Prostate Cancer Awareness Month (Part 2): Diagnosing Without the Panic

17 Sep 2026 · 47 min · 16 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Prostate Awareness Month Part 2—how PSA leads to diagnosis, why prostate MRI is used, how PI-RADS scoring guides biopsy decisions, and how Gleason/grade group and staging drive risk stratification.

Guests

Dr. Wayne Brisbane, UCLA prostate cancer specialist and surgeon-scientist; Dr. Jesse Mills and Jordan Runtai host the “mailroom” patient-journey discussion.

Guest backgrounds

Dr. Brisbane specializes in prostate cancer diagnosis and targeted/fusion biopsy approaches (MRI-targeted, micro-ultrasound, transperineal technique) and works on risk tools including UCLA prostate MRI scoring and risk calculators.

Key claims

PSA is a “thermometer,” not a cancer test; prostate MRI plus PI-RADS (1–5) estimates cancer risk (e.g., ~12–20% for 2, ~30% for 3, ~60% for 4, ~80% for 5). MRI can miss cancers if small, in the transition zone, or with certain “tentacled” phenotypes. Risk calculators (UCLA PCRC MRI) and double-negative MRI + urinary biomarkers can sharply reduce risk. Transperineal biopsy is preferred; infection risk is lower than transrectal (~4% infection cited for transrectal).

Notable examples

A PI-RADS 3 patient deferred biopsy after calculator estimated ~6% risk; a PI-RADS 2 patient had high risk (~56%) due to PSA density. A biopsy case found Gleason 3+4 in two foci with MRI showing organ-confined disease; Dr. Brisbane says it’s often curable and may allow return to testosterone.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Patient Journey Overview

1:44 to 2:53

Exploring the patient journey of a 55-year-old male with elevated PSA.

“We are part of this multi-part series with Dr.”

Discussion on PSA and Diagnosis

2:53 to 4:52

Understanding PSA as a risk stratification tool in prostate cancer diagnosis.

“I'm still recovering from my marathon I ran that I think leg day is going to be 2027 for me.”

MRI in Prostate Cancer Detection

4:52 to 9:08

Explaining how MRI works and its role in detecting prostate cancer.

“You're not going to say we got to go get a biopsy.”

Understanding MRI Scores

9:08 to 14:00

Overview of the scoring system for MRI results in prostate cancer diagnosis.

“that's kind of a, the MRI will then be interpreted by a radiologist, and so the radiologist will get all these pictures there, and they will give us a score, okay?”

Understanding MRI Limitations in Prostate Cancer Detection

14:00 to 15:10

Learn how MRIs can miss prostate cancer and the implications of these limitations.

“They kind of have more tentacles and less of a big body.”

Using the Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator

15:10 to 18:10

Discover how to utilize the Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator to assess cancer risk.

“That's Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator, MRI.”

The Value of Preventative Health Screening

18:10 to 22:00

Understand the benefits and concerns surrounding extensive preventative health screenings for prostate cancer.

“There's the population-based answer, and then there's the individual-based answer.”

Biopsy Techniques and Strategies

22:00 to 27:40

Explore different biopsy techniques and their effectiveness in detecting prostate cancer.

“You've done a lot of work in fusion biopsy.”

Navigating Biopsy Decisions and Risks

27:40 to 28:00

Learn about the decision-making process and risks involved in prostate biopsies.

“MRI and micro ultrasound or MRI and PSMA, it's very likely to be prostate cancer in that location.”

Understanding Prostate Biopsies

28:00 to 29:59

Explore the necessity and methods of biopsying the prostate, including targeted biopsies and patient discussions.

“And say, and I mean, he could, you can't really frozen section prostate cancer either.”
Show all 16 chapters

Evaluating Prostate Cancer Cases

30:00 to 31:39

Discuss the process of evaluating prostate cancer diagnoses and the implications of findings.

“And so we can do targeted only biopsies.”

Phases of Prostate Cancer Management

31:40 to 34:09

Learn about the five phases of managing prostate cancer from screening to survivorship.

“You got your, you got your beads on this to know exactly where you're going to go next year.”

Understanding Gleason Scores

34:10 to 39:38

Break down the Gleason scoring system and its significance in prostate cancer risk assessment.

“pathologist, and they look at the cells, and they're going to look at the cells as a pattern, okay?”

Advanced Cancer Risk Stratification

39:39 to 42:00

Explore the importance of risk stratification in prostate cancer and potential future developments.

“I think we're following and I think the main idea here is that that risk stratification is critical.”

Understanding Tumor Behavior through RNA Analysis

42:00 to 45:54

Learn how RNA markers can help predict the behavior of prostate cancer and treatment options.

“We can, we can interpret it pretty easily.”

The Importance of Early Detection and Treatment

45:54 to 46:39

Discover the curability of prostate cancer when caught early and treatment possibilities.

“I mean, we're going to have a whole next segment on treatment, but can that guy go back on testosterone?”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.

0:31positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, or PSMA-positive MCRPC, who have already been treated with hormone therapy and are considered appropriate to delay chemotherapy. Blue Victo involves contact with radioactivity, which may increase the risk for cancer and cause fetal harm. Drink plenty of fluids, urinate often, use contraception, and talk to your doctor about ways to reduce the risk of exposing others to radiation during and after treatment. Blue Victo can cause low levels of blood cell counts, kidney problems, and infertility. Tell your doctor if you have weakness, pale skin, shortness of breath, bleeding or bruising more easily, and infection or changes in urination.

1:05Side effects include decreased blood cell counts, tiredness, dry mouth, nausea, appetite loss, joint or back pain, and constipation. Ask your doctor about Fluvicto because every day without cancer progression is a victory. Visit Fluvicto.com to learn more.

1:31Let's talk about the mailroom Welcome to the mailroom Welcome, welcome, welcome back to the mailroom. Dr. Mills back here with Jordan Runtai again. We are part of this multi-part series with Dr. Wayne Brisbane. We're bringing him back today to talk about diagnosis. For those of you that listened to the last episode, we're walking through a patient journey, a 55-year-old male that is referred to Dr. Brisbane, a prostate cancer specialist here at UCLA, who has a bump in his PSA, went up from his baseline, and his primary doc said, hey, you know, you should probably get this worked up. So we learned all about screening on the last episode.

2:13A lot of great take-home points that should arm our audience to be able to be very informed when they go into their doc the next time to ask about prostate cancer screening, even beginning as early as age 45. Guidelines are a little bit squidgy on that. So the bottom line is if you feel you have a need, family history, maybe even just a curiosity of longevity, that you want to get screened relatively early. And screening has changed over the years from just one blood test to serum biomarkers, urinary biomarkers, and MRI. And so that's going to be the natural segue into the diagnosis segment of this trilogy.

2:53Dr. Brisbane, welcome. How are you, man? I'm doing so well. Thanks so much. I really appreciate you having me back. Was it leg day? Was it chest day? What was it today? You know, today was leg day, actually. I had leg day, too. I just came from leg day. I'm still recovering from my marathon I ran that I think leg day is going to be 2027 for me. How'd you do? I mean, I'm here. I'm awake. I did not end up on dialysis. So for me, it's all a win. I got a very heavy medal saying I finished the marathon. and a lot of high fives and bananas. So it was a really fun time. I ran it with my son who was already back in the hot bath in the hotel a good hour before I made it back.

3:36So we trained together, but we certainly didn't run together. You talk about aging well, Wayne, and you've watched me age for the last eight or nine years and we've known each other. And, yeah, I'm telling you, 30 years puts a lot of mileage on these legs and these hips and his back. I get it. But I'm happy I did it. It was a great feeling. It was just so fun to be out and seeing, first of all, the weather in Houston in January. Oh, it's just like one of the greatest towns out. I mean, big shout out to H-Town for their hospitality. It was amazing. But the weather is perfect. And there's just so many people out there supporting you.

4:14And you're part of this just really great feel-good moment where you're competing against yourself at my level because, you know, the guys that won the marathon could have run three in a time. It took me to run one pretty much. And then it was even great. Like there were the guys that had finished the marathon, they had their medal on. They came back onto the, you know, around around mile 26 and were high-fiving, being like, you got this, man. Oh, that's so cool. Dude, that is like, you could have been all drinking beer. But you're done and you came back. Oh, so great. So, no, I loved it. It was an amazing experience.

4:45And I'm actually not that sore. So I do need to get leg day in next year. But enough about this. Let's talk to our guys a little bit more about our patient that's in your office. You have a plan for him. His PSA is up. You're not going to say we got to go get a biopsy. You're going to tell him, what do we do now? Yeah, totally. So we talked a little bit about, you know, PSA. It's a thermometer. It is not a cancer test. It is a risk stratification tool, okay? It's like a thermometer. Just like if your temperature goes up, you might be running. If your temperature goes down, you might be sleeping, but you could also have a fever and you might be sick from a flu or something like that.

5:24But you'd be pretty, pretty skeptical if you got a fever, you went to your doctor and they said, hey, we're going to take you to the operating room for take care out your appendix. You'd say, well, don't you think there's a couple more tests we should do? And prostate cancer is the exact same thing. So PSA is your thermometer. If it goes up, there's several different things that could cause it to go up. Cancer is on that list, but it's actually not the top of the list. And we do need to take a look at this a little bit more extensively. Our main tool is MRI, prostate MRI. MRI is not perfect, but it has about a decade or more data now that shows that it's an extremely powerful, it's actually more like 15 years now, a really great test for separating those men who have cancer versus those who don't.

6:12Okay. Once you go and get in the MRI, people might want to know about that, what that feels like. So it's the, one of the questions I get is why does it have to be so tight? Like, why does it have to be so close to me? You know, I go and get a CT scan and it feels like I'm going through like a, like a little donut and it's open and it's great, but I go into this MRI and it has to be super, super close to me. And that has to do with the MRI and CT scanner acquire images very differently. A CT scanner is shooting an x-ray. You can think about it a regular x-ray, but then it's a CT because it's computed tomography.

6:48So they're using a computer to get all these little x-ray beams from all around in a circle and then realign them. So that is little x-rays that are going through your body. An MRI is based on magnetics. And so this is magnetic resonance imaging. So the reason why they take, you know, you can't have any metal in that room, they take away your phone, all that kind of stuff, because that magnet that is always on, okay, that that kind of cylinder that you lay in is a magnet. And they'll talk about the strength of that magnet in Teslas. And so it's very common to have a three Tesla magnet, occasionally, you'll get one that's 1.5.

7:25They have some that go up to 11 Tesla, usually only for research, but the in general, as those magnets get bigger and bigger, as far as their strength, they tend to get closer and closer to the cylinder gets smaller and smaller. And so this idea of an open MRI is a good concept for people who are claustrophobic, but it is usually a 1.5 Tesla magnet. It's a little bit open and that decreases the resolution because what the magnet does is it basically takes all the water molecules and it kind of aligns them in your body. And when you hear those big thuds, you're going to hear these big thuds in the MRI.

8:01That's these electromagnetic coils reorienting the water molecules at a perpendicular angle. So they're coming in and going against the water. I'm not an MRI physicist, so this is a little bit of a watered down version, but basically it's reorienting your water molecules and then they're measuring how long it takes for your water molecules to realign to that big magnet. And that produces an image. And so that's how you get these MRIs and different tissues in your body are going to react differently. So fat versus water versus muscle versus bone. Those all look different and those water molecules realign differently.

8:39And that's how you can get the separation of these different tissues. Well, normal prostate tissue looks very different than cancerous tissue. So cancer tends to be cellular growth that's unchecked. And so it grows very fast and it tends to grow very close together. So it creates more density. And that's usually what the MRI is picking up. And so we can use that looking for areas where the cellular structures are growing close together, and that can be identified on MRI. Now, that's kind of a, the MRI will then be interpreted by a radiologist, and so the radiologist will get all these pictures there, and they will give us a score, okay?

9:19And we have to come up with, this is a score that, as you mentioned, was very much involved here at UCLA. We had kind of the development and evolution of this score took several years, and a lot of UCLA physicians were highly involved in developing this score. It's basically a one to five score. One is perfection. It's beautiful. There's no abnormalities. Everything is perfect. I actually very rarely see that score because it's one of those things that if you're a 20-year-old getting an MRI of your prostate, that might be what your prostate looks like. But as we know, as we age, there's things that happen.

9:55Your joints probably don't look like they were when they were 20 either. So a lot of the times you would get a score of two. It means that there's no cancer. It's not perfect, but there's some little scar tissue, some degradation here and there, nothing to worry about, but it's a level two. And that means that we don't really see anything that's concerning for prostate cancer. Level three would say there's some cellular density, but it's not enough that it can be really measured. The radiologists can see it, but they say, you know, I just can't quite measure it. Okay, and that's, some radiologists might have some nuance with my description, but this is a general way to understand it.

10:31So it's what we call equivocal, okay? They can't quite measure it. Level four is they can measure cellular density. And there's some specific sequences in the MRI where you can measure cellular density. But it's less than 1.5 centimeters, and it doesn't look like it's pushing on the wall of the prostate at all. and five is they can measure cellular density but it is greater than 1.5 centimeters and it or and or it's pushing on the wall of the prostate and so that's kind of the levels and as you go from one to five the risk of prostate cancer goes up as you might expect in the coast so one and two has about depending on who you read maybe a 12 to 20 percent just risk of prostate cancer which I'll come back to a level three has about a 30-ish percent risk of prostate cancer level four about a 60 % risk of prostate cancer and a level five, about an 80 % risk of prostate cancer.

11:22And we'll get into kind of the grades of prostate cancer, but this would be those prostate cancers that you do want to know about, what we call clinically significant or prostate cancer that could spread, has the biologic potential for spread. Right. So then that gives you a little bit of shared decision-making with your patient, it sounds like, right? Absolutely. If a guy comes into you and says, whoa, whoa, you just said a two gives me still a teen to 20 % chance of prostate cancer. I can't live with that. Yeah. Can you, I mean, Dr. Brisbane, are you going to biopsy? Will you biopsy a one or two?

12:00If a guy just says, look, I can't sleep at night, or do you reassure, or how do you walk through that diagnosis? Great question. So what we oftentimes do is, and so that's a good point. So we said this MRI is looking for cellular density. And how would an MRI miss a cancer? Well, it would have to be something that was small, meaning that the cells hadn't packed together quite enough to really throw out a magnetic signal that the MRI could pick out. So that's probably the most common one is the cells are small. Or the cells might be hiding behind other things that are cellularly dense. Okay, so there's actually a couple zones in the prostate.

12:41The prostate's a weirdly shaped organ, but it kind of resembles if you ever wore a slipper where the toes are missing, you know, those flip-flops that you wear at the pool maybe. But if you slide your foot into that, that's kind of what a prostate looks like. The flip-flop portion is what we oftentimes refer to as the peripheral zone. It's on the periphery, and that generates about 80 % of prostate cancers. But your foot sitting in that slipper is probably, it's called the, that's the transition zone, if I can make the analogy. And that area is actually the part that causes more urinary trouble.

13:19The urethra is the tube that runs through that. That would be basically your foot. And your ankle is right around where the bladder sits. And then the penis would be kind of where your toes sit. And so it's kind of this area that's going through the peripheral zone. And that transition zone, about 20 % of prostate cancers do occur in the transition zone. but that area is much more cellularly dense. Okay. And so prostate cancers can hide in that area. Thankfully they're less common, but they can hide in that area. Okay. So that can be a way that an MRI can miss a prostate cancer. One would be small, one would be in the transition zone.

13:51And then there's some cancer, we call them phenotypes where the cancers just don't pack together quite as much. They kind of, they kind of spread out a little bit more and they have more like a, like a spider with, uh, with legs. They kind of have more tentacles and less of a big body. And so this is, these are the three ways that the MRI can miss a prostate cancer. And that's how you get to that 20%, even with a PI-RADS, that's the score too. I think you just, actually, I think you just invented our first swag merch is to have prostate shaped pool shoes. Yeah, yeah, right. Exactly. Can we get a 3D printer on that and see what a prostate pool shoe looks like?

14:28I think they would sell very nicely. Of course. I mean, and they'd be anatomically great. You could, you know, maybe we could do as part of your HSA spending. I love it. Open enrollments around the corner. I'm sorry. Yeah, go ahead. So actually, that was really, as much as I made light of it, very good analogy in terms of what the privacy looks like and how you can get a little bit lost in the MR. Totally. And so you can use that data in combination with your PSA, your age, the digital rectal exam we talked about, that's an optional thing. Any prior history, family history, stuff like that. You can add that into an online calculator.

15:07We have one that's available. Everyone can use it. It's PCRC. That's Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator, MRI. It's available online at UCLA. And that will compare you to 2 ,300 other men that we've biopsied, men that will tell you what your risk of clinically significant prostate cancer is. And so that changes the MRI from a biomarker, or sorry, from an imaging to a biomarker. It basically says, this is your picture. This is all the features. We compress them together. We compare you to a large cohort of men. We tell you what your risk is. And so I actually had a guy with a PyRADS 3 the other day that you would usually consider PyRADS 3, you should biopsy 30%.

15:45But when we put his calculated values in, his risk was only 6%. And so I said, hey, would you like to defer biopsy or would you like to go photobiopsy, he chose to defer. And so we'll continue monitoring his PSA for about a year to maybe two. We'll see what the trajectory is, and then we'll kind of see how that goes. I've had another guy with an MRI of two, or PIRADS of two, who has PSA density. His PSA was too high for his prostate size. We call that PSA density. And, you know, his age and all these features came in. He actually had a negative MRI, but his risk of prostate cancer was 56%, okay?

16:20And so you can have a negative MRI combined with multiple other variables in this calculator and you can go and kind of risk stratify as using multiple variables. And we hope that with time and more inputs and perhaps with some machine learning, we can get these accuracies to go even up. So that's some nuance. The other thing that you can use is you can use other tests on top of the PSA and urinary biomarkers are one that I particularly enjoy using just because they're easy to implement. I can send them to your house. And if you have a negative MRI and a negative urinary biomarker, some work out of our group and then also the group at UCSF has shown that your risk of prostate cancer drops precipitously if you have a double negative.

17:29how do you feel about guys that do really ultra preventative health screening right so if a guy has a PSA of 0.5 and he says no no no I got here's I got a bag of cash and I want to do an MRI plus or urinary biomarkers. Is that a thing? Do you have people ask about that? And because I know, I mean, things, you know, there's so many of these whole body MRIs that that are fascinating. It's a huge ethical debate, as well as a cost debate. And, but you know, people have money, and they don't want to get prostate cancer. Yeah. What is the diagnostic accuracy of somebody with an incredibly low PSA going through that next step?

18:07Yeah. So in general, I view this in two different ways. There's the population-based answer, and then there's the individual-based answer. So from a population standpoint, when I take my population science hat on and I say, how useful are these whole-body MRIs for a population compared to PSA? The answer is unequivocally not that useful. But for gentlemen who say, I accept possible false positives, meaning that I go through and the MRI picks up a little bit of inflammation in the prostate, or it picks up a little weirdness that I was born with. It's like a mole on the skin. It's fine. So those false positives will pick up quite a bit.

18:50If you have a PSA of 0.5, your risk of prostate cancer is quite low because the PSA has a very good negative predictive value. It's good at ruling prostate cancer out. And so I don't know if there's that much additional benefit. And in general, what I tend to do, those MRIs, the whole body MRIs, I get no money from them. But I do think that they're interesting. They have to go from the head to the toe. And they can't spend 18 hours in the scanner, right? You've got to do this in an hour or two. And so they have to be very choosy about which sequences on the MRI they pick. And each, as we said, you know, different tissues in the body have different responses to magnets.

19:31And so you can't image the head the same way you image the prostate, right? They're two very different sets of organs. And so you have to pick one thing that kind of does everything okay. And in general, that's a T2 weighted image that they just kind of run from the head down to the foot. And that will pick up bad things, really big things that are bad. But in general, the hope is for these prostate cancers to pick up small things when you still have a chance to intervene. And so at the level of the prostate, it's probably not your best test. But I still have guys who do it. I bless them. If they have something that's a false positive, we work it up.

20:08We just usually get a dedicated MRI of the prostate. Oftentimes the thing disappears or we'll get some PSA and we'll use our risk calculator. So I just kind of use it as another screening test. And you should know that they're running a huge, huge test, kind of clinical trial in England called TRANSFORM, where they're actually going to use MRI instead of PSA as a screening test. So this would not be necessarily diagnostic. It will be biparametric MRI, meaning that they're going to choose slightly different MRI sequences. so they can run it faster and cheaper. And they're going to just do that as a screening.

20:42So everybody gets one, just kind of like a colonoscopy. When you turn 40, you get one of these biparametric MRIs. We're going to see what the risk is. The other thing that they're running in this transform study, and then we're working on here at UCLA, and then also has been worked on in England a bit, is running a genomic test, right? We know family history is very important. So we can say, hey, you know, my brother had prostate cancer. My dad had prostate cancer. My grandfather had prostate cancer. And I've had some guys where they say, you know, I'm pretty much going to get prostate cancer.

21:07Or how do I be very careful? And so we'll just increase their screening frequency and stuff of that nature. But we can quantify genetic risk through a cheek swab. And basically, you can spit in the can, send it over to us, and we can use these various tests in order to say, what's your risk of prostate cancer as a lifetime risk? And this may also be a very good way to screen for prostate cancer instead of just PSA at an aged base frequency. So instead of saying, hey, you know, we at 40 start PSA screening, we could say, well, we know your genetic risk. And so, you know, Jesse, you get PSA screening.

21:44Wayne, you get colonoscopies. And we kind of risk stratify your prostate cancer risk versus other cancer risks and intensify some people's screening, de-intensify others. So that's those are hopefully things that we'll kind of get into later with with continued research. Yeah. Wow. Amazing. So then let's talk about our guy. So you say get an MRI. He has a PyRADS 4. So walk us through biopsies. You've done a lot of work in fusion biopsy. You've done a lot of work in targeted biopsies. And so let's hit to the biopsy part of this. So yeah, so PyRADS 4, guy needs a biopsy. What are his options for biopsies in 2026?

22:30How are you going to target this? Yeah. So there's a lot of different options. So in general, I'm going to start with the guidelines and then we can go into a little bit of my research and how we really do this with high precision. But the guidelines would suggest that you would do a, and this is pretty universal, at least in the European and US guidelines, that you would do a biopsy through the MRI target. And then you would also do what they call systematic. It's like a grid-based biopsy where they put biopsies around the prostate. Now, the biopsies around the prostate do two things. A, they can help with catching cancers that are MRI invisible.

23:14They can also help if there's some registration. Like, you know, we've all played darts and not everyone hits a bullseye. And so if you are aiming at the bullseye and you come a little bit off, but then you throw a couple more darts, you might have a higher chance of hitting that bullseye. Okay, so that it helps with registration error. And those are the main kind of, those are guidelines accepted strategies. There's also two approaches. One approach is you can put an ultrasound in the rectum and pass a needle through the rectum into the prostate. The prostate sits right underneath or right over the rectum.

23:49Using our shoe analogy, it would be as if you stood on a pipe, basically. Put your foot on a pipe, that rectum is the pipe, your shoe is the peripheral zone, and then your foot is the transition zone. And if you had a needle coming up from the pipe, it would hit your foot. But the problem, I know, maybe I shouldn't use that analogy. Jordan's grimacing. I'm just thinking that we need to make a steel shank on our shoes just so guys can walk on pipe. Regardless, it's easy access, right? So it's very easy to do and it's worked for it. That's the technique that's been used for many years. One of the problems, though, is you have to give people pretty high-dose antibiotics if you do it that way, because there's fecal material in the colon.

24:35You can do fecal cleanses and stuff like that to try and reduce the bacterial load, but you really do need to give pretty powerful antibiotics in order to prevent an infection in the prostate and sometimes the infection going to the other parts of the body. And despite our best efforts, that still happens about 4 % of the time. And so that's one of the major risks of that style of biopsy. So there's another style of biopsy that has gained traction recently where you actually just go through the skin. People are placed in the birthing position. We call it lithotomy, but it's the way that females get cervical exams.

25:07And you put the ultrasound in the rectum still because it's a great guide. You can't get closer to the prostate. But then you sterilize the skin and put the needle through the skin. And I know people get very queasy about these needles in this area. It's very sensitive. And I totally understand. And it is something that comfort is really important. And so we use lidocaine that's buffered in order to kind of take the sting out and basically will numb the skin, numb the prostate. And in general, our average pain scores are about a three out of 10 during these biopsies. So I think that guys do very well or oftentimes surprised by how comfortable it is.

Read the full transcript

25:46It's nothing that you'd sign up for on vacation, but it's actually pretty reasonable. So I prefer the transperineal technique for multiple reasons, but you should know there's two techniques, and they're still both highly valid, but my strong preference is for the transperineal technique. Now, when we get into biopsy strategy, a lot of my patients want to know, do I need those extra cores? Like, I get it. Put needles through this MRI target, but do you need to put cores everywhere? That seems a little nuts. And the answer is no. You don't necessarily need to put cores everywhere. So we have published that if I can use a specialized ultrasound, this micro ultrasound, and I can visualize the spot that the MRI saw, we have a 97 % chance of diagnosing cancer where there's cancer to be diagnosed.

26:31Okay. So this was guys who got all the biopsies. We looked at our accuracy at the level of the lesion. And basically, we always found the cancer, almost always. Now, that said, if I can't see the micro ultrasound, on micro ultrasound, the same thing that the MRI sees, the accuracy falls apart completely. And so that's a place where the systematic cores can be very beneficial because there's something on the MRI, maybe it's inflammation or something like that. But the PSA as a risk feature may also be signaling cancer somewhere else and the MRI found some inflammation. And I know that's a little bit complicated, but we're using now in clinical trials PSMA, which is a brand new PET scan.

27:13and we can get into PET scan if you like. But that's another good test to add on over a biomarker positive, meaning the PSA or the urine test is positive, MRI equivocal or negative. PSMA can be a very strong way to go and delineate who has prostate cancer or not. But that's at the level of clinical trials. So we have about two to three clinical trials in that space using PSMA to guide biopsy. But anyway, all that to say is if you can easily visualize the spot on two imaging modalities, MRI and micro ultrasound or MRI and PSMA, it's very likely to be prostate cancer in that location. You probably don't need the cores everywhere.

27:51However, if there's any equivocalness to that, then systematic cores can be very useful. And if you're interested in focal therapy, where we just go and ablate one spot in the prostate, then the systematic biopsies at this current time are very useful to rule out other cancers that are currently invisible in the MRI, but could grow fairly shortly after you did an ablation. And so those are the indications. I was going to say, I mean, that, you know, prostate cancer is not like other cancers in terms of, as we, you know, we'll talk about grading and staging, but, but yeah, I would think that even if, because otherwise, if you had an MRI targeted lesion, you could just do one biopsy, right?

28:32And say, and I mean, he could, you can't really frozen section prostate cancer either. Cause the mitotic figures, it's not, you know, the pathologic diagnosis isn't like taking out of the suite or doing Mohs surgery or something you need, you need it to be fixed. But at least if you have a smoking gun on the MRI, you do one biopsy, you decrease the morbidity, but then you've sort of ruled out doing anything more focal. If you miss, if you miss smaller cancers elsewhere. So that puts us back into basically, yeah, this guy's got a really bad prostate cancer. He's going to need definitive therapy, surgery, radiation, plus minus hormones.

29:08That's a different, that's a different beast than somebody that may have an obvious lesion. But as we all say in radiology, the most commonly missed lesion is the second one, right? So you don't know if there is something out, if you don't do some kind of sampling, But you're saying you don't routinely do random samples or you do routinely do random samples in addition to the one that obviously lights up on the micro ultrasound or MRI. Yeah, I actually ask guys every time. So we have a conversation about it every time and we chat about it and we discuss kind of what their goals are. It's a long conversation, unfortunately, but, you know, that's that's the UCLA way.

29:44We make sure you get what you want. Basically saying, hey, you know, I can get an estimation of how good a person might be for focal therapy looking at their MRI alone. So I can tell you, hey, look, this is this is a possibility for you or this is not a great option. And then we can decide, you know, where to go from that. And then also we can, and some guys, you know, we can, with the transperineal technique, if you have to be on a blood thinner, we can actually do the biopsy still while on the blood thinner because the soft tissue compresses against the prostate. And that happens for some guys.

30:18And so we can do targeted only biopsies. Some guys just don't like the idea of the biopsies and just the fewer cores, the better. And I think we can accommodate them. And then other guys are on active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer. and we're doing some serial biopsies. Maybe the MRI has changed a bit. And my personal opinion, this is starting to get into the point where people disagree. So you need to know that, obviously, for the listeners. But my personal opinion is if we have a good established diagnosis and everything seems to be in one spot, we don't need to go and put cores everywhere.

30:52We can just go back to the spot and take a single or one to three samples just to evaluate for upgrading.

31:19right and i mean you base that a little bit on the fact that as we talked about you almost always have time with with prostate cancer that if something is equivocal you can come back in a year, even six months, but most likely a year and relook at that spot. And your, and your targeting is so good now with MRI micro ultrasound that you know exactly where you're looking. It's not a needle in a haystack anymore. You've got a really good image. You got your, you got your beads on this to know exactly where you're going to go next year. Right. Correct. Yeah. Well, let's talk about our guy. So you do the perineal biopsy.

31:53He does fine with it. He's like, yeah, wait, and that was nowhere near as bad as I thought it was going to be and didn't have a lot of blood in the urine afterwards, had no infection. And you call him and you say, hey, so just want to let you know, we know we did find prostate cancer. You have a Gleason grade three plus four, and we found it in two areas of your prostate, two foci, as we say. The MRI we knew ahead of time, it showed that that the prostate looks like it's confined to the organ itself. It is not spread into surrounding organs such as seminal vesicles or rectal wall. And there's no extra capsular extent.

32:32And I'll actually say this, maybe this guy, because in this day and age, a lot of times patients get their medical information uploaded before we even get to make that phone call. Right. That's one of the things that we fight with is as doctors is that, that I may have opened up my chart and said, Oh, it says here, I've got two foci, three plus four disease involving 20 % of each core. MRI shows organ confined. What is, what did, what just happened to me, Dr. Braceby? Tell me, first of all, is this guy going to be okay? Are we going to be okay with what I just said? Is this a don't buy green banana situation or, or is this guy have a lot of daylight and sunsets ahead of him?

33:07Yeah. Yeah. Great question. So, um, this gets into the flavors of prostate cancer. So every Every cancer, regardless, prostate cancer is no exception, kind of goes through these phases. The first is screening, then diagnosis, then risk stratification, then treatment, then survivorship. Okay? So you have these five phases to every single cancer. It may look different depending on what the cancer is, but we went through screening, we've now gone through diagnosis. the next step is actually not treatment it's risk stratification okay so there's definitely multiple different types of prostate cancer and we need to risk stratify his prostate cancer because that directly informs how we treat it then is going to be diagnosis and then is going to be the survivorship so intermediate risk prostate cancer that's what we're talking about and i'm going to unpack that so we know exactly what it is there's multiple different ways of looking at the prostate cancer.

34:06The main one, though, is under the microscope. So you have a pathologist, and they look at the cells, and they're going to look at the cells as a pattern, okay? And they'll give one of two scores. Oftentimes, they'll give both. The first has been around for more than 50 years. It's called the Gleason score, and a lot of people have heard of that. The second one is called the grade group, and that is a way that was initially intended to simplify the Gleason score, but now we just report both to make it more confusing. So it's... It's been it's been it's anyway, but it's a it's a good idea. The Gleason lobby is very strong.

34:40It turns out the Gleason lobby is very strong. So what I'll tell you is I think about this. Actually, your your marathon example is is a pretty good one. And so I think of this as the pathologist is looking at the through the microscope. If you've ever seen one of those aerial photos of a bunch of people running in a marathon, you can you can get an idea of what the pathologist is looking at. Now, these aerial photos are static, but you can tell if they're at the start, nobody's moving. If they're mid-race, people are running, or if they're at the finish line and they're sprinting. And that's based on body position, might be based on the distribution of the people who are in the picture.

35:26But actually, if you showed pictures like that to all three of us, we've come up with reasonable kind of assessments of those phases of the race. And the pathologist is doing something very similar. They're looking at the cells. They're looking at specific features in the cells, which we won't get into. But they're saying, are those cells walking, running, or sprinting? They're trying to say, how fast are these cells moving? And it's a static image, but we can interpret based on cellular features what the speed of movement is. And within cancer, just to use our car example, that's how fast is the gas pedal pressed down.

36:02So how fast is the cell moving? And when we talk in cancer, that's called a grade. We're going to also talk about stage. That's how far the cancer has traveled. So how fast it's moving versus how far it's traveled. You can have a moderately fast tumor that's had a lot of time to move, or you can have a very fast cancer that hasn't had a chance to move, And those are treated very differently. So grade and stage are very important for the risk stratification of the tumor. Now, in general, there's five different grades. When Dr. Gleason first developed this score, grade one was normal. Grade two was low-risk cancer.

36:42Grade three was moderate-risk cancer. Grade four was bad cancer. And grade five was terrible. But over time, we've said grade one is normal. Grade two is actually normal. Okay, so this was one of the developments over time where the pathologists have made changes. So grade two is actually normal. So when you get your pathology back, and let's say we took more cores than just the ones in the target, there'd be a lot of ones that say benign is when you get your path back. And those would be Gleason scores one and two. Now, if the cells look like they're walking, that would be Gleason pattern three.

37:19if the cells look like they're running that would be gleason pattern four and if the cells look like they're sprinting that would be gleason pattern five and the pathologist will say you know if you take a picture of this race you'd be able to see that not everyone's moving at the same speed as maybe maybe you're more of a gleason pattern three and your son was a gleason pattern four but yeah that's exactly right i was hoping 3.5 but um you're going to say you know you're going going to see in this population of cells or people in our race analogy, there's different speeds. And so we can't say, well, this is all Gleason pattern three or all Gleason pattern four.

37:54So we'll give you a ratio. We're going to say you're a three with some four. And then the pathologists will oftentimes say that's 5 % pattern four. So 5 % runners, maybe 30 % runners. When you get up to 50 % or beyond, so if it's 60 % runners, they switch the numbers. So it becomes four plus three rather than three plus four. And that is how the Gleason score gives you a ratio. Now there's some inherent problems with the ratio. For example, if you have two to three runners and not that many walkers, then it might be four plus three. But if you have a ton of runners, but you just have a ton of walkers as well, it might be three plus four.

38:33So the score breaks down in some ways, but this is the most commonly diagnosed score a pattern three plus four in the MRI era, okay, now that we've stopped doing just biopsies as a trigger. Gleason pattern five is very dangerous. It's one of the cancers that really do cause a lot of problems, but thankfully very rare, okay? And if you have cancers that are only runners, pattern four plus four and a large amount of them, when the pathologist reports out, they say, there's a lot here, a lot of running patients. Those are very dangerous as well. this three plus four and four plus three are the ones that are often diagnosed.

39:08They're often curable. They're a high enough grade that we consider them treatable in men, especially men who are in their fifties, where we'd say, Hey, you know, these will, if we give them enough time, it may be several years, but if we give them enough time, they would spread. And so we would want to treat these before they had the opportunity to spread. And so that's kind of where I would, I would kind of talk to you or this 55 year old and kind of explain those. That's where we get the Gleason score. Now, I'll pause there because I have a couple more things to say, but that's a big, big soliloquy.

39:39So what any questions that generated? I think we're following and I think the main idea here is that that risk stratification is critical. I guess the only question I have, which is sort of a loaded question, because I know the answer. But then, you know, if you have any pattern of four, why would you report out the three, right? If you say I mean, I get a four plus three, but if you have a three plus four, why don't you just say four? Because the threes, those guys walking aren't, they're not going to make the finish line anytime in my lifetime. Yeah. Great, great question. So actually there's a, there's a big move to do that.

40:12Um, so the, there's a group that's led, uh, out of Memorial Sloan Kettering and actually UCLA is one of the, one of the sites as well. But this idea of where let's, let's not report out the pattern three, let's just report out the volume of pattern four and let's pattern, obviously if there's pattern five, we need to report that out. But instead of just pattern three, we need to report out the volume of pattern four. And this gets to historical context. We've been using three plus four and four plus three and four plus four, all these kind of ratio-based patterns for decades. And so it's very entrenched within the way that we do things in medicine.

40:48And it also works really well. So we've been using this for risk stratification for decades. It seems to work very well. We can probably tweak it and make it better. But obviously, we want to study this to make sure that we're doing the right thing. And I think that this will be future research. The other thing that we can do, though, is we can look at other biomarkers for speed of running. So let's say we take our race analogy and you take a picture of a bunch of runners. And it's all three plus three, right? This is the start of the race. It's all three plus three. Obviously, we know some of those runners are going to do really well, and some are not.

41:31But how do we know at the beginning of the race? Well, we can, probably extending this analogy too far, but we'll give it a try. We can look at their training schedule, okay? So we can say who's been training really well and who hasn't. And the way that we do that is we look at some kind of a genomic RNA test. There's three different ones, but we can basically use an RNA, which is the messenger molecule between DNA and protein. And it's a, the reason we use RNA is it's, it's a tumor specific and it can be encoded pretty easily. We can, we can interpret it pretty easily. Um, and we can compare the RNA of this gentleman's tumor, our 55 year old male, who's in my office to a bunch of other gentlemen who we know what happened to them over 15 years.

42:15So we can compare his RNA to their RNA. And we can say, is there any difference between them? Does his race schedule, does his training, does his tumor look like it's going to be a runner or look like it's going to be a walker over the next 15 years? And we can use that to help us understand what direction should we go with your treatment. Should we be more aggressive? Should we be more conservative? It's not perfect, obviously. You could have somebody who trains really well and sprained their ankle. but it's a very, it's a nice way of having additional information about the characteristics of the tumor.

42:48And it becomes really helpful in this three plus four cancers where you have some runners. It's probably not going to be, you know, there's a lot of race left to live, but we can get an idea of how the cancer may behave over the next few years and possibly start to recommend more things like active surveillance, which will, this is starting now, we've done our risk stratification, we're moving to treatment, active surveillance versus one of these active therapies. Yeah, that's amazing. I mean, so I think that the take home is that once you get the diagnosis, that risk stratification is so critical to know what you do with all those data.

43:24And the RNA markers even give you a little bit better idea of, you know, we talk about the wolf in sheep's clothing. And there are, there are people that look as if they have a Gleason for maybe a low grade, I mean, intermediate grade, but actually have something much more aggressive hiding in their, in their genes. And, and I think that 15 year window is critical as well, because, you know, if I'm not 55, if I'm 70, you may have a different conversation with me than if I'm 55 with that exact same tumor diagnosis, same genetics, same everything else. But as you say, you know, is that to make a morbid finish line metaphor is, you know, is that cancer, the prostate cancer going to hit win the race and kill you?

44:11Or is something else either another malignancy, as you talked about earlier, in terms of stratifying versus colon cancer risk, prostate cancer risk? Or how's your heart? You know, how are your lungs? How's your weight? What's your diabetes risk? I mean, what are the other? There's one of the things that's really important is to treat men holistically. And sometimes in the world of oncology, they get an undeserved bad rap for thinking their goal is to save you from cancer and not, you know, think about other organs. In fact, we do a really good job these days of risk ratification based on overall survivability.

44:45Well, wow. So we've got diagnosis. I mean, I think, Jordan, what are we missing from your notes? Anything else that we need Dr. Brisbane to talk about with a diagnosis of prostate cancer? I mean, you hit most of them. And what I have isn't really a full-fledged question. But the thing that sort of surprised me the most in hearing everything you had to say was, as you said, how treatable this is. I mean, I guess my question is you sit down and you give this diagnosis to someone, they hear cancer. And that's kind of probably the only word they hear for the first, you know. But I mean, what would you say?

45:20obviously it's a case by case basis and everybody's different and everybody's circumstances are different. But I mean, just to, to end on kind of a more positive note, other than the, you know, the morbid finish line analogy, what would you say to those people in terms of how, how treatable this is? This is a very curable disease for, for many, many men, especially if it's caught early and it can be, it's something that, you know, sometimes we need to do treatment, but it's very curable. So this guy's going to be okay. Yeah, he's going to be definitely okay. Our 55-year-old, three plus four, he'll be back in the gym.

45:53Let me ask you this. I mean, we're going to have a whole next segment on treatment, but can that guy go back on testosterone? Yeah, we oftentimes can get them back on testosterone. Great, great. Because it's good for more than just sexual function, as we've talked about multiple times on the show, is a big part of my research, of course, in men's health, is where hypogonasm plays a role. So, Wayne, you've done it all so far. I really appreciate all of your professorial explanations, your metaphors from cars to marathons, maybe still a little fashion. To footwear. I mean, you coined an idea. It's going to be at the top of leisure wear for spring break and cruises now in April of this year.

46:36But I appreciate so much. I'm looking forward to having you back here in a little bit to talk about how we treat this man with what sounds like a very curable disease if caught early. Wayne Brisbane, professor at UCLA of urology, surgeon scientist extraordinaire. Thanks so much. Long transit. Let's take us out on that guitar riff. Jordan, I'll see you soon.

47:06Let's talk about it. Let's talk about it in the mail room. Let's talk about it. Let's talk about it in the mail room. Let's talk about it. Let's talk about it in the mail room. The Mail Room with Dr. Jesse Mills was a production of iHeartRadio. It was executive produced by Jordan Runtog. If you liked what you heard, please subscribe and leave a review. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. This program was independently created by iHeartRadio. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation is the exclusive advertising partner.

47:55It is intended for educational and informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Please consult your health care provider for any medical or related questions or concerns before making any treatment decisions. The views and discussions aired on this podcast are those of Dr. Mills and his guests and do not represent the official positions of UCLA or UCLA Health.

From the publisher

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from The Male Room with Dr. Jesse Mills

All 53 episodes
Prostate Cancer Awareness Month (Part 2): Diagnosing Without the PanicThe Male Room with Dr. Jesse Mills · 47 min
Listen in VO