In short
Audie Cornish and Ari Shapiro discuss their shift from NPR’s All Things Considered to CNN’s podcast Engagement Party, and what audio/podcast amateurs can learn from professional editing and production.
Guests
Audie Cornish (former NPR All Things Considered host; now CNN anchor and Engagement Party co-host) and Ari Shapiro (former NPR All Things Considered host; now CNN and Engagement Party co-host). They met in early-2000s Boston and have been friends since early journalism careers.
Key claims
“Everyone can do it” technically, but everyone still benefits from an editor and a critical outside ear. Engagement Party aims for “private conversation” energy, mixing rigor/context with looser, more authentic moments (including messy pauses). Social feeds reward divisiveness/engagement; podcasts must earn attention with curiosity and off-bubble topics, not pronouncements.
Notable examples
Engagement Party pilot’s early discussion of gay sex on TV; NPR’s BuzzFeed-era “news is now” argument; Ari’s hosting The Mole (Netflix) and Audie’s cabaret Ach and Oy with Alan Cumming; reality-show “bad edit” fears; Michael Jackson discussed in their first episode.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VODiscussion on Media Changes
0:45 to 2:50
Hosts discuss changes in media and the competitive landscape of podcasts.
“Oh, there's a new technology you may be familiar with called artificial intelligence.”
Introducing Guests: Audie Cornish and Ari Shapiro
2:50 to 4:30
Introduction of guests Audie Cornish and Ari Shapiro, discussing their transition from NPR.
“We'll be right back with Ari and Adi after this.”
Insights from Audio Professionals
5:10 to 7:30
Audie and Ari share insights on the evolution of audio production and the democratization of media.
“Everyone has the technical means to do it.”
The Role of Editing in Podcasts
7:30 to 9:50
Discussion on the importance of editing in audio content and how it enhances engagement.
“And frankly, that applies beyond journalism, beyond podcasting.”
Transitioning to a New Podcast Format
9:50 to 11:50
Audie and Ari discuss the differences between Engagement Party and their NPR show.
“And strangely, TV has opened that up for me in a way that was really unexpected.”
Personal Connections and Professional Growth
11:50 to 14:01
The guests reflect on their personal and professional journeys in journalism.
“And the running joke about it is that that lens was also applied to lots of different things of varying levels of seriousness.”
The Evolution of Journalism and Media
14:01 to 15:26
Explore the continuous pivots in journalism and media, highlighting the importance of adaptation.
“And I think that this, after all these years later, Ben, it's been a minute.”
Engagement Party: Concept and Structure
15:27 to 18:21
Learn about the concept and structure of the Engagement Party podcast, emphasizing friendship and engagement.
“But what is a career in journalism if not one pivot after another?”
Limitations of NPR and Personal Expression
18:22 to 20:55
Discuss the limitations faced at NPR regarding personal expression and humor in journalism.
“I think a lot of podcasts that are hang type shows, it's a little bit closed.”
The Impact of Online Celebrity and Audience Connection
21:20 to 26:53
Explore the dynamics of online celebrity, audience connection, and the nature of public opinions.
“Last week, I was at the possible event, a marketing conference in Miami.”
Show all 20 chapters
Virality and Its Role in Journalism
26:54 to 28:00
Discuss the concept of virality in journalism and its implications for modern media.
“if you're talking about me, I'm winning.”
The Zins Debate
28:00 to 28:30
Discussion on personal preferences and the cultural impact of products like Zins.
“He's all about apparently, like, zinning and stuff now.”
Virality in Journalism
28:30 to 30:00
Exploration of how virality impacts journalism and audience engagement.
“Because one of the things I found fascinating was virality, like virality as a kind of de facto good in a journalism space, which at the time, you know, I had real critique about.”
Divisiveness and Engagement
30:00 to 31:50
Analyzing the relationship between divisive content and engagement in media.
“So that could be, is this dress, you know, white and gold or black and blue?”
Future of Variety Programming
31:50 to 34:00
Discussion on the evolution and future prospects of variety programming in media.
“that you can come to our show and hear all about the thing you're obsessed with that we're going to be talking about, hopefully, in an interesting, new, contextual way.”
NPR's Survival and Legacy Media
34:00 to 36:50
Reflection on NPR's funding challenges and the future of legacy media in a changing landscape.
“I mean, I guess I'm curious, I mean, more sort of existentially, do you think, I mean, is NPR going to survive?”
The Influence of Ownership on Journalism
36:50 to 39:00
Examining how ownership affects journalistic integrity and broadcasting.
“You know, are we going to newsletter our way out of this?”
Career Evolution in Media
41:48 to 42:00
Exploring the shift in media careers and the desire for new challenges among journalists.
The Evolving Media Landscape
42:00 to 44:37
Explore how Ari and Audie's careers reflect a shift in media perspectives.
“and doing different things and evolving their media careers beyond just, you know, the host of NPR, Morning Edition, of All Things Considered.”
Challenges and Advantages in Podcasting
44:37 to 45:51
Discuss the complexities and opportunities for traditional broadcasters in podcasting.
“In some ways, Don Lemon is more relevant now than he was at the end of his CNN career when he was a morning show host.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:10Welcome to another episode of the Mixed Signals podcast from us here at Semaphore Media, where we are talking to all of the most important and interesting people shaping our new media age. I'm Max Taney. I'm the media editor here at Semaphore. And with me, as always, is Semaphore's editor-in-chief, Ben Smith. Ben, you're broadcasting from an unusual place today. Looks like a hotel room. In fact, I know it's a hotel room. Where are you?
0:36Max:Out in Mountain View, California. Just interviewed the guy who runs search at Google. It's up on our YouTube page. A lot changing in media at the moment, not least the search box. What's going on with search? What did he have to say? Oh, there's a new technology you may be familiar with called artificial intelligence. and they've made the search box just like bigger so that you can type your very, very long and kind of soul-searching queries in. Well, two people who many of our listeners will not have to search or look up or use artificial intelligence to discover are our guests on today's show.
1:08That's Audie Cornish and Ari Shapiro. Audie and Ari were formerly the hosts of All Things Considered on National Public Radio and now are doing something very different at CNN. They are hosting a new podcast called Engagement Party. The first episode is actually out today, Friday, when our episode is dropping. That's a little bit of competition in the podcast space, Ben. I'm not threatened by it. But the show is a lot different than what they were doing at NPR. It's looser. It's about pop culture. It's in some ways racier. I listened to the pilot episode. In the first three minutes, they're talking about gay sex on television.
1:45It's a little bit shocking and different for two people who used to be pretty buttoned up for many years in their official jobs. Ben, you knew Audie. You guys kind of go back. Is it surprising to you that they're doing this kind of racy, loose, different type of show? What's that about?
2:01Max:Yeah, I think there are some people in these big legacy jobs who just sort of become part of the chair that they're sitting in. And I think these two were never that. They were both always kind of restless and looking out from the Olympian peak of NPR at this very radically changing landscape and trying to figure out how to be part of it. Well, we want to talk to them about that. We want to ask them their perspective on some of the challenges that NPR is facing right now from the reduction in public funding from the federal government to the kind of aging listenership and some of the challenges that come along with that.
2:37And of course, I also want to ask Ari a very specific question about reality television and his connection to the traders, which I think many of our listeners might want to know about. But we have to take a short break. We'll be right back with Ari and Adi after this.
3:00Max:Hi, I'm Joshua Spania, VP of Marketing at Google. And you might assume I have all the answers when it comes to marketing. The truth, I'm just as curious to learn, discover the answers to everything as everyone else. We are living through a total reset of our marketing industry. The old maps don't work, which means we get to chart a new path forward. It's dynamic, it's fast-paced, and honestly, there's never been a more exciting time to be in marketing. That is why we've started a new podcast, Frontier CMO. It's from Think With Google, and I promise it's not just a bunch of corporate waffle. I'm sitting down with people who really know what's going on.
3:44Max:CMOs, creators, technologists, the lot. And we're having a proper, unfiltered chat about what's working, and quite frankly, what isn't. These are your notes from the frontier. So do me a favor, search for Frontier CMO wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us and subscribe on YouTube.
4:10Ari and Adi, I don't know if you guys are familiar with how we set up the show, but we'll have a whole intro setting this up beforehand. So we're just going to jump right into the questions here. I kind of want to hear this intro, though. What's in there? What's in there, Max? As someone who's a reader, I can't imagine. Maybe this is a good place to start because we were going to ask this question later, but I think maybe it's more relevant now, which is, you know, You guys are pros in the audio production and broadcasting format. Now, every single person who is in media, such as us, thinks that they can produce essentially a radio quality interview show or podcast.
4:50Is there stuff that you guys know that you think that a lot of podcasters and people who are doing imitation radio programs kind of don't? Like, and is it offensive? Ari, do you mind if I start? Hit it. Go for it. Yeah. I just want to take issue with the premise. Everyone is a pro now. That's the point. Everyone can do it. Everyone has the technical means to do it. So that's not relevant in the way it might have been a very long time ago. And even then, I'd argue, wasn't that true, which is why public media in particular has so many interesting personalities in it. It has always been a kind of democratic, to the point where our video on demand chief here calls our department the, what does he call it?
5:38He calls it the like audio democracy or something because it's not hierarchical. You know, the way ideas are generated, the technological stuff, the people who are rolling on tape way back in the way, they're just as good editorially as the people on camera. Same thing with the producers. So I just want to say that we are not we come to this space like everyone else, which is this is interesting. How can I do it differently? And how can I connect? We actually don't come to it like we just came off Radio Mount Olympus and expect there to be people there. Because if you did that, nobody would be there.
6:17You know what I mean? Like that's a parade of what? It's not the way you're saying where we're kind of like, oh, look at what all these young people are doing. hello fellow teens, you know, in podcasting land. I don't look at it that way. I agree with you, Audie, but I also have one thing that I do think is a pearl of wisdom, which is that everybody, and I mean everybody, benefits from an editor. Whether that means having someone before the taping saying, hey, have you thought about this aspect of it? Or having someone after the taping saying, those five minutes were kind of boring, maybe we can lose them.
6:58Everyone benefits from an editor. Fair, fair. I'm a super snob about that. Like, I didn't understand why people listened to things on one and a half speed until I listened to some of the podcasts out there. And I was like, and rabbit icon. Yeah, yeah. Editors are not, they're a luxury, but they're not, to me, embrace it. You know, embrace a critical ear. embrace somebody from the outside saying, actually, is this all that looks interesting to listen to? That's not like the worst thing. And frankly, that applies beyond journalism, beyond podcasting. Every one of us can sometimes use a reality check from a friend or somebody on the outside saying, you might want to rethink this.
7:42Look, even when Audie and I were in the highly edited and produced context of four-minute interviews on All Things Considered, we both had the experience of, after a taping, going to the producer and saying, that awkward moment, that big pause and the sigh and the wait, wait, wait, you got it wrong. Keep that in. Like, you have to know that often the messy stuff is the best stuff. The goal isn't to make it the most polished version of itself. It's to make it the most engaging, authentic version of itself. Yeah, that's a great point. See, this is why we like doing these types of interviews is that we do actually learn a few of these things.
8:19I feel a little bit with our podcast, And I think our producer, Manny, does a great job of this, of like, whenever there's this kind of weird moment, I'm like, ah, we got to get rid of this. You know, I don't want to seem too strange or awkward or whatever with the guests. But we should we should experiment maybe with going a little bit looser. No, it's OK. First of all, they already know. They already know that about you. So they've they bought the ticket. I mean, that's another difference, right? Like radio was tune in dials discovery. That's not what this business is. This business is, I'm coming to spend time with you.
8:53I already like you. Even if I'm giving it a shot, it's because I'm inclined to try it. And frankly, that's one of the things that I think appealed to us most about creating this show. Engagement party for CNN is that it gives us a chance to be the kind of people with each other that we used to be in the All Things Considered studio when our mics were off. Yeah. You know, the mics would turn on and we would be these very kind of polished, curious, erudite versions of ourselves. and then the mics would turn off and we would cackle and finish each other's sentences and swear. We would kinky our way through the show.
9:25We would kinky our way through the show. And that's what we want to bring to this new show. Which made my sense because when the mics were off and I was sitting next to Robert Siegel, he was doing the like London Telegraph. Times of London crossword puzzle. Yeah, Times of London crossword puzzle in pen. Like that was him, you know what I mean? But that wasn't me. And Ben, I mean, I think you know this. When you're coming up, especially in Washington politics, you are rewarded for cosplaying as an adult because it's the best of both worlds for editors you're cheap you have no family you'll work all hours but if we tart you up in enough lipstick you know what i mean and dangle enough looks great in front of you rose color like you'll you'll leap for anything right like it's a great thing but then at a certain point it's like wait a second what are we doing you know what i mean what like i can't cosplay as a 60 year old forever?
10:15What am I going to do when I am 60? Like, I actually have to be myself. And strangely, TV has opened that up for me in a way that was really unexpected. And having Ari come back around, like, there is something extremely full circle about this moment that neither of us can get over. We keep being like, are we really doing this? I said to Adi, I feel like CNN, gave us the keys to the car and they don't quite realize how we drive. People know that we hosted All Things Considered together for years. They might not know that we've been friends since the very beginning of our journalism career. In the early 2000s, we met in Boston and we really kind of grew up together.
10:58And long, long before we were in the studio together, we were buddies who would hang out and compare notes and talk about our lives. And so this is trying to bring that energy along with the experience and credibility and news chops that everybody knows we both have. You guys are doing a very different show with Engagement Party than you did at NPR with All Things Considered. Audie, maybe I should start with you. What's your pitch for why people, particularly fans of what you were doing at NPR, should listen to this very different type of show that you guys are doing? Oh, that's interesting. It's funny.
11:36I don't think of people having fans at NPR. I think of people being fans of NPR, right? It's like working for Marvel. You know, I'm not Captain America. They're not fans of me. They're fans of Captain America. Um, you know, I think part of it is there was a kind of analysis and lens that that is the approach to news at NPR. And the running joke about it is that that lens was also applied to lots of different things of varying levels of seriousness. And I think it was satire when it was like sweaters and meatballs, you know, or maple syrup and autumn leaves. But then later on, when you had something like pop culture happy hour, the NPR politics podcast, those things took that approach to other areas.
12:21And if you're from newspapers, this is very familiar. You have the arts section, you have the food section, you have international. And I think for a time, especially once I left NPR, people were like, oh, she is a news person, sentence caps, Times New Roman. So we've got to make her do news things. And I was kind of looking around at the landscape and being like, that doesn't matter anymore. And I'll be really short with this, but it's really important to mention. I met Ben on a story my first year as host of All Things Considered. It was the first story I did with producers on my own as an anchor.
12:58And I go to New York and I go to this newsroom and there's Kate Natopoulos and Stapara and all these news people who we now know as sort of viral gurus who were standing up a newsroom. Like Ben, it was like one of your first news meetings you were at. And everybody was like, is this going to be, is BuzzFeed going to be a news organization?
13:18Max:Yeah, you were very persuasive. I really thought that you were a seasoned professional, by the way. I didn't realize. Well, it got my gears turning because the arguments— It was a huge deal for us, this big shout reporter from NPR. It was. It was a huge deal for you. It was a huge deal for me because I even had to sell the story to NPR. They were like, why do we care about some random website? And I was like, no, no, no, no, you don't understand. This is the news now. And that stuck with me for a really long time. The idea that your feed, as much as I hate that word, is your uncle's wedding, the war in Gaza, a joke about Colbert and something that's not safe for work.
13:56That is by definition the for you page, the feed, the algorithm. And that is not a newspaper beat system. And I think that this, after all these years later, Ben, it's been a minute. here we are having a conversation where I'm doing the thing you were selling you know what I mean which is like no no no all these things can be on the same page like is this dress blue or silver but also like here's the midterm elections and I still have a lot of like respect for that ethos so sorry to go on a tangent but like I get to say this to Ben you know if I can pick up that tangent
14:33Max:because you know obviously I you know enjoyed those conversations and then in I guess it must It's been, what, 2017, 2018. We did a Facebook Watch. We sort of recruited you to host a Facebook Watch show during the original pivot to video when Facebook was throwing money around. I have a memory of you interviewing Omarosa. For some reason, that's the one that sticks with me. I did. I did. Scaramucci. Yeah. Oh, my God. What a time capsule. Yeah, and it was an interview show. It was a pop culture interview show, some news, some cultural figures. But even then, I think we were simpatico about the idea that there was a younger audience that really, they treat these things with equal seriousness and equal levity.
15:15And there was no reason for the news business not to.
15:18Max:In some sense, you've been like pivoting to video for a while. Do you feel like... I've had so many pivots. It's so sad. But what is a career in journalism if not one pivot after another? One pivot after another. That'll be the season two. People in this conversation began before social media existed. So you can't have a long-term career in journalism unless you're constantly pivoting. And I think the dismissiveness that some people view that kind of constant adaptation is misguided. Because audiences change, platforms change, the way people absorb information changes. and if you're not meeting them where they are, you're missing the point.
16:06And the business changes. If I had said, whoa, this BuzzFeed thing didn't work out, I'm never doing that again, where would I be? Do you know what I mean? Or when people ask me about CNN Plus and they're like, oh my God, and the comps people are like, don't talk about that. But to me, I'm like, what? If you don't try stuff, you are dust. You are left in the smoke of people who are innovating. So I would much rather try and not necessarily become Oprah if I'm learning things and connecting with new audiences along the way. Like, it's only been upside for me, even as it's been a roller coaster itself.
16:43And there's something so satisfying about, in midlife, when you think you know what you're good at, starting out at something that you've never done before and might not be good at to start, and experiencing the learning curve that everybody experiences early in their career, even after you feel like you've more or less figured out where your strengths and weaknesses are. It's exciting to build new muscles. Yeah. Can you just explain the show to people who, again, are familiar with... No, no, he's better than that. What you're doing is Ari answered the question Adi blew by with her storytelling earlier.
17:17I was listening to this and I was like, this is a very engaging conversation. And also, we have explained nothing to the audience about what this show is. There are a few key components. First of all, the title Engagement Party gives you a clue that we're talking about the things that we're obsessed with, that we're engaged with, that we need to process with a friend. And the friendship is another really big part of it. I want people to feel like they're in on a private conversation between the two of us. And we're talking about things that people may have heard of, may also be obsessed with, or may not be on their radar.
17:47Because as Audie likes to say, the then diagram of what she and I are interested in is not a circle. And I hope we also bring to it the kind of rigor and context and analysis and history that people are accustomed to based on what they know of us from NPR. So we want to give people a laugh. We want to give people insight. We want to give people to talk about something to talk about at the dinner party over the weekend. Episodes are deliberately dropping on Fridays because it should be a fun listen that people can enjoy while they're doing other things. A fun listen and a fun watch because it's also on video.
18:19And the party part is really important because it's not, I think a lot of podcasts that are hang type shows, it's a little bit closed. Like you get to be a fly on the wall of these cool and interesting people. And sometimes that is great. You know what I mean? That's fun to do. But I've been joking that, you know, in public media, we were called hosts, not anchors, because Susan had told me that you're host of a party. Susan Stamberg, founding mother, yes. Yeah, it was like, oh, you have something interesting to say. Oh, you're like a business person. you know, oh, that's funny. Wait, you're an athlete?
18:56Here, you come over and talk as well. And our natural inclination is to draw people in. You know what I mean? Like, I think it's not an accident. I'm doing a panel show now. I think it's not an accident that Ari and his post-NPR life is like moderating every interview and talk with every interesting person who sets foot on a stage right now is because we still like, we're like, come into the party, come into the party. So it's something that we expect the audience to participate in, and we're going to have, like, ways for them to do that. Did you guys feel like when you were at NPR, like, you were limited in, in that, in some ways, this connection that you had off the mic was something that you kind of couldn't do on the NPR broadcast, and that was, in some ways, kind of limiting, and that the listeners were kind of missing out on something special?
19:46The way you describe it sounds negative, And I think that any journalism platform is going to ask you to bring a certain part of yourself that's not necessarily 100 % of yourself. That is the nature of being a journalist in any context, in any way, shape, or form. I mean, I would say the kind of anchor that Audie is at 6 a.m. every weekday morning on CNN is not going to be the same as what you get from Engagement Party. And so, sure, when we were together hosting All Things Considered, we weren't cracking jokes and dropping F-bombs, but that would have been wildly inappropriate. Neither of us was angsting about the fact that we weren't able to do that because we were the inheritors of this incredible heirloom that we both really prized and valued and loved.
20:34and what we were able to bring to All Things Considered was special and necessary and essential and also true to who we are in a way that didn't include cracking jokes and dropping F-bombs. And so that felt right for that platform. And this feels right for this platform. Well, we have a lot more that we want to get to with Ari and Adi, but we have to take a short break. So we'll be right back after this.
21:04Max:In this week's Branded segment from Think with Google, I talked with Google's VP of Marketing, Josh Spanier, about the importance of venturing outside of your bubble. So Josh, it's getting into kind of event season, and we had a little trouble scheduling this call because you have been constantly on the road. What are you picking up? Well, I have been on the road a lot. Last week, I was at the possible event, a marketing conference in Miami. The week before that, I was at Google Cloud Next, our big developer conference for Google Cloud. I learn a lot on the road. And I think one of of challenges for us marketers is that we spend too much time in the office, too much time heads down looking at our devices versus getting out into the real world.
21:42Max:And I've always found that really when I get out, I get ahead. What do you mean by getting out to get ahead? Getting out in the world is all about education for me. At Google Cloud Next, I saw incredible new technologies. I saw AI-powered robotics from Google's deep mind. I saw conversations and listen to conversations about cryptography. Most of this goes above my head, but it makes me a better marketer knowing it's there and picking up on the cues and the conversations around AI beyond straight marketing. So that education is super helpful. I also find just that real talk happens in the real world.
22:17Max:At a possible event in Miami, I met with a lot of our customers. I meet with a lot of CMOs and they tell me things that they're just not going to tell me over email or over a video conference call. Getting out helps me get ahead. It's also important that I let my team get ahead as well. So one of the things I love to do is to think about my insights, collect them all, and write them on the plane or on the bus or on the train going back to home, back to the office. You do it immediately. That gives you a real-time signal on what your boss really cares about, what they're interested in, and what they're learning about.
22:49Max:All this stuff just helps make me a richer, better marketer, and that helps lift the team as well. Where can people find out more about what you've been learning? You can watch the Google Cloud Next keynote on YouTube right now. And watch out for Brandcast, GML, I.O., these major Google events, which will all be live streamed over the next couple of weeks.
23:16Max:How do you think about, there's a very different kind of connection online. Like I think on NPR, everybody knows you, everybody likes you. People are like curious about your name, but often it doesn't go like... Oh, not everybody likes you. No, absolutely not. Okay. One of the very first things you learn when you become a host is that everybody hates some of the hosts. Really? Some people are going to hate you. Oh, yeah, yeah. Absolutely. Huh. I did not know that because I think of online celebrity as being fundamentally kind of polarizing. Like people who are successful on the internet are often very, very polarizing.
Read the full transcript
23:47Max:If you think of, you know, I probably like Megyn Kelly is the embodiment of this. Yeah. And I'm curious how you, how do you think about that with this show? It's hard for me to think of somebody on the internet who's successful who doesn't have real haters, too. I'm actually curious. In our very first episode, we touch on Michael Jackson, and without getting too deep into the specifics, I'm curious what the reaction to what I say about Michael Jackson in the episode is going to be. So, who knows? I may turn out to be a polarizing figure. I would say that at NPR, obviously, and in any news job originally, emotionally, like just kind of throwing your opinion in there the whole time was not embraced and frankly was something people liked about it.
24:27They wanted to just know. I used to joke like sometimes you don't need to make a sad sounding voice for something sad because by definition, the thing you're describing is sad. Like we didn't do that work for the audience. One thing that I found differently is when I went to TV, specifically linear TV, I got a coach because I was like, I don't know how to do this. You know, my face wasn't doing what needed to be done on screen. And I didn't connect with the audience the way you need to there. And I remember at one point I said something like, well, I don't want to do that. You know, people don't like that.
24:57And the coach was like, look, this is a different ballgame. If someone hates you, great. If someone loves you, great. What's important is you make them feel. And what's important is on camera, even when the sound is off, which we know cable news, it happens, that they still want to watch. And so some things that I had completely suppressed, waving my hands around, you know what I mean? Like my eyes get really big. I can't help it. I'm always fighting it. They were like, do it, you know, because you want someone to be like, oh, it's that person. And if they hate or like you, they might still tune in because they just want to be engaged with that feeling.
25:34And you're right about the Internet. The Internet takes it to the logical extreme, which is like infotainment as rage bait. It's like two things that we really didn't like separately now jam together and put on steroids. And I don't know how long that'll last. It's not guaranteed it'll last forever. I mean, the aughts period was kind of like a there was a snark period. And then there was like, actually, we're kind of into things and we're nice and we're earnest and we're millennials. Yay. And then now we're where we are now, where it pays to not believe in anything. But as long as you're saying it extremely loudly on the verge of violence, that's a click in the clips attention economy.
26:15And that is something, to your point, Ben, that it's different and that, no, we can't offer you that. It's not a show about hating things. It's a show about critique, analysis. It's a show about why everyone's fired up about something. But no, I'm not going to make money doing what some of those other voices do because it's like not even my nature. But, Adi, it's funny. What you're saying speaks directly to something that we talk about in the first episode, which is euphoria and the way the two of it stars, Zendaya and Sidney Sweeney, have approached fame differently, whereas Zendaya is sort of being this aspirational figure who appeals to everyone, and Sidney Sweeney's approach to fame is much more, if you're talking about me, I'm winning.
26:56Whether you're saying good things or bad things, there's no such thing as bad publicity.
27:00Max:So you're taking the Zendaya approach? That's the... Um, listen, if I can liken myself to Zendaya, then everything I've written in my journal for the last six months will have come true. No, I don't know. It's just like, you have to do what comes naturally to you, you know, like, the way people, to me, that's been my biggest lesson watching people be successful in this space, is like, the thing you have to be the most is yourself. And anything less is actually a huge problem. Like, it just doesn't work or resonate. so no I don't expect Adam Friedlander to be Megyn Kelly do you know what I mean and I don't expect Tucker Carlson to be like Max like that's not why I'm going on the internet I'm going on the internet to like dip my toe in these different worlds and visit the people that live there which is different from broadcast broadcast radio or broadcast television which is everyone is going to hear this so try and make something that's not going to offend them all it's true my style is not very similar to Tucker Carlson.
28:00I also hate zins, you know? He's all about apparently, like, zinning and stuff now. You mean the, like, tobacco pouch where you tuck into your lip? Yeah, I can't. I tried it again recently. Is that the big difference between you and Tucker Carlson? I actually think, I'm just saying that's a big, like, that's, like, a part of his personality is he's selling these types of things. It's like he's hawking them on, and I just don't quite get it. I don't care about your politics. If your personality is zin, I don't think we're going to vibe. Yeah, I direct your hate mail to Ari Shapiro. Well, Ben, how do you think about this?
28:31Because one of the things I found fascinating was virality, like virality as a kind of de facto good in a journalism space, which at the time, you know, I had real critique about. And I'm wondering, now that we're, like, in this world where people go viral for all kinds of reasons, like, how does that make you think about, like, how journalism plays in this space? Or even, you know, to goofballs like us who aren't there to sort of rage play.
28:59Max:Yeah. I mean, well, first of all, I just feel like I need to defend Zins, you know, because many of our colleagues who have stronger stomachs than Max, like, sort of run into the show. Am I getting to your mind? Yeah, I was just about to say, send the floor back to you by Zins. Exactly. a word from our actually Philip Morris is not a sponsor of this podcast he's a sponsor of other Tucker launched a Zin competitor I believe which we could maybe that's a potential path for us but no it's such a good question because I think like to me it's funny the word engagement like is a funny word for this because like when we were at BuzzFeed I mean one of the real things that we discovered and I think you know it wasn't where we were headed but it was where the internet took us which is that the the most engaging thing is the most divisive thing.
29:44Max:And that's how the social platforms at least were built in that moment. I think it's actually less true on TikTok and Insta these days. But, you know, in like Facebook in the sort of mid-aughts, the mid-2010s, the thing that was most, the thing that traveled was the divisive thing. So that could be, is this dress, you know, white and gold or black and blue? Like that's divisive. And people argue about it and the argument fuels, is what propels it. Or it could be, Donald Trump said something crazy, and people fight about that, and that propels it. But I think the notion of engagement really just became division, at least for a while.
30:23Max:And I think the sort of architecture of those social platforms really created that. And I think it's a more kind of diverse landscape now. There are sort of more different ways to find an audience and more different audiences. And few of them are as big as the, like, you could just see the sort of totally, like, some of these stories would just spread everywhere instantly. And I think things are more fragmented now, probably for the better. Instagram in particular is not necessarily built for news. And I think Adam Masseri was on the show and he didn't talk about news at all. I think it's much more built for commercialism and selling you stuff.
30:59And I did withhold an eye roll there, which was me kind of putting my NPR face back on, because Adam Masseri gave us the feed. I'm glad he's got religion about pictures and sandwiches and shopping and connection. But that dude gave us the feed. And I think that you're right, Ben, in that I do think the For You page, and I do think that makes a more focused and slightly insular experience. but it means that the hurdle that something leaps to travel, which does have something in common with the divisiveness, it's like a higher bar, but once it goes, it goes off like a rocket because now it's escaped each of our algorithms.
31:43If you're looking for a through line between what we did at NPR and what we're doing now at Engagement Party, I think one big one is curiosity, that you can come to our show and hear all about the thing you're obsessed with that we're going to be talking about, hopefully, in an interesting, new, contextual way. But I also want it to be a place you can come and hear about something that is totally off your radar, that you're unfamiliar with, and walk away with some new insight and understanding of what's going on outside of your own social media bubble. Without the pronouncement factor, which is why I'm curious about how it'll be received.
32:17Like, I think one of the hallmarks of kind of like the way hot take culture migrated to podcasts and video podcasts and all that stuff, is there's, and even the manosphere, arguably, it's a lot of someone be like, it's this way, and it's definitely this way. You know what I mean? And I guess there's someone out there that's always been like, you know, I'm so glad someone told me how this all works. I'm curious, do you think that newscasts like the ones that you did, this variety, you know, presenting a variety, a menu of information, are those basically going to go away, do you think, in the next few, in the next decade or so, as more people continue to just kind of experienced the feed and are satisfied with that as a way of getting information?
32:57Well, they were called magazines. They were called news magazine shows, okay? And what have happened to magazines? You know what I mean? Like your magazine has also really taken a hit because there are alternatives to a curated set of images and advertisers targeted to the thing you're interested in. So I think you're raising a very good question that I don't know the answer to because every time I say something is going to go away like here we are you know what I mean like I didn't think I'd be making any more radio and here we are um and I certainly didn't think I'd be making it with Ben and here we are so I don't want us pronounce anything dead but certainly we are seeing all variety programming of all kinds late night magazines broadcast magazines and it's unclear what the value is to the consumer and it's affecting the business of it.
33:53And I'd even ask right now, how many other examples can you point to? I mean, you're asking in the next few years, is this going to go away? I would say, where do you see it today?
34:01Max:It's the evening news. It's the morning show. I mean, I guess I'm curious, I mean, more sort of existentially, do you think, I mean, is NPR going to survive? I certainly hope so. And I am encouraged by the fact that individual donations have gone way up since federal funding was cut. I don't have any insight. I know that there were some recent buyouts offered. I've certainly been through times in my nearly 25 years at NPR when there were deeper cuts than that. And I think that if NPR can get through the next couple of years to this transition of a post-federal funding existence, then its future is incredibly bright because it doesn't answer to anyone other than journalists.
34:46Max:So that's my hope. Could you talk a little about, I'm curious what it was like, Adi, and having this shadow of political funding, funding that was coming from Capitol Hill, kind of hanging over the broadcast. How present was that for you guys? The problem is, well, two things. One, that was present since its inception because when the Corporation for Public Broadcasting was put into law, there were Congress people there who were like, what is this? What are we doing? The thing about it being, as I said, campus adjacent was a problem then. And the news of NPR came into its own with the Vietnam War and its coverage there and also coverage of hearings.
35:26So there is no time that there were not lawmakers who wanted to get rid of corporation and public broadcasting and NPR. The difference is now, just like USAID, just like the Department of Education, just like a bunch of other things, someone was able to do it. Someone was able to execute it. So I don't want the listener, I don't want you all to think that every day we were doing the news being like, oh boy, what does the congressman from so-and-so think? That was not relevant. It was just sort of always there. But the second thing I'd like to put out there, hold on, hold on, because I see where you're going with this.
35:59I am looking at BuzzFeed, Vice, Mike, Food52, CNET, all of this journalism that was valued at buku amounts of money in the end in just these last few years has been sold for a fraction of that. And I think I am somewhat more bullish on legacy media than other people because I look at the landscape of AI and the only thing I think about is verification. I think that there will be an emphasis on human verified things. I think that people will find that certain legacy names are something they sort of cling to in the AI information storm. And so I went from being a person that, you know, like you, it's like, oh, my God, it's all falling apart to being like, well, what's the alternative?
36:51You know, are we going to newsletter our way out of this? It seems like there are some aspects of legacy brands that are going to be deeply relevant and valuable to people. I just don't know what that value is since they also want it for free.
37:05Max:But I guess I'm curious, like as a broadcaster, as a host, because I think like a lot of journalists now are, you know, working for places that got bought by people who have, I mean, this kind of a neutral way, reactionary politics, who are reacting against the last era. And whether it's Jeff Bezos or the Ellison family who are trying to pull their publications to the right. Like, how do you think about being in an environment where kind of, because I think NPR has always been true for NPR in a way that's different, where the ownership is looking over your shoulder, the sources of funding are deeply entwined with the content.
37:36Max:Like, was that, is that in your head when you're broadcasting on NPR? No, no lawmakers came to meddle. You know what I mean? Certainly meddling is different. But yeah, in a way it feels like, do you, how do you feel in the media you're in? Do you know what I mean? Like in a world where you have to go to VCs for money, where we're making these jokes about Zen, where like, to me, the same issues are at play. and maybe y 'all are just actually less equipped to live with that sort of cloud. When I asked Charles Farrell, the number two at CBS News about this, he said, well, everybody's owned by someone, which I don't know, but I think it's a slightly grim way to say things.
38:22Because who else is going to pay you? I'd like to be owned by the viewer, which is why I was happy to hawk tote bags and be on air for five or six hours at a time and fundraise at member stations. I worked at a member station.
38:34Max:Yeah, real independence is like a healthy operation in some way, I think. Yeah, real independence, it's difficult to come by. It's a luxury because someone pays the check. But I have yet to work at some place where anybody has meddled. I don't have that feeling yet. And as soon as I am and will, I'll share that. I'm very transparent. So we're almost out of time here. What? I know. It's very, I know. It's sad. I mean, we could keep doing this for a long time. This is a podcast. We don't actually need to end everything. Yeah, we've got to throw to the next show that's coming on. This has been great, and you guys have been really generous with your time.
39:08But the last question that we had here is, you know, this is a fishing expedition, but I have to ask, Ari, you did or you wrote, I believe I've got it in my show notes here, that you produced a musical with Alan Cumming. And I'm very curious, now that you are, you know, you have a little bit, it seems like, you know, you're not an NPR. You don't have exactly a day job anymore. This is a weekly show, I believe. Are you going to go on The Traitors? Has that been discussed? Has that been brought up? Would you like to? Minor correction. You're very close to accurate. Alan Cumming and I created a cabaret show together, which was the two of us telling stories and singing songs, not songs that we had written.
39:47Say the name. But we toured all over. It was called Ach and Oy, a considered cabaret. And we went all over the country and into the Caribbean and Canada and all over the place. For six years, we toured this show. And then before, just after he became host of The Traitors, I was tapped to host The Mole for a season on Netflix. Right. And having had the experience of hosting a reality show, I can firmly say I don't think I would ever want to be a contestant on a reality show. First of all, don't say that because we need to be on Amazing Race. Oh my God, wait a minute. Can the two of us do Amazing Race, please?
40:25Can we put that into the universe? I don't know, you just say it. As a contestant, you live in fear of having a bad edit. Like if somebody puts the dumpty, dumpty, dumpty music over footage of you walking on a beach, you're toast. Yes, the villain edit. Right. As a host of a reality show, you can be completely incompetent. You can be a chaotic, sweaty mess, as I was when we were filming in Malaysia, and they still make you look glowing and perfect in the final cut. So I was totally spoiled. No thank you to being a contestant. Well, Ari, Adi, thank you guys so much for joining us. This was really fun.
40:59Yeah, love being on here. I love the conversation. Thank you. It's great to see you guys.
41:11Max:We spent 2025 talking to people who channeled the excitement and belief in AI in media and marketing. A lot of that conversation in 2026 will be about the hard work of building with those tools. Think with Google is here to bridge the gap between inspiration and implementation. This isn't fluff. It's a rigorous look at the mechanics of growth to help CMOs solve the hard problems, like navigating complex consumer journeys and proving value through better measurement. Make this the year you turn potential into performance. Visit thinkwithgoogle.com.
41:47So Ben, one of the things that surprised me about this episode and has surprised me about both Adi and Ari in general is the interest in kind of experimentation and doing different things and evolving their media careers beyond just, you know, the host of NPR, Morning Edition, of All Things Considered. One of the things that I feel like the previous generation, before Ari and Adi of hosts of these shows, would do is kind of get those jobs and that was the pinnacle of their career, right? They mentioned some previous hosts of those shows who basically did them until they retired. And both Ari and Audie seem interested in making a next new chapter beyond being the host of those shows.
42:40And that's not really a capstone job anymore. Were you surprised, as surprised by that as I was?
42:47Max:Yeah, I was surprised when Audie left NPR. And because, right, in a way, they both, and I know her better, really kind of like, Like she, for my first time, like embodied this kind of like really like serious person, even handed NPR host. And I was sort of shocked when we got her to come and host this slightly kind of like wacky show at BuzzFeed. But I think, you know, it's interesting, like for early, a lot of people who worked in legacy media for a long time, even though many journalists are very curious about the world, they're like traditionally very incurious about media. and I do think that there's something new kind of in the air that if you are, even if you have this incredible kind of prestige job where people are obsessed with like how to pronounce your name, you know, it's just no longer tenable to believe that the media's landscape is going to be similar in 20 years as it is now and that you're going to be kind of, and so people in what used to be thought of as kind of the pinnacle of the profession are just looking at their careers totally differently And I do think like both of them have been pretty, have been almost like it's like you see this person in this, you know, in like the glass broadcast booth.
43:56Max:And it's like then kind of like shocking to learn that they're, that like when the mic goes off, they're really looking outward and thinking really hard about the media landscape. What do you think of the thesis of their show, which is, I guess, a more personality-driven variety show that is staying away from the real hardcore divisiveness of a lot of what works online? Well, first of all, I've been proven wrong by the success of traditional broadcasters moving from legacy and linear modes into digital. I was surprised by Don Lemon's ability to make that transition. In some ways, Don Lemon is more relevant now than he was at the end of his CNN career when he was a morning show host.
44:42I've been surprised by the resilience of Piers Morgan. I mean, they're basically essentially doing versions of their old television shows on the internet, but they're still very much a part of the zeitgeist. And in some ways, they're bigger than they were when they were in their last jobs at CNN. So I'm not going to underestimate skilled broadcasters' ability to transfer mediums. That being said, it's a pretty crowded landscape out there for podcasts, particularly culture podcasts. I think that the advantage that Ari and Adi have is they people know them. They're celebrities. They have super fans and some haters from their time as hosts at NPR.
45:21But I think I think it is an uphill battle. And, you know, the feed in some ways and the Internet landscape is democratizing. It has to be good. It has to be interesting. People aren't going to listen or watch just because, you know, it's in front of them in the way that you might if you were tuning into NPR because you were stuck in traffic and, you know, you'd flipped through all of the limited channels. The stuff has to be good. So I think it's challenging, but they have an advantage over someone starting from scratch for sure. I do think you're right.
45:52Max:The advantage is it's as much skill as it is celebrity. And if you look down the list of the most successful podcasters right now, you're pretty much looking at, like, the primetime lineups of Fox News and CNN in 2009 or 2012. Like, it's people who have a lot of television experience, a lot of broadcast experience. And it is, to some degree, just the economics have shifted where, well, where people who would have succeeded online before because they're really skilled professionals are now making a living there. Well, that's it for us this week. Thank you for listening to the Mixed Signals podcast from us here at Semaphore.
46:30Our show is produced by Manny Fidel and Josh Billinson, with special thanks to Anna Pizzino, Jules Zern, Rachel Oppenheim, Tori Kaur, Garrett Wiley, and Daniel Haift. Our engineer is Rick Kwan, and our theme music is by Steve Bone. Our public editor is James Murdoch.
46:46Max:And if you are enjoying the show, please follow us wherever you get your podcasts and like and subscribe on YouTube. And if you want more, you can always sign up for Semaphore's media newsletter, which is out every Sunday night.
From the publisher
Audie Cornish and Ari Shapiro spent years together in the buttoned-up, professional audio journalism world of NPR co-hosting All Things Considered. Now, they’re reuniting at CNN for something very different — podcasting. The two join Max and Ben to talk about how their new show Engagement Party is really just a continuation of their off-mic dynamic from their NPR days, how they’ve both dealt with the pivots and shifts that come with a career in modern media, and whether the growing crop of amateur podcasters (us included…) can learn something from the audio pros that came before them.
Sign up for Semafor Media’s Sunday newsletter: https://www.semafor.com/newsletters/media
For more from Think with Google, check out ThinkwithGoogle.com.
Find us on X: @semaforben, @maxwelltaniIf you have a tip or a comment, please email us mixedsignals@semafor.com




