:11It's trading this year 42 times sales. Next year, 34%. Here's the problem. Sales are only growing at about 23%, 24 % for the next couple years. That's expectation. So they're going to have to have some material changes to the demand picture and, you know, for this thing to keep going. I mean, listen, when we talk about stocks, even gross stocks, that are trading 41 times earnings, you know what I mean? That sometimes is very expensive, especially on a PE to growth. We're looking at, you know, it's growing earnings off a very low base. So to me, this one doesn't make sense to me. Karen, too far, too fast?
25:43Yeah, I mean, it was interesting how excited Alex Karp was. You know, what a character anyway, right? Yeah, very much so. But, I mean, you couldn't sound more bullish that, you know, they eviscerated the quarter. We might as well just go home now. And what is it? Unrelenting, was that the word? I think so. Unrelenting demand? Oh, that sounds great. Right. It's hard to, you know, I just always come back to valuation. And this one's a little hard for me there. I'm long the stock. It's very expensive. And, you know, the question is, do I take some profits here? Probably not. But I recognize it for what it is.
26:15It is absolutely an AI proxy. It's it's an AI proxy in the current. That's what they announced. That was the exciting part of it. It's also kind of government's gone wild and they seem to have the inside track to government contracts. Dan's right. When you're getting 30 percent growth on 35 times forward sales, That's not a great, you know, that's not a lot of growth for that kind of a multiple. The sense is that they really do have kind of the gold standard of a customer base that will continue to grow and actually build around them. I'm going to hold on. It's interesting to see real quick what the analyst said.
26:49RBC Capital raised their price target. Oh, my God. They raised it from$9 to$11. Morgan Stanley had a$20 price target. They just said, you know what, we're not playing that game anymore. But they're still, I think, underweight to stocks. So in order to justify the market cap, that$3.5 billion next year should look like$22 billion. And we're nowhere close to that. So this is a great stock. Tim's done a great job. But it's a deep end of the pool now, for sure. And you started asking, is this the next NVIDIA? I mean, NVIDIA doubled their sales from$23 billion at$27 billion to$55 billion. And then they went from$55 billion.
27:23We've never seen anything like that in the history of the stock market on those sorts of numbers. So when you're thinking about the sort of numbers with Palantir, it doesn't look that pretty. There's also headlines, at least, and I don't know what the timing is on this, and these were probably in place, but$580 million of stock from insiders is coming into the market over the next six months. All fair points. Well, coming up, we are sitting down with ARK Invest CEO Kathy Wood for an in-depth look at how the election could impact the tech trade. The stakes for the high flyers and the group that's up next.
27:52Plus, is it rally on in China? what renewed stimulus hopes could mean for the country's struggling economy and its biggest companies. Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.
28:15Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks jumping on election day. The Dow surging 427 points, the S &P gaining more than 1 percent and the Nasdaq scoring nearly 1.5 percent. Meanwhile, Boeing shares falling today. And this is even after the machinist union voted in favor of a new labor deal last night. That's a big step toward ending a more than seven week long strike. And a couple after hours headlines to bring you. We're watching Amazon after Jeff Bezos filed a notice that he's planning to sell about three billion dollars of the stock. Boeing supplier Spirit Aerosystems flagging in its earnings report a growing concern risk.
28:49And the Wall Street Journal reporting that AI startup perplexity is finalizing half a billion dollar funding round that could value the company at nine billion dollars. A lot to round up there in the tech trade. And the ARK Innovation Fund is up more than three percent today and nearly 22 percent over the past three months. The fund, though, is still down almost eight percent this year. For more, let's bring in Kathy Wood, CEO and chief investment officer of ARK Invest. Kathy, It's great to have you here. And on this election day, very pertinent to have you. We understand, of course, that the performance has kind of lacked, to say the least, down about 68 percent since Biden has been in office.
29:26Are you hoping for a change in the White House? Well, what's been interesting about this campaign season is both candidates have sounded more and more alike when it comes to innovation. Our focus is only on truly transformative innovation. And so and it seems to be a bipartisan issue. The best example of that is what happened with crypto this year. We had one party for it, the other seemingly against. And clearly the electorate spoke very loudly. And so then they're now sounding very much like I think the decreasing regulations is critical. keeping taxes low, critical, and really incentivizing animal spirits is really what we're all about.
30:13So I think both sides want innovation. Maybe one is leaning a little bit more towards regulations coming down. That is very important. Before I move on to the traders, you know, Tesla stock, of course, we talk a lot about it was higher today. But Elon, a very vocal Trump supporter. If Trump does not end up in the White House again, is that going to be trouble for Tesla at all down the road if Harris takes over the presidency? I don't think so. Our thesis, short-term anything can happen, and volatility around this important day, we wouldn't be surprised. But if we're right and autonomous, so robo-taxis, The robo-taxi, autonomous taxi network opportunity is as big as we think it is.
31:03Any setback would be a great buying opportunity. Kathy, it's Karen Feinerman. Thanks so much for being on. So one thing different about four years ago is interest rates are entirely different. How important is that, that the Fed keep cutting for your portfolio? you? Yeah, it's really interesting that many people equated 0 % interest rates with a boom in our strategy. Our strategy in 2017 and 18 had really good years. I think 87 % up in 17 as interest rates started up. And then we were up in a down year in 2018. So this correlation to interest rates has been a phenomenon associated with this time.
31:50And I think the reason was the shock going from, you know, basically 25 basis points to 5.5 percent was a real shock to the system and certainly reverberated. Do we need lower interest rates? I think interest rates not continuing to go up unless we're in a very strong innovation led recovery, then interest rates, you know, short rates could stay around these levels. We don't think they will. We think we're in a bit of a sinking spell here and that we'll need a bit of time, maybe some new policies, and then we'll be on our way. So we don't think we need interest rates coming down necessarily. The other thing that has happened over the last six years is this concentration in the market, the likes of which we have not seen since the Great Depression.
32:51We think that the market is going to start broadening out in the next few years. That should also help our strategy. And so the last thing that has happened is our multiple enterprise value to EBITDA multiple is as close to a market multiple as I have ever seen in my career. So those three, interest rates, concentration, moving into broadening out and the valuation of our portfolios, We're feeling really good. Hey, Kathy, so Tesla is the largest position in the ARK Innovation Fund. It looks like from some of the headlines you've been selling a little bit over the last week or so. And you just mentioned, you know, Robotaxi and autonomy and the opportunity there.
33:39You know, I look at Tesla. It's down 47 percent from its all time highs. You just mentioned the concentration in mega cap. It's the only mega cap stock that's basically tech stock that's not near its all time highs. Why do you think other investors are not appreciating what you see as far as the opportunity for robo taxi and autonomy? Sure. Well, I think in terms of the way it's analyzed, we still if you look at the analyst coverage, it's it's mostly auto analysts still. A few more tech oriented. This is not an auto stock. Now, it's certainly not a traditional one. It's a robotic stock. So autonomous vehicles are robots.
34:20They'll be electric. And they're powered by AI. Those are three different kinds of analysts. We have three analysts working on this. And we've defined the market differently from, I think, a lot of other analysts. And we've done a lot of original research. We put our model out there. You can play with it and move around the variables if you disagree with some of our assumptions. But if we're right, this story has just begun. You know, Kathy, we have to ask, there have been a substantial amount of outflows by our calculations, about$2.8 billion from the ARK Investment Fund. Obviously, we talked about your performance in the beginning.
35:02Well, you certainly have had periods of time where you've had banner returns right now, and lately it hasn't really been part of them. So why should investors sort of feel confident in everything that you're saying now in your strategy? Why should they put their money to work with you and in this fund? Well, first of all, in terms of talking about this year, yes, as you say, we're down this year. Last year, we were up 68 percent and we ended at that point. So we do have some endpoint sensitivity going on here. The second thing is, as I think Karen mentioned, many people have associated our portfolio with low interest rates.
35:42Certainly, algorithmic trading seemed to do that. I think that's going to change. And if you look at our portfolio, it has been, if you take out the boom and the bust around COVID, it has basically been flat for six years. And yet over this time, and today was a beautiful day for this, over this time, the progress that our companies have made is astonishing. And in that category, I would put healthcare. Healthcare is going to be transformed completely by technology. And CRISPR therapeutics, Beam Therapeutics, and other companies have developed cures for disease. In 2018, we were wondering, is this technology safe?
36:38CRISPR gene editing. Today, not only is it safe, but it's been approved in the US, UK, and Europe. It's being reimbursed per patient at$2.2 million. Again, one dose,$2.2 million. Why? Why? Because these patients have taxed the system economically. Of course, they've had a terrible problem with their health. Now that's being cured. And instead of paying$500 ,000 a year for therapy and still having these people hospitalized, they're going to be cured. So we think a lot of what is going to happen, this is probably the most profound application of artificial intelligence and sequencing technologies and CRISPR gene editing.
37:30We are going to see real results as we move people out of hospitals and into cures. And that saved costs will save the system, but it will also go more and more to these therapies. And of course, the cures that could potentially save lives is probably most important of all. Kathy Wood, thank you for joining us. Absolutely. Thank you for joining us here on this very important election day. It's great to have you. Well, coming up, we are diving into the traders post-election picks, which stocks could surge no matter who wins. Find out right after this.
38:15Let's get another check on Supermicro falling as much as 17 percent. The CEO saying revenue was down as customers were waiting for NVIDIA's new chip, the stock trading at its lowest level since last November, down 14 percent. No matter the election outcome, investors might want to prep for big market moves. Check out the performance of the S &P 500 in the weeks following the last five elections. In 2020, stocks rose 5 percent in the week after and nearly 9 percent in the month after Election Day. So we asked the traders for their best picks heading into the results, a hedge, an outcome insensitive play.
38:48Trader's choice. Guy, kick us off. Short TLT. In other words, yields are going higher. And Peter Bookvar actually talked about that earlier in the show, and I'll sort of say it here. I think regardless of who wins, and quite frankly, House, Senate, presidential nominee, presidential elected person, yields go higher in this environment. Neither side is going to address, I think, the irresponsibility on the fiscal side, and I think it's going to continue to make yields push higher. So despite the fact that the TLT reversed today, I think yields are going higher, TLT lower. Okay, Dan. Yeah, this isn't a hedge or anything like that.
39:19I just think it could be a decent trade over the next couple of weeks. Look at Google, good quarter, good guide, good valuation, pulled back to that breakout level from right before the earnings. I think you probably get this thing back towards 185 or so in the not too distant future. So I like Google here. And Karen? Yes. So I think markets don't love uncertainty. So I think to the extent that we get certainty, that's good for many stocks. But I like TJX. I like that if it's a decent retail season, TJX can sort of directly do well. If it's not a great season and you have a lot of inventory left, TJX can buy that at a good price and then end up doing well.
39:54So either way, I feel like it's kind of insulated TJX. OK. And Tim, what do you talk? Yeah, we talked about gold. So I'll talk about airlines, which first of all would be Delta. Again, they gave a fourth quarter guide. What's happening with airlines is you're actually seeing margins come back. Delta's at the top of the heap. Their margins are going to be at 300 basis points year over year and EPS up 35 percent. I'll also just throw out for cannabis, because I think the The irony is, of course, under Biden, when Biden and then the Senate split, I should say. Yeah, it was the Senate flip back in in 2021.
40:25It was seemed to me game on for cannabis and the Biden administration really kind of dropped the ball, frankly. I actually think under either administration, cannabis legislation, but cannabis progress from an administration perspective is going to move farther. It might even move farther under Trump. Karen, I'm going to go back to you just for a second for kind of a jump ball because you use TJX. Walmart was an all time. Yes. Yes. What do you make of that move? I like it. It's just a, I mean, both of those are expensive, great retailers, but I like them both. Could have been either one. And you think Walmart does well, potentially, either way?
40:54Either way. Yeah, because it could be, I could see that, too, and I was wondering if that was part of the reason, at least, that we are seeing that as an all-time high. Guy, I feel like you're itching to say something. No, no, I mean, Walmart, we've been talking about forever, and I mean, valuation is a concern, but it hasn't really mattered. I mean, if you look at the stock and didn't know what it was, you would swear it's a technology stock. But with that said, I mean, it seems to be Walmart's world and everybody else is living in it. But TJX is probably the same type of company, just a little cheaper in valuation.
41:18Walmart would like it to be like to be thought of as a technology company, I think, with all of the billions. They've made investments. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, they're really, really working on it. So they can be sort of part of that as well. All right. Well, up next, it's already time for your final trades.
41:42What a fast hour. It's time for the final trade. Let's go around the horn. Tim, you get to start. Thank you for being here, Courtney. Great to see you. Delta Airlines, 35 % EPS growth year over year. I think it's going higher. Karen? Yep, thanks also. Pitch hitting. My final trade is good enough for the insular, no matter what happens in the election, so good enough for the final trade as well. TJX. Dan? Yeah, if you like the Google, I think you play through call spreads. And guys. It's nice to have you back. Thanks. It's good to be back. You're a growing family, beautiful family. It's wonderful.
42:14Mel's coming back tomorrow. She just had a birthday yesterday. Ooh, happy birthday, Mel. It's a big deal, right? Exciting times here. It's a family show, too. The move in Newmont Mining from 58 to 45 is overdone, Courtney. I think you're buying Newmont here at the 45 level. Okay, fair enough. Good trades all around. Happy Election Day to everyone. Get out there and vote. That's right. Get out there and vote. If you haven't already, your polls might be closing soon, depending on where you are. Thanks for watching Fast Money. Mad Money with Jim Cramer starts right now.
43:06internet or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.
From the publisher
Stocks climb as Wall Street awaits the Presidential election results. How the markets will fare when a winner is called, and how it could impact your money. Plus Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood weighs in on how the election will impact tech, the growth trade, and much more.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
