276. Will bond market vigilantes see off Starmer’s rivals?

6 May 2026 · 53 min · 23 chapters

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

UK interest-rate outlook after a Middle East/oil shock; Bank of England scenario analysis (A mild, B most likely, C worst case) and how it could affect inflation and borrowing costs. Also: whether bond markets will punish Labour/Keir Starmer if local elections (Scotland/Wales) go badly for him, potentially forcing a leftward shift and higher UK gilt yields. Finally: Jevons’ paradox applied to AI—whether AI will create jobs or replace workers.

Guests

Greg (energy/Octopus Energy sponsor mention; no further background given). Main hosts: Steph McGovern and Robert Peston. No other named guest appears in the transcript.

Key claims

Rates likely rise “a bit” under scenarios B/C; MPC is split (Hugh Pill favored a rise; others dissent; uncertainty is high). Bond-market “vigilantes” could raise borrowing costs if Labour is humiliated or shifts left. Jevons’ paradox may not hold for AI because AI can replace jobs, not just make people more efficient.

Notable examples

Strait of Hormuz ceasefire strain; 10-year UK gilt above 5%; LED/lightbulb efficiency leading to more consumption; retail using agentic AI (Ikea/Sephora examples).

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Chapters

Tap a time to open that second in VO

Economic Impact of Trump's War

0:00 to 0:37

Explore how geopolitical tensions are influencing central banks and interest rates.

“The impact of Trump's war is on every central bank's mind.”

Understanding Interest Rate Scenarios

1:56 to 4:28

Analyzing the Bank of England's forecasts and potential scenarios for interest rates.

“local elections and elections in Wales and Scotland and how bond markets will react and whether, you know, in effect, bond markets are going to determine who's in charge after the local elections.”

Inflation and Its Impact on Households

4:28 to 8:56

Discussion on how inflation affects low-income households and the broader economy.

“And we'll talk about, after I've told you about the other scenario, what that means for interest rates and things in a minute.”

Monetary Policy Challenges

8:56 to 13:14

Exploring the challenges the Bank of England faces in managing inflation and interest rates.

“that point, I kind of slightly whooped when I saw this in Andrew Bailey's, obviously the governor of the Bank of England's comments.”

Geopolitical Uncertainty and Economic Instability

13:14 to 14:01

Examining the ongoing geopolitical tensions and their unpredictable effects on the economy.

“Although I am very, very concerned about the disinflationary and deflationary depressing impact of this shock.”

Project Freedom and Volatility in the Middle East

14:01 to 15:21

Learn about the current instability in the Middle East and its global impact.

“The US had promised to help ships get through as part of this Project Freedom, but Iran's saying anyone who tries to get through will be attacked.”

UK Government's Response to Economic Shocks

15:21 to 16:35

Explore the UK government's challenges in addressing economic shocks and public expectations.

“And that's what makes this really difficult, is it impacts us so much, but it's impossible to work out when, how this will all end.”

Impact of Local Elections on Labour and Bond Markets

16:35 to 18:16

Analyze how local elections could affect Labour's position and bond markets.

“So the other big sort of potential macro shock that is looming is what will happen in debt markets if Labour is absolutely humiliated in these local and national and Scottish and Welsh elections.”

The Role of Bond Markets in Democracy

18:16 to 19:29

Understand the uncomfortable influence of bond markets on government policy.

“you could envisage genuine turmoil in bond markets.”

Potential of Green Party Policies

19:29 to 21:10

Discuss the implications of Green Party policies on the economy and bond markets.

“And the view is because the Green Party want to increase taxes and public spending, then, of course, as you say, the bond markets will be like, well, hang on a minute.”
Show all 23 chapters

UK's Fragile Debt Position and Growth Challenges

21:10 to 23:03

Investigate the UK's debt issues and failure to stimulate economic growth.

“because there'll always be this thing that the bond markets decide.”

Community Impact of Business Beyond Profit

23:03 to 24:24

Learn about the broader impact of businesses on communities beyond just financial gains.

“is if investors could be persuaded that the government had a credible plan to get the growth rate up.”

Positive Perspectives on AI and Job Creation

24:24 to 26:55

Explore discussions around AI's potential as a job creator in the near future.

“it's not just, I heard this brilliant German minister speak last week and he was talking about, and I literally sat there going, come to the UK, you've totally got the vision.”

Defence Spending and Fiscal Responsibility

26:55 to 28:00

Examine the implications of increased defence spending on national debt and investor confidence.

“So we're going to talk about that after the break.”

The Implications of Defense Spending on National Debt

28:00 to 29:20

Explore the challenges of increasing defense spending within fiscal constraints.

“Well, maybe you could take that defence spending out of the fiscal targets, out of the fiscal rules, have the defence spending not add to the official, you know, targeted national debt.”

Welfare and the Burden of Change

29:20 to 32:20

Discuss the political difficulties surrounding welfare reform and its impact on voters.

“And, you know, obviously, where, you know, all the right wing parties, right of center parties reform and the Tories say it has to come from is from welfare reform.”

Jevons's Paradox and AI's Economic Impact

34:20 to 37:10

Understand Jevons's paradox and its relevance to AI and employment.

“Welcome back to The Rest Is Money with me, Steph McGovern.”

AI's Transformative Role in Retail

37:10 to 42:04

Examine how AI is reshaping the retail sector and enhancing customer connections.

“And it's been a really, really, really important.”

AI and the Importance of Human Connection in Retail

42:04 to 44:33

Explore how AI is transforming retail while emphasizing the need for human interaction.

“So the boss of Ikea was talking about how instead of people now, you know, coming to them and saying, what's the best bed?”

The Evolution of E-commerce and Retail Strategies

44:33 to 46:46

Discuss the changes and strategies retailers must adopt to thrive in the age of AI.

Experiential Shopping: The Future of Retail

46:46 to 48:04

Learn about how experiential shopping enhances customer loyalty and the retail experience.

The Economic Impact of AI and Job Displacement

48:04 to 49:58

Examine the potential economic consequences of AI, including job loss and the need for government preparation.

“And I certainly think in the short term, Jevon's paradox does hold because I think so much of what's going on in AI at the moment is making individuals more skilled, more intelligent, as it were.”

A Gloomy Analogy for AI's Future

49:58 to 50:26

A striking analogy comparing humans to filament bulbs being replaced by LED AI technology.

“And the analogy, therefore, that maybe this is an appropriate place to finish that Chris came up with is because I was talking to him about the LED case.”
Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:02Robert Peston:The impact of Trump's war is on every central bank's mind. I think the likelihood is that interest rates will go up a bit at some point. The Bank of England is split.

0:13Steph McGovern:The Greens obviously are expected to do well in these elections. The view is because the Green Party want to increase taxes and public spending, the bond markets will be like, well, hang on a minute. How are they going to pay for all this? How are they going to do all this?

0:25Robert Peston:A way will be found to get Starmer out. If they lose significant numbers of seats to the Greens, the logic to fight back will be to move the government to the left.

0:36Steph McGovern:We're delighted to say that this year the rest is money is being powered by Octopus Energy. So Greg is back with us. Greg, I've got another question for you. So in terms of energy companies, are we just back to the big six? You know what?

0:49Robert Peston:We've only got like six or so major supermarket chains. No one worries about that because they invest ferociously in competition. You've got differentiation. You know, we thought the market was stable, then Aldi and Lidl turned up. Competition is not about reinventing the souk with dozens of identikit companies. It's about companies having different approaches to looking after customers and competing ferociously on that. Energy could well be going that direction.

1:16Steph McGovern:Well cheers Greg and thank you for powering this episode of The Rest Is Money.

1:31Steph McGovern:Hello and welcome to The Rest Is Money with me Steph McGovern.

1:35Robert Peston:And with me Robert Pester. We've got an action packed show. We're going to kick off with the outlook for interest rates as the fragile ceasefire in Iran and the Strait of Hormuz, breaking down oil price back at record levels. What does that mean for the price of money in the UK? We're also going to look at those incredibly important local elections and elections in Wales and Scotland and how bond markets will react and whether, you know, in effect, bond markets are going to determine who's in charge after the local elections. And then finally, having had that discussion with Tom Blomfeld of Monzo about how AI was going to destroy all jobs, there are a lot of people around saying actually AI is going to create jobs.

2:22Robert Peston:So we're going to look at those arguments. What is the Bank of England saying about the outlook for the rate of interest we all pay?

2:28Steph McGovern:Yeah, so it's interesting this. They have done a forecast and this is the first one since the Iran war broke out. And it's essentially looking at three scenarios of how the war, how the unrest in the Middle East, the energy and oil prices will hit the UK economy. And they all center around how long energy and oil prices stay high. Now, the bad news is none of them are good and they all involve living standards getting worse. But there's different levels of severity in terms of the impact. So they've done this as A, B and C. Now, A is the mildest outcome. So this is where energy prices will fall back sooner rather than later.

3:11Steph McGovern:Inflation will peak at about 3.6 % by the end of the year. And although that's not ideal, it won't lead to any kind of spiraling. And what I mean by that is households and firms changing their behavior. So people asking for pay rises or spending less because they've got less money or firms putting up prices because they're paying higher costs. So in that first scenario, it's likely the second round effects won't be as strongly felt. So things will kind of get back to normal sooner, although inflation will still go up. The second scenario, B, that's the most likely one, is what the Bank of England is saying.

3:50Steph McGovern:And this is where oil and gas stays higher for longer. So therefore pushing inflation again higher this year. and those second round effects could be firms passing on costs to consumers, then them having less money and then that could mean demand for things falls and then people might let go of employees so unemployment could rise but then that could mean inflation isn't hit as hard because then obviously if people's demand is lower then prices can come down. But equally you might get people asking for higher pay But that, again, is not as dramatic as the third scenario. So that's the one that the Bank of England thinks is most likely.

4:31Steph McGovern:And we'll talk about, after I've told you about the other scenario, what that means for interest rates and things in a minute. The worst case scenario, C, is that oil stays high for a sustained period. Gas prices, for example, double. the wage price spirals, and the end result will be inflation rising to 6.2 % in 2027. And interest rates having to go up because of that. And we'll talk about that in a minute. But basically, this is all dependent on how long oil stays high for and what that means for energy prices and therefore the impact on everyone else. Because people, the longer this goes on for, then the more likely people will change behaviours because of it.

5:15Steph McGovern:And that is what the Bank of England are trying to work out is what happens. But what, Robert, I'd love to know what you think on this. This then impacts, doesn't it? This is what they do when they sit in this meeting, this monetary policy committee, then sit in the meeting with all this data and try and work out what does that mean for interest rates. And we know from the last meeting that they've been held for now at 3.75%. There was one of them, Hugh Pill, who voted for it to go up. to 4%, but he was outnumbered by the others. But there is a chance that in the second and third scenarios, interest rates would have to go.

5:50Steph McGovern:Robert, what's your take on it?

5:52Robert Peston:So, yeah, on the scenarios, as you say, scenario C, interest rates would definitely rise, and scenario B, they would rise a bit. Scenario A is consistent with something we've talked about on the show, which is interest rates, which, you know, frankly, by recent historical standards feel high, a bank rate of 3.75%, that would be just held, well, just held, but it would be held for the rest of the year. I mean, we should just remember that is still a significant shift from what was expected to happen to interest rates before Trump's war in Iran, because before Trump's war in Iran, we were expecting interest rates to fall by perhaps a half of a percentage point.

6:44Robert Peston:So as a result of Trump's war, we are already paying more interest than would otherwise be the case. But under scenarios B and C, we would pay a lot more to borrow than would otherwise be the case. Certainly, if you look at the behaviour of markets, Markets are now expecting not massive interest rate rises, but nonetheless interest rate rises in the UK between now and the end of the year. And although, you know, the pressure on interest rates to go up is probably greater in the UK than elsewhere, this is now a global phenomenon. The inflationary impact of Trump's war is on every central bank's mind.

7:32Robert Peston:And, you know, at least for a period, we appear to be, you know, at the end of the interest rate cutting cycle, which for many businesses and, you know, many households will, one, be painful. but bees is something that you i know get get get pretty exercised about will be sort of inexplicable because of course you know the truth is that when you get um an inflationary shock of this sort when commodity prices oil prices go up we're expecting food prices to go up as as well particularly as fertilizer which is dependent on oil feeder stocks um you know fertilizer becomes in the short supply, we're expecting food to become more expensive.

8:20Robert Peston:That increase in the cost of living makes everybody poorer. And so for many people, just inexplicable why the Bank of England would want to make poor households who borrow poorer still in the circumstances where there is this shock to the cost of living.

8:38Steph McGovern:It's always the low-income households that are the most exposed when inflation goes up, particularly food prices and energy prices, because that's where they spend more of their income on essentials. So this again will hit the poorest hardest. And as you say, that point, I kind of slightly whooped when I saw this in Andrew Bailey's, obviously the governor of the Bank of England's comments. He said about what's happening now, there is nothing monetary policy can do to stop the cost increases. And I was like, yes, you've just admitted it. I mean, I know in the longer term it can, but in this moment, if you put up rates, you would just hammer people more and it wouldn't bring down energy prices.

9:21Steph McGovern:I know there's an argument of in the longer term it might make a difference, but it just feels like it's that people are hit unfairly when they're trying to control inflation.

9:32Robert Peston:I mean, look, the judgment that the Bank of England has to make, and one of the things that was very striking reading the minutes of the Bank of England's meeting, is quite how divided members of the Monetary Policy Committee are on the potential inflationary impact. And, you know, the worry for the Bank of England when you have an increase in prices of this sort, if there is not enough so-called slack in the labour market, workers demand higher wages, higher salaries, And that then forces companies to raise prices again. And you get into this inflationary spiral. Those second round effects are the impact of higher food and oil prices on what people are paid.

10:24Robert Peston:And that is what the Bank of England wishes to bear down on, because, you know, there is a lot of history that when inflation gets in the system in that kind of way, it undermines investment, it undermines growth. Both and over time, everybody gets gets poorer, which is why the Bank of England's mandate is explicitly and solely about keeping inflation as far as it can at the target of two percent. But as I say, it is very interesting. I mean, what I would say about where we're heading, I think the likelihood is that interest rates will go up a bit at some point this year. But it is by no means certain for two reasons.

11:12Robert Peston:One is because, you know, actually what's going on in the Middle East, there is a lot of uncertainty around Trump's Iran war about how, you know, bad these shortages of oil and gas are going to become, how bad the shortages of fertilizer, you know, jet fuel, diesel and all the rest of it are going to become. So there are uncertainties around that. And there's also this, when you forecast what a central bank has got to do, it's also about forecasting the views of people. And one of the things that was really quite striking about the, you know, because one of the innovations that the Monetary Policy Committee has introduced in the last year or two is each member of the MPC writes down their private views about what they think is going to happen to inflation and what should be done about it.

12:05Robert Peston:And so you've got Hugh Pill at the one end actually voting. He thinks the inflationary risk is significant. And he's not uninconsiderably, he's not, you know, he's the chief economist at the Bank of England, right? So, you know, that is it's not the official view of the Bank of England, but, you know, it is the official view of the economics department of the Bank of England that interest rates should go up. Then there's a member of the MPC called Megan Green, who also appears to be of a view that maybe interest rates should rise, although she didn't vote for a rise. And then at the other end, you've got somebody like Swati Dingo who's been on our show basically saying it's impossible at this moment to judge which of the three scenarios is the correct one.

12:47Robert Peston:The Bank of England is split. And given that it's a democratic vote, whether interest rates go up, it is quite hard to be absolutely confident what will happen to interest rates. Although I'm afraid my view is, given that the oil shock is greater, certainly that the Bank of England feared it would be only a few weeks ago, I fear myself that interest rates are going to go up a bit. Although I am very, very concerned about the disinflationary and deflationary depressing impact of this shock. I think growth will this year be, you know, will be negligible, almost non-existent. And that in and of itself will mean prices.

13:30Robert Peston:There will be downward pressure on prices.

13:34Steph McGovern:Yeah. And it's just worth, you know, reminding people, I think, as well, you know, what the Bank of England, as you say, trying to figure out is what happens. but they're working with completely unknown parameters because as we've seen, the volatility with oil is still happening. There was meant to be this ceasefire. This has come under strain because just this week, the US and Iran have exchanged fire in this Strait of Hormuz that we keep talking about how important it is. The US had promised to help ships get through as part of this Project Freedom, but Iran's saying anyone who tries to get through will be attacked.

14:08Steph McGovern:And they keep this sense of, okay, with the ceasefire, could things possibly go back to normal? No, because it's just impossible to predict what's going to happen next. And just, I was with last week, some of the guys from the Middle East who run various businesses there, pretty big ones, including the lads who run Majidal Futan, which is one of the biggest entertainment leisure hotel businesses there. They own a ton of shopping malls, huge leisure outlets across the Middle East. And they were essentially at this big retail congress in Berlin trying to convince everyone that everything was going back to normal.

14:48Steph McGovern:They're like, things are okay. Come back to the United Arab Emirates. Come back to the Middle East. Keep investing in us. We've been through volatile things before. And then at the same time, you've got friends who I've got who live out in the UAE saying they were about to send their kids back to school, but the schools are not open again because there's been more missile alerts and everything's kicked off. So it just feels like it is so volatile. It would be impossible for anyone to predict it, never mind the Bank of England trying to work out what it means in two years' time. There's just no sense of any settling down yet.

15:24Steph McGovern:And that's what makes this really difficult, is it impacts us so much, but it's impossible to work out when, how this will all end.

15:32Robert Peston:Yeah, for British people, but also for the British government. This is extremely bad news. The government may and does say, of course, that this shock to living standards is not its fault. And that is true. It is not its fault. But the British people expect any incumbent government to sort these problems out. We don't yet know. The government has got all these emergency preparations for the worst that could possibly happen in terms of impact on what it costs to heat our homes and food shortages and all the rest of it. But they haven't yet laid out detailed plans. This is a pretty unsettling backdrop for the local elections and those elections in Scotland and Wales.

16:20Robert Peston:And although this is probably not in and of itself at the moment, another net negative for Starmer and the government, and that's probably only because the poll ratings of Starmer and the government are so low. So the other big sort of potential macro shock that is looming is what will happen in debt markets if Labour is absolutely humiliated in these local and national and Scottish and Welsh elections. because, you know, and this seems to me to be reasonable, there are only two possible scenarios for what will happen to the government after, you know, if it is humiliated. One is a way will be found to get Starmer out.

17:15Robert Peston:Were that to happen, almost certainly the new leader would shift Labour to the left. And as far as lenders to the UK, buyers of UK government bonds, buyers of government debt are concerned. A shift to the left in that way means the government will borrow more, and that is something that lenders to the UK don't want, and will punish the British government by essentially selling that debt, meaning that interest rates for the government go up and interest rates for the rest of us go up. or Starmer will survive by promising a dramatic reset. But that reset will also be a shift to the left because that is where the pressure is coming from.

18:03Robert Peston:You know, because, you know, if they lose significant numbers of seats to the Greens, the logic to fight back will be to move the government to the left. And in both of those circumstances, you could envisage genuine turmoil in bond markets. Now, I have to say, most people listening to this will, I think, feel that's not how democracy should operate. You know, you shouldn't have a situation where the policies of the government of the day are determined by a limited number of wealthy individuals who run big investment funds, hedge funds and the rest, you know, who determine whether or not to lend to the UK.

18:45Robert Peston:it's very very uncomfortable for people's uh well it's very uncomfortable for the government obviously very uncomfortable for starmary's colleagues but it's also very uncomfortable for you know anybody who has a view about what should really you know influence the direction in which governments should go i mean you know this is obviously a story uh you know as old as capitalism but it is nonetheless always painful when it comes into sharp focus like this yeah

19:15Steph McGovern:Yeah. And I say this next bit without any political views in terms of, you know, any bias in any way. But for example, you know, the Greens obviously are expected to do well in these elections. And the view is because the Green Party want to increase taxes and public spending, then, of course, as you say, the bond markets will be like, well, hang on a minute. This will, you know, this could, how are they going to pay for all this? How are they going to do all this? but there is an argument that the bond markets might be out of date with this because the greens and again i just reiterate i'm not saying i'm pro the green party i'm not saying i'm against them but what if it works and it gets growth what if in the longer term their plans for you know and the change from the mainstream of what we've had which clearly hasn't worked like everything labor came in with hasn't worked but you know whereas we're in a worse situation than we were what if reform or greens coming in actually in the longer term even though it looks like it doesn't economically stack up any of this and it could be you know a nightmare for the economy what if it isn't and that's the that's that you get stuck in the same cycle based on what the bond markets think should happen and as you say it doesn't allow for democracy every list trust decided by the bond markets.

20:38Steph McGovern:So, and again, I'm not saying she should have stayed, but there is an argument for you can never change from the regime of we've always had, if it's always the bond markets that dictate what happens next for us. And I know that's a big, oh, Steph doesn't know what you're talking about, that's not how economics works, blah, blah, blah. But I just think what's to say that these outlander parties coming in might actually change things for the better. We don't know. And that's the problem we're never going to find out because there'll always be this thing that the bond markets decide.

21:14Robert Peston:Look, you can't escape the economic reality that, partly because of COVID, partly because actually during the austerity years, debt actually rose, partly because, you know, the impact on government debt of the global financial crisis back in 2007 and 2008 was significant. The UK's debt position is more fragile than many of our international competitors. And it is just a fact of life that whenever there are jitters globally about growth, it's always the UK who's or rather the UK government whose interest rate rises you know disproportionately more than the interest rate of other countries and you know one of the things that has been striking and rather worrying is that on what's known as the benchmark guilt the 10-year government bond you know the interest rate government pays has gone above 5 % And, you know, that is a level, you know, we haven't seen for decades.

22:24Robert Peston:That is, you know, and it's painful and it's significantly more than other governments are paying. And it isn't that long ago, pre-trust, actually, the UK was paying less than competitor economies, competitor governments, was paying less, for example, before trust than the US government was paying to borrow. So this is a big reversal since trust. And there's no, you know, it is spilled milk. There's no point complaining about it. It has got to be fixed. I mean, the thing, however, that you said is absolutely at the core of the British problem is if investors could be persuaded that the government had a credible plan to get the growth rate up.

Read the full transcript

23:12Robert Peston:And there were a ton of things that it could have done when it was elected to get the growth rate up. then we would not be in this painful position or not nearly to the extent that we are if we had regained the confidence of lenders to the uk that the growth rate was going to rise or was rising and thereby was generating additional tax revenues to pay for public services was boosting living standards you know the government would not be in this mess and you know you know in the end It's quite hard to feel sorry for this government being in this position because they knew that growth was the challenge.

23:52Robert Peston:And they didn't. I mean, you say that the government failed, but it failed because it didn't have a credible, coherent growth plan. And just hammered businesses. It wasn't by accident that it failed. It's because, you know, it faced in two directions. It taught the language of growth and then did a ton of stuff that undermined growth. And that was a huge strategic error. Yeah.

24:15Steph McGovern:And I'm really seeing that, see that play out locally in terms of businesses closing down because of the business rates and the employment costs and everything else. It really, you know, it's not just, I heard this brilliant German minister speak last week and he was talking about, and I literally sat there going, come to the UK, you've totally got the vision. And he talked about how when you look at business, you cannot just look at them in the context of jobs and the money they bring in. You have to look at what they do in terms of community cohesion, what they do for when, you know, these jobs are not just jobs for money, they're jobs for people's mental health.

24:53Steph McGovern:And he had this, I mean, he had a background in retail, so he had genuine experience in business and literally the room erupted with his, and it was a room full of people from all over the world. It wasn't just Germans. It wasn't just British people going, I wish he was one of ours. It was a room full of people going, yes, he gets it because he talked about how actually growth and it doesn't just come from thinking about business in a monetary sense. It's about thinking about everything else they bring to the party in terms of work and mental health and public health and even communities providing, they contribute to the infrastructure of areas.

25:33Steph McGovern:And I really listened to him and thought, this is what we're not doing. we're not thinking about the bigger context of what making money brings. It isn't just capitalism. It is about all the social stuff it brings and the pressure that reduces on welfare and everything else. And we don't think of it like that. I think in this country, we think too much like it's vulgar to make lots of money. Like, yes, okay, there's too many very, very powerful rich people who maybe have too much control and get too much money. But for people, for entrepreneurs and things, there's a sense of, yeah, we want you to do well.

26:09Steph McGovern:But when you get to the, when you actually start making money and doing well and providing for your local economy, you just get hammered by the government on taxes. And, you know, where's the incentive then? Anyway, that's a bit of a mini rant, but it was really inspiring to hear a politician talk about like the economy in a way that was not about taxes. And it was instead about all the good things that can come and someone who actually genuinely knew what they were talking about because they had business experience.

26:39Robert Peston:That is important. And in a minute, I want to also talk about something else that's positive because it's quite striking to me the number of economists and commentators who are positing that maybe AI can actually be a job creator, certainly in the sort of shorter term. So we're going to talk about that after the break. But just one final thought on this debt trap problem for politicians. it's quite striking that those on the left and you know the the the you know mayor of greater manchester who i think you know if you can if you can get a seat and there it looks to me as though there are moves um afoot to get him a seat in parliament andy burnham um i think he's the most if he gets a seat in parliament he's definitely the most likely to succeed kia starmer as leader and prime minister and i think you know that's not an unlikely prospect at the moment um but we'll see.

27:32But he has been flirting with the idea, given that we have to increase defence spending

27:39Robert Peston:to, you know, first 3 % of GDP, then 3.5 % of GDP. And we're looking at tens of billions of pounds of more spending. If you're on the left of the party, you don't want that additional spending to come from, you know, at the cost of less spending for schools, hospitals and public services. So on the left, people like Andy Burnham are looking for ways to pay for defence that doesn't lead to cuts elsewhere. And so, you know, he's mooting. Well, maybe you could take that defence spending out of the fiscal targets, out of the fiscal rules, have the defence spending not add to the official, you know, targeted national debt.

28:19Robert Peston:I have to say that I think if any prime minister of the UK does do that, they will be hammered by investors because debt is debt. The idea that somehow a hedge fund based in America or some kind of money manager in Singapore are going to essentially take a patriotic view that it is their duty to lend to the UK at lower interest rates to fund defence spending in the UK is pretty absurd. anything that adds to the national debt will be seen by investors as bad for the credit worthiness of the British government and the British government will be penalized for that so I'm afraid to say there is no easy fix by reworking the fiscal rules if you know we are going to meet that you know if we're going to increase defense spending in the way that you know essentially does, I'm afraid, look very important, then the government is going to have to find savings elsewhere.

29:21Robert Peston:And there is no alternative. And, you know, obviously, where, you know, all the right wing parties, right of center parties reform and the Tories say it has to come from is from welfare reform. And I'm afraid to say, you know, you know, and, you know, we've even had the former defense secretary, former head of NATO, George Robertson, member of the Labour Party say it has to come from welfare restructuring. It is quite difficult to see where you would find the money, if not from a reform of the welfare system. But my goodness, reforming the welfare system is not easy. And at the end of the day, obviously, as we've talked about before, the rational place to start is actually on support for those who are retired.

30:06Robert Peston:But there is no government at the moment, or I'll put that another way, You know, there doesn't appear to be any political party brave enough to look at changing the so-called triple lock when it comes to the state pension. But there will have to be, you know, inevitably, I'm afraid, very painful decisions taken, you know, if we're going to hit those defence spending targets.

30:31Steph McGovern:And then on top of that, you know, when you're thinking about people going to vote in the elections, they're hearing things about how, you know, how much of a stress welfare is. At the same time, as reports coming out from, you know, this Tory analysis was put out saying that there are more than 600 ,000 households getting more in benefits than the average worker's salary. so it's showing that they were these households were given more than 32 000 pounds in welfare payouts last year and the average annual salary of a british worker after tax you know is around that and so you've got that coupled with the welfare budget's too big and then you know the working poor hearing that there's people on benefits getting more money than them from not working and obviously that's a very divisive thing to put out because lots of people on benefits have not made that choice that they're there because of whatever circumstances are going on in their life.

31:30Steph McGovern:But that really then focuses the mind when they're going to the polls to decide, well, do we need change? Do we need to bring in these people who are going to cut that welfare fund and, you know, make it more fair for people? And so that's the, that really plays on people's minds, I think, at this time. That's what people are, you know, when people are talking to me about voting reform or whatever, they're saying it on the basis of, well, what about all the people on benefits? Well, we're grafting and they're not doing anything which is obviously you know not the story for lots of people but um but it but it does put pressure on when it comes to this and shows

32:03Robert Peston:that we do need to get on top of the welfare fund apart from just the fact that the you know the bill for those who retired has has gone up and up and up you know the other side of it is that the number of people uh who are disabled and the rise particularly of mental ill health uh that has also contributed to a massive explosion in the disability benefits budget. And, you know, that is the biggest challenge when it comes to reform. Incredibly hard to do, both from the point of view of, you know, obviously in the Labour Party, it absolutely split the Labour Party, which is why, you know, Rachel Reeves had to abandon her plans to reform the welfare budget, you know, now over a year ago or around a year ago.

32:50Robert Peston:Very difficult politically to do. But nonetheless, many would say absolutely essential. So look, let's take a very quick break. Because we had Tom Bromfield, who was one of the founders of Monzo, come on the programme and say, income tax is going to disappear because nobody's going to be in jobs as a result of AI. There are other people, as I say, right now, making a sort of counter-argument about how AI certainly in the short term is going to be creating jobs. So let's look at that after the break.

33:25Steph McGovern:This episode is sponsored by Starling, the bank that helps you organise your money, build great habits and stay in control of your spending. Now, I talk a lot about financial literacy and its importance in our economy, you know, giving people knowledge, but also confidence with money too. And Starling reckons anyone can be good with money and you can start simply by checking your balance. daily. It gets easier every day and it takes the mystery out of it. And then the real value comes from digging into the details with tools like Starling Spending Intelligence. So this is an AI powered search bar within Starling Current Accounts where you can ask a question about your spending habits and get an instant answer in app.

34:09Steph McGovern:It helps deepen your knowledge and make more informed money decisions. It's a little like having a financial co-pilot in your pocket, mapping out exactly where your money goes. Search Starling Bank to find out more. Good With Money starts here.

34:29Steph McGovern:Welcome back to The Rest Is Money with me, Steph McGovern.

34:32Robert Peston:And with me, Robert Peston. Now, I was just really struck over the last couple of weeks. Every time I looked at views of an economist on Substack or in some of the financial press, there was one very interesting piece, for example, in the FT. I kept seeing people refer to this very powerful theory of a really important 19th century British economist.

35:01Steph McGovern:Just love it when we're, you know, you go a 19th century British economist. Go on. What did they say? Why is it relevant to my life now?

35:08Robert Peston:An amazing man, actually. He's called William Stanley Jevons. And his life story is extraordinary. Comes from a reasonably humble background, goes off to Australia, comes back, teaches at University College London, dies. He drowns off the coast of Hastings at the age of 47. In a relatively short life, he builds up this enormous body of really important economic work, work in economics, and even designs of sort of prototype computer. Right. So he's one of those absolute sort of polymath, amazing Victorian figures. But he came up with this sort of theory is not quite the way I'm putting it, but principle of economics called and it's called Jevons's paradox.

35:52Robert Peston:And he was looking at why as steam engines became more efficient, i.e. they produced more power with less coal, why it was that consumption of coal was going up. Right. Because you assume if steam engines were using less coal to produce the same power. Yeah. You know, demand for coal would fall. But of course, what was actually happening was that the output of steam engines was becoming cheaper. So people wanted more steam engines. And the rise in demand for steam engines meant that even though these steam engines were way more efficient than the ones that had come before, the amount of coal that was needed went up and up and up.

36:39Robert Peston:Right. Because consumers and businesses wanted all this cheap output, whether it was in factories or to drive trains or whatever it is. Everybody wanted cheaper train travel, more stuff being produced by steam-driven factories. So demand for coal increase. That's the paradox, right? A machine becomes more efficient, but rather than it meaning that it consumes less of the energy or commodity that it requires, it actually ends up – the development means there's more consumption, right? And it's been a really, really, really important. It's been a really important theory in economics. So, for example, when there have been these rows about how you tackle climate change, there are the techno optimists, people like Bill Gates, for example, argued that actually restricting our lifestyles doesn't need to be that dramatic.

37:34Robert Peston:don't have to restrict how much we fly because technological change will mean that everything becomes more efficient and you know uses less carbon uh and all the rest of it and as a result of of of that the world will naturally emit less and so the example people always use is when the led light bulb um became you know proliferated people thought oh well that will mean we'll you know use you know leds will use way less power because they do use way less power than traditional light bulbs and we'd all be way better off in terms of climate, you know, CO2 emissions and all the rest of it. But of course, because LED was so much more efficient, people bought millions more of them.

38:13Robert Peston:We lit up all the centres of our cities and so we just went wild. And so actually getting rid of the traditional light bulb didn't lead to the reductions that people hoped for. So, you know, so that's why some people continue to argue you've got to have lifestyle changes. Now, artificial intelligence, because I've lost count on a number of articles recently have said Jevons paradox means that actually there'll be more employment because the whole point about artificial intelligence is it reduces the cost of intelligence, right? And if you reduce the cost of intelligence, and the argument is you basically give you and me AI help, we become way more intelligent for less cost, And therefore, the argument is you get millions more people like us and you get millions, much more employment because everybody wants more intelligence and you employ way more people.

39:09Robert Peston:Right. And it does work as a theory. You know, if AI is simply making all of us more efficient, but as we have discussed on this program many times, this is, we think, the first industrial revolution in history where what's happening is not that humans are becoming more efficient. They are being replaced. Right. So if AI was simply about augmenting what any of us can do, fine. Then it would be the same as the steam engine. But it isn't the same as the steam engine because the whole point about artificial general intelligence, and I say this as somebody who yesterday was working with Anthropics Cowork to basically automate some of the things I need in my daily life and was just staggered by how efficient Cowork is.

39:59Robert Peston:Some of what I'm doing is, well, most of what Cowork is doing is actually at the moment is making me more efficient. But you can just see the potential of something like co-work to replace lots of us. I hope it's not going to replace you and me, but you just can't take that for granted, can you?

40:14Steph McGovern:Yeah, that's really interesting because you're right on that paradox. It would suggest that then we'll just employ way more people and do way more stuff because we'll have more people who are really efficient.

40:26Robert Peston:And all the outputs will be cheaper and we'll all be spending more money on the things that we want, you know.

40:30Steph McGovern:Yeah. And I don't know, maybe there is an argument for that because just coming back to this event, I was at this retail conference. It was interesting to me because I thought, you know, a room full of C-suite level people in retail from all over the world would be talking about volatility and talking about supply chain disruption and talking about how do we weather this storm of what's going on in the Middle East. And actually, that was just a tiny part of it. Everything was about AI, you know, and they were talking about how in retail now it's totally past the experimentation phase. And it's now being used in this disciplined way.

41:10Steph McGovern:You know, agentic AI is everywhere in these retailers now, not just for chatbots, but for search and discovery and personalization and, you know, predicting customers, you know, I don't know, statistics to get products that are right for them. And, you know, pricing logic, customers journeys, the supply chain, how they, you know, deliver all that. and they were you know talking about how this is there was this great uh guy who's the ceo of a company called tendam which is this big huge european based in spain's retailer he sounded like antonio banderas so when he delivered it sounded like it was a hollywood movie star singer but he was like this isn't a wave this is a tsunami that's going to change everything we do but you cannot lose the emotional connection of people and the bricks and mortar of retail and that is going to go hand in hand with ai it's just that it's going to enhance all that it's not going to mean we you know that the suddenly it's in fact it's the opposite of we've talked about for years in terms of the high street it's that the high street and those physical outlets are going to be more important than ever because people are going to be desperate for that human connection but they'll just want everything delivered in a way that is easier for them.

42:28Steph McGovern:So the boss of Ikea was talking about how instead of people now, you know, coming to them and saying, what's the best bed? They now have people going on to whatever, ChatGPT, whatever you use, to say, how can I sleep better? And then they're looking at how do I connect to that? So then the answer for that question is you go to Ikea, that's how you sleep better. or if it's you know lululemon we're talking about how for them it's like people might this is a weird way of phrasing it but this is what the woman from lululemon said she said you know people will ask out people in our stores where's the best place to sweat and so that's the question now i was like you can't say that in many stores in middlesbrough uh but but how is the question sorry that's how she framed the question yeah she said that on stage where people go in and ask where's the best place to sweat i was like yeah yeah the point she was making was now lululemon huge you know brand for athletic wear and and athleisure and all that but their connection their ai is used so much in the business but on a delivery point it's them in areas where they know they'll that you know their store will be in a place where they know everything about that area so they'll know like where the best gyms are what kind of classes there are people will like so if people come in with that question of or you know people ask a chat but whatever they're not a chat but they ask chat gbt or whatever they're using a question like where can i exercise or whatever they will link into it to try and be the ones that then give them the the products or on a human delivery level if someone goes into the shop and says it or while you know i'm thinking about starting yoga let me tell you the five best places around here where uh you can do yoga and here are the perfect pants for it.

44:15Steph McGovern:It's thinking in that more, yes, AI is going to make everything on a level easier to deliver, more efficient with more personalization and everything else, but it's got to be connected to humans, knowing the area, knowing the people and that localization and emotional connection will be just as important. But I think the thing for me that I took away from all of this was if you look at like e-commerce it's it's barely changed for years has it you you go online you essentially get a catalog and you choose from there but what retailers who are going to do well are now is is have that connection so they're they're not it's not even about going

44:52Robert Peston:to websites it's just all within ai challenge for retailers will be i mean look i know and everybody listening will do the same i'm sure you know if i'm unsure about you know what brand or what product or what retailer to use i will ask claude or gemini um and the and the and you know and i'll give them a locality um and one of the things i did yesterday which was um very impressive is again I asked I was thinking of going to a particular you know island for a holiday and I just said you know draw you know can you come up with an itinerary places to stay this is my budget can you can you look at Airbnb for me and find out you know what's available and it produced you know a three-page document that was really impressive right and you know you know why would I go unfortunately to a sort of tour guide you know when this was produced for me in five minutes and I have to say look pretty robust similarly so I think so I think I think part of the problem for you know obviously um if you are uh in retail you've got no option you've got to use ai but i think the problem with many of the ai services is they are to use an expression disintermediating the traditional retailer because um you know you can just do it at home or on your phone um without stepping foot in the shop but that's where the retailers

46:37Steph McGovern:as a saying they have to you know they're the ones that are going to survive and do well are the ones who are going to be embedded in that so doing deals with um so you know some of these brands were talking about the deals that they've done with chat gbt or have done with gemini and that's or like for example sephora the beauty brand was talking about deals with uber eats so now when you order a pizza you can order a lip gloss as well and so you know they were talking about how you can't exist on your own i know probably that's more common than you think

47:06Robert Peston:that's a natural pairing oh i fancy a pepperoni thing in me oh let's have some let's have some

47:11Steph McGovern:apple lip gloss with it i mean yeah but just on the on that sephora point because it's obviously you know like this is where a place where when they open a shop somewhere it the hype is unreal there'll be queues for miles of particularly young women wanting to go there and and but what they were saying they're now doing is for example in their stores they want to bring people in so they can give them that experience of skin matching and using it agentic ai to like analyze a person's face so that they can then uh you know get the right products for their skin and and that's where the the bricks and mortar is going to be really important because people are going to enjoy that experience of going in with their friends with their girlfriends or whatever and doing uh doing these things together and and then that and then that leads into a loyalty because that will go to the app and the app will then tell them well this works with this skin tone and so you can see how people will still want that that it that because you know i remember as a kid i used to get a fiver get the bus into town i bloody loved it in meddlesbrough town center back in the day with a fiver it wasn't just about what you bought it was just that whole experiential level and that's what they've got to got a play to and that is why slime is a key part of all of this

48:24Robert Peston:let's promote your own brand but yeah no no i i i look i think look obviously as you say the experience of shopping um is something that is is you know valuable to people and so one's certainly not arguing that ai can't be used to enrich that experience of course that's of course that's right but i was quite struck um one of our producers chris when i was talking about essentially whether what was going to drive what the big economic impact of AI would be. And I certainly think in the short term, Jevon's paradox does hold because I think so much of what's going on in AI at the moment is making individuals more skilled, more intelligent, as it were.

49:15Robert Peston:But I am afraid somebody who thinks, you know, the rate of development of AI is really breathtaking. And I do believe that a lot of what humans do will be replaced by effectively by robots, whether they're, you know, virtual robots or actually real material, physical robots. But, you know, a lot of jobs will disappear. And as I've said many times on this podcast, it is worrying to me that the British government, in fact, no government, is making preparation for that, you know, essentially world of AI plenty that involves, you know, human incomes disappearing. And the analogy, therefore, that maybe this is an appropriate place to finish that Chris came up with is because I was talking to him about the LED case.

50:07Robert Peston:And he said he said he feared that humans. unfortunately were the filament light bulbs and that we were all going to disappear because ai was the led but there we are i think that probably on that very gloomy note that is uh we'll switch

50:25Steph McGovern:off the light now shall we of course that's it from us on the rest is money turn out the light

50:31Robert Peston:and your way out yeah goodbye see you soon

From the publisher

Could the government’s creditors protect Starmer and Reeves, even if Labour is humiliated in the elections? How high are UK interest rates going to rise because of Trump’s Iran war? Has monetary policy stopped working? Could AI actually lead to the creation of millions of new jobs? And is coal consumption in the 19th Century a good way to predict this?

Steph and Robert dissect the Bank of England’s latest assessment of the UK economy. Plus Robert takes us back in time to explain why Jevons Paradox on coal consumption could be relevant to the AI revolution we’re in now.

The Rest is Money is brought to you by Octopus Energy, Britain’s smart energy pioneer.

Email: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠the⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠restismoney@goalhanger.com⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

X: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@TheRestIsMoney⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Instagram: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@TheRestIsMoney⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

TikTok: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠@RestIsMoney⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

Advertise with us: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠Partnerships@goalhanger.com⁠
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Money

All 210 episodes
276. Will bond market vigilantes see off Starmer’s rivals?The Rest Is Money · 53 min
Listen in VO