In short
A live Bloomberg Weekend bonus episode marking 10 years since the UK voted to leave the EU, debating Brexit’s political and economic effects and what the UK–EU relationship should look like in the future.
Guests
Alastair Campbell, longtime Labour figure and former Downing Street communications chief under Tony Blair; Jacob Rees-Mogg, Conservative MP and prominent Brexit campaigner.
Key claims
Rees-Mogg argues Brexit support was underestimated, the UK has benefited economically via “economic freedoms” and faster services/invisible trade, and that Remain’s post-referendum campaigning was a mistake. Campbell argues Brexit caused “catastrophic” economic damage (citing productivity, lower GDP, and small firms stopping EU trade), that Brexit was driven by “lies” and lack of a plan, and that Labour failed to confront the consequences. They also clash over whether Brexit increased multi-party politics and whether a future EU rejoin referendum is likely.
Notable examples
Bloomberg Economics estimate of 2–4% GDP loss; audience polling showing near-unanimous “failure” views; discussion of Erasmus/Turing costs, UK regulation roll-over, and “early vaccine” as a disputed point.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOSetting the Stage for the Brexit Debate
0:30 to 1:24
The significance of the 10-year anniversary of Brexit is discussed.
“When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track.”
Setting the Stage for the Brexit Debate
1:29 to 2:04
The significance of the 10-year anniversary of Brexit is discussed.
“Most people see a busy dog salon, but I see operational excellence.”
Setting the Stage for the Brexit Debate
3:00 to 4:07
The significance of the 10-year anniversary of Brexit is discussed.
“The premise of this podcast, the promise, if you like, of what we do every week, is one essential conversation to make sense of the world.”
Political and Economic Impact of Brexit
4:07 to 5:13
Exploring the implications of Brexit on politics and the economy.
“They are Jacob Rees-Mogg and Alistair Campbell, who came into our London office to speak to an audience of Bloomberg subscribers.”
Reflections on the 2016 Referendum Campaign
5:13 to 7:16
Jacob and Alastair reflect on the 2016 Brexit referendum campaign.
“and also your views on the future and what could or should be the future of the UK's relationship with the EU.”
Debating the Economic Consequences of Brexit
7:16 to 10:01
A back-and-forth on the economic impacts of Brexit over the past decade.
“Jacob, do you mind if we stick to Brexit?”
Controversies and Claims of Lies
10:01 to 11:20
Alistair and Jacob discuss accusations of dishonesty surrounding Brexit.
“OK, that's a very rare view that you think overall there's been a net economic positive.”
Political Landscape Shaped by Brexit
11:20 to 14:00
Analyzing how Brexit has affected the UK's political parties and their fortunes.
“given that today the UK is still under OECD projections, projected to be the third fastest growing economy in the G7?”
The Political Impact of Brexit
14:00 to 17:46
A debate on the political repercussions of Brexit over the past decade.
“This aspect of it for a moment, because we can both see that you're never going to agree on a common set of numbers, and they are entitled to not agreeing on a common set of numbers.”
Economic Challenges Post-Brexit
17:55 to 18:59
Discussion on the economic implications of Brexit and public sentiment.
“Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC.”
Show all 19 chapters
Economic Challenges Post-Brexit
19:04 to 19:18
Discussion on the economic implications of Brexit and public sentiment.
“Cards are issued by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., member FDIC.”
Debating the Future of UK-EU Relations
19:18 to 28:00
A thorough examination of potential future relationships between the UK and EU.
“We're going to talk in detail about the future a bit later.”
The Future of Europe Post-Brexit
28:00 to 29:53
Discussing the potential changes in Europe and the implications for the UK post-Brexit.
“they have looked at the damage we've done to ourselves and said, no, this is not the way to go.”
Brexit's Impact on UK Politics
29:53 to 31:54
Exploring how Brexit has influenced multi-party politics and voter sentiment in the UK.
“And I could point past the ninth saying that actually the European Union is the apostate state and is eternally damned.”
Brexit and Political Regeneration
31:54 to 34:27
Evaluating the economic predictions for Brexit and the future political landscape in the UK.
“Because I actually think people who vote, a lot of people who voted for Brexit are disappointed that that hasn't delivered a better life for them.”
The Rise of Populism and Political Stability
34:27 to 36:37
Debating the rise of populism in Europe and its implications for the UK's political system.
“None of them deliver a comparable boost to the economy compared to the assessment on how much has been lost to GDP.”
Visions for the Future Relationship with the EU
36:37 to 38:06
Discussing differing visions for the UK's future relationship with the EU by 2036.
“It's 2036, and we are all gathered again to mark 20 years since Brexit.”
Visions for the Future Relationship with the EU
39:36 to 40:07
Discussing differing visions for the UK's future relationship with the EU by 2036.
“When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track.”
Visions for the Future Relationship with the EU
40:11 to 41:01
Discussing differing visions for the UK's future relationship with the EU by 2036.
“Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00So there's a lot of noise about AI, but time's too tight for more promises. So let's talk about results. At IBM, we work with our employees to integrate technology right into the systems they need. Now, a global workforce of 300 ,000 can use AI to fill their HR questions, resolving 94 % of common questions. Not noise. Proof of how we can help companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business. IBM. When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, that isn't always easy.
0:38Risk can touch multiple parts of an organization at the same time, often in ways that aren't immediately obvious. It might involve property, liability, or cyber. It could stem from regulatory requirements or challenges tied to a specific industry or the scale of an operation. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline, not a one-time decision. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. That means working with companies to identify where they're exposed, decide what matters most, and put practical standards in place so risk is managed as part of day-to-day operations.
1:14And when losses do happen, the Hartford can pair that risk control work with insurance coverage grounded in underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience developed over time. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation. Dog grooming genius here. Most people see a busy dog salon, but I see operational excellence. Thanks to genius from Global Payments. Scheduling? Personalized. Checkouts? Instant. Absolutely genius. From game day crowds to every groomer in this shop, genius keeps everything flowing seamlessly. Schnauzer is styled. Flawless execution. Big league reliability for any business.
1:56That's genius.
2:00Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. Does it have any impact upon you that these reasonably intelligent group of people actually think that what you inflicted upon the country has damaged the country? What I think is that the British people voted for it. Yes, they voted for it based upon... And we should respect a democratic result, which you have never wanted to do. It was a day that changed Britain and Europe. And 10 years on, Alastair Campbell and Jacob Rees-Mogg go head-to-head on Brexit. Do you think that Brexit has led us to the much more multi-party politics that we are in now?
2:39One of the reasons for Brexit is that people felt Whoever they voted for, nothing changed. Very little has changed in the 10 years since. And now they're looking at other parties. A lot of people who voted for Brexit are disappointed that that hasn't delivered a better life for them. From Bloomberg Weekend, this is The Michelle Hussain Show. I'm Michelle Hussain.
3:05The premise of this podcast, the promise, if you like, of what we do every week, is one essential conversation to make sense of the world. But sometimes there's more to talk about. Today is the 10-year anniversary of the UK voting to leave the European Union. An enormous decision. And one that contributed to the unprecedented churn in the number of prime ministers since. A phenomenon that's continuing right now, given the resignation of Keir Starmer. So what did Brexit do to the UK's politics as well as its economy? The 10-year milestone gives us an opportunity to reflect on just that, to look forward as well as back.
3:54And for this bonus episode, we decided to bring together two people on both sides of the debate who feel as strongly about Brexit now as they did back in 2016. They are Jacob Rees-Mogg and Alistair Campbell, who came into our London office to speak to an audience of Bloomberg subscribers. Quick final note before we hear them. If you want to be in the room for one of these in the future, there is a link to subscription offers in our show notes. And here's what happened when Jacob and Alistair joined me on stage.
4:37Welcome. Now, some of you will remember that it was at Bloomberg, not in this building in our old headquarters, where David Cameron made the fateful pledge that he was in favour of having an in-out referendum on the EU. Ten years ago, Jacob Rees-Mogg, you were a Conservative MP. You campaigned to leave the EU. Alistair Campbell, you were very much on the other side in 2016, but people knew you already from your work with Tony Blair in Downing Street. In the time we have, I want to look back at the economic impact and the political impact of Brexit in the last 10 years, and also your views on the future and what could or should be the future of the UK's relationship with the EU.
5:20So, first of all, as the results came in in June 2016, what did you not appreciate that we now know? Jacob? Well, the one thing I didn't appreciate was that the Remain side, who'd been quite passive in the referendum campaign, would start campaigning much harder after the result than they had done before. Very fair point. Whereas my side thought we'd won and stopped. And that was a mistake by our side and fascinating by the other side. And that's had very important consequences because since then you've had much more from people who think it was a mistake. I think the reason they started campaigning after the result was they never thought they would lose.
6:01And they thought it was just a few eccentrics like me who were in favour of it and that nobody would in fact vote for it. I thought at the time we would win because the more I got away from central London, the clearer it became that there was a very large base of support for Brexit. So that was the one big thing that I have noticed is the difference in campaigning since the result. Alistair? Well, when you were asking the question, the thing that popped into my head was I was in ITV studio. Tom Bradby was sitting there sort of talking about this, that and the other. And at the very moment when it came up that it is now impossible for Remain to win, I saw David Davis and Liam Fox look at each other with absolute panic in their eyes.
6:48The thing that really surprised me was that, and Jacob is right, by the way, the Remain campaign was terrible. I actually, I regret now, I didn't get that involved in the Remain campaign because Cameron and Osborne kept telling us, it's all fine, we're all going to, it's all fine, don't worry about it. I got involved subsequently and I was one of the few who admitted that the People's Vote campaign, to my mind, was probably the only vehicle we had left possibly to stop what I thought was a terrible act of self-harm. so I was open about that but I think what genuinely surprised me was there was just no plan there was no plan at all um the lies had been told the myths had been sold and and we had to pick up the pieces I do think Alistair Campbell of all people has to be careful about talking about lies considering his reputation well what's the reputation what's your reputation oh a high court judge in 1996 saying you're an unreliable witness That's quite a good part of your reputation, isn't it?
7:45Jacob, do you mind if we stick to Brexit? I think there's quite enough to get into on the Brexit side. I'm very happy to stick to Brexit, but Alistair brought up this question of lies. Well, you did lie. No, we didn't. You did. You lied. You drove a red bus with a pack full of lies. But I think if we're talking about lies, Alistair needs to look at his own record, because he has done more to damage trust in British politics than anybody else. This is the guy. And Peter Oborn has written a book about this. So if we wanted to, we could go through. We're getting all the old stuff. I would rather...
8:14But this is really important. I would rather that, given that I've set the parameters on, that we're going to talk about economic impact, political... Do you mind if we turn to economic impact, Jacob? As long as Alistair stops saying we lied, and then I won't talk about his lies. Well, I won't. Can we rest that point, Alistair? I think it would be better to talk about the economic impact. If you wait, we can spend the whole debate on Alistair's lies when he was in Darlene's. Can I tell you what Bloomberg economics analysis just released has been about the economic impact of the last 10 years, because this is just, you know, they've crunched the numbers as you'd expect.
8:44And in terms of the economic impact, this has been their finding that Brexit may have already cost the UK economy between two and four percent of GDP, that the central estimate is two and a half percent of GDP lost over the long run, which is equivalent to about 30 billion pounds a year in foregone annual tax revenue. How do you feel about that, Jacob? Well, the figures don't actually stack up. So if we look at the Bloomberg figure, which is, no, there are different ways of interpreting figures. So when you look at how the UK economy has done, actually, we've outperformed Germany, we've performed broadly in line with France.
9:20Why, if we'd remained in the EU, would we have performed as the outliers did? Let me put it in broader terms. Do you accept that there has been any economic hit at all in the last 10 years compared to where the UK would have been had it remained in the EU? I think using our economic freedoms has actually helped us. And if you look at our trade... Is that a yes or a no? Well, it's a complete answer, if you give me a moment. If you look at our trade, our invisible trade, our services trade, has been roaring ahead. And I think that's been partly possible. You've seen our trade with India increase very rapidly and invisibles.
9:53Because we're outside the European Union, we're no longer confined by its rules. So has that been an overall... I think it's been beneficial. I think it's been beneficial. OK, that's a very rare view that you think overall there's been a net economic positive. It's been beneficial to us, yes. OK. And not least, because we got the vaccine early, so we opened up. That's another lie. That's another lie. No, it's not. That's another lie. No, I'm just talking in terms of GDP. Hang on. But the early vaccine that our economy opened up earlier than the other ones we've done. Let me just say, Jacob says he doesn't want to leave.
10:21I'm not going to leave this lying thing because it is part of... All right, well, let's go back to the lying thing. I've got some papers on this. I'm sure you have. I've brought a nice record of lying to select committees of the House of Commons. And I've heard them all. of sexing up a document you may remember. Can I just finish the point? Well, you want to talk about lies. No, I want to explain to this public, you have got a list there. You can't point out a single lie to me. You have got a list there. I can point out a whole history of lying to you. Hang on for a second. They do not want to talk about the substance because they are so deluded in still thinking Grex has been anything other.
10:51I'm more than happy to talk about the substance. You have made every single person in this room poorer. Well, that's just not true. It is true. You've made every single person in this country poorer. Simply, we opened the economy earlier. because we had the vaccine first. By the lies that you told. No, this is justice. And you will never accept it. You're the one who destroyed trust in the British government by the lies you told over Iraq. Jacob, let me ask Alistair Campbell the same question that I put to you about the economic impact of the last 10 years. I'll give you a few more facts than he gave you.
11:16Well, would you accept that the economic impact has not been as bad as you thought, given that today the UK is still under OECD projections, projected to be the third fastest growing economy in the G7? I think that the economic consequences of Brexit have been catastrophic. I think that you've given a conservative end. If you take some of the other assessments that we're up to 8%, between 6 % and 8 % hit on the economy, we now have small firms that write to me all the time who have literally given up trying to trade with the European Union because of the red tape that these liars said they would cut by leaving Brussels, that they've now given up trading with business.
12:00Productivity is lower than it would be. Our GDP is lower than it would be. And what's more, we could double, we've got a security crisis at the moment. If we, to my argument, had not left the European Union, we could currently double defence spending and increase the National Health Service by 50 % without touching any taxes. If everything that you're saying is true, then why are we projected to be the third fastest growing economy I mean, the G7 this year. I've never been one of those anti-Brexit people who thinks that the European Union is some kind of panacea or some sort of... Europe is not in a good place.
12:37Europe's competitiveness is too low. But we, in wrenching ourselves out of the biggest market in the world, we have done fundamental damage to every single person and business in this country. OK, first of all, these figures are just wrong. The 8 % is a joke figure and assumes that we would have grown as the United States has grown. The United States has grown faster because it's got cheap energy. We have grown faster than Germany. What part of being in the EU would have allowed us to grow even faster than we have when its anchor economy has been failing? I'm relying. The productivity question is mainly a question in the public sector, whereas the private sector productivity has been marginally increasing and the public sector doesn't export to the European Union.
13:23I'm relying on the analysis done by the government by this government and the last government that has been tracked that we have taken a substantial... And I'm going to refer everyone here to the Bloomberg Economics Analysis, which has a wide range and where everyone can see the basis of the figures. But I think Alistair should just explain how the OBR came to its 4 % figure. I'm not talking about the OBR. Well, that's the key figure. The OBR's 4 % figure. No, it's not. That was a forecast. You've got your notes. I've got my notes. That was a forecast by the OBR. It's the National Bureau of Economic Research.
13:53But that's not... It is based on... The 8 % figure depends on Ireland. And I'm going to ask you both... But the Irish economy has just fallen by 12 % because of tariffs and pharmaceuticals. This aspect of it for a moment, because we can both see that you're never going to agree on a common set of numbers, and they are entitled to not agreeing on a common set of numbers. Let's turn to the political impact of the last 10 years. It's been a total triumph. Do you... Hasn't it? Both of you... Absolute triumph. Both of you... We're more respected in the world. You're associated. We've got a great special relationship.
14:23working for the two parties which have dominated our politics for the last century. Do you accept that both of their political fortunes have suffered because of Brexit? Alistair, do you accept that for Labour? Yes, and I'll tell you why. Because they haven't fought hard enough to make sure the public fully understands the calamity that was inflicted upon us by these people. And they've tried to accept. One of, I think, Keir Starmer's mistakes was this idea that we're going to make Brexit work. You can change things at the margins and they've tried very hard to do that with some of the veterinary agreements with Erasmus and so forth But they have they don't want to address the fundamental question and You know am I allowed to ask the audience a question for show of hands?
15:08I'd like to know because I you know, you can read polls You can read all the stats and voice of it Can I just ask the people in this room who thinks I'll be very very neutral? Success or failure for the United Kingdom who thinks breaks it has been a success for the United Kingdom? Who thinks it's been a failure? To explain, no one in the audience raised their hands when Alistair asked if Brexit was a success. Nearly everyone had raised their hands for failure. You get that, Jacob, you can live in your dream world. You get that everywhere in the country, everywhere. If I'd been here in the year of the referendum and we'd said who wants to leave and who wants to stay, we'd have had exactly the same.
15:44No, you would, not at all. I found that every yard I went from the centre of the City of London, you got more supporters for Brexit. I knew we were going to... If we went to Lincolnshire, if we went to Cornwall, and I really did find this during the debates because I went anywhere that invited me to speak. And the closer you were to the centre of the city, the heart of the city, the more anti-Brexit it was. So that doesn't surprise me at all that you get that... Does it have any impact upon you? These reasonably intelligent group of people actually think that what you inflicted upon the country has damaged the country?
16:15What I think is that the British people voted for it. Yes, they voted for it. We should respond if I can revisit this thing. Which you have never wanted to do. I've never wanted to do, no.
16:29The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks and free thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM. Support for the show comes from public.com. If you're actively involved in your portfolio, you probably catch yourself repeating the same actions, buying the dip, manually sweeping idle cash, putting on a hedge.
17:10On public, you can now create AI agents that handle all these tasks on your behalf. Just describe what you want to do in plain English. Like, if the VIX hits 25, buy a put option on the S &P 500. Or, if my cash balance goes above$20 ,000, move the excess into my direct index. You approve of the workflow, and your agent handles the rest. Monitoring the market, watching for your conditions, and executing your strategies exactly as defined. An investing platform driven by your intent, not just your clicks. You can also get full read and write access to your account via the public API. Go to public.com slash market and fund your account in five minutes or less.
17:52That's public.com slash market. Paid for by Public Investing. Brokered services by Open to the Public Investing, Inc., member FINRA and SIPC. Advisory services by Public Advisors, LLC, SEC Registered Advisor. Complete disclosures available at public.com slash disclosures. When you own your own business, you own every decision. Now own the card that rewards you for it. The Chase Sapphire Reserve for Business card brings the best Sapphire Reserve benefits to business owners who expect hardworking rewards. Designed to meet the needs of business owners at scale, this pay-in-full card elevates your travel experience and offers premium benefits and value toward business services that will take your business to the next level.
18:32Fuel your business and maximize rewards with 8x points on all purchases through Chase Travel, 3x points on social media and search engine advertising, annual partnership credits, and more. Make every journey more rewarding with a$300 annual travel credit and access to a network of airport lounges, whether you're looking for pre-flight productivity or time to rest and recharge. Chase Sapphire Reserve for Business. It's the card that gives back all you put in. Learn more at chase.com forward slash reserve business. Chase for business. Make more of what's yours. Accounts subject to credit approval.
19:08Restrictions and limitations apply. Cards are issued by JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., member FDIC.
19:17I'm going to bring in some polling by Ipsos. We're going to talk in detail about the future a bit later. But as a sense of where polling stands right now, over half of British adults would vote to rejoin the EU if a new referendum was held. Although that 52%, Alistair, is probably not as large a majority as you would hope for if things have been such a disaster in the last 10 years. I think an awful lot of people just do not want to revisit the debate. I do want to revisit the debate. And I think it's a debate that has to be had. But I meet lots of people who completely buy my analysis of what's happened, but actually just do not want to revisit the debate.
19:57And I'm afraid that's where I think the Labour government's got itself into as well. But that's not the question in that, is it? It's like if a vote was held, 52 % would apply to join the EU, would like to see the UK apply to rejoin the European Union. Yeah, but you're talking, I mean, 52%, 33%, if you're looking at that as an electoral thing, you'd call that a landslide. But look, I don't think until there is a debate, nobody here, nobody in this room thinks that we are going to have a referendum in the near future. Okay, I would like there to be one. I don't actually think we're going to have one for some time.
20:30And two reasons. One is I don't think the political debate wants it here. But secondly, while we've got the prospect of people like Jacob getting into bed with people like Nigel Farage and Nigel Farage possibly coming in the government, the European Union is not going to think about having us back. Because this debate, this is the triumph that Jacob can take some comfort in, given his views of the world. Until the country is settled in the view that we should be in the European Union, the European Union is not going to have us back. OK, before you answer that, Jacob, I want to take you back and put the same question to you that Alice answered a moment ago about Labour.
21:07So how the impact on your party, which fractured to some extent over Brexit and has been in power repeatedly since then. It's been very divisive for the Conservative Party since the early 1990s, that there's been a pro-European, anti-European wing. and that has made room for reform to grow out of the Conservative Party and led to a lot of divisions in the last government. Your party failed to actually handle Brexit properly. Alistair made the point that there was no plan for leaving. That was a deliberate policy decision of David Cameron and it seems to me it was a deeply irresponsible one that if you give the country a referendum and you're the Prime Minister you ought to think that you could lose.
21:48Did you have a plan as someone who was arguing for leave? I knew what I wanted to do but I wasn't in government. I was a backbench MP. And that was the difficulty. That's the difficulty with referendums, is that you don't have the party that wins the referendum then implementing the policy. You have the party that is in government doing it who may disagree with the referendum. And that was the position we got into, David Cameron going and Theresa May, who was a Remainer taking over. And so, yes, there were lots of ideas of what we should do when leaving, but we weren't the government of the day.
22:20We were just arguing for those points. But that gave them an extraordinary advantage, that leave could mean whatever any of the leavers said that it meant. And that's why there was such a catalogue of lies, because Johnson said one thing, Farage said another one, Michael Gove said another one. The lying experts back. I mean, listening to him on lies is like listening to King Herod on childcare. Well, I mean, I think you should get back, get into the modern world, Jacob. I know it's difficult for you, but I think that, and that's not an anti-historical point, The list of your Peter Oborn list is so debunked and so discredited.
22:54Have you sued him? I've never sued anybody in my life. So you haven't sued him? Unlike the right, I believe in free speech. Oh, OK. Now, if I can return to help Michelle. And footnoted. Try to put, oh, he's got footnotes in the book. Marvellous. Yes, referring to things that you said that turned out not to be true. I'll tell you something about the book that I would recommend. You should get this for your book club because this is what Brexit's actually about. Jacob's dad, William Rees-Mogg, wrote a brilliant book in 1997. Former editor of the Times newspaper. Former editor of the Times, called The Sovereign Individual.
Read the full transcript
23:27It was a guide to the rich and powerful about how to become more rich and more powerful. And it was written as a note to investors. And that is what you interviewed Elon Musk. That is what a lot of this is about. It is about the rich getting more rich, the powerful getting more powerful. and it's about people being conned by clever people like Jacob and clever people like Nigel Farage into voting for something that is fundamentally damaged. A man ago who weren't clever, the only ones who were clever, the ones who wanted to rejoin. My father believed that if everybody in the world got richer, the whole world got richer, that free trade added to growth.
24:01It's called trickle down. It is indeed. And there's very strong evidence for that. So I'm more than happy to defend my father and do a book club. But do you want me to come on to this chart? Because I think this is important. You can say something about this chart, yes? It's very yes-ministerish because it absolutely depends on the question you ask. So if you say this, would you like to rejoin the EU? Yes, you get a majority. Do you? Just from asking that question? I mean, there's 33 % of people who said no, we'll stay out of the EU. People always hanker for what they haven't got. But if you ask, would you like to join the euro?
24:35And would you like your contributions to go up on the latest budget proposals coming from Brussels to£36 billion a year, the answer's very different. When you say to people, do you want your trade rules made by a foreign country or international organisations, the answers are different. So yes, this is a headline figure, but it's not the full picture. And if we had a debate, where I agree with Alistair, it's unlikely that we will have the new referendum, I think this would all change during the course of the debate. Part of me is very perplexed that people like you from the Conservative Party, who essentially the ethos is to conserve institutions, to believe in representative government rather than the will of the people in this kind of format, that you ever thought that a referendum was the right way to make a big decision like this?
25:23There's something almost revolutionary about it. No, there isn't. Dicey sets out why he thinks the referendum should be the preferred way of making constitutional change after the 1911 Parliament Act. So you wouldn't object to another one then? I think referendum is the right way to make serious constitutional changes when you have a de facto unicameral system. So how long does the mandate for the 2016 one last? It's a good question. It's the same as the Scottish referendum. It's a generation is what has been said about Scotland. It's as the last one was. The last one was a decision for the best part of 50 years.
25:58There's got to be a clear desire for it. Now, I think that desire will grow. But at the same time, unless what I've realized since kind of being half in, half out of politics, unless within the political parliamentary system itself, there is real pressure for something, it's less likely to happen. And that's why I have been disappointed that Labour and the Lib Dems have basically kind of given up. They've given up almost in calling out the damage that's being done, which is why his side are allowed to sort of parrot the nonsense that they do. I disagree with the second half of that, but I don't disagree with the first half.
26:31I think there isn't an appetite to revisit this. But I'm also not sure the EU will exist in 20 years' time. It's got major financial problems. It's trying to increase its budget. It's got strains within it economically. And it's got strains within it culturally in relation to mass migration. Would you accept this, Alastair Campbell, that immigration was a big part of the debate in 2016? And since then, you can see that in so many other European countries. So, I mean, those tensions, they've been shown not to be unique. They weren't whipped up. They exist in other places because of the world that we're in.
27:10Yeah, but net migration trebled since the referendum, trebled. So where I accept... Under the prime minister that Jacob Hughes worked for. Under Boris Johnson. So what I accept, and this government actually has managed to get it down to a sort of more acceptable level. Over time, that could become damaging to our economy as we get older and older and older and we try to find the workers that we're going to need to look after us and so forth. But I think that the... Look, this is why I say the rest of Europe is facing a lot of the same challenges. Part of the problem with the Brexit debate has always been this sense of our sort of great British exceptionalism.
27:45We do these amazing big things like we're leaving the European Union. You watch, the French will follow and the Dutch will follow. None of them have followed. I don't think I ever said that. I'm not sure that was a major part of our debate. They have looked at us, including even the far right like Le Pen, they have looked at the damage we've done to ourselves and said, no, this is not the way to go. What I think is going to happen, so I don't talk about rejoin, I talk about join, because I think Europe has to change as well. And I... Tony Blair, your old boss, says that is not really an argument worth having right now, because the UK wouldn't do it from a position of strength, enter a negotiation.
28:19Well, that's because we've given up so much of the advantage. is we did have the rebate. We weren't in Schengen. We weren't in the euro. We've given up all that. We've given away so much. So are you accepting that if we joined, we'd have to take all that? I'm accepting that it would be a very, very difficult negotiation, which you've made a lot harder because of what was lost there. Okay, so Schengen, euro, and no rebate. No, I don't know, because I think it's going to be a very different Europe. No one's going to vote for that. I want to see a Europe that has Ukraine in it. I want to see a Europe that even has Turkey in it because of their military strength, which we're going to need, particularly as the Americans seem to be sort of, you know, deserting us on that front.
28:51I want to see Norway. Iceland's having a referendum coming up about whether to revisit. I think we've got to think of Europe not as, you know, and I would get rid of the whole kind of, you know, the power of the veto. We've got to have a very different Europe. But I think that the only, in fact, I made a note this morning because I've become a bit of a fan of the Pope since his encyclical on AI. I still don't do God, but he said yes. You all have to have that in common then, Jacob, being a Catholic. I've read the Father's encyclical on AI. It's wonderful. It's very important. I agreed with I agreed with the bits about how mankind needs to keep control of AI Then you have to understand the human person is I hope you agree as well with these with his fears about growing inequality But yesterday in the Spanish Parliament he said I encourage you all to nurture the process of the European Union Which is not merely a counterweight to other powers, but a gift to humanity.
29:41Did you agree with that? It's not an infallible statement. I don't know No, you don't. This is fine. The Holy Father is only infallible when he speaks on a matter of faith and morals ex cathedra. Okay, okay. That was not faith or morals and it was not ex cathedra. And I could point past the ninth saying that actually the European Union is the apostate state and is eternally damned. Oh. But that would be perhaps a little bit spicy. Yes, it would. It would, yeah. Anyway, my point. Hang on. I want, again, on the politics. Do you think that Brexit has led us to the much more multi-party politics that we are in now?
30:15And Jacob, do you regret that? Your party not only regarded itself as the natural party of government, but actually historically has more than often been that. I think the parties managed to come too close together. That you had David Cameron wanting to be the heir to Blair and people feeling that it didn't matter how they voted. So he wasn't a real conservative? Nothing changed. No, I'm not saying that. I'm just saying he accepted a lot of the changes under Labour, 97 to 2010. Quite right. And Labour had accepted a lot of the changes Margaret Thatcher made. which I may think is quite right. So we have a degree of common ground.
30:48But I think one of the reasons for Brexit is that people felt whoever they voted for, nothing changed, and that therefore they needed to vote for fundamental change. They found that very little has changed in the 10 years since. We are still massively over-regulated. We still have two bigger states. And now they're looking at other parties. I want to ask you one thing about regulation, though. It was, you were in the government, Boris Johnson's government, the moment that the UK actually left the EU at the end of 2020. And at that moment, all those EU regulations that you were so angry about for ages, they were put into UK law.
31:21That's right. And I had a bill that I introduced to the House that would have got rid of... But you were part of a government that just, like, took the ball. We're going back to your Today programme days. Ooh, take that, Michelle. I had a bill that I introduced to Parliament that was going to get rid of 6 ,000 EU regulations. And I'm sorry to say that Rishi Sunak, when he came in, binned it, which was a great mistake. Okay. The future. We've touched on this a bit already. Sorry about the parties. Yes, the parties. Okay. So I think this kind of atomization, I'm not sure it's directly related to Brexit, but I think Brexit played a part in it.
31:55Because I actually think people who vote, a lot of people who voted for Brexit are disappointed that that hasn't delivered a better life for them. Beyond the symbolism and the flags and the sort of fake debate about sovereignty and so forth. So I think that what's happened is that they've done, well, we did Labour, we did the Tories, and then we did this big thing. And for millions and millions of people in this country, their lives are still pretty crap. And so they're looking around. And also I think that tribalism has broken down. Now, you can argue that's a good thing or a bad thing, but people just, I think we now have a generation below my generation, in fact, even below my kids' generation, that is thinking, I don't know, I can shop around.
32:41You know, just as they shop around on television, just as they shop around for dates. You know, you can just shop around. And they're thinking in politics, I'm going to go. And so I think we've got the... And the other thing that's happened is very interesting to me, Nigel Farage used to be a big fan of proportional representation. Now in this atomised politics, he's working out, I could get there with 25, 28. Do you think, Jacob, that he could be the next Prime Minister, Nigel Farage? It's not impossible on the polling that he's achieving. I mean, I think John Curtis has said that that's not impossible, who I greatly respect.
33:12Would you join him? Have you considered joining reform? I'm not going to join reform, but I hope that the Conservatives and reform will work together. As in a formal pact? Is that what you're hoping? I'd like just to have a pre-election pact, a coupon election, and to work together. I think it could be very successful. I think that reform would bring something to the Conservative Party, the charisma of Nigel Farage, but that the Conservatives have depth and policymaking strength that reform lacks. And reform remains basically a one-man band. And would you therefore be looking to him to do what?
33:49To rip up the current and any agreements, the current agreements with the EU and start again? That's pretty much what he told me when he came on the podcast. I completely agree with that, that I think that leave meant leave. We are out. We should not be making new agreements. The new Erasmus scheme is bonkersly expensive. It's five times the price of the Turing scheme. Really crazy to waste money in that way when we're short of money for defence. Alistair, the Bloomberg economics, when they model different scenarios for the future, joining the single market for goods, joining the customs union and having a series of Swiss-style arrangements.
34:27None of them deliver a comparable boost to the economy compared to the assessment on how much has been lost to GDP. When you look at Keir Starmer and his two likely challenges, West Streeting and Andy Burnham, all these senior Labour figures have got a slightly different position on the EU. How much does that disappoint you? They've got a slightly different position. Slightly different position on how they feel about rejoining, when they rejoin, whether they want to have the debate now or not. We're in a very, very strange place because, of course, Kirsten was the prime minister. Wes Streeting is able to be much, much more open.
35:04I didn't realise that Wes wanted us sort of back in ASAP, but he's obviously decided that's his position. It all disappoints me, to be absolutely frank, because the thing that disappoints me most of all, I genuinely worry if this Labour government is not a success, I think our politics is going to a very dark place. You mentioned Europe. And one of the trends around Europe is that the populist radical right is kind of on the march. Now, Jacob may think that's a good thing. I think it's a terribly dangerous thing. I think that what we've seen just in the last few days and exacerbated, sorry to mention your first interview again, exacerbated by the influence that Elon Musk has on our social media landscape.
35:46I think what we've seen in Belfast and in Southampton recently, that is, to me, the politics of reform and restore. And one of the problems we have in the way that we talk about and deal with these people, we treat them as kind of, you know, normal mainstream politicians. I don't believe that they are. I think they're extremists. I think they're dangerous. I think Brexit was a vehicle for them. I don't agree with that. I actually think we're very fortunate in this country that we don't have that type of extremist that has been rising on the continent. I think that Nigel Farage is within the normal bounds of British political life.
36:23I think our politics is actually pretty stable. Our electoral system works, our democracy works. It changed government when it thought a government had failed. That is a proper process. And so I'm more confident about the stability of our political system. Right. One last question to close. It's 2036, and we are all gathered again to mark 20 years since Brexit. What do you think the relationship with the EU will be then? Jacob? I think it will be a friendly third-party relationship. I think the EU will no longer be hankering for us to return, if it still exists, and that we will be thriving outside the clasp, the dead hand of EU regulation.
37:01We'll have made trade deals globally. We've got the CTPPP. We've got so many opportunities globally, so I'm very excited about it. I mean, the trade deals that were promised, They were a big part of the lies. Not that happening. All of which we'd have to give up if we rejoin. The relationship in 2036. Well, the truth is I don't know. What do you hope for? What I hope for is what I described earlier. Europe where you have... Having rejoined or some other kind of relationship? Having joined a totally different organisation in which it's possible, for example, to have different levels of membership, in which it's possible for the Western Balkans to be in on one basis, for Ukraine to be on on the other, for the Turks to be part very much of a defence alliance, but there's part of European defence for the Norwegians.
37:43But everyone in the Commission is talking about this. These are two very different visions. Some of them are. It's not happening. They refuse to do it. David Cameron couldn't get anything out of his renegotiation, which he announced at Bloomberg. But I think Alistair's imagining a very different kind of EU. No, she's asking 20 years. You have to look ahead, Jacob. I told you where it is again. 10 years, 2036, not 2014. 2036. 20 years from the act of following. Anyway, we are still... All right, all right. Yeah, so from the here and now, we're also looking into the future. I'm going to take a deep breath, and very thankfully leave the stage now.
38:11And thank you both very much indeed. Alistair Campbell and Jacob Rees-Mogg, thank you. And that's where we left it. I really did need to breathe deeply afterwards, but Jacob and Alistair were fine with each other offstage and taking pictures for their socials before they left. If you're new to the show and enjoyed what you just heard, please do scroll back for other episodes because we go in depth every single time. From Gary Lineker on football and media to David Dimbleby on UK politics and Anthony Scaramucci on the US. Plus we have Steve Hilton coming up soon who wants to be governor of California.
38:55And so to the team. The producers are Jessica Beck and Chris Martlew. The video producer is Andy Haywood. Social media is by Alex Morgan. Audio mixing by Richard Ward. Our music is by Bart Walshaw. and the executive producer is Louisa Lewis. Special thanks for this live episode go to Susie Jackson, who looks after our subscriber events. And at Bloomberg Weekend, thanks to Brendan Francis Newnham and our executive editor, Catherine Bell. And until next time, goodbye.
39:36When you're running a business, the best days are the ones where priorities stay on track. For midsize and large companies, risk can affect multiple parts of the organization at once, from property and liability to cyber and regulatory challenges. At that level, managing risk becomes an ongoing discipline. At the Hartford, the focus is on helping businesses manage risk before it turns into something more disruptive. And when losses do happen, that work is paired with insurance coverage shaped by years of underwriting, risk engineering, and claims experience. Learn more at thehartford.com slash risk mitigation.
40:11Policies provided by Hartford Fire Insurance Company and its property and casualty affiliates, Hartford, Connecticut. Game night rush or any night of the week, really, Genius keeps every order moving From online ordering to your kitchen To the front counter Big league reliability for any business That's genius These days it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn Every field and every function But without identity You can't trust they'll serve your business Instead of jeopardizing it Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right By securing your AI agent's identities Giving you a single layer of control a single standard of trust.
40:51So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise, with Okta, you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent. Secure any agent. Okta secures AI.
From the publisher
It’s 10 years since the United Kingdom voted to leave the European Union. It was an enormous decision, one that has contributed to the churn of British prime ministers since, a phenomenon that has continued this week with the resignation of Keir Starmer.
What effect has Brexit had on UK politics and the British economy over the last decade? This bonus episode of The Mishal Husain Show is an opportunity to reflect and look ahead.
Earlier this month, Alastair Campbell, Co-Host of The Rest is Politics podcast, and Jacob Rees-Mogg, a presenter on GB News, joined Mishal Husain in front of an audience of Bloomberg subscribers to mark the anniversary.
Contact The Mishal Husain Show mishalshow@bloomberg.net
Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




