Prostate Cancer (Part 3): Surgery, Radiation, and the Reality of Side Effects

24 Sep 2026 · 57 min · 19 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Prostate Awareness Month Part 3 focuses on treatment choices for intermediate-risk prostate cancer (example: 55-year-old man with MRI-visible lesion, contained disease, Gleason 3+4). It compares active surveillance, focal therapy, radical prostatectomy, and radiation, and discusses PSA anxiety, side effects, and decision-making.

Guests

Dr. Jesse Mills (urologist/surgeon; leads “Wayne Brisbane MD trilogy” discussion) and Jordan Runtah (“man on the street” host). The episode also references radiation oncologists and UCLA survivorship/prehab/posthab protocols, but they are not direct guests.

Key claims

Active surveillance is guideline-preferred for low-risk (especially Gleason 3+3) and can be an option for 3+4 for limited periods (years, not months). Focal therapy is newer and not guideline-standard due to recurrence risk (about 40% recurrence within 2–5 years) and limited long-term prospective data. Surgery and radiation offer equivalent cure rates for 3+4, with different side-effect profiles. PSA changes should be interpreted as trends; PSA down doesn’t mean cancer is gone.

Notable examples

A firefighter treated prophylactically due to strong family history; “moldy toast” analogy for multifocal recurrence; “sunburn” analogy for radiation cystitis; catheter as a “cast for the urethra.”

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Recap of Prostate Cancer Series

0:01 to 1:17

Discussion of previous topics in the prostate cancer series.

“positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, or PSMA-positive MCRPC, who have already been treated with hormone therapy and are considered appropriate to delay chemotherapy.”

Recap of Prostate Cancer Series

1:20 to 1:32

Discussion of previous topics in the prostate cancer series.

Recap of Prostate Cancer Series

1:44 to 2:05

Discussion of previous topics in the prostate cancer series.

Introduction to Treatment Options

2:05 to 2:58

Introduction to treatment options for a 55-year-old prostate cancer patient.

“And there's an old saying in surgery that we, this evolution of a surgeon is you learn first how to operate and then you learn when to operate.”

Understanding Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

2:58 to 6:16

Discussion on the classification and implications of intermediate risk prostate cancer.

“I know you're just off some swells at Zuma.”

Active Surveillance and Treatment Decisions

6:16 to 9:12

Exploring active surveillance and treatment decisions for prostate cancer.

“And so low-risk prostate cancer, the risk of spread is super low.”

Focal Therapy Options for Prostate Cancer

9:12 to 14:01

Discussion of various focal therapy options and their appropriateness for treatment.

“So our guy, he's, it sounds as if he's, you're probably going to lean towards some kind of active treatment based on his age, based on the intermediate risk.”

Understanding Focal Therapy in Prostate Cancer

14:01 to 18:18

Learn about the appropriateness, risks, and outcomes of focal therapy for prostate cancer.

“Because there's a lot of ways you can get it done in general.”

Addressing Patient Expectations and Quality of Life

18:19 to 20:44

Explore the psychological and physical impacts of focal therapy on patients.

“And we said, hey, it looks like the guys who got focal therapy do do better as far as side effects.”

Navigating PSA Anxiety and Active Surveillance

20:45 to 23:26

Discuss the concept of PSA anxiety and the role of active surveillance in treatment decisions.

“But I think the thing that I would say in terms of now we're kind of halfway through active surveillance and focal therapy is tell me what, tell me about PSA anxiety.”
Show all 19 chapters

Choosing the Right Surgeon for Prostate Treatment

23:27 to 28:01

Learn how to select a surgeon and what to consider for prostate surgery options.

“And that is also, you know, that makes them a little bit more relaxed.”

Techniques for Urinary Control Post-Surgery

28:01 to 29:41

Learn about various surgical techniques to improve urinary control after prostate surgery.

“intentionally spare those muscles, guys can have much faster and more durable urinary control.”

Nerve-Sparing Surgery and Its Implications

29:41 to 32:40

Understand the importance of nerve-sparing techniques in prostate surgery and their effects on erectile function.

“Does a robot, because we're doing it at magnification, are there data to show that a robotic nerve sparing is superior?”

Survivorship and Recovery: The Three C's of Cancer

32:40 to 36:23

Explore the hierarchy of cancer survivorship focusing on cure, continence, and coitus after treatment.

“And I think it's a real huge service that we provide here.”

Understanding Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

36:23 to 41:27

Dive into the mechanics of radiation therapy, its benefits, and how it compares to surgical options.

“looks like for a guy, but also who is a 55-year-old guy different than, say, a 70-year-old guy in terms of what you would say surgery versus radiation.”

Side Effects of Radiation vs. Surgery

41:27 to 42:00

Learn about the side effects associated with radiation therapy and how they compare to surgical procedures.

“So to go to radiation for 40 treatments, five days a week.”

Understanding Surgical vs. Radiation Side Effects

42:00 to 48:35

Learn about the side effects associated with surgical and radiation treatments for prostate cancer.

“So what you're getting for, you know, we talked about surgical side effects.”

The Importance of Personalized Treatment

48:35 to 55:01

Explore how treatment options for prostate cancer can be tailored based on individual factors.

“But from a biological standpoint, that cancer has been growing under TRT up to that point.”

Hope and Advances in Prostate Cancer Treatment

55:01 to 56:01

Discover the latest advancements in prostate cancer treatment and the hope they bring to patients.

“know that that toolbox is a lot bigger than it was even five years ago.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00This is an iHeart Podcast. Guaranteed Human.

0:31positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, or PSMA-positive MCRPC, who have already been treated with hormone therapy and are considered appropriate to delay chemotherapy. Blue Victo involves contact with radioactivity, which may increase the risk for cancer and cause fetal harm. Drink plenty of fluids, urinate often, use contraception, and talk to your doctor about ways to reduce the risk of exposing others to radiation during and after treatment. Blue Victo can cause low levels of blood cell counts, kidney problems, and infertility. Tell your doctor if you have weakness, pale skin, shortness of breath, bleeding or bruising more easily, and infection or changes in urination.

1:05Side effects include decreased blood cell counts, tiredness, dry mouth, nausea, appetite loss, joint or back pain, and constipation. Ask your doctor about Fluvicto because every day without cancer progression is a victory. Visit Fluvicto.com to learn more.

1:31Let's talk about the mailroom Welcome to the mailroom Welcome back to the mailroom. Dr. Jesse Mills, as always, joined by Jordan Runtah, the man on the street, the everyman, the man near and dear at everybody's heart, the guy that's going to keep us on track as we go through the third part of the Wayne Brisbane MD trilogy, the trifecta, the, as I hope my Dodgers do, three-peat of this episode saga on prostate cancer. We've gone through screening, we've gone through diagnosis, and we've now going to hit on treatment using this 55-year-old gentleman that came into my office originally, that we made the screening decision on him, made the diagnosis, and now he does, sadly, but maybe not so sadly, I think Wayne's going to tell us he is probably going to be okay, but he has prostate cancer and the treatment options for prostate cancer have exploded even since I've left residency over 20 years ago.

2:34And there's an old saying in surgery that we, this evolution of a surgeon is you learn first how to operate and then you learn when to operate. And then the final stage of our evolution is learning when not to operate. And prostate cancer, I think Wayne will agree is one of those conditions where just because you have it, doesn't mean you always need to operate on it. So Wayne, welcome back. I know you're just off some swells at Zuma. Imagine you had a nice good break and here you are getting out of your wetsuit and joining us again. I really appreciate your time. How you been, man? I've been great.

3:10Thanks so much. Thanks for having me back. I appreciate it. Dude, it's absolutely our honor. Jordan, you good? I'm great. I'm jealous of all the surf talk here, but... The winter swell has been very good to us here in LA. We've got the polar plunge out in Coney Island. Much of you're familiar with that, where people see how long they can last in the Titanic temperature waters. We pay good money here to do cold plunges, you know? Yeah, you're getting that for free. I mean, we got to pay for a membership. And yeah, our brown fat is well earned out here. All right, well, let's let her rip. So we've got this guy, 55-year-old, for our audience, that's tuning into this third part of our episode.

3:52he has a i guess you would call it an intermediate grade prostate cancer so not the best not the most favorable but not the worst as well how are we going to walk this guy through his treatment options for his prostate cancer including you know is it an option not to treat at all so uh wayne take it tell us tell us how to get this guy through this if you were in your office of course of course so this guy just to remind everyone he's uh he's gone through kind of had an elevated PSA, which we talked about, underwent a biopsy, which we also talked about methodologies and, you know, when we do a biopsy imaging.

4:26He has an MRI. He has a small lesion on his MRI. It doesn't look like it's pushing through the capsule. And then when I felt his prostate, it wasn't, it's all contained. So that is classically what we would determine our term intermediate risk prostate cancer. So we had talked about, you know, all cancers go through this, these phases where you have risk stratification, or sorry, you have screening if there's available screening, you have diagnosis, risk stratification, and then treatment. And so we had kind of gotten up to the point of risk stratification. So diagnosis, we have three plus four prostate cancer, there's this Gleason score that's very commonly reported out.

5:04And there's five elements in a Gleason score. So the pathologist looks at the tissue underneath the microscope and says, I'm going to give you a score from one through five. One and two are considered normal and variations on normal. So the report would come back looking like it was a benign, non-cancerous. And then pattern three, four and five are increasing levels of aggressiveness. Pattern three, we think, is it is a cancer. It has some of the molecular hallmarks of cancer, but it probably never spreads. OK, there's a little bit of debate about that, but it's very, very safe to watch. It's clearly preferred that watching this term, what we call active surveillance, is the preference.

5:48And that's pretty much universal across all guidelines. But, Wayne, just tell me, I mean, it hasn't always been that way, right? I mean, there's been an evolution in what stimulates us or what gives us the confidence to recommend active surveillance. So is there new technology or what, you know, is there new diagnostic markers that we can look at to determine who would be a good candidate for active surveillance? Yeah, so there certainly are. So there's, you know, there's some, you know, we would say that, and that gets into the risk stratification a little bit, is, you know, Gleason 3 plus 3, or it's also called grade group 1, is considered low-risk prostate cancer.

6:30And so low-risk prostate cancer, the risk of spread is super low. So there's occasionally, you know, I've had a guy, I had a firefighter who came in, he was 45, his dad died of prostate cancer, his brother had prostate cancer, his grandpa died of prostate cancer. And he only had three plus three, but he had a visible lesion. And he said, you know what, I just know this is going to be a problem for me, I'd really like to get it done, get a surgery or radiation. So we treated him prophylactically, just because of his very strong family history, we can quantify those family histories with some genetic tests.

7:03So we can kind of see what you're, is there any, is there any molecular drivers? Like we talked about that car with the gas pedal stuck down or the brake wires being cut. So we can see if you genetically have one of those things that predisposes your cancer car to, to move fast. So that's, that's one of those things we can do, but in general, we, you know, why, why did we switch? Well, we had a lot of clinical trials that, you know, are us and the UK government sponsored for long term follow up. And we found that three plus three, just, you know, it behaves very well. So this is, you know, this is science at work data showing that men with three plus three, there's a very, very long event horizon before the cancer spreads.

7:44And so that's that was the shift. Is there also a is there a way or is there we have enough predictive models to say that, you know, if you have a three plus three diagnosis in 2025, what are the odds it'll stay three plus three if you read biopsy in 2027? Or in other words, how many people that select active surveillance end up having to go on to treatment? Yeah, we do. So we have a big prospective clinical trial called PROTECT that has now 15-year data and 20-year data as well very soon. And that it shows that there are a fair number of men who will need treatment who start off with active surveillance, but it happens slowly.

8:25We have some genomic biomarkers, which will look at the genetics of the tumor and compare you or compare the loved one to hundreds or thousands of other men over their 15-year course and see genetically what your cancer is predisposed to look like. In the analogy where we talked about runners, where, you know, group three was the walkers, group four was the runners, and group five was the sprinters, I kind of tell people that these genetic tests are like looking at the athlete's training schedule. So you get a snapshot with these Gleason scores, but these genetic tests can tell you how hard the athlete's been training over the, and how hard, you know, how fast they might finish the race when given 15 years.

9:06Got it. Got it. And so we can use all those tools at our disposal. There's also a lot of good nomograms, which take multiple variables, like one specifically designed for active surveillance, And you can put in your variables, your MRI, your PSA, your baseline Gleason score, and it will tell you what the surveillance schedule should be and what's your risk of reclassification to predominance of pattern four, which is a little more concerning over the next five years. Yeah. So our guy, he's, it sounds as if he's, you're probably going to lean towards some kind of active treatment based on his age, based on the intermediate risk.

9:45But say he has, you know, say it's, it's March, say it's April and, and his, his, his daughter's getting married in Italy in June. Do you say, gosh, we got to get you to the operating. We got to do something that, you know, that's going to save this from spreading. Or can he go to Italy, see his daughter get married, come back and take care of this in a couple months? Yeah. So what I would actually say is, you know, I would tell this guy, you have four options. And one of the options is active surveillance. So I would tell him he active surveillance is an option. This three plus four, definitely there is there are individuals doing active surveillance.

10:21It is an option. But what I tell young guys who are super healthy and this guy, you know, is fits the bill, is that it's not likely to be something you can do for the rest of your life. It is higher, you know, it's definitely something there you're more likely to need treatment. But and there is a smaller risk of or there is an increased risk of metastasis if we were to watch this for a long period of time. But I also tell them active surveillance is an option and it could be an option for several years. And so going to see your daughter get married is very reasonable. Okay, this is something that we're just trying to make sure that we don't miss something.

11:01But our window of watching this is on the, you can measure it in years, not weeks or months. That's amazing. Amazing. Okay, so then you say, yeah, let's do something. Now, he has focal disease, meaning his whole gland is not riddled with cancer. So talk to me about, before we get into sort of the gold standard of radical prostatectomy, prostatectomy. There's a lot of acronyms and technology out there to treat men focally with focal therapy, just like the analogy I think a lot of people are comfortable with is lumpectomy and breast cancer, where a woman has very localized disease that we can really monitor through radiation screening that they might be able to be going through organs-bearing surgery for breast cancer.

11:46Does it work the same in prostate cancer? Walk me through some of the acronyms and if that would be a potential real, really good course for a 55-year-old man with his Gleason and his intermediate staging. Yeah, totally. So when I say there's four options, these are the things I hit on. I say, guys, you can do active surveillance, you could do focal therapy, you could do radical prostatectomy, or you could do radiation. And I think that those are all, three of those are guidelines-based answers. And so when I say that, I mean that we have enough data, comparative evidence for long periods of time that we know these things work.

12:21And that is the active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, and radiation. Focal therapy is newer on the job. It's a newer tool. And there's a big umbrella of different focal therapy options. So the idea behind focal therapy or partial gland ablation, those are interchangeable terms, is that we're ablating or killing through some energy deposition the tumor plus a margin, but not the entire prostate. Okay. So that's the goal. Underneath that umbrella term is things like HIFU, high intensity focused ultrasound, cryotherapy, which is a freezing, IRE, which is irreversible electroporation, Tulsa Pro, which is a transurethral ultrasound ablation.

13:07That's another acronym. Focal laser ablation, focal brachytherapy, and I'm sure I'm forgetting one other. Oh, and then there's two clinical trials. One is heated vapor, which is, and then water vapor and another is high pressure water. So there's a lot of mousetraps out there that are trying to kill off the tissue. And I joke with patients when they're in a joking mood that we can heat it, we can freeze it, we can turn it into julienne fries. There's just like, you know, a lot of a lot of different ways you can get this done. And that can be very overwhelming. But the but the umbrella, the term that I really think is important is take a step back.

13:53Don't don't get so worried about like, how is it getting done? But is it the right decision? Is focal therapy appropriate for the cancer? Because there's a lot of ways you can get it done in general. They're probably all reasonable. but is it appropriate to do focal therapy? And what I mean by that is prostate cancer behaves like moldy toast. Okay. So I'll let that use this weird analogy, but it's absolutely true from a biological standpoint. So I'll say, you know, if you were to get a piece of bread and you go, and this happens to me in my house, unfortunately, quite a bit, but you go to, you go to your bread drawer, you pull out a piece of bread and there's a little bit of mold at the, at the corner.

14:37And in my house, that's a good piece of toast. You know, you just clip that bad boy off and throw in the toaster. Good to go. Right. Now, for the sake of this analogy, let's pretend you lost your appetite. You know, you pulled it out. There's mold. You clipped it off. You're like, yeah, you know what? I actually don't want a piece of toast right now. You throw it back in the bread drawer. It would not be surprising at all if you came back three days later and you found little pieces of mold in other locations. Those would be things that were too small to visualize initially, but that they had given some time, they had grown.

15:10And there is some very, very compelling evidence that genomically prostate cancer behaves very similarly. Even if we do a perfect ablation where we kill every little cell, we have a nice margin, and it's very few side effects that in perfection, it's very likely that the cancer will biologically start to grow in another location. In fact, that happens 80 % of the time. we find multi-focal disease rather 20 % of the time you just have these locations and for the event horizon that guys need to know is this happens over two to five years about 40 % of the time where you have a recurrence and sometimes they're about 20 % of the time the recurrence is significant enough that you need to do other treatments so this is something for focal therapy guys need to know that this recurrence issue is very problematic and so is it a good option for some men, certainly do we need comparative clinical trials to help us work out which men it is?

16:08Absolutely. And if you have a physician who seems resistant to focal therapy, this may be the reason why it's not because they're ignorant. It's because that they're, they're worried about some of these recurrence risks. Now, let me, let me ask you this. Is there just, I love your moldy toast. So I'm going to go with multifocal moldy toast. When you go into your bread drawer and you pick up that piece of bread, you're picking it up somewhere other than where you initially see the mold and then you put it back in. Is there a concern with prostate cancer focal therapy of spreading what we call seeding, right?

16:43There's some cancers that you touch it, bladder cancer is kind of a classic one, at least I know about as a urologist, that you can actually spread by disrupting the capsule or the ability for these tumors to spread. Is that a concern in prostate cancer or does it not behave that way? It's a good question. We don't think it does, but that's one of the things we need to study prospectively long term. And that's why focal therapy is not yet on the guidelines, because those very, very critical questions have yet to be answered over 10 year time. And we really need to answer this for guys over 10 to 15, 20 years, because our alternative therapies of surgery radiation are validated over 10 to 20, 20, some of the surgical data is out to 32 years.

17:30And so we really need to, we really need to do that for focal therapy prospectively. What I will tell you is the other concern that people have about focal therapy is that it's billed as an alternative with less side effects, you know, less, less sexual dysfunction, less urinary dysfunction. and the main sequelae that it means something is the erections not being as hard, the ejaculate volume decreasing or going away, and then urinary urgency and frequency. Those are the things that people oftentimes see after focal therapy. It does anecdotally, meaning that when you talk to people who do a lot of focal therapy, it does seem like that's lower than the alternative of surgery and radiation.

18:14But we haven't, until recently, we haven't compared them head to head. There have been some recent comparative trials that were retrospective, meaning we looked at a bunch of guys who got surgery, but looked at a bunch of guys who got focal. And we said, hey, it looks like the guys who got focal therapy do do better as far as side effects. But that's retrospective. And there's a lot of flaws in that design. But it has yet to be done prospectively. There's a couple of trials that are enrolling, but they haven't reported their results quite yet because they need to do so over a prolonged period of time.

19:12Yeah, and I would say anecdotally, as a surgeon and urologist, It treats men for some of the quality of life issues that happen with prostate cancer therapy from incontinence to sexual dysfunction. It's an interesting subset of patients because I certainly see fewer of these men post-focal therapy. But the ones I see tend to be a little bit, I don't want to say angrier, but a little bit more disappointed. And I think part of it is because, you know, maybe they had the expectation that if the risks are so much lower without really stratifying what those risks are qualifying, it happened to them.

19:45whereas my men that are going through prostate cancer therapy, which Jordan and I are going to do a whole episode on how I prep a guy for surgery, how we make sure that we optimize our outcomes post-surgery. We have really good protocols for that. With focal therapy, I treat those men the same way because I don't know, really, that's the only playbook I have. But it's interesting psychologically when people are making these decisions out there for anybody that's listening that's struggling with this decision. Yeah, it ain't zero. I mean, you are, there's a reasonable chance that you may still have some sexual dysfunction or urinary symptoms, but it's also not 100%.

20:20And so with surgery, we know 100 % of the time we're going to do something to kind of muck around with the nerves and we're going to do our best to spare them. And again, that's a whole nother episode. But I think that's the important thing for physicians to do is set the expectations that, you know, that we don't know if it happens to you. We still have amazing treatments to make your sexual function whole again, improve your urinary outcomes. But I think the thing that I would say in terms of now we're kind of halfway through active surveillance and focal therapy is tell me what, tell me about PSA anxiety.

20:56You know, because I think in counseling, I did this with my father-in-law years ago who had a low grade Gleason, but he was 50, 51 at diagnosis. And he was an engineer and he dealt in a black and white world. And he said, you know what, if you're going to tell me you can do a therapy that makes my PSA go to zero, I want that. Right. Because if you're going to tell me, keep an eye on it. But if my PSA goes from 2.7 to 3, I'm going to lose sleep. Wondering if my active surveillance is all of a sudden, you know, become the front runner in the race using your analogy. So so how real is that when you're counseling patients on if they say, Doc, I just you know, I just just get it out.

21:38I just want to go to zero. Have you ever persuaded somebody to say, look, actually, you know, this is a very watchable condition. But yes, you have to live with that PSA anxiety. So unpack that for us, Wayne. Sure. Yeah. I mean, I think that it's active surveillance for three plus four is, you know, it used to be that active surveillance for three plus three, we were dealing with a lot of clinician like patient anxiety, but also a lot of clinician anxiety. A lot of our patients reflect our anxieties. And so I think that's important to remember that because the clinicians have become much more relaxed about 3 plus 3 active surveillance, the patients have as well.

22:19Obviously, there's patients who are very nervous about this, and 3 plus 3 can transform into 3 plus 4 and beyond and cause problems. But it is rare. And And so statistically, it's unlikely to metastasize within a short window. There obviously are case reports, but it's very just unlikely. And so I tell guys, if you're comfortable, try active surveillance even for six months. And we'll touch base. And if you look in the mirror every day and you say, I think about this, I hate it, I really, really want to treat it, that's fine. That's totally fine. But give it six months. And a good majority of my guys after six months say, you know what, it was scary initially, but then it just becomes part of something that as long as I'm showing up for my visits, I'm okay.

23:11And I also ask them, you know what, if you can transfer you that concern to me and your only responsibility is coming on these visits at this time. And I will I will make sure that this doesn't metastasize or spread under our noses. As long as you show up, I'll take care of that risk for you. And that is also, you know, that makes them a little bit more relaxed. Take the load off. Put it right on me. Let's go. Let's go. But I will say for three plus four, it is it is a little it is a little bit more higher intensity. PSA anxiety is real. You know, we've talked about PSA. It's just the thermometer for the prostate and the thermometer can go up and down with multiple other events.

23:49And so you have to you have to tell people or I tell my patients, if your PSA goes up, I'm never too worried. And if your PSA goes down, I'm never too happy. So, you know, it's like it's one of those it's you got to you got to take the just take it as it comes. And what you're looking for is consistent rises and changes on imaging. That's those are really the things that I worry about. I love that. That's a, that's a really, really good point is that, you know, people look at that number and think, man, I had a, I had a great month. My PSA went down, so it's gone, right? Well, it's gone. It's gone.

24:21Okay. But it ain't gone. All right. So you're a surgeon, you do operations, you love to operate. So tell me what are the nuances? Well, how do you pick a, how do you pick a surgeon? How do you pick somebody that if, if our man is saying, look, I do want a radical prostatectomy, it's a gold standard. It's been around for years. It's probably had some improvements. So tell me, how do you pick somebody? What do you ask your surgeon you're interviewing? And then walk us through what that surgery looks like. Sure. So let's say this guy, we chatted with him about active surveillance, he says. And we'll give him a nice percentage of pattern four.

25:00It's visible. So it's visible in imaging. You know that there's enough cells to cluster together that it's visible. you get your percentage of pattern fours and we'll say 40%, which is, you know, the, you know, a good portion of the cores are coming back percent of pattern four rather than pattern three. So that's starting to get into the point where I, I, I start steering guys pretty aggressively away from active surveillance at that point, especially if they're willing to try something with treatment, we say focal therapy. And he's like, you know what, I don't like the idea. I'm a young guy.

25:29I've got decades left to live. I don't like the idea of this recurrence being an issue. I'd really like to treat it for good. I realized that maybe a little bit more steep sexual and urinary function up front. So let's look at surgery and radiation. That's kind of the conversation I'm having with the guy at this point. Now, surgery and radiation have been studied together for a very long period of time and found to be equivalent for cure. So you guys should know that if you're doing surgery or doing radiation, you're getting equivalent cures, especially in this three plus four sitting. But you have different side effect profiles.

26:04And so one of the things I think it's important, and you guys, our guys and gals who love the guys, owe it to themselves to speak to the radiation oncologist and the surgeons. And that's, I think, something very important. You should, this is, again, we've said you can go to a, you can go to a wedding in Italy, and you can also take some time to really sit with this, don't rush into a decision, find a, find several people to chat about, even several people within the same specialty to chat. And if they all say the same thing, that means it's probably closer to the truth. So, you know, if you get consistency in these second opinions, that's actually a favorable thing.

Read the full transcript

26:38If you get a lot of inconsistency, then you should, you should maybe seek a third opinion. Yeah, well put. So what I'll tell you is, I think surgery is very important. And it's, it's one of those things where it's kind of like, it's a little bit more like sports than it is like engineering. So, you know, to train a surgeon is like training a basketball player, a football player, you know, we have to go through multiple repetitions. And so experience matters. Okay, so there's, there's an experience portion of things. And then I, I personally think technique matters as well. There's, you know, robotic prostatectomies have been done a single way for a very long time.

27:16And they've been perfected as far as the technique, but there's been new introductions of technique, which spare the muscles over the prostate. It's called a retzius sparing or a hood sparing. And those sparing the muscles over the prostate is not conventionally done, but it can lead to much faster urinary recovery. So one of the problems with taking the prostate out is it sits between the bladder and the penis, and it's almost in the position of like a cork in a bottle and removing it can lead to urinary leakage. Now, for many, many years, we thought that that was just inevitable. And that was just something that that happened.

27:52But it's also I think, because they are, you know, there's good evidence to suggest it's because the muscles over the top of the prostate are being disrupted. And so if you intentionally spare those muscles, guys can have much faster and more durable urinary control. So that's the way I prefer to do it. And then a lot of my partners here at UCLA use a hood technique where the vast majority of the muscles are spared. And we found that that's a really, really nice way of preserving guys' urinary control. What do you tell them? Is it, you know, how long, so a guy has to, with a surgery, they have to have a catheter.

28:28And I think everybody kind of understands that deal for seven days, 10 days. Yeah. I think about it like it's like a cast for your urethra. You know, if you break your femur, you want a cast in place to have a heel in a straight line. The catheter is a cast for that urethra. make sure that it heals in a straight line and gives it a scaffold. Yep. And then when the catheter comes out after your, is it about a week, 10 days? What do you, what do you do? Yeah. So I do 10 days with the RETC sparing ones. Um, and then, um, you know, when out guys usually, uh, so, so 92 % of my guys, this is, uh, the data that we just, uh, pulled, um, we'll find that there, you know, they are 92 % of my guys are back to what they'd consider their baseline within three months.

29:10That's amazing. So, but that's, you know, there's still 8 % of guys who prefer to wear a pad out for longer and that does get better over time. Um, but, uh, with this, with this muscle sparing technique, you're, you're, you're, you're peeing pretty well, pretty fast. Um, and I think that's a huge improvement. Talk about what techniques of his, you know, Jordan and I are going to talk about this, the, the sort of the history of the nerve sparing prostatectomy. Yeah, sure. Walsh. So we'll, we'll cover that in a different, a different episode, but, But talk to me about how much better we are at sparing nerves.

29:43Does a robot, because we're doing it at magnification, are there data to show that a robotic nerve sparing is superior? And is there anything else we're doing to even better image those nerves intraoperatively? Let's walk through that. And is that something that a patient can ask their surgeon if they're employing these techniques? Of course. Yeah. So nerve sparing is pretty commonly done now. and it's the idea of these nerves run very close to the prostate in kind of a lattice. And I tell people, when I think of nerves, you can think of these as like telephone wires, which are copper wires with an insulator.

30:17And there are nerves in the body that look like this. And there's also, the alternative is like fiber optic lines. There's a bunch of glass wires that are running in and each one sends a little bit of a luminescence And it's the intensity changes that we're monitoring. These nerves, and Jesse, you know more than I do about this, but these nerves are much more like the glass fiber optic lines than they are like the copper wires. So we're not cutting these nerves. We're just trying to spare them and push them over to the side. But in sparing them, you can crack the glass fiber optics. And so the intensity of the light getting to the neuroreceptor that opens the arteries to the corpora cavernosa, which is basically the functional element of giving you an erection, the light intensity, that goes down with time.

31:09So all of us, as we age, you're getting less and less light output, which if you think about the light as a direct function of how much erection you're getting, that is going down. Bite your tongue, brother. Bite your tongue. I know. The other thing is if you do any surgery, that's going to crack some of those wires, but it's going to be, you know, where you're sitting. So if you're, if you're starting with a little bit lower out light output, it's going to be even lower than that. And that's important because we think that, you know, there's a lot of these nerves that come in at the five and seven o 'clock and can be pushed away, but there's some newer evidence and it's a little controversial, but I believe it personally, that there's some nerves that cross right in front of the prostate.

31:50And so there's no way to get the prostate out without clipping those nerves. And so that's why you can have a very, very discordant amount of, you know, if you do surgery, even if you do a perfect nerve sparing surgery, absolute perfection, you're going to have to divide a small number of the nerves, what percentage, it's still unclear. But just to get the prostate to remove out of its slot, there's some nerves that are sitting across the prostate. And so you're going to have a decrease in erection. And so that's why I send a lot of my guys over to Jesse and his team in order to prehab them and also help them post-operatively in maintaining their erectile function.

32:30And he's got a great kind of a protocol to help guys really, really have a, you know, it's a part of survivorship, but it's a really, really important part. And they feel like they're well counseled. And I think it's a real huge service that we provide here.

33:10For sure. Yeah, I think what it has a beautiful analogy, actually, I like the fiber optics. I say it's, you know, the technical term is a neuropraxia, where no matter what you do, you're going to get a little zinger to that nerve. And when you neuropraxia, a nerve that controls the smooth muscle contractility of the penis, then it's not going to contract for a little while. And that's the goal is to steward guys through that time period where you're zinging those nerves and waiting for them to essentially not even grow back, but just get back to normal function. That's a beautiful, beautiful way to describe that.

33:46And now we have some degree of imaging or ways to know, you know, what, I mean, the fact that you even explained all of that is, you know, in the old days, with loops or with magnification, you could see kind of the main branches of those nerves. And, but now you really are able to visualize even those, some of those tiniest little fibers, which is just, I mean, as a surgeon, as somebody trained to do radical prosthetics, they haven't done one for close to 20 years. It's just beautiful. I mean, I hate to say, I don't like the word beautiful when it comes to anatomy and cancer, but it's pretty amazing.

34:22It's great. And there's, you know, there's a lot of this is built on the back of some of the imaging technologies that we have. So that's PSMA, micro ultrasound, MRI, and building these models to help us understand exactly where the cancers are in relation to the nerves. There's also this unfortunate reality that the cancer cells kind of use the nerve cells as a ladder to escape the prostate often. And so you can have the cancers that grow in proximity to the nerves. there's some reasonable data to suggest that there's actually nerve fiber factors that are almost calling to the cancer cells and pulling them out.

35:02And so you have to be very careful in doing the nerve spare that it's appropriate, but it can be very, very well done. And we have some really awesome imaging technologies to help us understand exactly when it's appropriate. I liked what you said earlier about, you know, I call this a hierarchy of survivorship. And you alluded to it, and it's going to segue into us, you know, walking us through the radiation treatment, which, of course, neither of us are radiation oncologists, but we know our way around it pretty well. But I talk about this, and I know you talk about it as well, but the three C's of cancer therapies are, you know, everybody wants the first C is going to be cure or cancer control.

35:44Second is going to be continence. And then third is going to be coitus. And usually in that order, although I've had a few guys that say, doc, I want to be, I want to, I want to have coitus well before continence. I don't care. Just give me my erections back. But, but usually in the, in the way of how things recover, continence usually comes on, on board a little faster than, than coitus with, with radical prostatectomy. But, but is that, is that sort of the way that you're, and you said it in a great way is that you're, you know, we're, you have curative intent here. We're going to do everything we can.

36:14You're probably going to be okay, even with this intermediate cancer, because we caught it early. So walk us through a little bit of what radiation looks like for a guy, but also who is a 55-year-old guy different than, say, a 70-year-old guy in terms of what you would say surgery versus radiation. And think of the 70-year-old guy as somebody that's going to be running the New York Marathon, has longevity, and tell us about who those guys are and yeah just let her rip on radiation for a little bit sure yeah no so radiation i want i want to say that i'm a surgeon i don't do radiation and so um but uh i have excellent radiation oncology colleagues i do help with the brachytherapy portions of things and then from an academic standpoint i'm very interested in in how we help guys understand their choices and make sure that they get the best results that as we said that mirror what their expectations are So radiation, you should know, is a phenomenal option for guys.

37:12And for 3 plus 4 prostate cancer, even in guys who are 55, this is still a very good option. Now, there's some nuances that you'll hear about. And so I just want to address them to make sure that they're addressed here. So one of the things that you will hear about with radiation is that radiation always needs anti-testosterone therapy. There's a couple of terms that get thrown around. The most common one is androgen deprivation therapy, ADT. The idea behind this is, you know, radiation, what is it? Well, it's a bunch of either photons or protons that come in and they break DNA. Okay, so they break DNA and they separate them.

37:49And then cells that are dividing fast rely on those DNA as a blueprint. Now, cancer divides fast. So that's a preferential cancer cure. So if anybody is ever wondering, like, hey, is there any, like, thing we can do that preferentially kills the cancer and leaves the normal cells behind, radiation is that. That's what radiation is. It preferentially kills cancer and leaves the normal cells behind. However, your cells can repair themselves. That's what they do. And so testosterone is one of the mediated mechanisms by which cells repair themselves. And so with cancer, especially if the cancer is aggressive, we think that anti-testosterone therapy, also called ADT, will help make sure that radiation works and is durable.

38:32so that the cancers don't just come back after they've had a chance to repair themselves. However, risk stratification, what type of cancer you have going forward, is very important. And so if you have intermediate risk prostate cancer, you probably don't need the endogen deprivation therapy. So that's a really nice out because you don't have to have that in conjunction. Now, if you have the more aggressive tumor subtypes, you probably need to add some ADT. And if you really have aggressive tumors, you probably need to add a lot of ADT. So that's an important caveat because when we're having this conversation of surgery, radiation, ADT, it gets kind of muddy.

39:07But what I will say is radiation and surgery often do very good jobs of killing the cancer. If you're going to do radiation, oftentimes you can do it in about five treatments. Okay, so there's a lot of radiation options. One is photons, which would be, it's called, if you just think about beam-based radiation, this is regular radiation. The other is protons, and protons kind of come in and then they degrade. Instead of coming through, they almost degrade. And you can think about it as the main benefit of the proton is it comes in and then it doesn't have an exit wound, right? It doesn't hit anything on the other side.

39:47So that's a benefit of protons. photons they do but go all the way through the tissue and then they come out the other side but one of the benefits of proton or photons is they can be guided with mri at this point and so the the margins are super tight and they can do a very very nice job they can also compress the number of fractions and so the initial treatments that we would give guys for radiation would be 40 treatments and so be several months of treatments mondays through friday and then they started experimenting because the technology at aiming got so much better. We started going to hypo fractionation, which was 20 treatments.

40:25And then the technologies continued to improve. And now we have ultra hypo fractionation, also called SBRT. And this is a beam that only takes five treatments, and that's two weeks of radiation. And it's from our initial comparative studies, it appears that they work just as well as far as cancer control and side effect profile. So you can really, it's not your grandfather's radiation any longer. It's very, very aiming at the prostate is very good. And the number of treatments has decreased considerably. And it's still Monday through Friday because there's a radiation oncologist always tell us cancer doesn't grow on weekends.

41:01You know, I don't operate on weekends either, but that's... There you go. That's right. Yeah. My mom's oncologist told us that years ago when I was just applying for medical school and She was going through radiation therapy. I got you. I don't know how I ended up in urology if I realized that. But yes, it's truly actually close to miraculous in terms of the amount of time saved. Because this guy's 55. He's working. So to go to radiation for 40 treatments, five days a week. So you're there for two months. And LA traffic alone, that would say, gosh, tell me something else. because I'm going to take a half day off work every time I do this.

41:43I mean, I'd definitely go into Wayne's OR. Just get it done. Let me take a couple weeks off. But now the time and the opportunity cost has changed pretty dramatically with some of these novel therapies for radiation. And cure rates are the same and side effect rates are the same with SBRT versus traditional radiation. So what you're getting for, you know, we talked about surgical side effects. And I will say surgery, you know, it does have side effects. they tend to get better over time. So that's with the urinary control, you know, three months is kind of your benchmark there. And then usually it's about 12 months, your erections are slowly getting better for 12 months.

42:19And we do optimize that curve with some of these prehab and posthab that Jesse's been working on at UCLA. That said, radiation, you're going to get similar styles of side effects, but just a bit a different twist on them. So from a urinary standpoint, you know, So radiation kills things that grow fast. Well, what grows fast around the prostate? Well, the cancer. We said the cancer grows fast, so it kills the cancer very nicely. The urethra and the bladder also have a lining, a waterproofing layer that grows very fast. And so this results in what we call kind of a radiation cystitis. That's a very technical term, but basically it hurts to pee.

43:01And you can think about this as a sunburn in your bladder is the best kind of analogy I can come up with. with. It's not forever, but it is a transient thing where if you get, if you ever get a bad sunburn on your skin, you could think about, well, what would, what would it cost? Well, it hurts if you move, right? So if you, if you have to move the skin, it hurts. So as your bladder fills, that's your bladder moving. So you'd want to pee more often. So it'd be urgency, okay? And frequency. You'd want to pee more often. The second thing is you'd also have some pain, right? Because sunburns hurt.

43:35And that's the same thing. You have burning with urination that's called dysuria. And so urgency, frequency, and dysuria are common, not durable. Often, you know, same kind of three months, they get spicy for about six weeks and then gets better. But just like in surgery, I said, my urinary control outcomes in my personal series are very good. But in radiation, the vast majority guys get better, but there's a couple of guys who will have really, really bad urinary side effects where these kind of last for a long period of time. Thankfully, we do have tests to help determine who those guys might be.

44:10I think about it as kind of evaluating how pale you are in your bladder. Because, you know, I'm very pale. I love surfing. But I go in the middle and very early morning so the sun is not up yet. And so I can avoid getting sunburned. But this is a test where you can kind of determine how likely are you to get a radiation burn. And so the radiation oncologist will use that to determine, And can they give you these really, really hypofractionated doses or do they need to extend it out so you get a little bit of a dose each day? That's a tool. Or do you – has it ever changed decision making for somebody to go toward surgery because of that?

44:42You know, it can. It can. So I tell guys, you know, if you already – we have guys like who come in and they're in their 50s and they say, you know, in my 40s I was doing okay. But now I pretty much pee before every meeting just to make sure that I can get it all out. And I get up two to three times a night. Those are guys who might have a lot of trouble with radiation. And we just chat about that because they're already having urinary urgency and frequency. And so this could be a really compounding effect. Occasionally, they'll say, you know, I'll take the risk. But it's important consideration.

45:19consideration the other thing that i tell guys is there's some anatomic considerations so if some prostates grow pretty significantly into the bladder and for the radiation oncologist to treat the entire prostate they're going to have to extend the radiation field into the bladder quite a bit and that can be pretty significant cause some significant toxicity yeah well and also you know when you i love your sunburn analogy as all of your analogies are so well thought out and easy to visualize. And so I would take you if you get a really bad sunburn, you also peel. And when your bladder peels, you can get hematuria or blood in the urine as well.

45:56Sometimes we have to go in and do something about. So severe cases, which I will tell you, you know, somebody that still takes call as a general urologist, I'm not seeing as much as I used to. Yeah, no, definitely. I think radiation cystitis, because for severe cases, we even have to go in and actually kind of burn the bleeding spots in the bladder from that sunburn peel from radiation. Sometimes we even have to use hyperbaric oxygen to cure, but it seems as if our radiation colleagues have done a really good job of mitigating those risks. And it sounds like also stratifying the right patient.

46:27Well, let me ask you this. You had your guy or my guy who I sent to you, 55, three plus four, because I probably conservatively start 3 ,000 men a year on testosterone therapy in this city. There's a good chance that that guy is on testosterone. So if, if you said, Dr. Brisbane, whatever you do, you know, you're going to have to pry this testosterone syringe out of my cold dead hand. Yeah, sure. Yeah. Are you going to say, well, look, then why don't you just, let's do surgery, keep on your testosterone therapy versus if I did radiation, not only am I going to pull that syringe out of your hand, but I'm also going to probably have to take your testosterone down for six months, two years, depending on the protocols, somewhere in between.

47:14Would that guide your management of this patient if he was actively on testosterone therapy? I mean, yeah. And we share patients. This is not a hypothetical for a lot of our patients. This is tomorrow for us. Exactly. So these are guys who are saying, I have cancer. Getting on my hormone replacement is very important to me. And I want to make sure that this is optimized. and in some ways surgery can be a good option, it starts getting back into this recurrence issue. And I think that this is another thing that's very important is to say, well, if cancer comes back in the prostate after radiation, what are our options?

47:55And we actually have a lot of options. And one of the nice things about the emergence of focal therapy is we have now a lot of options. And it's almost another – that's a completely other conversation. But guys should know if they get radiation, they have recurrence. There are good options for them. The testosterone while they're getting treatment is oftentimes removed. I've actually – my radiation oncology colleagues get very nervous about actively getting TRT through their radiation treatment. Yeah, it makes sense based on what you just taught us. Yeah. But for surgery, we don't have that concern.

48:26Like if they want to continue the radiation or their hormone therapy, oftentimes they'll take a hiatus between the diagnosis and their treatment just because they're nervous about it, which is totally fine. But from a biological standpoint, that cancer has been growing under TRT up to that point. I don't have much of an issue having once the surgery is done, it should be it should be done. Now, if the cancer comes back outside the prostate at a later date, that would obviously be a time where we'd have to turn off their their testosterone. But within the prostate, the whole prostate is coming out.

48:55The cells that are cancerous should be coming out as well. So that that should be OK. Yeah. So, Jordan, we've got Dr. Brisbane here. We're kind of wrapping up this trilogy. We have our patient who has four real options for treatment with his degree of prostate cancer and over from active surveillance through some kind of focal therapy, through surgery, through radiation. What are your thoughts? What did we miss? You've had family members that have gone through cancer therapy, and you've got a bit of a personal connection to this. So tell me your thoughts and what we can get out of Dr. Brisbane before I run off to the operating room and he runs off to cure more cancer.

49:33So you were literally in scrubs right now. I just, this is one of those moments when I wish that the listeners could see what I can see right now. No, I mean, this was an extremely optimistic conversation about a very scary, serious topic. And that's the sort of general sense as the every person, lay person listening in right now that I'm leaving with. And the thing that I'm really glad you touched on and I kind of maybe want to leave listeners with is, as you just said, cancer of unknown origin runs in my immediate family. And it's been kind of a shadow over my life with a lot of hypervigilance, this thing, you know, I didn't know when and where it was going to appear.

50:13So for me, as soon as there was any trace of it discovered, my initial knee jerk reaction would be get it out immediately. You know, I want this gone sort of hear. And so I kind of want to go back to what you're saying about, you know, okay, sit with it for six months. If this is really ruined in your life, we can go in that direction. But I just thought that was such a fascinating take because me, somebody who has lived in fear of this for most of their adult life, that's not the most obvious response. And so I was very fascinated And very heartened, by the way, to hear you say that, that this is not, you know, something that was immediately a death sentence.

50:58It's probably going to be okay. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. And that's kind of what I wanted to leave the listeners with. Yeah. No, I think that, you know, it gets back into risk stratification. So to be clear, there are prostate cancers that are very aggressive and we need to be very aggressive in response. So, but I also tell my patients that, you know, we should tailor your therapy to the aggressiveness of your cancer. Or the funny way to say that is we should treat the cancer how it's asking to be treated. And so if it's an aggressive tumor, we need to mirror that by being aggressive. If it's a non-aggressive tumor, we need to mirror that by not being aggressive.

51:33But the vast majority of prostate cancers are less aggressive. And so I think that that's an important consideration is, you know, patients need to say, I have cancer. But what type? What flavor? and is my treatment effectively mirroring the cancer aggression and is the side effect profile that I'm being offered consistent with my goals? And then, you know, you should be able to achieve what you want. As Sean Connery said, don't bring a knife to a gunfight. That's right. I love it. Well, Dr. Brisbane, you delivered on the mailroom, but before I let you go, you also are the pinnacle of men's health.

52:11You know, you're a dad, a husband, a researcher, a surgeon. I don't know how you do a barista. I don't know how you do all that you do in a day. But one thing I have to ask for all our listeners of all our guests is what do we learn from you that makes Wayne, Wayne? What do you have to do every day so that you can be this world-class surgeon, world-class researcher, and just all around, you know, amazing person? What is your must-have when you wake up in the morning? You're like, this is what I got. This is how I have to be me. Talk to me. Give me your tip. Yeah, sure. I mean, I drink a lot of coffee.

52:46Hell yeah. But I do work out, not every morning, but most mornings I work out. And I do it because it's fun. I'm not David Goggins. I do the things that I enjoy. So that's surfing. I go to a very bougie gym here in LA, and I sit in the steam room for at least half the time. So I enjoy myself. But that just makes me feel good for the rest of the day. I love it. Inhaling a eucalyptus towel. I'm getting chills. I was at that bougie gym last night. Yeah, there's something about that. That's nice. Wayne, I'm grateful. I mean, yeah, I really put you to the test. I've never had a guy on for three consecutive episodes, but this is such an important topic.

53:30Yeah. There's some super exciting clinical trials undergoing with optimizing how we diagnose prostate cancer early. And this gets to the point is, can we screen for things? And if If you can screen for things and find them early, prostate cancer is one of those very curable diseases. The problem is, you know, we tend not to find the more aggressive cancers until it's too late. And we find some of these non-aggressive cancers when they never need to be found. You know, when guys hear advanced or metastatic prostate cancer these days, they're picturing what it used to be like years ago. And, you know, it's just not really the case anymore.

54:06It's not the conversation I want to have. You know, we've got guys living full, active lives, and they're on these hormones for years, and they're still kind of doing what they need to do, right? And a lot of these PSMA treatments, even some of those guys who would be considered advanced metastatic diseases, they still qualify for some of these precision options based on their genetics. And so even those guys have hope, right? And I think that's the thing that we have to take home from this is that there is still a lot of hope. and we're really changing the way that we think about prostate cancer and a lot of former what we'd almost consider death sentence cancers into chronic diseases i mean that's huge so even though we can't say hey this is a cure we can say we got this you know this is something that we can manage and hope that guys can optimize however many years they have left but but that's the way we're looking at it now is kind of years right not just oh man that's it end of the line so so i think that's an important thing for guys to think about is if they get this diagnosis, they just have to know that that toolbox is a lot bigger than it was even five years ago.

55:09I know you had the team from Grail out. That's very exciting. And then we're also in a similar vein using genetic proclivity here at the UCLA's Institute for Precision Health to see if that is a better way. We're using imaging in novel ways to screen. And then for those guys who are unlucky and get a diagnosis with advanced disease, we now have multiple medications. Two at least of them have come out of UCLA. And some of our efforts with the PSMA drug therapies have also been pioneered here. So obviously a shameless plug. This is a great place to get your cancer care. It's amazing. I mean, it gives me chills to think about it and just the luminaries we have in the field, you included.

55:58So, Wayne, thanks so much. Get out under the waves. Be you. And Jordan, thanks again for a fantastic episode. Thanks to our listeners for tuning in and caring about this. And again, this is a podcast for men and the people that love those men. So if you're listening and you have a brother, a father, a son, go out, talk to them about this and make sure that they know their numbers are getting some kind of access to care. So thanks, everybody. We'll listen to you next time.

56:43Let's talk about it. Let's talk about it in the mailroom. Let's talk about it. Let's talk about it in the mailroom. The Mailroom with Dr. Jesse Mills was a production of iHeartRadio. It was executive produced by Jordan Runtog. If you liked what you heard, please subscribe and leave a review. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, check out the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. This program was independently created by iHeartRadio. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation is the exclusive advertising partner. It is intended for educational and informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.

57:31Please consult your health care provider for any medical or related questions or concerns before making any treatment decisions. The views and discussions aired on this podcast for those of Dr. Mills and his guests and do not represent the official positions of UCLA or UCLA Health.

From the publisher

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from The Male Room with Dr. Jesse Mills

All 53 episodes
Prostate Cancer (Part 3): Surgery, Radiation, and the Reality of Side EffectsThe Male Room with Dr. Jesse Mills · 57 min
Listen in VO