159. Michael Gove: My Journey From Left to Right (Part 1)

27 Oct 2025 · 56 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Episode Notes: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 159: Michael Gove: My Journey From Left to Right (Part 1)

Episode Overview In this episode, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart interview former Cabinet Minister Michael Gove. The discussion explores Gove's political journey from left to right, his complex background, and his views on several contentious issues, including his stance on Israel and his relationship with media mogul Rupert Murdoch.

---

Key Themes and Discussions

  1. Michael Gove's Background
  2. Early Life: Gove was born in Aberdeen and adopted shortly after birth. He discusses the impact of his childhood and the nature of adoption on his identity.
  3. Family Influence: His parents had a modest background; father ran a fish processing business, and his mother worked in a shop and later as a lab assistant. They instilled a love of education and reading in Gove, although they were not particularly bookish themselves.
  1. Political Evolution
  2. Initial Leftist Ideals: Gove joined the Labour Party at age 16, inspired by leaders like Michael Foot and the idea of ethical socialism.
  3. Shift to Conservatism: He reflects on his transition to conservative beliefs during his university years, noting that he became conservative during a time of political division in the UK.
  1. Relationship with Boris Johnson and Journalism
  2. Support for Boris: Gove discusses his support for Boris Johnson during their time at Oxford, highlighting the camaraderie and political dynamics at the university.
  3. Journalism as a Foundation: Gove believes that journalism offers valuable skills for politics, such as communication and the ability to distill complex issues. He critiques the perception that journalists make superficial politicians.
  1. Rupert Murdoch's Influence
  2. Admiration for Murdoch: Gove expresses admiration for Murdoch's impact on the media landscape, particularly his role in revitalizing the UK newspaper industry.
  3. Media and Politics: The discussion touches on the evolving relationship between media and politics, with Gove advocating for the importance of a diverse media landscape.
  1. Views on Israel and Palestine
  2. Strong Support for Israel: Gove articulates a passionate defense of Israel, informed by his upbringing in the Church of Scotland and a deep admiration for the Jewish community.
  3. Critique of Criticism: He expresses frustration with what he perceives as unfair criticism of Israel, arguing that support for Israel is crucial in the broader context of global democracy.
  4. Understanding of Conflict: Gove acknowledges the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but maintains a pro-Israel stance, emphasizing the necessity of recognizing Israel's achievements and challenges.
  1. Reflections on Political Landscape
  2. Concerns about Double Standards: Gove discusses the double standards applied to Israel in comparison to other nations, questioning why Israel receives disproportionate criticism.
  3. Debate on Human Rights: The conversation extends to broader discussions about human rights and the treatment of minority communities in the UK and abroad.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Complex Identity: Gove's identity is shaped by his adoption, family background, and political journey, illustrating how personal history can influence political beliefs.
  • Political Shift: The evolution from left to right politics showcases the fluidity of political identities and the impact of personal experiences on political ideology.
  • Media's Role: The discourse emphasizes the importance of responsible journalism in shaping political narratives and the necessity for politicians to engage with media effectively.
  • Controversial Views: Gove's strong stance on Israel and his defense of its actions reflect a significant divergence from mainstream British political opinions, underscoring the complexities surrounding this issue.

---

Conclusion This episode provides an insightful look into Michael Gove's life, illustrating the interplay between personal experiences and political beliefs. The discussions highlight the nuances of political alignment, the role of media, and the complexities of international relations, particularly concerning Israel and Palestine.

---

Next Steps For listeners interested in further exploration of these topics, stay tuned for Part 2, where Gove's ministerial career and thoughts on education and Brexit will be discussed.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28Thanks for listening to The Rest is Politics. Sign up to The Rest is Politics. companies are facing a choice, lead the AI shift or risk being left behind. And companies like Trustpilot, Deliveroo, Skyscanner are already leading the way, with Wordsmith AI alongside them. It's like giving every lawyer an invisible paralegal, somebody who knows their history, drafts the first pass and frees up hours for complex work. Wordsmith handles the routine so that the lawyers can focus on the bigger issues. Crucially, this isn't at the moment something that's replacing lawyers. It's something that's taking out the more boring, routine tasks so they can really use their expertise, their experience, and their human judgment in the law.

1:08And it wasn't built in Silicon Valley. It was built like so many great things in history in Scotland, now benefiting companies worldwide. Shifts already happening. Wordsmith is helping legal teams around the world with clarity and confidence. There's free access to the Wordsmith Academy, plus their report on the future of legal skills, visit wordsmith.ai slash politics.

1:54Think less friction, more innovation. Ready to double your productivity? Try Spotify portal at backstage.spotify.com.

2:09Welcome to The Restless Politics Leading with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Alistair Campbell. And today we have as our guest, Michael Gove, who had the most remarkable career in British politics. In fact, I think very, very few people held so many different ministerial positions under so many prime ministers. He began as an education secretary under David Cameron. He served in the Ministry of Justice. He served in the environment. He served for Boris Johnson as a leveling up secretary. He was a leadership contender on a number of very well-known occasions, probably one of the very best known conservative politicians of his generation.

2:45Before that, he was a journalist. He was a columnist for The Times, and he is now the editor of The Spectator, a magazine owned by the extraordinary new media magnate Paul Marshall, who also owns GB News and Unheard and various other things. So Michael is an amazing route in to British politics, conservative politics, somebody who was very kind to me when I was a member of parliament, very actually kind to me when I became a minister. and also has, like many of our guests, a very remarkable backstory. Welcome, Michael. So, Michael, let's start with that backstory. Your childhood. Yes. More interesting than most.

3:24Well, I think that for people of my particular generation, we were almost the last generation before some of the laws changed around abortion and the termination of children. And therefore, I was one of the last of a generation, I think, where mothers had no option, effective option, but to carry a child to term and then give them up for adoption. And so I was born in Aberdeen to a woman who was studying kukri demonstration in Aberdeen at the time. She's originally from Edinburgh. I was in care for the first four months of my life and then adopted by my mum and dad, Christmas of 1967, and then brought up by them.

4:07And my dad passed away two years ago. My mother is still alive and in Aberdeen. And they also adopted my sister, who's five years younger than me, from a different birth family and who is profoundly deaf and happily married and lives just outside Aberdeen. And the two birth parents, what do you know about them? A limited amount. I don't know anything about my birth father. When you say you don't know anything? Anything. Name? Not a thing. Nationality, nothing. The only things that I know are that I was born Graham Andrew Logan, and I know that my birth mother was originally brought up in Edinburgh, then moved to Aberdeen to study, as I say, to be a cookery demonstrator.

4:49I don't know anything else about my background. In fact, I believed that I had been born in Edinburgh because that's where my parents collected me from. That's where the adoption agency was operating. And so on my passport, it says born in Edinburgh. But actually, the truth was that I was born in Aberdeen. That's where my birth mother was studying. I knew nothing else about them. Right. Gosh. Do you get a bit fed up with people asking you about this? I mean, it's such an extraordinary story. And presumably, it's the center of so many interviews. And the next question, I suppose, that occurs, but might be irritating is, why haven't you pushed to learn more about your mother and your birth father?

5:27I think that there are a group of people of broadly my age and maybe a wee bit older. Nicky Campbell, for example, the BBC host. Roger Mosey, who was my boss at the Today programme. Jim Nochte, who was my mentor on the Today programme. I'm sure he would disavow me now. They were all adopted. And so the nature of adoption has changed. And it was an issue that I took a very close interest in as a minister. People do ask, and I'm not at all bored about talking about it, because I think that inevitably, you don't need to be a Freudian to recognize that birth and family at the very earliest age has an impact on you, an influence on you, even if you're not always aware of what that influence is.

6:10Why haven't I taken things further? Well, as you both know, I'm a naturally nosy person. I've talked about it extensively with my mom. Your birth mother? No, no, no, with my adoptive mother, whom I think of as my mom. And that's the reason why I haven't done it, because I have felt that to try to find out more about my birth mother and my family might suggest to my my mom who's still alive that somehow the love that she gave me wasn't complete, that there was something missing. and she's never tried to steer me away from it. She's never suggested that I shouldn't do this, but it's just something that I know and feel.

6:49But others who have made the search for and established a relationship with their birth parents, with their birth mother, like Nikki Campbell, have encouraged me to do so, but so far I've held back. So when you say mum and dad, that's how you see them. Just tell us a bit about them. My mum and dad come from probably an unconventional background for someone who went on to become a Tory politician. So my dad was a small businessman. He ran a fish processing business in Aberdeen, which was established by my grandfather. He left school at 15 to go into the family business. It was never a big concern.

7:25Maximum number of people employed about 20. He met my mom ice skating in Aberdeen. My mom was the daughter of a laborer. She, again, left school at 15, went on to work as a shop assistant in a jewish shop in Aberdeen, Jemison and Carrie, and then subsequently worked as a lab assistant at Aberdeen University. Class terms, of course, are, you know, they're very difficult and they're pernicious. But my mom would have come from what you would have thought of as a working class background. and my dad probably from a lower middle class or, you know, bourgeois, petty bourgeois background. But it was a, in the best sense of the word, and I don't mean this in a demeaning way, an ordinary loving home.

8:04So it was never the case that we wanted for anything. There's no four Yorkshiremen style auction of poverty. It was completely comfortable. Indeed, they made sacrifices, not, you know, going without, but they made sacrifices in order to ensure that they could pay for me to go to an independent school when I was 11. I subsequently got a scholarship after I was there, but they were paying the full fees for the first few years. Again, the school concerned Robert Gordon's College for people who would know it or know something about Scotland. They'd recognize that it's not an ultra posh establishment, but it was an independent school.

8:37It cost hundreds of pounds at the time for me to go there. And they were, and my mum is, a lovely, unpretentious, unpolitical family. Was your dad political? He took an interest in politics. He wasn't very strongly political. Most of his instincts were right wing, but he voted conservative. He also voted SNP. He voted different parties at different times. My mum was always Labour. The only time that she ever voted... Give my fondest regards to your mum. I will. She voted Conservative during the time that I was an MP. But now that I'm no longer an MP, she has gone back to voting Labour. Good for her.

9:19good for her and Michael you were obviously this sort of very very uh I don't know not quite a child prodigy but you were a very sort of smart hyper literate child there are your parents have stories of you sort of reading the encyclopedia in the evenings and so sort of narrative about you not want to go reading a swap and your parents were less bookish your father was less bookish yes I think that's a completely fair to say so there weren't many books in in the home so my dad would subscribe to Reader's Digest and would read the Reader's Digest condensed book thrillers and sometimes history. My mum is a classic Catherine Cookson, you know, historical romance reading woman.

9:58And, you know, in that sense, neither of them were hyper literate, but nor was it the case that this was a home utterly devoid of books or any culture of reading. But it was the case that in comparison, I was inevitably a bit of a cuckoo in the nest and that they discovered as I was growing up this appetite on my part just to read and absorb information and so on. And my dad was also very athletic. He'd boxed for the army in his youth. He was a very good football player. He nearly played semi-professionally. And I, while I love watching sport, was an unathletic lump. So in that sense, it was clear that there was no sort of biological link between my very athletic dad and my very pretty mother and me.

10:47And Michael, one thing that sometimes happens, I guess, is that your parents might begin to believe, as you went on in life, that the world that you entered was quite alien to them. Oh, yes. It was quite difficult for your father to give you advice in the way that a father would like to. Yes. Because you'd got beyond the sort of things that he had experience of. Completely. And I think that it's an experience which is perhaps less marked now, but has obviously been fairly extensively written about in the sort of post-war era. So during the post-war era, you know, you had social mobility and, you know, you've got people like Alan Bennett who've written very movingly about this.

11:23So Alan Bennett is the bookish child of working class parents in Yorkshire. He goes off to Oxbridge. That is his natural destiny. But at the same time, he's almost educated out of his background. So he learns at Oxford, not out of stombishness or social climbing, but just a desire not to be awkward and not to stand out. He learns inevitably middle class habits. And so by definition, you find yourself not so much at school, but more when I went away to university in England, leading a life which is increasingly alien from your parents. But you embrace that life. Yes. And I think one of the things that I hope I'm conscious of is the difference and the distance without it being estrangement.

12:08So when earlier this year I was made a lord, which would have been unthinkable when I was a child, I was really pleased that my mum, my sister, my mum's best friend, Brenda, were all there. similarly it's still the case um with very old friends in scotland in aberdeen um that i can slip back sometimes too much so into the person i was when i was younger but there's a difference yes so your first political activism was for labor completely did you join the party i joined the labor party i joined when michael foot was leader when michael foot was leader against margaret thatcher yes who went on to become one of your heroines correct i joined the labor party in 1983.

12:48I was 16. I joined the Aberdeen North Labour Party. Bob Hughes was the MP at the time. Wonderful man. He was a wonderful man. He was a wonderful man. He was a very... He was the one MP that Nelson Mandela always used to pick out as a great campaigner on apartheid. He was A, a fantastic anti-apartheid campaigner, B, a very well-liked local MP, and C, he was the only Scottish Labour MP who didn't back John Smith for the leadership and backed Brian Gould instead. But put that to one side. I campaigned for Labour in the 1983 general election as a schoolboy. My mum was a regular attender at the Church of Scotland.

13:23I was a regular attender at the Church of Scotland. I believed in a world where if we abolished money and moved towards a greater level of equality, then we'd get rid of wickedness and evil. And I also remember that Aberdeen was twinned with the town of Clermont-Ferrand in France. and the daughter of the socialist mayor of Clément Ferrand was visiting Aberdeen and I was deputed to take her out on a sort of twin town style date. She was lovely. I'm sure she won't remember me. So a French socialist. Yes. France socialism. We'll get on to Brexit later and the disaster that that has wreaked upon the country, Michael.

14:08Of course. But what made you think you were Labour and when did you realise that maybe you weren't? So I would have described myself with all the pomposity that a 15 or 16 year old can muster as an ethical socialist. So I loved George Orwell. I believed that there were fundamental problems and injustices in our society that only the left or the Labour Party could deal with. There was something about Michael Foote in particular that I liked. I liked, I mean, remember, I'm a kid, but still, I liked the sort of dogged, unfashionable, the literary style that he brought to his oratory. And again, I was an unusual kid, not, I hope, too unusual, but certainly unusual at the time, in being the sort of kid who would watch the news avidly and who would read the papers and take an interest in those things.

14:58What did you think of Thatcher at the time? At the time, I thought that, you know, what we fundamentally needed, remember, I was just a teenager, was a radical shift to the left in the country. But I realized later, really in my final year at school, and as I arrived in university, I realized then that actually, even though I hadn't been aware beforehand, that I was conservative. And then at university, I'm very sympathetic, obviously, to the Michael Foote whole thing. The thing I can't quite work out, I can completely understand, you know, admiring Michael Foote. But am I right that at Oxford, you ran the campaign for Boris Johnson to be president of the union, who is like the polar opposite of Michael Foote?

15:39I mean, instead of being like a sort of shabby, high-minded, highly serious, thoughtful, ethical, intellectual, a complete sort of larger-than-life, flashy-dressing charlatan rogue, right? What was the transition? How did you go from foot to Johnson? I did not run Boris's campaign, but I was an enthusiastic supporter of it. Very good. So I was at the time in the Oxford Union, there were this cast of characters called stooges. And to be a stooge was to be the lowly representative in your college who would persuade other people who were members of the Oxford Union to vote for whoever the big guy or big woman on campus was.

16:11So you'd stand in the Porter's Lodge. More or less. And when people walked out and say, would you vote for Boris Johnson? Completely. The person who was actually running his campaign, though, was Simon Stevens, who went on to become chief executive of the NHS and who was an advisor to Ellen Milburn. The real guilty man is Simon, not me. He sat alongside me for years. Can I keep developing this? What was it that you saw in this guy? Why were you not horrified by him? Well, the very first time I met Boris, it was just after I joined the Oxford Union. And one of the things I really enjoyed at school was debating.

16:42There's a particular tradition associated with Scottish schools at that time. and he was literally one of the first people I met. He was there like a basking shark at the bar of the Oxford Union and I was introduced to him and he said, are you conservative? And I said, yes. And I said, and what about you? And at the time, there was a big sort of left, right, wet, dry division, both in the country and at Oxford. And I said, well, then what sort of conservative are you? And he sort of looked me up and down and there was sort of the brush of the hair. He said, yeah, I'm a green conservative. and I wasn't sure at the time whether this was a typical attempt to avoid answering the question because he didn't know whether I was on the wet or the dry side of the divide and once he found out which side of the divide I was on he could say, well, I'm pretty much a wet green or pretty much a dry green but there was, is, as is so much with Boris, an element, or more than an element of truth in that, he had been influenced by his father, noted environmentalist amongst many other things and he did have, you know, way before he got into parliament and interested in these issues.

17:46But he was at that point, the person who had already amassed around him a sort of group of friends and supporters. And the elections for the Oxford Union were essentially between, you know, one man or woman and their mates. And so the people who were in my college and the other people who I knew and liked were also Boris supporters. I don't want to overdevelop the psychological theme, but You're now the editor of The Spectator. And I remember once having a lovely meal with you in Parliament when you were a very distinguished cabinet minister. And you said in a reflective moment, I sometimes wonder whether actually I wouldn't rather have been editor of The Spectator than the cabinet.

18:23And of course, Boris became editor of The Spectator. And then, of course, you were involved in his governments. You were involved in leadership stuff. So he became quite a sort of major figure in your life, occupying positions, vying against you. He's been a major figure in all our lives. But yes, so there's a coincidence there. And the obvious thing is, and a number of people have sort of delved deep into this, like the FT writer Simon Cooper, who's written a whole book about the Oxford generation of which I was part. And yes, you've got a group of people who were at Oxford in the 80s, some of whom went into journalism, Boris and I.

18:56And of those people who went into journalism and conservative politics, there are parallels between Boris and myself. And that's inescapable. I mean, there were other people who were also at Oxford. Who were the other? Remind us who else is in that Simon Cooper book. Well, Ed Balls was at Oxford as an exact contemporary. And he went to journalism at the FT and then obviously subsequently into politics. Is Cameron's your age? David Cameron was another exact contemporary. He's a wee bit older than me, but he was at Brazenose College, 85 to 88. I never met David Cameron when I was at Oxford. So I did know one or two people who were his friends and who I subsequently got to know better.

19:32And Miliband, are they roughly your age? Yes, they were. So David Miliband was the president of the Junior Common Room, the student representative organization in his college, Corpus Christi. Ed Miliband went to the same college later and had the same post. Ruth Kelly was an exact contemporary. She was at Queen's College. Yvette Cooper was a wee bit younger. She was at Balliol and she went on to, again, she went on to journalism and politics as well. Stephen Twigg was probably the most prominent student labor politician at the time. he went on to become president of the Oxford University Students Union, which was the sort of genuinely university-wide student representative body.

20:11Presumably, Johnson and Cameron never suggested you have a membership of the Bullingdon Club. No. And I did a talk at the Oxford Union a couple of years ago, and I was looking around the walls. There's a picture of you sitting there looking rather nervous wearing a kilt. Yes. Do you often wear a kilt? Yes. Just talk to me a bit about your Scottishness, how important that is. So the first thing is that the president or the officers of the Oxford Union still, when debates occur, wear white tie. And I thought rather than going for the full rig, it would be appropriate. I had a kilt to get the dress accoutrement that marked the equivalent of that.

20:50The second thing is, one of the reasons I think I was nervous in that picture is that we had a debate with Malcolm Rifkind, Donald Dewar, George Galloway, and Eric Forth. And there'd been a bit of to and fro beforehand between Donald Gere being very uncomfortable about being on the same platform as George Galloway. Donald Gere did not like George Galloway. No, he did not. I remember that vividly. He did not. And so I think I was a little bit nervous about whether or not I'd upset the guest because of that sort of juxtaposition. I mean, they all spoke very well. Funnily enough, it was a debate on devolution.

21:17But, you know, the extent to which your birth and background determine your views and tastes, you can never, you know, put down in precise percentage terms. But I'm conscious of and reminded every day of the fact that as someone who was born and brought up in Scotland and I went back to work in Scotland for a brief period after university, that gives me a slightly different, maybe warped, but still a slightly different perspective from friends, even those with similar backgrounds and outlooks, who are English, particularly people who grew up in London and who are, you can either argue that bit more in their swim or that bit more instinctively comfortable with the institutions that are at the centre of British life.

22:11You mentioned both you and Boris Johnson went into journalism. Do you think journalists make good politicians in general? I think it's impossible to generalise. I think there are certain skills that you should pick up in journalism that help in politics. So I think it helps enormously to be able to cut through verbiage and evasion to get to the heart of the matter. I think it helps to be able to know that you have to communicate complexity to an intelligent individual, but someone who doesn't know anything about that subject, if you're going to command their attention in a story, a feature, or a column.

22:52And that similarly, if you're a minister or a politician, if you're confused, if things are opaque or obscure, then you're not the master or mistress of that detail, and you need to be. So the journalistic desire to get at the heart of things and the ability to sum up the essentials is a very valuable diagnostic or analytical tool if you're a politician. But you can get that if you're a doctor or if you're a lawyer or if you've been working as an engineer. So, you know, there's nothing particularly there. There is a tendency, I think, to dismiss some journalists. I can understand why. Because people think, oh, well, journalism is inevitably a superficial profession for butterfly minds.

23:33And in particular, there's a premium on people dashing off provocative opinion that gets talked about or lots of clicks. And one of the disastrous things are people who want to win applause and want to create a bit of a crackle around the policy that they're implementing or embracing. And then they walk away because journalists are used to their columns being tomorrow's fish and chip paper, and they don't see things through. In other words, an 1100 word column is a lot easier than a white paper. Yes. But the skills of the 1100 word column can help you construct a white paper. Absolutely. For example, I remember when I was at the Department for Education, one of the things that I thought is that, of course, you've got to try and convey, you know, some sense of authority to the little servants.

24:12They wonder who on earth is this guy. But at the same time, you sometimes just have to ask stupid questions because things seem unbelievable. And being a journalist, you almost have a license all the time to either be the ignoramus or to pose as the daft laddie and say, excuse me, I'm sorry, I just don't understand, you know, Columbo style. And similarly, so when I was trying to investigate, not investigate, ask about how PFI operated, I sort of knew, but I said to the civil servant, so you're telling me that we pay every year, we pay this private body to allow the school to operate and run. And then we pay them every time we replace a light bulb.

24:47And then at the end of it, presumably it's like a mortgage. At the end of 25 years, the local authority or the government owns the school. What? The private company owns the school. So we pay them rent and then they own it at the end. Well, you know, who thought of this thing? this is crazy. Now, all the civil servants were thinking, this guy's an idiot. Anyone who's a minister should know how PFI operates. But what I was doing was A, being a bit like a journalist or interviewer in bringing to light in that conversation, how absurd and indefensible the scheme would seem to the public. Can I answer just quickly on this journalist thing?

25:18I think it is interesting. I mean, how many other major British politicians were professional journalists as opposed to successful politicians who wrote journalism on the side, having done other things in their lives? Well, I think the first thing is there are some people who were so rich that they could have done anything, but they chose to make their name in journalism. And that was true of the Marquess of Salisbury. Churchill was a writer, but he was everything. But he first came to prominence, really, as a journalist and a writer. Michael Foote was a journalist and he was editor of the Evening Standard before he became a member of parliament.

25:54They come immediately to mind. There are other people who started out in journalism and then lost their way. I'm trying to think how many there were really in our time. In our time, fewer. Yeah. A lot of lawyers. Yes. A few doctors. Yes. Gordon Brown was a journalist. He was also an economic historian, Dr. Gordon Brown, but he was a journalist with Scottish television. In fact, it was his brother, his elder brother, John, who gave me a job at STV. But you're right, I think that - Peter Mandelson. and was it LWT? Yes. I think there's a mix. And again, there are some people who thought about journalism, but that went almost immediately into being special advisors.

Read the full transcript

26:37You know, George Osborne. And as I say, Ed Balls was a leader writer at the Financial Times. Yvette wrote for The Independent before then becoming a special advisor and so on. And just in passing, you know, some people are scornful of special advisors. I think, again, it's impossible to generalize. There are some people who become special advisors who get high on their own supply, as it were, of inside dope, as Damien McBride has acknowledged that he did. There are other people who are undergoing a very serious apprenticeship in the art of politics and go on to become successful ministers. Okay, Alison Michael, quick break and then back for more.

27:14This episode is brought to you by Revolut Business, the all-in-one account to manage your finances. Now, politics has its share of bad deals, trade summits, late night negotiations. Often, somebody walks away with the short straw. And we've seen enough botched negotiations in Westminster to know what happens when numbers don't add up. Business is no different. Nothing empties your pockets faster than hidden exchange rates. Revolut Business changes that. Over 25 currencies exchange at the same interbank rates that banks use during market hours within plan allowance. With automatic orders and price alerts, the guesswork disappears.

27:50Breaking into new markets feels possible, not perilous. Whether you're paying salaries in Dublin or suppliers in Sydney, your money reaches over 150 global destinations fast without the fine print hangover. Business across borders kept simple. Exchange like an expert. Open a Revolut business account today by scanning the QR code on screen or via the link in description. and add money by the 31st of December 2025 to get a£200 welcome bonus or equivalent in your local currency. Feature availability varies by plan. This offer is available for new business customers in the UK, US, Australia and Ireland.

28:27Fees and terms and conditions apply. Hi, it's Gary Lineker here and I want to tell you about a fantastic new quiz book from Goalhanger, the team behind the smash hit podcast. The rest is entertainment. The rest is history. The rest is politics. The rest is classified. And of course, the rest is football. The Rest is Quiz is packed with over 1000 brilliant questions to test your trivia knowledge against your friends and family. And from 1st of October to the 31st, you'll be able to preorder a copy from Waterstones for half price using the code REST2025. REST2025. Capital R, that is. Pre-order your copy of the Rest is Quiz by Goalhanger from Waterstone using the code REST2025.

29:17Now.

29:20Let me just ask about your time as a journalist. And I always get the sense that Rupert Murdoch was a sort of huge figure in your life. Yes. A big influence. I don't know if you've listened to the excellent miniseries that the Rest is Apologies is running at the moment about Rupert Murdoch. but it's fair to say I'm not as big a fan as you are. How big an influence was he? How do you define his contribution to public life? And do you think we've got the relationship between media and politics right? So I'm a big admirer of Rupert Murdoch's and I admire what he did at Wapping. I think that he saved or certainly gave a significant extension of life to the UK newspaper industry.

30:05The Independent, Yvette Cooper's paper, would never have existed without that change. I think that he is someone who loves journalism and who devotes a significant additional amount of time and energy to journalism out of proportion to what it generates for his business empire overall. I think he's shown even recently with the Wall Street Journal publishing details of Trump's cartoon that he put in the Epstein birthday book, that he's prepared to stand by journalism, even when there are sometimes political enemies who would rather that he crumpled. And I once went to a retreat. Rupert Murdoch used to organize them every three years or so for executives and journalists from his newspapers and for outside business people and politicians.

30:56We went to one famously in Australia. Yes. The one I went to was in the US. Gordon Brown and Douglas Alexander were there. Sorry to drop them in it. Albeit briefly. Was this the moment when Tony Blair was in government and they were plotting against him trying to get themselves in pole positions? Possibly. It was in the early... I'll defer to Alistair. It was... I don't know. I think it was in the Blair first term. Yes, yeah, exactly. I think they're probably there without permission trying to set up Brown's run. Very suspicious. But the thing I remember is that he, Rupert Murdoch sort of gave the closing speech, the equivalent of the leader's speech at a conference.

31:31And in it, he told the story, which I dimly knew and had never heard, and certainly not from his own lips, of the attempt that was made on the death of his father by the Adelaide establishment to take his father's newspapers away from him and his mother and effectively close him down. his determination not to allow that to happen, the freezing out of his mother, and his determination then not to allow the establishment to crush him. And I got a sort of affirmation of that sense then, that he was a restless, creative, you can't keep him down spirit. And most of Rupert Murdoch's political positions are very similar to mine.

32:11And I've arrived at them for my own reasons, but they happen to coincide in Not in every area, but in most areas. So I can't help liking and admiring him more for that. And then on the relationship between the media and politics, I think that's changing. So I think you can argue the dominance of certain newspaper titles at certain points meant that the playing field was tilted in terms of print media against the left. I think that's true. But I don't think that holds any longer just because of the way in which the media landscape is much more diverse now. Can I bring you in on Murdoch and Michael?

32:45I mean, having spent a long time thinking about Rufus Murdoch, what's your response hearing Michael talk about all that stuff? Well, I agree with him. He's a phenomenal, that's the reason we did the series. He's an extraordinary figure in media and political history. And that's why we talk about him a lot. I do think that the relationship was exposed brutally at Leveson, and I regret the fact that that hasn't led to serious change. I think that was criminality and mendacity of a pretty institutional kind. And I also will talk later about America today. But I think Fox News has been an absolute catastrophe for the world.

33:27So I come at it from a very different place. One thing I do want to ask you, though, is whether you think that Murdoch backed Tony Blair in 1997 because he believed in Tony Blair and Labour or because he knew we were going to win? Both. So I actually think that at the time he saw in Blair what he would also have seen at certain points in his career in Australian labor. He saw a tough right wing leader who was unsentimental, who had little time for what became known as political correctness or woke. He knew that the Conservative Party was exhausted and discredited at that time. In particular, he felt cheated by the Conservative Party over their treatment of Margaret Thatcher.

34:23And while John Major was hardly a toff, he had very little time for the sort of the wet grandees who were around John Major at that time. You know, the Douglas Herd figures and so on. They were the people whom he really didn't like. Is that kind of weird class thing? Well. Because he wasn't working class. No, he wasn't. But he was a Marxist when he was at Oxford, briefly. It's an Australian thing, and it's also, you sometimes see it in America, which is that they dislike a particular type of grit condescension that they detect, even if it's not actually present, but they do detect it. So I think that actually he would probably have been on balance inclined to support Tony Blair anyway.

35:06And the fact that Labour were almost certain to win just put the cherry on the cake. One more. You mentioned that you coincidentally have a lot of views that you share with him. But I wonder whether, I've always find your stance on the Middle East and Israel strange. Yes. Because you strike me as being uber passionate. Yes. Which I always felt Murdoch was as well. I remember witnessing once a huge argument between Murdoch and James Murdoch, his son, in front of Tony Blair, about Israel-Palestine. And so I just wonder, is that an influence? Or how have you independently got to a position that feels to me a little bit extreme?

35:44It predates it. It's certainly the case that if you look at the sort of spectrum of opinion, particularly in the UK at the moment, I don't think you could describe my position as mainstream. I think that's probably fair. I don't know how often you could describe any of my positions as mainstream. That is certainly true. But it's something that I have grown up with. So I mentioned that my mum was a regular attender of the Church of Scotland. And as I grew up and attended it with her, the Church of Scotland at that time, things have changed, had a very close attachment to the Holy Land. And the story of the Jewish people was part of the sort of backdrop to my growing up.

36:23And I had a romantic attachment to their story. And again, you may recall, Alistair Rory, the speech that Gordon Brown gave in the Knesset. And this was, of course, some time ago, when he talked about, for generations, you did not have a land, now you have a land. And it reflected a similar, but not identical background to mine, obviously not identical. And his father was a minister in the Church of Scotland. So there's that. And then the second thing is that I feel a very strong identification, love actually, for the Jewish community in Britain and everything that they've achieved and done and admire so much about it.

37:08And then the third thing is that when I look at the position in which Israel finds itself, I can run through my understanding of the history, which you both might want to correct or challenge. But it just seems to me that this is one of the most amazing stories in humanity and Israel's achievement is one of the most moving and powerful. And that obviously doesn't mean that it doesn't make mistakes. But my overall view is there's a queue of people who want to criticize Israel. And that's fine, but I'm not going to join them. I'm going to be on the side wherever I can defending it. Even when they're doing what they're doing in Gaza?

37:48Well, of course I can take a view that they're making mistakes. And, you know, for example, you can look at individual tactical decisions, like the bombing of the Hamas political leadership in Qatar. In Gaza, I think that the fundamental issue there is Hamas's control. But if you'd have been part of a war cabinet in Britain, engaged in a military conflict with whomsoever it may be, would you not have wanted to argue more for genuinely seeking to protect civilian life? Well, I believe that there were people who did. And I believe that the IDF, which is a citizen army in a rules-based democracy, has done everything it can.

38:32Really? You believe that? I do. In a grotesque conflict. And arithmetic here is horrendous because we're talking about individual lives lost. And we're talking about the lives of innocents who've been caught up in this horrible, horrible, horrible war. But the arithmetic would suggest that if you're talking about counterinsurgency warfare in an urban area, the level of casualties that the IDF have inflicted has been lower than we did or the Americans have done in similar through not identical conflicts. Now, it's horrible. Previous generations as well. Attitudes change. Attitudes change and so on.

39:10But we have never, thank God, been in a position where we've endured what Israel endured on October the 7th, nor have we faced what the people of Gaza have had to face. So emotions are bound to be engaged overall, and it's difficult to put oneself completely in those shoes. But as I say, there are so many people who, I think fairly and with sincerity and good faith, will criticize Israel. I sometimes think those criticisms are wrong. But I don't think that, I mean, there are some people who do argue in bad faith. But I think it's important to have some people who do see things instinctively as a starting point from Israel's point of view.

39:52The instinctive bit interests me because given that you've decided to take such a strong position on this, how much time have you spent in Israel, in the West Bank, in Gaza? I mean, how much do you actually know about this region? I mean, so what worries me, obviously, listening to you, I think, spent a lot of my life working in that region. Yes, of course. And when I was in parliament, I avoided taking pro-Arab or pro-Israeli positions when you were right in there. Yes. How much time have you spent in the region? I think I've been to Israel and the West Bank five or six times now. And for how long at a time in the West Bank?

40:28Do you spend the night there? I have never been overnight in the West Bank. I've spent days there. I've visited Romala. I've talked to people in the Fatah political leadership. I've talked to people in Palestinian civil society. So you've been there for a few hours. You've been there maybe 20, 30 hours? I would say, yeah, that would probably be. I would say more than that, but not much more than that. Okay, so 2030. So if I went to, said I've been to Manchester on five occasions, and I've met some of the leaders, and I'm now going to make Manchester my big issue, and I'm going to have very strong views on Manchester, and I'm going to...

41:09Would people not say, what the hell do you think you're doing? You've spent five days on the ground, you don't know anything about it. Well, the first thing is, I have been there. The second thing, though, is... I've been to Manchester too, but I'm not setting myself up as an expert on Manchester after five years. No, I'm not setting myself up as an expert on, for the sake of argument, the precise boundaries of… And also, you may remember that the country's tired of experts. We'll come back to that. The precise geography of a particular settlement in a particular location. The other thing is that the fate of Israel concerns us all.

41:40Because it is the case that the criticism directed at Israel falls into at least two categories. is there's a natural criticism that one democracy would extend towards another when it believes that a fellow democracy or an ally is falling short of the standards that you would expect. But it is also the case that there is opposition to Israel, not because of what it does, but because of what it is. Israel's success is a standing rebuke to a particular view of the world, two particular views of the world. It's a standing rebuke to the Islamist view of the world, and it's a standing rebuke to the left-wing decolonization narrative because Israel is a nation composed in almost entirely of refugees and asylum seekers with no natural resources that when it was born had all of its neighbors attempting to strangle it in its cradle.

42:31It's now become the single most... Michael, you don't really need to give me a lecture on that. No, but I have to explain that it is the single freest and most impressive jurisdiction. The single freest and most impressive jurisdiction. From Morocco to Delhi. And you have to ask, well, why has that happened? But also, why does it inspire such strong feelings? So when I was at the Labour Party conference, I asked Owen Jones why he spent all his time criticizing Israel and didn't show any concern for Sudan or for what was happening in Xinjiang. And could it possibly be that Sudan is not presented as our central ally?

43:19That Sudan is not a country that the United States has been providing billions of dollars of direct military support to? That Sudan has not been at the center of our entire political structures for 60, 70 years in the way that you, and that actually to compare Israel to Sudan, given that Israel is a liberal democracy and one of our closest allies, is profoundly patronizing to Israel. No, I think what happens is that people want to... Because it seems to me it's a possible double standards here, right? Well, there are double standards and they apply to Israel. On the one hand... Israel is held to different standards from other countries.

43:52This is becoming very whataboutery. So on the one hand, a liberal democracy within a rules-based international order. And on the other hand, Sudan. Okay? These are not comparable countries, right? If Denmark suddenly started doing something and I said, well, how come you're not criticizing Congo in the same way that you're criticizing Denmark? the answer would be Israel would hope to be held to a higher standard than Sudan. And it does operate to a far higher standard. But the question, of course, is why is it that the United Nations has chosen to single out Israel in the way that it has with the Zionism is racism motion being passed?

44:28Why is it the case that there is such hostility that's directed towards it? American support for Israel is like American support for Germany and NATO. It's support for a democracy or democracies that have been embattled. Why is it that all of Israel's enemies, its neighbors until recently, have tried to not just check its manners or see an alteration in its policy, but eliminate it? And why is it that it's so important that we recognize that? because antisemitism mutates over time and antisemitism from having been a religious prejudice and having been an ethnic prejudice is now a prejudice against the Jewish home and a desire to tear it down.

45:12Last one on this, Michael, because I understand your position. I was always profoundly confused in parliament by British parliamentarians setting themselves up as advocates and friends for foreign countries. I didn't take paid trips to Denmark. I didn't take paid trips to India or Israel or Saudi. I mean, these things were, I didn't think I needed to be a conservative friend of Israel, conservative friend of the Middle East. When people said, you know, what's my position on Kashmir? My answer would be, I'm a British politician. And that's somebody who spent most of his life working on foreign affairs.

45:54So one of the things that interests me is, would you say what you said about the Jewish community in Britain, about the Muslim community. Would you say that you feel, what was your phrase? I would say love and affection and admiration for what they've achieved. Would you say that about the Muslim community? I would say that about people from within the Muslim community. I would say that about very, very dear Muslim friends. But I think there is something about the Jewish story, and in particular, the Jewish experience in the 20th century, and the efforts which we've seen to destroy Jewish civilization, Jewish race and Judaism.

46:29That touches me in a way that isn't true of other communities. And I think that it is the case now that history teaches a certain lesson. And one of those lessons is that the safety and security of the Jewish community in any country at any time is the surest guide to how admirable and liberal that country is. As opposed to how we look after the poor, as opposed to how we look after prisoners, as opposed to how we treat Muslims, as opposed to many other questions. I think it is the absolute acme. It is the gold standard of how civilized a society is. Why logically? Because history shows you that whenever countries are moving towards authoritarianism, whenever they're moving into dark territory, it's the Jews who are turned on.

47:17But Michael, it's also the case that if one looks at those societies that were most liberal at any time, the Netherlands, for example, in the 16th and 17th century, Britain at the end of the 19th century, America throughout most of the 20th century, the most enlightened countries are those in which Jewish people have felt most safe. In which Jewish people feel most safe, and I agree with you on that, and in which minorities in general feel most safe, and in which human rights are respected, and particularly the human rights minority groups, of which the Jewish community is an incredibly important example.

47:45But the treatment of the Muslim community in Britain would also be a gold standard test for a civilized society. The treatment of British Muslims, the treatment of British Hindus, the treatment of British Sikhs matters to me because, like you, I have a certain idea of Britishness, which means that how you treat every citizen, and indeed every person, even if they're not a citizen, who is subject to British laws and paying British taxes, is a key element in civilization. All I would say is that there's never been, thank heavens, anything to compare with the Holocaust. It was a unique crime, the worst evil of which mankind has ever been guilty.

48:30And it was directed not at a section of any population for random reasons. It was directed explicitly at the Jewish people. And that is why when we see a rising tide of anti-Semitism now, it's a moral obligation on all of us to ask why to look at it. And certainly, of course, you can make a judgment about the government of Israel and its actions, but to blame the government of Israel's actions automatically for an increase in anti-Semitism as though that were a mathematical formula and a rational one is once again to blame Jews for prejudice against them. Who's doing that? Well, I mean, you're talking to me as though I'm doing that.

49:16No, you're not doing it. Okay, right. But it is emphatically the case that if you venture onto our streets or walk into the whirlpool of social media, you will find people who will, we've seen it in recent weeks and some of the people who've been commenting, on whether or not the fans of Maccabee Tel Aviv should be allowed to watch their team play Aston Villa. That doesn't mean that you can't make a judgment that that might be a mistake in good faith, but there's a lot of bad faith out there. But Michael, there are a lot of Muslims who feel deeply unsafe in Britain right now. Yes. If you were walking through central London when Tommy Robinson had 150 ,000 people out on the streets, and I mean, I don't like the whataboutery, but I sort of feel they're being lost in this debate.

50:04And I also, would you not agree with me that one of the consequences of what's happened in the last couple of years in the Israeli debate is it's kind of been exposed as a bit of a myth that they ever really believed in a two-state solution? Well, I don't think it's a myth. I think that it was very strongly the case that a lot of the Israeli population, a majority, have believed in a two-state solution. There's a very powerful speech that Bill Clinton gave, I think, when he was campaigning for Kamala Harris, when he explains the missed opportunity where the Palestinians were offered what was not a perfect, but certainly a good deal.

50:41And they walked away. I think things have changed. undoubtedly. I think support for a two-state solution in Israel has been ebbing. And I think it's been ebbing as a result of what's happened in Gaza. Israel, of course, withdrew, Hamas took over. The nature of that rule and other factors has meant that that's diminished. And then without, I hope, being naive, because who knows where the Trump peace plan will go, if it is the case that that you have an absence of violence and Palestinian civil society is given the chance to develop, then I think that you could see support for a two-state solution within the Israeli population growing again.

51:26Because I think the number of people in Israel who actually think the Palestinians should never have a state is small. The number of people - Very powerful. There are some very strong advocates of that position. That's not your position? No. I think that there are a number of people in Israel who think, I can't contemplate a Palestinian state at the moment if that Palestinian state is going to be run by or under the influence of the sort of people who were running Gaza when October the 7th happened. Now, the original plan that Rory and I had was to get through much of your ministerial career in part one.

52:04We haven't even got... Sorry. You haven't even become an MP yet. Yeah. Can we move on to that? Yeah. I mean, it's a fascinating aspect of your personality, this desire. Maybe it's your debating thing to be immensely combative about Israel, which we had no real interest in talking about. As you can tell, it is an issue that I feel very strongly about. We were really hoping that you could talk about stuff you really knew about, like schools and justice. Oh, he doesn't know anything about schools. But what is it that when you have the opportunity to talk about stuff you really know about and are really absorbed in, like all the work you did on schools, all the work you did on the environment, all the work you did on justice.

52:41To be fair, we did ask him. Yeah, but it becomes something where it's disproportionate, it feels to me. And it's something that interests me because I think it's a theme in your life that compared to the really interesting stuff, which is the granular absorbed detail and stuff that you actually do and do well, you have these massive ideological things that you want to have huge arguments about. I don't want to, but I'm certainly prepared to. You love arguing. I love getting to the heart of certain questions, but both as a journalist and as a politician, both member of parliament and minister, I spent far more time thinking, talking and worrying about other questions.

53:28So as Alistair established, my views on this question are not mainstream UK views. And as you've heard, they're very strongly and passionately held. And I think it's a very important issue. But the amount of sort of bandwidth that I've given to that in my professional career is relatively small compared to other questions, the questions that you've just touched on. Well, so we've got, Michael has not yet really become an MP as this canter through his life. But what we're going to have to do in part two, Michael, is cover your entire ministerial career. And in particular, two subjects in which, you know, I'm very, very interested in arguing with you, education and Brexit.

54:12Looking forward. If you want to hear part two straight away, rather than wait for a week, just sign up at the restispolitics.com.

54:33For all the entrepreneurs and business owners out there, if you're ready to simplify your business finances and exchange like an expert, now's the time to open a Revolut business account. Plus, you'll unlock a£200 welcome bonus or the equivalent in your local currency if you sign up and add money to your account by the end of 2025. Just use the link in the description. Fees and terms and conditions apply.

From the publisher

How did Michael Gove go from campaigning for Labour leader Michael Foot in 1983 to becoming a Conservative MP? What is the impact that Rupert Murdoch has had on public life? What do Michael and Rory disagree about when it comes to Israel? 

Alastair and Rory are joined by former Cabinet Minister Michael Gove to answer all this and more. 

 

Get more from The Rest Is Politics with TRIP+. Enjoy bonus episodes, ad-free listening, early access, live show ticket priority, our members’ newsletter, and private Discord community – plus exclusive mini-series like The Rise and Fall of Rupert Murdoch.

Start your 7-day free trial today at therestispolitics.com

For Leading listeners, there’s free access to the Wordsmith Academy - plus their report on the future of legal skills. Visit https://www.wordsmithai/politics

To save your company time and money, open a Revolut Business account today via https://www.revolut.com/rb/leading, and add money to your account by 31st of December 2025 to get a £200 welcome bonus or equivalent in your local currency. Feature availability varies by plan. This offer’s available for New Business customers in the UK, US, Australia and Ireland. Fees and Terms & Conditions apply.

For US customers, Revolut is not a bank. Banking services and card issuance are provided by Lead Bank, Member FDIC. Visa® and Mastercard® cards issued under license. Funds are FDIC insured up to $250,000 through Lead Bank, in the event Lead Bank fails. Fees may apply. See full terms in description. For Irish customers, Revolut Bank UAB is authorised and regulated by the Bank of Lithuania in the Republic of Lithuania and by the European Central Bank and is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland for conduct of business rules. For AU customers, consider PDS & TMD at revolut.com/en-AU. Revolut Payments Australia Pty Ltd (AFSL 517589).

Social Producer: Celine Charles

Video Editor: Josh Smith

Producer: Alice Horrell

Senior Producer: Nicole Maslen

Head of Politics: Tom Whiter

Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics: Leading

All 199 episodes
159. Michael Gove: My Journey From Left to Right (Part 1) The Rest Is Politics: Leading · 56 min
Listen in VO