71. Israel's former PM on why Netanyahu is finished, the settler movement, and corruption - Ehud Olmert

28 Apr 2024 · 1 h 4 min

Ask about this episode

Ask anything about it. ChatGPT or Claude reads this page and answers with the times it was said.

Connect VO and ask about every podcast you hear, including the moments you saved. Add to ChatGPT · Add to Claude

In short

```markdown

The Rest Is Politics

Leading

Episode Summary

71. Israel's Former PM on Why Netanyahu is Finished, the Settler Movement, and Corruption - Ehud Olmert

Podcast Overview

In this episode of "The Rest Is Politics

Leading," hosts Alastair Campbell and Rory Stewart interview former Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. The discussion delves into Olmert's time in office, the complexity of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and his perspective on the current political landscape in Israel.

Key Themes and Insights

Childhood and Early Political Influences

  • Background: Ehud Olmert was born 78 years ago in Palestine under British mandate. His parents were members of the Irgun, an underground movement.
  • Influence of British Mandate: Olmert reflects on the complexities of viewing his father as a freedom fighter versus the British perspective of him as a terrorist.

Israeli Politics

  • Nature of Politics: Olmert describes Israeli politics as demanding and sometimes brutal, contrasting it with more civilized parliamentary systems.
  • Historical Context: He notes the transition from a politically unified Labour Party to a more fragmented and polarized political landscape over the decades.

The Settler Movement and Two-State Solution

  • Rise of the Settler Movement: Olmert discusses the emergence and influence of the settler movement post-1967 war, which complicated the establishment of a two-state solution.
  • Two-State Solution Stance: He strongly believes in a two-state solution, having proposed significant concessions during his leadership, including territory swaps and shared control over parts of Jerusalem.

Challenges to Peace Initiatives

  • Failed Negotiations: Olmert highlights the lack of courage from Palestinian leadership to accept a historic proposal he made for a two-state solution, which he believed could have changed the course of history.
  • Corruption Charges: His political career was marred by corruption charges, which he claims were politically motivated and orchestrated by rivals.

Current Political Landscape

  • Critique of Netanyahu: Olmert expresses disdain for current Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, emphasizing that Netanyahu's manipulative strategies have allowed him to remain in power despite widespread distrust.
  • Concerns about Right-Wing Politics: He warns of the dangers posed by far-right political figures like Itamar Ben Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, who threaten the integrity of the state of Israel.

Future Outlook

  • Need for Leadership Change: Olmert believes that Israel requires a new leadership capable of making tough decisions that prioritize long-term peace over short-term political gain.
  • Hope for Change: Despite the current political climate, he expresses optimism that change is possible if a leader emerges with the conviction to pursue peace.

Key Takeaways

  • Complexity of Israeli Identity: Olmert stresses the diverse backgrounds of Israeli citizens, contributing to a rich but complex societal landscape.
  • The Importance of Historical Context: He argues that understanding the historical nuances of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is crucial for any future peace negotiations.
  • Political Courage: Olmert admires leaders who can pivot from previous positions for the greater good, suggesting that flexibility is essential for effective leadership.

Final Reflections

  • Controversial Figure: Listeners might have differing opinions on Olmert due to his controversial legacy and the nature of his political decisions.
  • Need for Dialogue: The episode emphasizes the importance of ongoing dialogue and understanding in the search for a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Conclusion This episode provides insightful reflections from a key player in Israeli politics, offering a unique perspective on leadership, the challenges of peace negotiations, and the evolving nature of Israeli society. ```

Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.

Hear the part that matters, and keep it.Open this episode in VO. Double tap your headphones to save a moment as you listen.
Get VO free

Transcript

Automatic transcript. May contain errors.

0:28Thanks for listening to The Rest is Politics. Sign up to The Rest is Politics. responsibility.org. Jack Daniels and Old Number 7 are registered trademarks. Tennessee Whiskey, 40 % alcohol by volume. Jack Daniel Distillery, Lynchburg, Tennessee.

0:44This is Rory here. Welcome to our latest installation of leading and a interview that we've done with a former Israeli Prime Minister. It's, I think, fascinating. You learn so much about some very tough issues. He's right at the heart of some of the most controversial issues in the world. And this isn't really an interview. And like a lot of our interviews, it's not really about whether you agree with him or disagree with him. It's about understanding how one of the very key players who was right at the heart of both the questions of occupation and the peace process thought and some of the moral dilemmas that he faced.

1:23And I hope that you find, as I do, that it really illuminates some of the problems that we're facing in the Middle East today, on which over to Alistair. Yeah, thanks, Rory. I agree. I think this is a very interesting interview. I think some people will probably want us to focus much more on the here and now, what's happening today. We do a bit of that. But actually, I think it's very, very interesting to find somebody who's been involved in this at various levels of his political career over decades. He's somebody who's been on a bit of a political journey himself, as he will explain. As things stand, absolutely despises the current Israeli prime minister and some of the hard right forces around him.

2:05And I think you maybe have to aim off a little bit for the fact that his own career ended in, as you will hear, in a pretty controversial way. But definitely somebody who has made a big contribution to this debate, still does, but also somebody who had really had interesting ideas about how we might have got to a better place than the place that we're in right now. So I hope you enjoy listening to our interview with the former Israeli Prime Minister, Ehud Omet, as much as Rory and I enjoyed doing it.

2:37Welcome to The Rest is Politics Leading with me, Alistair Campbell. And me, Rory Stewart. And we're absolutely thrilled and very lucky to have a former prime minister of Israel, Mr. Ehud Olmert, who was prime minister from 2006 to 2009, and also had two stints as a cabinet minister, was mayor of Jerusalem, had been deputy prime minister, acting prime minister, and took over when Ariel Sharon was incapacitated through illness and then got his own mandate in 2006. And so we're very, very pleased to have you. Can I just start by, we like to get a feel for our guests of kind of their background and their childhood.

3:20So you were born 78 years ago. And you were born in Palestine when it was under the British mandate. I'd just like to get a feel for two things. One, what your childhood was like, but also what your sense is of the British role in the history of Israel-Palestine. You mentioned correctly that I was born 78 years ago, in what was then Palestine, about three years before the inauguration of the State of Israel. So you can imagine that my memories are not exactly fresh, considering the fact that at that time I was two and a half years old. Unlike the present Prime Minister of Israel, who in spite of the fact that he was born after the inauguration of the State of Israel.

4:08He said that he still remembers when his father was holding him and he looked across from the balcony, the British soldiers in Great Britain, although the British soldiers were out of Israel years before he was born. But I don't have that kind of memory. I think that's the first of what I suspect will be several indications that you don't get on terribly well with Bibi Netanyahu. Well, that you knew even before I said that. Years after, when I grew up a little bit, okay, there were still talks about the British time. And there were memories of our parents and our neighbors and people in Israel about the British time.

4:52My parents were members of the Irgun, which was the underground movement of Melachem Begin, who later became the prime minister of the state of Israel. But at the time that he was elected, and I was already then a member of parliament of the Likud, he was still called a terrorist in Great Britain. And I was born in a place which is called Shuni. Shuni is a big castle on the slopes of Mount Carmel between a township, which is now known as Binyamina, and Zichon Yaakov. which at that time was a secret basis of the Egon. And very nearby the Shuniti castle, there was a British military camp. And they were about 500, 700 meters from where we lived, where I was born, in a place which had no running water, no electricity.

5:55I mean, this was, of course, under the most unbelievable circumstances. And about a year and a half after I was born, we moved into that township, Binyamina, where my parents and their friends, which were part of this community of Irgun members, built tiny houses where I grew up in. Tiny houses means like, I think, 40 squared meters, okay? Without a bathroom inside the house and so on and so forth. So we grew up in very modest conditions. Prime Minister, did you feel from the experience of your father fighting that you could see the connection between his perception of himself as a freedom fighter and the British perception of that group as terrorists?

6:46Did that give you some understanding of the complexity of that difference? I became aware of all these different perspectives and observations at a much later age. When I grew up, not when I was three, five, seven years old at that time. Now, you have to know something about my parents. My parents grew up in China, in the farthest place to Palestine. and they were inspired by one of the leaders, great leaders of the Jewish people at that time in the early 30s, the late 20s of the 20th century in China, at the end of the world, in Manchuria, in Harbin, which is in the northeast part of China. They were inspired by Jabotinsky.

7:36And my father decided to leave his family in 1930 when he was not yet even 20 years old, and to immigrate to Palestine. He was at that time a student in the university in Harbin, but he decided that in order to be a pioneer in Palestine, he's got to go to study agriculture. And he went to Holland, and he studied there for three years, and then he still had the privilege of getting a certificate which allowed him to immigrate into the state of Israel. His mother, my mother, joined in two years after he left China. So these people came out of idealism, out of an urge to be part of the resurrection of the Jewish people in a place which was historically part of the Jewish tradition and Jewish life and Jewish history.

8:36I must say that when I grew up, my father was not involved, and my neighbors, who were more or less of the same kind of community, were never involved in any violent actions against the British at the time. In fact, one of the British soldiers was secretly collaborating with my parents and their friends, helping them in all kinds of military or any secret matters, but in terms of assisting them to somehow get along with the very difficulties that were part of their lives. and maybe 30 years later I spotted him in Melbourne, Australia and I brought him over to Israel to visit with us with a friend that was part of our lives even though he was on the other side so the memories that I had from the British I heard lots of stories and of course you know that more than 250 members of the Yagun including a person who subsequently became Prime Minister of Israel, Nitzhak Shamir, who was one of the members of the commanders and the leaders of the stirring gang, were expelled to Kenya and to Arithra, which is in Africa, and they were there exiled for three years.

10:02And some of our neighbors were also in that group of members of the Irgun that were very exiled to Africa. But I must say that in my early life, there was no hatred. Okay. Can I ask you, you've mentioned several very well-known Israeli political figures already, two of whom I think I met, Shamir and Sharon. But I wondered, can you just give us a sense, having been prime minister, what is special about Israeli politics? It always feels to me like it's obviously got similarities to ours and to other political systems in the world, But it feels very different. It feels a lot tougher, a lot harder to do.

10:45I just wondered if you could reflect on that. Do you think that's a fair assessment of what it's like to be at the top level of Israeli politics? Well, Israel is changing dramatically. It's a different country, a different society from what it was when I started life in politics. I was first elected to parliament at a very young age, actually, 15 years ago, in 1973. Immediately after the 1973 war, it was still under the leadership of the Labour Party, the traditional control of the Labour Party, which was in control of the Jewish community before the inauguration of the State of Israel and then all the years after that, for almost 30 years from the proclamation of Israel.

11:30There was democracy. I always felt as a young man that everything was in a way possible. there was a great sense of solidarity and a very imminent social factor in our lives. The political system was demanding or sometimes brutal, or we didn't have the kind of maybe of finesse that may have characterized the other systems, certainly maybe to some extent the British system in comparison to us in the British system, in the British parliament, you may have heard a member of the Labour Party talking to a Tory member, saying, the distinguished gentleman. And in the Israeli case, already at that time, someone would have said to the member of the other side, you better shut up, okay?

12:30And so on. So the brutality in terms of the language, which in terms of the members, in terms of the attitudes of people one to the other, was different. But still, there was a great sense of solidarity. Things started to change in 1973. That is, after the war in 1973, for the first time, there was a feeling, which since then started to spread in the country, that the leadership, the people that were assigned, that were given the authority, to protect the people of Israel and the country of Israel that had all the means in order to exercise this authority in the most responsible manner, that they failed because of overconfidence, because of complacency, because of negligence, whatever.

13:27And that they were too long in government continuously, without a change, for almost 30 years, right? From 1948 till 1976, there was one party in power. One party in power. When I grew up and I was elected in 1973 already to parliament, it was obvious and natural that when there are elections, there are elections, there are free elections, everyone can vote. But the Labour Party will always take control. Sounds like a very, very good system to me. No, not since then. And since then, it started to be much more volatile and violent and noisy. And unfortunately, it started to have this characteristic of this distrust amongst many of the Israelis.

14:24Look, the Israeli society is maybe unique by any standard that you're familiar with. You are talking about when Israel was proclaimed in 1948, there were about 750 ,000 Jews living in Israel. Today, there are 7.5 million. Now, the Jews came from every corner of the world. So, the Israeli society is a makeup of people that came from Muslim countries in North Africa, from Europe, from different parts of Europe, the remnants of the Holocaust after the Second World War. And after the British allowed them to enter into the state of Israel, years later, they were kept in camps everywhere. But they came from European countries, which were entirely different in terms of background, language, manners, culture, personal histories.

15:18Then the Jews that came from Muslim countries, the Jews that came from the neighboring countries, again in our area, from Iraq, from Iran, from all of those places. And the Jews that came from South America, the Jews that came like my parents from China that were originally from Russia or the Ukraine, the people that came from North America, from South America. I mean, this was a mixture of people with different backgrounds. Now, in as long as Israel was safe and was fighting for its very existence, the degree of solidarity was enormous. We pulled out of this. We became a more successful country economically and stronger country militarily.

16:02And we felt safer. Somehow the differences amongst the different parts in the Israeli society started to erupt into controversies. And they have reached the point on these days, which is really endurging the stability. I promise I'm going to quickly interrupt because this is fascinating, but just one small thing as you tell the story. I was speaking to a British friend of mine who said to me that the real problem begins in 67, that in a sense the original sin was seizing the West Bank and Gaza and the Golan Heights and that the real problems start from them because it's at that moment that you end up with a very difficult balance between a liberal democracy on the one hand and occupation on the other.

16:54I mean, do you think this was a big defining watershed and that many of the problems for the last 50 years stem from 67? There are many problems which stem from 67. And I entirely subscribe to this observation and to this understanding. But what I was talking about is in a very serious way is independent, and you never mentioned, I would have come back to it anyway. Of course, the euphoric attitude that has devastated Israel after the 67 war, the feeling that we have, that God has brought us back into where we were supposed to be from the very beginning. But for the first time actually after 48, we are in charge of the entire Israel that was promised to us, so on and so forth, has developed the...

17:43the messianic spirit, and also the overconfidence of our capabilities. But the divisions in the Israeli society that I was talking about started independently. It started because of the length of the control of the one party on almost every facet of life in our country. for many years, the feelings of inferiority, of, in a way, a feeling of segregation, which characterized the Jews that came from Oriental countries. The feeling amongst the people that came from Oriental countries, from Muslim countries, that dominance in our society, in our life, in our institutions, in our courts, in our academic centers, was completely in the hands of Jews from Western backgrounds, and also Eastern background, was a major source of bitterness and disappointment, which has spread and started to shake the balance and the sense of solidarity within the country, which had nothing to do with the other aspect that you have mentioned, which I entirely agree with.

18:57Can I develop a little bit the other aspect? Because another thing that happens in the 70s is the beginning of the development of a strong settler movement. And there you talked about a messianic idea. And these are religious Zionists, many of them, in fact, from the United States, who begin to really believe. I was talking to somebody recently with Alistair about a few months ago who said, oh, you have to understand that Hebron is, I don't know, where Abraham was buried and so and so was where joseph was born and therefore these places have to be part of israel they can't be palestinian when does this view begin to develop because of course for an outsider this seems a little crazy i mean we're not really sure very much about this historical figure called abraham or joseph definitely also i'm not familiar enough with the jewish history because what he said about hebron is historically accurate hebron is one of the foundations what the Jewish life, Uriah, 2 ,000, 3 ,000 years ago.

20:01And in fact, talking about a person I mentioned before, Menachem Begin, who was the leader of the Irgun, and then subsequently the leader of the uh, party, of the Root party, and then of the new makeup, relatively new, the Likud, he was always talked about the, the two banks of the Jordan, which are the Jewish church and the symbol of the Irgun actually included not only all of the West Bank but also the East Bank of the Jordan and Menachem Begin refused to change the symbol of the Irgun, the logo of the Irgun ever and after 67 Menachem Begin was the person perhaps more than any other person that said that when we will come into power, we will annex all of these territories because the West Bank is not the West Bank, it's Judea and Samaria.

20:57It is the historical basis of the Jewish life. Now, I entirely agree with him that the West Bank is indeed Judea and Samaria historically and that they were part of the basis of the beginning of the emergence of the Jewish life. But I also subscribe to the wisdom and the leadership of Nafenbegin, who understood when he became prime minister that what he thought he would do when he would become prime minister is entirely impossible, because the fact is that now, in this time, 6776 to this day, the West Bank is inhabited by millions of people who are not part of us, who are not part of the Jewish people.

21:44and who are there. And there is no way that you can integrate these territories into the state of Israel without giving them all the civil rights, human rights, political rights, freedom of movement, freedom of speech, everything that has to come with it. But in that case, they will eventually become the majority and they will change entirely the nature and the essence of what Israel is all about. So we have to decide what do we want to achieve? and we have to give up. And Menachem Begin never said that he will give up the territories to make any change in the status of the territories in the direction of the integration and the annexation because he understood that this dream will never come true.

22:31When you became prime minister in 2006, I think in one of your first big speeches, you essentially said that there has to be a Palestinian state, there has to be a two-state solution, and the Israeli withdrawal from West Bank. And there seemed to me at that time considerable political support for that. When you talk about the way that Israel's changed, are we now in a position where, because of the politics of modern Israel, that that vision of the two-state solution is further away than it's ever been? I don't know if it's ever been, but it's further away from where it was when I was Prime Minister.

23:08I have to say, if I can, because I don't believe that anyone will do it for me, to my credit, before the elections in 2006, when I was elected, I did something which I don't think that any Israeli leader has ever done before, and I doubt that many in other countries were doing it. I decided to spread it out, what I think and what I'm going to do, which I knew would cost me quite a lot of votes in the coming elections, but that I wanted to have the moral authority after the elections, and I was confident that I will win the elections. What I want to do after the elections with the moral authority, I said in advance before you voted that I will do this.

23:53So I made a series of statements before the elections in which I said, yes, I'm going to go for a two-state solution. I said, I'm going to propose. And I was also, before the election, the most active minister in the cabinet of Sharon at that time, as a vice prime minister, in moving forward the disengagement, which is the pulling out from Gaza in August of 2005. And then it was quite a painful process for Israel because there were thousands of people living in those places near Gaza, and we pulled them out because we said that this is not part of the land of Israel. We don't want to be there.

24:33We don't want to be there. It's not ours. so before the elections I said and I'm going to pull out from the West Bank and all my advisors say to me you're crazy why do you have to say that so explicitly why do you have to spell it out in such a clear way leave it vague ambiguous let people think whatever they want focus on other things I say no, I mean business and I want after the elections to try and really pull out of the territories and I say, we will propose the Palestinians the most generous political plan and if they will agree then we will have peace. If they will not agree, we will pull out from the territories on a unilateral basis.

25:20Something that, you know, we're just after the very painful experience of pulling out from the West Bank and then suddenly an item is this. And indeed I got a smaller percentage. But you won. So, Prime Minister, and then ultimately it went wrong. So from the outside, it looks as though the Omut plan was derailed by the war in Lebanon. The Omut plan was derailed by Abu Mazen and the Palestinians being reluctant to sign up. And it was derailed also by views changing in the Israeli population. You know, very large numbers of Israelis being opposed to this. I mean, how do you explain what went wrong?

26:04How do you understand why you failed to get this plan through? I had a plan well articulated of how to, if we would have signed the agreement with Palestinians, how to guarantee that there will be a majority support for it in the state of Israel. And I think that there was a good chance to achieve it. This was 16 years ago, 15 years ago. So it's been a long time. I mean, many things changed since then. You can't judge what may have been done then to what can be done now. What went wrong? First of all, the forces that were opposing me and that were influenced by national religious groups and by the opposition led by Netanyahu.

26:49I defeated Netanyahu in the elections in 2006. I didn't get all the votes that I wanted to get, but he got 12 seats in the Knesset, which is the smallest ever for the leading right-wing party in the history of the state of Israel. He was absolutely crushed. But since then, when they realized that I'm serious about my political plans, they started the manipulations and the investigations and the incriminations against me in every possible way, assisted by some Jewish millionaires from America. The change in the makeup of the Israeli society was not affected by Jews that came from America. They were a relatively small number.

27:37It was mostly affected at that time by Jewish millionaires from America that felt that they can buy with money the territories for the Jewish people. Just to jump in, because some of our listeners won't necessarily know the full story, but what you're referring to there is that at the end of your premiership, you faced these charges of corruption and bribery and ended up in prison. Are you saying that they were all fabricated and they were all trumped up? At the end of the day, I mentioned it because I don't see any reason to hide it. You know, I'm not ashamed. I'm sad because of the consequences that I think really set Israel back into an entirely different direction from the one that may have been the future of Israel.

28:27I was, you know, I was charged with all kinds of stupid things. At the end of the day, I was convicted for receiving 60 ,000 shekels, which is about 12 ,000 pounds as a political contribution. There was never any registration of this money. There was no one that saw the money. And it was all not the money that was given to cover my political debt. I didn't have political debts. I didn't have this money. no one said that I took this money or I got this money for my own personal use no one said that I ever got this money directly to say that he was paid indirectly by one person to another person to cover political debts that I never had and so on and so forth this was all nonsense, it doesn't matter, I was convicted this was a concerted effort that was organized, financed and executed by my political rivals, mostly from the messianic national religious groups, assisted and advised by people that wanted to bring Bibi into power, knowing that he would take the country into an entirely different direction.

29:38So, Prime Minister, I suppose two things. What did it make you think about the Israeli legal system and the judiciary? Because, of course, as an outsider, we tended to imagine that actually the judiciary in Israel is relatively clean, the legal process works, so if they convict you, you're guilty. And then I think the second thing is, what was the experience of being in prison? What was it like to go from being prime minister to being a prisoner? Number one, I was very unhappy with the outcome. I knew I was, I, by the way, I was acquitted on maybe three, four different charges, different court cases that were presented against me in the first place.

30:17All of these I was acquitted. I was acquitted for all these charges. Subsequently, after I resigned the radius, Prime Minister, and so on, they came with a new case. Now, I was very unhappy with the legal system in terms of the outcome of my case. I thought that they were wrong. I thought that they were somehow simplistic. I think that I thought that they were acting under the enormous pressure of public opinion and the coordinated efforts by political parties and other political maneuvers. And I was very upset. But I never thought, never said, I never thought a legal system can be wrong. You know, a prime minister can be wrong, the chief rabbi can be wrong, the chief justice can be wrong, the head of Mossad can be wrong, And judges can be wrong.

31:12So I thought that they were wrong. I never thought that there was a conspiracy by the legal system against me. I never thought then, and I never wanted to destroy the legal system in order to avenge their decision that I was unhappy with. Just before we leave that period, so you've been in various sort of political parties and political groupings, but at the time when you were prime minister, you were part of this party called Kadima, which was the Sharon. And in a sense, Rory, who's a formed conservative minister, me, who's Labour, we're constantly being told we need to sort of set up a sort of new centrist political force.

31:52Was this at times you had Shimon Peres in there, ex-Labour, you had people from Likud. Just tell us about what that said about Israeli politics at the time, that a kind of liberal centrist force became the dominant force in politics, bringing people in both sides against the situation we have now, which seems to us to be completely atomized and polarized, but utterly dominated by the far right. It's not utterly dominated by the far right, but let's start. First, I think really Kadima was an absolutely revolutionary change in the makeup of Israeli politics. many of us from Likud who were part of the sometimes the extreme right and I was part of it I publicly apologized for my wrong opinions at an earlier time and I said yes I was wrong 20 years ago, 25 years ago I was entirely wrong and we have to change as by the way Sharon Sharon was the one that built all the settlements right?

32:55And in 2005, I, together with Sharon, as Sharon is the leader, we dismantled all the settlements that Sharon built because he figured out and he said it. He said, what you see from here, you don't see from there. So what I saw in the past is not what I see now when I'm at the top of the helm and I'm in charge of the fate of the future of this nation. I have to take decisions which may be different from what we took in the past. And I was in that section. So we decided, we figured out that there is a majority in the Likud which is against us. And we said we are not going to battle now and lose the fight because the fight is not for our personal political careers.

Read the full transcript

33:38The fight is for the future and the nature of the state of Israel. So we decided to create Kadima Party. Sharon collapsed after a couple of weeks. So I had to take it from there and build up the party. And we collaborated with some members. And the members of the Labour Party became part of the Kadima, and it was the centrist party which was destined to dominate the politics of Israel. And the right-wing factions and the extremist, fundamentalist, messianic, right-wingers, both here and from overseas, with big pockets of unlimited amount of dollars. in one of the court cases that I had, a young lady that was working as a secretary in my office when I was mayor of Jerusalem, and she was observant.

34:31She was suddenly, from nowhere, she came to testify against me. And I was absolutely surprised because I knew her to be very friendly and very supportive when she worked for me, and I didn't understand what happened. And she said he was prepared to surrender the second land of Israel to the Goim, to the Palestinians. And this is terrible. I mean, this was sacrilegious. So are you saying she was set up to do that? Yes, yes. I mean, yes, the right faction understood that Kadima is a real danger because it will destroy the infrastructure of the right-wing messianic groups and it will change the course of history in the direction that I thought was essential for the future of the state of Israel.

35:25And when Bibi took over in 2009, everything has changed. Look, I was in charge of the military operation beginning of 2009 in Gaza. And quite a few people were killed, including some civilians, fewer than, you know, in no comparison to what happened now. But at the end of that costly operation, in the beginning of 2009, 24 hours after we announced the ceasefire in the South, all of the major leaders of Europe came to the residence of the Israeli Prime Minister in Jerusalem for a dinner party that I hosted and sat with me in front of all the cameras of the world and said, Israel had a right to do what it did.

36:07Can you imagine them doing it now to this government? So even when some were not quite happy with our military operation, they understood that the government that I led and that I represented was anxious to achieve peace in line with what most of the countries that were friendly with us. Nicolas Sarkozy, Angela Merkel, you name it, came to Israel to express their solidarity with the attackers, with us, with me, even though we attacked Gaza because of what the Gazans did to us and so on and so forth. But the perception was that Israel was a country that was aiming at peace. You will never find anyone doing it now, obviously.

36:55Okay, Prime Minister Alistair, let's take a quick break.

37:03Prem, can we come back to your plan? Your plan was to give up much more than 90 % of the West Bank back to the Palestinians. You wanted to create a contiguous Palestinian state, a two-state solution. You were negotiating very closely with Abu Mazen. In the end, it didn't work out. You've talked about one of the reasons, which was the corruption investigation against you. But what did you learn from these negotiations about the dynamics of Israeli-Palestinian negotiation? Maybe give us the Palestinian perspective. Help us to understand. I don't want to speak for them. No, I don't speak for them.

37:43I think it's very easy. And I think it's not serious for me to speak for the other side. I can tell you this, and this is very important. and I know I urge you to be patient with me. What I proposed to the Palestinians was historic. It was a dramatic departure from anything that was ever discussed in the past. It was a full, comprehensive response to everything that the Palestinians ever requested. I not only did I agree to have a two-state solution, okay, I say two-state solution on the basis of 67 borders. Now, it's true, I said we will pull out for 95 % of the territories, but the 5 % that we will annex in the territories, we will swap with you in territories which were part of the state of Israel pre-67.

38:36So the size of the state, of the Palestinian state, will be 100 % identical to what the territories were before the occupation. That's number one. Number two, I said the Arab side of Jerusalem will be the Palestinian capital. In other words, I was prepared to divide the city of Jerusalem, which was one of the most significant slogans of Israelis and Israeli political leaders. To this day, you will not find one of the Israeli political leaders that are now in charge or that may become in charge tomorrow, that they will replace Netanyahu, including Lapid and Gansons and Isaac Cotet, say that they are prepared to pull out from the Arab side of Jerusalem.

39:20More so, I say that we will agree to waive the exclusive sovereignty that we exercised in the Temple Mountain in the Old City and the Holy Basin of Jerusalem, that the Holy Basin of Jerusalem will be administered by a trust ship of five nations, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Palestine, Israel, and America under the auspices of the UN Security Council, and that the refugee issue, which was always hanging over us in the Middle East, will be resolved within the framework of the Arab League Peace Initiative, which was approved in 2002 in Beirut, and again on 28th of March 2007 in Riyadh. This was a revolutionary approach.

40:06Now I answer you, now what happened to the Palestinians? At the end of the day, if you ask me, I think that they didn't have the courage to make that one step which will change history. I was pleading. I sat in my study in Jerusalem, and there were all kinds of stories, I mean, urbanic legends, that I drew the map on a napkin. I presented it with a map which was prepared by the geographic department of the Israeli army which was a very big map with all the necessary ingredients that were to be part of it and so on and he said to me I am not familiar with reading maps so perhaps I'll have my expert see will you give me the map I said President if I'll give you the map I'll never see you again.

40:58And in two years' time and three years' time, you'll come back to the Israeli and I will say, this, this I already have. I got it from all that. Now let's start negotiating for the rest. So I said, no way. You want the map? Sign it now. I will sign it and you will sign it. I said, listen, President, in the next 50 years, you will not have one Israeli Prime Minister that will propose to you what I propose to you now. I give it to you. You know you can trust me. You know that I mean it. You know that I care for it. You know that we've been sitting for hundreds of hours together and talking about it.

41:31Sign it now, otherwise it will disappear. And he said, give me 24 hours, I'll call you back. I'm still waiting. By the way, in the meantime, now I think that he didn't have the courage. He didn't have the courage. Had I been in a similar situation, the other side gives me a proposition. And he is likely not to support what he proposed. I could be in the best possible position. Had Abu Mazen signed the initials with me as I proposed to him, and then we would go to the United Nations Security Council, and the United Nations Security Council would have approved of it. And then the next Prime Minister of Israel would come and say, I don't approve of what my government proposed to the other side.

42:15It would have left Abu Mazen in the best possible position in the international arena, rather than to be the one that refused. Go and bring things just briefly right up to date. You mentioned earlier that Netanyahu looked like he was finished back in 2006. And here we are almost two decades later, and he's still prime minister. What does that say about him? What are your views on Ben Gavir and Smotrich? And most importantly of all, how is this thing going to get resolved? Number one, Netanyahu. Netanyahu is a much better political person than most of the opponents that he had dealt with since I left.

42:55He lost to me, as I said, in a very significant manner. The guys that came after me were not, unfortunately, didn't have the kind of firmness and determination and strength, inner strength, to face him. and he manipulated and he's a great performer. I always said that fortunately for Laurence Olivier, he died before Bibi because had he lived at the time of Bibi, no one would talk about Laurence Olivier, everyone would talk about Bibi. Bibi is a performer. He is, for every speech, every appearance that he makes, it's like a performance in the old week, if you want. He is made up, he's what remains of his hair, I don't have, as you can see, anything, but he's dying it with purple colors.

43:46And he's preparing like this is a theatrical appearance. And he's a great performer. He's the greatest performance in international politics in comparison to anyone that I know in the world arena. He is a man without any moral convictions. and I think that unfortunately he is nothing can stop him and nothing matters to him and he has been successfully manipulating the international arena as well you know I wondered all the time how come President Obama who is an outstanding person I know him I worked with him a little bit he's an outstanding person how come when Netanyahu was in such a provocative, manipulative way, was conspiring against him.

44:40How come he didn't take some measures against his government, of course, with the possible ramifications for the standing of the State of Israel? And he refrained from doing it, although I know exactly what he thought about Netanyahu. One of his assistants that I talked with privately say to him, no one ever insulted the Oval Office in the history of the United States of America as your Prime Minister, referring to Netanyahu. And my interpretation is that both Obama, and I don't include Trump in this context because I think that he's a different guy and a different person, but you look at Biden now.

45:26I mean, he is conspiring against Biden in every possible way. And look how helpful, supportive Biden is to the state of... How long can that last? I don't want to say. I don't want to say what I want to say. You see? So let me say this. I think that the days of Bibi are numbered. Bibi is finished. The elections will be sooner than later. They will be in four months, five months, six months. At the end of the year, there will be elections. And he will be thrown to the sidelines of history, where he belongs. And what about Ben Gavir and Smotrich? And then there will be the big battle will be against Ben Gavir and Smotrich, not against them personally only, but against what they represent.

46:11I think that what they represent is an imminent danger in the security, the safety, the stability, and the integrity of the state of Israel. And they have to be thrown out with him. I think he's much more important because he has been capable of pretending to be something different that misled a certain part of the Israeli population, which is not necessarily extreme right-wing fundamentalist messianic as Smotrich and Bengtie. So the priority for us is to get rid of him. We'll get rid of him, we'll get rid of them. What replaces them? I don't know what to say. I can say only one thing, that when I say to some of the contenders in Israel, that the greatest challenge of leadership is the ability of a leader, when he is in a position to take decisions which will determine the fate of his nation, is the ability to do the opposite of everything that he ever promised he would do.

47:23normally when we measure our political guys we say ah he's a great guy he's a good guy you know he stands by his word I don't want someone to stand by his word I want him to be able to say be to do the opposite of what he said for the country and and now I wanted I wanted when I look at the person that may take over there will be fire in his chest threatening to erupt in like a volcano and burn everything that will stand in its way. You ask me whether I see someone in the present time in any of the possible places where the alternative can come with this kind of fire in his chest? I don't. Prime Minister, my final question.

48:08From the outside, it looks very, very dark. It looks as though Israeli public opinion is much more right-wing than it was in the 90s and early 2000s, that 85 % of Israelis are against a ceasefire in Gaza. Who said so? That's not true. Well, there was a Times of Israel poll. The Times of Israel poll in the beginning of the year. Israel appears to be more right-wing, it's true. Yet, yet, since last year, in almost 100 different polls that were done through the year until last weekend, 80 % of the Israelis do not trust the prime minister. And the possible number in the Knesset is always around 70 to the opposition and 50 to the coalition of BVG.

49:00But, Prime Minister, the problem with the polls is you're right. Nobody likes Netanyahu, but they are overwhelmingly supportive of the operations in Gaza. They're opposed to the idea of a ceasefire. So this means that we're now in a situation after October where… They're not overwhelmingly. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I don't think that they are overwhelmingly in support of not stopping the war. In fact, I think that many of them are in support. The war is finished, by the way. The war is... the war is ended. There is no war. There are just operations here and there, but it's fading. It's fading. The problem is this.

49:34You can't ignore what were the circumstances on the 7th of October that influenced and impacted the emotions of the people in Israel and their attitudes toward Gaza and the Palestinians and Hamas. I know that the way you look at it, and I try to explain it, by the way, to the Israelis also, and I spell it out almost every day on the Israeli media. I said, look, we still feel the terrible pain of what happened to a couple of thousand of Israelis that were butchered and beheaded and raped and whatnot. by the Palestinians in their living rooms, in their bedrooms, in their safe rooms, in their houses, not as soldiers, not as a fighting group, etc.

50:20And we are also still worried for the originally 240 Israeli hostages, which are now 133, and we don't know how many of them are still alive, and they are raped and tortured on a daily basis at this very moment by their captors in the most brutal way. So you can't overlook the impact of these experiences in the emotions and the hearts of the people of Israel. But that can be changed if there will be a leadership that will have the power, the determination, and the courage to do the opposite of what people thought that they would do because this is the right thing to do. And I think that this can be changed.

51:05It can be changed and it will be changed because at the end of the day, when you say to them, OK, let's continue, let's destroy everything, let's take another six months and we will kill every single Hamas person that there is and there will not be Hamas anymore. There are still 6 million Palestinians. Do you think that we can carry on the occupation forever? Do you think that we can still deny the Palestinians from civil rights, human rights, political rights, voting rights, freedom of speech, freedom of movement forever? Do you think it's possible? Do you think Israel can contain it? Do you think that the international community will tolerate Israel as an occupying force forever?

51:44Forget about it. And when you talk like this to people, then in spite of the emotions, in spite of the hatred for the Palestinians that committed these atrocities to the Israelis, they understand that something must be done. but in order to be able to achieve it we need a different leadership and I unfortunately at the end of our meeting I'm not certain that I can give you the names of the people that I think can be the ones that will lead the country because I don't know that they are I don't know where they are but the point you're making is somebody has to emerge who essentially says that one day we are going to have to live in peace side by side with the Palestinians Simple as that.

52:28I say it every time I'm on television in Israel. I just said it the other day, you know, prime time, major television show. I said it, but I am a former prime minister of the future. Okay. Well, listen, thank you for giving me so much of your time. And we'll see you soon. Thank you. Thank you, Prime Minister. Bye-bye.

52:51So, Rory, that was very, very interesting. quite tough to interview because he likes to command the microphone and he doesn't necessarily like being interrupted. Yeah, I think 78-year-old former prime ministers from any country don't take kindly to people interrupting. Listen, I thought it was fascinating. I mean, I think people have to read it in its context as a historical thing. So just to point out the obvious, if you are a Palestinian listening to this, And in fact, if you're many people, you don't have to be a Palestinian, many, many people will be very angry. People who care about Gaza will feel that he wasn't remotely sympathetic enough about the horrors that have been inflicted on Gaza.

53:38And they will remember his participation in the Lebanon war and in previous attempts at Gaza. People from the right will say we let him get away with saying that he was completely guiltless. And actually, some of the evidence around the corruption trials seem to be pretty compelling, including video evidence. However, now I'm just going to flip back to you. I think it was completely mesmerizing. I think he is a very interesting political figure. It's absolutely true that the Olmert plan was the last serious attempt to get to a two-state solution. that it was pretty bold and radical. And I agree with him that if Abu Mazen had felt able to sign up to it, we probably would be in a much better position today.

54:26But brackets, I can see why Abu Mazen didn't sign up to it. Yeah. No, I found parts of it, particularly towards the end, I found it mesmerizing and I found him very, very compelling in some of the things that he said. I think the early stages we were being sort of lectured at a little bit. And also, I think he's He's very, I guess for understandable reasons, very, very anxious to relitigate both his career, because ultimately it did end with these corruption and bribery charges and the corruption and bribery charges themselves. So there was an element, I guess, of defensiveness. But I think his analysis of Israeli politics is always worth hearing.

55:11I mean, it's perfectly clear he absolutely despises Netanyahu and Ben Gavir and Smotrich, but it's because of the damage that he thinks they've done and continue to do. I also think there's something really interesting about political courage. So for all his flaws, what he was trying to do was very radical. I mean, he was genuinely trying to leave 90 % of the West Bank, dismantle an enormous number of settlements, not all of them, but an enormous number of them. And you can see that sense of a flawed character, but also a ferociously bright character, incredibly tough and determined, and exactly the kind of person that you need if you're going to get peace.

55:54I mean, if you think about peace in Northern Ireland, there's nothing cuddly about Martin McGuinness or indeed Ian Paisley, right? That these are pretty raw, tough, compromised street politicians with very difficult records. But that's where peace comes from, I guess. And so I did admire it. I mean, I believed him. I don't think he was faking it. I genuinely think with all the problems with that man, this was a guy who was trying to do something astonishing, which might have led to a much better situation in the Middle East. And it's interesting, isn't it, how his perspective on the international community at the moment, I mean, a lot that you hear here, particularly I think from younger people, is why are the Bidens, the Sunaks, the Macrons – well, actually, Macron's been pretty tough recently, but why are the sort of international leaders so supportive?

56:48But he was making the point that when he was involved in military action in Gaza, that because of what had led to it – and I can remember it, Gordon Brown did go there. Merkel did go there. Sarkozy did go there. There was this sort of huge international support. And I think I'm right that Gordon Brown was part of that group with all Merton Palestinians and also the king of Saudi Arabia that were at one point trying to drive this and get it back on the road. But it's also a moment. I mean, we've talked about this a little bit because our friend, Tom, who was in number 10, was part of making Gordon Brown - Tom Fletcher.

57:23Yeah, Tom Fletcher vote for a UN resolution against Gaza at that period, which was very critical of Israel and the US abstaining. So I think one question that listeners will have listening to this is probably, I think, one of the most important interviews we've done. But one of the questions people will have is, why didn't the Palestinians sign up to his plan? And I think there are many, many reasons for that. One, as he said, is that they thought he was a lame duck, couldn't deliver. Yeah, and politics was also changing elsewhere. And if you think about Abu Mahmr's and with his map, you can completely understand why he's like, wait a second, I'm not signing this now.

58:00I need to go back to my people and talk. I also think that there was a big problem, which is that he had his own plan. So he wasn't following the roadmap, which was the US George H.W. Bush process. He wasn't following the Saudi process. And it wasn't negotiated. It was unilateral. And that made people very uncomfortable. So what the Arab countries at the time were saying is, listen, this is fine, but we want to negotiate. We don't like being in the position of the Israeli prime minister, just saying, take it or leave it. This is what you're getting. We want to get to this together. So there's also a question of personalities, how this stuff is done, but it feeds a narrative, which is very difficult for the Palestinian cause, which is, of course, many Israelis on the basis of these things will often say, well, you know, Palestinians have rejected every attempt that we've made.

58:48And again, finally, I'd like to come back to you on this because I've been teaching here in the States civil rights. And of course, the big question for people looking at politics is when are you a rejectionist and when do you accept incremental gains? So if you're a movement like the Palestinians and you feel this incredible injustice and somebody says to you, I'm going to give you back 90 % of the territory, but we're going to leave 40 ,000 settlers in place. Do you take it? Or do you say, no, we're fighting for our justice. We reject these settlements. We're going to go for 100%. The other thing is going through the whole, if you think about the whole interview, and there's a guy who's coming up to 80, 78 now.

59:28and he talked rightly about that period when you kind of felt that the Labour Party was like the party of government in Israel then you had this period where you had this more centrist party Kadima that he was very very centrally involved in and now it does feel he pushed back at me saying it's utterly dominated by the far right what I meant I guess by that was utterly dominated by the right with these very far right elements that are kind of pulling it further so that that trajectory from left to right has been pretty stark. I guess what he was saying at the end, when he was actually talking about revolution, I guess he was saying that the only good that can now come out of this is that people understand this is so bad that we have to go right back into a completely different phase, which is essentially, and this is where I think he probably is sort of holding on to his own role in history, is actually that the foundations are in the sort of approach that he had.

1:00:27We have to live side by side. We have to live peacefully. We have to give as well as take. And that is something that he clearly doesn't think is ever going to come from the people in power now. Yeah. Yeah. Well, I mean, there's so much to think about there. And we didn't even get onto things like, I mean, he was a very influential mayor of Jerusalem. And I think his change in position from being quite a kind of right-wing guy to a much more centrist guy happened during that 10 years when he took over from Teddy Colick, who was this great Labour, heroic mayor of Jerusalem. And so there's so much exploring.

1:01:02And I wonder whether, despite his tendency to talk at great length, whether we might want to get him back on at some point. Yeah. Good. You get back to teaching about rights. That's right. Thank you very much, Alistair. Have a great day. Thanks a lot. Take care. Bye-bye.

1:01:21Thank you.

From the publisher

How much do you know about the last serious attempt at a two state solution in the Israel-Gaza conflict? 

On today's episode of Leading, Rory and Alastair are joined by former Israeli PM, Ehud Olmert, to discuss his time in office, the likelihood of a two state solution, and historic corruption charges.

TRIP Plus: 
Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, receive our exclusive newsletter, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. 
Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up, or start a free trial today on Apple Podcasts: apple.co/therestispolitics.
Instagram:
@restispolitics
Twitter:
@RestIsPolitics
Email:
restispolitics@gmail.com
Producers: Dom Johnson + Nicole Maslen
Assistant Producer: Fiona Douglas
Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

More from The Rest Is Politics: Leading

All 199 episodes
71. Israel's former PM on why Netanyahu is finished, the settler movement, and corruption - Ehud OlmertThe Rest Is Politics: Leading · 1 h 4 min
Listen in VO