In short
Podcast Episode Notes: CNBC's "Fast Money" - Stocks Sell Off On President Trump’s China Threat… And A New Drug Price Deal (10/10/25)
Episode Overview In this episode, host Melissa Lee and a panel of traders discuss the significant sell-off in stocks triggered by President Trump's announcement of new tariffs on China. The episode also covers the implications of ongoing government layoffs due to a shutdown and explores a new drug pricing deal in the pharmaceutical sector.
---
Key Topics Discussed
- Market Reaction to Tariff Announcement
- President Trump’s Announcement:
- Trump announced a new set of 100% tariffs on China, building on existing tariffs.
- Tariffs will go into effect starting November 1st or sooner, depending on China’s actions.
- Market Impact:
- Major indices experienced their worst day in months:
- Nasdaq: Down over 3.5%
- S&P 500: Dropped nearly 3%
- Dow: Lost 878 points
- Key sectors affected included semiconductors and technology.
- Government Shutdown Implications
- Discussion about the effects of the government shutdown:
- Possible layoffs leading to a significant economic impact.
- Concerns about growth and stability in financial markets.
- Drug Pricing Deal
- AstraZeneca's Agreement:
- AstraZeneca signed onto a drug pricing deal with the Trump administration, following Pfizer's earlier agreement.
- The aim is to lower drug prices by aligning U.S. prices with those in Europe.
- Market Reaction:
- Initial positive response from pharmaceutical stocks due to the deal.
- Technical Analysis and Market Sentiment
- Panelists discussed technical indicators signaling possible market corrections:
- Concerns over whether the "buy-the-dip" mentality is fading.
- Indicators suggesting potential volatility spikes and the importance of hedging strategies.
- U.S.-China Relations and Trade Dynamics
- Traders analyzed the broader implications of the U.S.-China trade tensions:
- China's control over rare earth minerals and technology sectors.
- Discussions on geopolitical maneuvering, including military posturing by China.
- Bank Earnings Season
- Anticipation of upcoming bank earnings and potential impacts on market confidence:
- Key banks set to report include JPMorgan, Citi, and Goldman Sachs.
- The importance of guidance on credit quality and loan demand.
---
Key Takeaways
- Investor Sentiment:
- Current market conditions reflect heightened uncertainty due to geopolitical tensions and domestic economic factors.
- A potential shift in investor mentality regarding growth and safety in the current environment.
- Market Strategy:
- Panelists expressed differing views on how to approach the current volatility:
- Some suggested looking for opportunities in defensive sectors such as consumer staples.
- Others anticipated a more cautious and strategic approach to new investments amid ongoing market fluctuations.
- Future Outlook:
- Continued monitoring of U.S.-China relations and its implications for markets is critical.
- The upcoming earnings reports from banks will likely provide further insight into economic health and investor sentiment.
---
Final Remarks The discussion encapsulated a turbulent moment in the stock market, driven by external geopolitical factors and internal economic challenges. The episode serves as a reminder for investors to stay informed and cautious in their strategies moving forward.
For more information, visit [Fast Money on CNBC](http://fastmoney.cnbc.com).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:02Live from the Nasdaq market side in the heart of New York City's Times Square. This is Fast money. Here's what's on tap tonight. New tariff turmoil. President Trump just announcing new 100 percent tariffs on China. That after earlier threats and major indices to their worst day in months. The Max 7 losing near an Eli Lilly's worth of market cap in just one day. The impact and all the ripple effects coming up and drug dealmaking, a potential agreement on drug prices and more talk of M &A, the big trends impacting the industry and how to play these moves. Plus, we set the table for bank earnings season, a technical take on two AI names that could be heading in very different directions.
0:37And can Baba bounce back? The Chinese tech giant down more than 10 percent already this month. Is there hope for a rebound when trade tensions continue to loom large? I'm Melissa Lee. Coming to you live from Studio B at the Nasdaq. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Dan Nathan, Mike Ko, and Fairlead Strategies founder and managing partner, Katie Stockton. Welcome, Katie. We start off with that breaking news out of Washington. President Trump just announcing 100 percent tariffs on China above what was previously implemented. The S &P and Hughes down after hours, this after major indices all closed near their lows of the session after the president threatened massive new tariffs on China.
1:12The Nasdaq, which hit an intraday record early in the session, ended the day down more than three and a half percent, its worst day since April 10th. The S &P shedding nearly three percent, while the Dow lost 878 points. All three indices now negative so far in October. Emily Wilkins has the very latest from Washington. Emily. Hey, Melissa. Well, yes, we're getting this news now of that 100 percent over and above current tariffs. Now, Trump said on Truth Social that that would be going into effect starting November 1st or this is his post or sooner, depending on any further actions or changes taken by China.
1:47He then also adds that on November 1st, the U.S. will impose export controls on any and all critical software. Of course, this is coming after that back and forth that we saw today with rare earths. China, of course, announcing the stricter export controls and Trump responding to that, saying that he basically saying that they could have tariffs. And now, of course, we're hearing more clarity from it. Trump also said in his truth social post, accusing China of taking an extraordinarily aggressive position on trade and says they sent an extremely hostile letter to the world that tariffs and export controls were going to go into effect on November 1st.
2:26This seems to be a way for the U.S. to counteract what China's moves would be. And of course, questions here about whether Trump and Chinese leader Xi would be meeting. They're expected to meet two weeks from now in South Korea. Trump, of course, earlier falling into question whether it was even worth having that meeting. Doesn't seem to address that in his latest post. But of course, this mention of tariffs and of the export controls really ratcheting up the pressure here and the degree of impact and conflict this could have. Melissa? Emily, thank you. Emily Wilkins out of D.C., very busy day today.
3:01In the after-hour sessions, we mentioned the major indices are moving lower. We're also seeing deepening losses in the sectors that were most hit during the session on the initial fears that there would be sort of retaliation for what China did with rare earth. So we're seeing semiconductors continue their slide, tech in general. Where does this go from here? We were talking just yesterday, Dan, about how what China did was poking the bear. And here we are now. Well, it speaks to leverage. And I know Tim kind of mentioned that, too. You know, this rare earth has been at the center of the focus as it relates to what we need and what they have.
3:34And the flip side of that is like our high end GPUs that are 90 percent of them come from NVIDIA. They're made in Taiwan, that sort of thing. And I think when China a couple of weeks ago, you know, kind of said to their buyers of these chips, we don't want you buying them. They feel confident with the chips that are being made by Huawei right now. Now, maybe that's a negotiating tactic, but the White House had just negotiated this export deal with NVIDIA. So you put that together, their lack of demand for these chips and then them, the leverage that they have over rare earths. It's a real problem.
4:04This today right now reminds me of April 2nd. We were sitting on the desk. There was this. I think it was in the Rose Garden. this big presentation of these tariffs. And I think we were all expecting something that didn't look like what happened on April 2nd. And, you know, the stock market was already down about 8 percent into that from their February highs. So you think about that swoon that we had over the next week or so. We did have the president and administration pull back from the worst of those tariffs. I'm not sure that happens anytime soon. That being said, you know, is this market going to basically be able to take this in stride a little bit?
4:38Today was a little bit of a panic, Right. You know, next week, we don't have the bond market open on Monday. There's going to be lots of time to digest the stock market, if you will. And I'm not sure we have what we had in early April over the next couple of weeks, because I think the administration knows they don't want the stock market to fall apart. That's a loss of confidence in the administration. But they have a stock market at all time highs and they've got some room. So if I'm the White House, I'm in a much better position to be as aggressive as possible. And I think it's it's easy to flex muscle with all risk assets, all time highs.
5:11But those are good points. And, you know, we don't usually you know, we don't we don't always get it right on this desk. But that conversation yesterday was was was the conversation to have because we're having the conversation about de-dollarization. And, you know, we brought up I think this is as much about China. And then we brought up that rare earth is really not something that's been settled and that it you know, they're 92 percent of the world's refined rare earth. Now, over the summer and at different times in the last year, as we've been having tariff conversations, for sure, we've discussed the U.S.'s desire to begin to build away from that, to reinvest.
5:46MP Materials is a great example. But we're still talking about three to five years. So when markets have had the kind of move they've had, there's no question you get this kind of pullback. Katie's going to have some it's great to have her here always. But on days when suddenly you immediately check some charts and say, wow, are we about to violate some really key levels on the downside? Just when we were where we were on the upside. And I also say, you know, it's been easy to be very blasé about a government shutdown when, in fact, there are headlines coming out every day about A.I. and trade dynamics that very much include Asian companies to trump.
6:23and sorry, I guess pun intended, I don't know, but to override concerns about a government shutdown. It's amazing how suddenly people are saying, hey, maybe with the government shutdown, I mean, banks sold off today because maybe, you know, they're more concerned about growth than ever. Suddenly the market doesn't just digest tariffs. It digests the second derivative of that, which is growth. Well, firings out of the government shutdown brings the shutdown to a new level in terms of an economic impact as well. I mean, not just the hit from shutting down, but the hit to. There are people out there who are not getting paychecks for sure.
6:55But all of this begs the question, Katie, as to whether or not the markets were primed for a pullback period. And this was just the excuse. Well, it does feel like there is some pent up selling pressure. Our sentiment metrics were not overly bullish, however. So it's a little unusual that this is happening all at once. Coming into this week, we had our first sell signals from something called the weekly DeMarc indicators. since the April low was established, in fact, since late last year. So we were paying attention, very close attention now, of course, to momentum gauges, short-term momentum gauges like the 20-day moving average that is now likely to roll over next week.
7:34And that would be our first impetus to get hedged or to recommend hedging strategies. We also feel that the VIX was a great risk metric, and it's been just kind of range-bound for many, many weeks and now has poked its head up against the 200-day moving average, looks poised also for some kind of volatility spike. So I do think it's interesting. I think it's meaningful. The sell signals that we had teed up are now confirming. Mike, do you think that the buy-the-dip mentality that has been reigning in the markets, has that come to an end? Is this the end of the road for that? Well, I think that investors are going to require a little bit more clarity before they rush in and buy this one because we have a confluence of things going on.
8:18And any one of these would probably be absorbable, I would say, at any point in time. But the combination of the government shutdown, the fact that we just had a - this is an important technical move we saw today, a downside reversal. The fact that we had gold trading at all-time highs, which spelled some unhappiness with the dollar, I would say. And the fact that we were already at pretty heady valuations for the S &P, I think those things serve as a pretty good counterbalance for what we normally would have to buy the dip, which is that this is seasonally typically a good time and that there's a decent amount of cash on the sidelines.
8:53But again, two standard deviations above the long term forward average of price to earnings for the S &P. I think all of those things are a little bit testy. And you can see that there was very much a rush for the typical safety trade. So utilities X the energy generation and staples. Yep. I'm glad you mentioned gold. It is ironic that all of these things going on with trade and the I don't want to say erratic, but unexpected moves by Trump. All of that sends gold higher and that all strengthens China's hand at the same time. And the dollar goes down. So isn't this a buy the dollar day? Usually the dollar goes lower and gold goes higher.
9:38I'm not saying changing of the guard, but boy, that is fascinating. That's part of this conversation. It's not an overnight development, but it's also not going to end. I just point out, too, you know, there's some other geopolitics around here that include China, which is that over the last couple of days, China has been sailing naval vessels around Japan and actually was sailing them right through next to Okinawa today. I mean, there's there's there's provocation. There's there's definitely bluster. There's definitely some sense that China is ready to and listening to President Trump, listening to the White House point out the letters that were sent around the world.
10:13This isn't just against necessarily the U.S., but also other trading partners. So there's no question China is flexing some muscle, and they're doing it both in the markets and they're doing it geopolitically. Yeah, when you think about the stock market, and we hear this all the time, Tim, you just mentioned it, that they have a little room to play with, right? So we have the S &P that was up nearly 30 percent off those April lows. I just feel like, you know, when you have this level of uncertainty, you have this level of just the administration digging in, You know, this idea that the Chinese and the U.S., they really want to save face in these sorts of situations.
10:43And it's kind of right out there in the opening. So when I think about a stock market that gets hit the way it did today and we have this memory of what happened back in really it wasn't just April. It was February. It was into March as we were expecting tariffs. But think of these tariffs rates right now. We were coming into this year maybe three percent or something across the board. We're looking at high teens. And if these go into place, you know, in November, well, we're going to have global growth scares. And it brings me back to 2018 when we had a very similar global growth scare and we had weak demand here in the U.S.
11:18We had weak demand, you know, weak economy in China. And so if you think about 750 ,000 government workers furloughed, if you think about what they want to fire right now, that is one of the threats here. You think about a consumer on the lower end that is having a difficult time right now. You think about inflation. This is the thing. The Fed minutes were telling us last week that the Fed is divided on whether they want to continue to cut rates at the rate that is expected in the Fed fund futures right now. So what do you think is going to happen to inflation if any of these tariffs go into place, given the consumer?
11:52You know, so to me, I just think it's a really tough point just to kind of put a bow on this as it relates to the stock market, because sometimes this stuff can get out of your control. And the last time that we had a proper sell off, you got to go back to 2022. Proper meaning 10 percent. No. Well, I mean, forget April. Go back to the bear market we had in 2022. A lot of the elements were in place that are similar now. We had SPACs. We had unprofitable tech. We had crypto. We had a whole host of just euphoria going on. Mean stocks. We have all that right now. and then add on all of this geopolitics and central bank stuff and tariffs.
12:25All right. Well, our next guest is more worried about China-U.S. relations now than six months ago. CNBC contributor DeWardrick McNeil is Longview Global's senior policy analyst. He served in the Obama administration. DeWardrick, always a pleasure to see you. Where are we now? I mean, where are we in the grand scheme of things? I mean, I would I would posit that maybe it's even more concerning now, Because back in April, we saw when we were staring into the worst case situation for tariffs, we knew at least the upside would be talks between the two men. And now we've gotten to that point and then it was taken away.
12:59We saw that China is willing to provoke the U.S. with its leverage. It seems like it's much worse. Thanks for having me, Melissa. Great to be with you and the traders. Listen, for the first time in a very long time, the market sentiment has matched my energy. There's been a real concern on my part that we are just not prepared for what China has been planning for quite some time. The stuff that they announced on enhanced export controls. The legal architecture has been in place to do this for about five years or so. And China is finding a correct time to do this for maximum leverage. But let's take a step back quickly, Melissa, and talk about what they've done.
13:44They have announced a policy that could either completely halt or severely slow down one of the sectors of the economy that the market has been trading well on. You cannot produce chips at the downstream if you cannot control or guarantee the supply chain in the upstream. And so I think it's time for us to really focus on the main thing and let the main thing be the main thing in these discussions. And that is, how do we break this chokehold that China has in the critical mineral space? So, Dwardrick, why now then? Always great to have you. And so, you know, we're talking about this some in a couple of weeks that was going to happen anyway.
14:27You've got leaders that, you know, we're going to be there anyway. It wasn't necessarily about getting together, but China does seem to be going on the offensive. And before I referenced the naval vessels and, you know, what are clearly provocative two days of cruising around Japan, why are they doing that? Why is this, you know, where is the I don't want to call it bravado because I think China's, you know, felt this way for a long time. I think China's got a lot of muscle they can flex. But it does appear that there's a confluence here and there does appear to be timing. And I don't believe China does anything happenstance.
15:02And here we are in the last few days. The movement in gold has highlighted just how much China has already diversified away from the U.S. And with gold, it does give some backing to their own currency if they're the biggest gold holder and producer in the world. So sorry, but why now? Why all this now? Yeah, look, I think there's two ways to look at this, Tim, and both of them are likely correct. In the short term, I do buy a lot of what we're hearing other analysts talk about in terms of trying to maximize leverage for what was potentially, it may not happen now, a meeting on the margins of APEC.
15:40And China, look, let's be clear, they still want some things for us, at least in the near term. I think they're pretty annoyed that IEPA fentanyl tariffs are still in place at 20 percent when they've made a deal with Biden to do something about fentanyl. They came back and offered a deal to Trump. None of that has moved the Dow on the IEPA 20 percent tariffs. I think China, despite what we know over the long term, still has a desire to get access to advanced chips in the short term. So they want to see those export controls go away. But those are near term things over the long term. Look, I do think they believe that now is their time to really assert China's role in the world.
16:23and they don't look to be subservient to the U.S. And they're showing the world that they can stand in the ring and match us blow for blow. And that has diplomatic value over the long term, Ted. You know, Duarte, we talk about rare earths and obviously China has a chokehold on them. And our defense industry obviously relies on that. But it's not just rare earths. A lot of our supply chain that goes into defense manufacturing really is involved with China. A lot of things that go into a lot of our weapon systems and stuff like talk a little bit about that. That's something that I mean, to me, should be very frightening.
16:59I know, Trump, when he was speaking to all the generals last week, he talked about the ships. He loves the ships. Well, we don't we don't make enough ships and they make a lot of ships. Like, isn't this a really important part of this whole discussion? You hit it on the head. Listen, I've been extremely frustrated with both the Biden and the Trump administration of Trump, one Biden and Trump, two, because we have spoken very clearly about the chokehold in our defense industrial sector, but not much is being done to really bolster that sector. And so we're in some real tough straits as we look at critical minerals and all the other things that you talk about, Dan, that we're dependent on from China in our defense sector.
17:39So, you know, I would like to see Congress and administration really get serious, stop talking about it and do something about building the U.S. defense industrial base. We are going to always be at the beck and call and the chokehold of China if we cannot figure out how to build here at home, or here's a novel thought, with allies. Let's re-engage allies. They're still out there. They would still love to work with us, but we have to focus on the main thing. I keep coming back to that. DeWordrick, great to get your take. Thank you. DeWordrick McNeil. Thank you, Melissa. So, Micah, what would you do?
18:14What would you be inclined to do ahead of Monday? Well, there's not much we can do ahead of Monday, is there? Well, in your mind, what is your plan as to what you do on Monday now? Yeah. Okay. So, yeah, I mean, look, there's a critical level here. About 30 in the S &P is going to be the 50-day moving average. I think if we manage to hold that, that would be a decent show of confidence. And you know our principal business is selling volatility. So from my perspective if we do get some dips we are going to get a big bid to implied volatility. We saw that in the VIX that's certainly part of it. But you know we're seeing it sort of across the spectrum a lot of single names and certainly the high beta names which are the ones that fell the most.
18:57So you know from my perspective I think it's an opportunity to start scaling into short vol because if the VIX gets up to about 30 plus generally speaking the next 30 days for the S &P is actually pretty good. in terms of its performance on a relative basis? Yeah, I mean, the way I look at the VIX is obviously as a countertrend indication of transactional gauge of market sentiment. I feel that this is probably the beginning of the volatility event, not the end. And I say that largely because we have these sell signals that have relevance for about nine weeks from now. So as much as we didn't get the volatility event in September or early October as is normal.
19:39Perhaps this is a bit more of a rough Q4 for the broader market. Meantime, as we had mentioned, safe havens performed decently today. Utilities, staples, shares of Pepsi in particular bucking today's sell-off. The stock up nearly 4%, adding to yesterday's 4 % gain. And that came after the soda and snack company topped EPS and revenue estimates with international growth offsetting lower volumes in North America. The stock, though, is still down on the year. Is it time to start switching into safer areas? For sure, because I think either way, there was positioning that should have been into places.
20:14And utilities are this strange, hey, they're not your father's utilities, your mother's utilities, somebody's utilities anymore. But staples are what they are throughout multiple cycles. And some of them are better positioned on multiple here. Pepsi, as you noted, had fantastic numbers a couple of days ago. Stocks really taken a couple of days even of a run, not just the immediate reaction on Wednesday. So you have a dynamic here where people are assessing the best of breed companies in there. I do think both snack foods and places that were overly hurt by GLP trends and whatnot. But also, I think there are places in some of the very traditional staples, and that includes tobacco and some of the Unilevers and the Procter & Gamble's of the world that look interesting to me.
21:02You don't ever. You know, safe haven, we all seem to talk about treasuries, right? And so we see a 10-year that's kind of in and around that 4 % again, which is, I think, kind of interesting. We talked about gold before. Look at Bitcoin today. It got killed. Not so safe. And that is really interesting to me, and it goes back to what we were talking about 2020 and 2021. You know, Bitcoin was one of the worst-performing risk assets in 2022, And it was supposed to be the one that acts well in an environment right like that. So, you know, Bitcoin has become very correlated to the Nasdaq. And I just think that's an interesting one because that pillar of the bull case seems to be gone right now.
21:40Coming up, big bank earnings kick off next week with JPMorgan City, Goldman and Wells Fargo all out on Tuesday. We're taking a first look at what to expect out of these results next. Plus, the White House preparing a new deal to lower drug prices. The details right after this.
21:59This is Fast Money with Melissa Lee, right here on CNBC.
22:13Welcome back to Fast Money. Earnings season gets in full swing next week when big banks kick off results. Citi, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase all report on Tuesday. Leslie Picker has more on what to expect from the group. Hey, Les. Hey Mel, yeah, interesting timing this quarter with concerns about credit quality rippling through the financial system. Take a look at shares of Jeffries right now, down more than 8 % in after-hours trading. And that comes after Bloomberg reported that several large firms are looking to at least partially redeem from its Point Bonita subsidiary. This is the one that had about$715 million invested in first brands' receivables.
22:52The auto parts conglomerate went bankrupt a few weeks ago, roiling certain pockets of the financial industry. So far, though, the six big U.S. banks have held up OK, with J.P. Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo trading right around their all-time highs before today's sell-off. As for next week's earnings, they should provide fresh clues about the state of the economy and how the loan books are holding up. Guidance, particularly on net interest income, the profitability metric for loan making, will be a key indicator of demand. Investment banking pipelines are a barometer of corporate confidence.
23:26And the amount banks are setting aside for those bad loans would show how they feel about the credit quality right now. Alyssa? All right, Leslie, thank you. Leslie Picker. How does what happened today change the picture in terms of confidence for deals, confidence for IPOs, all of these things, Tim? I don't think it does. It does. OK, we're having this conversation one or two days into this. And I would extend this to the markets dynamic. I think there's a lot of people watching that can't wait to buy the market. Now, that will change very quickly if we're 10 days into this and we have a lot more ratcheting higher.
Read the full transcript
24:02Back to the large cap banks, you're going to hear about great markets. You're going to hear about fantastic wealth management. You're going to continue to hear about a robust environment for M &A. So if I'm a big money center bank, on a look back, the numbers were fantastic. I think it was a great quarter. And it was a great quarter for the price movements of some of the biggest money center banks in the world. Now, they started to give that up. And I know we always talk about this. Karen, if she was sitting here, she would have said something like, I actually feel a little better going into these numbers because banks, money center banks have pulled back.
24:32CitiBank's down 10 percent before today going into next week's numbers, which I think are going to be positive. So I'm not ready to also go 180 degrees away from a trade that I think has been a great trade and will continue to be a great trade, given the environment that at least is sideways. I mean, sideways in news flow. It's not going to be spectacular. But if we fall out of bed, obviously, it's a different story. But the fundamentals right now for money center banks are excellent. How are the charts, Katie? You know, we did see a breakdown in relative terms for the bank index versus the broader market.
25:02And that was a reflection of exactly that, the pullback that proceeded now coming into earnings. I would say that because they're now relatively oversold coming into earnings, they're actually probably better positioned. You look at Citigroup for one, it's right into some short term support after its pullback. But that doesn't necessarily resolve the issues on the intermediate term setup where we have seen those overbought downturns develop. Yeah, a protracted shutdown actually pushes out deals. Right. So we've seen this before. So if you're filing S1 to go public, if you are trying to do a SPAC or something like that, I've heard that from some people this week that they've got to wait and they've got to see what's going on.
25:39So that's one. I think Tim is 100 % right on all the trading and the MA and all those fees. Great. Now, go back to Q2, though. We had Jamie Dimon, his kind of normal, cautious stance as it relates to a consumer. We also had Wells Fargo, but then we had Brian Moynihan and Bank of America, his usual stance about the consumer. where they're doing just fine. I think Citi was in the same boat. But you think about this, going back to the shutdown, going back to a weak labor market, going back to some delinquencies going higher. If we were to see all of these CEOs kind of strike a cautious tone about a U.S.
26:13consumer, that will be difficult for this group right here. So to me, you know, then throw in the inflation stuff as it relates to higher tariffs. There's a lot more fast money to come. Here's what's coming up next. biotech blasting off the sector at multi-year highs and seeing a bump in merger activity who could be the next target we'll talk to mizuo's jared holtz to find out plus an ai breakout and a breakdown we're going off the charts for a technical tale of two stocks that could be heading in opposite directions you're watching fast money live from the nasdaq market side in times square We're back right after this.
26:59Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks adding to their losses after hours after the president announced 100 percent tariffs on China on top of what already exists. The Dow had tumbled nearly 900 points during the regular session for its worst day since May, while the S &P 500 and Nasdaq both had their worst day since April, falling more than 2.5 percent and 3.5 percent respectively. The VIX meantime spiking higher, briefly crossing the 22 level. That's its highest level since June. Tech and consumer discretionary hit the hardest today. The so-called MAG7 losing a combined$768 billion in market cap just today.
27:34Take a look at Bitcoin trading around$110 ,000. The loss is accelerating, though, in the after-hours session here. But the consumer staples managed to eke out a gain thanks to another big day for Pepsi. Friday's action sealing the second losing week in the last three for the major indices. What do you make of consumer staples or utilities or any of these sectors supposedly more defensive? It depends if we're talking in absolute or relative terms. Good question. Because in relative terms, of course, they're very oversold. Well, maybe not some utilities, but staples certainly are oversold. And there are a lot of great setups, like we mentioned Pepsi earlier.
28:10And yet when we see a pullback, if this pullback does continue, the correlations tend to be very, very high on the downside. And most stocks tend to bottom right around that same day, even consumer staples, even utilities, even if they are outperforming. So it really depends on the broader market. I think you can be very comfortable in staples and utilities here. I really do. And that's truly during a downdraft. But once again, know what you own. if you're trying to hedge with, say, a Staples ETF, know that all staples are not really staples. And certainly in the utility space, you've got some highfalutin stuff in there.
28:45But I think based upon where the investors want to go, I think health care, we've talked about it for three weeks. I think health care has had some type of a turn. There's some news flow. We're going to talk about some more White House driven news flow. I think that's where you want to be. Mike Coe, quick, would you rather for you, staples or utilities? I'm going to have to go with staples. That's because part of the utility sector has been tied to the AI trade. Yes. Good point there. Coming up, the Trump administration is set to soon announce a deal on drug pricing with another big pharma name.
29:14We'll get the details and the latest on the health care space. That's next.
29:26Welcome back to Fast Money. President Trump in the Oval Office just now announcing a deal with AstraZeneca to lower drug prices this hour. Shares of the pharma giant moving higher in the after-hours session. CNBC's Bertha Coombs has more on all this. Bertha. Melissa, AstraZeneca is now the second drug maker to sign on to President Trump's most favored nation drug price program, according to our colleagues at MSNBC who reported it earlier. It comes after breaking ground on a$4.5 billion plant in Virginia yesterday, where Dr. Oz was present, CMS Administrator Dr. Oz, very much at the center of a lot of these negotiations.
30:03And it also comes 10 days after the Pfizer agreement to provide drugs at lower prices for Medicaid, as well as making a$70 billion investment in the U.S., including manufacturing. In exchange, Pfizer won't face tariffs for three years. We'll listen in and see what the details are. But CMS Administrator Dr. Oz, as I mentioned, very much at the center of this. And he told me in Washington on Monday that, you know, his goal is to get 95 % of drugs in the U.S. priced in line with what Europe pays. So who's next? The administration has reached out to a lot of firms. When I asked Dr. Oz about GLP-1s for weight loss and Medicare, he declined to answer, but said, quote, we're in the middle of a lot of action.
30:48You'll be hearing more about it very soon. So, Melissa, this is not likely to be the last one we hear. Yeah. You know, in the Pfizer deal, if we can call it a deal, Bertha, you know, is regarded as a lot less than what had been feared. They were drugs that were not huge moneymaker drugs anyway. I mean, do we have a sense of what this is for AstraZeneca? We don't have a sense for AstraZeneca, but, you know, Dr. Oz sort of says this isn't obviously the only tool that they're looking at. They're also looking at, you know, Medicare. He says that his team is negotiating quite aggressively. We're going to get the next round of the prices for IRA price negotiation next month.
31:34And they're also looking at using the Medicare innovation pilots to try to do something when it comes to prices as well. This is one of his top priorities. Yeah. Bertha, thanks. Bertha Coombs. And we see ASEAN, they're up a percent in the after recession. For more on all this, let's bring in the zoo host, Jared Holes. He's the health care strategist at the firm. Jared, always good to see you. What jumped out at me is that Dr. Oz told Bertha that he wanted 95 percent of the drugs in the United States to be priced in line with what other countries are paying. That's a lot. I don't know what the Pfizer deal represents, if it's like 0.5 percent of the drugs in the United States or even less.
32:11Is that even possible in your view? Yeah, I mean, it seems very optimistic. You know, it's an administration that's obviously, you know, pretty hyperbolic with a lot of the commentary around this industry. And so directionally, I think, you know, obviously we're going, you know, we're at a point where we're headed lower with drug prices really across the board. 90 or 95 % seems like a huge number. Okay, so pair this with what is going on in M &A. All of a sudden, Big Cat Pharma is seeing the light at the end of the tunnel in terms of the political winds, you know, hampering growth there. And now it's, you know, looks like M &A is actually starting to happen.
32:55You had a spreadsheet that you sent earlier this year. And actually, a few candidates have already been knocked off that spreadsheet, Jared. Give us a preview in terms of what you're expecting next. Yeah, it's been a super active year. I mean, I think 14 or 15 deals already north of 500 million just in terms of publicly traded companies. So we're kind of we're headed towards what could be a record in terms of the number. I still have about, call it 40 targets on my list that I think are near term candidates. Some of them are a little bit bigger, like Inzamed. I know you're super familiar with them.
33:33And then it kind of goes down by market cap and also revenue. On there as well is Abivax and cytokinetics and VaxCite, to name a few. I think it's impossible to call which one is going to be next. But I think, as you alluded to, if some of this political, if some of the political headwinds are abating, I think that will certainly help. There's also, though, the political headwinds of this rift now with China, Jared. And I'm wondering, in terms of, you know, some of the deals that were made were deals with Chinese biotech companies, deals from molecules, partnerships, licensing agreements, et cetera.
34:10If for some reason the political winds stop that or halt that significantly, is that even better for U.S. biotech? Is there sort of a, you know, stop the Chinese deals from happening, more deals will happen in the U.S. mentality? Yeah, it could be. I think the whole point of China has been that the drug development there is a little bit more accelerated, maybe a little bit less red tape around, you know, timelines and things of that nature and clinical trial design. I think it'll still be both. I'm not sure we can, you know, call for some sort of decline in China just because we're seeing an uptick in U.S.
34:50I think it'll be a fair mix of both. But I think sizes could be higher if pharma feels better as an industry. And that's why I think, you know, looking at some of these names on the sheet that you mentioned earlier is probably smart. Jared, Tim, I guess I'm just interested in the strategy sessions you've had with customers and investors over the last couple of weeks. I mean, the news flow, not only the deal flow that we're all talking about here, that was probably always expected. And so on some level, even investors that they didn't care three weeks ago or a month ago before the White House came in.
35:20So How has the tone changed? What do you expect it's going to change now, given the current trade rancor? And in some level, some part of this industry being very insulated, if you think that it's really all about the geopolitics, which are better. Yeah, I agree. It was already a pretty good year. And if we're looking just at M &A, it was it was a pretty good year through August. And I think some of the things that have kind of unfolded over the past couple of weeks with Pfizer first and now AstraZeneca, it kind of opens up the deal channel a little bit wider. If the companies, if this industry actually feel like the political headwinds are decreasing, it makes them feel better.
36:00I think there are two things. I think one, investors kind of felt like the first half of the year was a little bit slow, but are certainly noticing now. I mean, it comes up in every discussion. Everyone's trying to kind of figure out what the next thing is going to be. And I think the pacing has been the fastest that we've seen in a really long time. I mean, the past couple of weeks, Metzera was bought out by Pfizer. Marist was taken out. There's speculation that J &J is going to buy protagonists. Bristol Myers did a$1.5 billion deal, a private deal this morning. So the pacing is really, really fast.
36:34And I think you're right. If the geopolitical kind of framework that kind of envelopes this industry is a little bit clearer, it's really going to accelerate things even more. Jared, great to speak to you. Thanks. You too. Have a great weekend. You too. Coming up, a breakout and a breakdown in the AI space. We're going off the charts with Katie for a look at two key players in this trade. That's next.
37:00December 11th, join Melissa Lee and the team of traders in New York City for an all-access celebration, live and on air. Fast Money Live, trading the holidays. Get your tickets now at CNBCevents.com slash fast money.
37:21Welcome back to Fast Money. The AI trade taking a big breather today, but not all names in the space are created equally. Katie Stockton's taking a look at two names, one looking to break out and the other about to maybe break down. So which charts are you looking at? That's right. So UiPath has a breakout, the ticker there is PATH, and you'll see a big basing phase that's been completed with a breakout above previous highs, above some moving averages, and even a Fibonacci retracement level. So that does bode well for intermediate term upside follow-through, maybe welcome some consolidation there.
37:53And to contrast that, we have Appian, which is A-P-P-N. And you'll see there a downtrend. It's near its lows or headed towards its lows, it seems in terms of momentum to the downside, not a good day for it today alongside the broader space. But I do think it begs the question as to winners and losers in the AI space in general. It feels like if we do see a pullback that is broad based, that might then sort of differentiate between the ones that have better fundamental prospects. So I would pay a lot of attention to how these trade in relative terms during a pullback. When we are discussing this segment in the makeup room as we do every night.
38:33I don't wear makeup. What are you talking about? We were getting makeup. Oh, yeah, yeah. Fine. You were saying that you threw out a couple names. There's so many to choose from in your view. Well, there's a lot of quality names that got really overdone to the upside and people didn't care about valuations. They were discounting. Like, NVIDIA missed their data center number last quarter and the stock was down 1 % the next day. Just a lot of euphoria. But let me ask you this, Katie, because I see a lot of paths, right? Zoom, PayPal, these are things that were down 80-some percent from their 21 highs.
39:04They all look kind of similar. Would you put these stocks in that sort of bucket? You know, for everyone that's a high flyer, like a Micron or AMD, there is one that looks quite the opposite. Maybe a HubSpot, maybe their periphery plays. A ServiceNow doesn't look great. CRM has good support, but maybe doesn't look great from a momentum perspective. So I do feel like you have a lot of diversity in the space. And maybe it's because there's a lot of speculation in the space. Yeah. Mike, where would you go amongst the names that Katie mentioned or others? Yeah, I mean, look, you know, I was just taking a look at the stuff that we traded today.
39:44Of about 48 of the 114 stocks we are active in today were sort of tangentially related to, you know, the information technology space. And they were all down huge. I think if we get further weakness on Monday, you know, you can almost throw a dart at a board at that point because the average that I saw for our book was down about 6.3 % on the day for that pad. So you get down 10 % and that sort of correction territory, you might look to start making some entries. Yeah. Tim, what do you think? Well, I believe this is a market, especially in the sectors that we're talking about, despite those that have not been winners or have had a lot more volatility.
40:22People are looking to buy the sector. There is zero about what's going on that is going to change that in the short term. The mentality coming out of April for a lot of people has been if you strip that April, this is a three year bull market that I've wanted to own. And I've been disappointed when I haven't owned it. That's how it goes right now. Coming up, a baba bummer. The Chinese tech giant tumbling on the latest trade threat. What will it take for a turnaround? That is next. More Fast Money in two.
40:54Welcome back to Fast Money. Chinese tech stocks sinking today with one recent standout getting hit particularly hard. Alibaba down 8.5 % during the regular session, another 2 % after the close. It's now lost 17 % since hitting four-year highs early this month. Can the stock get itself righted if the tariff threats keep looming over it? And this is the perfect example of stock that you may like the fundamentals in, but you have these exogenous factors going and it sort of derails it. So what do you think? I think this is one you're buying. And this is one that I've been buying and one that I'd like to have bigger for some clients as well.
41:30It's the biggest position in Idevo, my ETF. So I think this is a case where, yes, the news flow could continue to be challenging. But when you do know the fundamentals of a name and on valuation and on balance sheet and on core positioning. And if we just had a conversation about the core trends in AI being things that people want to buy, This is an AI trend as it pertains to AliCloud and everything they're doing in Asia. And if you believe that China is competing, then they're going to be doing it with Alibaba. And this is with Alibaba as the homegrown product. So you're buying weakness. Mike, would you?
42:05You won't get a chance to do it after there's a resolution with China. So if you like the fundamentals, then yes, you have to buy it now, unfortunately. And the charts say yes or no, Katie. I'd give it a chance to pull back further. It takes more than just price, but also time to work off an overbought condition. All right. Up next, final trades.
42:30Final trade time. Mike Coe. Yeah, I'm looking at the only thing that's green today. Staples XLP. Tim. Making argument that Alibaba is the Porsche of the Chinese tech market. How about that? A-F-E. The box here. I'll go with PSQ. It's an inverse triple Q ETF, but only with a time frame of a couple, maybe three weeks as a hedge. Okay, that's a good clarification. Dan. I'm with Mike on the staples, but I want to go with Walmart. Thank you for watching Fast Money. Have a wonderful weekend. Mad Money with Jim Cramer starts right now.
43:13or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit CNBC.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.
From the publisher
Stocks dropping across the board, as President Trump threatens a tariff increase on China. The sectors getting hit the hardest, and where government layoffs are beginning as the shutdown continues. Plus Another drug pricing deal in the pharma space. The company striking a deal with the President, and the reaction from the health care sector.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
