In short
The episode (Field Notes) is about estimating how many English words you know using a website called Vocab Owl (inspired by a prior discussion on vocabulary size).
Guest
Jake (anonymous last name), who built Vocab Owl; his site cites the Oxford English Dictionary’s estimate of about 171,476 “current use” words and tests users with multiple-choice definitions for 100 words, grouped from core basics to grandmaster. Hannah Fry and Michael Stevens take the test and compare results: about 73,400 vs 72,250 words.
Key claims
most people know roughly 15–35k words; the test estimates vocabulary by difficulty tiers; core basics are ~3,000 words, then ~7k intermediate, ~10k advanced, ~25k expert, ~40k obscure. Notable examples of missed words: zenith (strongest point), zephyr (gentle breeze), laconic (few words), lugubrious (sad/dismal), unctuous (excessively flattering), innervate (drain energy), noisome (stinky), and sesquipedalian (long words).
Written by AI. May contain mistakes. Listen to the episode to check what was said.
Chapters
Tap a time to open that second in VOExploring Vocab Owl
2:54 to 4:56
Hosts discuss the vocabulary testing website created by Jake and their experience using it.
“dot com slash bright summer ahead to learn more.”
Comparing Vocabulary Scores
4:56 to 7:21
Hosts share and compare their vocabulary scores from the Vocab Owl test.
“Oh, we might because you might learn what the words are going to be.”
Learning from Mistakes
7:21 to 12:30
Hosts discuss the words they got wrong on the vocabulary test and their meanings.
“Do you want the number I got correct out of?”
The Complexity of Language
12:30 to 14:03
Discussion on the challenges of understanding and using complex vocabulary correctly.
“Not now that you asked me without multiple choice.”
Exploring Long Words and Their Usage
14:03 to 21:51
The hosts discuss the peculiarities of long words and their relevance in communication.
“But then, yeah, like hippo-bub-bub-bub-phobia.”
Exploring Long Words and Their Usage
22:03 to 26:24
The hosts discuss the peculiarities of long words and their relevance in communication.
“but today we're going to start much earlier, before cancer has even had a chance to begin.”
Listener Questions and Nuclear Blast Myths
27:36 to 28:01
The hosts address a listener's question about cooking pizza with a nuclear blast and the science behind it.
Nuclear Blasts and Microwave Pizza
28:01 to 31:18
Explore the science behind microwaves and nuclear blasts, and why they don't cook pizza.
“Is that really possible, or is it just nonsense?”
The Mystery of Human Hair Growth
31:19 to 34:30
Discuss why humans have unique hair growth compared to other primates and possible evolutionary reasons.
“Sat in a bar in Portugal, and there's a lively discussion on why human needs their hair cut, but monkeys and apes don't.”
Talking to Ourselves: The Inner Voice
34:31 to 41:24
Examine the phenomenon of self-talk, the variations in internal monologue, and their implications.
“Because I think the other thing that's worth saying is that actually the length of our hair is in part because we have the conditions in which to be able to take care of it.”
Show all 13 chapters
The Hard Problem of Consciousness
41:25 to 42:05
Delve into the complexities of consciousness and the challenges of understanding others' internal experiences.
“Yeah, because I don't even know if I'm describing it the way I should be.”
The Nature of Inner Dialogue
42:05 to 45:30
Explore how people externalize their thoughts and the reasons behind it.
“like for them, for their conscious awareness.”
Embracing Our Weirdness
45:31 to 50:42
Discuss the importance of recognizing and sharing our unique quirks.
“That must feel quite suffocating then where you need to continually talk in order to to process and think things.”
Transcript
Automatic transcript. May contain errors.0:01Welcome to the rest of science. I'm Hannah Fry. And I'm Michael Stevens. Today is an episode of Field Notes, where we have discovered something made by you. And not just all of you, but one of you named Jake. I don't know the last name. I don't know the last name either. Didn't provide it. But what I will say is Jake is an absolute legend. Yeah, maybe Jake wants to be a little bit anonymous, but his website should not be anonymous. Absolutely not. Inspired by a discussion we had on a previous episode about how many words does a person know and how many words are there to know, he looked into it and made a website that tests how many words you know.
0:37It estimates the size of your vocabulary. Certainly does. That's what we're going to get into today.
0:49This episode is brought to you by Cancer Research UK. Here's something strange. Your DNA contains more ancient viral fragments than genes. The genes that build our cells make up only 2 % of our DNA. And for years, that is what scientists focused on. They treated the rest, the ancient viruses and stuff, as junk. But now we know that that hidden majority, sometimes called the dark genome, influences how our biology works and how diseases like cancer behave. It's a reminder that progress rarely comes as a single breakthrough. It builds gradually. Cancer Research UK plays a central role in that progress, supporting decades of research into over 200 types of cancer, work that's helped double survival in the UK over the past 50 years.
1:42For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research breakthroughs, and how you can support them, visit cancerresearchuk.org forward slash the rest is science. For adults with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis symptoms, every choice matters. Tremphaya offers self-injection or intravenous infusion from the start. Tremphaya is administered as injections under the skin or infusions through a vein every four weeks, followed by injections under the skin every four or eight weeks. If your doctor decides that you can self-inject Tremphaya, proper training is required. Tremphaya is a prescription medicine used to treat adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease and adults with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
2:28Serious allergic reactions, increased risk of infections or lower ability to fight them and liver problems may occur. Before treatment, get checked for infections and tuberculosis. Tell your doctor if you have an infection, flu-like symptoms or need a vaccine. Explore what's possible. Ask your doctor about Tremphaya today. Call 1-800-526-7736 to learn more or visit trimfiradio.com.
3:16dot com slash bright summer ahead to learn more. See you this summer.
3:28Okay, so the website is called vocab owl, which looks like vocab bowl, like Super Bowl. Yeah, it's a little bit competitive vocable. It's vocable. It's very fun. And you and I have both done it. We don't know each other's scores. Basically, you just go through and you're shown words and then you have a multiple choice challenge. Which of these four is the definition of this word? And you go on like that for what, like 100 words? Yeah, 100 words. Because there's how many, in total, 170 ,000 or so words that you could potentially know that are considered part of the English language? Yes, yes. I think Jake quotes the OED as saying there's something like 171 ,476.
4:12Oh, that's precise. I wrote it down. Words in current use, what the OED considers current use. But - Hold on though. If that number is so precise, can we not just make one up and then add one to it? We would have to get it into common use. Is coolth in there? Coolth is not there yet. Hey. I haven't confirmed this, but I'm going to just guess. Let's make coolth a thing. Coolth. We need some more coolth. We don't need more coolth in here. It's cool in this room. cool. There's a lot of cool thing here. But the OED also estimates that most people only know between 15 and 35 ,000 words. Right. Right.
4:48We should say, actually, if you want to do this test, you should probably do it now because we're going to be saying some of the words. That would be really fun. If you're in your car, it's OK. We're not going to spoil anything. Oh, we might because you might learn what the words are going to be. I don't want people to have to stop. If you can, go do your score. Pause. Go take the little test. If you can't, just put your fingers in your ears. Take them off the steering wheel over your ears. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. So how should we do this? Should we share our scores? I want to share the ones I got wrong.
5:21Oh, my gosh. They're cool words. My experience of this was you start off and he's got it. So you do the core basics first? And I was doing those. And I was like, hey, check me out. Yeah, it's very easy. I didn't know it would get harder. I was like, I know every word. Oh, my gosh. But no, it goes from core basics to intermediate, advanced, expert, and then grandmaster. And can I just say, once you get to the grandmaster words, the advantage goes to the kind of nerd who has read a lot of those books with titles like the scrumtubulous person's guide to perplex of flibby words. Right. And I am a person who owns like five books like that.
6:07So it paid off a little bit. Yeah. But let's see. So who's going to go first? I'll be honest with you. I think you've won from between us two. I think you've won because you you're an English lit major, right? That's true. I could barely write a sentence until I was 25. You know, I'm okay. I'm okay. Do you think we should have more animosity between us? Would that make the show more interesting? I think it might. We just dug at each other all the time. When we first joined, they were like, the producers were like, it is when you disagree, that's when the real magic happens. I think that we're looking at Alistair and Rory and thought we should mirror that.
6:42So maybe we should. Maybe we should lay into each other a bit more. We could try, but it's always hard because so often with math and science, It's not like, no, the square root of four is two and a half. Like, what are we, how are we going to disagree? We can disagree on interpretations and which facts to weigh in which way. But I think we're similar in a lot of ways, too. It's true. Also, bluntly, I just quite like you. So, you know, I don't think it would be. I might tease you in jest. Just rib you around the edges a little here and there. No, it's fine. Yeah. I like you, too. However, let's compare our vocabs.
7:21Okay, deal. According to Jake's vocab owl. Vocab owl. Okay, what are we saying? Do you want the number I got correct out of? No, I want the estimated number of words you know. Okay. 73 ,400. Don't look at me like that. What was yours? 72 ,250. Wow. Wow. Okay, congratulations. Congratulations to you. All right. Well, that's a lot of words. I feel. So you know a thousand more words than me, approximately. What are they? Who knows? Probably British ones like Chim Chim Chirree and, and, uh. Jiminy Cricket. I don't know them. Jiminy Cricket. I know Jiminy Cricket. I like that. I say that when I'm upset.
8:04Jiminy. I say Jiminy Christmas. I got 10 words wrong. I got nine wrong. Oh, but maybe we got them wrong in different parts. I think that's what it is because the way the website estimates your vocabulary is by saying, okay, in the English language, there are this many words that are of intermediate difficulty or intermediately known. And if you only know two-thirds of them, then you only know two-thirds of those words. Of the wider corpus. Okay, so I missed more from lower down the chain. Yeah, you must have done. And fewer up at the top, but there's fewer to know at the top. so you have a larger vocabulary than me but I think maybe I'm lopsided I think I think you've been reading too many of the scrum diddly umptious yes and not enough of the dick and jane jack and jill went up the hill jack and jill went up went up the what I don't know that one but uh borborygmus I know that one what words did you get wrong can I tell you the first word I got wrong.
9:05Yeah. I was annoyed about this actually. Okay. Um, it was the word Zenith. Oh, meaning like the top? I thought it meant top, but apparently it means strongest point. Oh, well, strongest and top can be related, but you know, it's kind of depends on the options that you're given. Absolutely. It's the pinnacle of something. Uh, I thought it was the highest point but it means apparently it means like the the peak so which which option did you choose um there wouldn't have been highest and strongest no i think i sort of mucked up a little bit yeah okay well that's fair i mean that'll happen like i don't think any of the ones i got wrong were unfair i'm a little bit embarrassed about one go on but i got the first one i got wrong was zephyr Zephyr.
9:54Now, I knew that zephyr was a kind of wind, but I was given two options. It's either a violent storm wind or a soft, gentle breeze. But then they get quite crazy once you get towards the end. They do get crazy because then this next one, I think I should have known, laconic. Laconic. Laconic. I said, oh, that means being lazy and slow. But no, it means using very few words. Yeah. Did you know that? I think I did know that one. I bet you did. Laconic is a great one. It is a good one. Like, oh, the way she describes things is so laconic. No wasted words. Just, okay. Should I go through what I've missed or should we trade?
10:31I don't have a full list of them. I'll be honest with you. I found the test quite painful. I don't like getting things wrong. Yeah. Well, yeah. Well, me neither. Actually, no, I did like getting them wrong. I mean, look at me. I've written them all down and I've put them into sentences and I'm like, I'm not going to get these wrong again. So I'll share my list. Yeah, go on. Okay. Lugubrious. Lugubrious. I got that one wrong. Now, I've heard the word before. I decided that it means looking or sounding happy or gay. But it means looking or sounding sad and dismal. I think I got that one wrong as well, you know.
11:04Oh, really? Lugubrious. So that's a sad way to be. Ah, his lugubrious pose. You can really tell in the way that you're saying it. When you say, lugubrious, it sounds like it's got the opposite definition. All the children with their lugubrious play. But no, a lugubrious play would be very sad. Okay, unctuous. I got that one wrong. Well, can I just tell you this one? I also got this one wrong, but I actually got this one wrong particularly because I was sitting next to producer Lauren, who was like, oh, it means delicious. Apparently not. It means excessively or irritatingly flattering. That is cool.
11:47I would not have guessed that. but I guess that it meant dry and rough and rude, unctuous. Oh, this drink is unctuous. But no, to be unctuous means to be like a salesperson is unctuous. They're like, oh, you have such great tastes. And oh, this is you. You know what's good. And you're it's just, oh, stop being so flattering. I was a bit unctuous earlier when I told you I liked you. You said it, not me. And now we all understand it. This one is the one that I wish I'd not missed. innervate. Right. Innervate. It does not mean to cause someone to be filled with energy. It means the opposite. It means to cause someone to feel drained of energy.
12:30That's a tricky one. That is a tricky one. I think quite a lot of these actually, you know, when you see the word, you roughly know what it's to do with, but as to whether it's in the positive direction or the negative direction is is actually quite a difficult thing to remember the words that that obviously go in one direction or another they're more common it's these weird ones like innervate innervate you would think it means like oh yeah you know that speech really innervated the crowd yeah but that would be a bad thing for the speech to do because heat innervates you makes you more sluggish It feels wrong.
13:09I guess, did you get noisome right? I don't know. Because noisome is a... Do you know what noisome means? Not now. Not now that you asked me without multiple choice. Without multiple choice. And the privacy of my own room to make mistakes. It sounds like noisome might mean like noisy. But it actually means stinky, bad smell. But it's got the word noise in it. Anyway, I was really proud that I knew that one. Okay, then what about this one? Zinzi, Zinzi, Zinik. I don't think I got that one. You don't think you got? You would remember because this was a ridiculous one. Zinzi, Zinzi, Zinik. Did you get the hippo-bub-bub-bub-bub-bub-bub-bub-phobia?
13:53If I did, I got it right. The one about the fear of long words. Sesquipedalian also means really long words. Meh. But then, yeah, like hippo-bub-bub-bub-phobia. I don't know the word off the top of my head, but I think when I saw it, I'm like, it's got to be one of those. It's a hilariously long word. What's the word for when something describes what it is? So like the word describing fear of long words is in itself an extremely long word. Yeah. I think that would be autological. Autological. The word describes itself. The thing is, I think there's also quite a big difference between seeing these words and being able to take a good stab at what their definition is.
14:41That's a skill in and of itself. And then the opposite, which is to be able to conjure these words from the depths of your mind and use them correctly in a sentence. Yeah, and there's a certain point where it's impressive that you can use them, but you still shouldn't because it just makes everyone feel lost and confused. Like if I started talking about, ah, yes, but as we all know, that requires math in the Zinzi, Zinzi, Zinnik variety or whatever. That's an old archaic way of saying the eighth power of a number. Okay. Before superscripts were used. It's the German spelling of the medieval Italian word senso, meaning squared, Zinzik.
15:25And so to the power of two, to the power of two, to the power of two is to the power of the eighth. That's why Zinzi Zinzi Zinik meant to the eighth power. And yet, if you start using that word when you're describing to the eighth power, people are going to think you're a bit of a Zinzi Zinik. No, you aren't even describing things better or more richly, just archaically. Do you know one of my favorite things to do in the world is to just pick general words, completely innocuous words, and use them as insults for children. Ah. So, for example, you absolute bing, you know? You absolute bean? Bing.
16:04Bing. Yeah. Ah, okay, this is like an automatopoeia. You know? Or like, stop being a plinky, you know? Right. This kind of thing. But just like, almost say them with the venom that you might deliver as well. Sure, I thought you meant words that were really common, like, you absolute table. Oh, I mean, you can do that a bit as well. Plinky and bing are kind of, they're kind of cute. They're kind of cuter. Well, you know, banana is like the standard one, right? Can you stop being a banana? Hannah Banana, of course. Sure, sure. Yeah. You absurd chair leg. You absolute democracy. I use nerd a lot as an insult because I am such a nerd.
16:45I just think that it's fair. I think it's fair. I'll be like, yo, what up, nerds? Yeah. But like, actually, I'm the one here who's like, well, actually, on page 712 of The Lord of the Rings. Gandalf says this. You can't see steam? That's not steam that you're visibly seeing. You know, like the fog that comes off of dry ice? Yeah. I'm always the first to say that's actually water. That's not carbon dioxide. The cold gas is causing water vapor in the air to condense into a cloud. So the white stuff that you see off of dry ice, that's water. Yeah, no, I think you're allowed to call other people. Okay, there's three more that I got wrong.
17:24We're going to just cover these quickly. Pogana trophy. Okay. That is not a trophy hunting sport. That is the growing of a beard. Yes. I got that one wrong. You clept. Yes. I think I got that one wrong as well. That, but see, that's literally an archaic word. It's a way of saying called or by the name of, oh yes, the lady you clept Jessica. Come on. If someone said that, I would, I would not go, dang, you are so good of a communicator. I'd be like, what does you clept mean? Yeah. up. Finally, Eucaligon. Eucaligon means a neighbor whose house is on fire. Oh, yeah, I got that one wrong as well. You know, actually, there's a lot of overlap in the ones that we got wrong.
18:05Yeah. I think maybe I got an extra one or two wrong, like Zenith, in the early. But hang on, this doesn't make sense. You must have got one of these right. Yeah, one of the late ones right. Yeah. Yeah. For example, I don't know why you don't remember this, but the Zenzi, Zenzi, Zenik, maybe you just guessed right i actually did this test 15 minutes ago so it really is extraordinary i did this like three weeks ago so maybe the deal is that like so many new words have been invented since then that possibly changed the curve um so eucaligon that is another like ridiculous it's a character from the iliad whose house was burned at this one point and it became an eponym for some reason.
18:51Like in literature, authors have written things like, ah, but who is this eucaligon? Meaning who is this neighbor of mine that is suffering? And I've never needed to use that word. No, fair. Absolutely fair. Just looking at these stats that he has here on the website, actually the number of words in each category increases as you go up the difficulties of the category. So core basics, in terms of the frequency of words that people use in the English language, there are only actually around 3 ,000 core basic words, 7 ,000 intermediate words, 10 ,000 advanced words, and then it's 25 ,000 expert words, he describes it, and then 40 ,000 obscure words.
19:37So the words, so the harder they get, the more obscure they get, not only are they harder, use less commonly, and so on. But also there's way more of them. There are way more of them. Do you have your actual final results page open? Because we could compare. I wrote down how many I got right in each category. Okay, go for it. I was 20 for 20 in core basics. Same. 20 for 20 in intermediate. I got 19. Oh, interesting. I was 18 for 20 with advanced. 17. I was 17 for 20 in expert. 17. And I was 16 for 20 in grandmaster. 17, baby. Okay. So because you knew one more grandmaster word than me, which might have been the Zinzi Zinzi Zinic, that's my guess.
20:19It could be. That meant the algorithm estimated you to know a thousand more words. Not that I'm going to be stuck on this for the rest of my life, but that might be what happened. I think that's probably what happened. But anyway, Jake, thank you for creating that. Thank you. And please, everyone out there, go check it out. There'll be a link in the description. I think there's also something quite positive in that, that if you want to learn a new language, I mean, the idea of learning 70 ,000 words, 170 ,000 words feels extremely intimidating. But actually you can get really quite far with just 3 ,000 words.
20:50I mean, that's nothing. That's right. That's right. With just the grammar and 3 ,000 words. Like learn 10 words a day, you can do it in a year. Yeah. I mean, you won't know how to put them together, but go try this out, vocab owl, and let us know in the comments what you got. And we're all going to compare and we're all going to support and love each other. It's a bit unbunctious of you. I just don't want people to get all judgmental and think that they're better than each other. Okay. This is not about the value of you as a person. It's about having fun. It's about the value of this podcast. It's about the value of this podcast.
21:23Yeah. At the bottom of the page, it doesn't even say the name. That's why I don't know Jake's full name. I know. It's not like made by Jake. It's just inspired by the rest is science with Professor Hannah Fry and not Professor Michael Stevens. That part isn't there, the not professor. But whenever I see those together, I'm always like, oh, I don't get to have anything in front of my name. By Professor Hannah Fry and Mr. Michael Stevens. Anyway, coming up after the break, we're going to answer some of your questions. We certainly are.
21:59This segment is brought to you by Cancer Research UK. Now, most cancer stories begin at the moment of diagnosis, but today we're going to start much earlier, before cancer has even had a chance to begin. You can think of it like a biological time machine. If you go back far enough, understand what's starting to change, you can help save lives and spare people from ever-facing diagnosis, treatment, and what follows. And that is what Cancer Research UK scientists are exploring, how the ecosystem inside of us has changed over time and what that could reveal about a cancer's earliest roots. So today we are asking, what if the key to preventing cancer is by decoding what is already inside of us?
22:41Here's a fact that you may already be aware of, Michael. You are more microbe than human. The average human adult has about 30 trillion human cells, but about 38 trillion tiny bugs inside of them. Most of them are in the gut microbiome. this biome it's not just digesting your dinner it can influence your immunity it can influence your mood it can influence how you think in general you have these sort of good bugs in inverted commas that help you to protect against toxins and that train the immune system to behave and then you have some bad bugs that produce toxins that damage your your cells your bowel cells and and potentially can help tumors to grow and normally in a healthy adult you would have the good bugs out-competing the bad bugs for resources in space.
23:27But as you get older, our microbiome can end up changing and the number of good bugs declines over time. And so can't crowd out those bad bugs. And some of the chemicals that were once beneficial to us would end up start behaving a little bit differently. Now we call them bugs. And what are they? I mean, they're little microorganisms, bacteria. They have completely different DNA than us. They are not us, and yet they outnumber the cells you and I are made out of. If you wanted to count every single bacteria in your body, one every second, it would take you a million years. A lot of these bacteria are good, but harmful shifts in your gut microbiome can create the ideal environment for bowel cancer to develop and grow.
24:11But Cancer Research UK scientists are now screening a library of around 1 ,500 approved drugs to see if any of them helped stop the shift from helpful to harmful bacteria. But here's a question. So we know about the link between age and bowel cancer, but why is it becoming more common in young adults? Okay, well, to try and answer that question, Cancer Research UK scientists are tapping into one of the world's oldest bowel cancer archives because hidden beneath this hospital, there is tens of thousands of bowel cancer samples that have been collected all the way back to the 1950s, right? And what Cancer Research UK scientists have been doing has been hunting for essentially genomic scars, right?
24:55Little bits of DNA damage inside of the tumours because different causes of cancer can end up leaving different scars in the DNA. And you can now use whole genome sequencing to map all of the DNA of all of those tumours And then by comparing the different scars in the DNA in these tumors from the 1950s all the way through to now, scientists can investigate what are the environmental factors, right? Because essentially you can see in your DNA that the sum of everything your body experiences over a lifetime, right? Your lifestyle, your diet, your pollution, your stress, and then how it ends up affecting your biology.
25:35And if those bad bug scars become more common over the decades, then that's a really strong clue that targeting these bad bugs specifically could help to prevent bowel cancer in younger people. So by using the past to protect our future, we can help to stop these harmful shifts before they even start. And that's how Cancer Research UK is creating a future where fewer people hear the words, you have cancer. In the past 50 years, their work has helped double cancer survival in the UK and saved and improved millions of lives around the world. And in the golden age of cancer research, we are finally unlocking the secrets of time to stop cancer before it can even begin.
26:19For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research, breakthroughs, and how you can support them, visit cancerresearchuk.org forward slash rest is science.
Read the full transcript
26:36This episode is brought to you by Cancer Research UK. In the UK, nearly one in two people will face cancer in their lifetime. The question is, could science stop cancer before it begins? In over the past 50 years, Cancer Research UK has helped double cancer survival in the UK. And that's proof of what research can achieve, like take cervical cancer. Almost every case is caused by HPV, the human papillomavirus. And when scientists uncovered that link, prevention became possible. Indeed it did, by a vaccine. And it's protection that works way before the cancer itself can actually grow. After the vaccine was introduced, cervical cancer rates in England were nearly 90 % lower than expected in women in their 20s.
27:18I mean, we're now genuinely at a point where this is a disease that is disappearing in younger women in the UK. This is something that I really hope my daughters will never have to deal with. For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research, breakthroughs, and how you can support them, visit CancerResearchUK.org forward slash rest is science.
28:00That's why you wreck.
28:10Okay, we're back with a question from Andreas from Sweden, who says, I recently listened to your episode about microwaves and fridges, and I've heard that if you stand at the right distance from a nuclear blast, you get a perfectly microwave pizza. Is that really possible, or is it just nonsense? Okay, I want to imagine that when I was listening to this, I was thinking of it very literally. And it's like, if you stand just far enough away, you get a perfectly frozen pizza. Like it just falls out of the sky. There you go. A perfectly cooked pizza. You have to be holding the pizza to begin with, I think is what he means.
28:42And then it becomes cooked because of the blast. Right. Is that true? No. Oh. Is the short answer. But the slightly longer answer is no, but in an interesting way, I think. Okay, so the thing is, is that you get almost no microwaves from a nuclear detonation. Oh, bummer. I would have assumed it'd be a lot. Yeah. A lot of everything, every kind. All across the electromagnetic spectrum. But no? But what it is, is you get 5 % that's gamma rays, neutrons, the sort of initial nuclear radiation. 35%, this is from the nuclear detonation, 35 % is thermal radiation. So infrared, visible light, UV, the kind of great blast.
29:2350 % is kinetic energy. Half of it is just a pressure wave through matter, through the air. Yeah. Wow. And then 10 % is residual radiation, the kind of fallout. And I mean, there's not that much microwaves in that list, right? So it's almost all this flash of infrared and visible light. But also a flash is kind of the operative word there because it's not lasting long enough. You know, you're not it's not sort of like you put your your frozen pizza in the microwave. If that's how you're cooking them. Oh, yeah. Right. Now, I wouldn't do it that way. No, me neither. But fine. Who asked this question?
29:59I've got a lot of suspicion. Someone from Sweden. All right. I'll make sense now. But yeah, it's right. You're not good. You could put your pizza in the microwave and shoot microwaves at it for minutes and minutes. A nuclear blast is going to ionize for years, but it's going to blast for a second. A few seconds, exactly, maximum. It's like, but it doesn't cook in the same way. It won't cook in the same way. It's like, it's more like you're standing next to the sun for a second. Yeah, right, right. It's sort of the difference between warming yourself by the fire and warming yourself in the fire.
30:34Ah, big difference. That's sort of the fundamental difference of what's going on here. Also, I mean, the other thing is that the heat that is coming through isn't going to distinguish between the pizza and, you know, your face. Ah, true. Because I was just about to say, look, you could thaw the pizza. You could thaw the pizza. If you stood next to enough sequential atomic bomb explosions, just a blast of heat, another blast of heat, another blast of heat, eventually it'll be room temperature. I would say overall an inefficient way to do it. Don't do it. Yeah. Yeah, because you're getting cooked too.
31:04You are getting cooked too. Yeah. And if you survive that bit, then the blast will come through immediately afterwards and knock you off your feet. So yeah, I'd go with no, generally. Okay. Overall. Okay, next question. This one is for you. This is from Mark. Sat in a bar in Portugal, and there's a lively discussion on why human needs their hair cut, but monkeys and apes don't. Yeah, this is one that I've asked a lot, and we don't know the answer. The question is, why are humans like the only primate that just kind of keeps growing hair only at one place, by the way? Now, would you call them orangutans or orangutans or orangutans?
31:50Okay, so orangutans have pretty long hair. They do. Chimpanzees don't. humans, the theory goes, lost most of our hair because we needed to be able to sweat. We walk and move and especially run in ways that our tree dwelling ancestors didn't. And so it was really helpful to have less fur and more open skin so that we could cool down through sweating. But we needed protection on our heads because of ultraviolet light from the sun. but then for some reason we not only kept fur hair on our heads we also started growing it much longer like the growing phase of each of our hair follicles on our heads is really long it can be years but for a pubic hair it's like weeks yeah for an eyelash hair it's uh weeks but like not many yeah like six weeks and that's and that's why the hairs are as long as they are it's not Not that the body knows to stop growing after a certain length on my eyelash versus my head.
32:57Well, my head, it doesn't know what to do. But the point is that they fall out eventually and new ones grow in and they only grow for a certain amount of time. But why it would be that humans would have longer hair than a lot of other primates is up to just guesses. It could have been sexual selection. It could have been that human populations around the world just liked it. They just thought it was pretty and they chose partners who were able to grow longer hair. It could have been a sign maybe of health to them. We don't know. It could be about thermoregulation, though it doesn't quite make sense.
33:32Even the sexual selection guess doesn't really make sense because there are populations where people grow much longer hair than others. And there are papers where researchers have said, well, it's definitely sexual selection. It was up to us and our choices and who we mated with and that's why. but those selections were different in different places okay so in like the tropics there was still a preference for longer hair but there were other things that were more important and so that's why you'll have shorter hair here and longer hair there but yeah it's amazing how little we know i mean it could also be that there is no reason you know like evolution doesn't have a trajectory.
34:14It doesn't have a direction that it's heading for. Sometimes you just get features that appear for no reason at all. There is no pressure on it one way or the other. That's right. So either it helped in some way or it didn't help or hurt. And so it's just the way it is. Because I think the other thing that's worth saying is that actually the length of our hair is in part because we have the conditions in which to be able to take care of it. Right. If you imagine instead of taking a modern human and making them wild, in inverted commas, where they're kind of like moving around, you know, sleeping in different conditions, it's probable that the hair would break before it got to its full length, you know?
34:56So it could also just be there is no reason at all. Yeah. But it wasn't getting in the way. Oh, for one, I'm glad it is though because… Look at that. It's my greatest feature. Hair care companies, sponsorship opportunities. Astonishing that they haven't already, frankly. I mean, look at this. I won the hair lottery. Look at this. Hello. Between us, we average half a good head of hair. Between us, it's like one good head of hair. Because you've got like more than, I've got less than. I wouldn't consider myself negative. I meant on average, each person gets half. I was sharing. Oh, you were sharing.
35:39I was sharing. Okay, fair enough. Okay. I phrased it wrong though. I appreciate it came across that way. Okay, all right. Last question. This one from Megan, who asked, why do we talk to ourselves? Oh. This is good. Okay, first off, you know not everyone does. Yeah. Some people do not have an internal voice. I don't know if I believe them. Really? It's very hard to define and talk about things like this. they don't have an internal voice. What does that mean to them? Because what does it mean to have an internal voice? When I silently think, it doesn't feel like it's a talking thought thing. Do you feel like it's words?
36:24Yeah, words would be the best way to describe it. But they're not fully spoken. Oh, I think mine are. I talk out loud to myself a lot. That helps me to figure out what I'm thinking and feeling. But in my own head, like, let me just try. Give me something. Give me like a something to. A difficult puzzle. Yeah. Okay. The only puzzle that sprung to mind is the last one you told me. Hold on. Let me get one. Let me get one. Okay. I am an odd number. Take away a letter and I become even. What number am I? 11. I mean, that didn't involve very much. No, it didn't. But here's what I'll say. It still gave me some insight into what's going on.
37:09It's very visual. There's one other answer. Oh, there's another answer. Okay, so it's, I'm an odd number, take away a letter. Tune. No, stew. I don't know, what is it? Seven. Shoot. Yeah. Of course, seven. Okay, now tell me what happened in your mind. So what happened in my mind was very visual. It was more about images. While you were looking for a riddle, I was thinking about what did I eat typically for breakfast as a kid? And in my head, I wasn't thinking, well, usually I had this food. I just saw images of them. Interesting. What is it like in your head? Oh, she will not shut up. She is constantly chatting.
37:54And it's verbal. It's verbal. It's verbal. The people who don't have this instantly, people who have the inability to visualize images in their mind. Yeah, I've heard about this. There's a sort of standard spectrum that you see, which is you imagine an apple. Imagine a juicy red apple in your head. And some people will see essentially a photorealistic version of this apple. That's what I got, yeah. Is it? Yeah. Lucky thing. It's like I'm remembering a photo of an apple I saw once. Okay. With a lot of detail. even before you ask for the detail, it's there. Like I'm noticing things that are there.
38:32I'm not looking for them and then confabulating them. Whereas for other people, myself included, it's much less like a fully formed picture. It's sort of like there's maybe the feeling of the shape of an apple. Yeah, I know what that's like too, though, because if you say, well, imagine an apple and a strawberry, I don't think too much about them. Sure. But if you really make me imagine an apple, I can get it all. Fully photorealistic. Fully photorealistic. Oh, it's red and green and it's very ripe, you know, but. I don't think I can quite get there. If you were to say, well, Michael, imagine you had eight apples and you needed to share them with two people.
39:12I don't see eight photorealistic apples. I probably see like a half, half image, half word kind of thing. And that's all I need. So now this is the slight difference actually, because if you, there was one program that i did where they put me in an mri scanner and then asked me to do a number of mathematical calculations okay some of them were just simple arithmetic and some of them were about the movement of surfaces uh some of them were about um some calculus basically trying to trying to solve these quite long complicated equations and over and over again regardless of the the problem that i was being given the the part of my brain that was lighting up was the visual cortex right Right.
39:49Okay. So, and that I think matches. It's not like a photorealistic version of what I'm manipulating, but it's definitely like the visual cortex is definitely doing a lot of work when it comes to mathematics. You're kind of manipulating things. But the people who are, who really struggle to create images in their minds, there's quite a big overlap with them and the ones who do not have an internal monologue whatsoever. Oh, is there? Yeah. So to not have an internal monologue, these people are still aware of the thoughts that they're having and they're just normal people from the outside but they insist that what when they like debate something in their head like oh should i should i take a break from studying right now what are they it just doesn't appear in the form of words right i mean i think i i mean i'm not i'm not one of these people right um but but yeah they say it appears in your head in the form of words yeah for me if i'm like ah should I take a break I imagine what I could be doing during the break I imagine the benefits I get from not taking a break as like experiences like I feel them and I'm weighing them I definitely aren't the words break doesn't enter into it right oh no until I take another step back if I want to talk out loud about what I'm trying to decide then it becomes very verbal I think we should do a whole episode on this you know at some point because I think it's really really fascinating all of the different ways that you can test because it's incredibly be difficult.
41:16I mean, this is like the hard problem of consciousness, right? It's like understanding the experience from somebody else's perspective and how difficult it is to describe your own internal world, your own internal monologue. Yeah, because I don't even know if I'm describing it the way I should be. It's hard. And I don't know if I should trust other people's descriptions of it. You know, I've always loved this hard problem of consciousness. What is it like to be someone else's mind? I just read a Greg Egan story where this couple wants to get closer. They just feel like they don't know why they got married.
41:47Like they don't really. So they decide, well, maybe we need to be closer. And through all these various steps, they eventually, they realize that they cannot swap minds because as soon as they swap minds or bodies, they just learn what it's like to be in the other person's body, but not what it's like for them, for their conscious awareness. Right. So this doctor has an idea. What if I take both of your memories and pool them together so you have each other's memories? And then I'll knock you unconscious and I will put your brains into exactly the same physical mechanical shape. Your awareness is still there.
42:26And then when I snap my fingers, you won't be each other, but you will both be for a moment the same third person. And this makes them so close that they get divorced because they realize that not knowing the other person is exciting. and now that they're so close, they're like, I don't care for you anymore. You may as well not be there because I already have myself. That's such a great idea. It's kind of cute. Yeah, I like that a lot. In terms of why we all do this, by the way, in terms of why we have this voice or where this voice comes from, if you, and experiments have been done on this, where you look at three, four-year-old children, at that point, all of the voices are external for them.
43:02They're narrating everything they're doing. They're like, I'm going to put this block here and then I'm going to do this here and then they're chattering all the time continually. And the idea is that essentially you just stop doing it out loud. It's the same voice that's going on, but you just do it in your head instead of doing it particularly out loud. But speaking out loud, by the way, I mean, so many people do this. It's way more, I mean, people do it in private because it's associated with something, you know, there's something that people who've lost their minds. I know, I know. But people do it all the time.
43:31Like it's really difficult to find people who don't do this ever at all. And it's good. It's kind of good. It improves your performance on particular tasks. There's one of my favorite studies on this is from 2012, where they were asking people to find particular items in a supermarket. And those that were told to say the item's name out loud were much faster at finding than others. Yeah. That makes me feel better because I talk out loud all the time. Even in the grocery store, I know that I can't. So I'll like mouth it. And if you look at me, I'm going. and i'm always afraid someone's gonna like record me in public and be like he's losing his mind you're optimizing i'm the old man muttering around the store being like under my breath going well would those be in the the uh the thai food section or the potato chip section i just want prawn crackers come on i see i am doing that but i'm doing it's all in your head yeah i think that i never gave it up as a kid right i never internalized it so i have to externalize it in order to form the words.
44:32But I'm always doing little shows and stuff too. Like when I'm alone in my hotel room, I'll be like, ah, now when this, I'll literally talk out loud. I'll be like, you know, I think that the warmer, it's like I'm on the podcast, even when no one's listening. The warmer soda has stronger flavors, but it's not as refreshing. And I think it's because of this. Do you really? Yeah. On your own? And that's, I think is why I'm such a, like a loner. Cause I know that I can't do that around other people. So I have to escape. I work in my office by myself and I'm just sitting there basically performing a whole thing, externalizing every single thought I have out loud with words.
45:08Can you do it in front of your wife? No, but I'm terrified that she'll walk in on me and I'll be doing this and she'll be like, dude, you are not on camera. But I'm like this when I'm all alone. So you on camera is the most authentic version of you. The least authentic is this version. Wow. That must feel quite suffocating then where you need to continually talk in order to to process and think things. Yes. And so I find myself in your head. No, especially when I'm like traveling, visiting my wife's family and we're staying in their house and I never have a moment to myself. I'm like, I don't know what to do.
45:53I can't. I need to sit down and go, oh, why is Susan always saying that? I think it's because I need to just do that. And you say that to myself. And it's embarrassing because it makes it look like I think that I've got an audience all the time. No. The first time I noticed this was weird is when I was on vacation with my family and they went down to the pool and I was going to go join them. And I just started talking out loud about why there was this sealed for your hygiene seal on the toilet. And I was like, out loud I just said they do that so that people feel that the toilet is clean and and I realized that no one was listening and that it wouldn't be an interesting thing to listen to and yet I was compelled to do it see see I think I am having very very very similar conversations but I'm just not doing them out loud well good for you sometimes I'll be like narrating that I mean it's almost like there's two or more conversations going on simultaneously so I might be like oh this hygiene thing it's so that people blah blah blah blah blah and then the other person will come in and be like either good job or you're an idiot that's sort of that goes on a lot oh there's like a conversation oh there's a conversation and sometimes it can be this is the one uh that i find um the most disconcerting i'm i'm sure other people have this exact same experience but i can be on stage uh and having giving an entire talk right a full presentation especially if i know something reasonably well and i can be verbally delivering the words and there will be an entire conversation going on in my head about something different do you like this other voice she's really annoying okay but she's part of you and it like informs what you say out loud in this she's called colin um where did this name colin come from she actually is called colin well uh maybe i'm giving away a bit too much for myself colin is the nasty part you know yeah because i think it's just when when when when colin is just like, whoa, you're a bit much today, Colin.
48:04It feels very useful to externalize it. To externalize it, give it a name. I am definitely talking way too much. This reminds me of the Carl Jung thing about like as soon as the unconscious becomes conscious, it loses its power. And I think this is also a thing for another episode, but this is one of those silly reels from like the, I'm a Navy SEAL teaching you how to be a man. But there was one that I thought was actually really, really insightful. And it was that to disarm someone who's who's got the upper hand, just mention how good they are. So, like, if you're being interrogated, one way to disarm them and to kind of like make them second guess themselves is to actually say, you're really good at this interrogation.
48:50Like, I can tell that you have been trained and have a lot of experience. Wow. Once it's spoken, now they have to live up to that. and he was like, if a guy comes up to you and shakes your hand, like really firm, he's got power over you so long as you're going, oh gosh, okay. But if you go, wow, that was a really strong handshake. They say that that's what alpha men do. Then the guy's like, oh. Oh, now I need to be an alpha. Yeah, and now it's out there and it's been named and it doesn't have power. It's not fate if it's been said. Right. And I think about that a lot beyond just the like strong handshake kind of a thing, but just in life.
49:29It's like as soon as you name it and you've said it, it's just not scary anymore. No, it's just not scary anymore. You know, also speaking out loud, I mean, even just beyond naming the things that otherwise go unnamed, there is also some evidence that it does help with emotional regulation, that there is something really positive about this. so um there's one study where they were like looking at people who had muttered to themselves you've got this sarah like you can do it claire you know as they were doing a task yeah yeah yeah and they actually like it reduced their anxiety it reduced their their their stress levels you know and i want to i i think that that's so true but it can come in different flavors all right like for someone like me i don't think you got it michael i externalize myself this is very common I think like when I'm playing like basketball, you know, in the backyard, I'll be like, and look, look how well he does this.
50:22It's the announcer saying it. And then if it doesn't go in, I'm like, oh, we'll do that again. Now look at Michael never misses. Right. It's like a third person describing how good I am. Um, but it does make me better. So I don't know who asked this original question, but you got a full episode. You, you basically got more of me and Michael there than, than I think either of us have ever given away on anything. But I think that ultimately, you know, the reason why I like talking about these kinds of things is because I think every single person is extremely weird. Every single person is extremely weird.
50:56And we have been taught and sort of societally expected to hide our weirdnesses from each other. And I think let's not do that anymore. Yeah, yeah, yeah. It doesn't help because it makes us think that other people like have just nothing weird about them, that they have no trouble waking up in the morning, that they love getting all their tasks done. And it's like, guys, it's called a task rather than having no name because it's terrible. Yeah, yeah. We're all in the same boat. We're all in the same boat. You're weird, Michael. I'm weird. And so are you, our listeners, each and every one of you.
51:29So stay weird and please, yeah, reach out to us. Jake, who else? We had Megan as well. Megan. Guys, you are great role models for the rest of the audience. Send in your questions. The rest is science. at goalhanger.com. Can't wait to hear from you. Or you can leave a comment under the video which you're watching now or the podcast which you have downloaded. We read all of them and we love your questions. So thank you. We'll see you next time. Bye-bye.
52:09Ryan Reynolds here from Mint Mobile. The message for everyone paying big wireless way too much. Please, for the love of everything good in this world, stop. With Mint, you can get premium wireless for just$15 a month. Of course, if you enjoy overpaying, no judgments, but that's weird. Okay, one judgment. Anyway, give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Upfront payment of$45 for three-month plan, equivalent to$15 per month required. Intro rate first three months only, then full price plan options available. Taxes and fees extra. See full terms at mintmobile.com.
From the publisher
Most people use just a fraction of the words they understand. But how big is your vocabulary, really?
When a listener builds a tool that claims to measure it, Hannah and Michael put themselves to the test.
If you'd like to try for yourself, follow the link and tell us what score you get in the comments: https://vocabowl-870366514258.us-west1.run.app/
Along the way they uncover forgotten words, obscure linguistic curiosities, and a surprising question hiding beneath the quiz itself: what does it mean to know a word?
After the break, they tackle your questions and answer a nuclear pizza problem, explain why humans can grow such remarkably long hair, and ask whether everyone has a voice inside their head.
-------------------
For more information about Cancer Research UK, their research, breakthroughs and how you can support them, visit https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/our-research/rest-is-science
Cancer Research UK is a registered charity in England and Wales (1089464), Scotland (SC041666), the Isle of Man (1103) and Jersey (247). A company limited by guarantee. Registered company in England and Wales (4325234) and the Isle of Man (5713F). Registered address: 2 Redman Place, London, E20 1JQ.
-------------------
Find The Rest Is Science all over the internet by clicking here.
-------------------
Video Producer: Adam Thornton + Oli Oakley + Jack Meek
Animator: Sam Benson
Video & Social: Bex Tyrrell
Assistant Producer: Lucy Lipscombe
Producer: Simona Rata
Senior Producer: Lauren Armstrong-Carter
Head Of Digital: Samuel Oakley
Exec Producer: Neil Fearn
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
