Tesla’s Stall Continues… And The Long Term Impact From Trump’s Economic Policies 02/11/25

11 Feb 2025 · 42 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: CNBC's "Fast Money"

Episode Title

Tesla’s Stall Continues… And The Long Term Impact From Trump’s Economic Policies

Date

02/11/25

---

Episode Overview In this episode of "Fast Money," hosted by Melissa Lee and featuring a panel of expert traders, the discussion revolves around Tesla's declining stock performance and the implications of President Trump's economic policies. The episode highlights investor concerns regarding Elon Musk's distractions, Tesla's sales downturn, and a mixed outlook on the broader economic landscape shaped by recent governmental actions.

---

Key Topics Discussed

  1. Tesla's Stock Decline
  2. Current Situation: Tesla shares fell over 6%, reaching their lowest point since mid-November, marking a five-day losing streak and a significant decline from their peak in December.
  3. Investor Concerns:
  4. Distractions for Elon Musk: Concerns about Musk’s involvement in Dogecoin and other ventures have raised doubts about his focus on Tesla.
  5. Sales Issues: Notable sales drops in major markets including France, Germany, and China.
  6. Competition: Increased competition in the EV market, particularly from companies like BYD, which offer self-driving features without additional costs.
  1. Future Outlook for Tesla
  2. Self-Driving Technology: Some analysts believe Tesla's push into self-driving technology may serve as a catalyst for recovery, but skepticism remains about its imminent success.
  3. Fundamentals vs. Market Sentiment:
  4. Analysts point out that despite a potential bounce at the 150-day moving average, fundamental issues in the car business suggest further declines are possible.
  5. The current P/E ratio remains high (above 150), indicating a disconnect between stock price and actual earnings performance.
  1. Trump’s Economic Policies
  2. Short-term Optimism vs. Long-term Concerns:
  3. Early reactions to Trump’s policies have resulted in market optimism; however, potential long-term negative impacts remain.
  4. Discussions touched on tariffs and deregulation, with concerns that quick policy changes could disrupt economic stability.
  1. Other Market Insights
  2. Earnings Reports: Discussions included earnings from Lyft and Supermicro, with Lyft's stock falling sharply post-earnings due to weaker guidance.
  3. Apple's AI Partnership: Apple is reportedly partnering with Alibaba to incorporate AI features into iPhones in China, a move seen as vital for maintaining market share against local competitors.

---

Expert Insights

Trader Perspectives

  • Dan Nathan: Critiques Tesla's performance and raises alarms about a round trip back to previous lows (around $280).
  • Katie Stockton: Offers technical analysis suggesting a potential buy-in opportunity for Tesla once it establishes a more stable price point.
  • Tim Seymour: Emphasizes the need for tangible results from Tesla's innovations and warns against overly optimistic projections that lack current evidence.

Economic Expert Guest

Paul McCulley

  • Uncertainty vs. Risk: McCulley differentiates between risk (defined and calculable) and uncertainty (ambiguous and unpredictable), indicating that the current market environment leans towards the latter.
  • Federal Reserve Positioning: He commends the Fed for being in a good place to navigate potential future economic challenges and emphasizes the importance of maintaining stable monetary policy amidst political chaos.

---

Conclusion and Takeaways The episode underscores the precarious situation Tesla finds itself in due to leadership distractions and competitive pressures, while also examining the broader economic ramifications of Trump's policies. Traders express cautious optimism, noting that while there are opportunities for recovery, significant challenges remain. The discussions highlight the ongoing dynamic nature of the markets and the importance of staying informed about both company-specific developments and macroeconomic trends.

---

For more insights and updates on financial markets, tune into "Fast Money," airing weeknights at 5p ET on CNBC.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Live from the Nasdaq market site in the heart of New York City's Times Square this is fast money Here's what's on tap tonight. A Tesla tumble. Shares trading at nearly three-month lows. Is there more downside to come, or will Elon Musk get shares revved up again? And three weeks into his second term, we are getting a clearer picture of Trump's economic policies. Will early optimism prove justified, or is there a reckoning on its way? Plus, digging in on earnings from Lyft and Supermicro, Apple reportedly partners up to bring its AI to China, and we go off the charts to find the next move in the energy trade, where one of our traders sees that space going.

0:32I'm Melissa Lee coming to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Tim Seymour, Dan Nathan, Guy Adami, and Katie Stockton, founder and managing partner of Fairleaf Strategies. Welcome, Katie. And we start off with Tesla in turmoil. The EV stock plunging more than 6 % today, hitting its lowest level since mid-November and locking in a five-day losing streak. The stock has lost a third of its values in setting a record in December, retracing more than half its post-election rally. The latest round of losses coming amid a slew of potential distractions for CEO Elon Musk heading up Doge.

1:05Here he is, in fact, today in the Oval Office with the president as well as his son. Then there's his$97 billion bid for control of open AI and, of course, his nonstop posting on X. On top of that, there's concern over the slowdown in Tesla's core business. The company seeing sales in France, Germany and China plummet to start the year. Bulls seem to think the push into self-driving will be the next positive catalyst for the stock. But will that be enough to give Tesla the edge over the competition? What are we looking at here? And we take a look at this slide, Dan. I didn't look at the slide, but that's a cute kid over there.

1:37I got to be honest with you. Super cute. You know, listen, on the last call about a week and a half ago, I mean, Elon really didn't spend a lot of time talking about, like, the car sales and what's going on in Europe. And, you know, we're down here in the U.S. also, and it doesn't look like they're going to make their deliveries this year. I know it sounds really early just to kind of extrapolate what they did in January, but we know they're in a price war. We know that there's threats about tariffs. We know that, you know, these EV credits could go away. We know that price war that's been going on for three years is not abating anytime soon.

2:06But what he spent a lot of time talking about is robots and robo taxis and how that is going to inflate the price of this stock. And so when I think about what's going on right here, if you bought the stock on the breakout from November 5th and it was nearly a double from November 6th to December 18th, You know, you have to believe in his proximity to the president and the White House and what that might mean for deregulation is going to help all the things that he's not focused on right now. They're not making a low end EV to compete with some of the low end competition that's coming from China and other places.

2:36So at the end of the day, if the promise was that we're going to get to full self-driving, then we're going to get to robo tax. It's going to happen sooner than you think. And oh, by the way, this optimist thing is going to be really helpful in making all this stuff. And you can buy one, too, and you can have it in your house. That's not happening anytime soon. So when you think about this stock, I mean, it really could round trip the entire move back to November 6th because the fundamentals of the car business are not particularly good. And they're only getting worse right now. There are a lot of things to come.

3:01And yet BYD today announces its self-driving offering and it's called God's Eye across all models and not for an additional fee, which which Tesla is offering in terms of full self-driving. They're starting at a very low pricing point. They're going across three levels. and this could actually force, you know, the rethink in terms of these services. Are we going to charge for them or not? And there might be pressure to not charge for them. The whole company. Yes, absolutely. And, you know, January 29th was a Wednesday. We were here together. They, Tesla, reported earnings. Margins were a disaster.

3:33The worst margins in over five years. And I said to you that night, if we had played the game, if you had told me last night this was going to happen, where's the stock? I said it would have been down$50. It was not. As a matter of fact, it got up to about$4.15 or so. Now here's the$50 in the rearview mirror. I'm not sure why the market's deciding now to sort of punish them on what I think was the back of that quarter and some of these headlines. But I do think it's justified. And Dan talks about round trip. Yeah, maybe. We stopped today at about the 150-day moving average. It's a normal place for us to bounce.

4:04But, you know, fundamentals matter. The fundamentals to me suggest lower. Tim? It's always been a story of we're betting on the concepts and we don't necessarily have delivery. I mean, energy storage is another one of these things that the analyst community got really excited about. I mean, ultimately, the revenue number missed pretty badly. Yes, there were some positives on the margin, but then there was and, you know, let's point to the lowest cost of goods sold on record. And there's some dynamics that I think are things that that the bulls can point to. I just take it back to what's the company worth?

4:33And it's much like we're going to have a conversation about, you know, Chairman Powell and they can only price in tariffs. when they actually see the impact. I'll price this into the model when I actually have these revenues, not where I think growth could be. That's always been my story here. You know, the current P.E. is north of 150, even after some of this pullback. That's what it comes down to. Again, there's a lot of moving pieces. There's a lot of unknowns. There's a lot of upside. There's a lot of excitement. There's a lot of core businesses that certainly are hard to put a number on. And that's exactly right.

5:02I'm not putting a number on them. Today, the action was not very good, Katie, on very heavy volume. It finished as lows. Yeah, so it took out some support around 350. It does follow a major breakout, though. That was a big resistance level for it to get through post-election. So we think this is a countertrend move and ultimately something that will yield a buy-in opportunity, believe it or not, because it ran up so quickly, though it is not oversold yet from an intermediate-term perspective. We have no countertrend buy signals, so we think it'll take some time to get there. And, of course, there's all the arguments that, you know, he's tight with Trump and therefore things like investigations, like NHTSA investigations or the DOJ investigation, maybe those will go away magically or be lessened if there's something, if there's wrongdoing to be found.

5:47At the same time, there's also backlash when it comes to his association with Donald Trump. It's interesting that when those were brought up, I mean, it didn't seem to have any impact at all. I mean, maybe in some odd way, the fact that they've effectively cozied up to the administration and they will be dropped, maybe he'll get punished on the back end for that. I'm not sure. But to Katie's point, I think her work would suggest like 280. If you go back and look like last summer, that was the level we had trouble at a couple of times on the upside and then finally broke out post election. It makes sense to do a round trip.

6:17And the round trip that Dan talks about is this 280 level. Then you can have a conversation about buying it. Yeah, I'll just say this. And Tim laid out some of the other things that you could get excited about from a fundamental standpoint. And again, we don't know when this is going to happen. And, you know, if you want to give Musk credit for anything, it's like he puts this vision out in the world. He pursues it very hard. He makes a reality happen for the most part. Again, eventually there will be full self-driving. There will be Tesla robo taxis. There will be robots, all that sort of thing.

6:42But if you're willing to do that now, if you're willing to pull forward all that excitement, it's kind of hard to see how you can make money like doing that for, you know, again and again. I mean, this is one of the worst on November 5th. This is one of the worst performing mega cap tech stocks over the prior three years during this whole bull market. So it got really disconnected from fundamentals for a bunch of reasons that you can't put your finger on. So I guess when I think about this coming in, I think there's a potential air pocket. If Musk were to leave the administration, whatever you want to call it, then all of a sudden, if you were really excited from 250 up to 500 essentially, and now here you are at 325, Where do you think this stock goes if he were to leave Doge, if he were to actually have beef with the administration?

7:25It goes lower. It doesn't go higher. We've got some breaking news out of the White House. Eamon Javris has more on that meeting between Musk and President Trump. Eamon. Yeah, Melissa, it ended up being something like a half an hour news conference with Elon Musk and Donald Trump. and Elon Musk was asked by reporters in a number of different ways about the critics of Doge, his government efficiency operation, who say that Elon Musk is basically operating without any accountability, without any transparency, without any checks and balances in the normal course of business. Here's what Elon Musk had to say about that.

8:01All of our actions are fully public. So if If you see anything, you say, like, wait a second, hey, that seems like maybe there's a conflict there. It's not like people are going to be shy about saying that. Transparency is what builds trust, not simply somebody asserting trust, not somebody saying they're trustworthy, but transparency so you can see everything that's going on. And then you can see, am I doing something that benefits one of my companies or not? It's totally obvious. And if we thought that, we would not let him do that segment or look in that area. if we thought there was a lack of transparency or a conflict of interest.

8:39And we watched that also. So you heard the president there at the end saying that if he thought there was any conflict of interest, he wouldn't let Elon Musk do any of the things that he's doing. You know, the problem with that, the critics will say, Melissa, is that, you know, really it's just down to the White House's judgment about whether it's appropriate for Elon Musk, for example, to be involved in Pentagon spending decisions when the Pentagon is obviously a huge contractor of Starlink or with NASA spending when NASA is a huge contractor with SpaceX. So we'll have to see how this relationship sorts out over time because, you know, there are some potential conflict of interest pitfalls here for Elon Musk.

9:19But as for now, he says, look, everything I'm doing is public. And Trump says we'll keep him away from anything that wouldn't be appropriate. Melissa. All right. Eamon, thank you.

9:31Eamon Let's get back to Tesla and its self-driving cars here and its pursuit of self-driving. Let's bring in Fred Lambert, the editor-in-chief of Electric. Fred, great to have you with us. Thanks for having me. What do you make of, I mean, overall, do you think that it is a benefit or it is a risk that Elon Musk is so tightly associated with Donald Trump? I would think right now we've seen the impact that we are kind of missing with the it's hard to you cannot gauge the impact of Elon's political middling right now it's impossible to put a number on it it's it's having an impact most likely than not but it's it's very difficult to put a number on it to to to say that like of this today in the market what we're seeing is the impact of Elon Musk in his dojo middling.

10:25Right. I'm just curious, though, I mean, in terms of the core business and the hopes of investors in Tesla stock, I mean, you wonder how is it going to benefit the core business that Elon Musk is involved with the Trump administration? Is it more cons because he's distracted? He's got other things to do. The other things that he's he's he's doing on behalf of the United States instead of working on his business. Is it more of a benefit? Because perhaps those investigations that we talked about, the NITSA investigations into six crashes, the DOJ investigation to the claims of full self-driving, the regulations that will pave the way for RoboTaxi, all those things will be benefits for Tesla stock ultimately.

11:02Well, over the Biden administration, there were several investigation minutes into Tesla's self-driving products in the US. And they got a slap on the wrist with basically having to change a bunch of alert system and monitoring driving system. And that was basically all they had to force Tesla to do a complete stop instead of what we call in Canada an American stop or in the US sometimes you call it a Californian stop. That was basically it. So in the U.S., regulators are not the bottleneck for Tesla's self-driving effort. The technology is the bottleneck. And Tesla's technology right now, based on the latest Crosso's data, is at about 500 miles between critical disengagement.

11:43And Tesla itself says that it needs to be at 700 ,000 miles between disengagement to be safer than human drivers, which is what NHTSA says is miles between human collisions, which makes sense. So how important is this event in Austin in June for the self-driving car? Well, that's a masterful play by Elon. He's going to be moving the goalposts, basically. So Tesla has been promising to all its customers since 2016 that all cars they're building is capable of full-cell driving, has the hardware full-cell driving. They've been wrong twice about this. They already announced that they have to change the computers on two different occasions.

12:23So what they're going to do right now is basically Elon is losing all credibility when it comes to self-driving. He's literally been saying that it's going to happen by the end of the year for the last six, seven years or so now. So what he's going to do in June instead is he's going to launch Waymo. He's going to launch a service that's geofence that is teleoperated or teleoperation supported remotely. It's going to be most likely to not map, though that's not entirely sure. And it's going to be an internal fleet rather than the customer vehicles that he's been talking about for years. So basically, it's going to announce that Tesla has achieved unsupervised self-driving, but it's going to be a service that Waymo has launched for years ago, including now in Austin already.

13:01So, Fred, I've been reading articles, including one on Electric, about analysts in Europe specifically that are concerned about the Elon Musk political sort of, you know, siding with the far right wing of various parties in Europe, particularly in Germany, and how that can actually backfire, particularly when it comes to sales in Germany, which is a very important market for Tesla. You ran an article on Electric that had pictures of various, you know, there's instances of vandalism at various stores in Europe. There's also in the Berlin factory, excuse me, they projected a picture of Elon doing that salute, that Nazi-like salute, along with Heil Tesla onto the face of the Berlin factory.

13:47I mean, what do you make of those sorts of reports? I mean, in Europe, they take the Nazi stuff pretty seriously for good reasons. not that we don't necessarily hear but it's less of a reality for us in North America so saying similar things in China which you know it's this this is the most important market you know Elon could call his nest kids Adolf and they probably would be fine in China but in Europe we're seeing the impact right now I think obviously there's the model Y change over it's also not helping Tesla sells but in some market you can see that it's a model 3 that's hurting even more than a model why.

14:23So in Europe is the only market right now that we have data that we can clearly see that Elon's meddling in politics is affecting Tesla negatively and in a significant way. The vandalizing stuff, I mean, it's, you know, it's frustration. People, like, it's nearly criminal, so I don't put that much weight into that. But the failing sales are pretty clear to me. Yeah. Fred, thanks so much for joining us. Great to get your take. No problem. Fred Lambert of electric? All in all, I don't know. What do you make of this? Well, again, remember six months ago or before this parabolic move, I think it was universally thought that the company had probably 12 to 18 months of rough sledding for markets, for valuations, for things that would drive the stock higher.

15:07And there have been different reasons why a lot of them have been certainly macro related to the scene that go higher. If you look at 25, the core auto business has headwinds. You've got higher startup costs. You've got dynamics around China and the risks that we've talked about. And I just think that those are the things that for an investor, at least like me, there's very little to be excited about in the short run. You can talk about the DCF model out in 2035 on Robo and that it's worth 80 billion in revenues, which some analysts are doing. But I don't do that. Meantime, we've got an earnings alert on Lyft.

15:38The stock is dropping sharply after missing top and bottom line estimates. That conference call is now underway. Our Deidre Bose has got the details. Debo. Hey Mel, so it's really that soft guidance that's taking shares lower in the after hours by about 8%. When I spoke to CO David Risher on the results, he attributed the soft guidance to new pricing pressure, he says, that showed up at the end of last year. He said, we price competitively and reliably. If someone else takes it down, we will match them. So that has been sort of weighing on their earnings. The after hours decline, that wipes out all of Lyft's year-to-date gains.

16:12and the bump that it just saw yesterday on that announcement that it will roll out mobile-powered robo-taxis in 2026. I also asked Risher about the impact of Waymo because robo-taxis is really the thing that moves these ride-sharing stocks. Waymo has expanded in San Francisco, which is an important market for Lyft. But Risher says he sees it still as a premium product, so not exactly competitive. The earning call is ongoing right now. The CFO is speaking. They haven't got to Q &A, but I'll bring you any highlights. Back to you, Mel. All right. Debo, thanks. Deidre Bosa in San Francisco. Yeah, we talked about this yesterday, at least the announcement, the timing of it, pretty curious about robo-taxis in 2026, you know, the day before earnings.

16:50You know, I looked at this thing and I said, listen, you know, it probably is okay here. You're looking at a four or five, you know, billion dollar enterprise value. If they are really serious about partnering with Mobileye and others to do these ring-fenced, you know, robo-taxis, it's probably like a cheap entity. It probably could still get bought by a Google or other sort of companies that actually divested some of their interests in robo taxi or autonomous vehicles over the last couple of years. So, you know, one thing I do not like, the stock had that huge gap last quarter because they guided up for bookings for this year.

17:21And now they kind of miss that. And the guidance seems kind of squishy. So that's not great credibility right there. You know, it's had a good oversold bounce. But to me, with this likely breakdown tomorrow, it's an avoid. We often see these oversold retests from these stocks. And in fact, we think the same might happen with the broader market. So that there is risk, broadly speaking, and that this pickup in volatility from a bottom-up perspective, including these earnings reactions, is more negative than positive. You're glad you didn't put it in band, make it bland. Yeah, no. Because it would have really been bland if you added it.

17:53That ETF would not have tasted so good. Acronym, excuse me. I think you've got a dynamic here where it's a prove me story. And even though bookings were up 15 percent and this was a record quarter and you've got the CFO out there saying that market share is the best they've seen since 2022. There's still a lot of things that I think are left unsaid. So to me, I think the market punishes on something where the guide is not great. That's not surprising. The stock is basically traded in a very wide range, but in a range for the last year and a half. And I think it's about a story that still needs to establish credibility.

18:27Uber, by the way, is down one plus percent. In sympathy. And I think, you know, my sense is you buy Uber on the back of that. It was down today as well. You look at the lift quarter. I mean, I get the guidance scaring people they're selling off the stock. The quarter is pretty good. Tim just said it. Not only that, I mean, margins better, probably the best margins they've ever seen in terms of 7.3 percent. Free cash flow came in$100 million-ish more than the street was looking for. This is actually a really good quarter. If you think they're sandbagging, then I think you buy this stock here. And I think they're sandbagging.

18:56All right, down 9 % plus at this moment. Coming up more after hours, ActionShares, the Supermicro, on the move after its latest results. In an update on its delayed annual report, what they are saying about a potential Nasdaq delisting. That is next. Plus, an overseas tech team outbap will reportedly picking an AI partner to bring its tech to China. How that move could impact market share in that region and what it means for the China trade ahead. Do not go anywhere. Fast Money is back in two. Welcome back to Fast Money. shares of Supermicro higher by 10 % after the server maker announced preliminary Q2 expectations and full year guidance.

19:30CNBC's Christina Parts Nevelis has got all the details. Christina. Yeah, well, Supermicro's racing against the clock right now to avoid a Nasdaq delisting. The AI server maker promising again today in that business update they'll file their delayed annual report and outstanding quarterly reports by the deadline February 25th. This all started when an activist investor raised some serious questions about their accounting, which led to their auditor, Ernst & Young cutting ties, which is some pretty messy stuff. You're seeing the timeline on your screen. But here's the interesting part. Supermicro telling investors after the bell today that they won't need to revise any past financial statements.

20:02While their latest earnings might have missed the marks. Yes, they did lower their full year 2025 outlook in their business update. But the company is playing the long game. Their CEO is particularly excited about their liquid cooling technology for data centers. Boldly predicting they'll hit$40 billion in revenue by 2026. Plus, they're beefing up their war chest with an extra$700 million in capital. That's what this could mean for NVIDIA. It maybe raises some concerns about the production of NVIDIA server racks and Supermicro builds them for NVIDIA. But shares are definitely not reacting right now.

20:35The business update, though, is Supermicro's way of saying, we've had some bumps, but we're still in this race. So far, investors agree shares are up 11%. Let's see if that momentum continues ahead of that February 2025 deadline and the earnings call, which is underway right now. So, Christina, I'm not sure if they said this explicitly, but they don't have to restate any results because of the findings by the committee that they appointed, which is a single person. Exactly. It's all just like that they had in December, the independent investigation that found no misdoings. And so today they are reassuring investors again that they do not have to restate anything, even if there is just one auditor right now.

21:17So it's going to be no changes. Okay. Christina, thank you. Christina Parts Nevelis, their independent investigation was an independent board member. It was a single board member who managed to go through months and months of financial results in a very short amount of time. But here we are up 11 percent, Guy. What do you make of this whole thing? People are betting that they're going to get it in by the February 25th deadline. Now, by the way, this was due in August of last year, just full disclosure. And the quarter wasn't particularly good. and Christina mentioned$40 billion of revenue in 2026.

21:49I mean, that basically is the same revenue trajectory that they've been on. So they're not telling you really anything, I don't think, different. It all comes down to if you think they're going to file, the stock can probably, as I said last night, you can actually get it up to$70 and then we'll have a conversation. But I don't think you play it out of the way right now. Yeah, it's interesting. When you look at their suppliers, NVIDIA, Broadcom, AMD, Intel, I mean, the list goes micro on, the list goes on and on. It's kind of an important company in the ecosystem. We know it's kind of a two-horse race between them and Dell.

22:17We know that Dell has twice the gross margin. So that was one of the issues, I think, that was kind of hurting this company. I don't remember exactly what some of the allegations were. I bet it gets sorted out. And the other thing I'll just say is that, you know, you see a stock like this. It was up 10%. It was down 10%. You know, meme stocks are having their day. We talked about it. Look at Upstart in the aftermarket today. You know, yesterday was a firm in Carvana. So, you know, again, this is one where I'm sure the short interest is, you know, pretty high. And this thing is down a lot. Internal controls was what the auditor that resigned flagged.

Read the full transcript

22:46You like Intel, though, which Tan mentioned. Yeah, I mean, it's obviously a safer play. The beta in Supermicro is incredibly high, so I think Intel as an alternative is attractive. It has what looks like a double bottom formation on the chart. It held some very important support around 1885 and closed above its 50-day moving average today on improved momentum. So intrigued by it. There's a lot more fast money to come. Here's what's coming up next. Apple picks a partner. The tech giant reportedly inking a deal to bring AI features to China's iPhone users, who they're buddying up with, and whether the move can help staunch a shrinking market share.

23:25Plus, could short-term optimism over President Trump's economic policies give way to some longer-term pain? The potential impact of the most recent tariffs, regulations, and executive orders out of the White House. You're watching Fast Money, live from the NASDAQ market side in Times Square. We're back right after this. Welcome back to Fast Money, a big tech AI team up. Apple reportedly picking Alibaba as a partner to help bring Apple intelligence features to iPhone users in China. The company has been facing shrinking market share in the country, losing out to domestic rivals like Huawei. Apple and Alibaba both getting a bump on the report, while Baidu, which seemingly lost out on the deal, dropped.

24:06This is according to the information. They also reported that they actually submitted the AI features to the China cyberspace regulators who would have to approve everything before it gets released on the phone. Tim, so it looks like it's far down the line if you believe this report. It's good, and it's good for some of the reasons why both companies are also potentially more interesting or discounts have been put on the company. So if you think about Apple and some concern about what's going on in China, we've talked about it ad nauseum, certainly in terms of handset sales. But in terms of them being sanctioned or blessed or being, you know, OK to do business in China, this is a good sign.

24:40In terms of Alibaba and their ability to do business with the West. And again, that to me is the biggest dynamic around investing in Alibaba, because as we've talked about many times, it's not a macro call in China. Forty percent cash, et cetera, et cetera. But, you know, back to the A.I. And I think ultimately Apple, whether Apple intelligence is anything now and whether DeepSeek meant you begin to push it really even faster onto handsets. The bottom line is I think Apple will always be the way that most people are going to be doing search or carrying out. It's the vehicle. It's the platform.

25:12Until otherwise, it's Apple's game. Yeah, it just depends whether that's going to be the game in China, right? So when you think about it, I mean, this is a company that's been losing market share to local providers. We know that things like WeChat, these super apps there, they can run on very cheap Android phones. Or Huawei has some really great high-end ones that have been competing very well with Apple. When you think about Apple's privacy focus here in the U.S., it's kind of interesting to think that they have to partner with an Alibaba locally where we know all that data can go right to the government.

25:41You know, and so it's just like we have a lot of our companies that want to be there and they almost need to be there. Twenty percent of Apple sales come from China, which are down 12 percent year over year, not doing particularly well. So what are they willing to kind of sacrifice as it relates to the sort of messaging that they have here in the U.S.? And so I think this is something that we're going to be living with for a while, especially in a world where TikTok is such a debate here. Deep Seek is going to be such a debate here. So, again, it's important. I just don't see it as a really material thing for at least a year or two.

26:08Maybe not necessary for Apple. I do think for Baba and, you know, David Tepper, we talked about it yesterday and they asked him, they, the morning show, are you concerned about China? And he said, my concerns about China, my hedges, I don't care. So he's sort of guns blazing. And we said it last night, you get through 118 in Alibaba, which I think we will. And you're talking uncharted territory. This stock to me is still about 30 percent too cheap. 118 the key? You know, well, Baba looks better than Apple on its chart, which is kind of curious. I do not want to chase momentum in this environment, though.

26:41So we can't look at Baba in a vacuum. If we did, it would be a buy because it has a short term breakout, a long term basing phase. whereas Apple, it feels like it has another wave lower to it, to this longer-term uptrend. So, Bob is more attractive, but I think in this environment, we want to always wait for the pullback. Coming up just three weeks in, and there have been a lot of announcements coming out of the White House, what it could mean for the economy long-term when Fast Money returns. Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks closing mixed today as investors digested cautious commentary on interest rates from Fed Chair Jerome Powell.

27:15The Dow jumping 123 points, the S &P just eking out a small gain, and the Nasdaq falling about four-tenths of a percent. Shares of Coca-Cola leading the Dow today, the stock jumping nearly 5 percent after the Soda Maker reported earnings and revenues atopped estimates this morning. Net sales growing 6 percent for the quarter, fueled by rising global demand. Shares of Meta further extending its record-winning streak, the stock closing at another all-time high, notching its 17th straight day of gains. The stock is up nearly 18 percent in that time. It shares a T-Mobile hitting a fresh all-time high today.

27:48That's stuck up nearly 60 percent over the past year. And some after hours action shares a Gilead higher after beating expectations on the top and the bottom line. DoorDash earnings in line with estimates in AI lending platform Upstart surging after hiking its Q1 and full year revenue guidance. Meanwhile, President Trump has had a busy first three weeks in office announcing increased tariffs and a massive deportation plan, restructuring government departments and making investments in energy and AI. And while markets seem to be initially optimistic about his policies, what will the long-term impact be?

28:19Let's ask former PIMCO chief economist Paul McCulley. He is also an adjunct professor at Georgetown McDonough School of Business. Professor McCulley, great to have you with us. Good to be with you, Melissa. I like how you explained the concept of risk versus uncertainty because I feel investors right now are facing uncertainty as opposed to risk. Yeah, I think that's very much right. In fact, I teach my students this all the time. And risk is calculating the odds in a game where you know the parameters and you know the rules. You may win or lose, but you know the rules, so you're taking defined risk.

28:58Where uncertainty is when you are playing a game and you don't know the parameters, You don't know the rules. The rules are in flux. And actually, you respond as an investor, as a human being, differently to risk than you do to uncertainty. You keep playing if all you're doing is managing risk. But when you face uncertainty, you don't know what the rules are, then you tend to pull back. So actually, from the standpoint of the economy, there's more downside risk from uncertainty about the rules as opposed to simply risk within the context of definable rules. Let's say, for instance, this period of uncertainty lasts for, I don't know, six months.

29:47It could be longer. It could be shorter. But as an economist, how do you sort of factor that into your projections for the economy, for spending, for inflation, et cetera? Well, I think you naturally start with a baseline, And that's obviously what the Federal Reserve does. And a baseline will tend to extrapolate from where you've been, adjusting for this, that, and the other. But fundamentally, the object in motion continues. And from that standpoint, it's actually we're in a good place. In fact, Chair Powell said that many times today. We're in a good place on the economy from the standpoint of the dual mandate.

30:26unemployment at four inflation with the two handle we're in a good place there the feds in a good place with the policy rate having recalibrated a hundred basis points down to four and three eights which is not necessarily neutral but pretty close so essentially you logically forecast that the economy will continue humming along and the feds going to hang out in the right neighborhood. So that becomes your base case forecast. And then you're just looking for all of the wild cards with respect to the parameters of the game. And I think that's what the Fed will be doing as well. I mean, fortunately, they did the recalibration and they're in a good place right now.

31:13So effectively, they are well positioned, as Chair Powell likes to say, to respond whether or not the uncertainty clears up or the uncertainty becomes more nefarious. So that's the essence of how you are forecasting. It takes humility, but also for the Fed, they're in a really good starting point. So essentially, if Mr. Trump doesn't keep this economy out of sync with reality, then the economy should perform pretty well. Love the optimism, Paul. love the flow as well. So I guess you would then think that moving yields since September higher is on the back of an economy that's doing better. But is there a point where rates get too high, in your opinion?

32:00By definition, there has to be, because we're starting from a very, very flat yield curve. And if for whatever reason, uncertainty being predominant, particularly on tariffs, which have a stagflationary smell to them. If you go down that path, you'll get a bear steeping of the yield curve. And then that would raise a major question about valuations across a whole bunch of assets and could turn animal spirits negative. So that's what I'm focusing in on there. It's not a particular level. I mean, I think we're probably going to be for the 10-year, 400 quarter to four and three quarters for the next six months or so.

32:48But if you move to a level that effectively leads animal spirits to turn down and you see a big correction in financial conditions to the restrictive side, then it becomes problematic. Hoya Saxa, Professor McCulley, do you think we're making too big a deal about the politics with the Fed in Washington? You sit in Washington. You've been very close to the dynamics here for a long time. I think the Fed is in a really good place right now. And fortunately, they did the recalibration. And we're at a level for the policy rate at four and three-eighths that is really not offensive to anybody. In fact, President Trump himself gave a salute to Mr.

33:40Powell for setting still a couple weeks ago. So effectively, not even Mr. Trump could find something to complain about. And then we have our new Treasury Secretary not talking about short rates, but talking about long rates in a way that confuses me at times, but essentially the politics that's going on in Washington is not going to infect the Fed, I don't think. And also along those lines, in that Mr. Powell voiced a very open mind to where we're going on the bank and financial regulatory front, recognizing that the Fed doesn't have a monopoly in bank regulatory matters like it does in setting the policy rate.

34:31And we got new people at the Office of the Comptroller, which is in the Treasury, and also the FDIC. And so he commented that he's going to be open-minded and work in a collegial fashion with his new colleagues on the regulatory side. So I don't worry too much about where the Fed is in the firmament of politics and democracy. I think we're fortunate that we have a statesman as chairman of the Fed. Paul, we always love having you on. Thanks so much for joining us. Thank you. Paul McCulley, now of Georgetown. We've got some inflation numbers this week that are going to be very important. Yeah, I think it's really interesting what Professor just said there.

35:17is like if Trump is going to back off the Fed a little bit and let them do their thing, that's probably the best thing that they could have done for him. If they see inflation go higher, it really kind of hurts, I think, their pro-growth agenda, and they probably lose a lot of support of his electorate and the base in general. So again, I think Powell's done a pretty nice job here, staying pat. And, you know, that's probably the best thing if you believe in this pro-growth agenda and watching inflation and make sure it doesn't get re-inflated. Coming up, high energy charting. What Katie Stockton is seeing in the technicals as crude bounces off recent lows.

35:49How she is playing the pump next. Welcome back to Fast Money Energy. Catching a bid this week on reports activist investor Elliott Management has upped its stake in both BP and Phillips 66. Katie here says there's more reason to be positive on the space. Let's go off the charts. So, Katie, what are you looking at? Well, it's really perked up from a momentum perspective and also from a relative perspective. If you look at the rotational work on the sector front, normalized versus the S &P, you'll see some rotations that are starting to favor the more cyclical areas of the market, the more defensive areas of the market.

36:20It's all occurring at the expense of the mega cap heavy sectors. Sorry, technology. We don't usually see this kind of chart. It looks almost like a weather pattern. I see constellations. I actually see hurricanes. I see caster and polly. It looks like the Gulf of America. But in all seriousness. I see the twins. Let me explain a little bit here. So this is a normalized view of sector rotation. We all know sector rotation is there. This is a way to visualize it. Think of it like a data visualization tool. It's normalized. The crosshairs represent the S &P 500. Anything going down into the left is underperforming with growing momentum typically and vice versa.

36:56So you assume a clockwise rotation. Notice that energy has just reversed into favor. This is a six week trailing history that you're seeing behind the sectors. And then off to the lower left, those are the more oversold areas of the market. So this is where I think there's more opportunity for that rotation to benefit. And it does include energy, of course. And I think that it could become more sustainable, more than just a countertrend move. If we were to see crude oil, of course, break out from what has been a very prolonged range, it's right now in a triangle formation. Triangles tend to be a very high probability.

37:32If we were to see it resolved to the upside, that would happen above about$76 per barrel for WTI. That would be a major breakout for crude oil and could lend sustainability to a sector that tends to sort of have a mind of its own. So if you believe that we could see more consolidation or a weaker tape this year like we do, we think energy could just be on its own path, right? We have seen that happen before. Now, with all of this, of course, the individual stocks are perking up as well. They've been mostly in cyclical downtrends. We looked at SLB in our work this week, and you'll see that it has a countertrend buy signal.

38:09that kind of reverse the sell signal from a few months before and show signs of life from a momentum perspective with some positive divergences. And these are really widespread in the space, helped by the BP and PSX moves as well. First of all, I agree. Can we put that back up? Because Jason Giewertz, now I'm breaking the ninth wall or something. Right. It looks like, remember that game Simon? We have to remember what colors came up. Simon says. Yellow. Yes. That's what. Oh, no. I thought it looked like the spaghetti. Look at that. Look in the middle of it. You know what? A viewer named Drew, a friend of mine, he just texted me the same thing, Game of Simon.

38:45Really? I think a lot of the viewers are thinking about it. Okay. I like it. I like that. I like it. Visualization of the rotation. And I like the fact that energy is getting its mojo. And Slumberger quickly, if it gets above 44, it's broken a two-year downtrend, Melissa Lee. That's what she just said. Did she? Yeah. She said those exact things. You're too busy texting with Jason. The key word says hi, by the way, Mel. Hi, Jason. Coming up, Fed Chair Jerome Powell raising concerns about the housing market in this testimony today. What he had to say about mortgage rates, a housing shortage, and much more.

39:19Fast Money is back in two. Welcome back to Fast Money. We've got an earnings alert on Zillow. Shares dropping as guidance came in weaker than expected. The home-buying platform did beat on revenue but missed EPS. Zillow also announcing a partnership with Redfin that will make it the exclusive provider of listings on apartment hunting sites like Rent.com. Meantime, Fed Chair Jerome Powell also making some comments on the housing market in his Senate testimony today. Take a listen to what he had to say. We're clearly having an effect on the housing market, and that'll unwind as we normalize policy.

39:53But we're still going to be faced with high insurance costs and high material costs and labor shortages and all the things that keep driving housing prices up across the country. So what does this mean for the housing trade, which has been under pressure recently, Tim? I think housing, the housing trade's under pressure because I think the homebuilders went from a place where they're reasonably priced. There was so much interest rate sensitivity that when we started to get relief on them, they gave it this kind of this double oomph after rallying for three years straight. The valuations aren't that great.

40:22The business is challenged. If you can't have access to capital, it makes it more difficult. They've been eating a lot of the financing costs and it's been lowering margins. I'm out. What does the chart look like? Very corrective. Well, for Zillow, it actually looks kind of interesting longer term. It's a big basing phase, but overextended in the near term. Whereas home builders, you know, the correction almost makes it look like a big head and shoulders top formation. Louise is watching. Louise, that's an homage. The longer the base, the higher in space. There's no outer space. We've said that like five times in the last two weeks.

40:53I haven't said it tonight. She's watching. You've got to remind people of real trades. Good for you. Do you have a trade here? We've got to go to break. Home Depot. Well, reports on the 18th breaking out. Excellent. Up next, final trips. Time for the final trade. Tim. I like Katie's energy trade. I like the MLP's trade even better. They've been rocking energy transfer. It still goes higher. Katie stocked in a fair lead. Yeah, I'll go with UNG, which is a natural gas fund, and following. Great to have you on the show tonight, Katie. Yes. Dan Nathan. It was great. Lift, I was intrigued last night.

41:26I think the slight bookings miss is probably okay, down 10%. There you go. I'm still intrigued. Yeah. No, you can't tell, but the set looks like the Simon game, too. It's round, it's lit up, we just need different colors. And I can whack it like that. See that? We sold more Simons tonight than they've sold in the last 10 years. Devin Energy, Melms. Thank you for watching Fast Money. See you back here tomorrow at 5 more Fast Money.

42:00television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such. To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit cnbc.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer.

From the publisher

Shares of Tesla hitting the skids, as the stock hits its lowest level since November. Why investors are concerned about a potentially distracted Elon Musk, and if Tesla’s has more problems under the hood. Plus Short-term optimism, but long-term concern. Why some of President Trump’s latest policies could spell trouble for the economy down the line.

 

Fast Money Disclaimer


Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.

More from CNBC's "Fast Money"

All 871 episodes
Tesla’s Stall Continues… And The Long Term Impact From Trump’s Economic Policies 02/11/25CNBC's "Fast Money" · 42 min
Listen in VO