Tariffs Crush Global Markets… And Volatility Swings Ahead Of Tomorrow’s Jobs Report 4/3/25

3 Apr 2025 · 49 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Summary

Podcast Title

CNBC's "Fast Money" Podcast Description: Hosted by Melissa Lee and a roundtable of top traders, “Fast Money” delivers actionable news for investors, breaking through daily market noise. Airs weeknights at 5 PM ET.

Episode Title

Tariffs Crush Global Markets… And Volatility Swings Ahead Of Tomorrow’s Jobs Report (4/3/25)

Episode Description: This episode focuses on the severe market downturn following President Trump's tariff announcement, exploring its impact on various sectors, particularly retail, and discussing the impending jobs report.

---

Key Highlights

Market Reactions to Tariff Announcement

  • Significant Market Decline:
  • S&P 500 dropped nearly 5%.
  • Nasdaq fell almost 6%, marking its worst day since the pandemic.
  • The Dow lost approximately 1,700 points, its fifth largest point drop.
  • Small-cap Russell 2000 entered bear market territory, down over 22% from its peak.
  • Sector Impact:
  • Consumer stocks heavily affected; notable drops included:
  • RH (-40%).
  • Kohl’s (-22%).
  • Gap, Nike, and Lululemon also faced declines.
  • Energy sector showed significant losses, particularly in major companies.

Discussion on Economic Indicators

  • Jobs Report Anticipation:
  • The upcoming jobs report is viewed as critical amid rising volatility.
  • Analysts express concerns over consumer expenditure and hiring paralysis due to tariffs.
  • Market Sentiment:
  • Comments from analysts reflect a lack of confidence in the economy’s structural integrity.
  • Paralyzed CapEx investments and hiring practices are highlighted as major concerns.

Perspectives on Tariff Policies

  • Concerns Over Market Dynamics:
  • Discussion on the uncertainty created by tariffs and their long-term implications.
  • The tariffs are viewed as a substantial risk, potentially affecting corporate earnings and overall economic growth.
  • Debate on Trade Deficits:
  • Varied opinions on whether trade deficits are inherently negative or a sign of economic strength.
  • Conversations highlighted the complexity of global trade relationships and the need for a fair playing field.

Trader Insights

  • Strategies for Investors:
  • Importance of focusing on quality businesses that can withstand economic shocks.
  • Identifying companies insulated from trade vulnerabilities emphasized.
  • Long-term vs Short-term Planning:
  • Emphasis on long-term investment strategies amidst turbulent market conditions.

Guest Insights

  • David Zervos (Jeffrey’s Chief Market Strategist):
  • Shares thoughts on historical market responses to tariffs, suggesting current reactions might be overplayed.
  • Advocates for a cooperative approach in trade negotiations, emphasizing potential for long-term benefits despite short-term volatility.
  • Richard Fisher (Former Dallas Fed President):
  • Highlights the need for a cautious approach to economic analysis in light of tariffs.
  • Warns that consumers will ultimately face increased prices as businesses adjust to new costs.

Final Thoughts

  • Investor Strategies Moving Forward:
  • Focus on sectors less dependent on international trade highlighted as prudent.
  • Consideration of companies in stable industries or those benefiting from local production echoed as a strategy.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Market Volatility:
  • Expected to remain high due to ongoing tariff discussions and economic uncertainty.
  • Economic Outlook:
  • Concerns regarding recession risks loom as tariffs apply pressure on consumer spending and business investment.
  • Investment Approach:
  • Emphasis on sector selection and identifying resilient companies to navigate through turbulent market conditions.

---

Conclusion The episode highlights the significant impact of President Trump's tariff announcements on global markets, investor sentiment, and the broader economic landscape. The discussions emphasize the importance of strategic investment decisions in a climate characterized by volatility and uncertainty.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square. This is Fast money. Here's what's on tap tonight. Tariff tantrum, a major sell-off the day after President Trump shocked the world with his trade announcement that was more extreme than feared. The S &P dropping nearly 5 percent, the Nasdaq losing almost 6 percent, the Dow dropping close to 1 ,700 points. We'll go inside the numbers and look ahead to tomorrow's incredibly important jobs report straight ahead. Plus, a retail wreck from the stomach-churning drop in RH to the massive slide in Target. How much further could these names drop and when could they be looking like a buy?

0:34We'll debate that. And later, what's the Fed's next move? We'll ask former Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher. Should investors get ready for a big surge in volatility? And will Tim's MIGA, make a traditional great again, trade, keep climbing higher? I'm Melissa Lee coming to you live from the studio of Be It the Nasdaq. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Vano and Eisen, Steve Brasso, and Julie Beal. We start off with a slew of jaw-dropping stats in today's market sell-off. The Nasdaq sinking 6 percent, its worst day since the start of the pandemic after President Trump announced his sweeping tariff plans.

1:06The index now trading at its lowest since early August. The S &P down nearly 5 percent, its worst loss since June 2020. The Dow shedding almost 1 ,700 points, its fifth biggest point drop on record. And the small cap Russell 2000 index sinking 6.5 percent, now more than 22 percent off its record high, making it the first major index to enter a bear market. and take a look at some of the sectors getting particularly hard hit. Consumer stocks, for instance, RH sinking 40 percent after its earnings last night, its worst day on record. Kohl's down over 22 percent. Gap, Nike, Lululemon, all following suit.

1:41We'll have more on the retail trade shortly. Energy, the biggest sector loser today, the XLE ETF, seeing its worst day in nearly three years. It was led lower by double-digit losses in APA, Valero, Phillips 66, and Marathon Petroleum. Big Tech, of course, tumbling, too. Apple down 9 percent. It's worst day since March 2020. Amazon, it's worse since April 2022. The so-called Magnificent Seven losing a combined trillion dollars in market cap just today. And financials among the biggest drags of the Dow. The 9 % decline in Goldman Sachs, erasing 230 points from the index. Meantime, yields plunging to multi-month lows.

2:17The 10-year dropping 14 basis points, briefly touching an even 4%. And volatility spiking too. The VIX jumping almost 40%, flirting with the 30 level. So what's next? Have we re-rated enough for the new tariff regime? Tim, how are you feeling today? Not great, Mel. But I think we're going to talk about the VIX. We're going to talk about market dynamics later on in the show. And we're going to talk probably throughout the show about important levels on the S &P. But it's pretty clear that the close that we had was so destructive that there's not a lot of room, with exception, down to some really important levels that get into Fibonacci retracements, they get into, you know, 5100, 5130, areas that I think on a day after the size of the move today doesn't suddenly feel that far away.

3:01There's no question we've done a lot of damage in a short amount of time. So the velocity of the move is part of what's going on here. We say this all the time. The lack of uncertainty is part of what's going on. And I think part of what market participants and folks on Main Street are feeling today is, hey, I'm not sure I knew that our economy was structurally broken, because, in fact, the things that at least are intended and announced out of Washington are things that make it seem as if we have to suddenly transform industries that we didn't know needed to be transformed. That's part of where I think the outlook on stocks becomes very, very cloudy.

3:34You add in some other elements about the dollar giving a lot of ground, the move in rates and the breakdown in oil. In terms of risk assets, if we start to see the dollar break down significantly and we start to see oil break down significantly, unfortunately, that is correlated to more market dynamics. So we haven't got an earnings season. As you mentioned, a massive, massive, massive, I'll say it three times, payroll number tomorrow, even though that is not really new data. That's a post tariff shock environment. And we had ISM services today, which wasn't very good and cast a little bit of a pall on that data.

4:08So the good news for markets is we've plumbed a lot of ground here. I mean, there really is. And if you've made your list and you have companies, you have to ask yourself if something really fundamentally changed. Yeah. Julie Beal, what do you think? Have we re-rated to this new tariff world? I mean, I don't even know how you think about the tariff since the only certainty we know is the new tariff levels per country. But we don't know what will come in terms of companies actually basically caving or saying that we're going to give you something that you really want, something phenomenal, as President Trump just said, in order for these tariffs to be lifted or at least clawed back a little.

4:43Yeah, I think that's the biggest problem. What I really worry about more than anything is just the level of paralysis that most companies are facing in terms of CapEx investments, which we're already seeing in survey data before the tariffs were announced, and in terms of hiring. And that paralysis, that stillness, it really creates a lot of sluggishness in the economy. And it makes sense to me, right? Because even if Trump came back today and said, JK, JK, no tariffs, was just having fun with y 'all. It's I don't think anyone would be allocating any differently or still feeling much better. It's like if you had a landlord that said, I'm so sorry, but you're going to have to move out in the next three months.

5:22and then came back to you a week later and said, just kidding, you'd still be looking around for another place to live, right? There's no clarity and certainty that these are really locked in and going to be here for the long term. So I think that's the real problem that we have is even with the clarity that we have of the tariffs in a little chart, we don't actually have a lot of confidence that we know what the timelines look like. And that makes it impossible to plan. Yeah, I think Julia makes a lot of good points. and then kind of like leaning into that, I think procedurally it's very much a shock.

5:53This is essentially enacted on the back of an executive order, as opposed to going through a much more protracted congressional process where you have a bit more time to kind of plan around this. And then the expectation is that if it does go through said process, that it is going to be in place for a lot longer. I don't know what we can do in the interim that really starts to undo the damage that has been done. Aside from saying, actually, we are, in fact, only using this for posturing and these are not going to stick. And they've been vehement about the fact that that is really not the case.

6:27So there's no way for you to pick up a plant and onshore within a 30 to 60 day period. This is all very long, long planned out capital intensive type of investment that we're talking about. And so I don't see how you're able to pivot away from the pain in the interim. And I think that's what the market is now digesting. I do think there was a prevailing sentiment that perhaps at these worst, simply bargaining chips. And then there was a little bit more teeth. But the extent to which this rollout has encompassed, I think that is really what the market is digesting right now. To your point in terms of the lag period, I mean, Dan Ives over at Wedbush was pointing out specifically for Apple that even if tomorrow they wanted to bring factories back to the United States and charge$3 ,500 to$400 ,000 for an iPhone, it would cost$30 billion and take three years minimum to move those factories.

7:17So in the meantime, let's say, yes, they're going to do that. Amazing. In the meantime, we're still living in a world where there's a big tariff from goods from China. So the first question we have to ask is there's a$1.2 trillion trade deficit. Do we do nothing about it? Because there's no wrong answers, right? So do we do nothing about that and just keep paying it? So that's the first question. Well, I mean, I asked it. Right. I mean, I'm not sure if there are wrong answers. I mean, I think there could be wrong answers. But is the presumption that a deficit is bad? I guess is the question, because I don't presume you want free trade and you want fair trade.

7:54So I don't think he's saying we don't need products from other countries here. What he's saying is we want an equal playing field. So if we have a car, how much does it cost to sell it in Europe? 30 to 50 percent more than we sell it here. If they have a car, how much does it cost more here? Two and a half percent. Is that fair? I don't think so. I get it. But what's the goal here? Is it to actually level the playing field in terms of deficits? Because a deficit symbolizes a very strong economy. Strength, prosperity, consumption. That our citizens can buy a lot of stuff from other people. Because we exported inflation, and now everyone thinks we're importing inflation.

8:31But what I think he's doing is he slaps those taxes on the other countries, making it cost effective to actually manufacture here. Now, that's another question you might not want to manufacture in the USA. There's a lot of people who do. Well, I mean, look, I'm all for fair playing field. I'm also fair for let's let's use our leverage. Let's push our way around. I'm all for that. I'm not sure I want to reindustrialize our economy. I'm not sure also that a trade deficit with Vietnam is something that keeps me up at night. And in fact, there are certain places where I wouldn't mind some of those textiles being put.

9:03I understand the China backdoor. Exactly. But it's not exactly. I mean, ultimately, you have a case. What is it? 40 percent of things coming in from Cambodia could be from China. A trade deficit to me is a sign of prosperity and buying power. And again, it's very clear to me, get the dollar weaker, get oil weaker, get rates lower. These are objectives of this administration. You got it. But a trade deficit and structurally remaking the economy is not they're not the same thing. And the linear relationship between where tariffs came from and trade deficits is something that I think a lot of people are figuring out right now doesn't necessarily make sense.

9:39There's also the element of services, which we export to other countries, which is not necessarily reflected in these goods numbers, Steve. So as a country, you know, we are very strong in that area in terms of services. I agree with you on a lot of elements, but we do buy 35 % of the world's goods. So when Tim said if we're using this as a leverage point, I think we have a lot more leverage over Europe and over China and over Africa and over all the other countries than they have over us. I don't want to have a discussion in terms of is this good or is this bad? What does this do to the markets?

10:17What do we have to do in terms of thinking about the S &P 500 this year? Digestion period. Bank of America is saying it's going to be a 5 % to 35%, and that is a drive the truck through that percentage range kind of hit. So I think you have to have a conversation prior to the conversation on the market, is this good? Because if it's just fantasy world and it's going to come off, then we could say, okay, take two weeks. One doesn't preclude the other necessarily. It can be good in 10 years, but very bad right now. It could be good in five years, but cause a recession now. I think we're going to see what happens in the next earnings cycle, which is probably too soon.

10:51But I think you give it six to eight months, and I don't think six to eight months of the market selling off to this magnitude. And then you see where we're at. And I think this is a moving target. This is a fluid story. I don't think, I don't think, and I think he does have the flexibility to say, well, let's move up or let's move down or let's see how we negotiate. I don't think it's far. Tomorrow, I mean, he just said, look, China, if you approve a TikTok deal, then we can talk about tariffs. Bang. So, OK, so we're talking about 24 hours. But Julie, to your point about paralysis, we are in a land here where we're just waiting for that next headline day to day.

11:28And so what does the market do? What do you as an investor do in that sort of let's say it's eight to ten, eight to ten months? That seems like a pretty good scenario. Live eight to ten months in uncertainty. But what does that do to the markets? Well, I think we start to really see where the types of businesses that are dependent on trade are and are dependent on a specific type of policy to work. those are just not the types of companies you need to be owning. You're probably better served in the types of businesses that we excel in, like information businesses or software businesses. I think that's probably a better place to be.

11:59Or if you're looking at industrials, you want to look at things that are kind of highly specialized and are a little bit more insulated. And there's some in small cap that might be a good place for that. But I think kind of in the interim and larger, bigger picture, what we really have to think about in terms of this policy is, you know, Yes, economists told us that globalization would be great for everyone and there would be no deadweight costs. And that's kind of true. But the problem is, is that that assumes that you're going to be able to reskill people. And I think that's the piece that we really missed in this country.

12:29And that's why you have this large population that feels very left behind. So I think that there is some support for his policies in terms of we're going to make the other guys pay. The problem is, is that in all cases or in most cases, it's actually us who are going to pay these. Well, when our last guest, our next guest, joined Fast Money last time on March 4th, he called the president's tariff policy, quote, minutiae in the grand scheme of things. Let's bring in Jeffrey's chief market strategist, David Zervos. He's also a CNBC contributor. David, great to have you with us. You also said the markets are massively overplaying the risks of tariffs.

13:03Here we are now. So what do we do with the selloff? How do you view this? So I think the tariff story for me, I was looking at the 2018 playbook, watched how it went. I think the new information really is that we have a much more MAGA Republican Party that's willing to go further on trade. That said, I actually think there's a silver lining under all this that's positive. So I don't get really bothered by the story. I actually look at it and think we're going to bring our trading partners to the table. They have a lot more to lose than we have to lose, similar to what you were saying earlier in the segment, and that we have a real chance of getting a more cooperative, fair trading outcome, which I think has huge benefits to the U.S.

13:49I think as well that we're still early days in the deregulatory policies and the tax cut policies or the fiscal policies and the benefits from having just a significant reduction in the government footprint in the U.S. economy. So this is not, to me, the be-all, end-all. This never was. And I'll tell you something that's very interesting. I went back and looked at the price action in the beginning of 2018 when the first kind of tariff stuff started to come out in Trump 1.0. We had like three or four days with 3 % moves in the S &P. We had a 10 % correction in February. We had a 7 % correction in March.

14:27The market got really spooked by a much smaller trade story than the one that got put with us today. So to be honest with you, I actually see how big this was and how much it was a surprise. The market didn't react nearly as much as you might have thought. Let's just take a pause here. We've got some breaking news from President Trump. He spoke to reporters a short time ago on Air Force One. New developments on the tariffs he announced just yesterday. Potentially more levies to come. Megan Cassell has got the latest. Megan. Hey, Melissa, a lot of news coming out of this gaggle that was just on the plane.

14:59We're just getting the headlines from the wires and the pool reporters and starting to see the video play out now. on negotiations with other countries about these tariffs. This is the top line here. The president said that he is open to tariff negotiations if other countries offer something phenomenal. He also said, quote, every country is calling us. We put ourselves in the driver's seat. Now other countries will do anything for us. A big development that I flagged there, Melissa, because all day today and even late yesterday, we were talking about this. We were hearing from administration officials and allies of the president saying they weren't looking to make deals.

15:30They were not looking to make negotiations. Now the president kind of changing that and saying as long as there's something good on the table, he's not specifying what that is, that he would be open to potentially lowering these tariffs at some point in the future. He also said that further tariffs will be coming. They hinted at this yesterday, but he says that tariffs on semiconductors will be starting very soon and that they're also looking at pharmaceuticals. He says that's under review right now. Remember, both of those products currently exempt from the reciprocal tariffs because they said at some point sector-specific tariffs would be coming.

16:00He's saying now that's coming very soon. He also said the market reaction today is what is expected. He said it is going to be a booming economy, but he called this a transition period. He also said that he spoke today with some auto executives at the White House as the auto tariffs kicked in today. One industry that's definitely going through that transition period. He wouldn't say who he had talked to or what exactly they talked about. But you can imagine the idea of tariff relief and exemptions came up in that conversation. And then just finally, Melissa, he spoke about TikTok in the context of this tariff relief.

16:32He said that he would consider a deal where China approves a TikTok sale in exchange for some tariff relief and also said with that deadline looming on Saturday for a sale, he said the U.S. is very close to a deal with multiple investors involved. So we'll keep listening to this as it goes. But a lot of headlines right there from the president. Melissa. Megan, thank you. Megan Casella. So there's this possibility that everything he announced yesterday could be in some way clawed back or paused or whatnot if things are negotiated here. The transition period that he just mentioned, it's similar to what Scott Besson said in terms of a detox period, David.

17:06How do we trade through a period like that where if you are a fundamental investor, you have to apply these tariffs into models and say it's going to hit S &P earnings by this much and therefore the valuations need to come down presumably by this much? Yeah, but at the end of the day, aren't you also looking at a discounted cash flow that goes out forever. You're an equity investor. You're in the longest term capital there is. You're not a two year note trader or a five year note trader. So what you're thinking this does over the five, 10, 20 year horizon, what it does to rates as well, bringing rates down, which means that five to 10 year horizon is even more valuable because we get a lower rate structure, I think matters a lot.

17:44You're detoxifying. I love the story. It's probably less in the trade side than it is in the reg side or the overall government sector side. And that is kind of getting the fiscal monkey off our back, get this thing that's been dragging us down, this big crowding out of the federal government from the private sector, pull those resources back into more productive uses in capital and labor. And, you know, you're going to go through a little transition if you do it fast. People got nervous with the chainsaw. That was the thing we didn't really know how to. How quick are we going to do it? And is it a trillion dollars fast?

18:19Is it more than a trillion dollars? But we'll get there. And at the end of the day, a clean patient that's not on the kind of fiscal juiced up sugar high that they've been on is is a better economy, a better patient and a better story. So I hit 100 percent in terms of the fiscal mess that went on for a long time, really on both sides of the aisle. But let's let's reel it in and let's let's exert our our our clout and our leverage globally. This is what we're all saying. But I saw even some of your notes. You said, you know, maybe a behavior of change is not a bad thing and it leads to a better economic outcome.

18:55How are you defining that? Because you're an economist and you understand what's going on here. In other words, at least you've worn these hats. And ultimately, was there something structurally broken about our economy that needed this type of structural change or so it seems we're positioning for? Because everything on fiscal restraint and deregulation, 100 percent animal spirits. Everybody wants that, I think. I mean, I want that. But I'm just trying to understand the parts that I think the market doesn't understand is, hey, were we signing up for this? Were we signing up for is the U.S. economy structurally need to undergo a massive change here?

19:31I think what we need to understand on the trade side, and that's what we're talking about today, is is there a need for 50 percent tariffs on every agricultural product going into India? or 300 % tariffs on everything going into Canada that's dairy or 700 % tariffs on rice that we might sell to Japan. Does that make sense? Is that fair? Is that the right structure of trade with our trading partners? No. And I think there's a desire to fix that just from a kind of meritocratic kind of good relationship story. Let's have a level playing field. And if you make a better product than we do on a level playing field, great.

20:07Then we'll take it. If not, let's not take it. But let's not subsidize the workforces of other countries through VAT. Let's not put unfair trading practices into play. And that does need to be fixed. That's hollowed out a big chunk of our country and has probably been a big part of why the voter bases of those swing states moved toward the Republican Party away from the Democratic Party, at least starting in 2016 and again in 2024. I think that's an important story. And I think that's where he's pushing. But the even bigger story is kind of what Secretary Besson has been alluding to much more of this detoxification of the six point eight trillion dollars of spending, which may even we might find out there's an Enron moment here that a trillion or two of it is just complete fraud.

20:54And we don't know that yet. We don't know whether these Social Security numbers that they found of people north of 120, 130 years old. How many are there? Are we paying them? It's a lot more to find. But that, I think, is actually a little more nerve wracking for the market and suggests there may be some real spending that gets pulled out. But again, you're talking about a period where you take the bad toxicity out and the patient gets a little shaky. The patient gets a little unhappy because you're taking their sugar high away. But we have to remember what it is. It's a sugar high. It's not real growth, which is so funny because we're over there in Europe, which I was in last week, listening to German clients tell me how excited they were about deficit spending.

21:35I thought I was on the planet, frankly. But I'm like, this is, you guys have been telling us this is a sugar high forever, and that we're just going to have to pay in the long run for all this excess debt that we take to do spending that's relatively unproductive. I think it's a great exercise if we can do it. It'll probably lead to a lot lower interest rates. I think this Fed will be cooperative with that. I think Jay Powell loved to see fiscal restraint. And I don't know. I just I'm not I'm not buying the really end of the world narrative that people are throwing out there today on a day that it feels pretty.

22:07Well, that felt good. Did it feel all right? OK, good. David, thank you for coming by. Always a pleasure to be here. David Zervos. So, Grasso, you feeling that good, too? Yeah. Well, let's see how long it lasts. A. But I do believe when David was talking about the 200 to 300 percent on milk, egg and cheese in Canada, that was prior to Trump. That was prior to this whole tariff tantrum. That was not fair. So when Canadians talk about that, it's good to have the power and it's good to be a rich country. But if you go out to dinner and you're paying three and four times the price for dinner and the restaurant owner is not buying you a drink or sending you over dessert, you probably go to another restaurant.

22:46We got to even those When you go in a house and get a roof, you get three estimates. We've been paying hand over fist for everything we're doing. We just want to lower it out, make it fair. And maybe in the meantime, we get some more jobs. So did you buy this dip? I bought an EV carmaker. I bought Lucid. All right. Just curious. Coming up. Much more on today's global sell-off, what tariffs mean for the Fed's rate path, how international markets are handling the news, and a deep dive into volatility as we gear up for tomorrow's jobs report. But first, more on today's retail stock route, major drops and big names across the board.

23:18But could this be a chance to get in? We'll debate that next. I'm going to our Fast Money back in two.

Read the full transcript

23:30Welcome back to Fast Money. Consumer-facing stocks under major pressure today. The S &P retail ETF dropping 8 percent for its worst day in nearly three years as retailers grapple with the impact of tariffs on global supply chains. For more on the sector impact. Courtney Reagan is here on set. Busy day for you, Courtney. A really busy day, extreme. I mean, frankly, the new tariff policy is being described as, quote, a nightmare come true, worst case scenario, beyond imagination. These aren't my words. These are coming from analysts, executives and retail lobby groups. So the losses were deep and they were wide.

24:00RH shed 40 percent of its value. Now, this also was after a disappointing quarter and worry about its sales, but also exposure to manufacturing in the now heavily tariffed countries in Asia. Its CEO cursing on the conference call and a real-time reaction to watching his stock crater. Wayfair, Victoria's Secret, VF Corp, Capri, Kohl's, and so many others losing 20 percent or more. Again, we're just talking about today's session. Some consumer staples names, those were higher. But look at the divergence. I think this is so interesting in just the dollar stores, often looked at as a safe haven. Dollar Tree, though, down more than 13 percent.

24:35Dollar General up almost 5 percent. Why? China sourcing exposure. Almost a third of Dollar Tree's goods are made in China. Only 4 % for Dollar General. So investors may be doing their homework on that one. However, Jeffrey's Randy Koenig tells me retailers actually are more worried about consumers pulling back right now, more so than they are about the higher cost of goods. Retailers, for the most part, staying pretty silent. They don't want to talk. Their stocks are tumbling. They're trying to figure out what to do. American Apparel and Footwear Association's CEO Steve Lamar is kind of doing the talking for some of the members.

25:09And he says that his members are feeling stress, frustration, anger, and even helplessness. Now, Cytex makes jeans in Vietnam and L.A. for names like Ralph Lauren, J. Crew, Madewell, and others. Its CEO and co-founder Sanjeev Ball tells me that at least for now, none of his retail clients are asking him to absorb all of that tariff cost. He says the same pair of jeans, though, does cost him half as much to make in Vietnam purely because of labor costs than it does in L.A. He says he's got an 80%, 20 % hybrid model, and that's as good as he can do. The Dollar Tree, Dollar General divergence is fascinating.

25:44So where are they getting their dollar goods? So if you think about like Dollar General does have more food and beverage. So a lot of that is going to be local. That is a lot of the reason for that. Dollar Tree, remember, for a long time was sticking to that$1 price point. They had to go up to$125. Dollar General rather does have goods that sort of go beyond that$1 threshold and more food and beverage. That's a big reason for the divergence. So different types of goods, but both of them are often lumped together and say, hey, those are safe haven, those are discounters. But if you're talking about exposure, it's vastly different.

26:16How much of this do you think, so we know tariff impact, higher cost of goods sold, higher import costs, whatever that is, but you talked about the consumer. And so we've got, first of all, a consumer that might have already spent too much on a lot of these discretionary items and have more than they needed. And then there's the unknown of the consumer. So there's almost a triple whammy here. If you could break down what's the contribution of each of these three buckets to what's going on here. Because I look at a Lululemon, and we're now a week past or three or four days past their numbers. And we'd see on this test, 20 times Lulu's really cheap, except for the fact that what I heard from this company is they could have negative comps and that actually their CAGR on EPS is going to be 5 % for the next four years.

26:58And I'm not sure it's worth 20 times. Yeah. And Jeffrey's, Randy Koenig also who I spoke to again about sort of the consumer sentiment piece, when he would look at Lululemon, he actually is also really worried that it's potentially a biggest loser for those things. Plus, also, it's exposure to Vietnam. Yeah, he was out there early on that, by the way. It's exposure to Vietnam. Yeah. I mean, this is really tricky. And I've really started to think about if prices go up so substantially, isn't it going to be this consumer pullback that is going to be a bigger problem? That seems to be an issue for me because if you're the retailers now, it's a little bit less about who's more exposed to China and who's not.

27:33There's nowhere to hide. Everybody's being hit. I mean, very few retailers source all or the majority of their goods here in the United States. So that means everybody's costs are going up. And so maybe everybody's cost of business is going up. So it's not me pitted against me if I'm a retailer. But if I'm a consumer, my gosh, to your point, do I really need another blue shirt? I mean, that one looks fine, Tim. Well, thanks. I mean, I know I don't. Yeah, it's pretty new. Courtney, thank you. Courtney Reagan. And the trend is that consumers were sort of pulling back. We saw that in the data most recently throughout the first quarter.

28:07As the first quarter went on and on and on, consumers were getting a little bit more choiceful in how they spend, is I think the nice word of saying they're cutting back. So, Bono, are you looking through this wreckage at all and saying, you know what, there might be some interesting buys, or are you just worried about this sort of overlay of the consumer losing their jobs, of a growth scare, growth, I don't know, pullback, whatever you want to call it? I think you're always looking for an opportunity within the chaos. I mean, you've got to kind of keep your mettle and kind of pick through things.

28:34So, one, it just seems like correlation did really start to approach, Ron, within this XRT kind of cohort. And so when I look at, you know, a Lulu or Restoration Hardware versus like a Ralph Lauren or a Gap, I do think there's some differentiation there. I think Lulu has already gotten hit on the back of earnings, restoration as well. And then you're kind of seeing some taking there. Ultimately, they're really appealing to a higher-end consumer. And then the consumer in general, I'm thinking about what are the spending trends likely to be. It's likely to be more credit card heavy. Now, maybe I don't want exposure to a Capital One, but perhaps a Visa that has a nice mix of your AXP type of clientele and then your middle type of clientele might be an opportunity for more fee generation there.

29:18Yeah, you want to look at the retailers that are coming from a sense of strength. So you go to Costco or you go to Walmart where they can negotiate prices better. But I will tell you, Capri down 24 % catches my attention to start sifting through because there's got to be some buyer at Capri trading with a 14 handle. Coming up, a couple of names managed to book the sell-off today. How French fries and soda help boost the staple sector into the green. that is next. Plus, Trump's tariff plans could put a major wrench in the Fed's rate plans. How yields will respond and what our next guest is hearing from business leaders abroad.

29:54You're watching Fast Money live from the Nasdaq Market Site in Times Square. Back right after this.

30:20Welcome back to Fast Money Stocks. Tanking after President Trump unveiled his 10 % baseline tariff on almost every country. The Dow diving nearly 1 ,700 points. The S &P falling nearly 5%. The Nasdaq down nearly 6%. All three indices seeing their worst days since 2020. Dow transport sinking more than 9 % as airlines, rail stocks and delivery companies like FedEx and UPS all drop in today's sell-off. Crypto also getting crushed. Bitcoin hovering around the$82 ,000 level. Other tokens like Ethereum, Solana, Ripple, all lower as well. But some bright spots in today's drop, investors flocking to the staples sector amid the global sell-off.

30:55Lamb Weston, the French fry maker, jumping 10 % after topping earnings expectations. And beverage stocks like Coke, Pepsi, Molson Coors, helping fuel the staples trade. We've got a news alert. One of Wall Street's biggest firms updating its odds for a recession. Steve Leisman's got the details. Steve. Yeah, Melissa, and not one that is really quick on the trigger to make changes like that. J.P. Morgan upping its recession odds to 60 percent from 40 percent previously, citing obviously the tariffs, the effect on business sentiment, the effect on investment and the effect on and on consumer price.

31:28They said, quote, these policies, if sustained, would likely push the U.S. and possibly global economy into recession this year. And if I could shift gears, Melissa, we just got an email from a study from the Cato Institute. What they did is they looked at the tariffs that the White House says countries charged us versus the actual tariffs they charge. Take a look. Vietnam, they said that President Trump said it's 90 percent. It's actually five point one percent for an 85 percent difference. We'll go down the list. Taiwan, Switzerland, which is known to not charge almost any tariffs at all. 61 percent, the White House said, it's actually 1.7.

32:09Indonesia, where we get a lot of garments from, they're at 5.3. The White House says they're at 64. And very importantly, the European Union. Remember when the president said there was 39? And then we can go down the list. These are important trading partners. Now, of course, there are some non-tariff trade barriers that are difficult to quantify. But the White House basically being accused by people of using a formula that no one has ever used to come up with these tariff rates and then say, oh, we were kind to them and we did half. Melissa? Steve, thank you. Steve Leisman. The 10-year Treasury yield dropping again today, hitting 4 % at its lows at the session.

32:46That was its lowest level since October. Our next guest warns President Trump's tariffs are upsetting the global order. Richard Fisher is the former Dallas Fed president. CNBC contributors also served as deputy trade representative around the time NAFTA was implemented. Richard, great to have you with us. You just returned from a very long trip around Europe. You talked to a bunch of CEOs, investors. And what are they saying here as J.P. Morgan ups his recession odds to 60 percent for this year? Well, my trip ended at the beginning of this week. So they were apoplectic. They were worried. They wanted some certainty.

33:21And I guess they have a little more certainty now after President Trump's announcement on tariffs. So, look, this is just upsetting the current global order. And to make decisions, including at the Federal Reserve, I believe, without having a full sense of what the impact will be, it's too early. It's just too early to make decisions. I don't like this because I was schooled and I believed and I negotiated my duties for USGR. with all the countries that have been talked about on this show. It's just a different approach. And Steve is right when he reports those numbers. Those, for example, the Vietnam number was one that I negotiated.

34:13When we put on the first Nike investments on behalf of the United States, I helped negotiate their opening in Vietnam. So remember, Melissa, consumers are going to pay the price. And one of the meetings I had was with Rolls-Royce, my first meeting in London. And then last weekend in EFT, the successful CEO of Rolls-Royce pointed out that if you're going to make for dramatic change in any organization, in his case, his company, you have to deliver results very quickly to keep your constituents going on your side. We'll see how this affects the farmers, how it affects the consumers, and how it affects the constituents that voted for President Trump.

35:02But my guess is no one is happy having to pay higher prices than they already are paying at a time when the economy is on a downturn. So it's compounding the issues and also challenging all these other countries in terms of their economic welfare. From the Fed perspective, I understand that you have to see what the impacts are going to be, the direct as well as the indirect impacts of these tariffs and how it filters through the economy, etc. There are other economists on the street who, you know, they have to cater to investors and they need to put notes out and they need to figure out how exactly it's going to impact everything right now.

35:38But at the same time, at the same time, Richard, you know, at what point does the Fed or maybe there is no point where the Fed is less passive in its role in the economy in terms of watching to see how things impact the economy and take on a more active role in terms of where the economy should go? Well, first, they have to figure out what's likely to be the impact on inflation and employment. And Melissa, you've heard me say this. We've been friends for a long time. I don't believe in instant analysis. That's an oxymoron. It takes time to figure out what the consequences will be in a very complex economy like the United States.

36:19I do think everybody realizes that tariffs are indeed a tax. It will put price pressure on consumers as businesses struggle to protect their margins with increasing costs. And this is an increase in cost. But I think right now, if you look at what's happened that affects business, rates have come down a little bit. The 10 years hovering just at 4%. percent. So I believe the Federal Reserve only controls the yield curve out to one year. And from then on, on the yield curve, what impacts operating businesses who employ people, who sell products, who buy things from others to make into products and to provide services, the short-term rates aren't as important.

37:04You're right as far as the trading markets are concerned. But let's not overestimate how powerful the Fed can be in terms of affecting the price of money that they depend on, businesses depend on, to finance their operations. And right now, I would say rates come down. The spreads have not widened that dramatically. We're just going to have to see how this works its way through the system. And as we see how it works its way through the system, the Federal Reserve, like any business right now, just has to take their time to understand all the movements that are likely to occur from this dramatic change in the way we approach the world and we approach our own economy.

37:47Not an easy task, Melissa. No, it's not. Richard, thank you for the instant analysis of the situation. I want to tell our good friend on the set, by the way, I am wearing a blue shirt like he is. So looking good, Richard. It looks new. Richard, thank you. Nice to see you, Richard Fisher. So like every other component in the economy in terms of the consumer, businesses, a state of paralysis even at the Fed in terms of what they do, according to Richard, because we have to see how things filter through. And there are two sides to what the Fed sees here. And there is a part of this that they're probably pretty excited about in terms of fiscal restraint.

38:26So I think it's it's tomorrow's payroll number is an important payroll number for the markets, but it's not necessarily going to dictate the world that we see. And I believe that that patience will will be borne out over the next few weeks. If there are cracks, though, in that report tomorrow, Julie, cracks that existed before the tariffs have come into effect, that will really concern investors, I would think. It should. I mean, right, if two-thirds of your economy is based on the health of the consumer and everyone spends every incremental dollar or they have been for the last few years, it's really concerning if they start to lose their jobs.

39:01And more importantly, it's not just the losing of the jobs that really impacts demand, it's the fear of losing your job. That's when you start to really pull back your spend, even though you are still gainfully employed. And I think it's that confidence piece that's not just lacking in businesses, But if it starts to bleed into consumers as well, that is a meaningful impact on demand. And that happens immediately. Coming up, a spike in volatility as Trump tariffs tank equities across the globe. How our next guest is navigating the stock swings and where she sees safety amid the turmoil. That is next.

39:40Welcome back to Fast Money. Today's massive stock market sell-off comes as investors now turn to the March jobs report tomorrow. So how should investors position themselves now? Let's ask CBOE, CBO's Mandy Hsu. She joins us here on set. Mandy, great to have you with us. In terms of today, we saw a big volatility spike. We closed at around 30 or so. But, you know, on the 1230 call, these guys were saying that they expected it to be much higher. Exactly. So as big of an increase in the VIX as we saw today, we would have expected a much bigger increase given the fact that S &P sold off almost 5%, right?

40:11If you recall last August when we had that almost 5 % pre-market sell-off, VIX was 65. So in terms of what's different this time, I think the fact that tariffs, while what was announced yesterday was larger than expected, it was very much an anticipated risk for the market. It wasn't a true shock, right? It wasn't a black swan event. And typically what really produces the kind of type of volatility shocks, you know, we saw last summer was a true black swan event. And that's not what we saw yesterday or today. In terms of volatility in the other asset classes like yields, for instance, was that more in line with what you were expecting or still muted?

40:45No, we did see volatility increase across asset classes. In terms of what stands out on a cross-asset basis, I would say right now credit volatility to us seems fairly contained given this rising concern of a recession. Credit spreads being still fairly tight on a historical basis. In the rates market, in the bond market, what's interesting is that for all the talk about stackflation, the possibility of much higher inflation, the bond market is solely focused on the downside risk to growth. There's almost nothing being priced in for the inflation. So all the positioning is for rates to go lower from here.

41:17Very different from what we saw in 2022 when it was the other way around. Manny, we spend a lot of time talking about the VIX at the index level. Can you kind of tell us what you're seeing under the hood at the individual single stock level and whether that's telling us a different picture or a different story about investor sentiment around fear? Yes. And I say one of the reasons why, you know, the VIX was probably more contained today was that investor focus was actually really idiosyncratic, the stock selection side. People were looking for the winners and losers of tariff policy. So what we saw actually was a fair amount of dispersion.

41:48We had certain sectors, staples, utilities actually up on the day. And even within sectors, I think you guys were talking about in the retail, dollar general versus dollar tree. Exactly. There was quite a bit of dispersion there. So that, to me, suggests that people are still looking at from earnings, from a fundamental perspective and not from a macro perspective. So if there were more fears around recession, more macro fears, you would start to see higher levels of correlation. And that would kind of then you would expect to see higher levels of VIX. So I would say right now, equity investors still focus in terms of stock selection, sector selection, picking out the winners and losers.

42:24Could that change? Certainly. And if it did, we would expect to see higher levels of volatility. So, Mandy, if the VIX is only good for a black swan event or things of that nature, I don't want to put words in your mouth, but that's how you framed it, where you see these spikes in volatility. What should the people watching the show, what should us as traders, when Bono and I asked you about individual names, is there a certain aspect or a certain metric that we can look at as traders that will give us a day-to-day volatility picture versus the black swan events? Yes, absolutely. So to be clear, so VIX, when I say good for black swan, I mean, significant VIX spikes like to 60, 50, 60 type levels.

43:02Typically, you would get, you know, it's on the back of a black swan event. But in terms of what other volatility measures you can look at, we actually released a VIX for single stocks. The ticker is VIX EQ. It's looking at the top 80, 90 stocks in the S &P. That gives you a good measure of kind of average single stock volatility in the market. So if you want to look at the stock side, we also have measures across asset classes, VIX TLT, which looks at bond market volatility, VIX IG, which is credit volatility. So we do have a variety of measures for across asset classes as well as within the equity market.

43:36Bottom line, though, I hear that there's more possibility for downside risk to equities and to a lot of different asset classes because we haven't priced in recession. We haven't gone that last mile. Right now, we're only pricing still a growth scare. I mean, we're still willing to look at fundamentals for stocks. That is my big takeaway in terms of what is currently being priced into the equity options market. Yeah. Do you think we need to price in recession at some point? Well, I think the comment on credit is really important. I think, you know, if I look at what credit markets have done, and I also look at the crowd that's in credit markets, and I look at the lack of liquidity, you know there's not the kind of liquidity to actually unwind a lot of positions for a lot of people.

44:13If you own CDS, yes, it's highly liquid. But the private credit markets are what they are. But if you went up, and you can do this at home, if you look up high-yield OAS spreads, you can see that we've seen essentially in high-yield spreads we've backed up 100 basis points in about three months, four months, really most of it from January. And that's a major, major move. And yet we're still incredibly tight. Mandy's talking about markets only saying lower rates, pretty good for companies, pretty good for owning bonds, right? Lower rates, higher prices. But credit spreads widening is the part that really I'd be careful on.

44:46What are you watching tomorrow? Post jobs report, pre jobs report. Yeah, I think the so heading into this week, the market was putting more emphasis on the economic data than the tariff announcement. That turned out not to be an oversight. Right. But I would say kind of going forward, I could see why the market did that, because the economic outlook is going to be the key driver. Right. In terms of just in terms of both the labor market, as well as consumer spending, you know, those data points I would expect to be much bigger volatility drivers or catalysts for the market. All right. Mandy, thanks for stopping by.

45:17I appreciate it. Mandy Shoe of SIBO. Julie Beal, how are you feeling about tomorrow's jobs report? And do you think we need to price in recession? Are you starting to do that math in terms of S &P earnings, et cetera? I think that what we are trying to do is look at our portfolio companies and have confidence that even if we do hit a recession, that they're going to be OK. That's how we build our portfolios. And And that's why when we have days like today, we tend to do half as bad as the market. The thing that I think is really important for all investors to be looking at is what types of quality businesses do I have?

45:50Am I well positioned? Because if we do have a negative jobs report before the tariffs, that is problematic exactly for as she was saying. The consumer spending aspect of it is so important. All right. Meantime, global markets also hit hard after yesterday's tariff announcements. The Europe stock, 600, down over 2.5%. Germany, an outperformer earlier this year, getting whacked 3%. China's Hang Seng Index down 1.5%. Meantime, the Mexico ETF soaring as our southern neighbor was spared additional tariffs. The EWW saw its best stay since June. Canada not seeing the same enthusiasm today, down more than 2%.

46:26So, Tim, you're known for your MIGA trade, which is, of course, making international great again. How are you feeling about it now? Well, if we think that the dollar is going lower, again, you've got this you've got this buffer when you're investing in foreign markets here that actually if you're investing in a company that sits in Europe, the euro's strength is actually to your benefit. So that's part of what the move was. That's why if you own the EWG, it really outperformed the DAX. The part about I think this trade that investors need to think about is there are foreign investors and some U.S., but really, if you're a foreign investor, you invest in dollars.

46:59So much of that position is unhedged. If some of that money comes repatriating back, I think it's going to be even more powerful for that international trade. So I continue to think that this is a trade that, while it's had a big run, there are structural things that have changed dramatically that mean this is, I think, just the beginning. Just quickly, within international, are there specific areas you like the best now after we know all these tariff announcements? Well, again, it's fascinating how Mexico has kind of carved this out. But I continue to think that Germany, what they're doing in that economy and the industrial nature of that economy and the fiscal spending.

47:33Germany and Spain are kind of the, I think, the most interesting economies in Europe. Up next, final trades.

47:44Time for the final trade. Let's go around the horn. Julie. Enerpac, I'm thinking local and highly specialized. Tim. Unilever. This is a Staples play, but it's an EU food play. It's cheap to its group and I think is actually a bit of a re-rating play on cost improvements. Lever or lever? You know, I don't know. We know what you're talking about. Bono in. You want to focus on the consumer. I really think that, you know, you want to look at the credit card providers. Visa. Steve Grasso. I said before I bought Lucid Motors for the last two days. Took a shot there. They're mostly manufactured in the States and they're backed by the Saudi private investment funds.

48:23So I took a shot at Lucy. All right. Thanks for watching Fast Money. See you back here tomorrow at 5 for more Fast Mad Money with Jim Cramer starts right now.

48:32All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC Universal, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy. but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.

49:07To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.

From the publisher

Stocks are tumbling as tariffs take their toll, but will this cause the markets to reset? We’ll break down the impact on retail, international reaction, and what investors can expect in the coming weeks. Plus what to expect out of tomorrow’s jobs report, as volatility spikes as Trump’s tariff plans ripple across the market. 

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 871 episodes
Tariffs Crush Global Markets… And Volatility Swings Ahead Of Tomorrow’s Jobs Report 4/3/25CNBC's "Fast Money" · 49 min
Listen in VO