In short
M&A Science Podcast Episode Summary: Validating the Acquisition Plan
Episode Overview Title: Validating the Acquisition Plan Host: Kison Patel Guest: Adam Harris, CEO of Cloudbeds Duration: Approximately 1 hour and 10 minutes
In this episode of M&A Science, Adam Harris shares insights into a structured six-step process that Cloudbeds employs to validate acquisition plans, emphasizing the importance of ensuring that acquisitions bring value to the parent company.
Key Concepts
- Importance of Validation in M&A: Ensuring that an acquisition adds value is crucial to avoid the pitfalls of purchasing a company that does not align with the strategic goals.
- Six-Step Process for Validating Acquisition Plans:
- Surveying Customers
- Industry Trend Analysis
- Partner vs. Build Analysis
- Formulating the Strategic Rationale
- In-depth Company Analysis and Product Demos
- Drafting a Detailed Memo
Detailed Breakdown
- Surveying Customers
- Constant Feedback: Regular customer surveys are essential to gather insights on needs and trends.
- Diverse Methods: Use different formats such as polls during webinars, quick questions, and in-person surveys at conferences.
- Industry Trend Analysis
- Trend Mapping: Analyze macro and micro trends affecting the industry, helping to identify potential acquisition targets or areas for development.
- Competitor Research: Keeping an eye on competitors' movements to anticipate market changes.
- Partner vs. Build Analysis
- Evaluating Options: Determine whether to build a solution internally or partner with an existing company.
- Proof of Concept: Conduct experiments to see which approach might work best before proceeding.
- Formulating the Strategic Rationale
- Collaborative Thesis Writing: Involve potential acquisition targets in discussions to create a shared vision and rationale for the merger.
- In-depth Company Analysis and Product Demos
- Cultural Fit Assessment: Evaluate the potential cultural compatibility through product demos and interactions with the target company's team.
- Talent Evaluation: Analyze the skills and backgrounds of the team to identify synergies.
- Drafting a Detailed Memo
- Transparency: Create a comprehensive memo that outlines strategic rationale, potential concerns, and integration plans, encouraging open communication between both parties.
Key Takeaways
- Importance of Customer Insights: Gathering feedback from customers is critical in shaping acquisition strategies.
- Cultural Compatibility: Assessing the cultural fit of potential acquisitions is just as important as financial metrics.
- Collaborative Documentation: Involving the target company in the memo creation fosters transparency and clarity.
Episode Bookmarks
- 00:00 - Intro
- 08:45 - Approaching M&A
- 18:20 - Surveying Customers
- 23:47 - Industry Trend Analysis
- 28:13 - Partner vs. Build Analysis
- 34:12 - Formulating the Strategic Rationale
- 36:50 - In-depth Company Analysis and Product Demos
- 41:18 - Drafting a Detailed Memo
- 44:15 - Pitching M&A to the Board
- 44:54 - Craziest Thing in M&A
Conclusion Adam Harris outlines a comprehensive methodology for validating acquisition plans that emphasizes customer engagement, thorough market analysis, and the importance of cultural compatibility. This episode serves as a valuable guide for M&A practitioners looking to refine their validation processes to ensure successful integrations.
For more insights and episodes, visit [M&A Science](https://www.mascience.com/podcast).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00This podcast episode is brought to you by Dealroom. In a world of M &A, speed, efficiency, and collaboration are key. The AZEK company faced challenges familiar to many. Outdated methods led to time-consuming processes which hindered deal potential. That's when they found a lifeline in Dealroom, a modern end-to-end M &A solution. With Dealroom, AZEK centralized collaboration, got real-time results, and eliminated excess. With Dealroom's help, deals were closed faster, onboarding's five times quicker, and they've saved 93 ,000 annually. Don't let outdated methods slow down your M &A success. Join the AZ company and countless others.
0:40Revolutionize your M &A process with Dealroom, the modern M &A solution. Learn more at dealroom.net. Again, that's dealroom.net. I'm Kisan Patel and you're listening to M &A Science, where we talk with deal professionals and learn valuable lessons from their experience. This podcast focuses on stories, strategies, and what actually happened during M &A deals.
1:16Hello M &A scientists, welcome to the M &A Science Podcast, where we learn from the best in M &A to uncover proven techniques for enterprise value creation. If you're interested in learning more about how to optimize your M &A practice or want to get involved with our community of forward-thinking M &A practitioners, visit mascience.com and subscribe to our free weekly newsletter for the latest industry trends, insightful content, and community events. And if you want to keep up with us on the go, head to LinkedIn and follow M &A Science. I'm your host, Kisan Patel, CEO and founder of M &A Science.
1:51Joining me today is Adam Harris, CEO at CloudBeds. Cloud Beds is a cloud-based hotel management platform, which includes tools for managing reservations, availability, rates, distribution channels, payments, guests, housekeeping, and more. Today, we're going to talk about validating the buy plan to get board approval. Adam, how are you doing? I'm doing well. Thanks for having me. Thanks for taking the time to have a conversation. Can we kick things off a little bit about your background? I've got a mixed background. It's fun. Everything from being called Gizmo and my fraternity at Berkeley, being a tinker of technology my entire life to doing some Wall Street stint and coaching soccer and ultimately working in technology and building software for others until my good friend and I, Rich, decided why not start our own SaaS company and here we are with CloudBeds.
2:39You're a two-time founder because you started a company prior to CloudBeds that acquired. I did, yep. And now CloudBeds, what got you involved in the hotel industry? Glutton for punishment, I think. I had a full head of hair when I started this thing. I'm I'm quite envious of you. We realized a couple of things. One is there's a trillion and a half dollars gets spent inside hospitality travel every year. And it's a ginormous industry. It's also one of the most complex. And at the time, we had a hotel group approach us saying, hey, I've got this problem. And their problem was they had a bunch of different concepts in this big master development down in Latin America.
3:16What they were trying to accomplish was, how do I centralize all the reservation experience for a consumer in one place? Now, the issue was there was like nine different technologies that were doing one element of that flow. And we built from scratch this woven technology into one unified experience for a consumer. Rich and I looked at each other and we're like, it can't be this bad. Like, it really can't be this bad in an industry that will put a billion people into a bed for the first time by 2020, 2030. How on earth is the technology this horrible? Fast forward today, what we realized was travel as a whole has some of the least digitally adopting individuals.
3:58I love the scientists. So the hotel scientists are not very tech forward in their thinking. They are very much old school. They like to keep things as normal. And I think our peer group for digital adoption in about 50 industries is forestry, prison incarcerated services, and construction. I'll take Procore all day long. Not too sure about forestry and prison services. I didn't know they had tech. And to be honest with you, I'm sure they do. But if you think about that, here's an industry with a billion and a half people who are going to stay in a hotel this year. The consumer is incredibly savvy.
4:33The hotel operator is not. And so we saw this opportunity to take advantage of some tailwinds in the market. And so we went vertical. We built a vertical SaaS company. It took a lot of years to prove that this thing was actually doable and possible. We strung a lot of technology together. We bought six companies along the way. We're actually in exclusivity on another one right now, which is really exciting for us. And part of that M &A practice was accelerating our capability from a product perspective. is can we get to market quicker than a build, for example, scenario? And I'm happy to walk you guys through some of that thought process.
5:08I'd love to. What catches my attention right away is the tech company. I run a tech company now. And I'm curious too, we'll probably get in the conversation about managing their organic growth with these inorganic activities, especially you're still at the earlier stages and balancing that out where it doesn't become such a major distraction and throughout all the organic efforts. We tend to be a platform kill M &A approach, meaning when we buy platforms, we tend to roll off all of the customers into our ecosystem, even if that means deteriorating revenue. That's not in all cases, but in most cases, we also like to find earlier stage MVP.
5:47That earlier stage MVP needs to be proven, needs to be completely reliable and scalable from an architecture perspective. But I don't need the big go-to-market engine. I have that. I have the logos of customers already in our ecosystem being one of the largest in the world. And we can also take advantage of the fact that our ecosystem is used by so many different types of properties. I don't need another interface. The interface basically becomes the one inside our core user experience. And so really what we're looking for is technologists who have mastered the practice of whatever they solve for.
6:23So for example, our first M &A deal was MyAllocator. We had just raised our first$2 million. $2 million. And we stumbled upon this technology that allowed hotels to take inventory, so rooms and availability, and then prices, and send it out to the major OTAs. That's Booking.com, Expedia, and others. They were doing maybe$400 ,000 in revenue, recurring, something like that. We bought it for$1 million. Now, great multiple if you wanted to accelerate to today in the way we think about things. But at the time, it was half our cash. We basically just raised money and took half our cash on a bet. Now, it was one of the best things we've ever done in this company history.
7:03It was one of the smartest things. And so that just became a service. That technology became a service to CloudBeds, which meant there was no interface long-term. It was just the connectivity that enabled the rest of the mothership, meaning CloudBeds core, to do everything else and connect to that ecosystem. And so Whistle, which is one of our latest acquisitions, which is a guest communication platform, that user experience has now been interfaced into CloudBeds. And so that interface of old will slowly be sunsetted into the fields. But from the perspective of what we're looking for is we're looking for great practitioners of technology who understand the needs of the consumer, but have built it in a way that we're able to flexibly take that and integrate that in many different ways.
7:46That's just been one of our approaches. Not every situation is the same. We've definitely bought tech that we've completely rewritten. For the most part, that's what we're looking for. You have this vision as a vertical SaaS serving hospitality, but a real platform model. 100%. That you're doing acquisitions and they're different expertise of capability that they've matured to. And when you acquire them, you're adding that capability to this core platform that is all driving your sort of core organic growth, your current go-to-market, basically. I think a really good analogy would be Salesforce.
8:20However, Salesforce keeps all those interfaces separate. So as you look at their laundry list of acquisitions they've done in the last decade, Slack is still sold as a third party, but Slack has now been deeply integrated into service cloud and sales cloud and stuff like that. So our approach would be slightly similar. We're looking for things that we can bolt on to the product ecosystem. I just want to get rid of the interfaces long term. How do you approach M &A? Oh, man. So we are religious about our M &A practice. It's something that we've perfected over time. And it's been fun. We were a little more cavalier early in the days.
8:54And now I think we've done enough motion where we sort of have a system. There's six steps that we go to validate. And really along those entire six steps, what we're doing is trying to write a thesis. And we're also trying to write that thesis with the other party in mind. So we actually want them to participate in that process. We want them to give us insight to how they see the two businesses working together. What they see is the value add of one plus one equals hopefully three or four or five. And so what we do is simple and probably makes sense. One, we always are surveying our customers.
9:28I don't think you can ever survey your customers as a tech company enough. Constantly be asking questions in different ways, in different formats, sometimes full surveys that are five minutes long, sometimes just one quick question in back and forth interaction. Sometimes we do polls inside webinars. We are literally trying to collect as much data on our customers as possible. We even bring tablets to big conferences and we have interns walk the hall asking hoteliers questions around buying trends and things like that. So we're very forward thinking around how do we understand what the need analysis is today?
10:01So we always started the need analysis. The second thing is we look at what trends are happening in this big industry. This big industry with a bunch of different influences. You've got outside party influence. You've got inside party influence, meaning macro things, micro events. And throughout that entire first two steps, we begin to start formulating ideas of, okay, who could the targets be? Or is this something we should build ourselves? You got to keep in mind, we've already originated themes throughout the M &A practice to this point. So even before we start serving the customer, people might be on this call being like, how do you know what to ask?
10:41We're asking such a wide array. We're looking for topics. Like if, for example, we were interested in car transfer software, someone in our ecosystem, meaning it could have been support teams are fielding a bunch of inquiries on why doesn't your booking engine enable car transfers, meaning I can book a hotel. Why can't I also prearrange a car transfer? Well, that keeps feeding up in some. It could be on the sales side. It could be on the support side. It could be in our marketing team. It could be partnerships bringing a lot of car transfer companies coming to us. I'm using such a poor example, but I couldn't think of anything else that wasn't revealing.
11:16All of a sudden, we then go and start surveying our customers. All right, car transfers keeps coming up. Is this a theme? So then we survey, do you want this? Yes or no. And we're looking for buying trends. And then we go industry trends. Is car transfer plus hotel reservations a theme? I don't know. Let's go find out. And so we then start surveying industry people. We'd start looking at what other competitors are doing in this area. We'd even look at what the OTAs are doing. And so we start to formulate a little bit of step one and step two to go, yes. To go back and forth. Yeah. This is triangulating into something real.
11:48So then we go, cool. This is a build or a buy. In this scenario, how long would it take us to become experts, like actual experts at building out car transfers? Or is there some startup or some company that has become the expert at car transfers and is already partnering with companies like ours? And can we just go partner with them? And so we then just go build and partner. So we haven't even explored, do we try to buy? We just go, hey, how do we get an MVP? heat? How do we test it in real life? So we know that the industry is saying something. We know our customers are saying something too. Those are triangulating correctly.
12:26Let's go put it into action. Let's go find 100 proof of concept customers. Let's pilot it out. And we'll set some totally subjective number as a target. It could be, we need 100 properties and we need 5 % of our reservations, book a car transfer or 10 % or whatever it is. It doesn't matter. And that probably would be fed by our research. And if it hits it, we're like, okay, that's interesting. This is interesting. Now we can go down into, is there even a target? This whole process is us building up to beginning to understand some kind of strategic rationale. There's a target out there. There's a partner out there that's proving that it works.
13:10There's capability for us to build it. And we begin to sort of really formulate down into maybe there's an M &A thesis here. Maybe it's something that we could bite off. Maybe the revenue accretion is doable. Maybe there's something that's profitable that we could actually extract EBITDA from it. And all of a sudden, we start bringing together targets. That's just one all. We try to go from big to small to medium. We want to look at everything. And ultimately, what that leads to is a lot of opportunities for two groups to begin to fall in love and or fall out of love with this thesis. And it's a product team.
13:46And then it's our corp dev team. So both teams are partnering on this. We always find some type of internal stakeholder. It typically comes on the product or engineering side. It could also be myself or my co-founder or even a sales leader, a partnership leader. It's never corp dev. Corp dev can never be the sponsor of these deals. It has to bring some team into the fold. So they have work to even convince any of us up front. They're trying to remain unbiased. And we do product demos. And these are my favorite thing. I love seeing product demos. I could do product demos all day long. What we learn is we start to learn about the talent.
14:24So we've already done a complete analysis of all their talent, who they are, where they came from. Is there overlap? Is there not overlap? Is there redundancies and synergy of G &A and finance and HR and people? We have a good idea of who these people are, but until they start opening their mouth and until we see how they treat their staff in those conversations, who they bring to the fold for the product demo, because look, they know that we're looking at this strategically. The founders are aware that this might lead to somewhere. And so it's very interesting to see who's in the trust tree when you bring a strategic product demo to light.
15:00And so there's a lot to tell from founders and CEOs and C-level staff. And we really are looking for culture fits along the way. We're also looking for salesmanship. Are they passionate about that product? All the things you would expect, it's like an interview, except they don't realize they're being interviewed because we're just asking questions about the product. After five, six really coordinated, incredibly thorough steps, we didn't write a memo. And the hope is we found a target. They're excited about what we're doing. We're excited about what they are and their culture and their people and all that stuff.
15:33We believe that there's opportunity to bring both of them together. We start writing the memo and we have them contribute. We have them contribute. It could be a deck. It could be a written memo. It doesn't matter. But we want to see where their vision is and how it brings together. We then share our fears. We share our risks. We share as much as we can transparently so that they understand what we're doing is really bringing a document to the table, doctrine, some kind of doctrine, PowerPoint or written. So that they have to show that with the rest of their team or their board or whoever their decision makers are.
16:08And it shows that they helped participate in that. We wrote a lot of it and we're sharing why we came to the equation, what the risks are. And the founders on the other side are pretty revealing. They're like, I'm really scared to go to market. Or we're really struggling in our win-loss ratio right now because of this competitor. And it's just all revealing. That document is meant to be all revealing. It leads to really quick due diligence. Nothing comes up in due diligence because we wouldn't know about it. I'll give you a perfect example. Last year, we looked at a deal where we were told that revenue was in the millions.
16:42Great. This is a founder-led organization, big company, 25 plus people doing millions of dollars profitable. And we started doing our dance. We started doing our process. We started going down. When corp devs started to get into the financial, the quality of earnings analysis, we're like, this thing doesn't even cross a million dollars in revenue. How do they have millions of dollars in revenue? But we're here and they're over here. Something is not adding up. What they were equating to was trials. So if all of those trials worked out, they would have millions and millions of dollars in revenue, not millions of dollars of captured revenue.
17:25They had millions of dollars worth of opportunities that may or may not ever translate into business. That was a weird one for us because of course that would come out in our review. Of course, people would get fired if they missed that in our analysis. And so why wouldn't that have been brought earlier to the table? It was weird. That's the thing where we try to avoid. So ever since that happened, and we've never had something that blatantly obvious where it was just like, no, that's not how you run accounting, but okay. We try to bring things clear. So we try to get them to commit as much as possible.
18:05And that way, we really have a good sort of framework to build off. That's oftentimes us spending two days in person with the teams, whether we go visit them or they visit us in our office. We just want to spend as much time. So that would have come up over a beer, I'm sure. And we had just skipped one of our steps because we were so excited about the tech. Now, granted, we ended up buying that asset, but we bought it as an asset. And there was no team came along. I want to make sure I got the six steps. So you have one, spray the customers. Two, industry trends. Three, build versus partner analysis.
18:39Proof of concept, yeah. Four, strategic rationale. Define it. This is where you start looking for targets. Number five, product demo, which has some initial culture, diligence, and things related we'll talk more about. And then six, the investment memo and creating that transparency, which lends into more formal diligence. Sounds about right. Can we break them apart and talk through some of these in more detail? Sure. Survey customers. You mentioned a lot of different formats. It could be a one-question thing. You could have folks on the tablet asking questionnaires. Walk me through that. This ties into the second one.
19:12You have investment trends. You might develop a hypothesis and you're validating it. Can you give me some examples or even like what type of questions you would ask these customers? I'll give you a perfect example. We just did a survey middle of last year around AI. We were asking our hoteliers, our real live questions to a real live hotel audience in one of our product release webinars. What does AI mean to you? And there was a series of questions related to AI. What practices of AI do you think it would be useful for? And we gave them a box full of operations or data or revenue pricing. We know where AI is practical in a hotel for technologists like this.
19:50That's pretty straightforward. We just wanted to see their lens. And so we started asking them questions around that. We did that in a live webinar and a poll. We did that as a follow-up survey. We've done that at trade shows, all around the same theme. And really what we're trying to understand is how in vogue AI, the generative AI and open AI and all this sort of talk about it, was translating into an industry that doesn't have a high digital adoption curve. Was it getting through just because the massive amounts of media talk? Or was it something that was very early? And to our correct assumption, it was really early.
20:24Now we've done that same survey again. We've done it each quarter since then and in different ways. Again, trying to pull up. Now, every industry trade show I've been to has talked about AI. Every single one of them. I just went to another one last week. They had a whole panel on AI. It's like you can't escape it. As we watched our customers go through the same surveying behavior, whether it's a pendo notice inside our application where a pop-up shows, hey, take a quick survey. when they go through five questions. We are trying to just triangulate on a trend line to see whether or not this is becoming more and more interesting.
20:58And we're also looking at that from a perspective of what is our future product lines look like in 2024. So we were really trying to understand what are some of the things we're doing? Do we touch AI? Do we not? Can we wait? Is it a little bit too much snake oil? What is the real value here and how much money we have to invest in it? Blah, blah, blah. This is a recent theme. That's just a recent survey. We think it's interesting because AI is interesting, but we've been using machine learning for seven years. We have machine learning built into our application. We will always have machine learning.
21:30AI has just been glamorized because of media attention and all the talk about it. But I wanted to hear real-time feedback. And so when you have a thousand hotels on a webinar, you ask them questions. If you don't, you're just losing this amazing opportunity to get some real-time information. So we always do two polls. We typically do one or two small questions in there. And then we also have a team in the live chat asking questions, following up the questions that are being answered, triangulating around those things. This is us just having conversations. That's the best way of describing it. Have conversations until you go blue in the face.
22:09Because if it's the same thing over and over, you got something. If you're getting a scattered answer list, keep going, go deeper. You're not there yet. You don't have the right answer. Awesome. This is really relevant, by the way, because I'm working on AI for our product and having a lot of one-on-one conversations with customers. I haven't really applied surveys because I'm always like to just get in there first and have those conversations, get some insights. I think you're right, because I can see where we can create like a quadrant of use cases and say, all right, let's get some feedback.
22:40Like where would you fit in this sort of quadrant here? Keep in mind, when you do one-on-ones, you can lead the witness. So if you're very good at asking one-on-one questions, you can create unnecessary bias just by a one-on-one conversation. We always do one-on-ones too. And then we do group think. And then we just try to get obfuscated. They're just answering questions on the whim, depending on the time of day, things like that. It's that whole collection. But I'm listening to you to interview me and I'm changing my answers on the fly just based on how you're approaching it. I could tell you have a influence over this conversation alone.
23:16So now I'm taking that back of like, you got to have a multi-pronged approach. Like let's took the data from different areas, even different formats of surveys, and then start putting it together and see if we can get some visibility and patterns or insights out of it. And then the industry trend. At this point, are you creating a market map? That's the most common thing I see, right? You sort of map out the space and you say, okay, here's the different tech companies specializing in these areas of capability. Is that kind of what you're doing in the industry trends? Are there other elements? Are you looking at some industry publications to see what the talk of the town is?
23:47It's not so much that. Like our corp dev team is responsible for mapping the industries. Okay. We're already doing that biennial. That is unrelated to a specific deal. We are trying to create the largest database of all of the competitors, all of the peer group, point solutions, things like that. We just want to know where everyone stands. And so twice a year, we'll go back and pull how many employees they have and try to triangulate around revenue scale. And we put that into our CRM. When we go into industry survey, there are maybe a handful of places our customers go for information. Only a handful.
Read the full transcript
24:22Those are going to be conferences. Those are going to be some media, specific niche media outlets. There are some reputation or review sites. We have partners that we can go to as well that we're already working in relationship to. And then lastly, there is just our own reach. I'm part of a collection of CEOs in our industry that get together. We all chat. We all share information. We try to be transparent. Some of us are competitors. Some of us are not. I find it incredibly helpful to share. I don't have anything to hide. I really don't think that's a competitive weakness of knowing what my revenue scale is or how many employees I have or things like that from an industry perspective.
25:02Look, at the end of the day, the surveying from an industry perspective is we're trying to get third parties to revalidate what we already know from our customer perspective. We want to make sure that what our customers are saying are not biased by our customer, meaning they're just not a sample of our customers. Now, I have N plus 300, which is what I need for statistical relevance. So if I survey my base and I get over 300 to 400 customers, I've got relevance. It doesn't matter. I don't need to survey anymore because I have so many customers. I want to do the same thing outside of our customer base and try to get that with a wider audience.
25:36And there's some groups that we will go to do surveys for us. We'll pay for them to publish. So you could get a third party and have them run a broad survey that's outside your customer base. And that's more of your industry research. That's more of the industry research. And it's actually more industry surveying. That's the surveying part. The industry research part is there's consulting practices that do work in this area. We might talk to them. We might hire them for some initiative. We really haven't spent too much time with third-party consultancies like Bain or McKinsey or Deloitte. We know them all and we spend time when they're on initiatives and whatnot.
26:12We haven't engaged any of them. I think that would be overkill for the type of research that we're looking for. Nevertheless, there's plenty of sort of niche consultant practices that are publishing information frequently. We subscribe, we purchase all that data, bring that down, and then that just goes and reconfirms some of the surveying that we're doing. So we've got a good mix between the research you do, working with some of these consultants to help out with some of these. I say, what exactly would you hire them to do? Like a consultant practice or like the survey group? The survey group I get, I think that's pretty straightforward.
26:43That, hey, this is where a hypothesis is and you want this broader view. But when you mentioned doing more industry research and bringing consultants in. I'll give an example. We occasionally will do mock RFPs through third-party consultants. So we'll actually have them take us through like a mock sale to make sure that we're triangulating message around certain products that we're exploring or we're looking at just to understand the value proposition, the selling cycle, things like that. We've hired them to do outside in work so that we are not revealing. So sometimes there's only one or two providers in the space versus 18 providers.
27:19So if we just start knocking on the door, there's enough closeness between those that it begins to signal. And we try to be mindful of our approach. So I would say two things. One is we'll use them for outside-in work on a very small niche work where we'll have them do some of the customer surveying, the research and whatnot, so that we don't identify a target that we're looking at. We've only had to do that twice. For the most part, they're doing things that is busy work that our team doesn't want to do. Fair enough. the build versus a partner analysis. This gets interesting because maybe at this point, I assume you found something.
27:53Let's be really hypothetical here. Let's say we just talked to a bunch of property owners and found out that AI to help housekeepers determine which room to clean first is something that could really optimize and make it much more efficient so guests aren't waiting 3 p.m. to check in. You're getting that figured out. How do you start thinking through the partner versus build? So that would be a really interesting one because I think we would be torn on do we build that or do we partner with that? And here's why. In our partnership ecosystem, we have housekeeping apps that specialize in housekeeping and maintenance practice.
28:27We have our own too. We have our own that competes with those. We give ours away for free and those are paid services that we make revenue from as well. It's an interesting dilemma. In that, what we would really be realizing is this AI application, Is it better suited for tacking onto our app, which is a very light, basic housekeeping module? Or is it better to buy one of these guys, who's our partners, who's already doing it, and then tacking the AI on that? And so what we would be doing is both. We'd be looking at where are these guys headed in terms of their product cycle, the depth of their capability.
29:10Are they embedding AI into that use case that you revealed? And then we'd be looking at our product team to say, okay, guys and gals, we are nowhere near this over here. We know that. We're not trying to be these sophisticated housekeeping apps. Is this useful? And how long would it take? And so we'd be running a dual track analysis, knowing what I know about our own ecosystem. So it was really fascinating. I can't believe you picked that one because it's kind of funny, but it's a great dilemma that we would have internally because I love AI. I think it's fascinating. But then I also realize how mission-critical housekeeping is to some businesses and some it's not.
29:50So some it's about speed of turn and others are just like, I just need to make sure I check a box. That's why we have the two different sides. What I would say is we would first go back to all of our users, all of our users using our partners, all of our users using our app, and we'd survey them separately. And we would probably start asking these customers, why don't you use these products over here? Have you looked at these products over here? Seeing whether or not we could push all of our customers off our homegrown system into a paid service in the future. In the meantime, we'd be looking at these customers, seeing if we could push them off the paid service into the free.
30:27So we'd be trying to get different patterns to see whether or not we were right in our hypothesis. Is it just the AI that's interested? Or is it AI plus all of the ecosystem around the AI in the housekeeping app? Are you running surveys against it? You're running surveys. You're doing one-on-ones. You're doing big mock-ups to show. You're trying anything. This is such a unique case that I'm playing with it a little bit to show how we would have to start getting through. To be honest with you, I almost would say you put the thumb in the wind. And yeah, I think that's directionally accurate because I don't think you ever get the answers that we would be looking for.
31:01This is one of the ones where we'd start spinning our wheels. We would have so much analysis, we'd get paralysis, and we'd have deal fatigue and not do it. We'd just say, no, we're not going to do it. Yeah, because it would be too much change for what our discipline is. Meaning we already have something and we already have partners. We can validate both. This is a layer that sits on top. I'd rather both of them just develop it on their own and not worry about a target. At the end of the day, let's say we found the strategic rationale was not to partner, not to build, it was to buy. We would have already done the analysis on what it would cost, how many engineers, how many PMs would be working on it, what the UI time commitment, how long that would look at.
31:43And we basically work that into the deal price. And so we say, okay, a million dollars to go build this application. A million dollars from start to finish is going to be nine months. We can or cannot monetize it. We think the number of customers that would attach it based on this user install base is 50%. And therefore, we could quickly create a model. Wow. Okay. We spend a million, we make a million. I don't know if that's something we'd want to do. And so then we might look at the buy. Wow. We get a full-fledged app that's way better than our basic one. It also has a light version of it. It's doing$3 million in revenue and it's got half a million in EBITDA.
32:21We would say, wow, building makes sense. It's cheap, but we don't get any acceleration, revenue, accretive value and product. We might start moving away from build over into the camp of buy purely based on the economics of what we accretively add to the mix. Now, we would then start eroding what our price would be based on the fact that we know it would cost a million dollars. We know that we're going to have to lay people off if there was overlap. So you start to unravel the purchase price decision making. And then sometimes it brings you right back in where you have a really tiny gap between the two.
32:56And that, again, leads to analysis paralysis. And we're just like, we're done. We're out. We can't do this. This doesn't work for us. It has to be a clear cut winner. We all have to be unanimously aligned. So there should be like a pretty clear gap, either the capability that you have. I was actually curious about that when you're talking through if you get that bias from the developers, They want to build everything in house. 100%. They always believe that their stomachs can have more food in it than they can actually handle. And at the end of the day, I love that about them. I want them to be fearless in our ability to build up.
33:30Sometimes it's good to just bring in some institutional knowledge and groups that have only been thinking about that for a period of time. And I think you accelerate what we can do. And we have a saying internally, if you're going to reinvent a spark plug, don't just throw 10 Sparkplug engineers into a room and say, hey, create something new, put one. So form and function is there and then do nine other engineers from other walks of life. You're going to get something innovative. And so sometimes we need to bring the outside in and that's helpful and healthy. On the strategic rationale, you got this viewer, the hypothesis of, hey, we validated that there's an opportunity to add this capability.
34:08Is there any more details that you put in there before you start looking out for targets? At some point in time, the internal sponsor is coming into the play. And so they might have some added bias in that strategic rationale. They might say, hey, there's a use case here. I really have conviction. Is this like a product manager, product owner person? Yeah, it could be myself. It could be my co-founder. It could be our head of strategy. It could be our sales leader or product leader and saying, guys, there's something here. We need to do this. Think about it. Product managers who are doing their jobs are going out in the field as well.
34:41They're going out in the field, they're doing surveying, they're talking to other competitors, they're talking to product partnerships. They should fully understand what they're solving for, just as much as what corp dev would do, which is to reconfirm the exact data that they're looking at, but just from a deal side. It's funny, sometimes our PMs are just as knowledgeable about a space as our corp dev people, because they're looking at it from just two different lenses. But I love the argument, the push-pull, like, well, no, we could build this. And it's like, well, can we? You just told me two days ago, it's going to take two years to get to that point.
35:14I did, but I think the iterative approach, and so it's like when an architect comes and designs you a beautiful home and shows you these 3D renderings, you're like, oh, I can see myself living there. And they're like, okay, cool. Yeah, the contractor says it's going to take two years to build it. You're like, oh, that deflates it a little bit. And so like, I can show beautiful renderings of things, but actually getting to use it is two years away. Sometimes it means that we need to bring them closer to reality and say, can we grab this now? Can we start to integrate? Now, the funny thing in all of this is when you start integrating products together and you run a tech company, it never goes as planned.
35:51It always takes longer. And sometimes it even takes two years to fully integrate. The build scenario is like, yeah, it would take two years. The integrate scenario is like, oh, we're going to do it in six months. And then two years later, I'm laughing like, hey, we finished the integration. And I'm like, okay, so we spent more and we're at the same place minus whatever revenue. So I've given up on grading strategic rationale from how quickly we can get something to market because it never works out that way. It is always two times longer in every scenario that we've ever done. More like construction projects.
36:25Yeah. We get the strategic rationale put together. We identify targets and we start doing diligence on them. Our product demo seems like early diligence. You had some interesting points that you wanted to see. Who are they bringing under the 10? the sense of the culture. Can you tell me a little bit more about that? I'm curious too, if there's like specific key questions that you ask that give you some insights about what that culture is like, or is it just pure feel from how they do the simple tasks of demo in the product? I am a big people person. Our company culture is all around people and how we treat each other and with respect.
36:57The interaction of leaders and who they bring around the table, who is trusted is really fascinating. Sometimes it's more, Sometimes it's less. We ran a deal that was a failed process at the beginning of last year. It was just the two founders. They never brought any other team members into the equation. It was weird. Something was off. We realized early that we were just a stalking horse for another deal that was being delayed. But then there was behavior where then the stalking horse theory went away, where they're like, no, we're all in. And they started revealing more. But it kind of had this flip-flop.
37:36And either they both had the world's best poker faces, or they were the world's worst user experience. They just didn't know what they were doing. They were deer in headlights every time they got in calls with us. They couldn't sell their product. They couldn't convince us the product was real. They couldn't articulate why they weren't selling more. Things that didn't make any sense. And in hindsight, I'm so thankful that deal didn't go through. I'm so thankful. There was deal fatigue. there was back and forth between they had bankers, we didn't. And then we almost brought bankers in because we're sick of their banker.
38:10It was a little bit of everywhere. It was a perfect storm of things going wrong. And for us, one thing goes wrong, we're like, yeah, it could be just the deal. Two things get wrong. I don't have any hair on my head, but every hair was sticking up on my head. Three, I was like, we're done. We're done. We started actually pushing them away, saying we traded the deal and they just kept coming back. And so then we're like, maybe we are just not understanding anything that's going on. And the same thing happened again. Fail process, six months later, pop back up, same initiative, same behavior, kicked them to the curb again.
38:48And no, no, no, really. And we're like, we're done. TV timeout indefinitely. Wow. And so culture was the driver there. We never thought we could work with these people. And you see that coming over many conversations. Like, I'll never forget this. And this is, I'll try to obfuscate this somehow. I won't say the year, but we were in love with a piece of technology. Every person in my team unanimously was like, we need that piece of asset. We need it now. We are going to revolutionize what we're going to do. Let's go fly to this part of the world. We're going to go meet with the team. We're going to spend a week there.
39:26We're going to write our thesis together. We're going to do our processes. So we get maybe day three, we pass the, oh, let's get to know each other, drinking beer, having some good meals and doing the vision board and strategic rationale and all the fun stuff. Then we're getting into the deal points and the negotiating and the actual due diligence. And I shit you not. One founder took me aside and said, look, if it's a problem, I think we can do this deal without my co-founder and that person. We don't need them. What? Like, infighting was revealed. And the same thing happened on the other side.
40:00Those two guys were like, look, he doesn't do anything. He's a waste of space. He owns a lot. We don't want him going forward. Wait, hold the phone. It's almost a beer test. It's almost like you sit next to the person at an airport and can you stay in them for six hours? That's who you want to hire. Yeah, if you had a great conversation for six hours, you could do anything with that person. It was weird, bizarre. I can't explain it. And so then what we like literally like, all right, guys, we're gonna take a break. We're gonna go back and we're gonna collect all this information. We basically told them, we're like, we're done.
40:32We're not gonna go forward. And they freaked out. What do we say? And they're like, no, no, no, no. Like, there's a lot of fighting. We're worried about who does what going forward. And we're committed. And you know what? That team is still together today. We didn't do the deal. They're still together today. They're doing fantastic. Maybe we just got them on a bad day. But lessons in M &A. You never reveal that. Don't reveal the ghosts in the first date. That was weird. And we've had plenty of conversations with them prior. But the first in-person, like the honeymoon stage, that was a doozy for sure.
41:07The memo. You mentioned you do this jointly. Can you tell me a little bit about how that approach works? Because I never heard of that, where you actually create this memo and you share it with the target company. So the goal there is to be all-revealing, for them to be all-revealing, and for us to be all-revealing. I learned this practice from someone who's way smarter than me at M &A. Their argument was, if there's a board or there's a venture backer or private equity backer, and you have a founding team that is revealing their fears, their risks, the things that keep them up at night, that is getting articulated into why the synergy between the two companies makes sense.
41:44And we are, from our opposing side, showing our fears of the deal, I think the threats of the deal and why we're very nervous about things like this that have now been revealed to us, it allows us to re-architect the value and what we're going to pay for the deal. If they're bored, if they are venture-backed or have a board, they have to reveal that document. It's a formal offer. It's like our NBIO. You then have a boardroom on the other side saying, oh, I didn't know you're so afraid of these things. That's revealing to me. So it's our way of bringing to the table an honest conversation. It's not about trapping anyone.
42:20It's about an honest conversation. Because VCs or private equity firms always tell their founders, I want a 5X MOEC. Okay, guys, you'll take a 2X MOEC every single day of the week. We all know that. Stop telling people you want a 5 when I know you'll take a 2. And at the end of the day, a cap table is not what you necessarily have to write a deal around. That is just a legal document among parties. But what I am buying and how I'm convincing the seller of what value is from my lens, I can write whatever deal parameters I want. If I want to shift all the value to the team going forward and pay less for the asset or whatever the deal confronts, I can do that.
42:58They don't have to accept it, but I can do that in my legal right. And so all we're trying to do with the memo is bring two aligned parties together. And that's the go forward teams. Those are the people I care about. Now, if I'm letting shareholders roll, I want them to feel comfortable about what we're doing too. I want them to feel like they have an upward path to success. I want them to see the strategic rationale that one plus one equals more for them, that their share value is going to go up. So I'm very revealing. I will do management presentations, board presentations, where I show our thesis from our lens of why we're doing this.
43:32And then I'll even go backwards to show our performance. Here's how we create Moex for our shareholders. Here's how we've done it historically in the past. This is what our milestones is why what stock price you're getting from me. It's a stock deal. It's fair. And here's how I'm going to give you your return and all that stuff. So this is a two-way street. This is never a one-way street. It needs to be very collaborative. And we think it works great. You have everything, price, terms. It's all outlined in this memo. How long is it? Five, six pages or longer? We restricted 10 pages. And that's going to include some financial analysis on there.
44:04But we try to do it in two pages. It never can be done in two pages. We try to do it in two pages. it always becomes like six to 10. You got any tips for pitching this to the board to get them to see us? Oh man, those memos that we write, if you don't believe the deal at the end of that memo, you don't know how to read, to be honest with you. I mean, it is full conviction. There is everything from our return on invested capital, what are the attachment rates of why we're doing it, how we're cutting the stock. We have such a thorough analysis on our end. It's pretty straightforward. Like we've never had a memo get rejected in our company.
44:38history from our board. I've written down so many different topics that we can cover from breaking down the memo and then also some of the negotiations that happen with these transactions. Hopefully we can catch you later this year, Adam, so we can continue this conversation. But before I wrap things up, I got to ask you, what's the craziest thing you've seen in M &A? We're probably out of it. But when I was a young associate at a bank, we pitched Facebook to get acquired by eHarmony. And at the time, this was early 2000. So think about what Facebook was like, you were single or you were married, you had that little indicator.
45:15But we had seen that there were so many patterns of bringing people together. And eHarmony had so many identifiers of what were matches. We thought the two companies were a match made in heaven. And at the time, Facebook was only worth a couple hundred million bucks and eHarmony was worth a billion. Obviously, Zuck said no, which makes perfect sense considering what he created. But it was the craziest pitch deck that I've ever been part of. That's what I've ever heard of that one. Yeah, totally outside of the box. Dead on arrival very quickly. Awesome. I love it. Adam, thanks so much for taking the time.
45:49You've helped me become a better M &A scientist. A lot of fun. Those of you still with us, thanks for sticking through. Until next time, here's to the deal.
46:08Thank you for taking the time to explore the world of M &A with our podcast. We love hearing feedback. Tag us on a LinkedIn post, add a review on Apple Podcasts. We'd love to hear from you. If you need help standing up an M &A function or optimizing one that you already have, we're here to help. And if we can't help you, we probably know someone that can. You can reach out to me by email, Kisan, K-I-S-O-N, at mascience.com. Or you can text me directly at 312-857-3711. If you just want to keep learning at your own pace, visit mascience.com for a lot more content and resources. That's where you can also subscribe to our newsletter.
46:53Again, that's mascience.com. Here's to the deal. Thank you.
From the publisher
When executing M&A, having a structured approach to validating the acquisition plan is crucial. The worst thing any acquirer can do is to buy a business that doesn't bring value to the parent company.
In this episode of the M&A Science Podcast, Adam Harris, CEO of Cloudbeds, shares the meticulous 6-step process his company uses to validate their acquisition plan.
Things you will learn:
• Surveying Customers
• Industry Trend Analysis
• Partner vs Build Analysis
• Formulating the strategic rationale
• In-depth Company Analysis and Product Demos
• Drafting a detailed memo
This episode is sponsored by the DealRoom
Ready to take your M&A to the next level with software made to manage each stage of the deal process? See how DealRoom can facilitate your next deal at https://www.dealroom.net
Episode Bookmarks00:00 Intro
08:45 Approaching M&A
18:20 Surveying Customers
23:47 Industry Trend Analysis
28:13 Partner vs Build Analysis
34:12 Formulating the strategic rationale
36:50 In-depth Company Analysis and Product Demos
41:18 Drafting a detailed memo
44:15 Pitching M&A to the board
44:54 Craziest thing in M&A
