45. Dr Comfort Ero: Resolving deadly conflicts & reforming the UN

13 Nov 2023 · 1 h

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

Podcast Summary: The Rest Is Politics - Episode 45: Dr Comfort Ero: Resolving Deadly Conflicts & Reforming the UN

Podcast Title: The Rest Is Politics Episode Title: 45. Dr Comfort Ero: Resolving Deadly Conflicts & Reforming the UN Hosts: Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart Guest: Dr. Comfort Ero, CEO of the Crisis Group Main Themes: Role of international community in conflict resolution, efficacy of the United Nations, current global conflicts.

---

Episode Overview In this episode, Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart engage Dr. Comfort Ero in a deep discussion about her experiences in conflict resolution and the state of global peacekeeping efforts. The conversation traverses through personal narratives, historical context, and contemporary issues facing the international community and the United Nations.

Key Points Discussed

  1. Current State of Global Conflicts
  2. Dr. Ero describes the contemporary world as bleak, with rising levels of human suffering.
  3. Conflicts in regions like Ethiopia, Myanmar, and Sudan are highlighted, with special mention of the increasing toll on children.
  4. The episode discusses the United States’ increased focus on domestic issues as a potential precursor to international conflict.
  1. Background of Dr. Comfort Ero
  2. Dr. Ero shares her upbringing in the UK, influenced by immigrant parents from Nigeria who valued education and the importance of social responsibility.
  3. Her career trajectory includes significant roles within the Crisis Group and the United Nations, giving her a multifaceted perspective on global issues.
  1. The Role of the Crisis Group
  2. The Crisis Group works on the ground in conflict zones to produce detailed analyses and policy recommendations.
  3. Dr. Ero discusses the organization’s historical context and its establishment in response to conflicts like those in the Balkans, aiming to influence policy through rigorous research.
  1. Challenges of Peacemaking
  2. Dr. Ero identifies a crisis in peacemaking today, stating that only a couple of negotiations (like in Colombia and the Philippines) in recent years have led to successful peace deals.
  3. The discussion includes an examination of failed interventions and the misconceptions surrounding peacekeeping missions post-9/11.
  1. The United Nations' Relevance
  2. The UN's ability to respond to global crises is scrutinized, especially concerning the Security Council's structure and the influence of its permanent members.
  3. Dr. Ero asserts that while the UN faces challenges, it remains vital for international cooperation in humanitarian efforts, climate change, and human rights.
  1. The Future of Democracy in Africa
  2. The episode highlights the recent rise in military coups in Africa and examines the dissatisfaction with the quality of democracy in various nations.
  3. Dr. Ero discusses the disconnect between electoral processes and the actual governance experienced by citizens.
  1. The Israel-Palestine Conflict
  2. The hosts navigate the complexities surrounding the ongoing Israel-Palestine tensions and Dr. Ero’s thoughts on potential pathways to peace.
  3. The discussion reveals the difficulties in addressing historical grievances while managing current hostilities.

---

Key Takeaways

  • Deteriorating Global Conditions: The world is witnessing unprecedented levels of violence and conflict, necessitating urgent international attention and action.
  • Need for Effective Conflict Resolution: Organizations like the Crisis Group play a crucial role in analyzing conflicts and proposing solutions, but they face significant obstacles.
  • UN Reform Required: The United Nations must adapt to contemporary challenges, re-evaluating its methods and structure to remain relevant in peacekeeping and international relations.
  • Democracy vs. Governance in Africa: There’s a distinction between the presence of democratic institutions and the effectiveness of governance, which affects public trust and stability.

Conclusion The episode with Dr. Comfort Ero offers an in-depth look at the pressing issues of conflict resolution and the limitations of international institutions in addressing contemporary challenges. The conversation underscores the need for reform and innovative solutions to foster a more peaceful and just global environment.

---

Contact Information

  • Instagram: [@restispolitics](https://www.instagram.com/restispolitics/)
  • Twitter: [@RestIsPolitics](https://twitter.com/RestIsPolitics)
  • Email: restispolitics@gmail.com

Additional Resources

  • Podcast Website: [The Rest Is Politics](https://therestispolitics.com)
  • Goalhanger Podcasts: [Goalhanger](http://www.goalhanger.com)

---

This summary encapsulates the critical discussions from the podcast episode, providing insights into the complexities of global politics and the significance of effective leadership in conflict resolution.

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28Thanks for listening to The Rest is Politics. Sign up to The Rest is Politics. Responsibility.org. Jack Daniels and Old No. 7 are registered trademarks. Tennessee Whiskey. 40 % alcohol by volume. Jack Daniel Distillery. Lynchburg, Tennessee. En Prime Big Deal Days, este 7 y 8 de octubre, aprovecha grandes ofertas en un nuevo spa de pies. Te transformará en la reina de la relajación. Espera, tiene chorros de burbujas. Aprovecha hasta 40 % menos en Prime Big Deal Days, 7 y 8 de octubre. Con las grandes ofertas de Prime Big Deal Days, este 7 y 8 de octubre, la grandeza está en tus manos. So if you like to order a new bed, you can get a offer in a new bed.

1:03You will become the prince of the pan. Attention, attention! Open the bar of the brioche, the visconde of the bizcocho and the conde of the cuernitos! Prime Juan! See, eh, hola? Aprovecha hasta 40 % of discount on Prime Big Deal Days, 7 and 8 of October.

1:29Welcome to The Restless Politics Leading with me, Rory Stewart. And me, Alistair Campbell. And we're very, very lucky to have with us today, Dr. Comfort Eero. And Dr. Eero is the head of the International Crisis Group. And we talk a lot in the podcast about the challenges of the liberal global order, the way in which from the 90s, we had an age of optimism to an age now where things seem to be disintegrating around the world. And Comfort's work and the work of Crisis Group is right at the very heart of this. This was an organization founded in the mid-1990s, founded because of the catastrophes in the Balkans and Yugoslavia, dedicated around the world to producing incredibly detailed, high-quality research in conflict zones.

2:13If you wanted to know a few years ago about exactly what was happening with tribal groups in the northeast of South Sudan, you would go to the crisis group. If you wanted to know exactly what was happening in East Timor in the late 90s, you would go to the crisis group. If you wanted to understand the Balkans, you'd go to the crisis group. And Comfort is the president, so she's the boss, but she's also been part of the creation of this organization. She was a relatively early employee. She led on their programs in West Africa out of Sierra Leone. She then worked for the United Nations Mission in Liberia.

2:45She's somebody with a deep academic training. So she was trained in the UK. She's British, but her parents were brought up in Nigeria. and she is somebody who combines, I think, a real dedication to influencing policy, shaping policy, making the world a safer place with a commitment to ground truth. So comfort, welcome. Let's start with where we are today, the day on which we're speaking and how you would describe the world today, literally today, compared to how it was when you left university and the world that you saw in the 90s. It hasn't panned out in the way that it was described to me. I left school when I was told that I was the generation of the future, the era after the end of the Cold War, where key institutions and one that I aspire to work at, the United Nations, the ideal of we the people and dealing with peacekeeping, peacemaking, that these institutions were ripe to respond to conflicts.

3:48that were ripe to respond to peace building. And also that these were institutions that were entrusted and there was trust at the centre of them. I think today I look at a world that is going in the wrong direction. I have struggled with the numbers that we're seeing since the end of the Cold War. We've never seen figures like this except for the Rwandan genocide. Last year, set aside Ukraine was the worst year in terms of human suffering and deaths. And we can name Ethiopia, Myanmar, Sudan, which you're familiar with. and this year I think it's gone further in the wrong direction because just astonishing figures around children for example the most innocent of people now being caught in the crossfires of great power politics and in revenge and in pain and the idea that this is what we're dealing with in the 21st century when my generation was told that we would be the generation that would turn things around.

4:57There's a sense of failure, to be frank, a sense of hopelessness, a sense where the horizon looks bleak and dark, and the sense in which you don't know where to go. But I cling on to hope as well, which is why I do what I do. Tell us a little bit about your own life and your own childhood, your life before you were, I guess, 20. A little bit about your parents' inferences on your life, where you lived, how that helped to form you? Look, my parents are in a sense your classical immigrant parent. They found themselves here. They came here from Nigeria to study. My father, electrical engineering.

5:39My mother, initially teaching and nursing and specialised in paediatric ophthalmology. One of the most famous high hospitals, Moorfield's Eye Hospital. I grew up on the children's ward of Moorfield's Eye hospital and I saw my very first eye so to speak at the age of about six or seven and you know our mother insteeped in us the value of our eyes and in fact my mother used to tell me off as every good Nigerian mother does with her eyes you know somebody would say but I never saw your mother talk I guess she did she used her eyes and I knew when she was calling me stupid I knew when she was telling me behave yourself I knew when she was saying you're doing okay she was minimal with her words but her eyes spoke volume as well they both believed um in education my my father was an educationalist he was very clear my mother used to say oh let's take the children on holiday my father would like i'm on holiday i'm in the uk i'm not at home in in nigeria but my myself my two siblings it was made very clear to us that there's one thing that can't be taken away from you with your education and for me particularly as the only girl middle child um my parents were pretty clear.

6:45And my father did chart the classical male father career that he thought I would take. I was going to do medicine. And then I took a turn and guess what made me take a turn? It was the 1989, sort of the beginnings of the end of Thatcherism. And I was asked if I wanted to come out and get involved in election campaigning and all those kind of things. So very quickly started doing all those things. You campaigned for labor? i'm not going to reveal mine i'm getting the vibe i'm getting the vibe but nonetheless i got caught up very few people say i got to 1989 the end of thatcherism decided to campaign and i was campaigning for thatcher my father had some key that my father had lots of books because my father was an educationist he always bought our school books and he would take our list of books to read and he'll just literally go and buy all the ones but there was one thing he consistently bought which is books of politically and or historically significant women so i grew up with one book in the living room apart from goldemir and and gandhi i grew up with thatcher's book that doesn't say anything about my father's political lenience but it said a lot about how he viewed women and he was very clear to me about about your independence as a woman your independence as a woman was bound by your education that you get educated nothing can be taken away from you because you chart your own course.

8:11And so I didn't do medicine. My dad didn't understand it. And he said, well, what else are you going to do? The only other profession he could possibly conceive of was the law. So in the midst of doing my first degree, he registered me and I still wasn't interested. He still didn't get it. And then he said, well, you do your master's. And I did it in international relations. And he still wasn't figuring it out. And I was still registered to do law. I deferred it several times. but my father seemed to have a way with the law society that maintained that and then well he said well you're going to be a lecturer then because what else could you be you know if you weren't going to do medicine if you weren't going to do law then you'd be a lecturer which was what my father was and then he said well and to be a lecturer you have to get a PhD and you know I grumbled and everything and I had a very good friend who said to me you're lucky because your parents are prepared to invest in you and invest in you getting educated take it grab it while they're still alive and get educated and do whatever you want after because it's not many children who are blessed with parents who care about their education now unfortunately my father wasn't alive to see me get the phd but my mother was and when i got a call a year after i was i got graduated somebody called the house and asked to speak to dr era and i said unfortunately he's passed away and they said oh we'd like to speak to his daughter and i was like oh yes that's me that's me i'm the daughter yeah listen tell me about tell me about your name oh comfort i don't think i don't i don't think i've i mean i've signed many many thousands of books in my life as has rory and i love it when i find something they say can you sign it to such and such because oh i've never heard that name before but i can honestly say to you i've never heard that name before and on that note expect a signed copy at my door of your book it'll be there tomorrow It's my maternal, my mother's mother's name, Comfort.

10:01And, you know, as all children from those colonial past, you know, they do land with an English name at one point. My English name is Comfort. And I have a host of other names that are non-English. What are your other names? Comfort, Ekwase, which is the Bini side, Edo state of my father. And Abusola, which is the Yoruba side of my mother. My full name is Ayaru, which is my father's name. And the same goes on with my brothers as well. I mean, the other tradition is that your grandparents and the most significant people in your family also name you as well. Am I right that you went back to Nigeria during your childhood?

10:44What was your sense coming from Britain to Nigeria? What struck you as a child about what you loved about Nigeria and what you missed about Britain? So I could only answer that on hindsight because I was a child. I mean, I was a baby when I went to Nigeria. I mean, my parents did what all good Nigerian parents did at that time, which is to take their children back, get them steeped in their heritage, the Nigerianness. And in fact, I was convinced that my mother was the one in Nigeria, which was her eldest sister. And I used to call her mummy all the time. And I had no idea that this wasn't my, you know, and then she had lots of sisters.

11:16Just to explain that, so your parents remained in Britain and you were sent back age two or something to be with their family, their extended family in Nigeria, until you were what age? I came back at the time of infants, the last year of infants. Do we still call it infants? Pre-primary school, I guess. My older brother came back in time to go to primary school and I was brought up on my mum's side by her sister and her siblings. And we lived in my uncle, my mum's elder sister's husband, was in University of Lagos. So I grew up on the campus, Lagos campus, and my aunt was working for the African American Institute.

11:52She was also a museum curator. And in fact, she influenced, I mean, it's hard to tell my story and the decisions I took without talking about my aunt in Nigeria because she influenced it. And so even though you came back to Britain when you were six, you stayed very close to your aunt? I stay close to all of them, particularly on my mother's side. So I call my aunt in Nigeria, Mommy Kampos. And we tend to call people by their location. So my cousins will call her Mama Keja because the Keja is one of the government areas, boroughs, if you like, in Lagos. So but because I grew up on campus, I grew up on the Lagos campus, I called her and her husband, mummy and daddy campus and then my mum's elder brother we would go and hang out and play with them and their children um in Ibadan's and but they came from Canada so I would call them mummy and daddy Canada because that's how I identified with them and then I arrived in London I was told we were coming back to London and I saw my parents as mummy and daddy London and I was told these are your parents I was like oh that's who are these people so I felt blessed I felt that I had several parents in my life.

13:04Comfort. Just tell our listeners a little bit about what the crisis group is. Rory gave some of the kind of key things that you look at. But for example, we talk a lot on the podcast about what's going on in the United States. Looking at the sort of scale of political polarization there, it's not impossible to imagine all sorts of conflict that we wouldn't see as a conflict maybe in that we think about some of the issues in the Balkans or South Sudan and so forth. But is that a potential crisis that you would look at and seek to try to prevent? Yes. And in fact, in our nearly 30 years of history, Alistair, a decision was taken in the aftermath of the George Floyd incident for crisis group to formally work on the United States as a conflict actor.

13:50Now, let me step back a bit. A decision was taken soon after Trump's coming in power that we needed to look at the United States in terms of do no harm, in terms of its use of force and within the context of the war and terror and never ending conflicts. And so the trustees sort of instructed us, so to speak, to start looking at the US overseas and its foreign policy. We took a tilt in 2020 to look at the United States' domestic politics and reverberations, because what did we see? We saw language that we would see in other conflict zones. So looking at sort of civilians who are protesting on the street, Trump was using language of battlefields, of enemies of the states.

14:40And while these were citizens protesting in the name of justice, inequality. And we have an indicator, Alistair, for example, when we're looking for countries that are going to go through election crisis, where we think that the elections will be usurped, will be challenged, where we think that various actors will seek to delegitimize the vote. we we use this kind of indicators to look at other countries and our boss my boss at the time rob marley asked curiously if you try to overlay this within the united states what would the scorecard look like and everything turned red and in fact the january the 6th incident alistair that everybody's familiar with was sadly a vindication of what we had forecasted that there would be a run on the country that there would be a challenge to the elections and that there would be some kind of attempt to delegitimize that as well.

15:36So that's why we are where we are. So coming back then to where we are today, what happened between the 90s and now? You're part of a crisis group which was set up by these sort of heroes of ending war, people like Richard Holbrook and Mark Mallett-Brown and all these figures who were very much part of a vision of a UN liberal global order. What happened to it? What happened to the idea that we still had in the early 2000s that the problem was the world wasn't intervening enough, that we turned our back on Rwanda, that we had a responsibility to protect, that was going to be this global order that was going to make the world ever more peaceful and prosperous?

16:13Where did it go wrong? This is a good question, Rory, and I've just come back from our board meeting in Oslo. And this was a central theme that today we are, what we are witnessing is a crisis in peacemaking. And also at the same time that we see a new generation of conflicts emerging. And basically, I think what we found is that particularly after the Arab Spring, I mean, let's backtrack a little bit. I mean, I think one thing is clear to me, the era of negotiated settlements, finding peace deals, that there are only two that we can cite in recent times, Colombia in 2016, the ending of the FARC, and then 2014 Mindanao in the Philippines.

16:53Those are the only two that we can mention. Can I, speaking to you from Dublin, can I put in a pitch for Northern Ireland? I was going to come to that because I'm walking backwards. And I think that the only other one in my time that I think holds credibly, and I think when you look at it within the guise of crisis group, and we never worked on Northern Ireland, which was interesting, Alistair, that for me was sort of a classic example of contemporary post-Cold War. And it gave people a great sense of optimism. It gave people a great sense of optimism. Many people made careers. They said, you know, I've brought peace in all nine and now I'm going to go around the world and create peace in 30 other places.

17:29Yeah, there was that. But soon after the Irish peace agreement, then things started to fall apart. And it was very first tested in Syria when suddenly you saw that the principles of peacemaking, peacekeeping were no longer holding truth. Leaders said that in the name of responsibility to protect all those key doctrines and suddenly they were fritted away. And I think the very first damage was in response to 9-11. And fast forward, you know, people are invoking 9-11 again in terms of Israel-Palestine. So I think that was the first death of that liberal democracy. Intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq?

18:01The way it went, it went wrong. Notions of state building, notions that you can't impose peace, that you can't use the military or strong arm the military to fix the problem. The notion that you can go in and bomb a country, even despite the atrocities of that country. The notions that the The United States and its notion of democracy could easily be transported, I think, died a death in Iraq and Afghanistan, which you know well, Rory. If everything I was saying is wrong, then we wouldn't be where we are today, which is 20 years wiped out and the return to Taliban. Also, the notion of democracy and human rights, the fallacy of that, particularly in Africa as well.

18:41and now suddenly we see that all those ideas suddenly looked very freeball come 2010 in the midst of the Arab Spring as well. I mean for our general listeners because we you know we have many many people in many different countries around the world with different levels of knowledge could you give us a sense of half a dozen conflicts that maybe people aren't focused on happening at the moment in the world that you think people should focus on more? You know when I became interim vice president in 2021, I was told, welcome to your new job, Myanmar, the coup. Myanmar was at the top of the headline in February 2021.

19:15It dominated the first three years of my transition and it slipped down the radar. That's the other one. Tell us what's happening in Myanmar now. I think you've got a situation where the coup leaders are entrenched, suppressing resistance, trying to push ahead with elections. But you've got leaders who are using the most brutal tactics to sideline, to curtail, to oppress people. And you're seeing heavy human trafficking in the region, first heavy refugee flows. And you remember, Rory Alistair, we had the Rohingya crisis as well, and you had flows of refugees going into the border regions of Bangladesh.

19:51And today you've got a country where it has been able systematically to ignore the international community. It's resistant to the pressure of sanctions, resistant to ideas of intervention. And it's been able to maintain its power, partly because the international community has decided that it has not, sees no options. It's not prepared to go into sort of loggerheads with China. And it's also largely because we are talking at a time of great power politics. I think one of the factors that has undermined the ability to deal with crises like Myanmar is because of the US-China tension. Let's just very quickly maybe give us examples of four or five other conflicts that continue and then maybe we'll get into this question.

20:36Haiti is another one. I think so you were talking about an era sort of post the Cold War. It's funny how certain crises come back onto the agenda. So Haiti sort of back on our agendas about three or four times in the span of 30 years. You've got Yemen also in the Middle East region. Sudan, I've heard you and I have to give credit to your podcast for continuously bringing in places like Sudan and the Sahel, which should be a strategic importance in a way to the West, onto the agenda. The DRC, one of the longest running intractable conflicts on the continent. And then, you know, I mentioned other unknown ones like the Central Africa Republic as well.

21:16And then, you know, we've got, well, it's not a small one. I think it's quite a big one. The South China Seas and Taiwan. I wouldn't put that as an off the radar conflict. I'd call it quite significant. Kamph, you said some things there about several of the governments you just mentioned and several of the regimes, for example, Myanmar. And you were very, very clear and very, very forthright and very critical. What are your relations like with governments where you're going in and you're trying to make an analysis? And do you work at having good relations or do you just think that your job is to speak truth to power and to help people prepare whatever the government is?

21:53It's both those things. And I think that is Crisis Group's sort of unique power. We're not a name and shame organisation, Alistair. We spend our time, as you suggest, providing sort of rigorous field-based analysis. So we don't parachute in. We're in those countries. Our analysts are either working in those countries, long historical presence in those countries. They also work in the regions as well. Our job is not to, as I said, name and shame, but to find a pathway to peace. It's about getting stuck in the politics, the grey area. So we don't see a black and white. We're trying to seek a compromise.

22:33We're trying to seek solutions that requires us to engage, to understand the dilemmas of the actors involved. My very first job is to build trust with even the most problematic actors, even actors who've got blood in their hands, even actors that have committed the most atrocious crime. My job is to find or to shape the politics of peace. And that requires me to engage with you. So I spend my time understanding, bringing your perspective into my analysis. In the end, I'm going to come up with policy options. And those are policy options that you may not like, but they're nonetheless how we understand a way out of the crisis.

23:12One of the things you said in talking about why we have been unable to address Myanmar is great power competition. Tell us about the way in which the world has changed and why great power competition matters as a way of explaining conflict today. I should say it's always been there. It eves and flows. It can exacerbate certain conflicts. And, you know, there's certain conflicts that become proxy to great power politics. I mean, it was great power politics that brought us into two world wars. So I don't want to make it sound as though it's new. I think what is new is we're no longer living in an era of unipower where there's one dominant power, the US.

23:46You know, we're no longer living in that bipolar US-Russia. It is the era also of Asian geopolitics, of US-China competition. And it coincides with a period where institutions that we would normally rely on, either the United Nations or the European Union or other regional bodies are brittle, lack in legitimacy, are often not seen as able to respond to those crises because they are caught up in that geopolitical crisis as well. Talk about the UN. You, I believe, began working for the UN when you were very young. It's one of your first jobs. Well, do you mean the association or do you mean the UN itself?

24:23The association. and I say it proudly that I was probably well self-declared longest intern I believe I was the longest intern I mean if there was a Guinness book of records on internship I probably would get it I think I don't I don't know but at least in my world. And your internship started in? 93 I was in between finishing my master's and then getting ready or trying to figure out whether I was going to do a PhD or go to law school. So there you are it's 1993 and you're starting to intern for the United Nations Association. What has happened to the UN during this period? I mean, 93 to 2023 is quite a neat period to look at, 30-year period.

25:01What's happened in 30 years? I mean, it's what we struggle with every single day. I think what we've watched is that in the theatres of wars, civil wars, interstate conflict, war and terror, in the midst of all that, and I would even say that the first salvo of the crisis that faced the UN was in Srebrenica, where you, Alistair, Rory would know, and Rwanda was the other beginning of the death knell. So even in that glorious era that everybody talks about, there were already problems with peacekeeping and question marks about the UN's own ability to peacekeep. But then suddenly in the 2000s, we saw a resurgence of the United Nations going into places where I first started, in Sierra Leone, in Liberia.

25:44And one of my former bosses, who also was president at Crisis Group, Jean-Marie Guéheno, came up with this innovation of partnerships where the regional bodies would rehat in the form, for example, of the West Africa body and work in partnership with the UN. And there was a moment in which the region and the international body would work in concert to help rebuild and bring peace back. So you would, for example, get peacekeeping troops from African countries, part of African regional groups working alongside the UN? Yeah, working and they called it rehatting. So, for example, despite, and I think, concerns about the heavy handedness, for example, of Nigerian military or other regional bodies, countries, Ivory Coast, despite the controversies of their intervention in Sierra Leone or Liberia, the UN saw them as useful tools because it was Africa in the lead.

26:33And this was also the era of African solutions for African problems. I leave aside what I think about that. All is to say is that there was a period of a sense in which the UN was on the right path. It started to go in the wrong direction in the midst of 9-11. And it further took a knockback because all the triumphalism of that period was started to sort of die within the context of the Arab Spring. And then we get to Libya, when doctrines, peacekeeping, responsibility to protect, all those things that we championed were seen, foreseen for what they were. They were misused. There was double standards.

27:09There was hypocrisy. We talk about those things today, but they're already there, Rory, in 2010. They're already there, exposed. A spotlight was shone on them in the midst of Libya, in the midst of Ivory Coast, and in the midst of the Democratic Republic. We already saw that the system was brittle, was fragile, and was being called into question then. I think lots of people sort of see the United Nations almost like a body that sits above global politics, when in fact all the United Nations is is a collection of all the countries of the world, with all the tensions and divisions that exist there.

27:40Do you think that the system, the basic foundation of the United Nations with this permanent five, which seems a bit odd given where real power lies around the world today, but you've got that permanent five fundamentally divided, US, UK, France most of the time, and then Russia and China in a very, very different place. Yeah, expose your nationality there. Sorry about that. But you know what I'm saying. And all with this power of veto. then all these other organizations that in groups so g you mentioned g7 there's the g20 there's the bricks rory and i talked on the podcast recently about the 10th anniversary of the belton road initiative which seemed to me was being used almost to form a different kind of global powerful alliance around china is the united nations as a kind of legitimate accepted form of global authority do you think it's gone no and it's not dead and in fact i and i made that very clear when I gave my sort of acceptance speech at the United Nations.

28:36If your entry point is the Security Council, then yes, you'll be forgiven for questioning its relevance going forward. But the UN is more than the Security Council. I think there are important agencies that are doing vital work as we speak today. They're at the front line, for example, in trying to get trucks into Gaza. Then you've got important agencies that are doing work on climate change, doing work on environmental issues. You know, you've got other bodies that are doing sort of important vital developmental work like UNDP as well. So I think you've got to look at the entirety of the UN. And when I worked in the UN in Liberia, Rory, I began to appreciate the rest of the UN family that does the sort of work behind the scenes that doesn't often get heard about and where the job is largely thankless.

29:23You know, our entry point, your entry point, all our entry points tends to be the Security Council. And so if I was to focus on that, then yes, it's inevitable. And there's certain things that are inevitable with an intergovernmental system, which is what it is. There's also something inevitable and dysfunctional about a body that in the end is controlled by five countries who, by the way, their only claim to be on the Security Council rested with the triumph in which they brought not to be undersold with the Second World War. The world is radically different from the end of the Second World War.

30:00There are other powers that are vying for claim. Just on that, I mean, we were sort of thinking about this in relation to what would happen if suddenly the Security Council booted off Britain and France, which seems pretty reasonable the way the world is changing. But brought in... He's not showing his nationality there. Brought in Britain, brought in Brazil, brought in India, brought in South Africa. And when we began talking about it, Brazil was being run by Bolsonaro. India is being run by Modi. South Africa has problems of its own. It didn't exactly feel to me as though the inclusion of those great regional powers was going to suddenly lead to a human rights respecting pro-democracy liberal global order.

Read the full transcript

30:41If you're going to judge them on their democracy, then you're opening the door to criticize those other five permanent countries as well. I mean, number one, even in the regions of these countries, there's no consensus on who's going to represent them as well. So for example, in Africa, there's a real contest. The continent has its own superpowers. The continent has its own hegemont. So Nigeria, South Africa, Egypt, also, and Ethiopia, all vying for status as the representative of the continent. And also, I think with Asia as well, and there is that tension, I think China would guard jealously.

31:18And in fact, where there is consensus, so I talked about how dysfunctional the P5 is, but where there is consensus is that they jealously guard their right to stay in that position. So when Biden opens the door to reform, it is a reform that keeps us at the table and intact as the P5. This is not about one of us off and the other one, you know, and a new person in. There is a question today as to how you right size the Security Council, how you bring in another two or three. But there's no question about those five going off. The other thing that worries me a bit about the UN, I mean, you gave a very lovely moving account from your perspective in Liberia of all the wonderful work that UN agencies do.

31:58But of course, those who worked with UN agencies, they also can often seem the most unbelievable bureaucratic horrors. Yeah, well, it's always nice to start off with a good story. But with every large organisation that you do run up against bureaucracy, and when you are in the deepest, far flung northern bit of Sudan, you know, or South Sudan, all the places where you're so familiar with in Afghanistan, you're caught up with filling in all these forms and checking boxes and everything. it becomes ridiculous because your simple job is to focus on how you're going to get the wells fixed, how you're going to get the trucks to the next village, how you're going to do the water wells, how you're going to get that child that is caught in the crossfire of a rebel.

32:39What's stopping us sorting this out? I mean, you know, I have friends working for the UN in Afghanistan who have to use browsers to access a form of Internet Explorer that ceased to be issued in the 1990s, need seven signatures to go on leave, can't resign from the organisation because they can't, maybe you can load the forms in the right way. I think it was last week in the midst of all the tragedy of Gaza, I think you saw somebody from the Office of the High Commission for Human Rights was quite a letter. One feels as though that person resigned for other, that resignation was coming. But it all sort of crash landed and all his frustrations and sadness and concerns were all laid to bear as a result of Gaza.

33:23So that was probably his tipping point. So just quickly to explain to listeners, this was a blistering resignation letter from a senior official in the UN Human Rights Organization, New York, saying that he was completely horrified by the Israeli bombing of Gaza and that he felt he could no longer remain in the UN. But I think underlying it was also years of frustration with the bureaucracy, the nonsense, the hypocrisy that sadly is embedded in so much of the UN system. Yes, but everything. It was the letters that you were reading, 75 years of failure. But I go back to that classic first degree essay that we are all asked to sort of answer when we do international relations.

34:06If the United Nations did not exist today, would we recreate it? Yes, as a child of children that have suffered the colonial legacy, and as a child coming from countries who fled to flee or were told not to go back because of the civil war. As a child who saw and listened to stories of people who fled other countries and who has friends who are refugees, I would recreate the United Nations for that reason, to safeguard those rights. Even if it appears to be a fallacy today, even if it appears that it's been smashed up today on the high halter of geopolitics, I would recreate the UN. A better one, where this self-entitlement that you can continue to sit at the helm of the Security Council is then equalized in a different way.

34:49Right then, we'll be back in a second. So let's just take a quick break.

35:19community serving seniors for over 35 years in the heart of reston our residents like paul love the active lifestyle sitting around out front talking with people doing the things that i would do if i were alone that's sort of a fulfillment of my life come experience tall oaks for yourself visit talloaksal.com or call 703-834-9800 to schedule a personal tour

35:49At New Balance, we believe if you run, you're a runner.

35:56However you choose to do it. Because when you're not worried about doing things the right way, you're free to discover your way. And that's what running is all about. Run your way at newbalance.com slash running.

36:20Now, Kumpur, we've got, as Rory said earlier, lots of listeners in different parts of the world, but a lot of our listeners are in the UK, and you are like Rory and me, you're British. I'm from London. Okay. North London. You have a United Kingdom passport. And I just wondered what you made of the British standing in a lot of the issues that you deal with now. We talk a lot about, you know, getting rid of DFID, about scrapping the 0.7 % development, uh brexit i think sort of undermining our power and at the moment a really horrible debate around one of the themes that you've just addressed which is immigration which let's be honest is going to get worse for the world particularly climate and all these conflicts so what's your assessment of um your own government you know when i was coming on to this podcast it's like i'm gonna have to do everything in my power to avoid talking about the uk you know when you were asking me rory to sort of chart my own history in the course of sort of international politics and the glorious area or not and everything about the UN, there's another story about the UK as the champion of the United Nations and these core principles.

37:32And I would say that those core principles is what bound both sides of the political divide, whether you were conservative or whether you were Labour, but there was a sense in which the UK was seen as a reliable, trusted, go-to actor. And I remember my first sort of coming to crisis group, and even before then, the importance of knocking on the door of embassies, of getting the perspective of the UK officials, because they were very succinct, analytical, the Foreign Office for me still the go-to place, partly because some of my colleagues have come from there, and I've gone back to there and everything.

38:07So there was a clear sense of Britain standing in the world. And I mean, I'll be candid that that's been lost. And I think there is a concern about how the UK is viewed internationally. There is a sense in which the UK is sort of lost at sea, that what we trusted it for, what we understood it for, about protecting some of these key principles and doctrines are, I wouldn't say completely gone, but have been, there's a sense in which we're struggling to claim our rightful seat. at the table, which is why people are questioning why the UK still sits at the table of the UN. I've got to say, Kamp, if that was you being very, very diplomatic, I'd love to hear the full version, but I got a very, very clear sense of where you were going.

38:58Now, listen, we've gone around a fair few issues, but maybe as we come towards the close, I wonder if we shouldn't just spend a little bit of time on what's happening now in Israel-Palestine. So I'm going to give you a magic wand and you're going to go in and you're going to try to bring some sort of peace to that place now how do you even start with all that's going on well it's a good question Alistair and if there was a magic wand we wouldn't be where we are today so I think we should just acknowledge that I think that if we can't answer the question of what to do about Hamas then it becomes very difficult to understand how you deal with Israel's own sense of security.

39:43And I don't think we should underestimate the trauma, the pain and the horror that Israelis see today that their security and that deterrence that they held on to for so long has been shattered. So I think before you can ask them to stop the bombing, we've got to be clear on how you restore that. And that requires us to do with Hamas. Yet at the same time, and for me, it's about how do you stop the bombing? Because the statistics just on the children alone and the pummeling of Gaza and the pummeling of innocent people. And so a way forward, Alistair, requires us to recognize the pain and the harm and destruction on both sides.

40:27So I just want to say that at the very beginning. Now, the difficult question is, how do we begin to chart a political way forward? You know, you can to a certain degree, and who knows whether Israel will be able to do this, it's unpredictable, it's uncertain, but you can maybe to a certain degree, decapitate, degrade, downgrade Hamas. And there are real question marks about that. what you can't do is that you can't get rid of an ideology because it continues and we can't ignore the context in which this happened which is Palestinian aspirations and rights and political rights however I've got to make it clear that this is not a justification for Hamas and did and what Hamas did is not you know what happened on the 7th of October was not done in the name of those aspirations.

41:15But nonetheless, this is the reality that we're facing as well. So what would it mean for Palestinians to have a real sense of statehood or nationhood? What would be the minimum requirements? I think there are two things. Well, number one is the whole leadership on the Palestinian side as well, in relation to the Palestinian authorities. I think there are question marks as we try to reconceptualise what a Palestinian state looks like. There's that pillar to be dealt with. But there is also the sense in which Israel today is moving more and more to the right. And put Gaza to the side for one minute, you've got the whole settler violence unfolding in the West Bank, where every single day, the rights of the West Bank, which we often saw as the base for the Palestinian, is being pummeled, is being attacked, and it's been encroached upon.

42:09So even that becomes a challenge. And how do you address that question of the West Bank before then you get back to the wider issue of Gaza and then the whole issue of the rights of the Palestinians as well? Do you think there's any realistic chance of preventing the building of more settlements? I mean, I was talking to an Israeli friend yesterday who really did not want to be drawn in any idea of saying, okay, enough settlements, we have to have an agreement on no more settlements. Instead, he was saying, you need to understand that this is a place where Joseph was born or this is a place where Abraham was buried.

42:45This is part of historic Israel. Is that mindset actually remotely compatible with trying to create a two-state solution? No, not now. If you're talking to me about where Israel is now and the last two years, it's increasingly far right when you listen to the key leaders, whether it's Ben Givir or Smodrich and even the young people, they call themselves the hilltop youths. They're the ones who are committing most of the violence today. There is no interest. There's no appetite. So how do you put a pause on that settler violence? And then how then do you begin to do just the basic fundamentals of dealing with the rights of Palestinians in the West Bank?

43:25Again, there's a whole different prescription needed today for dealing with Gaza. But just in the midst of everything else, what we've seen in the last two weeks is as the bombing is taking place in Gaza, you've got this settler violence taking place and that's off the headlines. And it's been suffocated because of what's happening in Gaza. And you asked me, Alistair, at the beginning about how do you keep certain things on the radar of international actors? And I think this is one that we have to continually bring on the radar. And my colleague brought it to the spotlight two days ago when she highlighted that in the midst of Gaza, we were seeing settlers taking advantage of that and using it as a means in which to go after and then continue to pursue that settler strategy.

44:14When we were talking earlier about 9-11 and some of the actions that flowed from that, I got a sense from your sort of body language and the way you were describing things that you have quite a critical view of the impact that America and Britain as a result of our response to 9-11 has had on the rest of the world. Yes. And I'd like you maybe just develop that a little bit. And also, does that mean, so I think I probably sit here and I think Rory maybe does as well. And we think, well, the two state solution, if it's ever going to be possible, it's never going to happen unless the Americans really put the energy in there.

44:49But do you actually think it's going to be other countries closer to there that are now more powerful, whether it's Saudi Arabia, whether it's Qatar, whether it's some of the regional powers there, that their influence is perhaps going to be greater if we're ever going to get any progress on the Israel-Palestine question? Yes, partly because the US itself, its supervisory power, its ability to cajole, to influence, to a certain degree is there for Israel. And there's a sense in which Netanyahu and the Israelis will listen to Washington, but up to a degree. But we are talking at the moment, Alistair, where while the two-state solutions was increasingly seen as bankrupt, and quite frankly, we have to resell that idea of a two-state notions as a process back to the Palestinians who may not trust that as a process going forward.

45:39But while that was sort of set aside and the aspirations of the Palestinians were set aside, another process called the Abram Accords or normalization was going on. So economic deals and they came alive really under Trump. With places like UAE. With the places like the Emirates, Morocco as well. And on the eve of the 7th of October attacks, the process, the normalization process between the most significant country in the region, Saudi Arabia and Israel, the train was out of the station. So I think the weaving, the netting of piecing this back together requires the involvement of Arab countries.

46:16And in fact, although it's highly unlikely, Alistair, that Israel will outsource its security to anybody else, one has to ask that question as to whether the future of Hamas and what it becomes, politically at least, can sort of be also nurtured by the region, that you sort of need the region. and Arab countries to be the guarantor of what comes after as well. Can I, as my sort of final step, bring you back to Africa? One of the great apparent miracles of the late 80s, 90s was the explosion of democracies across Africa. And of course, in just over 12 months, we had six coups, military coups, where elected governments were toppled and military governments have come in.

47:03Give us two or three reflections on that. What lessons should people draw from that? What does that mean for the future of democracy in Africa? What is it that really matters about those coups? In fact, there were seven. I was just quickly doing the maths as well. Seven coups in the last three years, that tells you about the state of play on the continent. And I'll tie it back to Alistair's question. I think what we've seen in the last few years is that a number of crises, is whether it's Ukraine and the fallout from that now Israel Palestine and the fallout of that I think COVID-19 the climate financing the question marks about institutions the bankruptcy of I think the liberal democratic process all of it shone a spotlight first with the fallout of the war on terror and then the Arab Spring and now again and I think here the fallacy of democracy has been exposed.

47:58But I want to qualify what I mean. Because there's an assumption that what is happening on the continent equals the death of democracy. And in fact, it's not. It's a dissatisfaction with the quality of democracy that is taking place on the continent. It's question marks about this performative democracy that I go through the motions every four years, only to get something that is quite questionable, where there's still a shrinking of the political space, where governments themselves are only checkboxing. These are elections that are signed off, considered legitimate by external actors. I put the West in that camp.

48:38And then what happens after you get a flurry of international assistance, security sector reform, that does what? That solidifies a regime that is seen as questionable by its citizens as well. I mean, I've often said You can't eat democracy. If democracy doesn't lead to jobs, the promises of jobs, of education, of a different lifestyle, people begin to question who is it that is sitting in the statehouse. And they've watched 10 years of intervention in Mali, for example, 10 years of hyper-militarization in the Sahel. We are defenders of the security first approach because for you to get to governance and do all those kind of things, you need to get security back.

49:18But you've got to do the hard work of politics. You've got to give people the hope to live for the next day. And what we're seeing in Mali, what we're seeing in Guinea, what we're seeing in Sudan, and Sudan is the saddest of all of that, because we saw a revolution taking place in 2019. and instead of doing the hard work of ensuring that Prime Minister Hamdok, who was given the most difficult task, Rory, of trying to turn things around in Sudan, while the military were able to continue to have access to the largesse of the state and the paramilitary forces, who were the coup proofers, were also able to continue with their gold mining, Prime Minister Hamdok was left with the most difficult job, which is to weave together a very complicated, fragmented society, which is to fix the problem of the economy, try to bring livelihoods back together, back to do with displacement and refugees.

50:11Meanwhile, the army and the paramilitary forces were able to continue to carry on as business as usual. So this is the challenge on the continent to convince people about the quality of democracy. And the one other thing I would say, Rory, is that there've been different surveys that have been held on the continent in the last year or so, whether it's the Open Society Foundation or UNDP, this is where UNDP is good, despite what you said about the UN earlier, or even Afro Barometer. And they're all consistent about people's desires for democracy, 66%, but they wonder about the type of leaders at the helm, so much so that one young kid says to me, come for, what's the difference between a rigged election and a soldier in power, when the difference is very marginal for that young child who sees no prospects and no hope going forward.

51:03Come, it's been lovely talking to you, but we've done a fair few regions of the world and it's all been pretty gloomy. Just give us something to feel happy and bouncy about as we close. Yeah, I mean, I can't do happy and bouncy, but in every tragedy, there's always an opportunity. So I don't come out of this feeling rather bleak and hopeless. For example, as we speak, there's this innovative, I mean, I think it's going to be a challenge for them, but there's this interesting, ad hoc, innovative approach that Kenya is pursuing to help deal with Haiti. But it needs to work with an alliance of countries to make sure that the political agenda is not lost in the process of trying to sort of bring force into Haiti.

51:47The Maduro government, as you know, Rory, in Venezuela has been less and less inclined to pursue a democratic path and electoral process. But only a couple of weeks ago, we saw this agreement in Barbados between the opposition in Venezuela and the Maduro government. And I think we have to keep an eye on that process to make sure that we do get to a process where there are sort of democratic elections in two years time as well. And I think there is still a sense, despite the fact that people preach about the demise of the United Nations, nobody's calling for the death of the United Nations. There may be alliances.

52:26We may be in an era of clubbism where everybody wants to go into different directions. And it's true, there is a lack of inconsistency about international relations. But if you're looking for consistency, then you don't come into work in international relations because, you know, the transactions and tradeoff are crucial. But my job is to look for opportunities. And I spend a great deal of my time looking for even the smallest window. And if I can push it ajar a little bit further, then we'll take it as well. Thank you very much, Comfort. It's been a great, great pleasure. You've covered an incredible amount of the world.

52:57We're very lucky to have you on the show. We're also lucky to have you running Crisis Group. Thank you very much. Thank you. It's a real pleasure. Thanks for your welcome. I love to see you. Thank you.

53:07So Alistair, let's start with the question of what you thought about her politics. Well, I agree with you that you're unlikely to get radicalised in 1989 because you really think you've got to get out and Maggie, Maggie, Maggie, in, in, in. And I thought her assessment of the UK, well, I mean, it was a very mild version of what you and I think, which is that we've really damaged our standing in the world. I thought what was great about her was that she's got this very internationalist mindset and she sort of has a kind of breadth of experience and knowledge that was, you know, obviously rooted in a lot of values.

53:44But I was struck by how clearly part of her thinking about the things that are going wrong in the world do relate to America, 9-11, Iraq, Afghanistan. So that's something that I was also intrigued by. And maybe if we got on again at some point to talk about, because it doesn't seem to me that the answer to the problems of the world is going to be just the UN. The answer to the problems is going to be the US and other Western powers getting more involved. I think that the risk is, in fact, we've learned the wrong lessons that yes, there were humiliating messes in Iraq and Afghanistan, but we've responded by going to the other extreme and going into a period of isolation, not really being involved in the two-state solution, not really checking Russia over Crimea.

54:31Oh, and also the big one, which you did mention, not engaging in Syria. Not engaging in Syria. And the other example she gave is not engaging in Sudan after the civilian government took over, not really supporting them. So I think the story in a sense is a very complicated one, which is that somebody who clearly feels passionately conscious of the harm that the UK, the US and others have done, both her experience, the colonial legacy in Nigeria, her experience of 9-11, her sense, intuitive sense that regional solutions are preferable to the Security Council weighing in. But that has to be balanced against the fact that she's also reminded us that since the US withdrew from the world, the world has just got more and more dangerous since 2014.

55:16Every year, more conflict, more internally displaced people, more refugees. So that's one of the big questions. I mean, what would it mean to recreate a liberal global order? And what is the way in which the US can re-engage the world, notwithstanding all the baggage of the past? I mean, I suppose the other thing that she was projecting was this, I mean, I hate the phrases, but people roughly know what we mean, global north, global south, that she sees herself probably as something of a spokesperson for the global south having endured a lot of the kind of, you know, the damage of some of the things that we're talking about.

55:54I guess the other thing that I found very interesting in talking to her was this tension that there must be between wanting to be both an analyst and a player. Yes. In a sense, what the group is doing is going in and analyzing a place and analyzing a problem, but also trying to influence it. And that's very, very difficult. And that does put you into difficult positions. So she talked about, you know, she'd be in the room with people who, you know, and she's thinking, well, yeah, you've killed a lot of people, but I've got to sort of talk to you. But how do you get that balance right? You must have had this a little bit directly in terms of getting the balance right between analysing the place that you're in, but also trying to influence it.

56:29It's unbelievably difficult. And I mean, I think she's an exceptional appointment for Crisis Group. And she comes with so much credibility. But the thing that I particularly love about Crisis Group is their brutally detailed analysis of what's happening often at a very, very local level in a country. Well, by the way, on that, I was very surprised that one of the first things we talked about, I just sort of threw it out. I don't know why he was thinking about it, but about America. And she's sort of straight in there and say, well, you know, America's a bit of a basket case right now, I paraphrase.

56:59Right, right, right, right. Brutal. Brutal. And that had been done by her predecessor, Rob Malley, who in fact, careful listeners will realise that we've just been talking about the podcast this week because he's been suspended from the Biden administration because of his dealings with Iran. One, I think Crisis Group is a wonderful organisation. It's a sort of foreign office for the world. I mean, what it does is provide traditional political reporting with people who speak local languages fluently, have deep cultural understanding on areas that other people aren't covering. And I think if you're a Scandinavian country or many of the middle powers of the world who can't afford to have huge diplomatic networks, Crisis Group is that network for them.

57:36But at the same time, there's the problem of influencing. So how can you, on the one hand, say the military government in Myanmar are a bunch of horrifying, murdering, human rights abusing, rape endorsing, arson endorsing, and in the case of their treatment with the Rohingya, profound racists. And at the same time, sit down at the table with them and expect them to want to negotiate with you. And the second problem, as with every organization, and I think it's one of her challenges she has to deal with, is the question of funding. She has to find people to support it and some of that will be governments you know the british government maybe um i was interested she didn't want to talk about how she voted in britain and that's presumably because she has to keep a really good relationship with british governments of all political complexions absolutely yeah i got the feeling that was the one part of the interview where she was really struggling to say not to say what she really thought i sensed i sensed the vibe yeah i said she's more on your side i think yeah but it must be for somebody like her an internationalist really believes that foreign policy matters, really believes that the UK has a special place in the heart of all these different parts of the world that she knows.

58:45And she said, you know, we've slightly given, well, not slightly, we've given it up. We've given it away. And yet at the same time, she is the first British head of crisis group. That's a great achievement. You know, we had big Australian political figures running it, huge figures from the UN running it. And she's the second woman, but the first woman of colour, as it were. So So, no, no, she's a very, very impressive woman. I'm really, really glad that you got her on. Very good. Great. Well, thank you, Alistair, and have a great day. All the best. Bye-bye.

59:21And Doug. Here we have the Lemo Emu in its natural habitat, helping people customise their car insurance and save hundreds with Liberty Mutual. Fascinating. It's accompanied by his natural ally, Doug. Uh, Lemu? Is that guy with the binoculars watching us? Cut the camera! They see us! Only pay for what you need at LibertyMutual.com. Liberty, Liberty, Liberty, Liberty. Savings vary. Underwritten by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and affiliates. Excludes Massachusetts.

From the publisher

How important is the role of the international community in resolving conflict? Is peace possible in the Middle East? How relevant is the United Nations today?
Rory and Alastair are joined by CEO of the Crisis Group, Dr Comfort Ero, to discuss all this and more in today's episode of Leading.

TRIP Plus: Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.

Instagram:
@restispolitics

Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics

Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com

Producers: Dom Johnson + Nicole Maslen
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics: Leading

All 199 episodes
45. Dr Comfort Ero: Resolving deadly conflicts & reforming the UNThe Rest Is Politics: Leading · 1 h
Listen in VO