In short
Podcast Notes: M&A Science - Corporate Development Strategy: Notion's M&A Approach with Hilary Shirazi
Episode Overview In this episode, Kison Patel hosts Hilary Shirazi, the Head of Corporate Development at Notion. With a decade of experience in M&A from companies like LinkedIn, Pinterest, and Zendesk, Hilary discusses the development of corporate strategy in high-growth tech firms. Key topics include the Deal Thesis Methodology, the Four T’s framework, and an innovative approach to integration.
Key Learning Points
- Deal Thesis Framework: Clarifying strategy before identifying acquisition targets using a structured document.
- Four T’s of M&A: Classifying acquisitions into four categories—Talent, Tech, Traction, and Terrain—to inform your acquisition and integration strategies.
- Integration Without IMO: Advocating for embedding integration practices throughout the acquisition process instead of relying on an Integration Management Office (IMO).
Episode Chapters
- [00:02:00] Hilary's career evolution and preference for in-house M&A vs. advisory.
- [00:05:00] Building M&A best practices at mature organizations.
- [00:08:30] Understanding executives' M&A fears and biases.
- [00:11:00] The Deal Thesis Methodology: Creating strategy documents before naming targets.
- [00:30:00] The Four T's Framework: Talent, Tech, Traction, and Terrain deals.
- [00:35:00] Integration Without IMO: Why Corp Dev should lead integration efforts.
- [00:42:00] Using Notion for M&A processes.
- [00:51:00] The role of AI in corporate development.
Detailed Insights
Hilary's Background and Career Path
- Transitioned from investment banking to in-house M&A, realizing the potential for long-term strategy development.
- Experienced both public and private companies, emphasizing the importance of best practices in M&A execution.
Deal Thesis Methodology
- A document created by the deal sponsor to clarify the strategic reasons for an acquisition.
- Questions to be answered include:
- What problem are you solving?
- Why is it critical to act now?
- What are the success metrics?
- What is the necessary level of investment?
The Four T's Framework
- Talent: Acquiring people to build new products or enhance existing teams.
- Tech: Acquiring intellectual property or products that accelerate time to market.
- Traction: Acquiring companies that bring in customers or revenue, often leading to a new go-to-market strategy.
- Terrain: Long-term strategic bets that align with future company directions.
Integration Without IMO
- Hilary argues for the Corp Dev team to own integration instead of handing it off to a separate team.
- Integration plans should be established before the term sheet is signed, ensuring continuity and alignment throughout the acquisition process.
Using Notion for M&A
- Notion serves as a single source of truth and collaboration tool for various M&A processes, reducing reliance on multiple software platforms.
- The platform enables transparency and organization in deal discussions, documentation, and project management.
The Role of AI in Corporate Development
- AI is utilized for competitive intelligence, summarizing earnings reports, and even aiding in sourcing potential acquisition targets.
- The integration of AI helps streamline processes and enhances the capability to make informed decisions quickly.
Challenges in M&A Integration
- Common pitfalls include lack of a solid integration plan, unclear deal sponsorship, and changes in strategy post-acquisition.
- Real-life examples highlight the necessity for thorough planning and communication to prevent integration failures.
Key Takeaways
- Understanding the fears and biases of key stakeholders in M&A is crucial for success.
- Integration should be embedded in the corporate development strategy from the beginning, promoting a seamless transition.
- Utilizing tools like Notion and AI can significantly enhance efficiency and collaboration in M&A processes.
Conclusion Hilary Shirazi shares invaluable insights into building effective corporate development strategies in fast-paced environments, emphasizing the importance of thoughtful planning, stakeholder engagement, and the innovative use of technology in M&A success.
---
Additional Resources For more episodes and insights into M&A practices, visit [M&A Science Podcast](https://www.mascience.com/podcast).
Follow-Up For questions or feedback, connect with Kison Patel on LinkedIn or reach out via email at kison@mascience.com.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00We're back! The third annual M &A Science Fair, October 16th in New York City. And this is not your typical M &A conference. Forget the endless panels. Forget the consultants. Forget the sales pitches. Seriously, no vendors, no consultants, no boring panels. Instead, this is about collaboration. It's about connecting with your peers and actually testing your ideas. You bring your playbooks, your theories, your frameworks. And walk away with techniques you can apply directly to your M &A practice. That's right. It's practitioner-led, invite-only, limited just 60 people. And the best part? Tickets are only$250.
0:42Way better than paying thousands, just as if through boring conference panels nobody remembers. October 16th, New York City. Click the link to request your invite. Spots are going fast. See you at the Science Fair. Cheers. Cheers, cheers.
1:03The buyer-led M &A Summit is back October 30th, hosting over a thousand corporate development, private equity, everybody on the buy side. You'll hear from the best in M &A from companies like Quadiant, SPS Commerce, iSolve, State Street. These are all leaders who have built repeatable, scalable M &A strategies. You're going to learn how to prioritize deals, execute diligence under pressure, rig integration all the way to the front of your deal process so you can realize synergies faster. I mentioned we're going to do a live M &A science podcast with Keith Crawford, the head of Corp Dev at State Street Capital.
1:41Whether you're new to the industry or a serial acquirer, this is an event you don't want to miss. Hope to see you there. Bye.
1:52check it out yourself at dealroom.net slash summit or look for a link in the descriptions i'm kisan patel and you're listening to m &a science where we talk with deal professionals and learn valuable lessons from their experience This podcast focuses on stories, strategies, and what actually happened during M &A deals.
2:26Hello and welcome to the M &A Science Podcast. This podcast is part of a mission to rethink how M &A is done, the old school seller-led approach. Instead, FireLed M &A is all about strategy, alignment, and efficiency, putting value creation at the center of every deal. And let's be real, it's not just about closing the deal. It's about making it successful. We uncover what truly works at M &A by learning directly from the best. I'm your host, Kisan Patel, founder and CEO of Dealroom, chief scientist at M &A Science. Joining me today is Hilary Shirazi, head of corporate development at Notion, the all-in-one connected workspace reshaping how teams think, write, plan, and organize.
3:08Before Notion, Hillary built her M &A and investing muscle at Pinterest, Zendesk, and LinkedIn, helping shape acquisition strategies across early-stage and late-stage tech companies. At Notion, she's focused on tech and talent acquisitions that accelerate product and team growth during a critical stage of scale. Today, we're going to talk about what it's really like to build an M &A motion inside a high-growth tech company, why integration without an IMO might actually be a better model for agile teams. Hillary, how are you doing? I'm great. Thanks for having me. Thanks for hosting me live here.
3:40This is headquarters? Headquarters, Notion HQ. Yeah, we just moved into this office downtown about three or four months ago. That's a great space. Thank you. So we're here at Notion World Headquarters. I'd love to kick off with just a little bit of your background. I've been in M &A now since about 2014. I didn't actually know that you could have a full-time job at a company in M &A until right before starting. I had done M &A on the investment banking side of things. After that, I was an investor. And we ended up merging one of our portfolio companies with another one, Seamless and Grubhub. But it wasn't until one of our portfolio companies hired a head of CorpDev that I realized you could move in-house and advise a company on the right way to do M &A in the long term.
4:27I started at LinkedIn in 2014, was there for four years through us getting acquired by Microsoft. So I can say that I've been on both sides of an M &A. And as you said, have done corporate development now at private companies, at public companies. So LinkedIn, Zendesk, when it was still public, and now it's private, and Pinterest, and now Notion, which is still private. And it's been a ton of fun. So I got to ask you, because I talked to a lot of business school students, and I feel like the career path always, like default going to investment banking. Then when you're investing in banking, everybody wants to go on the buy side.
5:00Then you get into private equity. And like you described, that's when you figure out like, oh, there's this corporate development thing. So a lot of times students aren't even exposed to what corporate development is. And then you land in there. How would you contrast the difference between those three career areas? It's funny because now folks from undergrad are actually reaching out and saying, I want to explore corp dev. And I say, how did you even find out about this career path? I wish I had known about it earlier. I would say the most exciting thing about doing it in-house is you just get closer and closer to the mission and the vision and frankly, the founders.
5:32Because when you're in investment banking, you're advising and it's more about the numbers, but you don't get to see the integration. When you're working with portfolio companies, you do get to see how it ends up, but you're still pretty far away. And then when you move into a company, you really get to see what is the strategy? How do you go about sourcing? How do you build relationships with the founders? How do you convince folks and stakeholders internally to go ahead with the acquisition? And then truly working hand in hand with the different functional partners is how the integration happens.
6:06And then you're really owning it for one, two, three, four years after the fact before it really becomes embedded. You got a lot deeper in strategy and you have to own the execution all the way through. Yes. Sounds like more work. So maybe it's more rewarding. More rewarding, I was going to say. I also got to ask, you've worked at some pretty prominent companies in the Bay Area from LinkedIn, Pinterest, now at Notion. How has your perspective or view on M &A evolved when you've been able to see it in these different environments? I would say, and this is my advice to a lot of folks breaking into CorpDev, try to start somewhere that already has developed best practices.
6:43because it's a lot to figure out. A lot of folks, again, reaching out saying, I want to get into corp dev as the first corp dev hire, which could be great. But I feel like having started at LinkedIn, they had already done about 20 deals, had already gone public and had all these best practices and this kind of set of principles for how they thought about M &A. And that's quality over quantity, really leading with strategy, which we can get into kind of on the integration side of things, embedding integration throughout the process, being flexible and focusing on value creation and taking all that together in a playbook really helps you think about deals the right way from the start.
7:23I would say in the evolution of corporate development, in my view, it's always starting with the principles and then really figuring out what are the differences in companies that you're joining and how do they think about M &A and who are their players And how can you craft the playbook to really fit in with whatever the vision and mission of the company you're currently working at is? I like that. Just having the experience around what a mature machine looks like. And not today, you're basically building it from scratch. It's funny because a lot of the time people see a big public company. like when I joined Pinterest, it was close to a$50 billion market cap company, but had only really done small M &A, three to four folks, small tech acquires.
8:10Even though they were really big, coming in and helping drive their first true acquisition was a whole new learning process and building a whole new muscle. So it's almost as if you can't necessarily classify a really big company as having done it in the past and having that muscle. It's like you have to get in and see, okay, what's the experience of the company? Where should you start such that you can target the right companies and integrate them in the right way and work with all the cross-functional partners? It's interesting. When you look at the current state, because you've seen this as a really mature, you get a sense of what it really takes to make these deals successful.
8:46How do you think about M &A when you're just kind of starting off building the function for an organization? And we talk like Bioled, You're going to hear me reference it because it's a framework that we published. And one of the original pillars, the first pillars, is really detailing out the strategy. So you have this clear criteria. Yep. Which it sounds like that was already in place when you're working on more of a mature M &A platform. But then when you're standing it up, I don't think there's some work to do. Yeah. It's not always the case that everyone knows what to do internally. And I think that's what I've found to be one of the more fun things about corporate development is you come into a company and you think about all your partners, even the exec team, everyone has a different degree of experience with M &A.
9:27So you could have some people who have been acquired, done acquisitions. You could have some people who maybe went through a terrible acquisition and have their own deep-seated fears about doing deals. It's really about the people at the company and what are their biases or inclinations and really making sure that you're getting to know all of the individuals that will be involved in the process internally before you can feel really confident about going out and talking to founders and convincing them to sell. Because you want to make sure they're going to be set up for success and you want to make sure that everyone internally understands what each step of the process means.
10:09A term sheet really means an engagement ring. It's like you're getting married, even though most of the terms are non-binding, except for confidentiality and exclusivity. You want to make sure that your partners understand how the process works. And to do that, you really have to get to know them. I chuckled because I did a podcast yesterday with Stefan over at Snowflake. Oh, yeah. We use the wedding analogy quite a bit. I'll pick a different one. We can still use it. I feel like it's either home buying or the wedding. Yes, that was going to be my other one. We follow pretty well when it comes to M &A.
10:41I'm curious because we actually talked about this as well, is when you think about the steps to stand up an M &A function, I feel like what you describe is step one, get to know the organization's leaders, understand like where their train of thought is. And you kind of walked me through like, what that journey look like for you at Notion and standing it up. At Notion, they had already done one acquisition before I joined. So I already knew that there was an appetite to do it, which isn't necessarily the case at every company I've been in or even heard about where they say we want to do M &A. and then you get in and everyone's still saying that, but you run into brick walls when you try to bring something forward.
11:16It's really about getting to know and know. So why don't you want to do a deal? And then unpacking that. Here, the executive team is experienced. Most of them have experienced M &A before. They do understand that it's a bit of an art, a bit of a science. There's no perfect time. You have to trust your partners and trust that there's that vision alignment. It's funny because even though Notion is a private company that's at a smaller scale than some of the public companies I've worked at, it feels a little more natural to lean into these processes and get all the folks working together to make sure that we're talking to the right founders and doing the right deals.
11:55And then that's where you can start getting a sense of strategy or how do you build an M &A strategy off of what these executives and then probably helps that they already got experience doing M &A. So they got some ideas. Was there effort to start organizing this stuff and really building a process? Notion, a thousand people right now. I can imagine even at that size, there's different areas where ideas for M &A could bubble up. Yep. Do you like centralize it? Yeah. This is, I would say, a more formalized process over time where LinkedIn did a version of this and then worked on it more at Zendesk.
12:30and then Pinterest really formalized it where everything needs to start with a deal thesis and a document that is created by someone I call the deal sponsor. One misconception is that corporate development is the sponsor. But really, it's the person that's going to own that acquisition internally, which is usually someone in the engineering product or design function. I coach those deal sponsors saying, you do a PRD, you do a product requirements document for when you want to build something. So you should do the same thing when you want to buy something. You have to ask a lot of the same questions, which are, what problem are you trying to solve?
13:13And why now? Where is this on your priority list? And if you start with that with a no names basis, you can do a lot more first principles thinking because a lot of the times people will come in with, I want to buy this company or I heard about this hot startup. You're skipping ahead because you've ignored all the other potential targets in the space. Starting with that thesis document is super important. Even if someone wants to start with a target, say back up on a no-names basis, what are you trying to do? This is the similar conundrum when you get the book from the banker and then you get excited about it.
13:51And all of a sudden you're like, building a business case, go do this deal. Right. Just because it came across your desk. Exactly. You're like back solving. One, it sounds like it's a good thing that people actually want to do M &A. Yes. I've heard the other way around. People don't want to do it. They have some phobia of it. So that's good. But then you have the opposite where you got to dial them back and say, all right, this is how we do it. We want to crystallize the why. And then we can search the market and make sure we're finding the best asset for answering that why. Yeah. And it's also helpful to your point.
14:18There's a lot of people. I love when people are excited about pitching ideas. but if they aren't the one that's going to own it, I coach them to say, I can't own this. So you should go find the person that's going to own this and work with them on the document. And they can then be a part of the deal, but they're not going to be the one that drives it. It helps with alignment and it also helps reduce thrash for good ideas that maybe don't have an owner that makes sense. Now, this is interesting. You were creating this deal thesis before you have an identified target. That is my perfect world. It does not always work that way.
14:55Can you walk me through what's included in the deal thesis? It's a pretty simple list of questions. What are you trying to solve in your roadmap? Why now? Where does this sit on your list of priorities? What is the level of investment you believe we need here? And that is really important because if it's, hey, we need two engineers to build this. Okay, well, we could find a really small company, but it's harder to find those itty bitty startups. So maybe if we see an inbound acquihire, that might make sense. But that really helps scope the scale. After that, I ask, what is the build path if we don't acquire a partner?
15:32What would success look like if we did buy something here? What is success in 6 months, 12 months, 2 years? And then what are you actually interested in? Is it talent? Is it tech? or is it reach within a certain audience customers? And finally, this one I leave as optional, but are there examples or templates of success we can learn from? Oh, company X bought company Y and that is really exciting to me. It's almost like the more specificity you can pull out of a deal sponsor, the better. And once we have that clear vision, we can go do that market map. But until... I can actually use an example where I was at a company and they said, we want to go buy a company in the video space.
16:19And that's really broad. And so you could say there's 5 ,000 video companies. What do you mean by that? Is it video creation, video editing, and helping them hone it down and hone it down and hone it down by showing all of these different landscapes of video companies? You would like for your partner to immediately have that crystal clear thesis, but sometimes it is corporate development's job to help refine it by doing a little bit of boiling the ocean, showing them what's available, and then letting it click. Oh, no, this click down of specificity, and then this one, and then this one. And finally, you end up with three companies that fit that criteria.
16:54And you go out and you talk to three of them, and you pick one, and that's how it ends up. You've got to have a funnel. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So I want to make sure I got these steps right for your ideal thesis. One is clarifying what that roadmap currently looks like. And then where does this sit in your order of priorities? And the investment, like what are we looking at spending on this opportunity? Then there's this sort of build versus buy thinking that comes in. Yeah, like what would you do if we couldn't buy something here? What's the BATNA, I guess? Got it. So it's, oh, we're going to hire five engineers.
17:24It's going to take us three years to get this to market. And then what success looks like. Yeah. If we do acquire this, like ultimately what's that going to mean? And then the value drivers of the defining like why What is a specific thing for the people, the technology, and that part? The template examples is really good. It's like, okay, give me examples of others that have done this or that you can model around. And then once you get that crystallized, then you can do the market mapping exercise. That's when we go out and we try to use this criteria to pull in that list of, call it, 30 companies that you then hone down based on even more refined.
17:58I want to clarify, are these like purely product managers that are going through this exercise? Like who in the organization would? It depends on who is set up to be kind of that deal sponsor. Super tactically rule of thumb, who will the CEO of the acquired company report to? So if it's an engineer CEO, usually there will be an engineering sponsor. Or if it's a product CEO, it would be someone in product design, kind of similar thing. That doesn't always have to be the case, but it's, at least in my experience at tech companies, it's almost always someone who's in the engineering or product side of the world.
18:36And Notion's a very design-driven company, so there's even the possibility that we could have a designer sponsor. Oh, wow. You'll have some engineers even go through this exercise. Yeah, some of my best sponsors have been engineers, actually. I can imagine. I've done a lot of these podcasts. The engineers stand out. I think people think it's either execs or product folks, but it can be anyone who has clarity of thought and conviction and can pound the table. Yes, that's true. There's two parts to it, the engineering with actual execution. I guess we'll talk a little bit more about that. Yeah. So we get the deal thesis and then from there you build a market map and that allows you to find these opportunities.
19:16I'd love to hear a little bit about how you evaluate them. And I feel like that's the one challenge you start looking at and the companies can blur together, especially in the competitive space. What are some of the indicators that what's going to be the best fit? Obviously, it's like really the product and tech, but then we always talk about like team and culture. What are your sort of indicators that this company is going to be a better fit than the other ones in your pipeline? Yeah, it depends on what is the culture of the company where you are. At LinkedIn, we were very focused on building the economic graph.
19:47So could you see from the outset that companies you were looking to acquire were also focused on helping people get jobs and making that process easier? Again, at Notion, we're very design-driven. Is their website thoughtful and beautiful? So there's kind of high-level things that you can do. Does their tagline on their website align to some extent with our vision? You can get a lot just from what a company puts out there about themselves. You can tell what they care about. But I think it's not until you bring the founders in and figure out, are they saying the same things that our founders say?
20:22Do they focus on the things that we focus on? And frankly, once we introduce them to our founders, how do they get along and do they really see eye to eye? there are a number of signals that companies put out there that just over time, being in corporate development for a while at a company, you already start to say, oh, for instance, all companies have that little footer that says copyright year. And if the year is out of date, you can kind of already tell, oh, they don't have that attention to detail that I know they're going to get dinged on here. So even little things like that. There's red flags.
20:56Sure, copyright's up to date. Still a recovering banker. Or if you're really savvy, you got an engineer that actually codes it to automatically update. There you go. Thankful for it in our team. It's interesting because you said that here's this sort of common thinking around the mission, vision, that the founders jive together. Yeah. That's a good indicator. When you look even past that of, and maybe it's just there, but like people always think that we know that integration makes or breaks the deal ultimately. Is there things as you progress that are like indicators for you early on that company may be easier to integrate or more likely to integrate well versus not?
21:33What we try to do at Notion is if we have that really clear thesis document, then we do a lot of the collaboration and early pitching as front loaded as possible. What that means is we explain to the founders why we want to bring them on board and what we're excited about. And we start with that high level pitch. And I'm always surprised when I talk to founders, not in the context of Notion, but just giving advice to founders who are, oh, I'm in a process. And I said, why are they interested in you? And they, a lot of the times, can't even describe it. And I said, that's your first problem is you have to figure out why does the company want to acquire you and have they explained that.
22:15So once we get aligned on that, then we ask the founders, we give them a couple days and say, come back and pitch to us what your roadmap is going to be. So in six months, what are you going to want to have happen? In 12 months, what are you going to want to launch? This is after LOI though. This can be before LOI. Oh, interesting. Yeah. So you're challenging to think about what things are going to look like if a deal gets done. Yeah. And I would say this is also tough is the more you can do before LOI, the better because there's that alignment. if you're going to get engaged, you're going to want to know that it's the right fit.
22:47That's what I say is, if you don't fully understand why we're bringing you on board and what we want to build together, do you even want to come here? I try to turn it around on founders who maybe don't want to give more information up front. We pitch our vision, they pitch it back to us with more detail. And if you have that kind of just down the checklist. Yes, yes, yes. You know that it's going to be successful. When you have that, oh, that timeline is too long or that isn't exactly what we wanted to ship, that's when you start questioning, is this the right fit? But when you have that melding of the minds and that early phase pre-LOI joint vision, it makes everything else easier because on our side, they're really excited about getting these folks on board.
23:35And on their side, they're really excited about making it happen and the rest of the details fall into place. I like this a lot. Firelight M &A is about synchronizing diligence integration. This is such a prime example to even do this before LOI. How would you frame it to the company? It's like, hey, I kind of gave you where our vision is, but now I want you to expand on it. How do you frame that so it doesn't come off like, who the hell are these people think they are? We also try to front load bringing our founders in. So our CEO, our technical co-founder, our head of product. Yes, they are in there early.
Read the full transcript
24:09We show, hey, we have our highest folks are focused on this and care about this. So it's not just something, it's not a homework assignment we're asking you to do. We truly want to hear from you what you want to do here. And it's not pitched as prove it to us. It's more, you're setting up yourself for success. So we will sign off on these plans and then you'll know exactly what you're going to do here day one. That helps founders imagine themselves creating this value together and getting them really excited about joining up and frankly accelerating whatever they've been building on already. What does that look like once you sign an LOI, you move into conformatory diligence?
24:50Are the founders, are they literally creating an integration plan now? Oh, our founders are there? The target. Oh, the target. But no, so we think about their plan as... It's almost like a, we say integration thesis. Yeah. You can move goalposts. So they're goalposts and you don't have to have everything figured out, but you want to know, okay, we're marching in this direction. And so there's not a ton more detail that we require on that. What are we in the ship when? At that point, we know what we need to go do the diligence. Because, for instance, if they say, in order to accomplish our 12-month roadmap, we actually think we want to pause building our current product and focus all our attention on building this integrated product.
25:37We wouldn't go do a ton of diligence on helping merge infrastructures, for instance. We would really focus on what is that future vision. It really informs our diligence plan so that we know, okay, how much attention do we need to pay to all of the different aspects of a deal? And just focus on the ones where we know that we're going to have them build towards on day one. I guess I was curious about what that looks like when you're going through this process, informatory diligence, and just almost like the synchronization between those founders looking to work through that and then your team as well.
26:14Is that sort of collaborative? Yeah, we try to minimize the number of people from our side that they're talking to. I was on one deal at a public company where the team we were acquiring was less than 50. And by the end, we had 75 people internally just working on the M &A. We had more people internally than at the company we were actually acquiring. And that can get overwhelming. That's not how you blow up startups. Just put more people. This was across all functions, accounting and IT and workplace and all that stuff. We don't want the founders that we're acquiring to see any of that because it's just all details.
26:52It's like we have a specialized person for every different work stream. And they're a startup, so they have one person that does 20 of the things. So CorpDev really tries to limit the number of people that founders have to coordinate with. That's in a best case scenario. And then you're funneling all of the requests. You're making sure that all the internal questions are getting compiled on the back end. And then you're going through and figuring out what actually needs to be asked. I was working on one where we had a great benefits team. Kudos to them. but they were really focused on figuring out what the gym membership of the target startup was so that we could maintain parity of benefits.
27:35And we just finally said, enough. They don't have a gym membership plan because they're a startup. And so, you know, we can kind of just ignore that. So we try to not push back on our own side, but make sure that the right questions are getting filtered. So quarterbacking that process. Is integration, what does that look like structurally in your company? Is it a team? Is it within CorpDev? Most of the places I've worked don't have a completely separate integration function. So at LinkedIn, we had one person on the people side who was fully dedicated to M &A integration. People's the most important thing.
28:10But otherwise, corporate development also acted as internal integration. So that meant the people who worked on the deal pivoted to then own integration after the fact. And there was actually no transition because we had developed the integration plan prior to term sheet. And we do that at Notion as well. We can just follow through. And then the integration function at the company are different cross-functional leaders who have been identified as people who can really help guide the process internally. And what that's looked like at larger companies is it becomes this role that's a rotational program where you're a full-time technical accounting person.
28:51But if an M &A comes up, you then pivot to work on that technical accounting piece. And after mastering that, you get promoted. So it's pitched as if you can carve out time in your cross-functional role to help with the integration, that's a step up. That's one way to get people to help with integration internally. Get them to do the dirty work. Yeah. The fun stuff. Maybe if you're like really type A, I look at some of these and there's no way. Not for me. The integration plan. It's interesting that you have a version of it at Termsheet. How detailed is it? Because you kind of mentioned like the founder comes in.
29:29It's just like, what is, how detailed is that actually? It's as detailed as we can make it without assigning too much process. So you always want to be flexible, but it goes back to that having goalposts. post. So a lot of the time, if we're not sure how we want something to end up, we say, by this period of time, we want to run these A-B tests to figure out what we actually want to do here. But we know what we want to figure out. We don't have to have it figured out, but we know what we want to do by what period of time so we can march towards that. So for instance, when I was at LinkedIn and we acquired lynda.com, we didn't necessarily know how we wanted to divide the consumer business from the sales business and what parts we wanted to integrate.
30:14We ran really lightweight A-B tests to see what do we want to change. So before we made any big decisions, we had that informed data and we could bring that to the execs. We did periodic check-ins and said, here's what we found. Here's what we're going to do. And then we'd have it sign off. You don't know everything from the start, but you timebox, okay, when are we going to have this figured out? When are we going to have this figured out? And you kind of keep it flexible. There's a point where you have a timeline of at least some ideas of where we want to get. For instance, you can say in a year, we want to have this product shipped with Cron, which became Notion Calendar.
30:51We had a rough idea of we want to keep their product running. It's a beautiful product. It had users, but we need to integrate it into Notion to get that beautiful collaborative workspace benefit. We said, okay, this time period, let's do a rebrand and let's make sure it gets rolled out to all the Notion users. And so you pick that as your North Star. So everyone's really working towards it. I like that example. So Cron was a calendar app. Yep. And then you acquired this business. They already had a customer base. Yep. Did you just day one, we're now part of Notion? No. So we did announce that they were part of Notion right after the acquisition.
31:31We didn't rebrand it. So we kept the Cron logo, we kept the Cron domain, and then about a year after acquisition, we flipped a switch, we rebranded to Notion Calendar, and we did a big push across our entire user base saying, now you can use this Notion Calendar. For a lot of people, it was new. There's always the users that said, oh, I used Notion Calendar back when it was Cron. So they know that there was that period. Then it became part of the platform because you really did an actual integration. Yep. So now we have a Notion calendar team that's been expanded since we... It was three employees when we acquired them.
32:08And now the calendar team is... It's much bigger. What's the go-to-market thinking? Because that's always an interesting one. When this, obviously, product was sold as a standalone, but then you bring it as a platform. Is it some part of the suite? Does it become an add-on? Yeah. That's another thing we think about the go-to-market plan. It might be a good time to talk about the four different types of M &A. The go-to-market plan differs across those four. So it's something we call the four T's, which is talent, tech, traction, and terrain. And those four T's represent a different kind of acquisition.
32:42Talent is the smallest. So you're only bringing on the... That's what people talk about when they talk about acquihire. So then you're not even bringing the product on. You're just bringing on a team that builds whatever they've been building on your platform. And then it's tech. And that's when you're acquiring the IP or a product that really helps you get... Accelerate time to market. So Calendar was a really good example of that, where we knew we wanted to offer a calendar product. And buying a calendar company, keeping it running, and then rebranding it was an immediate way to do that. At that point, you do want to think about, are we going to directly monetize?
33:20To your point, how are you thinking about bringing it to market? Is it an add-on? Is it for retention? Across all companies, that's part of the integration plan. Part of what is success? Is it bringing new users in the door? Is it a new SKU? Generally for tech, it's a product feature that you're adding. So you're not expecting some sort of new monetary value. The third T, traction, is where I see new go-to-market strategies come into play. And traction, in my mind, is basically acquiring customers or revenue that open up a strategic adjacency, that's where you're bringing in the whole company, not just the tech, not just the product, but you're keeping it running.
34:01Maybe you're adding it to your sales team. Maybe you're putting it on your pricing page. But traction deals are really where you're saying, Okay, this is something I want to monetize. And I would say, we're not doing that yet here. And we did some math when I was at LinkedIn on when is the right time to start doing traction deals. And we basically saw, and again, this was 10 years ago, but we saw that when a company reached or had line of sight to a billion of core ARR, didn't have to be at a billion of ARR, but a billion of core ARR, that's when you should start doing those bigger traction deals.
34:34When you hear traction, that's to use an old school example, Google buying YouTube. YouTube had traction. Facebook buying Instagram. Instagram had traction. So what are you bringing on and you're going to leave independent? So LinkedIn's example is LinkedIn buying Linda. We kept it as a standalone business and kept selling it. That is when you're really thinking about what is our revenue targets for this. And then the final T is terrain, which is something only the really large companies do, which is like a 10-year bet. So again, old school example, but Facebook buying Oculus. What is a place that we know we want to be in 10 years?
35:09And only pretty big companies can really be thinking about that and spending tons of money in that category. So talent, tech, traction, terrain, each one of those has a different set of, I would say, like diligence questions, success metrics, and smaller companies or even bigger companies that are just starting out should acquire in that order to build the muscle of how do we make M &A successful and work their way up. I love the way to think about this. So talent is basically people only. Tech is IP or product. Traction. You're thinking of a new go-to-market and really thinking of revenue synergies.
35:44And then your terrain is basically a new platform where you're really getting away from the core. Yes. Exactly. Awesome. When you have that fit, then that sort of shapes how you approach the deal. Then you can clarify that with the team. This is why we're doing the deal. This is what that means. And then you start answering those questions. Right. I want to go back on the integration. IMO, integration management office. Traditionally, a lot of big corps around here in the valley will have an IMO set up and they will hand off the integration responsibilities. Corp. dev will hand it off to IMO and they'll run it.
36:17They'll execute a hundred-day plan or depending on the deal, right? It could be a big one and it takes longer. And then they eventually hand it off to the business. You don't do that. No, I do wonder if part of that is just being at a kind of always smaller company. I'll put in quotes. When I joined LinkedIn, it was about 3 ,000 people. By the time I left, it was about 13 ,000, 14 ,000, if you don't count Microsoft. You can still manage without an IMO if you're doing four to five acquisitions a year that are not super complex and traction heavy, as it were. I also think the reason that a lot of integration fails is either the plan wasn't right the first time, or it's not understood and followed properly on the back end.
37:06The more connective tissue you can have between the people that worked on the deal thesis and brought it to life can also then shepherd it into fruition and reality on the back end. What that has looked like in the integration functions where I've been is the deal lead will literally pivot to making the deal a success, which I think is the same thing a lot of integration teams do. But it's just that person that worked on the deal is then also pivoting their set of skills. I think a lot of the times, CorpDev folks, and I'll screen for this, are like, I just want to do the glamorous deals and the deal work and then ignore what comes next.
37:46But I'll do that unglamorous, going around with a clipboard. I remember when we went around to all the acquired engineers and said, What kind of Mac do you want? Super tactical stuff just to make sure that people are landing and feeling like this is my home. I want to work here. I want to make it successful because they haven't had that discourse like the founders have. So you really want to go and make sure that every single person to the extent possible. And again, this is why maybe bigger companies doing bigger deals need a whole integration team to make that a reality. But we did that all on our own at LinkedIn.
38:21And at Pinterest, I did hire a head of integration. She reported to me she was sitting in the room with the deal lead from day one, getting to know the founders, developing that integration plan. So even though it had a separate name, they weren't separate from the team at all. And they were shoulder to shoulder. And they were someone who had come from within the company. They knew how all the people functions work and could make that really clean transition from... here's why we're doing the deal to here's how to make the success. Cause I know exactly how this company runs. I can seamlessly bring it together.
38:58They're along for the ride. Yeah. Everything. Yeah. Diligence. I'm a little bit biased in having integration just be hand in hand with corp dev, if not the same. But then again, once you get to those super duper large acquisitions, that process probably breaks and you need to. So no shade on that. Yeah, that's fair. That's a fair, I had a good conversation with a friend who's an integration leader about this. Cause he did both. He did it with an IMO, without the IMO. It was much better without the IMO because it just, he didn't have a necessary handoff. Right. Straight to the business. In this sense, it's like you have CorpDev that sort of takes more of that accountability around orchestrating the integration.
39:34But then the business is really in there, involved to... Exactly. Pick things up and get it done. Yeah. Pretty cool. Anybody that's an IMO want to debate this, feel free to reach out. Hillary and I hop on a live webinar about this. That's a good idea for our next one. Absolutely. I got to ask you, when you see integrations go off track? Oh, yeah. Why? I would say integrations go off track for a few reasons. Sometimes there is no plan. You would be surprised at how many times the plan is super high level and hand wavy. I've seen this firsthand. I've heard horror stories. but someone is really pounding the table and they have a specific reason that they want the deal to go through and they're willing to ignore the other questions in order to accomplish this one thing.
40:29What happens is you ignore all the downsides and risks that might mean that you can't even accomplish that one thing once you buy the company. Not having a plan is definitely the number one way for an integration to fail. Surprising that it happens, but it does. Another is no clear deal sponsor. So if it's unclear on who's going to own it after the fact, because you really want that person to pound the table for this kind of external organism that you're absorbing, it's not smooth. You need someone internally who's respected, who's stable, who has the trust of the exec team to just manage that company through the process.
41:10I've seen also where a deal sponsor happens to leave after the fact, they lose that. I've seen deals where the strategy changes after the acquisition happens. So you can have the clearest strategy in the world, but sometimes there's turnover at the top and that changes. And then the company is there and they pivot and it can still be fine. I've also seen a horror a story where the acquired company was on AWS and everyone hands over all their credentials. But then we wanted to change the credit card on the AWS account. And the person that had the login details from our side had not added it to a 1Password and was on some leave where we couldn't reach out to them.
41:52So we tried to add the new credit card and we couldn't because we didn't have the admin password. And so literally the acquired company's site went down for three days. We were like, we want to give you the payment method. And they're like, you're not the admin. So that was probably one of the... Luckily, in the end, everything was okay. But that was definitely an integration gone wrong. So now I'm very on top of all the credentials, which again, not glamorous, but one of those details that you really need to manage. Make sure someone's paying an electric bill. Yeah, exactly. Is there a working credit card on all the accounts?
42:27Wow. These are great examples of what goes wrong. We talked through most of the life cycle. We kind of talked about the strategy, how it shapes, how you do diligence, but really put integration thinking in the forefront and get to execution, get the team members involved in collaborating directly. Tech is a big piece. There's a lot of people out there still using Excel. I got to ask, as unbiased way as possible, as a founder of a tech company that supports executing M &A, I know you use Notion, which I'm a big fan of. Dogfooding, I agree. I love to hear about the value add. I feel like just having a place to collaborate, single source of truth, and I feel like you've achieved it.
43:05I love to hear about how you use Notion to do M &A. Yeah. And I tell you, we use Notion in our company. Amazing. Fuel Room uses Notion. It supports a lot of it. It reminds me, I actually got to update my little CEO corner section in there. I'll do that after the interview. That's great to hear. I will say being at Notion and using Notion to run CorpDev, it's very meta, but it's amazing because the thing I struggled with most across all of the CorpDev teams that I've worked on is we use so many different tools. There's a prospecting tool, you use a CRM, there's a deal checklist, you have to build alignment documents.
43:41And because you can do all those things in Notion. You can use it as a CRM. You can use it as your team work hub, present your deal thesis. You can use it as a project management tool. You can do all the work in one place. The way we have it set up is we have our internal CRM in Notion. And each company we talk to has a card, a page basically, and everything gets built off of that. So every company has its own status. and then every time we have a meeting, we put the notes right there. And then once you actually start getting active, we can drop in templates that we've created for a template for the team, a template for the process, a template for the thesis document.
44:27We've basically built up a template for everything that we need to do and we can hone it inside the card to keep everything organized and also manage permissions. So it's pretty neat to have all of that. But I'm kind of laughed because I'm part of a corporate development Slack group where someone said, Hey, what's your tech stack? What do you use? And everyone had 12 different pieces of software. And I was like, we use Notion. You use it for everything? For pipeline, diligence, integration? What we don't use it for is data, company data. If you think about Crunchbase or PitchBook, obviously, we don't have company data.
45:02But for any tools, kind of like software tools, that's been replaced with Notion. But if you do your search in PitchBook or any of those products and shortlist it, would you put that shortlist in Notion? Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So you'll do that. Everybody does that. Yeah. Some database for the private company data and then get saved. Yeah. And then the counterparty. You'll go back and forth in diligence with them. We will use wherever they like to upload their docs. If they want to email to us, we'll do a shared Notion. If they email them, we'll drop them in that. Or we can do a shared Notion outside the Notion workspace.
45:37it's actually nice to see you can tell now what founders are aligned where they'll send us an email and in the footer it'll say sent with Notion mail. So you can tell who uses Notion on a day-to-day basis and that's a good sign that they'll be a fit. Same with Notion calendar. And if we say, hey, what's your pitch? We talked about building that day zero, six month, 12 month plan. Now most founders do it in Notion and they'll send it to us in the shared Notion doc with the seamless kind of collaboration experience. I've seen it firsthand, the flexibility, the templating I've seen. I was actually impressed because I went just to poke around with the marketing team does.
46:12So I didn't realize this podcast, the whole back end of it is on Notion. Everything, every step of the production, the guests that we're hunting down, everything's all on Notion. That's awesome. That's awesome to hear. And actually, I've demoed my corp dev setup for other corp dev teams. Because speaking of startups, a lot of startups use Notion. So when they get acquired, their acquirer will usually try to get them to cut software. And a lot of the times they'll kick and scream and say, I don't want to give up my notion. And so I'll say, well, if you want to use it, here's how I use it and try to pitch for dev teams to adopt it internally to help create the case to keep it instead of having them spin up on another tool.
46:54So for the old school people out there on Excel, what's the pitch and the value of having everything in one place? You don't have to search for anything and it's all there. And maybe we can get into AI, but with everything in one place, I literally just go ask AI. For instance, someone came to me internally and said, hey, what mobile companies have we talked to? We might be interested in mobile. I went into Notion AI and I said, what mobile companies have I talked to? And it literally pulled up the seven recent conversations I'd had with companies. And And that's not just in the name. It searched my notes.
47:33It searched the website. It said, Hey, here's five companies that are mobile. And these two might be because you said this in the notes. It's just there. You don't have to tag it necessarily the way you used to have to tag things. And having it all in one place makes that part seamless. And just everything in one place, the notes, the pitch docs, the project plan, it all links back together. You do have to spend some time setting it up. I think the reason a lot of people try Notion and give up is it seems too complicated. So it takes some effort. But then once you set it up in the right way, it can really make the deal process a lot easier.
48:09Yes. A lot of efficiency, it sounds like. But definitely pitch M &A signs too. I know. That's a whole contact sales. They might reach out to you. That's usually how it works. Yeah, yeah, yeah. A couple of months after you're on the podcast, somebody at Deal Room Sales will reach out. love to see it. Maybe give me more ideas for ways to set up Notion better. It's interesting when you work with a really large corp dev team and their different functions have standardized on different project management tools. Oh, yeah. I feel like that's... We're really good at connecting diligence integration, but at a high level.
48:42But then when it turns into a plan that actually expands, okay, we got to migrate HubSpot to Salesforce and it turns into like 50 other tasks. Then it makes sense to plug it right into Notion. Yeah. And we're building those plugins. So hopefully you can still, people can use different tools. That's what we do. We'll plug them in and get them both together. Yeah. The data room environment and then boom. Yeah. We'll do a partnership. There you go. It started right here. The AI. Yeah. I was really impressed with how fast Notion adopted AI. That was insane. Just because I know the organization isn't like super small.
49:17We're a small company. We're 50 people. And for us to do stuff, it's so cool. Literally, they don't have a choice because I'm barking at them. But for Notion to do at scale and just it's matured really quickly. I'm curious about that part of, hey, here's like a company to move at speed, keep up with AI. But then as you think about the M &A and like just I'm struggling with it, just an AI for M &A. There's literally 100 companies right now that are trying to automate every little piece, use AI. And to be honest, a lot of them are struggling with traction just because you need a lot of data to really make some progress here.
49:53Right. How do you sort of look at it both organically and inorganically? It's nice that you're pushing it top down at your company. It's similar to Notion. Our founders had an early view of GPT 3.5, I believe, is the one that got released in November 2022. And the entire company was on a retreat in Cancun. And they saw the pre-release, locked themselves in a hotel room, and spent the next five days jamming on what can Notion be with AI. We were, I would say, one of the first at-scale SaaS companies to launch a product in GA. It was February of 2023 and started charging for it. And it was mostly individual users picking it up and trying it since we've shifted to more enterprises using it.
50:42But it was that kind of top-down understanding of what AI can do for the company, much less corp dev, but for the product. We've since launched a bunch of different AI. We have AI Writer, Database Autofill, like Search across different connectors, as we were talking about. And we have an AI agent that has been silently released. We're doing a big push on that in a few weeks. That's kind of the next iteration of how can I have AI use Notion to do my work for me? So it's not necessarily SaaS is going away. We're taking a piece out of that labor. We're having AI do the work for you in your software that already exists.
51:27And we're fortunate to be in a position where we're not these research labs competing for the bleeding edge AI researchers. as you've seen,$100 million packages, thankfully. We're building on top of all of these great models like OpenAI and Anthropic and iterating super quickly where something we tried six months ago that didn't work now works today with kind of the newest iteration of name your model. That's been really exciting. Pivoting to corporate development, we've tried to automate as much as possible with AI and that's allowed us to stay small We're a team of two. And corporate development, in addition to sourcing deals, we also do what I'll call competitive intelligence, just tracking what's in the news.
52:15We use AI for that, summarize it every week. Quarterly earnings of companies that we look up to or consider competitors, we'll just drop the earnings reports into Notion AI and it knows how we want to divide it up and what's in a report and we can just ship that to the company. It's been really exciting to see how AI is also shaping how you can do more as a corporate development person at your company. I like that. They're using AI to track the market. Yeah. The way you keep tabs on all these AI companies, you use AI to keep tabs on all the different AI companies. Yes. It's very recursive. It was also thinking back to that time AI is coming out.
52:52Do we need to go buy a bunch of AI companies to be at the forefront? Our recent acquihires have all been in the AI space. Every single founder that we've acquired has been put against our AI efforts. And it's been amazing because they iterate so quickly and have that scrappy founder mindset, which you need in this world of models changing every two minutes. That has also been helpful for us. Even though Notion wasn't originally thought of as an AI company, we're one of three AI companies on the Forbes AI 50 list that are not AI native, quote unquote, they're founded pre what I'll call the AI generation.
53:30And now we're seeing it become a huge part of our product. You've done talent acquisitions for AI. Yes. I was going to say, because tech is freaking expensive. Yes. You know, they've raised it 2050x multiplier. Yeah. It was definitely tough for a while when the initial funding wave came out and no one was interested in selling. And I think two things, valuations were so high that a lot of companies didn't find that traction. And then also, we've proven ourselves as an AI company. Our brand in the space is stronger now as a place folks who want to build AI for an at-scale user base can do that.
54:09And the way that our product is architected as building blocks, that's how we talk about Notion, as Lego blocks. It's all code. And AI uses code. And so you can literally use AI to do soon almost anything. Looking forward to it. it's like moving fast. So we got to hang on, keep up. I don't know if it's hang on. It's like you got to run faster to keep up. All of the above. Any parting advice for corp dev leaders that are looking to scale an M &A function in a growth environment? Yeah, I would say if you already know the basics of M &A and know how to run a process, it's truly about getting to know your counterparts at the company, the key stakeholders, what are their fears, what are their concerns, or maybe they're too eager and you have to talk them back, but get to know each person and what makes them tick so that you can best position yourself as an acquirer and as a home for that acquired company to be successful.
55:09It's funny, people say it's all about the people. It's about the people that you acquire and it's about the people internally. Yeah, I was just thinking about that. It's like both sides and it's like, really understand the psychology on both ends. It's tricky. Yeah. It is tricky. And knowing who's the best engineering leader to go do the technical diligence because not everyone has that same level of depth that they need to get to. And some people know the right questions to ask. You have to know enough to be dangerous as a corporate person, but then you go find the people that can do the deep technical diligence that you need.
55:40Other advice. Try to keep it small. Going back to this AI piece, see how much you can do with AI. It's not necessarily trying all the tools. Although definitely, if anyone has, maybe leave it in the comments, if anyone has really good AI tools they're using to source or to even do deals. One of the things that I found fascinating is that you're really active with the corporate development community. You helped organize different initiatives out here in the Bay Area and other things. Can you tell me a little bit more about that? Yeah. I organized what is now a Slack channel called CorpDevBreakfast, which is kind of a funny name.
56:14but it all started back in 2016 when I was again at LinkedIn. I was taking a friend from Uber CorpDev to breakfast at the office and ran into one of my colleagues who was taking his friend from Uber CorpDev to breakfast. We joined forces and just talked about on a high-level basis, what were we seeing, what were we struggling with? And we walked away from that breakfast thinking, that was so helpful. I wish we did this more. There's no community for CorpDev folks to share best practices. So every quarter, we started organizing breakfasts for people to get together. And it grew organically to the point where about a month before COVID hit, one of my friends at Google Corp Dev hosted the group and it was just too big.
56:59It was like 50 people showed up and we realized this is not going to work. And then COVID hit and we didn't have the breakfast anymore. And someone said, I really miss this community. How can we keep it going. That's when we spun up the Slack group. Now it's about 250 people and it's global because it's not limited just to the Bay Area tech companies, which is really nice. And the only requirements are that you have corp dev in your bio and you use a work email. So people will pose questions in the general channel. They'll post jobs that they're hiring for. They'll post resumes of folks that are looking for jobs in corp dev.
57:36It's a nice, safe place for people to feel like they have a community amongst the different companies who some of them may be competitors, but it's like we're all trying to help each other out. So all the people that reach out to me looking for jobs or hiring, I should just... Yeah, I'll post it. I'm going to send them to you. That's really good. I love hearing about it because it's something that I've noticed even with this podcast that there's a community. Maybe we've got to collaborate on an event actually. Yeah. The Friends of Snowflake. They got a great space over there that we could use.
58:04Okay, I'll call them up. We like doing it. having just a peer group. I think even as an early CEO founder, I used to do this in Chicago. We had these FinTech CEO roundtable. That's where I got the idea for the format that we currently do. Just six to 10 on the table. We're going to do intros. The next time around, what's the biggest challenge you currently face? And everybody weighs in on it. So now we just do that scale. We get 50 people, we break them in little pods of six or seven folks and just do the same format. That's awesome. Yeah, but that's the same thing. It's like the most valuable thing is just getting that peer network.
58:30And then you just got friends like, hey, I need your help. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Off the record. Yeah, let me tell you about the situation or I got this weird thing I'm trying to negotiate. I mean, I tell you even really early of what we're trying to look at in terms of thinking about M &A for a small company. It's so helpful. Yeah. The universe of problems is actually at the end of the day, quite small. And if enough people are in the room, they've all seen the same problem and can empathize or at least provide guidance. The best thing you can do for your career is listen to this podcast and get involved with a group of your peers.
59:03Yeah. So I got to ask you, what's the craziest thing you've seen in M &A? One of the craziest things that I saw was when a CEO didn't come along with the company. And it turned out after the fact that they had convinced everyone to sign and join by just making up imaginary outcomes for the employees, which required a lot of footwork on the back end. But this goes back to your question earlier. When have you seen integration go wrong, go off the rails? is when you don't bring on that leader because you don't know what the leader then told the team to get them to come on board. Does it have to sign like retention letters or offer letters?
59:40Kind of like, oh, you'll have pots of golden rainbows. And if you do this, and because the person you're talking to is generally the founder, you don't have insight into what they're telling their team. So that was pretty crazy. That was a crazy thing in M &A that I personally experienced. That is pretty wild. Yeah. Because you're on your way out. That's not good. That's so shady. I've seen some funny stuff on Twitter. Not that I've been a part of, but founders going off on their process on Twitter. So if I find any good threads, I'll share those. That'd be fun. Yeah. We got to start our own like M &A Lunatics thread on Reddit.
1:00:15I like that. I have some good ones. That'd be good. Yeah. Let's put it all down on this. Hillary, this has been great. I really appreciate taking a break from doing deals to have a conversation with me and helping me become a better M &A scientist. Yeah. It's great to talk about it. And it was great to have you here at Notion. and hopefully we can do it again. Thank you so much. If you were listening to this all the way to the end of the podcast, I salute you, the fellow M &A brothers and sisters out there. It takes some real dedication to listen to long-form content like this. I'd love to hear from you.
1:00:45Connect with me on LinkedIn. Love getting the feedback, different ideas for topics we haven't covered and the criticism. I'm used to that. So I'll take it, learn from it. So next time, here's to the deal.
1:01:08Thank you for taking the time to explore the world of M &A with our podcast. We love hearing feedback. Tag us on a LinkedIn post, add a review on Apple Podcasts. We'd love to hear from you. If you need help standing up an M &A function or optimizing one that you already have, we're here to help. And if we can't help you, we probably know someone that can. You can reach out to me by email, Kisan, K-I-S-O-N, at mascience.com. Or you can text me directly at 312-857-3711. If you just want to keep learning at your own pace, visit mascience.com for a lot more content and resources. That's where you can also subscribe to our newsletter.
1:01:53Again, that's mascience.com. Here's to the deal. Thank you.
From the publisher
Hilary Shirazi, Head of Corporate Development at Notion, brings over a decade of M&A experience from LinkedIn, Pinterest, and Zendesk to discuss building corporate development strategy at high-growth tech companies. She shares her proven deal thesis methodology, the "Four T's" framework for categorizing acquisitions, and why integration without an IMO might be the better approach for agile teams.
Things you will learn:
-
The Deal Thesis Framework – How to crystallize strategy before identifying targets using Hilary's proven document template
-
The Four T's of M&A – Talent, Tech, Traction, and Terrain categories that determine your acquisition approach and integration strategy
-
Integration Without IMO – Why embedding integration throughout the process beats traditional handoff models for most deals
___________________
The Buyer-Led M&A™ Summit is back.
The virtual event built for dealmakers who want to eliminate chaos and take control from sourcing through integration.
📅 October 30, 2025
🕚 11:00 AM – 2:30 PM ET
💻 Free & Virtual
Learn from leaders who’ve built scalable, repeatable strategies that keep deals on track - Register now.
____________________
Join us for the 3rd M&A Science Fair IN PERSON
Get pure, off-the-record collaboration between corporate development, private equity, and integration leaders. Instead of passive listening, you’ll be sharing real frameworks, trading ideas, and testing what actually works in modern deal execution. Everything’s practitioner-led, and every topic is surfaced by the attendees themselves.
October 16th — NYC
8AM-7:30PM
Request an invite here: https://luma.com/khkuh6yw
____________________
Episode Chapters[00:02:00] Hilary's career evolution and why in-house M&A beats advisory work
[00:05:00] Building M&A Best Practices – Why starting at a mature organization teaches critical fundamentals before going solo
[00:08:30] Getting to know executives' M&A fears and biases before sourcing deals
[00:11:00] The Deal Thesis Methodology – Creating strategy documents before naming targets to avoid "solution shopping"
[00:16:00] Deal Sponsor Selection
[00:20:00] Front-Loading Vision Alignment
[00:30:00] The Four T's Framework – Categorizing acquisitions as Talent, Tech, Traction, or Terrain deals
[00:35:00] Integration Without IMO – Why Corp Dev should own integration instead of handing off to separate teams
[00:42:00] Using Notion for M&A
[00:51:00] AI in Corporate Development
Questions, comments, concerns?
Follow Kison Patel for behind-the-scenes insights on modern M&A.
