Buying Carve-outs for Future Exits

17 Jul 2023 · 55 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

M&A Science Podcast Episode Summary: Buying Carve-outs for Future Exits

Podcast Overview Title: M&A Science Host: Kison Patel Guest Speakers:

  • Joe Covey - Serial CEO and Acquirer
  • Matthew Davidge - Co-owner of NBC Affiliate WVNC

Episode Focus: The intricacies of buying carve-out businesses and the approach toward exit strategies.

Episode Highlights Key Concepts Discussed

  • Carve-outs: Divestitures of non-performing business units from larger corporations, often overlooked but valuable for prospective buyers.
  • Buy-side Strategies: Approaches for acquiring these carve-outs, emphasizing the importance of flexibility, speed, and due diligence.

Introductory Insights

  • Joe and Matthew share backgrounds that led to their partnership in buying businesses without external capital.
  • The discussion highlights the importance of maintaining ownership and profit-sharing directly from ventures.

Detailed Breakdown by Timestamps 00:00 - 06:43: Introduction

  • Discussion of corporate training plans offered through the M&A Science Academy.

06:43 - 10:35: Buy-side Carve-out Deals

  • Explanation of the process of purchasing non-performing business units and the opportunities they present for buyers.

10:35 - 19:05: Due Diligence Approach

  • Importance of a streamlined due diligence process. Joe and Matthew utilize a small, trusted team to expedite evaluations while ensuring thoroughness.

19:05 - 27:58: Unbinding a Company

  • Challenges faced during the separation of a business unit from a larger corporation, including Transition Services Agreements (TSA).

27:58 - 35:55: Challenges on Buy-Side Carve-outs

  • Difficulties in sourcing and identifying suitable targets. Persistence is key.

35:55 - 42:14: Collaboration with Investment Banks

  • Differences between proprietary deals and those run through investment banks. Insights into when to engage banks and how to manage the process effectively.

42:14 - 49:59: Lessons Learned

  • Key takeaways from their collective experiences in M&A, including the importance of realistic projections, timing of exits, and maintaining a positive reputation.

49:59 - 50:40: Closing Remarks

  • Final thoughts on the importance of being adaptable and maintaining ethical standards in M&A dealings.

Key Takeaways

  • Persistence is Crucial: Follow-up and maintaining relationships are essential in securing deals.
  • Speed and Flexibility Matter: The ability to close deals quickly gives buyers an edge over higher bidders.
  • Due Diligence: A compact team can facilitate faster decision-making while ensuring thorough evaluations.
  • Ethics in Transactions: Maintaining a good reputation is vital for future deals as relationships often carry over into new transactions.
  • Exit Strategy: Timing and preparedness for exit should be a priority from day one, with an internal timeline established.

Final Thoughts Joe and Matthew emphasize the importance of understanding the human element in M&A, the need for flexibility in approach, and the crucial role an experienced team plays in successful deal-making. Their combined experiences underline that while the mechanics of M&A can be technical, the relationships and strategic thinking are what drive successful outcomes.

For more insights and resources, listeners are encouraged to visit [M&A Science](https://www.masience.com).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Hello, M &A friends. If you're looking to improve your in-house training, we have corporate training plans provided through the M &A Science Academy. Give your team members access to the best-in-class courses, templates, and networking opportunities in the industry. Our academy was designed to lead practitioners with the how-to of M &A practices. If you're interested in learning more about individual or team plans, go to mascience.com slash academy. It's also a great way to show your support for M &A science. Again, that's mascience.com slash academy. On to the interview.

0:45I'm Kisan Patel, and you're listening to M &A Science, where we talk with deal professionals and learn valuable lessons from their experience. This podcast focuses on stories, strategies, and what actually happened during M &A deals.

1:09Hello, M &A scientists. Welcome to M &A Science, where we curate knowledge from the best in M &A to continuously improve. If you're interested in keeping up the latest from M &A Science, subscribe to our free newsletter at mascience.com. Every week we share highlights from our interviews, invitations to events, M &A role openings, and other resources as we build the greatest community of forward-thinking M &A practitioners. Again, that's mascience.com. I'm your host, Kisan Patel, CEO and founder of M &A Science. Joining me today is Joe Covey, a serial CEO and acquirer and investor since 1992. Also joining me today is Matthew Davidge, who's the co-owner of the NBC affiliate WVNC based out of Watertown, New York, and several other stations around the country.

1:59Today, we're going to talk about the buy side of carve-outs and exit lessons. Gentlemen, how are you doing? Thank you for joining me today. Thanks for having us. Good to be here. Can we kick off with some brief intros? I had run some venture-backed businesses for about 10 or 12 years. And when I met Matthew, I had this idea that we could buy a business together without outside capital, run that business, and eventually sell it. And we formed a partnership in 2008. My dad always worked for himself as an entrepreneur. He was always doing deals. I went in a different direction. and Bruce Banner. While I worked for Bane, which I did, and MTV for many years, which I did, I always wanted to burst out and be the Incredible Hulk.

2:41I was just looking for an opportunity. Joe and I knew each other and I got that chance. And so I burst out of the corporate scene, shed that skin and never looked back. This kind of played off of each other where Joe was like, hey, I want to buy a business. And then Matthew came up with an idea. Partially what prompted it is that I had sold some businesses that were venture backed and my venture backers made significant money and I made relatively little money. Of course, they deserve to be rewarded having written the checks, but I was doing a lot of work and what I thought was making relatively little money.

3:14And so I thought, let's do it on our own. And if we're successful, we're going to reap the benefits. And if we're not successful, we're going to feel it because we decided to do this with our own money without outside investors. At the time, I was working for a number of different companies in media. and Joe said to me, look, one of your clients has got to be interested in selling something. And I worked at MTV at the time. They had a bunch of businesses. I worked at EMI and I worked also as a consultant to Rainbow Media. I went around and said, are you selling any of these businesses? One of them said, yeah, we are actually.

3:47We're in process. And that's how Joe and I said, OK, let's go take a look. I like it. Fundamentally, very similar to a typical private equity firm in terms of buying the business, fixing the business, and selling the business. But you thought, hey, why do it for the institutions where the partners reap most of the benefit? Why not do it as principles ourselves? And that's where you sought out to find a business to acquire. That's right. But there are a lot of differences the way we do it. Because when we find a deal, first of all, we have to find a deal. We have to source it. Then we have to negotiate to buy the deal.

4:19Then we have to run the business. And then we eventually sell the business. It's not like we find a deal and we buy it and then hand it off to an integration team who hands it off to another team. We have to wear a lot of hats. Also, I think that on day one, Joe, we didn't quite know what scale deal we were going to do. When I was at Bain, I'd worked on a couple of billion dollar deals. And so Joe and I were pretty certain we're not going to do a billion dollar deal, but we could have done a 50 million dollar deal and we'd had to have gone out and raised a whole bunch of investment. That would have been a crowded room.

4:53And so ultimately, Joe and I decided that we would do something on our own, ourselves, with our capital, nobody else, no other decision maker, just you and me. We would own it and we'd sell that ship either to the shore or sink. And we decided in terms of scale and size to go for something in the$10 million range, not something enormous. Are you leveraging debt products, managing that way to do those deals? The best possible debt you can get is from the seller. And that's a model that we have followed. Sellers have different reasons to sell. But when they're very keen to sell and sales price maximization is not their goal, feed and certainty to close may be high on their mind.

5:40And at that point, you can persuade them to lend you the money that you need to buy their business from them. Okay. A lot of the deals are owner financed. Yes. As opposed to getting a third-party bank financed. Joe, you and I have done deals where it's seller financed, where the seller is a multi-billion dollar company. And we've also done seller financing when the seller is just an individual person that wants to sell their business. And in particular, with a large company, a multi-billion dollar company, and a purchase price that is not in the hundreds of millions of dollars, far less, doesn't make a difference.

6:14It doesn't move the needle in their world if they get paid over the next 12 months or 18 months or if they get paid at close. Very cool. It sounds like you guys have done a couple of these carve-out deals. Can we walk through maybe this first one we started talking about as an example? I often talk to the corporate side on the whole carve-out divestiture process, but I don't often get the story in the buy side and would like to understand what were the steps and challenges you ran across when you were going through the process from the buy side. One of the transactions, we started by engaging an investment banker who was in between jobs.

6:50And we said, here's a list of companies, big companies in the New York area. We'd like you to reach out to their corporate development decision makers and see if they have anything that they might consider divesting. It gave us a lot of credibility that he was reaching out. He had worked for a top tier grade A bank, whereas if it was just Matt and Joe reaching out, they might or might not probably wouldn't have taken the call. In that case, they were selling an asset which turned out to be what we call the wellness network. But they were TV channels in hospital. One is the newborn channel that almost every mom in the country has to watch.

7:24By law, they have to watch a show when they have a baby. And there are other shows about diapering and breastfeeding and things that moms have to watch. So it's a great business, but it was buried in the world of NBC in a division, and they wanted to sell that business. They had a process, and we were not the highest bidder in that process. Someone else bid more money. It was a private equity-backed company. So we were sent away. About 90 days later, Matthew, you decided to call up and see what happens. There were several people in the process. We bid what we thought was a fair but lower price.

7:54And they rightfully pursued it with somebody else. We kept checking the trades to see the announcement. Didn't come. On the 90th day, I said, Joe, we still haven't seen the announcement yet. let's send them a letter and tell them a little bit tongue-in-cheek let's tell them that we're self-financed we'll close in a week and we did send that letter and they did call us back the next day and they said we're not sure we can really talk to you because we're trying to close the transaction with somebody else so i don't we don't really think we can talk to you but of course because they were talking to us we knew that they would do something and so we said we'll close it in a week we'll close it in a week you gotta let us in and so what they did is they didn't say yes they went back to the other buyer and they said, look, you're taking too long.

8:38And if you're going to keep doing this and procrastinating, we're going to go with this other company. So they basically called their bluff and the other buyer said, sure, go off and do it then. And we did make the offer. They did engage with us and we did close. And they were like, what? And we did buy the business. Wow. I love that story. There's a good theme here, even from originating. This is the same deal where you asked around and basically found the opportunity. So there's just reaching out and being proactive that led you to identify the opportunity. And then even though you didn't pass it, you didn't give up on it.

9:12You had this level of persistence where you followed up, got a little window back in, and then ended up winning the deal. Of course, after we did that transaction, we then became a part of the patient ed business, which we were in for five years. We were a big player in that business. Very quickly, we came to meet and work with the party that we beat. It was bound to happen. And very quickly, we ended up meeting that guy. Joe, you remember the story. We laughed about it over a drink. And he said they were a competitor of ours and a private equity backed company. He said we were going a little too deep on the due diligence and NBC was frustrated.

9:46And so good for you guys for making it happen. So what was the advantage we had? The advantage was speed because they certainly, we don't know what they bid, Joe, but they certainly outbid us. But this company, NBC, just wanted to get rid of this division. Time was of the essence. You got quarterlies. The deal team needs to move on to something five times bigger. It's like, we can't be spending another four months doing this. And so speed and flexibility was what got us that deal. What's the key in your approach to doing diligence that allows you to do it? I feel like you're probably less bodies digging in, looking at things.

10:20Two bodies, Joe and me. Yeah, so is it more of a, hey, we got a slim down process. We're going to put the hours, we're going to touch base about our findings and make a decision. Were you acting on speed as just having a slimmed down diligence process or just less people accountable for doing diligence? Partially, it was a slimmed down diligence process. And partially, when you're buying a business from an NBC or a big company, they're very buttoned up. They have a lot of lawyers. They have a lot of accountants. It's highly unlikely there's some surprise buried in there that would be problematic.

10:50And Matthew and I do have a little bit more of a team than the two of us. We have a lawyer that we've worked with on all our transactions for the past 15 years. We have an accountant and we have various consultants we can bring in, one for HR, another for other kind of financial due diligence. So we have our little mini team and we are scrappy and resourceful and we do dig deep, but we probably don't dig as deep as... But again, two people running the deal have one conversation. Three people running the deal have three conversations. Four people running the deal have 10 conversations, bilateral conversations.

11:21So Joe and I, we're on the same page every day. We're looking at the same documents. We make a quick call. Our experts advise us and we just keep moving, tearing forward at a terrifying speed, frankly. So for the corporation, the whole process of unbinding a company is pretty complex. And on your side, how did that work in terms of really getting assurance that you know what you're actually buying and these all these little TSA things that people complain about? How did all that unfold? Well, we've had transition services agreements where they continue to run the business for some period of time where we can make sure that we smooth out any kind of HR issues or business issues that take time.

12:02But we can close quickly and still have the momentum, but make sure we don't have any bad bumps along the way. It's fantastic, though, when the seller is going to give you finance to buy the company and enter into a TSA to run the company for you while they're lending you the money to buy it. It means that you don't have to create the organization to receive it in advance. And we're just, we're laser focused on the most important terms of the overall deal is when you're getting down to the reps, warranties, and indemnifications, the end of the day, you can dig and dig. You can dig forever. And at some point, you just have to say, there is risk there.

12:44We'll take the risk. I'll give you an example, a specific example on that deal. This was a business that had recurring annual contracts, millions of dollars. And so you're going to inherit millions of dollars of deferred revenue, a deferred revenue obligation, the obligation to provide services in the future without the cash. You have to recognize the revenue, but you're not going to get the cash. Is that schedule right? Is there really that much deferred revenue or not? We gave it our best shot to try and validate it was correct. It wasn't correct. But again, the deal was still a good one anyway.

13:18So was the difference material? Ultimately, no. But if you're in a corporation where you can get fired for making a mistake, you're going to due diligence that deferred revenue schedule with hundreds and hundreds of lines. You're going to diligence that to death. And we have to eyeball it, do a bit of math, and take the risk. It's interesting how you do that because it can sound so easy, lucrative, I should say, to be able to carve a business out of a large corporation. You think of those dollar acquisitions. If you can figure out those terms in between, you can get a lot of value generated. Why is it not as easy said than done?

13:51It's very hard to find a deal. Very hard to identify those little unloved divisions that are swept in the corner somewhere in the basement of these big companies. Let's talk about that. Let's talk about sourcing those opportunities. You've obviously figured out a few times. What's the approach to do that? We've tried a few different ways. Tried networking with people we know. and we've tried hiring, in that case, an out-of-work investment banker. Another time we hired a corporate development executive who was in between jobs. He also found us a deal. We've tried using databases. It's challenging though, and it can take a long time and it's very unpredictable.

14:22It could take you a month to find a business. It could take you two years to find a business. I think once you get down to subscale opportunities is that it's very un-corporate, whereas the corporate acquisition or divestiture screen has parameters, officers, executives, admins, they all run it. They all march as an army and we're on track, we're on track. Whereas we have to be very entrepreneurial, go off the beaten path, look under some strange stones, be prepared to adjust our approach at a moment's notice. And so when you look at the deals, we've done a couple from searches. We did one out of a database.

14:56One was somebody you were mentoring at the time who sold their business to us. So you have to be flexible in everything, not just how you do the deal, what the structure of the deal is. Is it an SBA? Is it an APA? But also how you finance the deal, how you find the deal. You've got to be comfortable ad-libbing it if you're in our space. If you're up with an extra couple of zeros, there probably isn't a lot of ad-libbing going on. So no secret formula. It's just a lot of different things that you do. Be brave. That's the secret formula. Is there a certain title of person that you'd want to talk to in a larger company?

15:34We have a lot of conversations with the corporate development people, but does it make sense to get into the C-suite or talk to one of the board members? In the first few that we did, because we did two from very large media organizations at NBC, which was at the time a multi-billion dollar business, you just aren't going even six runs down. You're not even at that level. You are talking to biz dev people who have been tasked with the disposal of an asset. They are the right people to talk to. Try going over your head. Won't do you any good. Will create bad blood. Hey, I know the CEO. Yeah, that's not going to help here.

16:09It's not going to help. But at other times in smaller organizations, actually, sorry, let me take that back. On reflection, the way in which the business tells you they want to sell the asset is the way in which you should address them. Tell me more. What I'm saying is that don't sneak around, is that we go in there and we say, you see that Rolls Royce? I know you think it's worth$100 ,000, but it's old and it's tired and we'll give you 15 ,000 cash and we'll give it to you today. And we approach the buyer directly. We're straightforward. We will close. We have a track record of bidding and closing.

16:42And we're very direct. And we don't take any tangential approach. There's no asterisk in the contract, whatever we say we're going to do. And some of the times the person says, I'm not going to sell you my Rolls Royce at$15 ,000. Are you mad? But occasionally, somebody does. You own a Rolls Royce for$15 ,000. Are you finding it where they're explicit that this is something we're going to sell prior to that? Or are you sending in some un-slicited interest on, hey, you got this asset and we're interested in buying it? We've knocked on a lot of doors of people that aren't selling. We have. And we make them aware of us.

17:18And so when they do decide they have a division or a small business unit that they want to divest, they think of us. Is that inquiry on a specific asset? Hey, I saw you got this asset. I want to talk to you about it. Or is it, I want to introduce myself and let you know about who we are because we like to buy things in your space. We've tried to reach out to companies and say, this is who we are. We bought some businesses. If you have something, please consider us. But more likely, it's through a relationship. It's through someone who knows someone. It could be the business development person at the large company.

17:47It could be an operating executive who knows that a division is going to be sold. My experience may be a little different. I would say that in today's noisy business environment, If you hit the right person at the right time, they will call you back immediately if it's relevant. If you hit the right person at the wrong time or the wrong person at the right time, they will never call you back and they will never remember you. So the strategy must be to be reaching out at all times to all people about everything and looking for who responds. Don't go planting seeds and then go take a break and wait for one of the people to call you.

18:21It'll never happen. You've just got to pound it and keep calling these people. And eventually, you'll find somebody who says, you know what? I think we are selling that thing. Talk to that person over there. Now I see how you guys complement each other. Matthew's the thoroughbred hunter. While Joe wants to be more strategic and figure the right introduction avenue to go there. I run up a lot of blind alleys. Yeah, Joe, not so much. I mean, together, we've bought six businesses and we've sold five of them. They were not all corporate carve-outs, but we have complementary skills. And eventually we've come to an agreement on each of these deals.

18:53And there are other points to really negotiate or really key things when doing a carve-out, like clarifying the people that are going with the business. Or how do you... What are the key things to make sure I don't screw up a carve-out deal I try to do in the future? Well, interestingly, with one of our deals, one of the most important factors was that the people were taken care of. The people who worked at NBC were to be taken care of in our smaller company, our new entity that was going to hire them. And we knew that these people were important and were key people. And one of the things NBC wanted was to make sure that these people had similar compensation and similar benefits to what they had in the world of NBC.

19:27Of course, our small company, we didn't have the ability to give them all the benefits that a big company like NBC had. But we had to make sure that we at least compensated them in a way that they could have those benefits. So there are factors like that that are not necessarily about purchase price, but are important to the seller and we abided by them. Just talking about that specific deal without reaching any confidentiality. So they had these key executives. They'd already slimmed the team down a great deal, but they had a number of people they thought were important to them, key resources.

19:57They were selling a skinny down team. And we negotiate the transaction. We come to a price and then somebody pipes up and says, yeah, we just want to make sure that you have similar pension agreements in place and 401k in place for the executives. Then we're like, no, there's nothing. There's nothing. I'm sorry, there's nothing at all. And they're like, oh. And so what we did is that we did a quick one-day analysis of what the dollar value of those benefits would be. And we asked them to discount the price that we would financially compensate the executives for the loss of benefits and NBC agreed.

20:34That's pretty cool. That deal, they were very ethical. They cared about their employees. They wanted them to be treated right so much so that they would take a small reduction in the purchase price in order that their employees would be adequately and equally compensated post-close. And that's how we got to an agreement there. That was a very large organization that showed remarkable flexibility and moral fiber, I thought. Yeah, because it's of their interest and they took it upon themselves to hold accountability with it instead of just forcing it on you, as some people do on these deal points.

21:09And on the HR point, I'll add that often we find that people coming out of a large company are not as comfortable in a scrappy little entrepreneurial company like ours. But there were some real entrepreneurial people there that were successful in the world of NBC and were successful in the small world of Joe and Matthew. Also on that deal as well is that you remember we brought in an external HR consultant who had been very senior in a media organization, very senior. We didn't walk in arm and arm and say, welcome to the toy shop. We brought somebody with us who was one of them, basically. They knew who she was.

21:45They knew where she worked. And so we brought this person in as our HR transition expert that would transition all of these employees and settle them. And that also helped. You had some alignment there with the management team pretty early, it sounds like, for clothes. Yes, this was unusual. some sellers will let you interact with the employees, their employees before you close. Some sellers do not want you to interact with the employees before you close. In this case, we were encouraged to visit the employees in their places of work, not just New York. And we did do that, Joe, right? We did. We got to know the employees somewhat well before we closed that transaction.

22:27I'm trying to boil this down, though, into lessons that are applicable beyond the specific instance we're talking about. And I think it, again, comes back to energy, earnestness, flexibility, all of the things that a lot of corporations don't have too much of. You're playing the violin and they say play the cello, and you've got to take the violin and put it on the floor and play the violin like the cello immediately. Have you ever walked away from a deal just because you didn't think the people were cut out for what you wanted to work with? We've walked away from deals. I'm not sure it was about the people.

23:01There was one in the sports category, Matthew, you probably remember that we walked away from, but there are a few things wrong with that deal. But one of the positives of these deals that we haven't addressed is that when you pull a little business out of a large company, you remove these corporate allocations. So you no longer have to pay for the CEO's private jet or the fancy offices in Midtown Manhattan. And when you run the business as we do out of, in our case, a tiny little office on 57th Street with a window facing a brick wall and much more modest rent expense, it becomes even more profitable.

Read the full transcript

23:32Those corporate allocations coming off the P &L immediately make the business profitable, not to mention other things that we do. A business that looks unprofitable within the corporation can, in fact, be profitable on day one outside the corporation. Is that a lot of your consideration around how you model that out? I'm curious too, in addition, how accurate did you end up with this carve-out-based pro forma versus what your actual numbers ended up? We go to great lengths to put together a pro forma before we buy the business and make sure that in a worst-case scenario, it's still going to be something that we can live with and that we're somewhat happy with.

24:09But there's still risk. There's still uncertainty. And you never know until you're in it. So there is a moment, Matthew and I talk about this moment, when you're about to close and you're about to wire a large amount of money, millions of dollars, you have to be just a little bit crazy or a real believer that you are going to be successful. Joe, don't you remember walking across the street? Because our bank was across the street on 57th Street. We're like, okay, let's go down and wire the money. So Joe and I go down there. We show up at the bank. Literally, at the time, it was a retail bank. We're like, hi, we're here to wire a few million dollars to somebody.

24:41And they're like, what? Oh, come over here. Sit down. So we sit there and we do this, like, how many numbers are on this wire? And so we do the wire and Joe is looking at me and he's like, are you sure you want to do this? This isn't just vacation money. This is real money. And ultimately, we're like, we've done the numbers and this is going to be OK. Of course, we have to come home and in my case, tell my wife and watch the blood drain from her face. She realizes that here we go again. Thus far, it's worked out OK. Was there a big difference between what you model out in your best case scenario to what your actuals were?

25:16I would say that in all of the deals we've done, the modeling we did proved to be very accurate for the first year or two. So there was never a misrepresentation of what the business was. And most of what we modeled would have been very minimal revenue enhancement in the first year, but some realistic cost reduction. And all of those things proved to be true. In one of our deals, we had some representations from the selling entity, Joe, that revenue per contract, per binding contract would rise. We looked at those contracts, looked like it was going to be true, bought the company and proved to be true.

25:56For people doing R-sized deals, you have to stop at 10 contracts. We had one company that we bought that had 2 ,400 contracts. You could go on forever. You could go on down that list forever. But once you've looked at the top 25 and they're all solid, the other 2 ,175 are going to be fine. But you've got to be a little bit brave to say, I've looked at the 25 biggest. It looks good. That's what counts. On the carve-out, are there any other challenges or big things to look at when working on the buy side of a carve-out? I would... So let me answer first. As we did more, we paid more attention to cash flow and working capital and true ups.

26:38Because when somebody says to you, this is going to be an$11.5 million transaction, you have to think through all of the networking capital and changes in networking capital, because that can, depending on the business, vary radically from quarter to quarter. and we've gotten better at thinking of the number above the headline price, which is term 1.1 in the contract. When you run down through it, there's a lot of other numbers that you have to think through to do with working capital, balance sheet, and adjustments. Get into those details, make sure you know what you're ultimately committing to in regards to those adjustments.

27:18Or the headline price is one, it's the most important aspect, financial aspect of the deal, But there are many other financial aspects of the deal, including the networking capital, true ups, balance sheet items, financing, and so on. It's not just the headline purchase price. And in some cases, even closing transactional costs can be significant. We're very careful and we have help to make sure that we can do it carefully but inexpensively. But we've seen others do M &A activity where those transactional costs can be very high. I feel like if this is your first deal, you just don't know better and you're going to get taken for a ride.

27:54If you're a first-time acquirer, how do you prevent yourself from running into those problems? You have to surround yourself with people who have done it before and can help you avoid some mistakes. We chose not to hire a big law firm, even on our first transaction, because I knew that I would start yelling at them very quickly because I'd get frustrated because they'd say, on the matter of patents. We'll bring the patent team in and they'll talk to the IP team, which will talk to the labor team. And this would drive me crazy. So we happened to find an attorney who had been in a very large prestigious firm who was just like us.

28:33He set out with his own stall to help people like us buy assets from big companies and doing these. He was like a guerrilla attorney. He would run in there amongst the opposite team and they'd all fall over dead without even realizing he'd work them over. He was fantastic because he was one of them, but they didn't realize he was one of them, but he was on our side of the table. So you've got to have a good lawyer and you've got to have a busy lawyer, a lawyer that doesn't need your hours to make his number. He's already busy. It doesn't matter whether he's billing you or he's billing clients six or seven.

29:06You don't want a guy who's like, I got a few more hours for you. And he's just filling his hours full of the nonsense he could think up to do for you. I like that tip a lot. I take that in my book here. Look, on the other side, we've for the companies that we've bought, the seller has always had outside counsel, never inside counsel. It's always outside counsel. They're all the obvious people, the most famous law firms, and there's squads of them. They come in, they're like mushrooms. You deal with five of them, there's five more of them. They're just hundreds of thousands of dollars. They're just running the clock.

29:37We don't have anything to do with that. So on a transaction cost, our cost might be$75 ,000. Their cost might be$675 ,000. Because you see it all in the 8594. At the end of the day, you see your deal transaction costs. They see yours, you see theirs. You're like, holy mackerel, you found that selling the business. It's crazy. Great tips on managing a carve-out. In terms of the businesses you acquired and your approach in creating value. I'm sure so much of this is around your leadership style, your operating model that you bring to these businesses to create value. How has that evolved over company to company in terms of what drives success for you?

30:21One of the things that we do is we put a lot of thought and effort and time and money into growing sales. In a big company, sometimes a small division will just, as I said earlier, gets swept in the corner and doesn't necessarily get the sales and marketing supported needs. And so when you focus on that and you reinvest in the sales process, you can get good results. Simultaneously, as you gather from our conversation, we're very sensitive to costs and making sure that wherever costs can be trimmed or things can be done in a more efficient way, we do it. Almost everything we'll do will have to do with raising revenue and cutting costs.

30:56I don't want to scare your listeners, But do you remember, Joe, we had the I mean, I will scare the listeners. But do you remember, Joe, we used to have these policies where it was like two point five star hotels. Right. Or is it three star hotels? I would fly and I would stay in a Motel 6 just to make the point, just to make the point to the other staff that Joe's typically the CEO. I'm typically the president just to make the point that when I travel, I stay in a Motel 6. So don't come to us and ask to stay in an Intercontinental because I'm staying in a Motel 6. So we're very frugal and we have to eat our own dog food.

31:31Do you remember the hotel we stayed at in New Orleans where there's basically there was a bit of murder? It was one of those motels with the pool and there was a murder like three doors down. It was taped up with police tape. There were roaches in the hotel. You don't have to go that far. I will say that as I've gotten older, the hotels have maybe crept up a little bit. Yeah, I don't see it. I don't stay in the hotel. The point you're making is valid that we are very sensitive to cost, travel costs. cost of operating the business and we live it. It's not like we're traveling business class and everyone else is traveling coach.

32:03No, we're careful in how we run our businesses. And I think it's paid off. It's a discipline. And I like how you said it from the beginning. I think it makes it well-earned for the long run in terms of as you grow. People respect you if you're prepared to stay in that Motel 6 and you bring donuts to the introductory staff meeting. You're setting the expectation that I'm not Nero piddling around while you employees work. I'm in there with you. We're going to make this work together. We're facilitators, financiers, planners. It's not them and us. We're there with you. We're traveling the same way you are.

32:38Now in the world after COVID, people are remote and people don't need to have an office for the same reasons they used to. But when we have bought our businesses, we've always had a very modest office because we didn't really have clients coming to that office anyway. As long as it was clean and it was safe, it didn't matter if we had a view of a brick wall or others might want a view of Central Park here in New York City. But it didn't seem like a good use of our money. So add color to that. So our first office, we had a music executive to record labels. He had all of his colleagues walk out.

33:09And so he had three offices to rent and he was in the back corner. We moved in. So there was a music executive in the back corner. and you remember the carpet was so bad, Joe, so bad that when we left that office and upgraded, we cut the piece out, we had it mounted in a frame and we put that on our wall. And when people would come in, we would say, there's the carpet from our first acquisition. Look how disgusting it is because we prefer to put money into the business than spend it on the carpet. I like it. The best thing is when people ask, is that some new avant-garde artwork? when they came to our office.

33:47And we say, no, that is carpet. That's a piece of the carpet from our first office. Yeah, I would have went with the artwork. No, these are great examples in terms of your operating approach, the focus on revenue. Think of it as an entrepreneur, like you've done it, you've bought this business. You're the boss, you're the boss. You give orders, people take those orders. It's incredible. Let's go out and buy myself a beautiful recliner and sit at an enormous desk. It's like, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. Go buy a plastic table from Staples, sit down and get to work. Don't do any of that nonsense.

34:21Yeah, no, I agree. I think it's a good discipline to have at the beginning because then you'll inherit a lot more value in the long run. And like you mentioned, you can ease up over time, get upgraded. A little bit. A little bit. When you see the returns coming back, what about the time to exit? How do you determine the right time to exit? The best time to exit is when someone comes and approaches you and says, we want to buy your business. However, I have an internal time clock. Matthew will tell you about it. Basically, when we buy the business and the day we close, Joe puts the date five years into the future.

34:51And it's like, we will have sold by this day, the fifth anniversary. We go in there and from day two and day three, can we sell the business? Can we sell the business? We're not really going to sell the business, but Joe is always interested in selling and I'm never interested in selling. And so we fight it out. We do always know that the five-year clock is coming and we need to exit on or by the fifth year. Because by that time, as entrepreneurs, you've done whatever you can do. Again, is that you can grow a business from two to$10 million and maybe you can convince yourself you're the right team to go from 10 to 20, but there's probably a better team who can take it to the next level.

35:28If you haven't done it in five years, let's reset and do what we do again for another five years in a different organization. But it's important that when the time comes to sell the business as healthy, that it's growing. that it's profitable, and the machine is well-oiled. Yeah. You mentioned earlier, Joe, that when somebody approaches you, can you contrast that between working with an investment bank? Have you looked at creating that competitive process? We have hired investment bankers to do a running process and effective and well-run. In a perfect world, someone comes and approaches you, but more likely and more often for us, we have engaged the banker.

36:06We've made a list of the potential acquirers. We put together a sim and prepare the management team. And it's, as you know, a disciplined process that works. Why is one better than the other? To have a buyer approach you and have more of a proprietary process as opposed to running a competitive process through an investment bank? Carrying a competent outside bank will guarantee that you expose the opportunity to all relevant, appropriate buyers. You may not like what you get. You may not like the response you get, but you will have covered the market. If you choose to do something in a private way, somebody approaches you, you never quite know how the market would speak.

36:46Whereas if you go out wide using a bank that has contacts in the particular sector, sector prices the deal for you. So you prefer the bank process, it sounds like, Matthew. I prefer the bank process as a seller, yes. Unless I'm very sure that the list of the buyers is very small and I know them all. Joe, on the other hand, prefers the source by the buyer process. Well, yeah. I mean, when a buyer comes and approaches you and you know by comparison, by looking at comps and other deals that have happened, that you're being offered very healthy price can be quick and simple. Because the process with an investment banker has not been quick for us.

37:23When we hire a banker, it sometimes can be a prolonged process. Never goes as quickly as you think. Never. Yeah. You have this marketing phase and prep before the marketing phase. and I could see it overall being a lengthier process. Do you feel it's easier on a proprietary deal or the buyer source that it's just easier and we can mutually agree on our timelines and be more amicable in how we work together versus the bank process or the other things that are different? It's hard to say which is easier, which is quicker, I already spoke about, but which is easier, I think it varies. I hate bank run processes, I really do, because they're going to start talking about PowerPoints And as soon as somebody mentions the word PowerPoint, I get hives all over my skin.

38:04I gave up PowerPoints in the 1980s. I'm not doing any PowerPoint slide, but they do this deck and it's got 100 slides and it drives me crazy. Ideally, you would sell to a knowledgeable, informed person that's already in your business because they could quickly deliver you the value because they're knowledgeable. But some businesses, the pool of potential buyers is extremely wide. strategic buyers, investment buyers, left of center buyers, and you do have to engage a bank. But I'm allergic to large companies. So I do get the highs very easily. But luckily, Joe... I don't mind a slide deck. I agree.

38:41If it's 100 slides, it's painful. And who pays attention? But if it's 10 slides, I can get through 10 slides and there's real value there. Yeah. Again, if anybody ever says the word Merry Mecco to me, you probably have to put me in a asylum because I did so much of that stuff in my 20s when we were doing strategic stuff for Bain or a growth share matrix. I'm probably going to have some kind of fit. Overall, it sounds like you're open to the direct inquiries, but as timelines get near, you're more likely to engage with an investment bank to sell a business. That's well said. Can we talk through lessons learned during the exits you've gone through?

39:19What were the key lessons? Well, one of the biggest lessons is don't miss your numbers. When you go through that exercise with an investment bank and you put together your sim and you put together your projections, you better make sure that those projections are realistic and that you're going to hit them. Yeah, absolutely. If you miss those numbers, there's a direct impact to the purchase price. Isn't that what the bankers do? Pull out lipstick on the pig? Isn't that... Yeah, they want you to show the hockey stick and it's going to be a quick sale. So the broken hockey stick, that's somebody else's problem.

39:49But we know that the sale process can take a year. And so whatever you forecast for next year, you're going to live it and you're going to have to justify it. We tend to resist hockey stickitis, right, Joe? Realistic. We want a realistic set of numbers that we can hit. Be real on the numbers. Yeah. Be realistic about your expectations is that when you start a process, by the time you sign with a bank, you should be done 365 days later. Nobody will give you that number. They will all talk about four to six months, but you may well still be working on that project 365 days later. Can't get ahead of yourself, get frustrated or annoyed.

40:29The process does take time. Sometimes you get lucky. Anything around timing? I'm always curious about it. I've heard from a family member, if you get a good offer, you should put a consideration on it. That might have been your cue to sell. I actually had an uncle that had that lucrative strategic offer, didn't do it, raised, raised, raised, ended up selling a number of years later, less than what the original preemptive offer he had from a strategic. I think there's a famous quote along those lines from Jimmy Goldsmith, who is a very successful UK-based business person who said, someone asked him, how did you get so rich?

41:03And he said, I always sold too soon. And so if you sell too late, it can be very problematic. Joe will always sell, always. And I will always want to hold. And so it's only a matter of time before Joe overwhelms me and we sell. And one of the craziest things that we saw in our experience together is an asset, a small asset that at one time had an offer north of$20 million, I think. We saw the LOI. Yep, 20 million bucks. And then the world changed and we ended up buying that for... $10 ,000. Yeah. Wow. If you don't sell when you can at the right price. You can close that deal when that money's on the table and the world changes.

41:45The tide goes out, you're left naked. Wow. That was a little bit extreme. That was real and it was true. But that is a crazy example. Anything around communications when exiting? Part of this lends to how do you choose, because a lot of times you're running a competitive process, between the different buyers. But any specifics around the approach to communications and even getting into how that can lend to knowing which buyer you should work with? Or is it just about the numbers? What's about confidence that you will close? As the buyer, we always give exceptional confidence that we will do what we say.

42:21We may not offer the price they want, but if you want to sell and you want to be certain of closure, we will close. And you look for the same thing when you exit. 100%. No point in somebody dangling something in front of our eyes with an extra zero on it. If they don't have the financing, Many people don't. If they're not actually going to close, many people aren't. If they're shopping many other deals at the same time, they'll pick another one. Confidence to close is really important. What are your clues to identify that? I think that's a radiation. That's a sense, a trust, a business sense about somebody.

42:55Also their track record. We got to a point where we bought five where people like, how can I trust you? There's an announcement, five, four, three, two, and one over the last eight years. you'll be number six. It's all very straightforward. There's also personal judgment when you look somebody in the eye and you assess whether you can trust them or not. How much of it goes to alignment on how the business is going to be operated after close and really, I guess, aligning on the strategy or vision of the deal you get into versus you hold that close and just try to negotiate terms to get the deal done?

43:33Well, we did buy one business for a founder, an elderly person who didn't have anyone who wanted to take over the business in his family. And he said that he had a higher offer from someone else, but he sold to us because he thought that we were going to do right by his business. And he knew what we intended to do. And he thought that was more important than taking more money from someone else, which I thought was interesting and kind of nice, reassuring. Is that part of the approach? You build that in this narrative of being good operators and doing what's best for the company and the people?

44:02Is that a big part of it? I think so. We have a track record of doing right by our employees and making sure that they have some ownership and that they are treated well and find working with us rewarding. Many people, when they sell a business, that's a top priority. It's how they feel about the team. Also, when you come out of a deal, everybody's got to feel good about the deal because we're not going to do one deal. So if you do one deal or you only do one deal in your life, you can create a lot of destruction and bad will amongst people. But we do many deals. So we always need everybody, the buyer, the seller, the buying bank, the selling bank.

44:37Everybody needs to talk well of us and everybody needs to speak well of us because there'll always be some connection from the next entity somehow to the old entity. So you can't have a reputation that follows you that you're a poor person morally. People know that we're straight and they know that we are value buyers. We do close quickly. That serves us well. We sleep better at night and we get more deals. That's an important part. Reputation matters. Earlier, you gave me advice first time carving out a company. As a first-time founder exiting, what's your best advice to make sure I don't screw up some things that lose a lot of value for me?

45:14As a first-time founder exiting. Yep. What are these key things I really want to negotiate? And it seems like some of it might be relevant from the buy side when you talked about these adjustments to make at closing and paying attention to those. Joe, I think that sometimes we underestimate the importance of our attorney as the third person around the deal team. He's not with us as we run the business, but the same guy that buys the business with us is there at the end and selling the business. And that person can save you from disaster when you're buying and selling a deal. And you have to listen carefully to what they say because unfortunately, they don't always agree with you.

45:53But as a first-time buyer and a first-time seller, ignoring your attorney's best advice is not a wise thing to do. If you've got the right attorney. So we go back to the same theme of luring up, make sure you got a really good lawyer you're working with. You've got to have a fantastic lawyer. You've got to interview a bunch of lawyers and you've got to find somebody that sees the world your way and not somebody who's 70 % booked and wants to use you to get towards being 100 % occupied. You want to find a lawyer who's already 100 % working flat out because that's a guy who's got a lot of clients that want to buy a lot of his hours.

46:29You want to steal some hours from that guy, not fill in an attorney's schedule who hasn't got enough clients. And again, when you negotiate, a lot of the terms are principle to principle. I'm going to buy this for$10 million. No, you're going to buy it for$11 million. Your attorney doesn't negotiate that. You negotiate that. But then you leave the room, and then they get into all of the holdbacks and indemnifications, the escrow amounts. that attorney is going to run point on several of those deals and see he has to be completely aligned with you. And you need to pick that person very carefully.

47:04Joe and I will do all principal terms, a lot of other terms that get put into that 40 page APA. Another piece of advice for someone if they're entrepreneurs who want to do what we do and find these businesses and acquire them is start small. Because the first one invariably will have some surprises and it may not go as you hoped. And you want to make sure that you don't bet the farm on the very first deal. You're wiped out. These are good examples. Are there any things that you would consider negotiating around to preventing a buyer from screwing up the business? One element I think of is retention packages for some of the key people and maybe working with them and helping them identify and negotiate those things.

47:46Is that something that's really relevant in terms of trying to preserve the business or hand it off in a good way that doesn't get screwed up by the buyer? Or do you just not put as much consideration on that? It's solely the buyer's responsibility? It's very difficult to have control over the situation once you've sold the business. If you have a strong team and they take on your team, you can be a little bit more confident. But still, there's often the us versus them when an M &A transaction occurs and some things happen that are not the way you would do them and want them to unfold. So it's difficult.

48:18And I do keep tabs on the businesses we've sold and some of the people. And sometimes it went great. Sometimes it didn't go quite as well. Even though I find that a little frustrating personally, when it doesn't go well, it was sold. So it was out of our control. You are walking on very thin ice if you are trying to tell a buyer what to do in any way once you have closed that door and sold. It's like trying to put your hand through the hinge. You know, good luck. They want to be able to call on you for advice, but they don't want to be attached to you or forced to do anything at all. And even though you might want to lean forward and protect a key resource, the way you do that is that you make sure before you close that there's some agreement that gives them protection after close, but you're effectively, we're going to have nothing to do after close.

49:05And we're going to always, we're going to reduce significantly the amount of money we're going to have to pay after close that is in any way contingent or either as a buyer or a seller, You want to reduce the amount of contingency. You just don't want the arguments after close. We sell, we move on. It's great to work with you. You're great. We move on. Then just what you're obligated to for any transition period, if you have those in the terms. Sometimes there's a three-month TSA or something like that. We also don't want to, if you've got things like earnouts, unless it's a very simple earn out, a percentage of revenue, for example, but that might work.

49:44But if you're looking at any percentage of net profits two years down the road, forget it. It's never going to work. This is going to be fuzzy math. They're not going to spend money marketing your business. They're going to merge streams of revenue together. You got to try and keep it simple. It's really good points. Joe, Matthew, what's the craziest thing you've seen in M &A? I think that transaction that I mentioned earlier where a business could have sold for $20 million and ended up going for$10 ,000. That was... You actually acquired. It is. I've seen, yeah. It really was instructive in many ways because we got to know the sellers.

50:18And to be honest, we felt sorry for them. You remember the analysis they gave about the Rolls Royce. We'll give you a hundred bucks for the Rolls Royce because the wheels have fallen off. And they took it because at the time, I think we got a call saying, we have to take an offer, so give us an offer. That was a very sobering moment because their footpath for the grace of God go we is that we buy these things. The tide can go out on us too. It was crazy to think of the difference in valuation between three years prior and when we acquired that asset. There is a humanity to this, especially when you're buying from people, not a corporation.

50:54At the end of the day, when you're buying from a multi-billion dollar corporation, if your deal closes or it doesn't close, none of the deal team care. They don't care about you. All they care about is executing the transaction and getting their next bonus, a big corporation. but these were entrepreneurs and didn't work out. And we looked at each other and if we're going to be in that situation on a deal, we're going to be in a deal where we lose money. It's a sobering thought. We've been up to bat, what, six times together, Joe, and we've lost money on a deal. You can't get annoyed. You can't punch a hole in the wall.

51:31You've just got to think, what's my RBI? is that nobody has an RBI of 0.9. It doesn't exist. You just got to go again. You got to go out and swing again. Yeah, keep the batting average up best you can. Best you can. Any other crazy stories? Did you ever want to top that, Matthew? I do not. That was pretty crazy. Along the way, Joe, we've met some very crazy people. Yes. You will recall that we almost bought a radio station? Yes, we've met people who are unethical. We couldn't close because they're in jail. Right. They're in jail. By the time we, yes. And then, yes. Actually, we met a couple of people.

52:10A couple of people selling businesses that actually went to jail a couple of months or years later. You have to kiss a lot of frogs to find a prince. We spent our time together talking about deals that we did. My goodness me, there were lots and lots and lots of deals we didn't do. All kinds of odd things. I think that we let the fish get away that we should have let swim away. You look at those as wins or just part of the process? Not buying those two businesses, the owners did end up serving in federal penitentiary. Those were good decisions. Not wins of their own. I don't think we have any regrets about deals that we didn't do that we should have done.

52:51And particularly not those when the people were unethical or of that caliber. Well, but Keith, I'm asking us to tell a story, a really crazy story. Those guys, those different businesses, we got back on the train that day. You were like, I don't know about this. This feels really weird. And yeah, it was weird. Also, you have all your gut on that. It was great. Great. Joe, Matthew, I enjoyed the conversation. I really appreciate taking the time, helping me become a better M &A scientist. Thank you for having us. We've enjoyed rustling through our memories together very much. Those of you still tuned in, thank you.

53:27Till next time, here's to the deal.

53:41Thank you for taking the time to explore the world of M &A with our podcast. We love hearing feedback. Tag us on a LinkedIn post, add a review on Apple Podcasts. We'd love to hear from you. If you need help standing up an M &A function or optimizing one that you already have, we're here to help. And if we can't help you, we probably know someone that can. You can reach out to me by email, Kisan, K-I-S-O-N, at mascience.com. Or you can text me directly at 312-857-3711. If you just want to keep learning at your own pace, visit mascience.com for a lot more content and resources. That's where you can also subscribe to our newsletter.

54:26Again, that's mascience.com. Here's to the deal.

54:40views and opinions expressed on M &A science reflect only those individuals and do not reflect the views of any company or entity mentioned or affiliated with any individual this podcast is purely educational

From the publisher

Joe Covey, a serial CEO and acquirer, and investor since 1992. 

Matthew Davidge, the co-owner of the NBC Affiliate WVNC (Watertown, NY) and several other stations around the country.

In big companies, some business units may not perform well and might be overlooked. It can be helpful for the company to find a more suitable owner for these units. At the same time, buyers can take advantage of these opportunities to improve the businesses and maximize their potential. 

In this episode of the M&A Science podcast, we will explore the experiences of Josh Covey, a successful CEO, acquirer, and investor, and Matthew Davidge, co-owner of NBC Affiliate WVNC, as they buy and develop these businesses with the goal of exiting in the future.

____________________________________________________________________________

This episode is sponsored by the M&A Science Academy. If you're looking to improve your in-house training, we have corporate training plans provided.

Give your team members access to the best-in-class courses, templates, and networking opportunities in the industry. Our academy was designed to lead practitioners to outdo M&A practices. It's also a great way to show your support for M&A Science. If you're interested in learning more about individual or team plans, visit this page.

Episode Timestamps

00:00 Intro 

06:43 Buy-side carve-out deals              

10:35 Key approach to due diligence               

11:52 Unbinding a company                

13:51 Why carve-outs are difficult                

15:41 Conversations with the right people        

19:05 Key things to consider when doing a carve-out

22:58 Walking away from a deal

23:59 Considerations in the carve-out model

26:32 Challenges on the buy-side of carve-outs

27:58 You have to surround yourself

30:21 Evolving the operating model 

34:37 The right time to exit

35:55 How working with an investment bank is different

37:48 Bank process vs. Proprietary deals 

39:21 Key lessons

40:55 Timing

42:14 Communications

43:34 Alignment on post-close operations

45:27 Advice for first-time sellers

47:57 Negotiation considerations

49:59 Craziest thing in M&A

More from M&A Science

All 205 episodes
Buying Carve-outs for Future ExitsM&A Science · 55 min
Listen in VO