In short
Whether neobanks are replacing private banking by expanding from consumer banking into investing, planning, AI advice, and premium services; how “challenger” roles are evolving and what this means for the advice gap.
Guests (backgrounds)
- Maya Bittner, investment partner at X Factor Ventures; previously spent 8 years at Chime, scaling it from challenger to large-scale operator.
- Aileen Dinovits, Head of Operations at Formans; works on financial infrastructure, including a programmable ledger powering money movement for fintechs.
- Matthew Ford, founder of Sidekick; premium wealth manager digitizing private-bank-style services and aiming to democratize access via cost reduction and product digitization.
Key claims
- Neobanks’ scale and behavior blur “challenger vs incumbent”; they win by solving customer pain and monetizing differently.
- Wealth management is shifting from product access to guidance/complexity management; “financial advice” is the last major profit pool to be attacked.
- AI can reduce the cost of education/advice, but regulated advice still needs human accountability and trust.
Notable examples
- Revolut (e.g., 75M customers, profit cited; subscription value like covering Tinder via tiers), Monzo/Chime/Newbank, Robinhood Cortex, Clear Autopilot, Publix Alpha.
- Challenger impact cited: reduced overdraft fees; “paid two days early” enabling small but real economic wins.
- Private markets require accredited/investor constraints (US), making democratization politically/regulatorily constrained.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOThe Evolution of Neobanks
2:36 to 6:22
Discussion on how neobanks are redefining traditional banking roles.
“And what then does that mean for the future of the industry?”
Challengers vs. Incumbents
6:22 to 7:44
Debate on the definition of challengers in the banking space and their impact.
“Do you think that maybe some of the language or vernacular around how we think about some of these fintech players needs to change?”
Addressing Customer Pain Points
7:44 to 11:10
Exploration of how fintechs aim to solve longstanding issues in finance.
“There's almost there's a mindset, there's a mentality that sets them apart.”
The Future of Financial Advice
11:10 to 14:00
Discussion on how AI and digitization are changing financial advisory services.
“because I think obviously the fees are an obvious barrier.”
The Impact of AI on Financial Advice
14:00 to 16:40
Exploration of how AI is transforming access to financial advice and services.
“and things was using digitization and software to make things cheaper.”
Challenger Banks vs. Traditional Banks
16:40 to 21:30
A discussion on the competitive landscape between challenger banks and traditional banks, focusing on customer experiences and fee structures.
“But Aileen, do you feel like we're sort of making progress in terms of realizing or helping customers achieve some of those bigger outcomes or are we really just sort of scratching the surface?”
Deflationary Economics in Banking
21:30 to 24:10
Understanding deflationary economics and its significance in the competition between neobanks and incumbents.
“Even being able to see what you had in what account and see it with an up-to-date balance was like a problem 10 years ago.”
Innovative Business Models of Neobanks
24:10 to 27:40
Examining how neobanks structure their services and revenue models to attract customers.
“Now it's about how can you aggregate and get more and more and more of the other stuff to start to monetize in lots of other different ways.”
Accessibility of Wealth Management Services
27:50 to 28:00
Analyzing the shift towards making wealth management services available to a broader audience.
“Now, before the break, we explored how the biggest neobanks have moved beyond competing on better banking experiences.”
The Democratization of Financial Services
28:00 to 30:33
Explore how neobanks are making personalized financial services accessible to all.
“once reserved for private banking are becoming accessible to everyone.”
Show all 17 chapters
Navigating Complex Financial Choices
30:33 to 33:03
Discuss the complexities of personal finance and the challenges individuals face in making informed decisions.
“And there's some really great options out there.”
AI's Role in Financial Education
33:03 to 35:53
Learn about the shift in perspective towards financial education, emphasizing the personalization brought by AI.
“And I go on the podcast and I go to Money 2020 and fintech dev con and blah, blah, blah.”
The Human Element in Financial Advice
35:53 to 38:24
Examine the importance of human interaction in financial advice and the limitations of AI in high-stakes decisions.
“So I think AI can play a massive role on both sides of it, but I would just hazard of bundling education and advice in because I think they are very, very different pieces ultimately.”
AI and the Future of Financial Advisory
38:24 to 42:00
Discuss how AI can transform financial advising by allowing for more meaningful human connections.
“So we still see humans needing a human interaction.”
AI's Role in Financial Advice
42:00 to 45:30
Explores how AI can enhance financial advice while maintaining human interaction.
“and there's the Mills review out recently, I don't see a world, I don't know why we would see a world either where an LLM, which by definition is guessing the next best token, is the answer to regulated financial advice.”
Complexity in Financial Decisions
45:30 to 49:48
Discusses the varying needs of consumers in financial advice, from simple to complex.
“And, you know, when I look at the like popular financial advisors who have TV shows and podcasts and books and things like that, like Dave Ramsey, they often have really blunt advice.”
Trusting AI in Finance
49:48 to 53:31
Examines the potential and challenges of trusting AI with personal financial data.
“Well, like it is creepy and like I don't know that I would want that and there's a bunch of data.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00Hey folks, David Breer here, CEO of 11FS. Here's something you might not know about me. I get a lot of people trying to impersonate me online. Fake profiles, scam emails, the lot. And a big part of that comes from data brokers. Hundreds of them quietly collecting and selling your personal information. Your phone number, email, home address, job title, all out there and all fueling identity theft, scam calls and spam. If you've ever searched your own name online, hands up, who hasn't? you'll know how exposed you really are that's why we've partnered with incogni they contact 230 plus data brokers and tell them to delete your information properly and legally under gdpr and ccpa doing it yourself would take hundreds of hours incogni automates the whole thing and keeps working with repeat removal requests if your data reappears i tried it and within days saw brokers deleting my data you can even protect your family members too fintech insider listeners get 60 % off an annual plan, just head to incogni.com slash fintechinsider and use code fintechinsider.
1:07And yes, it's risk-free with a 30-day money-back guarantee. You'll find the link in the description.
1:27Ross Gallagher:Hello and welcome to FinTech Insider Insights. I'm Ross Gallagher, the head of consulting here at 11FS. For the last decade, neobanks have challenged traditional banks with better apps, lower fees and simpler customer experiences. And by almost every measure, they've been a huge success. Leading players like Revolut, Monzo, Newbank and Chime have attracted millions of customers, achieved profitability and become many customers' primary banking relationship. At the same time, companies like Robinhood and Klarna are expanding beyond their original propositions, signaling that the race to become consumers' primary financial partner is no longer just a battle between what we would have traditionally considered banks.
2:09But now the
2:10Ross Gallagher:biggest challenges appear to be entering a new phase. Rather than simply replacing your bank account, they're expanding into investing, financial planning, AI-powered advice, lifestyle services, and premium experiences. In doing so, they're beginning to break down the traditional boundaries between retail banking, wealth management, and private banking. So today we're asking, are the traditional battle lines in financial services being redrawn? And what then does that mean for the future of the industry? Now, to discuss this really interesting topic, I'm joined by a great panel of guests. First, we have a very welcome return to the show for Maya Bittner, the investment partner at X Factor Ventures.
2:51Ross Gallagher:Maya, lovely to be back behind the mic together so soon. Great to have you. Maybe you can just, I know you've been on quite recently, but you can just remind our listeners a little bit about yourself, reintroduce yourself. Yes, of course, Ross. You know, I have an entrepreneurial background, but big news on my side. I recently wrapped up eight years working at Chime. So I really got to see Chime rise from being an ambitious challenger to operating at massive, massive scale. And then, as you mentioned, I'm now focused on investing and spending a lot of time on Twitter. So excited to chat about today's topic from all those angles.
3:30Ross Gallagher:Yeah, excited to have you, Maya, as always. And I think, yeah, given all of your experiences and insights, I think you'll definitely lend a lot to today's topic as well. So thanks for jumping on and sharing that with us. Also joining us, and another very welcome return back to the show, Aylen Dinovits, the Head of Operations at Foreman. Aylen, it's great to see you. Obviously, we did a show together at Money 2020, which was really, really enjoyable. Maybe you can, again, just remind our listeners a little bit about yourself and maybe some of the things you've been up to since then. Of course. Yeah, thanks for having me.
4:04That was a really fun show. Yeah, quick recap. I'm head of operations at Formans, where essentially we provide the financial infrastructure layer to a lot of fintechs and financial services companies that surely are on the listening side today. and essentially what the core of our product is a programmable ledger that powers money movement for these companies.
4:30Ross Gallagher:Love it. Awesome. Well, thank you so much again, Aileen, for jumping back on with us. And then another old friend of the show, Matthew Ford. Matt, just back from paternity leave. Congratulations. Thank you very much. Again, it's great to see you as always. Maybe you can just, yeah, reintroduce yourself to our listeners and maybe give a little bit of background to Sidekick and what you guys are up to. Sure, yeah. I mean, great to be on the show as always. So I'm the founder of Sidekick. We're a premium wealth manager. We're trying to take a lot of those products and services that a traditional private bank would offer and digitize those, drive cost out of those and open those up to a much broader segment.
5:12So a lot of the intro, Ross, that you were giving around how things are changing is very much top of mind for us because we're hopefully very much at the forefront of the financial advice, AI question. We're spending a huge amount of time there. We offer a variety of different wealth products. So everything from private markets through to much more like customized, personalized investment products. So yeah, really trying to push the boundary on how do you take this archaic, expensive, very face-to-face manual premium service and how do you make that much more accessible and open rather than just delivering the same old commodity products which historically the mass affluent have been stuck with.
5:53Ross Gallagher:Yeah, love it. And I think we're going to get into a lot of that as we sort of move through the discussion and the debate. So yeah, Matt, really excited to have you and sort of to get your perspectives on this stuff as well. So yeah, look, I promised you an awesome panel. I think that's exactly what we have. So I think the only thing left to do is to dive right in. And I think, look, Maya, maybe I'll start with you and something a little provocative to get us going. Do you think that maybe some of the language or vernacular around how we think about some of these fintech players needs to change?
6:31Ross Gallagher:I mean, certainly when you think about some of the brands that we mentioned at the top of the show, the Newbanks, the Revoluts, the term challenger doesn't really seem to fit the mold anymore. Totally. I mean, Revolut has 75 million customers and 2 billion in profit, right? New Bank has 135 million customers. It's like, if you have this many people, are you really a challenger? I think when you bring up the question, what does it mean to be an incumbent? Is it that you are the same scale or that you're behaving like an incumbent? And here's how I think incumbents behave. They have this big base of customers and they're focused on protecting their base and on monetizing the people that they already have, right?
7:13Well, I think challengers are more interested in their growing, their reimagining the roadmap, their building out experiments on the edges of banking, things like that. And so the topic of our show is about how all of these companies are imagining new experiences. They're building, they're still growing. And so I, yeah, I think it's kind of on the line, you know, they seem like incumbents by their size, but they're maybe not acting like incumbents.
7:43Ross Gallagher:Yeah, I couldn't agree more. And I think that's right. There's almost there's a mindset, there's a mentality that sets them apart. And it's, it's not just growth at all costs. But I think for me, a lot of it comes down to that relentless focus, you could almost call it an obsession around solving for customer problems, and then how that starts to feed through into different, maybe less familiar propositions and offerings. than we've typically been used to. I mean, Aylan, I'm always really interested in your time at Revolut because I think when you talk about players who are very, very good at sort of just like product development and pushing new propositions live, I think they're the standard bearer.
8:36Ross Gallagher:I guess, do you recognize some of that in terms of what Maya was saying? Yeah, absolutely. And I think what's interesting is that Revolute was definitely one of the most provocative challengers out there. And maybe, like, is it a challenger or is it an incumbent? Have we already said that this is what a bank looks like? Like, are we now expecting our banking experience to be like this? If that's the case, then surely they are no longer challenging and this is like market standards. or what we would expect from any provider these days. Revolut in particular, I think, hasn't settled. And maybe I go back to one of the values they have, which is don't settle, never settle.
9:22They keep on pushing the bar, right? So the speed of delivery for a product is insanely fast. So you see launch after launch, some more successful than others. And maybe the strategy is a lot of testing in new bets. And some works better than other things, but for sure, they keep that spirit of adding more and more as they see a need. Yeah, no, completely. I agree with everything. But I suppose like the other nuance, and I think this is where kind of like the challenger aspect I think is interesting, is that like finance is one of the oldest industries of time. You know, like it has been here forever.
10:04And a lot of the pain points and a lot of the reasons that new fintechs and challenges exist is to solve a problem that the incumbents have created. So, you know, if you think about even why is back in the day, it was getting ripped off by FX or money is incredibly hard to move across borders or whatever it may be. It was that these things already existed. Like money has existed for a very long time. Financial products have existed for a very long time. We're often not even creating new financial products. but where you know the business models that a lot of these incumbents have sat on has just been like so profitable and often so misaligned with the outcomes of the end customer that that for me is what the challenger bit is it's kind of writing the wrong a lot of the time and you know in wealth that is often just the fee rip off so yeah so i mean i think that's the that's the other thing it isn't necessarily just about how fast you move how agile you are how innovative you are whether you're in playing with new technologies or not, it's like you're actually attacking some of the core of the pains that the customers are feeling with those incumbents as well.
11:08Ross Gallagher:And Matt, I think when I think about specifically where you guys play it side, because I think obviously the fees are an obvious barrier. But I suppose when I think maybe where the root of some of those legacy problems around exclusion, I think it also maybe goes back to how we've traditionally thought about customer segments. And, you know, I think it's been quite basic, right? It's been like, if you have a salary of X and have investable assets of X, then we'll talk to you. If you don't, we won't. And it feels like a lot of, you know, the work that you guys are doing is maybe starting to democratize access and plug that kind of advice gap.
11:49Yeah, completely. And some of it's structural. So, I mean, like, you know, I think where we started was we said that there are these unfair advantages that a wealthy individual has access to with a private bank. So a lot of that is product. So private markets, more personalized portfolios, much smarter cash management, like actually really sweating the products, not just giving you a vanilla product, but really sweating them, making sure the tax efficiency works and all that good stuff. And like the exclusion part was just that if you're too small and you're not going to make us that much money, like we're just going to lift the limits all the way up here.
12:25So, you know, private banks have historically needed about a million pounds to get going. And even IFAs, so traditional financial advisors, unless you've got a couple of hundred thousand pounds, you're just too small and non-profitable enough to be able to be interesting for those providers. So, you know, where we started was, well, actually, how do you tackle that? Like, can you make the segment that is perhaps not as profitable and a little bit more expensive to serve? Can you make them a hell of a lot less expensive to serve? And if you can't make them a hell of a lot less expensive to serve, then guess what?
12:59You can serve them and you can build a really viable business there. So I think that was where we started, which was just like, it's structurally often some of the limits. But where we're moving to increasingly, so what are the advantages of the wealthiest? Some of it is product, but actually some of it is just guidance and support as well. And again, a lot of it is just the fact that some of it's risk appetite. The banks got burned by providing financial advice, however many numbers, a number of years ago. So some of it's just risk appetite. But again, a lot of it just comes down to it's just as expensive to have a half an hour phone call with somebody who might make 50 pounds off than someone that you might make 5 ,000 pounds off.
13:43So why bother? So, you know, I think that's our starting point is like, can you drive out costs? Can you digitize? can you support like a segment that has historically not been addressable? And that's how they break you down. I mean, the structure thing is totally key. And I think like the first wave of internet startups and things was using digitization and software to make things cheaper. And now AI is just like an order of magnitude making everything way cheaper once again, particularly on the personalization side, which I think we're seeing now come across with financial advice. And it's like, wait, if our costs get way, way, way cheaper, what does that mean for the landscape of people who have access to this advice and these opportunities?
14:27Ross Gallagher:Yeah, completely. And I don't know, it's not just outcomes in the way that we maybe think about outcomes in terms of like micro outcomes, like I've helped this customer accomplish this task and get from A to B, but it's like, it's life outcomes. Maya's what you're talking about, right? It's like, how can you enable me to live better? How can you enable me to realize a better financial future? Totally. People want better jobs. They want to buy a house. They want to pay for college for their kids. They have real tangible financial goals. And I think we are just now shifting from what you're saying, like the kind of small scale stuff.
15:04You know, I actually think the first wave of challenger banks, There's this narrative that they improved on the experience. I actually don't really buy that. Like Chase has a great app. I don't know if you guys have used a Chase app, but it's great. Like it looks nice. It works well. It's fast. It has great information. It's responsive. I think they have a great digital experience. Plus they have all of the in-person branches and those really cool looking ATMs. So Chase is great. I actually think the first wave of challenger banks really did compete on economic impact, right? No overdraft fees, no minimum balance fees, getting paid two days early.
15:46That stuff has really tangible impact on consumers. I have heard thousands of stories about people who can buy formula for their kids because they got paid two days early when otherwise they couldn't. The average American pays$300 a year in bank fees. And with the challenger banks, they're not doing that. So that's very real. But at the same time, like it's$300. Like$300 is not going to let you buy a house when you weren't able. Do you know what I mean? Like it matters deeply and it is driving growth at the challenger banks and people care a lot, but it's not those big changes. It's not people starting to invest for the first time and seeing that passive income.
16:30It's not, you know, really that progress along financial milestones that a lot of people are looking for.
16:37Ross Gallagher:Alan, would you agree with that? I think, look, I think it would be ridiculous to suggest that we haven't moved the needle. And I think, you know, even culturally, I think an impact of the challenges and the success that they've had is I think culturally, even right into all of the big incumbents, I think we have seen a shift away from just thinking about along the traditional lines of what it is to be a bank and sort of pushing things much closer to the customer. But Aileen, do you feel like we're sort of making progress in terms of realizing or helping customers achieve some of those bigger outcomes or are we really just sort of scratching the surface?
17:16Oh, for sure. And to be honest, I don't know much about the Chase experience, so I'm not going to get into that, but at least in the UK and Europe. So if we time travel and go like, I don't know, like 10 years back, the banking experience was not amazing, right? For a lot of things, you needed to go to a branch. The range of products that you would have with your traditional bank was quite limited, plus really expensive on specific products, right? And now we take for granted that we have this very wide range of products on an app. You have support clicking on help and you get things sorted without going anywhere.
18:01There's been a massive consolidation of products that maybe you needed different providers to get access to those. And now you have a lot of, there's just a lot of stuff happening in every of these apps, right? I do have a bit of a bias with Revolut, but again, it solves a lot of your problems. So it's not just, it covers, and that's the whole mission, right? Like covering almost, yeah, virtually every aspect of your financial life. So I think it changed what we're understanding as a bank. And maybe, yeah, 10 years ago, it was a challenger. saying, Rebeloo was like, we're never going to be a bank.
18:49And today they are. And all of these challenger banks or these super techie startups that got into the financial services market, they are all regulated and they all are banks. So I think the definition of what a bank is has changed massively.
19:09Ross Gallagher:I completely agree. And I think there's like the, there's the what you do, which I think is your point about you're a bank because you have a banking license, you operate within financial service and it's tightly regulated and actually there are pretty strict definitions around what it means to be a bank but then there's also like the how you do it and I think the how you do it for me is where you're really starting to see some of that differentiation and I think particularly when you, you know, looking at Revolut, I mean the way that they're starting to just sort of push out of traditional financial services into travel.
19:47Ross Gallagher:And they've got the rev points and all of this sort of stuff and the crypto. And now you're starting to see what they're doing around AI. I mean, all of the potential for all of that sort of stuff is huge. Of course, as well, Aileen, to the point that you made, you know, of course, we're starting to see them all now build out different products, you know, starting with that small niche, whether it was wise going after. the expensive overseas transaction fees. But of course, now they're all building out beyond sort of classic current accounts into investments, into credit cards, personal loans, all of that sort of stuff.
20:29Ross Gallagher:But again, Matt, I think the thing that stands out for me here is if you look across the landscape and you look purely at what they're doing, then maybe you're not seeing a ton of differentiation. But I think, again, when you look at how they're sort of doing it, it's not necessarily the same. Yeah, it's a stage of the market that we're in as well, because it makes me sound very old, but like the first startup I worked at was called Entrees back in 2012. We had a mobile app and it was like, whoa, the banks don't do mobile apps. You know, like literally all we did was you got to see your balances and your transactions within a mobile app.
21:05And that was 2012. And like by 2014, 15, all the challenger banks were coming. So there's like time and place. And we're at like peak maturity of fintech. Genuinely, I remember how hard it was getting pin view and card block and block like back in the day. It all sounds completely ridiculous now because it's all a massive commodity. But like back then, features did really matter because it was so terrible. It was so terrible. Even being able to see what you had in what account and see it with an up-to-date balance was like a problem 10 years ago. And they went and solved it. Fees were a disgrace, and they went and solved that.
21:43But now we're just at a different stage in the market. So, yes, incumbents have caught up because technology has got better. Some of the features were never enduring moats. They were reasons for people to initially shift, and everyone's caught up. The features and the fees. I don't know if you've seen this huge wave of banks in the United States, at least, have eliminated their overdraft fees. And I really think that is due to competitive pressure from the challengers. And that is a huge win for the American consumer. It is not right. It's like, okay, now they don't look as good in comparison because they're not charging overdraft fees like everybody else.
22:21But they've changed the whole industry. So few people are being charged overdraft fees. And I think it's because, yeah, the banks, the incumbents, they need to catch up. They need to catch up with features and with their fee structure. Yeah, completely. But I think one thing I'm always really fascinated about is there's this concept of deflationary economics, which I think is where challenges will always win versus an incumbent. Because if you think about incumbents, they have these huge profit pools across lots of different areas. Those have been attacked. So whether that was stock trading, overdraft fees or whatever, those have been attacked.
22:54But the incumbents, they have offset that with better digitization, so lower cost of branches and stuff like that. So they basically just moved the cost and income structure around slightly within the organization and the net result is kind of a little bit better. But deflationary economics is like really the main asset of what Revolut and Co. did back in the day, which is if you basically destroy a market, so you've destroyed the market for FX, like or, you know, travel abroad fees, like you've destroyed that. But then what you do is you reinflate the market on a completely different axis. So, you know, like Revolut basically took like, you know, billions of pounds worth of money that was a foreign spend fees, made that a zero market, but then started charging for lounge access.
23:39You know, and if you kind of then re-inflate on an axis that an incumbent is never going to be able to kind of ultimately go and play in, those are super, super interesting. So I think that's why you've kind of seen this weird world where basically there's lots of these profit pools that have just been like collapsed. But now, because so many of those have been picked off, and by the way, I think financial advice is the last profit pool that needs to and is getting slowly started. like it will start to be attacked pretty soon. But most of them are now been attacked. So this is why you've now got this like harmonization across everybody because they destroyed the incumbent profit pools.
24:13Now it's about how can you aggregate and get more and more and more of the other stuff to start to monetize in lots of other different ways. That is such a smart way to think about it. I've never heard it described like that. And I think, you know, when you talk about, like, I think consumers really, like, almost over focus on specific angles when they're choosing who to do business with. And so by making those as attractive as possible, right, it's like, okay, and then it's like, nobody's picking their bank based on lounge access, or maybe they are, but like, they get to make money in smart ways.
24:52You know, I think of, I have a local bank here that I adore and they offer like a crazy high interest rate. It's like 7 % or 9 % or something on your first$2 ,500 in savings. And I think angles like that are really smart because people really like to choose banks based on their savings rate. But it's actually very cheap to provide a high interest rate on a small amount of money. And so they're kind of shifting. It's like we're looking at how do people choose who to do business with. And but like, just what you're saying, Matt, it's like, but you still need to make money somewhere. And so you've got to move this stuff around and be really strategic about where you're making money and how you're acquiring customers.
Read the full transcript
25:35And those might not be the same way.
25:36Ross Gallagher:But what I love about that example is it shifts your revenue model away from, you know, forcing customers to pay fees towards here's some value that we're going to give you. And you choose the lounge access. It is optional. You are not tricked into it or strong-armed into it or pushed into it out of desperate financial circumstances. You just like 100 % opt into that. And you know, when I look at Revolut and how they've designed their subscription, like their packaged account products and the tiers, I think it's the best illustration of what I was saying earlier about the difference between the what and the how because they have a different brand permission to other banks and their competitors playing in that space and I think it's best summed up by like what other bank could offer to cover the cost of your annual tinder subscription and you would be like yeah I'm gonna go for that right there's just no other bank that can do that but it's also when you sit down and you actually look that you break out all of the um the value that you get from each one of those tiers there's a ton of value like one of those tiers where you're paying i can't remember right but it's in like the i don't know it's like 15 or 17 um pounds a month includes a ft subscription which you would never you know would cost you more to just get that by yourself and that's just one of the options and again it's revolute using their size and being able to negotiate really good deals for their customers.
27:10Ross Gallagher:So it's like value over just cost to, you know, make an overseas transaction, which, you know, from a, again, just value to the consumer is a completely different, completely different thing. Although I think if we had someone from the income and banks here that they would argue that overdraft fees are providing value to consumers because they're letting, you know, blah, blah, blah. You can spend more money than you have access to helpful in a pinch. But yeah, I'm not arguing that. All right. I am going to take us to a break and then we'll be back with you very shortly.
27:48Ross Gallagher:Welcome back to FinTech Insider. Now, before the break, we explored how the biggest neobanks have moved beyond competing on better banking experiences. Now let's look at what that expansion means for wealth management and whether capabilities once reserved for private banking are becoming accessible to everyone. Historically, personalized investment advice, financial planning, and concierge-style services were reserved for affluent customers. Today, we're seeing these capabilities become increasingly accessible. Revolut Wealth, Clear Autopilot, Robinhood Cortex, and Publix Alpha, just a few examples.
28:22Ross Gallagher:But Matt, you know, obviously, with your experience, which you've already talked to in some detail, building out Sidekick, I'm really keen to get your thoughts on sort of direction of travel here and where we're headed. I mean, we've learned a lot. Where we started to where we are today is pretty night and day, I would say. And I kind of alluded to earlier that I think that there's two distinct problems. So one is just getting access to more products that can achieve better financial outcomes is always going to be a good thing and a lot of those things have been locked away. So private markets, not for everybody.
29:02Private equity, it's not for everybody, but it can play a really good role for some within their portfolio and most people have been locked away from that kind of stuff. So I think the market has been on this kind of traditional fintech way, which is like you break the box apart. So you had hundreds of companies all trying to democratize private markets to some extent or you had loads of companies trying to democratize auto saving or uh you know uh challenge a traditional robo advisor with lower cost ready-made portfolios and all those types of things so the box got broken apart but i think like where we're now the most excited is that we've almost kind of caused a problem for ourselves in some ways which is now okay now these things are available but like what the hell do i do like how do i navigate that complexity money is complex but like wealth is particularly complex because what are risk adjusted returns um you know allocation drives everything but how should i allocate how do i even think about what i want to achieve in life it's not as simple as like i have a savings goal for three years like life is messy and muddy i have lots of like behavioral traits which means i do really stupid things we all do you know we buy high sell low all that all that stuff we panic when the markets move So there's all of these things now that if you give people the tools and give people the weapons, they're still going to make pretty poor choices or be really overwhelmed by what choices they should make anyway, because it's just cognitive load and complexity.
30:30So I think the market's in a really interesting space. And I would say this because I'm building in this space, but we've all been trying to blow it all apart. And there's some really great options out there. Now it's about trying to not rein it back, but actually help people use these tools now that are available to them to achieve the great things that they need to in life. So for me, the financial advice is the final boss. It's the bit that the banks got scared about. It's the bit that we're all a bit scared about because the bar is high, the risk is high, you know, the opportunities to be sued are very high.
31:04You've got to get this right because it is people's real money. But technology, AI is helping. It is not the magical answer that is, you know, not everything is at the end of an LLM, but, you know, the tools, the technology, and everything is now there to, again, going back to that kind of open up, drive out cost, make these expensive, operationally complex things much more open. That's where we're betting on now for the next two, three years, is that we've got the tools in place and now let's go help people make the most of it, basically.
31:41Ross Gallagher:Maya, I could see you sort of going back and forth between frantically nodding and then very pensive. So I'm interested in your reaction to the world as Matt sees it. I mean, I have so many thoughts on that. Matt is talking about private markets and he says they're not for everyone, which is true. I mean, the government, right? So at least in the United States, you have to be an accredited investor, which means you either have enough money or you've passed a test that says you have enough knowledge to do this incredibly risky type of investment where it's very, very easy to lose all your money.
32:15Like the whole difference between private markets and public markets is that public companies are very regulated in the information they have to provide and how they operate so that it's hard for people to be bamboozled and lose all their money without thinking that they're going to. And so I think when we talk about democratizing products like that, like private markets and private equity and investing in those things, it is pretty scary. It's not that the incumbents have chosen not to offer those to everyone. It's that the government has chosen that maybe it is too scary. So I do have a lot of concerns on that angle.
32:58And that's, you know, what Matt is saying with the advice piece being the final frontier. The other thing I was thinking through is, you know, I've been talking about fintech for a long time, right? And I go on the podcast and I go to Money 2020 and fintech dev con and blah, blah, blah. And one of the pieces where I have really deviated from the industry for the past 10 plus years is on financial advice. I've been anti-financial advice. Everybody is into financial advice and education. They're like, we just need to educate people and people don't understand what compound interest is. And they don't.
33:29And I'm like, they do not need financial education. It's not going to work. And the reason I don't think financial education works is because the 90 percent of financial education or 80 percent that applies to everyone. You can write the blog post and you can send the information, but the details that really matter is that last 20 percent. AI changes that. I am shifting my whole stance to be pro-financial education now because AI can do that last 20 % and truly personalize it based on who you are, the zip code you live in, your personal circumstances, the money you make that you've got both a W-2 job and a 1099 job, and you're trying to cobble together different sources of income, and you've got these interesting expenses things, and you want to tax optimize and you want to grow your wealth and you're worried about these risks, it can handle all of that and actually give you a pretty compelling answer.
34:27And so I'm quite bullish on AI driving the cost of financial education to zero, that personalized financial education. Same thing with personalized health. Personalized to zero and bringing it out of the big private banking. Sorry to interrupt there, but massive difference between financial education and financial advice. So like I completely agree with you that the problem with financial education is even if you make it more engaging and more compelling and more palatable, it's still education which takes time, which takes effort, which is very, very, very hard to educate a whole market on very, very, very complex things and ensure that people fully comprehend it.
35:07Financial advice is almost the opposite though, which is just like, we will help do this for you and take you along the journey. So this is why I think it is the final frontier because, you know, everything else was about let's write more blogs about how to invest. Let's, you know, like, let's, let's just kind of like build the knowledge base. But all of those things I was talking about, which is like, we have behavioral biases, we do really stupid things. We're fighting against our own kind of, um, yeah, species, As a species, we do irrational things. This is where the role of an advisor comes in, which is a real expert whose only singular job is to understand this stuff and help you navigate it and help do it for you.
35:47The problem historically has just been inaccessible and it's super, super expensive. So I think AI can play a massive role on both sides of it, but I would just hazard of bundling education and advice in because I think they are very, very different pieces ultimately. Yeah, it's fair.
36:04Ross Gallagher:I agree. I think there's levels to all of this. And I think, I mean, Matt, I couldn't agree with your point more about, you know, we all like to think of ourselves as these perfectly rational beings, and we're not. We all have, you know, what would be considered by a rational being like poor financial habits and behaviors and all of that sort of stuff that is probably undermining our financial goals and where we're trying to get to. I think when you look at things like the autopilot tool that Cleo's rolling out where, and Maya, this probably goes more to what you were kind of saying around like, look, we'll understand your financial reality.
36:42Ross Gallagher:We will understand where you're trying to get to in terms of your goals and objectives. We will set you a plan that will, you know, sort of get you there, but then we'll continue to reevaluate. So as soon as your personal circumstances change, then we'll make sure that the plan is up to date. I mean, when you compare for me something like that and, you know, versus where that sort of thing just didn't exist before, you can start to see how over time individuals can start to realize a much better financial future. and I'm really keen to bring you in and get your thoughts can you start to can you start to see a path to where maybe some of those traditional barriers or silos for private banking and wealth management start to get broken down a little bit yeah so super interesting uh point of view here right I have so many thoughts I'm trying to organize those but I think it's so cool things I think it's very different if you're deciding on, so again, taking clothes, right?
37:45It advices on small things, right? It's not advising if you should or should not get a mortgage. And I think that's where it's easier to apply AI and take financial advice from AI and be comfortable with that versus when you're making a life decision and involving a lot of risk, potentially taking a lot of debt or putting a lot of money down as a payment. On that type of situations, again, we are irrational. We are emotional creatures. So we still see humans needing a human interaction. It doesn't mean that someone needs to call me on the phone. But I'd be slightly skeptic if we are from like saying that we're 100 % ready to take advice from a model on buying or not buying a house.
38:48again is it right or wrong I'm not discussing I'm just saying we are emotionally rational creatures that would struggle to not have anyone to make accountable or responsible for part of that decision and then I would also split so that's one point the other point and sorry to hijack this bit I would differentiate things that are purely native private banking and wealth management. So I think that what's been happening is we have now better tools for deciding on, again, small-ish investments, planning, understanding our expenses. There's tons of data, and for those bits, I think AI is great. But then part of the core of private banking is that it gives you access to something that is genuinely scarce.
39:50So you have access to something there's not much of. So I'm trying to reconcile, like, okay, if you're giving access to something that is super scarce, how is that operating in a mass market? You know what I mean? and maybe match that. I'll throw that to you, maybe. Yeah, I think it's the human relationship ultimately. I think you kind of said it a little bit earlier is when it comes to money, as much as I've been in the fintech space for such a long time, I like to pretend that everything should be through an app and digital and fast and remove fiction and make onboarding faster and slicker and more digital.
40:29People, when it comes to money, trust no one more than another human at the other end of it. And, you know, that is the premium scarce resource that has always been at the other end, which is like a true real expert. And you can fast forward this even within private banks themselves because, you know, like if you've got a million pounds, sounds like you're doing quite well in life. You are doing quite well in life relative to the general population. But you're still not getting the real experts. The real experts are managing people who've got 200 million, 500 million. So there's still shades of this as well.
40:58But no, I mean, it's the human interaction piece. And, you know, we are running at this problem very, very hard at the moment. So we don't provide financial advice today. it is our ambition in the near future. But AI can do a lot of the admin side of the role that meant that human interaction was scarce. So if you think about the role of a financial advisor, they spend their life setting up meetings, replying to emails, drafting pretty boilerplate suitability reports, doing soft fact-find checks, hard fact-find checks. These are pretty generic tasks that... agents are extremely good at. But that is not what financial advice is.
41:42Financial advice is then the final mile and the human interaction and all that good stuff. So I think AI can actually just take out 80%, 90 % of the work that an advisor does to then free up that advisor to service 10 times as many clients. So I think that's where we're most bullish. I don't see a world, and there's the Mills review out recently, I don't see a world, I don't know why we would see a world either where an LLM, which by definition is guessing the next best token, is the answer to regulated financial advice. But it can be a really great tool to obtain information, to do a fact find, to do a few of these things.
42:22And then you need human accountability at the other end of it. And you need a human relationship as well. So yeah, I really do think AI is going to completely revolutionize financial advice. But I think it will revolutionize it by allowing humans to have more interactions with humans, which is ultimately, I think what I'm most excited about.
42:41Ross Gallagher:And I just, I mean, that point that you made that's so true is, you know, that if you get that blended model right between humans and AI, then the model scales and it scales way beyond where it is today, right? Yeah, completely. It's interesting in terms of like, I don't know, Maya, it'd be interesting to get your thoughts in terms of like direction of travel, you know, how ubiquitous can this become? AI financial advice, you mean? Well, I mean, in terms of like, can we move to a world whereby, you know, we all know about the advice gap today, but can we move to a point where we've almost closed that off?
43:20Oh, I really hope so. But it's also not a one size fits all problem. So, you know, if I was to take my critical hat and almost be like wise of 2014 and say, you know, the incumbents are shocking. Let's go and run at the profit pools. You know, at the bottom end of the advice market, there are a bunch of people who have essentially very low confidence, very low financial confidence, who have quite basic financial decisions to make, but want a human to do it for them because of that low level of confidence. And they're getting ripped off often for pretty basic stuff, which is like fill your ISA and put whatever's left into a pension.
43:56And they're paying an absolute fortune for that. And I think like that end of the market can be like, you don't need an LLM for that. It can be pretty deterministic in the way that those types of things are done. And I think technology can really go after a bunch of that market. And this is where probably like the money boxes and those types of businesses are going to run really hard is that they're just going to make that sort of like low-level regulated financial advice but simple financial advice much more easy accessible open and i hope a lot more people you know are able to step into that the further you go up the finalized pose of complexity where um trust structures and complex financial situations and all of those types of things start to come in i think that's where like basic models start to break and i think that's where like the real human kind of advisor relationship and um you know that deep complexity that they've built their career on.
44:52That's where like, it's less about fees really at that point. Of course, you should be paying fees for really complex decisions. But that's where they're going to earn their fees because they're actually going to do some really complex work and like really earn their fees for it. And, you know, you're not just filling your eyes at that point. You're unlocking thousands of pounds worth of either tax efficiencies or losses that you would have had in other ways. So, yeah. So what I hope is that more people take that simplified approach and that fees are driven out as much as they can be. And then more people who have more complexity at the top end can get access to more financial advisors.
45:25And I don't think necessarily fees are going to disappear at that point. But the accessibility of those services is going to open up much more broadly. I think Matt is really right. And, you know, when I look at the like popular financial advisors who have TV shows and podcasts and books and things like that, like Dave Ramsey, they often have really blunt advice. Like Dave Ramsey says, no debt, no debt ever. No mortgage, no debt to buy a car, no debt to like no college, no debt ever. and it's like there is a certain person who this is really good advice for and they really need to hear like, no, no debt.
46:04You cannot take on any debt. There's no excuse. If you have debt, you got to get out of debt and pay it off. That is really valuable for, there like is a certain type of person. And then there's a lot of different financial advisors. I don't know. I follow Rami on Twitter and I really like his stuff and I listen to his podcast and they've all sort of got an angle. And kind of what Matt is saying is for the low confidence consumer, right? It doesn't need to be that sophisticated to be really valuable. And I really wish, I mean, I think it would be really cool if all of these financial advisors had their own apps with someone's specific personalized data and you could get Dave Ramsey's personalized advice for your financial life, you know, sent to you and push notifications and you should not have spent money.
46:52It's just really cut and dry and clear. Do not spend money here. Pay down this debt. Do spend money here. Work on your income there. And it's just there's like no room for negotiation. I think that would be really helpful for most people. And I totally agree with the way that Matt's sort of segmenting the market. There's a big group of, yeah, higher confidence consumers that that doesn't apply to. But it's a really good fit for LLMs. And when you look at the numbers, it would help so many people to sort of bring them up to the next level of financial stability. Yeah. Where I think LLMs are powerful is the discovery stage.
47:31And I kind of, being a new father, so two weeks in, two weeks today, you should look at my Claude history. because basically from like a medical perspective, like there's about 500 chats open of, is it normal if baby does this? Is it normal if baby does that? Is it normal if baby does that? It's actually hilarious kind of looking through because you're like, oh my God, is this some paranoid new parent? But actually, you know, it's really powerful to surface because you could Google those things, but there'd be a blog and there'd be complexing advice and all this type of stuff. It's a really great way of building confidence, breaking down complex things, navigating things really effectively, that discovery side of things.
48:14If my baby was really not well, I'm going to pick up the phone to a doctor and get him into A &E as soon as possible and get the expert in front of them. And I think you're going to get exactly the same within the financial advice space, which is like, I think like ChatGVC, Claude, whatever, it has dangers because it's going to tip into, and it already does tip into regulated financial advice. But it can be a really great discovery tool for just building a bit of confidence, asking some simple questions, breaking down some of those barriers. It isn't this wall of terror that like, I don't know anything about money, so I'm not even going to engage with it.
48:46It's going to break down some of those early barriers and do some of that like early discovery type stuff. But it's that handoff then to when you've gone from like discovery, information, fact fine, kind of building a bit of confidence too. But now I need an expert. I need that to be auditable and repeatable and transparent. I do think, I mean, there's the regulation piece and the liability piece, But I do think AI is going to creep higher and higher up that stack of what it's able to do. Because if it's able to see all of your transactions and it knows everything, like it's just, it is going to be so much better equipped to be giving you real-time financial advice about your situations that people will build more trust.
49:28Like if you're, so you're asking ChatGPT, like, is it normal for your baby to poop 25 times a day? The answer is kind of yes. Right. It's like if ChatGPT or AI had real-time monitors on your baby and knew all of its vitals or it pulled in all of these things or you've got the outlet song. That was getting creepy. Well, like it is creepy and like I don't know that I would want that and there's a bunch of data. Like it's creepy, but like pretend it's not creepy or you're running like a local model on your computer and so the data is not going anywhere or something like that. And it was able to send you push notifications that said, hey, we noticed, actually, I think Nana does this, right?
50:06We noticed that like the oxygen level of your baby has dropped a little bit. Like go check in on. If it could send you that, that would be so valuable. It would be so amazing to see that the blood, like the blood oxygen, almost said blood alcohol, blood oxygen levels have dropped a little bit. And you need to check in on your baby that you are going to trust that system more and more. And it's actually going to be better than a doctor because a doctor is not going to be looking at all of the data every second. Does that make sense? Like the scale that it can operate at. So I think I think financial AI is going to get the same way.
50:38It's going to get more and more equipped with all of this really fine tuned data that's changing instantly. And it's going to be providing more timely, more contextual, more helpful recommendations than advisors can, like very slowly creeping up over time. just because it can, should it, and will it be allowed to? Because I'm telling you now, the UK regulator is never, they will start coming and clamping down on this stuff because they need the basis of regulation is accountability, human accountability. And technology is amazing. Technology can do amazing things, but the limits of technology are often not the limits of adoption.
51:20It is regulation. It is all of those types of things. So I think we also have to ground it in the reality that if, you know, and the regulator is all over this at the moment, and it is going to be one of the hottest topics, I think, of the next year of like, what are the model providers going to be allowed to do, not just what can it do? Because they can do amazing things and reduce hallucinations to one in a billion. Like, of course, it would be able to do that eventually.
51:45Ross Gallagher:Aileen, final word to you on this. So just like we all reacted and say, oh, that's creepy, like I wouldn't share that information. I think people can feel the same way about sharing their whole financial life. So the model is just as good as the data you input in. So if there's an emotional side and you're not sharing, I don't know, you're ashamed that you spent X amount, you know, people do those things, right? So the output you're going to get out of a model is only as good as what I read about it in. and having the trust to actually say like, oh, I'm going to be completely open and I trust that when I share all of it, my deepest financial secrets to this model, then I'm going to get a good advice and I'm going to take it.
52:45I think that's a barrier. And on top the compliance bit, right? This is super regulated. But even without the regulation, I would like for a second to compare our reaction with the baby data and I think people would behave in a similar way maybe they're more prone to sharing or getting advice on day-to-day spends and progressively we're going to get there and people are going to trust it but it will take time I think
53:17Ross Gallagher:I feel like it's progressive for sure but I think we're all aligned behind you know I think whatever the route there's definitely, you can plot a path here to a much better customer experience, much better customer outcomes. I think that is a great place to end. Thank you as ever to our guests for joining us today. Before we go, maybe we can just do a whiz around the virtual rooms and you guys can tell us a little bit more about where people can find out more about you. Maya, how about we start with you? Oh, always Twitter. I'm Maya B, M-A-I-A-B on Twitter. And I'm posting all kinds of stuff about having toddlers and fintech and working remotely and that fun stuff.
54:02So yeah, it's the best place to keep up with me.
54:04Ross Gallagher:And still refusing to call it X. Aylan, how about you? Yeah, you can find me on LinkedIn old fashioned I guess hopefully my whole name is going to be Aridem because I'm not going to spend 10 minutes spelling that excellent thanks Ailyn and Matt how about you? same LinkedIn but also Sidekick it's at sidekickmoney.com so yeah check us out perfect and you can find me also on LinkedIn and thank you for listening if you like what you've heard please do follow our podcast. As always, if you want to join the conversation, find us on social media, just search for 11FS or FinTech Insider or email podcasts at 11FS.com.
54:52Ross Gallagher:Thank you very much again and goodbye.
From the publisher
About this episode:
For years, neobanks competed by offering better banking experiences. Now, the biggest players are expanding into investing, AI-powered financial guidance, wealth management and premium services—areas once dominated by private banks.
In this episode, host Ross Gallagher is joined by Maia Bittner, Ayelen Denovitzer and Matthew Ford to explore whether neobanks are redefining what it means to be customers' primary financial partner, how AI is reshaping financial advice, and whether private banking is becoming accessible to everyone.
This week's guests:
Maia Bittner - Investment Partner, XFactor Ventures
Ayelen Denovitzer - Head of Operations, Formance
Matthew Ford- CEO & Co-Founder, Sidekick
Links to check out:
Join our WhatsApp community, where you can get the inside track on all all things 11:FS, as well as having your say on the things we should be paying attention to.
https://chat.whatsapp.com/KpA4gFbbWDlLFm7kx39raf
About Fintech Insider:
Fintech Insider by 11:FS is a bi-weekly podcast that covers everything from finance and banking to technology and the latest trends in financial services.
Our expert hosts, with hands-on industry experience, are joined by key decision-makers, VCs, and top reporters from across the financial landscape, including guests from companies like Stripe, Revolut, Plaid, PayPal, and Monzo. Together, they break down the biggest news and innovations shaping the space.
Our weekly news show drops every Monday, covering major stories like mergers, new product launches, regulatory shifts, and emerging tech trends. On Thursdays, our Insights show goes deeper into the hottest topics driving the future of finance, including AI in banking, decentralised finance, and the evolving landscape of embedded finance.
Whether you're already in the fintech game or just starting to explore, this is the #1 podcast for you.
If you enjoyed this episode, don’t forget to subscribe and leave a review!
Got a question for us? Email podcasts@11fs.com!
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices




