In short
Peter Navarro discusses Trump-era and current tariff policy, especially toward China, and argues tariffs are necessary to counter “cheating” and protect U.S. manufacturing and working-class jobs. He also addresses a Supreme Court case over whether emergency presidential powers can impose tariffs, and what happens if the government loses.
Guest backgrounds
Peter Navarro is an economist and former White House trade advisor to Donald Trump; he says he went to prison to defend constitutional separation of powers after January 6-related actions. He previously negotiated with U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and has written on China in a “China trilogy,” including The Coming China Wars.
Key claims
Total China tariffs are “almost 50%,” with only partial reductions (e.g., down to ~45% on some items). He argues Trump diplomacy keeps “open lines” with dictators while maintaining pressure. He claims China’s model relies on subsidies, IP theft, and weaponized critical minerals/rare earths. He says new factories take 2–3 years to produce jobs, with construction jobs first.
Notable examples
Mentions China backing out of a “comprehensive” trade deal after Xi Jinping said no; “skinny deal” in January 2020; Mexico adopting 50% tariffs on China at U.S. urging; tariffs on steel/aluminum/lumber/critical minerals/pharmaceuticals via Section 232; China’s role in AI chips (NVIDIA H200) and rare-earth leverage.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOUS Trade Policy and Foreign Affairs
2:35 to 3:41
Explore the intersection of US trade policy and foreign affairs under Trump.
“First, the seizure of Venezuela's leader, Nicolas Maduro, and saying the US will be running that country, at least for now.”
The Bond with Trump: Origins
3:41 to 5:46
Learn about Navarro's relationship with Trump and their shared views on China.
“Navarro and I spoke in Washington before the Venezuela developments, But the way he sees the world is a crucial insight into how the Trump circle thinks and why.”
Navarro's Political Evolution
5:46 to 8:00
Understand Navarro's shift from Democrat to advocate for protectionism.
“There'll be typed letters, but it'll always put a handwritten note in it.”
Life in Prison: Reflections
8:00 to 9:56
Hear Navarro's thoughts on his prison experience and its impact on him.
“And then we had passed the income tax and kind of shifted away from that.”
Current US-China Trade Relations
9:56 to 12:22
Get insights into the current state of trade relations between the US and China.
“Basically, what Congress did in the wake of the January 6th riots on Capitol Hill was engaging a partisan effort to unseat the president and make sure he never ran for office again.”
Ongoing Tariff Strategies
12:22 to 14:02
Dive into the implications of tariffs on US-China trade dynamics.
“So the problem that we always face with China is that you always kind of wonder, whether they're just stretching you out, whether even if you sign a deal, they're going to retrade it.”
Encouraging Global Tariffs Against China
14:02 to 15:10
Explore the strategy of encouraging global tariff parity to combat Chinese trade practices.
“Now, as we are talking just in the recent news, Mexico did exactly what I'm suggesting, did so at the urging of our trade team, which is to say the Senate in Mexico passed 50 % tariffs on China.”
Trump's Diplomatic Approach
15:10 to 16:10
Discuss the dynamics of Trump's diplomacy with authoritarian leaders and its implications.
“honored he is that President Xi has authorized the purchase of soybeans and other goods.”
China's Economic Challenges
16:10 to 17:30
Analyze the economic challenges China faces and the need for reforms.
“It needs to lower the savings rate in China by providing a social safety net for its people.”
Negotiating Technology and Trade
17:30 to 19:00
Investigate the complexities of technology transfer and trade negotiations with China.
“I think people have to understand that there's a constant negotiation going on with countries around the world.”
Show all 17 chapters
Influence and Political Messaging
22:00 to 24:10
Discuss the importance of political messaging and influence in governance.
“You write essentially that people need to remember about delivering for working class Americans.”
Economic Policies and Their Impact
24:10 to 28:01
Examine economic policies and their effects on American households and businesses.
“So what we have to do is explain very clearly to the American people.”
Impact of Tariffs on Economy
28:01 to 29:47
Explore how tariffs affect food prices and manufacturing jobs.
“It increases the cost of transportation for food to the market.”
Midterm Strategies and Tax Debates
29:48 to 31:00
Discuss strategies for upcoming midterms and tax implications.
“Don't you think you might have to do more?”
Legalities of Tariffs and Plan B
31:01 to 34:31
Understand the Supreme Court case regarding tariffs and alternative strategies.
“You've got the Supreme Court case verdict coming up soon, which a lot of people are preparing for it to go against the government based on the comments that the justices, including John Roberts, made during questioning.”
Life in the White House
34:32 to 36:20
Insights into the demanding life of working in the White House.
“Imagine the refund bill, which some are saying could be as much as$100 billion.”
Critique of Media Representation
36:21 to 37:28
Discuss the portrayal of the White House team in Vanity Fair.
“and I could just as easily be working on my next book or whatever.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:00The thing about AI for business, it may not automatically fit the way your business works. At IBM, we've seen this firsthand. But by embedding AI across HR, IT, and procurement processes, we've reduced costs by millions, slash repetitive tasks, and freed thousands of hours for strategic work. Now we're helping companies get smarter by putting AI where it actually pays off, deep in the work that moves the business. Let's create smarter business, IBM. Small businesses are the pulse of every community. They bring people together, create opportunities, and drive growth. Chase for Business helps business owners like you with personalized guidance and convenient digital tools all in one place.
0:42With that guidance and your determination, you can take your business farther and help build a brighter future for your community. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., member FDIC. Copyright 2026, JPMorgan Chase and Company. Travel smarter, not harder, at America's Best Value In by Sinesta, with convenient locations from coast to coast and value-packed comfort at every turn. It's a practical choice for road trips, quick getaways, and everyday travel that keeps things simple without sacrificing comfort.
1:22And when you're a Sinesta Travel Pass member, staying at America's Best Value In means earning points toward free nights, upgrades, and more every time you stay. Go to Sonesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass. Here today, Rome tomorrow. Join now at Sonesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. Bloomberg Audio Studios. Podcasts, radio, news. I always trust in the president. He's playing three-dimensional chess. You can have points of view. You win some, you lose some. But I always trust his judgment. Peter Navarro, economist, White House trade advisor, and the man who went to jail for President Trump.
2:09Yes, indeed. This morning I did walk out of a federal prison. Who would you trust to continue this agenda? You got J.D. Vance as the vice president and Marco Rubio. That would be a great ticket. From Bloomberg Weekend, this is the Michelle Hussain Show. I'm Michelle Hussain.
2:34It's been a dramatic start to the new year for the Trump administration. First, the seizure of Venezuela's leader, Nicolas Maduro, and saying the US will be running that country, at least for now. And then renewed talk of acquiring Greenland, which is part of Denmark, a NATO ally. Given Greenland's minerals and Venezuela's oil, all of this is another demonstration of just how acutely aligned US trade policy and foreign policy now are. But there's also a really important aspect to the trade story that is bubbling at home in the US. And it's part of this conversation with Peter Navarro, the man who has probably influenced Donald Trump on tariffs more than anyone else, a man who's been at his side for years.
3:27Right now, the administration is waiting for the Supreme Court to have its say on the legal basis for last year's tariffs. And if the White House loses, the implications are considerable. So keep that in mind as you listen. Navarro and I spoke in Washington before the Venezuela developments, But the way he sees the world is a crucial insight into how the Trump circle thinks and why. Dr. Navarro, welcome. Thanks for being with us. Great to be with you. I wondered if we could start with the origins of your bond with the president. When did you meet him for the first time? It goes back to 2006 when I wrote the first book in what would be my China trilogy.
4:17This was a book called The Coming China Wars. And at the time, it was widely viewed as hyperbole. Right now, it reads like a government report. Basically, based on my research, I had parsed the Chinese economic model. The prevailing view in the early 2000s, as China had joined the World Trade Organization, it was beginning to inundate the world with their dump manufactured products, was that it was simply cheap labor. And what my analysis showed that was a lot more than that, things I would eventually call the seven deadly mercantile of sins, which is to say that China set about taking the world apart using things like high government subsidies, intellectual property theft, counterfeiting piracy, the whole state-owned enterprise, the whole gamut.
5:18So I had spent several years doing research on that, published The Coming China Wars. And then in 2011, President Trump was doing an interview and they asked him what his favorite books on China were. And mine was on the top 10 list. So I sent him a note of thanks and we exchanged correspondences. There'll be typed letters, but it'll always put a handwritten note in it. And that's how that began. And when he went down the escalator with Melania and declared, I sent him a note, say, hey, you need anything? And they called me in 2016. I was supposed to go out to New York just for a couple of days.
6:09And I meet him there. It was pretty funny. I get into this black SUV in the back seat, right? And we're getting ready to go to the airport and get in his plane to go to a rally, okay? It was famous rallies. And he gets in the front seat and he's going, hey, Rupert, what's going on? It's like he's talking to Murdoch. And then he hangs up and he looks at back and he goes, who's that? Because he'd never seen me before. And I introduced myself, and that's kind of how it happened. So you bonded over China, essentially, your views on China, and then China became a big rallying point for him in his first run for the White House.
6:55I want to understand something about how your views evolved, because you used to be a Democrat, right? You used to talk about how bad protectionism would be, not only for the U.S., but the global economy. Well, you're conflating a few things there, because historically Democrats were the ones who were protectionists, who were in favor of basically defending the American working class against unfair trade. And we have in our history of this republic, a very long history of defending our manufacturing base. If you go back to Alexander Hamilton, first Treasury Secretary. He wrote a very stunning book about manufacturing and the need to protect it.
7:43Lincoln was a tariff man. McKinley was a tariff man. Henry Clay was a tariff man. I mean, all of these famous figures. And up until 1913, the United States actually funded its government entirely through tariff revenues. I don't know if you knew that. And then we had passed the income tax and kind of shifted away from that. And one of the running jokes the boss and I have is like, who figured the China thing out first? And of course he did, because if you go back, there's a famous interview with him and Oprah Winfrey back in the 80s. And he wasn't talking about China, but he was talking about Japan and how they were taking us apart with unfair trade.
8:26And everything he said back then would then fit the China model. Now, with respect to my evolution of thought, my first exposure to kind of the Chinese economic model was when I was in the Peace Corps in Thailand. And what was fascinating to me is that virtually everywhere you went in Asia, the commerce was run by Chinese. Even then? It's before China has joined the WHO? Oh, yeah, yeah. Well, this was the Chinese diaspora who had left because of Mao's starvation and famine policies. So you fast forward to, I'm teaching at the University of California, Irvine, business students who are fully employed, right?
9:12They come at night and on the weekends. And I'm noticing they're losing their jobs. I'm thinking, what's going on here? And this was circa 2003. and, curiously, two years after China joined the World Trade Organization. So I looked into this, and it's like all roads led to Beijing. I do the research project, and I realize, hey, this is cheating. It's devastating our manufacturing base, and I would continue that research. So bring us up to the present day then, because you were at President Trump's side in the first term. You went to jail for him. So to be clear, I went to prison in defense of the Constitution, the constitutional separation of powers.
9:56Basically, what Congress did in the wake of the January 6th riots on Capitol Hill was engaging a partisan effort to unseat the president and make sure he never ran for office again. I wonder how much it changed you, because I'm struck reading your account of your prison days, how much you notice and document all the small pettiness, really, the meanness that you see around you, the withholding of medicines, the lack of fresh fruit and vegetables. Did you see a different America which has informed your politics? No, no, I grew up poor. I grew up in that milieu. And prison didn't change me at all.
10:39I changed prison. I changed that place. I changed the system. I went in there to defend the Constitution on principle. And instead of crying in my beer, I turned myself into an investigative reporter and covered a$5 billion scandal. And since I've been out, I've solved that scandal. And that's a pretty good achievement. So prison had changed me. I changed it. And now you've been his trade counselor and advisor through this period. How's the relationship between the U.S. and China on trade going now? Help us understand it. Look, it's a work in progress, the relationship with China. I am a veteran of the first term.
11:24I spent months and months and months with then United States Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer, one of the great American patriots and thinkers in this country. and we negotiated with the Chinese a very, very comprehensive trade deal. It was an amazing thing that would have been really good for China as well as the United States because it would have completely reformed the Chinese model. And they agreed to it. And then at the last minute, Xi Jinping said no. Okay? So that's, like, really important to understand. Like, we went for a long, over a year negotiating what would have been a perfect deal, and then at the end they backed out on that.
12:15And then we signed what was called the skinny deal, and that was in January of 2020, the last year of the Trump administration, and they didn't abide by that. So the problem that we always face with China is that you always kind of wonder, whether they're just stretching you out, whether even if you sign a deal, they're going to retrade it. You're part of the US administration, which is why I want to understand what the actions currently are. For example, President Trump meets Xi Jinping, and essentially, you end up with a deal which lowers some tariffs and which suspends heightened tariffs. So there's effectively a year-long trade truce.
13:00Is that keeping with your mission to avoid death by China? So you're bearing the lead here. What's the current tariff rate now? Well, the ones I'm referring to are the lowering of some of... But what's the current rate after they've been lowered? Well, it's 10 % on some things, right? The total tariff on China is almost 50%. Okay, let me say that one more time. It's almost 50%. So when you say that we lowered the rates, we only lowered them down to 45%. But on Chinese imports imposed to curb fentanyl flows. And there was a suspension of high-tech reciprocal tariffs. You have to understand there was a baseline tariff because of the Section 301 actions in the first term.
13:47One of the few things Joe Biden kept that we added the reciprocal tariff to, which is still in place, and a 20 % fentanyl tariff, which we only lowered by 10%. So those are robust tariffs on China. And in fact, we are strongly encouraging Europe to adopt exactly the same level of tariffs that we adopt for the simple reason that when the president puts up tariffs to defend America from Chinese cheating, China can't sell as much here. Where does it sell it? dumps it in Europe, dumps it in Mexico. Now, as we are talking just in the recent news, Mexico did exactly what I'm suggesting, did so at the urging of our trade team, which is to say the Senate in Mexico passed 50 % tariffs on China.
14:42And they did it because China was dumping goods which would otherwise go into America. And Europe should follow the U.S. and Mexican lead. And they are doing that. They're doing that in steel. And I see that. That's the interest on other countries. But I'm sure that you can see why looking at the US-China relationship, one can see the contrast between when President Trump first arrived and we end up with a meeting after which he talks about having enormous respect between the two countries and how honored he is that President Xi has authorized the purchase of soybeans and other goods. So there is a softening.
15:21No, there's no softening. You have to understand how Trump diplomacy works. And the great thing that people, particularly on the left, don't understand is that it's functional for President Trump to have open lines with Xi Jinping, Vladimir Putin, Erdogan in Turkey, all of the people that the world regards as vicious dictators, which they are, but they are part of the world stage where you have to negotiate. Are you comfortable with him saying enormous respect for China? That's what he's talking about. Do you have enormous respect for China? I have enormous respect for the Chinese people. The Chinese people are under the boot of Chinese Communist Party, if China is going to escape its own mercantilist economic model, which is screwing the world, including Europe, and causing tremendous instability in the financial system and great anger towards China, it needs to do one simple thing.
16:29It needs to lower the savings rate in China by providing a social safety net for its people. It's extraordinary that a communist socialist country has no protections with respect to pensions or health care for its people. That's extraordinary. And instead, what the Chinese do, because that's the way they roll, is they let the Communist Party members become rich. They let a smaller slice of the entrepreneurial Euroclass become rich, and then everybody else, the Lao Baixing, suffer. I know how strongly you feel about this. You've written about it in successive books. I wonder if there are other people who would prioritize doing business with China who have influence over the president in a way that makes you less than comfortable.
17:26Jensen Huang has managed to get NVIDIA H200 chips being sold to China. Are you comfortable with that? That's a work in progress. Yes, that's an ongoing dialogue. I think people have to understand that there's a constant negotiation going on with countries around the world. I mean, and the China relationship is a very difficult one. I think you left out the part about how China has weaponized rare earths, critical minerals, which are a critical part of virtually every high technology product that's made around the world. and China has been flexing its muscles now in Europe, in India, in the United States, saying basically we're going to do what we want and if you try to stop us, we're going to take away your critical minerals because they think they have a monopoly on it.
18:26But that's just a matter of time. American innovation is going to quickly wipe away that weaponization. So what do you do in the meantime? You do diplomacy. And if people want to call that soft, then they don't understand the chessboard. So are you comfortable with China being able to buy NVIDIAs, specifically about NVIDIAs? They're the next generation AI. Chips not my lane, okay? Except it enables a lot of competition then with US AI companies. Let me let your viewers know this. I'm one of only three people who served as a senior advisor in the first Trump administration from the beginning to the end.
19:09That happened because I stay in my lane and chips are not my lane.
19:17Everyone has been there. Your team's feedback is scattered across emails, chats and sticky notes. It's a mess. But PDF Spaces and Adobe Acrobat gives you one collaborative workspace to streamline every file and comment. So, if you need six departments to finally agree on a proposal, do that with Acrobat. Need to turn a mountain of feedback into one plan of action? Do that with Acrobat. Want to stop searching for files and finally get everyone on the same page? Do that. Do that. Do that with Acrobat. Learn more at adobe.com slash do that with Acrobat.
20:20Yep. High yield cash. Yes, again. They even have direct indexing. Public has modern design, powerful tools and customer support that actually helps. Go to public.com slash market and earn an uncapped 1 % bonus when you transfer your portfolio. That's public.com slash market.
20:50See complete disclosures at public.com slash disclosures. Being a small business owner isn't just a career. It's a calling. Chase for Business knows how much heart and effort go into building something of your own. That's why they make business growth their priority. The Chase team takes the time to understand your mission, where you are now, and where you want to go. Their broad range of solutions is designed with you in mind so you can bring your ideas to life. From banking to payment acceptance to credit cards, you can conveniently manage all your business finances all in one place with their digital tools.
21:23Looking for tips and advice? Their online resources are always available to give you the solutions you need to help your business thrive. See how your business can get stronger and go farther with Chase for Business. Learn more at chase.com slash business. Chase for Business. Make more of what's yours. The Chase mobile app is available for select mobile devices. Message and data rates may apply. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. Member FDIC. Copyright 2026. JPMorgan Chase and Company.
22:04I know from one of your books, Taking Back Trump's America, that you know exactly what it's like to be part of an administration where different people have influence and how you worry about losing sight of a core agenda. You write essentially that people need to remember about delivering for working class Americans. So are there risks to the American people not understanding the agenda that you're trying to deliver now that we're in the run up to the midterms? Of course. And part of my job is to explain exactly what we've inherited, which is a mess, how we're addressing it, and how long it's going to take to see the fruits of the Trump policies.
22:51The model here... How long do you think it's going to take? Well, the model here is the transition from Jimmy Carter in the 70s era of stagflation to the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Carter, much like Biden-Harris, created a tremendous problem with both inflation and recession because of their policies. If you think about what Biden set us up for, it was a stagflationary scenario. So Carter did the same for Reagan. So Reagan comes in, does their deregulation, positive supply shock, does the tax cuts, positive supply shock, makes adjustments, stops doing stupid stuff like Carter did. But it takes time.
23:38And for Reagan, the time ran out because by the time the midterms rolled around two years after he assumed office, it was a bloodbath. And the Democrats won the House and basically paralyzed government. But the next six years were a beautiful thing because Reagan's policies took hold and we had one of the most prosperous times. Now, we understand that history and we're trying to make sure we don't get caught in that same vice. So what we have to do is explain very clearly to the American people. Let me give you two examples. I do want to ask you this, this point about the time frame. So work in progress, you need to convince Americans and work hard on that.
24:232028, in that election, Who would you trust to continue this agenda? It's not for me to say. That's not my job. You've got J.D. Vance as the vice president and Marco Rubio. That would be, for example, a great ticket. With who at the top of the ticket? J.D. would be there. But Marco's already said that if J.D. runs, he wouldn't challenge him. I love these guys. I always admired Marco back in 2016. I always thought he was like, of the people on that stage, the 16 Republicans, I always thought he was the sharpest tool in the shed besides Donald Trump. Right. He couldn't hold a candle to Trump with respect to everything.
25:06But but he's he's he's really a very capable person. But I think you're on to something here with the messaging because people on your side of the Atlantic are going to be watching that election for Congress very carefully. Because what happened in 2018, because we lost the House, I write about that in my book. There were some mistakes made that I hope we don't make again. It became, let's say, a crap show. That's a little easier way of saying it. Because the Democrats just started issuing subpoenas and impeachments and all that. We don't want to repeat that. But here's what we're up against. It's like we come in and we got egg prices off the charts and we got beef prices off the charts.
25:54OK, it's like that's terrible. It's like it's it's as American as you can. Scrambled eggs in hamburgers. Right. So with eggs, we've been able to dramatically reduce the price of eggs almost immediately. How did we get there? This is really interesting how politics works here. It's like the Democrats come in and with chickens, they kill 80 million chickens. Literally, Joe Biden slaughters 80 million chickens because he overreacts to an avian flu thing. At the same time, with beef, he reduces grazing land because they want to eat soy burgers. But Dr. Rouse, there's also questions about your policy, aren't there?
26:35You mentioned beef, and I'm conscious of the fact that President Trump reduced tariffs on beef, tomatoes, coffee and bananas exactly because of the pressures on the household budgets of ordinary Americans. So that's an acknowledgement, isn't it, that some of the actions the administration has taken, including on tariffs of which you are the architect, they have played a role in hurting ordinary Americans. I'm totally supportive of no tariffs on products we don't make here. We don't make coffee here. So why did that happen? It made no sense. It happened. And now we make adjustments. That's what we do.
27:15We make adjustments. But if you look at the economics of that or elasticities of supply and demand, it's like we don't make coffee, right? So we don't make chocolate. So we lower the price on that. In the short run, we can import a little beef. But we just had oil drop below$60 a barrel, which is where it was when we left office the first term for Trump. OK, Biden jacked that price up to about$75. And so what that does, it not only increases the cost of heating your home and driving your car. it increases the cost of fertilizer for crops. So food prices go up. It increases the cost of transportation for food to the market.
28:05And actually manufacturing jobs have declined for seven straight months. Let's shift to that. Let's think about that. Okay. That's my job. I'm the senior counselor for trade manufacturing. I take that really seriously. How long do you think it's going to take you to change it? I can tell you that with exactitude. Okay. Okay. Here's how it works. No, how long is it going to take for you to be able to change that? Well, let me just work you through the quick math. For you to have a new factory in this country, ready to produce things and therefore have new manufacturing jobs, that's about two to three years.
28:41Now, what you see in the interim is this. We're having literally trillions of dollars of investment come in from abroad as well as domestically, which is, as we speak, beginning to design those factories and get ready to build them. Now, what happens then? You have a boom in construction jobs. That's the first phase of that. But you won't see any improvement in manufacturing right then. But then once you build the factories, that's when you see the manufacturing jobs. So Rome wasn't built in the day. China took us to, it's going on 25 years now where they've taken us apart. It's not just the factories they took.
29:26They took our supply chains. And we can't like wave a magic wand. It doesn't work like that. But if you simply look at the trajectory, it's going to be a beautiful thing. Do you think it's going to be enough of a message to be saying to Americans in the run up to the midterm, it's a work in progress? The Democrats left us a really bad inheritance. Don't you think you might have to do more? We are doing more. I can assure you. Let me give you one concrete thing. What about increasing taxes on the wealthiest, like a 40 percent tax rate? That's something Steve Bannon, who you know well, is in favor of.
Read the full transcript
30:02Would you support it? I supported that back in the first term. It's a debatable issue. But look, I always trust in the president. He's playing three-dimensional chess. And it's like you can have points of view. You win some, you lose some. But I always trust his judgment. Now, you're pulling that kind of out of left field. I think the thing that we have to do here in terms of the midterms is, first of all, explain to people exactly what we're doing across the different areas where we have problems with inflation, which is the housing, the health care costs, food, energy. Those are the biggies.
30:51And we are, as we speak, working 24 hours a day on things we can do to make that better. You've got the Supreme Court case verdict coming up soon, which a lot of people are preparing for it to go against the government based on the comments that the justices, including John Roberts, made during questioning. What happens if the government loses the case? What is the plan B? Let's start with the case itself. The case is about whether you can use the emergency powers of the president to impose tariffs. And it was your advice that he could. Absolutely. You were clear that this was the way the IEPA, this was the act to use.
31:33If the Supreme Court wants to essentially ratify the president's use of tariffs under IEPA, the law is on its side and our side. And the law is simply this. There's two salient points for your viewers. One is the question of whether a tariff is a tax. And in this context, in an emergency context, it's absolutely not. Okay. Tariffs, taxes, hang on. What if the Supreme Court takes a different view? The revenues are incidental. Now, the other issue is a language issue, is whether tariffs are a legitimate form of import restriction. And, of course, they are. So the Supreme Court has the ability. Now, with respect to Plan B, whatever Plan B is will not be as good as Plan A.
32:27So we have to recognize that. It will also be expensive, won't it? Because, Dr. Rowe, lots of companies will have to be compensated, won't they, for tariffs refunded for the tariffs they were charged? Let's not go there until we have to go there. I mean, I'm very confident that we have a very, very good chance. I mean, the law is on our side. The law is on our side here. So let's win that. Now, if we don't win, there's the whole alphabet number soup of things we've got. We've got the Section 232s, which we are using aggressively already on things like steel and aluminum, on lumber, on critical minerals, on pharmaceuticals.
33:07We have that. We have the 301 section, which we used on China to impose tariffs, which we can do on any country in the world that's cheating us. But if this case goes against you, it will affect your standing, won't it, in the White House? because you were the one who was convinced that this route was the right one to go down with the bulk of tariff policy. Would you consider resigning if the case is lost? Oh, of course not. That's silly. I mean, I'm part of a trade team. We've got Scott Bessett as the Treasury Secretary, Howard Lutnick as the Commerce Secretary, Jameis Greer as the United States trade representative and myself with J.D.
33:53Vance weighing in. And the only person who matters is President Trump. OK, so we are proceeding as the vision of how to go about this was crafted not by me, but by a group of people. We're doing exactly what we should be doing. We've anticipated contingencies. But we think that the most important thing to do now is focus on winning that case at the Supreme Court. That's where we're at. If we lose, then we have a plan B. It's not for me to talk about that to the world because I don't think we're going to lose. But if we do, we are certainly prepared. Imagine the refund bill, which some are saying could be as much as$100 billion.
34:38I think you're basically making the case why what we've done is a very good thing. I mean, think about it. We inherited from the Democrats who spent money, as we say, on this side of the pond, like drunken sailors, just totally fiscally irresponsible, like crazy stuff. And we were looking when we got into office at a fiscal cliff that was going to crush us with higher interest rates, inability to finance it. And this tariff revenue, if you just cost it out, is the difference between a dangerous deficit and a healthy pay down in our debt. We're coming towards the end of the conversation. And I quite often ask people what they do at the weekends.
35:26And I'm conscious. Like, what are your weekends like work? When you're, look, it's like when you're working for the White House, it's like being at sea or being on deployment for the military. You're working every day. And I know better than most because I remember the last day from the first term. And it was like, you know, you're leaving and there was some stuff we left on the table we could have, should have got done. And we didn't. And I try to tell people who are there, it's like, look, the clock's ticking. And we got a lot of work to do for the American people. Spend as much time as you can without it influencing or harming your family time.
36:11But this job is not a job. It's not a job. It's a mission. I mean, there's no, I mean, I don't, it's like if this were just a job, I wouldn't be doing it. because I'm at the retirement age and I could just as easily be working on my next book or whatever. But this is a mission. Some of the White House team are in glossy photo shoots for Vanity Fair. What did you think of that? You know, funny you mention that. Go to that Vanity Fair article and look at everybody they took a picture of. And every one of those persons and pictures looks demonic. demonic in those pictures. They frame those pictures in a way to have you hate those people, and that's despicable.
36:58That Vanity Fair thing is a very sophisticated form of propaganda. It's basically the triumph of fear over fact. And the guy who wrote it, Chris Whipple, shame on him. He was once a fairly good author. He's turned into a Trump derangement syndrome guy. All the quotes are on the record and they're all on tape. Well, I would challenge that as well. Just go look at those pictures. I mean, Caroline Levitt, the way they did, it's like they went in and airbrushed that thing in a way, which I mean, it's just, it's brutal what they do. Is that really what you're taking away from it? What I was putting to you is that they're taking the time to be in a vanity fair photo shoot you're talking about so mission and you weren't in that photo no no no no no no no no like every one of those people in that article works twice as much as anybody you know okay they're they're working non-stop and the pressure is is hard i mean stuff happens like on any given day stuff happens that you got to figure out you got to be quick on your feet, you got to be able to do the right thing.
38:15And I'm just saying that that Vanity Fair article, it's just a study in propaganda. Peter Navarro, thank you very much for talking to us. It's been a pleasure. That's the Michelle Hussain show for this week. You'll find our email in the show notes, so please do write to us or leave us a comment. And don't forget these conversations are also in video, as well as illustrated versions with my notes at bloomberg.com slash weekend. And so to the team, producers Jessica Beck and Chris Martlew. Video editing is by Andy Haywood and Megan Olson, and social media by Alex Morgan. Richard Ward is our sound engineer, the music is by Bart Warshaw, and the executive producer is Louisa Lewis.
39:02At Bloomberg Weekend, Brendan Francis Newnham is Editorial Director of Audio and Special Projects, and our Executive Editor is Catherine Bell. This week, we'd also like to thank Matt Shirley, Brendan Palmer, Joe Mathieu, and the Bloomberg Podcast team. Until next time, goodbye.
39:29Here's a paradox. We buy insurance for peace of mind, yet the very policies we trust can deliver the biggest financial shocks. Across America, millions of claims are denied every year, not because people did anything wrong, but because policies quietly excluded the things that happened. The psychology of trust tells us we assume the contract is fair, but in insurance, the information gap is massive. The insurer knows every detail of what's covered. The policyholder rarely does. That's where my policy advocate comes in. For just 27 cents a day, their platform reads your policies and shows you in plain language where you're vulnerable.
40:05They're not selling insurance. They don't do that. It's about transparency, giving ordinary people the same understanding insurance companies have had for decades. Because when you know what's really in your policy, you can plan, protect, and avoid surprises. Before you trust your policy to protect you, let My Policy Advocate tell you what it really says. Visit MyPolicyAdvocate.com today. Peace of mind starts with knowing the truth. MyPolicyAdvocate.com. Find home wherever you roam at Sinesta ES and Simply Suites, where longer stays feel comfortable, flexible, and easy. Stretch out and enjoy spacious accommodations and home-like amenities designed to help you settle in and stay productive or relaxed for however long you need.
40:47And when you're a Sinesta Travel Pass member, staying at Sinesta ES and Simply Suites means earning points toward free nights, upgrades, and more with every eligible stay. Go to Sonesta.com to book your stay and unlock the best rates with Sonesta Travel Pass. Here today, roam tomorrow. Join now at Sonesta.com. Terms and conditions apply. These days, it seems like AI agents are just about everywhere you turn, every field and every function. But without identity, you can't trust they'll serve your business instead of jeopardizing it. Fortunately, Okta helps you get identity right by securing your AI agent's identities, giving you a single layer of control, a single standard of trust.
41:27So whether an AI agent supports a single user or your entire enterprise with Okta, you'll turn risk into opportunity. Secure every agent, secure any agent. Okta secures AI.
From the publisher
US President Donald Trump’s tough talk about China and tariffs can be traced back in large part to economist Peter Navarro. A well-known China hawk, he has written books arguing Beijing poses a threat to the US economy and its national security.
Navarro is a loyalist who has served as a key trade adviser in both Trump administrations. In between, he spent four months behind bars for refusing to comply with a Congressional subpoena tied to the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the US Capitol.
It is Navarro who stands behind Trump’s sweeping tariffs against China and other nations, levies that have in some cases raised prices for US companies and consumers.
In this conversation with Mishal Husain, recorded in Bloomberg's Washington studio, Navarro discusses the US relationship with China and an upcoming Supreme Court ruling on the administration’s use of emergency powers to levy tariffs. They also look ahead to this year’s midterm elections and back at the controversial Vanity Fair profile of Trump Chief of Staff Susie Wiles.
00:00 - Introduction from Mishal Husain
02:16 - Navarro’s bond with President Trump
05:04 - Navarro’s journey from Democrat to MAGA Republican
08:01 - Time in Federal prison
09:36 - US-China relationship
12:21 - Navarro’s advice for Europe
13:22 - Trump diplomacy
15:35 - Allowing Nvidia to export advanced chips to China
17:49 - Delivering for working class Americans
20:08 - Rubio-Vance 2028
21:57 - Addressing affordability concerns
23:38 - Manufacturing jobs: “We can’t wave a magic wand”
26:45 - Supreme Court ruling
30:17 - Cost of tariff refunds
31:15 - “It's not a job, it's a mission”
Watch this podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLe4PRejZgr0Ns_wjGlmjlPz0cded0nTYS
You can find the written version of this interview with Mishal’s notes on Bloomberg Weekend: https://www.bloomberg.com/latest/weekend-interview
Contact The Mishal Husain Show mishalshow@bloomberg.net
Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.




