In short
Arthur Laffer (coiner of the Laffer Curve) discusses incentives in economics, the “transfer theorem” claim that redistribution reduces total income, and how tax rates and policy changes affect growth and tax receipts. He also speculates about future society with lower transaction costs, automation, and shared electric transport, and comments on US presidents and Donald Trump’s approach to trade.
Guest backgrounds
Arthur Laffer is an 85-year-old economist who worked in the White House starting at age 29 and later advised multiple presidents. He co-authored Prosperity Through Growth (with Matthew Elliott, Michael Hintze, Douglas McWilliams). He describes a highly privileged family background in the US (executive father, prominent mother, medical/scientific lineage).
Key claims
The Laffer Curve is a simple model linking tax rates to revenue. Redistribution (taxing above-average earners and subsidizing below-average) allegedly drives total income toward zero. He argues higher marginal tax rates reduce incentives to produce; cutting rates to the rich increases growth and top-end tax receipts. He says the best social program is a good job.
Notable examples
He contrasts Nixon’s wage/price controls and protectionism with George Shultz’s views. He cites US income-tax history (1913–1940s–Reagan era) and claims receipts rose after top-rate cuts (e.g., 73% to 25% post-WWI; 70% to 28% under Reagan). He argues Smoot-Hawley tariffs worsened the 1929 crash. He claims Trump’s trade deals reduced tariffs (USMCA, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, Colombia) and describes “reciprocity” tariff leverage.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUnderstanding the Laffer Curve
1:43 to 4:10
Dr. Laffer explains the relationship between tax rates and total revenues.
“What would you be studying today if you were going to university?”
Future of Work and Education
4:13 to 6:40
Discussion on the implications of technology on jobs and education.
“What do you do if you're a billionaire and you have children?”
Arthur Laffer's Background and Values
9:46 to 14:00
Arthur Laffer shares insights about his privileged upbringing and its impact.
“Belfast, Northern Ireland, we all come from, and Scotland and Germany.”
Living with Your Hand
14:00 to 15:00
Learn how to embrace and maximize your circumstances for success.
“You want to learn to live with who you are and do the best you can with the hand that you're dealt.”
Early Influences and Career Beginnings
15:00 to 16:20
Discover Dr. Laffer's early experiences and significant career milestones.
“Well, so you have almost worked with pretty much every president in your working life.”
Lessons from Working with Presidents
16:20 to 18:00
Understand the insights gained from Dr. Laffer's time in the White House.
“comes from this back and what did that first job working for the president teach you i tell everyone it was sort of like this that i said you won't believe this but i just speech for the president of the United States.”
Critique of Nixon's Economic Policies
18:00 to 19:20
Hear Dr. Laffer's critical perspective on Nixon's economic decisions.
“He didn't understand the minimal regulations.”
Privilege and Opportunity
19:20 to 20:40
Explore the concept of privilege and the importance of opportunities for all.
“And what we need to do is be able to provide a society that allows people to make it on their own, to fly as high as their little wings will take.”
The Dangers of Government Intervention
20:40 to 22:40
Learn about the effects of government attempts to equalize outcomes.
“And it explains to you that, you know, when the government comes in and tries to manipulate the situation so that everyone comes out equal, it doesn't work.”
The Redistribution Dilemma
22:40 to 26:40
Examine the consequences of income redistribution and its impact on society.
“But, you know, when you think about it for a second, let me, if I can, with you, go through this mathematics, although I'll describe it verbally to you.”
Show all 23 chapters
Historical Context of Income Tax
26:40 to 28:00
Discover the origins and implications of the progressive income tax in the U.S.
“I'm going to take you back to my book two years ago, two and a half years ago, called Taxes Have Consequences.”
Historical Context of Income Tax in the U.S.
28:00 to 34:02
Explore the evolution of income tax rates in the U.S. and their implications.
“What's she done to deserve and yet the little one in Lake Forest, Illinois living in the mansion there, her little birthday parties have all of me.”
Historical Context of Income Tax in the U.S.
34:03 to 34:39
Explore the evolution of income tax rates in the U.S. and their implications.
“We've just partnered with Hunch, an AI job finding platform that I believe in so much, I've actually invested in it.”
Tax Policies and Economic Outcomes
34:45 to 42:03
Analyze how tax policies have shaped economic booms and depressions in history.
“Because you've got to learn from history.”
Reagan's Economic Policies and the 86 Tax Act
42:03 to 44:10
Explore the impact of Reagan's tax policies and the significance of the 86 Tax Act.
“Do you know that Reagan was a racist, a fascist, a sexist?”
The Transfer Theory of Income and Economic Performance
44:11 to 46:24
Understand the relationship between tax rates, income inequality, and economic performance.
“Now, let me take you through a couple of lessons to your redistributions.”
The American Tax Code and Economic Aspirations
46:25 to 48:56
Discuss the implications of the American tax code on wealth and societal aspirations.
“and I dare you to go the opposite direction.”
Lessons from Reagan's Leadership Style
48:57 to 52:47
Analyze how Reagan's leadership style evolved and what it means for modern politics.
“And I look at Britain and I start crying.”
Comparing Reagan and Trump's Leadership Styles
52:48 to 56:00
Explore the similarities and differences between Reagan and Trump as leaders.
“struck against the people of America, he fired them.”
Peace Through Strength and Free Trade
56:00 to 1:01:10
Learn about Arthur Laffer's view on peace through strength and the nuances of free trade policies.
“I believe in a strong peace through strength.”
The Role of Incentives in Politics
1:01:10 to 1:06:10
Explore how political incentives shape the behavior of leaders and economists in government.
“Don't take him literally, but do take him seriously.”
Personal Experiences and Economic Philosophy
1:06:10 to 1:10:02
Discover Arthur Laffer's personal experiences in government and his philosophical stance on economics.
“Their money should be private, just the way it was prior to 1913.”
Economic Insights from Dr. Arthur Laffer
1:10:02 to 1:15:54
Explore Dr. Laffer's perspectives on economic policies and healthcare transparency.
“I say to him what I just said to you early.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01This episode is brought to you by Google Chrome. You think you know a browser, but Gemini and Chrome, that's new. It can help you with practically anything on the web, like restoring a vintage motorcycle from a 50-page restoration block, or finally break down that long article you've had open for weeks. Gemini and Chrome is here for it. Ready to make anything online make sense? There's no place like Chrome. Check responses set up required. Compatibility and availability varies 18+. You're in your apartment alone. Then you hear something. You think, was it just the storm? You realize you're not alone.
0:36Your living room is not safe with Unhinged, the new immersive game experience brought to you by Netflix. To make it out alive, you must answer the phone. The question is, when your phone rings, will you answer? Tap the banner to play Unhinged now, only on Netflix. Welcome back to Jimmy's Jobs of the Future. Today, I'm joined by Arthur Latha, one of the world's most preeminent economists, and of course, the man who coined the Laffer Curve. He is also the oldest guest that we've ever had on Jimmy's Jobs of the Future at 85. He first started working for presidents when he was just 29 years old, and he's worked with many of them throughout the decade.
1:17So it was fascinating talking to him about the different styles and which presidents have been good, which presidents have learnt things as they've gone along as well was particularly interesting. He's just co-authored the new book Prosperity Through Growth alongside Matthew Elliott, Michael Hintze and Douglas McWilliams. It charts some ways for the UK to get some growth back. On to today's episode.
1:43What would you be studying today if you were going to university? You know, what I really like to do is understand how to combine, simplify and structure models. Now, that's exactly what is the Lavera curve? I mean, it's a very simple pedagogic device that explains a very obvious relationship between tax rates and total revenues. I mean, you think about, what's so brilliant about that? There's nothing. It's just the relationship there. Now, these types of relations and interactions and connections and models is where I think the human mind still has a way. It's like Roger Penrose, did you see his The Emperor's Clothes or whatever it was, the book?
2:27And the whole sort of the decoherence in creating a new thought, a new way of looking. This is what I really think is cool about the world, getting rid of all transactions costs. Let me imagine you guys love your national health service, but you know, it's really, really bad. And I don't mean yours specifically. I mean, here you have, you can be a doctor. You can be, what is it? MD. I don't know what the name of the thing is called, but you can look up symptoms. I've got a dribbling nose, my eye itches. I've got something. That's what you've got. You don't need a doctor anymore. You don't need to spend all this money on getting diagnosis.
3:15And then you ask, what are the normal treatments? Here's what you do. Where does the medicine come in? Now it should be in research labs and doing that type. And that's where all the great developments are. And we could probably reduce transactions costs in society, maybe 50, 60%. I mean, you go to school, what do you learn at school? that isn't in your computer. Well, exactly. So what do you think? Well, this is what's cool. I'm not sure I have the right answer. Yeah. But it's the right question to ask. I mean, it's what you gigglingly said coming in. I mean, where are those jobs? Here's what I started doing.
3:58And it's exactly the right thing that you're doing. And where does the modern world go? And you don't want to have a human brain trained to be a markedly inferior computer. Yeah. Why would you spend all that time that way? What can we really do? So what's, and it may not be jobs. See, talking with you coming in and all these entrepreneurs that do all these things, they're nervous now and they look at their little kids, my snuffling, snuffling, snuffling, no, this kid doesn't, doesn't understand what it's like to have to work for a living. I need to train. No, it's a different world. What do you do if you're a billionaire and you have children?
4:41what does the royal family do do you think King Charles has to work to be a no he's got to work to be a king and you look at the royal family you look at all these people with different asset endowments and not only asset endowments different skill endowments and what would make for a better society you were talking there what's the difference between being rich and getting rich that's the question isn't You know, once you're rich, you need to learn how to work a buck and sell a newspaper and do the paper routes that you asked me about when I was first done. No, you don't. You need to know how to handle assets and use them in a way that creates a better world.
5:26And it may not be economic. I mean, you know, most people think of rich people should be charity driven, but they should be wealth driven. and you know how to handle wealth is very different than how to acquire wealth but isn't there too much of people maybe this is a british thing but of protecting their wealth right not trying to grow it well protecting their wealth is another thing but i mean enjoying art creation you know there's there's all sorts of parts of the world that are not abstemious little money grubbing earning yeah and i don't know what they all but we're trying to move into this new society wouldn't it be i mean if all of these do you remember a little abner uh al cap i don't know if you do the cartoonist he get created this thing called a shmoo the shmoo provided all the food and all the necessities of life you didn't need to work for now what do you do what would i do if I didn't have to, I would, I'd probably exercise.
6:30Be careful. You know, what you want to do is think it through very, very slowly and carefully and train people on how to handle themselves in a world of plenty. And especially if it comes in a world of plenty without all sorts of negative externalities like polluted and trash on the streets and things. things. Imagine if we could have a car that drove a person from here to there, the cost of driving only a person from here to there. For example, of each gallon or what do you call a liter of petrol, you say, gallon of gas. But you know, a quarter of 1 % is really the amount of energy needed to move you from here to there.
7:17The rest of it's taking car, all that. Now imagine if we could have heating in a building where only the ambient environment around you was warm. Well, it could all be electric soon as well, right? All the cars. Not only electric, but they could be you just fit in a little tiny tube. And the thing do it. So you don't even have to drink all that metal to walk around and all that. I mean, just the looking at Tesla and the self-driving that vehicle that sits there that drive drove you for its downtime is what 98 of its time is downtime now if we could use that for everyone else as well so now we need one-tenth the number of cars that we have yeah because you and i could share i mean all of us could have this you wouldn't have to have a driver you would i mean and you could have the heat and the thing for in the little back i mean just it's really wonderful that's going to be one of the interesting things that happen to potentially cities right is if you get rid of all car parking right there's no parking necessary anymore exactly not only that but there's i mean you have to make many of and they last for a hundred thousand years they've got that battery yeah there are no moving parts except the little wheels yeah the maintenance of a of a battery driven car is very small yeah i mean it really is i mean what do you have it's i don't know i mean a little bit heavy thing under the seat and zero to 60 is what in two seconds yeah so you could now transport someone from here to canary wharf and what 34 seconds i'm joking but but you know what i'm saying yeah well since we're talking about electric cars i'll just mention that this episode is supported by our long-term partners octopus energy now not only have they been shaking up the way that we power our homes with green electricity, but now they've got some brilliant options if you're thinking about switching to an electric car and how you can power it with solar panels and even heat your home with a heat pump, which makes going electric a lot simpler and more affordable to do.
9:29If you're a listener of Jimmy's Jobs and you're considering an electric car, solar panel or a heat pump, then just drop us a line at jimmy at octopus.energy and the team will look after you personally. By the way, you have the map of Scotland all over your face, by the way, just for the record. What's the map of Scotland? Oh, you look very... Oh, yeah, yeah. Well, McLaughlin as well. Of course, my family. We're Scots-Irish as well. Is that where they... German as well. Belfast, Northern Ireland, we all come from, and Scotland and Germany. Well, tell us about you and your background, right? And take us back to the sort of beginning.
10:08What did your parents do for work? Well, my father was CEO and chairman of one of the largest companies in America for 25 years, so very privileged family. My mother was foreman of the grand jury, Cleveland, Cuyahoga County. Twice she was head of the largest women's organization there. I mean, a very power couple. My grandfather was a brain surgeon at Western Reserve Medical and also at the University of Vienna. We were bilingual. My grandmother, his wife, was number two in the suffrage movement in Cleveland. My mom's father started four steel companies, was very financially successful. My grandmother on my mother's side was the grand dame of them.
10:51My mother was probably the lead socialite of Cleveland at the time. And if you go back generations, we've been very successful. The same prep school, the same Yale brothers as well. And so we've been very privileged for a long time. And it's what I'm talking about. how do you raise people in this environment as opposed to a shopkeeper or something else and very much the same background as Donald Trump we're definitely going to come on to him but what do you and what did that kind of like instill in you from sort of an early age what you know an obligation to be able to pay nice way not I'm so guilty I'm not guilty at all I didn't do anything wrong I remember telling my father when I was young and you know dad to have been successful, you know.
11:39But I look at a black family or a Jewish family or something like that, and what do I say? I can't say I came out of the dirt poor and made it on my own. The only problem with my grandfather. And it's a different family type of structure that I come from. Yeah. And it is a very privileged family, but not one that you don't back. Yeah. I mean, you don't work your little tush off. And I did. Very proudly so. My dad did too. My dad didn't get those jobs because he was... Do you think there's a cultural difference between Britain and America in this sense? Because what is interesting about the data of British people now is that they want to have come from nothing, right?
12:29like that scene. I know. What is that? I don't know. Why did they want to insult their parents? But it's this thing about generational wealth. There's now something in the UK to kind of be almost maybe not ashamed of, but certainly not to brag about. In Australia, it's really bad. Yeah. Oh, in Australia, it's the tall wheat syndrome. I mean, you know, there's nothing wrong with having successful parents and grandparents. In fact, it's sort of, I'm sort of proud of my grandparents and my parents and all that. I mean, someone says, My dad worked from paycheck to paycheck. Oh, my God. What a Shlobovich.
13:04Your grandfather, your father must have been. My father was pretty cool. I mean. Yeah, it is interesting. But you know what I'm saying. Completely right. And, you know, why should you be ashamed of your father and mother and of your grandparents? I mean, they were poor. They lived dirt poor. They were scratching dirt. No. It's almost just wanting to prove it all against the odds, though. Like, it is a fascinating shift that's happened. And it's kind of happened over your lifetime, I think. What's happened, I don't know. But I can remember my daughter saying, Dad, I want to make it on my own, not because of you.
13:41I want, well, then give me back my half of the double helix. Come on, give it back to me. I mean, you know, genetically, you're parents. Genetically, you're your grandparents. What the hell's wrong with that? Do you want to give back your double helix? No. You know, you're, what, 23 and me? Come on, plug it in. There you all are. You want to learn to live with who you are and do the best you can with the hand that you're dealt. Yeah. And do it the best you can, not by climbing on other people's backs and kicking the tush. Yeah. None of that. You want to do it as a more constructive member of a society.
14:19I mean, I'm very proud of what I've accomplished. No, I've started with a lot. Yeah. But I've used that a lot, I think, very well. Yeah. I've got six kids. I've got 14 grandkids. I already have four great grandkids. And they're all doing pretty well. I mean, you know, the thing is to be able to play the hand, to get the hand and play the hand you've been dealt. Yeah. And that's wonderful. That is. Six kids. There's nothing wrong with being successful. Yeah. And there's nothing wrong with your parents being successful or your grandparents being successful. You know, but what you want to do is play that hand well.
14:57Yeah. Well, so you have almost worked with pretty much every president in your working life. When I was a child, MacArthur carried me on his shoulders when he came and visited Cleveland. I mean, Bob Taft used to stay at our house. I've never been in awe of those people. I love them. In fact, I feel very good with them. Yeah, yeah, yeah. But your first official job, was it 29 for a president? Is that right? Yeah, I was 29 in the White House, yes. yeah george schultz's right-hand person i mean you know i went to yale that pretty early uh my prep school is pretty cool of my class of 65 kids in my prep school i think 13 of us went to yale okay well you know so it wasn't like we i was the only one i mean uh and my dad's i can remember my dad's comment, you know, son, you know, you can do any college you want to, but I will pay your way.
15:59That's a joke. As you know, it's not real, but there's an element of truth that makes it funny. Yeah. You have expectations of success, you know, from those to whom much has been given, much is expected. Yeah. And, you know, that's the way I've always been raised. And I looked at my brothers and colleagues and you know a lot of them burnt crashed and burned but that's what comes from this back and what did that first job working for the president teach you i tell everyone it was sort of like this that i said you won't believe this but i just speech for the president of the United States. Now, there were two words he changed.
16:50That's true. But that's all. But it was my speech. Everywhere I had is not, he put is. And everywhere I put is, he put is not. But other than that, Mom, it's my speech. You know, Nixon was not. I like Nixon very much personally. Yeah. But he was not a good president. And I don't mean because he was immoral. Probably he was that, too. All right. But he wasn't good on economics. I mean, wage and price controls, devaluation, the dollar, that boop-bop, it was all wrong. And the consequences were wrong. Protectionist all the way. Camp David was a 10 % import tax surcharge. And then we had the job development credit which excluded foreign-made capital from getting the investment tax credit.
17:34All of this was every single part of what Nixon did made the world worse. And I don't mean that because he was a bad person. He wasn't. He didn't understand the five kingdoms of macroeconomics. He didn't understand you want a low rate broad base flat tax. He didn't understand that spending restraint was better than spending. He didn't understand that a sound dollar would make for great prosperity. He didn't understand the minimal regulations. He didn't understand that free trade was hugely... The five grand kingdoms of macroeconomy, he didn't get. And I wasn't able to, at that stage, touch it.
18:17Now, my boss, George Shultz, was the finest human being that ever walked the face of the earth. And I really mean that. But he thought floating exchange rates was good. Hello? Excuse me? No. He was a professor. He was dean of the business school. He'd hired me four times. He never did learn better. You know? Yeah. And, but, you know, my job was how can I make this world a better functioning economy, better function to provide the wherewithal to create growth, output, employment, prosperity, so that people in the inner cities and the ghettos, they can make it on their own. They can't. Yeah. They're no different than you and I.
19:02They really aren't. and how do we create the environment that allows them to have the privilege I have? There's nothing wrong with privilege. The problem is there's not enough of it. Everyone should be privileged. And one of the quotes I use a lot that you say is, the best social program is a good job. Thank you. But that is true, and it is. And what we need to do is be able to provide a society that allows people to make it on their own, to fly as high as their little wings will take. Yeah. You know, my hero is Teddy Roosevelt. Teddy, not Frank. But you know that, you know. Why? Well, we're all dealt different.
19:49Some people come short. Basketball is probably in the cards for me. You know, some people are dealt with higher IQ, better looking. I mean, and that is their own affair, to play those hands. That is, you know, you can't change the dealings. You can't change how people play their hands. But what you want in this world from a government is there should be no crookedness in the dealings. You know, I'm not in favor of the rich man or against the rich man. I'm in favor of the poor man or the black man or the white man or the Jew or the Christian. You know, they're all dealt hands, but there should be no crookedness in how those hands dealt and no crookedness in how they're treated when they played those hands.
20:39Did you ever read a book by Kurt Vonnegut called Harrison Bergeron? I beg you to read it. It's a short story. You can read it. And it explains to you that, you know, when the government comes in and tries to manipulate the situation so that everyone comes out equal, it doesn't work. Yeah. Let me do the transfer theorem. And it's just me. That's it. That's it. And the way we talk about government today is, you know, those who have a little bit more, those who have a little bit less. And if you look at that, the government comes in. I mean, why does that little five-year-old girl raised a mansion in Lake Michigan, Lake Forest and then there's this little girl in Cabrini Green, black mother.
21:51She's a red lady, that's how she... And she's just a five-year-old girl too.
22:01You know, I don't know how to answer that question, but then you come in and say, we must do something. And I look at the situation there, and so the government comes in and says, Sias, Piketty, Sanchaeva, Sucman, all these, we've got to redress iniquity. Yeah. I feel the same. I mean, it's not fair. But let's go to their redressing. What they do and what they propose is that you come in and take from those who have a little bit more and give to those who have a little bit less. I mean, it's obviously. But, you know, when you think about it for a second, let me, if I can, with you, go through this mathematics, although I'll describe it verbally to you.
23:00If you take from those who have a little bit more and give to those who have a little bit less, by taking from those who have a little bit more, you reduce their incentives to produce. And they will produce a little bit less. Any questions on that? Nope. By giving to those who have a little bit less, you provide them with an alternative source of income other than working. and they too will produce a little bit less. Whenever you redistribute income, you always reduce total income. This is not a pig. I could give a damn what you're saying. This is about facts, not how you feed. You follow me? It's a math theorem.
23:56The theorem is very simply, whenever you redistribute income, you always reduce total income. Always. Now, the lemma from this theorem is fairly beautiful. You know it's a math theorem that I'm doing. This is the way I describe it to my students before I get up there and do the math. All right? The lemma from this theorem is also pretty obvious. I'm not going to prove it to you, but I'll say it to you, and I think you'll understand it. it's very clear that the more you redistribute, the greater will be the loss in totally. Yeah. You with me? Mm-hmm. The one I want to go through with you, because I wish Bernie Sanders, I wish you were Bernie Sanders, or Elizabeth Warren, or AOC, or Wedgwood-Ben, or McKinnick, or any of these people.
24:47Dower, Gordon Brown, I wish you were. Yeah. Our fellow. you take a 23andme and we're very closely related to him, if you know what I mean. The limit function of this theorem is delicious beyond belief. It's got that spicy piquant flavor. Your nose runs a little bit. You take a tissue. It's so wonderful. If we were able to redistribute it all in so that everyone is exactly the same. There will be no income whatsoever. Let me prove this to you verbally, but it's man. To get everyone to come at exactly the same, what do you have to do? What you have to do is you have to tax everyone who makes above the average income 100 % of the excess.
25:49Yeah. And you have to subsidize everyone below the average income 100 % up to the average income. Yeah. Now, if you actually did that, if you actually taxed everyone above the average income 100 % of the excess, and you actually subsidized everyone below the average income up to the average income, I will stipulate you late today, counselor, that we'll all be equal at zero income. Yeah. Now, you understand the transfer theorem. I don't give a goddamn if you're a tall, skinny professor at Harvard, little short, fat one at MTSU or whatever the hell the university's name is. This is math, not how you feel.
26:33Yeah. And all the libs, all the conservatives, it's true. It's provable. It's a theorem for God's sakes. Now, take a deep breath. Exhale slowly. Get a little brown paper back. You say, how do you help the poor? How do you do it? I'm going to take you back to my book two years ago, two and a half years ago, called Taxes Have Consequences. Oh, God. I use all the data. From the Institute of Inequality at Harvard. Yeah. Even these super lefties. You know the ones I'm talking about. And I go to the income tax of the U.S. Forget U.S. centric. Yeah. I can't help myself. I mean, it's my double helix. Yeah.
27:36And I go back to the income tax, which was put in the U.S., progressive income tax.
27:48You know that little girl in Cabrini-Green? Yeah. Does she deserve to live that life? Some little girl in Kentucky, coal mine in Kentucky, and she's living there. Her mom and dad are toothless. they take meth. The little girl cries every night. She has a torn dress. What's she done to deserve and yet the little one in Lake Forest, Illinois living in the mansion there, her little birthday parties have all of me. So what I did is I got every single tax return. We have every one of them. This is not a sampling issue. This is how it actually plays out. In 1913, the income tax started. We passed the 16th Amendment to the U.S.
28:41Constitution, which allowed a progressive income tax. 1913, when Woodrow Wilson was president, the first year of the income tax was only two months. It was November to 17.
28:58We're going to redistribute it. Yeah. Now, the first one was only two months. The progressive income tax applied to only 358 ,000 individuals. That was at a total adult population of 62. So we tell you a group of people, paid a progressive income tax and was less than hit for 1%. And the income tax went from 0 to 7%.
29:36And that income tax that was put in lasted for 3 years, 1913, 1914, 1915. Yeah. And
29:51a new tool. And they took that income tax. They ran from zero to 7%. They ran it up. We're in 1917. It started in 13. Now we're into 1917. The highest marginal income tax is about 77%. Four years. The number of people required to file went from 350 to 6 million. But now we had needs. Yeah. No, we did. We had the pandemic of 1917. You guys started it all, but we came in to join you World War I. Yeah. We did. We had great need. We defeated the pandemic. We defeated the Kaiser Wilhelms force. We defeated them all. We did. Our president, Woodrow Wilson, thank you for providing us with these resources to do this job.
Read the full transcript
31:07We're going to reward you. I'm going to give you a little bonus. We're going to cut that tax rate from 77%. to 73%. You're welcome. That's what we did. So from 1919, 1920, and 1921, the highest marginal income tax rate was 73%. Yeah. We got a big battle going on politically. The haves versus... Woodrow Wilson's hand-picked candidate It was a guy named from Ohio, my home state. He was the governor of Ohio. And he chose his running mate, who was the number two at the Department of Defense, named Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was the vice president of the Democratic Party. And the Republicans picked this guy named Warren G.
32:20Hart. And he picked his running mate, Calvin Coolidge. They ran on a return to normalcy. Now, Cox and Roosevelt ran on keeping the tax rates high and paying off the wartime debt. Harding and Coolidge ran on cutting tax rates, a return to normalcy, cutting those tax rates back to where they were pre-war, pre-pandemic. The biggest election in U.S. history, the Republicans won, were just... Yeah. They just wiped the floor with Cox and Roosevelt, and they were able to reduce the highest tax rate from 73 % to 25%. Now, that took them a couple of years. the biggest post-World War I depression crash at Seoul, they got that tax rate down to 25%.
33:15What happened? Tax receipts up. Oh, no, but it was called the Roaring Twenties. We had the greatest period of prosperity in this history. We had 11 years of sewer surpluses. The price actually declined. What did the Brits do? What did the Germans do? What did the froggy froggy French do? They did it the other way. They just kept the tax rates from World War I. And you had the worst depression collapse ever. But we had the greatest boom of all time. Yeah, but you also had the Great Depression in 2019, right? No, no. I'm taking a walking step. Okay. Please let me do that. Okay, so this isn't your usual ad read.
34:05We've just partnered with Hunch, an AI job finding platform that I believe in so much, I've actually invested in it. If you've ever listened to Jimmy's Jobs and thought, I'd love to work with those guests, now you can. Whether it's the UK government, Google, Amazon or the BBC, Hunch makes it easy to discover and apply for roles at companies like those. And here's the kicker. We'll be hiring through Hunch soon too. So if you download it, you might even end up working with us. Honestly, for our listeners, this feels like the perfect fit. Just visit askhunch.com to learn more. Back to the episode.
34:44Also the depression of 2019, right? No, no. Taking a walking step by step. Please let me do that. Because you've got to learn from history. You must. We have all the tax returns. Every one of them. we know the last guy in the top 1%. We know the first guy in the bottom 99%. I'm sorry, I'm Monsieur Piketty, I'm Monsieur Saez, I want to tell you how to redistribute wealth taxes and all this stuff. So in 1929, we felt really sorry for the funders. So they proposed something called the Smoot-Haldi Tariff. All right? They had the Smoot-Hawley tariff and came in and they wanted to do it there. And just a little tariff, but 1928-29, this movement of the tariff gained force, power.
35:45It got adherence all over the place in both parties. And it was the largest single tax increase on traded products in history. Really a big deal. It passed the House and the Senate in the fourth quarter of 1920. The market went from the high of all-time highs. It dropped 35 % in one quarter. It's a market crash. The bill passed both House and Senate. It went to the president, Herbert Hoover. He signed it into law on June 30th, 19...
36:27were in massive crash. The market fell to where it was 83 % of its previous high. The unemployment rate went up to as high as 20%, 25%. And what did this rocket surgeon do? We need to solidify the finances. So Ray raised the highest tax rate from 25 % to 63%. on January 1st, 1932. He lost the election. The market crashed. The unemployment rate went as high as 25%. It was downed. He lost the election to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who then came into office by a landslide, by the way. He came into law office in March of 1933. First thing he did was the Bank Holiday Act. And I'll just take you through a moment.
37:27First thing he did was he confiscated all the gold in the US, illegal to own gold. Took in all the currency, all the thing, and put in paper money that time. He confiscated the gold at$20.67 an ounce in March. Six months later, in September, he devalued the dollar to$35 an ounce. It was the biggest wealth tax in US history ever. And God, we went over the cliff again, way down. You know, it was incredibly devalued the dollar, devalued the currency abroad. He then, he didn't raise taxes quite yet, but in 1937 he did. He raised the highest marginal income tax rate from 63%, which is where Hoover put it.
38:22And he raised it to 79%. We put in the Social Security tax. The crash went way down again. Yeah. And then they decided to postpone the second and the third increase in the payroll tax for Social Security. They didn't stop the income tax. They kept raising it until 1944. The highest marginal income tax rate was 94%. Every dollar you earned will let you keep six cents. Now, let me take you on through. We won the war. We had tax cuts. Robert Tapp, who used to stay in my family's home, Senator Fong, Mr. Republican, Mr. Tax Cut. He kept trying to pass these bills in the House and the Senate tax cut.
39:06Harry Truman vetoed him, vetoed him, vetoed three of them. Finally, the House and the Senate overrode his veto and dropped the highest tax rate from 94 % to 82%. We had a boom. And then we created another war. It was called the Korean War. And then we raised the tax rates back up. Oh, we need to raise money. We raised up the 91%. Eisenhower came into office. Eisenhower kept it at 91 % for the full eight years of that crappy economy. And then we finally got John F. Kennedy. John F. Kennedy cut the highest tax rate in America from 91 % to 70%. The lowest rate from 20 % to 14%. He cut the corporate tax from 52 % to 48%.
39:56He tried to cut it for 46%. Thank God for Barry Goldwater. Bob Dole, they kept it from going down because we need a sound budget and low deficits. That's what he did. We had the go-go 60s. We had this boom because of... We had a balanced budget, no inflation. And then think that Johnson, Nixon, Ford, and car, the largest assemblage of bipartisan ignorance ever put on planet Earth, wage and price controls, devaluation, they raised the 10 % import tax surcharge, the worst 16 years of prison. And then, and you'll start recognizing this world, And then the skies cleared. The sun shone forth on the earth.
40:53The fields turned green. The trees blossomed and bore fruit. The animals, they multiplied. The orphans were adopted. The enemies, remember, we got Ronald Reagan. Now, let me take you through Ronald Reagan a little bit, would you? If you forgive me. We cut the highest marginal income tax rate. from 70 % to 28%. Is that okay? He's a right-wing freak. Cut the highest tax. He actually let people earn money from 70 % to 28%. We raised the lowest rate from 12.5 % to 15%. We went from 14 tax brackets to two tax brackets. We cut the corporate rate from 46 % to 34%. How irresponsible. This creepy doesn't even understand.
42:02He said his elevator didn't go to the top floor. Do you know that Reagan was a racist, a fascist, a sexist? I mean, he was just, he was, he read lines that other people wrote. He was just an actor. He did that. We got rid of all the deductions, exemptions, and exclusions in the 86th Act. We dropped the lowest, the highest rate to 28%. We got rid of all these. Do you know what the vote was for the 86th Act? No. In the Senate. Bear passed. You see what I'm just describing what we actually did. How would that do today? No one would vote for it. Yeah. That day in the Senate vote for the 86 tax act was really close.
42:58Ninety seven to three. There were three senators who voted against it. Paul Simon of Illinois, that little guy with the bow tie, dumb as a stump. Trump, Levin of Michigan, I mean, creepy, creepy creep. Merkula of Montana. Those were the only three who voted against it. Tall and Pink, Bill Bradley. Yeah. He voted for it. Joe Biden. He voted for it. Teddy Kennedy. He voted for it. My dear friend, man I worked with, one of my heroes, Al Gore, he voted for it. He said it was the best bill in economics he'd ever voted for. And what happened? Got this renaissance, renaissance, this Reagan boom of incredible proportions from January 1st, 83 to June 30th, 84.
43:49U.S. real GDP grew by 12%, 8 % per annum compounded. That's Chinese growth rates. Now, I'm now coming back to you full tilt. This is my book called Taxes Have Consequences. It is the entire history of the U.S. income tax. It's all there, young man. Now, let me take you through a couple of lessons to your redistributions. Now, I'm taking you full circle. I'm bringing you back now to the beginning of our conversation. What happened? You saw we have tax rates going up, down, up, down, move, move, deduction. I mean, every single thing that possibly could happen happened. Yeah. We have data on every one of those.
44:38Every single time we've raised the highest marginal income tax rate, three things have occurred. The economy has underperformed. Tax revenues from the rich have gone down, not up. Poor. Heard. Every single time we've cut tax rates on the rich, every single time. I've gone through them all with you. Every single time we've cut tax rates to the rich, the economy is way outperformed. Tax revenues from the top 1 % of income earners have gone way up and the poor have done well. Now, I have just taken you through two things. I've taken you through an explanation of economics with the transfer theory.
45:31You now know the logic underlying this And I've then taken you through all of the data What the hell more do you want from me? It is correct logically And it comports perfectly with the data Give me science, come on, have a date Let you and I have a debate We'll do it at Claridge's there Make it for three hours with this dumb son of a gun I'm using his data Now, it is true that if you raise tax rates, income inequality goes down. Why? Income inequality does go down. The transfer theorem tells you it'll go down. Everyone's going to be poorer, but the rich are going to be poorer faster than the poorer can be poor until you finally get equality where everyone is equally poor.
46:19That is exactly what these creepazoids are teaching us. And they're all wrong. and you've just understood everything about income inequality and I dare you to go the opposite direction. Gordon Brown, how did he do in your country? Not well. No, thank you. And unfortunately... But do you think America, like historically, when you paint all that picture through, like it seems like you would almost think that America is historically a high-tax country. But it is. Right, okay. We have tried every damn socialist thing there is. And we tried the others. And you know, unfortunately, we get to choose our presidents.
47:00Yeah. You can imagine if we were Britain, we would have Nancy Pelosi as our president.
47:09God, talk about the nightmare on Elm Street. But what, because your new book, right? Written with some great people. Are you having fun? Oh yeah, well, I am enjoying the history lesson part. But this is what economics is all about, incentives. If you tax people to work and you pay people that don't work, don't be surprised if you'll find a lot of people not working. So I actually think your whole thing about the book is incentives matter, right? But that's it. That's all it is. But we don't actually talk about that enough. I talk about it all here. I know. But Sam Altman also has this great phrase about incentives are a superpower.
47:48He wants a virtuous signal. I love the poor so much. I want to make everyone poor. No. There's nothing wrong with being rich. Everyone wants... How many people in this silly country of yours buy lottery tickets? Yeah. Why do they buy a lottery ticket? Because they want to be rich. Everyone wants to be rich. Let's let them be rich. There's nothing wrong with being rich. There's something desperately wrong with being poor. Let's give the poor a chance to become rich. Please. I agree. Stop already. The aspirational class. I think Britain is at its best when its prime ministers are in tune with aspiration.
48:25You're the home of the Industrial Revolution. Capitalism is born here. And now you're the example of virtuous signaling in poverty. Help. My job here. I'm a Yank. All right. Forgive me. That's where I was born. You know my background. You ask my background. I told you my background. All that. do I have anything in my repertoire that could help you make better decisions over here? If not, I'll go home. No, look it, I'll go home. I love you dearly. I really do love you. And I enjoy Britain very much. And I look at Britain and I start crying. And I sit there and I look at it like Bobby Kennedy. I look at what's going on and I ask why.
49:10And I imagine what could happen and I ask, why not? We're at our highest tax rates for years and years. But you don't learn. You know, John F. Kennedy put it so beautifully that no American's ever made better off by pulling a fellow American down. And we're all made better off whenever any one of us is made better off. A rising tide raises all boats. There's nothing wrong with rich people. There is something very wrong with poor people. They're poor. So what do you want to do? You want to do a tax code that comports with the wishes and dreams of every Brit. You don't want to make it rich versus poor.
49:50You don't want to make it black versus white, old versus young, male versus female. You don't want to do all that stuff. You're all in the same tub together. If your tax code is not agreeable to rich people, it's a bad tax code. If your tax code is not agreeable to poor people, it's a bad tax code. If you make 10 times as much as I do, you should pay 10 times as much in taxes, not a thousand times. And if you do a thousand times, you got me going. And look it, I'm richer than you are. I can shelter my income. I can change the location of my income. I can change the timing of my income. I can change the composition of my income.
50:37I can change the volume of my income. I have the means to hire the lawyers, the accountants, the deferred income specialists, the favor. I can buy more politicians. So when you get these people who are anti-rich, they're really anti-IQs. The rich are what we all want to be. And the dream is to have a low rate, broad-based flat tax, spending restraint, sound money, Minimal regulations, free trade, and then get the hell out of the way and let the poor people become rich. Please. Why did Reagan get this more than anyone else? He didn't at first. He learned. I've known Reagan since he was a young man.
51:18Joking. My God, the reason I was so close to Reagan, again, goes back to the beginning of our conversation. I'm privileged. My godfather happened to be Ronald Reagan's best friend, a man named Justin. And I tell everyone the reason I was chosen by Reagan is he had a big stage full of economists. And he said, I'll take the little short fat one over there. That's not true. I got my job because of privilege. It's so much nicer getting that job with privilege than actually. But I was involved with my first publication was in the first economic report of the governor of the state of California, when he was the single worst governor the U.S.
51:56had ever had. he raised the income tax rate from nine percent to 11 and a half he raised the corporate rate he and he learned from his mistakes i used to talk to him afterwards you know sir when you were governor arthur i know i was not a good governor but at least i was better than those other damn governors at least i learned from my mistakes they didn't even love and so this man evolved he was not born in a manger by god's light shining down on him he was a normal human being and a very wonderful, lovely one. And he learned to read his Reagan in his own hand, how he learned from him. He said, I did this and it didn't work.
52:36I did that and it didn't work. He was head of a union that had called the most vicious nationwide strikes ever. He understood what it was like to be a union leader and do the wrong thing. So that when the air traffic controllers struck against the people of America, he fired them. But you know something? Did you know that they were the only that endorsed him in the primary? Or did you know that they were the only union that endorsed him in the general election? Yet in spite of that, he let logic run his emotions. And he said, look, I love you guys. Thank you for endorsing me. I do. But this is the wrong thing to do.
53:17And if you don't come back to work, I'm firing you. That's what a great man does. That's what a Donald Trump does. Donald Trump isn't the pollster in chief. He's the CEO of the U.S. If you think everyone in the White House loves him, you're crazy. Not many people like CEOs. He doesn't ask his staff, what should I do? He tells his staff what we're going to do. And then he says, get it done. Let's talk about Trump, right? Let's talk about Trump. Because he's the modern, you know, it's incredible. He's the modern Ronald Reagan. Only it's a different style. But that's all. But how is his style different?
54:00Well, he's gruff. I mean, Reagan, all of them get angry at me, of course, because I'm prodding them all. You can tell who I am now. You've learned who I am now, unfortunately. You'll never invite me back. But when Ronald Reagan would get angry at me, he said, Arthur. Arthur? Reagan throws sandwiches against walls. Reagan, you hear his patois, his feet, just a different style. Yeah. Same man. Now, everyone in the Reagan kitchen cabin, including my godfather, was Donald Trump. Yeah. But Ronald Reagan was a gentleman. Ronald Reagan is, Donald Trump is also a gentleman. He's a very elegant man. And if you were in the Oval Office today, the redecoration he's done is phenomenal.
54:49It's really class. He's from a long line of very successful people, privileged people, and very much my background, Scott's Irish and German. We all went to the same prep school, the same Ivy League. I went to a couple better than any of them. And if you look at it, he's got class, he's got dignity, he's funny as hell. And he's got a vision of what he thinks the world should look like correctly. So and so did Reagan. And they both were very are very successful at it. But you're free markets here. And then we've got. Just let me say I believe in incentives. I don't believe in free markets and cops.
55:34I'm sorry. OK. I just don't. I think there are certain areas that government really is important. and that we need to make sure that we comport ourselves in a way that's compatible with good incentives. I do believe in punishing criminals. I do believe in rewarding people who do good things. I really am very incentive-based. Most of good incentives is free market, but not all of it. I believe in a strong peace through strength. What is peace through strength? Having the strongest defense in the world so you beat the living hell out of the bad actors yeah if you have to and peace is if you decide not to be a bad actor by the way let's make a lot of money together come on let's do business what do you think he's doing in ukraine and russia what do you think he did in gaza i get that it's more the tariff that's not free market no of course not that's that's insane i'm beginning to remember americans definition of free market is slightly a different, just like...
56:34Okay, then I maybe... No, no, no, but I'd say, but just on the tariff side, right? Let's do the tariffs. Like, because you are supportive of Trump, et cetera, so I would just, yeah. I know that... I had this question before. He called me in 19... in 2019. And I've known him for a long time. Not really well, but I've known him and he knows who I am and I all the way back. And he called me in 2019. He said, Arthur, I want you to know I'm a free trader. And I said, you know, I understand that. Anyone who is a CEO of an international company is a free trader. I mean, that's their nature. They hate governments, tariffs, blah, blah, blah.
57:24I then made a comment. I said, and also anyone who imports two foreign wives has to be a free trader. He did not laugh, by the way. And he said, I am a free trader. And I said, I agree. I know that. He said, look, when I look at this world, and it's what he calls reciprocity, the U.S. was very, very nice with all these foreign countries after the war. We were not damaged like they were, whether they be combatants on our side or against us. We tried to rebuild it. We gave them all sorts of leeway on tariffs and quotas to protect domestic industries when they were first starting out and they never removed them.
58:05So when you look at the world today, the way it's evolved, all of these countries have way more tariffs against us, way more non-tariff barriers against us than we do against them. Of the large countries, we're the freest trade, large country. Now you may have the island and in Jersey Guernsey and Sark and maybe Monaco and Hong call it, but of the biggies. We are by far the freest trade country. They've got all these barriers against us. And those barriers hurt them as well as us. This is him speaking to me. They hurt themselves as much as us. And he said, you know, all they care about these people, all they care about is access to our markets.
58:43They're mercantilists. I mean, David Ricardo would be screaming about these horrible people doing all this stuff. how do I bring them to the table to negotiate free trade? Then he went on the second two points. Now, you see the reciprocity is different than the Adam Smith argument. There are two other aspects that are different. He said, you know, the Smoot-Hawley tariff took five years to pass and took a century to get rid of. I mean, it was just very cumbersome, inflexible type of democracy at work. Now we have executive orders where we can flex. I can have a tariff on you, remove it tomorrow afternoon, double it.
59:23It's a very flexible system as opposed to a very rigid system. That's a huge difference between now and back then. And the last thing is that this is a very Trumpy thing, is that it's true. There are no winners in the trade war. That's very true. but the losses aren't equal in a trade war. You know, take the U.S. and Puerto Rico is the only two countries in the world. The U.S. is 99 % of the world. Puerto Rico is 1%. If you put on tariffs and quotas, Puerto Rico's heard a lot more than the U.S. is. So there's leverage. This is leverage in them. Okay. So he says to me, he said, look, these guys, all they care about is having access to our markets and denying us the right to sell in their markets.
1:00:12They use political things all the way through on their protection, but they want to access to our... So I'm going to scare the hell out of them, Arthur. 50%, 100%, 200 % tariffs and bring them to the table and force them to negotiate free or trade deals with us. Oh, excuse me. I didn't hear what you said earlier when we brought into this discussion. Now, again, that's the explanation. Let's look at the data. He had his first term, four years. There were five major trade deals done. The USMCA, Japan, South Korea, Brazil, and Colombia. Those were the five deals done. Did tariffs go up or down on those five deals?
1:00:58Every single one of them went down. Each one of those was freer trade than it had been prior to that. Look at what the man does, not what he says. you know, I'm going to tell you about Donald Trump on a personal level. Don't take him literally, but do take him seriously. Don't. When he was at the G7, Ottawa, with the baby Trudeau, Justin Trudeau, I can't stand him either. I didn't like his father either. Pierre was the worst. But when he was there, he had to leave early to go to Singapore to meet with Kim Jong-un. Kim Jong-un has that button. Who likes nuclear war? I'm looking for someone who wants to see this Linda Ronstadt's statement.
1:01:49Who likes nuclear war? No one. So he said, no one likes nuclear war. I've got to go to Singapore to meet with this man to lower the temperature and you want me to go and I need to go. But before I leave early, and I'm sorry, I have to leave early to do this. Before I leave early, I look at the six of you. The U.S. is, this is well documented, by the way. I'm looking at the six of you, the rest of the GCEP. The U.S. is prepared right as of now to get rid of all tariffs, all quotas and non-tariff barriers if you are.
1:02:21get the shoes no you know this man is the freest trade president this is me speaking now i'm not putting words in his mouth if you want to hear what he says about himself or about me he'll he'll tell you all sorts of trash about me but the truth of this i think this man uses trade to negotiate to get peace and free trade and i think he's the best free trader ever Okay. What incentives matter? Totally. What incentivizes, in your experience, presidents and politicians? Well, there are two types of presidents. There are those which we started off with, and my people. You know, I'm not a typical academic.
1:03:01When I went at the University of Chicago, my mother came over and said to me, Arthur, do you actually socialize with these people? and i you know i remember my son coming up there one time was around halloween he said look at all the people dressed for halloween that was normal garb at the time so i'm a very different person in the academic and that's why you'll find a lot of my people the other my colleagues and i was in class of a long got better grades than they did yeah but you i know all of these people from my classes and george akaroff was in my class at yale he's married to jan and i and i got my fastest promotion to tenure at Chicago, if anyone.
1:03:40So a professor, so I'm in that community, but it is a very different cultural community than mine. And they have used their academic career to advance themselves. I use my academic career because I love economics. And it's a totally, this is takes us back to what do you, how do you teach your children to live with wealth as opposed to create wealth. And this is my calling is he had the privilege of doing whatever he wanted to do. I got all the great job offers from Goldman's, Morgan's, all of those because in the MBA and then I went over and got my PhD. I wanted to become a PhD because I love, love, love academics.
1:04:25I read physics, nonstop math, biology, geology, linguistics. I mean, And it just, I'm in love with, not because I want to use it as a tool to control your lives, because I want to understand it. It's the old one, Zion forgot. I mean, stand in awe of this. Look at your studio here. How in that? How in that? You know, it's the most amazing, wonderful thing. I didn't do it because I want to change something. I want to use it as a tool. I wanted to understand the universe, to understand physics, to understand biology. Just a, my Lord, it's awesome, dude. It is. Now, my colleagues, they wanted it to advance their careers.
1:05:09They wanted to push them out instead of getting things in. I've got Paul Krugman couldn't start a business if he had to. The only way he can take control of an economy is by stealing it through his training to run this thing. He is an iterative. Now, it is true. If some guy has a green thing hanging out of his ear and plops down on the floor and the last 7 ,000 of them died from that green thing, okay, okay. I will agree to using a tool to cut that off. Maybe we can say, but my motto in life is primum non nocere. First of all, do no harm. And second one is vis medicatrix natura, which is the healing power of nature.
1:05:54When we were in there with Reagan, don't just stand there, undo something. Don't do something. Do you see the difference between me and them? They want to get their stinking hands in there and try to control things. Use re-interest. Get your hands up. Their money should be private, just the way it was prior to 1913. We don't need nationalized currencies. That's why we have all these cryptos. It's because government-run currencies don't work. My job is, Viz, and Metacatrix, and Natura, get the government out of money. Get the government out of trying to control every person's hand and redistribute all the income.
1:06:36They're totally incompetent at that. Milton put it very beautifully. if the government took over the Sahara Desert, within five years, there'd be a shortage of sand. You know, and the truth is government is good at doing some things that it should do. And then stop already. That's this book. You can see it here in your own country. You see the meddlers, you see Gordon Brown, you see Neil Kinnick, you see Wedgwood Bend, you see all these guys, they want to get rid of all private schools. Hello. They want to control everything in your life, your toilets and your little thaw showers. I mean, you know, everything's illegal in Massachusetts.
1:07:19No, that's not how you run the world. You know, I'm different now from every other economist. You've just learned what Arthur Laffer and Laffer economics is. Yeah. Now, you may like it yeah i may not like it but you know i ain't gonna change for you not today not tomorrow not never but i do i think you touched on something there which is interesting that even sort of free marketer liberal politicians once they're in government and they have all the levers in front of them it's human nature to want to interview more now you hit the last button of mine my personal life. I was in the Nixon White House.
1:07:58George Shultz asked me to go. I didn't want to. I had a great academic career, but I went there. I had a martini for God's sake. Never had one. Never will have one again. He waved the flag. Okay, sir, I'll do the job. I was the first chief economist in the White House at 29. All right. And I was the highest ranked economist in the White House when I was 30. I was the first American to go to China in 1970 with George Schultz and John Ehrlichman on Air Force Two. They bought suits. I was doing the stuff. I was in charge of the Vietnam. And I told you about the Nixon speech. If you only change two words, mom is, and change it to is not to is, but other than that, mom, that's true.
1:08:42And I made a vow back then that I would never take a penny from any public official. So Nixon, I mean, Reagan and Trump have all asked me to do very, I don't work for government. And why don't I? Because, you know, when you work for someone, quite correctly, you have an oath of loyalty. They pay you and you serve them. That's the right way to be. And I did never wanted to be in that situation ever again. I never took a job with Reagan. I never took a job with Thatcher. I never took a job with Trump. I never took a job with Sergio de Castro, Rolf Luters, Pinochet. I never took a job with any of these other kind of reporter, any of the ones I've done the things to the states.
1:09:26I do not take money from politicians. And why do I do that? So I can be honest. I look at these people and Janet Yellen's the one I use right now, but these academic economists who I know very, very well, they will rebut arguments. they know to be true in order to curry favors with their political benefactors. I don't want to do that. When I go into Donald Trump and we talk, I tell him what I actually think is correct and what I think is supportable. I'm not the president. I say to him what I just said to you early. Look, sir, I'm here to help you make better decisions. I'm not here to make decisions.
1:10:11I'm not here to lobby for a decision or any of that. I have a body of historical experience that may be useful to you to make a better decision. And that's what I'm here for. And please, would you please kindly not tell me what you're thinking? You don't want to know what you think is right and wrong. Because then I go outside and some reporter asks me, I don't want to lie to the reporter. I don't want to know. I want to say, I don't actually know what Donald Trump thinks about this or what he does. here's his telephone you call him and see what he says to you he's shy not shy shy believe me nor was reagan and that's my view is that's my role in life and this is my final question because i know you've got to go but but what what's the what's the best most interesting question that donald trump has asked of you uh because he he learns by asking questions no no no he does ask questions but not until we've gotten way down uh for example i i was talking about medical transparency you know we have a system there you go into a hospital in the u.s and what does it cost to get a cat skin you have no idea the doctor has no i know it does just doctor wants to see one i said you know it's like going to your building site with a truck full of materials in the back what do you got i don't know what's in breaks maybe it's important i don't know what it is Is it any good?
1:11:34Don't ask me. I'm not sure. I don't know if they're any good. Do you want to buy it? Well, what's it cost? I don't know that either. Sorry, I got that. Do you want to buy it or not? Are you going to sign the line or not? That's our healthcare system. We don't know what it is we've got. We don't know how much it costs, but you've got your insurance card. And it's the stupidest, worst thing in the world. So I'm going through this example. By the time I left the office, He had just done the executive order for price care transparency. He gives me all credit for it. I got a Larry Van Horn in there.
1:12:07He writer of the Department of Health. That's Donald Trump's CEO. Now, did he ask me about the health care system? Oh, I studied the health care system. I know it. And I would describe it to him. I had been chairman of the board of Centennial Hospital for three years, which is the flagship for HCA. It's one of the top four or five in the US. I mean, it's really amazing. I know all the, there's some of those doctors you don't want to be your doctors, but you don't know the information. And they go, man, it's wonderful. No, he's got a statistical record. You know, we need transparency in healthcare.
1:12:45And so this is Donald Trump. I go in there, 501c3s, universities. universities. Why should contribution to Harvard be tax exempt? Why should their earnings be tax exempt? They shouldn't be. Why shouldn't merit pay be there for merit pay for teachers? Why shouldn't good teachers get paid more than bad teachers? Please help me. Why shouldn't student, I mean, I would vote for vouchers. I would. But it's not the right thing to do. What you want to do is reward excellence, whether it's public or private. All those kids in the top 5 % of the SAT scores, give them$15 ,000 tax-free, no questions asked.
1:13:27Second 5%, give them$7 ,500. Let's run. Believe me how this word, you come to your dad, dad, I missed the top 5 % by just one kid. Get over here, son. Grandma, teach him. You want to incentivize the system to get the rewards you like politicians. Politicians are going to die rich. Get used to it. Get used to it. What you want them to do is they're going to die rich. Let's get them rich by doing the right thing rather than the wrong thing. Put them uncommissioned. If the economy grows at 3 % per annum, you get your pay. Grows at 4 % per annum, double your pay. 5 % per annum, triple your pay. 2%, no pay.
1:14:121%, you owe us the money. You would have been paid. They'll never vote the stupid way they vote now. Make it so that their votes have, you know, when they vote, they don't bear the consequences of their own actions. Now, I use that illustratively with you, but you know what I'm saying? Yeah, yeah. You know, and they should be allowed to do. Billy Weld, governor of Massachusetts, this one staffer found something that did it, that saved the state. Like$20 million, he gave her a$10 ,000 bonus and the courts required him to applaud back because that was illegal in Massachusetts to give a bonus to a public employee.
1:14:49Help me. Help me. You've got to do this in Britain. You need to resurrect your society. And if you don't, all your kids are going to die of bloody poverty. If not now, when? If not you, who? Jimmy. Jimmy, it's your job to do it. No, you giggle and laugh. But you see all those kids out there in this city? You're responsible for them. And this is not a joke. I've tried to make it humorous and educational with you. But it's not a joke. You have a moral obligation from God on above to make this life a better life for them. You can't virtue signal all the, oh, I love the poor so much. I want to make everyone poor.
1:15:29That's what they're saying to you. Get those people out of here and get someone in there who can show a little guts, a little Everyone knows That you'll have to lower taxes in Britain Everyone knows that Everyone knows you need deregulation Everyone knows you need freer trade Everyone knows you just need to sound the pound The pound is so bad They're going to call it the ounce You know all those problems Do something about it now Dr. Arfala Thank you, sir Thank you very much for coming on Jimmy's Jobs of the Future Brilliant We'll talk for hours more Well, I hope it may Is this what you wanted from me?
1:16:03Yes, it's very interesting Okay Although we didn't talk about AI and crypto. We don't. You know where AI and crypto are in my script. They're private markets trying to take care of government problems.
1:16:29The most memorable gifts aren't found. They're made. Zazzle is a custom marketplace where you pick any product, a mug, a card, a tote, a phone case, and make it personal, a photo, a name, an inside joke, the kind of gift that actually fits the person. That's what 30 million customers have been coming back to Zazzle for over 20 years to find. Right now, save 25 % on your first order at Zazzle.com. That's Zazzle.com. Make it z-amazing. Hey, it's Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. Well, now I was looking for fun ways to tell you that Mint's offer of unlimited premium wireless for$15 a month is back.
1:17:08So I thought it would be fun if we made$15 bills. But it turns out that's very illegal. So there goes my big idea for the commercial. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three months,$90 for six months, or$180 for 12-month plan required. $15 per month equivalent. Taxes and fees extra. Initial plan term only. Greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. See terms. There are two types of business owners, those who are busy and those who want to be busy. Toast is designed for both, with tools to keep you humming and help turn grind into growth. That's how you turn busy into business.
1:17:43Toast, built for busy.
From the publisher
Want your own Brand or Business Podcast? Try out our NEW Podcast Calculator: https://www.boxlight.io/
Rethinking Education, Wealth, and Future Innovation with Dr Arthur Laffer
In this thought-provoking episode, Jimmy sits down with Dr Arthur Laffer for an in-depth discussion about simplifying economic models and the implications of tax rates on revenue.
They explore the evolving importance of human intellect amidst advancing technology, the contrasts between acquiring and managing wealth, and the role of transaction costs in society.
This is one of Art’s most punch interviews to date, reflecting on the challenges of raising privileged children, the dynamics of national and economic policies across different eras, and the fundamental principles of macroeconomics.
**********
Follow us on socials!
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jimmysjobs
Tiktok: https://www.tiktok.com/@jimmysjobsofthefuture
Twitter / X: https://www.twitter.com/JimmyM
Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jimmy-mcloughlin-obe/
Want to come on the show?
hello@jobsofthefuture.co
Sponsor the show or Partner with us:
sunny@jobsofthefuture.co
Credits:
Host / Exec Producer: Jimmy McLoughlin OBE
Producer: Sunny Winter https://www.linkedin.com/in/sunnywinter/
Junior Producer: Thuy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

