In short
Podcast Notes: CNBC's "Fast Money" Episode - Tech Leads Market Bounce… And The Next Move In Rates (3/12/25)
Episode Overview In this episode, the hosts discuss the recent rebound in the S&P 500, driven by technology stocks, the impact of tariff headlines on market volatility, and insights into the upcoming Fed decisions regarding interest rates. The discussion includes a focus on individual companies like Intel, Apple, and Adobe, as well as broader market trends and economic indicators.
---
Key Discussions
Market Overview
- S&P 500 Rebound: The S&P 500 ended its two-day losing streak, primarily driven by a tech-led rally.
- Technology Stocks: Notable gains were seen in stocks like NVIDIA and Tesla, while Apple lagged.
- Volatility Factors: Ongoing tariff discussions contribute to market fluctuations.
Individual Company Insights
- Intel:
- New CEO Announcement: Intel appointed Lipu Tan as its new CEO, which led to a surge in stock prices after hours.
- Challenges: The company faces significant product delays and intense competition from AMD and NVIDIA. Concerns over their large spending on the foundry business and market share losses were highlighted.
- Future Outlook: Analysts expressed cautious optimism about the leadership change, suggesting Tan's background could be advantageous.
- Apple:
- Stock Performance: Apple was the only MAG-7 stock to decline, with a 9% drop since Monday.
- Morgan Stanley's Price Target: They lowered their target for Apple, citing delays in AI product rollouts.
- Strategic Focus: The discussion emphasized Apple's different approach to AI and augmented reality compared to competitors.
- Adobe:
- Earnings Report: Despite beating expectations, Adobe's stock fell due to weaker guidance.
- Market Position: The company is integrating AI into its offerings but faces competition from other tech firms.
Economic Indicators
- CPI Reports: Eased inflation, with the Consumer Price Index showing cooler-than-expected figures for February.
- Tariff Implications: Potential new tariffs could impact pricing pressures and inflation moving forward.
- Recession Concerns: Goldman Sachs increased recession probability forecasts, which could affect market sentiment and decision-making.
Analyst Insights
- Brad Gerstner's Comments: Investors are looking at recent market dips as buying opportunities, particularly in tech stocks like NVIDIA, which may present favorable entry points.
- Volatility Assessments: Analysts noted that with a VIX over 24, more volatility in the market is expected, indicating caution in the current trading environment.
---
Takeaways
- Tech Sector Resilience: The technology sector has shown resilience despite overall market volatility, attracting investor interest.
- Leadership Changes Matter: CEO transitions can significantly affect investor sentiment and stock performance, as seen with Intel.
- Recession Risks: Heightened discussions around recessionary conditions may shape investor strategies and company operations in the near term.
- Tariff Impact: Ongoing and potential tariffs on imports are likely to add further complexity to pricing and inflation dynamics, influencing consumer behaviors and corporate strategies.
---
Final Thoughts The episode highlights the interplay between technology sector performance, macroeconomic indicators, and individual company news in shaping investment strategies. As markets navigate uncertainties, particularly regarding tariffs and inflation, investors are urged to remain vigilant and consider both opportunities and risks in their portfolios.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is fast money Here's what's on tap tonight. A tech-led rebound on Wall Street with a number of beaten down names like NVIDIA and Tesla leading the charge. One mega cap did not come along for the ride. Why the divergence and what it means for the future of Apple? Plus, inside Intel, the embattled semi-stock finally tapping a new CEO. Shares are soaring after hours. All the details straight ahead. And easing inflation, CPI coming in cooler than expected in February. But what will more tariffs mean for pricing pressures?
0:31We'll debate that. And later, Adobe on the move after earnings. How do you know when it's time to buy Novo Nordisk and Target at 15-month lows? What's next for the retail giant? I'm Melissa Lee. I'm with you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Zee Grasso, Karen Feinemann, Courtney Garcia, and Guy Adami. We'll get to Wednesday's tech turnaround, boosting the markets in just a moment. But first, we want to start with Intel shares. They are soaring after hours. The chipmaker naming a brand-new permanent CEO. It's fourth in the last seven years. Our Christina Parts Nevelis joins us now with the details.
1:02month long or several months, I should say, they've been searching for a CEO. They found Lipu Tan. He's no stranger. He's, you know, he's a tech investor. He's worked at Cadence Design, which is a chip automation software firm. He used to be on Intel's board, but stepped down back in August. Rumors were that he clashed with former CEO Pat Gelsinger. So now he's back. The current or the co-CEOs, you have David Zisner. He's going to keep at it as CFO. And then Michelle Holthaus will remain the CEO of Intel products. But I guess that's one bright spot for Intel, given the other issues. They've had product delays with their AI chip.
1:39We know the spending. I think they're burning through about$25 billion a year on the foundry business. And then competition. They're losing continued market share to AMD and even to the likes of NVIDIA at this point. I mean, it seems that if you wanted to pick the perfect CEO for Intel at this moment in time, Lip Bhutan is the perfect guy because he's like the anti-Pat Gelsinger. I mean, he left in August reportedly because he clashed with Gelsinger. He said that Intel didn't have a clear AI strategy. Its workforce was bloated. He just disagreed with management style. And so those are exactly the things shareholders want addressed.
2:15Precisely why they're reacting more positively to this news as opposed to somebody like a David Zissner. No offense. Like, he's worked with the company, but his background is finance. It's not necessarily semiconductors. And Pat filled that role, but maybe not strategically, trying to do too much all at the same time. So let me ask you, what is the mandate, do you think, for his CEO-ship? You know, we have lots of discussions of looking to sort of carve up intel by various buyers looking. Is it custodian until that happens, or is it something very different? Excellent point. I think with lots of buyers referring to the foundry business and whether TSMC is going to be less than 50 % owner, AMD, Broadcom, those rumors have been milling.
2:56I know it came out today, the stocks for all of those shares popped, but those rumors have been milling about for quite some time. It seems like something has to happen with the foundry business. I don't know what 10's role would be in that case, but something needs to, especially with President Trump really pushing for more help specifically to that business that's burning cash, burning cash, and they're still not getting the number of customers up there to even compete at the same level as TSMC. Not saying that they can't eventually and that they have, you know, the know-how and all the wonderful talent here in the United States, but they're still so far behind.
3:27And that is a big drag on margin. So it's a possibility of a separation. Christine, I don't know the answer to this. You may. I mean, they're supposed to report the end of April. Any chance that they sort of in the next couple weeks come out, pre-announce, kitchen sink, clean slate? We've seen things like that before. I don't. There's an Intel Foundry Day at the end of April. So I wonder if they're going to hold off on doing something that drastic, given the proximity to the Foundry Day, we probably, you know, there's a lead up, you know, with like NVIDIA, for example, GTC, they waited, or they're going to wait to announce products and stuff like that.
3:59So to your point, it may not be beneficial to jump the gun with their earnings report just so soon, given they have that update. They have an AI event this month, but a Foundry one that should be bigger at the end of April. Intel has an AI event. Yeah, something I saw more at the end of March, which I'm not going to, but I should be going into the foundry run because I was expecting some news coming out of that at the end of April. Right. So another catalyst for the stock. Potentially. Potentially. Christina, thank you. Good point. Christina Partsinevelis. All right. So the biggest overhang in the stock, no CEO.
4:28That's now resolved. Courtney, does it look interesting? Well, I think that's the one overhang. But the other thing is just the foundry business, right? I mean, they're expected to still be showing losses there through 2026. And that's the question is when that can happen. In the meantime, you know, when is that turnaround going to be there. So I would actually still be cautious. I think this is good news, like maybe a reason to dip a toe in. I wouldn't be going in with two feet at this point in time. Where he came from, Cadence Design was one of the most innovative companies or seen as one of the most innovative companies when he was there.
4:58If you look at a stock chart, he's coming in at just the right time. It ran up, dipped, now it'll pop again. It already popped today. I would be a buyer. It's interesting. Pull up a long-term Cadence Design since we're talking about it. This stock did nothing for 20 years. I think he stepped in in January of 2009, got a year or so under his belt, and the stock went parabolic over the next 10 or 15 years. I think he stepped down in 18 or 19. So this is the right person for the job. And if I could change my acronym and jam an eye into my tube. Would you? Would you put the eye in the tube? Sounds painful.
5:32But it is extraordinary. But tweeb is not a word, so I want to play by the rules. That doesn't stop anybody else. No, it stops me, though. All right. And I do. Okay, we'll leave it at that. Meanwhile, stocks rebounding off today's lows. The S &P whipsawing in early trade, but ending the day up half a percent, leading the charge. Not banks. Nope. Not health care. Not utilities. It was technology. The Nasdaq surging almost one and a quarter percent with big moves higher in Tesla, Micron, Palantir, and NVIDIA. All but one member of the MAG-7 was up today. Some investors seeing recent weakness as an opportunity to buy up bargains.
6:06Take a listen to Altimeter Capital founder Brad Gerstner on Squawk Box this morning. We've seen the markets come back in, and I have to tell you, we were buying some yesterday because now you see Nvidia 18 or 19 times next year's earnings. Now you're getting paid. So do you believe the bounce? Do you think the tech trade was de-risked? And do you think things like financials and transports have not been in this route? Yeah, so it's interesting. I think Brad's got a much longer-term view than this show probably. So he looks at this move and like, you know, if I'm bullish Nvidia for the next couple of years, this is as good an entry point as any.
6:41And it's probably true. I don't think it's over, though. And still with the VIX north of 24, even with today's sell-off in the VIX, it suggests we're going to see some more volatility. I mean, just look at the intraday chart of the S &P 500, probably at 150-handle move up and down and closed slightly higher on the day. So I get the bounce. We actually discussed there potentially being a bounce in the space over the next couple days. So it's not surprising. But to answer your question, I don't think the downside is over. That may be. I mean, I don't really trade around, so I'm not trying to pick the bottom here.
7:11And I've sort of held going down, held going up. I am looking to find some places to add. I did add some banks, right, add some J.P. Morgan call spreads. I had been thinking that the banks at the moment, now that we're into March, are out of the market in terms of buying back their own stock if they were inclined to because we're getting too close to the end of the quarter. But I agree with you on the VIX. I wish it had gone a lot higher and then come down and not settled in here because I find it doesn't really live at 24, 25. Right. It goes somewhere else. And so I don't think the end is I don't I could think we could see more pain, but I'm not going to sell and then try to buy back later.
7:52I look I look at the tech stocks through the prism of where were they pre deep seek. And if you go back to the pre-headline, that was January 24th. Apple is only 2 % lower and was 10 % higher than where it started before the deep seek headline. If you look at NVIDIA, 18 % lower. Microsoft. So all these are somewhere between 12 % and 18%. Even Netflix is down 6%. Apple has had the best turnout of all those names. If you look at one other one, Meta, Meta is down 6%. There's no reason why any of these stocks, or I should say half of them, should be down what they are. But we have to reassess. I'm big on they spent too much for AI.
8:41They're trying to spend too much more on AI. 80 to 105 billion, way too much. It's got to be reassessed. Apple's not doing that. Apple is working on AI in a different way. Apple's looking at it through a device prism. and they'll figure it out. It's more of augmented reality versus AI. They might be using AI to do it, but they're spending$5 billion,$10 billion max, where the other ones are spending$85 to$105 billion. So I don't think it's over. I think they're going to be penalized and they're all going to have to come up with a couple of years of efficiency led by NVIDIA. I think NVIDIA still goes much lower.
9:19I mean, the thing that we have not talked about head-on within this tech discussion, whether or not these names have been de-risked, because the overlay of the increasing recession odds that Wall Street is starting to price in. I mean, you have Goldman Sachs coming and saying it's about a 40 percent chance of recession, up from 30 percent, which they estimate at the end of 2024. So three months ago, I mean, it wasn't too long ago where they're saying 30. Now it's 40 percent. So, I mean, that's got to put some concern. And there's an asterisk, I think, next to all of those CapEx plans that were outlined in January.
9:47It's a very different environment. I mean, CEOs, right, we talk about it all the time. CEOs, they feel very differently now versus the beginning of January when a lot of those CapEx plans were unveiled. Well, let me ask you. We were playing the game. Sure. We are playing a game. It's not a would you rather. I'm playing the game. If I had told you that Microsoft's CapEx numbers were too high, they're bringing them down. And Meta rallied on its CapEx news. But the other ones did not. Amazon and Microsoft. If I told you, all right, their CapEx is coming in by 15 percent, would the stocks rally or not?
10:26Are they doing the same thing that they were doing with the 15 percent higher? Are they doing the same? Are they cutting back on spending just to cut back on spending? Or were they able through efficiencies, through DeepSeek, through the idea of DeepSeek, are they able to get to the same end goal? If you're getting through a recession question, right, then it would be that we're not sure that the opportunity is as big. we're going to decrease our spending by 15%. I don't know. I don't play games. I'll pose it to you guys. I would think that there is a decent chance that a stock like a Microsoft would in fact go higher on a pullback in CapEx because the narrative could be we're in uncertain times.
11:05We just think it's prudent to do that and in the future we can ramp that number back up easily. What she said. I think that you can make that argument. I don't know if that would be the case, But I think there's an argument to be made. Yeah, I think that is the question. But what's happening is as more and more people are talking about recession, it's not just CEOs who are getting nervous about the economy. It's consumers and investors who are also pulling back and getting nervous. And that's where you're seeing this big trade kind of a rotation happening into your defensive names and your value names out of the U.S.
11:32and into abroad. So I think days like today shows people are willing to come in and buy these dips, which probably means, yeah, it might not be over. You're not seeing this mass selling that's been happening. But I would make sure you stay diversified here. I still own the tech names, but I'm not, like, jumping in, you know, with Sufi right now. A few things. I think our audience has gotten to know you over the last 16 years. By the way, it's almost your anniversary. That is true. 16 years on Fastball. And I think they realize that you're an avid game player. But I will play your game and say, you know what, if CapEx is going down.
12:05When I was a kid, I used to watch the Flintstones, and Fred used to get his contracts in, like, a big slate. But these CapEx numbers are not etched in that same stone. And if they feel there's a slowdown coming, they will ratchet it back. And Karen makes a good point. What will happen to the stocks? I think in this scenario, it's going to hurt a lot of these AI names. Well, let's dive deeper into Apple. That was the one Mag7 stock in the red today. The iPhone maker is down 9 % already since Monday, pacing for its worst week since November 2022. Morgan Stanley lowering its price target on the stock from$275 to$252, citing the delayed rollout of a more advanced Siri.
12:41For more, let's bring in Fast 20 friend Gene Munster of Deepwater Asset Management. Gene, after Apple revealed Apple intelligence at WWC last June, here's what you had to say. This is about getting people to recognize that their current phone isn't nearly good enough, and I think that they hit it. This is the biggest day for Apple since the iPhone, a full stop. Do you feel the same way? I think the biggest day is coming, Melissa, and ultimately this has been a disappointment in terms of the rollout of Siri. It's as big of a disappointment as covering this company and investing in it for 20 plus years that I've seen a one-year delay on something that's so critical.
13:26And so I don't want to pile on to the naysayers related to where this product ultimately can go. But to answer your question, as we stand here today, a very different place than what I thought we were going to be at back at WWDC. At the end of the day the question still is relevant is will they get Apple intelligence right and as it stands they're essentially just holding on too much to how the whole ecosystem that's powered by Apple intelligence is put together. They really need to expand it, allow developers more to build on to it, to accelerate the features. When I made those comments before it was a belief that these they would be in a unique place to bring personalization and automation to a device that are over 2.3 billion active devices.
14:16So that that central view is unchanged but it's gonna take much longer than what I thought. I do stand by this belief that a year from now we're gonna see meaningful acceleration in iPhone on the back of these new features getting rolled out. I was curious about how Apple was valued because I think there's a question here in this kind of market environment. Are you overpaying for Apple given its delay in AI features? Pre-WWDC, so just before June or so, it was trading at a 30 PE. Right now it's trading at a current 34 PE, not forward PE, just PE. So I mean just on that basis, how should we think about it.
14:57Is Apple still worth more than it was worth before the announcement? Should it actually have even more of a discount than being four turns, you know, having to go four turns lower to go back to pre-WWDC? Because it's sitting out as, for instance, its competitors in China are launching phones that are, you know, the same price point or lower with AI features. So I think the multiples in the right place and I think investors are still giving Apple the benefit, largely the benefit of the doubt in terms of how they can roll this out. So I think an above average multiple is justified just given how important these products are.
15:36They're not going anywhere. People are not going to get rid of their iPhones, for example, if an Android phone comes out with some impressive AI feature. And so that lock-in is really valuable to investors. They can sleep well at night knowing that the flywheel is in place. And so the multiple makes sense to me the move higher in the stock here has to come from the substance of these features driving revenue and ultimately earnings. And when I look at that, I mean, that's the question. I'm still optimistic, still positive, still own this stock on a belief that the iPhone estimates for this year are conservative, the streets looking for about 1 % growth steps up to 6 % for calendar 26.
16:16So it's a nice step up. I think that those are probably conservative. But to answer your question, I do think there is some benefit of the doubt that's being given right now. But I think the upside in the stock comes from earnings upside based on in part these features. But also keep in mind, there is this huge upgrade pool that is ultimately going to have some positive impact this year and next year. Hey, Gene, it's Courtney here. So just geographically, where should we see that growth coming from for Apple? So there's been a lot of disappointment when it comes to China sales. And I know there is some optimism with some other emerging markets like India, or hopefully we'll see that pick up in the U.S.
16:53But also with tariffs ongoing, like is that going to be an effect for Apple? And how should you look at that as an investor? So a couple topics on the, maybe start with the latter on the tariff side is I think that they're going to sidestep these tariffs. I think Apple's announcement about this$500 billion dollar investment into the U.S. It wasn't all incremental. It was probably more like 30 billion was incremental. But I think that was the politicking around this. And I think that Cook and Trump are in a good spot. So I think that Apple will find a way to avoid these tariffs. As far as where the growth comes from, the China piece, there is, it just doesn't impact Apple.
17:28It impacts Tesla, too. I mean, those two hardware companies, you're seeing this move to buy China, this nationalism consumer behavior that is, I believe, in part fueled by some of the messaging from Chinese leadership. And so I think that that's going to be a harder one to turn. Where the upside comes from, it's the old strengths of the U.S., Europe, and to a lesser extent, India. It's about 3 % of revenue today. I think longer term, that can be 10 % of revenue, and that's just kind of a slow build. Gene, we're out of time, but I got to ask you this one question. This is the question that we you're sort of bandying about on the desk just before going to you, and that is if the MAG7 came out and said, we're going to trim our CapEx spend for the year because of macro uncertainties, et cetera, it's just a prudent thing to do at this point.
18:14Do the stocks go higher or lower in your view? I think measurably lower. That would be a very bad day for these companies and a bad day for the broader AI trade. I think it would take many quarters for investor psychology to recover from that. All right. Gene, always great to speak with you. Thank you. Thank you. Gene Munster. Lots on the shoulders of the CEOs of the big tech companies. Well, I admire Gene coming on to take, you know, take a bullet, right? He's been writing this for a really long time. I just, even though it's down somewhat, it's still not close enough for me to buy it. All right.
18:52Coming up way off target, shares of the retailer hitting levels not seen in over a year. What is weighing on shares and how tariff turmoil is impacting the retail space ahead. But first, some after hours action to bring you Adobe on the move on its latest results, the details and numbers from that quarter next. Do not go anywhere. Fast Money's back in two.
19:16Welcome back to Fast Money Canada and the European Union imposing new taxes on U.S. goods in reaction to the Trump administration's levies on aluminum and steel imports. CNBC's Megan Costello's got the latest. Hi, Megan. Hey, Melissa. So those sweeping 25 percent tariffs on all imports of steel and aluminum took effect first thing this morning. And with that, take a look now at all of the tariffs now actually in effect. Besides the metals tariffs, we have the 25 percent duties on Mexican and Canadian goods that are not USMCA compliant. A White House official told us that's about half of what we buy from Mexico, two thirds of what we buy from Canada that will still see those tariffs.
19:52We also have the lower 10 percent tariff on Canadian energy and the extra 20 percent tariff on all Chinese imports. And it's hard here to estimate the total value of goods being hit. But by one analysis, more than 30 percent of all U.S. imports have seen tariffs added in the last month. Another analysis put that at well over a trillion dollars worth of goods. And there's more to come. April 2nd is the next date to watch. That's when the White House says they'll start rolling out customized reciprocal tariff rates on a country by country basis. And the sky seems like the limit from there. The Commerce Department, we know, is investigating imports of copper and lumber for national security threats.
20:28That paves the way for additional tariffs there. And we've also heard the president threaten tariffs on cars, semiconductors and pharmaceuticals. No details on any of those yet. But the only certainty, it seems like from here, is that the level of uncertainty is likely to stay elevated for what could be months to come. Melissa. All right, Megan, thank you. Megan Casella. So let's overlay that with what happened in the markets today in terms of that tech rebound guy. For that reason, the certainty of uncertainty, was this just a one-off rally? No, I think the market's learning how to deal with the – I think they understand there's going to be ebbs and flows of this.
21:03The rhetoric's going to get ratcheted up, ratcheting down, depending on where the market is. And at a 25 VIX, you understand that you're going to see rallies of this magnitude or even greater. But with that said, none of this is particularly bullish, I think. And if you want to look at one thing today, I still think it's the bond market in the form of yields. You saw that CPI number today. A lot of people said it was cool. That's what the market needed. One would think, given the trajectory of yields recently, yields would continue to go down. They're actually about 21 basis points higher than they were about a week and a half or so ago.
21:34That's what you have to be watching, I think. All right. Meantime, we've got an earnings alert on Adobe. Shares are sinking despite a beating the top and the bottom line. Conference calls underway. CNBC's SEMA Modi is dialed in. joins us now for all the details. Hey, Seema. Melissa, a slightly weaker second quarter guide from Adobe. That's why the stock is down right now. CEO Shantanu Narayan, he's on the call, but he also joined CNBC's John Ford in the last hour and said that Adobe's artificial intelligence products are creating new revenue streams from AI assistants, Acrobat readers that are also creating new subscription tiers.
22:06Narayan also downplayed any signs of a pullback, reaffirming Adobe's targets for the rest of the year. The question is whether the street is convinced Adobe is an artificial intelligence software winner and should be in the same category as Salesforce and ServiceNow that are deploying these AI agents or even Oracle that is standing up AI data centers. You'll see that shares have underperformed the broader IGV software ETF over the past six months. Morgan Stanley's team says competition is to blame, but they do think that the company's upcoming summit next week will give the street better read on enterprise demand and maybe more metrics as to how AI is playing out for this company.
22:40Melissa. Seema, thank you. Seema Modi. So that's a good question. Should it be in the same category as an Oracle, as a Salesforce? I think the key for them is Photoshop and their whole digital revenue sector. And the problem is, will open source take that away from them? I think they should be in the same category, but they should have a bigger tailwind because it's hard to replicate the benefits of Adobe. Guy? I think valuation, you can make a case for this stock, and it's nowhere, not that it matters, by the way, but, I mean, this stock was north of$600 a couple years ago. I mean, valuation has gotten reasonable.
23:18I didn't think it was a bad quarter, and I didn't think the guidance was particularly draconian either, so I'm surprised at the move. I think you're looking for a place to buy Adobe, not sell it. All right. There's a lot more fast money to come. Here's what's coming up next. Retail feeling the tariff impact. Target trading at more than 52-week lows. and Walmart looking to offset supply costs in China. What will trade talks mean for the space? Next. Plus, the next move in rates. Treasuries whipsawing this week on recession fears, tariff pressure, and the latest inflation report, where our next guest sees the bond market heading and what it'll mean for the Fed.
Read the full transcript
23:57You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market side in Times Square. We're back right after this.
24:12Welcome back to Fast Money. Shares of Target slipping to their lowest level since November 2023 today. The company just one of many across the retail space feeling the pressures from tariffs. China's commerce ministry holding talks with Walmart meantime after the U.S. retail giant reportedly requested price cuts from Chinese suppliers to offset increased costs. The country warning the company not to shift higher expenses to Chinese retailers as it could violate commercial contracts. contracts. All these headlines dragging the retail trade today down. The XRT hitting a new 52-week low, down over a percent.
24:44And consumer staples, the worst performing S &P sector today, down more than 2 percent. What's up with Target, Karen? What do you think? I don't know. I mean, you know, their quarter obviously had some problems. I thought, as I said at that time, they didn't give guidance for the next quarter, but they did for the full year, which I found kind of hard to believe. I mean, they're just, even though they do have a big top line, they're just really behind Amazon and Walmart's doing a great job and Costco and BJ's. It's cheap, but that's not enough. Yeah. And the big problem is, is the consumer deteriorating or not?
25:21That's what everyone's trying to figure out. And they have a much larger mix of discretionary goods than say a Walmart, which is where, you know, you have things like today, people are willing to come in and buy certain areas, but there's still a lot of questions about the consumer. So that's where seeing the likes of a Target are still under pressure here. And then add the tariffs on top of that. And I think you're likely going to see some of this. So I don't know if the consumer is under as much pressure as is currently getting priced in. So I think that's maybe something to consider. But it's going to continue to pressure.
25:47So even if you go year to date or you go one year back, Walmart and Costco have definitely outperformed Target. They just can't seem to get their act together. Guy used a term with Adobe, you should be looking for a spot to be a buyer. That's what I would be of Walmart and Costco. you can't touch target until they prove themselves. Do we have a crack staff in EC? That's a rhetorical question. They're always on. If they could pull up a longer-term chart at target. And by the way, I think as wrong as I am most of the time, target's one we've gotten right, I think, telling people to avoid it. And this was a$260-something stock a few years ago.
26:22So you can do the math and see how much it's lost. Under a broader market, it's been extraordinary. But this 105 level was the low we saw in November of 2023. So if you can flush this thing on like 50 million shares of volume over the next week or so, there's your level, I think, to try to play it from the long side. Coming up, a rate rally. Ten-year yields heading higher after this morning's CPI print. We're in next guest sees rates heading with a Fed decision coming next week and how she's positioning in the face of heightened volatility. Fast Money's back in two.
26:54Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back. right after this.
27:09Welcome back to Fast Money. The S &P is snapping a two-day losing streak thanks in part to this morning's soft inflation report. The index closing half a percent higher, the Nasdaq faring better of more than a percent, but the Dow shed about 80 points. The transport trade in rough shape, CSX, J.B. Hunt, and Old Dominion hitting multi-year lows, FedEx at its worst level in more than a year. And while Tesla shares were up today, J.P. Morgan sees more downside, analysts cutting their price target to a new street low of$120, more than 50 percent downside from current levels. Tesla already down nearly 50 percent from its record high.
27:44Well, Treasury yields rising today after softer than expected inflation data and a$39 billion auction of 10-year bonds. For more on the Treasury move and inflation risks, let's bring in Subhaja Rajapa, Societe Generale's head of U.S. rate strategy. Subhaja, great to have you with us. Thank you. the markets share the softer than expected data, but you say you're not buying into that. Yeah, because if you look beneath the hood, you get a very different picture. I mean, you look at a broad variety of metrics. I mean, airfares went down, but you saw things like used car prices start to go up. You've seen other categories within the CPI basket, recreation, apparel, all of that went up.
28:26So you kind of have this haves and have not story, if you will. Although the headline was, you know, lower than expected point to headline and core. Overall, I thought that some of these underlying, you know, parts of the basket showed, you know, that inflation was still quite sticky. So, Spadra, thanks for being here. We haven't seen tariffs yet. How do you factor that into your expectation for rates and inflation? Not as of yet. I mean, we're still looking for details. We just don't have much by way of information from the administration on what exactly is going to get passed. But if you look at, you know, the bond market, I would argue that the bond market is actually looking at, you know, somewhat of a softer CPI print, but looking past that and saying, you know what, we haven't really seen the impact of tariffs yet.
29:15So once we start seeing the impact of tariffs, that would mean higher inflation prints and a Fed that's going to be on pause for a lot longer. That's part of the reason why you saw the market start to price out cuts that were priced in ahead of the CPI brand. President Trump's first administration, they talked about the stock market being a report card. This one, they seem more focused on the bond market, and they want interest rates to go lower. Treasury Secretary Besson has talked about it. President Trump, can they do anything to get bond yields lower? Well, they can job on. For his part, I think Besson has told us very, very clearly that Besson and Trump don't want 10-year yields going above 4.5%.
29:59They want to see borrowing costs contained. They want to see a pickup in the mortgage market. The mortgage market's been pretty much in stasis for a while now. So they really want to see that pickup in these consumer-led areas. And really the way to do that is by keeping 10-year yields low. If 10-year yields get to around 4%, you're going to see a pickup in the mortgage market. That's great for the economy. Given what the administration has said about the 10-year yield, though, where do you expect it to go? Last time you were on FAST, back in January, you said 5%. You totally see 5%. Where are you now?
30:34I think Besson has really capped the rise in 10-year yields. I mean, 4.5 % is probably as high as it gets. And if anything, I think that the risk to yields are skewed to the downside. So I can see 10-year yields actually head towards 4 % if we start seeing any sort of weakness in the data. The Fed's going to keep policy on hold for the foreseeable future, at least for the first half of the year. Beyond that, I think you're going to see the long-end yields actually gradually decline and the yield curve flatten. And, you know, that's because the market's going to start looking towards tariffs and potentially the impact of tariffs on growth.
31:10It's a tough, though, sort of dual mandate to navigate here. If prices are going to go higher because of tariffs and we haven't seen the full effect yet, et cetera, et cetera. But the job market will certainly soften, at least from the last print that we got. Even if you just say government jobs are going to be reflected, you know, the cuts in government jobs will be reflected in the numbers going forward. How do you view that dual mandate and what wins out? And is that why you think the Fed will just be on pause as opposed to actually doing something in response to these two mandates? mandates.
31:42So after today's CPI print, I would argue that the Fed would be much more focused on what happens on the employment front because inflation has been trending lower. You've had this disinflationary trend for the last year or even longer. And now if there's any sort of weakness in the job market, I think that the Fed is going to be prepared to cut rates. I mean, If you look at what Powell was saying last Friday, he was saying that, you know, they are OK to be on pause because they can cut rates quickly if they need to. OK. Subhadra, thanks for coming by. I appreciate it. Thank you. Badra Rajafa, Societe Generale.
32:21Four and a half percent. Let's play the game. Well, I thought you were playing. You just said 18 minutes ago. She doesn't play it. You're playing it. I'm the game instigator. But if I were to tell you that yields would stay capped at 4.5%, the highest, is that good for equities or bad for equities? I think on the margins that's good for equities. I'll play the game correctly and say if you told me 4.5 % is a ceiling and probably the skew is lower, that's good. But I'll say this as well. If yields are going down because things are slowing in a meaningful way, that's not particularly good for equities.
32:52So there's my caveat. The 10-year was at 4.90 on January 13th. It dropped down to 4.17. It's rallied back above 4.3. But when you look at it, the housing market, shelter costs are 30 percent of CPI. Once that gets unlocked, you'll see inflation really dissipate from the economic backdrop. I think it's a positive the lower we go on the 10-year. Coming up, Starbucks under pressure as investors pour over updates at the company's annual meeting. what CEO Brian Nickel had to say about tariffs, turnaround plans, and much more next. But first, a no-go for Novo. The stock down over 17 % already this month as competition in the weight loss drug space meets up.
33:37Last, the top strategists, what it'll take for shares to bounce back when Fast Money returns.
33:52Welcome back to Fast Money. Novo Nordisk sending a losing streak down 4.25 % for its fifth straight day of declines. The stock is now trading in March 2023 lows, with concerns mounting over the company's competitive edge in the weight loss drug space. For more, Mizuho healthcare strategist Jared Holes joins us here on set. Jared, great to have you with us. It's like Karagasema happened, the second phase of Karagasema. Every single headline in the obesity space, even if it's not Novo, it's bad for Novo. The sentiment is so terrible. Is the stock where it should be right now, or is it overdone? It's been horrifying to watch it.
34:30Basically been cut in half since last summer, right? They had that big analyst day. They excited the street, and now we're sitting here at multi-year lows. So it feels fair and not fair. I mean, the news flow out of the company and out of the field has impacted it dramatically. So in some respect, yes, but they're still going to grow 15 % to 20 % this year. and it's a growth entity for the next few. So when you compare it to some of the other names in pharma, it's amazing that, you know, I was talking to some investors today. I think the sentiment on Novo is the worst in all of large cap pharma.
35:02Wow. Yeah. You bought some today. I did. I bought some today. I mean, I had owned it a couple of years before, sold it too early, and I thought, oh, wait, one day I'll get back in. When you think about the next few years, like this Roche thing, they're talking about 2029 at the earliest, right? So when you think about the profitability that's available potentially for Novo between here and there, how far does that get you? They can go for the next five plus years without really doing much, right? They're going to be the market leader. I still believe it's a two-player market in this injectable market for the foreseeable future, if for no other reason than the cost that you have to kind of take in order to be in it, the manufacturing spend, all of those things.
35:48It's interesting because this Kagrissema data, the street wasn't that excited about. Yet they're excited about this Roche plus Zeeland asset, which is essentially the same thing as Kagrissema, but investors like it. So I think we've kind of we've gone so far in terms of the pendulum swinging out of their favor that maybe you're right, Karen, it's time to buy a little bit. Well, that news was interesting, and it brings me back to Viking, which, as I said last night, you know, that move, I thought the stock would double from 50. I looked really smart for a while, and I looked really dumb, which is typical.
36:22But here we are with the stock. There's scarcity in the space in terms of assets. Yesterday's news, people suggest, you know, maybe they're going to go it alone. Mel read it differently. Karen read it differently. How do you read it? I don't think it really changes anything. I think if you are a publicly traded company, you've got to do things that essentially allow you to keep on going as an independent entity. And so they could get acquired tomorrow. I don't think anyone would be ultimately surprised. I mean, there's this whole thought around Wall Street that the competitive dynamic and, you know, there's so many assets in China.
36:56Why would you buy Viking when you can buy things cheaper? But the market caps have gotten obliterated. This and structure and a few others are trading where no one thought they would. because the barriers to entry seem minimal. But I kind of like it here. I mean, I haven't been the biggest bull on Viking North structure in a while. But now with the equity values where they are, you've got to take a look. I mean, these could be swiped up for a couple billion dollars, even if it winds up not being great for pharma. That's a small write-off. When you say it might be time to buy Novo, is that a pound on the table?
37:29This is a point in time where we're going to look back. We're going to think, wow, you could have bought this name at 18 times or so for where it is in terms of being a market leader in the obesity space for the next three, four, five years? Or are we going to say, you know what, the sentiment is so bad, and you know what, Eli Lilly is going to have a headline on its oral, and that's going to drive Novo even lower. Take your time, because we're going to replay this. Okay. When you're right or wrong. It's not a pound the table. I think it's more of a trade. I don't think there's anything pound the table like in large cap pharma, sadly.
38:02I think most of these are, you know, sentiment or valuation calls for the most part. The thing that bothers me about Novo is essentially what happened to Moderna, even though they're not analogous. Moderna,$500 stock a few years ago, everything was going right. They didn't do anything. They basically watched the world end out of their favor. And they could have done a lot in terms of strategic development and buying assets and really milking it. They did not. They stood still. And that's kind of what Novo has done here. So in part, you're making the analogy with Moderna. Wow. Yes. I mean, they versus where the stock was a year ago, they've essentially watched the entire world shift.
38:47So many different things have happened in terms of this category since that time over the last 12 months, whether it be other data, competitive data sets or different assets that have popped up or different deals that pharma companies have done. They've essentially stood still. So I think it's unfair to put them in the same category, but it reminds me of Moderna during the height of COVID when they were kings and they essentially let it slip all away. And here we are at$35 a share versus$500. So it's just very, it is reminiscent in a way. Jared, always good to see you. Thank you. Jared Poles of Mizuho.
39:21Steve, where do you stand on Novo? You know, sometimes sentiment is there for a reason. So I agree with Karen. I think you can get a pop off for a trade. But when you really look at these things, sometimes in six months, three months, a month away from the trade, you realize why sentiment was so negative. So I would be I would be have a short stay in some of these. But when you look at a name like Regeneron, totally different story. When you look at that, the market has given you the the possibility of making a pop or a bounce in a lot of these different names. So I think all of them short term, buy, don't overstay your welcome.
39:59Yeah, and I think some of this too, you've been seeing this big shift toward Europe in general. And I think one thing to consider with NOVA is one of the largest holdings in one of your European ETFs. So I think some of that yardage are going to get some like money flows that move in there. And I do think this is, there's a lot of opportunity in the space in general. It still really is them and Lilly. So I don't know. I think there might be some opportunity here. Would you rather? Oh, I like this game. That's a twice now in eight minutes you're playing a game. Really? Yeah, well, go ahead. Lilly or Novo?
40:25Novo. I just listened to everything he just said, but I think, you know, just valuation alone I think you take a shot here. Lilly has shown its colors over the last couple weeks. Novo. All right. Coming up, shares of Starbucks getting roasted this month. Is there a comeback percolating for this name, or is another turnaround too tall in order? The trade and the details from their latest annual meeting next. More fast in two.
40:54Welcome back to Fast Money. Starbucks shares falling as much as 2.6 % today as the coffee chain holds. Its annual shareholder meeting, the stock, which hit a more than three-year high at the start of the month, is now down nearly 16 % from those levels. It was the first shareholder meeting since Brian Nichol took over as CEO in September. The coffee is still expensive, and in this environment, maybe that's not the environment you want. 100%, and there's a consumer confidence number on Friday that's not going to be good. And again, when the stock market is the lead story every night, people start looking around, what can we cut?
41:26And the first thing they're going to cut is Tim Seymour's soy latte that he gets seemingly three or four times a day. So Starbucks has sold off. I think there's more room to the downside. What's more expensive, the coffee or the stock? I mean, they're both expensive, right? Although I do think some of the things that Brian Nichols has been doing really make sense. Cutting out those 20 percent of the drinks that are 80 percent of the labor. It was crazy the kind of drinks that they still had on the menu. Right. So but I feel like a lot of good things that he's done is priced in already. I don't own it here.
41:54Yeah. Too big to too great of an operator to bet against. You would if you look at it on a chart, it's still at the level where you could keep that uptrend intact. I wouldn't want to bet against him. He's one of those CEOs that anyone in this space would be lucky to have. He could write his own ticket. Hard to bet against them. And once again, the market gave you an opportunity here. I think through efficiencies, yes, the coffee's expensive. Yes, everyone has their own little cup to make inside their own house. But I think this one will be a survivor. Up next, final trades.
42:35Final trade time, Stephen. Apple with a$2.35 billion installed base. Can't bet against it. Karen. Yeah, so I took a shot in Novo today. Is it the bottom, bottom? Who knows? I don't know. Seems incorrect. Courtney. Adobe reported today. I think it has a good evaluation. It's one of the very few actually utilizing AI. I think it's something worth taking a look at. Bye. You should hear what we were just talking about in a commercial. We don't have a lot of time to discuss it. Not that interesting. I'll face it with Matt Moran, Melissa. Thanks for watching Fast Money. See you tomorrow. Matt Monday with Jim Kramer starts right now.
43:18by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.
From the publisher
The S&p 500 snapping a 2-day losing streak, with Tech leading the market bounce. What the reprieve in selling could indicate as Tariff headlines continue to spark volatility. And Rates whipsawing this week, as another Fed decision draws near. What our next guest sees in store for the bond market, and why she says recession risks are overblown.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
