In short
Fast Money discusses a pullback in AI/semis and big-tech earnings expectations, with debate over whether hyperscaler AI capex will pay off. It also covers Netflix’s slowing growth, SpaceX’s post-IPO slump, Japan’s Nikkei correction, and technical/option-driven takes on Tesla ahead of earnings. Guests/participants: Melissa Lee (host). On-desk: Karen Feiderman, Steve Grasso, Tim Seymour, Julie Veal.
Guest
Patrick Moorhead, CEO of Moor Insights and Strategy.
Guest
J.P. Coviello, head of portfolio strategy at CitiWealth.
Guest
Mike “Oh” (options strategist).
Key claims
AI “Kimi K3” news caused early AI/semis weakness but memory names rebounded; investors are questioning hyperscaler ROI and capex (e.g., “$5.7T” spend through 2030). China models are seen as competitive but regulatory uncertainty complicates moats. Free cash flow is framed as the “holy grail,” and hyperscalers still have room to invest.
Notable examples
Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 vs Claude/GPT; South Korea limiting leveraged ETFs; Meta/Microsoft as ROI examples; Netflix shares down after guidance/engagement-update changes; SpaceX down ~45% from record; Nikkei into correction; Tesla “double top” and options implying ~7% move.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOAI Trade and Market Reactions
1:46 to 4:28
Discussion on the impact of AI developments on market movements and investment strategies.
“The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, dropping as much as 6 % in early trade after a Chinese startup unveiled an AI model that it says rivals offering from OpenAI and Anthropic.”
Hyperscaler CapEx Concerns
4:28 to 6:04
Exploring concerns around capital expenditures for hyperscalers and their returns.
“But what we do know right now is China seems to be competitive on the low-cost models and now also on the high-cost models, Julie.”
Earnings Expectations and Market Insights
6:04 to 8:10
Analysis of upcoming earnings reports and expectations in the tech sector.
“And I think ultimately we get back to a point where, you know, really we just don't know what the ROI is.”
Competitive Landscape of AI Models
8:10 to 10:28
Discussion on the competition between U.S. and Chinese AI models and market implications.
“And they also have a moat behind them with search.”
Investor Sentiment on AI Technologies
10:28 to 14:00
Insights into investor perspectives on AI technologies and their future potential.
“So the moats for the, you know, the Anthropics and the XAIs, et cetera, are that these are still considered to be the pristine tech kind of, you know, places to cooperate on the enterprise side.”
The Impact of AI on Business Cash Flow
14:00 to 15:54
Discussion on how AI integration affects cash flow and business strategy.
“We went from the hyperscalers going positive cash flow to pretty much negative cash flow and a lot of debt or instruments to buy more CapEx.”
Earnings Expectations and AI Revenues
15:56 to 17:04
Analysts share insights on what to watch for in upcoming earnings reports regarding AI.
“So, Julie Beal, what are you looking for out of earnings?”
Investing in Tech Giants: A Cautious Approach
17:06 to 18:36
Investors discuss their perspectives on investing in major tech companies amidst uncertainty.
“arms race is something I have to subscribe to.”
Netflix's Stock Struggles and Future Potential
18:38 to 20:25
Analysis of Netflix's recent stock performance and what it means for future investment.
“The company last night warning revenue and profit gains will slow in the current quarter, also saying it will issue fewer engagement updates going forward.”
Shifts in Netflix's Business Strategy
20:27 to 21:48
Discussing Netflix's transition from growth to more traditional investment metrics.
“doesn't want to be viewed or maybe it should not be viewed as a growth company anymore because that's not what you're measuring the company by.”
Show all 24 chapters
Shifts in Netflix's Business Strategy
21:49 to 22:16
Discussing Netflix's transition from growth to more traditional investment metrics.
“Don't go anywhere fast when he's back in two.”
SpaceX's IPO Performance and Investor Sentiment
23:08 to 24:22
Examining the recent struggles of SpaceX shares post-IPO and investor perspectives.
“SpaceX shares down for a six straight day, now trading 45 % off the record high, hitting the days after its IPO.”
Valuation Concerns for SpaceX and XAI
24:23 to 26:11
Discussion on the valuation of SpaceX and its components amidst shifting market conditions.
“On scale, they're going to be the biggest in this space.”
Japan's Nikkei Index and Market Analysis
26:12 to 28:02
Analysis of the Nikkei's recent downturn and implications for investors.
“And price targets, Raymond James has an$800 price target on it.”
Concerns Over Japan's Economic Moves
28:36 to 29:29
Discussion on the implications of Japan's market movements and government rhetoric.
“Japan's broader topics index also taking a hit down almost 3 percent, way down by the memory and semi sell off.”
Tesla's Upcoming Earnings and Market Trends
29:29 to 30:49
Analysis of Tesla's earnings report and current market dynamics affecting the stock.
“Well, first of all, the difference between the Nikkei and the topics is important.”
Discussion on Tesla's Stock Dynamics
30:49 to 34:24
Exploration of Tesla's stock performance, market sentiment, and competition.
“the S &P down a percent in its worst day in almost a month, and the Nasdaq fell nearly a percent and a half.”
Options Market Insights on Tesla
34:24 to 36:52
Detailed analysis of options trading activity related to Tesla stock.
“And, you know, I was thinking a lot about how it was just a year ago, two years ago, we would talk about this AI pixie dust that really just seemed to drive so much stock movement.”
Earnings Season and Strategic Insights
36:52 to 41:28
Insights from J.P. Coviello on navigating the upcoming earnings season and market opportunities.
“Coming up, the market's next big test, how a top portfolio strategist is navigating the key earnings week ahead and the biggest opportunities he's finding amid the volatility.”
Market Growth Analysis and AI Influence
41:28 to 42:00
Discussion on the impact of major tech companies on market growth metrics.
“Tim, I bet you like the commodity portion of the portfolio.”
Navigating Commodities and AI Interdependence
42:00 to 42:57
Discussion on the role of commodities in investment strategies amidst AI influence.
“I'm not sure you want to have a 20 percent position to materials and commodities.”
The SEC's Proposal on Earnings Disclosures
42:57 to 45:26
Debate on the SEC's plan to change mandatory quarterly earnings reports.
“The SEC moving ahead with a controversial plan to ditch quarterly reporting requirements, the fierce scrutiny facing the move and what it could mean for investors next.”
Investor Concerns on Reporting Frequency
45:26 to 45:52
Discussion on the impact of proposed changes to reporting frequency on smaller companies.
“But the expense, I think JP Morgan's can afford it.”
Final Trades and Investing Insights
45:52 to 46:38
Hosts share their final trades and investment recommendations.
“Sotheby's just announcing results of its auction of Jensen Huang's leather jacket expected to sell for$40 ,000 to$60 ,000.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Tim Seymour:At Edward Jones, we believe rich isn't about having life all figured out. It's opening yourself to all the possibilities. That's why your dedicated financial advisor provides long-term planning built around you. Meeting you where you are and helping you get closer to where you want to be. So no matter where you're starting from, you can move forward with confidence. The key to being rich is knowing what counts. Let's find your rich. Edward Jones, member SIPC. Are you as confident as you should be when it comes to growing your business? Is your strategy ready to execute today? If cash flows aren't where they need to be, growth could be at risk, especially in the eyes of your investors, board members, and the business press.
0:44But when your business is operating in top shape, you've earned the right to grow. EY Parthenon can help you reimagine your business and execute a game plan for long-term growth. EY Parthenon. Solutions that work in practice. not just on paper.
1:28Tim Seymour:Glitch for Netflix, SpaceX's trillion-dollar drop, and the Nikkei enters a correction, what to make of the pullback in Japanese stocks and how to trade the international names right now. I'm Melissa Lee. Come to you live from Studio B at the NASDAQ. On the desk tonight, Karen Feiderman, Steve Grasso, Tim Seymour will join us shortly, and Julie Veal. And we start off with what might have been peak bearishness for the AI trade. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index, dropping as much as 6 % in early trade after a Chinese startup unveiled an AI model that it says rivals offering from OpenAI and Anthropic.
1:59Tim Seymour:Moonshot AI claiming its Kimi K3 outperforms the latest Claude and GPT on metrics like coding and general agents. And while those reports initially sent U.S. stocks tumbling, tech stocks specifically, many names staged solid reversals. Memory makers swinging 15 percentage points from low to high. Seagate, Western Digital, SK Hynix all ending the day in the green. The DRAM ETF was up nearly a percent, but major markets were down for the week still. So what do the swings we saw in some of these key names today say about the next step for the markets? What did you make of the swing, Steve? Yeah, so if you think about it, I'm trying to compare this to DeepSeek and make this sort of a DeepSeek 2.0 like everybody else is.
2:41DeepSeek took a lot out of the markets. This one didn't take a lot out of the markets. And then look at where we came into these markets originally. It was weak for AI already. It was weak for the hyperscalers. So I think they couldn't have taken a lot more out of it the way DeepSeq was. I think it's not limited downside, but there's a host of reasons to be a seller of these names already. I don't know if this is the main reason to be a seller of it, but it does put in question the huge CapEx that they're doing. Are they throwing good money after bad?
3:14Tim Seymour:Does it make you question the CapEx levels of the hyperscalers? Yes. I mean, that's been the question for a long time, but I think there's a few different things going on. There's the underlying AI story and its evolution, however that may be, where the spend is worth it. I don't know. I saw something today,$5.7 trillion of U.S. hyperscaler spend through 2030. That's an extraordinary amount of money. We don't know if it's worth it or not. Then there's what's happening with the stocks, which is in some ways not related. You know, to me, that thing we talked about yesterday with, you know, in Korea, them saying we're not going to allow levered ETFs anymore, which I think is a very significant event.
3:53And the volatility like, you know, Dell is my biggest position. Dell traded. It moved 10 percent today. Wow. On only this news. And we're not even certain how much that's absurd. So there's something else really going on with fund flows into the space that I don't think is connected to the story, because we don't know exactly how the story is going to play out. But the amount of the, you know, the gigantic market cap moves can't be that we can't be getting it right.
4:23Tim Seymour:Right. Right. Right. This reaction can't be exactly the right reaction to what this news was. And to be clear, we don't know a lot of details. But what we do know right now is China seems to be competitive on the low-cost models and now also on the high-cost models, Julie. I think it's something that people have had in the back of their mind is, I am going to know when it's time to get out, right? There's this recognition that, you know, once the music stops playing, I'm going to find my seat and it's no problem. And I think the volatility of these movements is an indication that people are really twitchy to get a chair before the music stops.
5:03And the real struggle that we have is we don't understand the relationship between the level of model intensity and the CapEx and how that's going to derive any kind of return. And I think that's what people are really nervous about is when are we going to see numbers that give us confidence that this is a business model we can build around?
5:21Tim Seymour:Tim, has your view of the hyperscaler trade or any of the AI trades changed since the release of Kimi K3? I think K3 underscores a moment we've had many times in the last year. I also don't think we should confuse the move in memory names with the move in hyperscalers, or at least there's a couple different things going on here. And talking about Korea and technical dynamics, access to their market, regulators, leverage, liquidity dynamics, and also just overblown memory trades are one thing. And then getting into hyperscaler CapEx, we've been wrestling with hyperscaler CapEx for a year and a half.
6:04And I think ultimately we get back to a point where, you know, really we just don't know what the ROI is. And Meta is a perfect example of that. Microsoft is maybe the greatest example of that. And I think much like we're slowly seeing with Apple that Microsoft is very well positioned, especially in enterprise. And at some point, you know, leaving aside what they're spending, they are well placed across enterprise and even across retail. retail. So I don't know that we're in a very different place today than we were before Kimmy showed up looking so attractive. But I do think it's a case where we have been wrestling with ROI and we've got cross currents of many trades in the tech sector.
6:52Tim Seymour:That's true. I mean, I think that's a good point to sort of separate out what's going on with memory and sort of the technical aspect of that trade that we're seeing play out after South Korea halted the issuance of single stock leverage ETFs versus what's going on overall in terms of questioning CapEx. As we go into the week where Alphabet will report earnings, is that a question that you, what would you ask on the conference call at this point? There's a lot of stuff. What's like top on your mind? Well, I'd love the direct answer to what do you think your return of capital is going to be? We haven't heard that.
7:23You know, I go back to the letter that Andrew Jassy wrote about this opportunity that he saw for AWS. He's never seen anything like it. He's been a great steward of capital in the past. And so we're kind of thinking, all right, well, he would know, but he hasn't told us exactly what he thinks that ROI is. That I would love to know. I also, though, I want to know how Google Cloud is doing. I want to know, we want to hear about Gemini with what's happened the other day. But And as as it speaks to how the economy is doing. Right. I think we'll hear from Meta. I think that speaks to how the economy is doing.
8:03And then YouTube on the heels of Netflix and then also Waymo. There's a lot of to me, that is the most interesting one. And they also have a moat behind them with search. But when you look at the other ones, when you think about it, I think free cash flow, as I've said, is the holy grail. Anyone who's growing free cash flow is going to be rewarded with it or not knocking it down. All of these companies went from extremely high growth, fortress balance sheet, ton of cash, free cash flow. And it's the reverse of that. Now they're issuing debt. And the market is probably rewarding Apple, of course, for the reasons of the aforementioned reasons.
8:41And you have to decipher which companies are going to be able to turn that switch and turn off the spigot and create the free cash flow yet again. Because the market, I think, has lost its tolerance for companies spending. It used to be an arms race. Now it's who has the most free cash flow.
8:58Tim Seymour:You mentioned the word moat, which I think is an important one in this context. Because I don't know, Tim, how do you think about these Chinese models? Are these Chinese models competitive with U.S. frontier models? Are there, you know, or in that moat, when it comes to, you know, U.S.-based AI, is there a moat there or no? The moat, I would say, would be possibly national security concerns or maybe corporate reluctance to adopt a foreign model. But the market interprets the rise of these Chinese models, whether it be a cheaper one or a more expensive competitive one, as true competitors to what's going on here.
9:39But I think you just hit on the most really are regulatory environment who you feel comfortable working with. Are we really going to adopt Chinese models if we are sitting in Europe, even though right now it would be kind of nice to have alternatives to the U.S., given some of the rosiness of those relationships have changed? So I think the open source, but also with proprietary, I mean, that's what we heard about Alibaba and what's going on on that relationship with Apple is one of seven that Apple's been approved to work with domestically. But that that's the story of China. China right now is proven not only low cost, but very much open source with the ability to to also adopt proprietary.
10:21And that's I think that that that very clearly is a challenge to what's going on in the United States. So the moats for the, you know, the Anthropics and the XAIs, et cetera, are that these are still considered to be the pristine tech kind of, you know, places to cooperate on the enterprise side. I still think that we just don't know. And DeepSeek has been a moment that's been going on since John of 2025. Today's another day.
10:52Tim Seymour:Yeah. Julie? Yeah. How big a moat can you have if you're one of several in a drop-down menu? That's the real struggle that I see. And I think for companies that are trying to build workflows around these models, the idea that this administration can knock out one of the models like they did with Fable, that's a concern, right? That should be a concern for everyone. And I think it makes it hard to feel confident I'm going to build business processes around these models that I have a lot of regulatory uncertainty. It almost favors the Chinese models in that way. But I think a lot of businesses just feel really uneasy latching themselves onto one because they don't know what's really going to be around the corner for them.
11:35Tim Seymour:I would think that it would make the Chinese models more precarious, Julie, in terms of where they stand because the national security concern can come to the fore and they say, you know what, no Chinese models here. But I think it's both, right? I think both can be true where you have Anthropic knocked out really easily, the stroke of a pen, and suddenly no one can use that model. I've heard from some businesses that they were like, when that happened, it actually made us wonder if the Chinese models wouldn't be better advantaged in that time period because they don't have the same kind of regulatory scrutiny.
12:08And I'm sort of like, well, both have a lot of regulatory scrutiny. The real underlying thing is that it just adds to the uncertainty everywhere.
12:16Tim Seymour:Our next guest, please, demand for AI remains intact despite the recent tech pullback. Patrick Moorhead joins us now. He's the CEO of Moor Insights and Strategy. Patrick, great to have you with us. How do you take this Kimmy news? How do you sort of apply that to the AI space? Yeah, so I think it's a minor speed bump. And I think your previous guests nailed it when they talked about it being a deep sink moment. And if you remember, the rumor there was that they had created a frontier level model with a few thousand GPUs. And what ended up, it ended up being a very, very distilled model. I think it's good to have these conversations.
12:57I think the markets are overreacting because they haven't fully pieced through what happens if Kimmy and previous models are everything that they're going to be. But I think at the very end of trading, if you look at where we ended up, I think people had done their research, their blood pressure had come down, and we saw some sanity come back into the markets. Patrick, it's Karen. Thanks for being on. So return on invested capital. That's sort of the, you know,$7 trillion question. When do you think we will really start to get some clarity from hyperscalers and whoever else about what they expect it to be?
13:42Yeah. So I think it's going to be relatable to investors that look at the AI cup half full, where they see the promise of it, I don't think we are going to see the big numbers that some people might want to see for 18 months or longer from now. We went from the hyperscalers going positive cash flow to pretty much negative cash flow and a lot of debt or instruments to buy more CapEx. I look at OpenAI margins that are quite significant. In fact, their margins are higher than the hyperscalers. There's a lot of money in there. We haven't even scratched the surface of what people are going to be willing to pay.
14:29If you look at, let's say, a bank that might have 50 ,000 applications, and maybe they have four or five applications or workflows that can take advantage of AI, we're not comprehending that. We're also not comprehending when all of this capability go to the edge in smartphones, in tablets, in PCs, and even in the industrial edge like robotics. But I think it just comes down to conviction of what you believe that AI will pay off. And it does take – I don't think you're going to see it early in the spreadsheets or the models. Patrick, this is a commoditized business. It will eventually return that way.
15:13So that makes all the capex that is spent probably overpaid. So what do you think about my free cash flow as the barometer to success? We've seen the marketplace already reward those growing it or not hurting it as much. I think you have a different stance on that. Yeah, I do. I mean, FCF is certainly the ultimate way to look at that. It's the way we measured a lot of the hyperscalers before. And I think that that will pay off, albeit a few years down the road. I don't think we're going to see immediate positive FCF.
15:51Tim Seymour:Patrick, great to speak with you. Thank you. Thanks for having me on. Patrick Moorhead. So, Julie Beal, what are you looking for out of earnings? I think more clarity on exactly how the AI revenue is going through the P &L and what they can directly attribute to that business. I think that's the place where people feel the most struggle is that it's still pretty squishy. And I think understanding, too, where are the efficiencies that we're getting on these models? Because to me, what I think I really struggle with is that it really feels like the frontier models are delivering a lot of whiz-bang technology that feels really dramatic.
16:30but it doesn't feel like that's necessarily the best technology for automating simple business processes, which it feels like the smaller models would be better suited to do that. And so I think that's what it's important to kind of understand is, do we really need all this compute when there's a lot of low-hanging fruit for simple business processes that would use smaller models?
16:51Tim Seymour:Tim, according to what Patrick said, it sounds like investors will have to wait a long time before they get any sort of indication on the return on investment. for AI. Are you willing to wait? I haven't dumped a ton of investment money into a view that an arms race is something I have to subscribe to. If anything, it's been just where in the last couple of months do I want to start nibbling on Microsoft? I'm comfortable owning NVIDIA because on some level, I still feel that they are the marginal supplier and the leading edge of the technology chain for where all this compute is being built. But I would agree.
17:33I think there's still a lot of uncertainty. And I'm not sure that investors aren't going to continue to want to. I mean, Google's core business and what we've seen from Gemini is that they're spending money, but at least they remain on the leading edge of their business. And that's actually been good news. Apple is a platform. Apple is a conduit, is a vessel for serving up AI. I think that's going to be great for Apple. And I think that's, even though they haven't spent the CapEx to necessarily differentiate, Siri's not a good product, but it's not really important right now. And so I think what we're wrestling with, we know there's demand.
18:13Picks and shovels have proven to be a way to play it. Although, again, I would go back to memory and just say, I think there's cyclicality. I think longer term contracts, that's great. We have more visibility, less cyclicality. it's still a very cyclical market. And I would not be chasing those numbers here, I think, or those margins are as good as they get.
18:35Tim Seymour:Meantime, let's get to Netflix. Shares sinking over 7 % today, closing at their lowest level since October 2024. The company last night warning revenue and profit gains will slow in the current quarter, also saying it will issue fewer engagement updates going forward. Netflix stock has been cut nearly in half since hitting a record just over a year ago. What's your take on the reaction during the day? Oh, well, better than where it could have been, right? It was looking particularly ugly. I think this is, I think, slightly better than where it went out last night. I think that there's still a lot of support from analysts, but I think Netflix needs to put up a couple of good quarters to start to turn this around.
19:16You know, I think it used to be we could maybe look through weaker guidance, but now they need to deliver on that. The engagement thing doesn't sit well, but I went back and talked about this last night. The subscriber thing also didn't sit well, and it ended up being fine. So this may be that as well. So I'm along. I didn't buy any today, kind of a three-day rule sort of thing. But I mean, I find it compelling, but I've thought that for a long time been wrong. I think I'll go with the three-day rule. I'll probably wait till next week. But I think these levels, as I've mentioned, go back to 2024.
19:48These are pretty attractive levels to buy Netflix. And when you really sift through the numbers, that ad tier makes sense, right? It's a low number. It's a big number for any other smaller company. It's a low number for them. They could grow it and they could lever that. I think that their investment is probably going to be less. So if that has peaked and the ad tier rises, and I think that they're still growing at this point. So it might not be what the market wants. And they've had a terrible year. Let's face it. They've had a terrible year, but I think this is a great spot.
20:21Tim Seymour:Yeah. Julie, I mean, it does seem like the fewer updates given to investors indicates that it doesn't want to be viewed or maybe it should not be viewed as a growth company anymore because that's not what you're measuring the company by. Yeah, I think they're experiencing a real rotation in their investment base away from the go-go growth investors to more the kind of garb or quality investors. I agree. I think right now they're in that really tricky chasm where they're still spending like a growth company, but they're not necessarily getting that return and engagement that they really need. I agree that the ad tier is a real opportunity for them.
20:59It really feels intuitively that they should be able to monetize that really well. And I think the real struggle that they have, though, is being able to land the plane in terms of being able to drive the margin profitability that they need to while still experiencing some of the growth. I think a good share buyback would help. And I think part of what they have to really recognize is what is the growth opportunity for their ad spend internationally? Because I think sizing that a little bit more directly would be really helpful for investors.
21:29Tim Seymour:Coming up, SpaceX comes back down to Earth. The stock now down in each of the last six sessions, why the hotly anticipated IPO can't seem to get out of its own way and what it needs to achieve liftoff. Plus, a Nikkei nosedive, Japan's benchmark index slides into correction territory, what is driving steep declines in the overseas market and whether this pullback is a buying opportunity. Don't go anywhere fast when he's back in two.
21:56Mazda has been named Consumer Reports' safest new car brand. It starts with our approach. Every Mazda comes standard with proactive safety features, so you're more aware of what's around you, more focused on the road ahead, and ready before problems ever start. Mazda. More of what matters most to you. Go to MazdaUSA.com to learn more. Consumer Reports does not endorse or promote any product. Soccer teaches us lessons we can take with us long after we leave the field. That's why Bank of America and U.S. Soccer are committed to helping bring soccer to every school. Raise your hand to help at bofa.com slash soccer at schools.
22:39It's smart to always have a few financial goals. And a really smart one you can set? Earning cash back on what you buy every day. And with Discover, you can. Get this. Discover automatically matches all the cash back you've earned at the end of your first year. Seriously, all of it. And we trust you to make smart decisions. After all, you listen to this show. See terms at discover.com slash credit card.
23:07Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. SpaceX shares down for a six straight day, now trading 45 % off the record high, hitting the days after its IPO. The stock got a bit of a pop bid day after the Wall Street Journal reported on its talks to provide computing power to the Pentagon, but closed the day near its highs. The company, which allotted 30 % of its shares in its debut to retail traders, has now wiped out about$1 trillion in market cap from the peak. Steve. Yeah, I mean, this is not, remember Meta? I mean, Meta had a host of reasons. Meta IPO? Facebook. Sorry, yeah. So it was a host of reasons that that IPO went bad.
Read the full transcript
23:44But you remember they struggled for about a year for that stock price to really get back above the IPO price. This is, when we look at$124, it was$135 IPO. Forget about the 150 print. Forget about everything else. You got the allocation. That was a$135 IPO. So it's 10 % basically off that IPO. I'm still long. I got a very small allocation like the rest of the people got very small allocations. I've added to it. I'm still long it. I think with Cursor and when you have Starlink and who knows how many other companies he buys and how many, how many sites they put in for a million, a million permits for satellites.
24:23On scale, they're going to be the biggest in this space. I'm still on.
24:27Tim Seymour:Tim, what's your take on is it a bargain? I mean, like if you can get it at 135 or whatever, I mean, it's bargain now, right? I'm not sure this is on the shelves at Dollar Tree. I think this is a case where it's it's it's actually you can make an argument. It's still expensive, especially when you consider where the valuation of this company was back in February when they completed the acquisition of XAI. that looked genius and was genius. But actually, then suddenly the combined entity put XAI at$250 billion and SpaceX over a trillion. By the time we came at one and three quarters trillion, the sum of the parts were somewhere around$900 billion or less.
25:08So I'm just not sure there's value here. And at a time when XAI was really the driver for the valuation dynamic, especially at a time when we are hearing about Anthropic and chat GPT valuations. I wonder. And I think this could have been part of our conversation in the A block. So I'm not sure that it ever made sense. And therefore, I still believe in the technology. And I think Starship is a value unlock. I think there's a lot of pieces on the space side investors really haven't even had a chance to value. I think you could own it here. I think there are people that are picking at it here. That doesn't bother me, but I'm not going to call it cheap.
25:51I agree with what Tim said about, I think, XAI. It was in the presentation. That was the bulk of the value. The two other businesses were interesting, but that was not where the value was. And so if you look at what's happened to the rest of the stories, they seem a lot cheaper to me than SpaceX. So and that's our position. And price targets, Raymond James has an$800 price target on it. Five of the seven price targets are above the current price of it now. So people do believe in growth. And sometimes when you're looking at growth, it's not going to look like a value stock.
26:24Tim Seymour:There's a lot more fast money to come. Here's what's coming up next. Japan in a rough patch. The Nikkei tumbling into correction territory. Why investors are hitting the sell button. And what comes next for investments overseas. Plus, a red light for Tesla? The chart master says to sell the stock ahead of earnings, the reasoning and the big bets options traders are placing into the print. You're watching Fast Money live from the NASDAQ market side in Times Square. We're back right after this.
26:59Running a small business means you have to do it all. The total solutions advantage only from Comcast Business can help keep everything on track with reliability, security, and savings all in one. No one does business like Comcast Business. Switch to Comcast Business and get started for just$60 a month for 12 months when you add wireless connect to a qualifying internet package. Don't wait. Call today. Limited time offer. Call for details.
27:32Good morning, students. Soccer teaches us teamwork, leadership, geometry, art, physics, and a lifetime of lessons we can take with us long after we leave the field. That's why Bank of America and U.S. Soccer are committed to helping bring soccer to every school. Soccer is officially in session. Raise your hand to help bring soccer to schools at bofa.com slash soccer at schools. It's smart to always have a few financial goals. And a really smart one you can set? Earning cash back on what you buy every day. And with Discover, you can. Get this. Discover automatically matches all the cash back you've earned at the end of your first year.
28:15Seriously, all of it. And we trust you to make smart decisions. After all, you listen to this show. See terms at discover.com slash credit card.
28:26Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Japan's benchmark Nikkei sliding 4 percent overnight, sending the index into correction territory, now almost 12 percent from its June 22nd record high. Japan's broader topics index also taking a hit down almost 3 percent, way down by the memory and semi sell off. Before we go to the ambassador, I will go to you, Karen, because you flagged this. Yeah, I mean, this is not great price action for sure. This isn't this isn't Korea. This is a much broader, bigger. Right. So this is a really significant move. I don't know. You know, we had comments from not the trade, the finance minister saying, you know, we're prepared to take decisive action.
29:03The last time I saw some really big decisive action, it was not a good thing. But if you go all the way back to this, you know, the British pound, that did not work out well. Ultimately, you know, things turn around. But to me, that that's sort of scary. Now, I'm long. I'm long without the yen, you know, hedge through the end with the DXJ. But I sort of think there's bargains there. But this kind of rhetoric is somewhat concerning.
29:28Tim Seymour:Yeah. Tim, what was your take on the pullback? Well, first of all, the difference between the Nikkei and the topics is important. I mean, it's kind of like Dow Jones and S &P. Nikkei is price weighted. Topics is market cap weighted. And I think the topics is a lot is a lot more relevant and important. And the pullback of the the highest for the topics is probably five and a half, which is totally in line for MSCI All World XUS. In other words, off the top, international markets have not had a great run here. And you can argue, especially with more war and some of the pullback in technology, even though part of the international story has been rotation into international tech.
30:07Keoxia in Japan is certainly one of the larger memory names in the world. It's been under a lot of pressure with everything else. I am concerned about yen and JGB dynamics. I think we all should be. But the rest of the Japanese equity market is very strong. And I'm along Mitsubishi and Sumitomo in Idevo. And I actually love Japanese banks here. So I think there are reasons to be concerned about an aggressive appreciation of the yen. That's a risk moment for all equity markets. And I think it's why we talk about it.
30:39Tim Seymour:Coming up, a fork in the road for Tesla with earnings just around the corner. What should you expect from Elon Musk's other company and the troubling technical trend the chartmaster just can't ignore? Fast Money is back right after this. Missed a moment of fast? Catch us anytime on the go. Follow the Fast Money podcast. We're back right after this.
31:04Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Stocks firmly lower to end the week. The Dow shedding 400 points. the S &P down a percent in its worst day in almost a month, and the Nasdaq fell nearly a percent and a half. Oracle shares up by almost two percent, even after hitting 52-week lows during the session. Still, the stock is in the midst of its sharpest drawdown since 2002, down over 60 percent from its September record. Travelers jumping nine percent to lead the S &P in better-than-expected results this morning, thanks to lower catastrophe losses and stronger investment income, management reaffirming outlook and expressing confidence in its AI investments.
31:38Tim Seymour:And intuitive surgical sinking 14 % for its worst day in four years. This is despite a strong second quarter report. The make of robotic surgery equipment sees slower growth in procedure volumes for the full year. We sort of heard about that from some health insurers managed plans before. But you flagged this one. Yeah. So I just think people are doing less surgeries, walking into hospitals less. You have less covered people. These are the type of stocks that will definitely get hurt off of it. But when you think about the technology with these names, it's hard to really throw this one out and not give it.
32:13You always want to pull back on a chart. And we are running into some support. It's a little bit of soft support. And we're going back again, back to 2024. So if you want to take a dabble, three-day rule, maybe you take an entry point, a flyer out on it next week.
32:28Tim Seymour:Meantime, Tesla set to report earnings next Wednesday. and the chart master says it is a good time to sell. Carter Worth put out a note this morning putting a$330 price target on the EV maker that is about 13 percent below today's close. He points to these converging trend lines as well as a double top formation that has him saying, we are sellers here. Yeah, see that arrow pointing down? Tim, what do you think of Tesla here? Well, I think it's caught in some of the same, let's just say, baskets and index dynamics that are hitting some of the other names out there. We had deliveries recently. They came in better than expected.
33:09I'm not really sure what the numbers are that we're watching here. Once again, it gets back to self-driving. It gets back to robots. It gets back to numbers that I think are out there that aren't going to be entirely clear. I think this remains a place where the dedicated hold on and the fundamental marginal catalyst is still very unknown. So I'm not doing much here. I think the technicals are, frankly, the more interesting way to look at the stock right here. So when I think about Tesla story, I think part of it is this site. The call is right. Right. Is SpaceX going to buy them? And are they going to do it?
33:45They're going to do it for stock. They're not going to do it for cash. And so there has to be some of this move here, the SpaceX downdraft directly into Tesla. I agree with that. I think that people thought Tesla was a cheaper way to buy SpaceX. And now with SpaceX collapsing in stock price, people are thinking maybe I just buy SpaceX if I want to buy it. So they're not buying Tesla anymore. They're just buying the they're not buying a proxy. They're buying the one that they wanted to buy or get shares of it, a cheaper way to go through Tesla.
34:11Tim Seymour:Or they're not buying either. Or they could not be buying either. And it's just a risk-off period, which would be totally justified in the market that we've seen. I feel like Julie Beal is in the not buy either camp. I don't know why you say that. I'm such an Elon stan. I'm well known for it, honestly. But, yeah, no, look, I agree. I think that there's a lot of noise. And, you know, I was thinking a lot about how it was just a year ago, two years ago, we would talk about this AI pixie dust that really just seemed to drive so much stock movement. And I think it's almost changed in a strange way.
34:47And we're moving away from that. And I think that some of the magic of Elon, too, is starting to dissipate, because I think people are really starting to recognize that we don't have the robo-taxis. We were dependent on robo-taxis and robots, and we're still not really seeing it come to fruition. And I don't want that to take away from any of the achievements at SpaceX. It's an incredible company, what they've been able to achieve. But I do think that there is a rubber meeting the road that has to happen for these valuations to be supported, because right now it's not the numbers.
35:18Tim Seymour:Let's bring in Mike Oh now to get the options action on Tesla. So, Mike, what are you seeing? Yeah, so it was the second busiest by contract volume after NVIDIA trading about 2.6 million shares. And the options market right now is implying a move of about 7 percent, higher or lower by the end of next week after they report earnings. Calls and puts were about 50-50. So that's slightly more bearish than usual. And that continues the shift in sentiment, which I think Carter was talking to in the technicals that we've been seeing over the past month. Overall options volumes, big as they are, have been trending lower.
35:51And sentiment has been getting less sanguine. So in fact, on balance, options traders actually got net shorter by the equivalent of about$550 million worth of stock today. And one of the trades that we saw trading most actively was the September 400, 300 put spread. That one's now in the money that traded probably about 6 ,000 times around 35 bucks per spread. And I also think that on a fundamental basis, you know, most of their sales just on the car side came from threes and whys, and they didn't have any real competition from that in that segment. And now the Rivian R2 is coming online, and that could be a potential competitor.
36:25Tim Seymour:Right. Are you seeing increasingly bearish options activity also in SpaceX? I mean, SpaceX sentiment certainly has also shifted a little bit more negative. You know, and actually this is true across tech. I think it would be fair to say that as I'm looking at the market overall, if you're looking at technology, sort of higher multiple, high beta and long duration equity, this shift has been lower volumes and increasingly bearish. All right. Mike, thanks. Have a great weekend. Mike Coe. Coming up, the market's next big test, how a top portfolio strategist is navigating the key earnings week ahead and the biggest opportunities he's finding amid the volatility.
37:03Tim Seymour:More Fast Money right after this.
37:10Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. Earnings season kicks into high gear next week with several big tech names set to report. For more on what the results could mean for the market and all the recent volatility, we are joined by J.P. Coviello, head of portfolio strategy at CitiWealth. J.P., great to have you with us. Thanks for having me. Great to be here. It seems like there is a lot on the line in terms of proving out the AI CapEx spend theory. Are you concerned at all about the narrative? I would say there's been a ton of hand-wringing about this narrative for really the past nine months, honestly.
37:40Every single quarter, we get the same hand-wringing. Is CapEx going to be revised higher? Is the rate of change going to tip over? For us, we're recalling Q1 earnings, for starters, right? 27 % earnings growth, the highest in two decades outside of a post-recession recovery. And now looking at this earnings season, we have 23 % expected earnings growth. For us, we're very optimistic here. We're informing clients, bring your cash off the sidelines into this pullback because the underlying fundamentals remain quite robust.
38:13Tim Seymour:Is there a lot of cash? I mean, we hear this all the time, cash on the sidelines. Is there cash on the sidelines that's like literally in cash that can be deployed? Literally in treasury bills, yes. I mean, when we look across client bases, we do see a lot of cash on the sidelines. As you know, we deal with high net worth individuals. They tend to carry a lot of cash. So for us, it's reminding them we are in a high inflation environment that does erode your real return. Let's think about putting some money to work as we come off the highs here and we see some volatility. Let's take advantage of that, right?
38:44So let me just ask you again about the earnings a little different way. Okay. Do you think, so the EPS might be up 23, 25%, which would be great. But how much focus do you think will be on the free cash flow? Absolutely. We'll be focused there too, right? As one of your prior guests mentioned, that's going to be a core focus for us. For us, the hyperscalers have room here, right? They have room to put money to work still, right? Their leverage ratios are not anywhere near where they could be from a negative perspective. So we see them as having ample room, actually, to keep putting money to work.
39:18They may even tap the debt markets in the future, right? That's a possibility. They have room to do that. We view this as opportunistic for them, right? So we're super focused on it, but we see them as in a great position still. JP, talk to me about themes. So you've located cybersecurity, which forever seemed like it should have been the thing that runs the first, and it took so long to get its sea legs. What do you think about it now, And do you see this being a longer in the tooth trade? Great question. We started looking at it a couple of months ago. Obviously, the software valuation compression to start the year as AI really came into the fore was an issue for the software as a whole.
39:59When we started digging into the agentic AI capabilities, we realized you need much greater observability. Right. When you have agents working alongside humans, you need password authentication. You need broader authentication. You need border control of what agents are able to access with respect to IP within a company. So for us, we see it as the most durable area of enterprise spend that's likely to continue for the next five to 10 years. It's already doubled over the past 15 as a percentage of enterprise spend. For us, we're very optimistic here for the bigger platforms. For us, that seems to be the area of focus.
40:35Tim Seymour:What is the primary inflation hedge in your portfolio? Leo? For us, great question, especially in a high inflation environment, as I mentioned. For us, it's global upstream natural resources. For us, it's the regime we're in. We start with where are we, right? As macro investors and fundamental investors, where are we? We're in an overheating regime. High growth, high inflation, right? Chairman Warsh spoke about the inflation problem a couple of weeks back. And for us, what has worked historically extremely well in a high growth, high inflation environment, that's the upstream natural resources portion.
41:07Now, you get exposure to the CapEx supply chain, right? You have some exposure to copper. You have some exposure to energy. You also have some exposure to agriculture. So for us, it's a real broad commodity piece within a bigger portfolio that can help diversify you and help in that higher inflation environment.
41:25Tim Seymour:JP, good to see you. Thanks for coming by. Thanks so much for having me. JP Coviello of Citi. Tim, I bet you like the commodity portion of the portfolio. I do like what JP's out there pitching. I think in a world where we have a more hawkish Fed, be careful, because I think you're going to get a stronger dollar. You're going to have commodities have some some some pressure. But I I love copper here. And I also think there's a dynamic with where there's a build out across power grids. There's a dynamic that's really bottom up fundamental. And I think, you know, I think there's a place to own commodities.
41:57One I would say is the problem with commodities. I'm not sure you want to have a 20 percent position to materials and commodities. So materials, at least as a sector and energy, this is where you have to be careful. I think it makes a ton of sense. It's more adding emphasis around the edges, but I'm not sure how overweight you can be. Julie? Yeah, I agree. I think commodities make a lot of sense from a diversification standpoint. And I think the biggest struggle we all have as investors is recognizing how interdependent and how tied to the AI narrative we all are. So any places where you can get a little bit of breathing room away from it, particularly in an inflationary environment, makes sense to me.
42:36You know, I think it's really important to recognize when we're talking about the 28 percent growth that we had in the first quarter, that something like 12 percent of it was Alphabet, Amazon and NVIDIA marking up their portfolios for, you know, their equity stakes in Anthropic and OpenAI. So, yes, it was good growth, but it wasn't exceptional.
42:56Tim Seymour:So coming up, could we be in for an end to earnings season as we know it? The SEC moving ahead with a controversial plan to ditch quarterly reporting requirements, the fierce scrutiny facing the move and what it could mean for investors next.
43:16Tim Seymour:Welcome back to Fast Money. The SEC facing intense pushback over a plan to scrap mandatory quarterly earnings reports in favor of twice yearly disclosures. According to The Wall Street Journal, the agency received over 200 ,000 public comments on the measure, with many warning the change would leave investors with less information. The proposal is still expected to advance, with proponents arguing it would ease the regulatory burden on public companies. Among the comments sent in, one from Wall Street Bets, of course, the forum for individual investors saying that, you know, professional investors have so much information.
43:48Tim Seymour:They have channel checks. They have their expert networks. They pay for research. They have satellite imagery. all these different things that give them a picture of how a company is doing. And all we have, they say, are quarterly reports. I think they should absolutely stick to quarterly reports for many reasons. I think that I can't imagine that J.P. Morgan is run where we don't know where we are in the quarter. Like if we just, you know, if it were for every six months that they just wouldn't do it. I think that that I think most significantly large businesses are already very much in position to do that.
44:22I think that investors need to see it. I think accountability is good. I would be maybe open to the idea of, all right, maybe you can do something a little more skeletal than the whole big quarterly call and all of that. Just have an income statement, a balance sheet and cash flow. And I think that would sort of suffice. I did see one also considering every four months, but I think every six is just way too long. And I think it would hurt companies more than help them, especially for smaller companies. Smaller companies, it's going to be more helpful for. Disagree. The expenses. I'm just talking about just the sheer expense of putting up the quarterly reports, I think, is the difference between being in the red or being pushed.
45:07Tim Seymour:I think they would be penalized by investors. We don't know what we've got. You could still file on 8K. We're not going to pay. So you could still file on 8K if you have anything that really is market moving. You file on 8K. You have a couple of days to file an 8K. It's just the 10K that you're not filing. Well, the 10K you have to file every year. The 10K is only a yearly filing. The Q is the quarterly filing. But that's a dense file. But the expense, I think JP Morgan's can afford it. The mega cap stocks can afford it. I think it's the ones that are the smaller cap names that you really have to check with.
45:36Those are the ones that have the...
45:38Tim Seymour:I think investors will penalize in terms of valuation on the companies that do not report quarterly. I think people put it, whatever information they have, they're going to figure it out. Whether they have it once a year, twice a year, four times a year, they'll figure it out. Up next, final trades.
45:56Tim Seymour:Fun story for Friday. Sotheby's just announcing results of its auction of Jensen Huang's leather jacket expected to sell for$40 ,000 to$60 ,000. It ended up fetching$960 ,000. That's about 4 ,800 shares of NVIDIA. Time for the final trade. Let's go around the horn. Julie Beal. I like Donaldson for some AI diversification, DCI. Timbo. They are not selling that leather at Walmart, but you should buy Walmart. This is a pullback, and I think it's to be bought. Karen. Yes. Bought back those JP Morgan calls. I was short at literally just about exactly the same price. It was big enough. Steve. Karen, enjoy that jacket.
46:36I hope you wear it well. Palo Alto.
46:39Tim Seymour:Thanks for watching. Fast Mad Money starts right now. All opinions expressed by the Fast Money participants are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC or its parent company or affiliates and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet, or another medium. You should not treat any opinion expressed on this podcast as a specific inducement to make a particular investment or follow a particular strategy, but only as an expression of an opinion. Such opinions are based upon information the Fast Money participants consider reliable, but neither CNBC nor its affiliates and or subsidiaries warrant its completeness or accuracy, and it should not be relied upon as such.
47:09To view the full Fast Money Disclaimer, please visit CNBC.com forward slash Fast Money Disclaimer. I want to grow the game so every kid can fall in love with soccer like I did. So I asked myself, what would you like the power to do? My answers inspired me to invent a pop-up soccer goal that can turn any basketball court into a street soccer pitch. Bank of America champion street soccer advocate Kyle Martino. And everyone who dares to ask, what would you like the power to do? Bank of America, proud to be the official bank of U.S. soccer and FIFA World Cup 2026. Bank of America NA member FDSE.
From the publisher
Big tech selling off to wrap up the week as names like Microsoft, Google and Meta aggressively ramp up AI spending. The traders break down how to trade these tech giants, and if massive AI buildouts will eventually lead to growth. Then, will market volatility persist? Citi Wealth’s head of portfolio strategy J.P. Coviello lays out where he sees opportunity in a time of high volatility and geopolitical uncertainty. Plus, why selling Tesla could be the move, Netflix crumbling after a disappointing second quarter, and why the biggest IPO in history is on a six day losing streak.
Hosted by Simplecast, an AdsWizz company. See pcm.adswizz.com for information about our collection and use of personal data for advertising.
