239. 2026 Predictions: a bubble bursts, Starmer’s only hope & Trump’s vulnerability

1 Jan 2026 · 44 min · 15 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

New Year economic/political outlook for 2026, focusing on UK growth stagnation, UK government messaging, nuclear and infrastructure deregulation, devolution, and global shocks driven by Trump tariffs and an AI investment bubble.

Guests

Steph McGovern (host) and Robert Peston (co-host). Both are UK business/economics journalists/commentators; Peston is known for macro/markets analysis.

Key claims

UK economy is “flatlining” with rising youth unemployment; government claims “growth” but policies (notably employer National Insurance cost rises) undermine hiring. Reeves/Starmer priorities (debt, NHS waits, cost of living) are framed defensively, not as an optimistic growth plan. Optimism hinges on deregulating nuclear projects via John Fingleton’s report and on devolution/metro mayors improving local skills/transport. Globally, Trump’s tariffs didn’t trigger Armageddon due to AI-driven investment, but an AI bubble may burst within a year; debt-financed AI is fragile. Bond markets and central bank independence (Federal Reserve) are pivotal.

Notable examples

“Fingleton plan” (cutting overlapping regulation; fish-disco nuclear safety example); “taco trade” (Trump reversing after market reaction); Trump’s 90-day tariff pause; China rare-earth control; NVIDIA vendor financing concerns.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Reflecting on 2025: A Dramatic Year

1:24 to 2:16

Discuss the major events and changes of 2025 leading into 2026.

“But no, as we end 2025 and start 2026, we wanted to kind of take stock of what's been an incredibly dramatic year.”

Economic Challenges and Government Actions

2:16 to 6:16

Analyzing the government’s measures and their effects on economic growth.

“We were told at the time, you know, there wouldn't be any more need for tax rises because Reeves had it sorted and everything looked like, yes, OK, it was a big pressure on businesses, those tax rises.”

Reevaluating Growth Priorities

6:16 to 10:42

Examining the government’s focus on debt, NHS, and living costs over growth.

“you know, just before the budget and then afterwards as well, actually, talking about the three priorities for her being to reduce the debt and the deficit.”

Regulatory Challenges in Nuclear Development

10:42 to 14:00

Insights into regulatory issues affecting nuclear projects and potential improvements.

“Secondly, on NHS waiting lists, too many people are unable to work and are claiming benefits because they can't get treatment from the NHS.”

Nuclear Development and Infrastructure Investment

14:00 to 15:10

Discussing the potential positive impact of government plans on nuclear development and investment climate.

“development, all held back by this, you know, overlapping, duplicating regulation.”

Devolution and Local Empowerment

15:10 to 17:41

The importance of metro mayors gaining more powers for local transport and skills development.

“Now, if the government now follows through on what I would regard as the Fingleton plan, then, yeah, we will have a much improved climate when it comes to investment and growth.”

Global Economic Volatility and Trump's Impact

17:41 to 18:39

Analyzing how Trump's presidency has affected global economic stability and inflation.

“episode about what local employers are doing around skills.”

The Federal Reserve's Challenges

19:21 to 24:12

Exploring the challenges faced by the Federal Reserve under Trump’s presidency and its implications.

“Hello, welcome back to The Rest is Money, our New Year's special.”

Bond Markets and Economic Decisions

24:12 to 27:41

The crucial role of bond markets in shaping economic policies and decisions by leaders.

“I would hope that the institutional safeguards for that independence are strong enough to withstand this Trump assault.”

Interest Rates and Inflation Trends

27:41 to 30:14

Discussing current trends in interest rates and inflation and their implications for mortgages.

“And it'll be interesting to see where it goes next, as you say, with the decisions Trump makes.”
Show all 15 chapters

The AI Bubble Concerns

30:14 to 33:05

Explores the risks associated with the AI investment bubble and the role of debt financing.

“A bright journalist on the FT invented the concept of the taco trade.”

Geopolitical Tensions and Economic Stability

33:05 to 36:16

Examines the economic battle between the U.S. and China, focusing on rare earth minerals.

“If you are particularly an American with an enormous amount of your savings in AI related companies, you will feel enormously poorer as and when this bubble is pricked.”

UK's Economic Prospects Amid Political Changes

36:16 to 40:04

Analyzes the UK’s economic outlook and the potential for growth under stable governance.

“The other thing as well that's different from 2007, 2008 crash was that the banks have got more liquidity as well, haven't they?”

Resilience and Future Prospects for Britain

40:04 to 42:14

Highlights the resilience of UK entrepreneurs and the potential for Britain to thrive economically.

“So long as we've got a government that's a bit bolder and a bit more ambitious.”

Building Financial Infrastructure

42:14 to 42:35

Discussion on the need for ambition in creating financial and physical infrastructure.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:00Robert Peston:We're the Hartford, with decades of experience insuring millions of unique small businesses. When it comes to your small business insurance, one size absolutely does not fit all. Get a quote or find an agent today at thehartford.com slash smallbusiness.

0:15Steph McGovern:This episode is brought to you by Indeed. Stop waiting around for the perfect candidate. Instead, use Indeed-sponsored jobs to find the right people with the right skills fast. It's a simple way to make sure your listing is the first candidate seat. According to Indeed data, sponsored jobs have four times more applicants than non-sponsored jobs. So go build your dream team today with Indeed. Get a$75 sponsored job credit at Indeed.com slash podcast.

0:41Robert Peston:Terms and conditions apply. Every soda's got something to say. Colas brag. Probiotics give TED Talks. Then there's Mr. Pibb. No pitch, no promises, just bold cherry bringing the flavor. Bold kick of cherry.

0:56Steph McGovern:Hey, yo, Mr. Pibb.

1:08Steph McGovern:Happy New Year and welcome to The Rest Is Money with me, Steph McGovern.

1:13Robert Peston:And with me, Robert Peston. I hope you've had a wonderful Christmas. And now let's talk about the bloody awful year we've all had and what we can expect.

1:23Steph McGovern:It's going to get better, guys. We hope. But no, as we end 2025 and start 2026, we wanted to kind of take stock of what's been an incredibly dramatic year. I feel like you can definitely say that about 2025. It was really dramatic. There was lots of big developments, you know, new government in place, Trump, obviously, in his liberation day, the tariffs and things like that. Lots of stories connected to AI, to trade deals and all sorts. So we're going to talk a bit about what's been important in all of that and where does that take us next. So, Robert, do you want to kick things off for us? Because we were expecting, weren't we, when the new government came in, we'd had the big budget in autumn in 2024,£44 billion worth of tax rises.

2:17Steph McGovern:We were told at the time, you know, there wouldn't be any more need for tax rises because Reeves had it sorted and everything looked like, yes, OK, it was a big pressure on businesses, those tax rises. But hopefully with the view that things would get calmer and the economy would start to grow more. But I mean, that was just the start of a very tumultuous year. What are your thoughts?

2:41Robert Peston:So, look, we are currently living through quite an extended period of economic flatlining of zero growth. We've had months of it. And we're also seeing unemployment rising in a way that is worrying, particularly actually unemployment among young people. I don't know whether you call it the paradox or the contradiction in this government is that this is a government that has said that its number one priority is growth. We heard that in the run-up to the election.

3:22Robert Peston:We've heard it since in almost every utterance that the Prime Minister and the Chancellor have said. But they have taken a number of steps, imposed a number of costs on the economy that have undermined growth. And the most important one was that decision to put up employers' national insurance in the previous years, last year's autumn 2024 budget, which heaped a ton of costs, 24 billion on businesses. and undermine their appetite to recruit. And it's because it was implemented this year. The negative impact on growth and employment has been felt this year. They have, as sort of countermeasures, taken some steps to improve our growth prospects, but not been ambitious enough.

4:26Robert Peston:So, yes, there's been some planning reform, not ambitious enough. Yes, there's been some infrastructure investment, in my view, not quite growth focused enough. They've maintained something else which is terribly important for long term growth. They've maintained the R &D budget, but not increased it. Research and development, that is so important to our growth prospects, but not increased it enough. They have taken some steps to improve the flow of capital from pension funds to growing business and infrastructure, but not being ambitious enough. They've not yet solved the problem of the British companies, you know, inability to get the kind of growth finance that's necessary.

5:08Robert Peston:British Business Bank has got a slightly more ambitious mandate, not ambitious enough. Regulations have been, in terms of burdensome regulations on businesses' ability to grow, eased a bit. Not enough. So the scorecard is quite a lot of stuff moving in the right direction, but not enough focus, not enough ambition. And quite a lot of the stuff that is sort of pro-growth will take too long to materialize. They are moving closer to the European Union, easing some of the costs of trading with the European Union. But again, it's not happening fast enough, and it's not enough. So, you know, if you were going to give the government a sort of school report card on its growth project, I don't know, what is it?

5:53Robert Peston:It's a sort of B minus at best. And we are a country that has got such a serious growth problem. You know, they should have been aiming for, you know, an A++ from the word go. And sadly, they didn't have the ambition.

6:10Steph McGovern:I think the thing for me that really put the kind of, nailing the coffin feels like the wrong phrase, but really suggested to me that we weren't thinking about growth enough was when we heard Rachel Reeves towards the end of 2025, you know, just before the budget and then afterwards as well, actually, talking about the three priorities for her being to reduce the debt and the deficit. So trying to bring down how much money the government has to borrow to pay for things. That being one priority. The second being bringing down NHS waiting lists. And the third being to reduce the cost of living. And for me, all of those things, of course, are important.

6:58Steph McGovern:Of course, we need to reduce witness. Of course, we need to bring down the cost of living. Of course, we need to reduce the debt. But none of them are like optimistic, kind of, you know, they're more defensive than they are talking about, you know, we need to, you know, isn't a priority to grow the economy, isn't a priority to have better access to public services. it feels, it felt really negative. And, you know, as someone who is an optimist and as someone who's got, you know, businesses and you, you know, you, you have as well speakers for schools and things like that, you, you felt we employ people, we provide work.

7:35Steph McGovern:It felt like there wasn't that sense of things are going to get better. It felt like what we were hearing from Rachel Reeves is it's going to be less worse rather than getting better. And I think that's where, you know, we've seen reform and even Trump do well with their messaging around. They might not achieve it, but they make you think that life is going to get better. That's what they're going to try and do for you because it feels rubbish at the moment, but we are going to try and make things feel better for you. And that's not the kind of rhetoric we've had from the government. So I think if they do want to make us feel empowered as business people, as employees, as employers, is to just give us that sense of, you know, it's been tough.

8:21Steph McGovern:There is always global uncertainty, but we'll get you through it and things are going to feel better. They are going to be better. And I think that's what's missing at the moment in terms of, you know, we need to be more positive, even if it's going to be hard and you don't achieve it. You've got to make people think that they are going to so that they come along for the ride. And it's that kind of placebo effect, isn't it, as well, as much as anything else?

8:44Robert Peston:No, you're totally right. And to be clear, there was, for different kinds of communicators, a way for Rachel Reeves as Chancellor and Keir Starmer as Prime Minister to make those three ambitions, debt and deficit being brought under control, NHS waiting is being brought down, ruthless focus on the cost of living, right? Those things could have been presented, actually in a more ambitious way than how they're executing them, but they could have been presented as actually pillars of a really exciting growth plan. So I'll give you an example of how you can sell those as part of a really exciting, optimistic growth plan.

9:30Robert Peston:So debt and deficit, right? If they'd done something that you and I on this podcast had thought was the right way to go, which is to have modestly increased the rates of income tax, that would have given confidence to the nation's creditors that this was a government prepared to make tough decisions in the interests of economic fiscal stability. At that point, in my view, the rate of interest that this government would have been forced to pay by those creditors would have come down very, very significantly. Now, when the government, when the interest rate that the government pays on its debts, on its bonds comes down, that actually sets a lower benchmark for interest rates in the entire economy.

10:12Robert Peston:That is good for all of us, whether we are consumers or businesses. And, you know, for example, it would have had an impact on the mortgages that people pay. Right. But they weren't bold enough when it came to that budget in the steps that they took to encourage our creditors that they really did have a compelling plan to manage the debt. With the vast numbers of smaller tax rises and the sort of deceit of freezing tax allowances, this still looked like a government afraid of its own shadow, despite its enormous majority. So not bold enough there. Secondly, on NHS waiting lists, too many people are unable to work and are claiming benefits because they can't get treatment from the NHS.

10:58Robert Peston:Again, if you just present this in a more ambitious way as a work programme by helping people who currently are essentially not getting, for example, the mental health support that they need. Right. If you present a really ambitious mental health support program. Right. That is part of the, you know, gets people the confidence to come off benefits into work. That's a massive growth program. And then finally, right. Anything that you do. Look, you know, they have tried to do something on energy costs. Not enough. Not bold enough. And then, OK, it's great to freeze NHS prescription charges. But again, on the whole cost of living side of things, people on lower incomes, they basically can't save.

11:43Robert Peston:Right. They have to spend any money, any additional money they have. It is a growth plan because the more money you put in people's pockets on lower incomes, the more they spend, the more good, you know, the more good it does for the overall economy. So there was just a way, okay, being more, you know, my problem with this government in all respects, right, is it just somehow, it's slightly afraid of its own shadow. Just when you think it's going to do the right thing, it somehow isn't ambitious enough. I mean, there's one other thing going on at the moment, which gives me pause for hope. But I don't know whether my hope is going to be dashed, as it were.

12:21Robert Peston:But it does genuinely give me cause for hope, which is there was a really excellent report published on the nightmare, the morass of sort of regulations and regulatory bodies that prevent us from actually for being literally the most inefficient, the slowest in the world when it comes to building really important new nuclear power stations. Right. Whether it's the big ones, whether it's the small modular ones, we are because there's literally, you know, we're just caught in this sort of absolute sort of treacle. Anybody who's trying to work in this sector, caught this treacle of planning restrictions, health and safety restrictions, safety restrictions.

13:09Robert Peston:It's an absolute nightmare. And this bloke, John Fingleton, who actually has a very distinguished record as a regulator, and I got his own consultancy, asked by the government to do this report into how to strip away all the unnecessary layers of regulation. and it is a brilliant report. I'd recommend it, the John Tingleton report. It's coherent. It sort of makes you laugh and cry in certain parts. You've probably heard about the fish disco, this extraordinary proposal to force, you know, a multi-hundred million pound project on one of our more important nuclear developments to save the lives of, I think, a single fish.

13:51Robert Peston:I mean, you know, the money that we've, that's been wasted off the charts, He comes up with a set of proposals. And the point about these proposals for deregulating, cutting costs for the nuclear industry is it has massive read across, massive implications for other sectors where, you know, whether it's house building, whether it's, you know, transport development, all held back by this, you know, overlapping, duplicating regulation. You know, gold plating safety in a way that actually doesn't save a single life or protect people from serious injury. Now, when he publishes it, the Treasury, and I think I mentioned this on this podcast, you know, basically then said, oh, no, by God, it all looks a bit too radical.

14:43Robert Peston:And they were proposing to basically pause it. There was a bit of an outcry. Prime Minister a few days later then not only says it is all going to happen, let's hope he's right, which would be great for nuclear development, so important for our nuclear costs. He also said that he'd asked Peter Kyle to go away and basically impose its lessons on every other bit of important government infrastructure investment or any other bit of major investment in the economy which we need for our growth plans. Now, if the government now follows through on what I would regard as the Fingleton plan, then, yeah, we will have a much improved climate when it comes to investment and growth.

15:26Robert Peston:So let's just see if it happens. But that is my that is my one cause for optimism is that the prime minister has said to his to his business secretary, do this. Kyle is going to come on the programme quite soon. You and I are going to hold him to account.

15:39Steph McGovern:Yeah, it is really interesting, this, actually, because this is, as you say, really important for infrastructure across sectors, whether it's building new data centres, whether it's energy and all those other large projects that, as you say, often get held back. So I am glad there's a bit of hope there. I think my hope at the moment in terms of, you know, where I feel like hopefully things will make a difference is around devolution, actually. And the kind of Metro mayors having more power around transport in particular. and you know so you hear me moan a lot on this show about transport and skills and I think I really hope that the metro mayors and this kind of devolution of powers so that they have more control over what exactly skills are needed in different areas and how can we make sure people can get around that connectivity could make a big difference.

16:36Steph McGovern:I have been really impressed actually by how much I have seen, for example, where I am, Kim McGuinness constantly coming out to fight for things and really think about the needs for the area. And of course, the Metro mayors need to deliver on all of this. But what I think has really impressed me is the rhetoric around talking the area up, like, yeah, OK, there's loads to do. And, you know, Kim McGuinness has got to do it. And so have the other mayors. but it feels it's that sense of like, oh, things are going to get better around here. I am prioritizing the things that matter to people around here.

17:14Steph McGovern:And that is important too. It's that feeling of things getting better that we keep talking about that we're not hearing from the government, but I feel like I'm hearing locally. And that's what me and my mates are talking about. We're like, oh God, yeah, they're going to sort out the metro. They're going to do this and that. And I think that is what matters to people is how they feel as much as it is about the reality of what is going on. But of course, they need to follow through on all this. And actually, I had a really interesting discussion, which you can hear on another episode about what local employers are doing around skills.

17:48Steph McGovern:So, you know, there's one business owner I talked to who's got an engineering firm and he explains about how they get, they work with schools locally and speak to them from like the age of 11 and get them into the workplace. They offer careers advice for them and work experience. They do all kinds of different things within the community with parents and everything else to try and get that pipeline for themselves so that they don't have this skills gap. But the impact is it helps all employers in the area what they're doing. So if you want to hear more about that, that is on a previous episode about skills.

18:22Robert Peston:Now, the important background to our economic prospects is, of course, a very volatile global economy and a global economy that's become way more volatile for one reason and one reason only. And we can sum up that reason in two words. Donald Trump became officially president of the United States at the beginning of this year. So let's talk about what Trump has meant for the world and for us after a quick break.

18:54Robert Peston:So good, so good, so good. New spring arrivals are at Nordstrom Rack stores now. Get ready to save big with up to 60 % off Rag & Bone, Mark Jacobs, Free People, and more. How did I not know Rack has Adidas? Because there's always something new. Join the Nordiclub to unlock exclusive discounts, shop new arrivals first, and more. Plus, buy online and pick up at your favorite Rack store for free. Great brands, great prices. That's why you rack.

19:51Robert Peston:For the threats you can't control. Terms apply.

20:20Robert Peston:Selection varies by location. Pay for offer exclusive. Ask in Hawaii.

20:26Steph McGovern:Hello, welcome back to The Rest is Money, our New Year's special. So what we're doing in this episode is taking stock, essentially, of what's happened in the previous year, 2025, and then looking ahead to what we think is going to be important in this next year. So we've done a bit of UK-focused economics, talking about what's happening with or not happening enough with growth, but where we think there might be optimism. But obviously, we are massively impacted by what happens in the rest of the world and the powerhouse that is the American economy and Donald Trump. So, Robert, do you want to pick things up on where things stand there?

21:10Steph McGovern:Because it has been one hell of a year.

21:12Robert Peston:Yes. And, you know, I think the important point is that we didn't and haven't suffered the sort of economic Armageddon that many thought might flow from Trump's imposition of tariffs, you know, impose them on the entire world. inaugurated a new era of protectionism, of what economists call mercantilism. Yes, those tariffs have reduced global growth a bit. They have increased global inflation a bit. But actually, it has been really rather remarkable the extent to which the American economy and indeed the world economy has absorbed this shock. And I think the biggest reason that it's managed to absorb it in a growth sense is because we've had this artificial intelligence investment bubble, massive investment, particularly in America, in data centers and the infrastructure for this artificial intelligence industrial revolution.

22:21Robert Peston:And an enormous proportion of American growth this year has come from that AI related investment. And then the other big Trump-related factor was the way that he tried to undermine the independence of the US Central Bank, tried to bully the US Central Bank, the Federal Reserve, into cutting interest rates faster than the Federal Reserve thought was prudent when it comes to managing inflationary pressures. I would say that the Federal Reserve has withstood that assault on its independence rather better than many people had feared. But we are in now for a big year for the Federal Reserve's integrity because we are going to get in the next year the appointment of a new chairman of the Federal Reserve.

23:19Robert Peston:There are other appointments that are likely to be made across the year. My own view is that it's it's well, it's obviously too early to judge whether that precious independence, that independence that gives confidence to the creditors of the United States, that interest rates are going to be set at levels that are good for the economy rather than good for the, you know, the political needs of a president who's in charge. The more that the Federal Reserve becomes politicized, the more that those creditors lose confidence in the United States and the higher, therefore, frankly, the interest rate that the government has to pay in America to borrow, the higher that becomes.

Read the full transcript

24:03Robert Peston:OK, the higher the whole framework of interest rates for the United States becomes. So all of that is in the balance. The independence of the Federal Reserve will depend on who in the end Trump appoints to that top job and then the resolve of the other members of the Federal Reserve. So there's quite a lot in play there. I would hope that the institutional safeguards for that independence are strong enough to withstand this Trump assault. But I can't be 100 % certain about that.

24:35Steph McGovern:Also, just following on from what you were saying there, I think we've seen in the last year, we've been reminded again of how important the bond markets are, you know, these markets where governments borrow money because we saw with Trump, didn't we, when it was that Liberation Day. So that day in April when he announced that, you know, he was putting tariffs on all of these countries because he was unhappy with how much money other countries were making from Americans. So he announced all these. And you remember he stood there like he was giving the odds on a horse race, announcing which tariff would hit which country.

25:15Steph McGovern:And we saw at that point global turmoil kick off. Everyone was kind of panicking about what this would mean. You even had his mates like the billionaire hedge fund boss, Bill Ackman, kicking off about it. There was, you know, there was a lot of drama around it. And then what I think led to Trump then pausing, do you remember he did that 90 day pause and then on these tariffs and then after that kind of negotiated various deals. I think what we saw part of the reason for that was because we had that increase in the cost of bonds for Americans that it was costing Trump more money to borrow money on the bond markets and that I think did have an impact on you know what he was doing with tariffs I think he didn't expect that and then thought actually our investors here this is going to be a big problem so we saw that pause.

26:09Steph McGovern:We saw then these negotiations happening, various deals being announced on what the tariffs would actually be. Because do you remember it went wild at one point with China. It was something like 145 % tariff that the Americans were putting on Chinese products coming into the country. And let's not forget, this is a country that needs Chinese products. They make 80 % of the world's air conditioners, 75 % of electric fans that the US imports are from China, 50 % of the ingredients that go into making antibiotics come from China. It's the second largest foreign owner of US treasury bonds. So this is a country that's pivotal for America's success as well.

26:54Steph McGovern:So we saw, though, that reaction to the bond market really play out in the way Trump then went ahead with the rest of the negotiations on tariffs. And similarly, here in the UK, you know, you've got Rachel Reeves trying to second guess how the bond markets are going to react to decisions she's making. And to lots of people is an esoteric concept, the idea of borrowing money, a country borrowing money, but how pivotal they are to all the decisions that are made by our leaders of these countries. And that, to me, has been really interesting to watch play out because we have seen borrowing costs go up for Rachel Reeves.

27:31Steph McGovern:You know, Trump was hit by borrowing costs going up. And so a lot of their decisions going forward, they'll be thinking about what it will mean for them borrowing money. And anyway, I found that fascinating with all of this. And it'll be interesting to see where it goes next, as you say, with the decisions Trump makes.

27:48Robert Peston:Yeah, I mean, look, just to be clear, there has been a very big structural change in the interest rates paid by all developed countries, which is at the time that central banks are bringing down the interest rate that tends to determine what we pay to borrow. So the interest rates set by the central bank, the Bank of England, the US Federal Reserve, coming down as inflation also comes nearer target. So here in the UK, one of the better bits of news we just got in the run up to the end of the year is inflation a little bit below what people were expecting. And that's why interest rates are set, in my view, in the UK.

28:38Robert Peston:Those ones set by the Bank of England are set to fall, you know, possibly by the end of the year, by certainly another half a percent, maybe by another three quarters of a percent. And those people who've got mortgages, that should bring the cost of their mortgages down. But the interesting thing about that trend to what's known as lower short term interest rates is we've seen the amount that governments pay to borrow, whether it's the British government or the American government, paying a bit less to borrow for a year or for five years. Right. But what they're paying to borrow for 30 years has actually risen.

29:19Robert Peston:And that is because when it comes to investors' view of our economy or the American economy, and you look at a national debt, the debt that the governments have in the UK, a bit under 100 % of gross domestic product of national income, but too close, some would say, for comfort to 100%. In the case of America, considerably above 100 % of their GDP, their national income. That's an enormous amount of debt. And so what investors have is concerns about their ability to manage that debt over the longer term, whereas a bit more optimism about where central banks' interest rates will settle in the short term.

30:01Robert Peston:But governments have to borrow a bit like any of us when you're managing your finances. You borrow a bit of short-term money and you borrow a bit of long-term money. So the fact that the cost of the long term money is going up is a genuine concern. But I just want to go back to one aspect of what you said, because there's one there was one really important innovation in, you know, sort of financial terminology. A bright journalist on the FT invented the concept of the taco trade. The Trump always chickens out trade. And taco has entered the sort of the lexicon. Because it is true that one of the one one of the reasons why all of us are a bit more optimistic about a Trump presidency is, you know, when the when the markets speak and they basically speak with adverse market movements to Trump and say, actually, if you do this, stock market is going to fall or bond market is going to fall.

30:55Robert Peston:He chickens out, right? And he reverses track. He does what a phrase that if you're not American, you've probably never heard of. He does what we call a reverse ferret here in the UK. And so one of the things that's important to focus on, the one bit of news was the inauguration of the Trump always chickens out, the taco trade. But the one other thing we haven't talked about, we've seen obviously some ludicrously ambitious financing trades in the AI space. There definitely is a bubble. One of the questions is, when will it burst? I think that you could just about make the case that the kind of, you know, hundreds and hundreds of billions of dollars we're seeing invested in AI infrastructure are just about sustainable for the next year.

31:43Robert Peston:So it's possible that we won't see the pricking of the AI bubble in the next year. But I do think within the next year, if there isn't a bit of moderation in investment, we can be confident that there is going to be a significant market fall at some point.

32:03Steph McGovern:So the thing that's interested me in the AI bubble, though, is a lot of the money has come from debt, hasn't it? And there's a lot of companies who are getting money from NVIDIA, for example, because they're going to be relying on their chips in order to be able to provide this AI. Does that worry you at all? It feels like there's quite a fragile, I don't know, financial hierarchy here in terms of where this money is coming from for their ambitious plans of where they want to take AI.

32:32Robert Peston:Look, the better news is that the use of debt finance is only now really taking off in a very, very significant way. And whenever you see particularly complex new financial instruments being created to finance, whether it's the energy infrastructure that underpins AI data centers or the data centers themselves, you begin to worry that, yes, there is the serious risk of an economic shock as and when this all comes to an end. And yes, I am worried about the increasing use of debt finance, although up to now, the large proportion of AI investment has been equity, which is not to say as and when these valuations fall, that it won't be painful, right?

33:21Robert Peston:If you are particularly an American with an enormous amount of your savings in AI related companies, you will feel enormously poorer as and when this bubble is pricked. But it isn't, in my view, like the 2007-2008 crash because actually our banks are not massively exposed to this AI investment. It's tends it's the debt markets tend to be these tend to be non bank sources of debt. So if there are big write offs, it should not massively imperil the ability of our banks to keep our savings safe or indeed to provide the credit that the global economy needs. You're right when you point to the way that a company like NVIDIA is financing this investment.

34:14Robert Peston:You're right to be worried about that because whenever you see what's known as vendor financing. So NVIDIA, massive beneficiary of all this investment in new data centers and indeed in the energy infrastructure, when it is effectively lending the AI developers the money to develop the services that then result in purchases of NVIDIA's very important processors and GPUs. obviously that's a concern. You could, you know, in an extreme case, when you see vendors financing purchases of that sort, it looks like a pyramid scheme, right? So I don't think we're at that stage yet. I don't think NVIDIA is being reckless in that sense.

35:01Robert Peston:But when the producer of the nuts and bolts has to lend to the buyer, for the buyer to make the purchases, I just think that is a concern. You're absolutely right to focus on it. But it's not only geopolitical military tension. No, I just think we've got to talk about America and China, because underneath almost everything we've talked about is the tension between America and China. You know, almost everything that we've talked about is in some senses being driven by this economic battle between the two of them. One of my sources of genuine medium term concern here is, you know, that China controls the rare earth, the precious essential minerals that underpin so much, particularly of high tech industrial activity.

35:51Robert Peston:Trump knows that he doesn't have enough access to, or America doesn't have enough access to these vital minerals, right, which actually underpin, you know, this is the sort of, this is essentially the equivalent of yesteryear's battles over control of oil, right? These rare earths actually basically underpin so much economic activity. China has them, America doesn't, and that is a major instability in the world. It's a major instability in the world.

36:19Steph McGovern:The other thing as well that's different from 2007, 2008 crash was that the banks have got more liquidity as well, haven't they? So even if they were to have exposure to AI, as you were saying, they don't massively, but even if they did, they've got more money, haven't they? and the buffers, as it were, to cope with if there was another big problem on people wanting to get their savings out or whatever else. And that's also a bit of a difference from that time.

36:49Robert Peston:For what it's worth, I think if we do have the pricking of that bubble, it will feel more like the dot-com crash of 25 years ago than the global financial crisis of 2007-8, which doesn't mean to say that it won't be painful. It just won't be as painful. Look, and just look, I think we should wrap up. But look, just to be clear, for this year.

37:13Steph McGovern:Yeah.

37:15Robert Peston:Look, I'm sort of cautiously optimistic, you know, in a weird way. I just think so long as certainly in the UK, we are through the cycle of the government putting up costs. You know, if you look at and if we can just get a bit of political stability in the UK And, you know, for what it's worth, you know, as we went into the end of the year, there was massive hysteria in Westminster that both Reeves and Starmer were going to be ejected by their own party. I think if we saw the kind of instability that saw them, saw that risk of them being thrown out, I actually do think that that would lead to a rise in the interest rate that the government pays, a fall in bond prices because, you know, the creditors of the UK would not like that instability.

38:08Robert Peston:the uncertainty about essentially whether any successors would manage the economy as prudently as those two. I mean, for what it's worth, and I may well be proved horribly, embarrassingly wrong about this, although I think speculation about Starmov being kicked out by his own party won't go away. I just think in the end, Labour MPs, when they look at the consequences for the reputation of the Labour Party of doing exactly what the Tories did in sowing chaos by throwing out a leader and a prime minister. I personally think Starmer will be in place at the end of the year. He's just got to get a hell of a lot better at actually basically understanding what a growth plan is and then implementing it.

38:56Robert Peston:And I think so long as some of that political instability is taken out, then I actually think, you know, the UK looks like compared to most of Europe, a pretty decent place to invest. Because, you know, we have got, take into account everything that I've just said about the instability of Starmer. Look, he ought to be able to govern in a stable way because he's got such an enormous majority. Right. If he starts to do things that look more investor friendly, we've already actually seen quite a lot of investment into the UK since Labour took over. That could really accelerate. OK, because if he does something which I think they really need to get a move on and do, which is to be much more ambitious in terms of reducing the cost of trading with the EU and look and do things that look a lot more like rejoining the single market and the customs union.

39:46Robert Peston:And again, you'd get an absolute flood of capital into the UK. And, you know, we get investment on a scale that would massively enhance our growth prospects and living standards. So, you know, I would say there's a lot of positive stuff that could happen in the UK in the coming year. So long as we've got a government that's a bit bolder and a bit more ambitious.

40:08Steph McGovern:And just to add to that, the thing I would say that you see consistently, even when there is uncertainty and, you know, I guess political instability is you still get entrepreneurs, business people, you know, people still cracking on and trying to control what they can control and, you know, still working through chaos to provide jobs to try and grow their business. and there are still the hardworking small business owners across the country who navigate their way through this and work hard through it, deal with the consequences of national insurance contribution rises and changes to minimum wage and everything else, have to make difficult decisions, but do carry on regardless.

40:56Steph McGovern:And sometimes some of them fail and it's been tricky for a lot of businesses over this last year with dealing with all these changes. But there's also still a sense of people will find a way through it because we are good at that. We are resilient as I think as a nation, because we have had so much turmoil over the last few decades and we get through it in the end.

41:17Robert Peston:This could be Britain's moment, right? We should be under no illusion. You know, we have got such extraordinary advantages when it comes to our prospects. And in particular, something I I keep repeating, six of the world's greatest universities, loads of other great universities. We are spinning out amazing new age, whether it's life sciences, whether it's technology. We have the ability in this country to be, for Europe, the generator of the industries of the future. And many of those are already in existence. We have just got to give those businesses the framework, the money, the stability that means that this decade could be Britain's decade, right?

41:58Robert Peston:And it really could be. If you look at the turmoil in the rest of Europe and the potential that this government had to create the framework for this to be, you know, essentially the powerhouse of the European economy. it's all there we got all the bits they've just got to hold their nerve and come up with you know essentially a bit more ambition when it comes to creating a financial infrastructure a physical infrastructure to unleash all that potential yeah

42:33Steph McGovern:hear you hear and that is a good note to end this show on so thank you very much for listening to us over the last few years we will continue to bring you the news as we see it, what's going on in the economy and politics and across the business world, and hopefully have more positive things to talk about over the next year or so. But thank you so much for listening. That's it from us. Bye-bye. Bye-bye. Happy New Year.

From the publisher

Will Starmer survive? Who will win the economic war between China and America? Is 2026 when hope returns to Britain?

Robert and Steph weigh up 2025 economic results and make some predictions for the year ahead.

Email: the⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠restismoney@goalhanger.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@TheRestIsMoney⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@TheRestIsMoney⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

TikTok: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@RestIsMoney⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://⁠⁠⁠goalhanger.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Money

All 210 episodes
239. 2026 Predictions: a bubble bursts, Starmer’s only hope & Trump’s vulnerabilityThe Rest Is Money · 44 min
Listen in VO