Steve Hilton on the Murdochs, David Ellison, and conservative media’s California

17 Jul 2026 · 50 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Steve Hilton, the Republican nominee for California governor, discusses conservative media’s portrayal of California, his campaign strategy in a huge state, Fox News’ role in his political rise, and California’s film/TV industry exodus (including a Paramount merger-related lawsuit and “Hollywood leaving” claims). He also argues for reforming film incentives and bureaucracy (“Bring Hollywood Home”), and for regulating children’s smartphone access rather than apps.

Guest background

Steve Hilton is a British media/politics figure; he advised David Cameron as a key media advisor until 2012, then worked in U.S. tech and later hosted a show on Fox News. He’s running for governor against Democrat Javier Becerra.

Key claims

California needs change because it’s failing on cost of living, crime, business climate, opportunity, poverty, unemployment, and taxes; conservative narratives are partly media-driven; Paramount’s “exit” talk is overstated; Hollywood decline is driven by worsening production conditions and government failure; film incentives should be uncapped and bureaucracy streamlined; children should not have unsupervised smartphone internet access.

Notable examples

Spencer Pratt’s LA mayor campaign and fire-related messaging; LA County vote share; downtown LA/Skid Row described as “worse than any third world country”; car-chase permitting chaos; tax incentives and film commission “concierge” idea; Newsom’s Fox media focus; “Bring Hollywood Home” policy paper.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Introducing Steve Hilton

0:45 to 1:30

Discover Steve Hilton's background and his surprising nomination.

“because it's a media state, not just the entertainment capital of the world, but also a place that's so big that traditionally politicians have to campaign through the media.”

California as a Media Laboratory

1:30 to 3:00

Learn how California's unique media landscape impacts political campaigns.

“Hi, I'm Joshua Spania, VP of Marketing at Google.”

Hilton's Campaign Experience

4:05 to 6:15

Steve Hilton shares insights from his experience campaigning in California.

“after 16 years of one party controlling everything.”

Media Lessons from Spencer Pratt

6:15 to 8:00

Discover what Hilton learned from competing against Spencer Pratt.

“And that's certainly what we're going to be doing in this next phase of my campaign.”

The Impact of Fox News

8:00 to 10:00

Explore how Steve's time at Fox News shapes his political communication.

“it affected everyone in LA, and I was here at the time, but it was very much a West Side story, in the sense of that's where it took place, particularly the Palisades Fire.”

Cultural Insights on Political Communication

10:00 to 12:00

Steve discusses cultural differences in political messaging between the UK and the US.

“to win an election in California with the Fox News audience.”

Reflections on Media and Politics

12:00 to 14:00

Concluding thoughts on the intersection of media and political campaigning.

California's Political Culture Compared to the UK

14:00 to 23:50

Explore the differences between California's laid-back political culture and the UK's direct tabloid style.

“And really in that world of crafting messages and so on, and the tabloid culture of the newspapers in the UK, particularly strong, and all of that is incredibly direct and blunt and simple and clear.”

The Murdoch Influence and California's Media Narrative

23:50 to 26:58

Discuss insights into the Murdoch family and the complexities of California's media portrayal amidst political challenges.

“This week on our branded segment from Think with Google, I talked to Google's VP of Marketing, Josh Spanier, about what marketing lessons we can learn from the World Cup.”

Political Messaging and Media Influence

28:00 to 29:00

Exploration of partisan media and politics surrounding Trump.

“It's a partisan attack, pure politics, dressed up as principal in order to promote his career as someone who's going to stick it to Trump.”
Show all 19 chapters

California's Media Production Crisis

29:00 to 30:18

Discussion on the decline of film and TV production in California.

“I published a policy paper, which is clearly the strongest in terms of keeping that industry, stopping the catastrophic decline, actually.”

Proposed Solutions for Film Industry Issues

30:18 to 32:44

Overview of strategies to revive California's film industry.

“complete stampede if we don't have some change here.”

The Importance of the Film Industry

32:44 to 34:08

Emphasis on the economic impact of the film industry on jobs.

“The headline was, will Los Angeles be the next Detroit?”

Personal Connections with Gavin Newsom

34:08 to 36:35

Steve Hilton shares his relationship with Gavin Newsom.

“You've been plugged in in global politics for a long time.”

Criticism and Role of Technology in Politics

36:35 to 39:26

Discussion on the balance between regulating and supporting tech.

“Decentralized power, that's been a core part of my political philosophy, but just none of it ever happened.”

Children's Access to Technology

39:26 to 41:39

Hilton discusses the dangers of uncontrolled smartphone access for children.

“New York just passed a moratorium on data centers.”

Challenges in the Upcoming Governor's Race

41:39 to 42:00

Hilton outlines the political landscape and his campaign's potential.

“So they know that they can't start talking about kids in smartphones because they're just as bad.”

California's Political Landscape and Voter Sentiment

42:00 to 45:42

Explore the dynamics of California's political environment and key voter sentiments ahead of the elections.

“make the case for why you think that this can happen.”

Conservative Strategies and the Future of California Media

45:50 to 50:05

Discuss the challenges facing conservative candidates in California and the media landscape's evolution.

“Ben, Steve's an interesting guy because he is kind of running as this kind of Trump-like Republican, nice guy, kind of running in California.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:10Max:Welcome to Mixed Signals from Semaphore Media. I'm Ben Smith, the editor-in-chief of Semaphore. And this week, Max and I talked to somebody who's right in the middle of a media political storm, which is the race for governor in California. Steve Hilton is the, I would say, somewhat surprising nominee on the Republican side for governor. He's somebody who's been at the intersection of media and politics his whole career, but a lot of it in another country, Britain, where he was David Cameron's key media advisor until 2012, before moving to the U.S., working in tech, and then getting a show on Fox News.

0:44Max:These California races are always a real laboratory for media, because it's a media state, not just the entertainment capital of the world, but also a place that's so big that traditionally politicians have to campaign through the media. You just can't knock on all the doors in California. And so we had an opportunity to talk to Steve about what he's learning from the middle of that crucible and about some of those big media issues facing California, particularly the flight of Hollywood, threats we reported on this week at Semaphore from Paramount to leave the state. And finally, of course, Max's personal hobby horse, which is the ways in which conservative media have been painting California as an uninhabitable hellhole.

1:22Max:So we'll have Steve Hilton here right after the break.

1:31Max:Hi, I'm Joshua Spania, VP of Marketing at Google. And you might assume I have all the answers when it comes to marketing. The truth, I'm just as curious to learn, discover the answers to everything as everyone else. We are living through a total reset of our marketing industry. The old maps don't work, which means we get to chart a new path forward. It's dynamic, it's fast-paced, and honestly, there's never been a more exciting time to be in marketing. That is why we've started a new podcast, Frontier CMO. It's from Think with Google, and I promise it's not just a bunch of corporate waffle. I'm sitting down with people who really know what's going on.

2:15Max:CMOs, creators, technologists, the lot. And we're having a proper, unfiltered chat about what's working, and quite frankly, what isn't? These are your notes from the frontier. So do me a favor, search for Frontier CMO wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us and subscribe on YouTube.

2:42Max:Thanks so much for joining us, Steve. Great to be here. I was preparing for this. I realized that many of the people who watch and listen to this show may know you from Fox, but they may know you from the streets of California. But I think many of them may also know you as the other Republican who was on the ballot during this wild media circus around Spencer Pratt, who ran for mayor of Los Angeles, who was going to be the big Republican champion. And then actually he lost and you won, despite his big tweets and his AI videos and things. And you, meanwhile, were wandering the state with a flip phone.

3:17Max:And I guess I wonder if there's a media lesson that you took from your victory and his loss there. Well, I do think Spencer did an amazing job generating excitement and energy around his campaign. So that's a huge positive. And you'll be seeing as we move as we've moved into the next phase of this campaign now in the general election. And you're going to be seeing really us turning up the volume very much. in terms of the campaign. Because as I've always said, although it's true that California obviously needs change, a majority of Californians think the state's going in the wrong direction, we can get into all the examples of why, you know, life is so tough for people who live in California, why we need a change of government, or at least some balance in our government, after 16 years of one party controlling everything.

4:08All that's true, but it's an uphill battle. And for me now, in a head-to-head with the Democrat candidate Javier Becerra, and so there's no question that we're going to be, we not only need, but we'll be even increasing the kind of volume in terms of media that you saw from Spencer. And so I think it's very important what he did, and it was great, and it got people very excited. But of course, it's also true that you've got to have a campaign that has that grassroots element to it. And that is what we've been doing. we've been traveling the state since when i launched my campaign up end of april last year and we've been doing many of the old-fashioned things a lot of people said to me that's not how it works in california it's too big it's the fourth biggest economy in the world the biggest state in america there's no way you can do it that way you basically announce your campaign in some slightly crappy press conference and then you sit at home and phone people for money and then you spend the money in ads at the end of the campaign.

5:11That's how it works. And I just thought that sounded really terrible in so many ways. I said, I don't want to do it like that. I actually feel like you've got to earn it. You've got to go out there. You've got to meet people. You learn from that. And that's what we've been doing. We've been doing hundreds and hundreds of town halls up and down the state. And yes, it's true. The very first one, I remember we had, I don't know, 75 people show up in Pasadena, I think it was. But by the end, we were getting 500 people regularly, every single stop. And that adds up. It's thousands and thousands of people, and they talk to other people and so on.

5:43And they post on Facebook. You take pictures with everyone. And of course, we still did raise money, and we still did spend that on ads, particularly streaming, which enables you to be much more targeted in your advertising. A lot of people said, why aren't you running ads? Well, we were, but we just weren't running the kind of broadcast ads that everybody sees and is aware of. We were much more targeted in our spending. So it's not like we didn't use that. I'm on social media. We had, you know, pretty good engagement on many of our posts, not on the scale of what you saw with Spencer. So I think you need all of it.

6:15And that's certainly what we're going to be doing in this next phase of my campaign. Spencer obviously got a lot of attention from the national media in the way that he was campaigning. He was really successful at capturing attention. But when you look at, you know, how he performed actually in L.A., it wasn't that much different than, you know, how the standard Republican has performed running in the city in previous elections kind of before the actual runoff. I mean, do you think that there was something – how do you explain that, I guess, the idea that, you know, he got a lot of attention from us in the media, but in the end, the results ended up being, you know, exactly the same.

6:53Does that say any – what do you learn from – what do you take away from that? It's interesting. I don't know Spencer particularly. I've met him once. I endorsed him, and I was thrilled to see the energy and excitement he brought to their campaign. I know many people are working with many of the people who worked with him now. We're now working with them. But I don't know too much about it. The question I always had was whether the power that he brought to his argument, really deriving from the fact that his story in relation to the fire. That really resonated, particularly on, if you could say, I mean, LA is huge for those who don't know.

7:33LA County is the biggest in the country. It's 10 million people. It's about a quarter of that whole vote. We have 58 counties in California. LA County is one. It's about 23, 24 % of the vote. He was running for mayor, which is LA City. That's a subset of LA County. That's about 4 million people, but it's an enormous metropolitan area. And the fire story, of course, it affected everyone in LA, and I was here at the time, but it was very much a West Side story, in the sense of that's where it took place, particularly the Palisades Fire. And the question for me was always like, what resonance did those arguments have, and the force of those arguments on, you know, in Boyle Heights, which has now been affected.

8:22I've been a few times now already on the east side of LA, a heavily working class Latino area, just affected by a fire in the warehouse. That was the fire story for East LA just recently. Of course, that was after the end of the mayor race. So I think it may well have been also a question of the core argument and the resonance of that across the city.

8:44Max:You've done a lot of things. You worked in British politics, in tech, and in the media. And before you ran for governor, you had a show on Fox. How has the power of Fox News affected your campaign? Well, I've been very open about that and appreciative of the fact that it's given me a platform, no question. Going back to what we're saying earlier about the size of California, which is a big state, and it's very difficult to get going if no one knows who you are. And thanks to those years on Fox, both as a contributor and hosting a show, a lot of people, particularly obviously on the Republican side, knew who I was.

9:22And so that gives you a starting point. And I'm really grateful for that. I loved my time at Fox. It was great fun and a whole new turn in my career that I didn't anticipate. Learned a lot doing it and made great friends and it was fantastic. But I'm very clear that it was an important foundational point for being able to run statewide in a state as big as California. The fact that just you've got that name recognition, that's really helpful. It's not the whole story. You don't win just on the basis of that. Obviously, you need to, and if you look at, you know, audience numbers, just to take that, you know, it's, you know, you're not going to win an election in California with the Fox News audience.

10:06However much I love the Fox News audience and appreciate their support. I'm curious, what did you learn about communicating in the American political space from being on Fox News? Obviously, you understand British political communication. It was something that you did to help David Cameron, the former prime minister there when you worked for him. But what did you learn about specifically American political communication from it i feel like i should i should chip in the research note here

10:36Max:that that hilton was satirized by the bbc comedy the thick of it as i watched some of it yesterday the herbal tea drinking publicist stewart pearson if people would like to drink herbal tea yeah no i mean sometimes i drink black tea most of the time okay in the evening you know i mean i mean if we get into tea yeah i'm definitely you know i can talk a lot about tea but um that wasn't the i didn't recognize the caricature although i think i'm slowly turning into that guy i remember when when the um just physically anyway when the character came out this is a while ago now is it two ten ten plus years ago yeah at least yeah right it was still i think i was still there i never watched it i was aware of it i never watched the show even the even the even the seasons before I made an appearance.

11:26And I remember seeing the clips and being horrified about how old and fat this character was. But now that's me, so I can't really complain. Also, the character had a beard back then, interesting, I think, which I didn't until recently.

11:42Max:We all sort of turn into caricatures of ourselves, ultimately, I think. But I think also the funny thing about it is that I think I said this somewhere else, maybe in one of the debates when I was asked about what we're watching with one of my team members on the campaign trail on sort of long drives around the state. We ended up watching it. So now I have seen it. I haven't quite got to the end. It's a brilliant show. It's a really fantastic show. To get back to the question, I am curious what you learned about, you know, about political communication through kind of your time at Fox and, you know, what some of the feedback you got was, you know, from your time on there, what lessons you took away that you're kind of applying now as you're kind of seeking the, you know, the governorship.

12:24It's interesting. One of the things that I heard is very interesting because when you're a host and people come up to you and they say generally nice things, I always used to point out that I was in the perfect, you know, sweet spot of awareness, not nothing like the kind of national figure status of someone like you know one of my former colleagues at fox tucker carson for example you know well ben um who you know i as far as you know found it difficult to go out because people would come up to him and yell at him and whatever is incredibly well known and therefore has had many people who hated him as well as loved him i wasn't anywhere near that category um i had a show on sunday nights it was a very uh loyal audience and i really appreciated it but just nothing like that kind of attention so people would come up to you and say always nice things i never had one negative thing ever um in all those years and they would say something general like i love your show that was very common oh hi is that you steve nice to see i can we do a picture i love your show and i would always ask why because i just in you know seeking feedback in terms of well if there's something particularly like then i should do more of that and the thing that came up over and over again was this phrase because you're so clear you tell it like it is all this kind of stuff something something in in that nature of being direct so i think actually funnily enough the real um learning point was not from u.s media maybe it was from it was bringing some of what uk media and politics is known for to american media because to me this is just natural how you make arguments remember i was you know that was my job for a long time in in uk policy even before working for david cameron years back before then the early 90s um i worked for a while as a policy researcher at the conservative party and then uh was the campaign coordinator for our general election campaign in 1992, working with our ad agency.

14:34And really in that world of crafting messages and so on, and the tabloid culture of the newspapers in the UK, particularly strong, and all of that is incredibly direct and blunt and simple and clear. And I think that's probably what people were reacting to. In other words, it was maybe bringing some of that British attitude to US media, in fact. Is California kind of too laid back for that? I feel like the California, you know, I'm from Southern California. It has definitely a more laid back kind of less plugged in political culture than the, you know, UK, you know, the kind of, you know, hard-nosed UK tabloid culture.

15:17I know the Post is kind of trying to do this with the California Post, but I mean, do you think California is a little bit too laid back for that style of politics? no i think you know it's just especially in in a world where you know as everyone always talks about you know you got get got to get people's attention everything's so fragmented social media people look at something what is it 10 seconds before moving on you know so i actually think maybe it's even not this podcast people listen to this for a really long time they lock in right to the end no yes whatever nope nope we don't see that drop off in the data one person in California who spends a lot of time watching Fox News, supposedly, he's told this to us, is Governor Gavin Newsom.

15:57He's been on Fox News a bunch. I mean, do you kind of buy that? Do you buy his I watch Fox News every day kind of thing? Oh, yeah. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I do very much. And I think that he's obsessed with the media yeah to a fault um and i think that you can see in him someone who is all and in a way you could say well there's not what else can he do because his record is so bad um you know california failing on every measure you know almost every single indicator that matters california is not just doing badly but the worst performing state in america on you know cost of living housing cost gas prices, electric bills.

16:42We just named the most dangerous state when it comes to crime. Chief Executive Magazine ranking California 50th out of 50 for business climate. U.S. News and World Report ranking as 50th out of 50 states for opportunity, highest poverty rates tied with Louisiana, highest unemployment rate, et cetera, highest taxes for the worst results. And so in a sense he's got nothing to say except to sort of tell a story completely detached from reality using the media. And so it's really interesting to me to watch him, you know, the shamelessness and brazen way he's kind of fabricating this counter-narrative to what he calls California derangement syndrome, which is very deep for him because he sees it all the time, because he sees the criticism of California based on the facts of what's happened in California for many years.

17:36And of course, he's got no answer for that, hasn't been able to change the trajectory when it comes to policy or substance. So all he's got is this media narrative. And I think he's pretty good at it, actually, until you actually bring the facts, which and when the whole thing collapses. Setting aside even, you know, some of the major problems, which are, you know, I think a lot of people agree with across party lines. I mean, do you agree with this portrait that, you know, some of even your former colleagues at Fox have painted of California as a nightmarish hellhole? Both things can be true.

18:10And this is how I put it, that now, even now, with all these things going wrong, there's nowhere better than California. There's nowhere better. I mean, we have everything we need with incredible advantages, incredible natural beauty, the best weather, great universities, amazing people, a culture of innovation and hustle and the rebel spirit of California, which is why we've created so many amazing, world-changing industries over the years, from tech to Hollywood, of course, and so on, and now AI. So that's all true. And so you drive around, as I do probably more than anyone else in the state of California.

18:45I've seen the whole state. It's just incredible. It's breathtaking. And you meet people who've started companies and they're doing amazing things and life can be very good that's all true but at this and and at the same time as gavin keeps pointing out we are the world's fourth biggest economy but it's an economy that isn't really working for the people who live here because the drivers of that of the fact that we have a big economy which i'm proud of and i i'm with my plans will be the third biggest economy because we're going to cut out the bloat and regulatory nightmare that is driving businesses out and restraining our growth.

19:25But the drivers of that scale are mainly a small number of very valuable, incredibly successful tech companies generating huge amounts of revenue and tax and so on, but not many jobs. And included in that overall size of the economy number is the size of the government. They've doubled the size of the government they've increased they've basically doubled the budget in the last 10 years even though the results were so worse so that's not a healthy economy and if you dig down into it i mean you use that term dystopian of course it's not true that the whole of california is a dystopian hell hole but the other day um we came back from the east coast quick trip to the east coast from downtown la and i went to get some food after you know got there in the evening and you walk around downtown LA.

20:19That's exactly what it felt like. It really did. It's shocking how bad it is in some parts of Los Angeles. Skid Row the other week, which is not a street, it's a neighborhood. It's absolutely worse than any third world country I've ever visited. I've been to many. The place where I would push you a little bit is, you know, the third world doesn't have, you know, natural wine bars or omakases or Equinox, which you'll also see down the street from some of these kinds of things. I guess, do you feel like the media narrative, though, is more complicated than sometimes you see in, you know, the front pages of the New York Post or, you know, the Daily Mail or places that are describing it in these types of ways?

21:01Because, you know, I read that and I think that's just, that's, there are certainly these, you know, there are certainly places where these problems are playing out and that's real. But there's also, So there is this other side of California as well, which is beautiful and amazing and incredible. And that doesn't really get talked about as well in this type of coverage. What do you think about that? You're right. But that's the media, isn't it? I mean, you know, it's not that the role of the media is not to be a tourist promotion agency for California or anywhere else.

21:34Max:When you're governor, we'll talk about how you feel about that. I got some ideas for California tourism when that happens. Max, this is so obviously your career trajectory. Deputy governor for tourism promotion. Yeah, call me, Steve. One struggling California small businessman I wanted to ask you about, who you know well, and a part-time resident, I believe, of L.A., Lachlan Murdoch. You worked for him and for his dad, and I think really know them. I'm curious what you think people don't understand about the Murdochs. um i don't know what to say to that question other than i admire them greatly um there's an incredible work ethic that's the number one thing that comes to mind an incredible work ethic a real commitment to some sort of just basic common sense values as i described them in terms of um a belief in in free enterprise in america love of america and everything america represents just very, you know, I think, you know, fundamentally decent and admirable values that I agree with, and they work incredibly hard.

22:46I also love the kind of disruptor role, particularly with Rupert over the years that he's played, taking on the anti-establishment aspect of of um his character and what he's done which actually is very californian in that sense of seeing an opportunity saying well this isn't working we've got a chance to do something completely different let's completely reinvent in industry he's done that many times and so i think it's that's what i see is is incredibly hard-working innovators um who've who've who've played an incredibly positive role in the world. That's what I see. Now, you wouldn't expect me to say anything probably other than that, but I think that it's just a really amazing story, actually.

23:37Well, we have a lot more that we want to get to with Steve Hilton, but we have to take a short break. So we'll be right back with more after this.

23:50Max:This week on our branded segment from Think with Google, I talked to Google's VP of Marketing, Josh Spanier, about what marketing lessons we can learn from the World Cup. We're in the middle of the World Cup, maybe the biggest entertainment event in the world, 6 billion people watching, 48 nations. How do marketers even begin to engage with an event of that scale? So this World Cup has been absolutely phenomenal. Just a wonderful reminder of humanity coming together, of teams, of communities, of fans, just enjoying each other. And it's been great. And I can tell you, every marketer in the whole world wants a piece of it.

24:27Max:We all want to bottle this magic and infuse it into our marketing programs. And one medium-term effect is, I'm telling you now, UEFA rights, FIFA rights, soccer rights, and most sports rights are going to be more expensive going forward because we're going to look back at this event and go, yes, we want to be part of whatever's coming next. So that's going to happen. As a marketing organization, Google Marketing, we've been heavily involved in the World Cup. And our real focus has been to be a companion to the matches, not just a commercial interruption. So all our assets, all our creativity, all our programs are really designed to give fans who enjoy the games, something extra.

25:05Max:Search, queries, keywords that people are looking for, YouTube dance trends, Gemini soccer tips, all the things that would help them enhance and enjoy their experience of the games. That's the way we're really showing up. And it kind of speaks to authenticity and being part of the experience, not trying to be dictatorial, top down, telling people just buy something now, but actually help them enjoy the overall game. What does this mean for marketers and how are they participating? There's been a load of really compelling marketing, but I want to tell you about something that we're doing inside of Google.

25:37Max:Pele is the world's most famous soccer player. His best goal was in 1959, but no one's ever seen it because there were no television cameras in the stadium where he scored this goal. We just have eyewitness accounts of it. Google Marketing, Google Technologists, Google Engineers have been working with the Pele Foundation, Pele's own family, to capture all those descriptions of the goal, a couple of still photographs, and using Gemini and AI to recreate the goal for the first time. It's a really good example of how I think we can give back to the soccer community. The documentary of the making, the talk about the goal is really fascinating.

26:16Max:And by the time you all hear this, it'll be out in the world. Great way to participate in the World Cup and World Cup topics without actually domineering it. Where should people go to find out more? You can subscribe to my podcast, Frontier CMO, on YouTube or on LinkedIn for our latest insights and learning about the World Cup and marketing overall.

26:43Steve, speaking of California media moguls, we reported this week that Paramount is threatening to leave California, in part because of some of the actions that the state has taken to try to block the merger that was just announced. Have you spoken to David Ellison, and how real do you think that that threat is i don't think that's not how i would characterize it i think that the story there that i'm gonna get to the merger in a minute but in terms of the thing i don't see i don't think there's any ever ever any moment when that was put forward as a threat i think it was an advisor briefing someone to say that all options are on the table first reported by our colleague rohan he's he read our report more closely than i'm describing it And as a result, you've got all this swirl of excitement from Tennessee.

Read the full transcript

27:35Paramount's somehow going to move to Tennessee. I don't think that's going to happen. And so I don't know. I would not characterize it at all as a threat. I think that there's two things. First of all, the actual lawsuit is another classic. The guy who filed it and led this effort, Rob Bonta, the California attorney general, is a classic machine politician in California who does this all the time, uses lawsuits as a political messaging tool. And that's all that this is. It's a partisan attack, pure politics, dressed up as principal in order to promote his career as someone who's going to stick it to Trump.

28:21It's all about Trump. It's about the fact that, and what's going on with CNN and all of that, and this sort of derangement around that. There's nothing to do with the law.

28:32Max:But do you think it's derangement to worry that the President of the United States is pressuring media companies to be sold to his favorite investors? I think you're Hungarian by origin, you follow European politics. Do you think it's deranged to worry about that? Well, I don't know if that's what happened. I mean, I don't know what you're referring to there, But I mean, all politicians want to influence the media. That's part of their job. And so that's as old as politics and media. So I don't think there's anything unusual there. um but the broader point i think is that there's many media companies in film and tv production is leaving california i think to do with any of this is to do with the conditions that have been um you know getting worse and worse and worse for production in california particularly los angeles and the total failure of the government of california to notice what's been happening in terms of competition for film and tv production around the world and to match it so i spent a lot of time on that issue.

29:31I published a policy paper, which is clearly the strongest in terms of keeping that industry, stopping the catastrophic decline, actually. I mean, my paper's called Bring Hollywood Home, and that's what we need to do. This is a much bigger issue than just maybe paramountly. I don't think they will. And actually, even bigger than that is that many, many businesses are saying now we're going to leave California. Almost every day I have meetings with businesses of all sizes, all sectors who say, we're just waiting to see what happens in November. If somehow you can make it, then we're hanging on until November.

30:09But I think that this exodus from California that's happened in media and else across the economy, it's going to turn into a complete stampede if we don't have some change here.

30:22Max:And yeah, there've been, I think, like 40 ,000 jobs, left California since 22, at least, in the film production industry. It's a real crisis. Your plan is very focused on tax incentives, which is obviously like the national and global competition, is all about cost. And I guess I wonder, can California kind of win a race to the bottom around cost? I mean, it's the US states, it's also the UK, which has become incredibly cheap to produce in. As I was there recently, somebody said, yeah, it's the Mexico of the film industry um like you know how do you it do you just have to be cheaper or is there another way to win that there's a couple of things so the the uk eastern europe other states new jersey now very very strong competitor have all way outbid in terms of tax um and so my plan is to is to is to put is to uncap the tax incentive for those who are following this um and also include above the line costs so the whole so that that gives certainty to the decision making process that you're not going to the uncapping part is very important there's not a finance there's not a kind of dollar amount that that stops at a certain point the problem with that is what we've got in california is that if you're making the decision as to whether to produce here in california or somewhere else, you don't know whether even the incentive that's there is going to come to you because it needs to go through a bureaucratic process because it's limited, it's capped.

31:53If you take off the cap, you know that there's certainty there, so you can make a plan. And the size of the incentive needs to be increased as well in terms of both the percentage amount and which expenses are covered. So that's the fiscal part of it. It's not the only part of my plan. it's also incredibly difficult to to do any from the same issues that plague anything you're trying to do in california that's to build a house or a factory or a new road or whatever exactly the same for this so there's a whole part of my plan which is about smashing through that bureaucracy revamping the california film commission to act as a kind of concierge service for production so you're not dealing you know you try and do a car chase in los angeles you're gonna you probably have to go to three different places to get a permit for like one scene it's just insane you

32:44Max:gotta gotta make it easier to do car chases it's true though i actually think they're using most most uh unfortunately i feel like you know at least in my view because i like how it looks better when it's shot a certain way i feel like most car chase scenes these days are just being done by you know ai and visual effects i want to see the actual cars on the road that's just my own personal i just think that look the point and it's also it's a very serious point because it's a massive industry i mean the way i always i mean no one likes to go to the movies anymore i love the movies i love the movies too all right so you just think about the end of a movie and you've got minutes and minutes and this and the credits are rolling um and some you know purists like to stay right to the end to appreciate all the work that's gone into well those are the jobs that we're talking about that long list of of credits that's that's who loses out when production leaves and And it's the drivers and the hair and makeup and the carpenters and the caterers.

33:40So many jobs depend on it. And it's a massive industry in LA. There was a story the other day. The headline was, will Los Angeles be the next Detroit? And we've got to stop that happening. It's a real crisis. And so I spent a lot of time on that plan, talking with people right across the industry. It's really a priority. and it's pathetic that Newsom and the people who've gone before just let this happen. It's actually a scandal. You live in Northern California. You've been plugged in in global politics for a long time. Newsom's a very social guy. He's out there. Presumably, you've probably met him on occasion.

34:19What was your relationship like with him before you jumped into this? And have you heard from him since you became the nominee? No. So I, although you're right, we're based in the Bay Area. Although when people say, where do you live? I say the Hampton Inn somewhere in the state of California. That's basically the answer to that question. Certainly for the last year or so. Yeah, when we first moved to California 2012 with my wife and my two sons, I was teaching. The reason we moved, for those who don't know, was that she had a big job at Google And I was working in 10 Downing Street as senior advisor to the prime minister.

34:56And you had young children. It was just rough from a family perspective. So we moved to the Bay Area. And for the first couple of years, I taught at Stanford. And it's actually there that I met someone and then husband again, very close friends of ours and still are, who knew the Newsom's very well from, I think, going back a long way to Stanford with Janet Newsom. And so, yeah, we met. And I'm not friends, close friends, but we've known each other over the years. I haven't spoken, haven't seen him. I think when's the last time I saw him? It would have been the presidential debate hosted at the Reagan Library by Fox News.

35:40Where they sent Gavin in as a kind of Biden's side. Yeah, yeah, I was there as well. That's the last time I saw him.

35:47Max:But when you first got to the U.S., I mean, I remember I met you. You were running a tech company, and I think there was a question of, like, is this guy a Republican or a Democrat? It was genuinely kind of – you didn't really fit then Cameron's politics. It didn't really fit the U.S. political spectrum. Did you ever think of working for Newsom? No, no. We did meet a couple – I think we met once. I can't remember now. It's a long time. I mean, other than socially, where we talked about, I remember he was positioning himself as a real reformer. He wrote a book called Citizenville, which was all about how we're going to totally transform government and make it modern and less bureaucratic.

36:33There are many things I agreed with. Decentralized power, that's been a core part of my political philosophy, but just none of it ever happened. and so i don't know there's no question i mean you know i was teaching at stanford and then i started a business and so i was focused on that and then the offer came to host to sean fox so there's never any thought of getting involved in in that sense you mentioned your wife rachel

36:57Max:whetstone who i think kind of some degree like reshaped tech tech communications in the u.s a really major major figure in that industry somebody a lot of people who listen to the show i suspect know. You've been criticized as being too closely aligned with tech. I think the San Francisco Standard referred to the hypocrisy of her husband's populist, occasionally anti-tech rhetoric. Jim Steyer told me that you're a shill for the broligarchs or something like that, a mouthpiece. And I'm curious, do you view the role of governor of California as, because I think there are two different things happening in California.

37:34Max:One is that California has an opportunity to regulate technology. It had passed strong privacy regulation, for instance, that you opposed, that Rachel fought against. And then on the other hand, it's the hometown industry and you're the governor and other possible roles. You're just the kind of go-to-the-mat defender of that industry in any context. Which of those is the job? Is it to regulate tech or is it to defend it? But right now, I'm running for governor. And then when I am governor, no question, my job will be to fight for all jobs in California and every business in California. That's the responsibility.

38:12Max:Even if those jobs involve, you know, have kids talking to chatbots inappropriately. That's OK. Of course. Of course. You know, there are. And that aspect of tech is very much the priority in terms of this. But let's just sort of, you know, be reasonable about it. The critics can't seem to make their mind up whether it's – As I was reading that, I realized that I was reading two totally opposite kinds of criticism. No, exactly. On the one hand, it's like, wait, this guy's just totally sort of, you know, like all about supporting tech. On the other hand, he's – did anyone watch my show on Fox? He's making me – I constantly was criticizing the tech companies.

38:54Max:Do you think possibly the liberal media wasn't watching your show on Fox? It's a scandal. I don't know how that could have possibly happened. I was watching. I think I wrote about it at some point. I just think that the point is that as governor, your responsibility is to grow the economy. And that means supporting our industries. I also think that there's been a lot of really dumb commentary from politicians about tech and particularly now about AI. And the kind of argument is heading in a really ridiculous direction. New York just passed a moratorium on data centers. What do you think of that?

39:32It's ridiculous. I mean, what are they talking? It's just, there's such a lot of stupidity around this, but I want to go back to the children point again to note something, which is in 2015, I wrote a book called More Human, designing a world where people come first and then i had a whole section on trial and the the theme of the book the main argument of the book was that everything in the world not to make these two sweeping statements you know it's a book you've got to have an art um has become too big and bureaucratic and centralized and distant from the human scale and i applied that argument to different areas of policy and experience and you know poverty inequality health food education and so on had a whole section on childhood chapter on childhood and back then raised the alarm about this i was the first person i as far as i'm aware ever to to to raise the prospect of of controls and constraints on children's technology and back then um i argued that children shouldn't have under 16s shouldn't have smartphones.

40:38And I still maintain that the real point about all of this is that's why I think most of the things I don't, I'm not aware of any regulation that's been proposed that makes any sense to me, whether that's the Australia social media ban or what the UK has just done or what other states are looking at, because they're aiming at the wrong target. They're aiming at the apps and all of this, whereas the real issue is the screens and the, and to be very precise about it, unsupervised access of children to the internet, where you can't control what their experience is. And that's really the smartphone that does that.

41:16And it has just enabled all of these really harmful experiences to be put in front of children. And so it's actually smartphones that we need to control. And no one else's. I said that 11 years ago. And I still don't see anyone really focusing on that. And I suspect it's because the people, to be honest, the adults who are having these conversations know that they are addicted to their smartphones. So they know that they can't start talking about kids in smartphones because they're just as bad. Steve, you said when I win a few minutes ago, and just really briefly, make the case for why you think that this can happen.

42:03I think many people look at the numbers, they see, you know, Larry Elder lost in the recall to Newsom, not when he was particularly popular, by the way, Newsom, you know, by 20 something, you know, 20 plus points, you're going to be running in a worse environment in some ways than that, you know, presumably, if there is, you know, kind of, you know, what we've been seeing play out across the country. So, I mean, And make the case for why you think you can do 20 points better, essentially, than Larry Elder did. I understand that. Look, there's one way of looking at the race. You know, the race is basically over.

42:37Javier Becerra is the next governor. It's going to be the same old story, 60-40, as it's been the last 20 years. 60 % Democrat, 40 % Republican. I get that. But the campaign hasn't begun yet. And we haven't started to make our arguments yet. And I think that there are some other numbers I would invite people to consider. number one, this is different from the last governor's race. The best indicator of whether an incumbent party or candidate will be voted out is that polling question, sometimes known as the right track, wrong track number. Is the state or the country, whatever is going on the right track, wrong direction, wrong direction.

43:14That number last time around four years ago was for the wrong track in California's mid to high 40s. Today, it's mid to high 50s. It's been over 60%. So there's a clear majority of Californians who think the state's going in the wrong direction and needs change. That's one number that's very important. A second set of numbers, when you look, I mean, this is a poll that we commissioned on a public poll, but I'll share it with you just to get a sense of what the battleground is that we've recently got the results from. 33 % of Californians, according to our poll, solidly with me, 41 % solidly with Javier Becerra, 26 % completely undecided and open to arguments.

43:54And the arguments that we're making are exactly the ones that people, and I have been making all year without polls or any kind of data, I just instinctively see it, you know,$3 gas, cut your electric bills in half, first 150 grand tax-free, starter homes for young families. Those are the things that they're really going to resonate. Then you have the fact that another number, we think roughly based on turnout and projections, the number of votes that I will need to win in california in november six million roughly president trump in california in 2024 got 6.1 million votes so the votes are there you've got to get the turnout i know everyone says we're going to get a good turnout but there's some reasons to believe we really will particularly the fact that you've got voter id as a ballot initiative is on the ballot in in november in california it's very popular with republicans but i think the real the real point is that when you just see the choice between myself and this candidate they've put forward at the just at the point where Californians are demanding change.

44:53The Democratic Party has put forward a candidate who's the living embodiment of the status quo and more of the same.

44:59Max:Glad we got you to let you get your licks in at the end there. But thanks for thanks for engaging on these big media questions. Appreciate it. Good to see you both. Thank you so much. It was fun. Thanks, Steve.

45:14Max:We spent 2025 talking to people who channeled the excitement and belief in AI in media and marketing. A lot of that conversation in 2026 will be about the hard work of building with those tools. Think with Google is here to bridge the gap between inspiration and implementation. This isn't fluff. It's a rigorous look at the mechanics of growth to help CMOs solve the hard problems, like navigating complex consumer journeys and proving value through better measurement. Make this the year you turn potential into performance. Visit thinkwithgoogle.com.

45:50Ben, Steve's an interesting guy because he is kind of running as this kind of Trump-like Republican, nice guy, kind of running in California. He's got an uphill climb, of course, California being an incredibly overwhelmingly Democratic state. What did you think about his pitch? Do you feel like it's going to resonate at all with California voters? Can he make up any of the ground that Spencer Pratt, even though he got a lot of attention, wasn't able to make up in Los Angeles?

46:19Max:Steve was really underestimated in that primary, I think, including by me, and I've known him for a long time. There's something interesting about his candidacy, and I do think it's partly it's this moment when people are looking to people who feel like different outsiders and like he sure is a different outsider. He's literally an outsider. Yeah, well, he renounced his UK citizenship. But I have that question you asked and his response around the big question of California, California, which conservatives denounce versus California, which Californians also truly believe is the best place in the world.

46:50Max:And I kind of thought he saw him straddle that very kind of deftly, right? You know, he's talking about the problems of California, but also I thought it was really interesting. He kind of got his back up about David Ellison threatening to leave. He didn't say, yes, these, you know, David Ellison has every right to complain. He said, like, that's never going to happen. What's he going to do? Go to Tennessee? I mean, that's like the ultimate, that's the Gavin Newsom answer too. Like, are you kidding me? What, you're going to go to New Jersey? Which isn't actually a totally satisfying answer because some people are.

47:17Max:I don't know. He's obviously kind of tapped into something interesting and real there. I don't know. I mean, I think I agree that you've got a kind of weakish generic Democrat probably wins this year no matter what. I want to ask you, though, Ben, what do you think about the big story that we're all talking about this week, at least in the media world, regarding paramounts, threats, suggestion, because Steve said they weren't threatening, but suggestion that they might take their business elsewhere. Do you think that this is kind of a real thing? Because it's a big narrative in conservative media.

47:48And that's a place where actually I was surprised that Steve broke with a lot of the conservative media outlets that have kind of, you know, talked about this California exit. And I've been talking about it really, in particular, since COVID.

47:59Max:It's hard to imagine kind of like the big studios just absolutely decamping. In the same way, it's hard to imagine the big banks leaving New York, like J.P. Morgan just built a big tower. But that doesn't mean that most of their growth isn't already elsewhere. And like, that's really the problem for California. Not that they're not going to have a few buildings and some directors and some actors. And in fact, at the very, very high end of the industry, Christopher Nolan can work wherever he feels like. And if he wants to work in California, they're just going to pay up and he's going to be the studio there or whatever, or in, you know, Norway.

48:29I think he actually worked in Greece on

48:31Max:this one. Right, exactly. But like, at the very high end of the film industry, there's always going to be people who, if they want to be in LA, are going to be in LA. But what you've seen is that so much of it bleeding out elsewhere, and you know, right from New Jersey to the UK in a really, really big way. It's hard for California to reduce that. It's part of this sort of like new globalized world that everyone's competing in. His basic solution, which is the basic Republican solution, which is massive tax cuts for the industry, you know, probably wouldn't hurt to keep people. That's certainly part of the industries.

49:01Max:That's just part of the core challenge. Do you think the car chases will do it, Max? Well, I like that he agreed with me that we should actually shoot car chases rather than just kind of generating them with AI or whatever, though it does seem like he'll be using some AI filmmaking, video making techniques in his campaign ads. I do wonder if, I mean, there's a world where AI changes filmmaking so much that it's actually easier to be in California, right? You can film the Odyssey on the studio a lot. So I don't know. I think a lot is changing very fast in that industry that is probably ultimately out of the reach of politicians.

49:36Thanks for listening to another episode of the Mixed Signals podcast from us here at Semaphore Media. Our show is produced by Manny Fidel, with special thanks to Josh Billinson, Amber Olley, Rachel Oppenheim, Anna Pizzino, Daniel Haift, Garrett Wiley, Jules Zern, and Tori Kaur. Our engineer is Rick Kwan, and our theme music is by Steve Bone. If you like Big Signals, please remember to follow us wherever you get your podcasts and feel free to leave us a five-star review. And if you want more, you can always sign up for Semaphore's media newsletter, which is out every Sunday night.

From the publisher

Steve Hilton has lived many lives: a key strategist to former British Prime Minister David Cameron, a populist Fox News host, and — after renouncing his UK citizenship — the Republican nominee in California’s gubernatorial race. Max and Ben ask him about a career that has intertwined politics and media at every turn, why he succeeded in a primary where Spencer Pratt failed, and how he balances conservative media’s portrayal of California with a campaign to lead the state. They also discuss whether David Ellison’s Paramount would really flee Hollywood, what people get wrong about the Murdochs, and what he really thinks about the character he inspired on The Thick of It.

More from Mixed Signals from Semafor Media

All 71 episodes
Steve Hilton on the Murdochs, David Ellison, and conservative media’s CaliforniaMixed Signals from Semafor Media · 50 min
Listen in VO