Elon Musk Wants Credit for Cutting Waste, Not Cutting Aid

26 Dec 2025 · 44 min · 24 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Elon Musk discusses his government advisory role (DOGE/Department of Government Efficiency), claims about cutting waste, Tesla “blowback,” SpaceX/Starlink plans, AI regulation, his OpenAI lawsuit, and political spending.

Guests

Elon Musk is the sole guest. He is CEO of Tesla and runs SpaceX and Starlink; he previously served as a White House special advisor and is described as the richest person in the world.

Key claims

  • Tesla sales are “already turned around,” citing Europe April sales and strong demand elsewhere; blowback shifted some buyers from left to right.
  • DOGE savings are real but depend on Congress/executive support; $170B is current on doge.gov, with a still-stated aim of $2T.
  • SpaceX won’t enter weapons; it dominates space launch and Starlink provides low-cost internet that lifts people out of poverty.
  • He wants “a few referees” for AI regulation, not an “army,” and argues AI is under-regulated.
  • OpenAI was funded as an open-source nonprofit; he says it changed for financial benefit, so he’s pursuing court action.

Notable examples

  • Attacks on Tesla showrooms: he says perpetrators will go to prison.
  • SpaceX sued over asylum seekers despite ITAR constraints.
  • USAID cuts: he disputes claims of millions of deaths, citing fraud/graft and partial transfer of useful programs to the State Department.
  • South Africa “racist laws” question: he rejects the premise and says rules are being worked around for Starlink licensing.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Elon Musk's Political Spending and Role

0:21 to 0:35

Explore Elon Musk's approach to political spending and his role in government.

“Manage all your business finances, from banking to payments to credit cards, all in one place with Chase's digital tools.”

Elon Musk's Political Spending and Role

2:49 to 4:23

Explore Elon Musk's approach to political spending and his role in government.

“It's that time of year when, if you're anything like me, you might be doing a mix of looking back and looking forward.”

Balancing Business and Government Roles

4:23 to 5:48

Musk discusses the balance of his time between Tesla and government work.

“Here it is in full in a special episode of The Michelle Hussain Show.”

Tesla's Sales and Market Challenges

5:48 to 8:25

Musk addresses challenges Tesla faces in the market and sales performance.

“Is it, well, clearly it's a lot, but is it still the case, as you said a while ago, that it's about one to two days a week on your government work?”

Commitment to Tesla Amidst Controversies

8:25 to 11:03

Musk discusses his commitment to Tesla and the impact of political controversies.

“I was citing sales figures rather than share price.”

Violence and Backlash Against Tesla

11:03 to 13:33

Musk reacts to violence against Tesla and discusses media portrayal.

“Well, one question before we move on to other companies, which is that I wonder if some of what has happened to Tesla in the last few months, did you take it personally?”

SpaceX and Future of Warfare

13:33 to 14:00

Musk shares insights on SpaceX, AI in warfare, and market dominance.

“I saw that you said in a speech at the West Point Military Academy recently that the future of warfare is AI and drones.”

SpaceX's Dominance in Space Launches

14:00 to 16:00

Learn about SpaceX's leading position in space launches and its impact on global connectivity.

“You certainly ask interesting questions that are impossible to answer.”

Challenges and Concerns of Going Public

16:00 to 17:44

Explore Elon Musk's thoughts on the implications of SpaceX potentially going public and the legal challenges involved.

“I don't currently anticipate SpaceX getting into the weapons business that's certainly it's not an aspiration we're frequently asked to do to do weapons programs but we have thus far declined.”

Lawsuit Against OpenAI: Musk's Perspective

17:44 to 21:08

Understand Elon Musk's motivations behind the lawsuit against OpenAI and the changes he opposes.

“So how can it be a class action representing a class if the class were against it?”
Show all 24 chapters

AI Regulation: Need for Balance

21:08 to 24:42

Discuss the need for AI regulation, striking a balance between oversight and innovation.

“I also wanted to ask you about AI and regulation, because when you were here last talking to John Micklethwaite, you had some pretty strong words about the risk that AI poses.”

AI Regulation: Need for Balance

25:56 to 26:34

Discuss the need for AI regulation, striking a balance between oversight and innovation.

“Transcription by CastingWords integrated AI with tools that can assist investors in building customized portfolios.”

Elon Musk's Role as an Advisor

28:32 to 29:10

Musk discusses his advisory role to the government and perceived conflicts of interest.

“Find an independent agent at cinfin.com.”

Perception of Conflict of Interest

29:10 to 30:39

Musk responds to questions about potential conflicts of interest in his business dealings.

“Can you see that there is a conflict of interest or a potential conflict of interest in broad terms just through that very fact?”

Transparency in Doge Operations

30:39 to 31:36

Discussion on the operational transparency of Doge and its contract evaluations.

“No, all we do is we review the organization to see if the organization has departments that are no longer relevant.”

Starlink's Global Impact

31:36 to 32:54

Musk addresses the international implications of Starlink and its regulations.

“And what about the international dimension?”

Government Policies in South Africa

32:54 to 34:21

Musk critiques South African laws regarding ownership and race.

“And so now I'm in this absurd situation where I was born in South Africa but can't get a license to operate in Starlink because I'm not black.”

Dogecoin's Savings Predictions

34:21 to 36:38

Musk discusses projected savings from Doge's initiatives and the challenges involved.

“Before the election, you said it was going to be at least$2 trillion.”

Critique of USAID and Bill Gates

36:38 to 38:06

Musk expresses skepticism about Bill Gates' claims regarding USAID cuts.

“I mean, I feel you're somewhat trapped in the NPC dialogue tree of a traditional journalist.”

Impact of USAID Cuts on Health Initiatives

38:06 to 40:16

Discussing the alleged consequences of USAID cuts on health programs.

“So I can see that you're proud of that work.”

Future Political Spending Plans

40:16 to 42:00

Musk shares his thoughts on his future political contributions and spending.

“The US led on international efforts to combat HIV, AIDS, treatment, prevention.”

Political Spending and Influence

42:00 to 44:34

Elon Musk discusses his future political spending and influence beyond the US.

“against AIDS for many years, which came out last year.”

Challenges and Innovations

44:34 to 47:17

Musk reflects on the challenges of managing multiple ventures and upcoming innovations.

“I challenged Vladimir Putin to single combat over the...”

Challenges and Innovations

48:33 to 49:10

Musk reflects on the challenges of managing multiple ventures and upcoming innovations.

“And that's not what you're building toward.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:01With LPL Financial, we provide the services to help push you forward. When it comes to your finances, your business, your future, the only question should be, what if you could? Pitt advertisement, Anna Kendrick is not a client of LPL Financial LLC and receives compensation to promote LPL. Investing involves risk, including potential loss of principal LPL Financial LLC member FINRA SIPC. Being a small business owner isn't just a career, it's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. Manage all your business finances, from banking to payments to credit cards, all in one place with Chase's digital tools.

0:31Plus, access online resources designed to help your business thrive. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company. Find home wherever you roam at Sonesta ES and Simply Suites, where longer stays feel comfortable, flexible, and easy. Stretch out and enjoy spacious accommodations and home-like amenities designed to help you settle in and stay productive or relaxed for however long you need.

1:08And when you're a Sonesta Travel Pass member, staying at Sonesta ES and Simply Suites means earning points toward free nights, upgrades, and more with every eligible stay. Go to Sonesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass. Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sonesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. Coffee genius here. Most people see a busy cafe, but I see precision at every step. Thanks to genius from Global Payments. Transactions? Instant. Inventory? Precise. Operations? In sync. Absolutely genius. From sold-out crowds worldwide to managing the morning rush, Genius keeps operations running smoothly.

1:51One portato. Flawless pour, perfectly timed. Just beautiful. Big league reliability for any business. That's Genius. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. In terms of political spending, I'm going to do a lot less in the future. And why is that? I think I've done enough. Is it because of blowback? Well, if I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it. I don't currently see a reason. Elon Musk, one-time White House special advisor and still the richest man in the world. I'll ask you a question. This is your interview. Everyone wants to hear from you. I'll ask you a question.

2:32Yes or no? Why do you like racist law? This is not for me to answer. Come on. Yes, it is. Now, you wouldn't be trying to dodge a question that is difficult for you to answer, would you? From Bloomberg Weekend, this is the Michelle Hussain Show. I'm Michelle Hussain.

2:55It's that time of year when, if you're anything like me, you might be doing a mix of looking back and looking forward. And in that spirit, let me take you back to a conversation from May 2025. It's kind of obvious why. Elon Musk remains as consequential a figure now as he was then, even if he is no longer working with President Trump, trying to slash the US budget and slash bureaucracy in the way you might remember he once demonstrated with an actual chainsaw. Within 10 days of the conversation you're about to hear, he had left Doge, the Department of government efficiency. And soon after that, he was publicly trading insults with the president, the man he helped get elected.

3:42So as you listen, see this as a moment in time and an insight into the mind of someone whose media appearances are rare and who I discovered doesn't really like questions at all. The conversation is a little different to those on the podcast so far in other ways too. Elon Musk joined Bloomberg's Qatar Economic Forum via a live link. So I was on stage in front of an audience and he was on a giant screen above me. We talked about Tesla, his ambitions for SpaceX and Starlink and his political spending. So see what you think. Here it is in full in a special episode of The Michelle Hussain Show. Hello, everyone.

4:31And Elon Musk, welcome to Qatar Economic Forum. How are you? Thank you for having me. I'm fine. How are you? Very well, thank you. And very pleased to have you with us. You know, among those here in the audience in Doha are some you will know, people who have backed you financially over the years. Since you last spoke here in 2022, a lot has changed in your life. You're not only running multiple companies. You were doing that then, but now you also have a role in government. So first of all, I hope you won't mind if from time to time I have to move you from one topic to another because we have a lot to cover in the time we have.

5:05That would be all right? Okay. Well, let's start then with exactly the fact that you now have this combination of being a CEO and having a role as a government advisor. Tell me about your week. How does it work? What's the split of your time? Well, I travel a lot. So I was in Silicon Valley yesterday morning. I was in LA yesterday evening. I'm in Austin right now. I'll be in DC tomorrow. I'll be there having dinner with the president tomorrow night, I believe. And then a bunch of cabinet secretary meetings and then back to Silicon Valley on Thursday night. But I mean the balance of your time. Is it, well, clearly it's a lot, but is it still the case, as you said a while ago, that it's about one to two days a week on your government work?

5:58Yeah, that's correct. And what does that mean for your corporate life? Because if we start with Tesla, the company has suffered in recent months what you've called blowback. So what is your plan for turning that around, the declining sales picture? And by what stage do you think you're going to be able to turn it around? Oh, it's already turned around. Give me some evidence for that. I've just been looking at the sales figures for Europe in April, which show very significant declines in the big markets. Europe is our weakest market. We're strong everywhere else. so our sales are doing well at this point we don't anticipate any meaningful sales shortfall and the obviously the stock market recognizes that since we're now back over a trillion dollars in market cap so clearly the market is aware of the situation so it's already turned around.

7:04But sales still down compared to this time last year? In Europe In Europe, okay. Yes, but that's true of all manufacturers. There's no exceptions. Does that mean that you're not going to be able to... The European crop is quite weak. Okay, but you would acknowledge, wouldn't you, that what you are facing... Okay, let's just take it as Europe. What you are facing is a significant problem. Tesla was an incredibly aspirational brand. People identified with it. They saw it being at the forefront of the climate crisis. And now people are driving around with stickers in their cars saying, I bought this before we knew Elon was crazy.

7:45And that there are also people who are buying it because Elon's crazy or however they may view it. So, yes, we've lost some sales perhaps on the left, but we've gained them on the right. The sales numbers at this point are strong and we see no problem with demand. So what do you... I mean, you can just look at the stock price. If you want the best inside information, the stock market analysts have that. And our stock wouldn't be trading near all-time highs if things weren't in good shape. They're fine. Don't worry about it. Okay. I was citing sales figures rather than share price. Well, tell me then how committed you are to Tesla.

8:31Do you see yourself and are you committed to still being the chief executive of Tesla in five years' time? Yes. No doubt about that at all? Well, no, I might die.

8:49Okay, short of that. I can't be CEO if I'm dead, so there's a slight amount of doubt. Does that mean that the value of your pay doesn't have any bearing on your decision?

9:04Well, that's not really a subject of discussion in this forum. I think, obviously, there should be a compensation for, if something incredible is done, that compensation should match that something incredible was done. But I'm confident that whatever some activist posing as a judge in Delaware happens to do will not affect the future compensation. This is the judge who twice struck down the$56 billion pay package that was awarded to you. I think on the current value of stock options. Not a judge. Not a judge. the activist who is cosplaying a judge in a Halloween costume. Okay, that's your characterization.

9:56I think on the current value of stock options, I think the actual... Judges dispense justice according to the law. On the current value of stock options, I think the value of that pay package stands at about$100 billion. Are you saying you are relaxed about the value of your future pay package? Your decision to be committed to Tesla for the next five years, as long as you are still with us on this planet, is completely independent of pay? No. It's not independent. So pay is a relevant factor then to your commitment to Tesla. Sufficient voting control such that I cannot be ousted by activist investors is what matters to me.

10:39And I've said this publicly many times. But let's not have this whole thing be a discussion of mileage pay. It's not a money thing. It's a reasonable control thing over the future of the company, especially if we're building millions, potentially billions of humanoid robots. I can't be sitting there and one day get tossed out by, for political reasons, by activists. That would be unacceptable. That's all that matters. Now let's move on. Okay, well, just one question. Now let's move on. Well, one question before we move on to other companies, which is that I wonder if some of what has happened to Tesla in the last few months, did you take it personally?

11:20Yes. And did it make you regret or think twice about your political endeavors?

11:31because it is i did i did what needed to be done uh the the violent antibody reaction um and i'm just i'm not someone who's ever committed violence um and yet uh massive violence was committed against my companies massive violence was threatened against me who are these people why would they do that how wrong can they be they're on the wrong on the wrong side of history and that's an evil thing to do to go and damage some point of some person's car to threaten to kill me what's wrong with these people i've not harmed anyone

12:17so something needs to be done about them and a number of them are going to prison and they deserve it. And more will. You're referring to the attacks on Tesla showrooms. But I think... Yeah. Biring bullets into showrooms and burning down cars is unacceptable. Those people will go to prison and the people that funded them and organized them will also go to prison. Don't worry. We're coming for you. Wouldn't you...

12:49Wouldn't you... some of the people who turned against Tesla in Europe were upset at your politics, and very few of them would have been violent in any way. They just objected to what they saw you say or do politically. Well, it's certainly fine to object to political things, but it's not fine to resort to violence and hanging someone in effigy and death threats. That's obviously not okay. you know that's absurd that is in no way justifiable at all in any way shape or form and some of the the legacy media nonetheless have sought to justify it which is unconscionable shame on them okay let's talk about your other companies then another business area SpaceX I saw that you said in a speech at the West Point Military Academy recently that the future of warfare is AI and drones.

13:47And obviously, defense is an increasingly booming sector with the state of the world at the moment. Do you see SpaceX moving into weaponized drones?

14:04You certainly ask interesting questions that are impossible to answer. So SpaceX is it's the space launch leader. So SpaceX doesn't do drones. SpaceX builds rockets, satellites, and internet terminals. So SpaceX has a very dominant position in space launch. So of the mass launch to orbit this year, SpaceX will probably do 90%. China will do half of the remaining amount, so 5%, and the rest of the world, including the rest of the US, will do about 5%. So SpaceX will do about 10 times as much as the rest of the world combined, or 20 times as much as China, which is... And China is doing actually a very impressive job.

14:55The reason for this is that we are putting into orbit the largest satellite constellation the world has ever seen by far. So I think at this point, about maybe approaching 80 % of all active satellites in orbit are SpaceX. And they're providing high bandwidth level connectivity throughout the world. In fact, this connection is on a SpaceX connection. So I think this is a very good thing because it means that we can provide low cost, high bandwidth internet to parts of the world that don't have it or it's very expensive. And I think the single biggest thing you can do to lift people out of poverty and help them is giving them an internet connection.

15:37Because once you have the internet connection, you can learn anything for free on the internet. And you can also sell your goods and services to the global market. And once you have knowledge by the internet and the ability to engage in commerce, this is going to greatly improve quality of life for people throughout the world. And it has. and I'd just like to thank anyone in the audience who may have been helpful and you know with Starlink and getting it approved in their country and I think it's doing a lot of good on the countries that have approved it which is I think at this point 130 countries are very happy with it.

16:16I don't currently anticipate SpaceX getting into the weapons business that's certainly it's not an aspiration we're frequently asked to do to do weapons programs but we have thus far declined. Do you envisage SpaceX or indeed Starlink as a separate entity publicly listing in the near future or at all? It's possible that Starlink may go public at some point in the future. And what would be the time frame? What kind of time frame do you consider? I'm in no rush to go public. The public is, I guess, a way to potentially make more money, but at the expense of a lot of public company overhead and inevitably a whole bunch of lawsuits, which are very annoying.

17:13So really something needs to be done about the shareholder derivative lawsuits in the U.S. because it allows plaintiffs, law firms who don't represent the shareholders to pretend that they represent the shareholders by getting a puppet plaintiff with a few shares to initiate a massive lawsuit against the company. And the irony being that extreme irony that even if the class they purport to represent were to vote that they don't want the lawsuit, the lawsuit would still continue. So how can it be a class action representing a class if the class were against it? And that's the bizarre situation we've got in the US.

17:52It's a dire need of reform. As anyone who's running a public company experienced this, it's an absurd situation that needs to change. Well, do you think Donald Trump might change it? You've certainly got his ear. I imagine that you've put this to him. Is this something you're trying to change before any Starlink IPO? Well, it would need a law to be passed. The trouble being that you need 60 Senate votes, and the Democrats will vote against it. The plaintiff's bar is, I believe, the second largest contributor to the Democratic Party. That's the issue. At the state level, this can be solved. And I should say Texas recently passed a law which at least the state level made class action lawsuits much more reasonable because you have to get at least one in 33 shareholders to agree that they are part of a class of shareholders.

18:553%. This will really help with frivolous lawsuits. Okay. Let's talk about AI, which is in so many of your businesses and in all our worlds in different ways. It's one of the big changes, the development of generative AI, since you last spoke to this forum three years ago. you're in this space, of course, with Grok, which almost everyone will know. You co-founded OpenAI and then left, and you've obviously got a legal battle with OpenAI and Sam Ortman. I wonder if you could say something about the status of that, because you were together in Saudi Arabia with the president last week, with Sam Ortman.

19:40In the same place at the same time. Sam was in the neighborhood. Okay, so does that mean you are pushing ahead with the lawsuit against OpenAI? Yes. So I came up with the name OpenAI as an open source and as a non-profit. And I funded AI, OpenAI, for the first roughly$50 million. And it was intended to be a non-profit open source company. And now they're trying to change that for their own financial benefit into a for-profit company that is closed source. So this would be like, let's say you funded a non-profit to help preserve the Amazon rainforest. But instead of doing that, they became a lumber company, chopped down the forest and sold the wood.

20:32You'd be like, wait a second, that's not what I funded. That's OpenAI. They've made some changes to their corporate structure, though, haven't they, since? In recognition of what you've said. No, that's just what they've told the media. Okay.

20:52They have partly walked back their plan to restructure the business. I guess that's made no difference to how you feel about it. So you're determined to see them in court? Of course. Well, that's certainly going to be one to watch. I also wanted to ask you about AI and regulation, because when you were here last talking to John Micklethwaite, you had some pretty strong words about the risk that AI poses. And you said that you really felt what the US was missing was a federal AI regulator, that something along the lines of the Food and Drug Administration or the Federal Aviation administration.

21:30Now, you're clearly now in a zone where you're more on the cutting regulation side than wanting new regulators. So has your view changed on the need for an AI regulator? Well, it's not that I don't think there should be regulators. You can think of regulators like referees on the field in sports. There should be some number of referees, but you shouldn't have so many referees that you can't kick the ball without hitting one. So in many, in most fields in the US, the regulatory burden has grown over time to the point where it's like having more referees than players on the field. So, and this is a natural consequence of an extended period of prosperity.

22:16It's very important to appreciate this. This has happened throughout history. When you have an extended period of prosperity with no existential war, there's no cleansing function for unnecessary laws and regulations. So what happens is that every year, more laws and more regulations are passed because legislators are going to legislate, regulators are going to regulate. And you will get the steady pile of more and more laws and regulations over time until everything is illegal. And let me give you an example of a truly absurd situation. Under the Biden administration, SpaceX was sued for not hiring asylum seekers in the US.

23:05Now, the problem is it's actually illegal for SpaceX under ITAR, International Traffic and Arms Regulations, to hire anyone who is not a permanent resident of the United States because the premise being that they will take advanced rocket technology and return to their home country if they're not a permanent resident. So we're simultaneously in a situation where it is illegal to hire asylum seekers and is also illegal to hire asylum seekers. And the Biden's Department of Justice chose to prosecute us despite both paths being illegal. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. But my question was specifically about a regulator for AI, which you said three years ago was needed.

23:47And you said we need to be proactive on the regulation of AI rather than reactive. Have you changed your mind on that? No, of course not. What I'm saying is that there should be some referees on the field, a few referees, but you shouldn't have a field jam-packed with referees such that you could not kick a ball in any direction without hitting one. So the fields that have been around for a long time, such as automotive, aerospace, the sort of food and drug industries are over-regulated, but the new fields like artificial intelligence are under-regulated. In fact, there is no regulator at all.

24:31So there should be one. Do you still think that? Yes, I'm simply saying, which I think is just basic common sense, that you want to have at least you want to have a few referees in the field. You don't want to have an army of referees, but you want to have a few referees on any given field, in any given sport or any given arena, industrial arena, to ensure that public safety is taken care of. but you don't have so there's a proper number of referees like I said it's actually very easy to visualize this when compared to sports if the whole field is packed with referees that would look absurd but if there were no referees at all your game's not going to be as good

25:56Transcription by CastingWords integrated AI with tools that can assist investors in building customized portfolios. One of these tools is called Generated Assets. It allows you to turn your ideas into investable indexes. So let's say you're interested in something specific like biotech companies with high R &D spend, small cap stocks with improving operating margins, or the S &P 500 minus high debt companies. Chances are there isn't an ETF that fits your exact criteria. But on public, you just type in a prompt and their AI screens thousands of stocks and build a one-of-a-kind index. You can even backtest it against the S &P 500.

26:32Then you can invest in a few clicks. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market.

26:53Illustrative purposes only, not investment advice. All investing involves risk of loss. See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. From coast to coast, unlock adventure at Red Lion Hotels by Sinesta, where restful sleep, friendly service, and trusted local knowledge are part of every stay. Red Lion makes it easy to feel welcomed, comfortable, and connected wherever the road takes you. Whether you're traveling for business or pleasure, you can spend less and make more of every trip. When you sign up for Sinesta Travel Pass, you'll get their best rates instantly. Go to Sinesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sinesta Travel Pass.

Read the full transcript

27:30Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sinesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. If you follow markets, you know the value of long-term thinking. You plan, you diversify, you prepare for volatility. But in life, even the best strategies can't prevent every bad day. A fire, a loss, a disruption that demands immediate attention. When that happens, what matters isn't just what you planned, it's who shows up. That's where Cincinnati Insurance comes in. For more than 75 years, they've helped individuals and businesses navigate life's toughest moments with care, expertise, and personal attention. Together with independent agents, Cincinnati Insurance focuses on relationships, not transactions.

28:12Their approach is grounded in experience, follow-through, and trust built over time. Bad days happen, and when they do, you deserve an insurance partner who understands risk, respects what you've built, and is ready to help you move forward. The Cincinnati Insurance Companies. Let them make your bad day better. Find an independent agent at cinfin.com.

28:50So let's then talk about your new world, your role advising government. You are in this unique and unprecedented position of having billions of dollars worth of contracts with the federal government yourself, mostly through SpaceX, and also now an insider's knowledge of it because of Doge. Can you see that there is a conflict of interest or a potential conflict of interest in broad terms just through that very fact? I don't think so, actually. There have been many advisors throughout history in the U.S. government and others who have had economic interests. And I am simply an advisor. I don't have a formal power.

29:35And that's it. and president can choose to accept my advice or not. And that's how it goes. If there's a single contract that any of my companies have received that people think is somehow not, was awarded improperly, it would immediately be front page news, to say the least. And if I didn't mention it, certainly my competitors would. So if you're not seeing that, then clearly there's not a conflict of interest. um the uh yeah there's another way though to look at it that for example you have many competitors whether it's companies like Boeing or companies who would like to do more of the kind of work you do for NASA Blue Origin Rocket Lab and because Doge is in every federal government department you or people who work for Doge and and you are the driving force behind it have an insight into to those companies' affairs and those companies' relationships with the federal government?

30:39No, all we do is we review the organization to see if the organization has departments that are no longer relevant. And then are the contracts that are being awarded good value for money? In fact, frankly, the bar is not particularly high. Is there any value for money in a contract. And if there isn't, then we make recommendations to the secretary. The secretary can then choose to take those actions or not take those actions. And that's it. And then any action that is as a function of Doge is posted to the Doge website and to the doge.gov handle on the X platform. So it's complete transparency.

31:24And I've not seen any case where, to the best of my knowledge, there's even been an accusation of conflict because it is completely and utterly transparent. That's it. And what about the international dimension? Now, let's think about Starlink. Starlink is obviously a very, very good internet service. It's sought after all over the world. It's critical to the frontline in Ukraine. It has also had more contracts coming its way. And there is some evidence that companies are allowing access to it because they want to be close to the Trump administration and send the right signal. So Bloomberg broke news today that the South African government is working around the rules on black ownership in order to allow Stalin, and that is being done on the eve of the visit that President Ramaphosa is going to make to the White House.

32:14Do you recognize that as a conflict of interest? No, of course not. First of all, you should be questioning why is there why are there racist laws in south africa that's the first problem that's what you should be attacking um it's improper for there be racist laws in south africa um the whole whole idea with what nelson modello who was a great man proposed was that all races should be on an equal footing in south africa that's the right thing to do not to replace one set of racist laws with another set of racist laws which is utterly wrong and improper um so So that's the deal, that all races should be treated equally and there should be no preference given to one or the other.

32:53Whereas there are now 140 laws in South Africa that basically give strong preference to if you're a black South African and not otherwise. And so now I'm in this absurd situation where I was born in South Africa but can't get a license to operate in Starlink because I'm not black. Does that seem right to you? Does that seem right to you? It looks like that's about to change. I just asked you a question. Please answer. Does that seem right to you? Well, those rules were designed to bring about an era of more economic equality in South Africa. And it looks like the government has found a way around those rules for you.

33:37I'll ask you a question. This is your interview. Everyone wants to hear from you. I'll ask you a question. Yes or no? Racist laws, yes or no? Not for me to answer. I have got a question for you about your government work and the amount of savings. Why do you like racist laws? This is not for me to answer. Come on. Yes, it is. Now, you wouldn't be trying to dodge a question that is difficult for you to answer. No, you answer mine. I'm sure you can have that conversation directly with the South African government if you want to. I want to ask you about the... You like racist laws. I can't believe it.

34:12That's not good. I want to ask you about the total amount that you're planning to save through Doge's work. Before the election, you said it was going to be at least$2 trillion. The number currently on doge.gov is$170 billion. That's a big change. What happened to the$2 trillion? Would you expect it to happen immediately? Well, is it going to happen? Because Doge is supposed to run until next July. I mean, your question is absurd in its fundamental premise. Are you assuming that on day, you know, within a few months, there's an instant$2 trillion saved? No, I'm not at all. I'm just asking, is that still your aim, then?

34:53Is it still your aim to get to$2 trillion? Have we not made good progress given the amount of time? That's exactly what I'm asking. So is it still your aim to go from$170 billion to$2 trillion? him? The ability of Doge to operate is a function of whether the government, and this includes the Congress, is willing to take our advice. We're not the dictators of the government, we are the advisors. And so we can advise, and the progress we've made thus far, I think, is incredible. The Doge team has done incredible work, but the magnitude of the savings is proportionate to the support we get from Congress and from the executive branch of the government in general.

35:45So we're not the dictators, we are the advisors. But thus far, for advisors, with the Doge team, to their credit, has made incredible progress. You've talked about$4 billion a day being saved, but that won't get, and I think everyone can agree that combating waste and inefficiency in government is a very good thing, but if you add that up, it's not going to get to$2 trillion over the lifetime of Doge.

36:20I'm sorry. The$4 billion a day, if Doge is going to run until next July, is not going to get you to$2 trillion.

36:32But you still say it's your aim, so we'll take that as read. There's what Doge... I mean, I feel you're somewhat trapped in the NPC dialogue tree of a traditional journalist. So it's difficult when I'm conversing with someone who's trapped in the dialogue tree of a conventional journalist because it's like talking to a computer.

36:57So DOJ is an advisory group. We are doing the best we can as an advisory group. The progress made thus far as an advisory group is excellent. I don't think any advisory group has done better in the history of advisory groups of the government. Now, we do not make the laws, nor do we control the judiciary, nor do we control the executive branch. We are simply advisors. In that context, we are doing very well. Beyond that, we cannot take action beyond that because we are not some sort of imperial dictator of the government. There are three branches of the government that are to some degree opposed to that level of cost savings.

37:42Nonetheless, let's not criticize whether there's$4 trillion and instead look at the fact that$160 billion has been saved and more will be saved too. And as I said, I think everyone can agree that cutting waste and indeed fraud in any government and being responsible with taxpayers' money is a very good thing. So I can see that you're proud of that work. I do want to ask you about USAID and the comments that Bill Gates made the other day, which I know that you called him. Yeah, he's a huge liar. I know. You've said that already. That's terrible. Also, who does Bill Gates think he is to make comments about the welfare of children, given that he frequented Jeffrey Epstein?

38:37he's he's he said he regrets i mean it's not exactly i wouldn't trust that guy to maybe he spent a lot he spent a lot of his own money on uh on philanthropy around the world over the years my question to you is have you looked at the data to check if he might be right that the cuts to usa id might cost millions of lives uh yes um i'd like him to show us any evidence whatsoever that that is true, it's false. What we found with USAID cuts, and by the way, they haven't all been cut. The parts of USAID that we found to be even slightly useful were transferred to the State Department. So they've not been deleted, they've simply been transferred to the State Department.

39:21But many times over with USAID and other organizations, when they said, oh, well, this is going to help children, or it's going to help some disease eradication or something like that. And then when we ask for any evidence whatsoever, I say, well, please connect us with this group of children so we can talk to them and understand more about their issue. We get nothing. We don't even try to come up with a show often, meaning it's sort of like, well, can we at least see a few kids? Where are they if they're in trouble? We'd like to talk to them and talk to their caregivers. And then we get something as a response because what we find is an enormous amount of fraud and graft.

40:10Okay, let me put this example to you. Very little of it actually gets to the kids, if anything at all. Okay, let me put this example to you because you grew up in South Africa, so you'll know the impact of HIV AIDS well. And this is why I asked about the data. The US led on international efforts to combat HIV, AIDS, treatment, prevention. And there's an initiative called PEPFAR, which is credited with saving 26 million lives in the last 20 years. It was part of the foreign aid freeze. Then there was a limited waiver. Its services are disrupted. And UNAIDS says if permanently discontinued, there will be another 4 million AIDS-related deaths by 2029.

40:51So if you look at that example, which is backed up by data, in 2023, 630 ,000 people died of AIDS-related illnesses, then perhaps Bill Gates' figures are not wrong. Millions of lives could be lost. First of all, the AIDS medication program is continuing. So your fundamental premise is wrong. It is continuing. Now, do you have another example? Not in its entirety. I think that it is false. Not in its entirety. There's a limited waiver, and UNAIDS have said that not all of the services that were previously funded by USAID are continuing. So that's why I put that example to you. Okay, well, which ones aren't being funded?

41:43I'll fix it right now. Okay, well, actually, they're all on the UNAIDS website. So you'll be able to see them. But mostly they are to do with prevention. And for example, the rollout of a drug called lenacapivir, which was hailed as one of the biggest breakthroughs against AIDS for many years, which came out last year. So if you are, perhaps, I'm sure UNAIDS would be delighted if you're able to look at that again. Yes. But if in fact this is true, which I doubt it is, then we'll fix it. Okay, fine. So finally, your political influence. I wondered whether you have decided yet how much you're going to spend on the upcoming midterms.

42:31You spent a lot more money on the last US election than you envisaged when you were speaking here three years ago. Are you going to continue to spend at that kind of level on future elections? I think in terms of political spending, I'm going to do a lot less in the future. And why is that? I think I've done enough.

43:00Is it because of blowback? Well, if I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it. I don't currently see a reason. What about political influence beyond the US? How often do you speak to President Putin? I don't speak to President Putin. You've never spoken to President Putin? I was on a video call with him once about five years ago. That's the only time. Why would you think I speak to President Putin? Oh, I get it. Because I've heard you speak about it. For example, in your West Point speech, you said, oh, I challenged President Putin to, was it an arm wrestle? And I know the Wall Street Journal has reported your reported conversations.

43:48If you're saying they haven't happened other than once, I'll take that as read. Is there a worse publication on the face of the earth than the Wall Street Journal? I wouldn't use that to line up my cage for paratroppings. That newspaper is the worst newspaper in the world. and if there's one newspaper that should be pro-capitalist, it's the one with Wall Street in the name, but it isn't. So I have the very lowest opinion of the Wall Street Journal, absolute nonsense, and you clearly believe the tripe that you've read in those papers. I read very widely, and I'm putting these questions to you so that you have an opportunity to respond to them, which you are, and for which we're all grateful to hear your responses.

44:33Okay, we are out of time. You mentioned me challenging. I did so on the X platform. I challenged Vladimir Putin to single combat over the... But I didn't talk to him. That was a post on the X platform. Great. That's why I asked you and you've clarified and explained. Thank you. That's why I was asking whether you have had reported conversations and you've said you have another video call. Typical legacy media lies. Okay, listen, I actually thought I might give Grok the last word, because when I asked Grok what your hardest challenge is, it said the strain of managing multiple high-stake ventures amid financial regulatory and public relations crises.

45:20And I wondered whether you recognize that characterization and whether you do think that this is a pivotal year in your life. Well, every year has been somewhat pivotal, and this one's no different. So, I mean, in terms of interesting things that probably are accomplished this year, the getting Starship to be fully reusable so that we catch both the booster and the ship, which will be the first fully reusable orbital rocket ever in history, which would be a profound breakthrough as the essential breakthrough necessarily to make life multi-planetary and ultimately become a space-faring civilization.

46:08We've got Neuralink, which is now helped by patients restore capability using the telepathy implants where they're able to control the computer simply by thinking. We'll be doing our first patient to restore sight with our blind sight implant, which ended this year or early next. In fact, that first patient might be in UAE, since we have a relationship with UAE and the Cleveland Clinic there.

46:44I think on the AI front, we are close to what you might call AGI, or digital superintelligence. I think we are seeing an explosion in digital superintelligence here. And then we've got at Tesla, we'll be launching unsupervised autonomy, basically self-driving cars with no one in them in Austin next month. So it's a big year for sure. Many other things in the works too. Okay. I'm a technologist first and foremost. Elon Musk, thank you very much for joining us here at Qatar Economic Forum. Thank you. Thank you.

48:02Thank you.

48:24Francis Newnham is Editorial Director of Audio and Special Projects, and our Executive Editor is Catherine Bell. Until next time, goodbye.

48:54And that's not what you're building toward. Brex is the intelligent finance platform that eliminates that work before it starts. AI agents that handle the manual stuff automatically. So your team can spend their time on what actually compounds. It's time to get Brex AF. Learn more at brex.com slash AF. Get the news you need in just 15 minutes. Start your day with Bloomberg Daybreak, the podcast with a global view on the stories that matter. I'm Nathan Hager. And I'm Karen Moscow. Join us each morning for curated stories on current events, politics, business, and foreign relations. Plus one conversation on the day's biggest developments, all in just 15 minutes.

49:34Subscribe to Bloomberg Daybreak for a precise, thoughtful take on the stories that matter. Listen to Bloomberg Daybreak each morning on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere you listen. This is Saigon, the story of my family and of the country that shaped us. From iHeart Podcast, Saigon. You don't think I'm serious about a free Vietnam? One city, a divided country, and the war that tore America apart. This is for Vietnam. They're pouring petrol all over here. Freedom for Vietnam! There's a fire coming to this country and it's going to burn out everything. Listen to Saigon on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.

From the publisher

As the year draws to a close, we are bringing you one of Mishal Husain’s biggest conversations of the year, in full. In May 2025, Elon Musk joined Bloomberg's Qatar Economic Forum, in a rare media appearance.

He remains as consequential a global figure today, as he was then, even if he is no longer working with Donald Trump.

Within 10 days of this conversation, he had left DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency, and soon after that he was publicly trading insults with the president.

Musk talked about Tesla, his ambitions for SpaceX and Starlink and his political spending.

Note: This episode was recorded with a remote guest in front of a live audience, and as a result, the audio quality may vary. 

02:31 - Mishal Husain introduces Elon Musk
03:21 - A week in the life of Elon Musk
04:25 - The future of Tesla
9:19 - Attacks on Tesla showrooms
11:35 - The future of warfare
14:30 - “I’m in no rush to go public”
17:30 - OpenAI
20:45 - Regulating AI
24:00 - “I’m simply an advisor”
26:30 - Starlink
29:44 - “Your question’s absurd”
31:26 - DOGE
33:15 - US Agency for International Development
37:20 - Political spending

Watch this podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLe4PRejZgr0Ns_wjGlmjlPz0cded0nTYS

You can find the written version of this interview with Mishal’s notes on Bloomberg Weekend: https://www.bloomberg.com/latest/weekend-interview

Contact The Mishal Husain Show mishalshow@bloomberg.net

Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

More from The Mishal Husain Show

All 53 episodes
Elon Musk Wants Credit for Cutting Waste, Not Cutting AidThe Mishal Husain Show · 44 min
Listen in VO