In short
Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 125: Peter Kyle: AI, Grief, and the Power of Elon Musk
Episode Overview In this episode of *The Rest Is Politics*, hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart interview Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation, and Technology in the UK. The discussion navigates through various topics, including the UK’s ambition to become an AI superpower, the lack of big ideas in politics, and the personal experiences of grief that have shaped Kyle's political journey.
Key Themes
- Background and Personal Journey
- Childhood and Family Influence:
- Peter Kyle reflects on his loving family background with a focus on his father's working-class roots as a stonemason.
- His father's journey from poverty to becoming a successful entrepreneur instilled a strong work ethic in Kyle.
- The discussion highlights the challenges of growing up in a family with traditional values while pursuing a different career path in public service.
- Coming Out and Family Dynamics:
- Kyle shares his experience of coming out as gay, detailing the initial difficulties with his father and the eventual reconciliation after introducing his partner.
- He discusses the impact of family relationships on his emotional well-being and political career.
- AI and Technological Aspirations
- UK’s AI Ambitions:
- Five consecutive UK Prime Ministers have aimed to position the UK as a leader in AI.
- Kyle emphasizes the importance of balancing safety and innovation in AI development, highlighting the establishment of the AI Security Institute.
- There is a commitment to ensuring that AI technology benefits society and enhances public services.
- Investment in Infrastructure:
- Kyle discusses plans for a significant increase in computing capabilities, referencing the need for the UK to keep pace with global advancements in AI.
- Political Landscape and Challenges
- Lack of Big Ideas:
- The conversation critiques the current political climate for its lack of bold, transformative ideas comparable to historical shifts, such as those seen in 1948.
- Kyle acknowledges the need for innovative thinking to address contemporary challenges while maintaining a focus on practical policies.
- Brexit and Relationships with Europe:
- The dialogue touches on the complexities and repercussions of Brexit, particularly regarding the UK's relationship with Europe and its implications for international cooperation.
- Grief and Resilience
- Personal Loss:
- Kyle candidly shares the profound impact of losing his partner, Vlas, and how this shaped his emotional and political outlook.
- He discusses the complexities of grief and its effects on mental health, emphasizing the importance of seeking help during difficult times.
- Navigating Political Grief:
- The conversation reflects on the collective anxiety and grief present in society due to political and social upheaval, underscoring the need for hope and resilience.
- Power Dynamics in Technology
- Influence of Big Tech:
- Kyle expresses concerns about the growing power of tech giants and their influence on democracy.
- The discussion includes the challenges of regulating these companies while ensuring they contribute positively to society.
- Elon Musk's Impact:
- Musk's role in shaping public discourse through social media is critiqued, raising questions about accountability and ethical considerations in technology.
- Future Outlook
- Collaborative Efforts:
- Kyle advocates for partnerships with European countries to strengthen technological innovation and address shared challenges.
- The episode concludes with a call for a more cohesive, strategic approach to technology and international relations.
Conclusion This episode offers a deep and personal lens into Peter Kyle's life and political philosophy, touching on significant contemporary issues such as AI development, the impact of grief on leadership, and the evolving relationship between technology and democracy. The conversation invites listeners to consider the interplay between personal experiences and broader political ambitions, emphasizing the need for empathy and innovation in the face of global challenges.
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:28Thanks for listening to The Rest is Politics. Sign up to The Rest is Politics. to see if you could save. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates. Potential savings will vary. Not available in all states or situations.
0:48Welcome to The Restless Politics Leading with me, Rory Stewart. And with me, Alistair Campbell. And we've got a member of His Majesty's Cabinet, Peter Kyle, who is the Secretary of State for all things tech and science and innovation. And Peter is somebody we talk about on the podcast quite a lot, actually. And you've got a lot to live up to because I know you listen. We'd say very nice things about you. You'd better be good. I'm only here because you haven't mentioned me for a few weeks and I thought I'd better just turn up. Sorry, yeah. So Peter is a Labour MP down south. His background is as an aid worker, working for charities, working pretty much in the public sector.
1:24a lot of his life after that. Became an MP in 2015. Rising star, we call them. And has now risen to the level of the cabinet. And I think he's seen as one of the hopes for the future. But has also got some really interesting insights in relation to his current job, because AI that we keep hearing about, that is part of his brief. And also very interesting childhood, interesting past, and lots of interesting things in his background. So thank you for being here. Thanks for having me. Peter, thank you. Can you begin by, it's a terrible question to ask a politician because often you get a pretty plastic answer, but can you give us a bit of a sense of your childhood and who you are and what you were like growing up?
2:08Oh, I had a great childhood. I came from a very loving family. It's very, very socially sort of mobile. My dad left school when he was 14, grew up in poverty in Liverpool. pool. He left school at 14 to become an apprentice stonemason to his dad. His grandfather was also an apprentice stonemason to his dad. So you get a sense of, you know, the family life there. Well, kind of. Peter, I'm interrupting here for a second. Just tell us a little bit about what being a stonemason means. What kind of stonemason? Well, my grandfather, who I only met a few times, he was working on Liverpool Cathedral. My dad had, you know, five, six, seven people living, you know, sleeping in the room that he was sleeping in it's what he called a slum uh it was something that impacted him his entire life at 16 straight away as soon as he could he joined the navy and he said for him it was either stonemason or navy going forward so he chose the navy uh he credits the drive the discipline he credits so much for that experience came out in his mid to late 20s became a daughter-door salesman for pilkerton glass then moved south which is i've got this accent than his accent when I was going for...
3:16You haven't got a little bit of Liverpool. No, I haven't got any. A tiny bit. No, no, no, no. I was in Liverpool yesterday, Steve Rotherham, and if I had said that to him, it would have killed me. But my dad rang me when I was going for selection in 2013 in Hove, and dad rang me and said, I bet this is the only time in your life you've ever wanted my accent, because in the Labour Party, it fetishises accents so badly. Well, unless they belong to Hatton than those guys. Yeah. So then he moved south and worked his way up from being salesman for a glass company, to owning the company and the same journey was going through our life you know that i was born when he was at the start of that journey down south and every couple of years we were moving home i was born into a home where it was a terrace house by the dump outside bognor regis by the main road with the dump the other side a couple of years later which is the first time i remember it was the end of a terrace uh and you had this sort of garage block that you could learn to ride bikes in a few years after that a new build estate and then on to when i was 12 onto a leafy estate where dad lived until he died last year.
4:16So it was very upwardly mobile, very, very, very driven. I've never met anyone to this day in all the jobs I've done that worked as hard as dad did. And I think that I have inherited his work ethic, sort of the working class work ethic that he had, but also the middle class sensibilities that he gave me through the journey that he took our family on. Rory loves a good working class backstory for Labour politicians. He doesn't quite hit Angela Rainer levels does he Rory? And I don't have came to. Where does Stone Mason and Toolmaker fit in the Labour working class lexicon? I'm proud of everything that dad did.
4:54The journey that I went on that he left for me is inconceivable and he after I won he didn't think I'd win the election nobody did in 2013 in 2015 and that week after the election we were walking down my street and there was Peter Kyle posters in all of the windows down my street. And Dad just said he couldn't stop looking at them. And he just said, isn't it just weird? And I just said, if you look at the posters, you'll see that Peter is written quite small and Kyle is in massive letters. I said, that's your name. I said, that's our name. I said, and this is what we have done as a family. And he was in floods of tears.
5:29And I probably only saw him cry twice in my whole life. so it's a very big thing for the we went through and that was because of his his journey my mum also was actually much closer to in many many ways because she was around more and i was very affectionate with mum and she was very very loving it was a nice childhood i know what you probably want to get to and start talking to about some of the challenges that i had in life but i never want to take away from the fact that actually at its core was a was a pretty sort of what people would appreciate is a standard uh family life one of the the lovely stories here is parents who navigated having a child that was very different to them.
6:09I guess you made very different choices in your life. You will have been different in terms of your academic path, in terms of your commitment to public service. So talk to us a little bit about what it was like for your parents having a child who I guess wasn't exactly like them and what kind of space they gave you to be who you are. I think actually dad in particular found it really difficult me and dad were really close growing up I absolutely idolized him then I started to take different journeys when I worked at the body shop you know dad that was proud of the very traditional approach he had to business and becoming a business person and a successful one and what did I do at 18 I ended up working at the body shops head office this is in 1989 when the body shop was going stellar and Anita Roddick was breaking every rule I mean he hated it you know and there was me coming back with having drunk the kool-aid and just talking about the campaigning the environmental campaigning and all that sort of stuff doing campaigning and making money he hated it then i went to university but as soon as i think i i think for somebody who is self-made having reflected on this so much because my relationship wasn't great with dad for a long time and i think that was really proud of me but as soon as i stepped outside of his life's experience i think he found it difficult being the dad he wanted to be which was to be guiding i think looking back he probably really wanted me to go into his business and actually carry on his business so that he could have carried on mentoring me and caring for me and being part of my sort of development into the future.
7:38And I only really recognize that now. When I ended up doing a doctorate, we barely spoke. You know, we spoke in sort of platitudinous ways for years. Oh, because that was just outside his... Whenever I mentioned it, he would end the call straight away. You can imagine at the time it was incredibly hurtful, very hurtful. And what about being gay? How did you deal with that? So I came out in my sort of mid to late 20s and I'd never sort of ignored it. I never really had a secret life. I never really wanted to be with anyone. And I'd been an aid worker. I'd done things that just because I had a difficult educational pathway, I just wanted to throw myself into really overwhelming and challenging environments.
8:16And I loved that. But as soon as I went to university and I wanted to be with someone, then I started to think who I was. And I just thought, oh, God, it's going to be with a man, isn't it? And it wasn't, I didn't have this sort of moment where rainbows are coming at my ears and it was this big thing. So I went to a tutor that I absolutely loved. He was brilliant. And I said to him, can I ask you advice? You've got three kids. How would you like to be told by one of them that they're gay? And he went, oh, come back tomorrow and I'll tell you and I'll think about it. He said, but just, and I was walking out the door, he goes, but don't do it by phone.
8:45I don't think I'd like it being done by phone. And I went back home and I thought, well, I know now. And now I feel I'm hiding something. This is like day one. I feel like I'm hiding something Dad was in New York My mum by then had a horrible divorce and mum was living in Devon and my brother lived down the road I thought this is ridiculous so I rang them all up one after another and just told them I was gay So you went against what the tutor told you? Yeah, so I went in the next day and he said look I've thought about this I said it's too late I rang him up and told them How did they take it?
9:15The thing that a straight person will never understand is that it is an appalling thing you have to do is to tell someone something so deep and personal, which is also about emotion. It's about sex and your sex life, which is because immediately it's connected to that. And no one actually has to do that. But for someone who's pretty good at getting conversations to where they need to be, there is no natural organic arc for a conversation where you ring a family member and say, how are you doing? Great, thanks. Did you see that on TV? And then suddenly you've got to get it to you saying, I'm gay.
9:48You can't do it. so I kept dad on the phone for 45 minutes and he was desperate to get off the phone for about half an hour of that 45 minutes and then he said I've got to go I've just got to go and I said dad I'm just ringing to say I'm gay and then there's just this long silence and he said what did you just say and I just said this whole conversation is about me telling you that I'm gay uh and he sort of he said oh okay all right no problem um we'll speak later and then he sort of like he kind of hung up but not in a bad way and then later on that evening he called back and we'd had a conversation about it and he just said all the things you would love to hear from a dad he was great mum wasn't so good she struggled with it and she didn't use the right words uh she didn't do it do it in a way that you know the keyword no it wasn't the keyword it was it was there was lots of things you know there was lots of things and by then i'd had my relationship with mum was shattered because of the way that the separation she she ran off with your dad's best friend yeah and that was when i earlier when you were 18 yeah when i was a teenager and that was it was just awful because very very very close was that the other time your dad cried no that was rage that was rage um now i don't remember tears uh in that period and that was appalling very very hurtful um and felt very very personal for me because you ever make it up with your mom uh i did but that That was when I got a boyfriend who you're probably going to want to mention as well.
11:14And as soon as I love the way, you know, what we're going to talk about. The thing is, you have such a reputation of subtlety, Alistair, that, you know, I never know where you're going to go. You're so unpredictable. That's your problem. So as soon as mum saw me and I was in love, everything just melted away. And I learned a lot about parents and families in that moment because she'd spoken a lot about being gay and come up in conversation. she'd said at one point I was just really worried you were going to turn into one of them you know and of course we were getting on well that day and suddenly you just sort of like implode and I just said well for every one of them I think I know what you're talking about you see in the street don't you think there's hundreds that you don't you don't know about and all that sort of stuff it was very difficult and she came from a very different background and had different experiences in life you know so I'm not going to judge anyone that needs to go on a journey so anyway I took Vlas down Vlas was your partner?
12:05my partner a while after we'd started seeing each other and it was the weirdest thing within probably 10 seconds mum had just melted her face her body expressions her everything because she saw in her own two eyes that her son was in love with someone and at the end of the day what parents want is their kids to be happy and all the prejudice or misconceptions she might have had just disappeared in a heartbeat and suddenly she was inviting friends around to to meet me and him and that hadn't happened before and in terms of her relationship i'll just say it was very very difficult uh vlas was very a very very family oriented person and incredibly you know a lot of his warmth which he had in abundance came from his family life that he he just loved and he he he hated the fact that i was estranged from mom and was so angry towards her and he would i didn't know this for a long time but he was calling her all the time and he was bringing the relationship together in his way and but we only spoke about the separation the about 10 days two weeks before she died at the hospital bed when i was sitting next to her and she was asleep and she woke up and saw me there and just said you know with everything i did i know would hurt you most but i hope you know i've always loved you and then i came back to her and said all the anger that i have and through it i hope you've always known i loved you and she said i do it's all we needed for all the stuff i wanted to talk to her about and tried talking to her about, that was it.
13:34It was an incredibly powerful moment. Peter, will you tell us a little bit about Vlas and tell us a little bit about what happened there? I'll tell you about Vlas and I'll tell you about after I lost Vlas. What I won't do is talk about the moment that I actually did lose him because I did one interview about that and it was a very, very, very difficult thing to do. and it took five months of discussion with Alice Thompson in the run-up to doing it. And I thought, I think people deserve to know about what makes politicians who they are and I'll do it once and get it out there. But Vlas was from the Czech Republic, grew up in a very conservative Catholic part of Bohemia and was just very straightforward.
14:25forward he was the same person uh in every situation i mean not a not a not a scintilla of mediation or fitting into he was just the person he was and sometimes that's brilliant at the time sometimes it was embarrassing because he just blurt stuff out in different situations and i feel some shame that i felt embarrassed to start with but he his overriding characteristic was warmth uh he always saw the best in everyone he was fun to be around and was just like a warm emotional blanket in any room that he was in and unbelievably loving unbelievably just straightforward and in many ways had some of those characteristics with with mum when I look back and you know like every relationship particularly someone like me that was coming into relationships for the first time there was no very very very few arguments but you know we we sort of came together very very closely we moved apart over the years but we were together for almost eight years and then you know i got the phone call very early one day uh like 5 30 to say that he had died and then there was a lot of stuff that happened afterwards because of police investigation and all the sort of horrors that go with that kind of thing and your life just literally implodes i am someone who's been an aid worker i'm naturally quite resilient you know i've always had very very robust mental health so even when it happened i was completely surprised at just how devastating it was to my brain to my sort of emotional life uh the fact that my hands were just tremoring the whole time that i had lost complete control of my emotions so i'd be walking down a street for weeks and weeks anywhere any situation and suddenly shaking with with tears and uh and so forth so i was really surprised at just how devastating it was it gets into you know that kind of grief and it gets into every part of your body and that's the bit i will talk about because i think we don't talk about grief in this country very much and thanks to you and others you talk about mental health but i think that the recovery and resilience building that comes from those experiences is something that i would be comfortable talking about but the actual events and and so forth is is something which you know i i managed to talk about once and that's it that's it yeah when you talked about this grief being kind of overwhelming how long does that go on for and how different was it to when you lost your your parents oh very different i think all grief is different.
17:10I don't think there's probably in the whole history of humanity been two people who grieve in exactly the same ways and have the same impact. But the funny thing is I could feel it happening. When the police officer called me, it was like I had shards of glass going into my brain and then just because bits of my brain weren't talking to each other anymore. And you know when somebody says something, does something, you've got to do something like, you know, even turn a shower on. You're not coordinated in the same way. Nothing is working in the way that it should nothing your thoughts don't complete you know your thought process takes you to different places everything is dysfunctional it says that's psychosis to me and well i i wouldn't know but that that's maybe it is maybe it was for me but i could feel everything just just pulling apart and fracturing i could feel it happening and i knew that it was happening in terms of how long it was i knew in that very first day that i would need help i knew that i wouldn't recover from that alone in the very first day that that happened uh and in that day you are barrel rolled into all sorts of difficult moments you have to do some formal things and and the like and you're just a zombie um i went back to my best friend was waiting for me he had lost his wife um and he'd been married for uh 18 months and she was uh 32 six months earlier he was waiting for me and took me back to his home and you know he just said you're shaking you know and my head was twitching and everything it was it was just unbelievable you know just how far you know i sank so i had a very good friend who is a consultant in a and e alley we were aid workers together back in the day i spoke to her and we had a conversation about lots of different things and then she said what can i do and i said you can find me a grief counselor uh she called back a couple days later and said could you speak to diana here's the number when you're ready and i did but of course before you get there as well you know six days later my mum died that was very different mum's in my arms uh and her husband's arms when she died and i went straight out to the car park after mum had left us and rang diana and just said i'm peter kyle and then just absolutely just started sobbing sobbing sobbing a couple of days later i went to see her for the first time and i sat in front of her and she said the very first thing she said to me was what i'm gonna say now it's gonna make you really angry because the whole point of what we're doing is we are going to get you back to a place and it'll be a very different place that you were in before because life will never be the same again but it doesn't mean that you can't build something back and the whole purpose of building back is so you can fall in love again because you've had it you can have it again and that is what we're going to get back to and she was very practical she you know week after week you know in some weeks i couldn't talk i couldn't say a word but you know twice a week to start with then once a week and you know slowly slowly and secondly a personal trainer i know it sounds middle class but physical and emotional and uh pete my trainer and diane i wouldn't be able to do what I do now without them.
20:24Peter, thank you for being so honest and open. And listeners who want to learn more about the story and Vlas being killed and many other things can read it in that interview that you gave at The Times. One of the things, of course, that echoes with what you're saying is that you've now put yourself into public life. And there is a sense of real, I hope this transition works, real grief and anxiety about what's happening to the world order. I mean, we feel like we're in a very, very uncertain time. People are mourning all these things we took for granted over the last 80 years about democratic values, about the far right in Europe, about NATO, about the International Alliance.
21:07And I guess one of the things I want to get you onto is how do you get that balance between realism about just what a crisis the world is facing and just what a big lift europe now has balanced against the sense of hope and optimism and coming through it the world is always changing and every generation where there is a generational shift and there is there is one now is really challenging i mean people accept change but find they know that change is happening but people normally find change quite difficult because you have to wake up thinking acting doing things differently than you did the day before so it's unsettling for me in this job and you know i think being part of this government you have to understand well for me to get through uh days not just in this issue but lots of different issues you have to understand where you have agency and how you can use that agency wisely but not get overwhelmed by the things you can't have an impact in if you can focus on the things where you can then you can really find ways to absolutely maximise what you can do.
22:13Now, I think if you look at the way that Keir and this government has acted in really difficult circumstances on a whole range of different things, I hope that puts into perspective what we are trying to do because every day around the world at the moment there are very big things happening, sometimes very disruptive, and we are constantly asked to commentate on everything. But what we see in Keir is this real determination to make an impact where we can and to make that impact positive and deliver as much positive change as we can with britain you know post brexit in a world where the polar sort of relationships or polar areas are just shifting in ways that are so rapid and so profound and we don't yet know because these are very new forces in historic terms we don't know where all of it is going and that's where i think you know everyone who comes to us speaks in certainties about the trump administration will mean this and you know putin will do that you know we know from histories how things will play out to a degree but actually these are quite unpredictable times and we have to use the agency that we have very very smartly on behalf of the british people right now and i I think people listening will already have sensed that you're somebody who's pretty open and pretty emotionally intelligent and empathetic.
23:36And you triggered me there because you mentioned Brexit. And I've managed to get through the whole interview without even getting there, Peter. How can I put this? I know what you think about Brexit. And I know how much of a thing you think, how bad it was for the country and so forth. But if Rory and I start to talk to you about Brexit now, we know there is a government line and you have to stick to it. And as you were saying before we started, I was very much always in favour of the big government line. How do you stick to it, right? Undersatement of the century there. Before you went wet. I'm not wet.
24:09I'm not wet. I'm just a bit more. Rory thinks I'm getting very left wing. I don't know what I'm becoming, but I'm definitely not wet. He's just becoming wet. What do you mean? What's wet? Oh, honestly, I do listen to the show. And? Oh, come on. Let's not go there. Come on. Go back to Brexit. I'm sorry. You cannot call me wet. am I right Peter that he's getting more and more left wing no I don't think he's getting more left wing I think he's just getting more I don't know there's no sort of cause that he doesn't think government should just adopt and make number one that's absolute bullshit it's not you get a campaigning email and suddenly it's like that should be number one priority for the whole government and we should put taxes up to pay for it and make the education department the sport department I mean I do listen.
24:53Sorry that's been my position for 25 years. Yeah that's because you read it in an email from something. I know that emails existed when I first advocated Sport B5 education. Anyway shut up. Oh he's back. This is the alley I remember. We've woken him up. Let me carry on. So but how do you feel when you know that people like me are watching you And I know that you are delivering a line that you have to deliver because that's the government line. But actually, if you were a totally free agent, you'd probably say something very different. There's very, very, very few times that I have had to deliver a line that I would disagree with more than a couple of degrees.
25:36So take the Brexit, your example, which triggers you. And it's a very triggering subject for a lot of people. And this is a good example of it. I put my heart and soul into that campaign and it was emotional as well as philosophical and practical. But I grieved for leaving the EU the day that we lost the 2019 election because that was the day we lost agency. That hung parliament became a landslide parliament against us and there was nothing I could do anymore. And I grieved for what the Labour Party had done by absenting itself from where the country needed us to be. I lost all hope of being able to steer towards a better deal, a better outcome, whatever.
26:20So when we actually left in January, you know, like two months later, I felt nothing. I literally felt nothing. Because at that point, I'd grieved because it was inevitable. And all I was thinking is, what is next? And what comes next? At that moment, the whole political landscape changed. And I think as someone who is of my politics, you have to live in the moment facing forward. Even if you're two weeks behind trying to catch up for two weeks and then face forward, then you're not where the public needed to be. So the landscape changed and I changed with it, taking my values and principles with me, applying it to the new landscape we're on.
26:59And I think the same approach happens in government. And I know there's other issues that we'll talk about, the difficult things we had to do. but that is how I approach these issues. So when I talk about Brexit now and Britain and the EU and Britain and the world and everything, actually, if you look at the big issues facing the EU and the UK and the world, Russia, Ukraine, China, China policy, how that's changed in 2015, from the golden age to where it is now, or 2010, you'd think of the rise of AI, you think of online harm, you think of all these big issues that are rattling around the world, you know biomechanics all these great opportunities but also challenges not one of them was there as a priority in 2016 and yet some people just want us to think about what we've lost i want to make sure we mitigate the things that we need to mitigate but we need to be rigorously focused on the future because that is the way that we really start rebuilding not just with the eu but without others is the risk though peter actually that you sort of jump to 2020 and then you get stuck in 2020.
28:02Yes, of course it is. I mean, I would say that the real time to be thinking about a much closer relationship with the European Union, some form of customs union, some whole new architecture is now the real risk is that you think, oh, I lost that in 2019. That's old news, we've got to move on. And what you can't see is that the direction that Trump's going in, the direction that Russia's going in actually means that now is the time to reimagine completely, not just Britain's relationship to Europe, but how Britain, Ukraine, Turkey, Norway could all relate to Europe. I think it's a good example.
28:38And I would say that I've leapt right to where we are now in 2025, because if you look at the tonal relationships in the EU, fundamentally changed. You know, just in the last two weeks, I've met four EU commissioners and I've done the rounds of EU commissioners since I first got in to this post, which is only seven months ago. Commissars, as Mr Vance called them. But if you look at what we need now, it is functional relationships, the effort to find common ground. There's a lot of work that Nick Thomas Simmons is doing on the long term rebuilding. But when you say customs union, because of what's happening in the world now, to rejoin the customs union is to take years of negotiation.
29:17Years. You're not going to suddenly pop in. Not with courage and imagination. I mean, you may be missing, in fact, an extraordinary opportunity. And it will require a referendum because of the lack of the change in sovereignty. There'll be lots of different issues. And also, there's lots of practical reasons why there are things there that the EU want from the UK. And there's lots of things we want in that relationship as well. And exploring them all, we can do that now. We can put food on people's table right now in the weeks ahead, rather than just trying to go back to the big existential things, which have very, very big, profound sovereignty issues.
29:51We need to be focusing on the practical issues because that's what they want us to do. It is also what is in the best interest of Britain now. I think there's a really interesting question here, and I think it goes to the heart of the way that the Labour government thinks about things. You get the sense that Starmer's personality is very much let's focus on the here and now and the practical and the small things. Let's not get into big ideas, big structures, big visions. And I think there's a risk that actually, we've entered a world and a politics where actually we need really big structures, big ideas, it feels more like 1948 feels more like the kind of world that Jean Monnet was dealing with.
30:30And that the risk of looking at, you know, let's do the practical everyday things that we can do, and of course, appeals to me, and that's quite a sort of small C conservative message, is that we won't achieve the transformational change necessary for European people. European security, European economies, or indeed our entire strategic independence. What I do agree with in what you just said is that I think one of the reasons for Brexit was that the public knew something quite big was wrong with the country, that we needed a sort of big refresh, and that the Remain argument felt very incremental.
31:06It didn't feel modern and fit for the sort of moment we were living in. yet the Brexiteers, obviously they weren't encumbered by any sort of need to anchor it in, you know, anything written down or anything like that. So it did feel like a big solution to a big, what felt like a big problem. Don't forget, we passed through an economic crisis. We were in the middle of a migration crisis. They had a big solution to what was a set of big challenges. And I do accept we face a lot of big challenges as a country, but the nature of them are very different. You know, we've inherited public finances that are genuinely, you know, extraordinarily difficult.
31:41You know, we've come into government and the tax threshold is ridiculously high. Borrowing is high. The amount of waste I found in the department I went into was unbelievable. Unfunded commitments. You sound like Elon Musk. Well, this is interesting. His friend will come on to that. I hope I get to talk about this. We'll come on to his admiration for Elon. Oh, I do hope we can talk about what I've been doing about regulating appropriately and tackling, you know, efficiencies and the like, which we have to do, but there are ways of putting your own values and principles into doing it that show you can achieve it in different ways.
32:11I would argue that right now, the really big thing we have to do is lay the foundations for what we can do in the future, because we don't get the basics right in running our public services, rebuilding our relationships with our neighbours and our key allies. If we don't get the economy and the foundations of the economy really strong, we will have nothing to build on right now. and just you both care about international politics and our bilateral and multilateral relationships incredibly strongly. Just imagine Britain as we inherited it after 14 years of the Tories and what they put us through and then we came up with a big idea for the new global order and then we went and tried to sell it to people.
32:47It would be ludicrous. What we are doing is rehabilitating Britain and we are showing through actions, not just words. I said this to all of the European and American and other sort of leaders and people leading different parts of governments from other governments that don't judge us on our words, judge us on our actions, and that I can talk through actions. And that's a great thing about being a government that does things. Yeah, great. But sometimes leadership is about, or we use the V word, the vision, but it's about setting a long-term sort of frame. And I do think there is a massive opportunity right now for it.
33:20You can call it what you want, a kind of defence, security, and economic partnership, forging a new relationship that we don't have to bang on about Brexit the whole time, though I probably will a bit, but actually just set out something for the future and i i think it's wide open there right now and i think we're always right is there's a danger that we just feel let's just go day to day let's be a bit incremental and and that's the way to do it and that's kia's style and that's fine i've got no problem with that anyway let's let's let's move on you just you put words into my mouth and then moved on yeah i know i know because that's why i'm sharing it now let's talk about you we mentioned another trigger word musk but let's just talk about ai because that was a huge part of your brief I think here is the fifth prime minister that we've had to say that Britain is going to be a global leader in AI.
34:04Now, before we get on to the how, just if you meet somebody who literally knows nothing about what this whole artificial intelligence debate is about, very basic to Mrs. Woman on top of the bus, what are we talking about? We're talking about machines that can learn human attributes and behaviors from the data that we produce in our daily lives. And it can bring it together. And because of the combination of vast amounts of data and huge computational abilities through what supercomputers can do these days, you can analyze that data and you can recreate human-like behavioral thinking. and the latest models that are producing artificial intelligence are now doing computational thinking in things like biology chemistry maths but also general cognitive thinking at phd level and very soon we will reach what they're calling and what they're aspiring to artificial general intelligence agi whereby artificial intelligence will be able to think cognitively along the breadth of human thinking above the way that most average humans can do.
35:20And what that means is that they can't just do one task you ask it to. It can follow a train of tasks through a logical process that actually reflects a human-like sequence of thinking to deliver the kind of outcomes that up till now only humans can do. Okay, Peter, Alistair, quick break and then back in a second.
Read the full transcript
35:48so you came in and as as anastas pointed out lots of other people banged on about ai before you arrived and i guess there are many choices you had to make but here's a couple of them you had to decide whether you were going to roll in behind rishi sunak and really put the emphasis on making the uk the leader in ai security and safety and trying to make the uk the central place for global agreements on what safety and security looks like. And another decision you made is you've decided to build a big supercomputer, 20 times compute, in order to do these enormous trainings that large language models do.
36:30And obviously, for listeners to explain, these are computers that can cost a billion and where a training package could cost 100 million. So just talk us through those two choices, because there were alternatives, right? I mean, And there's the alternative to Rishi Sunat, which is presumably the one you're pushing ahead on, which is putting more emphasis on innovation. And there's the alternative on the supercomputer, which is to say maybe the UK shouldn't be getting involved in massive supercomputers, huge training models. That's a bit excessive. We don't need to be doing that. The US can be doing that.
37:01There are other more niche things we can do on the applications of AI, more practical embedding and public services. So talk us through your policy choices. The best way to answer this is to say, what is the purpose of safety? What is the purpose of security? And I would argue that it is to protect people and to make people safe, but crucially to feel safe. Because you don't feel safe, you're not going to start interacting with something, feel it's okay to actually start using it. So once you've achieved that, why stop there? The purpose of safety is to protect people, but also to make people feel safe enough to embrace the technology.
37:35What the previous government was doing is focusing entirely on safety, but not actually using that safety for the next second step, which is opportunity. So what I've done is actually invested more heavily in the safety side. We have the AI Security Institute, which has a relationship with the big model creators, the people creating the platforms that are the most cutting edge. We test their models before they're released into the public. These big, powerful models. What the AI most people interact with is actually derivatives of that. But if you get the main model safe for the key things that could present huge existential challenges to life itself with things that you would imagine, you know, helping people build things that could cause widespread loss of life.
38:19If you can mitigate those, then you can get the derivatives right through our economy and society and public services to actually for benefit. So what I've done is invested heavily in safety and security. We are now genuinely world leaders. We are joint number one with that in the US. But what we're doing that Rishi Sudak never did was in a very ambitious, pointed way, making sure that that technology benefits everyone and is used right through our economy because people feel safe enough to explore the opportunities of it. Now, the third thing that you mentioned there is actually about the way that we're providing this sort of infrastructure for it and why a 20-fold increase in compute.
38:58Actually, it's the whole country's public sovereign compute we're increasing by 20 times. And also the rest of it, we're putting huge emphasis in as well. Why? Because the people who have these big models the countries that have them are going to be responsible for or benefit from the greatest opportunity for wealth creation the greatest opportunity for hard and soft power around the world because the impact it's going to have on security and defense is going to be huge when you look at how america has used sort of nuclear civil and defensive nuclear the relationship is quite subordinate with other countries that they partners with and actually that's not this This isn't unique insight.
39:39The Senate last year published a memo which said that they want the same relationship on AI. They want to have the absolute cutting edge. They want to have partners who are allied countries, but they want the allied countries to be kind of dependent on them for it. Well, I want us to be at the very forefront of it because those countries will be able to shape how it goes, how it is used and deployed. I don't want us to be for the next massive period of this industrial transformation that we are going to have because of AI. always buying off the shelf from other countries. And I think if we have the opportunity to have some of these very, very conceptual, powerful, cutting-edge pieces of work whose derivatives can then start flowing through the economy domestically, then the opportunities for wealth creation, but also staying at the top seat in the global order of how decisions and power is influenced and the ability to express our values and principles as a country, then AI is going to be absolutely central to it.
40:38The question you have to ask yourself is if we were going to have a new security council that would be set up in 10 years time after AI has gone through another 10 years you can bet that actually your ability to influence the world via technology in particular AI is going to be one of the things that will indicate who are the top countries and the most influential countries that need to be together in the room where big decisions are made. But a lot of the people who are driving this feel to me like they think that they are, and they may well be, far more important, far more powerful, far more significant to the future of the world than elected governments.
41:15Now, where do you get that balance? You talked there about AI being for everybody. How do you stop this just becoming another driver of inequality? Exactly. How do you do that? When the characters who we read about and hear about and we've talked to, who are driving it, do tend to be in this kind of sovereign individual space. And people like Musk, frankly, I just think he's a repellent human being who now has too much money, too much power. And because he has all that money and all that power, people like you and politicians around the world feel there's nothing they can do or say about it. So it's another way of answering Rory's previous question.
41:52It's another reason why we in Britain need to get this right. We've got great universities. We've got great skills. We have a great investment landscape. We've got English. You know, we have a huge scientific pedigree going back centuries. All these reasons why we should be bringing this together so that we can get into the cutting edge as well. Now, the amount of money, you've mentioned it already, the billions for the infrastructure, the hundreds of millions it takes to train just one of the models. And they need to do three or four of these every year. We don't have that money. So that money is often coming from outside of government, which is one of the fundamental challenges that we have.
42:25But we can create the circumstances where it can happen. Now, there are going to be a lot of moral and ethical challenges thrown up by AI going forward. I want those moral and ethical challenges to be resolved in a country like Britain, with a liberal democracy, where we have a mature regulatory landscape, and we are stable now, we are stable politics and economy. I want those things to be resolved here because we can have influence over it if we get it right. If we get it wrong, then we stand back and it will be countries which don't share our values, even if they might be allies. They might not quite have the liberal values that we have here.
43:02They might not quite have the democratic values that we have here. And believe you me, China is investing in this in a way which is just completely mind bending and hard to actually conceive on the scale of it. Why? Not for giggles. they're doing it because they know if they get there first and they stay ahead, then they will have dominance in the way that the world and its economy will unfold into the future. We have to be cognizant of that. So, Peter, let's follow up on that liberal democratic values thing. The big challenge to the liberal democratic values is now explicitly being made, and you heard it at the Munich Security Conference from J.D.
43:35Vance. The U.S. vice president said, very frankly, we don't share values with European countries anymore. and Elon Musk is now using social media platforms to undermine our own democracies, to support far-right parties, literally getting behind in the middle of an election in Germany, one of the most consequential elections in German history, putting his entire platform behind the AFD, a far-right party, something that the United States never considered doing, interfering in internal electoral affairs like that. So the biggest threat probably that we face now in Europe is the survival of those liberal democratic values and how we defend those liberal democratic values in the face of a concerted attempt by the Trump administration to use technology to undermine those values.
44:27How do we respond to that? And I suppose without sounding like a broken record, how do we avoid responding to that without doing it together as Europe? I mean, even this question about where we're going to get the money from, from your investment, how we take, as you say, our brilliant ideas and innovation and make them things that go to market. Britain's not big enough on its own. The only way we're going to be able to compete with the kind of money in the US is if we set up huge pan-European funds on this stuff. So you've already seen how concerted efforts to work together. Britain and Europe is working in an incredibly tight and functional way these days.
45:03And I've seen that myself. I was there at the Munich Security Council. I was in the room when J.D. Vance did the speech. I was sitting in the second row. As the words unfolded, I knew I was in a historic moment. I could feel the reaction. And you looked horrified. Were there clips of me doing it then? I saw you. Did you? Oh, God. You're just everywhere, aren't you? You're just omnipotent, sort of this sort of presence. You're wet, you're omnipotently wet. You're not going to regret saying that. I felt, you just knew it was a historic moment. But people think that the Trump administration has been there forever.
45:42It's been there for weeks. And we know that Trump uses rhetoric in an incredibly potent, but also smart way in terms of the way that it can sometimes disrupt things and then suddenly something quite different pops out at the other end in terms of actions. So we have to see what it's like when we start to sit down and get down to the meat and bones of what this relationship with America is going to be like under the Trump administration, which we accept is going to be very different from the previous Biden administration. And particularly with the EU and Europe, with Britain bilaterally with the states.
46:17But we had Macron going out there earlier than Kier. And you've seen coordination in all how these things unfold. You've seen Europe stick really tightly together when it comes to defending Ukraine and speaking up for President Zelensky and standing shoulder to shoulder with him. I think you've seen a lot of what you're asking for, but it's done in a way that actually can just wait to see where the real substance is and not just constantly just get battered around. I mean, when I do interviews and I do lots of media rounds these days, I am asked 99 percent about something that somebody in America has said and about one percent on what is actually going to be signed, delivered or sealed between the two countries.
47:04Yeah, but that's partly because the words of the people that say these things have consequences, and we saw that in Southport. And I don't know whether you thought I was being wet when I texted you in the middle of the Southport riots and said, you know, we go on about online harms, we cannot have a situation where somebody like Musk, with the reach he has, is deliberately inflaming hatred and violence. That happened. And that was words. It was words, but also it was the words of lots of people. And we made lots of arrests at that point in that period. And I think as I said... For which he's roundly attacked you.
47:39As I said... And back Tommy Robinson. And our laws haven't changed. Our laws will not change. You know, the law on misinformation in this country actually is quite a high bar because you have to show intent. Just words alone don't get you there. You have to show how you are intending to use those words in order to provoke the kind of outcome. So those people who were arrested and convicted for it... Let's say if I start out by saying that when Tony was around, there would be certain figures in the media that we would be a bit wary of taking on. OK, but that is Musk on a gargantuan scale. And I'd worry that these guys now have got the politicians over a barrel.
48:18So they're too powerful. And they actually we talk about speaking truth to power. They're the ones that we've got to be talking to. and the power is no longer where it should be with democratically elected politicians. There is no question that some of the companies in the tech world have a power that very few companies in the past have ever had. You have to go back quite a long way to find it. I think the challenge has been, and what we've seen in the last... I hate commentating. As I got in, I promised myself I wouldn't commentate. This is a more thoughtful media space than you normally do. So if you look at Silicon Valley, If you look at big rising sectors in the past, when a breakthrough sector emerges in the past, there is a time when it reaches a certain power, economic power, that ends up getting into politics.
49:10And what we've just seen in the last two years or so, maybe a bit longer, that's happened in Silicon Valley. And that's something that feels very new. Actually, previous generations have dealt with it in the past, with oil companies and others. And you look at some of the Vanderbilts and the rest of it in America, the East India company here. It happens. This has now happened with the tech world. So, again, there are individuals out there, but there are also these big companies. And just to give you a sense of why we need to be – I got into a little bit of controversy for saying that we need to act with humility.
49:46what I actually meant with that is that I can't sit in Whitehall anymore or we can't sit in Whitehall, Brussels or Washington anymore and legislate and regulate to get these companies to do what we want them to do actually we have to deploy statecraft in a way in addition to legislation in addition to regulation we have to deploy statecraft for which we've only really deployed against counterparts in other governments So it is like dealing with the country, you're dealing with Google, you're dealing with a powerful country I just wouldn't say it's a country because it's not everything You know, it's in singular purposes.
50:16So let me just give you this one example. If you take the big five, six companies, tech companies, most of them will be spending more on R &D. Amazon, for example, spends more on R &D in singular technological development than the entire British state does in public R &D. For the purpose of making Jeff Bezos even richer? For the purpose, well, for their commercial purposes. And look at what they've done with it. And you look at what they're doing with data, supercomputing, They're putting three and a half thousand satellites in the space. This is what they're doing. Now, you as a state going along to that, the relationship has to be sophisticated.
50:53Look, I do have tests for myself when I have these meetings because I have the privilege of meeting people very, very senior, chief exec and presidents of these companies. And when I sit with them, I hope because in the very, very first week that I had this job, I brought in victims of social media harm. And I sat with parents who have lost children to online activity. and I listen to them and I've had them in again before making announcements, before I've done things that might be challenging for them, I speak to them directly. And I hope when I end these meetings that, yes, I am there to beat the drum for Britain and investment and the like, but I always will say what the expectations of Britain is and what I have and what Keir have and what our government has of them should they come to Britain and operate here.
51:38And I hope those families would be proud of the words that I say, at least content with the words that I use. You've got an unbelievably difficult job. And obviously, as you keep teasing Alistair and me, it's all very well us sitting in a studio and asking you questions. And we do understand to some extent what that is. It is a pretty unpleasant time, though. I'm sitting here in the States talking to you. When I talk to people on the extreme edge of the West Coast, people in the kind of Peter Thiel camp, Mark Andresen camp, they basically say Europe and the UK doesn't matter anymore we've got the seven biggest tech companies in the world the whole of the future of defence is going to be defined by the kind of stuff that we're doing with data and cyber we've got them over a barrel if they dare to try to regulate us if they try to touch the way in which we operate with Twitter we're going to shut them down and kill them with trade sanctions they don't have any money all the companies come to the West Coast if they want to get investment because investment doesn't work in the UK and Europe, right?
52:46So that sounds to me like strategically over the next 10, 15 years, we're going to have to become more independent of these people. We cannot be over a barrel in relation to those people. You've talked a little bit about how a supercomputer could help you on that. But there's much more than that, isn't there? There's about how we get 350 million people in Europe together and 14 % of the world's GDP and use that money so that we actually have some sovereign independence in data, in tech, in search engines, in defense. How are we going to do that? It goes back to one of the first questions you asked me, and that's what we're doing by investing so heavily, I mean, literally heavily in AI and the infrastructure for it.
53:27We have to be able to innovate, upscale, and allow companies and partnerships between public and private sectors to innovate and commercialise in a way that we have to get that done better. So that is for sovereign purposes. It's just simply so our economy can be rooted in where the growth of the future is. But also it comes down to the hard and soft power that I mentioned and the economic wealth that I've been mentioning all the way through this. The fundamentals are exactly the same. And it's not new for this century, for this moment. In every century, you're relevant if you are rooted in where the economic opportunities are.
53:59That's why Britain has done so well as what is a fairly small geographic country. We were ahead at the first Industrial Revolution. We were really good at the two revolutions that came after it. But at the moment, we've been really, really behind in this latest one, which is about digital infrastructure and use of digital and the way that digital is going to transform absolutely everything. So we have to get there. You're avoiding my invitation to talk about scale. But in a global world, we should be having global partnerships. And, you know, you keep coming back to one particular bit, which is our neighbours.
54:34Called Europe. Called Europe. Where we share democratic and liberal values, because you're not, you can't rely on the US anymore. And you're certainly not going to rely on China. So you don't really have many options, do you? Well, in a global world, we should be partnering with our global allies. And also, we should be making sure that where there is China that is waiting there to try and, you know, get in and influence, we need to strengthen those as well. So Australia and Japan, incredibly influential partners. And in the digital age, that kind of innovation and the robotics and the use of digital technology in Japan is fundamentally important.
55:05Just bear this one statistic in mind. Since 2010, if you take technological stock, the stock of tech companies, it's increased by 400%. If you aggregate all other remaining sectors, then it's about 10%. And we have been sort of rooted in the 10%, not where the real growth has come from. If you took Silicon Valley out of America, they'd have the same productivity gains as Europe. We've been sitting on the sidelines here. So there are lots of reasons why we have to do this. And of course, our relationships with Europe on a whole load of grounds have got to be sort of rehabilitated and got to work together.
55:45But Europe has these same problems at all. You will know the Draghi report that came out a little while ago that spoke exactly in the terms that I am. But we will work with Europe on those key things where there is areas of mutual benefit. But there are certain things that we can do right now as a country, and we need to be focusing on them, exploiting them for the good of our domestic economy and people who live in Britain. And that includes also transforming the way we do government, because I've got a lot to say on the way that we modernise government for the moment we're living in in the future.
56:14Listen, you're going to have to go quite soon because you're a very, very busy cabinet minister with lots and lots of things to do. And we're just a couple of ageing old wet hacks who sit around sort of pontificating. But what I'm going to do before you go is get you to promise to come back in the not too distant future and answer some of these questions. But through questions from listeners who've listened to us so far. I'd love to do that. Yeah. I'd love to do that. I want to do one of your live shows. I want to go on the O2. do well yeah you would you bring in as many extra people to the crowd you'd need wemberly maybe wember yeah let me just ask you this though because this will also require quite a lot of legislation and at the moment you've been consulting on the data use and access bill and i've got to tell you if i see two sides okay and on one side i've got paul mccartney elton john and stephen fry saying you're doing something bad and on the other side i've got the musks and the Zuckerbergs and the Bezos's and the Google saying yeah yeah yeah this is the way to go I know who I'm backing I'm with Macca I'm with Elton John and I'm with Stephen Fry so why are so many people in the creative and cultural industries so upset about the line that you're taking in relation to copyright because it seems to me they have a very very very strong point I think people who are in the creative sector are extraordinary and the the thing that's extraordinary about their profession is it's not just going to work and coming home at five o 'clock and getting on with life for them it is it is a so so you understand they're very upset that's indeed i think you're going to destroy their industries indeed i understand i understand that so let's just understand exactly what i am doing so i have a data bill going through parliament at the moment yeah you will get that you will understand this because the data bill is actually about keeping us in compliance with the EU for data sharing across.
58:07Now, if we don't do that by June, then we fall out and all data for commercial and government businesses cannot pass the English Channel. So this is a leftover from the previous administration. The Lords have attached amendments on this to this bill. And what I have tried to do is to separate and give a specific moment to Parliament to look at the issue you've raised, which is about how the relationship between the creative arts sector and AI can interact in the modern times. I've said that the consultation, which closed recently, and I will legislate fully on the back of that, and I'll be setting out exactly what the red lines are in the coming period on it, but I need to listen to the consultation in order to do so.
58:50But I'll be forced into this debate now because of an amendment that's been attached to a different piece of legislation. Now, if I could just say one thing on this. We have the second largest creative arts sector in the world, We have the third largest AI market in the world. And what I'm being asked to do is to choose between one or the other. The copyright laws are 300 years old. And there is one reality which is immutable. And that is that all of the data that people are worried about has already been scraped and used by AI companies because not one of them, not one of them is domiciled in the UK.
59:26so unless you have international copyright attached to your work which is respected in california then your data has already been subsumed into the ai system and when it comes to china they have no regard for any copyright anywhere in the world so it's already been up there in it so this is about how we move forward from where we are and i'm trying to find a way through that will will give the protections for people who are creating creative uh sounds like you're confirming that the tech guys have got us all over the barrel. No, they have had. But the only way that we can have influence over them is to have them here by adding to British laws because I can't pass laws that will have an impact in the Gulf or in Texas.
1:00:09So what we are doing is trying to find a way through where we can have the relationships. They can come to Britain to do it, but I will not sell creative artists downstream in order to do so. Their rights will be protected in the modern age. And they shouldn't always have to end up going to court in order to make sure that they can have the rights that they need, because you need so much money to do that. Peter, thank you. Listen, I think listeners have got an amazing glimpse into you. I mean, everything from talking about complicated legislation, fights the creative industry, the huge geopolitical implications.
1:00:42We didn't begin to get into the way in which AI could transform health services, education, business. And we'll do that through members' questions when we re-engage again. But thank you for your honesty. Thank you for your frankness. And thank you for teasing us occasionally. See you at Wembley. Thank you for having me. Wet. You're not coming. I know I get that. We like Wes Streeting best in the car. You know how to wound me. Yeah, I think we get Wes or Angie. Thank you for your time. Thanks. Thanks again. Bye bye.
1:01:18So, Rory, Peter Kyle. Well, I thought really moving on his family. I thought it was really lovely hearing him talk about his father. I think he's sharp. I think he's a very able politician. And here comes the but, as you predict. The buzz is that there are two gigantic things happening. One of them is the complete reshape of global security as Trump abandons NATO. And I didn't feel that Peter is quite being serious enough about the way in which Britain should be coming much, much closer to Europe, not just economically, but in terms of defensive security. And I didn't buy into this idea of, well, we can make lots of small, slow, pragmatic steps.
1:02:05I think this really is a time for courage and ideological vision beyond a matching for leadership. And I was disappointed that Peter kind of poo-poos that so much. And I think the second thing is I was a little uncomfortable with him teasing you and saying that you've become a little bit too woke and that you're jumping on campaigns too much. the truth of the matter is that the Labour Party is doing things which I think are worth talking about I think the cutting of international aid was a really devastating short-sighted thing to do that doesn't sit well with Labour's values or what Keir Starmer said before the election and you're very loyal to the Labour Party but I think when you're raising some of these issues it's not just you I think many, many Labour voters are uncomfortable with some of these things.
1:03:00And I don't think you should just brush them off as being, Alistair's become a student activist. Anyway, that's me. OK, well, I'm going to come to his defence on both. On the first one about Europe, I think the trouble here is collective responsibility. You know, I framed the question to him by saying, I know what you think about Europe. I know what you think about Brexit. I know what you'd really like to do. But he is bound by collective responsibility. They do have to say the same thing. I actually thought recently after on the morning after Keir Starmer met Donald Trump, which was obviously a huge event during the morning round the next day was was West Street in the health secretary, who's very, very good when he's talking about health.
1:03:41OK, and social care. But he goes on and is expected to talk about defence and foreign policy and security and the future of Europe with the same dexterity and the same knowledge. And you know, having been a cabinet minister, you do have to immerse yourself in your brief. And I think sometimes it's unfair of us and of media people to expect cabinet ministers to have the same level of engagement and expertise on across all issues. Peter knows. And on the woke point, I mean, just to tell listeners that beforehand I was raging about aid. And Peter said, I've listened to your podcast. I listen to every episode.
1:04:22And you now say things. This is what he said. I wanted him to say it on air, actually. You now say things that back in the day when you would do your old job, if ministers had said those things, you'd have stopped them after three words, which is not quite true. But that's the point he was making. And I think likewise, we didn't really have time to get into aid because, of course, Peter, again, Peter's a former aid worker. He knows how bad this is. But he also knows that unless he resigned, as Annalisa Dodds did over the aid cuts, then he has to kind of toe the line. I thought you were going to say that you weren't convinced by his arguments on AI about how we, the UK, genuinely become this world leader without this relentless kind of sucking up to the Americans on tech and AI.
1:05:15Because that's where I felt we needed a bit more. Let's do the AI thing for a couple of things. So I think the first thing is the UK is making one particular type of bet, particularly in supercomputing and these large, very expensive training models, when it could be doing other things. I would prefer to see it saying, OK, that's not where we're going. Instead, we're going to focus on putting maybe even the same amount of money, but into the practical applications of AI into public policy. But the second thing is that I increasingly think that social media, in particular, X and Twitter, pose a very, very fundamental threat to our own democracies.
1:05:54I think Musk and Trump are trying to undermine our democracies from within. Yeah. And I would like to see us take that seriously in the way that people who fought fascism over the years have realized that you need to put guardrails around your democracy. Right. Yeah. These things are fragile and can be whipped away. And yes, I absolutely agree that it felt like we have a government that is so desperate to buddy up to these tech people that we didn't get a squeak out of him on Elon Musk. despite the fact that Elon Musk is mocking the British government saying that Tommy Robinson is a prisoner of conscience uh claiming that we're an Islamic state claiming that you know Peter Kyle's own colleagues are complicit in rape and so I think that is that is kind of worrying yeah yeah now that being said Rory you're in the states when we're talking to Peter I was with him.
1:06:50But after we ended, I asked him whether he would come back and do a members only Q &A on AI. So in other words, because I do think it's one of those areas, we get so many questions about this. And let's be honest, you and I, we study it a bit, but we're not experts. So we would like members and people who would like to become members and who could therefore take part in stuff like this is that from time to time where we have a guest like Peter we do the interview we put that out as normal but then we do a members only Q &A where you send in the questions and we then get the guests back and so on AI we would like to do maybe a half hour or so get Peter back and get our members questions and we can keep the conversation going about AI what do you think of that I think it's a great idea because there's so much specialist knowledge out there and there's so many questions that people in that field would love to ask Peter and so yeah well done on doing that and I think it's really important good
From the publisher
5 consecutive UK Prime Ministers have declared that the UK will become an AI Superpower, why is Keir Starmer any different? Why does no one have ‘big ideas’ anymore? And, how did Peter Kyle’s experience of grief shape the politician he is today?
Rory and Alastair are joined by Peter Kyle, the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, to discuss all this and more.
TRIP Plus:
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes.
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.
Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com
Video Editor: Josh Smith
Assistant Producer: Alice Horrell
Social Producer: Jess Kidson
Producer: Nicole Maslen
Senior Producer: Dom Johnson
Head of Content: Tom Whiter
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices




